Medicare and Medicaid Programs and the Children's Health Insurance Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2025 Rates; Quality Programs Requirements; and Other Policy Changes; Correction, 80098-80131 [2024-22501]

Download as PDF 80098 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 2. On page 64672, in the first column, in the first full paragraph, in line 6, ‘‘3.8’’ is corrected to read ‘‘3.9’’. Elizabeth J. Gramling, Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human Services. [FR Doc. 2024–22496 Filed 9–27–24; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 4120–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Parts 405, 412, 413, 431, 482, 485, 495, and 512 [CMS–1808–CN2] RIN 0938–AV34 Medicare and Medicaid Programs and the Children’s Health Insurance Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the LongTerm Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2025 Rates; Quality Programs Requirements; and Other Policy Changes; Correction Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services HHS. ACTION: Final rule; correction AGENCY: This document corrects technical and typographical errors in the final rule that appeared in the August 28, 2024 Federal Register titled ‘‘Medicare and Medicaid Programs and the Children’s Health Insurance Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2025 Rates; Quality Programs Requirements; and Other Policy Changes’’ (referred to hereafter as the ‘‘FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule’’). DATES: The corrections in this document are effective October 1, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Thompson and Michele Hudson, DAC@cms.hhs.gov, (410) 786– 4487, IPPS Payment Rate Issues. Lily Yuan, NewTech@cms.hhs.gov, New Technology Add-On Payments Issues. Benjamin Cohen, benjamin.cohen@ cms.hhs.gov, Provider Reimbursement Review Board. Mady Hue, marilu.hue@cms.hhs.gov, and Andrea Hazeley, andrea.hazeley@ cms.hhs.gov, MS–DRG Classifications Issues. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 Jennifer Tate, jennifer.tate@ cms.hhs.gov, Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program— Administration Issues. Julia Venanzi, julia.venanzi@ cms.hhs.gov, Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program and Hospital ValueBased Purchasing Program— Administration Issues. Jennifer Tate, jennifer.tate@ cms.hhs.gov, PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting— Administration Issues. Ariel Cress, ariel.cress@cms.hhs.gov or Lorraine Wickiser, lorraine.wickiser@ cms.hhs.gov, Long-Term Care Hospital Quality Reporting Program— Administration Issues. Jessica Warren, jessica.warren@ cms.hhs.gov and Elizabeth Holland, elizabeth.holland@cms.hhs.gov, Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In FR Doc. 2024–07567 of August 28, 2024 (89 FR 68986), there were a number of typographical and technical errors that are identified and corrected in this correcting document. The corrections in this correcting document are applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2024, as if they had been included in the document that appeared in the August 28, 2024 Federal Register. II. Summary of Errors A. Summary of Error in the Dates Section On page 68986, we are correcting technical errors in our discussion of the regulatory provisions that are effective November 1, 2024. B. Summary of Errors in the Preamble On pages 69060 and 69095, in our discussion of the Change to Specific Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS–DRG) Classifications, we are correcting several inadvertent typographical errors. Under our methodologies as finalized in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, we exclude hospitals that have subsequently converted to rural emergency hospitals (REHs) from certain data and calculations used in the IPPS ratesetting. Specifically, we stated that we exclude REHs, including hospitals that subsequently became REHs after the period from which the data were taken for purposes of developing the MS–DRG relative weights for FY 2025 (89 FR 69109) and from the calculation of the standardized amount (89 FR 69942). In addition, we PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 stated that any hospital that is designated as a REH by 7 days prior to the publication of the preliminary wage index public use file (PUF) is excluded from the calculation of the wage index. We inadvertently treated a current IPPS hospital as a hospital that had converted to REH status, thereby erroneously excluding its data from the MS–DRG relative weight calculation and the wage index (CMS Certification Number (CCN) 260163). Therefore, we restored the applicable data for this hospital for these and other ratesetting calculations, as discussed further in section II.D. of this correcting document. We are correcting an error in the version 42 MS–DRG assignment for some cases in the historical claims data in the FY 2023 MedPAR files used in the ratesetting for the FY 2025 IPPS/ LTCH PPS final rule, which resulted in inadvertent errors in the MS–DRG relative weights. (We note this error did not change the associated average length-of-stay (LOS) for the impacted DRGs.) Additionally, the version 42 MS–DRG assignment and relative weights are used when determining total payments for purposes of all of the budget neutrality factors and the final outlier threshold. Therefore, the corrections to the MS–DRG assignment under the version 42 GROUPER for some cases in the historical claims data in the FY 2023 MedPAR files (along with the restoration of the data for CCN 260163 as discussed previously) and the conforming recalculation of the relative weights directly affected the calculation of total payments and required the recalculation of all the budget neutrality factors and the final outlier threshold. On page 69109, we are correcting the number of Medicare discharges from IPPS providers in the FY 2023 MedPAR file used in calculating the relative weights for FY 2025 due to the correction of the number of hospitals with REH status. On page 69113, we are correcting the normalization adjustment factor used in calculating the relative weights for FY 2025 due to the correction of the number of hospitals with REH status, the error in the version 42 MS–DRG assignment for some cases in the historical claims data, and the conforming changes to the relative weights. On page 69268, we are correcting the total number of hospitals that were removed from the FY 2025 IPPS wage index due to conversion to REH status and making a corresponding correction to the number of hospitals’ wage data used to calculate the FY 2025 wage index. E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations On page 69277, we are correcting the occupational mix adjusted national average hourly wage due to the inadvertent omission of one hospital’s wage data (CCN 260163). (We note, there was no change to the unadjusted national average hourly wage value rounded to 2-digits.) On page 69282 in the discussion of the FY 2025 reclassification application requirements and approvals, due to reclassification errors described in section II.D. of this correcting document, we are correcting the number of hospitals approved for reclassification in FY 2025, the total number of hospitals in reclassification status, and the number of hospitals reclassified back to their geographic urban area. On page 69282, in the discussion of the FY 2025 reclassification application requirements and approvals, we are correcting a typographical error in the date applications for FY 2026 reclassifications are due to the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB). On page 69291, we inadvertently omitted a hospital from the list of all hospitals subject to our reclassification assignment and reassignment policy for core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) reconfigured due to the migration to Connecticut planning regions and the CBSA assigned or reassigned for FY 2025 under this policy. We are correcting this error by adding a hospital, CCN 220015 to Table Y ‘‘HOSPITALS SUBJECT TO RECLASSIFICATION ASSIGNMENT POLICY’’. The assignment of the hospital’s MGCRB reclassification is discussed further in section II.D. of this correcting document. On page 69308, because we restored the wage data for a IPPS hospital that we inadvertently treated as a REH and recalculated the wage index (as discussed earlier in this section) and made corrections to the MGCRB reclassification status of three hospitals (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document), we recalculated budget neutrality factors, including the rural floor budget neutrality factor, which is the only budget neutrality factor applied to the FY 2025 wage indexes (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document), made conforming changes to the out-migration adjustment discussed in section II.E. of this correcting document (as discussed with regard to Table 4A in section II.E. of this correcting document) and made a conforming change to the 25th percentile wage index value across all hospitals. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 On pages 69313 and 69315, we are correcting typographical errors in the number of hospitals that may participate in the Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program at the start of FY 2025. On page 69369, we inadvertently omitted a reference to population health professional shortage areas (HPSAs) when summarizing the prioritization methodology for the distribution any remaining slots after awarding up to 1.00 FTE to each qualifying hospital under section 4122 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023. On page 69400, in our discussion of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, we are correcting a typographical error. On pages 69455, 69458, 69463, 69476, 69481, 69489, 69529, 69533, 69534, 69538, 69540, 69544, 69545, 69549, 69572, 69573, and 69575 in our discussion of the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program, we are correcting several typographical and technical errors. On page 69503, in our discussion of the Modifications to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Survey measure, we are correcting a typographical error. On page 69512, in our discussion of the Advancing Patient Safety and Outcomes Across the Hospital Quality Programs—Request for Comment, we are correcting a technical error. On pages 69577 and 69578, in our discussion of the PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program, we are correcting typographical errors. On pages 69590, in our discussion of the Long-term Care Quality Reporting Program (LTCH QRP), we are correcting a typographical error. On pages 69605 through 69613, 69621, and 69622 in our discussion of the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program, we are correcting several typographical and technical errors. On page 69880, in our discussion of the Provider Reimbursement Review Board, we are correcting an inadvertent grammatical error. On pages 69901 and 66902, in our discussion of the information collection requirements for the LTCH QRP, we are correcting typographical errors. C. Summary of Errors in the Regulations Text On page 69914, in the regulations text for the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program at § 495.24(f)(1)(i)(C), we are correcting a technical error. PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 80099 D. Summary of Errors in the Addendum We made inadvertent errors in the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB) reclassification status of 3 hospitals in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule. Specifically, we are correcting the MGCRB reclassification for CCNs 170040 and 220015. The correct reclassified CBSA for CCN 170040 is 41440, and the correct reclassified CBSA for CCN 220015 is 49340. We are also adding an MGCRB reclassification for CCN 520034 to CBSA 43100. The final FY 2025 IPPS wage index with reclassification is used when determining total payments for purposes of all budget neutrality factors (except for the MS–DRG reclassification and recalibration budget neutrality factor before the cap, MS–DRG reclassification and recalibration budget neutrality factor with the cap and the wage index budget neutrality adjustment factor) and the final outlier threshold. In addition, as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document, we inadvertently treated a current IPPS hospital as a hospital that had converted to REH status, thereby erroneously excluding its data from the IPPS ratesetting calculations for FY 2025, including the standardized amount calculations. After restoring the hospital’s data (CCN 260163) and correcting the version 42 MS–DRG assignment for some cases in the historical claims data (as also discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document, we recalculated the MS–DRG relative weights, all wage indexes (and geographic adjustment factors (GAFs)), all budget neutrality factors, the fixedloss cost threshold, and the national operating standardized amounts and capital Federal rate. The MGCRB reclassification changes described previously were included in these recalculations as applicable. Due to the errors described previously, we made updates to the calculation of Factor 3 of the uncompensated care payment methodology to reflect the updated information for the IPPS hospital that had inadvertently been treated as a hospital that had converted to an REH. This hospital is projected to be DSHeligible for purposes of interim uncompensated care payments during FY 2025. We recalculated the total uncompensated care amount for all DSH-eligible hospitals to reflect these updates. In addition, because the Factor 3 for each hospital reflects that hospital’s uncompensated care amount relative to the uncompensated care amount for all subsection (d) hospitals E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 80100 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations that receive a DSH payment for the fiscal year, we also recalculated Factor 3 for all DSH-eligible hospitals. The hospital-specific Factor 3 determines the total amount of the uncompensated care payment a hospital is eligible to receive for a fiscal year. This hospitalspecific payment amount is then used to calculate the amount of the interim uncompensated care payments a hospital receives per discharge. Given the very narrowly targeted update to the information used in the calculation of Factor 3, the change to the previously calculated Factor 3 for the majority of hospitals is of limited magnitude. We incorporated the revised uncompensated care payment amounts for all DSH-eligible hospitals into our recalculation of the FY 2025 fixed-loss threshold and related budget neutrality figures. On page 69960, we made conforming changes to the operating national average case-weighted cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) for March 2023 and March 2024, the 1-year national operating CCR adjustment factor, the capital national average case-weighted CCRs for March 2023 and March 2024, and the 1-year national capital CCR adjustment factor to reflect the inclusion of applicable data for the IPPS hospital that had inadvertently been treated as a hospital that converted to an REH. Due to the correction of the combination of errors that are discussed previously, we made changes to the following: • On page 69948, the table titled ‘‘Summary of FY 2025 Budget Neutrality Factors’’. • On page 69955, estimated capital outlier payments and estimated total capital Federal payments. • On page 69961, the outlier fixedloss cost threshold, total operating Federal payments, total operating outlier payments, and the outlier adjustment to the capital Federal rate. • On page 69963, the table titled ‘‘Changes from FY 2024 Standardized Amounts to the FY 2025 Standardized Amounts’’. In determining the capital budget neutrality adjustment factor for changes in DRG classifications and weights and the GAF, under our 2-step calculation of the GAF budget neutrality factor, we inadvertently assigned one hospital the incorrect FY 2024 GAF without incorporating the lowest quartile hospital wage index adjustment and the 5 percent cap on wage index decreases. We recalculated the capital outlier adjustment factor, the GAF/DRG budget neutrality factor, and the Quartile/Cap budget neutrality factor to reflect the correction of one hospital’s FY 2024 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 GAF. We note that these recalculations also reflect the correction of the error in the REH status, the correction of the error in the version 42 MS DRG assignment for some cases in the historical claims data, the recalculation of the relative weights, and the correction of the MGCRB reclassification status for certain hospitals described previously. As we noted in the final rule, the capital Federal rate is calculated using unrounded budget neutrality and outlier adjustment factors. The unrounded Quartile/Cap budget neutrality factor and the unrounded outlier adjustment to the capital Federal rate were revised because of these errors. However, after rounding these factors to 4 decimal places as displayed in the final rule, the rounded factors were unchanged from the final rule. On pages 69966 through 69971, in the discussion of the determination of the Federal hospital inpatient capital related prospective payment rate update, due to the correction of these errors as discussed previously, we made conforming corrections to the GAF/DRG budget neutrality factor, the capital Federal rate, and related figures. As a result of these changes, we also made conforming corrections in the table showing the comparison of factors and adjustments for the FY 2024 capital Federal rate and FY 2025 capital Federal rate. On page 69987, we are making conforming changes to the applicable HCO threshold for site neutral payment rate cases under the LTCH PPS for FY 2025 since it is calculated as the sum of the site neutral payment rate for the case and the IPPS fixed-loss amount. On page 69990, we are making conforming corrections to the national adjusted operating standardized amounts and capital standard Federal payment rate (which also include the rates payable to hospitals located in Puerto Rico) in Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D as a result of the conforming corrections to certain budget neutrality factors, as previously described. E. Summary of Errors in the Appendices On pages 69994, 69996 through 70001, 70003 through 70004, 70006 through 70008, and 70030 through 70032, in the regulatory impact analyses, we have made conforming corrections to the factors, values, and tables, and the accompanying discussion of the changes to operating and capital IPPS payments for FY 2025 as a result of the technical errors that lead to changes in our calculation of certain IPPS budget neutrality factors, MS–DRG relative weights, wage PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 indexes, and other figures as described in sections II.B. and D. of this correcting document. These conforming corrections include changes to the following: • On pages 69998 through 70000, the table titled ‘‘Table I—Impact Analysis of Changes to the IPPS for Operating Costs for FY 2025’’. • On pages 70003 and 70004, the table titled ‘‘Table II—Impact Analysis of Changes for FY 2025 Acute Care Hospital Operating Prospective Payment System (Payments per Discharge)’’. • On pages 70007 and 70008, the table titled ‘‘Table III—Provider Deciles by Beneficiary Characteristics’’. • On pages 70031 through 70032, the table titled ‘‘Table III—Comparison of Total Payments per Case’’. On page 70011, in our discussion of the effects of the changes to new technology add-on payments, we are correcting inadvertent typographical errors made in the numbers of traditional pathway technologies and new technology add-on payments provided for those technologies in FY 2025. On pages 70012 through 70015, we are correcting the discussion of the ‘‘Medicare DSH Uncompensated Care Payments and Supplemental Payment for Indian Health Service Hospitals and Tribal Hospitals and Hospitals Located in Puerto Rico’’ for purposes of the Regulatory Impact Analysis in Appendix A of the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, including the table titled ‘‘Modeled Uncompensated Care Payments* and Supplemental Payments for Estimated FY 2025 DSHs by Hospital Type,’’ in light of the corrections discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document. On page 70022, in our discussion of the effects of the changes to the Hospital VBP Program, we are correcting technical errors the entries for ‘‘By MCR Percent’’, ‘‘By DSH Percent’’, and By Teaching Status’’ in Table I.8–01. F. Summary of Errors in and Corrections to Files and Tables Posted on the CMS Website We are correcting the errors in the following IPPS tables that are listed on page 69989 of the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule and are available on the internet on the CMS website at https:// www.cms.gov/Medicare/MedicareFeefor-ServicePayment/Acute InpatientPPS/. The tables that are available on the internet have been updated to reflect the revisions discussed in this final rule correction. Table 2.—Final Case-Mix Index and Wage Index Table by CCN—FY 2025 Final Rule. As discussed in the previous E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations section, we inadvertently treated a current IPPS hospital as a hospital that had converted to REH status, thereby erroneously excluding its data from the wage index (CCN 260163). Therefore, we restored this provider to Table 2, which includes all relevant values for this provider for each column in the table. (We note, CCN 260163 has a MGCRB reclassification to CBSA 14.) Because of the inadvertent errors in the MGCRB reclassification status of 3 hospitals (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document) we are making the following corrections in Table 2: We are correcting the values in the columns titled ‘‘Wage Index Payment CBSA’’ and ‘‘MGCRB Reclass’’ for CCNs 170040, 220015 and 520034. As mentioned earlier, the correct reclassified CBSA for CCN 170040 is 41440, and the correct reclassified CBSA for CCN 220015 is 49340. The ‘‘Y’’ value in the column titled ‘‘MGCRB Reclass to Home’’ for both CCNs has also been removed, as the correct MGCRB reclassification CBSA is not the hospitals’ geographic urban CBSA. We are also adding an MGCRB reclassification for CCN 520034 by inserting CBSA 43100 to the columns ‘‘Wage Index Payment CBSA’’ and ‘‘MGCRB Reclass’’. Due to the inadvertent omission of one hospital’s wage data (CCN 260163), we are correcting the occupational mix adjusted national average hourly wage (as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document), and we recalculated all of the budget neutrality adjustments (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document) including the recalculation of the rural floor budget neutrality factor, which is the only budget neutrality factor applied to the FY 2025 wage indexes. As discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document we are making corrections to the MGCRB reclassification status of three hospitals. Because all these changes affect the calculation of various area wage indexes used to determine certain budget neutrality factors and hospitals’ final wage index value for FY 2025, we are also making conforming changes to the other impacted wage indexes, including the imputed floor, outmigration adjustment (as discussed later in this section) and the 25th percentile wage index value across all hospitals (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document). Therefore, based on all these changes described previously, we are correcting the values in the columns titled ‘‘FY 2025 Wage Index Prior to Quartile and Cap’’, ‘‘FY 2025 Wage Index With Quartile’’, ‘‘FY 2025 Wage Index With Quartile and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 Cap’’, and ‘‘Out-Migration Adjustment’’. We also updated footnote number 6 to reflect the conforming change to the 25th percentile wage index value across all hospitals. Table 3.