Medical Devices; Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Toxicology Devices; Classification of the Clozapine Test System, 75489-75491 [2024-20895]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
administrative sanctions. However, entry of a
guilty plea can be a sign that a Respondent
accepts responsibility for complying with the
EAR and will take greater care to do so in the
future. In appropriate cases where a
Respondent is receiving substantial criminal
penalties, OEE may find that sufficient
deterrence may be achieved by lesser
administrative sanctions than would be
appropriate in the absence of criminal
penalties. Conversely, OEE might seek greater
administrative sanctions in an otherwise
similar case where a Respondent is not
subjected to criminal penalties. The presence
of a related criminal or civil disposition may
distinguish settlements among civil penalty
cases that appear otherwise to be similar. As
a result, the factors set forth for consideration
in civil penalty settlements will often be
applied differently in the context of a ‘‘global
settlement’’ of both civil and criminal cases,
or multiple civil cases, and may therefore be
of limited utility as precedent for future
cases, particularly those not involving a
global settlement.
M. Future Compliance/Deterrence Effect.
The impact an administrative enforcement
action may have on promoting future
compliance with the regulations by a
Respondent and similar parties, particularly
those in the same industry sector.
N. Other Factors That OEE Deems
Relevant. On a case-by-case basis, in
determining the appropriate enforcement
response and/or the amount of any civil
monetary penalty, OEE will consider the
totality of the circumstances to ensure that its
enforcement response is proportionate to the
nature of the violation.
IV. Civil Penalties
A. Determining What Sanctions Are
Appropriate in a Settlement
OEE will review the facts and
circumstances surrounding an apparent
violation and apply the Factors Affecting
Administrative Sanctions in section III of this
supplement in determining the appropriate
sanction or sanctions in an administrative
case, including the appropriate amount of a
civil monetary penalty where such a penalty
is sought and imposed. Penalties for
settlements reached after the initiation of
litigation will usually be higher than those
described by these guidelines.
B. Amount of Civil Penalty
1. Determining Whether a Case is
Egregious. In those cases in which a civil
monetary penalty is considered appropriate,
the OEE Director will make a determination
as to whether a case is deemed ‘‘egregious’’
for purposes of the base penalty calculation.
If a case is determined to be egregious, the
OEE Director also will also determine the
appropriate base penalty amount within the
range of base penalty amounts prescribed in
paragraphs IV.B.2.a.iii and iv of this
supplement. These determinations will be
based on an analysis of the applicable factors.
In making these determinations, substantial
weight will generally be given to Factors A
(‘‘willful or reckless violation of law’’), B
(‘‘awareness of conduct at issue’’), C (‘‘harm
to regulatory program objectives’’), and D
(‘‘individual characteristics’’), with particular
emphasis on Factors A, B, and C.
A case will be considered an ‘‘egregious
case’’ where the analysis of the applicable
factors, with a focus on Factors A, B, and C,
indicates that the case represents a
particularly serious violation of the law
calling for a strong enforcement response.
75489
2. Monetary Penalties in Egregious Cases
and Non-Egregious Cases. The civil monetary
penalty amount shall generally be calculated
as follows, except that neither the base
penalty amount nor the penalty amount will
exceed the applicable statutory maximum:
a. Base Category Calculation and
Voluntary Self-Disclosures.
i. In a non-egregious case, if the apparent
violation is disclosed through a voluntary
self-disclosure, the base penalty amount shall
be up to one-half of the transaction value.
ii. In a non-egregious case, if the apparent
violation comes to OEE’s attention by means
other than a voluntary self-disclosure, the
base penalty amount shall be up to the
transaction value.
iii. In an egregious case, if the apparent
violation is disclosed through a voluntary
self-disclosure, the base penalty amount shall
be an amount up to one-half of the statutory
maximum penalty applicable to the violation.
iv. In an egregious case, if the apparent
violation comes to OEE’s attention by means
other than a voluntary self-disclosure, the
base penalty amount shall be an amount up
to the statutory maximum penalty applicable
to the violation.
v. The applicable statutory maximum civil
penalty per violation of the Export Control
Reform Act (ECRA) of 2018 is a fine defined
in ECRA and adjusted in accordance with
U.S. law, e.g., the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act
of 2015 (Pub. L. 114–74, sec. 701), which in
2024 was $364,992, or an amount that is
twice the value of the transaction that is the
basis of the violation with respect to which
the penalty is imposed, whichever is greater.
