Regulatory Hearing Before the Food and Drug Administration; General Provisions; Amendments, 77058-77061 [2024-21232]
Download as PDF
77058
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2024 / Proposed Rules
SUMMARY:
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2024–N–3654 for ‘‘Regulatory Hearing
Before the Food and Drug
Administration; General Provisions;
Amendments.’’ Received comments,
those filed in a timely manner (see
ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Dockets Management Staff
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 16
[Docket No. FDA–2024–N–3654]
RIN 0910–AI97
Regulatory Hearing Before the Food
and Drug Administration; General
Provisions; Amendments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
proposing to amend the Scope section of
our regulation that provides for a
regulatory hearing before the Agency to
clarify when such hearings are
available. We are proposing to revise the
list of statutory provisions enumerated
in the Scope section of the regulation by
removing one statutory reference and
adding a different statutory reference.
DATES: Either electronic or written
comments on the proposed rule or its
companion direct final rule must be
submitted by December 4, 2024. If FDA
receives any timely significant adverse
comments on the direct final rule with
which this proposed rule is associated,
we will publish a document
withdrawing the direct final rule within
30 days after the comment period ends,
and we will then proceed to respond to
comments under this proposed rule
using the usual notice and comment
procedures.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. The https://
www.regulations.gov electronic filing
system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of
December 4, 2024. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for
written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are received
on or before that date.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Sep 19, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents, the plain
language summary of the proposed rule
of not more than 100 words as required
by the ‘‘Providing Accountability
Through Transparency Act,’’ or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Schwartz, Center for Tobacco
Products, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 1–
877–287–1373, CTPRegulations@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of the
Proposed Rule
C. Legal Authority
D. Costs and Benefits
II. Companion Document to Direct Final
Rulemaking
III. Background
IV. Legal Authority
V. Description of the Proposed Rule
VI. Preliminary Economic Analysis of
Impacts
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
IX. Federalism
X. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
We are proposing to amend § 16.1 (21
CFR 16.1) to revise the list of statutory
provisions enumerated in the Scope
section of the regulation and thus clarify
the circumstances under which the
Agency intends to use the procedures in
part 16 (21 CFR part 16) for regulatory
hearings. We are also issuing a direct
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2024 / Proposed Rules
final rule revising the list in § 16.1 by
removing one statutory reference and
adding a different statutory reference
under the same section of the same
statute. Because we believe the rule
contains noncontroversial changes and
we do not expect significant adverse
comment on the direct final rule, we are
using direct final rulemaking
procedures, as described in this
document.
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of
the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule, if finalized, would
revise § 16.1, Scope, in order to clarify
the circumstances under which the
Agency intends to use the procedures in
part 16 for regulatory hearings. The
proposed rule amends the list of
statutory provisions enumerated in
§ 16.1. Specifically, the proposed rule
removes the reference to section
906(e)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
387f(e)(1)(B) (FD&C Act) (the statutory
provision that requires FDA to afford an
opportunity for an oral hearing prior to
promulgating a tobacco product
manufacturing practice (TPMP)
requirements regulation) and adds a
reference to section 906(e)(2)(E) of the
FD&C Act (the statutory provision that
provides a petitioner an opportunity for
an informal hearing on an order issued
on the petitioner’s request for temporary
or permanent exemption or variance
from TPMP requirements).
C. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing this rule under
provisions of the FD&C Act related to
regulations and hearings (21 U.S.C.
371), and general provisions respecting
control of tobacco products (21 U.S.C.
387f(e)).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
D. Costs and Benefits
If finalized, this proposed rule would
clarify the circumstances under which
the Agency intends to use the
procedures in part 16 for a regulatory
hearing. Potentially affected entities
would include manufacturers of
finished and bulk tobacco products who
choose to request an exemption or
variance from TPMP requirements and
are afforded an opportunity for a
hearing on orders regarding such
requests. Because this rule would
merely clarify which of its existing
procedures FDA intends to use when
conducting certain types of hearings
under the FD&C Act, costs and benefits
of this rule are expected to be minimal.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Sep 19, 2024
Jkt 262001
II. Companion Document to Direct
Final Rulemaking
This proposed rule is a companion to
the direct final rule published in the
rule section in this issue of the Federal
Register. This companion proposed rule
provides the procedural framework to
finalize the rule in the event the direct
final rule receives any significant
adverse comment and is withdrawn.
