Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Arizona; 2015 Ozone Infrastructure Requirements, 71830-71838 [2024-17711]
Download as PDF
71830
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED NEW JERSEY NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS—Continued
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
SIP element
EPA approval
date
Explanation
• Full approval.
• Certifies New Jersey’s commitment to implement NNSR requirements statewide within the
Ozone Transport Region (OTR)
for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.
• Full approval.
2015 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements OTR Certification.
State-wide .....................................
11/23/2021
9/4/2024, [insert
Federal Register citation].
2015 8-hour Ozone Marginal nonattainment emission inventory.
New Jersey portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City,
PA–NJ–MD–DE, 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area.
New Jersey portion of the New
York-Northern New Jersey-Long
Island NY–NJ–CT 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area.
11/23/2021
9/4/2024, [insert
Federal Register citation].
11/23/2021
9/4/2024, [insert
Federal Register citation].
2015 8-hour Ozone Moderate
nonattainment emission inventory.
3. Amend § 52.1582 by adding
paragraph (s) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1582 Control strategy and
regulations: Ozone.
*
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
New Jersey
submittal date
*
*
*
*
(s)(1) The Reasonable Further Progress
Plans for milestone years 2017 and 2020
pursuant to the 2008 8-hour Ozone
NAAQS, included in New York’s
January 2, 2018, and November 23,
2021, State Implementation Plan
submittals for the New Jersey portion of
the New York-Northern New JerseyLong Island NY–NJ–CT 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area are approved.
(2) The November 23, 2021, New
Jersey plan submittal providing a
certification that the State has satisfied
the requirements for an ozone
nonattainment new source review
program as sufficient for purposes of the
state-wide 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
Serious classification, including the
New Jersey portion of the NY–NJ–CT
nonattainment area, is approved.
(3) New Jersey’s certification that the
State has satisfied the requirements for
Emission Statement Program under the
Clean Air Act for the 2008 8-hour Ozone
NAAQS Serious classification, included
in the State’s November 23, 2021, SIP
submittal for the New Jersey portion of
the New York-Northern New JerseyLong Island nonattainment area is
approved.
(4) New Jersey’s certification that the
State has satisfied the requirements for
Clean Fuel for Fleets under the Clean
Air Act for the 2008 8-hour Ozone
NAAQS, included in the State’s
November 23, 2021, SIP submittal for
the New Jersey portion of the New YorkNorthern New Jersey-Long Island
nonattainment area is approved.
(5) The November 23, 2021, New
Jersey plan submittal providing a
certification that the State has satisfied
the requirements for an ozone
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
nonattainment new source review
program as sufficient for purposes of the
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS Marginal
classification for the New Jersey portion
of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic
City, PA–NJ–MD–DE, 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area, is approved.
(6) The November 23, 2021, New
Jersey plan submittal providing a
certification that the State has satisfied
the requirements for an ozone
nonattainment new source review
program as sufficient for purposes of the
state-wide 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS
Moderate classification, including the
New Jersey portion of the NY–NJ–CT
nonattainment area, is approved.
[FR Doc. 2024–19581 Filed 9–3–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0326; FRL–9693–02–
R9]
Partial Approval and Partial
Disapproval of Air Quality State
Implementation Plans; Arizona; 2015
Ozone Infrastructure Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving in part and
disapproving in part State
implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Arizona
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) for
the implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of the 2015 ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS
or ‘‘standard’’). In addition to our partial
approval and partial disapproval of
Arizona’s SIP revision, the EPA is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Full approval.
approving rules in the Arizona Revised
Statutes and Pima County Code related
to public availability of emissions
reports into the Arizona SIP and
reclassifying regions in Arizona with
respect to emergency episode plans for
ozone. Additionally, this final action
includes an error correction to amend
regulatory text related to the
nonattainment designation of the
Phoenix-Mesa, Arizona area for the 2015
ozone NAAQS.
DATES:
This rule is effective October 4,
2024.
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0326. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
ADDRESSES:
Ben
Leers, Planning and Analysis Branch
(AIR–2), Air and Radiation Division,
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 947–
4279, or by email at leers.ben@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Statutory Requirements
B. State Submittals
C. EPA’s Proposal
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. Final Action
A. Partial Approvals and Partial
Disapprovals
B. Incorporation of Rules Into Arizona’s
State Implementation Plan
C. Reclassification of Regions for Ozone
Episode Plans
D. Error Correction to 40 CFR 81.303
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
I. Background
A. Statutory Requirements
Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA requires
each State to submit to the EPA, within
three years after the promulgation of a
primary or secondary NAAQS or any
revision thereof, a SIP revision that
provides for the implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of such
NAAQS.
Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA contains
the infrastructure SIP requirements that
generally relate to the information,
authorities, compliance assurances,
procedural requirements, and control
measures that constitute the
‘‘infrastructure’’ of a State’s air quality
management program. These
infrastructure SIP requirements (or
‘‘elements’’) required by section
110(a)(2) are as follows:
• Section 110(a)(2)(A): Emission
limits and other control measures.
• Section 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air
quality monitoring/data system.
• Section 110(a)(2)(C): Program for
enforcement of control measures and
regulation of new and modified
stationary sources.
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i): Interstate
pollution transport.
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii): Interstate
and international pollution abatement.
• Section 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate
resources and authority, conflict of
interest, and oversight of local and
regional government agencies.
• Section 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary
source monitoring and reporting.
• Section 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency
episodes.
• Section 110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.
• Section 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation
with government officials, public
notification, prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD), and visibility
protection.
• Section 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality
modeling and submittal of modeling
data.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
• Section 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting
fees.
• Section 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/
participation by affected local entities.
Two elements identified in section
110(a)(2) are not governed by the threeyear submittal deadline of section
110(a)(1) and are therefore not
addressed in this action. These two
elements are: (i) section 110(a)(2)(C), to
the extent that it refers to permit
programs required under part D
(nonattainment new source review
(NSR)), and (ii) section 110(a)(2)(I),
pertaining to the nonattainment
planning requirements of part D. As a
result, this action does not address
requirements for the nonattainment NSR
portion of section 110(a)(2)(C) or the
whole of section 110(a)(2)(I).
This action also does not address the
interstate transport requirements under
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), referred to as
‘‘prongs 1 and 2’’ of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i), or the requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) pertaining to
interference with visibility protection in
other States, referred to as ‘‘prong 4’’ of
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i). The EPA has
proposed action on Arizona’s SIP with
respect to prongs 1, 2 and 4 of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS in separate rulemakings.1
B. State Submittals
The Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
submitted two SIP revisions to address
the infrastructure SIP requirements in
CAA sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for
the 2015 ozone NAAQS. On September
24, 2018, ADEQ submitted the ‘‘Arizona
State Implementation Plan Revision
under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1)
and 110(a)(2) for the 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.’’ 2 On February 10, 2022,
ADEQ submitted the ‘‘State
Implementation Plan Revision: Clean
Air Act Section 110(a)(2) for the 2012
Fine Particulate & 2015 Ozone NAAQS’’
(‘‘2022 I–SIP supplement’’).3 These
1 The EPA proposed to approve Arizona’s SIP
with respect to prongs 1 and 2 of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) on June 24, 2022 (87 FR 37776).
However, based on updated photochemical
modeling, the EPA issued a supplemental proposal
on February 16, 2024, proposing to approve
Arizona’s SIP with respect to prong 1 and to
disapprove Arizona’s SIP with respect to prong 2
(89 FR 12666). The EPA proposed to disapprove
Arizona’s SIP with respect to prong 4 of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) on May 31, 2024 (89 FR 47398).
2 Letter dated September 24, 2018, from Timothy
S. Franquist, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ,
to Michael Stoker, Regional Administrator, EPA
Region IX, Subject: ‘‘Submittal of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan Revision under Clean Air Act
Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS.’’
3 Letter dated February 10, 2022, from Daniel
Czecholinski, Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71831
submittals collectively address
Arizona’s obligation to satisfy
infrastructure SIP requirements for the
2015 ozone NAAQS.4 We refer to them
collectively herein as ‘‘Arizona’s ozone
I–SIP submittals.’’
