OPSEU Pension Plan Trust Fund, Jaguar Transport Holdings, LLC, and Jaguar Rail Holdings, LLC-Continuance in Control Exemption-Waterloo Railroad, LLC, 68978-68979 [2024-19364]
Download as PDF
68978
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
that WTRL provided notice of the
transaction and interchange
commitment to shippers on the Line.
The earliest this transaction may be
consummated is September 6, 2024, the
effective date of the exemption.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions for stay must
be filed no later than August 30, 2024
(at least seven days before the
exemption becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36798, must be filed with the
Surface Transportation Board either via
e-filing on the Board’s website or in
writing addressed to 395 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on WTRL’s representative,
William A. Mullins, Mullins Law Group
PLLC, 2001 L Street NW, Suite 720,
Washington, DC 20036.
According to WTRL, this action is
categorically excluded from
environmental review under 49 CFR
1105.6(c) and from historic preservation
reporting requirement under 49 CFR
1105.8(b).
Decisions of the Board are available at
www.stb.gov.
IANR’s Petition for Exemption, Docket
No. AB 284 (Sub-No. 5X)
IANR filed its petition under 49
U.S.C. 10502 for exemption from the
prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C.
10903 to discontinue its lease
operations over the Line. IANR states
that the proposed discontinuance of
service would allow IANR ‘‘to effectuate
an orderly transfer of rail operations
from IANR to WTRL.’’ (IANR Pet. 2,
Aug. 7, 2024, AB 284 (Sub-No. 5X).)
IANR requests expedited consideration
of its petition. (Id. at 6.)
Because the change of operator
exemption issued here in Docket No. FD
36798 effectively discontinues IANR’s
common carrier obligation on the Line,
IANR’s petition to discontinue its
operations on the Line will be denied as
moot, effective concurrently with
effectiveness of the change in operator
exemption.
It is ordered:
1. The delegation of authority to the
Director under 49 CFR
1011.7(a)(2)(x)(A) to determine whether
to issue a notice of exemption in this
proceeding is revoked.
2. WTRL’s notice of exemption is
issued and is effective September 6,
2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
3. IANR’s petition for exemption is
denied as moot, effective on September
6, 2024.
4. This decision will be published in
the Federal Register.
5. This decision is effective on its
service date.
Decided: August 22, 2024.
By the Board, Board Members Fuchs,
Hedlund, Primus, and Schultz. Board
Member Fuchs concurred with a
separate expression.
BOARD MEMBER FUCHS, concurring:
While I agree with the today’s
decision and find sufficient indication
that IANR consents to exiting the Line,1
I write separately to suggest that the
Board consider revising its change-inoperator exemption regulations to
explicitly require a verified notice to
indicate that the exiting carrier consents
to the transaction. The notice of
exemption process is built for speed and
typically involves little to no opposition
or controversy,2 and the process allows
simultaneous entry and exit licensing to
facilitate efficient changes in operators.
Consistent with this purpose, the
Board—in case law—has rightly
required an indication that the exiting
carrier consents to the change-inoperator notice. See SMS Rail Serv.,
Inc.—Change in Operator Exemption
Including Acquisition by Lease—Salem
Branch Line in Salem and Gloucester
Counties, N.J., FD 36529, slip op. at 2,
2 n.4 (STB served July 15, 2022) (notice
of change-in-operator exemption under
49 CFR 1150.41 discontinuing operating
authority for a carrier that consented,
but not for a second carrier that was
unreachable and thus had not
consented). However, the Board’s
regulations contain no explicit
requirement. Here, when IANR
contested the transaction, the case soon
generated an atypical amount of
litigation for a notice of exemption
proceeding, and the controversy showed
the potential for further complications if
a carrier were to never consent to
exiting. Forcing a carrier off a line is no
simple, permissive matter, and—in
stand-alone exit licensing proceedings
brought by a third party where the
subject carrier does not consent (i.e., a
1 I also agree that IANR has not demonstrated that
the standard 14-day period before the change-inoperator exemption becomes effective is insufficient
to permit the ‘‘orderly transfer of operations from
IANR to WTRL.’’ (IANR Pet. 2, Aug. 7, 2024, AB
284 (Sub-No. 5X).)
2 Class Exemption for the Acquisition and
Operation of Rail Lines under 49 U.S.C. 10901, EP
392 (Sub-No. 1), slip op. at 3 (STB served Jan. 15,
1986) (stating that the exemption process ‘‘is
designed to meet the need for expeditious handling
of a large number of requests that are rarely
opposed,’’ and ‘‘to reduce regulatory delay and
costs’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
typical ‘‘adverse’’ discontinuance or
abandonment case)—the Board has
rightly rejected the use of exemptions.
Wisconsin Dept. of Transp.—Aban.
