Fuels Regulatory Streamlining Amendments, 70048-70093 [2024-18773]
Download as PDF
70048
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 1090
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2024–0143; FRL–8513–02–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AV26
Fuels Regulatory Streamlining
Amendments
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This action proposes
revisions, updates, and corrections to
EPA’s streamlined fuel quality
regulations. This action does not
propose to change the stringency of the
existing fuel quality standards.
DATES: Comments. Comments must be
received on or before October 15, 2024.
Public hearing: If anyone contacts
EPA requesting a public hearing by
September 4, 2024, EPA will hold a
virtual public hearing on September 12,
2024. Please refer to the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for additional
information on the public hearing.
ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your
comments, identified by Docket ID No.
SUMMARY:
Category
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1 North
EPA–HQ–OAR–2024–0143, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from the docket. EPA
may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit to
EPA’s docket at https://
www.regulations.gov any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). Please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets for additional submission
methods; the full EPA public comment
policy; information about CBI or
multimedia submissions; and general
guidance on making effective
comments.
Public hearing. If a virtual public
hearing is requested by September 4,
2024, it will be held on September 12,
NAICS 1 code
211130
221210
324110
325110
325193
325199
424710
424720
457110, 457120
457210
486910
493190
2024. The hearing will begin at 9:00
a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) and
end when all parties who wish to speak
have had an opportunity to do so. All
hearing attendees (including even those
who do not intend to provide testimony)
should register for the virtual public
hearing by September 4, 2024.
Information on the status of the hearing
and how to register can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/diesel-fuelstandards/fuels-regulatory-streamlining.
Additional information regarding the
hearing appears below under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nick
Parsons, Office of Transportation and
Air Quality, Assessment and Standards
Division, Environmental Protection
Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann
Arbor, MI 48105; telephone number:
734–214–4479; email address:
parsons.nick@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this
proposed rule are those involved with
the production, distribution, and sale of
transportation fuels, including gasoline
and diesel fuel. Potentially affected
categories include:
Examples of potentially affected entities
Natural gas liquids extraction and fractionation.
Natural gas production and distribution.
Petroleum refineries (including importers).
Butane and pentane manufacturers.
Ethyl alcohol manufacturing.
Manufacturers of gasoline additives.
Petroleum bulk stations and terminals.
Petroleum and petroleum products wholesalers.
Fuel retailers.
Other fuel dealers.
Natural gas liquids pipelines, refined petroleum products pipelines.
Other warehousing and storage—bulk petroleum storage.
American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities potentially
affected by this action. This table lists
the types of entities that EPA is now
aware could potentially be affected by
this action. Other types of entities not
listed in the table could also be affected.
To determine whether your entity
would be affected by this action, you
should carefully examine the
applicability criteria in 40 CFR part
1090. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
Participation in Virtual Public Hearing
Information on the status of the
virtual public hearing and how to
register can be found at https://
www.epa.gov/diesel-fuel-standards/
fuels-regulatory-streamlining. The last
day to pre-register to speak at the
hearing is September 4, 2024. Please
note that any updates made to any
aspect of the hearing will be posted
online at https://www.epa.gov/dieselfuel-standards/fuels-regulatorystreamlining. Please monitor the website
or contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
determine if there are any updates. EPA
does not intend to publish a document
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
in the Federal Register announcing
updates.
If a virtual public hearing is held,
each commenter will have 3 minutes to
provide oral testimony. EPA may ask
clarifying questions during the oral
presentations, but will not respond to
the presentations at that time. Written
statements and supporting information
submitted during the comment period
will be considered with the same weight
as oral comments and supporting
information presented at the public
hearing.
If you require the services of a
translator or special accommodations
such as audio description, please preregister for the hearing and describe
your needs by September 4, 2024. EPA
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
may not be able to arrange
accommodations without advance
notice.
Preamble Acronyms and Abbreviations
Throughout this document the use of
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is intended to refer
to EPA. We use multiple acronyms and
terms in this preamble. While this list
may not be exhaustive, to ease the
reading of this preamble and for
reference purposes, EPA defines the
following terms and acronyms here:
ARV accepted reference value
BOB gasoline before oxygenate blending
DFE denatured fuel ethanol
EMTS EPA Moderated Transaction System
GTAB gasoline treated as blendstock
NFSP National Fuel Survey Program
OFR Office of the Federal Register
PBMS Performance-based Measurement
System
PCG previously certified gasoline
RVP Reid vapor pressure
SQC statistical quality control
TGP transmix gasoline product
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Table of Contents
I. Background and Overview
II. Sampling and Testing
A. Determining the Volume of NonCompliant Fuel
B. Requirements for In-Line Blending
C. Process for Amending In-Line Blending
Waivers
D. Changes to Manual Sampling Provisions
E. Homogeneity Samples Used for Batch
Certification
F. Retaining Samples
G. Homogeneity Testing of PCG
H. Precision and Accuracy Demonstration
I. Excluding SQC Data Points
J. Testing of Oxygenates for PCG Under
Compliance by Subtraction
III. Other Technical Amendments
A. Definition of Batch
B. Truthful Reporting
C. Clarification of RVP Standard in Federal
7.8 psi RVP Areas
D. National Fuel Survey Program
Notifications
E. Fuel Certification With Domestic Marine
Vessels
F. Technical Corrections
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory
Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
Part 51
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations and Executive Order 14096:
Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment
to Environmental Justice for All
V. Amendatory Instructions
VI. Statutory Authority
I. Background and Overview
On December 4, 2020, EPA finalized
the Fuels Regulatory Streamlining Rule
(‘‘streamlining rule’’) that replaced
EPA’s prior gasoline, diesel fuel, and
other fuel quality programs in 40 CFR
part 80 with a new set of provisions and
definitions in 40 CFR part 1090.1 Since
that time, EPA found that several
provisions in 40 CFR part 1090 require
further correction or clarification to
better align with current market
practices; this action proposes such
changes. As further discussed in Section
V, the regulatory text in this document
includes both text that EPA is proposing
to change as well as text that EPA is
republishing without change for context
and clarity in keeping with new
guidance by the Office of the Federal
Register (OFR). EPA is not reopening for
comment any of the unchanged text.
Specifically, EPA is not reopening any
fuel quality standard (e.g., the sulfur,
benzene, and Reid vapor pressure (RVP)
standards for gasoline in 40 CFR part
1090, subpart C, and the sulfur and
cetane standards for diesel fuel in 40
CFR part 1090, subpart D), the general
requirements that regulated parties
register with EPA, maintain records,
submit reports, etc., or the general
requirements for averaging, banking,
and trading. Any comments received on
these topics or on portions of the
regulations that are not the subject of
this action will be considered as beyond
the scope of this rulemaking.
This action proposes amendments to
two main areas of EPA’s fuel quality
regulations. First, EPA is proposing
minor revisions to provide clarity and
flexibility to provisions that govern how
fuel, fuel additives, and regulated
blendstocks are sampled and tested to
demonstrate compliance. Since
finalizing the streamlining rule, EPA
identified, with stakeholder input,
several areas in the sampling and testing
provisions that need further
consideration and clarification. These
areas include the in-line blending
waiver provisions, instructions for
collecting samples through automatic
and manual sampling, the process for
demonstrating homogeneity for
certification testing, and requirements
related to demonstrating the accuracy
and precision of test methods. The
sampling and testing amendments are
discussed in Section II.
Second, EPA is proposing the
following technical amendments, which
are discussed in Section III:
• Clarification of definitions and
general provisions.
• Clarification of the truthful
reporting requirement.
• Clarification of the RVP standard in
federal 7.8 psi RVP areas.
• Adjustments to notifications under
the National Fuel Survey Program
(NFSP).
• Addition of provisions to allow for
certifying fuel loaded onto domestic
marine vessels.
• Numerous clarifications,
corrections, and consistency edits to the
regulations.
II. Sampling and Testing
A. Determining the Volume of NonCompliant Fuel
EPA is proposing to clarify how
batches of fuel certified through
automatic sampling would be treated
when a test result indicates that a
regulated parameter exceeds a pergallon standard. A per-gallon standard
is defined as ‘‘the maximum or
minimum value for any parameter that
applies to every volume unit of a
specified fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock.’’ 2 This definition is
consistent with EPA’s historic approach
to per-gallon standards. Whether fuel is
produced and tested by in-line blending
or in storage tanks, each gallon of fuel
must meet all applicable per-gallon
standards. EPA expects fuel
manufacturers to apply a margin of
safety to their production targets to
ensure that all fuel meets all applicable
per-gallon standards in 40 CFR part
1090.
The current regulation states that ‘‘[a]
batch is noncompliant if any tested
sample does not meet all applicable pergallon standards.’’ 3 Since the
streamlining rule was finalized in 2020,
several stakeholders expressed concern
that this language could be construed to
mean that EPA would consider the
entire volume of a batch produced by
in-line blending to be in violation of a
per-gallon standard whenever any test
result exceeded the per-gallon standard.
To address this concern, EPA is
proposing to remove the abovereferenced language in 40 CFR
1090.1335(e)(2) and add clarifying
2 40
1 85
PO 00000
FR 78412.
Frm 00003
3 40
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70049
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
CFR 1090.80.
CFR 1090.1335(e)(2).
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
70050
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
language to 40 CFR 1090.1335(b) and
(c). Specifically, EPA is proposing first
to modify the manual-sampling
provisions in 40 CFR 1090.1335(b) to
include the statement that ‘‘The entire
batch volume is noncompliant if a
sample fails to meet any applicable pergallon standard.’’ This is intended to be
consistent with the provision described
above from 40 CFR 1090.1335(e)(2).
Second, EPA is proposing to modify the
automatic-sampling provisions in 40
CFR 1090.1335(c) to clarify that the
entire batch volume is noncompliant if
the composite sample fails to meet any
applicable per-gallon standard.
However, if an in-line sample fails to
meet any applicable per-gallon
standard, EPA would consider the
volume of noncompliant fuel to be the
volume starting with the last passing
result before the failing result (or the
start of the batch), up to the first passing
result after the failing result (or the end
of the batch). For example, if a head
sample exceeds a standard, followed
shortly by a middle sample with a valid
passing result, the volume of
noncompliant fuel would be limited to
the portion of the batch preceding the
middle sample with the passing result.
Also, if the fuel manufacturer took an
extra sample between the head and
middle samples and determined that the
extra sample had a passing result, that
would further limit the volume of fuel
considered noncompliant.
