Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity, 68778-68781 [2024-19192]
Download as PDF
68778
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p.389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11H,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 11, 2023, and
effective September 15, 2023, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW TX E5 Utopia, TX [Establish]
Brushy Creek Ranch Airport, TX
(Lat 29°42′49″ N, long 99°32′44″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 10-mile radius
of the Brushy Creek Ranch Airport.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 6,
2024.
Steven Phillips,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
U.S. Department of State, telephone
(771) 205–9566; email
DDTCCustomerService@state.gov,
ATTN: Regulatory Change, ITAR
Section 126.7 Australia, the United
Kingdom, and the United States
Exemption.
In FR Doc.
2024–18043, beginning on page 67270
in the Federal Register of Tuesday,
August 20, 2024, the following
correction is made:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 124.8
[Corrected]
1. On page 67290, in the second
column, in part 124, in amendment 4,
the instruction ‘‘Amend § 124.8 by
revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Amend
§ 124.8 by revising paragraph (a)(5) to
read as follows:’’
■
Stanley L. Brown,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2024–19262 Filed 8–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 150
[Public Notice: 12475]
RIN 1400–AF85
[FR Doc. 2024–19026 Filed 8–27–24; 8:45 am]
Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 12506; Docket No. 2024–
0024]
RIN 1400–AF84
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations: Exemption for Defense
Trade and Cooperation Among
Australia, the United Kingdom, and the
United States; Correction
Department of State.
Interim final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State (the
Department) is correcting an interim
final rule that appeared in the Federal
Register on August 20, 2024 creating an
exemption for defense trade and
cooperation among Australia, the
United Kingdom, and the United States
and related amendments.
DATES: Effective on September 1, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Engda Wubneh, Foreign Affairs Officer,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy,
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Aug 27, 2024
The Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations defines
‘‘diplomatic agent’’ and the level of
immunity enjoyed by a diplomatic
agent. However, because some other
individuals who are not themselves
‘‘diplomatic agents’’ as defined in the
VCDR also enjoy what is known as
‘‘diplomatic agent-level immunity,’’ the
Department of State is promulgating this
regulation to clearly and correctly
define which foreign persons enjoy
diplomatic agent-level immunity within
the United States and clarify that the
determination of who enjoys diplomatic
agent-level immunity and lesser statusbased immunity, which is both legal
and factual in nature, is made by the
Department of State.
DATES: This rule is effective on August
28, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clifton M. Johnson, Diplomatic Law and
Litigation, Office of the Legal Adviser,
Department of State, Washington, DC
20520, (202) 647–1075, or johnsoncm5@
state.gov (for information regarding this
SUMMARY:
22 CFR Part 124
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
final rule); Office of Foreign Missions,
Department of State, Washington, DC
20520, or OFM-Policy@state.gov (for
information regarding diplomatic status
and immunities in specific instances).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Article II of the Constitution which
provides the President with the right to
receive ambassadors and other public
ministers, the Secretary of State’s role to
execute the foreign policy of the United
States, specific provisions of the U.S.
Code discussed below, and well
established case law as noted below, the
U.S. Department of State is uniquely
positioned as the sole United States
government agency that accepts the
accreditation of foreign diplomats, and
is authorized to determine and certify
the diplomatic status of a foreign
individual and the immunity enjoyed by
that individual.
This regulation defines who enjoys
diplomatic agent-level immunity and
clarifies the comprehensive scope of
diplomatic agents’ immunity for the
non-exclusive purpose of facilitating
judicial and administrative proceedings
in the United States. The regulation also
clarifies that the determination of who
enjoys diplomatic agent-level immunity
and lesser status-based immunity is one
that requires application of law to facts
and is made by the Department of
State—not any other federal agency or
by any foreign mission in the United
States. Individuals enjoying diplomatic
agent-level immunity are not subject to
the criminal jurisdiction of the United
States, and are immune from the civil or
administrative jurisdiction of the United
States, with limited exceptions. Such
immunity is enjoyed by diplomatic
agents at bilateral diplomatic missions
pursuant to the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations (VCDR, 23 U.S.T.
