AmeriCorps Seniors Regulation Updates, 70536-70545 [2024-19348]
Download as PDF
70536
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
severable from the remainder of this
subpart and shall not affect the
remainder thereof.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: August 26, 2024.
Xavier Becerra,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2024–19421 Filed 8–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4166–14–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Parts 2551, 2552, and 2553
RIN 3045–AA81
AmeriCorps Seniors Regulation
Updates
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (operating as
AmeriCorps) is revising its regulations
governing AmeriCorps Seniors
programs. This rule removes barriers to
service for individuals and increases
flexibility for grantees to accomplish
project goals and recruit volunteers.
Specifically, this rule removes barriers
for individuals to serve as AmeriCorps
Seniors volunteers in three ways: first,
by modernizing what is considered
income in the calculation that
determines eligibility to receive a
stipend; second, by allowing volunteers
to continue to receive a stipend when
their sponsor places them on
administrative leave due to extenuating
circumstances that prevent service; and
third, by allowing grantees to
supplement stipends. This rule reduces
burden for AmeriCorps Seniors grantees
in two ways: first, it establishes a single
10 percent match value regardless of
grant year. Second, this rule allows
grantees to choose to pay more than (but
not less than) the AmeriCorpsestablished stipend rates, using nonAmeriCorps funds for the amount that
exceeds the AmeriCorps-established
rate. These changes will improve
grantees’ ability to recruit volunteers
and allow grantees to devote to program
operations resources that would
otherwise be devoted to meet
increasingly high match requirements.
The rule also updates nomenclature to
reflect that the Corporation for National
and Community Service operates as
AmeriCorps and that ‘‘Senior Corps’’ is
now known as ‘‘AmeriCorps Seniors.’’
DATES: This rule is effective October 1,
2024.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
Robin Corindo, Deputy Director,
AmeriCorps Seniors, at rcorindo@
americorps.gov, (202) 489–5578.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary of Final Rule
II. Background on the AmeriCorps Seniors
Programs Affected by This Rule
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule,
AmeriCorps’ Responses, and an
Overview of the Final Rule
A. Income Calculation—SCP (§§ 2551.12,
2551.43, and 2551.44); FGP (§§ 2552.12,
2552.43, and 2552.44)
B. Administrative Leave—SCP
(§§ 2551.23(i) and 2551.46(a)); FGP
(§§ 2552.23(i) and 2552.46(a))
C. Allowing Grantees To Pay Higher
Stipends—SCP (§ 2551.92(e)); FGP
(§ 2552.92(e))
D. Removing the Requirement for a FullTime Project Director—SCP
(§ 2551.25(c)); FGP (§ 2552.25(c)); RSVP
(§ 2553.25(c))
E. Establishing a Single, 10 Percent Match,
Regardless of Year—RSVP (§ 2553.72)
F. Other Comments on the Proposed Rule
IV. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
E. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
F. Takings (E.O. 12630)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
I. Executive Summary of Final Rule
This rule updates AmeriCorps Seniors
regulations implementing the Senior
Companion Program (SCP), Foster
Grandparent Program (FGP), and RSVP.
The updates to the SCP and FGP
regulations, at Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 2551 and 2552,
respectively, parallel each other and
include changes to simplify provisions
on calculation of an AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteer’s income to determine
whether they are eligible for a stipend
and removal of certain items from being
considered as income. The updates to
the SCP and FGP regulations also
specify that volunteers who receive a
stipend may be paid the stipend when
the sponsor places them on
administrative leave due to extenuating
circumstances that prevent service. The
updates also allow grantees to pay
stipends at a higher rate than that
established by AmeriCorps Seniors, if
they choose to do so, as long as they do
not use AmeriCorps grant funds to pay
for the amount that is above the
established stipend rate.
The updates to the RSVP regulations
at part 2553 change the level of nonAmeriCorps support (‘‘match’’) that an
RSVP sponsor must provide. Currently,
the regulations allow AmeriCorps to
grant up to 90 percent of the total RSVP
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
budgeted project cost in the first year of
a grant, but only 80 percent in the
second year and 70 percent in the third
and successive years. As a result,
grantees currently must provide
matching funds that are 10 percent of
the total project cost in the first year of
a grant, 20 percent in the second year,
and 30 percent in successive years. The
rule being finalized today instead
establishes a single required match rate
at 10 percent, regardless of the grant
year.
Lastly, this rule makes nomenclature
changes to add a definition for
‘‘AmeriCorps’’ and change references to
the ‘‘Corporation’’ and ‘‘CNCS’’ to
‘‘AmeriCorps’’ throughout these
regulations, to reflect that the
Corporation for National and
Community Service now operates as
AmeriCorps. This rule also changes
‘‘National Senior Service Corps (NSSC)’’
to ‘‘AmeriCorps Seniors’’ to reflect
current terminology and branding.
One change was proposed but is not
being finalized today, in response to the
comments opposing the change, as
discussed below: the update that would
have removed the requirement for
grantees to employ a full-time project
director.
II. Background on the AmeriCorps
Seniors Programs Affected by This Rule
AmeriCorps Seniors operates four
programs: the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), Foster Grandparent
Program (FGP), RSVP (formerly the
Retired and Senior Volunteer Program),
and a Senior Demonstration Program.
This rule affects regulations
implementing the first three programs.
These programs are authorized by the
Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq., and
this rulemaking is authorized by the
National and Community Service Act of
1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12501 et
seq.
AmeriCorps Seniors SCP and FGP
each provide grants to qualified
agencies and organizations (known as
grantees) for the dual purpose of
engaging persons 55 and older,
particularly those with limited incomes,
in volunteer service to meet critical
community needs and to provide a highquality experience that will enrich the
lives of older adult volunteers. In SCP,
program funds are used to support
Senior Companions in providing
supportive, individualized services to
help older adults and those with special
needs maintain their dignity and
independence. They also serve
caregivers with respite support. In FGP,
program funds are used to support
Foster Grandparents in providing
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
supportive, person-to-person service to
children with special and/or
exceptional needs, or in circumstances
that limit their academic, social, or
emotional development. In SCP and
FGP (but not RSVP), volunteers who are
‘‘low income’’ (meaning their income is
at or below 200 percent of the poverty
line) may receive stipends to allow them
to serve without cost to themselves. See
42 U.S.C. 5011(d)–(e), 5013(b).
In SCP, FGP, and RSVP, the sponsor
receiving the grant has several
responsibilities. Among them is the
responsibility to provide staff sufficient
to support the project. Another is the
responsibility to raise ‘‘match,’’ meaning
non-AmeriCorps cash and in-kind
contributions in support of the grant.
The match amount is stated as a
percentage of the total project cost. For
both SCP and FGP grantees, the required
match is 10 percent, meaning the
AmeriCorps grant funds 90 percent of
the total budgeted project cost. See 42
U.S.C. 5011(a), 5013(a). For RSVP, the
statute limits match to no more than 10
percent in the first year, 20 percent in
the second year, and 30 percent in
subsequent years. See 42 U.S.C. 5001(b).
In other words, the statute provides
upper limits (tiered by year) on what
RSVP grantees may be required to
provide as match. The current RSVP
regulations, however, instead frame
match as a limit on AmeriCorps’
contributions to 90 percent in the first
year, 80 percent in the second year, and
70 percent thereafter—in effect placing
a requirement, rather than an upper
limit, for grantee match at 10 percent in
year one, 20 percent in year two, and 30
percent thereafter. See 45 CFR 2553.72.
Additionally, in SCP and FGP,
AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers are
offered a stipend for their service. The
statute sets a minimum hourly rate for
the stipend. See 42 U.S.C. 5011(d),
5013(b). AmeriCorps Seniors establishes
the stipend rate annually through the
Notice of Funding Opportunity;
currently, the stipend rate is $4.00 per
service hour. The current SCP and FGP
regulations provide that a grantee must
pay no more than and no less than the
stipend rate that AmeriCorps establishes
and offers no flexibility to grantees who
may wish to use available additional
funding to supplement the stipend.
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule,
AmeriCorps’ Responses, and an
Overview of the Final Rule
AmeriCorps published a proposed
rule on February 14, 2024 (89 FR 11233)
and received 63 public comments in
response by the April 15, 2024,
comment deadline. Several of the
comments expressed general support for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
the rule changes. Comments that
specifically addressed one or more of
the five proposed substantive changes
are summarized below, along with
AmeriCorps’ responses to those
comments and brief descriptions of the
current regulations, proposals, and
finalized provisions. A discussion of
other comments received on the
proposed rule is also included.
A. Income Calculation—SCP
(§§ 2551.12, 2551.43, and 2551.44); FGP
(§§ 2552.12, 2552.43, and 2552.44)
Current Regulation: The current
regulations address an SCP and FGP
volunteer’s income in three sections: the
definition of ‘‘annual income’’ (at
§§ 2551.12 and 2552.12, respectively);
the income guidelines governing
eligibility to serve as a stipended
volunteer (at §§ 2551.43 and 2552.43,
respectively); and the categories of
‘‘income’’ for determining eligibility (at
§§ 2551.44 and 2552.44, respectively).
Currently, the definition of ‘‘annual
income’’ and the sections addressing
eligibility guidelines and the
determination of ‘‘income’’ each contain
components for the calculation of
income.
Changes That Were Proposed: The
proposed rule would streamline these
sections so that the definition sets out
only that the time period for calculation
of annual income is 12 months, and all
the components for the calculation of
income are contained in one section
each for SCP and FGP. Substantively,
these changes would remove several
items from being included in the
calculation of a volunteer’s income,
including:
• The value of shelter, food, and
clothing if provided at no cost by
relatives of the volunteer or volunteer’s
spouse;
• Strike benefits;
• Training stipends; and
• Regular support that is not legally
required from an absent family member
or someone not living in the household.
Comments on the Proposed Changes:
Most who commented on the proposed
changes to the income calculation
provisions expressed support for them.
Among the reasons that commenters
gave for their support were that the
changes would remove barriers for
individuals to serve as AmeriCorps
volunteers, help volunteer recruitment
and retention (which leads to more
children and seniors being served by the
FGP and SCP, respectively), and
contribute to greater food security
among low-income volunteers.
Several commenters requested that
only the volunteer’s income be
considered, without the spouse’s
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70537
income or income of the entire
household. These commenters stated
that spousal income being included in
a potential volunteer’s income
calculation is one of main reasons that
grantees must turn away potential FGP
and SCP volunteers.
One commenter stated that military
veterans should be exempt from
declaring their retirement as income.
Although the proposed rule did not
address the income threshold (200
percent of the poverty line), several
commenters advocated for an increase
in the income threshold or removal of
the threshold to engage more FGP and
SCP volunteers and serve more
individuals as a result. Most who
requested an increase suggested
increasing the threshold to 400 percent
of the poverty level; one suggested a
$5,000 to $10,000 increase per year in
the threshold. Two commenters
suggested using the Asset Limited,
Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)
tool instead of the Federal poverty level
as the income threshold as a more
equitable determination that accounts
for the local cost of living.
AmeriCorps’ Response to Comments:
AmeriCorps agrees with the commenters
who stated that the proposed changes to
income calculation would remove
barriers for individuals to serve as FGP
and SCP volunteers. The final rule
includes these changes and focuses the
income calculation more on long-term
legally required income.
AmeriCorps acknowledges the
comments stating that only the
volunteer’s income should be included
in the calculation, and not the spouse’s
or any other family member’s income.
Consistent with the current and
proposed rule, the final rule continues
to require the spouse’s income to be
included in calculation of the
volunteer’s income if the spouse resides
in the same residence. If AmeriCorps
considers removing the incomes of
cohabitating spouses from the
calculation of a volunteer’s income, it
will propose that removal in a future
rulemaking. However, this rulemaking
takes steps to limit other relatives’
support from being included in
calculation of a volunteer’s income. The
proposed rule and final rule both focus
solely on the volunteer’s own income
and resident spouse’s income, rather
than that of other relatives, as described
below.
With regard to the comment
requesting that military veterans’
retirement income be excluded from
their income calculation, if AmeriCorps
considers adding this exclusion, it will
propose the exclusion in a future
rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
70538
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
The comments regarding increasing,
removing, or changing the income
threshold cannot be addressed by
rulemaking because the underlying
statute, the Domestic Volunteer Service
Act of 1973, as amended, establishes
that the low-income threshold be not
more than 200 percent of the Federal
poverty line. See 42 U.S.C. 5011(e)(1).
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on
Income Calculation: As proposed, and
as finalized today, the volunteer’s
income calculation will no longer
include the value of shelter, food, and
clothing that relatives provide to the
volunteer, or financial support that
absent relatives opt to provide but are
not legally required to provide. Under
the proposed and final rules, the only
financial support from non-resident
relatives (other than the spouse living in
the same residence) that is included in
the volunteer’s income calculation is
financial support that the relatives are
legally required to provide. The
volunteer’s spouse’s income is included
in the calculation only if the spouse
lives in the same residence with the
volunteer. As a result, when examining
a volunteer’s income to determine
eligibility for a stipend under this
proposal, AmeriCorps Seniors would
look only at the volunteer’s income,
plus the spouse’s income if the spouse
lives in the same residence. The final
rule also removes strike benefits and
training stipends from the calculation of
income, because their removal supports
modernization of the regulations.