C. EPA’s Proposal
1. Approvals and Partial Approvals
We evaluated Arizona’s ozone I–SIP
submittals and the existing provisions of
the Arizona SIP for compliance with the
infrastructure SIP requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2) and the applicable
regulations in 40 CFR part 51
(‘‘Requirements for Preparation,
Adoption, and Submittal of State
Implementation Plans’’). Based on the
evaluation presented in the proposed
rulemaking and in the accompanying
technical support document (TSD), on
December 5, 2022, we proposed to
partially approve Arizona’s ozone I–SIP
submittals with respect to the 2015
ozone NAAQS for the requirements of
the following sections of the CAA.5
Partial approvals are indicated by the
parenthetical ‘‘(in part).’’
• Section 110(a)(2)(A)—Emission
limits and other control measures.
• Section 110(a)(2)(B)—Ambient air
quality monitoring/data system.
• Section 110(a)(2)(C)—Program for
enforcement of control measures and
regulation of new stationary sources (in
part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—
Interference with maintenance, or
‘‘prong 3’’ (in part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)—Interstate
pollution abatement, CAA section 126
(in part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)—
International pollution abatement, CAA
section 115.
• Section 110(a)(2)(E)—Adequate
resources and authority, conflict of
interest, and oversight of local
governments and regional agencies.
• Section 110(a)(2)(F)—Stationary
source monitoring and reporting.
• Section 110(a)(2)(G)—Emergency
episodes.
• Section 110(a)(2)(H)—Consultation
with government officials.
to Martha Guzman, Regional Administrator, EPA
Region IX, Subject: ‘‘Submittal of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan Revision under Clean Air Act
Sections 110(a)(2) for the 2012 Fine Particulate and
the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.’’
4 The 2022 I–SIP supplement also addresses
certain infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2012
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. We are not
taking action on the portions of the 2022 I–SIP
supplement addressing the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS in
this rulemaking.
5 87 FR 74349 (December 5, 2022). The TSD
supporting our proposed rulemaking is available at
https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID EPA–
R09–OAR–2022–0326.
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
71832
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
• Section 110(a)(2)(J)—Consultation
with government officials, public
notification, PSD, and visibility
protection (in part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(K)—Air quality
modeling and submission of modeling
data.
• Section 110(a)(2)(L)—Permitting
fees.
• Section 110(a)(2)(M)—
Consultation/participation by affected
local entities.
2. Partial Disapprovals
Based on the evaluation presented in
the proposed rulemaking and
accompanying TSD,6 the EPA proposed
to partially disapprove Arizona’s ozone
I–SIP submittals with respect to the
2015 ozone NAAQS for the following
CAA requirements:
• Section 110(a)(2)(C)—Program for
enforcement of control measures and
regulation of new stationary sources (in
part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—
Interference with maintenance, or
‘‘prong 3’’ (in part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)—Interstate
pollution abatement, CAA section 126
(in part).7
• Section 110(a)(2)(J)—PSD and
visibility protection (in part).
The EPA proposed to partially
disapprove Arizona’s ozone I–SIP
submittals with respect to the 2015
ozone NAAQS for these CAA
requirements due to deficiencies with
PSD permitting of greenhouse gases in
all permitting jurisdictions in Arizona
and with PSD permitting of all NSRregulated pollutants in Pima County.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
3. Incorporation of Rules Into Arizona’s
State Implementation Plan
The 2022 I–SIP supplement includes
the submittal of the following two rules
for incorporation into the Arizona SIP to
meet the requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(F) for the 2015 ozone NAAQS:
Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) 49–
432(C) and Pima County Code (PCC)
17.24.010. We reviewed ARS 49–432(C)
and PCC 17.24.010 and found that they
sufficiently provide for the public
availability of stationary source
emissions reports consistent with the
requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(F). We therefore proposed to
approve ARS 49–432(C) and PCC
17.24.010 into the Arizona SIP.
6 87
FR 74349.
our proposed rulemaking, we inadvertently
omitted ‘‘(in part)’’ from the proposed partial
disapproval of section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) and are
correcting it in this rulemaking. The analysis in the
TSD and the proposed partial approval of section
110(a)(2)(D)(ii) support our intention to partially
disapprove section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii).
7 In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
4. Reclassification of Regions for Ozone
Episode Plans
Priority thresholds for classification of
air quality control regions (AQCRs) are
established at 40 CFR 51.150, and the
classifications of AQCRs in Arizona are
listed at 40 CFR 52.121. Under 40 CFR
51.151 and 51.152, regions classified
Priority I, IA, or II are required to have
SIP-approved emergency episode
contingency plans, while those
classified Priority III are not required to
have plans. Under 40 CFR 51.153, based
upon the most recent three years of
complete air quality data at the time of
proposal (i.e., 2019–2021), the EPA
proposed to reclassify the Central
Arizona Intrastate AQCR from Priority
III to Priority I for ozone, to retain the
classification of the Maricopa Intrastate
AQCR as Priority I for ozone, and to
reclassify the Pima Intrastate AQCR
from Priority I to Priority III for ozone.8
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period that
ended on January 4, 2023. During this
period, the EPA received one
anonymous comment. The full text of
the comment is available in the docket
for this rulemaking. The EPA reviewed
the comment and determined that it is
not germane to our proposed action.
Therefore, we do not provide a specific
response to the comment in this
document.
III. Final Action
A. Partial Approvals and Partial
Disapprovals
Under CAA section 110(a), we are
taking final action to partially approve
and partially disapprove Arizona’s
ozone I–SIP submittals for the 2015
ozone NAAQS. Specifically, we are
approving the submittal for the
requirements of the following CAA
sections, including partial approval for
elements where noted:
• Section 110(a)(2)(A)—Emission
limits and other control measures.
• Section 110(a)(2)(B)—Ambient air
quality monitoring/data system.
• Section 110(a)(2)(C)—Program for
enforcement of control measures and
regulation of new stationary sources (in
part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—
Interference with maintenance, or
‘‘prong 3’’ (in part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)—Interstate
pollution abatement, CAA section 126
(in part).
8 87
PO 00000
FR 74349.
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)—
International pollution abatement, CAA
section 115.
• Section 110(a)(2)(E)—Adequate
resources and authority, conflict of
interest, and oversight of local
governments and regional agencies.
• Section 110(a)(2)(F)—Stationary
source monitoring and reporting.
• Section 110(a)(2)(G)—Emergency
episodes.
• Section 110(a)(2)(H)—Consultation
with government officials.
• Section 110(a)(2)(J)—Consultation
with government officials, public
notification, PSD, and visibility
protection (in part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(K)—Air quality
modeling and submission of modeling
data.
• Section 110(a)(2)(L)—Permitting
fees.
• Section 110(a)(2)(M)—
Consultation/participation by affected
local entities.
We are taking final action to partially
disapprove Arizona’s ozone I–SIP
submittals with respect to the 2015
ozone NAAQS for the following Clean
Air Act requirements:
• Section 110(a)(2)(C)—Program for
enforcement of control measures and
regulation of new stationary sources (in
part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—
Interference with maintenance, or
‘‘prong 3’’ (in part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)—Interstate
pollution abatement, CAA section 126
(in part).
• Section 110(a)(2)(J)—PSD and
visibility protection (in part).
Although the Arizona SIP remains
deficient with respect to PSD permitting
for certain pollutants in certain areas of
Arizona as described, these deficiencies
are adequately addressed in both areas
by existing federal implementation
plans. These partial disapprovals of
Arizona’s SIP do not create any new
consequences for Arizona, the relevant
county agencies, or the EPA, as Arizona
and the county agencies already
implement the EPA’s federal PSD
program at 40 CFR 52.21, pursuant to
delegation agreements, for all regulated
NSR pollutants. They also do not create
any new offset or highway sanction;
such sanctions are not triggered by
disapprovals of infrastructure SIPs.
