Air Plan Approval; FL; Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Amendments, 79147-79150 [2024-22135]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
to the public interest (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)). There is good cause to
waive rulemaking here as unnecessary.
Rulemaking is ‘‘unnecessary’’ in those
situations in which ‘‘the administrative
rule is a routine determination,
insignificant in nature and impact, and
inconsequential to the industry and to
the public.’’ Utility Solid Waste
Activities Group v. EPA, 236 F.3d 749,
755 (D.C. Cir. 2001), quoting U.S.
Department of Justice, Attorney
General’s Manual on the Administrative
Procedure Act 31 (1947) and South
Carolina v. Block, 558 F. Supp. 1004,
1016 (D.S.C. 1983). The regulatory
changes in this document are necessary
to correct technical errors and do not
establish any new substantive rules and
do not make substantive changes to
these regulations. Therefore, the
Department has determined that
publication of a proposed rule is
unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
The APA generally requires that
regulations be published at least 30 days
before their effective date, unless the
agency has good cause to implement its
regulations sooner (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)).
As previously stated, because the
regulatory changes correct errors, there
is good cause to waive the delayed
effective date in the APA and make the
corrections effective September 30,
2024.
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document in an accessible format.
The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF, you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Sep 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
79147
Corrections
In FR Doc. 2024–17239, published in
the Federal Register on August 29, 2024
(89 FR 70300), we make the following
technical corrections:
■ 1. On page 70320, in the second
column, correct instruction 4 for § 75.50
to read as follows:
and adding in its place the words
‘‘Assistance Listings and assigned an
Assistance Listing Number (ALN)’’.
■ c. Removing the text ‘‘CFDA number’’
and adding in its place the abbreviation
‘‘ALN’’.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 75.50
■
[Corrected]
4. Amend § 75.50 by removing the
words ‘‘authorizing statute and
implementing regulations’’ and adding
in their place the words ‘‘applicable
statutes and regulations’’.
■ 2. On page 70324, in the first column,
correct instruction 28 for § 75.210 by
adding paragraph (c)(2)(xxx) to read as
follows:
■
§ 75.210
[Corrected]
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(xxx) The extent to which the
proposed project is supported by
promising evidence.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 75.225
3. On page 70327, in the second
column, in instruction 36 for § 75.225,
redesignate paragraph (e) as paragraph
(d).
[Corrected]
101. Amend § 76.100 by removing the
words ‘‘the authorizing statute and the
implementing regulations’’ and adding
in their place the words ‘‘applicable
statutes and regulations’’.
■
§ 76.564
[Corrected]
6. On page 70338, in the second
column, correct instruction 127 from
‘‘Revise § 76.654 to read as follows:’’ to
‘‘Revise § 76.564 to read as follows:’’.
■ 7. On page 70339, in the second
column, correct instruction 147 for
§ 76.711 by revising instruction b. and
adding instruction c. to read as follows:
■
§ 76.711
[Corrected]
147. Amend § 76.711 by:
*
*
*
*
*
■ b. Removing the phrase ‘‘Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)’’
■
PO 00000
§ 79.4
[Corrected]
170. Amend § 79.4 in paragraph (b)(3)
by removing the word ‘‘official’s’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘officials’ ’’.
■
Roberto Rodriguez,
Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation
and Policy Development.
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Corrected]
4. On page 70331, in the second
column, in instruction 60 for § 75.591,
correct the section heading from
‘‘Federal evaluation; cooperation by a
grantee’’ to ‘‘Federal evaluation—
cooperation by a grantee’’.