—Final Wage Index Table by CBSA—FY 2025 Final Rule. As discussed previously, we inadvertently treated a current IPPS hospital as a hospital that had converted to REH status, thereby erroneously excluding its data from the wage index (CCN 260163). Therefore, we restored CCN 260163 to the wage data and recalculated the FY 2025 wage index for CBSA 26 as well as the reclassified wage index for CBSA 14 (see discussion earlier in this section regarding the MGCRB reclassification for CCN 260163). We also revised the values in the columns titled ‘‘FY 2025 Average Hourly Wage’’ and ‘‘3-Year Average Hourly Wage (2023, 2024, 2025)’’ for CBSA 26. Because of the inadvertent errors in the MGCRB reclassification status of CCNs 170040, 220015 and 520034 (as discussed earlier in this section), we recalculated the wage index for CBSAs 41440, 49340, 43100, and the rural wage index for Wisconsin (CBSA 52). Due to the inadvertent omission of one hospital’s wage data (CCN 260163), we are correcting the occupational mix adjusted national average hourly wage (as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document), and we recalculated all of the budget neutrality adjustments (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document), including the recalculation of the rural floor budget neutrality factor, which is the only budget neutrality factor applied to the FY 2025 wage indexes. As discussed earlier in this section we made corrections to the MGCRB reclassification status of three hospitals. Because these changes described earlier (restoring provider 2060163 to the wage data, the inadvertent errors in the MGCRB reclassification status of CCNs 170040, 220015 and 520034, the recalculation of the rural floor budget neutrality factor) affect the area pre and post reclassified wage indexes, we are also making conforming changes to the other impacted wage indexes, including the imputed floor. We also are making corresponding changes to the GAFs for any CBSAs with a wage index that changed. Based on all these changes described previously, we are correcting the values and flags in the columns titled ‘‘Wage Index’’, ‘‘GAF’’, ‘‘Reclassified Wage Index’’, ‘‘Reclassified GAF’’, ‘‘State Rural Floor’’, ‘‘Eligible for Rural Floor Wage Index’’, ‘‘Pre-Frontier and/or Pre-Rural Floor Wage Index’’, ‘‘Reclassified Wage Index Eligible for Frontier Wage Index’’, PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 80101 ‘‘Reclassified Wage Index Eligible for Rural Floor Wage Index’’, and ‘‘Reclassified Wage Index Pre-Frontier and/or Pre-Rural Floor’’. Table 4A.—Final List of Counties Eligible for the Out-Migration Adjustment under Section 1886(d)(13) of the Act—FY 2025 Final Rule. Due to the inadvertent omission of one hospital’s wage data (CCN 260163), we are correcting the occupational mix adjusted national average hourly wage (as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document), and we recalculated all of the budget neutrality adjustments (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document) including the recalculation of the rural floor budget neutrality factor, which is the only budget neutrality factor applied to the FY 2025 wage indexes. As also discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document and earlier in this section, we made corrections to the MGCRB reclassification status of three hospitals. Because all these changes affect various area wage indexes (including the post reclassified wage indexes), we are also making conforming changes to the other impacted wage indexes, including the imputed floor. As discussed in the FY 2012 IPPS final rule (76 FR 51601 through 51602), we calculate the outmigration adjustment using the postreclassified wage indexes. Because the wage indexes are one of the inputs used to determine the out-migration adjustment, the out-migration adjustments for some counties/hospitals changed. Therefore, we are making corresponding changes to certain outmigration adjustments listed in Table 4A. Specifically, we are correcting the values in the column titled ‘‘FY 2025 Out-Migration Adjustment’’. Table 5.—Final List of Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups (MS– DRGs), Relative Weighting Factors, and Geometric and Arithmetic Mean Length of Stay—FY 2025 Final Rule. We are correcting this table to reflect the recalculation of the relative weights, geometric average length-of-stay (LOS), and arithmetic mean LOS as a result of the correction of the number of hospitals with REH status and the correction in the version 42 MS–DRG assignment for some cases in the historical claims data (as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document). Table 12B.—Final LTCH PPS Wage Index for Rural Areas for Discharges Occurring from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025. As discussed in the previous section, we inadvertently excluded a hospital (CCN 260163) from the IPPS wage data used E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 80102 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations to calculate the FY 2025 LTCH PPS wage index. This resulted in a correction to the wage index value for rural Missouri (CBSA 26) in Table 12B. (We note, there are no LTCHs located in rural Missouri in the data used to develop the FY 2025 LTCH PPS rates in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final. Therefore, this correction to the LTCH PPS wage index value for rural Missouri did not necessitate the recalculation of the FY 2025 LTCH PPS rates.) Table 18.—Final FY 2025 Medicare DSH Uncompensated Care Payment Factor 3. We further note that we also made updates to the calculation of Factor 3 of the uncompensated care payment methodology to reflect the updated information for the IPPS hospital that had inadvertently been treated as a hospital that had converted to an REH. This hospital is projected to be DSH-eligible for purposes of the interim uncompensated care payments during FY 2025, but its data was erroneously excluded from the Factor 3 calculations for FY 2025. We recalculated the total uncompensated care amount for all DSH-eligible hospitals to reflect this update. In addition, because the Factor 3 calculated for each hospital reflects that hospital’s uncompensated care amount relative to the uncompensated care amount for all subsection (d) hospitals that receive a DSH payment for the fiscal year, we also recalculated Factor 3 for all DSH-eligible hospitals. The hospital-specific Factor 3 determines the total amount of the uncompensated care payment a hospital is eligible to receive for the fiscal year. This hospitalspecific payment amount is then used to calculate the amount of the interim uncompensated care payments a hospital receives per discharge. Given the very narrowly targeted update to the information used in the calculation of Factor 3, the change to the previously calculated Factor 3 is of limited magnitude for the majority of hospitals. For the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, we published a list of hospitals that we identified to be subsection (d) hospitals and subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals projected to be eligible to receive interim uncompensated care payments for FY 2025. We are updating this list and the calculation of Factor 3 of the uncompensated care payment methodology to reflect the updated information for the IPPS hospital that was inadvertently treated as a hospital that had converted to an REH. We are revising Factor 3 for all hospitals to reflect this correction. We are also revising the amount of the total uncompensated care payment calculated for each DSH-eligible VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 hospital. The total uncompensated care payment that a hospital receives is used to calculate the amount of the interim uncompensated care payments the hospital receives per discharge. III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the agency is required to publish a notice of the proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register before the provisions of a rule take effect. Similarly, section 1871(b)(1) of the Act requires the Secretary to provide for notice of the proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register and provide a period of not less than 60 days for public comment. In addition, section 553(d) of the APA, and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(i) of the Act mandate a 30day delay in effective date after issuance or publication of a rule. Sections 553(b)(B) and 553(d)(3) of the APA provide for exceptions from the notice and comment and delay in effective date APA requirements; in cases in which these exceptions apply, sections 1871(b)(2)(C) and 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act provide exceptions from the notice and 60-day comment period and delay in effective date requirements of the Act as well. Section 553(b)(B) of the APA and section 1871(b)(2)(C) of the Act authorize an agency to dispense with normal rulemaking requirements for good cause if the agency makes a finding that the notice and comment process are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. In addition, both section 553(d)(3) of the APA and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act allow the agency to avoid the 30day delay in effective date where such delay is contrary to the public interest and an agency includes a statement of support. We believe that this final rule correction does not constitute a rule that would be subject to the notice and comment or delayed effective date requirements. This document corrects technical and typographical errors in the preamble, regulations text, addendum, tables, and appendices included or referenced in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule but does not make substantive changes to the policies or payment methodologies that were adopted in the final rule. As a result, this final rule correction is intended to ensure that the information in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule accurately reflects the policies adopted in that document. In addition, even if this were a rule to which the notice and comment procedures and delayed effective date PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 requirements applied, we find that there is good cause to waive such requirements. Undertaking further notice and comment procedures to incorporate the corrections in this document into the final rule or delaying the effective date would be contrary to the public interest because it is in the public’s interest for providers to receive appropriate payments in as timely a manner as possible, and to ensure that the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule accurately reflects our policies. Furthermore, such procedures would be unnecessary, as we are not altering our payment methodologies or policies, but rather, we are simply implementing correctly the methodologies and policies that we previously proposed, requested comment on, and subsequently finalized. This final rule correction is intended solely to ensure that the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule accurately reflects these payment methodologies and policies. Therefore, we believe we have good cause to waive the notice and comment and effective date requirements. IV. Correction of Errors In FR Doc. 2024–07567 of August 28, 2024 (89 FR 68986), we are making the following corrections: A. Correction of Errors in the Dates Section 1. On page 68986, first column, DATES section, lines 7 and 8, the phrase ‘‘The regulations at §§ 482.42(e) and 485.640(d)’’ is corrected to read ‘‘The regulations at §§ 482.42(e) and (f) and 485.640(d) and (e)’’. B. Corrections of Errors in the Preamble 2. On page 69060, third column, first partial paragraph: a. Lines 22 through 26, the phrase ‘‘MS–DRG 447 ‘Multiple Level Anterior and Posterior Spinal Fusion Except Cervical with MCC or Custom-Made Anatomically Designed Interbody Fusion Device’ ’’ is corrected to read ‘‘MS–DRG 447 ‘Multiple Level Spinal Fusion Except Cervical with MCC or Custom-Made Anatomically Designed Interbody Fusion Device’ ’’. b. Lines 26 through 29, the phrase ‘‘MS–DRG 448 ‘Multiple Level Anterior and Posterior Spinal Fusion Except Cervical without MCC’ ’’ is corrected to read, ‘‘MS–DRG 448 ‘Multiple Level Spinal Fusion Except Cervical without MCC’ ’’. 3. On page 69095, bottom of page, second column, first partial paragraph, line 7, the date ‘‘June 5, 2025’’ is corrected to read ‘‘June 5, 2024’’. E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 4. On page 69109, first column, last paragraph, line 3, the figure ‘‘6,916,571’’ is corrected to read ‘‘6,916,748’’. 5. On page 69113, third column, first full paragraph, line 17, the figure ‘‘1.92336’’ is corrected to read as ‘‘1.92331’’. 6. On page 69268, third column, first partial paragraph: a. Line 14, the figure ‘‘4’’ is corrected to read ‘‘3’’, b. Line 20, the figure ‘‘19’’ is corrected to read ‘‘18’’, b. Line 25, the figure ‘‘3,074’’ is corrected to read ‘‘3,075’’. 7. On page 69277, at the bottom of the page, in the untitled table, the figure ‘‘$54.97’’ is corrected to read ‘‘$54.96’’. 8. On page 69282: a. Second column, third paragraph: i. Line 9, the figure ‘‘470’’ is corrected to read ‘‘471’’, ii. Line 29, the figure ‘‘1,078’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1,079’’, and iii. Line 32, the figure ‘‘237’’ is corrected to read ‘‘235’’. b. Third column, second full paragraph, line 3, the phrase ‘‘by September 1, 2024.’’ is corrected to read, ‘‘by September 3, 2024 (while 80103 applications are due not later than 13 months prior to the start of the fiscal year for which reclassification is sought, usually by September 1, it has been the MGCRB’s practice to allow submission up to the first business day in September).’’ 9. On page 69291, the Table Y ‘‘HOSPITALS SUBJECT TO RECLASSIFICATION ASSIGNMENT POLICY’’ is corrected by adding the following entry after row 8 (CCN 070036) and before row 9 (CCN 220020): CCN MGCRB case No. Approved CBSA Final rule CBSA 220015 ....................................................................................................................... 25C0368 49340 49340 10. On page 69308, third column, middle of the page, the untitled table is corrected to read as follows: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 FY 2025 25th Percentile Wage Index Value ....................................................................................................................................... 11. On page 69313, second column, first partial paragraph, line 13, the figure ‘‘23’’ is corrected to read ‘‘22’’. 12. On page 69315, third column, first full paragraph, line 1, the figure ‘‘23’’ is corrected to read ‘‘22’’. 13. On page 69369, second column, fourth full paragraph, line 14, the phrase ‘‘mental-health-only geographic’’ is corrected to read ‘‘mental-health-only population and geographic’’. 14. On page 69400, second column, last partial paragraph, line 9, the phrase ‘‘beneficiaries, ERRs, and aggregate’’ is corrected to read ‘‘beneficiaries, excess readmission ratios (ERRs), and aggregate’’. 15. On page 69455, third column, third footnote paragraph (footnote 266), lines 4 and 5, the web address ‘‘https:// www.cdc.gov/hai/data/archive/2021HAI-progress-report.html#2018’’ is corrected to read ‘‘https:// archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https:// www.cdc.gov/hai/data/archive/2021HAI-progress-report.html’’. 16. On page 69458, second column, second footnote paragraph (footnote 297), lines 4 through 6, the web address ‘‘https://qualitynet.gov/inpatient/iqr/ proposedmeasures’’ is corrected to ‘‘https://qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/ iqr/proposedmeasures’’. 17. On page 69463, lower half of the page, first column, first footnote paragraph (footnote 304), lines 3 through 5, the web address ‘‘https:// qualitynet.gov/inpatient/iqr/proposed measures’’ is corrected to ‘‘https:// qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/iqr/ proposedmeasures.’’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 18. On page 69476, first column, third footnote paragraph (footnote 341), lines 4 through 8, the web address https:// www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associatedinfections/?CDC_AAref_Val=https:// www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/ infection%25C2%25 ADcontrol%25C2%25 AD.assessment%25C2%25ADtools.html is corrected to ‘‘https://www.cdc.gov/ infection-control/media/pdfs/IPCInstructions-508.pdf.’’ 19. On page 69481, first and second columns, footnote paragraph (footnote 366), last line and lines 1 and 2, the web address ‘‘https://mmshub.cms.gov/sites/ default/files/PSSMTEP-SummaryReport-202306.pdf’’ is corrected to ‘‘https://mmshub.cms.gov/sites/default/ files/PSSM-TEP-Summary-Report202306.pdf.’’ 20. On page 69489, in the first column; first footnote paragraph (footnote 394), lines 3 through 5, the web address ‘‘https://qualitynet.gov/ inpatient/iqr/proposedmeasures’’ is corrected to ‘‘https://qualitynet.cms.gov/ inpatient/iqr/proposedmeasures.’’ 21. On page 69503, third column, second full paragraph, lines 15 through 17, the web address, ‘‘https:// hcahpsonline.org/en/mode-patient-mixadj/#jan2023publiclyreported’’ is corrected to read, ‘‘https:// hcahpsonline.org/en/mode--patientmix-adj/#jan2023publiclyreported.’’ 22. On page 69512, second column, first footnote paragraph (footnote 437), lines 1 through 4, ‘‘Medicare Hospital Quality Chartbook. National Rates over Time. Available at: https:// PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 0.9009 www.cmshospitalchartbook.com/ visualization/national-rates-over-time. Accessed March 12, 2024.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘MedPAC. (2019). Update: MedPAC’s evaluation of Medicare’s Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. Available at: https:// www.medpac.gov/update-medpac-sevaluation-of-medicare-s-hospitalreadmission-reduction-program/.’’ 23. On page 69529, first column, second footnote paragraph (footnote 531), lines 2 through 4, the footnote ‘‘CDC. (2024). National and State Healthcare-associated Infections Progress Report. Available at: https:// www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associatedinfections/php/data/progressreport.html.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘CDC. (2022). Antibiotic Resistance & Patient Safety Portal: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections. Available at: https://arpsp.cdc.gov/profile/nhsn/ cauti.’’. 24. On page 69533, first column, second full paragraph, lines 9 through 17, the sentences ‘‘In CAUTI and CLABSI SIRs, risk adjustment is applied at the individual location level, resulting in a count of infection events (SIR numerator) and predicted number of infections (SIR denominator). The NHSN then aggregates location-specific results for all of a facility’s locations prior to calculating the SIR.’’ are corrected to read ‘‘The NHSN then aggregates location-specific results for all of a facility’s locations prior to calculating the SIR.’’ 25. On page 69534, first column, second full paragraph, lines 18–21, the E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 80104 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 sentence ‘‘This would also allow more direct comparison with the CAUTI-Onc and CLABSI-Onc measures used in the PCHQR Program.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘The oncology-specific measures would also allow more direct comparison with the CAUTI and CLABSI measures used in the PCHQR Program.’’. 26. On page 69538, first column, last paragraph, lines 6 through 12, the sentence ‘‘Hospitals must report on the following three eCQMs: (1) Hospital Harm—Severe Hypoglycemia eCQM; (2) Hospital Harm—Severe Hyperglycemia eCQM; and (3) Hospital Harm—OpioidRelated Adverse Events eCQM.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Hospitals must report on the following three eCQMs: (1) the Safe Use of Opioids—Concurrent Prescribing eCQM; (2) the Cesarean Birth eCQM; and (3) the Severe Obstetric Complications eCQM.’’. 27. On page 69540, first column, last paragraph, line 11, the reference ‘‘section XXXX’’ is corrected to read ‘‘section X.A.’’. 28. On page 69544, third column, last paragraph, lines 6 through 12, the sentence ‘‘Hospitals must report the following three eCQMs: (1) Hospital Harm—Severe Hypoglycemia eCQM; (2) Hospital Harm—Severe Hyperglycemia eCQM; and (3) Hospital Harm—OpioidRelated Adverse Events eCQM.’’ is VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 corrected to read ‘‘Hospitals must report the following three eCQMs: (1) the Safe Use of Opioids—Concurrent Prescribing eCQM; (2) the Cesarean Birth eCQM; and (3) the Severe Obstetric Complications eCQM.’’. 29. On page 69545, third column, first partial paragraph, line 3, the reference ‘‘section XXXX’’ is corrected to read ‘‘section X.A.’’. 30. On page 69549, first column, fourth full paragraph, lines 5 through 7, the web address ‘‘https:// qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/iqr/ measures’’ is corrected to read ‘‘https:// qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/ measures.’’ 31. On page 69572, third column, last paragraph, line 25, the table reference ‘‘Table IX.C.XXXX’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Table IX.C.10.’’. 32. On page 69573, top of the page: a. First column, first paragraph, line 1, the table reference ‘‘Table IX.C.XXXX’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Table IX.C.10.’’ b. In the table titled, ‘‘TABLE IX.C.X:XXX. NEWLY FINALIZED eCQM REPORTING AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CY 2026 REPORTING PERIOD/FY 2028 PAYMENT DETERMINATION AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS’’, line 1, the table number ‘‘TABLE IX.C.XXXX’’ is corrected to read ‘‘TABLE IX.C.10.’’. PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 33. On page 69575: a. Top third of the page, third column, first full paragraph, line 3, the reference ‘‘Table IX.C.10.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Table IX.C.11.’’. b. Middle of the page, in the table titled, ‘‘TABLE IX.C.10. SUMMARY OF THE CURRENT AND NEWLY MODIFIED VALIDATION SCORING POLICIES’’, line 1, the table number ‘‘TABLE IX.C.10’’ is corrected to read ‘‘TABLE IX.C.11.’’. 34. On page 69577, third column, last partial paragraph, the parenthetical reference ‘‘(86 FR 36341)’’ is corrected to read ‘‘(89 FR 36341)’’. 35. On page 69578, first column, first partial paragraph, line 2, the parenthetical reference ‘‘(86 FR 36341)’’ is corrected to read ‘‘(89 FR 36341)’’. 36. On page 69590, first column, first partial paragraph, line 6, the word ‘‘effect’’ is corrected to read ‘‘effective’’. 37. On pages 69605 and 69606 remove the undesignated table. 38. On pages 69606 through 69613 correct ‘‘TABLE IX.F.–01.: SUMMARY OF OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR THE MEDICARE PROMOTING INTEROPERABILITY PROGRAM FOR THE EHR REPORTING PERIOD IN CY 2025’’ to read as follows: BILLING CODE 4120–01–P E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Jkt 262001 Electronic Prescribing (ePrescribing) e-Prescribing: I For at least one hospital PO 00000 discharge, medication orders for permissible prescriptions (for new and changed prescriptions) are transmitted electronically using CEHRT. * Frm 00051 e-Prescribing I Query of Prescription Drug The number of prescriptions in the denominator generated and transmitted electronically. NIA (measure is YIN) The number of new or changed prescriptions written for drugs requiring a prescription in order to be dispensed, other than controlled substances for patients discharged during the EHR reoorting oeriod. NIA (measure is YIN) Monitoring Program (PDMP): Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 For at least one Schedule II opioid or Schedule III or IV drug electronically prescribed using CEHRT during the EHR reporting period, the eligible hospital or CAH uses data from CEHRT to conduct a query of a PDMP for prescription drug history. E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM Health Information Exchange (HIE)*** I Loops Support Electronic Referral by Sending Health Information: 02OCR1 HIE I Number of transitions of care and referrals in the denominator where a summary of care record was created using CEHRT and exchanged electronically. For at least one transition of care or referral, the eligible hospital or CAH that transitions or refers its patient to another setting of care or provider of care: (1) Creates a summary of care record using CEHRT; and (2) Electronically exchanges the summ of care record. Support Electronic Referral Number of electronic Loops by Receiving and summary of care records in Reconciling Health the denominator for which Number of transitions of care and referrals during the EHR reporting period for which the eligible hospital or CAH inpatient or emergency department (Place of Service [POS] 21 or 23) was the transitioning or referring provider. Number of electronic summary of care records received using CEHRT Any eligible hospital or CAH that does not have an internal pharmacy that can accept electronic prescriptions, and there are no pharmacies that accept electronic prescriptions within 10 miles at the start of their EHR reporting period. ( 1) Any eligible hospital or CAH that does not have an internal pharmacy that can accept electronic prescriptions for controlled substances that include Schedule II, III and IV drugs and is not located within 10 miles of any pharmacy that accepts electronic prescriptions for controlled substances at the start of their EHR reporting period. (2) Any eligible hospital or CAH that could not report on this measure in accordance with applicable law. None None Measure may be calculated by reviewing only actions for patients whose records are maintained using CEHRT for which sufficient data were entered in the CEHRT to allow the record to be saved and not rejected due to incomolete data. NIA (measure is YIN) Measure may be calculated by reviewing only actions for patients whose records are maintained using CEHRT for which sufficient data were entered in the CEHRT to allow the record to be saved and not rejected due to incomplete data. Measure may be calculated by reviewing only actions for patients whose records are Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 TABLE IX.F.