Adoption of 2020 Core Based Statistical Area Standards, 72766-72769 [2024-19807]

Download as PDF 72766 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2024 / Proposed Rules through Friday, except on federal holidays at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room 350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337. promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Environmental Review [Docket No. FR–6464–P–01] Incorporation by Reference Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6000 of FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This document proposes to amend the current version of that order, FAA Order JO 7400.11H, dated August 11, 2023, and effective September 15, 2023. These updates will be published in the next update to FAA Order JO 7400.11. That order is publicly available as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11 lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting points. This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ prior to any final regulatory action by the FAA. RIN 2501–AE11 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 The Proposal The FAA proposes an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend Class E Surface airspace within a 4.2-mile radius of Eastern West Virginia Regional/ Shepherd Field Airport by updating the airport coordinates and formatting to comply with FAA Orders and databases. This action would also remove the city name from the second line of the header as per FAA Order JO 7400.2. The legal description was updated by referencing ‘‘Notice to Air Missions’’ (previously ‘‘Notice to Airmen’’) and ‘‘Chart Supplement’’ (previously ‘‘Airport/ Facility Directory’’). This action would not change the airspace boundaries or operating requirements. Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations in the area. Regulatory Notices and Analyses The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule, when VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Sep 05, 2024 Jkt 262001 Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). The Proposed Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. § 71.1 [Amended] Paragraph 6002 Class E Surface Airspace. * * * AEA WV E2 * Martinsburg, WV Eastern West Virginia Regional/Shepherd Field Airport, WV (Lat 39°24′08″ N, long 77°58′59″ W) That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4.2-mile radius of Eastern West Virginia Regional/Shepherd Field Airport. This Class E Surface airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Air Mission. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart Supplement. * * * * * Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 30, 2024. Patrick Young, Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team North, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. [FR Doc. 2024–20077 Filed 9–5–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Adoption of 2020 Core Based Statistical Area Standards Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: This proposed rule would adopt the 2020 Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) standards as determined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The Metropolitan Areas Protection and Standardization Act of 2021 (MAPS Act) requires agencies that propagate OMB’s CBSA Standards for non-statistical use to seek public comment before determining that the propagation supports the purposes of the agency’s programs and is in the public interest. This proposed rule describes HUD’s use of CBSAs, how CBSA standards support relevant programs, and how HUD believes the adoption of updated standards ensures accuracy of data and program administration. SUMMARY: Comments are due by: November 5, 2024. ADDRESSES: There are two methods for submitting public comments. All submissions must refer to the above docket number and title. 1. Electronic Submission of Comments. Comments may be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make comments immediately available to the public. Comments submitted electronically through www.regulations.gov can be viewed by other commenters and interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the instructions provided on that website to submit comments electronically. 2. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500. DATES: 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11H, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 11, 2023, and effective September 15, 2023, is amended as follows: ■ * 24 CFR Part 5 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM 06SEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2024 / Proposed Rules Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must be submitted through one of the two methods specified above. Again, all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of the rule. No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not acceptable. Public Inspection of Public Comments. All comments and communications properly submitted to HUD will be available for public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, an advance appointment to review the public comments must be scheduled by calling the Regulations Division at (202) 708– 3055 (this is not a toll-free number). HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as from individuals with speech or communication disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone call, please visit https:// www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/ telecommunications-relay-service-trs. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4), a summary of this proposed rule may be found at www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt Usowski, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Affairs, Office of Policy Development and Research, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th St. SW, Washington, DC 20410, telephone number 202–402–5899 (this is not a toll-free number) or via email to Kurt.G.Usowski@hud.gov. HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone call, please visit https://www.fcc.gov/ consumers/guides/telecommunicationsrelay-service-trs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background: Core Based Statistical Areas In its role as coordinator of the Federal statistical system, OMB establishes and maintains the CBSA program. CBSAs are geographic areas containing a large population nucleus, or urban area, and adjacent communities that have a high degree of integration with that nucleus measured by commuting ties. There are two types of