This proposed approach is intended
to preserve the long-standing principle
of requiring every tested sample to meet
all applicable per-gallon standards,
while allowing us to consider a portion
of the in-line blended batch to be
compliant based on tested samples that
establish the boundaries of what should
be considered noncompliant. We
believe the proposed approach properly
incentivizes fuel manufacturers both to
design and manage their processes to
provide for appropriate compliance
margins and to perform spot testing as
appropriate to verify that the blended
fuel continues to meet all applicable
per-gallon standards for the whole
batch.
Fuel manufacturers can measure fuel
parameters using procedures that are
different than the test methods used to
generate official test results for
certification. We recognize that those
nonstandard measurements provide
value to fuel manufacturers to inform
the blending process and add assurance
that the blend settings continue to
maintain compliant fuel across the
batch. However, as nonstandard tests,
those measurements cannot be used to
reduce the volume of fuel considered
noncompliant if there are test results
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
from any official test method showing
that a sample fails to meet a per-gallon
standard.
We request comment on this approach
to quantify the volume of noncompliant
fuel when a test result from in-line
blending indicates an exceedance of a
per-gallon standard.
B. Requirements for In-Line Blending
The current in-line blending waiver
provisions require that interested fuel
manufacturers submit general
information about their in-line blending
equipment, including the location,
layout, operation, and monitoring of
equipment.4 During EPA review and
approval of in-line blending waiver
requests following finalization of the
streamlining rule, multiple stakeholders
raised concerns regarding the
requirement to follow ASTM D4177 5
and the sampling and testing of spot
samples. Through iterative discussion
with these stakeholders, EPA approved
multiple flexibilities addressing these
and other concerns in individual waiver
requests. In this action, EPA is
proposing to codify these previously
approved flexibilities in the regulations
to ensure a consistent and transparent
framework. These proposed in-line
blending flexibilities would codify
existing industry practices, and thus
would not impose a new or greater
burden on industry. EPA is not
reopening for comment the existing
provisions for in-line blending waivers.
The rest of this section describes
several additional proposed provisions
for in-line blending waivers to provide
further flexibility, or to provide EPA
with additional information to help
with overseeing in-line blending
processes.
We request comment on the proposed
amendments for in-line blending
waivers. In particular, we note that in
some cases fuel manufacturers are
already including elements of the
proposed additional information in their
existing in-line blending waivers and
accordingly invite those fuel
manufacturers to describe how their
experiences either align with the
proposed provisions or lead them to
make specific recommendations for
adjusting the proposed provisions, along
with any appropriate supporting
information.
1. Scope of Measurements and Sampling
Frequency
EPA is proposing to require fuel
manufacturers to identify which
4 40
CFR 1090.1315.
D4177–22e1, ‘‘Standard Practice for
Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum
Products,’’ approved July 1, 2022.
5 ASTM
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
blendstock parameters will be measured
for managing the blending process and
the typical sampling frequency for those
measurements. This would enable EPA
to better understand the fuel
manufacturer’s ability to manage the
blending process to keep fuel
parameters within targeted values over
the course of the blend and to not
exceed per-gallon standards.
Regarding sampling frequency, the
general instruction for automatic
sampling at 40 CFR 1090.1335(c) is to
follow ASTM D4177 and to create a
composite sample from at least 9,604
grabs to represent the batch, with a
secondary specification to collect
samples with a sampling frequency that
does not exceed 20 seconds throughout
the batch. The underlying objective is to
require a sampling frequency that
corresponds to a margin of error of 0.01.
EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR
1090.1335(c) to include a direct
reference to the 0.01 error specification
to allow for less frequent sampling, as
long as sampling does not exceed a
margin of error of 0.01. In addition, we
recognize that such a sampling
frequency may be difficult to achieve for
certain batch characteristics. EPA is
therefore proposing to allow fuel
manufacturers to describe in their inline blending waiver requests
circumstances in which they cannot
meet the requirement to achieve a
margin of error at or below 0.01. Any
fuel manufacturer in those
circumstances must quantify their
measurement variability and adjust
target values as needed to account for
the greater margin of error. This
proposed approach is intended to
accommodate special circumstances
without relaxing the per-gallon
standards that apply for the fuel.
2. Reduced Spot Sampling for Small
Batches
As described in Section II.A,
automatic sampling generally requires
collection of head, middle, and tail
samples to confirm that the blended fuel
meets all applicable per-gallon
standards across the batch. We
acknowledge that collecting all three of
these spot samples can be difficult for
small batches due to the logistics of
collecting and analyzing samples during
the blending process. EPA is therefore
proposing that in-line blending waivers
may allow for reduced sampling
requirements for certain batch sizes to
provide additional flexibility.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to allow
for collecting a single sample anytime
during the blend for a batch involving
up to 8 hours of blending or up to 1
million gallons of fuel, and for
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
collecting two evenly distributed
samples during the blend for a batch
involving up to 16 hours of blending or
up to 2 million gallons of fuel. These
specified values would be based on
actual volume and duration. If a batch
volume or duration extends beyond
what was anticipated and exceeds the
specified threshold for relief from
sampling requirements, that would
trigger the need to collect additional
samples. We request comment on
whether the proposed threshold values
for volume and duration should be
adjusted to larger or smaller volumes to
properly reflect the competing interests
of reducing test burden for small
batches and ensuring that the whole
batch meets requirements. We also
request comment on whether to apply
the reduced sampling requirements
based on meeting the specified
threshold values for both the volume
and duration of the batch, rather than
just one or the other.
Another possible challenge for
complying with the requirement to
collect head, middle, and tail samples
for automatic sampling is the possibility
of process dynamics that cause the fuel
manufacturer to terminate the batch
earlier than planned. Any number of
factors may cause the early termination,
and the termination may involve
different levels of urgency. We are
aware that such an early termination
may not allow for an orderly process of
collecting all the required fuel samples.
EPA is therefore proposing that in-line
blending waivers may allow for failing
to perform required tests. The allowance
for reduced sampling and testing would
be limited to unforeseen circumstances.
When the unforeseen circumstances
allow for it, fuel manufacturers should
collect required samples whenever
possible. This may involve shifting
toward an earlier collection when there
is uncertainty about blending duration
for the batch, and there should be an
effort to adjust plans for an earlier
collection when the adjusted batch
termination allows for it. However, to
ensure that fuel manufacturers do not
always rely on this reduced-sampling
option, EPA is proposing that fuel
manufacturers may exercise this
reduced-sampling option for no more
than 10 percent of their in-line blending
batches for the calendar year.6 If a fuel
manufacturer exceeds the 10 percent
limit, EPA may consider that their inline blending waiver has proven
6 We note that we have already allowed fuel
manufacturers to use this proposed approach of a
10 percent limit under the current regulations as a
way to address situations where reduced sampling
and testing of in-line blending batches is necessary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
inadequate in practice.7 We request
comment on these proposed provisions,
including on the appropriateness of
capping the allowance for reduced
sampling to 10 percent of annual
batches.
3. Contingency Plans for Equipment
Failure
Some current in-line blending waivers
include provisions that describe how
the fuel manufacturer would respond if
their essential test equipment fails,
which we believe is an important
contingency to plan for. EPA is therefore
proposing that all in-line blending
waivers include this element of
emergency planning. Rather than
specifying a standard practice, EPA is
proposing that fuel manufacturers
describe their contingency plans for
alternative sampling and testing in cases
involving failure of the automatic
compositor or other essential
equipment. Such contingency plans
might appropriately consider a wide
range of possible scenarios. The overall
goal of this contingency plan would be
to preserve the ability to collect an
appropriate sample to properly
represent the batch for purposes of
demonstrating that the fuel meets all
applicable per-gallon standards. EPA is
proposing to require that, where
possible, contingency plans include
collecting a second composite sample
with a redundant system to minimize
the risk of shipping fuel without proper
documentation for compliance, or
alternatively to avoid the burden of
finding a different sampling method to
demonstrate compliance.
4. Alternative Compliance
Demonstration To Remedy
Noncompliance
The current regulation contains a
general requirement to demonstrate that
a batch of fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock meets all
applicable per-gallon standards before
any portion of the batch leaves the
facility.8 In-line blending waivers create
an exception to that general
requirement, with the understanding
that the terms and conditions for a
specific facility’s blending process
includes process controls to give
adequate assurance that fuel from inline blending will comply with all
applicable per-gallon standards. The
question of possible remedies by a fuel
manufacturer arises when considering
the possibility of test results showing
that fuel coming out of an in-line
blending process does not in fact meet
7 40
8 40
PO 00000
CFR 1090.20(d) and (e).
CFR 1090.1310(b).
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70051
all applicable per-gallon standards. To
the extent that fuel has already left the
facility, EPA would expect to take
appropriate action to address the
violation of failing to meet standards.
However, fuel manufacturers may be
able to take further measures before the
blended fuel leaves the facility to
demonstrate that the fuel meets all
applicable per-gallon standards. Such
remedies would involve additional
testing, and it may also involve
modifying or further blending the fuel to
comply. EPA is proposing to allow fuel
manufacturers to specify an alternative
sampling demonstration in their
contingency plan if an automatic
sampling test result fails to meet an
applicable per-gallon standard, as
opposed to being subject to EPA action
to address the violation of failing to
meet standards.
The proposed amendment identifies
two example remedies that would be
available as long as the fuel remains at
the facility. First, we describe batch
certification based on manual sampling
in a tank if the fuel manufacturer
collects the entire batch of blended fuel
represented by the noncompliant test
result in the tank before it leaves the
fuel manufacturing facility gate. Second,
we describe batch certification based on
secondary automatic sampling as fuel
comes out of a holding tank used to
collect the fuel that failed to meet a pergallon standard. Such an approved
alternative sampling demonstration
would allow the fuel manufacturer to
disregard the earlier failing result if the
subsequent valid measurements show
that all shipped fuel meets all
applicable per-gallon standards.
C. Process for Amending In-Line
Blending Waivers
Section II.B describes additional
information for fuel manufacturers to
include in in-line blending waivers. In
most cases, fuel manufacturers already
include the proposed information in
their approved in-line blending waivers.
However, in some cases, fuel
manufacturers will likely need to make
updates to their approved in-line
blending waivers to comport with the
proposed changes. EPA is therefore
proposing that all in-line blending
waivers must comply with the proposed
new specifications starting March 1,
2025, with all the proposed new
flexibilities being optionally available
before that deadline.
To accommodate the timely review of
these anticipated changes and other
periodic updates to fuel manufacturers’
in-line blending waivers, EPA is also
proposing changes to the process for
amending approved in-line blending
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
70052
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
waivers. EPA is proposing to specify
that requests for an amended waiver
must include a description of the
intended changes and a comparison
document that comprehensively and
clearly identifies the proposed changes
to the waiver. The request must also
include the statement attesting to the
truthfulness of the submitted
information, as described in Section
III.B. These proposed specifications are
intended to standardize the format and
substance of the information submitted
for the requested approval, with the
intent of streamlining EPA review of the
submitted material. It is particularly
important for the comparison document
to include all intended changes to the
approved in-line blending waiver so
that EPA staff can focus their review on
the suggested amendments to the waiver
instead of previously approved elements
of the waiver.