-01.: SUMMARY OF OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR THE MEDICARE PROMOTING INTEROPERABILITY PROGRAM FOR THE EHR REPORTING PERIOD IN CY 2025 80105 ER02OC24.000</GPH> lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 80106 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 HIE The eligible hospital or CAH must attest to the following: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 (1) Participating in an HIE in order to enable secure, bidirectional exchange of information to occur for all unique patients discharged from the eligible hospital or CAH inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23), and all unique patient records stored or maintained in the EHR for these departments, during the EHR reporting period in accordance with applicable law and policy. (2) Participating in an HIE that is capable of exchanging information across a broad network of unaffiliated exchange partners including those using disparate EHRs, maintained using CEHRT for which sufficient data were entered in the CEHRT to allow the record to be saved and not rejected due to incomplete data. for patient encounters during the EHR reporting period for which an eligible hospital or CAH was the reconciling party of a transition of care or referral, and for patient encounters during the EHR reporting period in which the eligible hospital or CAH has never before encountered the patient. NIA (measure is YIN) INone NIA (measure is YIN) Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 ER02OC24.001</GPH> clinical information reconciliation is completed using CEHRT for the For at least one electronic following three clinical summary of care record information sets: (1) received using CEHRT for Medication - Review of the patient encounters during the patient's medication, EHR reporting period for including the name, dosage, which an eligible hospital or CAH was the receiving party of frequency, and route of each medication; (2) Medication a transition of care or referral, or for patient encounters during !Allergy - Review of the the EHR reporting period in patient's known medication which the eligible hospital or allergies; and (3) Current Problem List - Review of CAH has never before encountered the patient, the lthe patient's current and eligible hospital or CAH active diagnoses. conducts clinical information reconciliation for medication, medication allergy, and current roblem list using CEHRT. HIE Bi-Directional Exchange IN/A (measure is YIN) Information: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 The eligible hospital or CAH must attest to the following: Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 NIA (measure is YIN) INone NIA (measure is YIN) 80107 ( 1) Participating as a signatory to a Framework Agreement (as that term is defined by the Common Agreement for Nationwide Health Information Interoperability as published in the Federal Register and on ONC's website) in good standing (that is, not suspended) and enabling secure, bi-directional exchange of information to occur, in production, for all unique patients discharged from the eligible hospital or CAH inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23), and all unique patient records stored or maintained in the EHR for these departments, during the EHR reporting period in accordance with applicable law and policy. (2) Using the functions of CEHRT to support bidirectional exchange of patient information, in production, under this Framework Agreement. IN/A (measure is YIN) Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 ER02OC24.002</GPH> HIE and not engaging in exclusionary behavior when determining exchange partners. (3) Using the functions of CEHRT to support bidirectional exchange with an HIE. Enabling Exchange under the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 80108 VerDate Sep<11>2014 For at least one unique patient discharged from the eligible hospital or CAH inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23): Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.003</GPH> Provide Patients Electronic Access to Their Health Information: Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange The number of patients in lthe denominator (or patient authorized representatives) who are provided timely access to health information Ito view online, download and transmit to a third party and to access using an application of their choice lthat is configured to meet the technical specifications of lthe API in the eligible hospital's or CAH's CEHRT. (1) the patient (or patientauthorized representative) is provided timely access to view online, download, and transmit their health information; and (2) the eligible hospital or CAH ensures the patient's health information is available for the patient (or patient-authorized representative) to access using any application of their choice that is configured to meet the technical specifications of the application programming interface (API) in the eligible hospital's or CAH's CEHRT. Immunization Registry IN/A (measure is YIN) Reporting: The eligible hospital or CAH is in active engagement with a public health agency (PHA) to submit immunization data and receive immunization forecasts and histories from the public health immunization registry or immunization information system (IIS). The number of unique patients discharged from an eligible hospital or CAR inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period. None NIA (measure is YIN) Any eligible hospital or CAH meeting NIA (measure is YIN) one or more of the following criteria may be excluded from the immunization registry reporting measure if the eligible hospital or CAH: (I) Does not administer any immunizations to any of the populations for which data are collected by its jurisdiction's immunization registry or IIS during the EHR reporting period; (2) Operates in a jurisdiction for which no immunization registry or IIS is capable of accepting the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT defmition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or (3) Operates in a jurisdiction where no immunization registry or IIS has declared readiness to receive immunization data as of 6 Measure must be calculated by reviewing all patient records, not just those maintained using CEHRT. Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Provider to Patient Exchange lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Syndromic Surveillance Reporting: NIA (measure is YIN) NIA (measure is YIN) Jkt 262001 PO 00000 The eligible hospital or CAH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit syndromic surveillance data from an emergency department (POS 23). Frm 00055 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange Electronic Case Reporting (eCR): NIA (measure is YIN) NIA (measure is YIN) E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM The eligible hospital or CAH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit case reporting of reportable conditions. 02OCR1 Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange Electronic Reportable Laboratory (ELR) Result Reporting: ER02OC24.004</GPH> NIA (measure is YIN) NIA (measure is YIN) I NIA (measure is YIN) I NIA (measure is YIN) 80109 The eligible hospital or CAH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit ELR results. NIA (measure is YIN) I Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange months prior to the start of the EHR reoorting oeriod. Any eligible hospital or CAH meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded from the syndromic surveillance reporting measure if the eligible hospital or CAH: (1) Does not have an emergency department; (2) Operates in a jurisdiction for which no PHA is capable ofreceiving electronic syndromic surveillance data from eligible hospitals or CAHs in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or (3) Operates in a jurisdiction where no PHA has declared readiness to receive syndromic surveillance data from eligible hospitals or CAHs as of 6 months prior to the start of the EHR reporting period. Any eligible hospital or CAH meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded from the case reporting measure if the eligible hospital or CAH: (1) Does not treat or diagnose any reportable diseases for which data are collected by its jurisdiction's reportable disease system during the EHR reporting period; (2) Operates in a jurisdiction for which no PHA is capable ofreceiving eCR data in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or (3) Operates in a jurisdiction where no PHA has declared readiness to receive eCR data as of 6 months prior to the start of the EHR reporting period. Any eligible hospital or CAH meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded from the ELR result measure if the eligible hospital or CAH: (1) Does not perform or order laboratory tests that are reportable in its iurisdiction during the EHR reoortin lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 80110 VerDate Sep<11>2014 NIA (measure is YIN) NIA (measure is YIN) Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 AU Surveillance**: Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange AR Surveillance**: Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange Public Health Registry Reporting: Fmt 4700 Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange ER02OC24.005</GPH> NIA (measure is YIN)** The eligible hospital or CAR is in active engagement with CDC's NHSN to submit AU data for the EHR reporting period and receives a report from NHSN indicating its successful submission of AU data for the EHR reporting period.** NIA (measure is YIN)** The eligible hospital or CAR is in active engagement with CDC's NHSN to submit AR data for the EHR reporting period and receives a report from NHSN indicating its successful submission of AR data for the EHR reporting period.** The eligible hospital or CAR is in active engagement with a PHA to submit data to public health registries. Clinical Data Registry Reporting: I None INIA (measure is YIN) Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 NIA (measure is YIN) period; (2) Operates in a jurisdiction for which no PHA is capable of accepting the specific ELR standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or (3) Operates in a jurisdiction where no PHA has declared readiness to receive ELR results from an eligible hospital or CAR as of 6 months prior to the start of the EHR reporting period. NIA (measure is YIN)** I Any eligible hospital or CAR may be I NIA (measure is YIN)** excluded from the measure if the eligible hospital or CAR: (1) Does not have any patients in any patient care location for which data are collected by NHSN during the EHR reporting period; (2) Does not have eMAR/BCMA electronic records or an ADT system during the EHR reporting period; or (3) Does not have a data source containing the minimal discrete data elements that are required for reporting.** NIA (measure is YIN)** I Any eligible hospital or CAR may be I NIA (measure is YIN)** excluded from the measure if the eligible hospital or CAR: (1) Does not have any patients in any patient care location for which data are collected by NHSN during the EHR reporting period; (2) Does not have an LIS or ADT system during the EHR reporting period; or (3) Does not have a data source containing the minimal discrete data elements that are required for reportina ** NIA (measure is YIN) I None INIA (measure is YIN) lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Jkt 262001 Frm 00057 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 02OCR1 Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements under 45 CFR 164.308(a)(l), including addressing the security (including encryption) of data created or maintained by CEHRT in accordance with requirements under 45 CFR 164.312(a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR 164.306(d)(3), implement security updates as necessary, and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the provider's risk management process. Actions included in the security risk analysis measure may occur any time during the calendar year in which the EHR reporting eriod occurs. IN/A (measure is YIN) Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) Guides NIA (measure is YIN) None NIA (measure is YIN) NIA (measure is YIN) None NIA (measure is YIN) Conduct an annual selfassessment using all nine SAFER Guides at any point during the calendar year in which the EHR reporting eriod occurs. * In the FY 2024 IPPS/L TCH PPS final rule (88 FR 59269), we inadvertently omitted a footnote describing changes to the phrasing of the measure description and description of the numerator in Table IX.F.-03.to align with the technical update finalized in the FY 2023 IPPS/L TCH PPS final rule (87 FR 49327). ** Signifies a measure finalized in this FY 2025 IPPS/L TCH PPS final rule that will apply to the EHR reporting period in CY 2025 and subsequent years. *** The ePrior Authorization measure will be required beginning with the EHR reporting period in CY 2027 (89 FR 8760). 80111 IX.F.–05: PREVIOUSLY FINALIZED ECQMS FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 39. On page 69621, top of the page, lines 1 and 2, the table title ‘‘TABLE PO 00000 ER02OC24.006</GPH> Protect Patient Health Information NIA (measure is YIN) Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 BILLING CODE 4120–01–C VerDate Sep<11>2014 Protect Patient Health Information The eligible hospital or CAH is in active engagement to submit data to a clinical data regist Security Risk Analysis 80112 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations AND CAHS FOR THE CY 2024 THE REPORTING PERIOD’’ is corrected to read ‘‘TABLE IX.F.–05: PREVIOUSLY FINALIZED ECQMS FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS AND CAHS FOR THE CY 2024 REPORTING PERIOD’’. 40. On page 69622, third column, last paragraph, line 19, the phrase ‘‘CY 206’’ is corrected to read ‘‘CY 2026’’. 41. On page 69880, third column, second full paragraph, line 2, the phrase, ‘‘supporting our CMS’s proposal’’ is corrected to read ‘‘supported CMS’s proposal’’. 42. On page 69901, lower half of the page, second column, partial paragraph, line 16, the phrase ‘‘section . and IX.E.7.b.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘section IX.E.7.b.’’. 43. On page 69902, top of the page, in the table title ‘‘TABLE XII.B–08: U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR AND STATISTICS’ MAY 2021 NATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND WAGE ESTIMATES, line 1, the date ‘‘MAY 2021’’ is corrected to read ‘‘MAY 2022’’. C. Corrections of Errors in the Addendum 44. On page 69948, the table titled ‘‘Summary of FY 2025 Budget Neutrality Factors’’ is corrected to read: 0.997190 0.999874 0.999981 0.962786 0.977500 0.997156 0.999179 0.999811 Reclassificatio *Rural *The rural floor budget neutrality factor is applied to the national wage indexes while the rest of the budget neutrality adjustments are applied to the standardized amounts. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 i. Line 4, the figure ‘‘0.24849’’ is corrected to ‘‘0.248486’’, ii. Line 6, the figure ‘‘0.252248’’ is corrected to ‘‘0.252261’’, and iii. Line 17, the figure ‘‘1.015123’’ is corrected to ‘‘1.015192’’. b. Second full paragraph: i. Line 5, the figure ‘‘0.017716’’ is corrected to ‘‘0.017718’’, ii. Line 7, the figure ‘‘0.017666’’ is corrected to ‘‘0.017669’’, and iii. Line 18, the figure ‘‘0.997178’’ is corrected to ‘‘0.997234’’. 47. On page 69961, second column: a. First full paragraph: i. Line 22, the figure ‘‘$46,152’’ is corrected to ‘‘$46,147’’, PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ii. Line 24, the figure ‘‘$4,349,520,041’’ is corrected to ‘‘$4,350,072,899’’, iii. Line 25, the figure ‘‘$80,269,760,637’’ is corrected to ‘‘$80,279,536,469’’, iv. Line 40, the figure ‘‘$46,502’’ is corrected to ‘‘$46,498’’, and v. Line 51, the figure ‘‘$46,152’’ is corrected to ‘‘$46,147’’. b. the untitled table, the figure ‘‘0.957682’’ is corrected to ‘‘0.957678. 48. On page 69963, the table titled ‘‘CHANGES FROM FY 2024 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2025 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS’’ is corrected to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.007</GPH> lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 45. On page 69955, third column, first full paragraph, line 6 through 11, the phrase ‘‘(estimated capital outlier payments of $292,195,135 divided by (estimated capital outlier payments of $292,195,135 plus the estimated total capital Federal payment of $6,564,012,091))’’ is corrected to read: ‘‘(estimated capital outlier payments of $292,277,686 divided by (estimated capital outlier payments of $292,277,686 plus the estimated total capital Federal payment of $6,564,098,157))’’. 46. On page 69960, third column: a. First full paragraph: Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 80113 CHANGES FROM FY 2024 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2025 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 National Standardized Amount for FY 2025 if Wage Index is Greater Than 1.0000; Labor/NonLabor Share Percentage (67.6/32.4) National Standardized Amount for FY 2025 if Wage Index is Less Than or Equal to 1.0000; Labor/Non-Labor Share Percentage (62/38) Hospital Did NOT Submit Quality Data and is NOT a Meaningful EHR User If Wage Index is Greater Than 1.0000: Labor (67.6%): $4,782.01 Nonlabor (32.4%): $2,291.97 If Wage Index is less Than or Equal to 1.0000: Labor (62%): $4,385.87 Nonlabor (38%): $2,688.11 1.029 0.997190 1.0035 0.997190 1.0205 0.997190 0.995 0.997190 0.999874 0.999874 0.999874 0.999874 0.999981 0.999981 0.999981 0.999981 0.962786 0.962786 0.962786 0.962786 0.997156 0.997156 0.997156 0.997156 0.999179 0.999179 0.999179 0.999179 0.999811 0.999811 0.999811 0.999811 0.949 0.949 0.949 0.949 Labor: $4,465.41 Nonlabor: $2,140.23 Labor: $4,354.75 Nonlabor: $2,087.19 Labor: $4,428.52 Nonlabor: $2,122.55 Labor: $4,317.86 Nonlabor: $2,069.51 Labor: $4,095.5 Nonlabor: $2,510.14 Labor: Nonlabor: $3,994.00 $2,447.94 Labor: $4,061.66 Nonlabor: $2,489.41 Labor: Nonlabor: 49. On page 69966, third column, first full paragraph, line 6, the figure ‘‘1.33 percent’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1.30 percent’’. 50. On page 69969, second column, second partial paragraph, line 17, the figure ‘‘0.9887’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.9884’’. 51. On page 69970: a. First column, first full paragraph, line 8, the mathematical phrase, ‘‘(0.9887) is 0.9856 (0.9969 × 0.9887)’’ is VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 Hospital Submitted Quality Data and is NOT a Meaningful EHR User If Wage Index is Greater Than 1.0000: Labor (67.6%): $4,782.01 Nonlabor (32.4%): $2,291.97 corrected to read ‘‘(0.9884) is 0.9854 (0.9969 × 0.9884)’’. b. Second column, second full paragraph, line 2, the figure ‘‘0.9856’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.9854’’. c. Third column: i. First partial paragraph, line 5, the figure ‘‘$510.51’’ is corrected to read ‘‘$510.39’’. ii. Second bulleted paragraph, line 12, the figure ‘‘0.9856’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.9854’’. PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 If Wage Index is less Than or Equal to 1.0000: Labor (62%): $4,385.87 Nonlabor (38%): $2,688.11 $3,960.17 $2,427.20 iii. Last paragraph: A. Line 13, the figure ‘‘1.44’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1.46’’. B. Line 25, the figure ‘‘1.33’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1.30’’. 52. On page 69971: a. Top of the page, the table titled ‘‘COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND ADJUSTMENTS: FY 2024 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND THE FY 2025 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE’’ is corrected to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.008</GPH> FY 2025 Base Rate after removing: 1. FY 2024 Geographic Reclassification Budget Neutrality (0.971295) 2. FY 2024 Operating Outlier Offset (0.949) 3. FY 2024 Rural Demonstration Budget Neutrality Factor (0.999463) 4. FY 2024 Lowest Quartile Budget Neutrality Factor (0.997402) 5. FY 2024 Cap Policy Wage Index Budget Neutrality Factor (0.999645) FY 2025 Update Factor FY 2025 MS-DRG Reclassification and Recalibration Budget Neutrality Factor Before Cap FY 2025 Cap Policy MS-DRG Weight Budget Neutrality Factor FY 2025 Wage Index Budget Neutralitv Factor FY 2025 Reclassification Budget Neutralitv Factor FY 2025 Lowest Quartile Budget Neutrality Factor FY 2025 Cap Policy Wage Index Budget Neutralitv Factor FY 2025 RCH Demonstration Budget Neutralitv Factor FY 2025 Operating Outlier Factor Hospital Did NOT Submit Quality Data and is a Meaningful EHR User If Wage Index is Greater Than 1.0000: Labor (67.6%): $4,782.01 Nonlabor (32.4%): $2,291.97 If Wage Index is less Than or Equal to 1.0000: Labor (62%): $4,385.87 Nonlabor (38%): $2,688.11 Hospital Submitted Quality Data and is a Meaningful EHR User If Wage Index is Greater Than 1.0000: Labor (67.6%): $ 4,782.01 Nonlabor (32.4%): $ 2,291.97 If Wage Index is less Than or Equal to 1.0000: Labor (62%): $4,385.87 Nonlabor (38%): $2,688.11 80114 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND ADJUSTMENTS: FY 2024 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND THE FY 2025 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE FY2024 1.0380 0.9885 0.9964 0.9598 $503.83 Update Factor1 GAF/DRG Adiustment Factor1 Quartile/Cap Adjustment Factor2 Outlier Adjustment Factor3 Capital Federal Rate FY2025 1.0310 0.9854 0.9958 0.9577 $510.39 Chan2e 1.0310 0.9854 0.9993 0.9978 1.0130 Percent Chan2e 3.10 -1.46 -0.07 -0.22 1.304 1 The update factor and the GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factors are built permanently into the capital Federal rate. Thus, for example, the incremental change from FY 2024 to FY 2025 resulting from the application of the 0.9854 GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factor for FY 2025 is a net change of 0.9854 (or -1.46 percent). 2 The lowest quartile/cap budget neutrality adjustment factor is not built permanently into the capital Federal rate; that is, the factor is not applied cumulatively in determining the capital Federal rate. Thus, for example, the net change resulting from the application of the FY 2025 lowest quartile/cap budget neutrality adjustment factor is 0.9958/0.9964 or 0.9993 (or -0.07 percent). 3 The outlier reduction factor is not built permanently into the capital Federal rate; that is, the factor is not applied cumulatively in determining the capital Federal rate. Thus, for example, the net change resulting from the application of the FY 2025 outlier adjustment factor is 0.9577/0.9598 or 0.9978 (or -0.22 percent). 4 Percent change may not sum due to rounding. b. Lower three-fourths of the page, first column, second paragraph, last line, the figure ‘‘$46,152’’ is corrected to read ‘‘$46,147’’. 