The comment period for this companion
proposed rule runs concurrently with
the comment period for the direct final
rule. Any comments received in
response to this companion proposed
rule will also be considered as
comments regarding the direct final
rule. FDA is publishing the direct final
rule because we believe the rule
contains noncontroversial changes and
there is little likelihood that there will
be significant adverse comments
opposing the rule.
A significant adverse comment is
defined as a comment that explains why
the rule would be inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule’s
underlying premise or approach, or
would be ineffective or unacceptable
without a change. In determining
whether an adverse comment is
significant and warrants terminating a
direct final rulemaking, we will
consider whether the comment raises an
issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive response in a notice-and
comment process. Comments that are
frivolous, insubstantial, or outside the
scope of the rule will not be considered
significant or adverse under this
procedure. A comment recommending a
regulation change in addition to those in
the direct final rule would not be
considered a significant adverse
comment unless the comment states
why the rule would be ineffective
without the additional change. In
addition, if a significant adverse
comment applies to a part of the direct
final rule and that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, we may
adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of the
significant adverse comment.
If any significant adverse comments to
the direct final rule are received during
the comment period, FDA will publish,
within 30 days after the comment
period ends, a notice of significant
adverse comment and withdraw the
direct final rule. If we withdraw the
direct final rule, any comments received
will be considered comments on the
proposed rule and will be considered in
developing a final rule using the usual
notice-and-comment procedure.
If no significant adverse comment is
received in response to the direct final
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77059
rule during the comment period, no
further action will be taken related to
this proposed rule. Instead, we will
publish a document confirming the
effective date of the final rule within 30
days after the comment period ends.
Additional information about direct
final rulemaking procedures is set forth
in the document entitled ‘‘Guidance for
FDA and Industry: Direct Final Rule
Procedures,’’ announced and provided
in the Federal Register of November 21,
1997 (62 FR 62466). The guidance may
be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
ucm125166.htm.
III. Background
Part 16 provides procedures for
regulatory hearings held before FDA.
The procedures in part 16 apply, among
other circumstances, when a statute or
regulation provides a person an
opportunity for a hearing on a
regulatory action. In 2012, FDA
amended part 16 1 to add several
statutory and regulatory provisions
throughout 21 CFR parts 1, 7, and 16,
to include reference to tobacco
products, where appropriate, so that
tobacco products would be subject to
the same general requirements that
apply to other FDA-regulated products.
The 2012 amendments revised § 16.1,
which governs the scope of part 16, to
include references to certain sections of
the FD&C Act that provide an
opportunity for a hearing. Among other
changes, the 2012 amendments added a
reference to section 906(e)(1)(B) of the
FD&C Act to § 16.1. This rule further
amends § 16.1, as described below.
The Agency is amending the list of
statutory provisions enumerated in
§ 16.1(b)(1) by removing the reference to
section 906(e)(1)(B) and adding a
reference to section 906(e)(2)(E) of the
FD&C Act. The list of statutory
provisions enumerated in § 16.1(b)(1)
currently includes section 906(e)(1)(B)
of the FD&C Act, which requires FDA to
afford the public an opportunity for an
oral hearing before issuing any TPMP
requirements regulation. The purpose of
an oral hearing under section
906(e)(1)(B) is to allow the public to
provide viewpoints, opinions, and
information on proposed TPMP rules.
The procedures under part 16 are not
aligned with the purpose and goals of
the oral hearing required under section
906(e)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act. For
example, part 16 includes procedures to
resolve a ‘‘genuine and substantial issue
1 ‘‘Further Amendments to General Regulations of
the Food and Drug Administration to Incorporate
Tobacco Products,’’ Food and Drug Administration,
77 FR 5171, February 2, 2012.
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
77060
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2024 / Proposed Rules
of fact’’ that is in dispute and the right
to confront and cross-examine
witnesses, which are not well suited for
allowing the public to provide
viewpoints, opinions, and information
to FDA regarding TPMP rules.
Accordingly, FDA is removing the
reference to section 906(e)(1)(B) of the
FD&C Act from part 16 as other
available procedures are better suited to
achieve its purposes.