The following matrix represents the base
penalty amount of the civil monetary penalty
for each category of violation:
BASE PENALTY MATRIX
Egregious case?
Voluntary self-disclosure?
NO
YES
YES ......................................
(1) Up to One-Half of the Transaction Value ..................
NO ........................................
(2) Up to the Transaction Value .....................................
(3) Up to One-Half of the Applicable Statutory Maximum.
(4) Up to the Applicable Statutory Maximum.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
b. Adjustment for Applicable Relevant
Factors. The base penalty amount of the civil
monetary penalty will be adjusted to reflect
applicable Factors for Administrative Action
set forth in section III of these guidelines.
The Factors may result in a penalty amount
that is lower or higher than the base penalty
amount depending upon whether they are
aggravating or mitigating and how they, in
the discretion of OEE, apply in combination
in a particular case.
C. Settlement Procedures
The procedures relating to the settlement
of administrative enforcement cases are set
forth in § 766.18 of the EAR.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Thea D. Rozman Kendler,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
21 CFR Part 862
[FR Doc. 2024–21013 Filed 9–12–24; 8:45 am]
Medical Devices; Clinical Chemistry
and Clinical Toxicology Devices;
Classification of the Clozapine Test
System
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
[Docket No. FDA–2024–N–4058]
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
75490
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
classifying the clozapine test system
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
clozapine test system’s classification.
We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the
device into class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
We believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices.
DATES: This order is effective September
16, 2024. The classification was
applicable on April 16, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Kotarek, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3504, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–2718,
Joseph.Kotarek@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
clozapine test system as class II (special
controls), which we have determined
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D
(21 CFR part 860, subpart D)). Section
207 of the Food and Drug
Administration Modernization Act of
1997 (Pub. L. 105–115) established the
first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144)
modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure.
A device sponsor may utilize either
procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially
equivalent device (see section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act, defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the 510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On May 24, 2019, FDA received
Saladax Biomedical, Inc.’s request for
De Novo classification of the MyCare
Psychiatry Clozapine Assay Kit. FDA
reviewed the request in order to classify
the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. FDA has determined that
general controls will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on April 16, 2020, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 862.3245.1 We have named the
generic type of device clozapine test
system, and it is identified as a device
intended to measure clozapine in
human specimens. Measurements
obtained by this device are used in
monitoring levels of clozapine to ensure
appropriate therapy in patients with
treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
TABLE 1—CLOZAPINE TEST SYSTEM RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks to health
Mitigation measures
Incorrect test results ...........................................................
1 FDA notes that the ACTION caption for this final
order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final order,’’
rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in December
2019, this editorial change was made to indicate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
Certain design verification and validation activities and Certain labeling information.
that the document amends the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance
with the Office of Federal Register’s (OFR)
interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the ‘‘Document
Drafting Handbook.’’
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
75491
TABLE 1—CLOZAPINE TEST SYSTEM RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES—Continued
Identified risks to health
Mitigation measures
Incorrect interpretation of test results ................................
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in part 860,
subpart D, regarding De Novo
classification have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0844; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814, subparts A through E,
regarding premarket approval, have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
parts 801 and 809, regarding labeling,
have been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 862
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
Certain design verification and validation activities and Certain labeling information.
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 862 is
amended as follows:
PART 862—CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
AND CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 862
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 862.3245 to subpart D to read
as follows:
conjunction with information available
from clinical evaluations and other
diagnostic procedures and that results
from the assay alone should not be used
in making treatment decisions.
Dated: September 10, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024–20895 Filed 9–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
■
§ 862.3245
Clozapine test system.
(a) Identification. A clozapine test
system is a device intended to measure
clozapine in human specimens.