CBSAs, the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and the Micropolitan Statistical Area. The classifications provide a nationally consistent set of delineations for collecting, tabulating, and publishing Federal statistics for geographic areas. OMB maintains CBSAs solely for statistical purposes. Every decade, OMB reviews and updates the Standards for Delineating CBSAs (CBSA standards), which describe the data sources and methods OMB uses to determine which geographic areas are to be designated CBSAs, prior to their application to new decennial census data. OMB updated 72767 CBSA standards on July 16, 2021 (86 FR 37770), prior to applying them to 2020 Census data. The Metropolitan Areas Protection and Standardization Act of 2021, or the MAPS Act, (31 U.S.C. 6102, et seq.) prohibits agencies from automatically propagating OMB’s standards for nonstatistical use by any domestic assistance program unless the agency determines that the propagation: (1) supports the purpose of the program; and (2) is in the public interest. (31 U.S.C. 6309(a)(2)(A)) Propagation of the standards for non-statistical use by domestic assistance programs must be done through a notice and comment rulemaking. (31 U.S.C. 6309(a)(2)(B)) HUD’s Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD), Office of Housing—Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and Office of Public and Indian Housing (PIH) use CBSAs to administer their programs listed in Table 1. The Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) also uses CBSA definitions to calculate Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family Income Estimates and Income Limits. This proposed rule describes, for each of its affected programs, how HUD uses CBSA definitions, how the use of new CBSA standards support the purposes of the programs, and that the adoption of the new CBSAs in the operations of these programs is in the public interest. HUD welcomes comments on all aspects of this proposed rule. TABLE 1—HUD USES OF CBSAS Use HUD Office Community Development Block Grant Program ..................................................................................................................................... Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Program ...................................................................................................... Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program ......................................................................................................................... HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program ................................................................................................................................ Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Program ....................................................................................................................................................... Continuum of Care .................................................................................................................................................................................. Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) ......................................................................................................................................................... FHA’s Title II Program (loan limits) ......................................................................................................................................................... Choice Neighborhoods Initiative ............................................................................................................................................................. Difficult Development Area and Qualified Census Tract Designations .................................................................................................. Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family Income, and Income Limits .................................................................................................... lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 II. Use of CBSAs in HUD Programs A. Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family Income, and Income Limits HUD uses CBSAs to calculate Fair Market Rents (FMRs), HUD’s Area Median Family Income (HAMFI) estimates, and Income Limits (ILs). FMRs, HAMFI, and ILs are addressed together because they incorporate MSA definitions in substantially identical ways and the presence of interacting calculations in the determination of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Sep 05, 2024 Jkt 262001 these ‘‘program parameters.’’ That is, FMRs, HAMFI estimates, and ILs share the same geography in any given fiscal year. FMRs are an estimate of the amount of money that would cover gross rents (rent and utility expenses) on 40 percent of the rental housing units in an area. FMRs are used in several HUD programs, including determining the maximum amount a Housing Choice Voucher will cover. ILs, which are derived from HAMFIs (and in some PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 CPD. CPD. CPD. CPD. CPD. CPD. CPD. Housing. PIH. PD&R. PD&R. cases, FMRs) set eligibility income levels for HUD programs as well as various other federal programs and maximum rent levels for housing supported by the Low-Income Housing Credit. From the inception of FMRs, HUD has generally considered MSAs to be good proxies for housing markets as they have been historically based on home-to-work commuting interactions as the principal means of identifying component geography to be combined. E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM 06SEP1 72768 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2024 / Proposed Rules lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 HUD has always also made exceptions for MSAs where boundaries extended beyond the actual housing market. Following the 2000 revisions that created CBSAs, HUD began making far more exceptions to the use of OMBdefined MSAs in FMRs to avoid large changes in FMR values due largely to geographic definition changes of MSAs. Since the promulgation of regulations mandating the use of ‘‘Small Area FMRs’’ estimated at the ZIP-code level in selected FMR areas, HUD has largely stopped incorporating new counties added to MSAs into FMR areas, instead maintaining separate ‘‘HUD Metro FMR Areas’’ (HMFAs). Currently, for computations of FMR estimates HUD uses the MSAs to define which areas are in HUD Metro FMR Areas or defines the FMR area as coterminous with the MSA as appropriate for the housing