Exemption, FD 31303, slip op. at 4 (ICC
served Dec. 5, 1988) (holding that the
exemption authority could not be used
to force abandonment or discontinuance
where the carrier opposes this action).3
Revising the change-in-operator
regulations 4 to explicitly include a
consent requirement would promote the
purpose of the regulations, provide
needed clarity for parties, and mitigate
potential inconsistencies across exit
licensing proceedings.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024–19341 Filed 8–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36797]
OPSEU Pension Plan Trust Fund,
Jaguar Transport Holdings, LLC, and
Jaguar Rail Holdings, LLC—
Continuance in Control Exemption—
Waterloo Railroad, LLC
OPSEU Pension Plan Trust Fund
(OPTrust), Jaguar Transport Holdings,
LLC (JTH), and Jaguar Rail Holdings,
LLC (JRH, and collectively with OPTrust
and JTH, Jaguar), each a noncarrier,
have filed a verified notice of exemption
under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to continue
in control of Waterloo Railroad, LLC
(WTRL), upon WTRL’s becoming a Class
III rail carrier. WTRL is a directly
controlled holding of JRH. OPTrust
indirectly controls JTH, which directly
controls JRH. Jaguar collectively
controls nine Class III rail carriers. (See
Notice 4.)
This transaction is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
exemption in Waterloo Railroad, LLC—
Change of Operator Exemption with
Interchange Commitment—Union
Pacific Railroad Company, Docket No.
FD 36798, in which WTRL seeks Board
approval to lease and operate
3 If, in a future proceeding, the Board were to
conclude that it does not have adverse
discontinuance or abandonment authority, the
agency would have an independent reason to
require consent in this type of proceeding.
4 I note that the agency’s decision promulgating
the applicable regulations appears to focus on the
agency’s entry licensing statute, and not the exit
licensing statute for discontinuances and
abandonments, even though a change in operator
involves an exit. See Class Exemption, EP 392 (SubNo. 1), slip op. at 10 (adopting final rule by citing
to 49 U.S.C. 10901 [acquisition and operation] but
not § 10903 [abandonments]). The Board should
address this apparent omission in any future
rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM
28AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
approximately 6.9 miles of rail line
owned by Union Pacific Railroad
Company, extending between milepost
325.1 and milepost 332.0, in Black
Hawk County, Iowa (the Line), replacing
the Line’s current operator, Iowa
Northern Railway Company.
Jaguar represents that: (1) WTRL does
not connect with any railroads in
Jaguar’s corporate family; (2) the
transaction is not part of a series of
anticipated transactions that would
connect WTRL with the rail lines of any
other carrier in Jaguar’s corporate
family; and (3) the transaction does not
involve a Class I carrier. Therefore, the
transaction is exempt from the prior
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C.
11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. However, 49 U.S.C. 11326(c)
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under 49 U.S.C. 11324 and
11325 that involve only Class III rail
carriers. Accordingly, because this
transaction involves Class III rail
carriers only, the Board may not impose
labor protective conditions here.
The earliest this transaction may be
consummated is September 6, 2024, the
effective date of the exemption. If the
verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions for stay must
be filed by August 30, 2024 (at least
seven days before the exemption
becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36797, must be filed with the
Surface Transportation Board either via
e-filing on the Board’s website or in
writing addressed to 395 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on Jaguar’s representative,
William A. Mullins, Mullins Law Group
PLLC, 2001 L Street NW, Suite 720,
Washington, DC 20036.
Board decisions and notices are
available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: August 23, 2024.
By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024–19364 Filed 8–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent of Waiver With Respect
to Land; Youngstown Regional Airport,
Youngstown, Ohio
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The FAA is considering a
proposal to change approximately
36.1875 acres of airport land from
aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use
and to authorize the sale of airport
property located at Youngstown
Regional Airport, Youngstown, Ohio.
The property is located in the northwest
corner of the airport, outside the airfield
fence and is separated from the airport
by Ridge Road. The aforementioned
land is proposed to be sold for
warehousing/storage facilities and is not
needed for aeronautical use.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 27, 2024.
ADDRESSES: All requisite and supporting
documentation will be made available
for review by appointment at the FAA
Detroit Airports District Office, Marlon
Pena, Program Manager, 11677 S Wayne
Rd., Romulus, MI 48174. Telephone:
(734) 229–2900/Fax: (734) 229–2950.
Written comments on the Sponsor’s
request may be submitted using any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Marlon Pena, Program
Manager, Federal Aviation
Administration, Detroit Airports District
Office, 11677 S Wayne Rd., Romulus,
MI 48174–1412.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail
address above between 8 a.m. and 5
p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays.
• FAX: (734) 229–2950.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlon Pena, Program Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Detroit
Airports District Office, 11677 S Wayne
Rd., Romulus, MI 48174. Telephone
Number: (734) 229–2900/Fax: (734)
229–2950.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with section 47107(h) of
Title 49, United States Code, this notice
is required to be published in the
Federal Register 30 days before
modifying the land-use assurance that
requires the property to be used for an
aeronautical purpose.