The Agency is also adding a reference
to section 906(e)(2)(E) of the FD&C Act
to § 16.1(b)(1). Section 906(e)(2)(E) of
the FD&C Act provides an opportunity
for an informal hearing after the
issuance of an order related to a
petitioner’s request for a temporary or
permanent exemption or variance from
TPMP requirements. The list of
statutory provisions in § 16.1(b)(1) that
specifies the statutory and regulatory
provisions under which regulatory
hearings under part 16 are available
does not currently include section
906(e)(2)(E) of the FD&C Act. FDA is
adding this reference to clarify that it
intends to use the procedures in part 16
when conducting such hearings.
FDA is proposing to amend § 16.1 to
clarify when it intends to use the
procedures in part 16 for regulatory
hearings. If finalized, the amended rule
would be more consistent with the
statute by aligning the purposes of the
two hearings referenced above with
more appropriate hearing procedures
under FDA’s regulations. It also clarifies
the availability of hearings under part
16 to tobacco product manufacturers.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
IV. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing this rule under
provisions of the FD&C Act related to
regulations and hearings (21 U.S.C. 371)
and general provisions respecting
control of tobacco products (21 U.S.C.
387f). Section 701 (21 U.S.C. 371) vests
FDA with ‘‘the authority to promulgate
regulations for the efficient enforcement
of [the FD&C Act].’’ Section 906(e) of the
FD&C Act includes provisions regarding
TPMP requirements regulations, and
temporary and permanent exemptions
and variances from TPMP requirements.
V. Description of the Proposed Rule
We are proposing to revise § 16.1,
Scope, to remove a reference to ‘‘Section
906(e)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act relating to
the establishment of good
manufacturing practice requirements for
tobacco products’’ and to add a
reference to ‘‘Section 906(e)(2)(E) of the
FD&C Act relating to exemptions or
variances from tobacco product
manufacturing practice requirements.’’
The proposed rule would clarify the
availability of the procedures in part 16
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Sep 19, 2024
Jkt 262001
for regulatory hearings to include
situations when a petitioner has
requested a temporary or permanent
exemption or variance from TPMP
requirements.
VI. Preliminary Economic Analysis of
Impacts
We have examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866, Executive Order 13563,
Executive Order 14094, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094 direct us to assess all benefits,
costs, and transfers of available
regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). Rules
are ‘‘significant’’ under Executive Order
12866 Section 3(f)(1) (as amended by
Executive Order 14094) if they ‘‘have an
annual effect on the economy of $200
million or more (adjusted every 3 years
by the Administrator of [the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA)] for changes in gross domestic
product); or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local territorial, or tribal
governments or communities.’’ OIRA
has determined that this proposed rule
is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 Section
3(f)(1).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires us to analyze regulatory options
that would minimize any significant
impact of a rule on small entities.
Because this rule merely clarifies which
of its existing procedures FDA intends
to use when conducting certain types of
hearings under the FD&C Act, we
propose to certify that the proposed rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires us to
prepare a written statement, which
includes estimates of anticipated
impacts, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $183
million, using the most current (2023)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Domestic Product. This proposed rule
would not result in an expenditure in
any year that meets or exceeds this
amount.
If finalized, this proposed rule would
clarify the procedures FDA intends to
use when conducting certain types of
hearings under the FD&C Act. When the
TPMP rule becomes final and effective,
potentially affected entities, including
manufacturers of finished and bulk
tobacco products, who choose to request
an exemption or variance from TPMP
requirements would be afforded an
opportunity for a hearing on orders
regarding such requests.
We do not know how many
manufacturers would pursue petitioning
for an exemption or variance from
TPMP requirements, once the Agency
has published a final TPMP rule to
establish such requirements and that
rule is in effect, nor do we know how
many requirements may be included in
each petition. We reason that a
manufacturer would petition for an
exemption or variance from a TPMP
requirement only if compliance with
said requirement is not a financially
viable choice compared to the cost of a
filing a petition. Because this rule
merely clarifies which of its existing
procedures FDA intends to use when
conducting certain types of hearings
under the FD&C Act, costs and benefits
of this rule are expected to be minimal.
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.30(h) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that this
proposed rule contains no collection of
information. Therefore, clearance by the
Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is
not required.