While these proposed specifications
for requests to amend in-line blending
waivers will facilitate timely review by
EPA staff, we are aware that fuel
manufacturers depend on timely
processing of their requests even when
circumstances lead to a protracted
review period. EPA is therefore
proposing that approval of a waiver
amendment request is deemed to be
effective 60 days after EPA
acknowledges receiving the request if
there is no further EPA response to the
request. Keying the date to our
acknowledgement is important to avoid
a case where the fuel manufacturer
submits the request in a way that does
not come directly to our attention. An
EPA response to the request may be in
the form of denying the request,
identifying deficiencies, or requiring
additional information. Under the
proposed approach, if EPA identifies
deficiencies or requires additional
information, the deemed approval date
would be 60 days after EPA
acknowledges receipt of the subsequent
submission that addresses the
deficiencies or includes the requested
information.
Considering the proposed timing
items together, fuel manufacturers could
expect requests to amend their in-line
blending waivers to comply with the
proposed new requirements to be
deemed approved by the March 1, 2025,
deadline if the requests are submitted by
December 31, 2024. We also note that
depending on when the final rule
promulgating these changes becomes
effective, EPA may also extend the
proposed March 1, 2025, deadline to
provide fuel manufacturers sufficient
time to update their in-line blending
waivers to meet the proposed new
specifications. We request comment on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
whether additional time is needed for
fuel manufacturers to update their inline blending waivers to meet the
proposed new specifications.
D. Changes to Manual Sampling
Provisions
EPA is proposing to allow for the
collection of spot samples or tap
samples to be used as a default method
in addition to the currently specified
‘‘running’’ or ‘‘all-levels’’ sampling.
Under the current regulation, a fuel
manufacturer must collect a ‘‘running’’
or ‘‘all-levels’’ sample from the top of
the tank and may use tap sampling or
spot sampling to collect upper, middle,
and lower samples only ‘‘if a running or
all-levels sample is impractical for a
given storage configuration.’’ 9 Since
finalization of the streamlining rule,
stakeholders have expressed concern
over the ambiguity of the term
‘‘impractical’’ and contended that tap or
spot sampling is as robust as running or
all-levels sampling. EPA agrees that
testing with spot samples or tap samples
can be used to routinely collect tank
samples for testing. Homogeneity
requirements further ensure that spot
samples and tap samples can properly
represent the batch. EPA is therefore
proposing to allow spot sampling and
tap sampling to be treated on par with
running or all-levels sampling.
E. Homogeneity Samples Used for Batch
Certification
The streamlining rule added
provisions describing a much more
detailed approach for demonstrating
that a batch can be considered
homogeneous when drawing manual
samples for certification.10 Industry
efforts to comply with these more
detailed specifications have led to
requests for EPA to provide further
clarification and adjustments to
accommodate several specific
circumstances.
1. Waivers From the Homogeneity
Requirement
Under the current regulations, the
homogeneity requirement is waived for
several certain situations.11 EPA is
proposing to waive the homogeneity
requirement for three additional
circumstances. First, we recognize that
homogeneity testing is impractical for
horizontal tanks used for storing ethanol
denaturant. Therefore, EPA is proposing
to waive the homogeneity requirement
for horizontal tanks with a circular or
elliptical cross section and with a
9 40
CFR 1090.1335(b).
CFR 1090.1337.
11 40 CFR 1090.1337(a).
12 ASTM D4057–22, ‘‘Standard Practice for
Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum
Products,’’ approved May 1, 2022.
10 40
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
volume less than 42,000 gallons to align
with current practice for storing ethanol
denaturant. The proposed waiver
includes a requirement to draw samples
from the approximate mid-depth of the
product level to ensure that the
measured parameters best represent the
batch.
Second, EPA is proposing to waive
the homogeneity requirement for
certified butane and certified pentane.
Certified butane and certified pentane
are stored under pressure, which makes
it impractical to collect homogeneity
samples using the methods of ASTM
D4057.12
Third, we are aware that a small
number of fuel tanks allow for tap
sampling only at ground level, along
with sampling from the roof.
Homogeneity testing with such a tank
configuration therefore depends on
sampling from the roof. Section II.D
describes how EPA is proposing to
allow tap sampling as a method that is
equivalent to running or all-levels
sampling. Based on those same
concerns, we are aware that
homogeneity testing is not possible with
a tank that has only a single location for
tap sampling when it is not an option
to sample from the roof. EPA is
proposing to allow an alternative
homogeneity demonstration when
inclement weather prevents sampling
from the roof for such a fuel tank based
on prior approval of a mixing process
that has been shown to achieve
homogeneity. The mixing
demonstration must apply for the
specific tank configuration and include
consideration of a range of product
types, fill levels, and other relevant
parameters to ensure that the specific
circumstances that apply for a given
certification support the conclusion that
the mixed fuel would meet homogeneity
specifications. Anyone relying on this
waiver from the homogeneity
requirement would be required to keep
records documenting EPA approval of
the mixing procedure, the specific
actions taken to follow the approved
mixing procedure, and the forcing
weather event.
We request comment on these three
additional waivers from the
homogeneity requirement, and on any
other circumstances where collecting
samples to meet homogeneity
specifications is impractical or
infeasible. Any suggestion for additional
waivers from the homogeneity
requirement should describe the need
for relief and any possible mitigating
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
factors or actions that would address
concerns for variability of measured
properties from different samples. We
also request comment on the proposed
qualifying conditions and
corresponding compliance requirements
for each of the proposed additional
waivers from the homogeneity
requirement.
2. Homogeneity Testing Requirements
EPA is proposing to clarify
homogeneity testing requirements for
special cases.13 The first case addresses
homogeneity test results that fall below
the lower range for a given parameter.
The homogeneity demonstration
depends on showing that multiple
samples collected in different places
inside the tank have measured values
that are consistent. Test results are not
helpful for comparing results across
samples if measured values are at or
below the lower limit of the test
method. EPA is therefore proposing to
disallow using measurements for
demonstrating homogeneity if multiple
measured values are at or below the
pooled limit of quantitation (PLOQ),
laboratory limit of quantitation (LLOQ),
or the valid range of the test method. In
those cases, EPA is proposing that
homogeneity testing would instead be
based on one of the following: (1)
Testing with a different qualifying, valid
test method for the same parameter; or
(2) Testing a different parameter
identified in 40 CFR 1090.1337(d) and
(e). For example, if a fuel manufacturer
tested a summer gasoline for both RVP
(required) and sulfur, and multiple
sulfur measurements using ASTM
D2622 14 were below the valid range of
the test method, EPA is proposing that
the fuel manufacturer could not use
those values to demonstrate
homogeneity. In this situation, the fuel
manufacturer would need to perform
homogeneity testing by one of the
following: (1) Measuring sulfur with an
approved alternative test method; (2)
Measuring benzene with the referee test
method or an approved alternative test
method; or (3) Measuring density or API
gravity using one of the test methods
specified in 40 CFR 1090.1337(d)(1).
The second case relates to testing that
includes results for more than the
required number of parameters.
Homogeneity testing for gasoline,
gasoline treated as blendstock (GTAB),
and transmix gasoline product (TGP)
involves measurements of at least two
parameters, while homogeneity testing
13 40
CFR 1090.1337(f).
D2622–16, ‘‘Standard Test Method for
Sulfur in Petroleum Products by Wavelength
Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry,’’
approved January 1, 2016.
14 ASTM
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
for diesel fuel involves measurements of
at least one parameter. A laboratory may
have commercial or other reasons to
perform measurements that include
more than the minimum number of tests
for demonstrating homogeneity. EPA is
proposing that if more than the required
parameters are tested, homogeneity
testing fails when testing for any
parameter other than density or API
gravity does not meet the applicable
homogeneity criterion.
The third case is for density or API
gravity results that fall above the current
scope of ASTM D4052.15 For valid
testing, ASTM D4052 currently specifies
an upper limit of 66° API. EPA is
proposing to temporarily allow using
test results above 66° API for
homogeneity testing with ASTM D4052.
Calculations for samples that exceed 66°
API would be based on the same
equation that applies for results that are
(51–66° API). The proposed allowance
applies only for testing performed with
ASTM D4052 through December 31,
2026. This temporary provision allows
for continued testing for this commonly
used test method, with the expectation
that the ongoing ASTM process for
updating the test method will allow for
valid measurements above 66° API by
the end of 2026. EPA is aware that
ASTM has started the process to update
the precision statements for ASTM
D4052, which would allow for
expanding the acceptable upper API
gravity range in the specified timeframe.
These proposed changes are intended
to clarify how to apply the established
homogeneity principles for addressing
the identified special circumstances. We
request comment on the proposed
provisions and whether the proposed
end of the temporary provisions (i.e., the
end of 2026) is enough time for ASTM
to complete its inter-laboratory study
and update ASTM D4052.
F. Retaining Samples
Fuel manufacturers and oxygenate
producers are currently required to
retain untested (or less tested) samples
for summer gasoline and tested (or most
tested) samples for winter gasoline,
diesel fuel, and oxygenate.16 The
requirement for such parties to retain
tested samples (other than summer
gasoline) was based on minimizing any
test differences for cases involving EPA
duplication of measurements already
made to certify a batch. The requirement
for retaining untested samples of
summer gasoline was based on ASTM
15 ASTM D4052–18a, ‘‘Standard Test Method for
Density, Relative Density, and API Gravity of
Liquids by Digital Density Meter,’’ approved
December 15, 2018.
16 40 CFR 1090.1345.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70053
5191,17 which calls for RVP
measurements to be from an aliquot that
is the first test specimen withdrawn
from a sample container.
Industry stakeholders have expressed
concern about the burden of complying
with these sample retention
requirements. We acknowledge that the
advantage of repeating a measurement
on a tested sample is offset by the risk
that the sampling process could
introduce errors caused by changing the
characteristics of the sample.
Accordingly, EPA is proposing to
simplify the sample retention
regulations by requiring parties to only
retain an untested sample that is
representative of the batch. This
proposed approach relies on the
principle that demonstrating
homogeneity allows for any sample
from the batch to be used for
measurements to establish test values to
characterize the batch. Untested
samples allow for testing summer
gasoline for RVP, and they provide an
unadulterated starting point for
measuring any other parameters.
We request comment on the proposed
simplified instruction for retaining
samples, specifically on the relative
risks of introducing measurement error
from using tested and untested samples
to make new measurements, the need to
allow for additional flexibility to retain
tested samples in certain circumstances,
and the need for separate instructions
for batches not demonstrated to be
homogeneous.