53. On page 69987, first column, first full paragraph, a. Line 13, the figure ‘‘$46,152’’ is corrected to read ‘‘$46,147’’. b. Last line, the figure ‘‘$46,152’’ is corrected to read ‘‘$46,147’’. 54. On page 69990: a. The table titled ‘‘TABLE 1A— NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/ NONLABOR (67.6 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/32.4 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS GREATER THAN 11)—FY 2025’’ is corrected to read as follows: TABLE lA.- NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (67.6 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/32.4 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS GREATER THAN 1)--FY 2025 Hospital Submitted Quality Data and is a Meaningful EHR User (Update= 2.9 Percent) Nonlabor Labor I $4,465.41 I $2,140.23 Hospital Submitted Quality Data and is NOT a Meaningful EHR User (Update= 0.35 Percent) Labor Nonlabor I $4,354.75 b. The table titled ‘‘TABLE 1B.— NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/ I $2,087.19 Hospital Did NOT Submit Quality Data and is a Meaningful EHR User (Update= 2.05 Percent) Labor Nonlabor Hospital Did NOT Submit Quality Data and is NOT a Meaningful EHR User (Update= -0.5 Percent) Labor Nonlabor I $4,42s.s2 I $2,122.55 I NONLABOR (62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS LESS $4,317.86 $2,069.51 I THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)—FY 2025’’ is corrected to read as follows: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 I $4,o9s.so I $2,510.14 c. The table titled ‘‘TABLE 1C.— ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS FOR HOSPITALS IN PUERTO RICO, VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 Hospital Submitted Quality Data and is NOT a Meaningful EHR User (Update= 0.35 Percent) Labor Nonlabor I $3,994.oo I $2,447.94 Hospital Did NOT Submit Quality Data and is a Meaningful EHR User (Update= 2.05 Percent) Labor Nonlabor I $4,061.66 I LABOR/NONLABOR (NATIONAL: 62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE BECAUSE WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4700 Hospital Did NOT Submit Quality Data and is NOT a Meaningful EHR User (Update= -0.5 Percent) Labor Nonlabor Sfmt 4700 I $2,489.41 $3,960.11 I $2,421.20 1)—FY 2025’’ is corrected to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.009</GPH> Hospital Submitted Quality Data and is a Meaningful EHR User (Update= 2.9 Percent) Nonlabor Labor ER02OC24.010</GPH> ER02OC24.011</GPH> TABLE lB.- NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)-FY 2025 80115 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations TABLE lC.-ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS FOR HOSPITALS IN PUERTO RICO, LABOR/NONLABOR (NATIONAL: 62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE BECAUSE WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)-FY 2025 National1 1 For Hospital is a Meaningful EHR User Hospital is NOT a Meaningful EHR and Wage Index Less Than or Equal User and Wage Index Less Than or Rates if Wage Index Greater Than 1 to 1 (Update= 2.9 Percent) Equal to 1 (Update= 0.35 Percent) Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor I Nonlabor I I $4,095.50 $2,510.14 $3,994.00 Not Applicable I Not Applicable I $2,447.94 I FY 2025, there are no CBSAs in Puerto Rico with a national wage index greater than 1. d. The table titled ‘‘TABLE 1D.— CAPITAL STANDARD FEDERAL PAYMENT RATE—FY 2025’’ is corrected to read as follows: TABLE 1D.— CAPITAL STANDARD FEDERAL PAYMENT RATE—FY 2025 Rate National ................................................................................................................................................................................................ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 b. Second full paragraph, line 5, the figure ‘‘690’’ is corrected to read ‘‘691’’. c. Third full paragraph, line 11, the figure ‘‘1,368’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1,369’’. 57. On page 69997: a. First column, first paragraph, line 4, the figure ‘‘1,832’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1,833’’. PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 b. Second column, first paragraph, line 7, the figure ‘‘244’’ is corrected to read ‘‘245’’. 4. On pages 69998 through 70000, the table titled ‘‘Table I.—Impact Analysis of Changes to the IPPS for Operating Costs for FY 2025’’ is corrected to read as follows: BILLING CODE 4120–01–P E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.012</GPH> lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 D. Correction of Errors in the Appendices 55. On page 69994, third column, first full paragraph, line 1, the figure ‘‘3,082’’ is corrected to read ‘‘3,083’’. 56. On page 69996, third column: a. First full paragraph, line 7, the figure ‘‘3,082’’ is corrected to read ‘‘3,083’’, $510.39 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 All Hosoitals Bv Geo!!raohic Location: Urban hospitals Rural hospitals Bed Size (Urban): 0-99 beds 100-199 beds 200-299 beds 300-499 beds 500 or more beds Bed Size (Rural): 0-49 beds 50-99 beds 100-149 beds 150-199 beds 200 or more beds Urban by Re!!ion: New England Middle Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Rural by Re!!ion: NewEugland Middle Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Puerto Rico Puerto Rico HosPitals Bv Pavment Classification: Urban hosPitals Rural areas 2.9 FY2025 Weights and DRGChanges with Application of Recalibration Bndget Neutrality (2)3 0.0 2,392 691 2.9 2.9 645 682 421 394 248 00 0.0 RnraIFioor with Application of National RnraIFioor Budget Neutrality (5)• 00 0.0 -0.2 00 0.6 -0.2 2.4 0.1 -0.7 0.4 0.1 -0.1 -0.7 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.1 -2.0 -0.8 -0.2 0.3 0.0 1.3 1.1 0.6 0.2 -0.8 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 -1.6 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 2.6 2.8 2.7 3.2 341 183 91 44 32 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 -0.3 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 -0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.7 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.9 0.2 0.3 00 00 0.1 -1.4 -1.6 -0.2 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.4 2.8 3.5 3.8 106 280 367 156 396 142 358 179 356 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.1 -1.6 -1.6 0.4 0.1 1.5 2.3 1.2 I.I -1.7 7.0 -0.1 -0.5 -1.7 -0.7 -1.8 -1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.2 -0.9 -0.1 -0.9 -0.9 0.1 2.3 0.6 0.8 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.3 0.0 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.0 4.2 1.1 4.6 2.7 4.4 4.7 3.7 2.4 0.1 21 52 110 78 112 132 120 42 24 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.9 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.4 -0.3 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.2 0.1 2.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.5 0.5 0.3 00 2.7 6.1 3.6 0.3 1.3 2.0 2.5 -0.2 2.6 -0.9 -I.I -0.7 -0.3 -0.7 -0.9 -0.8 -0.2 -0.5 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 00 0.4 00 -1.4 -0.2 -1.7 -0.3 -0.9 -0.5 -0.4 0.0 0.0 2.2 4.4 2.1 2.0 1.6 3.6 3.1 2.5 1.5 52 2.9 -0.3 -2.1 -3.4 -0.7 0.8 0.0 2.3 1,714 1,369 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.4 1.9 1.6 -1.2 0.6 0.1 0.0 -0.2 2.4 3.1 Nnmber of Hosoitals 1 3,083 Hospital Rate Update m' FY2025 Wage Data with Application ofWage Budget Neutrality FY2025 MGCRB Reclassifications (3)4 (4)' Application of Impnted Floor, the Frontier Wage Index, and Outmigration Adjustment MDH Expiration AIIFY 2025 Changes (6)7 (7)" (8)' 0.3 -0.1 2.8 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 ER02OC24.013</GPH> 80116 VerDate Sep<11>2014 TABLE 1.-IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO THE IPPS FOR OPERATING COSTS FOR FY 2025 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 FY2025 MGCRB Reclassifications (3)4 (4)' RnralFloor with Application ofNatioual Rural Floor Budget Neutrality (5)6 Application of Imputed Floor, the Frontier Wage Index, and Outmigration Adjustment MOH Expiration (6)7 (7)" AIIFY 2025 Changes (8)9 1,833 958 292 2.9 2.9 2.8 -0.1 -0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 -0.3 -0.6 0.0 0.4 1.3 0.0 -0.9 0.3 0.4 0.4 -0.4 -0.1 0.0 2.3 2.9 3.0 331 1,015 368 2.9 2.9 2.9 -0.3 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 -2.3 -2.5 -2.5 0.6 1.7 1.9 0.6 0.6 0.4 -0.2 0.0 -0.4 2.6 2.4 2.4 83 243 791 39 213 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 -0.1 -0.2 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.2 0.1 -0.1 0.6 0.7 3.5 0.4 2.0 -0.9 3.7 -1.3 -0.1 -1.2 -1.3 -1.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 -1.7 0.0 -0.1 -0.5 -5.1 2.0 2.9 3.2 4.0 -1.8 581 52 802 279 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 0.0 -0.2 0.0 -0.3 00 -0.3 0.0 0.2 -2.5 -2.2 -2.5 -2.3 1.1 0.0 2.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.4 0.0 -0.3 0.0 -0.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.9 155 579 245 34 119 46 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.1 -0.4 0.0 -0.3 -0.4 1.2 -0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.8 2.2 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.3 -1.3 -0.2 -0.1 -0.4 -0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 -0.7 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.3 2.6 3.1 2.8 2.7 1,907 755 420 2.9 2.9 2.8 0.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.7 -0.3 0.2 -0.4 -0.7 -0.1 1.2 -0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.1 2.7 3.2 2.6 1,362 1,616 65 16 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.5 0.1 -0.1 -0.4 -2.5 0.2 -0.1 -1.5 0.5 -0.5 0.4 -1.6 0.1 -0.1 0.1 3.0 -0.3 0.2 0.5 0.6 2.2 0.0 -0.3 -0.2 -1.0 2.9 2.7 1.1 0.0 1,911 1,044 99 29 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.5 -0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 -0.2 -1.0 -0.3 0.1 0.0 -1.4 -1.9 -0.1 0.0 2.2 2.7 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 -0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 2.8 1.1 0.8 1,061 2,022 902 1,501 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 -0.1 0.0 2.2 -2.6 1.9 -3.2 -1.0 1.2 -1.0 1.6 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.7 -0.2 -0.1 -0.2 0.0 3.1 2.5 3.1 2.4 80117 Teachin!! Status: Nonteaching Fewer than 100 residents 100 or more residents UrbanDSH: Non-DSH 100 or more beds Less than 100 beds RuraIDSH: Non-DSH SCH RRC 100 or more beds Less than 100 beds Urban teachin!! and DSH: Both teachin!! and DSH Teachin!! and no DSH No teaching and DSH No teaching and no DSH Snecial Hosnital Tvnes: RRC RRC with Section 401 Reclassification SCH SCH with Section 401 Reclassification SCHandRRC SCH and RRC with Section 401 Reclassification Tvpe of Ownership: Voluntarv Proprietarv Government Medicare Utilization as a Percent oflnpatient Davs: 0-25 25-50 50-65 Over 65 Medicaid Utilization as a Percent oflnpatient Davs: 0-25 25-50 50-65 Over 65 FY 2025 Reclassifications: All Reclassified Hospitals Non-Reclassified Hospitals Urban Hospitals Reclassified Urban Non-reclassified Hospitals Hospital Rate Update (1)' FY2025 Wage Data with Application ofWage Budget Neutrality Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 ER02OC24.014</GPH> Number of Hospitals' FY2025 Weights and DRG Changes with Application of Recalibration Budget Neutrality (2)3 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 80118 Jkt 262001 Frm 00064 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 02OCR1 ‘‘1.000114’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.999981’’. E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 58. On page 70000, second column, second full paragraph, line 26, the figure PO 00000 Hospital Rate Update fl)' 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.9 FY2025 Wage Data with Application ofWage Budget Neutrality FY2025 MGCRB Reclassifications (3)4 (4)' 0.7 0.4 -01 0.7 2.7 1.8 1.9 6.7 Rural Floor with Application of National Rural Floor Budget Neutrality (5)6 -0.8 -0.7 -1.2 -1.3 Application of Imputed Floor, the Frontier Wage Index, and Outmigration Adjustment (6)7 00 0.4 0.1 0.0 MOH Expiration m• AIIFY 2025 Changes (8)9 -0.4 -1.0 -0.2 -1.8 2.9 2.1 3.2 1.9 1 Because data necessary to classify some hospitals by category were missing, the total number of hospitals in each category may not equal the national total. Discharge data are from FY 2023, and hospital cost report data are from the latest available reporting periods. 2 This column displays the payment impact of the hospital rate update, including the 2.9 percent update to the national standardized amount and the hospital-specific rate (the 3.4 percent market basket rate-of-increase reduced by 0.5 percentage point for the productivity adjustment). 3 This column displays the payment impact of the changes to the Version 42 GROUPER, the changes to the relative weights and the recalibration of the MS-DRG weights based on FY 2023 MedPAR data, and the permanent IO-percent cap where the relative weight for a MS-DRG would decrease by more than ten percent in a given fiscal year. This column displays the application of the recalibration budget neutrality factors of0.99719 and 0.999874. 4 This column displays the payment impact of the update to wage index data using FY 2021 cost report data. This column displays the payment impact of the application of the wage budget neutrality factor. The wage budget neutrality factor is 0.999981. 5 Shown here are the effects of geographic reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB). The effects demonstrate the FY 2025 payment impact of going from no reclassifications to the reclassifications scheduled to be in effect for FY 2025. Reclassification for prior years has no bearing on the payment impacts shown here. This column reflects the geographic budget neutrality factor of 0.962786. 6 This column displays the effects of the rural floor. The Affordable Care Act requires the rural floor budget neutrality adjustment to be a 100 percent national level adjustment. The rural floor budget neutrality factor applied to the wage index 0.977500. 7 This column shows the combined impact of(!) the imputed floor for all-urban states; (2) the policy that requires hospitals located in frontier States have a wage index no less than 1.0; and (3) the policy which provides for an increase in a hospital's wage index if a threshold percentage ofresidents of the county where the hospital is located commute to work at hospitals in counties with higher wage indexes. These are not budget neutral policies. 8 This column displays the impact of the expiration of the MOH status on January I, 2025, a non-budget neutral payment provision. 9 This column shows the estimated change in payments from FY 2024 to FY 2025. Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 BILLING CODE 4120–01–C VerDate Sep<11>2014 ER02OC24.015</GPH> Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year Rural Non-reclassified Hospitals Full Year All Section 401 Reclassified Hospitals: Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 1886(d)(8)(B)) Number of Hospitals' 281 399 729 51 FY2025 Weights and DRG Changes with Application of Recalibration Budget Neutrality (2)3 -0.2 -0.2 0.1 -0.1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations Wage Index Values’’ is corrected to read as follows: FY 2025 Percentage Change in Area Wage Index Values Increase 10 percent or more Increase greater than or equal to 5 percent and less than 10 percent Increase or decrease less than 5 percent Decrease greater than or equal to 5 percent and less than 10 percent Decrease 10 percent or more Unchanged lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 b. Lower three-fourths of the page, second column: i. Second full paragraph, line 6, the figure ‘‘0.977499’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.977500’’. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 ii. Fourth full paragraph, line 5, the figure ‘‘0.977499’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.977500’’. 60. On pages 70003 and 70004, the table titled ‘‘Table II.—Impact Analysis PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Number of Hospitals Urban Rural 71 0 71 298 1,805 611 177 2 6 0 14 0 of Changes for FY 2025 Acute Care Hospital Operating Prospective Payment System (Payments Per Discharge)’’ is corrected to read as follows: BILLING CODE 4120–01–P E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.016</GPH> 59. On page 70001: a. Top of the page, the table titled, ‘‘FY 2025 Percentage Change in Area 80119 80120 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 11.--IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES FOR FY 2025 ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL OPERATING PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (PAYMENTS PER DISCHARGE) Estimated Average FY 2025 Payment Per Discharge 3,083 Estimated Average FY 2024 Payment Per Discharge (2) 16,290 16,744 2.8 2,392 691 16,685 12,024 17,153 12,331 2.8 2.6 645 682 421 394 248 12,090 13,147 14,849 16,536 20,839 12,221 13,484 15,262 16,979 21,506 1.1 2.6 2.8 2.7 3.2 341 183 91 44 32 10,087 11,670 11,491 12,948 14,692 10,250 11,837 11,810 13,403 15,249 1.6 1.4 2.8 3.5 3.8 106 280 367 156 396 142 358 179 356 18,193 19,817 15,604 15,718 14,272 13,553 14,328 16,502 21,702 18,949 20,033 16,327 16,139 14,896 14,185 14,852 16,897 21,721 4.2 1.1 4.6 2.7 4.4 4.7 3.7 2.4 0.1 21 52 110 78 112 132 120 42 24 16,899 13,444 11,680 12,316 11,130 10,397 9,970 14,353 16,967 17,278 14,037 11,930 12,557 11,306 10,768 10,283 14,707 17,222 2.2 4.4 2.1 2.0 1.6 3.6 3.1 2.5 1.5 52 9,519 9,738 2.3 1,714 1,369 14,861 17,632 15,218 18,177 2.4 3.1 1,833 958 292 12,463 14,737 23,992 12,755 15,158 24,718 2.3 2.9 3.0 331 1,015 368 12,800 15,461 10,944 13,131 15,829 11,204 2.6 2.4 2.4 83 243 791 39 213 15,996 13,192 18,261 17,229 9,643 16,309 13,572 18,843 17,915 9,467 2.0 2.9 3.2 4.0 -1.8 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 (1) All Hosnitals Bv Geo!!ranhic Location: Urban hospitals Rural hospitals Bed Size (Urban): 0-99 beds 100-199 beds 200-299 beds 300-499 beds 500 or more beds Bed Size (Rural): 0-49 beds 50-99 beds 100-149 beds 150-199 beds 200 or more beds Urban bv Re!!ion: NewEn!!land Middle Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Rural by Re!!ion: NewEn!!land Middle Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Hospitals By Payment Classification: Urban hospitals Rural areas Teachin!! Status: Nonteachin!! Fewer than 100 residents 100 or more residents UrbanDSH: Non-DSH 100 or more beds Less than 100 beds RuralDSH: Non-DSH SCH RRC 100 or more beds Less than 100 beds Urban teachin!! and DSH: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM (3) 02OCR1 FY2025 Changes (4) ER02OC24.017</GPH> Number of Hospitals 80121 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations Estimated Average FY 2025 Payment Per Discharge 581 52 802 279 Estimated Average FY 2024 PaymeutPer Discharge (2) 16,912 13,954 12,670 12,193 17,316 14,250 12,969 12,541 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.9 155 579 245 34 119 46 12,709 18,953 12,363 15,214 13,855 17,305 13,095 19,572 12,688 15,679 14,244 17,766 3.0 3.3 2.6 3.1 2.8 2.7 1,907 755 420 16,311 14,281 18,780 16,758 14,745 19,262 2.7 3.2 2.6 1,362 1,616 65 16 18,026 15,011 14,650 9,827 18,555 15,416 14,818 9,829 2.9 2.7 1.1 0.0 1,911 1,044 99 29 14,606 18,591 22,639 19,007 15,021 19,115 22,886 19,155 2.8 2.8 1.1 0.8 1,061 2,022 902 1,501 281 399 729 51 17,497 15,057 18,121 14,960 12,254 11,692 18,638 11,119 18,032 15,428 18,677 15,321 12,610 11,936 19,225 11,330 3.1 2.5 3.1 2.4 2.9 2.1 3.2 1.9 (1) Both teaching and DSH Teaching and no DSH No teaching and DSH No teaching and no DSH Special Hospital Types: RRC RRC with Section 401 Reclassification SCH SCH with Section 401 Reclassification SCHandRRC SCH and RRC with Section 401 Reclassification Type of Ownership: Voluntarv Proprietary Government Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient Days: 0-25 25-50 50-65 Over 65 Medicaid Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient Days: 0-25 25-50 50-65 Over 65 FY 2025 Reclassifications: All Reclassified Hospitals Non-Reclassified Hospitals Urban Hosoitals Reclassified Urban Non-reclassified Hospitals Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year Rural Non-reclassified Hospitals Full Year All Section 401 Reclassified Hospitals: Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 1886(d)(8)(B)) lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 61. On page 70006, third column, last paragraph: a. Line 9, the figure ‘‘$13,660.95’’ is corrected to read ‘‘$13,661.19’’. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 b. Line 12, the figure ‘‘$21,150.86’’ is corrected to read ‘‘$21,184.97’’. 62. On pages 70007 and 70008, the table titled ‘‘Table III—Provider Deciles PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (3) FY2025 Changes (4) by Beneficiary Characteristics’’ is corrected to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.018</GPH> Number of Hospitals lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 All Hospitals Jkt 262001 PO 00000 % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are American Indian or Alaska Native Frm 00068 % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are Asian or Pacific Islander I I I I 16,290.29 16,744.23 I 2.8% Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >l0to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 0.0%-0.2% 0.2%- 0.3% 0.3%- 1.2% 1.2% - 33.6% 12,874.75 15,353.20 17,962.96 15,978.53 13,234.44 15,850.91 18,376.75 16,462.04 2.8% 3.2% 2.3% 3.0% 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >l0to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 0.0%- 0.1% 0.1%- 0.8% 0.8%- 5.1% 5.1%- 92.0% 10,569.26 13,300.10 16,818.40 22,670.05 10,882.74 13,776.30 17,342.60 22,794.51 3.0% 3.6% 3.1% 0.5% 0.0%- 0.4% 0.4%-4.0% 4.0%- 23.6% 23.6% - 93.8% 13,889.75 14,827.75 17,120.89 19,094.89 14,152.82 15,215.78 17,613.61 19,705.68 1.9% 2.6% 2.9% 3.2% 02OCR1 % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are Black I I 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >lOto 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are Hispanic I 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >lOto 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 0.3%- 1.0% 1.0%-2.7% 2.7%- 21.4% 21.4% - 98.3% 12,561.00 14,277.73 17,847.60 19,215.13 12,961.48 14,798.21 18,284.68 19,420.04 3.2% 3.6% 2.4% 1.1% 0.0%- 1.5% 1.5%-2.1% 2.1%- 3.0% 3.0%- 11.1% 13,909.22 15,717.56 17,022.38 18,040.94 14,228.04 16,142.36 17,497.11 18,715.92 2.3% 2.7% 2.8% 3.7% 0.1%- 47.1% 47.1%- 85.0% 85.0%- 95.1% 95.1%- 98.5% 21,226.18 17,879.04 14,161.90 12,325.67 21,579.03 18,347.20 14,625.38 12,666.11 1.7% 2.6% 3.3% 2.8% I % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are Multiracial I I 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >l0to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are White I I 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >l0to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 ER02OC24.019</GPH> 80122 VerDate Sep<11>2014 TABLE III. PROVIDER DECILES BY BENEFICIARY CHARACTERISTICS lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 13,698.87 14,859.85 17,958.89 21,271.95 14,167.67 15,307.58 18,469.54 21,401.93 3.4% 3.0% 2.8% 0.6% Oto 10 >l0to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 0.0%- 12.2% 2 to 5 6to 9 10 12.2%- 27.1% 27.1%- 52.7% 52.7% - 100.0% 13,656.82 15,001.13 17,870.54 21,194.10 14,117.23 15,458.61 18,366.60 21,337.95 3.0% 2.8% 0.7% 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >l0to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 0.0%- 12.3% 12.3% - 27.2% 27.2% - 52.8% 52.8% - 100.0% 13,661.19 14,995.26 17,882.77 21,184.97 14,118.71 15,453.44 18,377.76 21,330.83 3.3% 3.1% 2.8% 0.7% 0% 0.0%- 1.6% 1.6%- 6.2% 6.2% - 100.0% 12,573.38 12,922.09 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >lOto 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 15,128.47 17,126.11 17,909.79 15,573.32 17,597.79 18,325.48 2.8% 2.9% 2.8% 2.3% 0.0%- 35.6% 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >lOto 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 35.6% - 46.8% 46.8% - 57.6% 57.6% - 100.0% 18,619.72 17,018.72 15,357.00 19,004.17 17,434.70 15,860.55 14,613.77 15,096.50 2.1% 2.4% 3.3% 3.3% % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries I who come from rural areas I 2 to 5 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >lOto 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 0.0%-0.8% 0.8%- 13.9% 13.9% - 93.3% 93.3% - 100.0% 17,284.97 16,781.33 15,794.73 12,086.40 17,491.22 17,262.20 16,307.39 12,364.06 1.2% 2.9% 3.2% 2.3% % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries With ESRD coverage** 2 to 5 Oto 10 >lOto 50 0% 0.0%-3.9% >50to 90 >90 to 100 3.9%-9.2% 9.2%- 28.0% 11,208.65 13,919.19 17,328.46 22,073.13 2.9% 2.7% 6to 9 10 10,894.52 13,554.49 16,842.90 21,531.91 2 to 5 % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are LIS Enrolled During The Month Of Discharge . % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are Dual(All) or LIS Enrolled During The Month Of Discharge % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries With a Z code reported related to SDOH ** % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries With a Behavioral Health Diagnosis I I 3.4% 2.9% 2.5% 80123 0.0%- 10.4% 10.4% - 24.6% 24.6% - 50.4% 50.4% - 100.0% Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 ER02OC24.020</GPH> 6to 9 10 Oto 10 >l0to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries Who Are Dual(All) Enrolled During The Month Of Discharge lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 80124 Jkt 262001 Frm 00070 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 02OCR1 5 new’’ is corrected to read ‘‘estimates E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM and 3, the phrase ‘‘estimates for the 6 technologies for which we are providing PO 00000 % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries who live in an area with ADI >= 85 2 to 5 6 to 9 10 2 to 5 6 to 9 10 0 to 10 >10 to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 25.8% - 38.0% 38.0% - 100.0% 14,293.82 15,816.63 17,228.91 18,115.89 14,661.02 16,239.43 17,728.75 18,722.72 2.6% 2.7% 2.9% 3.3% 0.0%-0.4% 0.4%- 10.3% 10.3%- 46.1% 46.1% - 100.0% 19,438.31 16,763.92 15,118.25 11,538.30 19,670.63 17,151.60 15,722.27 11,987.06 1.2% 2.3% 4.0% 3.9% 0.0%-16.0% 16.0%- 25.8% * Decile group 1 contains the 10% of hospitals with the lowest rate of discharges for that characteristic; decile group 2 to 5 contains the hospitals with less than or equal to the median rate of discharges for that characteristic, excluding those in decile group 1; decile group 6 to 9 contains the hospitals with greater than the median rate of discharges for that characteristic, excluding those in group 1O; and decile group 10 contains the 10% of hospitals with the highest rate of discharges for that characteristic. ** Greater than IO percent of providers did not report discharges associated with this characteristic. Therefore, we have randomly allocated those providers to decile groups I and 2. Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 63. On page 70011, top of the page, first column, partial paragraph, lines 2 VerDate Sep<11>2014 ER02OC24.021</GPH> % Of Discharges for Beneficiaries with Disability 0 to 10 >10 to 50 >50to 90 >90 to 100 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations for the 5 technologies for which we are providing 4 new’’. 64. On page 70012: a. Second column, second paragraph, line 1, the number ‘‘2399’’ is corrected to ‘‘2400’’, and b. Third column, first paragraph, line 6, the number ‘‘23’’ is corrected to ‘‘22’’. 65. On pages 70013 and 70014, the table titled ‘‘Modeled Uncompensated Care Payments* and Supplemental 80125 Payments for Estimated FY 2025 DSHs by Hospital Type’’ is corrected to read as follows: FY 2024 Final Rule Estimated Uncompensated Care Payments and Supplemental Payments ($ in millions) (2) FY 2025 Final Rule Estimated Uncompensated Care Payments and Supplemental Payments** ($ in millions) 2,400 6,021 1,926 1,002 924 474 Dollar Difference: FY2024FY2025 ($ in millions) (4) Percent Change*** (5) 5,786 -236 -3.91% 5,687 2,573 3,114 335 5,453 2,430 3,023 332 -233 -143 -91 -2 -4.10 -5.54 -2.91 -0.68 377 788 761 230 1,287 4,170 237 1,225 3,991 8 -62 -179 3.40 -4.83 -4.29 362 102 10 183 121 31 179 122 31 -4 1 0 -2.06 1.11 0.56 87 223 309 103 323 130 251 140 316 44 153 653 640 305 1,477 365 1,238 255 525 75 145 618 576 289 1,403 348 1,248 245 508 72 -8 -35 -64 -16 -74 -17 10 -10 -17 -3 -5.41 -5.36 -9.97 -5.29 -5.01 -4.55 0.81 -3.81 -3.16 -4.20 9 32 70 30 87 111 107 21 10 19 41 20 94 66 70 9 9 17 42 21 96 63 70 9 -1 -1 1 1 1 -4 0 0 -9.03 -7.01 2.50 5.07 1.37 -5.47 -0.16 -0.67 Number of Estimated DSHs (1) lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Total By Geographic Location Urban Hospitals Other Urban Areas Large Urban Areas Rural Hospitals Bed Size (Urban) 0 to 99 Beds 100 to 249 Beds 250+ Beds Bed Size <Rural) 0 to 99 Beds 100 to 249 Beds 250+ Beds Urban by Region New England Middle Atlantic South Atlantic East North Central East South Central West North Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Puerto Rico Rural by Region New England Middle Atlantic South Atlantic East North Central East South Central West North Central West South Central Mountain VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 (3) E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.022</GPH> MODELED UNCOMPENSATED CARE PAYMENTS* AND SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENTS FOR ESTIMATED FY 2025 DSHS BY HOSPITAL TYPE 80126 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations MODELED UNCOMPENSATED CARE PAYMENTS* AND SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENTS FOR ESTIMATED FY 2025 DSHS BY HOSPITAL TYPE Number of Estimated DSHs FY 2024 Final Rule Estimated Uncompensated Care Payments and Supplemental Payments ($ in millions) FY 2025 Final Rule Estimated Uncompensated Care Payments and Supplemental Payments** ($ in millions) Dollar Difference: FY2024FY2025 ($ in millions) Percent Change*** (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Pacific By Payment Classification Urban Hospitals Large Urban Areas Other Urban Areas Rural Hospitals Teachin2 Status N onteaching Fewer than 100 residents 100 or more residents Type of Ownership Voluntarv Proprietary Government Medicare Utilization Percent**** 0 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 65 Greater than 65 Medicaid Utilization Percent**** 0 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 65 Greater than 65 7 5 6 0 7.50 1,345 702 643 1,055 3,165 1,878 1,287 2,857 3,046 1,833 1,214 2,739 -118 -45 -74 -117 -3.74 -2.39 -5.72 -4.10 1,306 812 282 1,526 2,133 2,363 1,477 2,028 2,280 -49 -104 -83 -3.18 -4.90 -3.49 1,508 524 367 3,483 855 1,683 3,323 824 1,638 -160 -31 -45 -4.59 -3.62 -2.65 1,219 1,148 26 7 4,273 1,736 11 1 4,134 1,640 10 1 -139 -96 -1 0 -3.25 -5.51 -8.31 -7.09 1,315 950 107 28 2,349 2,937 610 125 2,246 2,810 598 132 -103 -128 -12 7 -4.40 -4.34 -1.96 5.76 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 BILLING CODE 4120–01–C 66. On page 70014, first column, first paragraph, line 1 the language (beginning with the phrase ‘‘The changes in projected FY 2025 UCP and supplemental payments compared to the’’ and ending with the sentence ‘‘Meanwhile, hospitals with less than 25 percent Medicaid utilization and those VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 with Medicaid utilization between 25– 50 percent are projected to receive larger than average decreases of 4.44 percent and 4.31 percent, respectively.’’) is corrected to read as follows: ‘‘The changes in projected FY 2025 UCP and supplemental payments compared to the total of UCP and supplemental payments in FY 2024 are driven by PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 changes in Factor 1 and Factor 2. The Factor 1 has increased from the FY 2024 final rule’s Factor 1 of $10.015 billion to this final rule’s Factor 1 of $10.457 billion. The Factor 2 has decreased from FY 2024 final rule’s Factor 2 of 59.29 percent to this final rule’s Factor 2 of 54.29 percent. In addition, we note that there is a slight increase in the number E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.023</GPH> Source: Dobson I DaVanzo analysis of 2019, 2020, and 2021 Hospital Cost Reports. *Dollar UCP calculated by [0.75 * estimated section 1886(d)(5)(F) payments* Factor 2 * Factor 3]. When summed across all hospitals projected to receive DSH payments, UCP and supplemental payments are estimated to be $6,021 million in FY 2024, and UCP and supplemental payments are estimated to be $5,786 million in FY 2025. ** For IRS/Tribal hospitals and Puerto Rico hospitals, this impact table reflects the supplemental payments. *** Percentage change is determined as the difference between Medicare UCP and supplemental payments modeled for this FY 2025 IPPS/L TCH PPS final rule (column 3) and Medicare UCP and supplemental payments modeled for the FY 2024 IPPS/L TCH PPS final rule correcting document (column 2) divided by Medicare UCP and supplemental payments modeled for the FY 2024 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule correcting document (column 2) times 100 percent. ****Hospitals with missing or unknown Medicare utilization or Medicaid utilization are not shown in the table. Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 of projected DSH-eligible hospitals to 2,400 at the time of the development for this final rule compared to the 2,384 DSHs in the FY 2024 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule (88 FR 58640). Based on the changes, the impact analysis found that, across all projected DSH-eligible hospitals, FY 2025 UCP and supplemental payments are estimated at approximately $5.786 billion, or a decrease of approximately 3.91 percent from FY 2024 UCP and supplemental payments (approximately $6.021 billion). While the changes result in a net decrease in the total amount available to be distributed in UCP and supplemental payments, the projected payment amounts vary by hospital type. This redistribution of payments is caused by changes in Factor 3 and the amount of the supplemental payment for DSH-eligible IHS/Tribal hospitals and Puerto Rico hospitals. As seen in the previous table, a percent change of less than negative 3.91 percent indicates that hospitals within the specified category are projected to experience a larger decrease in payments, on average, compared to the universe of projected FY 2025 DSH-eligible hospitals. Conversely, a percentage change greater than negative 3.91 percent indicates that a hospital type is projected to have a smaller decrease compared to the overall average. The variation in the distribution of overall payments by hospital characteristic is largely dependent on a given hospital’s uncompensated care costs as reported on the Worksheet S–10 and used in the Factor 3 computation and whether the hospital is eligible to receive the supplemental payment. Rural hospitals, in general, are projected to experience a smaller decrease in UCP compared to the decrease their urban counterparts are projected to experience. Overall, rural hospitals are projected to receive a 0.68 percent decrease in payments, while VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 urban hospitals are projected to receive a 4.10 percent decrease in payments, which is slightly larger than the overall hospital average. By bed size, rural hospitals with 0 to 99 beds are projected to receive a smaller than average decrease of 2.06 percent in payments, while those with 100 to 249 beds are projected to receive an increase of 1.11. Additionally, rural hospitals with 250+ beds are projected to receive a 0.56 percent increase in payments. Among urban hospitals, the smallest urban hospitals, those with 0 to 99 beds, are projected to receive a 3.40 percent increase in payments. In contrast, larger urban hospitals with 100–249 beds and urban hospitals with 250+ beds are projected to receive decreases in payments that are larger than the overall hospital average, at 4.83 and 4.29 percent, respectively. By region, rural hospitals are projected to receive a varied range of payment changes. Rural hospitals in the New England, West North Central, and Middle Atlantic regions are projected to receive larger than average decreases in payments. Rural hospitals in all other regions are projected to receive either increases in payments or smaller than average decreases in payments. Urban hospitals in the West South Central, Mountain, and Pacific regions are projected to either receive either increases in payments or smaller than average decreases in payments, while urban hospitals in all other regions are projected to receive larger than average decreases in payments. By payment classification, hospitals in urban payment areas overall are expected to receive a 3.74 percent decrease in UCP and supplemental payments. Hospitals, in large urban payment areas are projected to receive a smaller than average decrease in payments of 2.39 percent. In contrast, hospitals in other urban payment areas and hospitals in rural payment areas are PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 80127 projected to receive a larger than average decrease in payments of 5.72 and 4.10 percent, respectively. Nonteaching hospitals and teaching hospitals with 100+ residents are projected to receive a smaller than average payment decrease of 3.18 percent and 3.49 percent, respectively. Teaching hospitals with fewer than 100 residents are projected to receive larger than average payment decreases of 4.90 percent. Voluntary hospitals are projected to receive larger than average decreases of 4.59 percent, while government-owned hospitals and proprietary hospitals are expected to receive a smaller than average payment decrease of 2.65 percent and 3.62 percent, respectively. Hospitals with less than 25 percent Medicare utilization are projected to receive smaller than average decreases of 3.25 percent. Hospitals with Medicare utilization between 25–50 percent, 50– 65 percent, and greater than 65 percent are projected to receive larger than average decreases of 5.51 percent, 8.31 percent, and 7.09 percent, respectively. Hospitals with 50–65 percent Medicaid utilization are projected to receive a smaller than average decreases in payments of 1.96 percent, while those with greater than 65 percent Medicaid utilization are projected to receive a 5.76 percent increase in payments. Meanwhile, hospitals with less than 25 percent Medicaid utilization and those with Medicaid utilization between 25– 50 percent are projected to receive larger than average decreases of 4.40 percent and 4.34 percent, respectively.’’ 67. On pages 70021 through 70022, in the table titled TABLE I.8.–01 IMPACT ANALYSIS OF BASE OPERATING DRG PAYMENT AMOUNTS RESULTING FROM THE FY 2025 HOSPITAL VBP PROGRAM, the table is corrected to read as follows: BILLING CODE 4120–01–P E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 80128 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations VerDate Sep<11>2014 Urban Hospitals 0-99 beds 100-199 beds 200-299 beds 300-499 beds 500 or more beds 1,950 334 603 395 379 239 0.059% 0.584% 0.157% -0.136% -0.177% -0.227% Rural Hospitals 0-49 beds 50-99 beds 100-149 beds 150-199 beds 200 or more beds 521 194 170 89 40 28 0.422% 0.742% 0.357% 0.264% -0.068% -0.207% [BY REGION: Urban By Region New England Middle Atlantic South Atlantic East North Central East South Central West North Central West South Central Mountain Pacific 1,950 98 245 354 315 109 127 236 149 317 0.059% 0.092% -0.170% 0.093% 0.113% -0.188% 0.267% -0.138% 0.099% 0.261% Rural By Region New England Middle Atlantic South Atlantic East North Central East South Central West North Central 521 21 40 85 99 88 66 0.422% 0.559% 0.257% 0.376% 0.422% 0.168% 0.805% 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.024</GPH> lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 TABLE 1.8.-01: Impact Analysis of Base Operating DRG Payment Amounts Resulting from the FY 2025 Hospital VBP Program Number of Average Net Percentage Hospitals Payment Adjustment [BY GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: All Hospitals 2,471 0.135% Urban Area 1,950 0.059% 0.422% Rural Area 521 Missing Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations BY MCR PERCENT: 0-25 25-50 50-65 Over 65 Missing BY DSH PERCENT: 0-25 25-50 50-65 Over 65 Missing BY TEACHING STATUS: Non-Teaching Teaching lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 68. On page 70030: a. Second column, first full paragraph, line 4, the figure ‘‘0.9856’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.9854’’. b. Second column, second full paragraph, line 6, the figure ‘‘3,082’’ is VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 71 28 23 0.237% 0.721% 0.821% 1,090 1,347 34 0.027% 0.216% 0.384% 870 1,343 154 104 0.359% 0.050% -0.178% -0.177% 1,302 1,169 0.300% -0.049% corrected to read ‘‘3,083’’. c. Third column, first full paragraph: i. Line 9, the figure ‘‘0.3’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.4’’. ii. Line 14, the figure ‘‘2.2’’ is corrected to read ‘‘2.1’’. PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 d. Third column, second full paragraph, line 12, the figure ‘‘2.8’’ is corrected to read ‘‘2.7’’. 69. On pages 70031 through 70032, the table titled ‘‘Table III—Comparison of Total Payments per Case’’ is corrected to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.025</GPH> West South Central Mountain Pacific 80129 80130 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations [FY 2024 PAYMENTS COMPARED TO FY 2025 PAYMENTS] All Hosoitals Bv Geograohic Location: Urban hosoitals Rural hosoitals Bed Size (Urban): 0-99 beds 100-199 beds 200-299 beds 300-499 beds 500 or more beds Bed Size (Rural): 0-49 beds 50-99 beds 100-149 beds 150-199 beds 200 or more beds Urban bv Region: New England Middle Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Rural by Region: New England Middle Atlantic East North Central West North Central South Atlantic East South Central West South Central Mountain Pacific Puerto Rico: Puerto Rico Hosoitals Bv Pavment Classification: Urban hospitals Rural areas Teaching Status: N onteaching Fewer than 100 residents 100 or more residents UrbanDSH: Non-DSH 100 or more beds Less than 100 beds Rural DSH: Non-DSH SCH RRC I 00 or more beds Less than 100 beds Urban teaching and DSH: Both teaching and DSH Teaching and no DSH No teaching and DSH No teaching and no DSH Soecial Hosoital Tvoes: RRC RRC with Section 40 I Rural Reclassification SCH SCH with Section 40 I Rural Reclassification SCHandRRC SCH and RRC with Section 40 I Rural Reclassification Tvoe ofOwnershio: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4700 Number of Hosoitals 3,083 Average FY2024 Pavmeuts/Case 1,155 Average FY2025 Pavmeuts/Case 1,187 Change 2.8 2,392 691 1,189 793 1,221 823 2.7 3.8 645 682 421 394 248 894 984 1,095 1,185 1,419 915 1,010 1,123 1,215 1,459 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.8 341 183 91 44 32 667 760 768 863 965 691 787 795 899 1,004 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.2 4.0 106 280 367 156 396 142 358 179 356 I 261 1,365 1,086 1 122 1,032 983 1,069 I 194 1,564 I 310 1,376 1,140 1 146 1,077 1,032 1,107 1220 1,562 3.9 0.8 5.0 2.1 4.4 5.0 3.6 2.2 -0.1 21 52 110 78 112 132 120 42 24 1,048 894 768 785 736 724 701 867 1,070 1,085 939 814 804 754 760 730 882 1,066 3.5 5.0 6.0 2.4 2.4 5.0 4.1 1.7 -0.4 52 623 636 2.1 1,714 1,369 1,102 1,206 1,127 1,244 2.3 3.2 I 833 958 292 945 1,079 1,565 970 1,110 1,606 2.6 2.9 2.6 331 1,015 368 985 1,140 817 1,010 1,166 836 2.5 2.3 2.3 83 243 791 39 213 1,107 823 1,253 1,173 664 1,146 847 1,292 1,223 692 3.5 2.9 3.1 4.3 4.2 581 52 802 279 1 205 1,031 996 961 1 232 1,053 1,019 987 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.7 155 579 245 34 119 46 923 1,314 766 947 865 1,106 968 1,354 792 972 901 1,134 4.9 3.0 3.4 2.7 4.2 2.5 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.026</GPH> lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 TABLE III.-- COMPARISON OF TOTAL PAYMENTS PER CASE Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Rules and Regulations E. Corrections of Errors in the Regulations Text § 495.24 [Corrected] 70. On page 69914, in the first column, § 495.24(f)(1)(i)(C) is corrected to read: ‘‘(C) In 2025 earn a total score of at least 70 points’’. ■ Elizabeth J. Gramling, Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human Services. Average FY2024 Payments/Case 1,158 1,060 1,265 Average FY2025 Payments/Case 1,189 1,094 1,294 Cban2e 2.7 3.2 2.3 1,362 1,616 65 16 1,243 1,091 1,055 719 1,277 1,122 1,068 725 2.7 2.8 1.2 0.8 1,911 1,044 99 29 1,056 1,289 1,571 1,348 1,087 1,323 1,585 1,353 2.9 2.6 0.9 0.4 1,061 2,022 902 1,501 281 399 729 51 1,210 1,099 1,256 1,108 811 766 1,281 808 1,248 1,125 1,294 1,133 844 791 1,320 842 3.1 2.4 3.0 2.3 4.1 3.3 3.0 4.2 Payment System for Federal Fiscal Year 2025 and Updates to the IRF Quality Reporting Program’’ (referred to hereafter as the ‘‘FY 2025 IRF final rule’’). The effective date of the FY 2025 IRF final rule is October 1, 2024. This correction is effective October 1, 2024. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BILLING CODE 4120–01–C I. Background In FR Doc. 2024–16911 of August 6, 2024, the FY 2025 IRF final rule (89 FR 64276), there were technical and typographical errors that are identified and corrected in this correcting document. These corrections are effective as if they had been included in the FY 2025 IRF final rule. Accordingly, the corrections are effective October 1, 2024. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Parts 412 [CMS–1804–CN] RIN 0938–AV31 II. Summary of Errors Medicare Program; Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System for Federal Fiscal Year 2025 and Updates to the IRF Quality Reporting Program; Correction Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Final rule; correction. AGENCY: This document corrects technical and typographical errors in the final rule that appeared in the August 6, 2024 Federal Register entitled ‘‘Medicare Program; Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Oct 01, 2024 Kia Burwell, (410) 786–7816. [FR Doc. 2024–22501 Filed 9–27–24; 4:15 pm] DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Number of Hospitals 1,907 755 420 Jkt 262001 A. Summary of Errors in the Preamble On page 64304, we made a typographical error in the standard payment amount calculated following the application of the budget neutrality factor for the FY 2025 wage index due to the number being transposed in the original text. A technical error in the calculation of the final FY 2025 IRF PPS wage indexes require us to recalculate the impact analysis provided on pages 64335 and 64336 in Table 17. Discussions of these errors are found in section IV. of this document. PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 B. Summary of Errors and Corrections Posted on the CMS Website for the IRF Wage Index As discussed in the FY 2025 IRF PPS final rule (89 FR 64289 through 64291), in developing the wage index to be applied to IRFs under the IRF PPS, we use the updated, pre-reclassified, prerural floor hospital inpatient PPS (IPPS) wage data, exclusive of the occupational mix adjustment. For FY 2025, the updated, unadjusted, pre-reclassified, pre-rural floor IPPS wage data used under the IRF PPS are for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2020, and before October 1, 2021 (FY 2021 cost report data), as discussed in the final rule entitled ‘‘Medicare and Medicaid Programs and the Children’s Health Insurance Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the LongTerm Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2025 Rates; Quality Programs Requirements; and Other Policy Changes’’ (89 FR 69896) (hereinafter referred to as the FY 2025 IPPS final rule). In calculating the wage index under the FY 2025 IPPS final rule, we made an inadvertent error related to the calculation of the wage index. This error is identified, discussed, and corrected in the document entitled ‘‘Medicare and Medicaid Programs and the Children’s Health Insurance Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2025 Rates; Quality Programs E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 ER02OC24.027</GPH> [FY 2024 PAYMENTS COMPARED TO FY 2025 PAYMENTS] Voluntary Proprietary Government Medicare Utilization as a Percent oflnpatient Davs: 0-25 25-50 50-65 Over65 Medicaid Utilization as a Percent oflnpatient Davs: 0-25 25-50 50-65 Over65 FY 2025 Reclassifications: All Reclassified Hospitals Non-Reclassified Hospitals Urban Hospitals Reclassified Urban Non-Reclassified Hospitals Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year Rural Non-Reclassified Hospitals Full Year All Section 401 Rural Reclassified Hospitals Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 1886(d)(8)(B)) 80131