AmeriCorps expects these changes
will simplify the determination of
whether someone is eligible to serve as
a stipended FGP or SCP volunteer and
remove barriers to those individuals to
serve in FGP and SCP. These changes
will also support AmeriCorps Seniors
programs’ ability to recruit and retain
volunteers, rebuild volunteer numbers
to pre-COVID–19 levels, and reduce
relinquishment of FGP and SCP
program that result from difficulties
recruiting eligible volunteers.
B. Administrative Leave—SCP
(§§ 2551.23(i) and 2551.46(a)); FGP
(§§ 2552.23(i) and 2552.46(a))
Current Regulation: Currently, the
regulations governing SCP and FGP are
silent as to whether AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers who receive a stipend for
their service and earned leave may also
receive a stipend for administrative
leave.
Changes That Were Proposed: The
proposed rule would add that stipended
volunteers may be paid administrative
leave, as long as grantees have written
service policies to address
administrative leave. The proposed rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
would also require grantees to obtain
AmeriCorps’ approval to pay the
stipend for administrative leave after the
seventh calendar day of the extenuating
circumstances that are the basis for the
administrative leave.
Comments on the Proposed Changes:
Most who commented on the
administrative leave proposal supported
the proposed changes. Among the
reasons provided for support were that
the proposed changes would enhance
program flexibility to attract and retain
volunteers and promote consistent
volunteer participation. One commenter
noted that many volunteers are
dependent upon the stipend they
receive and that any break in service,
planned or unplanned, can create
hardship for the volunteer.
A few of the commenters in support
of the change suggested modifications.
One suggested the regulation establish a
‘‘floor’’ of circumstances that would
trigger administrative leave. Similarly,
another stated that there should be
guidelines as to what constitute
‘‘extenuating circumstances’’ that justify
administrative leave. The other
recommended increasing the time a
stipend may be paid for administrative
leave before AmeriCorps’ approval is
required, from the proposed seven
calendar days to a month.
AmeriCorps’ Response to Comments:
AmeriCorps agrees that allowing
stipends to be paid for administrative
leave both enhances program flexibility
to attract and retain volunteers and
helps to protect volunteers who rely on
their stipends from unpredictable loss of
their stipend due to events beyond their
control. AmeriCorps believes the phrase
‘‘extenuating circumstances’’ itself
provides a baseline for the types of
circumstances that would justify
administrative leave—meaning
circumstances that are exceptional,
unusual, and/or unpredictable. The rule
gives grantees the flexibility to establish
for themselves what extenuating
circumstances would justify
administrative leave to complement
their own policies’ categorizations of
circumstances qualifying as sick leave
and emergency or disaster leave, as
appropriate.
AmeriCorps has determined that
seven calendar days is a more
appropriate time period than a month
for obtaining AmeriCorps’ approval of
continued payment of a stipend for
administrative leave. As a practice,
grantees should keep their portfolio
managers updated as to any extenuating
circumstances that affect their programs
and service. Seven days is long enough
to allow grantees to take any emergency
action they may need to in response to
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the circumstances, while allowing
AmeriCorps to provide some oversight
to ensure that volunteers are not
unnecessarily being paid for time not in
service.
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on
Administrative Leave: The final rule
adopts the proposed rule’s changes to
allow SCP and FGP grantees to grant
administrative leave to their volunteers
in those unusual and rare situations that
prevent a volunteer, through no fault of
their own, from serving at their
volunteer station, as long as the
grantee’s program policies permit
administrative leave in such situations.
Many dedicated AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers in SCP and FGP rely upon
the stipend to supplement their limited
incomes so they can pay for necessities
like medicine and groceries. This
change ensures that these volunteers are
not penalized by having their stipends
withheld for being unable to serve due
to extenuating circumstances (as
defined in the program’s policy). While
grantees must define the specifics of
administrative leave, the rule provides
parameters by defining the term as a
temporary absence that the sponsor
allows in extenuating circumstances
that prevent the volunteer from serving,
or from serving safely. The final rule
provides a check on grantees providing
administrative leave to volunteers by
requiring AmeriCorps’ approval to pay
the stipend for administrative leave after
the seventh calendar day of the
extenuating circumstances that are the
basis for the administrative leave.
C. Allowing Grantees To Pay Higher
Stipends—SCP (§ 2551.92(e)); FGP
(§ 2552.92(e))
Current Regulation: The current SCP
and FGP regulations prohibit grantees
from paying stipends at rates different
from those established by AmeriCorps.
Changes That Were Proposed: The
proposed rule would allow grantees to
pay stipends to SCP and FGP volunteers
at a higher rate than the rate established
by AmeriCorps Seniors, if they choose
to do so, and as long as they use funds
other than AmeriCorps grant funds to
pay for the amount above the
established stipend rate. The proposed
rule also would allow grantees to use
funds with which they supplement the
stipend to count toward required match
contributions.
Comments on the Proposed Changes:
A few commenters expressed their
support for the proposed change as
removing barriers to volunteer
recruitment and retention, promoting
economic security for older adults, and
accounting for certain geographic areas
having higher costs of living. Several
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
commenters opposed the proposed
change based on one or more of the
following reasons: grantees able to
supplement stipends will attract
volunteers away from grantees who are
not able to supplement stipends,
creating inequities across the country;
the different stipend rates will cause
confusion among volunteers; and
Congress might reduce funding for
stipends overall.
AmeriCorps’ Response to Comments:
AmeriCorps agrees that allowing
grantees to supplement stipends will
help remove barriers to volunteer
recruitment and retention, promote
economic security for low-income
volunteers, and account for different
costs of living. AmeriCorps does not
believe that the change will create
inequities; rather, the change will help
address the inequities that already exist
among geographic areas with different
costs of living. This rule provides
grantees a means of attracting more
volunteers if they are in an area with a
higher cost of living and gives them an
incentive to find more community
support so they can supplement
stipends. This flexibility aligns with the
approach taken by AmeriCorps State
and National in allowing grantees the
flexibility to provide additional benefits
and higher living allowances.
AmeriCorps has no basis for expecting
that this change will cause confusion
among volunteers or result in reduced
appropriations for stipends, as there is
no evidence that these were issues when
prior versions of the regulations allowed
supplementation of stipends. See 45
CFR 1207.2–2 and 1208.2–2 (10/01/1996
edition).
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on
Supplementation of Stipends: The final
rule adopts the proposed rule’s changes
to allow grantees to pay volunteers a
stipend at a rate higher than the
AmeriCorps-established rate, should
they have the desire and funding to do
so, and allows grantees to count the
funds with which they supplement the
stipend toward their required match
contribution. Grantees’ supplementation
of volunteers’ stipends must comply
with anti-discrimination and other laws.
The current regulation, which
restricts all volunteers to the
AmeriCorps-established stipend rate,
prevents grantees from adjusting their
benefits to account for the needs of
volunteers in their local communities.
This restriction is not compelled by
statute, as the DVSA establishes only a
minimum stipend rate ($3.00 per hour).
Earlier versions of the regulation
explicitly allowed for stipend payments
in excess of the amount established by
AmeriCorps (then ‘‘ACTION’’). See 45
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
CFR 1207.2–2 and 1208.2–2 (10/01/1996
edition). The final rule reinstitutes this
allowance, and also allows the
supplemented stipend amount to count
toward the required match contribution.
Under the final rule, AmeriCorps will
continue to establish stipend rates and
comply with the statutory minimum for
stipend rates, but grantees will have the
flexibility to supplement the rate with
their non-AmeriCorps funds.
AmeriCorps expects that the
flexibility for supplementing stipends
will help grantees to recruit and retain
volunteers by improving the feasibility
of service for low-income volunteers
whose costs of serving exceed the
AmeriCorps-established stipend rate.
This flexibility will also allow for
grantees to account for things like
higher costs of living in providing their
volunteers with stipends, by using their
grantee (non-AmeriCorps) share funds
to add on to the single stipend rate that
AmeriCorps establishes for the entire
country.
D. Removing the Requirement for a FullTime Project Director—SCP
(§ 2551.25(c)); FGP (§ 2552.25(c)); RSVP
(§ 2553.25(c))
Current Regulation: The current SCP,
FGP, and RSVP regulations all require a
sponsor to employ a full-time project
director to accomplish project objectives
and manage functions and project
activities, except in a limited
circumstance where the sponsor may
negotiate with AmeriCorps for
permission to instead employ a parttime project director. That circumstance
is when the sponsor has demonstrated
to AmeriCorps that having only a parttime project director will not adversely
affect the size, scope, or quality of
project operations.
Changes That Were Proposed: The
proposed rule would have replaced
these prescriptive requirements with a
more results-focused requirement that
grantees employ project staff sufficient
to support the size, scope, and quality
of project operations. In the application,
the sponsor would have had to
thoroughly outline their management
plan to describe how each project
director duty will be fulfilled. At the
time of renewal, program structure
would then be evaluated based on
performance measures. The intention of
the proposed change was to provide
grantees with the flexibility to
determine their own appropriate mix of
staffing to support the project.
Comments on the Proposed Changes:
Of those who commented on this
proposed change, approximately half
expressed support and half opposition.
Those in support of the change stated
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70539
that it allows programs to use staff more
efficiently by allowing programs to
reallocate work duties, adjust
workflows, and increase continuity of
services, without having to request a
waiver from AmeriCorps. Those in
opposition to the change stated that it
would allow grantees to pull the
currently full-time project directors onto
other efforts, limiting the amount of
time the project directors would be able
to devote to the programs and
undermining their ability to effectively
run them, would contribute to
understaffing the programs and job loss,
and would increase compliance issues,
as there would be no single full-time
person accountable as program director.
Commenters also pointed out that there
is already a waiver process in place to
enable grantees to employ a part-time
director, and one commenter provided
evidence that there are insufficient
requests for waivers to justify a change
to the general rule.
AmeriCorps’ Response to Comments:
AmeriCorps is persuaded by those
comments opposing the change that
state that a waiver process is already
available and is not used so frequently
as to justify a change to the overall
requirement for a full-time project
director. For this reason, AmeriCorps is
not moving forward with finalizing this
change at this time, but will monitor the
number of waiver requests in the future
to determine whether this change
should be considered in a separate,
future rulemaking.
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on
Full-Time Project Director: The final
rule retains the current regulatory
requirement for a full-time project
director, and opportunity for a waiver of
this requirement.
E. Establishing a Single, 10 Percent
Match, Regardless of Year—RSVP
(§ 2553.72)
Current Regulation: The current
regulation provides that AmeriCorps
RSVP grants may fund up to 90 percent
of the total budgeted project cost in the
first year, leaving the sponsor
responsible for 10 percent of the total
project cost through locally generated
contributions. The current regulation
then decreases the level of funding
AmeriCorps may provide for RSVP
grants to 80 percent (consequently
increasing the sponsor’s responsibility
to 20 percent) in the second year, and
further decreases AmeriCorps’
contribution to 70 percent
(consequently increasing the sponsor’s
responsibility to 30 percent) in the third
year and beyond.
Changes That Were Proposed: The
proposed rule would revise the current
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
70540
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
tiered match requirements for RSVP to
instead provide RSVP parity with the
FGP and SCP programs, which each
require 10 percent match regardless of
year.
Comments on the Proposed Changes:
Every commenter who commented on
the proposed match change supported
the proposed reduction of required
RSVP match to 10 percent. Among the
reasons commenters expressed for their
support were that the proposed change
would establish parity with the FGP and
SCP program match requirements;
simplify raising and reporting match for
RSVP grantees; help RSVP programs
remain sustainable in a time of rapid
inflation and stagnant or reduced
funding from other non-Federal sources;
have a compounding positive financial
impact on RSVP grantees’ ability to
provide needed vital services to their
communities; streamline management of
RSVP program budgets; and allow for
more focus on RSVP program
requirements, volunteer recruitments,
partnerships and potential new
programming. A commenter also noted
that the current 30 percent match can be
a barrier for service in rural areas that
are philanthropically underserved and
that a 10 percent match, regardless of
year, helps to remove this barrier.
AmeriCorps’ Response to Comments:
AmeriCorps agrees with these
unanimous comments in support of the
change to a 10 percent required match
for RSVP, regardless of year. In addition
to the reasons expressed by the
commenters for their support, this
change will also benefit grantees that
have RSVP programs and FGP and/or
SCP programs, by allowing them to have
consistent policies across all their
programs. AmeriCorps also anticipates
that this change will reduce
relinquishments of RSVP programs.
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on
Income Calculation: The final rule
removes the increasing required match
for RSVP programs, requiring match at
10 percent regardless of year. The
statute limits how much match funding
RSVP grantees must provide to no more
than 10 percent in the first year, 20
percent in the second year, and 30
percent in subsequent years. See 42
U.S.C. 5001(b). In other words, the
statute provides upper limits (tiered by
year) on what RSVP grantees may be
required to provide as match. In
contrast, the current RSVP regulations
convert these upper limits into
requirements for grantees to provide
match at 10 percent in the first year, 20
percent in the second year, and 30
percent in subsequent years. See 45 CFR
2553.72. The final rule instead uses the
flexibility afforded by the statute to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
require 10 percent match for RSVP
regardless of year. This change in
required match is not expected to
impact the quality of services provided
to communities by the program because
all program expectations remain the
same under this final rule.