IX. Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. We
have determined that this proposed rule
does not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, we
conclude that the rule does not contain
policies that have federalism
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2024 / Proposed Rules
implications as defined in the Executive
order and, consequently, a federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
X. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
We have analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13175. We
have tentatively determined that the
rule does not contain policies that
would have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. The
Agency solicits comments from tribal
officials on any potential impact on
Indian Tribes from this proposed action.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 16
Administrative practice and
procedure.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, we propose that 21
CFR part 16 be amended as follows:
77061
PART 16—REGULATORY HEARING
BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
1. The authority citation for part 16
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1451–1461; 21 U.S.C.
141–149, 321–394, 467f, 679, 821, 1034; 28
U.S.C. 2112; 42 U.S.C. 201–262, 263b, 364.
2. Amend § 16.1 by revising paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 16.1
Scope.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The statutory provisions are as
follows:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (b)(1)
Section 304(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the administrative detention of devices and drugs (see §§ 800.55(g) and
1.980(g) of this chapter).
Section 304(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the administrative detention of food for human or animal consumption
(see part 1, subpart K of this chapter).
Section 419(c)(2)(D) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the modification or revocation of a variance from the requirements
of section 419 (see part 112, subpart P of this chapter).
Section 515(e)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the proposed withdrawal of approval of a device premarket approval
application.
Section 515(e)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the temporary suspension of approval of a premarket approval application.
Section 515(f)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to a proposed order revoking a device product development protocol or
declaring a protocol not completed.
Section 515(f)(7) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to revocation of a notice of completion of a product development protocol.
Section 516(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act regarding a proposed regulation to ban a medical device with a special effective
date.
Section 518(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to a determination that a device is subject to a repair, replacement, or refund order or that a correction plan, or revised correction plan, submitted by a manufacturer, importer, or distributor is inadequate.
Section 518(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to a cease distribution and notification order or mandatory recall order concerning a medical device for human use.
Section 520(f)(2)(D) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to exemptions or variances from device current good manufacturing
practice requirements (see § 820.1(d)).
Section 520(g)(4) and (g)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to disapproval and withdrawal of approval of an application
from an investigational device exemption (see §§ 812.19(c), 812.30(c), 813.30(d), and 813.35(c) of this chapter).
Section 903(a)(8)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the misbranding of tobacco products.
Section 906(e)(2)(E) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to exemptions or variances from tobacco product manufacturing
practice requirements.
Section 910(d)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the withdrawal of an order allowing a new tobacco product to be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce.
Section 911(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the withdrawal of an order allowing a modified risk tobacco product to be
introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce.
*
§ 16.1
*
*
*
*
redesignating table 1 to paragraph (b)(2)
as table 2 to paragraph (b)(2).
[Amended]
3. Effective December 18, 2025, in
§ 16.1, amend paragraph (b)(2) by
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Sep 19, 2024
Jkt 262001
Dated: September 6, 2024.
Robert M. Califf,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2024–21232 Filed 9–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77058-77061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21232]
[[Page 77058]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 16
[Docket No. FDA-2024-N-3654]
RIN 0910-AI97
Regulatory Hearing Before the Food and Drug Administration;
General Provisions; Amendments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
proposing to amend the Scope section of our regulation that provides
for a regulatory hearing before the Agency to clarify when such
hearings are available. We are proposing to revise the list of
statutory provisions enumerated in the Scope section of the regulation
by removing one statutory reference and adding a different statutory
reference.
DATES: Either electronic or written comments on the proposed rule or
its companion direct final rule must be submitted by December 4, 2024.
If FDA receives any timely significant adverse comments on the direct
final rule with which this proposed rule is associated, we will publish
a document withdrawing the direct final rule within 30 days after the
comment period ends, and we will then proceed to respond to comments
under this proposed rule using the usual notice and comment procedures.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of December 4, 2024. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are received on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2024-N-3654 for ``Regulatory Hearing Before the Food and Drug
Administration; General Provisions; Amendments.'' Received comments,
those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-
402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents, the
plain language summary of the proposed rule of not more than 100 words
as required by the ``Providing Accountability Through Transparency
Act,'' or the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in
brackets in the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and
follow the prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Schwartz, Center for Tobacco
Products, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 1-877-287-1373,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Proposed Rule
C. Legal Authority
D. Costs and Benefits
II. Companion Document to Direct Final Rulemaking
III. Background
IV. Legal Authority
V. Description of the Proposed Rule
VI. Preliminary Economic Analysis of Impacts
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
IX. Federalism
X. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
We are proposing to amend Sec. 16.1 (21 CFR 16.1) to revise the
list of statutory provisions enumerated in the Scope section of the
regulation and thus clarify the circumstances under which the Agency
intends to use the procedures in part 16 (21 CFR part 16) for
regulatory hearings. We are also issuing a direct
[[Page 77059]]
final rule revising the list in Sec. 16.1 by removing one statutory
reference and adding a different statutory reference under the same
section of the same statute. Because we believe the rule contains
noncontroversial changes and we do not expect significant adverse
comment on the direct final rule, we are using direct final rulemaking
procedures, as described in this document.
