Safety Zone; M/V DALI Transit of the Elizabeth River, Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel and Chesapeake Bay, Norfolk, VA, 77780-77782 [2024-21774]
Download as PDF
77780
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
zone lasting only 2 hours on one day
that will prohibit transit in a 3-mile
range on the Ohio River nearby New
Albany, Indiana. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0871]
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
a portion of the Elizabeth River, Norfolk
Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, and the
Chesapeake Bay in Norfolk, VA. This
action is necessary to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards created by the
M/V Dali as it departs Norfolk, Va. Entry
of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Virginia.
DATES: This rule is effective from
September 24, 2024, through September
24, 2024. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from September 19, 2024, until
September 24, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
0871 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
SUMMARY:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T08–0806 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0806 Safety Zone; Ohio River,
New Albany, IN.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ACTION:
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: On the Ohio River from
mile markers 606.5–609.6 from the
times of 8:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on
September 27, 2024.
(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Ohio Valley or their
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by phone at (502) 779–
5400. Those in the safety zone must
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(3) The COTP will provide notice of
the regulated area through advanced
Jkt 262001
[FR Doc. 2024–21842 Filed 9–23–24; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
■
15:57 Sep 23, 2024
Dated: September 17, 2024.
Heather R. Mattern,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Ohio Valley.
Safety Zone; M/V DALI Transit of the
Elizabeth River, Norfolk Harbor,
Thimble Shoal Channel and
Chesapeake Bay, Norfolk, VA
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
notice via broadcast notice to mariners
and by on-scene designated
representatives.
(c) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 10:30
p.m. on September 27, 2024.
If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LCDR Justin Strassfield, Sector
Virginia, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard, Telephone:
757–668–5580, email:
VirginiaWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On March 26, 2024, the M/V Dali lost
propulsion and allied with the Francis
Scott Key Bridge in the Chesapeake Bay,
near the Port of Baltimore, causing the
bridge to collapse upon it. See 89 FR
24385 (April 8, 2024) for additional
details about the allision. On June 22,
2024, the M/V Dali transited from the
Port of Baltimore to Norfolk, Va. for
repairs. More recently, the Port of
Virginia has notified the Coast Guard
that the M/V Dali will depart Virginia.
The vessel transit is taking place with
the assistance of multiple tugboats and
will be subject to a safety zone issued
by the Captain of the Port (COTP). It is
anticipated that the vessel will depart
between September 19, 2024, and
September 24, 2024, but these dates are
subject to change. Given both the
damage to the vessel from the allision,
and the vessel’s mechanical history,
including the loss of propulsion which
led to the allision, a 500-yard safety
zone will be enforced during the transit
within Virginia waters.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule under authority in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory
provision authorizes an agency to issue
a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ The Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable and contrary
to public interest. There is insufficient
time to provide notice of a proposed
rule, take and consider comments, and
publish a final rule before September
19, when the rule must be in effect to
provide for safety in the navigable
waters around the M/V Dali as it departs
Norfolk, Virginia.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because prompt action is needed to
respond to the dangers associated with
the transit of the M/V Dali.
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
COTP, Sector Virginia has determined
that potential hazards associated with
the transit of the M/V Dali will be a
safety concern for anyone within a 500yard radius of the vessel due to its
limited ability to maneuver. This rule is
needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in the
navigable waters within the safety zone
while the M/V Dali transits through the
waters of the COTP Zone, Sector
Virginia.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from September 19, 2024, to September
24, 2024. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters within 500 yards of the
M/V Dali while in transit within waters
of the COTP Zone, Sector Virginia. The
dates of the safety zone were chosen to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in the navigable
waters of the Sector Virginia, COTP
Zone before, during, and after the
scheduled transit. No vessel or person
will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated
representative.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this safety zone while the
vessel departs Norfolk, VA. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16 about the zone,
and the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Sep 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
B. Impact on Small Entities
Because the Coast Guard has
determined that this final rule is exempt
from notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, the regulatory flexibility
analysis provisions of the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.) do not apply to this action.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77781
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a 500yard moving safety zone around a
vessel. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(c)
of appendix A, table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
77782
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T05–0871 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0871 Safety Zone; M/V DALI
transit of the Elizabeth River, Norfolk
Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel and
Chesapeake Bay, Norfolk, VA
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Elizabeth
River, Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal
Channel, and Chesapeake Bay within
500 yards of the M/V Dali while it is
transiting within Virginia waters.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Virginia (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by VHF–FM Channel 16.
Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement officials. The U.S.
Coast Guard may be assisted in the
patrol and enforcement of the safety
zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced during the outbound
transit of the M/V Dali from the Port of
Norfolk.
Dated: September 18, 2024.