G. Homogeneity Testing of PCG
The regulations specify requirements
that apply for a refiner or blending
manufacturer that adds blendstock to
previously certified gasoline (PCG) to
produce a new batch of gasoline.18
Refiners and blending manufacturers
can meet the requirements based on
either ‘‘compliance by subtraction’’ or
‘‘compliance by addition.’’ The
streamlining rule established that
homogeneity requirements apply to the
blendstocks and finished gasoline for
compliance by addition but did not
address homogeneity for compliance by
subtraction for the PCG.19 Compliance
by subtraction in many cases does not
depend on homogeneity testing because
the relevant fuel parameters for the PCG
are already known, as the PCG
previously underwent certification
testing consistent with the sampling and
17 ASTM D5191–22, ‘‘Standard Test Method for
Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products and Liquid
Fuels (Mini Method),’’ approved July 1, 2022.
18 40 CFR 1090.1320.
19 Note that the finished gasoline created in a PCG
compliance by subtraction situation must meet the
homogeneity requirements.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70054
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
testing requirements in 40 CFR part
1090, subpart N. However, if a batch of
PCG was mixed with other batches of
PCG or if the batch of PCG was exempt
from homogeneity testing under 40 CFR
1090.1337(a)(4), the relevant fuel
parameters are not known, and the
batch of PCG should be demonstrated to
be homogeneous prior to testing for
compliance by subtraction to ensure the
test results are valid. As such, EPA is
proposing to require homogeneity
testing for compliance by subtraction if
blending involves multiple batches of
PCG, or if a single batch of PCG was
certified without demonstrating
homogeneity under 40 CFR
1090.1337(a)(4). Homogeneity testing for
these cases ensures that tested samples
properly represent the batch after
blending.
We request comment on applying
homogeneity requirements in these
specific circumstances related to
compliance by subtraction. We also
request comment on either further
narrowing these specified circumstances
or adjusting the proposal to require
homogeneity testing more broadly. We
also request comment on how to address
the situation where a party blends an
aborted in-line blending batch of
gasoline into a tank that also contains
PCG with unknown parameters prior to
leaving the fuel manufacturing facility.
H. Precision and Accuracy
Demonstration
The streamlining rule carried the
principles for the Performance-based
Measurement System (PBMS) from 40
CFR part 80 into 40 CFR part 1090. The
streamlining rule added specifications
to clarify how to apply quality-control
testing requirements for meeting
precision and accuracy requirements.
Demonstrating precision and accuracy is
critical for ensuring that test results are
valid and properly represent the
sample.20 In reviewing program
implementation for quality-control
testing, we recognized the need to
address two shortcomings. First, while
in-house testing for accuracy requires
that test results meet specifications, the
option to demonstrate compliance with
accuracy requirements by periodically
participating in a crosscheck program
does not identify a ‘‘fail’’ condition for
nonconforming test results. Second, for
both precision and accuracy, the
regulations do not describe the
consequence for failing to meet
requirements.
EPA is proposing that any of the
following outcomes would result in a
failed test result from a crosscheck
20 40
CFR 1090.1375.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
program and thus are not valid for
demonstrating compliance with
accuracy requirements:
• The crosscheck program does not
have a robust accepted reference value
(ARV) based on the check standard
requirements in Section 6.2 of ASTM
D6299.21
• The difference between the test
result and the ARV is greater than the
maximum allowable difference for
accuracy under 40 CFR 1090.1375.
• The difference between the test
result and the ARV is greater than the
method-defined limit for check standard
accuracy, if applicable.
• The measured value lies outside of
two Z-scores.22
If test results from a crosscheck
program are found to be invalid for
demonstrating compliance, EPA is
proposing to allow a laboratory to make
timely corrections to avoid a
compliance or enforcement
consequence. Specifically, EPA is
proposing that the laboratory would
need to respond to a problematic test
result by performing a root cause
analysis and correcting the problem,
which we understand to already be
standard practice across the industry.
The laboratory would need to document
the findings of the root cause analysis
and the steps taken to correct the
problem. Under this proposal, the
laboratory would have a grace period to
continue testing for 35 days without
being out of compliance. After that grace
period, the laboratory would need to
demonstrate that they again meet
accuracy and precision requirements.
The laboratory would be considered to
continue to meet accuracy requirements
if, after correcting the problems
identified by the root cause analysis, inhouse testing meets accuracy
requirements using a check standard
qualified by a third party. Alternatively,
the laboratory could participate in the
next crosscheck program and receive
test results meeting specifications. We
believe the proposed deadline for
correcting issues represent a reasonable
timeframe for taking remedial action
and getting new test results.
Failing to meet precision or accuracy
requirements indicates that test
instruments are not suitable for
generating valid test results for
certification. As a result, EPA is
proposing to specify that presumed fuel
21 ASTM D6299–23a, ‘‘Standard Practice for
Applying Statistical Quality Assurance and Control
Charting Techniques to Evaluate Analytical
Measurement System Performance,’’ approved
December 1, 2023.
22 The Z-score is a standardized dimensionless
measure of the difference between an individual
result in a data set and the sample arithmetic mean.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
parameters 23 would apply any time a
laboratory fails to meet precision or
accuracy requirements that prevent it
from demonstrating compliance with
standards using valid test results. For
meeting accuracy requirements by
participating in a crosscheck program,
the presumed fuel parameters would
apply only if the laboratory failed to
correct the problems identified by the
root cause analysis and repeat testing
with valid test results within the
specified timeframe. On the other hand,
if corrective action is not taken to
remedy the failing result within the
specified timeframe, the presumed fuel
parameters would apply for all relevant
tests starting on the date the laboratory
received the first failing report from the
crosscheck program.
We request comment on these
proposed revisions to precision and
accuracy requirements. We specifically
request comment on the proposed
criteria for evaluating test results from
crosscheck programs, the proposed
process and timeline for remedying an
adverse result from crosscheck
programs, and the proposed approach
and timeline to address a finding that a
laboratory has failed to meet precision
and accuracy requirements.
The proposed criteria for crosscheck
programs create a boundary to ensure
that individual test results are accurate
for purposes of meeting standards; they
do not address a scenario in which a
laboratory would manage measurement
error in a way that consistently
undershoots the true value by a small
amount. We accordingly request
comment on specific provisions that
would address such a possibility of
long-term bias in test results.
It bears note that these proposed
revisions narrowly address failures to
meet precision and accuracy
requirements in quality-control testing
under 40 CFR 1090.1375. Any broader
or different failure to meet testing
specifications under 40 CFR part 1090
would be treated as its own violation
based on the circumstances that apply.
I. Excluding SQC Data Points
EPA is proposing to allow for the
exclusion of certain test results from
statistical quality control (SQC) testing,
as long as the fuel manufacturer or their
third-party laboratory meets certain
criteria. The regulations currently
incorporate by reference ASTM D6299–
20; however, neither 40 CFR part 1090
nor ASTM D6299–20 clearly addresses
how to handle suspected outlier results
obtained as part of SQC testing.24 Since
23 40
24 40
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
CFR 1090.1710(g).
CFR 1090.95(c)(30) and 1090.1375.
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
the streamlining rule was promulgated
in 2020, however, ASTM has updated
this method to ASTM D6299–23a,
which allows for the exclusion of
outliers in SQC testing. Fuel
manufacturers have asked EPA to
update its incorporation by reference of
ASTM D6299–20 in 40 CFR part 1090 to
ASTM D6299–23a to also address
outliers as part of SQC testing. EPA is
proposing to update the regulations to
reference the updated standard.
The purpose of SQC testing is to
ensure that a fuel manufacturer or their
third-party laboratory is conducting
valid tests to ensure compliance with
EPA’s fuel quality requirements. Under
ASTM D6299–23a, excluding an SQC
test result can be appropriate under two
scenarios:
• Scenario 1: When identified as an
outlier using an appropriate statistical
test, such as the Generalized Extreme
Studentized Deviate (GESD), and
evidence gathered from an investigation
supports the exclusion. Supporting
evidence could include a transcription
error or other assignable cause that is
not part of the normal process and
needs to be properly documented.
• Scenario 2: During what is
perceived to be normal operations of the
SQC process, an SQC test result might
fall outside of the Upper or Lower
Control Limit, which is a strong
indication of a system that is out-ofstatistical-control (OOS). However, an
immediate retest SQC sample should be
performed to confirm the OOS event. If
the retest indicates the system is in
control as described in ASTM D6299–
23a, then the OOS is not confirmed and
the original SQC result might be
excluded following further statistical
analysis as addressed in section
A1.5.4.1 of ASTM D6299–23a.
To provide clarity, EPA is proposing
to allow outliers to be excluded from
SQC samples—but not certification
samples—under the certain
circumstances outlined in ASTM
D6299–23a.
However, we are concerned that
parties may dub certain test results as
outliers even though the test result is
valid and should be included as part of
SQC simply because the party does not
like the test result. Therefore, EPA is
also proposing to add recordkeeping
requirements for exclusion events. If
SQC data are excluded using the
protocols outlined in ASTM D6299–23a,
the laboratory would need to document
the result as well as the assignable cause
and justification for exclusion. EPA
expects that SQC exclusions should be
visible on the user’s quality control
chart while at the same time be
excluded from ongoing SQC statistics.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
Under this proposed approach, if EPA
determines that the assignable cause for
a test result treated as an outlier was not
consistent with the circumstances
described in ASTM D6299–23a, then
such a test result would need to be
retroactively included in the party’s
SQC. Furthermore, if documentation of
the result as well as the assignable cause
and justification are not maintained,
EPA is proposing that the test result
must also be included as part of the
party’s SQC.
We request comment on this proposed
approach to excluding outliers for SQC
testing.
