Freedom of Information Act: Revised Fee Schedule, 73258-73260 [2024-19527]
Download as PDF
73258
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS
accession number for each document
referenced (if it is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that it is
mentioned in this document.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
publicly available documents, is open
by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern
time (ET), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Revision 3 to RG 5.62 may be found
in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML23299A176. The NRC staff’s
responses to public comments on Draft
Regulatory Guide (DG)-5080 are
available in ADAMS under Accession
No. ML23299A187.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and NRC approval is not
required to reproduce them.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil
Brochman, Office of Nuclear Security
and Incident Response, telephone: 301–
287–3691; email: Phil.Brochman@
nrc.gov or Stanley Gardocki, Office of
Nuclear Regulatory Research, telephone:
301–415–1067; email:
Stanley.Gardocki@nrc.gov. Both are staff
of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Discussion
The NRC is issuing a revision in the
NRC’s ‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This
series was developed to describe
methods that are acceptable to the NRC
staff for implementing specific parts of
the agency’s regulations, to explain
techniques that the staff uses in
evaluating specific issues or postulated
events, and to describe information that
the staff needs in its review of
applications for permits and licenses.
The proposed Revision 3 to RG 5.62
was issued with a temporary
identification of DG–5080 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML23198A191).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Sep 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
This revision provides additional
guidance on physical security event
notifications, written follow-up reports,
and recordkeeping of security events
and other security-related conditions
adverse to quality. These new and
updated requirements are part of the
NRC’s final rule, entitled ‘‘Enhanced
Weapons, Firearms Background Checks,
and Security Event Notifications’’
(hereafter the Enhanced Weapons rule),
that was published in the Federal
Register on March 14, 2023 (88 FR
15864). These provisions are found in
the NRC’s regulations under title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), §§ 73.1200, 73.1205, and 10 CFR
73.1210.
Revision 3 to RG 5.62 provides
examples, considerations, and guidance
to assist licensees and their security
personnel in understanding their
responsibilities in implementing the
provisions of §§ 73.1200, 73.1205, and
73.1210.
II. Additional Information
The NRC published a notice of
availability of DG–5080 in the Federal
Register on October 27, 2023 (88 FR
73767) for a 45-day public comment
period. The public comment period
closed on December 11, 2023. The NRC
staff made changes to RG 5.62 in
response to public comments. The NRC
staff’s responses to these public
comments on DG–5080 are available in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML23299A187.
As noted in the Federal Register on
December 9, 2022 (87 FR 75671), this
document is being published in the
‘‘Rules’’ section of the Federal Register
to comply with publication
requirements under 1 CFR chapter I.
III. Congressional Review Act
This RG is a rule as defined in the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
801–808). However, the Office of
Management and Budget has not found
it to be a major rule as defined in the
Congressional Review Act.
IV. Backfitting, Forward Fitting, and
Issue Finality
Issuance of Revision 3 to RG 5.62 does
not constitute backfitting as defined in
10 CFR 72.62, ‘‘Backfitting,’’ 10 CFR
70.76, ‘‘Backfitting,’’ and 10 CFR 50.109,
‘‘Backfitting,’’ and as described in NRC
Management Directive (MD) 8.4,
‘‘Management of Backfitting, Forward
Fitting, Issue Finality, and Information
Requests’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML18093B087); does not constitute
forward fitting as that term is defined
and described in MD 8.4; and does not
affect the issue finality of any approval
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
issued under 10 CFR part 52, ‘‘Licenses,
Certificates, and Approvals for Nuclear
Powerplants,’’ because, as explained in
Revision 3 to RG 5.62, licensees are not
required to comply with the positions
set forth in the RG.
V. Submitting Suggestions for
Improvement of Regulatory Guides
A member of the public may, at any
time, submit suggestions to the NRC for
improvement of existing RGs or for the
development of new RGs. Suggestions
can be submitted on the NRC’s public
website at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/reg-guides/
contactus.html. Suggestions will be
considered in future updates and
enhancements to the ‘‘Regulatory
Guide’’ series.