■ 5. On page 70335, at the end of the
first column and beginning of the
second column, correct instruction 101
for § 76.100 to read as follows:
■
§ 76.100
[Corrected]
8. On page 70340, in the second
column, correct instruction 154.a. for
§ 76.783 to read as follows:
■ 154. Amend § 76.783 by:
■ a. In paragraph (a)(1), removing the
word ‘‘or’’ at the end of the paragraph;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. On page 70343, in the third column,
correct instruction 170 for § 79.4 to read
as follows:
[FR Doc. 2024–22195 Filed 9–26–24; 8:45 am]
[Corrected]
■
§ 75.591
§ 76.783
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2023–0273; FRL–12121–
02–R4]
Air Plan Approval; FL; Surface Coating
of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products Amendments
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) on
October 12, 2022. EPA is approving
changes allowing the option for
aerospace parts and products coating
operations in Florida to comply with
Federal National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
requirements in lieu of the volatile
organic compound (VOC) standards in
Florida’s Surface Coating of
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products
(MMPP) rule (hereinafter referred to as
FL MMPP Rule) in the Florida SIP. EPA
has determined that the changes
included in Florida’s October 12, 2022,
submission are consistent with the
applicable provisions of the Clean Air
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM
27SER1
79148
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Act (CAA or Act) and its implementing
regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective October 28,
2024.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2023–0273. All documents in the docket
are listed on the regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air and Radiation Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Simone Jarvis, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, Region 4, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562–8393. Ms. Jarvis can also be
reached via electronic mail at
Jarvis.Simone@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
EPA is approving changes to the
Florida SIP submitted by the State on
October 12, 2022. The changes address
the FL MMPP Rule—Rule 62–296.513,
Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal
Parts and Products, which provides
specific reasonably available control
technology (RACT) requirements for
sources in Broward, Duval,
Hillsborough, Miami-Dade, Orange,
Palm Beach, or Pinellas Counties that
apply surface coatings to any number of
metal parts and products, to limit their
VOC emission rates, including surface
coating at aerospace manufacturing
operations.1 However, sources are
exempt from this rule if they emit no
more than 15 pounds in any one day
1 See
Rule 62–296.500(3)(a).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Sep 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
and no more than three pounds in any
one hour. The FL MMPP Rule was
incorporated into the Florida SIP to
address the RACT requirements for
areas that were designated
nonattainment for the 1979 1-hour
ozone standard.2 EPA redesignated
these areas to attainment in 1995.3
Through a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) published on July
30, 2024 (89 FR 61055), EPA proposed
to approve changes to the State’s MMPP
Rule, which revises the SIP to provide
that aerospace parts and products
coating operations classified as area
sources of hazardous air pollutants
(HAPs) may, in lieu of complying with
the VOC requirements of the FL MMPP
Rule, instead comply with specified
elements of EPA’s NESHAP for
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework
Facilities at 40 CFR part 63, subpart GG
(Aerospace NESHAP). Major sources of
HAPs, which are required to comply
with the Aerospace NESHAP, would
also be exempt from the FL MMPP Rule.
In this rulemaking, EPA is finalizing its
approval of Florida’s October 12, 2022,
request to incorporate the changes to the
FL MMPP Rule into the Florida SIP.
EPA’s rationale for approving the
changes is described in the July 30,
2024, NPRM. Comments on the July 30,
2024, NPRM were due on or before
August 29, 2024. EPA received three
sets of comments on the NPRM. EPA
received two sets of substantively
identical comments from the same
commenter. These comments are
addressed below and are available in the
docket for this action. The third set of
comments is not relevant to this action
and is excluded from the docket.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received two substantively
identical sets of comments on the July
30, 2024, NPRM from Clean Future
(Commenter). EPA has summarized and
responded to the comments below:
2 On November 6, 1991, EPA designated and
classified the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-W. Palm
Beach Area (i.e., Broward, Dade, and Palm Beach
Counties) as moderate nonattainment for the 1979
1-hour ozone NAAQS; the Jacksonville Area (i.e.,
Duval County) as transitional nonattainment; the
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater Area (i.e.,
Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties) as marginal
nonattainment; and Orange County as attainment.
See 56 FR 56694. Among the requirements
applicable to nonattainment areas for the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS was the requirement to amend the
SIPs for areas to satisfy the requirements of section
183 of the CAA.
3 See 60 FR 41 for the Jacksonville, FL (Duval
County) redesignation. See 60 FR 10325 for the
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-W. Palm Beach, FL (MiamiDade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties)
redesignation. See 60 FR 62748 for the Tampa-St.
Petersburg-Clearwater, FL (Hillsborough and
Pinellas Counties) redesignation.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments: The Commenter supports
EPA’s action and suggests that ‘‘the EPA
offer a thorough analysis of the
anticipated decreases in VOC emissions
as a consequence of these adjustments.’’