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 80098-80131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Parts 405, 412, 413, 431, 482, 485, 495, and 512

[CMS-1808-CN2]
RIN 0938-AV34


Medicare and Medicaid Programs and the Children's Health 
Insurance Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for 
Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective 
Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2025 Rates; Quality 
Programs Requirements; and Other Policy Changes; Correction

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of 
Health and Human Services HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects technical and typographical errors in 
the final rule that appeared in the August 28, 2024 Federal Register 
titled ``Medicare and Medicaid Programs and the Children's Health 
Insurance Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for 
Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective 
Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2025 Rates; Quality 
Programs Requirements; and Other Policy Changes'' (referred to 
hereafter as the ``FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule'').

DATES: The corrections in this document are effective October 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Donald Thompson and Michele Hudson, [email protected], (410) 786-
4487, IPPS Payment Rate Issues.
    Lily Yuan, [email protected], New Technology Add-On Payments 
Issues.
    Benjamin Cohen, [email protected], Provider Reimbursement 
Review Board.
    Mady Hue, [email protected], and Andrea Hazeley, 
[email protected], MS-DRG Classifications Issues.
    Jennifer Tate, [email protected], Hospital-Acquired 
Condition Reduction Program--Administration Issues.
    Julia Venanzi, [email protected], Hospital Inpatient 
Quality Reporting Program and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program--
Administration Issues.
    Jennifer Tate, [email protected], PPS-Exempt Cancer 
Hospital Quality Reporting--Administration Issues.
    Ariel Cress, [email protected] or Lorraine Wickiser, 
[email protected], Long-Term Care Hospital Quality 
Reporting Program--Administration Issues.
    Jessica Warren, [email protected] and Elizabeth Holland, 
[email protected], Medicare Promoting Interoperability 
Program.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In FR Doc. 2024-07567 of August 28, 2024 (89 FR 68986), there were 
a number of typographical and technical errors that are identified and 
corrected in this correcting document. The corrections in this 
correcting document are applicable to discharges occurring on or after 
October 1, 2024, as if they had been included in the document that 
appeared in the August 28, 2024 Federal Register.

II. Summary of Errors

A. Summary of Error in the Dates Section

    On page 68986, we are correcting technical errors in our discussion 
of the regulatory provisions that are effective November 1, 2024.

B. Summary of Errors in the Preamble

    On pages 69060 and 69095, in our discussion of the Change to 
Specific Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) 
Classifications, we are correcting several inadvertent typographical 
errors.
    Under our methodologies as finalized in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS 
final rule, we exclude hospitals that have subsequently converted to 
rural emergency hospitals (REHs) from certain data and calculations 
used in the IPPS ratesetting. Specifically, we stated that we exclude 
REHs, including hospitals that subsequently became REHs after the 
period from which the data were taken for purposes of developing the 
MS-DRG relative weights for FY 2025 (89 FR 69109) and from the 
calculation of the standardized amount (89 FR 69942). In addition, we 
stated that any hospital that is designated as a REH by 7 days prior to 
the publication of the preliminary wage index public use file (PUF) is 
excluded from the calculation of the wage index. We inadvertently 
treated a current IPPS hospital as a hospital that had converted to REH 
status, thereby erroneously excluding its data from the MS-DRG relative 
weight calculation and the wage index (CMS Certification Number (CCN) 
260163). Therefore, we restored the applicable data for this hospital 
for these and other ratesetting calculations, as discussed further in 
section II.D. of this correcting document.
    We are correcting an error in the version 42 MS-DRG assignment for 
some cases in the historical claims data in the FY 2023 MedPAR files 
used in the ratesetting for the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, which 
resulted in inadvertent errors in the MS-DRG relative weights. (We note 
this error did not change the associated average length-of-stay (LOS) 
for the impacted DRGs.) Additionally, the version 42 MS-DRG assignment 
and relative weights are used when determining total payments for 
purposes of all of the budget neutrality factors and the final outlier 
threshold. Therefore, the corrections to the MS-DRG assignment under 
the version 42 GROUPER for some cases in the historical claims data in 
the FY 2023 MedPAR files (along with the restoration of the data for 
CCN 260163 as discussed previously) and the conforming recalculation of 
the relative weights directly affected the calculation of total 
payments and required the recalculation of all the budget neutrality 
factors and the final outlier threshold.
    On page 69109, we are correcting the number of Medicare discharges 
from IPPS providers in the FY 2023 MedPAR file used in calculating the 
relative weights for FY 2025 due to the correction of the number of 
hospitals with REH status.
    On page 69113, we are correcting the normalization adjustment 
factor used in calculating the relative weights for FY 2025 due to the 
correction of the number of hospitals with REH status, the error in the 
version 42 MS-DRG assignment for some cases in the historical claims 
data, and the conforming changes to the relative weights.
    On page 69268, we are correcting the total number of hospitals that 
were removed from the FY 2025 IPPS wage index due to conversion to REH 
status and making a corresponding correction to the number of 
hospitals' wage data used to calculate the FY 2025 wage index.

[[Page 80099]]

    On page 69277, we are correcting the occupational mix adjusted 
national average hourly wage due to the inadvertent omission of one 
hospital's wage data (CCN 260163). (We note, there was no change to the 
unadjusted national average hourly wage value rounded to 2-digits.)
    On page 69282 in the discussion of the FY 2025 reclassification 
application requirements and approvals, due to reclassification errors 
described in section II.D. of this correcting document, we are 
correcting the number of hospitals approved for reclassification in FY 
2025, the total number of hospitals in reclassification status, and the 
number of hospitals reclassified back to their geographic urban area.
    On page 69282, in the discussion of the FY 2025 reclassification 
application requirements and approvals, we are correcting a 
typographical error in the date applications for FY 2026 
reclassifications are due to the Medicare Geographic Classification 
Review Board (MGCRB).
    On page 69291, we inadvertently omitted a hospital from the list of 
all hospitals subject to our reclassification assignment and 
reassignment policy for core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) 
reconfigured due to the migration to Connecticut planning regions and 
the CBSA assigned or reassigned for FY 2025 under this policy. We are 
correcting this error by adding a hospital, CCN 220015 to Table Y 
``HOSPITALS SUBJECT TO RECLASSIFICATION ASSIGNMENT POLICY''. The 
assignment of the hospital's MGCRB reclassification is discussed 
further in section II.D. of this correcting document.
    On page 69308, because we restored the wage data for a IPPS 
hospital that we inadvertently treated as a REH and recalculated the 
wage index (as discussed earlier in this section) and made corrections 
to the MGCRB reclassification status of three hospitals (as discussed 
in section II.D. of this correcting document), we recalculated budget 
neutrality factors, including the rural floor budget neutrality factor, 
which is the only budget neutrality factor applied to the FY 2025 wage 
indexes (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document), 
made conforming changes to the out-migration adjustment discussed in 
section II.E. of this correcting document (as discussed with regard to 
Table 4A in section II.E. of this correcting document) and made a 
conforming change to the 25th percentile wage index value across all 
hospitals.
    On pages 69313 and 69315, we are correcting typographical errors in 
the number of hospitals that may participate in the Rural Community 
Hospital Demonstration Program at the start of FY 2025.
    On page 69369, we inadvertently omitted a reference to population 
health professional shortage areas (HPSAs) when summarizing the 
prioritization methodology for the distribution any remaining slots 
after awarding up to 1.00 FTE to each qualifying hospital under section 
4122 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023.
    On page 69400, in our discussion of the Hospital Readmissions 
Reduction Program, we are correcting a typographical error.
    On pages 69455, 69458, 69463, 69476, 69481, 69489, 69529, 69533, 
69534, 69538, 69540, 69544, 69545, 69549, 69572, 69573, and 69575 in 
our discussion of the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program, we 
are correcting several typographical and technical errors.
    On page 69503, in our discussion of the Modifications to the 
Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems 
(HCAHPS) Survey measure, we are correcting a typographical error.
    On page 69512, in our discussion of the Advancing Patient Safety 
and Outcomes Across the Hospital Quality Programs--Request for Comment, 
we are correcting a technical error.
    On pages 69577 and 69578, in our discussion of the PPS-Exempt 
Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program, we are correcting 
typographical errors.
    On pages 69590, in our discussion of the Long-term Care Quality 
Reporting Program (LTCH QRP), we are correcting a typographical error.
    On pages 69605 through 69613, 69621, and 69622 in our discussion of 
the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program, we are correcting 
several typographical and technical errors.
    On page 69880, in our discussion of the Provider Reimbursement 
Review Board, we are correcting an inadvertent grammatical error.
    On pages 69901 and 66902, in our discussion of the information 
collection requirements for the LTCH QRP, we are correcting 
typographical errors.

C. Summary of Errors in the Regulations Text

    On page 69914, in the regulations text for the Medicare Promoting 
Interoperability Program at Sec.  495.24(f)(1)(i)(C), we are correcting 
a technical error.

D. Summary of Errors in the Addendum

    We made inadvertent errors in the Medicare Geographic 
Classification Review Board (MGCRB) reclassification status of 3 
hospitals in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule. Specifically, we are 
correcting the MGCRB reclassification for CCNs 170040 and 220015. The 
correct reclassified CBSA for CCN 170040 is 41440, and the correct 
reclassified CBSA for CCN 220015 is 49340. We are also adding an MGCRB 
reclassification for CCN 520034 to CBSA 43100. The final FY 2025 IPPS 
wage index with reclassification is used when determining total 
payments for purposes of all budget neutrality factors (except for the 
MS-DRG reclassification and recalibration budget neutrality factor 
before the cap, MS-DRG reclassification and recalibration budget 
neutrality factor with the cap and the wage index budget neutrality 
adjustment factor) and the final outlier threshold.
    In addition, as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting 
document, we inadvertently treated a current IPPS hospital as a 
hospital that had converted to REH status, thereby erroneously 
excluding its data from the IPPS ratesetting calculations for FY 2025, 
including the standardized amount calculations. After restoring the 
hospital's data (CCN 260163) and correcting the version 42 MS-DRG 
assignment for some cases in the historical claims data (as also 
discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document, we recalculated 
the MS-DRG relative weights, all wage indexes (and geographic 
adjustment factors (GAFs)), all budget neutrality factors, the fixed-
loss cost threshold, and the national operating standardized amounts 
and capital Federal rate. The MGCRB reclassification changes described 
previously were included in these recalculations as applicable.
    Due to the errors described previously, we made updates to the 
calculation of Factor 3 of the uncompensated care payment methodology 
to reflect the updated information for the IPPS hospital that had 
inadvertently been treated as a hospital that had converted to an REH. 
This hospital is projected to be DSH-eligible for purposes of interim 
uncompensated care payments during FY 2025. We recalculated the total 
uncompensated care amount for all DSH-eligible hospitals to reflect 
these updates. In addition, because the Factor 3 for each hospital 
reflects that hospital's uncompensated care amount relative to the 
uncompensated care amount for all subsection (d) hospitals

[[Page 80100]]

that receive a DSH payment for the fiscal year, we also recalculated 
Factor 3 for all DSH-eligible hospitals. The hospital-specific Factor 3 
determines the total amount of the uncompensated care payment a 
hospital is eligible to receive for a fiscal year. This hospital-
specific payment amount is then used to calculate the amount of the 
interim uncompensated care payments a hospital receives per discharge. 
Given the very narrowly targeted update to the information used in the 
calculation of Factor 3, the change to the previously calculated Factor 
3 for the majority of hospitals is of limited magnitude. We 
incorporated the revised uncompensated care payment amounts for all 
DSH-eligible hospitals into our recalculation of the FY 2025 fixed-loss 
threshold and related budget neutrality figures.
    On page 69960, we made conforming changes to the operating national 
average case-weighted cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) for March 2023 and 
March 2024, the 1-year national operating CCR adjustment factor, the 
capital national average case-weighted CCRs for March 2023 and March 
2024, and the 1-year national capital CCR adjustment factor to reflect 
the inclusion of applicable data for the IPPS hospital that had 
inadvertently been treated as a hospital that converted to an REH.
    Due to the correction of the combination of errors that are 
discussed previously, we made changes to the following:
     On page 69948, the table titled ``Summary of FY 2025 
Budget Neutrality Factors''.
     On page 69955, estimated capital outlier payments and 
estimated total capital Federal payments.
     On page 69961, the outlier fixed-loss cost threshold, 
total operating Federal payments, total operating outlier payments, and 
the outlier adjustment to the capital Federal rate.
     On page 69963, the table titled ``Changes from FY 2024 
Standardized Amounts to the FY 2025 Standardized Amounts''.
    In determining the capital budget neutrality adjustment factor for 
changes in DRG classifications and weights and the GAF, under our 2-
step calculation of the GAF budget neutrality factor, we inadvertently 
assigned one hospital the incorrect FY 2024 GAF without incorporating 
the lowest quartile hospital wage index adjustment and the 5 percent 
cap on wage index decreases. We recalculated the capital outlier 
adjustment factor, the GAF/DRG budget neutrality factor, and the 
Quartile/Cap budget neutrality factor to reflect the correction of one 
hospital's FY 2024 GAF. We note that these recalculations also reflect 
the correction of the error in the REH status, the correction of the 
error in the version 42 MS DRG assignment for some cases in the 
historical claims data, the recalculation of the relative weights, and 
the correction of the MGCRB reclassification status for certain 
hospitals described previously. As we noted in the final rule, the 
capital Federal rate is calculated using unrounded budget neutrality 
and outlier adjustment factors. The unrounded Quartile/Cap budget 
neutrality factor and the unrounded outlier adjustment to the capital 
Federal rate were revised because of these errors. However, after 
rounding these factors to 4 decimal places as displayed in the final 
rule, the rounded factors were unchanged from the final rule.
    On pages 69966 through 69971, in the discussion of the 
determination of the Federal hospital inpatient capital related 
prospective payment rate update, due to the correction of these errors 
as discussed previously, we made conforming corrections to the GAF/DRG 
budget neutrality factor, the capital Federal rate, and related 
figures. As a result of these changes, we also made conforming 
corrections in the table showing the comparison of factors and 
adjustments for the FY 2024 capital Federal rate and FY 2025 capital 
Federal rate.
    On page 69987, we are making conforming changes to the applicable 
HCO threshold for site neutral payment rate cases under the LTCH PPS 
for FY 2025 since it is calculated as the sum of the site neutral 
payment rate for the case and the IPPS fixed-loss amount.
    On page 69990, we are making conforming corrections to the national 
adjusted operating standardized amounts and capital standard Federal 
payment rate (which also include the rates payable to hospitals located 
in Puerto Rico) in Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D as a result of the 
conforming corrections to certain budget neutrality factors, as 
previously described.