Dated: September 4, 2024.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Meraj Rahimi,
Chief, Regulatory Guide and Programs
Management Branch, Division of Engineering,
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2024–20353 Filed 9–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES
SAFETY BOARD
10 CFR Part 1703
[Docket No. DNFSB–2024–01]
RIN 3155–AA03
Freedom of Information Act: Revised
Fee Schedule
Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule revises the
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board’s (DNFSB or Board) Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA or Act) fee
schedule and makes conforming
amendments to two related provisions
of its FOIA regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective October 10,
2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tayrn L. Gude, Director, Division of
Operational Services, Office of the
General Manager, Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana
Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC
20004–2901, (202) 694–7000 (Toll Free
(800) 788–4016.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Freedom of Information Act
permits Federal agencies to recover
certain costs they incur in processing
requests filed under its authority. 5
E:\FR\FM\10SER1.SGM
10SER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(i). To do so, they are
required to publish a schedule of the
fees charged for those costs in
accordance with guidelines issued by
the Office of Management and Budget,
(52 FR 10012 (March 27, 1987), revised
85 FR 81955 (Dec. 17, 2020)). The rules
governing DNFSB’s collection of fees
appear in its FOIA regulations at 10 CFR
1703.107(b)(6), and on November 15,
2023, DNFSB issued a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR) to amend
the rules to use the actual salary rate(s)
(i.e., basic hourly rate of pay plus an
additional 16%) of personnel searching
for and reviewing records in response to
FOIA requests as the basis for
calculating fees.
personnel costs on the hourly pay rate
(plus 16% to cover benefits costs).
DNFSB has replaced the words
‘‘employee’’ and ‘‘employees’’ with the
word ‘‘personnel’’ to ensure that it is
able to recover the cost of document
search and review time spent by
contract workers as well as federal
employees, in accordance with the OMB
Uniform Freedom of Information Act
Fee Schedule and Guidelines, 52 FR
10012, 10018, 7. Fees To Be ChargedGeneral. The replacement of the word
‘‘employee’’ to ‘‘personnel’’ in the final
rule so that it includes contractors is in
keeping with the purpose of the
proposed rule to align the fees with the
direct costs incurred by DNFSB.
II. Summary of Final Rule
With today’s action, DNFSB amends
the following subsections of its
regulation governing fees charged for
responding to requests for records (10
CFR 1703.107):
A. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(1): Changes the
definition of ‘‘Direct Costs’’ by replacing
the phrase ‘‘average salary and projected
benefits costs of agency employees’’
with ‘‘the hourly salary and projected
benefits costs of agency personnel.’’
B. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(2)(i): Changes
the description of the fees charged to
commercial use requesters by replacing
the phrase ‘‘average salary and projected
benefits costs of agency employees’’
with ‘‘the hourly salary and projected
benefits costs of agency personnel.’’
C. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(2)(ii): Changes
the phrase ‘‘the Board’s charges’’ to ‘‘the
DNFSB’s charges’’ and restores the last
sentence of the paragraph, which was
inadvertently omitted from the
proposed notice of rulemaking, i.e.,
‘‘[T]here shall be no charge for the first
100 pages of duplication.’’
D. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(2)(iii): Changes
the description of the fees charged to
‘‘other’’ requesters, i.e., those who are
not commercial requesters nor
representatives of the news media or
educational or noncommercial scientific
institutions, by replacing the phrase
‘‘average hourly pay rate for Board
employees, plus the average hourly
projected benefits cost’’ with ‘‘hourly
salary and projected benefits costs of the
agency personnel who search for
records in response to a request.’’
E. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6)(i): Replaces
the existing paragraph, which requires
publication of an annual update of a
schedule of FOIA fees that includes a
statement of the average hourly pay
rates and average hourly projected
benefit costs of agency employees, with
a new paragraph that lists the FOIA
response costs DNFSB may seek to
recover and bases the calculation of
III. Response to Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Sep 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
DNFSB received two sets of
comments on its proposed rulemaking.
One commenter noted that the
proposed amendment to 10 CFR
1703.107(b)(2)(ii) failed to include the
last sentence of the existing regulation
barring the agency from charging the
covered requesters for the costs of the
first 100 pages of duplication. This
comment was well taken: the omission
of the sentence containing the
exemption from duplicating costs was
unintentional, and as noted above, the
sentence has been reincorporated in the
final text of the regulation published
today.
The second commenter expressed
concern that the proposed amendments
did not explicitly take account of the
statutory prohibition from seeking fees
for responses to requests that are not
made within the statutory time limit. 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(viii). DNFSB agrees
with the commenter’s assertion that the
regulations must take account of FOIA’s
prohibition of fees for responses made
out of time. It does not agree, however,
that the changes to the proposal
suggested by the commenter are
necessary because the regulations
already contain a provision barring the
collection of fees for untimely
responses. Specifically, 10 CFR
1703.107(b)(2)(iv) states that: ‘‘The
Board will not assess any fees if it has
failed to meet its deadlines in
§ 1703.108,’’ which sets out the time
limits within which the agency is to
respond to perfected FOIA requests.