B. Incorporation of Rules Into Arizona’s
State Implementation Plan
For the reasons described in our
proposed rulemaking, we found that
ARS 49–432(C) and PCC 17.24.010
sufficiently provide for the public
availability of stationary source
emissions reports consistent with the
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(F). We are therefore taking
final action to approve ARS 49–432(C)
and PCC 17.24.010 into the Arizona
SIP.9
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
C. Reclassification of Regions for Ozone
Episode Plans
For the reasons described in our
proposed rulemaking, we are taking
final action to reclassify the Central
Arizona Intrastate AQCR from Priority
III to Priority I for ozone. We are also
taking final action to reclassify the Pima
Intrastate AQCR from Priority I to
Priority III for ozone. We are retaining
the classification of the Maricopa
Intrastate AQCR as Priority I for ozone.
Plans for areas classified as Priority I,
IA, or II regions for a specific pollutant
are required to include an emergency
contingency plan meeting the
requirements of 40 CFR 51.151 and
51.152 for that pollutant. The Central
Arizona Intrastate AQCR includes Gila
and Pinal counties. Emergency episode
procedures in Gila County are governed
by Arizona Administrative Code R18–2–
220. Emergency episode procedures in
Pinal County are governed by Pinal
County Air Quality Control District
Code of Regulations Chapter 2, Article
7. The emergency episode provisions in
each of these regulations comply with
the requirements of 40 CFR 51.151 and
51.152 pertaining to Priority I areas.
Therefore, the reclassification of areas of
Arizona from Priority III to Priority I for
ozone will not generate new
requirements for Arizona, and our
reclassification of the Central Arizona
Intrastate AQCR for ozone does not
affect our approval of the Arizona SIP
with respect to CAA section
110(a)(2)(G).
D. Error Correction to 40 CFR 81.303
On October 7, 2022, the EPA issued
a final rule titled ‘‘Determinations of
Attainment by the Attainment Date,
Extensions of the Attainment Date, and
Reclassification of Areas Classified as
Marginal for the 2015 Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards’’ that
included a final action to reclassify the
Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area in
Arizona from ‘‘Marginal’’ to ‘‘Moderate’’
nonattainment for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS.10 In the portion of 40 CFR
81.303 amended by the EPA’s final rule,
the EPA erroneously listed ‘‘Mariposa’’
County in place of ‘‘Maricopa’’ County
among the partial counties composing
9 PCC
17.24.010 replaces Rule 631 in the 1979–
1993 Rule Codification of the Pima County Code,
which was previously approved into the Arizona
SIP. Thus, PCC 17.24.010 will replace Rule 631
under 40 CFR 52.120, Identification of Plan.
10 87 FR 60897 (October 7, 2022).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area.
The EPA is taking action to correct this
error by replacing ‘‘Mariposa’’ with
‘‘Maricopa’’ in the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area description under
the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
In addition, we are taking action to
correct a typographical error in the entry
for the designated area of Maricopa
County. The entry is currently
contained in two cells, and we are
condensing it into one cell.
The EPA has determined that this
action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’
exemption in section 553(b)(4)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
public participation where public notice
and comment procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. Public notice and
comment for this action are unnecessary
because the underlying rule for which
this correcting amendment has been
prepared was already subject to a 30-day
comment period, and this action merely
corrects errors in the rule text. Further,
this action is consistent with the
purpose and rationale of the final rule,
which is corrected herein. Because this
action does not change the EPA’s
analyses or overall actions, no purpose
would be served by additional public
notice and comment. Consequently,
additional public notice and comment
are unnecessary.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. EPA is
finalizing the removal of Pima County
Air Pollution Control Regulation Rule
631, Confidentiality of Trade Secrets,
Sales Data, and Proprietary Information,
from the Arizona SIP, which is
incorporated by reference in accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51.
EPA has made and will continue to
make the State Implementation Plan
generally available at the EPA Region 9
Office (please contact the person
identified in the For Further
Information Contact section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71833
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review, Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and Executive Order
14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA because this action does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities beyond those imposed by State
law.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to
the private sector, will result from this
action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, because the SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
71834
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs
the EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. The EPA believes that this
action is not subject to the requirements
of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. The EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA
further defines the term fair treatment to
mean that ‘‘no group of people should
bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
ADEQ did not evaluate environmental
justice considerations as part of its SIP
submittals; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis
and did not consider EJ in this action.
Due to the nature of the action as
described in our proposed rulemaking,
this action is expected to have a neutral
to positive impact on the air quality of
the affected area. Consideration of EJ is
not required as part of this action, and
there is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O.
12898 of achieving environmental
justice for people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 4,
2024. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental Protection, Air
pollution control.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 5, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends chapter I,
title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. Amend § 52.120 by:
a. Removing in paragraph (c) table 7
under the heading ‘‘Chapter VI:
Recordkeeping and Reporting’’ the entry
for ‘‘Rule 631;’’
■ b. In paragraph (e) table 1 under the
heading ‘‘Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)
State Implementation Plan Elements
(Excluding Part D Elements and
Plans),’’:
■ i. Adding entries for ‘‘Arizona State
Implementation Plan Revision under
Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and
110(a)(2) for the 2015 Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (dated
September 24, 2018)’’ and ‘‘State
Implementation Plan Revision: Clean
Air Act Section 110(a)(2) for the 2012
Fine Particulate & 2015 Ozone NAAQS
(dated February 2022)’’ before the entry
for ‘‘Ordinance No. 1993–128, Section 1,
17.040.190 ‘‘Composition’’ Section 6,
17.24.040 ‘‘Reporting for compliance
evaluations’’;’’
■ ii. Adding an entry for ‘‘Ordinance
No. 1993–128, Section 6, 17.24.010
‘‘Confidentiality of trade secrets, sales
data, and proprietary information’’,’’
before the entry for ‘‘Ordinance 2005–
43, Chapter 17.12, Permits and Permit
Revisions, section 2, 17.12.040
‘‘Reporting Requirements’’;’’ and
■ c. Adding in paragraph (e), table 3
under the heading ‘‘Article 2 (State Air
Pollution Control),’’ an entry for ‘‘49–
432(C)’’ before the entry for ‘‘49–433.’’
The additions read as follows:
■
■
§ 52.120
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
*
*
71835
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED NON-REGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
[Excluding certain resolutions and statutes, which are listed in tables 2 and 3, respectively] 1
Applicable
geographic
or nonattainment area or
title/subject
State/submittal
date
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
*
Arizona State Implementation Plan
Revision under Clean Air Act
Section 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2)
for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(dated September 24, 2018).
*
State-wide ........
*
September 24, 2018 ......
*
September 4, 2024,
[INSERT FEDERAL
REGISTER CITATION].
State Implementation Plan Revision: Clean Air Act Section
110(a)(2) for the 2012 Fine Particulate & 2015 Ozone NAAQS
(dated February 2022).
State-wide ........
February 10, 2022 .........
September 4, 2024,
[INSERT FEDERAL
REGISTER CITATION].
*
*
Adopted by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
on September 24, 2018. EPA
fully approved all elements of
the submittal except those addressing CAA sections
110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D), and
110(a)(2)(J).
Adopted by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
on February 10, 2022. EPA approved all elements of the submittal except those addressing
requirements for the 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS.
*
*
Ordinance No. 1993–128, Section
6, 17.24.010 ‘‘Confidentiality of
trade secrets, sales data, and
proprietary information’’.
*
Pima County .....
*
February 10, 2022 .........
*
September 4, 2024,
[INSERT FEDERAL
REGISTER CITATION].
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
*
*
*
Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Pima County, Arizona
on September 28, 1993.
*
*
*
1 Table
1 is divided into three parts: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) State Implementation Plan Elements (excluding Part D Elements and
Plans), Part D Elements and Plans (other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or Tucson Areas), and Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 3—EPA-APPROVED ARIZONA STATUTES—NON-REGULATORY
State citation
Title/subject
*
49–432(C) ........
*
*
Classification and reporting; confidentiality of
records.
*
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
*
February 10, 2022 ...........
*
September 4, 2024, [INSERT FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION].
*
*
Arizona Revised Statutes. Adopted by
the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality on February 10, 2022.