market. FMRs are estimated separately for each county or county equivalent not in a MSA, including those in Micropolitan CBSAs. HUD also uses MSA-level data in the calculation of FMRs in HMFAs. See HUD’s notice announcing fiscal year (FY) 2024 FMRs for details on the use of MSA-level data at: https:// www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/ fmr2024/FMR_FY24_FinalNotice_ 2023.pdf (88 FR 60223). HAMFIs and ILs are estimated for the same areas as FMRs. Details on the relationship between ILs and FMRs is available in the FY 2024 Income Limits Methodology description at: https:// www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il// il24/IncomeLimitsMethodologyFY24.pdf. B. Difficult Development Area and Qualified Census Tract Designations HUD designates Difficult Development Areas (DDAs) and Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs) for purposes of the Low-Income Housing Credit (LIHTC) program. DDAs and QCTs derive from FMRs and ILs, but HUD also uses CBSA definitions in counting the metropolitan population and nonmetropolitan population for the DDAs, where designated populations are restricted to 20 percent of the respective totals, and the full population of metropolitan CBSAs for QCTs where the total population of designated tracts in a metropolitan area or nonmetropolitan part of a state cannot exceed 20 percent of total population of the respective areas. (26 U.S.C. 42(d)(5)(B)) C. Additional PIH Use of CBSAs PIH’s Choice Neighborhoods Initiative program uses CBSA definitions as part of its grant application process. In VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Sep 05, 2024 Jkt 262001 awarding Planning grants and Implementation grants, MSAs are used to determine points earned for the ‘‘leverage’’ rating factor. Points are different for applications targeting a neighborhood in an MSA with a population greater than 500,000 versus 500,000 or less. CBSAs are also a factor used to determine whether an applicant qualifies for an exception to the hard unit one-for-one replacement requirement. If grantees want to locate replacement housing outside their target neighborhood, they cannot locate it in areas of minority concentration, which is defined using CBSA delineations. D. Additional CPD Use of CBSAs CPD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program uses OMB’s definition of ‘‘Principal Cities’’ of Metropolitan CBSAs to determine which jurisdictions are eligible for metropolitan city status, as defined at 24 CFR 570.3. Metropolitan cities are participating units of general local government that are either principal cities, by OMB’s definition, or any other city in a metropolitan area with a population of 50,000 or more. Other entitlement jurisdictions include ‘‘urban counties’’ which are defined and may be determined eligible by one of two ways as set forth in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘HCDA’’) (see 42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(6)). Either the population of the urban county exceeds 200,000 after deducting the population contained in any metropolitan city (cities), or part(s) of a metropolitan city (cities), within the county, or the urban county meets the low- and moderate-income preponderance test, in that it has a total combined population of at least 100,000 (but fewer than 200,000) in its unincorporated areas and included units of general local government, and those areas (combined) include the majority of low- and moderate-income persons in the county. The CDBG entitlement formula uses as its denominator for five of the six variables the aggregated data for all metropolitan areas (see 42 U.S.C. 5306). CDBGeligible low- and moderate-income areas and households are determined relative to HUD’s ILs. CPD’s CDBG-Disaster Recovery funds provides relief to rebuild disasterstricken areas and crucial seed money to start the long-term recovery process. Funding is awarded to ‘‘metropolitan areas’’ and ‘‘metropolitan cities’’, among other recipients. Those geographic areas are defined in the HCDA as being established by OMB, referring to CBSAs. (42 U.S.C. 5302(a)) PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Additionally, CPD’s Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) program awards funding to States and ‘‘metropolitan statistical areas’’ to address the housing needs of low-income people living with HIV/ AIDS and their families. The statute for the program defines ‘‘metropolitan statistical areas’’ as metropolitan statistical areas established by OMB and specifies that this includes the District of Columbia (HOPWA, section 853(5) of the AIDS Housing Opportunity Act, 42 U.S.C. 12902(5)). Finally, CDP’s HOME, Continuum of Care, and ESG programs offer grants to grantees in geographic areas based on the CDBG definitions that are themselves based on CBSAs. These programs do not otherwise use CBSAs in their grant allocation formulas. The HTF program uses formula factors whose definitions are based upon CBSA-level data. E. Office of Housing’s Use of CBSAs The Office of Housing uses CBSAs to establish the Title II loan and mortgage limits. Loan limits are based on the county-level median home price of the highest price county within the area, with ‘‘area’’ defined as the ‘‘metropolitan statistical area as established by the Office of Management and Budget’’, referring to OMB’s CBSA program. (National Housing Act 203(b)(2) (12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(2)) III. Adoption of New CBSAs Standards Would Support Program Purposes and be in the Public Interest The new CBSA standards support FMRs, HAMFIs, and ILs. Because the new CBSAs become the standards for Federal statistical entities and private sector firms releasing data used in FMR calculations, adopting the new standards in these calculations serves to promote the accuracy of FMRs and makes their calculation more efficient. Whether a particular county is a nonmetropolitan FMR area or one-county HMFA makes only a slight difference in the estimated value of the FMR but may make it more accurate. HMFA designation means HUD applies adjustments to the county-level data derived from the containing MSA rather than the non-metropolitan part of the state. Similar adjustments apply to ILs. Using new CBSA definitions improves the accuracy of HUD’s affected calculations. The accuracy of these program parameters is in the public interest as it most appropriately will direct resources governed by these parameters to recipients in the most appropriate amounts. E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM 06SEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2024 / Proposed Rules The new CBSA standards support HUD’s designation of DDAs and QTCs as well as PIH, CPD, and Housing’s programs because they more accurately reflect the current housing markets, which have changed significantly since the 2010 census. Furthermore, adopting the new standards will not be disruptive to the programs as program participants are expecting HUD to regularly update the metropolitan area standards and definitions to reflect current market conditions as HUD has done historically. IV. This Proposed Rule For the reasons stated above, this proposed rule would affirmatively adopt new OMB CBSA Standards for purposes of estimating Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family Incomes, and Income Limits, and for other administrative purposes in PIH, CPD, and Housing programs. This includes any future revisions to the CBSA delineations under these standards. HUD proposes to add a new subpart M to part 5 that will cross reference all affected programs and adopt the updated CBSA standards for such programs. V. Findings and Certifications lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Regulatory Review (Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094) This proposed rule would adopt updated standards for CBSA delineations that HUD programs use for program administrative purposes. It is statistical and administrative in nature with the purpose of maintaining past administrative practices. This rule was not subject to OMB review. This proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as defined in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and is not an economically significant regulatory action. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531– 1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, and on the private sector. This proposed rule does not impose any Federal mandates on any State, local, or Tribal governments, or on the private sector, within the meaning of UMRA. Environmental Review This proposed rule establishes discretionary review of loan limits, fair market rent schedules, income limits and exclusions with regard to eligibility for or calculation of HUD housing assistance or rental assistance, and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:03 Sep 05, 2024 Jkt 262001 similar rate and cost determinations and related external administrative or fiscal requirements or procedures which do not constitute a development decision that affects the physical condition of specific project areas or building sites. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6), this proposed rule is categorically excluded from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321). Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule would adopt updated definitions of CBSA geographic areas that affected HUD programs use for various administrative purposes. The proposed adoption would be statistical and administrative in nature and consistent with longstanding HUD policy and practice. Therefore, the proposed action does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Executive Order 13132, Federalism Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either: (i) imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments and is not required by statute, or (ii) preempts State law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive order. This proposed rule does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments or preempt State law within the meaning of the Executive order. List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 5 Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Claims, Crime, Government contracts, Grant programs—housing and community development, Individuals with disabilities, Intergovernmental relations, Loan programs—housing and community development, Low and moderate income housing, Mortgage insurance, Penalties, Pets, Public housing, Rent subsidies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Social Security, Unemployment compensation, Wages. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 72769 Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, HUD proposes to amend 24 CFR part 5 as follows: PART 5—GENERAL HUD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS 1. The authority for part 5 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1701x; 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437f, 1437n, 3535(d); 42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.; 34 U.S.C. 12471 et seq.; Sec. 327, Pub. L. 109–115, 119 Stat. 2396; E.O. 13279, 67 FR 77141, 3 CFR, 2002 Comp., p. 258; E.O. 13559, 75 FR 71319, 3 CFR, 2010 Comp., p. 273; E.O. 14015, 86 FR 10007, 3 CFR, 2021 Comp., p. 517. ■ 2. Add subpart M to read as follows: Subpart M—Core Based Statistical Areas § 5.3001 Automatic propagation of OMB’s Core Based Statistical Area Standards. When using Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs), HUD shall use the 2020 CBSA standards adopted by the Office of Management and Budget on July 16, 2021, through publication in the Federal Register as well as any subsequent updates to the CBSA delineations based on these standards made by the Office of Management and Budget. Purposes and programs that use the CBSA standards include, but are not limited to: (a) The Community Development Block Grant Program (24 CFR part 570); (b) The Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery funds (applicable appropriations and Federal Register notices); (c) The Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program (24 CFR part 574); (d) The HOME Investment Partnerships Program (24 CFR part 92); (e) The Continuum of Care Program (24 CFR part 578); (f) The Emergency Solutions Grants Program (24 CFR part 576); (e) The FHA Title II Program (National Housing Act of 1934 Title II); (f) The Choice Neighborhoods Initiative Program (42 U.S.C. 1437v, as applied by the applicable annual appropriations act(s); 24 CFR 905.602(d); (g) The Housing Trust Fund Program (24 CFR part 93); and (h) The calculation of: Fair Market Rents (24 CFR part 888); Area Median Family Income (this part); Income Limits (this part); Difficult Development Areas; and Qualified Census Tracts. Todd Richardson, General Deputy Assistant Secretary, Policy Development and Research. [FR Doc. 2024–19807 Filed 9–5–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM 06SEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72766-72769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-19807]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Part 5