3227; see Articles 29 and 31 in
particular); certain senior officials of the
United Nations pursuant to Article V,
Section 19 of the Convention on
Privileges and Immunities of the United
Nations of 1970 (21 U.S.T. 1418) (‘‘UN
Convention’’); diplomatic staff at
Permanent Missions of Member States
to the United Nations pursuant to
Article V, Section 15 of the United
Nations Headquarters Agreement of
1947 (1947 U.S.T. 529) and Article IV,
Section 11 of the UN Convention;
consular officers assigned to consulates
of countries with which the United
States has an enhanced immunities
agreement that ‘‘enhances’’ their
immunity to diplomatic agent-level;
certain senior officials of and
representatives to some international
organizations (see, e.g., Agreement on
Privileges and Immunities of the
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Organization of American States (26
U.S.T. 1025) and Agreement on the
Status of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization, National Representative
and International Staff (33 U.S.T. 1272));
and others. Lesser forms of status-based
immunity include administrative and
technical staff immunity as set forth in
the VCDR, which is generally
coextensive with diplomatic-agent level
immunity with the exception of civil
immunity which is more limited (for
official acts only); consular officer
immunity as set forth in the Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations
(VCCR, 21 U.S.T. 77), which entails
immunity for official acts and personal
inviolability from arrest absent a
warrant for grave crimes; and consular
employee immunity as set forth in the
VCCR, which entails immunity for
official acts.
Accordingly, the intent of the
regulation is to strengthen the ability of
law enforcement, the courts, foreign
governments, and the public to
recognize and rely upon authoritative
determinations by the United States of
the diplomatic status and corresponding
level of status-based immunity enjoyed
by foreign individuals. It is meant to
discourage reliance on outdated or
incomplete documentation of
diplomatic status or assertions by
persons other than Department of State
officials that may lead to inaccurate
understandings of who enjoys immunity
and the scope of that immunity, and to
direct interested parties to instead
consult with the Department of State for
such information. By doing so, the
regulation will help ensure that
individuals entitled to immunity will be
treated accordingly and reduce the risk
that individuals who erroneously or
misleadingly assert such status are
accorded immunity to which they are
not entitled. The regulation is necessary
to ensure the Secretary of State can
continue to meet international and
domestic legal obligations to respect the
immunities accredited foreign
diplomats enjoy. Specifically, the VCDR
and various bilateral treaties enhancing
immunities of individuals other than
diplomatic agents establish immunities
that the United States is obligated to
respect under international law.
Additionally, the Diplomatic Relations
Act of 1978 (22 U.S.C. 254b(c))
establishes immunities for members of
foreign missions and their families for
foreign States not party to the VCDR.
The Secretary and the Department of
State are uniquely positioned to fulfill
those responsibilities in this manner.
The Department of State has legal
authority to promulgate this regulation.
Article II, Section 3 of the United States
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
Constitution directs the President to
‘‘receive Ambassadors and other public
Ministers.’’ 22 U.S.C. 2656 grants the
Secretary of State authority to perform
duties relative to matters respecting
foreign affairs, including duties
regarding applications and requests
from foreign public ministers or other
foreigners. Pursuant to this statutory
authority, as well as Article 9 of the
VCDR and Article 23 of the VCCR, the
Department accepts accreditation of
members of foreign diplomatic or
consular missions at its discretion.
Additionally, Article 10 of the VCDR
and Article 24 of the VCCR provide that
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
specifically, or the authority designated
by that ministry (per the VCCR) or such
other ministry as may be agreed (per the
VCDR), shall be notified of the
appointment of members of a
diplomatic or consular mission. Under
the VCDR, the Department of State has
the broad discretion to classify
diplomats. See Abdulaziz v. Metro.
Dade Cty., 741 F.2d 1328, 1330 (11th
Cir. 1984). Additionally, pursuant to 22
U.S.C. 2656 and the United Nations
Headquarters Agreement of 1947, the
Department of State also accords
privileges and immunities to foreign
individuals accredited to the United
Nations.
With respect to determining the
status-based immunity that accredited
foreign individuals and their family
members enjoy, the Diplomatic
Relations Act of 1978 (22 U.S.C. 254c(a))
authorizes the President to, ‘‘on the
basis of reciprocity and under such
terms and conditions as he may
determine, specify privileges and
immunities for members of the mission,
their families and the diplomatic
couriers of any sending state which
result in more favorable or less favorable
treatment than is provided under the
Vienna Convention.’’ The President has
delegated authority to prescribe
regulations for that purpose to the
Secretary of State through Executive
Order 12101 (43 FR 54195), amended by
Executive Order 12608 (52 FR 34617).