F. Other Comments on the Proposed
Rule
Two commenters commented on the
proposed rule’s nomenclature updates,
such as the updates to reflect that
‘‘Senior Corps’’ is now called
‘‘AmeriCorps Seniors.’’ One commenter
supported these updates. The other
commenter opposed the updates, stating
that most communities are only familiar
with the separate identities of the FGP,
SCP, and RSVP, and that ‘‘AmeriCorps’’
causes confusion because people think
of the AmeriCorps State and National
program. AmeriCorps is finalizing the
nomenclature updates, as its programs
have been operating under the unifying
moniker ‘‘AmeriCorps’’ for several
years.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives, and if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs in
the Office of Management and Budget
determined this rule is not a significant
regulatory action.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), AmeriCorps certifies that this rule,
if adopted, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. While many
grantees are small governmental
jurisdictions or not-for-profit enterprises
that may qualify as small entities, the
economic effect of this proposed rule on
those small entities is minimal.
Therefore, AmeriCorps has not
performed the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis that is required
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) for rules that are
expected to have such results.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
For purposes of title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, as well as
Executive Order 12875, this regulatory
action does not contain any Federal
mandate that may result in increased
expenditures in Federal, State, local, or
Tribal Governments in the aggregate, or
impose an annual burden exceeding
$100 million on the private sector.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act,
an agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless the
collections of information display valid
control numbers. This rule does not
affect any information collections.
E. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
prohibits an agency from publishing any
rule that has federalism implications if
the rule imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by
statute, or the rule preempts state law,
unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This
rulemaking does not have any
federalism implications, as described
above.
F. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630 because this rule does not
affect individual property rights
protected by the Fifth Amendment or
involve a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rulemaking: (a) meets
the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that
all regulations be reviewed to eliminate
errors and ambiguity and be written to
minimize litigation; and (b) meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that
all regulations be written in clear
language and contain clear legal
standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175)
AmeriCorps recognizes the inherent
sovereignty of Indian Tribes and their
right to self-governance. We have
evaluated this rulemaking under the
agency’s consultation policy and the
criteria in Executive Order 13175 and
determined that this rule does not
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
impose substantial direct effects on
federally recognized Tribes.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Parts 2551,
2552, and 2553
Aged, Grant programs—social
programs, Volunteers.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, under the authority of 42
U.S.C. 12651c(c), the Corporation for
National and Community Service
amends chapter XXV, title 45 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 2551—SENIOR COMPANION
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 2551
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.; 42
U.S.C. 12651b–12651d; E.O. 13331, 69 FR
9911.
2. Revise and republish § 2551.12 to
read as follows:
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
§ 2551.12
Definitions.
Act. The Domestic Volunteer Service
Act of 1973, as amended, Public Law
93–113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 396, 42
U.S.C. 4950 et seq.
Adequate staffing level. The number
of project staff or full-time equivalent
needed by a sponsor to manage the
AmeriCorps Seniors project operations
considering such factors as: Number of
budgeted Volunteer Service Years
(VSYs), number of volunteer stations,
and the size of the service area.
Adult with special needs. Any
individual over 21 years of age who has
one or more physical, emotional, or
mental health limitations and is in need
of assistance to achieve and maintain
their highest level of independent
living.
AmeriCorps. The Corporation for
National and Community Service,
established pursuant to section 191 of
the National and Community Service
Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
12651, which operates as AmeriCorps.
AmeriCorps Seniors. The collective
name for the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), the Foster Grandparent
Program (FGP), the Retired and Senior
Volunteer Program (RSVP), and
Demonstration Programs, all of which
are established under Parts A, B, C, and
E, Title II of the Act
Annual income. The applicant or
enrollee’s total income for the preceding
12 months, including the applicant or
enrollee’s spouse’s income, if the spouse
lives in the same residence, as
calculated in § 2551.44.
Chief Executive Officer. The Chief
Executive Officer of AmeriCorps
appointed under the National and
Community Service Act of 1990, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
amended, (NCSA), 42 U.S.C. 12501 et
seq.
Cost reimbursements.
Reimbursements budgeted as Volunteer
Expenses and provided to volunteers,
including stipends to cover incidental
costs, transportation, meals, recognition,
supplemental accident, personal
liability and excess automobile liability
insurance and other expenses as
negotiated in the Memorandum of
Understanding.
In-home. The non-institutional
assignment of a Senior Companion in a
private residence.
Letter of Agreement. A written
agreement between a volunteer station
or sponsor and the person(s) served or
the person legally responsible for that
person. It authorizes the assignment of
an SCP volunteer in the home of a
client, defines SCP volunteer activities,
and specifies supervision arrangements.
Memorandum of Understanding. A
written statement prepared and signed
by the Senior Companion project
sponsor and the volunteer station that
identifies project requirements, working
relationships, and mutual
responsibilities.
Non-AmeriCorps support (excess).
The amount of non-AmeriCorps cash
and in-kind contributions generated by
a sponsor in excess of the required
percentage.
Non-AmeriCorps support (match).
The percentage share of nonAmeriCorps cash and in-kind
contributions required to be raised by
the sponsor in support of the grant.
Performance measures. Indicators that
help determine the impact of an SCP
project on the community and clients
served, including the volunteers.
Project. The locally planned SCP
activity or set of activities in a service
area as approved by AmeriCorps and
implemented by the sponsor.
Proprietary Health Care Agency.
Private, for-profit health care
organization that serves one or more
vulnerable populations.
Service area. The geographically
defined area(s) in which Senior
Companions are enrolled and placed on
assignments.
Service schedule. A written
delineation of the days and times a
Senior Companion serves each week.
Sponsor. A public agency, including
Indian Tribes as defined in section
421(5) of the Act, and private, non-profit
organizations, both secular and faithbased, in the United States that have
authority to accept and the capability to
administer a Senior Companion project.
Stipend. A payment to Senior
Companions to enable them to serve
without cost to themselves. The amount
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70541
of the stipend is set by AmeriCorps in
accordance with Federal law.
United States and territories. Each of
the several States, the District of
Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam
and American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and the Trust Territories of the
Pacific Islands.
Volunteer assignment plan. A written
description of a Senior Companion’s
assignment with a client. The plan
identifies specific outcomes for the
client and the activities of the Senior
Companion.
Volunteer station. A public agency; a
private, non-profit organization, secular
or faith-based; or a proprietary health
care organization. A volunteer station
must accept responsibility for the
assignment and supervision of Senior
Companions in health, education, social
service, or related settings such as
multi-purpose centers, home health care
agencies, or similar establishments.
Each volunteer station must be licensed
or otherwise certified, when required,
by the appropriate state or local
government. Private homes are not
volunteer stations.
3. In § 2551.23, redesignate
paragraphs (i)(2) through (5) as
paragraphs (i)(3) through (6) and add
new paragraph (i)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 2551.23 What are a sponsor’s project
responsibilities?
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(2) Administrative leave, meaning a
temporary absence the sponsor allows
in extenuating circumstances that
prevent the Senior Companion from
serving or serving safely.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 2551.25, revise paragraph (h) to
read as follows:
■
§ 2551.25 What are a sponsor’s
administrative responsibilities?
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Comply with, and ensure that
Memorandums of Understanding
require all volunteer stations to comply
with, all applicable civil rights laws and
regulations, including nondiscrimination based on disability.
5. Revise the heading for subpart C to
read as follows:
■
Subpart C—Suspension and
Termination of AmeriCorps Assistance
6. In § 2551.43, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
70542
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
§ 2551.43 What income guidelines govern
eligibility to serve as a stipended Senior
Companion?
■
*
Subpart K—Non-AmeriCorps Funded
Senior Companion Projects
*
*
*
*
(b) For applicants to become
stipended Senior Companions, income
is based on annual income at the time
of application. For serving stipended
Senior Companions, annual income is
counted for the past 12 months. Annual
income includes the applicant or
enrollee’s income and that of his/her
spouse, if the spouse lives in the same
residence, as calculated in § 2551.44.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 2551.44, revise paragraph (a)(3)
to read as follows:
§ 2551.44 What is considered income for
determining volunteer eligibility?
(a) * * *
(3) Social Security, Unemployment or
Workers Compensation, alimony, and
military family allotments, or other
legally required financial support from
an absent family member or someone
not living in the household.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 2551.46, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 2551.46 What cost reimbursements are
provided to Senior Companions?
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Stipend. The stipend is paid for
the time Senior Companions spend with
their assigned clients, for earned leave,
for administrative leave, and for
attendance at official project events. The
sponsor may pay a stipend for
administrative leave for extenuating
circumstances lasting up to seven
calendar days, but must obtain
AmeriCorps’ written approval to pay a
stipend for administrative leave based
on extenuating circumstances lasting
beyond seven calendar days.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 2551.91
[Amended]
9. In § 2551.91, remove ‘‘CNCS’ ’’ and
add in its place ‘‘AmeriCorps’ ’’
wherever it appears.
■ 10. In § 2551.92, revise paragraph (e)
to read as follows:
■
§ 2551.92 What are project funding
requirements?
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
*
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 2551.114
[Amended]
12. In § 2551.114, remove ‘‘nonCNCS’’ and add in its place ‘‘nonAmeriCorps’’ and remove ‘‘CNCS’ ’’ and
add in its place ‘‘AmeriCorps’ ’’.
■ 13. In § 2551.121, revise paragraph
(c)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 2551.121 What legal limitations apply to
the operation of the Senior Companion
Program and to the expenditure of grant
funds?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) An agency or organization to
which AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers
are assigned or which operates or
supervises any AmeriCorps Seniors
program shall not request or receive any
compensation from AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers, or from beneficiaries, for the
services provided by AmeriCorps
Seniors volunteers.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 2551.122
[Amended]
14. In § 2551.122, remove ‘‘CNCS’s’’
and add in its place ‘‘AmeriCorps’ ‘‘.
■
§§ 2551.21 through 2551.122
[Amended]
15. In addition to the amendments set
forth above, in §§ 2551.21 through
2551.122, remove ‘‘CNCS’’ and add in
its place the word ‘‘AmeriCorps’’.
■
§§ 2551.92, 2551.102, 2551.112, and
2551.113 [Amended]
16. In addition to the amendments set
forth above, in §§ 2551.92, 2551.102,
2551.112, and 2551.113, remove ‘‘nonCNCS’’ and add in its place the word
‘‘non-AmeriCorps’’.
■
PART 2552—FOSTER GRANDPARENT
PROGRAM
17. The authority for part 2552
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.; 42
U.S.C. 12651b–12651d; E.O. 13331, 69 FR
9911.
18. Revise and republish § 2552.12 to
read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
(e) May a sponsor pay stipends at
rates different than those established by
AmeriCorps? A sponsor must pay
stipends at rates no less than the rate
established by AmeriCorps. A sponsor
may use non-AmeriCorps funding to
pay stipends at rates higher than the rate
established by AmeriCorps but may not
use AmeriCorps funding for this
purpose.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
11. Revise the heading of subpart K to
read as follows:
§ 2552.12
Definitions.
Act. The Domestic Volunteer Service
Act of 1973, as amended, Public Law
93–113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 396, 42
U.S.C. 4950 et seq.
Adequate staffing level. The number
of project staff or full-time equivalent
needed by a sponsor to manage the
AmeriCorps Seniors project operations
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
considering such factors as: Number of
budgeted Volunteer Service Years
(VSYs), number of volunteer stations,
and the size of the service area.
AmeriCorps. The Corporation for
National and Community Service,
established pursuant to section 191 of
the National and Community Service
Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
12651, which operates as AmeriCorps.
AmeriCorps Seniors. The collective
name for the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), the Foster Grandparent
Program (FGP), the Retired and Senior
Volunteer Program (RSVP), and
Demonstration Programs, all of which
are established under Parts A, B, C, and
E, Title II of the Act.
Annual income. The applicant’s or
enrollee’s total income, as calculated in
§ 2552.44, over the preceding 12
months.
Chief Executive Officer. The Chief
Executive Officer of AmeriCorps
appointed under the National and
Community Service Act of 1990, as
amended, (NCSA), 42 U.S.C. 12501 et
seq.
Child. Any individual who is less
than 21 years of age.
Children having exceptional needs.
Children who have a developmental
disability, such as those who have
autism; an intellectual disability;
cerebral palsy or epilepsy; a visual,
speech, hearing, or orthopedic
impairment; an emotional, behavioral,
or language disorder; a specific learning
disability; multiple disabilities; other
significant health impairments; or have
literacy, math or other educational
assistance needs. Before a Foster
Grandparent is assigned to a child,
existence of the child’s exceptional need
shall be verified by an appropriate
professional, such as a physician;
psychiatrist; psychologist, including
school psychologists; registered nurse or
licensed practical nurse; speech
therapist; licensed clinical social
worker; or educator.
Children with special needs. Children
who are abused or neglected, in need of
foster care, adjudicated youth, homeless
youth, teenage parents, and children in
need of protective intervention in their
homes. Existence of a child’s special
need shall be verified by an appropriate
professional before a Foster Grandparent
is assigned to the child.
Cost reimbursements.