IV. Regulatory Analysis
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule pertains to the Board’s
policies and practices for processing
FOIA requests and does not impose any
new requirements on small entities.
Therefore, no analysis is required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73259
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, as amended, 5
U.S.C. 804. It will not result in: an
annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This update to the Board’s FOIA
regulations contains no new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., and it does
not require or request information from
members of the public. As a result, this
rulemaking is not covered by the
restrictions of the PRA.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
These regulations meet the applicable
standards set forth in Executive Order
12988.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
According to Executive Order 13132,
agencies must state in clear language the
preemptive effect, if any, of new
regulations. These amendments to the
Board’s FOIA regulations affect only
how the Board responds to requests for
information and have no preemptive
effect on state, tribal, or local
government laws or otherwise have
federalism implications.
Congressional Review Act
This is a rule under the Congressional
Review Act. The Board will send a copy
of this rulemaking to Congress and the
Government Accountability Office
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). The
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs has designated this rule as not a
major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
E:\FR\FM\10SER1.SGM
10SER1
73260
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1703
Freedom of Information.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board amends section 1703.107
of the Code of Federal Regulations to
read as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for part 1703
continues to read:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552; 31 U.S.C.
9701; 42 U.S.C. 2286b.
2. Amend § 1703.107 by revising by:
a. In paragraph (b)(1), revising the
definition of ‘‘Direct costs’’; and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i), (ii),
(iii), and (b)(6).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 1703.107
Fees for Record Requests.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Direct costs mean those expenditures
which DNFSB incurs in search, review,
and duplication, as applicable to
different categories of requesters, to
respond to requests under § 1703.105.
Direct costs include, for example, the
hourly salary and projected benefits
costs of agency personnel who search
for, review, or duplicate records in
response to a request. Overhead
expenses such as cost of space, and
heating or lighting the facility in which
DNFSB records are stored are not
included in direct costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(i) If documents are requested for
commercial use, DNFSB shall charge the
hourly salary and projected benefits
costs of agency personnel who search
for and review records in response to a
request, and for the costs of duplication
as set out in subsection (b)(6) of this
section.
(ii) If documents are not sought for
commercial use and the request is made
by an educational or noncommercial
scientific institution, whose purpose is
scholarly or scientific research, or a
representative of the news media,
DNFSB’s charges shall be limited to the
direct costs of duplication as set out in
subsection (b)(6) of this section. There
shall be no charge for the first 100 pages
of duplication.
(iii) For a request not described in
paragraphs (b)(2) (i) or (ii) of this
section, DNFSB shall charge the hourly
salary and projected benefits costs of the
agency’s personnel who search for
records in response to a request and the
direct costs of duplication as set out in
subsection (b)(6) of this section. There
shall be no charge for document review
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Sep 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
time, and the first 100 pages of
reproduction and the first two hours of
search time will be provided without
charge.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Schedule of Fees. To the extent
authorized by these regulations, DNFSB
is authorized to seek the following fees
to recover costs incurred in responding
to FOIA requests:
(i) Document search charges. (A)
Manual: Salary rate(s) (basic hourly pay
plus 16%) of personnel performing
records search or review.
(B) Electronic: Salary rate(s) (basic
hourly pay plus 16%) of personnel
performing search or review.
(C) Document Review Charges: Salary
rate(s) (basic hourly pay plus 16%) of
personnel performing search or review.
(iii) Commercial requests. DNFSB will
charge requesters who seek records for
commercial purposes for the cost of
reviewing them to determine whether
they are exempt from mandatory
disclosure. The agency will assess these
charges only when the records are first
analyzed to determine the applicability
of a specific exemption to a record or
portion thereof. DNFSB will not charge
for the review of an exemption
previously applied at the administrative
review level. If a record or portion
thereof was withheld in full under an
exemption that is subsequently found
inapplicable, it may be reviewed again
to determine the applicability of other
exemptions not previously considered.
DNFSB may charge for the cost of such
review.
(iv) Copying charges. (1) Paper: $.05
per page, if done in-house, or generally
available commercial rate,
approximately $0.10 per page.
(2) Electronic media: Direct cost,
including operator time (basic hourly
pay plus 16%).
(3) Audio and video cassette: Actual
commercial rates.
(4) Duplication of CD or DVD: Direct
cost, including operator time (basic
hourly pay plus 16%).
(5) Large documents, e.g., maps or
diagrams: Actual commercial rates.
Dated: August 22, 2024.
Joyce Connery,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2024–19527 Filed 9–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2024–1005; Project
Identifier AD–2022–00996–T; Amendment
39–22796; AD 2024–15–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 767–300
series airplanes. This AD was prompted
by report that some Model 767–300
series airplanes that had been converted
into a freighter configuration are
missing an electrical bracket for a wire
bundle in the main equipment center.