The Diplomatic Relations Act of 1978,
as amended (22 U.S.C. 254c(b)) also
authorizes the Secretary of State, on the
basis of reciprocity and under such
terms and conditions as the Secretary
may determine, with the concurrence of
the Attorney General, to specify
privileges and immunities for a consular
post, the members of a consular post,
and their families which result in more
favorable or less favorable treatment
than is provided in the VCCR. The
Secretary’s determinations of the scope
of the status-based immunity of foreign
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68779
individuals in that regard are made
pursuant to international agreements
with foreign governments that the
Department of State negotiates,
concludes, and interprets pursuant to 22
U.S.C. 254c(b), as well as the President’s
Article II authority to speak as the sole
organ of the government with respect to
agreements regarding diplomatic
relations, delegated to the Secretary. See
22 U.S.C. 2656; United States v.
Belmont, 301 U.S. 324, 330 (1937). By
according diplomatic agent-level
immunity to foreign individuals, the
Department of State is able to
‘‘contribute to the development of
friendly relations among nations’’ and
‘‘to ensure the efficient performance of
the functions of the diplomatic
missions.’’ See Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v.
Moore, 345 F.2d 978, 980 (D.C. Cir.
1965), citing the VCDR, preamble.
As the above authorities illustrate, the
Department of State is authorized to and
responsible for determining whether
someone enjoys diplomatic agent-level
immunity or other status-based
immunity, consistent with the
concurrence requirements of 22 U.S.C.
254c(b), as applicable. 22 U.S.C. 2651a
authorizes the Secretary ‘‘to promulgate
such rules and regulations as may be
necessary to carry out the functions of
the Secretary of State and the
Department of State.’’ Clarifying that the
Department of State is responsible for
indicating which foreign individuals
enjoy diplomatic agent-level immunity
or lesser status-based immunity will
reduce the risk of conflicting
determinations of the diplomatic status
and corresponding immunity foreign
individuals and their family members
may enjoy.
Courts have long held that the
Department of State’s certification is
‘‘conclusive and dispositive evidence’’
of a diplomat’s entitlement to statusbased immunity. See United States v.
Al-Hamdi, 356 F.3d 564, 573 (4th Cir.
2004) (‘‘[W]e hold that the State
Department’s certification . . . is
conclusive evidence as to the
diplomatic status of an individual.’’);
Abdulaziz v. Metro. Dade Cty., 741 F.2d
1328, 1339 (11th Cir. 1984) (‘‘[O]nce the
United States Department of State has
regularly certified a visitor to this
country as having diplomatic status, the
courts are bound to accept that
determination.’’); Muthana v. Pompeo,
985 F.3d 893, 906–09 (D.C. Cir. 2021);
Carrera v. Carrera, 174 F.2d 496, 497
(D.C. Cir. 1949) (‘‘It is enough that an
ambassador has requested immunity,
that the State Department has
recognized that the person for whom it
was requested is entitled to it, and that
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
68780
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
the Department’s recognition has been
communicated to the court.’’).
Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act
This rulemaking is published as a
final rule since it relates to a foreign
affairs function of the United States and
is exempt from notice-and-comment
rulemaking. 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). Because
this rulemaking is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
553, the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
are not applicable and this rule is
effective immediately.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
Since this rule is exempt from notice
and comment rulemaking, it is also
exempt from the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.
Congressional Review Act
This rulemaking does not constitute a
major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804,
for purposes of congressional review of
agency rulemaking.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally
requires agencies to prepare a statement
before proposing any rule that may
result in an annual expenditure of $100
million or more by State, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector.
This rule will not result in any such
expenditure nor would it significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism and Executive Order 13175,
Impact on Tribes
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the
regulations have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Orders 12372 and 13132.
This rule will not have tribal
implications, will not impose costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175
do not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094: Regulatory Review
This rule has been drafted in
accordance with the principles of
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended by
Executive Order 14094) and 13563. This
rule has been determined to be a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
significant rulemaking under section 3
of Executive Order 12866, but not
significant under section 3(f)(1). The
benefits of the rule are qualitative, in
that the rule provides clarity for foreign
governments and their personnel, and
secondarily for domestic officials and
the public, on which individuals are
entitled to diplomatic agent-level
immunity and the scope of that
immunity. Individuals enjoying
diplomatic agent-level immunity are not
subject to the criminal jurisdiction of
the United States, and are immune from
the civil or administrative jurisdiction
of the United States, with limited
exceptions. There are no costs to the
rulemaking as the United States is
already required to accord immunity to
certain foreign individuals pursuant to
its obligations under international law,
including the VCDR. The rule does not
expand or otherwise change the
categories or number of individuals who
enjoy diplomatic agent-level immunity.