Reimbursements budgeted as Volunteer
Expenses and provided to volunteers,
including stipends to cover incidental
costs; transportation; meals; recognition;
supplemental accident, personal
liability and excess automobile liability
insurance; and other expenses as
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
negotiated in the Memorandum of
Understanding.
In-home. The non-institutional
assignment of a Foster Grandparent in a
private residence or a foster home.
Letter of Agreement. A written
agreement between a volunteer station
or sponsor and the person(s) served or
the person legally responsible for that
person. It authorizes the assignment of
an FGP volunteer in the home of a
client, defines FGP volunteer activities,
and specifies supervision arrangements.
Memorandum of Understanding. A
written statement prepared and signed
by the Foster Grandparent project
sponsor and the volunteer station that
identifies project requirements, working
relationships, and mutual
responsibilities.
Non-AmeriCorps support (excess).
The amount of non-Federal cash and inkind contributions generated by a
sponsor in excess of the required
percentage.
Non-AmeriCorps support (match).
The percentage share of nonAmeriCorps cash and in-kind
contributions required to be raised by
the sponsor in support of the grant.
Non-AmeriCorps support (excess).
The amount of non-Federal cash and inkind contributions generated by a
sponsor in excess of the required
percentage.
Parent. A natural parent or a person
acting in place of a natural parent, such
as a guardian, a child’s natural
grandparent, or a step-parent with
whom the child lives. The term also
includes otherwise-unrelated
individuals who are legally responsible
for a child’s welfare.
Performance measures. Indicators that
help determine the impact of an FGP
project on the community and clients
served, including the volunteers.
Project. The locally planned FGP
activity or set of activities in a service
area as approved by AmeriCorps and
implemented by the sponsor.
Proprietary Health Care Agency.
Private, for-profit health care
organization that serves one or more
vulnerable populations.
Service area. The geographically
defined area(s) in which Foster
Grandparents are enrolled and placed
on assignments.
Service schedule. A written
delineation of the days and times a
Foster Grandparent serves each week.
Sponsor. A public agency, including
Indian Tribes as defined in section
421(5) of the Act, and private, non-profit
organizations, both secular and faithbased, in the United States that have
authority to accept and the capability to
administer a Foster Grandparent project.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
Stipend. A payment to Foster
Grandparents to enable them to serve
without cost to themselves. The amount
of the stipend is set by AmeriCorps in
accordance with Federal law.
United States and Territories. Each of
the several States, the District of
Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam
and American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and the Trust Territories of the
Pacific Islands.
Volunteer assignment plan. A written
description of a Foster Grandparent’s
assignment with a child. The plan
identifies specific outcomes for the
child and the activities of the Foster
Grandparent.
Volunteer station. A public agency; a
private, non-profit organization, secular
or faith-based; or a proprietary health
care organization. A volunteer station
must accept responsibility for the
assignment and supervision of Foster
Grandparents in health, education,
social service, or related settings such as
multi-purpose centers, home health care
agencies, or similar establishments.
Each volunteer station must be licensed
or otherwise certified, when required,
by the appropriate state or local
government. Private homes are not
volunteer stations.
19. In § 2552.23, redesignate
paragraphs (i)(2) through (5) as
paragraphs (i)(3) through (6) and add
new paragraph (i)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 2552.23 What are a sponsor’s project
responsibilities?
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(2) Administrative leave, meaning a
temporary absence the sponsor allows
in extenuating circumstances that
prevent the Foster Grandparent from
serving or serving safely.
*
*
*
*
*
20. In § 2552.25, revise paragraph (h)
to read as follows:
■
§ 2552.25 What are a sponsor’s
administrative responsibilities?
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Comply with, and ensure that
Memorandums of Understanding
require all volunteer stations to comply
with, all applicable civil rights laws and
regulations, including nondiscrimination based on disability.
21. Revise the heading for subpart C
to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70543
Subpart C—Suspension and
Termination of AmeriCorps Assistance
§ 2552.43
[Amended]
22. In § 2552.43, revise paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
■
§ 2552.43 What income guidelines govern
eligibility to serve as a stipended Foster
Grandparent?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) For applicants to become
stipended Foster Grandparents, income
is based on annual income at the time
of application. For serving stipended
Foster Grandparents, annual income is
counted for the past 12 months. Annual
income includes the applicant or
enrollee’s income and that of his/her
spouse, if the spouse lives in the same
residence, as calculated in § 2552.44.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 23. In § 2552.44, revise paragraph
(a)(3) to read as follows:
§ 2552.44 What is considered income for
determining volunteer eligibility?
(a) * * *
(3) Social Security, Unemployment or
Workers Compensation, alimony, and
military family allotments, or other
legally required financial support from
an absent family member or someone
not living in the household.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 24. In § 2552.46, revise paragraph (a)
to read as follows:
§ 2552.46 What cost reimbursements and
benefits do sponsors provide to Foster
Grandparents?
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Stipend. The stipend is paid for
the time Foster Grandparents spend
with their assigned children, for earned
leave, for administrative leave, and for
attendance at official project events. The
sponsor may pay a stipend for
administrative leave for extenuating
circumstances lasting up to seven
calendar days but must obtain
AmeriCorps’ written approval to pay a
stipend for administrative leave based
on extenuating circumstances lasting
beyond seven calendar days.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 25. In § 2552.92, revise paragraph (e)
to read as follows:
§ 2552.92 What are project funding
requirements?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) May a sponsor pay stipends at
rates different than those established by
AmeriCorps? A sponsor must pay
stipends at rates no less than the rate
established by AmeriCorps. A sponsor
may use non-AmeriCorps funding to
pay stipends at rates higher than the rate
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
70544
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
established by AmeriCorps, but may not
use AmeriCorps funding for this
purpose.
■ 26. Revise the heading of subpart K to
read as follows:
Subpart K—Non-AmeriCorps Funded
Foster Grandparent Projects
§ 2552.112
[Amended]
27. In addition § 2552.112
introductory text, remove ‘‘Non-CNCS’’
and add in its place ‘‘non-AmeriCorps’’.
■ 28. In § 2552.121, revise paragraph
(c)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 2552.121 What legal limitations apply to
the operation of the Foster Grandparent
Program and to the expenditure of grant
funds?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) An agency or organization to
which AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers
are assigned or which operates or
supervises any AmeriCorps Seniors
program shall not request or receive any
compensation from AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers, or from beneficiaries, for the
services provided by AmeriCorps
Seniors volunteers.
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 2552.21 through 2552.122
[Amended]
29. In addition to the amendments set
forth above, in §§ 2552.21 through
2552.122, remove ‘‘CNCS’’ and add in
its place the word ‘‘AmeriCorps’’
wherever it appears.
■
§§ 2552.91, 2552.114, and 2552.122
[Amended]
30. In addition to the amendments set
forth above, in §§ 2552.91, 2552.114,
and 2552.122, remove ‘‘CNCS’ ’’ and
add in its place ‘‘AmeriCorps’
’’wherever it appears.
■
§§ 2552.92, 2552.102, 2552.112, 2552.113,
and 2552.114 [Amended]
31. In addition to the amendments set
forth above, in §§ 2552.92, 2552.102,
2552.112, 2552.113, and 2552.114,
remove ‘‘non-CNCS’’ and add in its
place ‘‘non-AmeriCorps’’ wherever it
appears.
■
PART 2553—THE RETIRED AND
SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
32. The authority for part 2553
continues to read as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.
33. Revise and republish § 2553.12 to
read as follows:
■
§ 2553.12
Definitions.
Act. The Domestic Volunteer Service
Act of 1973, as amended, Public Law
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
Jkt 262001
93–113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 396, 42
U.S.C. 4950 et seq.
Adequate staffing level. The number
of project staff or full-time equivalent
needed by a sponsor to manage the
AmeriCorps Seniors project operations
considering such factors as: Number of
budgeted volunteers, number of
volunteer stations, and the size of the
service area.
AmeriCorps. The Corporation for
National and Community Service,
established pursuant to section 191 of
the National and Community Service
Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
12651, which operates as AmeriCorps.
AmeriCorps Seniors. The collective
name for the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), the Foster Grandparent
Program (FGP), the Retired and Senior
Volunteer Program (RSVP), and
Demonstration Programs, all of which
are established under Parts A, B, C, and
E, Title II of the Act.
Assignment. The activities, functions,
or responsibilities to be performed by
volunteers identified in a written
outline or description.
Assignment description. The written
description of the activities, functions,
or responsibilities to be performed by
RSVP volunteers.
Chief Executive Officer. The Chief
Executive Officer of AmeriCorps
appointed under the National and
Community Service Act of 1990, as
amended, (NCSA), 42 U.S.C. 12501 et
seq.
Cost reimbursements.
Reimbursements budgeted as Volunteer
Expenses and provided to volunteers,
including stipends to cover incidental
costs, transportation, meals, recognition,
supplemental accident, personal
liability and excess automobile liability
insurance, and other expenses as
negotiated in the Memorandum of
Understanding.
Letter of Agreement. A written
agreement between a volunteer station
or sponsor and the person(s) served or
the person legally responsible for that
person. It authorizes the assignment of
an RSVP volunteer in the home of a
client, defines RSVP volunteer
activities, and specifies supervision
arrangements.
Memorandum of Understanding. A
written statement prepared and signed
by the RSVP project sponsor and the
volunteer station that identifies project
requirements, working relationships,
and mutual responsibilities.
Non-AmeriCorps support (excess).
The amount of non-AmeriCorps cash
and in-kind contributions generated by
a sponsor in excess of the required
percentage.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Non-AmeriCorps support (match).
The percentage share of nonAmeriCorps cash and in-kind
contributions required to be raised by
the sponsor in support of the grant.
Performance measures. Indicators that
help determine the impact of an RSVP
project on the community, including the
volunteers.
Project. The locally planned RSVP
activity or set of activities in a service
area as approved by AmeriCorps and
implemented by the sponsor.
Proprietary Health Care Agency.
Private, for-profit health care
organization that serves one or more
vulnerable populations.
Service area. The geographically
defined area(s) approved in the grant
application, in which RSVP volunteers
are enrolled and placed on assignments.
Sponsor. A public agency, including
Indian Tribes as defined in section
421(5) of the Act, and private, non-profit
organizations, both secular and faithbased, in the United States that have
authority to accept and the capability to
administer an RSVP project.
United States and Territories. Each of
the several States, the District of
Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam
and American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and the Trust Territories of the
Pacific Islands.
Volunteer station. A public agency; a
private, non-profit organization, secular
or faith-based; or a proprietary health
care organization. A volunteer station
must accept responsibility for the
assignment and supervision of RSVP
volunteers in health, education, social
service, or related settings such as
multi-purpose centers, home health care
agencies, or similar establishments.
Each volunteer station must be licensed
or otherwise certified, when required,
by the appropriate state or local
government. Private homes are not
volunteer stations.
■ 34. In § 2553.25, revise paragraph (h)
to read as follows:
§ 2553.25 What are a sponsor’s
administrative responsibilities?
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Comply with, and ensure that
Memorandums of Understanding
require all volunteer stations to comply
with, all applicable civil rights laws and
regulations, including nondiscrimination based on disability.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 2553.43
[Amended]
35. In § 2553.43, in paragraph (b)(2)
introductory text, remove ‘‘CNCS-
■
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
§§ 2553.71, 2553.84, and 2553.92
[Amended]
specified’’ and add in its place
‘‘AmeriCorps-specified’’.
§ 2553.71
36. In § 2553.71, in the paragraph (b)
heading, remove the words ‘‘the
Corporation’’ and add in their place the
word ‘‘AmeriCorps’’.
■
37. In § 2553.72, revise the paragraph
(a) heading and paragraphs (a)(1) and (c)
to read as follows:
■
§ 2553.72 What are project funding
requirements?
(a) Is non-AmeriCorps support
required? (1) An AmeriCorps grant may
be awarded to fund up to 90 percent of
the total project cost.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) May AmeriCorps restrict how a
sponsor uses locally generated
contributions in excess of the nonAmeriCorps support required?
Whenever locally generated
contributions to RSVP projects are in
excess of the non-AmeriCorps funds
required (10 percent of the total cost),
AmeriCorps may not restrict the manner
in which such contributions are
expended, provided such expenditures
are consistent with the provisions of the
Act.
*
*
*
*
*
38. Revise the heading to subpart H to
read as follows:
■
Subpart H—Non-AmeriCorps Funded
Projects
39. In § 2553.91, revise paragraph
(c)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 2553.91 What legal limitations apply to
the operation of the RSVP volunteer
program and to the expenditure of grant
funds?
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) An agency or organization to
which AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers
are assigned or which operates or
supervises any AmeriCorps Seniors
program shall not request or receive any
compensation from AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers or from beneficiaries for
services of AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers.
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 2553.21 through 2553.108
[Amended]
40. In addition to the amendments set
forth above, in §§ 2553.21 through
2553.108, remove ‘‘CNCS’’ and add in
its place the word ‘‘AmeriCorps’’
wherever it appears.
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Aug 29, 2024
41. In addition to the amendments set
forth above, in §§ 2553.71, 2553.84, and
2553.92, remove ‘‘CNCS’ ’’ and add in
its place the word ‘‘AmeriCorps’ ’’
wherever it appears.