[Docket No. FR-6464-P-01]
RIN 2501-AE11


Adoption of 2020 Core Based Statistical Area Standards

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban 
Development (HUD).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would adopt the 2020 Core Based Statistical 
Area (CBSA) standards as determined by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB). The Metropolitan Areas Protection and Standardization Act 
of 2021 (MAPS Act) requires agencies that propagate OMB's CBSA 
Standards for non-statistical use to seek public comment before 
determining that the propagation supports the purposes of the agency's 
programs and is in the public interest. This proposed rule describes 
HUD's use of CBSAs, how CBSA standards support relevant programs, and 
how HUD believes the adoption of updated standards ensures accuracy of 
data and program administration.

DATES: Comments are due by: November 5, 2024.

ADDRESSES: There are two methods for submitting public comments. All 
submissions must refer to the above docket number and title.
    1. Electronic Submission of Comments. Comments may be submitted 
electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit 
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the 
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely 
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make comments immediately available 
to the public. Comments submitted electronically through 
www.regulations.gov can be viewed by other commenters and interested 
members of the public. Commenters should follow the instructions 
provided on that website to submit comments electronically.
    2. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by 
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department 
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 10276, 
Washington, DC 20410-0500.


[[Page 72767]]


    Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must 
be submitted through one of the two methods specified above. Again, 
all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of the 
rule.

    No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not acceptable.
    Public Inspection of Public Comments. All comments and 
communications properly submitted to HUD will be available for public 
inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above 
address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, an 
advance appointment to review the public comments must be scheduled by 
calling the Regulations Division at (202) 708-3055 (this is not a toll-
free number). HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from 
individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as from 
individuals with speech or communication disabilities. To learn more 
about how to make an accessible telephone call, please visit https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs. In 
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4), a summary of this proposed rule may 
be found at www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt Usowski, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Economic Affairs, Office of Policy Development and 
Research, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th St. SW, 
Washington, DC 20410, telephone number 202-402-5899 (this is not a 
toll-free number) or via email to [email protected]. HUD welcomes 
and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard 
of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication 
disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone 
call, please visit https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background: Core Based Statistical Areas

    In its role as coordinator of the Federal statistical system, OMB 
establishes and maintains the CBSA program. CBSAs are geographic areas 
containing a large population nucleus, or urban area, and adjacent 
communities that have a high degree of integration with that nucleus 
measured by commuting ties. There are two types of CBSAs, the 
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and the Micropolitan Statistical 
Area. The classifications provide a nationally consistent set of 
delineations for collecting, tabulating, and publishing Federal 
statistics for geographic areas. OMB maintains CBSAs solely for 
statistical purposes. Every decade, OMB reviews and updates the 
Standards for Delineating CBSAs (CBSA standards), which describe the 
data sources and methods OMB uses to determine which geographic areas 
are to be designated CBSAs, prior to their application to new decennial 
census data. OMB updated CBSA standards on July 16, 2021 (86 FR 37770), 
prior to applying them to 2020 Census data.
    The Metropolitan Areas Protection and Standardization Act of 2021, 
or the MAPS Act, (31 U.S.C. 6102, et seq.) prohibits agencies from 
automatically propagating OMB's standards for non-statistical use by 
any domestic assistance program unless the agency determines that the 
propagation: (1) supports the purpose of the program; and (2) is in the 
public interest. (31 U.S.C. 6309(a)(2)(A)) Propagation of the standards 
for non-statistical use by domestic assistance programs must be done 
through a notice and comment rulemaking. (31 U.S.C. 6309(a)(2)(B))
    HUD's Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD), Office of 
Housing--Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and Office of Public and 
Indian Housing (PIH) use CBSAs to administer their programs listed in 
Table 1. The Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) also uses 
CBSA definitions to calculate Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family 
Income Estimates and Income Limits. This proposed rule describes, for 
each of its affected programs, how HUD uses CBSA definitions, how the 
use of new CBSA standards support the purposes of the programs, and 
that the adoption of the new CBSAs in the operations of these programs 
is in the public interest. HUD welcomes comments on all aspects of this 
proposed rule.