The Commenter goes on to ‘‘urge the
EPA to make certain that the revised SIP
offers sufficient assistance to impacted
industries and contains explicit
guidelines for compliance.’’ Lastly, the
Commenter ‘‘recommend[s] that the
EPA establish a mechanism for periodic
review and adjustment of the
regulations to incorporate new
developments and address any
unforeseen challenges.’’
Response: EPA appreciates the
Commenter’s support for this action.
Due to the general nature of the
Commenter’s requests and suggestions,
EPA is only able to provide general
responses.
The scope of EPA’s review in
evaluating SIP revisions is limited to the
process in CAA section 110 and EPA’s
implementing regulations codified at 40
CFR part 51. Under CAA section 110,
States have broad discretion to choose
the mix of emission limitations and
other control measures, means, or
techniques that they will implement (or
update) through a SIP to provide for
attainment and maintenance of national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
EPA’s role, with respect to a SIP
revision, is focused on reviewing the
submission to determine whether it
meets the minimum criteria of the CAA.
These minimum criteria include CAA
section 110(l) which prohibits EPA from
approving a SIP revision that would
interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress (as defined
in section 171), or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. Where a SIP
revision meets the minimum CAA
criteria, EPA must approve the
submission. When approving a SIP
revision, the Agency is not establishing
its own requirements for the State to
implement. If, at any time, EPA finds
that a SIP is inadequate to attain or
maintain the relevant NAAQS or
otherwise does not comply with the
CAA, EPA has the authority under CAA
section 110(k)(5) to require the State to
revise its SIP to correct such
inadequacies.
Regarding the suggestion that EPA
provide a thorough analysis of
anticipated decreases in VOC emission
associated with this SIP revision, EPA
discussed the potential changes in VOC
emissions in the NPRM, and the
Commenter has not pointed to any
specific concerns with EPA’s analysis of
VOC emissions. In the NPRM, EPA
noted that the SIP revision would allow
E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM
27SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
some sources to apply coatings with a
higher VOC content, which has the
potential to increase VOC emissions.
However, EPA also noted that with all
counties in Florida attaining the 1997,
2008, and 2015 ozone, as well as the
2006 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, and
anticipated to attain the 2024 PM2.5
NAAQS based on 2021–2023
monitoring data,4 it is unlikely that any
de minimis increase in the potential to
emit VOCs from aerospace coating
operations facilities would impact any
NAAQS.5 Thus, EPA has concluded that
this SIP revision is consistent with the
CAA and its implementing regulations
and would not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress (as defined in section 171), or
any other applicable requirement of the
Act.
EPA initially incorporated the FL
MMPP Rule into the SIP as part of
Florida’s measures to attain and
maintain the NAAQS.6 The SIP revision
does not impose new requirements on
the covered coating operations, but
rather adds an exemption from an
existing SIP requirement for sources that
comply with the established standards
of the Aerospace NESHAP. Given the
limited nature of this SIP revision and
EPA’s role in reviewing SIP revisions
discussed above, the Commenter’s
suggestion that the revised SIP provide
industry assistance and contain explicit
guidelines for compliance, as well as the
Commenter’s recommendation the EPA
establish a mechanism for periodic
review and adjustment of regulations to
incorporate new developments and
unforeseen challenges are beyond the
scope of EPA’s review. Regarding the
Commenter’s recommendation to
establish a mechanism for periodic
review and adjustment of regulations to
incorporate new developments and
4 See https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-qualitydesign-values.
5 There are six NAAQS established to protect
human health and the environment. These NAAQS
are carbon monoxide (CO), lead, nitrogen dioxide
(NO2), ozone, particulate matter (PM)—including
PM2.5 and PM10, and sulfur dioxide (SO2). EPA does
not believe that there would be any changes in
emissions of CO, lead, NO2, or SO2 from this change
to the FL SIP.
6 On November 6, 1991, EPA designated and
classified the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-W. Palm
Beach Area (i.e., Broward, Dade, and Palm Beach
Counties) as moderate nonattainment for the 1979
1-hour ozone NAAQS; the Jacksonville Area (i.e.,
Duval County) as transitional nonattainment; the
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater Area (i.e.,
Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties) as marginal
nonattainment; and Orange County as attainment.
