Dakota Prairie Grasslands; North Dakota; Withdrawal of the Notice of Intent for Dakota Prairie Grasslands Land and Resource Plan Amendment and Site-Specific Projects for the Elkhorn Ranchlands, 79227-79228 [2024-22153]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2022–0038]
Notice of Decision To Authorize the
Importation of Fresh Table Beet Root
for Consumption From the United
Kingdom Into the Continental United
States, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the
U.S. Virgin Islands
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public of
our decision to authorize the
importation of fresh table beet root (Beta
vulgaris L.) for consumption from the
United Kingdom into the continental
United States, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands. Based on
findings of a pest risk analysis, which
we made available to the public for
review and comment through a previous
notice, we have determined that the
application of one or more designated
phytosanitary measures will be
sufficient to mitigate the risks of
introducing or disseminating plant pests
or noxious weeds via the importation of
fresh table beet root from the United
Kingdom.
SUMMARY:
Imports may be authorized
beginning September 27, 2024.
DATES:
Ms.
Claudia Ferguson, Senior Regulatory
Policy Specialist, PPQ, APHIS, USDA,
4700 River Road, Unit 133, Riverdale,
MD 20737; (301) 851–2352;
Claudia.Ferguson@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
Under the regulations in ‘‘Subpart L–
Fruits and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–
1 through 319.56–12, referred to below
as the regulations), the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
prohibits or restricts the importation of
fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to
prevent plant pests from being
introduced into or disseminated within
the United States.
Section 319.56–4 contains a
performance-based process for
approving the importation of
commodities that, based on the findings
of a pest risk analysis, can be safely
imported subject to one or more of the
designated phytosanitary measures
listed in paragraph (b) of that section.
Under that process, APHIS proposes to
authorize the importation of a fruit or
vegetable into the United States if, based
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Sep 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
on findings of a pest risk analysis, we
determine that the measures can
mitigate the plant pest risk associated
with the importation of that fruit or
vegetable. APHIS then publishes a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing the availability of the pest
risk analysis that evaluates the risks
associated with the importation of a
particular fruit or vegetable. Following
the close of the 60-day comment period,
APHIS will issue a subsequent Federal
Register notice announcing whether or
not we will authorize the importation of
the fruit or vegetable subject to the
phytosanitary measures specified in the
notice.
In accordance with that process, we
published a notice 1 in the Federal
Register on August 23, 2023 (88 FR
57409–57410, Docket No. APHIS–2022–
0038) in which we announced the
availability, for review and comment, of
a pest risk analysis that evaluated the
risks associated with the importation of
fresh table beet root (Beta vulgaris L.) for
consumption from the United Kingdom
into the continental United States,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin
Islands. The pest risk analysis consisted
of a risk assessment identifying pests of
quarantine significance that could
follow the pathway of the importation of
fresh table beet root into the continental
United States, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands from the United
Kingdom and a risk management
document (RMD) identifying
phytosanitary measures to be applied to
that commodity to mitigate the pest risk.
We solicited comments on the notice
for 60 days, ending on October 23, 2023.
We received no comments by that date.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 319.56–4(c)(3)(iii), we are announcing
our decision to authorize the
importation into the continental United
States, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S.
Virgin Islands of fresh table beet root
(Beta vulgaris L.) for consumption from
the United Kingdom subject to the
phytosanitary measures identified in the
RMD that accompanied the initial
notice.
These conditions will be listed in the
U.S. Department of Agriculture’s,
APHIS Agricultural Commodity Import
Requirements (ACIR) database (https://
acir.aphis.usda.gov/s/).2 In addition to
these specific measures, each shipment
must be subject to the general
requirements listed in § 319.56–3 that
1 To view the notice and the supporting
documents, go to www.regulations.gov. Enter
APHIS–2022–0038 in the Search field.
2 On September 30, 2022, the APHIS Fruits and
Vegetables Import Requirements (FAVIR) database
was replaced by the ACIR database.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79227
are applicable to the importation of all
fruits and vegetables.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the recordkeeping and burden
requirements associated with this action
are included under the Office of
Management and Budget control
number 0579–0049.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this notice, please contact Mr. Joseph
Moxey, APHIS’ Paperwork Reduction
Act Coordinator, at (301) 851–2533.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1633, 7701–7772,
and 7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a;
7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of
September 2024.