This AD requires installing an electrical
support bracket and re-installing wire
bundles. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
This AD is effective October 15,
2024.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of October 15, 2024.
ADDRESSES:
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2024–1005; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, any comments
received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For Boeing material, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention:
Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110 SK57,
Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; telephone
562 797 1717; website
myboeingfleet.com.
• You may view this material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available at regulations.gov
under Docket No. FAA–2024–1005.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\10SER1.SGM
10SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 10, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73258-73260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-19527]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
10 CFR Part 1703
[Docket No. DNFSB-2024-01]
RIN 3155-AA03
Freedom of Information Act: Revised Fee Schedule
AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule revises the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board's (DNFSB or Board) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA or Act) fee
schedule and makes conforming amendments to two related provisions of
its FOIA regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective October 10, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tayrn L. Gude, Director, Division of
Operational Services, Office of the General Manager, Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington,
DC 20004-2901, (202) 694-7000 (Toll Free (800) 788-4016.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Freedom of Information Act permits Federal agencies to recover
certain costs they incur in processing requests filed under its
authority. 5
[[Page 73259]]
U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(i). To do so, they are required to publish a
schedule of the fees charged for those costs in accordance with
guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget, (52 FR 10012
(March 27, 1987), revised 85 FR 81955 (Dec. 17, 2020)). The rules
governing DNFSB's collection of fees appear in its FOIA regulations at
10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6), and on November 15, 2023, DNFSB issued a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPR) to amend the rules to use the actual
salary rate(s) (i.e., basic hourly rate of pay plus an additional 16%)
of personnel searching for and reviewing records in response to FOIA
requests as the basis for calculating fees.
II. Summary of Final Rule
With today's action, DNFSB amends the following subsections of its
regulation governing fees charged for responding to requests for
records (10 CFR 1703.107):
A. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(1): Changes the definition of ``Direct
Costs'' by replacing the phrase ``average salary and projected benefits
costs of agency employees'' with ``the hourly salary and projected
benefits costs of agency personnel.''
B. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(2)(i): Changes the description of the fees
charged to commercial use requesters by replacing the phrase ``average
salary and projected benefits costs of agency employees'' with ``the
hourly salary and projected benefits costs of agency personnel.''
C. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(2)(ii): Changes the phrase ``the Board's
charges'' to ``the DNFSB's charges'' and restores the last sentence of
the paragraph, which was inadvertently omitted from the proposed notice
of rulemaking, i.e., ``[T]here shall be no charge for the first 100
pages of duplication.''
D. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(2)(iii): Changes the description of the fees
charged to ``other'' requesters, i.e., those who are not commercial
requesters nor representatives of the news media or educational or
noncommercial scientific institutions, by replacing the phrase
``average hourly pay rate for Board employees, plus the average hourly
projected benefits cost'' with ``hourly salary and projected benefits
costs of the agency personnel who search for records in response to a
request.''
E. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6)(i): Replaces the existing paragraph, which
requires publication of an annual update of a schedule of FOIA fees
that includes a statement of the average hourly pay rates and average
hourly projected benefit costs of agency employees, with a new
paragraph that lists the FOIA response costs DNFSB may seek to recover
and bases the calculation of personnel costs on the hourly pay rate
(plus 16% to cover benefits costs). DNFSB has replaced the words
``employee'' and ``employees'' with the word ``personnel'' to ensure
that it is able to recover the cost of document search and review time
spent by contract workers as well as federal employees, in accordance
with the OMB Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule and
Guidelines, 52 FR 10012, 10018, 7. Fees To Be Charged-General. The
replacement of the word ``employee'' to ``personnel'' in the final rule
so that it includes contractors is in keeping with the purpose of the
proposed rule to align the fees with the direct costs incurred by
DNFSB.
III. Response to Comments
DNFSB received two sets of comments on its proposed rulemaking.
One commenter noted that the proposed amendment to 10 CFR
1703.107(b)(2)(ii) failed to include the last sentence of the existing
regulation barring the agency from charging the covered requesters for
the costs of the first 100 pages of duplication. This comment was well
taken: the omission of the sentence containing the exemption from
duplicating costs was unintentional, and as noted above, the sentence
has been reincorporated in the final text of the regulation published
today.
The second commenter expressed concern that the proposed amendments
did not explicitly take account of the statutory prohibition from
seeking fees for responses to requests that are not made within the
statutory time limit. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(viii). DNFSB agrees with
the commenter's assertion that the regulations must take account of
FOIA's prohibition of fees for responses made out of time. It does not
agree, however, that the changes to the proposal suggested by the
commenter are necessary because the regulations already contain a
provision barring the collection of fees for untimely responses.