See 56 FR 56694. Among the requirements
applicable to nonattainment areas for the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS was the requirement to amend the
SIPs for areas to satisfy the requirements of section
183 of the CAA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Sep 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
challenges, EPA reiterates that it has the
authority to issue a SIP call under CAA
section 110(k)(5) if, at any time, it finds
the SIP to be inadequate to attain or
maintain the relevant NAAQS or
otherwise does not comply with the
CAA.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, and as discussed in Sections
I and II of this preamble, EPA is
finalizing the incorporation by reference
of Florida Rule 62–296.513, F.A.C.,
Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal
Parts and Products, State effective on
June 16, 2022. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 4 Office (please contact the
person identified in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
State implementation plan, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will
be incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.7
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving the October 12,
2022, Florida SIP revision consisting of
amendments to Rule 62–296.513,
F.A.C., Surface Coating of
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products, in the Florida SIP. EPA has
evaluated Florida’s October 12, 2022,
SIP revision, and determined that the
changes will not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
7 See
PO 00000
62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
79149
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
because it approves a State program;
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a
Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rulemaking does not
have Tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on communities with
environmental justice (EJ) to the greatest
extent practicable and permitted by law.
EPA defines EJ as ‘‘the fair treatment
and meaningful involvement of all
people regardless of race, color, national
origin, or income with respect to the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM
27SER1
79150
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The FDEP did not evaluate EJ
considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and
did not consider EJ in this action.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
communities with EJ concerns.
This action is subject to the
Congressional Review Act, and EPA will
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. This action
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 26, 2024. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 20, 2024.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K—Florida
2. In § 52.520 paragraph (c), amend
the table by revising the entry for ‘‘62–
296.513’’ to read as follows:
■
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
§ 52.520
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED FLORIDA LAWS AND REGULATIONS
State citation
(section)
State
effective
date
Title/subject
EPA approval date
Explanation
Chapter 62–296 Stationary Sources—Emission Standards
*
*
62–296.513 .....................................
*
*
*
*
*
Surface Coating of Miscellaneous
Metal Parts and Products.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–22135 Filed 9–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 711
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2018–0321; FRL–5982.2–
01–OCSPP]
RIN 2070–AK33
Chemical Data Reporting; Extension of
the 2024 Submission Period
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or Agency) is amending
the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) Chemical Data Reporting (CDR)
regulations to extend the submission
deadline for 2024 reports to November
22, 2024. This extension is for the 2024
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Sep 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
6/16/2022
*
*
*
9/27/2024, [Insert first page of
Federal Register citation].
*
submission period only. The TSCA CDR
regulations require manufacturers
(including importers) of certain
chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory
(TSCA Inventory) to report data on the
manufacturing, processing, and use of
the chemical substances.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 27, 2024.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2018–0321, is
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Additional
information about dockets generally,
along with instructions for visiting the
docket in-person, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact:
Susan Sharkey, Data Gathering,
Management, and Policy Division
(7406M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–8789; email address:
sharkey.susan@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture
(including import) chemical substances
listed on the TSCA Inventory. The
following list of North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
to help readers determine whether this
document applies to them. Potentially
affected entities may include but are not
limited to:
E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM
27SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 79147-79150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22135]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2023-0273; FRL-12121-02-R4]
Air Plan Approval; FL; Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal
Parts and Products Amendments
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Florida Department
of Environmental Protection (FDEP) on October 12, 2022. EPA is
approving changes allowing the option for aerospace parts and products
coating operations in Florida to comply with Federal National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requirements in lieu of
the volatile organic compound (VOC) standards in Florida's Surface
Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products (MMPP) rule
(hereinafter referred to as FL MMPP Rule) in the Florida SIP. EPA has
determined that the changes included in Florida's October 12, 2022,
submission are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Clean
Air
[[Page 79148]]
Act (CAA or Act) and its implementing regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective October 28, 2024.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2023-0273. All documents in the docket
are listed on the regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Simone Jarvis, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-8393. Ms. Jarvis can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
EPA is approving changes to the Florida SIP submitted by the State
on October 12, 2022. The changes address the FL MMPP Rule--Rule 62-
296.513, Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products,
which provides specific reasonably available control technology (RACT)
requirements for sources in Broward, Duval, Hillsborough, Miami-Dade,
Orange, Palm Beach, or Pinellas Counties that apply surface coatings to
any number of metal parts and products, to limit their VOC emission
rates, including surface coating at aerospace manufacturing
operations.\1\ However, sources are exempt from this rule if they emit
no more than 15 pounds in any one day and no more than three pounds in
any one hour. The FL MMPP Rule was incorporated into the Florida SIP to
address the RACT requirements for areas that were designated
nonattainment for the 1979 1-hour ozone standard.\2\ EPA redesignated
these areas to attainment in 1995.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Rule 62-296.500(3)(a).