*
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 52.121 by revising the
entries in the table for ‘‘Pima Intrastate
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
State/submittal date
*
*
(Pima)’’ and ‘‘Central Arizona Intrastate
(Gila, Pinal)’’ to read as follows:
AQCR
(constituent
counties)
PM
SOX
*
*
*
Pima Intrastate (Pima) .................................................................
*
I
III
*
*
*
Central Arizona Intrastate (Gila, Pinal) ........................................
*
I
IA
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
§ 52.121
*
Classification of Regions.
The Arizona plan is evaluated on the
basis of the following classifications:
Classifications
*
Jkt 262001
*
PO 00000
*
Fmt 4700
*
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
*
*
III
*
III
*
04SER1
O3
III
III
*
Sfmt 4700
CO
III
*
*
Frm 00033
NO2
I
*
71836
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
4. Amend § 52.123 by reserving
paragraph (s) and adding paragraph (t)
to read as follows:
■
§ 52.123
Approval status.
*
*
*
*
*
(s) [Reserved].
(t) 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS: The
SIPs submitted on September 24, 2018,
and February 10, 2022, are fully or
partially disapproved for CAA elements
110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J) for
all portions of the Arizona SIP.
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
5. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment
Status Designations
6. Amend § 81.303, the table entitled
‘‘Arizona—2015 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS’’ by revising the entry for
‘‘Phoenix-Mesa, AZ’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 81.303
*
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
*
Arizona.
*
*
*
ARIZONA—2015 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS
[Primary and secondary]
Designation
Classification
Designated area 1
Date 2
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ .....................................................................................................
Gila County (part):
T2N, R12E (except that portion in Maricopa County); T3N, R12E (except
that portion in Maricopa County); T4N, R12E (sections 25 through 29
(except those portions in Maricopa County) and 33 through 36 (except
those portions in Maricopa County))
Maricopa County (part):
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Type
Date 2
Nonattainment
11/7/22 .......
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
Type
Moderate.
71837
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ARIZONA—2015 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS—Continued
[Primary and secondary]
Designation
Classification
Designated area 1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Date 2
Date 2
Type
Type
T1N, R1E (except that portion in Indian Country); T1N, R2E; T1N, R3E;
T1N, R4E (except that portion in Indian Country); T1N, R5E (except
that portion in Indian Country); T1N, R6E; T1N, R7E; T1N, R1W; T1N,
R2W; T1N, R3W; T1N, R4W; T1N, R5W; T1N, R6W; T1N, R7W; T1N,
R8W; T2N, R1E; T2N, R2E; T2N, R3E; T2N, R4E; T2N, R6E (except
that portion in Indian Country); T2N, R7E (except that portion in Indian
Country); T2N, R8E; T2N, R9E; T2N, R10E; T2N, R11E; T2N, R12E
(except that portion in Gila County); T2N, R13E (except that portion in
Gila County); T2N, R1W; T2N, R2W; T2N, R3W; T2N, R4W; T2N,
R5W; T2N, R6W; T2N, R7W; T2N, R8W; T3N, R1E; T3N, R2E; T3N,
R3E; T3N, R4E; T3N, R5E (except that portion in Indian Country);
T3N, R6E (except that portion in Indian Country); T3N, R7E (except
that portion in Indian Country); T3N, R8E; T3N, R9E; T3N, R10E (except that portion in Gila County); T3N, R11E (except that portion in
Gila County); T3N, R12E (except that portion in Gila County); T3N,
R1W; T3N, R2W T3N, R3W; T3N, R4W; T3N, R5W; T3N, R6W; T4N,
R1E; T4N, R2E; T4N, R3E; T4N, R4E; T4N, R5E; T4N, R6E (except
that portion in Indian Country); T4N, R7E (except that portion in Indian
Country); T4N, R8E T4N, R9E; T4N, R10E (except that portion in Gila
County); T4N, R11E (except that portion in Gila County); T4N, R12E
(except that portion in Gila County); T4N, R1W; T4N, R2W; T4N,
R3W; T4N, R4W; T4N, R5W; T4N, R6W; T5N, R1E; T5N, R2E; T5N,
R3E; T5N, R4E; T5N, R5E; T5N, R6E; T5N, R7E; T5N, R8E; T5N,
R9E (except that portion in Gila County); T5N, R10E (except that portion in Gila County); T5N, R1W; T5N, R2W; T5N, R3W; T5N, R4W;
T5N, R5W; T6N, R1E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T6N,
R2E; T6N, R3E; T6N, R4E; T6N, R5E; T6N, R6E; T6N, R7E; T6N,
R8E; T6N, R9E (except that portion in Gila County); T6N, R10E (except that portion in Gila County); T6N, R1W (except that portion in
Yavapai County); T6N, R2W; T6N, R3W; T6N, R4W; T6N, R5W; T7N,
R1E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T7N, R2E (except that
portion in Yavapai County); T7N, R3E; T7N, R4E; T7N, R5E; T7N,
R6E; T7N, R7E; T7N, R8E; T7N, R9E (except that portion in Gila
County); T7N, R1W (except that portion in Yavapai County); T7N,
R2W (except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R2E (except that
portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R3E (except that portion in Yavapai
County); T8N, R4E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R5E
(except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R6E (except that portion
in Yavapai County); T8N, R7E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R8E (except that portion in Yavapai and Gila Counties); T8N,
R9E (except that portion in Yavapai and Gila Counties); T1S, R1E
(except that portion in Indian Country); T1S, R2E (except that portion
in Pinal County and in Indian Country); T1S, R3E; T1S, R4E; T1S,
R5E; T1S, R6E; T1S, R7E; T1S, R1W; T1S, R2W; T1S, R3W; T1S,
R4W; T1S, R5W; T1S, R6W; T2S, R1E (except that portion in Indian
Country); T2S, R5E; T2S, R6E; T2S, R7E; T2S, R1W; T2S, R2W;
T2S, R3W; T2S, R4W; T2S, R5W; T3S, R1E; T3S, R1W; T3S, R2W;
T3S, R3W; T3S, R4W; T3S, R5W; T4S, R1E; T4S, R1W; T4S, R2W;
T4S, R3W; T4S, R4W; T4S, R5W; T5S, R4W (sections 1 through 22
and 27 through 34).
Pinal County (part):
T1N, R8E; T1N, R9E; T1N, R10E; T1S, R8E; T1S, R9E; T1S, R10E;
T2S, R8E (sections 1 through 10, 15 through 22, and 27 through 34);
T2S, R9E (sections 1 through 6); T2S, R10E (sections 1 through 6);
T3S, R7E (sections 1 through 6, 11 through 14, 23 through 26, and 35
through 36); T3S, R8E (sections 3 through 10, 15 through 22, and 27
through 34).
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation.
Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Includes only non-contiguous areas of Indian country known as ‘‘parcels
M & N’’.3
Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1 Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. EPA is not determining the boundaries of any area of Indian
country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a determination that the State has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
71838
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
2 This
date is August 3, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
section 3.0 of the EPA’s technical support document for Arizona, titled ‘‘Arizona Final Area Designations for the 2015 Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards Technical Support Document (TSD),’’ for more information and a map showing the locations of ‘‘parcels M & N’’
(available in Docket ID: EPA–HQ–OAR–2017–0548).
3 See
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2024–17711 Filed 9–3–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 98
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2023–0234; FRL–10246–03–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AV49
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule:
Revisions and Confidentiality
Determinations for Petroleum and
Natural Gas Systems; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction and
correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is correcting a final rule
published in the Federal Register on
May 14, 2024. The final rule amended
requirements that apply to the
petroleum and natural gas systems
source category of the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule to ensure that reporting
is based on empirical data, accurately
reflects total methane emissions and
waste emissions from applicable
facilities and allows owners and
operators of applicable facilities to
submit empirical emissions data that
appropriately demonstrate the extent to
which a charge is owed under the Waste
Emissions Charge. This document
corrects inadvertent errors introduced in
preparing the amendatory regulatory
text for the final rule or in preparing the
signed final rule for publication. These
corrections do not result in any
substantive changes to the final rule.
