Air Plan Revisions; California; San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, 77023-77025 [2024-21494]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations PART 16—REGULATORY HEARING BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1451–1461; 21 U.S.C. 141–149, 321–394, 467f, 679, 821, 1034; 28 U.S.C. 2112; 42 U.S.C. 201–262, 263b, 364. 1. The authority citation for part 16 continues to read as follows: ■ 2. Amend § 16.1 by revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows: ■ § 16.1 77023 Scope. * * * * * (b) * * * (1) The statutory provisions are as follows: TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (b)(1) Section 304(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the administrative detention of devices and drugs (see §§ 800.55(g) and 1.980(g) of this chapter). Section 304(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the administrative detention of food for human or animal consumption (see part 1, subpart k of this chapter). Section 419(c)(2)(D) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the modification or revocation of a variance from the requirements of section 419 (see part 112, subpart P of this chapter). Section 515(e)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the proposed withdrawal of approval of a device premarket approval application. Section 515(e)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the temporary suspension of approval of a premarket approval application. Section 515(f)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to a proposed order revoking a device product development protocol or declaring a protocol not completed. Section 515(f)(7) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to revocation of a notice of completion of a product development protocol. Section 516(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act regarding a proposed regulation to ban a medical device with a special effective date. Section 518(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to a determination that a device is subject to a repair, replacement, or refund order or that a correction plan, or revised correction plan, submitted by a manufacturer, importer, or distributor is inadequate. Section 518(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to a cease distribution and notification order or mandatory recall order concerning a medical device for human use. Section 520(f)(2)(D) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to exemptions or variances from device current good manufacturing practice requirements (see § 820.1(d)). Section 520(g)(4) and (g)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to disapproval and withdrawal of approval of an application from an investigational device exemption (see §§ 812.19(c), 812.30(c), 813.30(d), and 813.35(c) of this chapter). Section 903(a)(8)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the misbranding of tobacco products. Section 906(e)(2)(E) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to exemptions or variances from tobacco product manufacturing practice requirements. Section 910(d)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the withdrawal of an order allowing a new tobacco product to be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce. Section 911(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the withdrawal of an order allowing a modified risk tobacco product to be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce. * § 16.1 * * * * [Amended] 3. Effective December 18, 2025, in § 16.1, amend paragraph (b)(2) by redesignating table 1 to paragraph (b)(2) as table 2 to paragraph (b)(2). ■ Dated: September 6, 2024. Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs. DATES: [FR Doc. 2024–21231 Filed 9–19–24; 8:45 am] 2024. BILLING CODE 4164–01–P ADDRESSES: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2024–0032; FRL–11685– 02–R9] ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve a revision to the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns a rule submitted to address section 185 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’). SUMMARY: Air Plan Revisions; California; San Diego County Air Pollution Control District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:52 Sep 19, 2024 Jkt 262001 This rule is effective October 21, The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2024–0032. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https:// www.regulations.gov, or please contact PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 the person identified in the FOR FURTHER section for additional availability information. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with a disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kira Wiesinger, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; phone: (415) 972–3827; email: wiesinger.kira@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. INFORMATION CONTACT Table of Contents I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action On April 2, 2024 (89 FR 22648), the EPA proposed to approve the following rule into the California SIP. E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1 77024 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE Local agency Rule Rule title Adopted Submitted SDCAPCD ....................................................... 45 Federally Mandated Ozone Nonattainment Fees. 06/09/2022 07/20/2022 We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rule and our evaluation. II. Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA’s proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received two comments from members of the public. One comment was supportive of our proposed action. We thank the commenter for their support and input. The other comment was not germane to this action. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is approving this rule into the California SIP. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of SDCAPCD Rule 45, ‘‘Federally Mandated Ozone Nonattainment Fees,’’ adopted on June 9, 2022, which addresses the CAA section 185 fee program requirements. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:52 Sep 19, 2024 Jkt 262001 additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program; • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act. In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address ‘‘disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects’’ of their actions on communities with environmental justice (EJ) concerns to the greatest extent practicable and PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 permitted by law. The EPA defines EJ as ‘‘the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that ‘‘no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and policies.’’ The State did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of Executive Order 12898 of achieving EJ for communities with EJ concerns. This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 19, 2024. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review, nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations § 1068.250 Extending compliance deadlines for small businesses under hardship. recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: September 16, 2024. Martha Guzman Aceves, Regional Administrator, Region IX. * For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS * * * * (i) We may include reasonable requirements on an approval granted under this section, including provisions to recover or otherwise address the lost environmental benefit. For example, we may require that you meet a less stringent emission standard or buy and use available emission credits. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2024–21640 Filed 9–19–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 0099–10–P 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F—California 41 CFR Parts 300–3, 301–11, 301–50, 301–52, 301–70, 301–71, and 301–73 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(615) to read as follows: ■ § 52.220 [FTR Case 2023–03; Docket No. GSA–FTR– 2023–0023, Sequence No. 2] RIN 3090–AK66 Identification of plan—in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (615) The following regulation was submitted electronically on July 20, 2022, by the Governor’s designee as an attachment to a letter of the same date. (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. (1) Rule 45, ‘‘Federally Mandated Ozone Nonattainment Fees,’’ adopted on June 9, 2022. (2) [Reserved] (B) [Reserved] (ii) [Reserved] * * * * * Office of Government-wide Policy (OGP), General Services Administration (GSA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: CFR Correction GSA is issuing a final rule amending the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) to remove outdated information on deployment of the original E-Gov Travel Service (ETS) contract as agencies prepare for the next generation of ETS, known as ETSNext, to provide updated policy, and make miscellaneous editorial corrections. DATES: Effective October 21, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cheryl D. McClain-Barnes, Office of Government-wide Policy at 202–208– 4334 or email at travelpolicy@gsa.gov for clarification of content. For information pertaining to the status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat Division at 202– 501–4755 or GSARegSec@gsa.gov. Please cite FTR case 2023–03. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations. ■ In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1060 to End, revised as of July 1, 2024, amend § 1068.250 by reinstating paragraph (i) to read as follows: I. Background In November 2003, GSA’s Federal Acquisition Service awarded master contracts for the first iteration of ETS, a web-based end-to-end travel management service. GSA published FTR Amendment 2003–07 (68 FR 71026) in December 2003, to amend the FTR on the required use of the new travel service. The original ETS implementation policies included [FR Doc. 2024–21494 Filed 9–19–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 1068 General Compliance Provisions for Highway, Stationary, and Nonroad Programs ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Travel Regulation; Updating Glossary of Terms and E-Gov Travel Service Requirements VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:52 Sep 19, 2024 Jkt 262001 SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 77025 timelines with specific dates for agencies to deploy ETS and migrate to the new platform. This information regarding ETS implementation is no longer needed because all mandatory users have deployed ETS (either initially, or upon expiration of an exception to its use) since it became available to civilian agencies in the first quarter of 2004. Contracts awarded under ETS2, the second iteration of ETS, are set to expire in June 2027. GSA published a proposed rule (88 FR 89650) on December 28, 2023, seeking to amend the FTR to remove outdated policy and provide updated policy as agencies prepare for the implementation of the next generation of ETS known as ‘‘E-Gov Travel Service, Next Generation’’ or ‘‘ETSNext’’ for short. Accordingly, this rule finalizes the proposed changes to FTR parts 300–3, 301–11, 301–50, 301– 52, 301–70, 301–71, and 301–73. GSA is also amending the FTR to make minor editorial changes for clarity. Specifically, GSA is relocating a definitional term at § 301–50.6, namely ‘‘online self-service booking tool,’’ to part 300–3, ‘‘Glossary of Terms,’’ and updating the definition; renaming the term ‘‘Online booking tool (OBT);’’ and renumbering sections in part 301–50 in logical order. GSA is further updating the ‘‘Glossary of Terms’’ by capitalizing the initialism ‘‘ETS’’ in the body of the definition of ‘‘E-Gov Travel Service (ETS)’’ to be consistent with the definition heading. GSA is also removing and reserving § 301–73.101 and relocating relevant language from note 1 of the section regarding agency funding responsibility for ETS to a note to § 301–73.2. Further, GSA is revising the note to § 301–73.106 to remove duplicate text regarding travel agent services that align with present requirements for ETS2, but may not align with the terms of successor travel management service contract(s). Finally, GSA is adding a reference to the ‘‘extenuating circumstances’’ exception to the use of ETS and Travel Management Service (TMS) to existing exceptions at §§ 301–50.4 and 301– 73.102. II. Discussion of the Final Rule A. Summary of Significant Changes GSA has not made any significant changes to the regulatory language from the proposed to final rule. However, of note, the proposed rule duplicated some technical changes to an FTR final rule that took effect on April 16, 2024 (89 FR 12250); GSA removed these duplicate technical changes from this final rule as E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77023-77025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21494]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2024-0032; FRL-11685-02-R9]