\2\ On November 6, 1991, EPA designated and classified the
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-W. Palm Beach Area (i.e., Broward, Dade, and
Palm Beach Counties) as moderate nonattainment for the 1979 1-hour
ozone NAAQS; the Jacksonville Area (i.e., Duval County) as
transitional nonattainment; the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater Area
(i.e., Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties) as marginal
nonattainment; and Orange County as attainment. See 56 FR 56694.
Among the requirements applicable to nonattainment areas for the 1-
hour ozone NAAQS was the requirement to amend the SIPs for areas to
satisfy the requirements of section 183 of the CAA.
\3\ See 60 FR 41 for the Jacksonville, FL (Duval County)
redesignation. See 60 FR 10325 for the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-W. Palm
Beach, FL (Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties)
redesignation. See 60 FR 62748 for the Tampa-St. Petersburg-
Clearwater, FL (Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties) redesignation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on July
30, 2024 (89 FR 61055), EPA proposed to approve changes to the State's
MMPP Rule, which revises the SIP to provide that aerospace parts and
products coating operations classified as area sources of hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) may, in lieu of complying with the VOC requirements
of the FL MMPP Rule, instead comply with specified elements of EPA's
NESHAP for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities at 40 CFR part
63, subpart GG (Aerospace NESHAP). Major sources of HAPs, which are
required to comply with the Aerospace NESHAP, would also be exempt from
the FL MMPP Rule. In this rulemaking, EPA is finalizing its approval of
Florida's October 12, 2022, request to incorporate the changes to the
FL MMPP Rule into the Florida SIP. EPA's rationale for approving the
changes is described in the July 30, 2024, NPRM. Comments on the July
30, 2024, NPRM were due on or before August 29, 2024. EPA received
three sets of comments on the NPRM. EPA received two sets of
substantively identical comments from the same commenter. These
comments are addressed below and are available in the docket for this
action. The third set of comments is not relevant to this action and is
excluded from the docket.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received two substantively identical sets of comments on the
July 30, 2024, NPRM from Clean Future (Commenter). EPA has summarized
and responded to the comments below:
Comments: The Commenter supports EPA's action and suggests that
``the EPA offer a thorough analysis of the anticipated decreases in VOC
emissions as a consequence of these adjustments.'' The Commenter goes
on to ``urge the EPA to make certain that the revised SIP offers
sufficient assistance to impacted industries and contains explicit
guidelines for compliance.'' Lastly, the Commenter ``recommend[s] that
the EPA establish a mechanism for periodic review and adjustment of the
regulations to incorporate new developments and address any unforeseen
challenges.''
Response: EPA appreciates the Commenter's support for this action.
Due to the general nature of the Commenter's requests and suggestions,
EPA is only able to provide general responses.
The scope of EPA's review in evaluating SIP revisions is limited to
the process in CAA section 110 and EPA's implementing regulations
codified at 40 CFR part 51. Under CAA section 110, States have broad
discretion to choose the mix of emission limitations and other control
measures, means, or techniques that they will implement (or update)
through a SIP to provide for attainment and maintenance of national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). EPA's role, with respect to a
SIP revision, is focused on reviewing the submission to determine
whether it meets the minimum criteria of the CAA. These minimum
criteria include CAA section 110(l) which prohibits EPA from approving
a SIP revision that would interfere with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in
section 171), or any other applicable requirement of the Act. Where a
SIP revision meets the minimum CAA criteria, EPA must approve the
submission. When approving a SIP revision, the Agency is not
establishing its own requirements for the State to implement. If, at
any time, EPA finds that a SIP is inadequate to attain or maintain the
relevant NAAQS or otherwise does not comply with the CAA, EPA has the
authority under CAA section 110(k)(5) to require the State to revise
its SIP to correct such inadequacies.