                       Table 1--HUD Uses of CBSAs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Use                              HUD Office
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community Development Block Grant Program.......  CPD.
Community Development Block Grant Disaster        CPD.
 Recovery Program.
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS       CPD.
 Program.
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program.....  CPD.
Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Program................  CPD.
Continuum of Care...............................  CPD.
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG).................  CPD.
FHA's Title II Program (loan limits)............  Housing.
Choice Neighborhoods Initiative.................  PIH.
Difficult Development Area and Qualified Census   PD&R.
 Tract Designations.
Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family Income,     PD&R.
 and Income Limits.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Use of CBSAs in HUD Programs

A. Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family Income, and Income Limits

    HUD uses CBSAs to calculate Fair Market Rents (FMRs), HUD's Area 
Median Family Income (HAMFI) estimates, and Income Limits (ILs). FMRs, 
HAMFI, and ILs are addressed together because they incorporate MSA 
definitions in substantially identical ways and the presence of 
interacting calculations in the determination of these ``program 
parameters.'' That is, FMRs, HAMFI estimates, and ILs share the same 
geography in any given fiscal year. FMRs are an estimate of the amount 
of money that would cover gross rents (rent and utility expenses) on 40 
percent of the rental housing units in an area. FMRs are used in 
several HUD programs, including determining the maximum amount a 
Housing Choice Voucher will cover. ILs, which are derived from HAMFIs 
(and in some cases, FMRs) set eligibility income levels for HUD 
programs as well as various other federal programs and maximum rent 
levels for housing supported by the Low-Income Housing Credit. From the 
inception of FMRs, HUD has generally considered MSAs to be good proxies 
for housing markets as they have been historically based on home-to-
work commuting interactions as the principal means of identifying 
component geography to be combined.

[[Page 72768]]

HUD has always also made exceptions for MSAs where boundaries extended 
beyond the actual housing market. Following the 2000 revisions that 
created CBSAs, HUD began making far more exceptions to the use of OMB-
defined MSAs in FMRs to avoid large changes in FMR values due largely 
to geographic definition changes of MSAs. Since the promulgation of 
regulations mandating the use of ``Small Area FMRs'' estimated at the 
ZIP-code level in selected FMR areas, HUD has largely stopped 
incorporating new counties added to MSAs into FMR areas, instead 
maintaining separate ``HUD Metro FMR Areas'' (HMFAs).
    Currently, for computations of FMR estimates HUD uses the MSAs to 
define which areas are in HUD Metro FMR Areas or defines the FMR area 
as coterminous with the MSA as appropriate for the housing market. FMRs 
are estimated separately for each county or county equivalent not in a 
MSA, including those in Micropolitan CBSAs. HUD also uses MSA-level 
data in the calculation of FMRs in HMFAs. See HUD's notice announcing 
fiscal year (FY) 2024 FMRs for details on the use of MSA-level data at: 
https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2024/FMR_FY24_FinalNotice_2023.pdf (88 FR 60223). HAMFIs and ILs are 
estimated for the same areas as FMRs. Details on the relationship 
between ILs and FMRs is available in the FY 2024 Income Limits 
Methodology description at: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il//il24/IncomeLimitsMethodology-FY24.pdf.

B. Difficult Development Area and Qualified Census Tract Designations

    HUD designates Difficult Development Areas (DDAs) and Qualified 
Census Tracts (QCTs) for purposes of the Low-Income Housing Credit 
(LIHTC) program. DDAs and QCTs derive from FMRs and ILs, but HUD also 
uses CBSA definitions in counting the metropolitan population and 
nonmetropolitan population for the DDAs, where designated populations 
are restricted to 20 percent of the respective totals, and the full 
population of metropolitan CBSAs for QCTs where the total population of 
designated tracts in a metropolitan area or nonmetropolitan part of a 
state cannot exceed 20 percent of total population of the respective 
areas. (26 U.S.C. 42(d)(5)(B))

C. Additional PIH Use of CBSAs

    PIH's Choice Neighborhoods Initiative program uses CBSA definitions 
as part of its grant application process. In awarding Planning grants 
and Implementation grants, MSAs are used to determine points earned for 
the ``leverage'' rating factor. Points are different for applications 
targeting a neighborhood in an MSA with a population greater than 
500,000 versus 500,000 or less. CBSAs are also a factor used to 
determine whether an applicant qualifies for an exception to the hard 
unit one-for-one replacement requirement. If grantees want to locate 
replacement housing outside their target neighborhood, they cannot 
locate it in areas of minority concentration, which is defined using 
CBSA delineations.