The subject property is mostly
wooded undeveloped land that was
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68979
federally conveyed as part of a larger
parcel under the Federal Property and
Administrative Services Act of 1949, as
amended, and the Surplus Property Act
of 1944, as amended. The airport
sponsor proposes to sell the land, at fair
market value, to a private party to be
developed as warehousing/storage
facilities.
The disposition of proceeds from the
sale of the airport property will be in
accordance with FAA’s Policy and
Procedures Concerning the Use of
Airport Revenue, published in the
Federal Register on February 16, 1999
(64 FR 7696).
This notice announces that the FAA
is considering the release of the subject
airport property at the Youngstown
Regional Airport, Youngstown, Ohio,
from federal land covenants, subject to
a reservation for continuing right of
flight as well as restrictions on the
released property as required in FAA
Order 5190.6B section 22.16. Approval
does not constitute a commitment by
the FAA to financially assist in the
disposal of the subject airport property
nor a determination of eligibility for
grant-in-aid funding from the FAA.
Legal Description
Vienna Township, Trumbull County,
State of Ohio
Known as being part of Section No. 44
in said Vienna Township (Township 4,
Range 2) and being further bounded and
described as follows:
Beginning at a 5⁄8-inch iron pin found
on the westerly Right-of-Way line of
Ridge Road (County Road 159/Right-ofWay varies/Plat Volume 47, Page 92)
said point being a northeasterly corner
of lands of Antique Tractor Club of
Trumbull County, Inc. (Instrument No.
200807220018111);
Thence South 89°18′00″ West along
the northerly line of said lands of
Antique Tractor Club of Trumbull
County, Inc. a distance of 1633.23 feet
to a 5⁄8-inch iron pin found at the
southeasterly corner of lands of A&N
Land Company, LLC (Instrument No.
201901070000302);
Thence North 01°28′55″ West along
the easterly line of said lands of A&N
Land Company, LLC a distance of
1157.30 feet to a 5⁄8-inch iron pin set;
Thence North 89°17′40″ East through
the lands of the Grantor and passing
over a southerly corner of lands of the
United States of America (Deed Volume
1051, Pages 80 and 95) a distance of
756.12 feet to a 5⁄8-inch iron pin set on
the said westerly Right-of-Way line of
Ridge Road;
Thence South 54°32′04″ East along
said westerly line of Ridge Road a
E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM
28AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68978-68979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-19364]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36797]
OPSEU Pension Plan Trust Fund, Jaguar Transport Holdings, LLC,
and Jaguar Rail Holdings, LLC--Continuance in Control Exemption--
Waterloo Railroad, LLC
OPSEU Pension Plan Trust Fund (OPTrust), Jaguar Transport Holdings,
LLC (JTH), and Jaguar Rail Holdings, LLC (JRH, and collectively with
OPTrust and JTH, Jaguar), each a noncarrier, have filed a verified
notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to continue in control of
Waterloo Railroad, LLC (WTRL), upon WTRL's becoming a Class III rail
carrier. WTRL is a directly controlled holding of JRH. OPTrust
indirectly controls JTH, which directly controls JRH. Jaguar
collectively controls nine Class III rail carriers. (See Notice 4.)
This transaction is related to a concurrently filed verified notice
of exemption in Waterloo Railroad, LLC--Change of Operator Exemption
with Interchange Commitment--Union Pacific Railroad Company, Docket No.
FD 36798, in which WTRL seeks Board approval to lease and operate
[[Page 68979]]
approximately 6.9 miles of rail line owned by Union Pacific Railroad
Company, extending between milepost 325.1 and milepost 332.0, in Black
Hawk County, Iowa (the Line), replacing the Line's current operator,
Iowa Northern Railway Company.
Jaguar represents that: (1) WTRL does not connect with any
railroads in Jaguar's corporate family; (2) the transaction is not part
of a series of anticipated transactions that would connect WTRL with
the rail lines of any other carrier in Jaguar's corporate family; and
(3) the transaction does not involve a Class I carrier. Therefore, the
transaction is exempt from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C.
11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption
authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to
protect the interests of its employees. However, 49 U.S.C. 11326(c)
does not provide for labor protection for transactions under 49 U.S.C.
11324 and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Accordingly,
because this transaction involves Class III rail carriers only, the
Board may not impose labor protective conditions here.
The earliest this transaction may be consummated is September 6,
2024, the effective date of the exemption. If the verified notice
contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab
initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g) may
be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. Petitions for
stay must be filed by August 30, 2024 (at least seven days before the
exemption becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD 36797, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board either via e-filing on the Board's
website or in writing addressed to 395 E Street SW, Washington, DC
20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on
Jaguar's representative, William A. Mullins, Mullins Law Group PLLC,
2001 L Street NW, Suite 720, Washington, DC 20036.
Board decisions and notices are available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: August 23, 2024.
By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024-19364 Filed 8-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P