DATES: The Federal Register corrections,
numbers 1.a through 1.ff and 2.a
through 2.q, are effective January 1,
2025. The correcting amendments in
instructions 2 and 3, correcting
§§ 98.233 and 98.236, respectively, are
effective October 4, 2024.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2023–0234.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically at
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, EPA Docket Center,
EPA/DC, EPA WJC West Building, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Room 3334,
Washington, DC.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Sep 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
Jennifer Bohman, Climate Change
Division, Office of Atmospheric
Protection (MC–6207A), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (202) 343–9548;
email address: GHGReporting@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA
is correcting inadvertent errors in the
regulatory text of the final rule as
described in this section. These
corrections are necessary to be
consistent with the May 14, 2024 final
rule (89 FR 42062) (hereafter referred to
as the ‘‘final rule’’), the redline-strikeout
version of the final regulatory text in the
docket for the final rule (hereinafter
referred to as ‘‘final rule redlinestrikeout’’) (Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2023–0234–0459), and the
preamble for the August 1, 2023
proposed rulemaking (88 FR 50282)
(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘proposed
rule’’). Under the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA)’s good cause
exception, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), it is
unnecessary to take public comment on
these technical, non-substantive
corrections.
The EPA is correcting 40 CFR
98.233(a)(2) to add ‘‘as applicable’’ after
‘‘well-pad site, gathering and boosting
site, or facility’’ to clarify the reporting
level. The ‘‘as applicable’’ language was
used in the preamble to the final rule
(89 FR 42107 and 42108, May 14, 2024),
where the EPA discussed finalizing
requirements for Calculation Method 2
in 40 CFR 98.233(a)(2) to allow reporters
to measure the natural gas emissions
from each pneumatic device vented
directly to the atmosphere at the wellpad site, gathering and boosting site, or
facility, as applicable. The ‘‘as
applicable’’ phrase was also correctly
included in the final rule redlinestrikeout.
The EPA is correcting 40 CFR
98.233(a)(2)(iii) and (c)(2)(ii) to remove
the extraneous instance of
‘‘representative’’ from ‘‘measure the
emissions under representative
conditions representative of normal
operations.’’ The corrected text reads
‘‘measure the emissions under
conditions representative of normal
operations.’’ This phrase was correct in
40 CFR 98.233(a)(2)(iii) and (c)(2)(ii) in
the final rule redline-strikeout. The
correct phrase (without the duplicate
‘‘representative’’) also appears in the
final amended regulation two times, in
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the versions of 40 CFR 98.233(a)(2)(iii)
and (c)(2)(ii) that were effective on July
15, 2024 (89 FR 42224 and 42228,
respectively, May 14, 2024).
The EPA is correcting 40 CFR
98.233(a)(2)(v)(A)(2) to replace an
incorrect cross-reference to ‘‘paragraph
(a)(6) of this section’’ with the correct
cross-reference to ‘‘paragraph (a)(7) of
this section.’’ The EPA proposed to
reference ‘‘paragraph (a)(6)’’ in the
Proposed Rule, in which 40 CFR
98.233(a)(6) was ‘‘Type of natural gas
pneumatic devices’’ (88 FR 50384,
August 1, 2023). In the final
amendments, the ‘‘Type of natural gas
pneumatic devices’’ paragraph is 40
CFR 98.233(a)(7) (89 FR 42242, May 14,
2024). The cross-reference to ‘‘paragraph
(a)(7) of this section’’ was correct in the
final rule redline-strikeout. In addition,
the correct paragraph reference appears
in the version of 40 CFR
98.233(a)(2)(v)(A)(2) that became
effective on July 15, 2024 (89 FR 42224,
May 14, 2024). All other references to
this section are correct.
The EPA is correcting the version of
40 CFR 98.233(a)(3)(ii)(A) that became
effective on July 15, 2024 (89 FR 42226,
May 14, 2024) to replace an incomplete
cross-reference to ‘‘§ 98.234(a)(1)
through (3)’’ with the correct crossreference to ‘‘§ 98.234(a)(1) through (3),
(6), and (7).’’ The paragraphs that are
cross-referenced in the final rule and the
redline-strikeout version of the final
regulatory text effective July 15, 2024 in
the docket for the final rule (Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2023–0234–0460)
correspond to the amended version of
40 CFR 98.234 that will be effective on
January 1, 2025. However, the
amendments to 40 CFR 98.234 that will
be effective on January 1, 2025
consolidate current 40 CFR 98.234(a)(6)
into 40 CFR 98.234(a)(1) and
consolidate current 40 CFR 98.234(a)(7)
into 40 CFR 98.234(a)(2). Therefore, the
EPA is correcting the cross-referenced
paragraphs in the version of 40 CFR
98.233(a)(3)(ii)(A) that became effective
on July 15, 2024 so that all of the
available methods are correctly
referenced.
The EPA is correcting 40 CFR
98.233(c)(1) to replace an incorrectly
formatted cross-reference to ‘‘§ 98.234(b)
of this subpart’’ with the correct crossreference to ‘‘§ 98.234(b).’’ The cross
reference as published does not follow
the cross-reference requirements
specified by the Office of the Federal
Register. The cross-reference to
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 4, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71830-71838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17711]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0326; FRL-9693-02-R9]
Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality State
Implementation Plans; Arizona; 2015 Ozone Infrastructure Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving in part
and disapproving in part State implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Arizona pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 2015 ozone
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or ``standard''). In
addition to our partial approval and partial disapproval of Arizona's
SIP revision, the EPA is approving rules in the Arizona Revised
Statutes and Pima County Code related to public availability of
emissions reports into the Arizona SIP and reclassifying regions in
Arizona with respect to emergency episode plans for ozone.
Additionally, this final action includes an error correction to amend
regulatory text related to the nonattainment designation of the
Phoenix-Mesa, Arizona area for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
DATES: This rule is effective October 4, 2024.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0326. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Leers, Planning and Analysis
Branch (AIR-2), Air and Radiation Division, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 947-4279, or by email at
[email protected].
[[Page 71831]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Statutory Requirements
B. State Submittals
C. EPA's Proposal
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. Final Action
A. Partial Approvals and Partial Disapprovals
B. Incorporation of Rules Into Arizona's State Implementation
Plan
C. Reclassification of Regions for Ozone Episode Plans
D. Error Correction to 40 CFR 81.303
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. Statutory Requirements
Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA requires each State to submit to the
EPA, within three years after the promulgation of a primary or
secondary NAAQS or any revision thereof, a SIP revision that provides
for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of such NAAQS.
Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA contains the infrastructure SIP
requirements that generally relate to the information, authorities,
compliance assurances, procedural requirements, and control measures
that constitute the ``infrastructure'' of a State's air quality
management program. These infrastructure SIP requirements (or
``elements'') required by section 110(a)(2) are as follows:
Section 110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and other control
measures.
Section 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality monitoring/data
system.
Section 110(a)(2)(C): Program for enforcement of control
measures and regulation of new and modified stationary sources.
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i): Interstate pollution transport.
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii): Interstate and international
pollution abatement.
Section 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources and authority,
conflict of interest, and oversight of local and regional government
agencies.
Section 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source monitoring and
reporting.
Section 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency episodes.
Section 110(a)(2)(H): SIP revisions.
Section 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation with government
officials, public notification, prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD), and visibility protection.
Section 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling and submittal
of modeling data.
Section 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees.
Section 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/participation by
affected local entities.
Two elements identified in section 110(a)(2) are not governed by
the three-year submittal deadline of section 110(a)(1) and are
therefore not addressed in this action. These two elements are: (i)
section 110(a)(2)(C), to the extent that it refers to permit programs
required under part D (nonattainment new source review (NSR)), and (ii)
section 110(a)(2)(I), pertaining to the nonattainment planning
requirements of part D. As a result, this action does not address
requirements for the nonattainment NSR portion of section 110(a)(2)(C)
or the whole of section 110(a)(2)(I).