J. Testing of Oxygenates for PCG Under
Compliance by Subtraction
EPA is proposing a separate
procedure for blending manufacturers
that make a new batch of fuel with PCG
that was a gasoline before oxygenate
blending (BOB) and do not want to
account for oxygenate added
downstream under the compliance by
subtraction provisions at 40 CFR
1090.1320(a)(1).25 Under the existing
regulations, a blending manufacturer
certifying a batch using the PCG by
subtraction procedures must create a
hand blend of the PCG if the PCG was
a BOB to determine the parameters of
the PCG that will be used for the
blending manufacturer’s compliance
calculations.26 EPA established this
requirement to ensure consistent
accounting of sulfur and benzene levels
of the PCG and believes that this
approach is reasonable in the case
where both the manufacturer of the PCG
(a BOB in this case) and the
manufacturer of the new finished fuel
have accounted for oxygenate added
downstream. However, after finalization
25 Under
EPA’s fuel quality regulations, a gasoline
manufacturer may add additional blendstocks to
PCG to create a new batch of gasoline so long as
the gasoline manufacturer certifies the new batch as
meeting all applicable per-gallon standards, and
properly accounts for the sulfur and benzene levels
of the gasoline manufacturer’s annual average
compliance calculations. The regulations at 40 CFR
1090.1320 provide two options for the certification
of a new batch using PCG. First, the gasoline
manufacturer may directly measure the gasoline
and sulfur levels of the added blendstock and report
those measurements and the volume as a positive
batch thereby adding those values to the gasoline
manufacturer’s annual sulfur and benzene
compliance calculations; this procedure is called
compliance by addition. The gasoline manufacturer
may also determine the sulfur and benzene levels
of the new blendstocks by measuring the sulfur and
benzene levels of the PCG and the finished fuel
then subtracting the PCG from the finished fuel to
determine the values of the added blendstock; as
such, this procedure is called compliance by
subtraction. Gasoline manufacturers often use the
compliance by subtraction method for PCG because
it is often impractical to directly measure the sulfur
and benzene values of blendstocks.
26 40 CFR 1090.1320(a)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70055
of the streamlining rule, one stakeholder
suggested that the creation of a hand
blend for the PCG would not result in
an accurate accounting of sulfur and
benzene levels of the new finished fuel
if the manufacturer of such fuel did not
account for oxygenate added
downstream. Rather, this stakeholder
highlighted that testing both the PCG
and the finished fuel without the
addition of oxygenates would result in
the correct sulfur and benzene levels of
the reported sulfur and benzene values
for average annual compliance if the
manufacturer did not intend to account
for oxygenate added downstream. Thus,
in this circumstance there is no need to
create a hand blend. EPA agrees with
this assessment and as such is
proposing to clarify the regulations to
accommodate the scenario where a
blending manufacturer complies by
subtraction for PCG and does not
account for oxygenate added
downstream. Under this proposal, the
blending manufacturer would test and
report the sulfur and benzene values of
the PCG and the finished fuel without
the addition of oxygenates, which
would be netted during the fuel
manufacturer’s annual compliance
demonstration to report the correct
sulfur and benzene values of the added
blendstock. EPA still believes blending
manufacturers that use the compliance
by subtraction provisions to certify
batches of fuels produced from PCG and
elect to account for oxygenate added
downstream should follow the existing
requirement to create a hand blend of
both the PCG and the finished fuel and
are therefore not proposing to change
that requirement. We request comment
on this approach.
III. Other Technical Amendments
A. Definition of Batch
EPA is proposing to modify the
definition of batch to better align with
how the sampling and testing regulatory
provisions establish the values for the
regulated parameters for batches. Under
the current definition, a batch is defined
as a ‘‘quantity of fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock that has a
homogeneous set of properties.’’ 27 The
definition notes further that ‘‘[t]his also
includes fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock for which homogeneity
testing is not required under
§ 1090.1337(a).’’ Since this definition
was promulgated in the streamlining
rule, industry stakeholders have
identified that the definition appears
inconsistent because it says that a batch
must be homogeneous, but the
27 40
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
CFR 1090.80.
28AUP2
70056
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
regulations also allow for certifying a
batch without demonstrating
homogeneity. It is also the case that fuel
produced with in-line blending
procedures is not subject to any
homogeneity requirement. To address
these concerns, EPA is proposing to
revise the definition of batch to mean ‘‘a
quantity of fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock with properties
that can be characterized by a single set
of values using the measurement
procedures in subpart N of this part.’’
We believe this framing better reflects
our intent to have the values established
through the sampling and testing
provisions reflect the volume identified
as the batch for manual sampling in
cases where homogeneity has been
determined and in cases where a party
is allowed to certify a batch without
demonstrating homogeneity. The
proposed definition also aligns with the
requirement that fuel manufacturers
using in-line blending must collect a
single composite sample that represents
the whole batch being certified. We
request comment on this revised
definition.
B. Truthful Reporting
EPA is proposing to clarify a
requirement that applies to all
information submitted to the Agency.
Parties that submit information to EPA
must, among other things, ensure that
the information is complete, accurate,
and not misleading according to the
submitter’s personal knowledge and
belief. This requirement is codified at 18
U.S.C. 1001 and in several other
statutory provisions. EPA’s data
systems—such as DCFuel and the EPA
Moderated Transaction System
(EMTS)—require the submitter to
actively acknowledge this
responsibility. For DCFuel, the
submitter confirms that the information
‘‘meets all the requirements of the’’
applicable regulations by actively
checking the certification box.
Similarly, when information is
submitted through EMTS, the submitter
certifies that, ‘‘the information shown is
a correct and accurate account of the
transaction(s) that have taken place’’ or,
‘‘under penalty of law, that the
information provided in this document
is, to the best of [the submitter’s]
knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. [The submitter is] aware
that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including
the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.’’
When information is submitted to EPA
through email, however, there is
currently no equivalent certification
made, though the same requirement to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
submit complete, accurate, and not
misleading information still applies.
Therefore, EPA is proposing to add
language in 40 CFR 1090.20 to ensure
that the regulated community is aware
that this obligation applies to all
information submitted under 40 CFR
part 1090, regardless of the form of that
submission. We note that the statutory
requirement to submit complete,
accurate, and not misleading
information applies with or without the
proposed regulatory clarification. We
request comment on this language.
C. Clarification of RVP Standard in
Federal 7.8 psi RVP Areas
EPA is proposing to correct the RVP
standards for federal 7.8 psi RVP areas
to allow for the use of 9.0 psi RVP
summer gasoline in federal 7.8 psi RVP
areas during the month of May. Prior to
the streamlining rule, gasoline used in
federal 7.8 psi RVP areas had to meet a
9.0 psi RVP standard during the month
of May and a 7.8 psi RVP standard for
the remainder of the summer season
(i.e., June 1 to September 15). In the
gasoline RVP standards specified in 40
CFR part 1090.215, EPA inadvertently
modified the RVP standard for federal
7.8 psi RVP areas for the month of May
in transcribing the previous RVP
standards table in 40 CFR 80.27. This
proposed revision would fix that
transcription error.
D. National Fuel Survey Program
Notifications
EPA is proposing that independent
surveyors include additional
information in notifications to EPA and
branded fuel manufacturers when the
surveyor identifies potential noncompliance as part of the NFSP. Under
the current NFSP requirements, the
independent surveyor utilizes
information about retail outlets to
identify potential locations and
ultimately randomly selects retail
outlets for sampling. When the
independent surveyor collects samples,
it tests the sample to determine whether
it meets the applicable fuel quality
standards. If a test result exceeds one or
more applicable standards, the
independent surveyor is required to
notify EPA, the retailer, and the branded
fuel manufacturer (if applicable) within
24 hours of identifying the issue. The
current regulations do not specify that
the surveyor indicate the contact
information of the retail outlet in the
notification provided to EPA or the
branded fuel manufacturer (if
applicable), even though the
independent surveyor has this
information readily available. Based on
EPA’s experience with the NFSP to date,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
we believe that including such
information as part of the notifications
for potentially non-compliant samples
would help EPA and branded fuel
manufacturers more expeditiously
resolve these issues consistent with
EPA’s original intent in setting up the
NFSP. As such, EPA is proposing that
any notification to EPA or a branded
fuel manufacturer of a potential noncompliant sample would be required to
include the retail outlet’s contact
information, including name, title,
mailing address, telephone number, and
email address of a representative of the
retail outlet, if available. We request
comment on this proposed requirement.
E. Fuel Certification With Domestic
Marine Vessels
Several stakeholders requested
flexibility to meet testing requirements
for fuel certification when loading
gasoline or diesel fuel onto domestic
marine vessels, specifically by sampling
and testing with the procedures that
apply for importing fuel on marine
vessels as specified in 40 CFR
1090.1605. EPA is proposing to provide
this flexibility subject to the stipulations
that each vessel compartment would
need to be sampled and tested
independently, and that no additional
product would be loaded after sampling
has been completed. The marine vessel
would also not be permitted to navigate
beyond 15 miles from the fuel
manufacturing facility or discharge fuel
until demonstrating compliance with all
applicable per-gallon standards. This
proposed condition is intended to allow
fuel manufacturers to free up dock space
while waiting on test results. However,
the fuel manufacturer would still be
accountable for any noncompliance and
would maintain responsibility for
addressing any noncompliance before
the fuel is discharged. EPA selected the
15-mile limit based on prior discussions
with industry and believes this distance
would be sufficient to allow for vessels
to travel to free up dock space and still
return to port to bring fuel back to the
fuel manufacturing facility if an issue is
identified with the fuel after it has left
the dock.
We request comment on this proposed
flexibility for certifying fuel on domestic
marine vessels, including the
appropriateness of the 15-mile limit.
F. Technical Corrections
EPA is proposing numerous technical
amendments to 40 CFR part 1090. These
amendments are being made to correct
minor inaccuracies and clarify the
current regulations. These changes are
described in Table III.F–1. We seek
comment on the proposed changes.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
70057
TABLE III.F–1—MISCELLANEOUS TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS TO FUEL QUALITY REGULATIONS
Part and section of Title 40
Description of revision
1090.50(a) ................................................................................................
Removing explanatory text that noted that the rounding provisions at
1090.50 are consistent with ASTM E29 and NIST SP 811.
Changing the term ‘‘retail station’’ to ‘‘retail outlet’’ to be consistent with
the defined terms in 1090.80.
Adding cross-references to 1090.1335 to ensure that auditors for in-line
blending waivers have experience with sampling VCSBs.
Clarifying that auditing in-line blending operations requires an auditor to
be familiar with the in-line blending waiver provisions of 1090.1315
and to demonstrate work experience and be proficient with the automatic sampling procedures specified in 1090.1335(c).
Adding missing definitions of ‘‘Distillate global marine fuel’’, ‘‘ECA associated area’’, ‘‘Emission control area (ECA)’’, ‘‘Fuel additive manufacturing facility’’, ‘‘Regulated blendstock import facility’’, and ‘‘Regulated
blendstock production facility’’.
Adding paragraph to clarify that generic terms may also be used to
refer to specific fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock types.
Adding missing acronym for volume additive reconciliation (VAR).
Removing requirement for detergent blenders to demonstrate compliance with 1090.260(a) and 1090.1240 because it is duplicative of existing requirements at 1090.100(a) and 1090.110(a).
Adding paragraph to clarify that the most stringent RVP standard applies when more than one summer gasoline RVP standard applies in
the same geographic area.
Clarifying that parties may not blend certified butane and certified pentane into previously certified summer reformulated gasoline (RFG) or
summer RBOB under 1090.1320(b).