The promulgation of this rule will not
increase the number of individuals
accorded diplomatic agent-level
immunity, as the rule will not affect the
long-standing standards by which the
Department determines a foreign
individual’s status and corresponding
immunity. This rule will help ensure
that law enforcement, the courts, foreign
governments, and the public are aware
of the need to consult the Department of
State to understand foreign individuals’
diplomatic status and corresponding
immunity, which is relevant for, among
other purposes, understanding whether
their family members born in the United
States were born subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States under
the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution. The rule would reduce the
risk of erroneous determinations
detrimental to the foreign relations of
the United States. This rule also clarifies
that the Department itself, in accordance
with international and domestic law
and taking into account the
comprehensive information available to
it related to diplomatic status, identifies
the diplomatic status and corresponding
immunities of foreign persons. In the
absence of this rule, there is continued
risk of immunity being extended or not
extended erroneously, which can result
in, inter alia, the inappropriate exercise
of criminal jurisdiction over accredited
diplomats; the inaccurate determination
of lawful permanent residence status;
and erroneous decisions on whether an
individual was born in the United States
subject to the jurisdiction of the
Fourteenth Amendment. Therefore, the
Department believes that the qualitative
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
benefits of this rulemaking are manifest,
and there are few costs.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
This rule has been reviewed in light
of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from
OMB for each collection of information
they conduct, sponsor, or require
through regulation. This rule neither
establishes nor modifies any collection
of information subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 150
Foreign officials; Immunity.
For the reasons set forth above the
State Department amends title 22,
chapter I by adding part 150 to subpart
P to read as follows:
PART 150—DIPLOMATIC AGENTLEVEL IMMUNITY
Sec.
150.1 Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity.
150.2 Determination by the Department of
State.
150.3 Severability.
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 2656; 22
U.S.C. 254c; Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations, Done at Vienna April
18, 1961, 23 U.S.T. 3227; Vienna Convention
on Consular Relations, Done at Vienna April
24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77; Convention on the
Privileges and Immunities of the United
Nations, 21 U.S.T. 1418.
§ 150.1
Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity.
Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity
refers to the complete immunity from
the criminal jurisdiction of the United
States and to comprehensive immunity
from the civil and administrative
jurisdiction of the United States, and is
enjoyed by:
(a) Foreign individuals accredited to
the United States as ‘‘diplomatic agents’’
under the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations, and the family
members forming part of their
households;
(b) Foreign individuals accredited to
the United States as administrative and
technical staff or service staff of
diplomatic missions, or as consular
officers of consular missions, and the
family members forming part of their
households, representing a foreign
government with which the United
States has an international agreement
for the enhancement of immunity of
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
those individuals to diplomatic agentlevel immunity; and
(c) Certain other foreign officials and
representatives as determined by the
Department of State.
§ 150.2 Determination by the Department
of State.
The question of whether any
particular person enjoys diplomatic
agent-level immunity and is therefore
not subject to the jurisdiction of the
United States, or whether they enjoy
lesser status-based immunity, on any
particular date entails both factual and
legal analysis, and is determined by the
Department of State, in accordance with
relevant international and domestic law.
§ 150.3
Severability.
The provisions of this part are
separate and severable from one
another. If any provision is stayed or
determined to be invalid, it is the
Department of State’s intention that the
remaining provisions shall continue in
effect.
Kevin E. Bryant,
Deputy Director, Office of Directives
Management, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024–19192 Filed 8–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–08–P
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act).
DATES: This correction is effective
August 28, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael Castle, Acting Director,
Charleston Field Office, Telephone:
(859) 260–3900. Email: osm-chfo@
osmre.gov.
In the
final rule published Monday, March 18,
2024, in FR Doc. 2024–05682, on page
19273, column 2, a revision to 30 CFR
948.12 (State statutory, regulatory, and
proposed program amendment
provisions not approved) that revised
paragraph (k) will be corrected to
instead add that provision as new
paragraph (l). Additionally, we are
revising paragraph (k) to reinstate the
deferral as it existed in the CFR prior to
the publication of the Federal Register
document. See also 89 FR 2133 (Jan. 12,
2024). We are also adding paragraph 38–
2–12.5.d of West Virginia’s regulations
to the table at 30 CFR 948.15 (Approval
of West Virginia regulatory program
amendments). We had approved its
deletion from West Virginia’s
regulations in the March 18, 2024,
Federal Register, but it was omitted
from the table.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Register Correction
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
§ 948.12
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 948
[SATS No. WV–118–FOR (partial); Docket
ID: OSM–2011–0009; SATS No. WV–126–
FOR; Docket ID: OSM–2019–0012; S1D1S
SS08011000 SX064A000 220S180110;
S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000
220XS501520]
West Virginia Regulatory Program;
Correction
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), published a document in the
