Medical Devices; Dental Devices; Classification of the Neuromuscular Tongue Muscle Stimulator for the Reduction of Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea, 71153-71155 [2024-19725]
Download as PDF
71153
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 170
Tuesday, September 3, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 872
[Docket No. FDA–2024–N–3948]
Medical Devices; Dental Devices;
Classification of the Neuromuscular
Tongue Muscle Stimulator for the
Reduction of Snoring and Obstructive
Sleep Apnea
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the neuromuscular tongue
muscle stimulator for the reduction of
snoring and obstructive sleep apnea into
class II (special controls). The special
controls that apply to the device type
are identified in this order and will be
part of the codified language for the
neuromuscular tongue muscle
stimulator for the reduction of snoring
and obstructive sleep apnea’s
classification. We are taking this action
because we have determined that
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe
this action will also enhance patients’
access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective September
3, 2024. The classification was
applicable on February 5, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anita Belani, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G236, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–3944,
Anita.Belani@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
neuromuscular tongue muscle
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Aug 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
stimulator for the reduction of snoring
and obstructive sleep apnea as class II
(special controls), which we have
determined will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D
(21 CFR part 860, subpart D)). Section
207 of the Food and Drug
Administration Modernization Act of
1997 (Pub. L. 105–115) established the
first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144)
modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure.
A device sponsor may utilize either
procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially
equivalent device (see section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act, defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the 510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On March 24, 2020, FDA received
Signifier Medical Technologies’ request
for De Novo classification of the
eXciteOSA without remote control,
eXciteOSA with remote control device.
FDA reviewed the request in order to
classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
71154
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 3, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on February 5, 2021, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 872.5575.1 We have named the
generic type of device neuromuscular
tongue muscle stimulator for the
reduction of snoring and obstructive
sleep apnea, and it is identified as a
device that consists of a removable
intraoral mouthpiece that uses
electrodes to deliver neuromuscular
stimulation to the tongue to strengthen
tongue musculature to reduce snoring
and obstructive sleep apnea.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
TABLE 1—NEUROMUSCULAR TONGUE MUSCLE STIMULATOR FOR THE REDUCTION OF SNORING AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP
APNEA RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks to health
Mitigation measures
Adverse tissue reaction ..................
Interference with other devices/
electrical shock.
Use error leading to pain, discomfort, or injury.
Mucosal or skin overheating or
burn.
Infection ...........................................
Biocompatibility evaluation.
Electrical safety testing, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing, Battery safety testing, Wireless coexistence testing, and Labeling.
Human factors assessment; Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis; Electrical safety testing;
and Labeling.
Software validation, verification, hazard analysis; Electrical safety testing; Electromagnetic compatibility
(EMC) testing; and Labeling.
Labeling.
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 872
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 872 is
amended as follows:
PART 872—DENTAL DEVICES
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
regarding premarket approval, have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
1. The authority citation for part 872
continues to read as follows:
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in part 860,
subpart D, regarding De Novo
classification have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0844; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814, subparts A through E,
■
1 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Aug 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 872.5575 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
§ 872.5575 Neuromuscular tongue muscle
stimulator for the reduction of snoring and
obstructive sleep apnea.
(a) Identification. A neuromuscular
tongue muscle stimulator for the
reduction of snoring and obstructive
sleep apnea consists of a removable
intraoral mouthpiece that uses
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
electrodes to deliver neuromuscular
stimulation to the tongue to strengthen
tongue musculature to reduce snoring
and obstructive sleep apnea.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Performance testing must
demonstrate the wireless compatibility,
electrical safety, battery safety, and
electromagnetic compatibility of the
device in its intended use environment.
(2) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
(3) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Patient labeling must include:
(i) Information on device components,
setup, and use of the device including
placement of sensors and mouthpieces,
and images or illustrations;
(ii) A summary of technical
specifications;
(iii) Instructions on how to clean and
maintain the device;
(iv) A statement that the patient
should maintain regular follow up visits
with dentist and sleep specialist; and
(v) A statement that patients should
have a comprehensive dental
examination prior to using this device.
(5) A human factors assessment must
evaluate simulated use of the device to
demonstrate that the user can correctly
use device based on the labeling and
instructions for use.