Michael Watson,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–22396 Filed 9–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Dakota Prairie Grasslands; North
Dakota; Withdrawal of the Notice of
Intent for Dakota Prairie Grasslands
Land and Resource Plan Amendment
and Site-Specific Projects for the
Elkhorn Ranchlands
Forest Service, Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The Dakota Prairie Grasslands is
withdrawing its notice of intent to
prepare an environmental impact
statement for the Dakota Prairie
Grasslands Land and Resource
Management Plan amendment and sitespecific projects for the Elkhorn
Ranchlands acquired lands. The original
notice of intent was published in the
Federal Register on October 8, 2008,
document number E8–23812. The
Dakota Prairie Grasslands will assign
management area allocations for these
lands with a land management plan
administrative change as described in
the land exchange regulations at 36 CFR
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
79228
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Notices
254.3 and planning regulations at 36
CFR 219.13.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning this notice should
be directed to LeAnn Colburn via U.S.
postal mail at Dakota Prairie Grasslands
Supervisors Office, 2000 Miriam Circle,
Bismarck, ND 58501; via telephone at
701–989–7304; or via email at
leann.colburn@usda.gov.
Individuals who use
telecommunications devices for the
hearing impaired may call 711 to reach
the Telecommunications Relay Service,
24 hours a day, every day of the year,
including holidays.
Keith Lannom,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2024–22153 Filed 9–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Adoption of Categorical Exclusions
Under Section 109 of the National
Environmental Policy Act
Forest Service, Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Notice of adoption of multiple
categorical exclusions from the
Department of the Interior, United
States Geological Survey.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, is adopting
multiple categorical exclusions from the
Department of the Interior, United
States Geological Survey (USGS) listed
at 516 Departmental Manual 9.5 B, G, H,
I, K, and P pursuant to section 109 of
the National Environmental Policy Act
for future application to Forest Service
decisions concerning land management
activities that are similar in nature. This
notice describes the categories and
consultation between the agencies.
DATES: The categorical exclusion
adoptions take effect on September 27,
2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Pahlevanpour, Assistant
Director, Forest Service, Ecosystem
Management Coordination, by phone at
771–216–0229 or via email to
andrea.pahlevanpour@usda.gov.
Individuals who use
telecommunications devices for the
hearing impaired may call 711 to reach
the Telecommunications Relay Service,
24 hours a day, every day of the year,
including holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Sep 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
I. National Environmental Policy Act
and Categorical Exclusions
The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347), as
amended, requires all Federal agencies
to consider the environmental impact of
their proposed actions before deciding
whether and how to proceed (42 U.S.C.
4321, 4332). The aims of NEPA are to
ensure that agencies consider the
potential environmental effects of their
proposed actions in their decisionmaking processes and inform and
involve the public in that process (42
U.S.C. 4332). NEPA created the Council
on Environmental Quality, which
promulgated NEPA implementing
regulations at 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 1500 through
1508 (Council on Environmental
Quality regulations).
To comply with NEPA, agencies
determine the appropriate level of
review for a proposed action. Where
required, these levels of review may be
documented in an environmental
impact statement (EIS), an
environmental assessment (EA), or by
reliance on a categorical exclusion (CE)
(40 CFR 1501.3). If a proposed action is
likely to have significant environmental
effects, the agency will prepare an EIS
and document its decision in a record
of decision (40 CFR 1502, 1505.2). If the
proposed action is not likely to have
significant environmental effects or
where the level of significance is
unknown, the agency will prepare an
EA, which involves a more concise
analysis and process than an EIS (40
CFR 1501.5). Following preparation of
an EA, the agency may reach a finding
of no significant impact if the analysis
shows that the action will have no
significant effects (40 CFR 1501.6). If,
following preparation of an EA, the
agency finds that the proposed action
will have significant effects, it will
prepare an EIS before issuing any
decision to authorize the action (40 CFR
1501.6(a)(3)).