This action also does not address the interstate transport
requirements under section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), referred to as ``prongs
1 and 2'' of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), or the requirements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) pertaining to interference with visibility
protection in other States, referred to as ``prong 4'' of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i). The EPA has proposed action on Arizona's SIP with
respect to prongs 1, 2 and 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 2015
ozone NAAQS in separate rulemakings.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The EPA proposed to approve Arizona's SIP with respect to
prongs 1 and 2 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) on June 24, 2022 (87 FR
37776). However, based on updated photochemical modeling, the EPA
issued a supplemental proposal on February 16, 2024, proposing to
approve Arizona's SIP with respect to prong 1 and to disapprove
Arizona's SIP with respect to prong 2 (89 FR 12666). The EPA
proposed to disapprove Arizona's SIP with respect to prong 4 of
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) on May 31, 2024 (89 FR 47398).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. State Submittals
The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) submitted
two SIP revisions to address the infrastructure SIP requirements in CAA
sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. On September
24, 2018, ADEQ submitted the ``Arizona State Implementation Plan
Revision under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the
2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards.'' \2\ On February
10, 2022, ADEQ submitted the ``State Implementation Plan Revision:
Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) for the 2012 Fine Particulate & 2015
Ozone NAAQS'' (``2022 I-SIP supplement'').\3\ These submittals
collectively address Arizona's obligation to satisfy infrastructure SIP
requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.\4\ We refer to them collectively
herein as ``Arizona's ozone I-SIP submittals.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Letter dated September 24, 2018, from Timothy S. Franquist,
Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Michael Stoker, Regional
Administrator, EPA Region IX, Subject: ``Submittal of the Arizona
State Implementation Plan Revision under Clean Air Act Sections
110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.''
\3\ Letter dated February 10, 2022, from Daniel Czecholinski,
Director, Air Quality Division, ADEQ, to Martha Guzman, Regional
Administrator, EPA Region IX, Subject: ``Submittal of the Arizona
State Implementation Plan Revision under Clean Air Act Sections
110(a)(2) for the 2012 Fine Particulate and the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.''
\4\ The 2022 I-SIP supplement also addresses certain
infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2012 fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) NAAQS. We are not taking action on the portions
of the 2022 I-SIP supplement addressing the 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS in this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. EPA's Proposal
1. Approvals and Partial Approvals
We evaluated Arizona's ozone I-SIP submittals and the existing
provisions of the Arizona SIP for compliance with the infrastructure
SIP requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2) and the applicable
regulations in 40 CFR part 51 (``Requirements for Preparation,
Adoption, and Submittal of State Implementation Plans''). Based on the
evaluation presented in the proposed rulemaking and in the accompanying
technical support document (TSD), on December 5, 2022, we proposed to
partially approve Arizona's ozone I-SIP submittals with respect to the
2015 ozone NAAQS for the requirements of the following sections of the
CAA.\5\ Partial approvals are indicated by the parenthetical ``(in
part).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 87 FR 74349 (December 5, 2022). The TSD supporting our
proposed rulemaking is available at https://www.regulations.gov
under Docket ID EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0326.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(a)(2)(A)--Emission limits and other control
measures.
Section 110(a)(2)(B)--Ambient air quality monitoring/data
system.
Section 110(a)(2)(C)--Program for enforcement of control
measures and regulation of new stationary sources (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--Interference with
maintenance, or ``prong 3'' (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)--Interstate pollution abatement,
CAA section 126 (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)--International pollution
abatement, CAA section 115.
Section 110(a)(2)(E)--Adequate resources and authority,
conflict of interest, and oversight of local governments and regional
agencies.
Section 110(a)(2)(F)--Stationary source monitoring and
reporting.
Section 110(a)(2)(G)--Emergency episodes.
Section 110(a)(2)(H)--Consultation with government
officials.
[[Page 71832]]
Section 110(a)(2)(J)--Consultation with government
officials, public notification, PSD, and visibility protection (in
part).
Section 110(a)(2)(K)--Air quality modeling and submission
of modeling data.
Section 110(a)(2)(L)--Permitting fees.
Section 110(a)(2)(M)--Consultation/participation by
affected local entities.
2. Partial Disapprovals
Based on the evaluation presented in the proposed rulemaking and
accompanying TSD,\6\ the EPA proposed to partially disapprove Arizona's
ozone I-SIP submittals with respect to the 2015 ozone NAAQS for the
following CAA requirements:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 87 FR 74349.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(a)(2)(C)--Program for enforcement of control
measures and regulation of new stationary sources (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--Interference with
maintenance, or ``prong 3'' (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)--Interstate pollution abatement,
CAA section 126 (in part).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In our proposed rulemaking, we inadvertently omitted ``(in
part)'' from the proposed partial disapproval of section
110(a)(2)(D)(ii) and are correcting it in this rulemaking. The
analysis in the TSD and the proposed partial approval of section
110(a)(2)(D)(ii) support our intention to partially disapprove
section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(a)(2)(J)--PSD and visibility protection (in
part).
The EPA proposed to partially disapprove Arizona's ozone I-SIP
submittals with respect to the 2015 ozone NAAQS for these CAA
requirements due to deficiencies with PSD permitting of greenhouse
gases in all permitting jurisdictions in Arizona and with PSD
permitting of all NSR-regulated pollutants in Pima County.
3. Incorporation of Rules Into Arizona's State Implementation Plan
The 2022 I-SIP supplement includes the submittal of the following
two rules for incorporation into the Arizona SIP to meet the
requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(F) for the 2015 ozone NAAQS:
Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) 49-432(C) and Pima County Code (PCC)
17.24.010. We reviewed ARS 49-432(C) and PCC 17.24.010 and found that
they sufficiently provide for the public availability of stationary
source emissions reports consistent with the requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(F). We therefore proposed to approve ARS 49-432(C)
and PCC 17.24.010 into the Arizona SIP.
4. Reclassification of Regions for Ozone Episode Plans
Priority thresholds for classification of air quality control
regions (AQCRs) are established at 40 CFR 51.150, and the
classifications of AQCRs in Arizona are listed at 40 CFR 52.121. Under
40 CFR 51.151 and 51.152, regions classified Priority I, IA, or II are
required to have SIP-approved emergency episode contingency plans,
while those classified Priority III are not required to have plans.
Under 40 CFR 51.153, based upon the most recent three years of complete
air quality data at the time of proposal (i.e., 2019-2021), the EPA
proposed to reclassify the Central Arizona Intrastate AQCR from
Priority III to Priority I for ozone, to retain the classification of
the Maricopa Intrastate AQCR as Priority I for ozone, and to reclassify
the Pima Intrastate AQCR from Priority I to Priority III for ozone.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 87 FR 74349.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period
that ended on January 4, 2023. During this period, the EPA received one
anonymous comment. The full text of the comment is available in the
docket for this rulemaking. The EPA reviewed the comment and determined
that it is not germane to our proposed action. Therefore, we do not
provide a specific response to the comment in this document.
III. Final Action
A. Partial Approvals and Partial Disapprovals
Under CAA section 110(a), we are taking final action to partially
approve and partially disapprove Arizona's ozone I-SIP submittals for
the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Specifically, we are approving the submittal for
the requirements of the following CAA sections, including partial
approval for elements where noted:
Section 110(a)(2)(A)--Emission limits and other control
measures.
Section 110(a)(2)(B)--Ambient air quality monitoring/data
system.
Section 110(a)(2)(C)--Program for enforcement of control
measures and regulation of new stationary sources (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--Interference with
maintenance, or ``prong 3'' (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)--Interstate pollution abatement,
CAA section 126 (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)--International pollution
abatement, CAA section 115.
Section 110(a)(2)(E)--Adequate resources and authority,
conflict of interest, and oversight of local governments and regional
agencies.
Section 110(a)(2)(F)--Stationary source monitoring and
reporting.
Section 110(a)(2)(G)--Emergency episodes.
Section 110(a)(2)(H)--Consultation with government
officials.
Section 110(a)(2)(J)--Consultation with government
officials, public notification, PSD, and visibility protection (in
part).