D. Additional CPD Use of CBSAs

    CPD's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program uses OMB's 
definition of ``Principal Cities'' of Metropolitan CBSAs to determine 
which jurisdictions are eligible for metropolitan city status, as 
defined at 24 CFR 570.3. Metropolitan cities are participating units of 
general local government that are either principal cities, by OMB's 
definition, or any other city in a metropolitan area with a population 
of 50,000 or more. Other entitlement jurisdictions include ``urban 
counties'' which are defined and may be determined eligible by one of 
two ways as set forth in the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1974, as amended (``HCDA'') (see 42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(6)). Either the 
population of the urban county exceeds 200,000 after deducting the 
population contained in any metropolitan city (cities), or part(s) of a 
metropolitan city (cities), within the county, or the urban county 
meets the low- and moderate-income preponderance test, in that it has a 
total combined population of at least 100,000 (but fewer than 200,000) 
in its unincorporated areas and included units of general local 
government, and those areas (combined) include the majority of low- and 
moderate-income persons in the county. The CDBG entitlement formula 
uses as its denominator for five of the six variables the aggregated 
data for all metropolitan areas (see 42 U.S.C. 5306). CDBG-eligible 
low- and moderate-income areas and households are determined relative 
to HUD's ILs.
    CPD's CDBG-Disaster Recovery funds provides relief to rebuild 
disaster-stricken areas and crucial seed money to start the long-term 
recovery process. Funding is awarded to ``metropolitan areas'' and 
``metropolitan cities'', among other recipients. Those geographic areas 
are defined in the HCDA as being established by OMB, referring to 
CBSAs. (42 U.S.C. 5302(a))
    Additionally, CPD's Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS 
(HOPWA) program awards funding to States and ``metropolitan statistical 
areas'' to address the housing needs of low-income people living with 
HIV/AIDS and their families. The statute for the program defines 
``metropolitan statistical areas'' as metropolitan statistical areas 
established by OMB and specifies that this includes the District of 
Columbia (HOPWA, section 853(5) of the AIDS Housing Opportunity Act, 42 
U.S.C. 12902(5)).
    Finally, CDP's HOME, Continuum of Care, and ESG programs offer 
grants to grantees in geographic areas based on the CDBG definitions 
that are themselves based on CBSAs. These programs do not otherwise use 
CBSAs in their grant allocation formulas. The HTF program uses formula 
factors whose definitions are based upon CBSA-level data.

E. Office of Housing's Use of CBSAs

    The Office of Housing uses CBSAs to establish the Title II loan and 
mortgage limits. Loan limits are based on the county-level median home 
price of the highest price county within the area, with ``area'' 
defined as the ``metropolitan statistical area as established by the 
Office of Management and Budget'', referring to OMB's CBSA program. 
(National Housing Act 203(b)(2) (12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(2))

III. Adoption of New CBSAs Standards Would Support Program Purposes and 
be in the Public Interest

    The new CBSA standards support FMRs, HAMFIs, and ILs. Because the 
new CBSAs become the standards for Federal statistical entities and 
private sector firms releasing data used in FMR calculations, adopting 
the new standards in these calculations serves to promote the accuracy 
of FMRs and makes their calculation more efficient. Whether a 
particular county is a non-metropolitan FMR area or one-county HMFA 
makes only a slight difference in the estimated value of the FMR but 
may make it more accurate. HMFA designation means HUD applies 
adjustments to the county-level data derived from the containing MSA 
rather than the non-metropolitan part of the state. Similar adjustments 
apply to ILs. Using new CBSA definitions improves the accuracy of HUD's 
affected calculations. The accuracy of these program parameters is in 
the public interest as it most appropriately will direct resources 
governed by these parameters to recipients in the most appropriate 
amounts.

[[Page 72769]]

    The new CBSA standards support HUD's designation of DDAs and QTCs 
as well as PIH, CPD, and Housing's programs because they more 
accurately reflect the current housing markets, which have changed 
significantly since the 2010 census. Furthermore, adopting the new 
standards will not be disruptive to the programs as program 
participants are expecting HUD to regularly update the metropolitan 
area standards and definitions to reflect current market conditions as 
HUD has done historically.