Federal Register on March 18, 2024,
approving in part, and not approving in
part, amendments to the West Virginia
regulatory program (the West Virginia
program) under the Surface Mining
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
1. Effective April 17, 2024, in FR Doc.
2024–05682 at 89 FR 19262 in the issue
of March 18, 2024, on page 19273, in the
second column, amendatory instruction
2 is corrected to read: ‘‘Section 948.12
is amended by adding paragraph (l) to
read as follows:’’
■ 2. On page 19273, in the second and
third columns, § 948.12 is corrected to
read:
*
*
*
*
*
(k) We are not approving the
following portions of provisions of the
proposed program amendment that
West Virginia submitted on May 15,
2017:
(1) We are deferring our decision on
the deletion of provisions from W.Va.
Code 22–3–11(g)(2) regarding the
development of a long-range planning
process for the selection and
prioritization of sites to be reclaimed.
We defer our decision until we make a
determination on West Virginia’s related
amendment docketed as WV–128–FOR,
■
Original amendment
submission dates
Date of publication
of final rule
April 25, 2011 .......................
May 8, 2018 .........................
March 18, 2024 ..............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
[Corrected]
PO 00000
68781
which relates to the complete and
accurate listing of all outstanding
reclamation obligations (including water
treatment on active permits in the State.
(2) [Reserved]
(l) We are not approving the following
provisions of the proposed West
Virginia program amendments dated
May 2, 2018:
(1) At W.Va. Code 22–3–9, revisions
substituting notice by newspaper with
notice in a form and manner determined
by the Secretary which may be
electronic.
(2) At W.Va. Code 22–3–20, revisions
substituting notice by newspaper with
notice in a form and manner determined
by the Secretary which may be
electronic.
(3) At CSR 38–2–2.37, the removal of
the definition ‘‘completion of
reclamation’’.
(4) At CSR 38–2–12.2.d., the
elimination to the existing prohibition
on bond release for any site specific
bonding (i.e., open-acre bonding) until
all coal extraction is completed and the
disturbed area is completely backfilled
and regraded.
(5) At CSR 38–2–12.2.e., to restructure
and revise existing approved language
in this section and move it to CSR 38–
2–12.2.a.4.
(6) At CSR 38–2–12.2.f., to move,
unchanged, this existing language to
CSR 38–2–12.2.d.
(7) At CSR 38–2–12.2.g., to move,
unchanged, this existing language to
CSR 38–2–12.2.f.
(8) At CSR 38–2–12.2.h., to renumber
existing CSR 38–2–12.2.h to 12.2.i. and
to insert it as a new CSR 38–2–12.2.h.
(9) At CSR 38–2–12.4.c., to eliminate
an existing 180 day window for
initiating reclamation operations to
reclaim the site in accordance with the
approved reclamation plan or
modification thereof.
(10) At CSR 38–2–12.5., to delete
subsection 12.5 of the West Virginia
regulations, which directs WVDEP’s
collection, analysis and reporting on
sites where bond has been forfeited
including, in particular, data relating to
the water quality of water being
discharged from forfeited sites.
§ 948.15
[Corrected]
3. On page 19273, in the table,
§ 948.15 is corrected to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
Citation/description of approved provisions
CSR 38–2–2.6; 9.3.d; 11.3.f; 11.4; 11.6; 12.2.a, 12.5.b, c and d; 12.4.a.2.B, 12.4.b,
4.b.1 and 4.b.2; 12.4.d; 14.5.b
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68778-68781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-19192]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 150
[Public Notice: 12475]
RIN 1400-AF85
Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations defines
``diplomatic agent'' and the level of immunity enjoyed by a diplomatic
agent. However, because some other individuals who are not themselves
``diplomatic agents'' as defined in the VCDR also enjoy what is known
as ``diplomatic agent-level immunity,'' the Department of State is
promulgating this regulation to clearly and correctly define which
foreign persons enjoy diplomatic agent-level immunity within the United
States and clarify that the determination of who enjoys diplomatic
agent-level immunity and lesser status-based immunity, which is both
legal and factual in nature, is made by the Department of State.