Regarding the suggestion that EPA provide a thorough analysis of
anticipated decreases in VOC emission associated with this SIP
revision, EPA discussed the potential changes in VOC emissions in the
NPRM, and the Commenter has not pointed to any specific concerns with
EPA's analysis of VOC emissions. In the NPRM, EPA noted that the SIP
revision would allow
[[Page 79149]]
some sources to apply coatings with a higher VOC content, which has the
potential to increase VOC emissions. However, EPA also noted that with
all counties in Florida attaining the 1997, 2008, and 2015 ozone, as
well as the 2006 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, and anticipated to
attain the 2024 PM2.5 NAAQS based on 2021-2023 monitoring
data,\4\ it is unlikely that any de minimis increase in the potential
to emit VOCs from aerospace coating operations facilities would impact
any NAAQS.\5\ Thus, EPA has concluded that this SIP revision is
consistent with the CAA and its implementing regulations and would not
interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171), or any other
applicable requirement of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-design-values.
\5\ There are six NAAQS established to protect human health and
the environment. These NAAQS are carbon monoxide (CO), lead,
nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone, particulate matter (PM)--
including PM2.5 and PM10, and sulfur dioxide
(SO2). EPA does not believe that there would be any
changes in emissions of CO, lead, NO2, or SO2
from this change to the FL SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA initially incorporated the FL MMPP Rule into the SIP as part of
Florida's measures to attain and maintain the NAAQS.\6\ The SIP
revision does not impose new requirements on the covered coating
operations, but rather adds an exemption from an existing SIP
requirement for sources that comply with the established standards of
the Aerospace NESHAP. Given the limited nature of this SIP revision and
EPA's role in reviewing SIP revisions discussed above, the Commenter's
suggestion that the revised SIP provide industry assistance and contain
explicit guidelines for compliance, as well as the Commenter's
recommendation the EPA establish a mechanism for periodic review and
adjustment of regulations to incorporate new developments and
unforeseen challenges are beyond the scope of EPA's review. Regarding
the Commenter's recommendation to establish a mechanism for periodic
review and adjustment of regulations to incorporate new developments
and challenges, EPA reiterates that it has the authority to issue a SIP
call under CAA section 110(k)(5) if, at any time, it finds the SIP to
be inadequate to attain or maintain the relevant NAAQS or otherwise
does not comply with the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ On November 6, 1991, EPA designated and classified the
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-W. Palm Beach Area (i.e., Broward, Dade, and
Palm Beach Counties) as moderate nonattainment for the 1979 1-hour
ozone NAAQS; the Jacksonville Area (i.e., Duval County) as
transitional nonattainment; the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater Area
(i.e., Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties) as marginal
nonattainment; and Orange County as attainment. See 56 FR 56694.
Among the requirements applicable to nonattainment areas for the 1-
hour ozone NAAQS was the requirement to amend the SIPs for areas to
satisfy the requirements of section 183 of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, and as discussed in Sections I and II of this preamble, EPA
is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Florida Rule 62-
296.513, F.A.C., Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products, State effective on June 16, 2022. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the
person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section of
this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have
been approved by EPA for inclusion in the State implementation plan,
have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully
federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the
effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving the October 12, 2022, Florida SIP revision
consisting of amendments to Rule 62-296.513, F.A.C., Surface Coating of
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products, in the Florida SIP. EPA has
evaluated Florida's October 12, 2022, SIP revision, and determined that
the changes will not interfere with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment or any other applicable requirement of the CAA.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rulemaking does not have Tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on communities with environmental justice
(EJ) to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. EPA
defines EJ as ``the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all
people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with
respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and policies.'' EPA further defines
the term fair treatment to mean that ``no group of people should bear a
[[Page 79150]]
disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including
those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and
policies.''
The FDEP did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Consideration of EJ is
not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the
record inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for communities with EJ concerns.
This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 26, 2024. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 20, 2024.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K--Florida
0
2. In Sec. 52.520 paragraph (c), amend the table by revising the entry
for ``62-296.513'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Florida Laws and Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation (section) Title/subject effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 62-296 Stationary Sources--Emission Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
62-296.513...................... Surface Coating of 6/16/2022 9/27/2024, [Insert .......................
Miscellaneous first page of
Metal Parts and Federal Register
Products. citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-22135 Filed 9-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P