■
[Amended]
Jkt 262001
§§ 2553.72, 2553.82, 2553.83, and 2553.84
[Amended]
42. In addition to the amendments set
forth above, in §§ 2553.72, 2553.82,
2553.83, and 2553.84, remove ‘‘nonCNCS’’ and add in its place ‘‘nonAmeriCorps’’ wherever it appears.
■
Andrea Grill,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024–19348 Filed 8–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 20
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2023–0113;
FXMB1231099BPP0–245–FF09M32000]
RIN 1018–BG63
Migratory Bird Hunting; 2024–25
Seasons for Certain Migratory Game
Birds
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule prescribes the
seasons, hours, areas, and daily bag and
possession limits for hunting migratory
birds. Taking of migratory birds is
prohibited unless specifically provided
for by annual regulations. This rule
permits the taking of designated species
during the 2024–25 season.
DATES: This rule takes effect on August
29, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may inspect comments
received on the migratory bird hunting
regulations at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–HQ–MB–2023–0113. You may
obtain copies of referenced reports from
the Division of Migratory Bird
Management’s website at https://
www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds
or at https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2023–0113.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jerome Ford, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Department of the Interior,
(703) 358–2606. Individuals in the
United States who are deaf, deafblind,
hard of hearing, or have a speech
disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or
TeleBraille) to access
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70545
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations Schedule for 2024
On February 8, 2024, we published in
the Federal Register (89 FR 8631) a
proposal to amend title 50 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) at part 20.
The proposal provided a background
and overview of the migratory bird
hunting regulations process and
addressed the establishment of seasons,
limits, and other regulations for hunting
migratory game birds under §§ 20.100
through 20.107, 20.109, and 20.110 of
subpart K. Major steps in the 2024–25
regulatory cycle relating to open public
meetings and Federal Register
notifications were illustrated in the
diagram at the end of the February 8,
2024, proposed rule.
We provided the meeting dates and
locations for the Service Regulations
Committee (SRC) on our website at
https://www.fws.gov/event/us-fish-andwildlife-service-migratory-birdregulations-committee-meeting and
Flyway Council meetings on flyway
calendars posted on our website at
https://www.fws.gov/partner/migratorybird-program-administrative-flyways.
On October 10, 2023, we held open
meetings with the Flyway Council
Consultants, at which the participants
reviewed information on the current
status of migratory game birds and
developed recommendations for the
2024–25 regulations for these species.
The February 8, 2024, proposed rule
provided detailed information on the
proposed 2024–25 regulatory schedule.
On May 13, 2024, we published in the
Federal Register (89 FR 41522) the
proposed frameworks for migratory
game bird hunting regulations during
the 2024–25 season. On August 26,
2024, we published in the Federal
Register (89 FR 68500) the final
frameworks for migratory game bird
hunting regulations, from which State
wildlife conservation agency officials
selected seasons, hours, areas, and
limits for hunting migratory birds
during the 2024–25 season.
The final rule described here is the
final in the series of proposed,
supplemental, and final rulemaking
documents for migratory game bird
hunting regulations for the 2024–25
season and deals specifically with
amending subpart K of 50 CFR part 20.
It sets hunting seasons, hours, areas, and
limits for migratory game bird species.
This final rule is the culmination of the
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 169 (Friday, August 30, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70536-70545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-19348]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Parts 2551, 2552, and 2553
RIN 3045-AA81
AmeriCorps Seniors Regulation Updates
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (operating
as AmeriCorps) is revising its regulations governing AmeriCorps Seniors
programs. This rule removes barriers to service for individuals and
increases flexibility for grantees to accomplish project goals and
recruit volunteers. Specifically, this rule removes barriers for
individuals to serve as AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers in three ways:
first, by modernizing what is considered income in the calculation that
determines eligibility to receive a stipend; second, by allowing
volunteers to continue to receive a stipend when their sponsor places
them on administrative leave due to extenuating circumstances that
prevent service; and third, by allowing grantees to supplement
stipends. This rule reduces burden for AmeriCorps Seniors grantees in
two ways: first, it establishes a single 10 percent match value
regardless of grant year. Second, this rule allows grantees to choose
to pay more than (but not less than) the AmeriCorps-established stipend
rates, using non-AmeriCorps funds for the amount that exceeds the
AmeriCorps-established rate. These changes will improve grantees'
ability to recruit volunteers and allow grantees to devote to program
operations resources that would otherwise be devoted to meet
increasingly high match requirements. The rule also updates
nomenclature to reflect that the Corporation for National and Community
Service operates as AmeriCorps and that ``Senior Corps'' is now known
as ``AmeriCorps Seniors.''
DATES: This rule is effective October 1, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin Corindo, Deputy Director,
AmeriCorps Seniors, at [email protected], (202) 489-5578.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary of Final Rule
II. Background on the AmeriCorps Seniors Programs Affected by This
Rule
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule, AmeriCorps' Responses, and an
Overview of the Final Rule
A. Income Calculation--SCP (Sec. Sec. 2551.12, 2551.43, and
2551.44); FGP (Sec. Sec. 2552.12, 2552.43, and 2552.44)
B. Administrative Leave--SCP (Sec. Sec. 2551.23(i) and
2551.46(a)); FGP (Sec. Sec. 2552.23(i) and 2552.46(a))
C. Allowing Grantees To Pay Higher Stipends--SCP (Sec.
2551.92(e)); FGP (Sec. 2552.92(e))
D. Removing the Requirement for a Full-Time Project Director--
SCP (Sec. 2551.25(c)); FGP (Sec. 2552.25(c)); RSVP (Sec.
2553.25(c))
E. Establishing a Single, 10 Percent Match, Regardless of Year--
RSVP (Sec. 2553.72)
F. Other Comments on the Proposed Rule
IV. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
E. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
F. Takings (E.O. 12630)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
I. Executive Summary of Final Rule
This rule updates AmeriCorps Seniors regulations implementing the
Senior Companion Program (SCP), Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), and
RSVP. The updates to the SCP and FGP regulations, at Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 2551 and 2552, respectively, parallel each
other and include changes to simplify provisions on calculation of an
AmeriCorps Seniors volunteer's income to determine whether they are
eligible for a stipend and removal of certain items from being
considered as income. The updates to the SCP and FGP regulations also
specify that volunteers who receive a stipend may be paid the stipend
when the sponsor places them on administrative leave due to extenuating
circumstances that prevent service. The updates also allow grantees to
pay stipends at a higher rate than that established by AmeriCorps
Seniors, if they choose to do so, as long as they do not use AmeriCorps
grant funds to pay for the amount that is above the established stipend
rate.
The updates to the RSVP regulations at part 2553 change the level
of non-AmeriCorps support (``match'') that an RSVP sponsor must
provide. Currently, the regulations allow AmeriCorps to grant up to 90
percent of the total RSVP budgeted project cost in the first year of a
grant, but only 80 percent in the second year and 70 percent in the
third and successive years. As a result, grantees currently must
provide matching funds that are 10 percent of the total project cost in
the first year of a grant, 20 percent in the second year, and 30
percent in successive years. The rule being finalized today instead
establishes a single required match rate at 10 percent, regardless of
the grant year.
Lastly, this rule makes nomenclature changes to add a definition
for ``AmeriCorps'' and change references to the ``Corporation'' and
``CNCS'' to ``AmeriCorps'' throughout these regulations, to reflect
that the Corporation for National and Community Service now operates as
AmeriCorps. This rule also changes ``National Senior Service Corps
(NSSC)'' to ``AmeriCorps Seniors'' to reflect current terminology and
branding.
One change was proposed but is not being finalized today, in
response to the comments opposing the change, as discussed below: the
update that would have removed the requirement for grantees to employ a
full-time project director.
II. Background on the AmeriCorps Seniors Programs Affected by This Rule
AmeriCorps Seniors operates four programs: the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), RSVP (formerly the
Retired and Senior Volunteer Program), and a Senior Demonstration
Program. This rule affects regulations implementing the first three
programs. These programs are authorized by the Domestic Volunteer
Service Act of 1973, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq., and this
rulemaking is authorized by the National and Community Service Act of
1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12501 et seq.
AmeriCorps Seniors SCP and FGP each provide grants to qualified
agencies and organizations (known as grantees) for the dual purpose of
engaging persons 55 and older, particularly those with limited incomes,
in volunteer service to meet critical community needs and to provide a
high-quality experience that will enrich the lives of older adult
volunteers. In SCP, program funds are used to support Senior Companions
in providing supportive, individualized services to help older adults
and those with special needs maintain their dignity and independence.
They also serve caregivers with respite support. In FGP, program funds
are used to support Foster Grandparents in providing
[[Page 70537]]
supportive, person-to-person service to children with special and/or
exceptional needs, or in circumstances that limit their academic,
social, or emotional development. In SCP and FGP (but not RSVP),
volunteers who are ``low income'' (meaning their income is at or below
200 percent of the poverty line) may receive stipends to allow them to
serve without cost to themselves. See 42 U.S.C. 5011(d)-(e), 5013(b).
In SCP, FGP, and RSVP, the sponsor receiving the grant has several
responsibilities. Among them is the responsibility to provide staff
sufficient to support the project. Another is the responsibility to
raise ``match,'' meaning non-AmeriCorps cash and in-kind contributions
in support of the grant. The match amount is stated as a percentage of
the total project cost. For both SCP and FGP grantees, the required
match is 10 percent, meaning the AmeriCorps grant funds 90 percent of
the total budgeted project cost. See 42 U.S.C. 5011(a), 5013(a). For
RSVP, the statute limits match to no more than 10 percent in the first
year, 20 percent in the second year, and 30 percent in subsequent
years. See 42 U.S.C. 5001(b). In other words, the statute provides
upper limits (tiered by year) on what RSVP grantees may be required to
provide as match. The current RSVP regulations, however, instead frame
match as a limit on AmeriCorps' contributions to 90 percent in the
first year, 80 percent in the second year, and 70 percent thereafter--
in effect placing a requirement, rather than an upper limit, for
grantee match at 10 percent in year one, 20 percent in year two, and 30
percent thereafter. See 45 CFR 2553.72.
Additionally, in SCP and FGP, AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers are
offered a stipend for their service. The statute sets a minimum hourly
rate for the stipend. See 42 U.S.C. 5011(d), 5013(b). AmeriCorps
Seniors establishes the stipend rate annually through the Notice of
Funding Opportunity; currently, the stipend rate is $4.00 per service
hour. The current SCP and FGP regulations provide that a grantee must
pay no more than and no less than the stipend rate that AmeriCorps
establishes and offers no flexibility to grantees who may wish to use
available additional funding to supplement the stipend.
III. Comments on the Proposed Rule, AmeriCorps' Responses, and an
Overview of the Final Rule
AmeriCorps published a proposed rule on February 14, 2024 (89 FR
11233) and received 63 public comments in response by the April 15,
2024, comment deadline. Several of the comments expressed general
support for the rule changes. Comments that specifically addressed one
or more of the five proposed substantive changes are summarized below,
along with AmeriCorps' responses to those comments and brief
descriptions of the current regulations, proposals, and finalized
provisions. A discussion of other comments received on the proposed
rule is also included.
A. Income Calculation--SCP (Sec. Sec. 2551.12, 2551.43, and 2551.44);
FGP (Sec. Sec. 2552.12, 2552.43, and 2552.44)
Current Regulation: The current regulations address an SCP and FGP
volunteer's income in three sections: the definition of ``annual
income'' (at Sec. Sec. 2551.12 and 2552.12, respectively); the income
guidelines governing eligibility to serve as a stipended volunteer (at
Sec. Sec. 2551.43 and 2552.43, respectively); and the categories of
``income'' for determining eligibility (at Sec. Sec. 2551.44 and
2552.44, respectively). Currently, the definition of ``annual income''
and the sections addressing eligibility guidelines and the
determination of ``income'' each contain components for the calculation
of income.
Changes That Were Proposed: The proposed rule would streamline
these sections so that the definition sets out only that the time
period for calculation of annual income is 12 months, and all the
components for the calculation of income are contained in one section
each for SCP and FGP. Substantively, these changes would remove several
items from being included in the calculation of a volunteer's income,
including:
The value of shelter, food, and clothing if provided at no
cost by relatives of the volunteer or volunteer's spouse;
Strike benefits;
Training stipends; and
Regular support that is not legally required from an
absent family member or someone not living in the household.
Comments on the Proposed Changes: Most who commented on the
proposed changes to the income calculation provisions expressed support
for them. Among the reasons that commenters gave for their support were
that the changes would remove barriers for individuals to serve as
AmeriCorps volunteers, help volunteer recruitment and retention (which
leads to more children and seniors being served by the FGP and SCP,
respectively), and contribute to greater food security among low-income
volunteers.
Several commenters requested that only the volunteer's income be
considered, without the spouse's income or income of the entire
household. These commenters stated that spousal income being included
in a potential volunteer's income calculation is one of main reasons
that grantees must turn away potential FGP and SCP volunteers.
One commenter stated that military veterans should be exempt from
declaring their retirement as income.
Although the proposed rule did not address the income threshold
(200 percent of the poverty line), several commenters advocated for an
increase in the income threshold or removal of the threshold to engage
more FGP and SCP volunteers and serve more individuals as a result.