DATES: This rule is effective on August 28, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clifton M. Johnson, Diplomatic Law and
Litigation, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State,
Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-1075, or [email protected] (for
information regarding this final rule); Office of Foreign Missions,
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, or [email protected] (for
information regarding diplomatic status and immunities in specific
instances).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Article II of the Constitution
which provides the President with the right to receive ambassadors and
other public ministers, the Secretary of State's role to execute the
foreign policy of the United States, specific provisions of the U.S.
Code discussed below, and well established case law as noted below, the
U.S. Department of State is uniquely positioned as the sole United
States government agency that accepts the accreditation of foreign
diplomats, and is authorized to determine and certify the diplomatic
status of a foreign individual and the immunity enjoyed by that
individual.
This regulation defines who enjoys diplomatic agent-level immunity
and clarifies the comprehensive scope of diplomatic agents' immunity
for the non-exclusive purpose of facilitating judicial and
administrative proceedings in the United States. The regulation also
clarifies that the determination of who enjoys diplomatic agent-level
immunity and lesser status-based immunity is one that requires
application of law to facts and is made by the Department of State--not
any other federal agency or by any foreign mission in the United
States. Individuals enjoying diplomatic agent-level immunity are not
subject to the criminal jurisdiction of the United States, and are
immune from the civil or administrative jurisdiction of the United
States, with limited exceptions. Such immunity is enjoyed by diplomatic
agents at bilateral diplomatic missions pursuant to the Vienna
Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR, 23 U.S.T. 3227; see Articles
29 and 31 in particular); certain senior officials of the United
Nations pursuant to Article V, Section 19 of the Convention on
Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of 1970 (21 U.S.T.
1418) (``UN Convention''); diplomatic staff at Permanent Missions of
Member States to the United Nations pursuant to Article V, Section 15
of the United Nations Headquarters Agreement of 1947 (1947 U.S.T. 529)
and Article IV, Section 11 of the UN Convention; consular officers
assigned to consulates of countries with which the United States has an
enhanced immunities agreement that ``enhances'' their immunity to
diplomatic agent-level; certain senior officials of and representatives
to some international organizations (see, e.g., Agreement on Privileges
and Immunities of the
[[Page 68779]]
Organization of American States (26 U.S.T. 1025) and Agreement on the
Status of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, National
Representative and International Staff (33 U.S.T. 1272)); and others.
Lesser forms of status-based immunity include administrative and
technical staff immunity as set forth in the VCDR, which is generally
coextensive with diplomatic-agent level immunity with the exception of
civil immunity which is more limited (for official acts only); consular
officer immunity as set forth in the Vienna Convention on Consular
Relations (VCCR, 21 U.S.T. 77), which entails immunity for official
acts and personal inviolability from arrest absent a warrant for grave
crimes; and consular employee immunity as set forth in the VCCR, which
entails immunity for official acts.
Accordingly, the intent of the regulation is to strengthen the
ability of law enforcement, the courts, foreign governments, and the
public to recognize and rely upon authoritative determinations by the
United States of the diplomatic status and corresponding level of
status-based immunity enjoyed by foreign individuals. It is meant to
discourage reliance on outdated or incomplete documentation of
diplomatic status or assertions by persons other than Department of
State officials that may lead to inaccurate understandings of who
enjoys immunity and the scope of that immunity, and to direct
interested parties to instead consult with the Department of State for
such information. By doing so, the regulation will help ensure that
individuals entitled to immunity will be treated accordingly and reduce
the risk that individuals who erroneously or misleadingly assert such
status are accorded immunity to which they are not entitled. The
regulation is necessary to ensure the Secretary of State can continue
to meet international and domestic legal obligations to respect the
immunities accredited foreign diplomats enjoy. Specifically, the VCDR
and various bilateral treaties enhancing immunities of individuals
other than diplomatic agents establish immunities that the United
States is obligated to respect under international law. Additionally,
the Diplomatic Relations Act of 1978 (22 U.S.C. 254b(c)) establishes
immunities for members of foreign missions and their families for
foreign States not party to the VCDR. The Secretary and the Department
of State are uniquely positioned to fulfill those responsibilities in
this manner.