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule, if finalized, would revise Sec. 16.1, Scope, in
order to clarify the circumstances under which the Agency intends to
use the procedures in part 16 for regulatory hearings. The proposed
rule amends the list of statutory provisions enumerated in Sec. 16.1.
Specifically, the proposed rule removes the reference to section
906(e)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
387f(e)(1)(B) (FD&C Act) (the statutory provision that requires FDA to
afford an opportunity for an oral hearing prior to promulgating a
tobacco product manufacturing practice (TPMP) requirements regulation)
and adds a reference to section 906(e)(2)(E) of the FD&C Act (the
statutory provision that provides a petitioner an opportunity for an
informal hearing on an order issued on the petitioner's request for
temporary or permanent exemption or variance from TPMP requirements).
C. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing this rule under provisions of the FD&C Act related
to regulations and hearings (21 U.S.C. 371), and general provisions
respecting control of tobacco products (21 U.S.C. 387f(e)).
D. Costs and Benefits
If finalized, this proposed rule would clarify the circumstances
under which the Agency intends to use the procedures in part 16 for a
regulatory hearing. Potentially affected entities would include
manufacturers of finished and bulk tobacco products who choose to
request an exemption or variance from TPMP requirements and are
afforded an opportunity for a hearing on orders regarding such
requests. Because this rule would merely clarify which of its existing
procedures FDA intends to use when conducting certain types of hearings
under the FD&C Act, costs and benefits of this rule are expected to be
minimal.
II. Companion Document to Direct Final Rulemaking
This proposed rule is a companion to the direct final rule
published in the rule section in this issue of the Federal Register.
This companion proposed rule provides the procedural framework to
finalize the rule in the event the direct final rule receives any
significant adverse comment and is withdrawn. The comment period for
this companion proposed rule runs concurrently with the comment period
for the direct final rule. Any comments received in response to this
companion proposed rule will also be considered as comments regarding
the direct final rule. FDA is publishing the direct final rule because
we believe the rule contains noncontroversial changes and there is
little likelihood that there will be significant adverse comments
opposing the rule.
A significant adverse comment is defined as a comment that explains
why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's
underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable
without a change. In determining whether an adverse comment is
significant and warrants terminating a direct final rulemaking, we will
consider whether the comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant
a substantive response in a notice-and comment process. Comments that
are frivolous, insubstantial, or outside the scope of the rule will not
be considered significant or adverse under this procedure. A comment
recommending a regulation change in addition to those in the direct
final rule would not be considered a significant adverse comment unless
the comment states why the rule would be ineffective without the
additional change. In addition, if a significant adverse comment
applies to a part of the direct final rule and that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of the significant adverse
comment.
If any significant adverse comments to the direct final rule are
received during the comment period, FDA will publish, within 30 days
after the comment period ends, a notice of significant adverse comment
and withdraw the direct final rule. If we withdraw the direct final
rule, any comments received will be considered comments on the proposed
rule and will be considered in developing a final rule using the usual
notice-and-comment procedure.
If no significant adverse comment is received in response to the
direct final rule during the comment period, no further action will be
taken related to this proposed rule. Instead, we will publish a
document confirming the effective date of the final rule within 30 days
after the comment period ends. Additional information about direct
final rulemaking procedures is set forth in the document entitled
``Guidance for FDA and Industry: Direct Final Rule Procedures,''
announced and provided in the Federal Register of November 21, 1997 (62
FR 62466). The guidance may be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm125166.htm.