Most who requested an increase suggested increasing the threshold to
400 percent of the poverty level; one suggested a $5,000 to $10,000
increase per year in the threshold. Two commenters suggested using the
Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) tool instead of the
Federal poverty level as the income threshold as a more equitable
determination that accounts for the local cost of living.
AmeriCorps' Response to Comments: AmeriCorps agrees with the
commenters who stated that the proposed changes to income calculation
would remove barriers for individuals to serve as FGP and SCP
volunteers. The final rule includes these changes and focuses the
income calculation more on long-term legally required income.
AmeriCorps acknowledges the comments stating that only the
volunteer's income should be included in the calculation, and not the
spouse's or any other family member's income. Consistent with the
current and proposed rule, the final rule continues to require the
spouse's income to be included in calculation of the volunteer's income
if the spouse resides in the same residence. If AmeriCorps considers
removing the incomes of cohabitating spouses from the calculation of a
volunteer's income, it will propose that removal in a future
rulemaking. However, this rulemaking takes steps to limit other
relatives' support from being included in calculation of a volunteer's
income. The proposed rule and final rule both focus solely on the
volunteer's own income and resident spouse's income, rather than that
of other relatives, as described below.
With regard to the comment requesting that military veterans'
retirement income be excluded from their income calculation, if
AmeriCorps considers adding this exclusion, it will propose the
exclusion in a future rulemaking.
[[Page 70538]]
The comments regarding increasing, removing, or changing the income
threshold cannot be addressed by rulemaking because the underlying
statute, the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, as amended,
establishes that the low-income threshold be not more than 200 percent
of the Federal poverty line. See 42 U.S.C. 5011(e)(1).
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on Income Calculation: As
proposed, and as finalized today, the volunteer's income calculation
will no longer include the value of shelter, food, and clothing that
relatives provide to the volunteer, or financial support that absent
relatives opt to provide but are not legally required to provide. Under
the proposed and final rules, the only financial support from non-
resident relatives (other than the spouse living in the same residence)
that is included in the volunteer's income calculation is financial
support that the relatives are legally required to provide. The
volunteer's spouse's income is included in the calculation only if the
spouse lives in the same residence with the volunteer. As a result,
when examining a volunteer's income to determine eligibility for a
stipend under this proposal, AmeriCorps Seniors would look only at the
volunteer's income, plus the spouse's income if the spouse lives in the
same residence. The final rule also removes strike benefits and
training stipends from the calculation of income, because their removal
supports modernization of the regulations.
AmeriCorps expects these changes will simplify the determination of
whether someone is eligible to serve as a stipended FGP or SCP
volunteer and remove barriers to those individuals to serve in FGP and
SCP. These changes will also support AmeriCorps Seniors programs'
ability to recruit and retain volunteers, rebuild volunteer numbers to
pre-COVID-19 levels, and reduce relinquishment of FGP and SCP program
that result from difficulties recruiting eligible volunteers.
B. Administrative Leave--SCP (Sec. Sec. 2551.23(i) and 2551.46(a));
FGP (Sec. Sec. 2552.23(i) and 2552.46(a))
Current Regulation: Currently, the regulations governing SCP and
FGP are silent as to whether AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers who receive
a stipend for their service and earned leave may also receive a stipend
for administrative leave.
Changes That Were Proposed: The proposed rule would add that
stipended volunteers may be paid administrative leave, as long as
grantees have written service policies to address administrative leave.
The proposed rule would also require grantees to obtain AmeriCorps'
approval to pay the stipend for administrative leave after the seventh
calendar day of the extenuating circumstances that are the basis for
the administrative leave.
Comments on the Proposed Changes: Most who commented on the
administrative leave proposal supported the proposed changes. Among the
reasons provided for support were that the proposed changes would
enhance program flexibility to attract and retain volunteers and
promote consistent volunteer participation. One commenter noted that
many volunteers are dependent upon the stipend they receive and that
any break in service, planned or unplanned, can create hardship for the
volunteer.
A few of the commenters in support of the change suggested
modifications. One suggested the regulation establish a ``floor'' of
circumstances that would trigger administrative leave. Similarly,
another stated that there should be guidelines as to what constitute
``extenuating circumstances'' that justify administrative leave. The
other recommended increasing the time a stipend may be paid for
administrative leave before AmeriCorps' approval is required, from the
proposed seven calendar days to a month.
AmeriCorps' Response to Comments: AmeriCorps agrees that allowing
stipends to be paid for administrative leave both enhances program
flexibility to attract and retain volunteers and helps to protect
volunteers who rely on their stipends from unpredictable loss of their
stipend due to events beyond their control. AmeriCorps believes the
phrase ``extenuating circumstances'' itself provides a baseline for the
types of circumstances that would justify administrative leave--meaning
circumstances that are exceptional, unusual, and/or unpredictable. The
rule gives grantees the flexibility to establish for themselves what
extenuating circumstances would justify administrative leave to
complement their own policies' categorizations of circumstances
qualifying as sick leave and emergency or disaster leave, as
appropriate.
AmeriCorps has determined that seven calendar days is a more
appropriate time period than a month for obtaining AmeriCorps' approval
of continued payment of a stipend for administrative leave. As a
practice, grantees should keep their portfolio managers updated as to
any extenuating circumstances that affect their programs and service.
Seven days is long enough to allow grantees to take any emergency
action they may need to in response to the circumstances, while
allowing AmeriCorps to provide some oversight to ensure that volunteers
are not unnecessarily being paid for time not in service.
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on Administrative Leave: The
final rule adopts the proposed rule's changes to allow SCP and FGP
grantees to grant administrative leave to their volunteers in those
unusual and rare situations that prevent a volunteer, through no fault
of their own, from serving at their volunteer station, as long as the
grantee's program policies permit administrative leave in such
situations. Many dedicated AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers in SCP and FGP
rely upon the stipend to supplement their limited incomes so they can
pay for necessities like medicine and groceries. This change ensures
that these volunteers are not penalized by having their stipends
withheld for being unable to serve due to extenuating circumstances (as
defined in the program's policy). While grantees must define the
specifics of administrative leave, the rule provides parameters by
defining the term as a temporary absence that the sponsor allows in
extenuating circumstances that prevent the volunteer from serving, or
from serving safely. The final rule provides a check on grantees
providing administrative leave to volunteers by requiring AmeriCorps'
approval to pay the stipend for administrative leave after the seventh
calendar day of the extenuating circumstances that are the basis for
the administrative leave.
C. Allowing Grantees To Pay Higher Stipends--SCP (Sec. 2551.92(e));
FGP (Sec. 2552.92(e))
Current Regulation: The current SCP and FGP regulations prohibit
grantees from paying stipends at rates different from those established
by AmeriCorps.
Changes That Were Proposed: The proposed rule would allow grantees
to pay stipends to SCP and FGP volunteers at a higher rate than the
rate established by AmeriCorps Seniors, if they choose to do so, and as
long as they use funds other than AmeriCorps grant funds to pay for the
amount above the established stipend rate. The proposed rule also would
allow grantees to use funds with which they supplement the stipend to
count toward required match contributions.
Comments on the Proposed Changes: A few commenters expressed their
support for the proposed change as removing barriers to volunteer
recruitment and retention, promoting economic security for older
adults, and accounting for certain geographic areas having higher costs
of living. Several
[[Page 70539]]
commenters opposed the proposed change based on one or more of the
following reasons: grantees able to supplement stipends will attract
volunteers away from grantees who are not able to supplement stipends,
creating inequities across the country; the different stipend rates
will cause confusion among volunteers; and Congress might reduce
funding for stipends overall.
AmeriCorps' Response to Comments: AmeriCorps agrees that allowing
grantees to supplement stipends will help remove barriers to volunteer
recruitment and retention, promote economic security for low-income
volunteers, and account for different costs of living. AmeriCorps does
not believe that the change will create inequities; rather, the change
will help address the inequities that already exist among geographic
areas with different costs of living. This rule provides grantees a
means of attracting more volunteers if they are in an area with a
higher cost of living and gives them an incentive to find more
community support so they can supplement stipends. This flexibility
aligns with the approach taken by AmeriCorps State and National in
allowing grantees the flexibility to provide additional benefits and
higher living allowances. AmeriCorps has no basis for expecting that
this change will cause confusion among volunteers or result in reduced
appropriations for stipends, as there is no evidence that these were
issues when prior versions of the regulations allowed supplementation
of stipends. See 45 CFR 1207.2-2 and 1208.2-2 (10/01/1996 edition).
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on Supplementation of Stipends:
The final rule adopts the proposed rule's changes to allow grantees to
pay volunteers a stipend at a rate higher than the AmeriCorps-
established rate, should they have the desire and funding to do so, and
allows grantees to count the funds with which they supplement the
stipend toward their required match contribution. Grantees'
supplementation of volunteers' stipends must comply with anti-
discrimination and other laws.
The current regulation, which restricts all volunteers to the
AmeriCorps-established stipend rate, prevents grantees from adjusting
their benefits to account for the needs of volunteers in their local
communities. This restriction is not compelled by statute, as the DVSA
establishes only a minimum stipend rate ($3.00 per hour). Earlier
versions of the regulation explicitly allowed for stipend payments in
excess of the amount established by AmeriCorps (then ``ACTION''). See
45 CFR 1207.2-2 and 1208.2-2 (10/01/1996 edition). The final rule
reinstitutes this allowance, and also allows the supplemented stipend
amount to count toward the required match contribution. Under the final
rule, AmeriCorps will continue to establish stipend rates and comply
with the statutory minimum for stipend rates, but grantees will have
the flexibility to supplement the rate with their non-AmeriCorps funds.
AmeriCorps expects that the flexibility for supplementing stipends
will help grantees to recruit and retain volunteers by improving the
feasibility of service for low-income volunteers whose costs of serving
exceed the AmeriCorps-established stipend rate. This flexibility will
also allow for grantees to account for things like higher costs of
living in providing their volunteers with stipends, by using their
grantee (non-AmeriCorps) share funds to add on to the single stipend
rate that AmeriCorps establishes for the entire country.
D. Removing the Requirement for a Full-Time Project Director--SCP
(Sec. 2551.25(c)); FGP (Sec. 2552.25(c)); RSVP (Sec. 2553.25(c))
Current Regulation: The current SCP, FGP, and RSVP regulations all
require a sponsor to employ a full-time project director to accomplish
project objectives and manage functions and project activities, except
in a limited circumstance where the sponsor may negotiate with
AmeriCorps for permission to instead employ a part-time project
director. That circumstance is when the sponsor has demonstrated to
AmeriCorps that having only a part-time project director will not
adversely affect the size, scope, or quality of project operations.
Changes That Were Proposed: The proposed rule would have replaced
these prescriptive requirements with a more results-focused requirement
that grantees employ project staff sufficient to support the size,
scope, and quality of project operations. In the application, the
sponsor would have had to thoroughly outline their management plan to
describe how each project director duty will be fulfilled. At the time
of renewal, program structure would then be evaluated based on
performance measures. The intention of the proposed change was to
provide grantees with the flexibility to determine their own
appropriate mix of staffing to support the project.
Comments on the Proposed Changes: Of those who commented on this
proposed change, approximately half expressed support and half
opposition. Those in support of the change stated that it allows
programs to use staff more efficiently by allowing programs to
reallocate work duties, adjust workflows, and increase continuity of
services, without having to request a waiver from AmeriCorps. Those in
opposition to the change stated that it would allow grantees to pull
the currently full-time project directors onto other efforts, limiting
the amount of time the project directors would be able to devote to the
programs and undermining their ability to effectively run them, would
contribute to understaffing the programs and job loss, and would
increase compliance issues, as there would be no single full-time
person accountable as program director. Commenters also pointed out
that there is already a waiver process in place to enable grantees to
employ a part-time director, and one commenter provided evidence that
there are insufficient requests for waivers to justify a change to the
general rule.
AmeriCorps' Response to Comments: AmeriCorps is persuaded by those
comments opposing the change that state that a waiver process is
already available and is not used so frequently as to justify a change
to the overall requirement for a full-time project director. For this
reason, AmeriCorps is not moving forward with finalizing this change at
this time, but will monitor the number of waiver requests in the future
to determine whether this change should be considered in a separate,
future rulemaking.
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on Full-Time Project Director:
The final rule retains the current regulatory requirement for a full-
time project director, and opportunity for a waiver of this
requirement.
E. Establishing a Single, 10 Percent Match, Regardless of Year--RSVP
(Sec. 2553.72)
Current Regulation: The current regulation provides that AmeriCorps
RSVP grants may fund up to 90 percent of the total budgeted project
cost in the first year, leaving the sponsor responsible for 10 percent
of the total project cost through locally generated contributions. The
current regulation then decreases the level of funding AmeriCorps may
provide for RSVP grants to 80 percent (consequently increasing the
sponsor's responsibility to 20 percent) in the second year, and further
decreases AmeriCorps' contribution to 70 percent (consequently
increasing the sponsor's responsibility to 30 percent) in the third
year and beyond.
Changes That Were Proposed: The proposed rule would revise the
current
[[Page 70540]]
tiered match requirements for RSVP to instead provide RSVP parity with
the FGP and SCP programs, which each require 10 percent match
regardless of year.