Specifically, 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(2)(iv) states that: ``The Board will
not assess any fees if it has failed to meet its deadlines in Sec.
1703.108,'' which sets out the time limits within which the agency is
to respond to perfected FOIA requests.
IV. Regulatory Analysis
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule pertains to the Board's policies and practices for
processing FOIA requests and does not impose any new requirements on
small entities. Therefore, no analysis is required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions are deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, as amended,
5 U.S.C. 804. It will not result in: an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This update to the Board's FOIA regulations contains no new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., and it does not require or
request information from members of the public. As a result, this
rulemaking is not covered by the restrictions of the PRA.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
These regulations meet the applicable standards set forth in
Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
According to Executive Order 13132, agencies must state in clear
language the preemptive effect, if any, of new regulations. These
amendments to the Board's FOIA regulations affect only how the Board
responds to requests for information and have no preemptive effect on
state, tribal, or local government laws or otherwise have federalism
implications.
Congressional Review Act
This is a rule under the Congressional Review Act. The Board will
send a copy of this rulemaking to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has designated this rule as not a
major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
[[Page 73260]]
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1703
Freedom of Information.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board amends section 1703.107 of the Code of Federal
Regulations to read as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for part 1703 continues to read:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 2286b.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1703.107 by revising by:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(1), revising the definition of ``Direct costs'';
and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i), (ii), (iii), and (b)(6).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1703.107 Fees for Record Requests.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
* * * * *
Direct costs mean those expenditures which DNFSB incurs in search,
review, and duplication, as applicable to different categories of
requesters, to respond to requests under Sec. 1703.105. Direct costs
include, for example, the hourly salary and projected benefits costs of
agency personnel who search for, review, or duplicate records in
response to a request. Overhead expenses such as cost of space, and
heating or lighting the facility in which DNFSB records are stored are
not included in direct costs.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(i) If documents are requested for commercial use, DNFSB shall
charge the hourly salary and projected benefits costs of agency
personnel who search for and review records in response to a request,
and for the costs of duplication as set out in subsection (b)(6) of
this section.
(ii) If documents are not sought for commercial use and the request
is made by an educational or noncommercial scientific institution,
whose purpose is scholarly or scientific research, or a representative
of the news media, DNFSB's charges shall be limited to the direct costs
of duplication as set out in subsection (b)(6) of this section. There
shall be no charge for the first 100 pages of duplication.
(iii) For a request not described in paragraphs (b)(2) (i) or (ii)
of this section, DNFSB shall charge the hourly salary and projected
benefits costs of the agency's personnel who search for records in
response to a request and the direct costs of duplication as set out in
subsection (b)(6) of this section. There shall be no charge for
document review time, and the first 100 pages of reproduction and the
first two hours of search time will be provided without charge.
* * * * *
(6) Schedule of Fees. To the extent authorized by these
regulations, DNFSB is authorized to seek the following fees to recover
costs incurred in responding to FOIA requests:
(i) Document search charges. (A) Manual: Salary rate(s) (basic
hourly pay plus 16%) of personnel performing records search or review.
(B) Electronic: Salary rate(s) (basic hourly pay plus 16%) of
personnel performing search or review.
(C) Document Review Charges: Salary rate(s) (basic hourly pay plus
16%) of personnel performing search or review.
(iii) Commercial requests. DNFSB will charge requesters who seek
records for commercial purposes for the cost of reviewing them to
determine whether they are exempt from mandatory disclosure. The agency
will assess these charges only when the records are first analyzed to
determine the applicability of a specific exemption to a record or
portion thereof. DNFSB will not charge for the review of an exemption
previously applied at the administrative review level. If a record or
portion thereof was withheld in full under an exemption that is
subsequently found inapplicable, it may be reviewed again to determine
the applicability of other exemptions not previously considered. DNFSB
may charge for the cost of such review.
(iv) Copying charges. (1) Paper: $.05 per page, if done in-house,
or generally available commercial rate, approximately $0.10 per page.
(2) Electronic media: Direct cost, including operator time (basic
hourly pay plus 16%).
(3) Audio and video cassette: Actual commercial rates.
(4) Duplication of CD or DVD: Direct cost, including operator time
(basic hourly pay plus 16%).
(5) Large documents, e.g., maps or diagrams: Actual commercial
rates.
Dated: August 22, 2024.
Joyce Connery,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2024-19527 Filed 9-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P