The Department of State has legal authority to promulgate this
regulation. Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution
directs the President to ``receive Ambassadors and other public
Ministers.'' 22 U.S.C. 2656 grants the Secretary of State authority to
perform duties relative to matters respecting foreign affairs,
including duties regarding applications and requests from foreign
public ministers or other foreigners. Pursuant to this statutory
authority, as well as Article 9 of the VCDR and Article 23 of the VCCR,
the Department accepts accreditation of members of foreign diplomatic
or consular missions at its discretion. Additionally, Article 10 of the
VCDR and Article 24 of the VCCR provide that the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs specifically, or the authority designated by that ministry (per
the VCCR) or such other ministry as may be agreed (per the VCDR), shall
be notified of the appointment of members of a diplomatic or consular
mission. Under the VCDR, the Department of State has the broad
discretion to classify diplomats. See Abdulaziz v. Metro. Dade Cty.,
741 F.2d 1328, 1330 (11th Cir. 1984). Additionally, pursuant to 22
U.S.C. 2656 and the United Nations Headquarters Agreement of 1947, the
Department of State also accords privileges and immunities to foreign
individuals accredited to the United Nations.
With respect to determining the status-based immunity that
accredited foreign individuals and their family members enjoy, the
Diplomatic Relations Act of 1978 (22 U.S.C. 254c(a)) authorizes the
President to, ``on the basis of reciprocity and under such terms and
conditions as he may determine, specify privileges and immunities for
members of the mission, their families and the diplomatic couriers of
any sending state which result in more favorable or less favorable
treatment than is provided under the Vienna Convention.'' The President
has delegated authority to prescribe regulations for that purpose to
the Secretary of State through Executive Order 12101 (43 FR 54195),
amended by Executive Order 12608 (52 FR 34617). The Diplomatic
Relations Act of 1978, as amended (22 U.S.C. 254c(b)) also authorizes
the Secretary of State, on the basis of reciprocity and under such
terms and conditions as the Secretary may determine, with the
concurrence of the Attorney General, to specify privileges and
immunities for a consular post, the members of a consular post, and
their families which result in more favorable or less favorable
treatment than is provided in the VCCR. The Secretary's determinations
of the scope of the status-based immunity of foreign individuals in
that regard are made pursuant to international agreements with foreign
governments that the Department of State negotiates, concludes, and
interprets pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 254c(b), as well as the President's
Article II authority to speak as the sole organ of the government with
respect to agreements regarding diplomatic relations, delegated to the
Secretary. See 22 U.S.C. 2656; United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324,
330 (1937). By according diplomatic agent-level immunity to foreign
individuals, the Department of State is able to ``contribute to the
development of friendly relations among nations'' and ``to ensure the
efficient performance of the functions of the diplomatic missions.''
See Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v. Moore, 345 F.2d 978, 980 (D.C. Cir. 1965),
citing the VCDR, preamble.
As the above authorities illustrate, the Department of State is
authorized to and responsible for determining whether someone enjoys
diplomatic agent-level immunity or other status-based immunity,
consistent with the concurrence requirements of 22 U.S.C. 254c(b), as
applicable. 22 U.S.C. 2651a authorizes the Secretary ``to promulgate
such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the
functions of the Secretary of State and the Department of State.''
Clarifying that the Department of State is responsible for indicating
which foreign individuals enjoy diplomatic agent-level immunity or
lesser status-based immunity will reduce the risk of conflicting
determinations of the diplomatic status and corresponding immunity
foreign individuals and their family members may enjoy.
Courts have long held that the Department of State's certification
is ``conclusive and dispositive evidence'' of a diplomat's entitlement
to status-based immunity. See United States v. Al-Hamdi, 356 F.3d 564,
573 (4th Cir. 2004) (``[W]e hold that the State Department's
certification . . . is conclusive evidence as to the diplomatic status
of an individual.''); Abdulaziz v. Metro. Dade Cty., 741 F.2d 1328,
1339 (11th Cir. 1984) (``[O]nce the United States Department of State
has regularly certified a visitor to this country as having diplomatic
status, the courts are bound to accept that determination.''); Muthana
v. Pompeo, 985 F.3d 893, 906-09 (D.C. Cir. 2021); Carrera v. Carrera,
174 F.2d 496, 497 (D.C. Cir. 1949) (``It is enough that an ambassador
has requested immunity, that the State Department has recognized that
the person for whom it was requested is entitled to it, and that
[[Page 68780]]
the Department's recognition has been communicated to the court.'').
Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act
This rulemaking is published as a final rule since it relates to a
foreign affairs function of the United States and is exempt from
notice-and-comment rulemaking. 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). Because this
rulemaking is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 553, the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
553(d) are not applicable and this rule is effective immediately.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
Since this rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking, it is
also exempt from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
Congressional Review Act
This rulemaking does not constitute a major rule, as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804, for purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally
requires agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that
may result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This rule will
not result in any such expenditure nor would it significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism and Executive Order 13175,
Impact on Tribes
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the regulations have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders 12372 and
13132. This rule will not have tribal implications, will not impose
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094: Regulatory Review
This rule has been drafted in accordance with the principles of
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 14094) and 13563.
This rule has been determined to be a significant rulemaking under
section 3 of Executive Order 12866, but not significant under section
3(f)(1). The benefits of the rule are qualitative, in that the rule
provides clarity for foreign governments and their personnel, and
secondarily for domestic officials and the public, on which individuals
are entitled to diplomatic agent-level immunity and the scope of that
immunity. Individuals enjoying diplomatic agent-level immunity are not
subject to the criminal jurisdiction of the United States, and are
immune from the civil or administrative jurisdiction of the United
States, with limited exceptions. There are no costs to the rulemaking
as the United States is already required to accord immunity to certain
foreign individuals pursuant to its obligations under international
law, including the VCDR. The rule does not expand or otherwise change
the categories or number of individuals who enjoy diplomatic agent-
level immunity. The promulgation of this rule will not increase the
number of individuals accorded diplomatic agent-level immunity, as the
rule will not affect the long-standing standards by which the
Department determines a foreign individual's status and corresponding
immunity. This rule will help ensure that law enforcement, the courts,
foreign governments, and the public are aware of the need to consult
the Department of State to understand foreign individuals' diplomatic
status and corresponding immunity, which is relevant for, among other
purposes, understanding whether their family members born in the United
States were born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under
the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The rule would
reduce the risk of erroneous determinations detrimental to the foreign
relations of the United States. This rule also clarifies that the
Department itself, in accordance with international and domestic law
and taking into account the comprehensive information available to it
related to diplomatic status, identifies the diplomatic status and
corresponding immunities of foreign persons. In the absence of this
rule, there is continued risk of immunity being extended or not
extended erroneously, which can result in, inter alia, the
inappropriate exercise of criminal jurisdiction over accredited
diplomats; the inaccurate determination of lawful permanent residence
status; and erroneous decisions on whether an individual was born in
the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the Fourteenth
Amendment. Therefore, the Department believes that the qualitative
benefits of this rulemaking are manifest, and there are few costs.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
This rule has been reviewed in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation,
establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or require through regulation. This
rule neither establishes nor modifies any collection of information
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 150
Foreign officials; Immunity.
For the reasons set forth above the State Department amends title
22, chapter I by adding part 150 to subpart P to read as follows:
PART 150--DIPLOMATIC AGENT-LEVEL IMMUNITY
Sec.
150.1 Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity.
150.2 Determination by the Department of State.
150.3 Severability.
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 2656; 22 U.S.C. 254c; Vienna
Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Done at Vienna April 18, 1961,
23 U.S.T. 3227; Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, Done at
Vienna April 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77; Convention on the Privileges
and Immunities of the United Nations, 21 U.S.T. 1418.
Sec. 150.1 Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity.
Diplomatic Agent-Level Immunity refers to the complete immunity
from the criminal jurisdiction of the United States and to
comprehensive immunity from the civil and administrative jurisdiction
of the United States, and is enjoyed by:
(a) Foreign individuals accredited to the United States as
``diplomatic agents'' under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
Relations, and the family members forming part of their households;
(b) Foreign individuals accredited to the United States as
administrative and technical staff or service staff of diplomatic
missions, or as consular officers of consular missions, and the family
members forming part of their households, representing a foreign
government with which the United States has an international agreement
for the enhancement of immunity of
[[Page 68781]]
those individuals to diplomatic agent-level immunity; and
(c) Certain other foreign officials and representatives as
determined by the Department of State.
Sec. 150.2 Determination by the Department of State.
The question of whether any particular person enjoys diplomatic
agent-level immunity and is therefore not subject to the jurisdiction
of the United States, or whether they enjoy lesser status-based
immunity, on any particular date entails both factual and legal
analysis, and is determined by the Department of State, in accordance
with relevant international and domestic law.
Sec. 150.3 Severability.
The provisions of this part are separate and severable from one
another. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, it is
the Department of State's intention that the remaining provisions shall
continue in effect.
Kevin E. Bryant,
Deputy Director, Office of Directives Management, U.S. Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2024-19192 Filed 8-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P