Adding the term ‘‘other’’ prior to nonroad engines to clarify that the provision that limits the use of 500 ppm LM diesel in nonroad engines
does not include locomotive and marine engines that are allowed to
use it.
Amending to use consistent language for all exemption provisions and
clarifying which exemption provisions also apply to fuel additives and
regulated blendstocks.
Updating national security exemption to remove obsolete references to
engine and vehicle emission standards.
Clarifying and simplifying the existing equations for sulfur and benzene,
but not changing the overall calculations.
Clarifying that batch reports must include whether the 1-psi waiver applies to the batch of summer gasoline.
Removing requirement to report RVP standard and RVP test results for
gasoline produced from PCG using compliance by subtraction because it is duplicative of the reporting requirement at
1090.905(c)(3)(ii).
Clarifying that oxygenate producers may report sulfur levels as allowed
under 1090.1330 instead of only through testing.
Clarifying that a certified butane producer must test certified butane before transferring the certified butane batch for delivery.
Clarifying that the PTD requirements of this section apply to exempt
fuel additive and regulated blendstock in addition to exempt fuel.
Clarifying which PTD requirements apply to gasoline detergent and
which PTD requirements apply to gasoline.
Clarifying that distillate global marine fuel manufacturers must comply
with the recordkeeping requirements of this section.
Removing recordkeeping requirements for the sampling and testing of
undenatured ethanol because they are duplicative of the general recordkeeping requirements for all sampling and testing at
1090.1205(c).
Clarifying that the total volume of detergent must be calculated in gallons.
Clarifying that a manufacturer or distributor of 500 ppm LM diesel fuel
using transmix must comply with the recordkeeping requirements of
this section.
Amending to allow for an RCO’s delegate to submit in-line blending
waiver requests.
Adding a reference to the latest version of ASTM D4057 for manual
sampling and updating the regulation to include proper cites to content in ASTM D4057.
Adding a statement for manual sampling to clarify that, once the batch
meets homogeneity specifications, any properly drawn sample may
be used to represent the batch.
Reorganizing paragraph content to align with manual sampling.
1090.55(b)(1), 1090.215(d)(1), and 1090.1335(b)(3) ...............................
1090.55(b)(2) ............................................................................................
1090.55(b)(3) ............................................................................................
1090.80 .....................................................................................................
1090.85(g) ................................................................................................
1090.90 .....................................................................................................
1090.110(c) ...............................................................................................
1090.215(c) ...............................................................................................
1090.220(e) and 1090.1320(b) .................................................................
1090.515(d) ..............................................................................................
1090.605, 1090.610, 1090.615, 1090.620, 1090.625, 1090.630,
1090.635, 1090.640, 1090.645, and 1090.650.
1090.605(a)(1) ..........................................................................................
1090.700, 1090.715, 1090.725, 1090.740, and 1090.745 .......................
1090.905(c)(1)(viii)(A), (c)(2)(viii)(A), and (c)(8)(vii)(A) ............................
1090.905(c)(3)(i)(H) ..................................................................................
1090.915(c)(5) ..........................................................................................
1090.1000(e)(2)(i)(A) ................................................................................
1090.1105 .................................................................................................
1090.1110(e) ............................................................................................
1090.1215(a) ............................................................................................
1090.1230(b)(8) ........................................................................................
1090.1240(b)(2)(ii)(B) ...............................................................................
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1090.1255(a) ............................................................................................
1090.1315(a)(1) ........................................................................................
1090.1335(b) ............................................................................................
1090.1335(b)(4) ........................................................................................
1090.1335(c) .............................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70058
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE III.F–1—MISCELLANEOUS TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS TO FUEL QUALITY REGULATIONS—
Continued
Part and section of Title 40
Description of revision
1090.1337(b) ............................................................................................
Clarifying how samples tested for homogeneity may be used to certify
a batch of fuel.
Removing separate reference to tap sampling, since that is just one
kind of spot sampling.
Clarifying that the homogeneity parameters for gasoline apply equally
for GTAB and TGP.
Allowing for homogeneity testing based on density as being equivalent
to API gravity.
Expanding paragraph to describe homogeneity testing parameters for
oxygenate and certified ethanol denaturant.
Adjusting wording to allow for a passing result for homogeneity testing
if the variation among measured values is exactly equal to the passfail criterion.
Clarifying that a hand blend from the worst-case BOB sample is required if fuel manufacturers rely on worst-case results instead of performing homogeneity testing.
Clarifying that the specified recording precision applies for all measured oxygenate compounds.
Updating for consistent reference to test methods rather than test procedures.
Clarifying the absolute fuel parameters by removing text that is duplicative of the PBMS requirements at 1090.1350(a).
Clarifying that qualifying a test method applies for all instruments needed for those measurements.
Clarifying that laboratories qualifying an alternative method for oxygenate measurements must include all the oxygenate compounds identified in the referee method (ASTM D5599).
Referencing an older version of ASTM D5191 to properly identify the
version corresponding to the specified reproducibility value for gasoline RVP measurements to qualify alternative measurement procedures.
Narrowing the scope of the demonstration to exclude fuel additives and
regulated blendstocks (other than butane) that are not covered by
PBMS.
Simplifying the instruction to select a test fuel for quality testing by requiring that the fuel sample have an ARV representing fuel that is
typical for testing, rather than requiring selecting a sample with an
ARV that is connected to a standard. This is especially important for
RVP measurements, where there might be multiple standards.
Decreasing the crosscheck program requirements for RVP testing from
three to two times per year. This is based on RVP standards applying only for summer gasoline.
Clarifying that baseline fuel for detergent testing must contain between
8.0 and 10.0 volume percent ethanol instead of denatured fuel ethanol (DFE). This is consistent with the previous provisions at 40 CFR
part 80.
Clarifying that the two references to ‘‘10 volume percent’’ are referring
to 10 volume percent ethanol and not 10 volume percent DFE.
Clarifying that summer gasoline samples that are not subject to EPA’s
federal RVP standards under 1090.630 do not need to be tested for
RVP under the National Sampling and Testing Oversight Program
(NSTOP).
Making explicit the assumption that fuel in an individual compartment
on a marine vessel is homogeneous.
Clarifying how to demonstrate that a composite sample is valid.
Clarifying that RVP measurements are on individual samples, not composite samples.
Removing the word ‘‘fuel’’ to account for parameter measurements in
fuel additives, etc.
Adding 1090.1800(a)(3) to clarify that gasoline manufacturers that
transact sulfur/benzene credits for a compliance period but that did
not produce gasoline in that compliance period must still undergo an
annual attest audit for the credit transactions.
Amending to use consistent language for all attestation engagement
provisions.
1090.1337(c) .............................................................................................
1090.1337(d) ............................................................................................
1090.1337(d) ............................................................................................
1090.1337(e) ............................................................................................
1090.1337(f) .............................................................................................
1090.1340(a)(1) ........................................................................................
1090.1350(c)(4) ........................................................................................
1090.1355(b) ............................................................................................
1090.1360(b)(1)(i) .....................................................................................
1090.1365(a)(3) ........................................................................................
1090.1365(b)(3) ........................................................................................
1090.1365(b)(3), Table 3 ..........................................................................
1090.1365(c)(3)(i) .....................................................................................
1090.1375(c) .............................................................................................
1090.1375(d) ............................................................................................
1090.1395(a)(1)(i) .....................................................................................
1090.1420(a)(2) ........................................................................................
1090.1450(c)(3)(ii) and (v) ........................................................................
1090.1605(b)(1)(i) .....................................................................................
1090.1605(b)(1)(ii) ....................................................................................
1090.1605(b)(1)(iii) ...................................................................................
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1090.1610(a)(1)(i)(A) ................................................................................
1090.1800(a)(3) ........................................................................................
1090.1810, 1090.1815, 1090.1820, 1090.1825, 1090.1830, 1090.1835,
1090.1840, 1090.1845.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
70059
TABLE III.F–1—MISCELLANEOUS TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS TO FUEL QUALITY REGULATIONS—
Continued
Part and section of Title 40
Description of revision
1090.1, 1090.5, 1090.15, 1090.20, 1090.80, 1090.90, 1090.95,
1090.100, 1090.105, 1090.110, 1090.130, 1090.140, 1090.145,
1090.155, 1090.160, 1090.165, 1090.175, 1090.180, 1090.200,
1090.210, 1090.215, 1090.230, 1090.265, 1090.285, 1090.290,
1090.295, 1090.300, 1090.310, 1090.315, 1090.325, 1090.500,
1090.510, 1090.520, 1090.605, 1090.610, 1090.615, 1090.620,
1090.625, 1090.630, 1090.635, 1090.640, 1090.645, 1090.650,
1090.700, 1090.710, 1090.715, 1090.720, 1090.725, 1090.730,
1090.735, 1090.740, 1090.745, 1090.800, 1090.805, 1090.815,
1090.820, 1090.900, 1090.905, 1090.910, 1090.915, 1090.925,
1090.930, 1090.935, 1090.1000, 1090.1005, 1090.1010, 1090.1015,
1090.1100, 1090.1105, 1090.1110, 1090.1115, 1090.1120,
1090.1205, 1090.1210, 1090.1215, 1090.1230, 1090.1240,
1090.1245, 1090.1250, 1090.1255, 1090.1320, 1090.1335,
1090.1340, 1090.1350, 1090.1355, 1090.1365, 1090.1375,
1090.1390, 1090.1395, 1090.1400, 1090.1405, 1090.1410,
1090.1415, 1090.1420, 1090.1450, 1090.1515, 1090.1600,
1090.1610, 1090.1615, 1090.1710, 1090.1715, 1090.1800,
1090.1805, 1090.1810, 1090.1815, 1090.1820, 1090.1825,
1090.1830, 1090.1835, 1090.1840, 1090.1845, 1090.1850.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory
Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as amended by
Executive Order 14094, and was
therefore not subject to a requirement
for Executive Order 12866 review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden under the
PRA. OMB has previously approved the
information collection activities
contained in the existing regulations
and has assigned OMB control number
2060–0731.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. In making this
determination, EPA concludes that the
impact of concern for this rule is any
significant adverse economic impact on
small entities and that the agency is
certifying that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because the rule has no net regulatory
burden on the small entities subject to
the rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
Correcting typographical, grammatical, and consistency errors.
The small entities directly regulated
by the RFS program are small refiners,
which are defined at 13 CFR 121.201.
This action proposes relatively minor
corrections and modifications to EPA’s
fuel quality regulations, and we do not
anticipate that there will be any
significant cost increases associated
with these proposed changes. We have
therefore concluded that this action will
have no net regulatory burden for all
directly regulated small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538, and does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
action imposes no enforceable duty on
any state, local, or tribal governments.