E. Summary of Errors in the Appendices

    On pages 69994, 69996 through 70001, 70003 through 70004, 70006 
through 70008, and 70030 through 70032, in the regulatory impact 
analyses, we have made conforming corrections to the factors, values, 
and tables, and the accompanying discussion of the changes to operating 
and capital IPPS payments for FY 2025 as a result of the technical 
errors that lead to changes in our calculation of certain IPPS budget 
neutrality factors, MS-DRG relative weights, wage indexes, and other 
figures as described in sections II.B. and D. of this correcting 
document. These conforming corrections include changes to the 
following:
     On pages 69998 through 70000, the table titled ``Table I--
Impact Analysis of Changes to the IPPS for Operating Costs for FY 
2025''.
     On pages 70003 and 70004, the table titled ``Table II--
Impact Analysis of Changes for FY 2025 Acute Care Hospital Operating 
Prospective Payment System (Payments per Discharge)''.
     On pages 70007 and 70008, the table titled ``Table III--
Provider Deciles by Beneficiary Characteristics''.
     On pages 70031 through 70032, the table titled ``Table 
III--Comparison of Total Payments per Case''.
    On page 70011, in our discussion of the effects of the changes to 
new technology add-on payments, we are correcting inadvertent 
typographical errors made in the numbers of traditional pathway 
technologies and new technology add-on payments provided for those 
technologies in FY 2025.
    On pages 70012 through 70015, we are correcting the discussion of 
the ``Medicare DSH Uncompensated Care Payments and Supplemental Payment 
for Indian Health Service Hospitals and Tribal Hospitals and Hospitals 
Located in Puerto Rico'' for purposes of the Regulatory Impact Analysis 
in Appendix A of the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, including the 
table titled ``Modeled Uncompensated Care Payments* and Supplemental 
Payments for Estimated FY 2025 DSHs by Hospital Type,'' in light of the 
corrections discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document.
    On page 70022, in our discussion of the effects of the changes to 
the Hospital VBP Program, we are correcting technical errors the 
entries for ``By MCR Percent'', ``By DSH Percent'', and By Teaching 
Status'' in Table I.8-01.

F. Summary of Errors in and Corrections to Files and Tables Posted on 
the CMS Website

    We are correcting the errors in the following IPPS tables that are 
listed on page 69989 of the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule and are 
available on the internet on the CMS website at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Feefor-ServicePayment/AcuteInpatientPPS/. 
The tables that are available on the internet have been updated to 
reflect the revisions discussed in this final rule correction.
    Table 2.--Final Case-Mix Index and Wage Index Table by CCN--FY 2025 
Final Rule. As discussed in the previous

[[Page 80101]]

section, we inadvertently treated a current IPPS hospital as a hospital 
that had converted to REH status, thereby erroneously excluding its 
data from the wage index (CCN 260163). Therefore, we restored this 
provider to Table 2, which includes all relevant values for this 
provider for each column in the table. (We note, CCN 260163 has a MGCRB 
reclassification to CBSA 14.)
    Because of the inadvertent errors in the MGCRB reclassification 
status of 3 hospitals (as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting 
document) we are making the following corrections in Table 2: We are 
correcting the values in the columns titled ``Wage Index Payment CBSA'' 
and ``MGCRB Reclass'' for CCNs 170040, 220015 and 520034. As mentioned 
earlier, the correct reclassified CBSA for CCN 170040 is 41440, and the 
correct reclassified CBSA for CCN 220015 is 49340. The ``Y'' value in 
the column titled ``MGCRB Reclass to Home'' for both CCNs has also been 
removed, as the correct MGCRB reclassification CBSA is not the 
hospitals' geographic urban CBSA. We are also adding an MGCRB 
reclassification for CCN 520034 by inserting CBSA 43100 to the columns 
``Wage Index Payment CBSA'' and ``MGCRB Reclass''.
    Due to the inadvertent omission of one hospital's wage data (CCN 
260163), we are correcting the occupational mix adjusted national 
average hourly wage (as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting 
document), and we recalculated all of the budget neutrality adjustments 
(as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document) including 
the recalculation of the rural floor budget neutrality factor, which is 
the only budget neutrality factor applied to the FY 2025 wage indexes. 
As discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document we are making 
corrections to the MGCRB reclassification status of three hospitals. 
Because all these changes affect the calculation of various area wage 
indexes used to determine certain budget neutrality factors and 
hospitals' final wage index value for FY 2025, we are also making 
conforming changes to the other impacted wage indexes, including the 
imputed floor, outmigration adjustment (as discussed later in this 
section) and the 25th percentile wage index value across all hospitals 
(as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document). Therefore, 
based on all these changes described previously, we are correcting the 
values in the columns titled ``FY 2025 Wage Index Prior to Quartile and 
Cap'', ``FY 2025 Wage Index With Quartile'', ``FY 2025 Wage Index With 
Quartile and Cap'', and ``Out-Migration Adjustment''. We also updated 
footnote number 6 to reflect the conforming change to the 25th 
percentile wage index value across all hospitals.
    Table 3.--Final Wage Index Table by CBSA--FY 2025 Final Rule. As 
discussed previously, we inadvertently treated a current IPPS hospital 
as a hospital that had converted to REH status, thereby erroneously 
excluding its data from the wage index (CCN 260163). Therefore, we 
restored CCN 260163 to the wage data and recalculated the FY 2025 wage 
index for CBSA 26 as well as the reclassified wage index for CBSA 14 
(see discussion earlier in this section regarding the MGCRB 
reclassification for CCN 260163). We also revised the values in the 
columns titled ``FY 2025 Average Hourly Wage'' and ``3-Year Average 
Hourly Wage (2023, 2024, 2025)'' for CBSA 26.
    Because of the inadvertent errors in the MGCRB reclassification 
status of CCNs 170040, 220015 and 520034 (as discussed earlier in this 
section), we recalculated the wage index for CBSAs 41440, 49340, 43100, 
and the rural wage index for Wisconsin (CBSA 52).
    Due to the inadvertent omission of one hospital's wage data (CCN 
260163), we are correcting the occupational mix adjusted national 
average hourly wage (as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting 
document), and we recalculated all of the budget neutrality adjustments 
(as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document), including 
the recalculation of the rural floor budget neutrality factor, which is 
the only budget neutrality factor applied to the FY 2025 wage indexes. 
As discussed earlier in this section we made corrections to the MGCRB 
reclassification status of three hospitals. Because these changes 
described earlier (restoring provider 2060163 to the wage data, the 
inadvertent errors in the MGCRB reclassification status of CCNs 170040, 
220015 and 520034, the recalculation of the rural floor budget 
neutrality factor) affect the area pre and post reclassified wage 
indexes, we are also making conforming changes to the other impacted 
wage indexes, including the imputed floor. We also are making 
corresponding changes to the GAFs for any CBSAs with a wage index that 
changed. Based on all these changes described previously, we are 
correcting the values and flags in the columns titled ``Wage Index'', 
``GAF'', ``Reclassified Wage Index'', ``Reclassified GAF'', ``State 
Rural Floor'', ``Eligible for Rural Floor Wage Index'', ``Pre-Frontier 
and/or Pre-Rural Floor Wage Index'', ``Reclassified Wage Index Eligible 
for Frontier Wage Index'', ``Reclassified Wage Index Eligible for Rural 
Floor Wage Index'', and ``Reclassified Wage Index Pre-Frontier and/or 
Pre-Rural Floor''.
    Table 4A.--Final List of Counties Eligible for the Out-Migration 
Adjustment under Section 1886(d)(13) of the Act--FY 2025 Final Rule. 
Due to the inadvertent omission of one hospital's wage data (CCN 
260163), we are correcting the occupational mix adjusted national 
average hourly wage (as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting 
document), and we recalculated all of the budget neutrality adjustments 
(as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document) including 
the recalculation of the rural floor budget neutrality factor, which is 
the only budget neutrality factor applied to the FY 2025 wage indexes. 
As also discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document and 
earlier in this section, we made corrections to the MGCRB 
reclassification status of three hospitals. Because all these changes 
affect various area wage indexes (including the post reclassified wage 
indexes), we are also making conforming changes to the other impacted 
wage indexes, including the imputed floor. As discussed in the FY 2012 
IPPS final rule (76 FR 51601 through 51602), we calculate the out-
migration adjustment using the post-reclassified wage indexes. Because 
the wage indexes are one of the inputs used to determine the out-
migration adjustment, the out-migration adjustments for some counties/
hospitals changed. Therefore, we are making corresponding changes to 
certain out-migration adjustments listed in Table 4A. Specifically, we 
are correcting the values in the column titled ``FY 2025 Out-Migration 
Adjustment''.
    Table 5.--Final List of Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups 
(MS-DRGs), Relative Weighting Factors, and Geometric and Arithmetic 
Mean Length of Stay--FY 2025 Final Rule. We are correcting this table 
to reflect the recalculation of the relative weights, geometric average 
length-of-stay (LOS), and arithmetic mean LOS as a result of the 
correction of the number of hospitals with REH status and the 
correction in the version 42 MS-DRG assignment for some cases in the 
historical claims data (as discussed in section II.B. of this 
correcting document).
    Table 12B.--Final LTCH PPS Wage Index for Rural Areas for 
Discharges Occurring from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025. 
As discussed in the previous section, we inadvertently excluded a 
hospital (CCN 260163) from the IPPS wage data used

[[Page 80102]]

to calculate the FY 2025 LTCH PPS wage index. This resulted in a 
correction to the wage index value for rural Missouri (CBSA 26) in 
Table 12B. (We note, there are no LTCHs located in rural Missouri in 
the data used to develop the FY 2025 LTCH PPS rates in the FY 2025 
IPPS/LTCH PPS final. Therefore, this correction to the LTCH PPS wage 
index value for rural Missouri did not necessitate the recalculation of 
the FY 2025 LTCH PPS rates.)
    Table 18.--Final FY 2025 Medicare DSH Uncompensated Care Payment 
Factor 3. We further note that we also made updates to the calculation 
of Factor 3 of the uncompensated care payment methodology to reflect 
the updated information for the IPPS hospital that had inadvertently 
been treated as a hospital that had converted to an REH. This hospital 
is projected to be DSH-eligible for purposes of the interim 
uncompensated care payments during FY 2025, but its data was 
erroneously excluded from the Factor 3 calculations for FY 2025. We 
recalculated the total uncompensated care amount for all DSH-eligible 
hospitals to reflect this update. In addition, because the Factor 3 
calculated for each hospital reflects that hospital's uncompensated 
care amount relative to the uncompensated care amount for all 
subsection (d) hospitals that receive a DSH payment for the fiscal 
year, we also recalculated Factor 3 for all DSH-eligible hospitals. The 
hospital-specific Factor 3 determines the total amount of the 
uncompensated care payment a hospital is eligible to receive for the 
fiscal year. This hospital-specific payment amount is then used to 
calculate the amount of the interim uncompensated care payments a 
hospital receives per discharge. Given the very narrowly targeted 
update to the information used in the calculation of Factor 3, the 
change to the previously calculated Factor 3 is of limited magnitude 
for the majority of hospitals.
    For the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, we published a list of 
hospitals that we identified to be subsection (d) hospitals and 
subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals projected to be eligible to 
receive interim uncompensated care payments for FY 2025. We are 
updating this list and the calculation of Factor 3 of the uncompensated 
care payment methodology to reflect the updated information for the 
IPPS hospital that was inadvertently treated as a hospital that had 
converted to an REH. We are revising Factor 3 for all hospitals to 
reflect this correction. We are also revising the amount of the total 
uncompensated care payment calculated for each DSH-eligible hospital. 
The total uncompensated care payment that a hospital receives is used 
to calculate the amount of the interim uncompensated care payments the 
hospital receives per discharge.

III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date

    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 
the agency is required to publish a notice of the proposed rulemaking 
in the Federal Register before the provisions of a rule take effect. 
Similarly, section 1871(b)(1) of the Act requires the Secretary to 
provide for notice of the proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register 
and provide a period of not less than 60 days for public comment. In 
addition, section 553(d) of the APA, and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(i) of 
the Act mandate a 30-day delay in effective date after issuance or 
publication of a rule. Sections 553(b)(B) and 553(d)(3) of the APA 
provide for exceptions from the notice and comment and delay in 
effective date APA requirements; in cases in which these exceptions 
apply, sections 1871(b)(2)(C) and 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act provide 
exceptions from the notice and 60-day comment period and delay in 
effective date requirements of the Act as well. Section 553(b)(B) of 
the APA and section 1871(b)(2)(C) of the Act authorize an agency to 
dispense with normal rulemaking requirements for good cause if the 
agency makes a finding that the notice and comment process are 
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. In 
addition, both section 553(d)(3) of the APA and section 
1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act allow the agency to avoid the 30-day delay 
in effective date where such delay is contrary to the public interest 
and an agency includes a statement of support.
    We believe that this final rule correction does not constitute a 
rule that would be subject to the notice and comment or delayed 
effective date requirements. This document corrects technical and 
typographical errors in the preamble, regulations text, addendum, 
tables, and appendices included or referenced in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH 
PPS final rule but does not make substantive changes to the policies or 
payment methodologies that were adopted in the final rule. As a result, 
this final rule correction is intended to ensure that the information 
in the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule accurately reflects the 
policies adopted in that document.
    In addition, even if this were a rule to which the notice and 
comment procedures and delayed effective date requirements applied, we 
find that there is good cause to waive such requirements. Undertaking 
further notice and comment procedures to incorporate the corrections in 
this document into the final rule or delaying the effective date would 
be contrary to the public interest because it is in the public's 
interest for providers to receive appropriate payments in as timely a 
manner as possible, and to ensure that the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final 
rule accurately reflects our policies. Furthermore, such procedures 
would be unnecessary, as we are not altering our payment methodologies 
or policies, but rather, we are simply implementing correctly the 
methodologies and policies that we previously proposed, requested 
comment on, and subsequently finalized. This final rule correction is 
intended solely to ensure that the FY 2025 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule 
accurately reflects these payment methodologies and policies. 
Therefore, we believe we have good cause to waive the notice and 
comment and effective date requirements.

IV. Correction of Errors

    In FR Doc. 2024-07567 of August 28, 2024 (89 FR 68986), we are 
making the following corrections:

A. Correction of Errors in the Dates Section

    1. On page 68986, first column, DATES section, lines 7 and 8, the 
phrase ``The regulations at Sec. Sec.  482.42(e) and 485.640(d)'' is 
corrected to read ``The regulations at Sec. Sec.  482.42(e) and (f) and 
485.640(d) and (e)''.

B. Corrections of Errors in the Preamble

    2. On page 69060, third column, first partial paragraph:
    a. Lines 22 through 26, the phrase ``MS-DRG 447 `Multiple Level 
Anterior and Posterior Spinal Fusion Except Cervical with MCC or 
Custom-Made Anatomically Designed Interbody Fusion Device' '' is 
corrected to read ``MS-DRG 447 `Multiple Level Spinal Fusion Except 
Cervical with MCC or Custom-Made Anatomically Designed Interbody Fusion 
Device' ''.
    b. Lines 26 through 29, the phrase ``MS-DRG 448 `Multiple Level 
Anterior and Posterior Spinal Fusion Except Cervical without MCC' '' is 
corrected to read, ``MS-DRG 448 `Multiple Level Spinal Fusion Except 
Cervical without MCC' ''.
    3. On page 69095, bottom of page, second column, first partial 
paragraph, line 7, the date ``June 5, 2025'' is corrected to read 
``June 5, 2024''.

[[Page 80103]]

    4. On page 69109, first column, last paragraph, line 3, the figure 
``6,916,571'' is corrected to read ``6,916,748''.
    5. On page 69113, third column, first full paragraph, line 17, the 
figure ``1.92336'' is corrected to read as ``1.92331''.
    6. On page 69268, third column, first partial paragraph:
    a. Line 14, the figure ``4'' is corrected to read ``3'',
    b. Line 20, the figure ``19'' is corrected to read ``18'',
    b. Line 25, the figure ``3,074'' is corrected to read ``3,075''.
    7. On page 69277, at the bottom of the page, in the untitled table, 
the figure ``$54.97'' is corrected to read ``$54.96''.
    8. On page 69282:
    a. Second column, third paragraph:
    i. Line 9, the figure ``470'' is corrected to read ``471'',
    ii. Line 29, the figure ``1,078'' is corrected to read ``1,079'', 
and
    iii. Line 32, the figure ``237'' is corrected to read ``235''.
    b. Third column, second full paragraph, line 3, the phrase ``by 
September 1, 2024.'' is corrected to read, ``by September 3, 2024 
(while applications are due not later than 13 months prior to the start 
of the fiscal year for which reclassification is sought, usually by 
September 1, it has been the MGCRB's practice to allow submission up to 
the first business day in September).''
    9. On page 69291, the Table Y ``HOSPITALS SUBJECT TO 
RECLASSIFICATION ASSIGNMENT POLICY'' is corrected by adding the 
following entry after row 8 (CCN 070036) and before row 9 (CCN 220020):

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         CCN                            MGCRB case No.       Approved CBSA      Final rule CBSA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
220015..............................................                 25C0368          49340               49340
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. On page 69308, third column, middle of the page, the untitled 
table is corrected to read as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2025 25th Percentile Wage Index Value................          0.9009
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    11. On page 69313, second column, first partial paragraph, line 13, 
the figure ``23'' is corrected to read ``22''.
    12. On page 69315, third column, first full paragraph, line 1, the 
figure ``23'' is corrected to read ``22''.
    13. On page 69369, second column, fourth full paragraph, line 14, 
the phrase ``mental-health-only geographic'' is corrected to read 
``mental-health-only population and geographic''.
    14. On page 69400, second column, last partial paragraph, line 9, 
the phrase ``beneficiaries, ERRs, and aggregate'' is corrected to read 
``beneficiaries, excess readmission ratios (ERRs), and aggregate''.
    15. On page 69455, third column, third footnote paragraph (footnote 
266), lines 4 and 5, the web address ``https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/
archive/2021-HAI-progress-report.html#2018'' is corrected to read 
``https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/
archive/2021-HAI-progress-report.html''.
    16. On page 69458, second column, second footnote paragraph 
(footnote 297), lines 4 through 6, the web address ``https://
qualitynet.gov/inpatient/iqr/proposedmeasures'' is corrected to 
``https://qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/iqr/proposedmeasures''.
    17. On page 69463, lower half of the page, first column, first 
footnote paragraph (footnote 304), lines 3 through 5, the web address 
``https://qualitynet.gov/inpatient/iqr/proposedmeasures'' is corrected 
to ``https://qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/iqr/proposedmeasures.''
    18. On page 69476, first column, third footnote paragraph (footnote 
341), lines 4 through 8, the web address https://www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associated-infections/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/infection%25C2%25ADcontrol%25C2%25AD.assessment%25C2%25ADtools.html is 
corrected to ``https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/media/pdfs/IPC-
Instructions-508.pdf.''
    19. On page 69481, first and second columns, footnote paragraph 
(footnote 366), last line and lines 1 and 2, the web address ``https://
mmshub.cms.gov/sites/default/files/PSSMTEP-Summary-Report-202306.pdf'' 
is corrected to ``https://mmshub.cms.gov/sites/default/files/PSSM-TEP-
Summary-Report-202306.pdf.''
    20. On page 69489, in the first column; first footnote paragraph 
(footnote 394), lines 3 through 5, the web address ``https://
qualitynet.gov/inpatient/iqr/proposedmeasures'' is corrected to 
``https://qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/iqr/proposedmeasures.''
    21. On page 69503, third column, second full paragraph, lines 15 
through 17, the web address, ``https://hcahpsonline.org/en/mode-
patient-mix-adj/#jan2023publiclyreported'' is corrected to read, 
``https://hcahpsonline.org/en/mode--patient-mix-adj/
#jan2023publiclyreported.''
    22. On page 69512, second column, first footnote paragraph 
(footnote 437), lines 1 through 4, ``Medicare Hospital Quality 
Chartbook. National Rates over Time. Available at: https://www.cmshospitalchartbook.com/visualization/national-rates-over-time. 
Accessed March 12, 2024.'' is corrected to read ``MedPAC. (2019). 
Update: MedPAC's evaluation of Medicare's Hospital Readmission 
Reduction Program. Available at: https://www.medpac.gov/update-medpac-
s-evaluation-of-medicare-s-hospital-readmission-reduction-program/.''
    23. On page 69529, first column, second footnote paragraph 
(footnote 531), lines 2 through 4, the footnote ``CDC. (2024). National 
and State Healthcare-associated Infections Progress Report. Available 
at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associated-infections/php/data/
progress-report.html.'' is corrected to read ``CDC. (2022). Antibiotic 
Resistance & Patient Safety Portal: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract 
Infections. Available at: https://arpsp.cdc.gov/profile/nhsn/cauti.''.
    24. On page 69533, first column, second full paragraph, lines 9 
through 17, the sentences ``In CAUTI and CLABSI SIRs, risk adjustment 
is applied at the individual location level, resulting in a count of 
infection events (SIR numerator) and predicted number of infections 
(SIR denominator). The NHSN then aggregates location-specific results 
for all of a facility's locations prior to calculating the SIR.'' are 
corrected to read ``The NHSN then aggregates location-specific results 
for all of a facility's locations prior to calculating the SIR.''
    25. On page 69534, first column, second full paragraph, lines 18-
21, the