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 3, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 28, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024–19725 Filed 8–30–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA–2024–N–3992]
Medical Devices; Neurological
Devices; Classification of the Digital
Therapy Device for Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the digital therapy device for
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
digital therapy device for Attention
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder’s
classification. We are taking this action
because we have determined that
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe
this action will also enhance patients’
access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective September
3, 2024. The classification was
applicable on June 15, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tushar Bansal, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4104, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 240–402–4684,
Tushar.Bansal@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
digital therapy device for Attention
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder as class II
(special controls), which we have
determined will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Aug 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D
(21 CFR part 860, subpart D)). Section
207 of the Food and Drug
Administration Modernization Act of
1997 established the first procedure for
De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71155
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially
equivalent device (see section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act, defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the 510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On April 16, 2020, FDA received
Akili Interactive Labs Inc.’s request for
De Novo classification of the
EndeavorRx device. FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on June 15, 2020, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 882.5803.1 We have named the
generic type of device digital therapy
device for Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and it
is identified as software intended to
provide therapy for ADHD or any of its
individual symptoms as an adjunct to
clinician supervised treatment.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
1 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 3, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71153-71155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-19725]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 3, 2024 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 71153]]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 872
[Docket No. FDA-2024-N-3948]
Medical Devices; Dental Devices; Classification of the
Neuromuscular Tongue Muscle Stimulator for the Reduction of Snoring and
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the neuromuscular tongue muscle stimulator for the
reduction of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea into class II (special
controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are
identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for
the neuromuscular tongue muscle stimulator for the reduction of snoring
and obstructive sleep apnea's classification. We are taking this action
because we have determined that classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective September 3, 2024. The classification
was applicable on February 5, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anita Belani, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G236, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3944,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the neuromuscular tongue muscle
stimulator for the reduction of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea as
class II (special controls), which we have determined will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of
the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D (21 CFR part 860, subpart D)).
Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of
1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety
and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor may utilize
either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo
process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that
type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C
Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval application to market a
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the
510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On March 24, 2020, FDA received Signifier Medical Technologies'
request for De Novo classification of the eXciteOSA without remote
control, eXciteOSA with remote control device. FDA reviewed the request
in order to classify the device under the criteria for classification
set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable
[[Page 71154]]
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on February 5, 2021, FDA issued an order to the
requester classifying the device into class II. In this final order,
FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
872.5575.\1\ We have named the generic type of device neuromuscular
tongue muscle stimulator for the reduction of snoring and obstructive
sleep apnea, and it is identified as a device that consists of a
removable intraoral mouthpiece that uses electrodes to deliver
neuromuscular stimulation to the tongue to strengthen tongue
musculature to reduce snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Neuromuscular Tongue Muscle Stimulator for the Reduction of
Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks to health Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adverse tissue reaction........... Biocompatibility evaluation.
Interference with other devices/ Electrical safety testing,
electrical shock. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
testing, Battery safety testing,
Wireless coexistence testing, and
Labeling.
Use error leading to pain, Human factors assessment; Software
discomfort, or injury. verification, validation, and
hazard analysis; Electrical safety
testing; and Labeling.
Mucosal or skin overheating or Software validation, verification,
burn. hazard analysis; Electrical safety
testing; Electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC) testing; and
Labeling.
Infection......................... Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo classification
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part
820, regarding quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 872
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
872 is amended as follows:
PART 872--DENTAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 872 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 872.5575 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 872.5575 Neuromuscular tongue muscle stimulator for the
reduction of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.
(a) Identification. A neuromuscular tongue muscle stimulator for
the reduction of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea consists of a
removable intraoral mouthpiece that uses electrodes to deliver
neuromuscular stimulation to the tongue to strengthen tongue
musculature to reduce snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Performance testing must demonstrate the wireless
compatibility, electrical safety, battery safety, and electromagnetic
compatibility of the device in its intended use environment.
(2) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be
performed.
(3) The patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Patient labeling must include:
(i) Information on device components, setup, and use of the device
including placement of sensors and mouthpieces, and images or
illustrations;
(ii) A summary of technical specifications;
(iii) Instructions on how to clean and maintain the device;
(iv) A statement that the patient should maintain regular follow up
visits with dentist and sleep specialist; and
(v) A statement that patients should have a comprehensive dental
examination prior to using this device.
(5) A human factors assessment must evaluate simulated use of the
device to demonstrate that the user can correctly use device based on
the labeling and instructions for use.
[[Page 71155]]
Dated: August 28, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-19725 Filed 8-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P