Requirements for the private sector do
not exceed $100 million in any one
year.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action will be
implemented at the Federal level and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
potentially affects transportation fuel
refiners, blenders, marketers,
distributors, importers, exporters, and
renewable fuel producers and importers.
Tribal governments would be affected
only to the extent they produce,
purchase, and use regulated fuels. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
as applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern environmental
health or safety risks that EPA has
reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. Therefore, this action
is not subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
Part 51
This action involves technical
standards. Except for the standards
discussed in this section, the standards
included in the regulatory text as
incorporated by reference were all
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70060
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
previously approved for incorporation
by reference (IBR) and no change is
included in this action.
In accordance with the requirements
of 1 CFR 51.5, we are proposing to
Standard or test method
Part and section of Title 40
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, updated through
December 2023.
Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements
No. 19, Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements,
Issued December 2019.
System of Quality Management Standard No. 1, A
Firm’s System of Quality Management; Issued June
2022.
System of Quality Management Standard No. 2, Engagement Quality Reviews; Issued June 2022.
System of Quality Management Standard No. 3, Amendments to Quality Management Standard Section 10,
‘‘A Firm’s System of Quality Management’’ and Section 20, ‘‘Engagement Quality Reviews;’’ Issued March
2023.
1090.95 and 1090.1800 .....
In accordance with the requirements
of 1 CFR 51.5, we are proposing to
incorporate by reference the use of
certain standards and test methods from
ASTM International. The referenced
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
incorporate by reference the use of
attestation standards from the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA). The referenced standards may
be obtained from AICPA, 220 Leigh
1090.95 and 1090.1800 .....
Farm Rd., Durham, NC 27707–8110,
(919) 402–4500, or www.aicpa-cima.org.
We are proposing to incorporate by
reference the following standards from
AICPA:
Summary
This updated document describes standardized accounting practices for performing audits.
This updated document describes standardized practices for performing attestation engagements.
1090.95 and 1090.1800 .....
This new standard describes requirements for designing quality standards.
1090.95 and 1090.1800 .....
This new standard describes quality standards for performing attestation engagements.
This new standard describes amended requirements for
designing quality standards and performing attestation engagements.
1090.95 and 1090.1800 .....
standards and test methods may be
obtained from ASTM International, 100
Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West
Conshohocken, PA, 19428–2959, (610)
832–9585, or www.astm.org. We are
proposing to incorporate by reference
the following standards from ASTM
International:
Standard or test method
Part and section of Title 40
Summary
ASTM D86–23ae1, Standard Test Method for Distillation
of Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels at Atmospheric Pressure, approved December 1, 2023.
ASTM D975–24, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel,
approved May 1, 2024.
ASTM D1319–20a, Standard Test Method for Hydrocarbon Types in Liquid Petroleum Products by Fluorescent Indicator Adsorption, approved August 1, 2020.
ASTM D2163–23, Standard Test Method for Determination of Hydrocarbons in Liquefied Petroleum (LP)
Gases and Propane/Propene Mixtures by Gas Chromatography, approved March 1, 2023.
ASTM D2622–21, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in
Petroleum Products by Wavelength Dispersive X-ray
Fluorescence Spectrometry, approved December 1,
2021.
ASTM D3231–24, Standard Test Method for Phosphorus
in Gasoline, approved March 1, 2024.
ASTM D3237–22, Standard Test Method for Lead in
Gasoline by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy, approved October 1, 2022.
ASTM D4052–22, Standard Test Method for Density,
Relative Density, and API Gravity of Liquids by Digital
Density Meter, approved May 1, 2022.
ASTM D4057–22, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, approved
May 1, 2022.
ASTM D4177–22e1, Standard Practice for Automatic
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, approved July 1, 2022.
ASTM D4814–24a, Standard Specification for Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel, approved July 1,
2024.
ASTM D5186–24, Standard Test Method for Determination of the Aromatic Content and Polynuclear Aromatic
Content of Diesel Fuels By Supercritical Fluid Chromatography, approved July 1, 2024.
ASTM D5191–22, Standard Test Method for Vapor
Pressure of Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels
(Mini Method), approved July 1, 2022.
1090.95 and 1090.1350 .....
This updated standard describes procedures to characterize a fuel’s distillation parameters.
1090.80 and 1090.95 .........
This updated standard describes parameters to characterize a range of properties and grades of diesel fuel.
This updated standard describes procedures to measure the aromatic content of diesel fuel.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
1090.95 and 1090.1350 .....
1090.95 and 1090.1350 .....
This updated standard describes procedures to measure the purity and benzene content of butane and
pentane.
1090.95, 1090.1350,
1090.1360, and
1090.1375.
This updated standard describes procedures to measure sulfur content.
1090.95 and 1090.1350 .....
This updated standard describes procedures to measure the phosphorus content of gasoline.
This updated standard describes procedures to measure the lead content of gasoline.
1090.95 and 1090.1350 .....
1090.95 and 1090.1337 .....
This updated standard describes procedures to measure fuel density.
1090.95, 1090.1335, and
1090.1605.
This updated standard describes procedures to normalize manual sampling procedures for measuring
fuel parameters.
This updated standard describes procedures to normalize automatic sampling procedures for an in-line
blending configuration.
This updated standard describes parameters to characterize a range of properties and grades of motor gasoline.
This updated standard describes procedures to measure the aromatic content of diesel fuel.
1090.95, 1090.1315, and
1090.1335.
1090.80, 1090.95, and
1090.1395.
1090.95 and 1090.1350 .....
1090.95 and 1090.1360 .....
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
This updated standard describes procedures to measure the volatility of gasoline.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Standard or test method
Part and section of Title 40
ASTM D5599–22, Standard Test Method for Determination of Oxygenates in Gasoline by Gas Chromatography and Oxygen Selective Flame Ionization Detection, approved April 1, 2022.
ASTM D5769–22, Standard Test Method for Determination of Benzene, Toluene, and Total Aromatics in Finished Gasolines by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, approved July 1, 2022.
ASTM D6299–23a, Standard Practice for Applying Statistical Quality Assurance and Control Charting Techniques to Evaluate Analytical Measurement System
Performance, approved December 1, 2023.
ASTM D6667–21, Standard Test Method for Determination of Total Volatile Sulfur in Gaseous Hydrocarbons
and Liquefied Petroleum Gases by Ultraviolet Fluorescence, approved April 1, 2021.
ASTM D6751–24, Standard Specification for Biodiesel
Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels,
approved March 1, 2024.
1090.95 and 1090.1360 .....
This updated standard describes procedures to measure the oxygenate content of gasoline.
1090.95, 1090.1350, and
1090.1360.
This updated standard describes procedures to measure a fuel’s concentration of benzene and other aromatic compounds.
1090.95, 1090.1370,
1090.1375, and
1090.1450.
This updated standard describes numerical and statistical methods for evaluating procedures for measuring various fuel parameters.
1090.95, 1090.1360, and
1090.1375.
This updated standard describes procedures to measure the sulfur content of butane.
1090.95 and 1090.1350 .....
This updated standard describes the characteristics of
biodiesel.
Summary
V. Amendatory Instructions
paragraph). The piecemeal amendments
served as an indication of changes EPA
was proposing for public comment. Due
to the extensive number of technical
and conforming amendments being
proposed in this action, however, EPA
is utilizing OFR’s new amendatory
instruction ‘‘revise and republish’’ for
proposed revisions that will become
effective when this action is finalized.28
Therefore, instead of the past practice of
piecemeal amendments for proposed
revisions to the CFR, EPA is using the
‘‘revise and republish’’ instruction to
both revise regulatory text that is being
proposed for comment and republish in
their entirety certain sections of 40 CFR
part 1090 that contain the regulatory
text being revised and proposed for
comment. To indicate those portions of
provisions where changes are being
proposed for comment, EPA has created
a red-line version of 40 CFR part 1090
that incorporates the proposed changes.
This red-line version is available in the
docket for this action, as well as on
EPA’s website at https://www.epa.gov/
diesel-fuel-standards/fuels-regulatorystreamlining. This red-line version
provides further context to assist the
public in reviewing and making
meaningful comments on the proposed
regulatory text changes. As previously
noted, EPA is not reopening those
unchanged provisions for comment.
Republishing provisions that are
unchanged in this proposal is consistent
with guidance from OFR.
Amendatory instructions are the
standard terms that OFR uses to give
specific instructions to agencies on how
to change the CFR. OFR’s historical
guidance was to include amendatory
instructions accompanying each
individual change that was being made
(e.g., each sentence or individual
28 OFR’s Document Drafting Handbook (Chapter
2, 2–38) explains that agencies ‘‘[u]se [r]epublish to
set out unchanged text for the convenience of the
reader, often to provide context for your regulatory
changes.’’ https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/write/handbook. Additional information on
OFR’s mandatory use of ‘‘revise and republish’’ is
available at https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/write/ddh/revise-republish.
ASTM International and AICPA
regularly publish updated versions of
their standards, with the potential that
there will be a published version of one
or more of the documents listed above
before we adopt the final rule that is
more recent than the documents we
identify in this proposed rule. For any
of these more recently updated versions,
we will consider including a reference
to the latest document when we finalize
the revisions covered by this proposed
rule.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations and Executive
Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation’s
Commitment to Environmental Justice
for All
EPA believes this type of action does
not concern human health or
environmental conditions and therefore
cannot be evaluated with respect to
potentially disproportionate and
adverse effects on communities with
environmental justice concerns. This
action does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment by applicable air
quality standards. This action proposes
relatively minor corrections and
modifications to EPA’s existing fuel
quality regulations and therefore will
not cause emissions increases from
these sources.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
70061
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
VI. Statutory Authority
Statutory authority for this action
comes from sections 114, 202, 203, 204,
205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 211, 213, 216,
and 301 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
7414, 7521, 7522, 7523, 7524, 7525,
7541, 7542, 7543, 7545, 7547, 7550, and
7601.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 1090
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Diesel fuel, Fuel
additives, Gasoline, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Oil imports,
Petroleum, Renewable fuel.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR part 1090 as follows:
PART 1090—REGULATION OF FUELS,
FUEL ADDITIVES, AND REGULATED
BLENDSTOCKS
1. The authority citation for part 1090
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7521, 7522–
7525, 7541, 7542, 7543, 7545, 7547, 7550,
and 7601.
Subpart A—General Provisions
2. Amend § 1090.1 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1090.1 Applicability and relationship to
other parts.
(a) * * *
(1) The regulations include standards
for fuel parameters that directly or
indirectly affect vehicle, engine, and
equipment emissions, air quality, and
public health. The regulations also
include standards and requirements for
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70062
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
fuel additives and regulated blendstocks
that are components of any fuel
regulated under this part.