IV. This Proposed Rule

    For the reasons stated above, this proposed rule would 
affirmatively adopt new OMB CBSA Standards for purposes of estimating 
Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family Incomes, and Income Limits, and 
for other administrative purposes in PIH, CPD, and Housing programs. 
This includes any future revisions to the CBSA delineations under these 
standards.
    HUD proposes to add a new subpart M to part 5 that will cross 
reference all affected programs and adopt the updated CBSA standards 
for such programs.

V. Findings and Certifications

Regulatory Review (Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094)

    This proposed rule would adopt updated standards for CBSA 
delineations that HUD programs use for program administrative purposes. 
It is statistical and administrative in nature with the purpose of 
maintaining past administrative practices. This rule was not subject to 
OMB review. This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory 
action'' as defined in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and is not 
an economically significant regulatory action.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 
1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to 
assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and 
Tribal governments, and on the private sector. This proposed rule does 
not impose any Federal mandates on any State, local, or Tribal 
governments, or on the private sector, within the meaning of UMRA.

Environmental Review

    This proposed rule establishes discretionary review of loan limits, 
fair market rent schedules, income limits and exclusions with regard to 
eligibility for or calculation of HUD housing assistance or rental 
assistance, and similar rate and cost determinations and related 
external administrative or fiscal requirements or procedures which do 
not constitute a development decision that affects the physical 
condition of specific project areas or building sites. Accordingly, 
under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6), this proposed rule is categorically excluded 
from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 
generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility 
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking 
requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
This proposed rule would adopt updated definitions of CBSA geographic 
areas that affected HUD programs use for various administrative 
purposes. The proposed adoption would be statistical and administrative 
in nature and consistent with longstanding HUD policy and practice. 
Therefore, the proposed action does not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) prohibits an agency from 
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule 
either: (i) imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and 
local governments and is not required by statute, or (ii) preempts 
State law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding 
requirements of section 6 of the Executive order. This proposed rule 
does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial 
direct compliance costs on State and local governments or preempt State 
law within the meaning of the Executive order.

List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 5

    Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Claims, Crime, 
Government contracts, Grant programs--housing and community 
development, Individuals with disabilities, Intergovernmental 
relations, Loan programs--housing and community development, Low and 
moderate income housing, Mortgage insurance, Penalties, Pets, Public 
housing, Rent subsidies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Social Security, Unemployment compensation, Wages.

    Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, HUD proposes 
to amend 24 CFR part 5 as follows:

PART 5--GENERAL HUD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS

0
1. The authority for part 5 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1701x; 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437f, 
1437n, 3535(d); 42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.; 34 U.S.C. 12471 et seq.; 
Sec. 327, Pub. L. 109-115, 119 Stat. 2396; E.O. 13279, 67 FR 77141, 
3 CFR, 2002 Comp., p. 258; E.O. 13559, 75 FR 71319, 3 CFR, 2010 
Comp., p. 273; E.O. 14015, 86 FR 10007, 3 CFR, 2021 Comp., p. 517.

0
2. Add subpart M to read as follows:

Subpart M--Core Based Statistical Areas


Sec.  5.3001   Automatic propagation of OMB's Core Based Statistical 
Area Standards.

    When using Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs), HUD shall use the 
2020 CBSA standards adopted by the Office of Management and Budget on 
July 16, 2021, through publication in the Federal Register as well as 
any subsequent updates to the CBSA delineations based on these 
standards made by the Office of Management and Budget. Purposes and 
programs that use the CBSA standards include, but are not limited to:
    (a) The Community Development Block Grant Program (24 CFR part 
570);
    (b) The Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery funds 
(applicable appropriations and Federal Register notices);
    (c) The Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program (24 CFR 
part 574);
    (d) The HOME Investment Partnerships Program (24 CFR part 92);
    (e) The Continuum of Care Program (24 CFR part 578);
    (f) The Emergency Solutions Grants Program (24 CFR part 576);
    (e) The FHA Title II Program (National Housing Act of 1934 Title 
II);
    (f) The Choice Neighborhoods Initiative Program (42 U.S.C. 1437v, 
as applied by the applicable annual appropriations act(s); 24 CFR 
905.602(d);
    (g) The Housing Trust Fund Program (24 CFR part 93); and
    (h) The calculation of: Fair Market Rents (24 CFR part 888); Area 
Median Family Income (this part); Income Limits (this part); Difficult 
Development Areas; and Qualified Census Tracts.

Todd Richardson,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary, Policy Development and Research.
[FR Doc. 2024-19807 Filed 9-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.