Measurements obtained by this device
are used in monitoring levels of
clozapine to ensure appropriate therapy
in patients with treatment-resistant
schizophrenia.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Design verification and validation
must include the following:
(i) Precision study data that
demonstrates precision that is clinically
appropriate, as determined by FDA, for
the clozapine test system. Precision
studies must include a minimum of
three samples containing different
concentrations of clozapine including
near medical decision points and
throughout the expected therapeutic
range of clozapine. Samples near the
medical decision points must be clinical
specimens collected from patients
taking clozapine;
(ii) Method comparison data that
demonstrates accuracy that is clinically
acceptable, as determined by FDA, for
the clozapine test system;
(iii) Data from studies that
demonstrate that the device is free from
clinically significant interference, as
determined by FDA, from commonly coadministered medications that are used
in patients with treatment-resistant
schizophrenia; and
(iv) Data from studies that
demonstrate that the device is free from
clinically significant cross-reactivity, as
determined by FDA, from major
circulating metabolites found in the
intended use population.
(2) The labeling required under
§ 809.10 of this chapter must include a
limiting statement conveying that the
assay should only be used in
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA–2024–N–4061]
Medical Devices; Immunology and
Microbiology Devices; Classification of
the Device To Detect or Measure
Nucleic Acid From Viruses Associated
With Head and Neck Cancers
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the device to detect or
measure nucleic acid from viruses
associated with head and neck cancers
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
device to detect or measure nucleic acid
from viruses associated with head and
neck cancers’ classification. We are
taking this action because we have
determined that classifying the device
into class II (special controls) will
provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness of the device. We
believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices.
DATES: This order is effective September
16, 2024. The classification was
applicable on May 11, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim
Davis, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3220, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–1049,
Kim.Davis@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75489-75491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20895]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 862
[Docket No. FDA-2024-N-4058]
Medical Devices; Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Toxicology
Devices; Classification of the Clozapine Test System
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
[[Page 75490]]
classifying the clozapine test system into class II (special controls).
The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in
this order and will be part of the codified language for the clozapine
test system's classification. We are taking this action because we have
determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the
device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to
beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective September 16, 2024. The classification
was applicable on April 16, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Kotarek, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3504, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-2718,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the clozapine test system as class
II (special controls), which we have determined will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of
the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D (21 CFR part 860, subpart D)).
Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of
1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety
and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor may utilize
either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo
process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that
type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C
Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval application to market a
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the
510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On May 24, 2019, FDA received Saladax Biomedical, Inc.'s request
for De Novo classification of the MyCare Psychiatry Clozapine Assay
Kit. FDA reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. FDA has determined that general controls
will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of
the device.
Therefore, on April 16, 2020, FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is
codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
862.3245.\1\ We have named the generic type of device clozapine test
system, and it is identified as a device intended to measure clozapine
in human specimens. Measurements obtained by this device are used in
monitoring levels of clozapine to ensure appropriate therapy in
patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ACTION caption for this final order is
styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document amends the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the ``Document Drafting Handbook.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Clozapine Test System Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks to health Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Incorrect test results............ Certain design verification and
validation activities and Certain
labeling information.
[[Page 75491]]
Incorrect interpretation of test Certain design verification and
results. validation activities and Certain
labeling information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo classification
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part
820, regarding quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR
parts 801 and 809, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 862
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
862 is amended as follows:
PART 862--CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 862 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 862.3245 to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 862.3245 Clozapine test system.
(a) Identification. A clozapine test system is a device intended to
measure clozapine in human specimens. Measurements obtained by this
device are used in monitoring levels of clozapine to ensure appropriate
therapy in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Design verification and validation must include the following:
(i) Precision study data that demonstrates precision that is
clinically appropriate, as determined by FDA, for the clozapine test
system. Precision studies must include a minimum of three samples
containing different concentrations of clozapine including near medical
decision points and throughout the expected therapeutic range of
clozapine. Samples near the medical decision points must be clinical
specimens collected from patients taking clozapine;
(ii) Method comparison data that demonstrates accuracy that is
clinically acceptable, as determined by FDA, for the clozapine test
system;
(iii) Data from studies that demonstrate that the device is free
from clinically significant interference, as determined by FDA, from
commonly co-administered medications that are used in patients with
treatment-resistant schizophrenia; and
(iv) Data from studies that demonstrate that the device is free
from clinically significant cross-reactivity, as determined by FDA,
from major circulating metabolites found in the intended use
population.
(2) The labeling required under Sec. 809.10 of this chapter must
include a limiting statement conveying that the assay should only be
used in conjunction with information available from clinical
evaluations and other diagnostic procedures and that results from the
assay alone should not be used in making treatment decisions.
Dated: September 10, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-20895 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P