Comments on the Proposed Changes: Every commenter who commented on
the proposed match change supported the proposed reduction of required
RSVP match to 10 percent. Among the reasons commenters expressed for
their support were that the proposed change would establish parity with
the FGP and SCP program match requirements; simplify raising and
reporting match for RSVP grantees; help RSVP programs remain
sustainable in a time of rapid inflation and stagnant or reduced
funding from other non-Federal sources; have a compounding positive
financial impact on RSVP grantees' ability to provide needed vital
services to their communities; streamline management of RSVP program
budgets; and allow for more focus on RSVP program requirements,
volunteer recruitments, partnerships and potential new programming. A
commenter also noted that the current 30 percent match can be a barrier
for service in rural areas that are philanthropically underserved and
that a 10 percent match, regardless of year, helps to remove this
barrier.
AmeriCorps' Response to Comments: AmeriCorps agrees with these
unanimous comments in support of the change to a 10 percent required
match for RSVP, regardless of year. In addition to the reasons
expressed by the commenters for their support, this change will also
benefit grantees that have RSVP programs and FGP and/or SCP programs,
by allowing them to have consistent policies across all their programs.
AmeriCorps also anticipates that this change will reduce
relinquishments of RSVP programs.
Overview of Final Rule Provisions on Income Calculation: The final
rule removes the increasing required match for RSVP programs, requiring
match at 10 percent regardless of year. The statute limits how much
match funding RSVP grantees must provide to no more than 10 percent in
the first year, 20 percent in the second year, and 30 percent in
subsequent years. See 42 U.S.C. 5001(b). In other words, the statute
provides upper limits (tiered by year) on what RSVP grantees may be
required to provide as match. In contrast, the current RSVP regulations
convert these upper limits into requirements for grantees to provide
match at 10 percent in the first year, 20 percent in the second year,
and 30 percent in subsequent years. See 45 CFR 2553.72. The final rule
instead uses the flexibility afforded by the statute to require 10
percent match for RSVP regardless of year. This change in required
match is not expected to impact the quality of services provided to
communities by the program because all program expectations remain the
same under this final rule.
F. Other Comments on the Proposed Rule
Two commenters commented on the proposed rule's nomenclature
updates, such as the updates to reflect that ``Senior Corps'' is now
called ``AmeriCorps Seniors.'' One commenter supported these updates.
The other commenter opposed the updates, stating that most communities
are only familiar with the separate identities of the FGP, SCP, and
RSVP, and that ``AmeriCorps'' causes confusion because people think of
the AmeriCorps State and National program. AmeriCorps is finalizing the
nomenclature updates, as its programs have been operating under the
unifying moniker ``AmeriCorps'' for several years.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives, and if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Office of
Management and Budget determined this rule is not a significant
regulatory action.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.), AmeriCorps certifies that this rule, if adopted, will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. While many grantees are small governmental jurisdictions or
not-for-profit enterprises that may qualify as small entities, the
economic effect of this proposed rule on those small entities is
minimal. Therefore, AmeriCorps has not performed the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis that is required under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) for rules that are expected to have such
results.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
For purposes of title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, as well as Executive Order 12875, this
regulatory action does not contain any Federal mandate that may result
in increased expenditures in Federal, State, local, or Tribal
Governments in the aggregate, or impose an annual burden exceeding $100
million on the private sector.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information unless the collections of
information display valid control numbers. This rule does not affect
any information collections.
E. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This rulemaking does not have any
federalism implications, as described above.
F. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 because this rule
does not affect individual property rights protected by the Fifth
Amendment or involve a compensable ``taking.'' A takings implication
assessment is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rulemaking: (a) meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (b) meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
AmeriCorps recognizes the inherent sovereignty of Indian Tribes and
their right to self-governance. We have evaluated this rulemaking under
the agency's consultation policy and the criteria in Executive Order
13175 and determined that this rule does not
[[Page 70541]]
impose substantial direct effects on federally recognized Tribes.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Parts 2551, 2552, and 2553
Aged, Grant programs--social programs, Volunteers.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority of 42
U.S.C. 12651c(c), the Corporation for National and Community Service
amends chapter XXV, title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 2551--SENIOR COMPANION PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 2551 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 12651b-12651d;
E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911.
0
2. Revise and republish Sec. 2551.12 to read as follows:
Sec. 2551.12 Definitions.
Act. The Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, as amended, Public
Law 93-113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 396, 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.
Adequate staffing level. The number of project staff or full-time
equivalent needed by a sponsor to manage the AmeriCorps Seniors project
operations considering such factors as: Number of budgeted Volunteer
Service Years (VSYs), number of volunteer stations, and the size of the
service area.
Adult with special needs. Any individual over 21 years of age who
has one or more physical, emotional, or mental health limitations and
is in need of assistance to achieve and maintain their highest level of
independent living.
AmeriCorps. The Corporation for National and Community Service,
established pursuant to section 191 of the National and Community
Service Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12651, which operates as
AmeriCorps.
AmeriCorps Seniors. The collective name for the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), the Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), the Retired and
Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP), and Demonstration Programs, all of
which are established under Parts A, B, C, and E, Title II of the Act
Annual income. The applicant or enrollee's total income for the
preceding 12 months, including the applicant or enrollee's spouse's
income, if the spouse lives in the same residence, as calculated in
Sec. 2551.44.
Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer of AmeriCorps
appointed under the National and Community Service Act of 1990, as
amended, (NCSA), 42 U.S.C. 12501 et seq.
Cost reimbursements. Reimbursements budgeted as Volunteer Expenses
and provided to volunteers, including stipends to cover incidental
costs, transportation, meals, recognition, supplemental accident,
personal liability and excess automobile liability insurance and other
expenses as negotiated in the Memorandum of Understanding.
In-home. The non-institutional assignment of a Senior Companion in
a private residence.
Letter of Agreement. A written agreement between a volunteer
station or sponsor and the person(s) served or the person legally
responsible for that person. It authorizes the assignment of an SCP
volunteer in the home of a client, defines SCP volunteer activities,
and specifies supervision arrangements.
Memorandum of Understanding. A written statement prepared and
signed by the Senior Companion project sponsor and the volunteer
station that identifies project requirements, working relationships,
and mutual responsibilities.
Non-AmeriCorps support (excess). The amount of non-AmeriCorps cash
and in-kind contributions generated by a sponsor in excess of the
required percentage.
Non-AmeriCorps support (match). The percentage share of non-
AmeriCorps cash and in-kind contributions required to be raised by the
sponsor in support of the grant.
Performance measures. Indicators that help determine the impact of
an SCP project on the community and clients served, including the
volunteers.
Project. The locally planned SCP activity or set of activities in a
service area as approved by AmeriCorps and implemented by the sponsor.
Proprietary Health Care Agency. Private, for-profit health care
organization that serves one or more vulnerable populations.
Service area. The geographically defined area(s) in which Senior
Companions are enrolled and placed on assignments.
Service schedule. A written delineation of the days and times a
Senior Companion serves each week.
Sponsor. A public agency, including Indian Tribes as defined in
section 421(5) of the Act, and private, non-profit organizations, both
secular and faith-based, in the United States that have authority to
accept and the capability to administer a Senior Companion project.
Stipend. A payment to Senior Companions to enable them to serve
without cost to themselves. The amount of the stipend is set by
AmeriCorps in accordance with Federal law.
United States and territories. Each of the several States, the
District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, Guam and American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands.
Volunteer assignment plan. A written description of a Senior
Companion's assignment with a client. The plan identifies specific
outcomes for the client and the activities of the Senior Companion.
Volunteer station. A public agency; a private, non-profit
organization, secular or faith-based; or a proprietary health care
organization. A volunteer station must accept responsibility for the
assignment and supervision of Senior Companions in health, education,
social service, or related settings such as multi-purpose centers, home
health care agencies, or similar establishments. Each volunteer station
must be licensed or otherwise certified, when required, by the
appropriate state or local government. Private homes are not volunteer
stations.
0
3. In Sec. 2551.23, redesignate paragraphs (i)(2) through (5) as
paragraphs (i)(3) through (6) and add new paragraph (i)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2551.23 What are a sponsor's project responsibilities?
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(2) Administrative leave, meaning a temporary absence the sponsor
allows in extenuating circumstances that prevent the Senior Companion
from serving or serving safely.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 2551.25, revise paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 2551.25 What are a sponsor's administrative responsibilities?
* * * * *
(h) Comply with, and ensure that Memorandums of Understanding
require all volunteer stations to comply with, all applicable civil
rights laws and regulations, including non-discrimination based on
disability.
0
5. Revise the heading for subpart C to read as follows:
Subpart C--Suspension and Termination of AmeriCorps Assistance
0
6. In Sec. 2551.43, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
[[Page 70542]]
Sec. 2551.43 What income guidelines govern eligibility to serve as a
stipended Senior Companion?
* * * * *
(b) For applicants to become stipended Senior Companions, income is
based on annual income at the time of application. For serving
stipended Senior Companions, annual income is counted for the past 12
months. Annual income includes the applicant or enrollee's income and
that of his/her spouse, if the spouse lives in the same residence, as
calculated in Sec. 2551.44.
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 2551.44, revise paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 2551.44 What is considered income for determining volunteer
eligibility?
(a) * * *
(3) Social Security, Unemployment or Workers Compensation, alimony,
and military family allotments, or other legally required financial
support from an absent family member or someone not living in the
household.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 2551.46, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 2551.46 What cost reimbursements are provided to Senior
Companions?
* * * * *
(a) Stipend. The stipend is paid for the time Senior Companions
spend with their assigned clients, for earned leave, for administrative
leave, and for attendance at official project events. The sponsor may
pay a stipend for administrative leave for extenuating circumstances
lasting up to seven calendar days, but must obtain AmeriCorps' written
approval to pay a stipend for administrative leave based on extenuating
circumstances lasting beyond seven calendar days.
* * * * *
Sec. 2551.91 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec. 2551.91, remove ``CNCS' '' and add in its place
``AmeriCorps' '' wherever it appears.
0
10. In Sec. 2551.92, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 2551.92 What are project funding requirements?
* * * * *
(e) May a sponsor pay stipends at rates different than those
established by AmeriCorps? A sponsor must pay stipends at rates no less
than the rate established by AmeriCorps. A sponsor may use non-
AmeriCorps funding to pay stipends at rates higher than the rate
established by AmeriCorps but may not use AmeriCorps funding for this
purpose.
0
11. Revise the heading of subpart K to read as follows:
Subpart K--Non-AmeriCorps Funded Senior Companion Projects
Sec. 2551.114 [Amended]
0
12. In Sec. 2551.114, remove ``non-CNCS'' and add in its place ``non-
AmeriCorps'' and remove ``CNCS' '' and add in its place ``AmeriCorps'
''.
0
13. In Sec. 2551.121, revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 2551.121 What legal limitations apply to the operation of the
Senior Companion Program and to the expenditure of grant funds?
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) An agency or organization to which AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers are assigned or which operates or supervises any AmeriCorps
Seniors program shall not request or receive any compensation from
AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers, or from beneficiaries, for the services
provided by AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers.
* * * * *
Sec. 2551.122 [Amended]
0
14. In Sec. 2551.122, remove ``CNCS's'' and add in its place
``AmeriCorps' ``.
Sec. Sec. 2551.21 through 2551.122 [Amended]
0
15. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in Sec. Sec.
2551.21 through 2551.122, remove ``CNCS'' and add in its place the word
``AmeriCorps''.
Sec. Sec. 2551.92, 2551.102, 2551.112, and 2551.113 [Amended]
0
16. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in Sec. Sec.
2551.92, 2551.102, 2551.112, and 2551.113, remove ``non-CNCS'' and add
in its place the word ``non-AmeriCorps''.
PART 2552--FOSTER GRANDPARENT PROGRAM
0
17. The authority for part 2552 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 12651b-12651d;
E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911.
0
18. Revise and republish Sec. 2552.12 to read as follows:
Sec. 2552.12 Definitions.
Act. The Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, as amended, Public
Law 93-113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 396, 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.
Adequate staffing level. The number of project staff or full-time
equivalent needed by a sponsor to manage the AmeriCorps Seniors project
operations considering such factors as: Number of budgeted Volunteer
Service Years (VSYs), number of volunteer stations, and the size of the
service area.
AmeriCorps. The Corporation for National and Community Service,
established pursuant to section 191 of the National and Community
Service Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12651, which operates as
AmeriCorps.
AmeriCorps Seniors. The collective name for the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), the Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), the Retired and
Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP), and Demonstration Programs, all of
which are established under Parts A, B, C, and E, Title II of the Act.
Annual income. The applicant's or enrollee's total income, as
calculated in Sec. 2552.44, over the preceding 12 months.
Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer of AmeriCorps
appointed under the National and Community Service Act of 1990, as
amended, (NCSA), 42 U.S.C. 12501 et seq.
Child. Any individual who is less than 21 years of age.
Children having exceptional needs. Children who have a
developmental disability, such as those who have autism; an
intellectual disability; cerebral palsy or epilepsy; a visual, speech,
hearing, or orthopedic impairment; an emotional, behavioral, or
language disorder; a specific learning disability; multiple
disabilities; other significant health impairments; or have literacy,
math or other educational assistance needs. Before a Foster Grandparent
is assigned to a child, existence of the child's exceptional need shall
be verified by an appropriate professional, such as a physician;
psychiatrist; psychologist, including school psychologists; registered
nurse or licensed practical nurse; speech therapist; licensed clinical
social worker; or educator.