Under NEPA and the Council on
Environmental Quality’s implementing
regulations, a Federal agency can
establish CEs—categories of actions that
the agency has determined normally do
not significantly affect the quality of the
human environment—in its agency
NEPA procedures 42 U.S.C. 4336(e)(1);
40 CFR 1501.4, 1507.3(e)(2)(ii),
1508.1(d). If an agency determines that
a CE covers a proposed action, the
agency then evaluates the proposed
action for any extraordinary
circumstances in which a normally
excluded action may have a significant
effect (40 CFR 1501.4(b)). Responsible
officials in the Forest Service evaluate
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed actions for extraordinary
circumstances in accordance with the
Forest Service’s NEPA implementing
regulations at 36 CFR 220.6. If no
extraordinary circumstances are found
or if further analysis determines that the
extraordinary circumstances do not
involve the potential for significant
environmental impacts, the agency may
rely on the CE to approve the proposed
action without preparing an EA or an
EIS (42 U.S.C. 4336(a)(2); 40 CFR
1501.4). If extraordinary circumstances
exist, the agency may nonetheless
categorically exclude the proposed
action if it determines that there are
means to avoid the impacts or otherwise
modify the action sufficient to avoid
significant effects (40 CFR 1501.4(b)(1)).
Section 109 of NEPA, enacted as part
of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023,
allows a Federal agency to ‘‘adopt a
categorical exclusion listed in another
agency’s NEPA procedures for a
category of proposed agency actions for
which the categorical exclusion was
established’’ (42 U.S.C. 4336c). To adopt
another agency’s categorical exclusion
under section 109, the adopting agency:
(1) identifies the relevant categorical
exclusion listed in another agency’s
(‘‘establishing agency’’) NEPA
procedures ‘‘that covers a category of
proposed actions or related actions’’; (2)
consults with the establishing agency
‘‘to ensure that the proposed adoption of
the categorical exclusion for a category
of actions is appropriate’’; (3) ‘‘identifies
to the public the categorical exclusion
that the [adopting] agency plans to use
for its proposed actions’’; and (4)
‘‘documents adoption of the categorical
exclusion’’ (see 42 U.S.C. 4336c).
The Forest Service’s NEPA
procedures are found at 36 CFR 220.
These procedures address compliance
with NEPA. The Forest Service
maintains a list of categorical exclusions
available at 36 CFR 220.6. Additional
NEPA policy is found in the Forest
Service Handbook 1909.15, chapter 10.
This notice documents the Forest
Service’s adoption of the USGS
categorical exclusions 516 Departmental
Manual 9.5 B, G, H, I, K, and P.
II. Additional Considerations Related to
Forest Service Categorical Exclusions
1. Decision Memo
The Forest Service requires at 36 CFR
220.6(e) that, ‘‘A supporting record is
required and the decision to proceed
must be documented in a decision
memo for the categories of action in
paragraphs (e)(1) through (25) of this
section.’’ For all the categorical
exclusions (CEs) adopted in this notice,
the Forest Service will require a
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79227-79228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22153]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Dakota Prairie Grasslands; North Dakota; Withdrawal of the Notice
of Intent for Dakota Prairie Grasslands Land and Resource Plan
Amendment and Site-Specific Projects for the Elkhorn Ranchlands
AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dakota Prairie Grasslands is withdrawing its notice of intent
to prepare an environmental impact statement for the Dakota Prairie
Grasslands Land and Resource Management Plan amendment and site-
specific projects for the Elkhorn Ranchlands acquired lands. The
original notice of intent was published in the Federal Register on
October 8, 2008, document number E8-23812. The Dakota Prairie
Grasslands will assign management area allocations for these lands with
a land management plan administrative change as described in the land
exchange regulations at 36 CFR
[[Page 79228]]
254.3 and planning regulations at 36 CFR 219.13.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this notice
should be directed to LeAnn Colburn via U.S. postal mail at Dakota
Prairie Grasslands Supervisors Office, 2000 Miriam Circle, Bismarck, ND
58501; via telephone at 701-989-7304; or via email at
[email protected].
Individuals who use telecommunications devices for the hearing
impaired may call 711 to reach the Telecommunications Relay Service, 24
hours a day, every day of the year, including holidays.
Keith Lannom,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2024-22153 Filed 9-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P