Section 110(a)(2)(K)--Air quality modeling and submission
of modeling data.
Section 110(a)(2)(L)--Permitting fees.
Section 110(a)(2)(M)--Consultation/participation by
affected local entities.
We are taking final action to partially disapprove Arizona's ozone
I-SIP submittals with respect to the 2015 ozone NAAQS for the following
Clean Air Act requirements:
Section 110(a)(2)(C)--Program for enforcement of control
measures and regulation of new stationary sources (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--Interference with
maintenance, or ``prong 3'' (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)--Interstate pollution abatement,
CAA section 126 (in part).
Section 110(a)(2)(J)--PSD and visibility protection (in
part).
Although the Arizona SIP remains deficient with respect to PSD
permitting for certain pollutants in certain areas of Arizona as
described, these deficiencies are adequately addressed in both areas by
existing federal implementation plans. These partial disapprovals of
Arizona's SIP do not create any new consequences for Arizona, the
relevant county agencies, or the EPA, as Arizona and the county
agencies already implement the EPA's federal PSD program at 40 CFR
52.21, pursuant to delegation agreements, for all regulated NSR
pollutants. They also do not create any new offset or highway sanction;
such sanctions are not triggered by disapprovals of infrastructure
SIPs.
B. Incorporation of Rules Into Arizona's State Implementation Plan
For the reasons described in our proposed rulemaking, we found that
ARS 49-432(C) and PCC 17.24.010 sufficiently provide for the public
availability of stationary source emissions reports consistent with the
[[Page 71833]]
requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(F). We are therefore taking final
action to approve ARS 49-432(C) and PCC 17.24.010 into the Arizona
SIP.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ PCC 17.24.010 replaces Rule 631 in the 1979-1993 Rule
Codification of the Pima County Code, which was previously approved
into the Arizona SIP. Thus, PCC 17.24.010 will replace Rule 631
under 40 CFR 52.120, Identification of Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Reclassification of Regions for Ozone Episode Plans
For the reasons described in our proposed rulemaking, we are taking
final action to reclassify the Central Arizona Intrastate AQCR from
Priority III to Priority I for ozone. We are also taking final action
to reclassify the Pima Intrastate AQCR from Priority I to Priority III
for ozone. We are retaining the classification of the Maricopa
Intrastate AQCR as Priority I for ozone.
Plans for areas classified as Priority I, IA, or II regions for a
specific pollutant are required to include an emergency contingency
plan meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 51.151 and 51.152 for that
pollutant. The Central Arizona Intrastate AQCR includes Gila and Pinal
counties. Emergency episode procedures in Gila County are governed by
Arizona Administrative Code R18-2-220. Emergency episode procedures in
Pinal County are governed by Pinal County Air Quality Control District
Code of Regulations Chapter 2, Article 7. The emergency episode
provisions in each of these regulations comply with the requirements of
40 CFR 51.151 and 51.152 pertaining to Priority I areas. Therefore, the
reclassification of areas of Arizona from Priority III to Priority I
for ozone will not generate new requirements for Arizona, and our
reclassification of the Central Arizona Intrastate AQCR for ozone does
not affect our approval of the Arizona SIP with respect to CAA section
110(a)(2)(G).
D. Error Correction to 40 CFR 81.303
On October 7, 2022, the EPA issued a final rule titled
``Determinations of Attainment by the Attainment Date, Extensions of
the Attainment Date, and Reclassification of Areas Classified as
Marginal for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards''
that included a final action to reclassify the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area in Arizona from ``Marginal'' to ``Moderate''
nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.\10\ In the portion of 40 CFR
81.303 amended by the EPA's final rule, the EPA erroneously listed
``Mariposa'' County in place of ``Maricopa'' County among the partial
counties composing the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area. The EPA is
taking action to correct this error by replacing ``Mariposa'' with
``Maricopa'' in the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area description under
the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 87 FR 60897 (October 7, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, we are taking action to correct a typographical error
in the entry for the designated area of Maricopa County. The entry is
currently contained in two cells, and we are condensing it into one
cell.
The EPA has determined that this action falls under the ``good
cause'' exemption in section 553(b)(4)(B) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) which, upon finding ``good cause,'' authorizes
agencies to dispense with public participation where public notice and
comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. Public notice and comment for this action are
unnecessary because the underlying rule for which this correcting
amendment has been prepared was already subject to a 30-day comment
period, and this action merely corrects errors in the rule text.
Further, this action is consistent with the purpose and rationale of
the final rule, which is corrected herein. Because this action does not
change the EPA's analyses or overall actions, no purpose would be
served by additional public notice and comment. Consequently,
additional public notice and comment are unnecessary.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. EPA is finalizing the removal of Pima
County Air Pollution Control Regulation Rule 631, Confidentiality of
Trade Secrets, Sales Data, and Proprietary Information, from the
Arizona SIP, which is incorporated by reference in accordance with the
requirements of 1 CFR part 51. EPA has made and will continue to make
the State Implementation Plan generally available at the EPA Region 9
Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further
Information Contact section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and Executive
Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those
imposed by State law.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will
result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
[[Page 71834]]
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with the CAA.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
ADEQ did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part
of its SIP submittals; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA did not
perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Due to
the nature of the action as described in our proposed rulemaking, this
action is expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air
quality of the affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and
Indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 4, 2024. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental Protection, Air pollution control.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 5, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends chapter I,
title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. Amend Sec. 52.120 by:
0
a. Removing in paragraph (c) table 7 under the heading ``Chapter VI:
Recordkeeping and Reporting'' the entry for ``Rule 631;''
0
b. In paragraph (e) table 1 under the heading ``Clean Air Act section
110(a)(2) State Implementation Plan Elements (Excluding Part D Elements
and Plans),'':
0
i. Adding entries for ``Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision
under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (dated September 24, 2018)'' and
``State Implementation Plan Revision: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)
for the 2012 Fine Particulate & 2015 Ozone NAAQS (dated February
2022)'' before the entry for ``Ordinance No. 1993-128, Section 1,
17.040.190 ``Composition'' Section 6, 17.24.040 ``Reporting for
compliance evaluations'';''
0
ii. Adding an entry for ``Ordinance No. 1993-128, Section 6, 17.24.010
``Confidentiality of trade secrets, sales data, and proprietary
information'','' before the entry for ``Ordinance 2005-43, Chapter
17.12, Permits and Permit Revisions, section 2, 17.12.040 ``Reporting
Requirements'';'' and
0
c. Adding in paragraph (e), table 3 under the heading ``Article 2
(State Air Pollution Control),'' an entry for ``49-432(C)'' before the
entry for ``49-433.''
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 71835]]
Table 1--EPA-Approved Non-Regulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
[Excluding certain resolutions and statutes, which are listed in tables 2 and 3, respectively] \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic or
Name of SIP provision nonattainment area or title/ State/submittal date EPA approval date Explanation
subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Arizona State Implementation Plan State-wide................. September 24, 2018................... September 4, 2024, Adopted by the Arizona
Revision under Clean Air Act [INSERT FEDERAL Department of
Section 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for REGISTER CITATION]. Environmental Quality
the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air on September 24,
Quality Standards (dated September 2018. EPA fully
24, 2018). approved all elements
of the submittal
except those
addressing CAA
sections
110(a)(2)(C),
110(a)(2)(D), and
110(a)(2)(J).
State Implementation Plan Revision: State-wide................. February 10, 2022.................... September 4, 2024, Adopted by the Arizona
Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) for [INSERT FEDERAL Department of
the 2012 Fine Particulate & 2015 REGISTER CITATION]. Environmental Quality
Ozone NAAQS (dated February 2022). on February 10, 2022.
EPA approved all
elements of the
submittal except
those addressing
requirements for the
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
* * * * * * *
Ordinance No. 1993-128, Section 6, Pima County................ February 10, 2022.................... September 4, 2024, Adopted by the Board
17.24.010 ``Confidentiality of [INSERT FEDERAL of Supervisors of
trade secrets, sales data, and REGISTER CITATION]. Pima County, Arizona
proprietary information''. on September 28,
1993.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Table 1 is divided into three parts: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) State Implementation Plan Elements (excluding Part D Elements and Plans), Part
D Elements and Plans (other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or Tucson Areas), and Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson
Areas.