III. Background
Part 16 provides procedures for regulatory hearings held before
FDA. The procedures in part 16 apply, among other circumstances, when a
statute or regulation provides a person an opportunity for a hearing on
a regulatory action. In 2012, FDA amended part 16 \1\ to add several
statutory and regulatory provisions throughout 21 CFR parts 1, 7, and
16, to include reference to tobacco products, where appropriate, so
that tobacco products would be subject to the same general requirements
that apply to other FDA-regulated products. The 2012 amendments revised
Sec. 16.1, which governs the scope of part 16, to include references
to certain sections of the FD&C Act that provide an opportunity for a
hearing. Among other changes, the 2012 amendments added a reference to
section 906(e)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act to Sec. 16.1. This rule further
amends Sec. 16.1, as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Further Amendments to General Regulations of the Food and
Drug Administration to Incorporate Tobacco Products,'' Food and Drug
Administration, 77 FR 5171, February 2, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Agency is amending the list of statutory provisions enumerated
in Sec. 16.1(b)(1) by removing the reference to section 906(e)(1)(B)
and adding a reference to section 906(e)(2)(E) of the FD&C Act. The
list of statutory provisions enumerated in Sec. 16.1(b)(1) currently
includes section 906(e)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act, which requires FDA to
afford the public an opportunity for an oral hearing before issuing any
TPMP requirements regulation. The purpose of an oral hearing under
section 906(e)(1)(B) is to allow the public to provide viewpoints,
opinions, and information on proposed TPMP rules. The procedures under
part 16 are not aligned with the purpose and goals of the oral hearing
required under section 906(e)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act. For example, part
16 includes procedures to resolve a ``genuine and substantial issue
[[Page 77060]]
of fact'' that is in dispute and the right to confront and cross-
examine witnesses, which are not well suited for allowing the public to
provide viewpoints, opinions, and information to FDA regarding TPMP
rules. Accordingly, FDA is removing the reference to section
906(e)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act from part 16 as other available procedures
are better suited to achieve its purposes.
The Agency is also adding a reference to section 906(e)(2)(E) of
the FD&C Act to Sec. 16.1(b)(1). Section 906(e)(2)(E) of the FD&C Act
provides an opportunity for an informal hearing after the issuance of
an order related to a petitioner's request for a temporary or permanent
exemption or variance from TPMP requirements. The list of statutory
provisions in Sec. 16.1(b)(1) that specifies the statutory and
regulatory provisions under which regulatory hearings under part 16 are
available does not currently include section 906(e)(2)(E) of the FD&C
Act. FDA is adding this reference to clarify that it intends to use the
procedures in part 16 when conducting such hearings.
FDA is proposing to amend Sec. 16.1 to clarify when it intends to
use the procedures in part 16 for regulatory hearings. If finalized,
the amended rule would be more consistent with the statute by aligning
the purposes of the two hearings referenced above with more appropriate
hearing procedures under FDA's regulations. It also clarifies the
availability of hearings under part 16 to tobacco product
manufacturers.
IV. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing this rule under provisions of the FD&C Act related
to regulations and hearings (21 U.S.C. 371) and general provisions
respecting control of tobacco products (21 U.S.C. 387f). Section 701
(21 U.S.C. 371) vests FDA with ``the authority to promulgate
regulations for the efficient enforcement of [the FD&C Act].'' Section
906(e) of the FD&C Act includes provisions regarding TPMP requirements
regulations, and temporary and permanent exemptions and variances from
TPMP requirements.
V. Description of the Proposed Rule
We are proposing to revise Sec. 16.1, Scope, to remove a reference
to ``Section 906(e)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act relating to the establishment
of good manufacturing practice requirements for tobacco products'' and
to add a reference to ``Section 906(e)(2)(E) of the FD&C Act relating
to exemptions or variances from tobacco product manufacturing practice
requirements.'' The proposed rule would clarify the availability of the
procedures in part 16 for regulatory hearings to include situations
when a petitioner has requested a temporary or permanent exemption or
variance from TPMP requirements.
VI. Preliminary Economic Analysis of Impacts
We have examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, Executive Order 14094, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094 direct us to assess all
benefits, costs, and transfers of available regulatory alternatives
and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Rules are ``significant'' under Executive Order 12866
Section 3(f)(1) (as amended by Executive Order 14094) if they ``have an
annual effect on the economy of $200 million or more (adjusted every 3
years by the Administrator of [the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA)] for changes in gross domestic product); or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local territorial, or tribal governments or
communities.'' OIRA has determined that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 Section
3(f)(1).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires us to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this rule merely clarifies which of its existing
procedures FDA intends to use when conducting certain types of hearings
under the FD&C Act, we propose to certify that the proposed rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires
us to prepare a written statement, which includes estimates of
anticipated impacts, before proposing ``any rule that includes any
Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one
year.'' The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $183
million, using the most current (2023) Implicit Price Deflator for the
Gross Domestic Product. This proposed rule would not result in an
expenditure in any year that meets or exceeds this amount.