Children with special needs. Children who are abused or neglected,
in need of foster care, adjudicated youth, homeless youth, teenage
parents, and children in need of protective intervention in their
homes. Existence of a child's special need shall be verified by an
appropriate professional before a Foster Grandparent is assigned to the
child.
Cost reimbursements. Reimbursements budgeted as Volunteer Expenses
and provided to volunteers, including stipends to cover incidental
costs; transportation; meals; recognition; supplemental accident,
personal liability and excess automobile liability insurance; and other
expenses as
[[Page 70543]]
negotiated in the Memorandum of Understanding.
In-home. The non-institutional assignment of a Foster Grandparent
in a private residence or a foster home.
Letter of Agreement. A written agreement between a volunteer
station or sponsor and the person(s) served or the person legally
responsible for that person. It authorizes the assignment of an FGP
volunteer in the home of a client, defines FGP volunteer activities,
and specifies supervision arrangements.
Memorandum of Understanding. A written statement prepared and
signed by the Foster Grandparent project sponsor and the volunteer
station that identifies project requirements, working relationships,
and mutual responsibilities.
Non-AmeriCorps support (excess). The amount of non-Federal cash and
in-kind contributions generated by a sponsor in excess of the required
percentage.
Non-AmeriCorps support (match). The percentage share of non-
AmeriCorps cash and in-kind contributions required to be raised by the
sponsor in support of the grant.
Non-AmeriCorps support (excess). The amount of non-Federal cash and
in-kind contributions generated by a sponsor in excess of the required
percentage.
Parent. A natural parent or a person acting in place of a natural
parent, such as a guardian, a child's natural grandparent, or a step-
parent with whom the child lives. The term also includes otherwise-
unrelated individuals who are legally responsible for a child's
welfare.
Performance measures. Indicators that help determine the impact of
an FGP project on the community and clients served, including the
volunteers.
Project. The locally planned FGP activity or set of activities in a
service area as approved by AmeriCorps and implemented by the sponsor.
Proprietary Health Care Agency. Private, for-profit health care
organization that serves one or more vulnerable populations.
Service area. The geographically defined area(s) in which Foster
Grandparents are enrolled and placed on assignments.
Service schedule. A written delineation of the days and times a
Foster Grandparent serves each week.
Sponsor. A public agency, including Indian Tribes as defined in
section 421(5) of the Act, and private, non-profit organizations, both
secular and faith-based, in the United States that have authority to
accept and the capability to administer a Foster Grandparent project.
Stipend. A payment to Foster Grandparents to enable them to serve
without cost to themselves. The amount of the stipend is set by
AmeriCorps in accordance with Federal law.
United States and Territories. Each of the several States, the
District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, Guam and American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands.
Volunteer assignment plan. A written description of a Foster
Grandparent's assignment with a child. The plan identifies specific
outcomes for the child and the activities of the Foster Grandparent.
Volunteer station. A public agency; a private, non-profit
organization, secular or faith-based; or a proprietary health care
organization. A volunteer station must accept responsibility for the
assignment and supervision of Foster Grandparents in health, education,
social service, or related settings such as multi-purpose centers, home
health care agencies, or similar establishments. Each volunteer station
must be licensed or otherwise certified, when required, by the
appropriate state or local government. Private homes are not volunteer
stations.
0
19. In Sec. 2552.23, redesignate paragraphs (i)(2) through (5) as
paragraphs (i)(3) through (6) and add new paragraph (i)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2552.23 What are a sponsor's project responsibilities?
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(2) Administrative leave, meaning a temporary absence the sponsor
allows in extenuating circumstances that prevent the Foster Grandparent
from serving or serving safely.
* * * * *
0
20. In Sec. 2552.25, revise paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 2552.25 What are a sponsor's administrative responsibilities?
* * * * *
(h) Comply with, and ensure that Memorandums of Understanding
require all volunteer stations to comply with, all applicable civil
rights laws and regulations, including non-discrimination based on
disability.
0
21. Revise the heading for subpart C to read as follows:
Subpart C--Suspension and Termination of AmeriCorps Assistance
Sec. 2552.43 [Amended]
0
22. In Sec. 2552.43, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 2552.43 What income guidelines govern eligibility to serve as a
stipended Foster Grandparent?
* * * * *
(b) For applicants to become stipended Foster Grandparents, income
is based on annual income at the time of application. For serving
stipended Foster Grandparents, annual income is counted for the past 12
months. Annual income includes the applicant or enrollee's income and
that of his/her spouse, if the spouse lives in the same residence, as
calculated in Sec. 2552.44.
* * * * *
0
23. In Sec. 2552.44, revise paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 2552.44 What is considered income for determining volunteer
eligibility?
(a) * * *
(3) Social Security, Unemployment or Workers Compensation, alimony,
and military family allotments, or other legally required financial
support from an absent family member or someone not living in the
household.
* * * * *
0
24. In Sec. 2552.46, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 2552.46 What cost reimbursements and benefits do sponsors
provide to Foster Grandparents?
* * * * *
(a) Stipend. The stipend is paid for the time Foster Grandparents
spend with their assigned children, for earned leave, for
administrative leave, and for attendance at official project events.
The sponsor may pay a stipend for administrative leave for extenuating
circumstances lasting up to seven calendar days but must obtain
AmeriCorps' written approval to pay a stipend for administrative leave
based on extenuating circumstances lasting beyond seven calendar days.
* * * * *
0
25. In Sec. 2552.92, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 2552.92 What are project funding requirements?
* * * * *
(e) May a sponsor pay stipends at rates different than those
established by AmeriCorps? A sponsor must pay stipends at rates no less
than the rate established by AmeriCorps. A sponsor may use non-
AmeriCorps funding to pay stipends at rates higher than the rate
[[Page 70544]]
established by AmeriCorps, but may not use AmeriCorps funding for this
purpose.
0
26. Revise the heading of subpart K to read as follows:
Subpart K--Non-AmeriCorps Funded Foster Grandparent Projects
Sec. 2552.112 [Amended]
0
27. In addition Sec. 2552.112 introductory text, remove ``Non-CNCS''
and add in its place ``non-AmeriCorps''.
0
28. In Sec. 2552.121, revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 2552.121 What legal limitations apply to the operation of the
Foster Grandparent Program and to the expenditure of grant funds?
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) An agency or organization to which AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers are assigned or which operates or supervises any AmeriCorps
Seniors program shall not request or receive any compensation from
AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers, or from beneficiaries, for the services
provided by AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers.
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 2552.21 through 2552.122 [Amended]
0
29. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in Sec. Sec.
2552.21 through 2552.122, remove ``CNCS'' and add in its place the word
``AmeriCorps'' wherever it appears.
Sec. Sec. 2552.91, 2552.114, and 2552.122 [Amended]
0
30. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in Sec. Sec.
2552.91, 2552.114, and 2552.122, remove ``CNCS' '' and add in its place
``AmeriCorps' ''wherever it appears.
Sec. Sec. 2552.92, 2552.102, 2552.112, 2552.113, and
2552.114 [Amended]
0
31. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in Sec. Sec.
2552.92, 2552.102, 2552.112, 2552.113, and 2552.114, remove ``non-
CNCS'' and add in its place ``non-AmeriCorps'' wherever it appears.
PART 2553--THE RETIRED AND SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
0
32. The authority for part 2553 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.
0
33. Revise and republish Sec. 2553.12 to read as follows:
Sec. 2553.12 Definitions.
Act. The Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, as amended, Public
Law 93-113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 396, 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.
Adequate staffing level. The number of project staff or full-time
equivalent needed by a sponsor to manage the AmeriCorps Seniors project
operations considering such factors as: Number of budgeted volunteers,
number of volunteer stations, and the size of the service area.
AmeriCorps. The Corporation for National and Community Service,
established pursuant to section 191 of the National and Community
Service Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12651, which operates as
AmeriCorps.
AmeriCorps Seniors. The collective name for the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), the Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), the Retired and
Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP), and Demonstration Programs, all of
which are established under Parts A, B, C, and E, Title II of the Act.
Assignment. The activities, functions, or responsibilities to be
performed by volunteers identified in a written outline or description.
Assignment description. The written description of the activities,
functions, or responsibilities to be performed by RSVP volunteers.
Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer of AmeriCorps
appointed under the National and Community Service Act of 1990, as
amended, (NCSA), 42 U.S.C. 12501 et seq.
Cost reimbursements. Reimbursements budgeted as Volunteer Expenses
and provided to volunteers, including stipends to cover incidental
costs, transportation, meals, recognition, supplemental accident,
personal liability and excess automobile liability insurance, and other
expenses as negotiated in the Memorandum of Understanding.
Letter of Agreement. A written agreement between a volunteer
station or sponsor and the person(s) served or the person legally
responsible for that person. It authorizes the assignment of an RSVP
volunteer in the home of a client, defines RSVP volunteer activities,
and specifies supervision arrangements.
Memorandum of Understanding. A written statement prepared and
signed by the RSVP project sponsor and the volunteer station that
identifies project requirements, working relationships, and mutual
responsibilities.
Non-AmeriCorps support (excess). The amount of non-AmeriCorps cash
and in-kind contributions generated by a sponsor in excess of the
required percentage.
Non-AmeriCorps support (match). The percentage share of non-
AmeriCorps cash and in-kind contributions required to be raised by the
sponsor in support of the grant.
Performance measures. Indicators that help determine the impact of
an RSVP project on the community, including the volunteers.
Project. The locally planned RSVP activity or set of activities in
a service area as approved by AmeriCorps and implemented by the
sponsor.
Proprietary Health Care Agency. Private, for-profit health care
organization that serves one or more vulnerable populations.
Service area. The geographically defined area(s) approved in the
grant application, in which RSVP volunteers are enrolled and placed on
assignments.
Sponsor. A public agency, including Indian Tribes as defined in
section 421(5) of the Act, and private, non-profit organizations, both
secular and faith-based, in the United States that have authority to
accept and the capability to administer an RSVP project.
United States and Territories. Each of the several States, the
District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, Guam and American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands.
Volunteer station. A public agency; a private, non-profit
organization, secular or faith-based; or a proprietary health care
organization. A volunteer station must accept responsibility for the
assignment and supervision of RSVP volunteers in health, education,
social service, or related settings such as multi-purpose centers, home
health care agencies, or similar establishments. Each volunteer station
must be licensed or otherwise certified, when required, by the
appropriate state or local government. Private homes are not volunteer
stations.
0
34. In Sec. 2553.25, revise paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 2553.25 What are a sponsor's administrative responsibilities?
* * * * *
(h) Comply with, and ensure that Memorandums of Understanding
require all volunteer stations to comply with, all applicable civil
rights laws and regulations, including non-discrimination based on
disability.
* * * * *
Sec. 2553.43 [Amended]
0
35. In Sec. 2553.43, in paragraph (b)(2) introductory text, remove
``CNCS-
[[Page 70545]]
specified'' and add in its place ``AmeriCorps-specified''.
Sec. 2553.71 [Amended]
0
36. In Sec. 2553.71, in the paragraph (b) heading, remove the words
``the Corporation'' and add in their place the word ``AmeriCorps''.
0
37. In Sec. 2553.72, revise the paragraph (a) heading and paragraphs
(a)(1) and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 2553.72 What are project funding requirements?
(a) Is non-AmeriCorps support required? (1) An AmeriCorps grant may
be awarded to fund up to 90 percent of the total project cost.
* * * * *
(c) May AmeriCorps restrict how a sponsor uses locally generated
contributions in excess of the non-AmeriCorps support required?
Whenever locally generated contributions to RSVP projects are in excess
of the non-AmeriCorps funds required (10 percent of the total cost),
AmeriCorps may not restrict the manner in which such contributions are
expended, provided such expenditures are consistent with the provisions
of the Act.
* * * * *
0
38. Revise the heading to subpart H to read as follows:
Subpart H--Non-AmeriCorps Funded Projects
0
39. In Sec. 2553.91, revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 2553.91 What legal limitations apply to the operation of the
RSVP volunteer program and to the expenditure of grant funds?
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) An agency or organization to which AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers are assigned or which operates or supervises any AmeriCorps
Seniors program shall not request or receive any compensation from
AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers or from beneficiaries for services of
AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers.
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 2553.21 through 2553.108 [Amended]
0
40. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in Sec. Sec.
2553.21 through 2553.108, remove ``CNCS'' and add in its place the word
``AmeriCorps'' wherever it appears.
Sec. Sec. 2553.71, 2553.84, and 2553.92 [Amended]
0
41. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in Sec. Sec.
2553.71, 2553.84, and 2553.92, remove ``CNCS' '' and add in its place
the word ``AmeriCorps' '' wherever it appears.
Sec. Sec. 2553.72, 2553.82, 2553.83, and 2553.84 [Amended]
0
42. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in Sec. Sec.
2553.72, 2553.82, 2553.83, and 2553.84, remove ``non-CNCS'' and add in
its place ``non-AmeriCorps'' wherever it appears.
Andrea Grill,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024-19348 Filed 8-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P