P.M. Britton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2024–21774 Filed 9–23–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0875]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Grosse Tete, Iberville LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Sep 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters from mile marker
45 to mile marker 47 of the Port Allen
Route, Iberville, LA. The safety zone is
needed to protect Grosse Tete bridge
repairs and ferry operations for crossing
school students during morning and
afternoon commutes as a result of the
Grosse Tete bridge closure. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Sector New Orleans.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from September 24, 2024
through 11:59 p.m. on December 1,
2024. For purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from
September 17, 2024, until September 24,
2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
0875 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Benjamin Adrien,
Marine Safety Unit Baton Rouge, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone: (225) 281–2875,
email: benjamin.d.adrien@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule under the authority in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ The Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for not
publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because prompt action is needed to
protect personnel, vessels and the
marine environment in the vicinity of
the Grosse Tete bridge allision and
associated passenger ferry operations
during bridge repairs. It is impracticable
to publish an NPRM because we must
establish this safety zone by September
17, 2024.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because prompt action is needed to
mitigate potential safety hazards
associated with the bridge closure and
increased passenger ferry operations.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans
(COTP) has determined that a safety
zone is needed for the safety of Grosse
Tete bridge repairs and passenger ferry
operations from mile marker 45 to mile
marker 47 on the Port Allen Route,
Iberville, LA. The safety zone is needed
to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in the navigable
waters and in the vicinity of the bridge
while it is being repaired.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary
safety zone for all navigable waters from
mile marker 45 to mile marker 47 of the
Port Allen Route, Iberville, LA, on
September 17, 2024, through 11:59 p.m.
on December 1, 2024. The safety zone
will be enforced from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m.
and from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., daily
Monday through Friday, except on
federal holidays. The safety zone will
also be enforced on September 18, 2024,
from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. for bridge repairs
and testing. The duration of the zone is
intended to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment while the
bridge is being repaired. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 24, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77780-77782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21774]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0871]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; M/V DALI Transit of the Elizabeth River, Norfolk
Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel and Chesapeake Bay, Norfolk, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for a
portion of the Elizabeth River, Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel,
and the Chesapeake Bay in Norfolk, VA. This action is necessary to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential
hazards created by the M/V Dali as it departs Norfolk, Va. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Virginia.
DATES: This rule is effective from September 24, 2024, through
September 24, 2024. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will
be used from September 19, 2024, until September 24, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-0871 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email LCDR Justin Strassfield, Sector Virginia, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard, Telephone: 757-668-5580, email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On March 26, 2024, the M/V Dali lost propulsion and allied with the
Francis Scott Key Bridge in the Chesapeake Bay, near the Port of
Baltimore, causing the bridge to collapse upon it. See 89 FR 24385
(April 8, 2024) for additional details about the allision. On June 22,
2024, the M/V Dali transited from the Port of Baltimore to Norfolk, Va.
for repairs. More recently, the Port of Virginia has notified the Coast
Guard that the M/V Dali will depart Virginia. The vessel transit is
taking place with the assistance of multiple tugboats and will be
subject to a safety zone issued by the Captain of the Port (COTP). It
is anticipated that the vessel will depart between September 19, 2024,
and September 24, 2024, but these dates are subject to change. Given
both the damage to the vessel from the allision, and the vessel's
mechanical history, including the loss of propulsion which led to the
allision, a 500-yard safety zone will be enforced during the transit
within Virginia waters.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule under authority in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory provision authorizes an agency to
issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' The Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be
impracticable and contrary to public interest. There is insufficient
time to provide notice of a proposed rule, take and consider comments,
and publish a final rule before September 19, when the rule must be in
effect to provide for safety in the navigable waters around the M/V
Dali as it departs Norfolk, Virginia.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because prompt action is needed to
respond to the dangers associated with the transit of the M/V Dali.
[[Page 77781]]
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The COTP, Sector Virginia has determined that potential hazards
associated with the transit of the M/V Dali will be a safety concern
for anyone within a 500-yard radius of the vessel due to its limited
ability to maneuver. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety
zone while the M/V Dali transits through the waters of the COTP Zone,
Sector Virginia.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from September 19, 2024, to
September 24, 2024. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters
within 500 yards of the M/V Dali while in transit within waters of the
COTP Zone, Sector Virginia. The dates of the safety zone were chosen to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable
waters of the Sector Virginia, COTP Zone before, during, and after the
scheduled transit. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
will be able to safely transit around this safety zone while the vessel
departs Norfolk, VA. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
Because the Coast Guard has determined that this final rule is
exempt from notice and comment rulemaking requirements, the regulatory
flexibility analysis provisions of the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply to this action.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a 500-
yard moving safety zone around a vessel. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L60(c) of appendix A, table 1 of
DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
[[Page 77782]]
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No.
01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0871 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0871 Safety Zone; M/V DALI transit of the Elizabeth
River, Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel and Chesapeake Bay,
Norfolk, VA
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Elizabeth River, Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, and
Chesapeake Bay within 500 yards of the M/V Dali while it is transiting
within Virginia waters.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Virginia (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF-FM Channel 16. Those in the safety zone must
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP's designated representative.
(d) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in
the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and
local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced during the
outbound transit of the M/V Dali from the Port of Norfolk.
Dated: September 18, 2024.
P.M. Britton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2024-21774 Filed 9-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P