If finalized, this proposed rule would clarify the procedures FDA
intends to use when conducting certain types of hearings under the FD&C
Act. When the TPMP rule becomes final and effective, potentially
affected entities, including manufacturers of finished and bulk tobacco
products, who choose to request an exemption or variance from TPMP
requirements would be afforded an opportunity for a hearing on orders
regarding such requests.
We do not know how many manufacturers would pursue petitioning for
an exemption or variance from TPMP requirements, once the Agency has
published a final TPMP rule to establish such requirements and that
rule is in effect, nor do we know how many requirements may be included
in each petition. We reason that a manufacturer would petition for an
exemption or variance from a TPMP requirement only if compliance with
said requirement is not a financially viable choice compared to the
cost of a filing a petition. Because this rule merely clarifies which
of its existing procedures FDA intends to use when conducting certain
types of hearings under the FD&C Act, costs and benefits of this rule
are expected to be minimal.
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.30(h) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that this proposed rule contains no
collection of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of
Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not
required.
IX. Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. We have determined that
this proposed rule does not contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
we conclude that the rule does not contain policies that have
federalism
[[Page 77061]]
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
X. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
We have analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13175. We have tentatively
determined that the rule does not contain policies that would have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. The Agency solicits comments from tribal
officials on any potential impact on Indian Tribes from this proposed
action.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 16
Administrative practice and procedure.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, we propose
that 21 CFR part 16 be amended as follows:
PART 16--REGULATORY HEARING BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 16 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1451-1461; 21 U.S.C. 141-149, 321-394,
467f, 679, 821, 1034; 28 U.S.C. 2112; 42 U.S.C. 201-262, 263b, 364.
0
2. Amend Sec. 16.1 by revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 16.1 Scope.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The statutory provisions are as follows:
Table 1 to Paragraph (b)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 304(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to
the administrative detention of devices and drugs (see Sec. Sec.
800.55(g) and 1.980(g) of this chapter).
Section 304(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to
the administrative detention of food for human or animal consumption
(see part 1, subpart K of this chapter).
Section 419(c)(2)(D) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
relating to the modification or revocation of a variance from the
requirements of section 419 (see part 112, subpart P of this chapter).
Section 515(e)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating
to the proposed withdrawal of approval of a device premarket approval
application.
Section 515(e)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating
to the temporary suspension of approval of a premarket approval
application.
Section 515(f)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating
to a proposed order revoking a device product development protocol or
declaring a protocol not completed.
Section 515(f)(7) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating
to revocation of a notice of completion of a product development
protocol.
Section 516(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act regarding a
proposed regulation to ban a medical device with a special effective
date.
Section 518(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to a
determination that a device is subject to a repair, replacement, or
refund order or that a correction plan, or revised correction plan,
submitted by a manufacturer, importer, or distributor is inadequate.
Section 518(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to a
cease distribution and notification order or mandatory recall order
concerning a medical device for human use.
Section 520(f)(2)(D) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
relating to exemptions or variances from device current good
manufacturing practice requirements (see Sec. 820.1(d)).
Section 520(g)(4) and (g)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
relating to disapproval and withdrawal of approval of an application
from an investigational device exemption (see Sec. Sec. 812.19(c),
812.30(c), 813.30(d), and 813.35(c) of this chapter).
Section 903(a)(8)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
relating to the misbranding of tobacco products.
Section 906(e)(2)(E) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
relating to exemptions or variances from tobacco product manufacturing
practice requirements.
Section 910(d)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating
to the withdrawal of an order allowing a new tobacco product to be
introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce.
Section 911(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to
the withdrawal of an order allowing a modified risk tobacco product to
be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Sec. 16.1 [Amended]
0
3. Effective December 18, 2025, in Sec. 16.1, amend paragraph (b)(2)
by redesignating table 1 to paragraph (b)(2) as table 2 to paragraph
(b)(2).
Dated: September 6, 2024.
Robert M. Califf,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
[FR Doc. 2024-21232 Filed 9-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P