[[Page 80104]]

sentence ``This would also allow more direct comparison with the CAUTI-
Onc and CLABSI-Onc measures used in the PCHQR Program.'' is corrected 
to read ``The oncology-specific measures would also allow more direct 
comparison with the CAUTI and CLABSI measures used in the PCHQR 
Program.''.
    26. On page 69538, first column, last paragraph, lines 6 through 
12, the sentence ``Hospitals must report on the following three eCQMs: 
(1) Hospital Harm--Severe Hypoglycemia eCQM; (2) Hospital Harm--Severe 
Hyperglycemia eCQM; and (3) Hospital Harm--Opioid-Related Adverse 
Events eCQM.'' is corrected to read ``Hospitals must report on the 
following three eCQMs: (1) the Safe Use of Opioids--Concurrent 
Prescribing eCQM; (2) the Cesarean Birth eCQM; and (3) the Severe 
Obstetric Complications eCQM.''.
    27. On page 69540, first column, last paragraph, line 11, the 
reference ``section XXXX'' is corrected to read ``section X.A.''.
    28. On page 69544, third column, last paragraph, lines 6 through 
12, the sentence ``Hospitals must report the following three eCQMs: (1) 
Hospital Harm--Severe Hypoglycemia eCQM; (2) Hospital Harm--Severe 
Hyperglycemia eCQM; and (3) Hospital Harm--Opioid-Related Adverse 
Events eCQM.'' is corrected to read ``Hospitals must report the 
following three eCQMs: (1) the Safe Use of Opioids--Concurrent 
Prescribing eCQM; (2) the Cesarean Birth eCQM; and (3) the Severe 
Obstetric Complications eCQM.''.
    29. On page 69545, third column, first partial paragraph, line 3, 
the reference ``section XXXX'' is corrected to read ``section X.A.''.
    30. On page 69549, first column, fourth full paragraph, lines 5 
through 7, the web address ``https://qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/iqr/
measures'' is corrected to read ``https://qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/
measures.''
    31. On page 69572, third column, last paragraph, line 25, the table 
reference ``Table IX.C.XXXX'' is corrected to read ``Table IX.C.10.''.
    32. On page 69573, top of the page:
    a. First column, first paragraph, line 1, the table reference 
``Table IX.C.XXXX'' is corrected to read ``Table IX.C.10.''
    b. In the table titled, ``TABLE IX.C.X:XXX. NEWLY FINALIZED eCQM 
REPORTING AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CY 2026 REPORTING PERIOD/
FY 2028 PAYMENT DETERMINATION AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS'', line 1, the table 
number ``TABLE IX.C.XXXX'' is corrected to read ``TABLE IX.C.10.''.
    33. On page 69575:
    a. Top third of the page, third column, first full paragraph, line 
3, the reference ``Table IX.C.10.'' is corrected to read ``Table 
IX.C.11.''.
    b. Middle of the page, in the table titled, ``TABLE IX.C.10. 
SUMMARY OF THE CURRENT AND NEWLY MODIFIED VALIDATION SCORING 
POLICIES'', line 1, the table number ``TABLE IX.C.10'' is corrected to 
read ``TABLE IX.C.11.''.
    34. On page 69577, third column, last partial paragraph, the 
parenthetical reference ``(86 FR 36341)'' is corrected to read ``(89 FR 
36341)''.
    35. On page 69578, first column, first partial paragraph, line 2, 
the parenthetical reference ``(86 FR 36341)'' is corrected to read 
``(89 FR 36341)''.
    36. On page 69590, first column, first partial paragraph, line 6, 
the word ``effect'' is corrected to read ``effective''.
    37. On pages 69605 and 69606 remove the undesignated table.
    38. On pages 69606 through 69613 correct ``TABLE IX.F.-01.: SUMMARY 
OF OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR THE MEDICARE PROMOTING INTEROPERABILITY 
PROGRAM FOR THE EHR REPORTING PERIOD IN CY 2025'' to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P

[[Page 80105]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.000


[[Page 80106]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.001


[[Page 80107]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.002


[[Page 80108]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.003


[[Page 80109]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.004


[[Page 80110]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.005


[[Page 80111]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.006

BILLING CODE 4120-01-C
    39. On page 69621, top of the page, lines 1 and 2, the table title 
``TABLE IX.F.-05: PREVIOUSLY FINALIZED ECQMS FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS

[[Page 80112]]

AND CAHS FOR THE CY 2024 THE REPORTING PERIOD'' is corrected to read 
``TABLE IX.F.-05: PREVIOUSLY FINALIZED ECQMS FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS AND 
CAHS FOR THE CY 2024 REPORTING PERIOD''.
    40. On page 69622, third column, last paragraph, line 19, the 
phrase ``CY 206'' is corrected to read ``CY 2026''.
    41. On page 69880, third column, second full paragraph, line 2, the 
phrase, ``supporting our CMS's proposal'' is corrected to read 
``supported CMS's proposal''.
    42. On page 69901, lower half of the page, second column, partial 
paragraph, line 16, the phrase ``section . and IX.E.7.b.'' is corrected 
to read ``section IX.E.7.b.''.
    43. On page 69902, top of the page, in the table title ``TABLE 
XII.B-08: U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR AND STATISTICS' MAY 2021 NATIONAL 
OCCUPATIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND WAGE ESTIMATES, line 1, the date ``MAY 
2021'' is corrected to read ``MAY 2022''.

C. Corrections of Errors in the Addendum

    44. On page 69948, the table titled ``Summary of FY 2025 Budget 
Neutrality Factors'' is corrected to read:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.007

    45. On page 69955, third column, first full paragraph, line 6 
through 11, the phrase ``(estimated capital outlier payments of 
$292,195,135 divided by (estimated capital outlier payments of 
$292,195,135 plus the estimated total capital Federal payment of 
$6,564,012,091))'' is corrected to read: ``(estimated capital outlier 
payments of $292,277,686 divided by (estimated capital outlier payments 
of $292,277,686 plus the estimated total capital Federal payment of 
$6,564,098,157))''.
    46. On page 69960, third column:
    a. First full paragraph:
    i. Line 4, the figure ``0.24849'' is corrected to ``0.248486'',
    ii. Line 6, the figure ``0.252248'' is corrected to ``0.252261'', 
and
    iii. Line 17, the figure ``1.015123'' is corrected to ``1.015192''.
    b. Second full paragraph:
    i. Line 5, the figure ``0.017716'' is corrected to ``0.017718'',
    ii. Line 7, the figure ``0.017666'' is corrected to ``0.017669'', 
and
    iii. Line 18, the figure ``0.997178'' is corrected to ``0.997234''.
    47. On page 69961, second column:
    a. First full paragraph:
    i. Line 22, the figure ``$46,152'' is corrected to ``$46,147'',
    ii. Line 24, the figure ``$4,349,520,041'' is corrected to 
``$4,350,072,899'',
    iii. Line 25, the figure ``$80,269,760,637'' is corrected to 
``$80,279,536,469'',
    iv. Line 40, the figure ``$46,502'' is corrected to ``$46,498'', 
and
    v. Line 51, the figure ``$46,152'' is corrected to ``$46,147''.
    b. the untitled table, the figure ``0.957682'' is corrected to 
``0.957678.
    48. On page 69963, the table titled ``CHANGES FROM FY 2024 
STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2025 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS'' is corrected 
to read as follows:

[[Page 80113]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.008

    49. On page 69966, third column, first full paragraph, line 6, the 
figure ``1.33 percent'' is corrected to read ``1.30 percent''.
    50. On page 69969, second column, second partial paragraph, line 
17, the figure ``0.9887'' is corrected to read ``0.9884''.
    51. On page 69970:
    a. First column, first full paragraph, line 8, the mathematical 
phrase, ``(0.9887) is 0.9856 (0.9969 x 0.9887)'' is corrected to read 
``(0.9884) is 0.9854 (0.9969 x 0.9884)''.
    b. Second column, second full paragraph, line 2, the figure 
``0.9856'' is corrected to read ``0.9854''.
    c. Third column:
    i. First partial paragraph, line 5, the figure ``$510.51'' is 
corrected to read ``$510.39''.
    ii. Second bulleted paragraph, line 12, the figure ``0.9856'' is 
corrected to read ``0.9854''.
    iii. Last paragraph:
    A. Line 13, the figure ``1.44'' is corrected to read ``1.46''.
    B. Line 25, the figure ``1.33'' is corrected to read ``1.30''.
    52. On page 69971:
    a. Top of the page, the table titled ``COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND 
ADJUSTMENTS: FY 2024 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND THE FY 2025 CAPITAL 
FEDERAL RATE'' is corrected to read as follows:

[[Page 80114]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.009

    b. Lower three-fourths of the page, first column, second paragraph, 
last line, the figure ``$46,152'' is corrected to read ``$46,147''.
    53. On page 69987, first column, first full paragraph,
    a. Line 13, the figure ``$46,152'' is corrected to read 
``$46,147''.
    b. Last line, the figure ``$46,152'' is corrected to read 
``$46,147''.
    54. On page 69990:
    a. The table titled ``TABLE 1A--NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING 
STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (67.6 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/32.4 
PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS GREATER THAN 11)--FY 2025'' is 
corrected to read as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.010

    b. The table titled ``TABLE 1B.--NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING 
STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT 
NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)--FY 2025'' is 
corrected to read as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.011

    c. The table titled ``TABLE 1C.-- ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED 
AMOUNTS FOR HOSPITALS IN PUERTO RICO, LABOR/NONLABOR (NATIONAL: 62 
PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE BECAUSE WAGE INDEX IS 
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)--FY 2025'' is corrected to read as follows:

[[Page 80115]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.012

    d. The table titled ``TABLE 1D.-- CAPITAL STANDARD FEDERAL PAYMENT 
RATE--FY 2025'' is corrected to read as follows:

       TABLE 1D.-- CAPITAL STANDARD FEDERAL PAYMENT RATE--FY 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
National...............................................         $510.39
------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Correction of Errors in the Appendices

    55. On page 69994, third column, first full paragraph, line 1, the 
figure ``3,082'' is corrected to read ``3,083''.
    56. On page 69996, third column:
    a. First full paragraph, line 7, the figure ``3,082'' is corrected 
to read ``3,083'',
    b. Second full paragraph, line 5, the figure ``690'' is corrected 
to read ``691''.
    c. Third full paragraph, line 11, the figure ``1,368'' is corrected 
to read ``1,369''.
    57. On page 69997:
    a. First column, first paragraph, line 4, the figure ``1,832'' is 
corrected to read ``1,833''.
    b. Second column, first paragraph, line 7, the figure ``244'' is 
corrected to read ``245''.
    4. On pages 69998 through 70000, the table titled ``Table I.--
Impact Analysis of Changes to the IPPS for Operating Costs for FY 
2025'' is corrected to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P

[[Page 80116]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.013


[[Page 80117]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.014


[[Page 80118]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.015

BILLING CODE 4120-01-C
    58. On page 70000, second column, second full paragraph, line 26, 
the figure ``1.000114'' is corrected to read ``0.999981''.

[[Page 80119]]

    59. On page 70001:
    a. Top of the page, the table titled, ``FY 2025 Percentage Change 
in Area Wage Index Values'' is corrected to read as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.016

    b. Lower three-fourths of the page, second column:
    i. Second full paragraph, line 6, the figure ``0.977499'' is 
corrected to read ``0.977500''.
    ii. Fourth full paragraph, line 5, the figure ``0.977499'' is 
corrected to read ``0.977500''.
    60. On pages 70003 and 70004, the table titled ``Table II.--Impact 
Analysis of Changes for FY 2025 Acute Care Hospital Operating 
Prospective Payment System (Payments Per Discharge)'' is corrected to 
read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P

[[Page 80120]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.017


[[Page 80121]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.018

    61. On page 70006, third column, last paragraph:
    a. Line 9, the figure ``$13,660.95'' is corrected to read 
``$13,661.19''.
    b. Line 12, the figure ``$21,150.86'' is corrected to read 
``$21,184.97''.
    62. On pages 70007 and 70008, the table titled ``Table III--
Provider Deciles by Beneficiary Characteristics'' is corrected to read 
as follows:

[[Page 80122]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.019


[[Page 80123]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.020


[[Page 80124]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.021

    63. On page 70011, top of the page, first column, partial 
paragraph, lines 2 and 3, the phrase ``estimates for the 6 technologies 
for which we are providing 5 new'' is corrected to read ``estimates

[[Page 80125]]

for the 5 technologies for which we are providing 4 new''.
    64. On page 70012:
    a. Second column, second paragraph, line 1, the number ``2399'' is 
corrected to ``2400'', and
    b. Third column, first paragraph, line 6, the number ``23'' is 
corrected to ``22''.
    65. On pages 70013 and 70014, the table titled ``Modeled 
Uncompensated Care Payments* and Supplemental Payments for Estimated FY 
2025 DSHs by Hospital Type'' is corrected to read as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.022


[[Page 80126]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.023

BILLING CODE 4120-01-C
    66. On page 70014, first column, first paragraph, line 1 the 
language (beginning with the phrase ``The changes in projected FY 2025 
UCP and supplemental payments compared to the'' and ending with the 
sentence ``Meanwhile, hospitals with less than 25 percent Medicaid 
utilization and those with Medicaid utilization between 25-50 percent 
are projected to receive larger than average decreases of 4.44 percent 
and 4.31 percent, respectively.'') is corrected to read as follows: 
``The changes in projected FY 2025 UCP and supplemental payments 
compared to the total of UCP and supplemental payments in FY 2024 are 
driven by changes in Factor 1 and Factor 2. The Factor 1 has increased 
from the FY 2024 final rule's Factor 1 of $10.015 billion to this final 
rule's Factor 1 of $10.457 billion. The Factor 2 has decreased from FY 
2024 final rule's Factor 2 of 59.29 percent to this final rule's Factor 
2 of 54.29 percent. In addition, we note that there is a slight 
increase in the number

[[Page 80127]]

of projected DSH-eligible hospitals to 2,400 at the time of the 
development for this final rule compared to the 2,384 DSHs in the FY 
2024 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule (88 FR 58640). Based on the changes, the 
impact analysis found that, across all projected DSH-eligible 
hospitals, FY 2025 UCP and supplemental payments are estimated at 
approximately $5.786 billion, or a decrease of approximately 3.91 
percent from FY 2024 UCP and supplemental payments (approximately 
$6.021 billion). While the changes result in a net decrease in the 
total amount available to be distributed in UCP and supplemental 
payments, the projected payment amounts vary by hospital type. This 
redistribution of payments is caused by changes in Factor 3 and the 
amount of the supplemental payment for DSH-eligible IHS/Tribal 
hospitals and Puerto Rico hospitals. As seen in the previous table, a 
percent change of less than negative 3.91 percent indicates that 
hospitals within the specified category are projected to experience a 
larger decrease in payments, on average, compared to the universe of 
projected FY 2025 DSH-eligible hospitals. Conversely, a percentage 
change greater than negative 3.91 percent indicates that a hospital 
type is projected to have a smaller decrease compared to the overall 
average. The variation in the distribution of overall payments by 
hospital characteristic is largely dependent on a given hospital's 
uncompensated care costs as reported on the Worksheet S-10 and used in 
the Factor 3 computation and whether the hospital is eligible to 
receive the supplemental payment.
    Rural hospitals, in general, are projected to experience a smaller 
decrease in UCP compared to the decrease their urban counterparts are 
projected to experience. Overall, rural hospitals are projected to 
receive a 0.68 percent decrease in payments, while urban hospitals are 
projected to receive a 4.10 percent decrease in payments, which is 
slightly larger than the overall hospital average.
    By bed size, rural hospitals with 0 to 99 beds are projected to 
receive a smaller than average decrease of 2.06 percent in payments, 
while those with 100 to 249 beds are projected to receive an increase 
of 1.11. Additionally, rural hospitals with 250+ beds are projected to 
receive a 0.56 percent increase in payments. Among urban hospitals, the 
smallest urban hospitals, those with 0 to 99 beds, are projected to 
receive a 3.40 percent increase in payments. In contrast, larger urban 
hospitals with 100-249 beds and urban hospitals with 250+ beds are 
projected to receive decreases in payments that are larger than the 
overall hospital average, at 4.83 and 4.29 percent, respectively.
    By region, rural hospitals are projected to receive a varied range 
of payment changes. Rural hospitals in the New England, West North 
Central, and Middle Atlantic regions are projected to receive larger 
than average decreases in payments. Rural hospitals in all other 
regions are projected to receive either increases in payments or 
smaller than average decreases in payments. Urban hospitals in the West 
South Central, Mountain, and Pacific regions are projected to either 
receive either increases in payments or smaller than average decreases 
in payments, while urban hospitals in all other regions are projected 
to receive larger than average decreases in payments.
    By payment classification, hospitals in urban payment areas overall 
are expected to receive a 3.74 percent decrease in UCP and supplemental 
payments. Hospitals, in large urban payment areas are projected to 
receive a smaller than average decrease in payments of 2.39 percent. In 
contrast, hospitals in other urban payment areas and hospitals in rural 
payment areas are projected to receive a larger than average decrease 
in payments of 5.72 and 4.10 percent, respectively.
    Nonteaching hospitals and teaching hospitals with 100+ residents 
are projected to receive a smaller than average payment decrease of 
3.18 percent and 3.49 percent, respectively. Teaching hospitals with 
fewer than 100 residents are projected to receive larger than average 
payment decreases of 4.90 percent. Voluntary hospitals are projected to 
receive larger than average decreases of 4.59 percent, while 
government-owned hospitals and proprietary hospitals are expected to 
receive a smaller than average payment decrease of 2.65 percent and 
3.62 percent, respectively. Hospitals with less than 25 percent 
Medicare utilization are projected to receive smaller than average 
decreases of 3.25 percent. Hospitals with Medicare utilization between 
25-50 percent, 50-65 percent, and greater than 65 percent are projected 
to receive larger than average decreases of 5.51 percent, 8.31 percent, 
and 7.09 percent, respectively. Hospitals with 50-65 percent Medicaid 
utilization are projected to receive a smaller than average decreases 
in payments of 1.96 percent, while those with greater than 65 percent 
Medicaid utilization are projected to receive a 5.76 percent increase 
in payments. Meanwhile, hospitals with less than 25 percent Medicaid 
utilization and those with Medicaid utilization between 25-50 percent 
are projected to receive larger than average decreases of 4.40 percent 
and 4.34 percent, respectively.''
    67. On pages 70021 through 70022, in the table titled TABLE I.8.-01 
IMPACT ANALYSIS OF BASE OPERATING DRG PAYMENT AMOUNTS RESULTING FROM 
THE FY 2025 HOSPITAL VBP PROGRAM, the table is corrected to read as 
follows:
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P

[[Page 80128]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.024


[[Page 80129]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.025

    68. On page 70030:
    a. Second column, first full paragraph, line 4, the figure 
``0.9856'' is corrected to read ``0.9854''.
    b. Second column, second full paragraph, line 6, the figure 
``3,082'' is corrected to read ``3,083''. c. Third column, first full 
paragraph:
    i. Line 9, the figure ``0.3'' is corrected to read ``0.4''.
    ii. Line 14, the figure ``2.2'' is corrected to read ``2.1''.
    d. Third column, second full paragraph, line 12, the figure ``2.8'' 
is corrected to read ``2.7''.
    69. On pages 70031 through 70032, the table titled ``Table III--
Comparison of Total Payments per Case'' is corrected to read as 
follows:

[[Page 80130]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.026


[[Page 80131]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC24.027

E. Corrections of Errors in the Regulations Text


Sec.  495.24   [Corrected]

0
70. On page 69914, in the first column, Sec.  495.24(f)(1)(i)(C) is 
corrected to read: ``(C) In 2025 earn a total score of at least 70 
points''.

Elizabeth J. Gramling,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human 
Services.
[FR Doc. 2024-22501 Filed 9-27-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.