Air Plan Revisions; California; San Diego County Air Pollution 
Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final 
action to approve a revision to the San Diego County Air Pollution 
Control District (SDCAPCD) portion of the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns a rule submitted to 
address section 185 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'').

DATES: This rule is effective October 21, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2024-0032. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance 
in a language other than English or if you are a person with a 
disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, 
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kira Wiesinger, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; phone: (415) 972-3827; email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On April 2, 2024 (89 FR 22648), the EPA proposed to approve the 
following rule into the California SIP.

[[Page 77024]]



                                             Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Local agency                    Rule              Rule title            Adopted         Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SDCAPCD.............................              45   Federally Mandated           06/09/2022       07/20/2022
                                                        Ozone Nonattainment
                                                        Fees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it 
complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action 
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
During this period, we received two comments from members of the 
public. One comment was supportive of our proposed action. We thank the 
commenter for their support and input. The other comment was not 
germane to this action.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule 
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in 
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is approving this rule into the 
California SIP.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of SDCAPCD 
Rule 45, ``Federally Mandated Ozone Nonattainment Fees,'' adopted on 
June 9, 2022, which addresses the CAA section 185 fee program 
requirements. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these 
documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 
IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program;
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, 
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address 
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental 
effects'' of their actions on communities with environmental justice 
(EJ) concerns to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. 
The EPA defines EJ as ``the fair treatment and meaningful involvement 
of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income 
with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of 
environmental laws, regulations, and policies.'' The EPA further 
defines the term fair treatment to mean that ``no group of people 
should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, 
including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences 
of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and 
policies.''
    The State did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP 
submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither 
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA did not perform an EJ 
analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Consideration of EJ is 
not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the 
record inconsistent with the stated goal of Executive Order 12898 of 
achieving EJ for communities with EJ concerns.
    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 19, 2024. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review, nor does it extend the time within which a petition 
for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the 
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged 
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 
307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, 
Reporting and

[[Page 77025]]

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 16, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental 
Protection Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(615) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (615) The following regulation was submitted electronically on July 
20, 2022, by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter of 
the same date.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) San Diego County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 45, ``Federally Mandated Ozone Nonattainment Fees,'' 
adopted on June 9, 2022.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (B) [Reserved]
    (ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-21494 Filed 9-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.