* * * * *
Table 3--EPA-Approved Arizona Statutes--Non-Regulatory
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State citation Title/subject State/submittal date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
49-432(C)................ Classification and February 10, 2022... September 4, 2024, Arizona Revised
reporting; [INSERT FEDERAL Statutes. Adopted
confidentiality of REGISTER CITATION]. by the Arizona
records. Department of
Environmental
Quality on
February 10, 2022.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 52.121 by revising the entries in the table for ``Pima
Intrastate (Pima)'' and ``Central Arizona Intrastate (Gila, Pinal)'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.121 Classification of Regions.
The Arizona plan is evaluated on the basis of the following
classifications:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classifications
AQCR (constituent counties) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM SOX NO2 CO O3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Pima Intrastate (Pima)............ I III III III III
* * * * * * *
Central Arizona Intrastate (Gila, I IA III III I
Pinal).
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 71836]]
0
4. Amend Sec. 52.123 by reserving paragraph (s) and adding paragraph
(t) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.123 Approval status.
* * * * *
(s) [Reserved].
(t) 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS: The SIPs submitted on September 24,
2018, and February 10, 2022, are fully or partially disapproved for CAA
elements 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J) for all portions of
the Arizona SIP.
PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES
0
5. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart C--Section 107 Attainment Status Designations
0
6. Amend Sec. 81.303, the table entitled ``Arizona--2015 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS'' by revising the entry for ``Phoenix-Mesa, AZ'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 81.303 Arizona.
* * * * *
Arizona--2015 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
[Primary and secondary]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation Classification
Designated area 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date 2 Type Date 2 Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ.............. Nonattainment....... 11/7/22.......... Moderate.
Gila County (part):
T2N, R12E (except that
portion in Maricopa
County); T3N, R12E
(except that portion
in Maricopa County);
T4N, R12E (sections
25 through 29 (except
those portions in
Maricopa County) and
33 through 36 (except
those portions in
Maricopa County))
Maricopa County (part):
[[Page 71837]]
T1N, R1E (except that
portion in Indian
Country); T1N, R2E;
T1N, R3E; T1N, R4E
(except that portion
in Indian Country);
T1N, R5E (except that
portion in Indian
Country); T1N, R6E;
T1N, R7E; T1N, R1W;
T1N, R2W; T1N, R3W;
T1N, R4W; T1N, R5W;
T1N, R6W; T1N, R7W;
T1N, R8W; T2N, R1E;
T2N, R2E; T2N, R3E;
T2N, R4E; T2N, R6E
(except that portion
in Indian Country);
T2N, R7E (except that
portion in Indian
Country); T2N, R8E;
T2N, R9E; T2N, R10E;
T2N, R11E; T2N, R12E
(except that portion
in Gila County); T2N,
R13E (except that
portion in Gila
County); T2N, R1W;
T2N, R2W; T2N, R3W;
T2N, R4W; T2N, R5W;
T2N, R6W; T2N, R7W;
T2N, R8W; T3N, R1E;
T3N, R2E; T3N, R3E;
T3N, R4E; T3N, R5E
(except that portion
in Indian Country);
T3N, R6E (except that
portion in Indian
Country); T3N, R7E
(except that portion
in Indian Country);
T3N, R8E; T3N, R9E;
T3N, R10E (except
that portion in Gila
County); T3N, R11E
(except that portion
in Gila County); T3N,
R12E (except that
portion in Gila
County); T3N, R1W;
T3N, R2W T3N, R3W;
T3N, R4W; T3N, R5W;
T3N, R6W; T4N, R1E;
T4N, R2E; T4N, R3E;
T4N, R4E; T4N, R5E;
T4N, R6E (except that
portion in Indian
Country); T4N, R7E
(except that portion
in Indian Country);
T4N, R8E T4N, R9E;
T4N, R10E (except
that portion in Gila
County); T4N, R11E
(except that portion
in Gila County); T4N,
R12E (except that
portion in Gila
County); T4N, R1W;
T4N, R2W; T4N, R3W;
T4N, R4W; T4N, R5W;
T4N, R6W; T5N, R1E;
T5N, R2E; T5N, R3E;
T5N, R4E; T5N, R5E;
T5N, R6E; T5N, R7E;
T5N, R8E; T5N, R9E
(except that portion
in Gila County); T5N,
R10E (except that
portion in Gila
County); T5N, R1W;
T5N, R2W; T5N, R3W;
T5N, R4W; T5N, R5W;
T6N, R1E (except that
portion in Yavapai
County); T6N, R2E;
T6N, R3E; T6N, R4E;
T6N, R5E; T6N, R6E;
T6N, R7E; T6N, R8E;
T6N, R9E (except that
portion in Gila
County); T6N, R10E
(except that portion
in Gila County); T6N,
R1W (except that
portion in Yavapai
County); T6N, R2W;
T6N, R3W; T6N, R4W;
T6N, R5W; T7N, R1E
(except that portion
in Yavapai County);
T7N, R2E (except that
portion in Yavapai
County); T7N, R3E;
T7N, R4E; T7N, R5E;
T7N, R6E; T7N, R7E;
T7N, R8E; T7N, R9E
(except that portion
in Gila County); T7N,
R1W (except that
portion in Yavapai
County); T7N, R2W
(except that portion
in Yavapai County);
T8N, R2E (except that
portion in Yavapai
County); T8N, R3E
(except that portion
in Yavapai County);
T8N, R4E (except that
portion in Yavapai
County); T8N, R5E
(except that portion
in Yavapai County);
T8N, R6E (except that
portion in Yavapai
County); T8N, R7E
(except that portion
in Yavapai County);
T8N, R8E (except that
portion in Yavapai
and Gila Counties);
T8N, R9E (except that
portion in Yavapai
and Gila Counties);
T1S, R1E (except that
portion in Indian
Country); T1S, R2E
(except that portion
in Pinal County and
in Indian Country);
T1S, R3E; T1S, R4E;
T1S, R5E; T1S, R6E;
T1S, R7E; T1S, R1W;
T1S, R2W; T1S, R3W;
T1S, R4W; T1S, R5W;
T1S, R6W; T2S, R1E
(except that portion
in Indian Country);
T2S, R5E; T2S, R6E;
T2S, R7E; T2S, R1W;
T2S, R2W; T2S, R3W;
T2S, R4W; T2S, R5W;
T3S, R1E; T3S, R1W;
T3S, R2W; T3S, R3W;
T3S, R4W; T3S, R5W;
T4S, R1E; T4S, R1W;
T4S, R2W; T4S, R3W;
T4S, R4W; T4S, R5W;
T5S, R4W (sections 1
through 22 and 27
through 34).
Pinal County (part):
T1N, R8E; T1N, R9E;
T1N, R10E; T1S, R8E;
T1S, R9E; T1S, R10E;
T2S, R8E (sections 1
through 10, 15
through 22, and 27
through 34); T2S, R9E
(sections 1 through
6); T2S, R10E
(sections 1 through
6); T3S, R7E
(sections 1 through
6, 11 through 14, 23
through 26, and 35
through 36); T3S, R8E
(sections 3 through
10, 15 through 22,
and 27 through 34).
Fort McDowell Yavapai
Nation.
Gila River Indian
Community of the Gila
River Indian Reservation,
Arizona.
Includes only non-
contiguous areas of
Indian country known
as ``parcels M &
N''.\3\
Tohono O'odham Nation of
Arizona.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa
Indian Community of the
Salt River Reservation.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. EPA is not determining the
boundaries of any area of Indian country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the
larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a determination
that the State has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
[[Page 71838]]
\2\ This date is August 3, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
\3\ See section 3.0 of the EPA's technical support document for Arizona, titled ``Arizona Final Area
Designations for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards Technical Support Document (TSD),'' for
more information and a map showing the locations of ``parcels M & N'' (available in Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-
0548).
[FR Doc. 2024-17711 Filed 9-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P