(2) This part also specifies
requirements for any person who
engages in activities associated with the
production, distribution, storage, and
sale of any fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock, such as collecting
and testing samples for regulated
parameters, reporting information to
EPA to demonstrate compliance with
fuel quality requirements, and
performing other compliance measures
to implement the standards. A party that
produces and distributes other related
products, such as heating oil, may need
to meet certain reporting,
recordkeeping, labeling, or other
requirements of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 1090.5 by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (b)(3) and
(c)(4); and
■ b. Adding paragraph (d).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 1090.5
Implementation dates.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Unless otherwise specified, a
regulated party must use the provisions
of 40 CFR part 80 in 2021 to
demonstrate compliance with regulatory
requirements for the 2020 calendar year.
This applies to calculating credits for
the 2020 compliance period, and to any
sampling, testing, reporting, or auditing
related to any fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock produced or
imported in 2020.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) The independent surveyor may
collect only one summer or winter
gasoline sample for each participating
gasoline manufacturing facility instead
of the minimum two samples required
under § 1090.1450(c)(2)(i).
(d) The provisions of
§ 1090.1315(a)(7) through (14) apply
beginning March 1, 2025. Fuel
manufacturers may optionally apply
those new provisions before March 1,
2025.
■ 4. Amend § 1090.15 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
§ 1090.15 Confidential business
information.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) EPA may disclose the information
specified in paragraphs (b) through (d)
of this section on its website, or
otherwise make it available to interested
parties, without additional notice,
notwithstanding any claims that the
information is entitled to confidential
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
treatment under 40 CFR part 2, subpart
B or 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
■ 5. Amend § 1090.20 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (f); and
■ b. Adding paragraph (g).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 1090.20
this part.
Approval of submissions under
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Any person who has an approval
revoked or voided under this part is
liable for any resulting violation of the
requirements of this part.
(g) Submitting false, misleading, or
incomplete information is a violation of
law.
■ 6. Amend § 1090.50 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 1090.50
Rounding.
(a) Unless otherwise specified, round
values to the number of significant
digits necessary to match the number of
decimal places of the applicable
standard or specification. Perform all
rounding as specified in 40 CFR
1065.20(e)(1) through (6).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 1090.55 by revising and
republishing paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
§ 1090.55
parties.
Requirements for independent
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Technical ability. The third party
must meet all the following
requirements in order to demonstrate
their technical capability to perform
specified activities under this part:
(1) An independent surveyor that
conducts a survey under subpart O of
this part must have personnel familiar
with petroleum marketing, the sampling
and testing of gasoline and diesel fuel at
retail outlets, and the designing of
surveys to estimate compliance rates for
fuel parameters nationwide. The
independent surveyor must demonstrate
this technical ability in plans submitted
under subpart O of this part.
(2) A laboratory attempting to qualify
alternative procedures must contract
with an independent third party to
verify the accuracy and precision of
measured values as specified in
§ 1090.1365. The independent third
party must demonstrate work
experience and a good working
knowledge of the VCSB methods
specified in §§ 1090.1335, 1090.1365,
and 1090.1370, with training and
expertise corresponding to a bachelor’s
degree in chemical engineering, or
combined bachelor’s degrees in
chemistry and statistics.
(3) Any person auditing in-line
blending operations must be familiar
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
with the waiver provisions of
§ 1090.1315 and be proficient with the
sampling procedures specified in
§ 1090.1335(c).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 1090.80 by:
■ a. Revising the definitions of
‘‘Auditor’’, ‘‘Automated detergent
blending facility’’, and ‘‘Batch’’;
■ b. Removing the definition of
‘‘California diesel’’ and adding in
alphabetical order the definition of
‘‘California diesel fuel’’;
■ c. Revising the definitions of
‘‘Certified ethanol denaturant
producer’’, ‘‘Detergent additive
package’’, ‘‘Detergent blender’’, and
‘‘Diesel fuel manufacturer’’;
■ d. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Distillate global marine
fuel’’;
■ e. Revising the definitions of
‘‘Downstream location’’, ‘‘E0’’, and
‘‘E85’’;
■ f. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘ECA associated area’’;
■ g. Revising the definition of ‘‘ECA
marine fuel’’;
■ h. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Emission control area
(ECA)’’;
■ i. Revising the definitions of ‘‘Fuel
additive’’ and ‘‘Fuel additive
manufacturer’’;
■ j. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Fuel additive
manufacturing facility’’;
■ k. Revising the definitions of ‘‘Fuel
manufacturing facility’’, ‘‘Gasoline
before oxygenate blending (BOB)’’,
‘‘Gasoline manufacturer’’, ‘‘Global
marine fuel’’, ‘‘Marine engine’’, ‘‘Nonautomated detergent blending facility’’,
and ‘‘Reformulated gasoline (RFG)’’;
■ l. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Regulated blendstock
import facility’’;
■ m. Revising the definition of
‘‘Regulated blendstock producer’’;
■ n. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Regulated blendstock
production facility’’;
■ o. Revising the definitions of
‘‘Sampling strata’’ and ‘‘Transmix
processor’’;
■ p. Removing the definition of
‘‘Volume Additive Reconciliation (VAR)
Period’’ and adding in alphabetical
order the definition of ‘‘Volume additive
reconciliation (VAR) period’’; and
■ q. Revising the definition of
‘‘Wholesale purchaser-consumer
(WPC)’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1090.80
*
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
*
Definitions.
*
28AUP2
*
*
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Auditor means any person who
conducts audits under subpart S of this
part.
Automated detergent blending facility
means any facility (including, but not
limited to, a truck or individual storage
tank) at which detergent is blended with
gasoline by means of an injector system
calibrated to automatically deliver a
specified amount of detergent.
*
*
*
*
*
Batch means a quantity of fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock with
properties that can be characterized by
a single set of values using the
measurement procedures in subpart N
of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
California diesel fuel means diesel
fuel designated by a diesel fuel
manufacturer as for use in California.
*
*
*
*
*
Certified ethanol denaturant producer
means any person who certifies ethanol
denaturant as meeting the requirements
in § 1090.275.
*
*
*
*
*
Detergent additive package means an
additive package containing detergent
and may also contain carrier oils and
other active components such as
corrosion inhibitors, antioxidants, metal
deactivators, and handling solvents.
Detergent blender means any person
who owns, leases, operates, controls, or
supervises the blending operation of a
detergent blending facility, or who
imports detergent-additized gasoline.
*
*
*
*
*
Diesel fuel manufacturer means a fuel
manufacturer that owns, leases,
operates, controls, or supervises a diesel
fuel manufacturing facility.
*
*
*
*
*
Distillate global marine fuel means
global marine fuel that is distillate fuel.
*
*
*
*
*
Downstream location means any point
in the fuel distribution system other
than a fuel manufacturing facility
through which fuel passes after it leaves
the fuel manufacturing facility gate at
which it was certified (e.g., fuel at
facilities of distributors, pipelines,
terminals, carriers, retailers, oxygenate
blenders, and WPCs).
E0 means gasoline that contains no
ethanol.
*
*
*
*
*
E85 means a fuel that contains more
than 50 and no more than 83 volume
percent ethanol and is used, intended
for use, or made available for use in
flex-fuel vehicles or flex-fuel engines.
E85 is not gasoline.
ECA associated area has the meaning
given in 40 CFR 1043.20.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
ECA marine fuel means diesel fuel,
distillate fuel, or residual fuel used,
intended for use, or made available for
use in C3 marine vessels while the
vessels are operating within an ECA, or
an ECA associated area.
Emission control area (ECA) has the
meaning given in 40 CFR 1043.20.
*
*
*
*
*
Fuel additive has the same meaning as
additive in 40 CFR 79.2(e).
*
*
*
*
*
Fuel additive manufacturer means
any person who owns, leases, operates,
controls, or supervises a fuel additive
manufacturing facility.
Fuel additive manufacturing facility
means any facility where fuel additive
is produced or imported.
*
*
*
*
*
Fuel manufacturing facility means
any facility where fuel is produced,
imported, or recertified. Fuel
manufacturing facilities include
refineries, fuel blending facilities,
transmix processing facilities, import
facilities, and any facility where fuel is
recertified.
*
*
*
*
*
Gasoline before oxygenate blending
(BOB) means gasoline for which a
gasoline manufacturer has accounted for
oxygenate added downstream under
§ 1090.710. BOB is subject to all the
requirements and standards that apply
to gasoline, unless subject to a specific
alternative standard or requirement
under this part.
Gasoline manufacturer means a fuel
manufacturer that owns, leases,
operates, controls, or supervises a
gasoline manufacturing facility.
*
*
*
*
*
Global marine fuel means diesel fuel,
distillate fuel, or residual fuel used,
intended for use, or made available for
use in steamships or Category 3 marine
vessels while the vessels are operating
in international waters or in any waters
outside the boundaries of an ECA.
Global marine fuel is subject to the
provisions of MARPOL Annex VI. (Note:
This part regulates only distillate global
marine fuel.)
*
*
*
*
*
Marine engine has the meaning given
in 40 CFR 1042.901.
*
*
*
*
*
Non-automated detergent blending
facility means any facility (including a
truck or individual storage tank) at
which detergent additive is blended
using a hand-blending technique or any
other non-automated method.
*
*
*
*
*
Reformulated gasoline (RFG) means
gasoline that is certified under
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70063
§ 1090.1000(b) and that meets the
standards and requirements in
§ 1090.220.
*
*
*
*
*
Regulated blendstock import facility
means any facility where regulated
blendstock is imported into the United
States.
Regulated blendstock producer means
any person who produces or imports
regulated blendstock in the United
States, or any person who owns, leases,
operates, controls, or supervises a
facility where regulated blendstock is
produced or imported.
Regulated blendstock production
facility means any facility where
regulated blendstock is produced.
*
*
*
*
*
Sampling strata means the following
types of areas sampled during a survey:
(1) Densely populated areas.
(2) Transportation corridors.
(3) Rural areas.
*
*
*
*
*
Transmix processor means any person
who owns, leases, operates, controls, or
supervises a transmix processing facility
in the United States. A transmix
processor is a fuel manufacturer.
*
*
*
*
*
Volume additive reconciliation (VAR)
period means the following:
(1) For an automated detergent
blending facility, the VAR period is a
time period lasting no more than 31
days or until an adjustment to a
detergent concentration rate that
increases the initial rate by more than
10 percent, whichever occurs first. The
concentration setting for a detergent
injector may be adjusted by more than
10 percent above the initial rate without
terminating the VAR period, provided
the purpose of the change is to correct
a batch misadditization prior to the
transfer of the batch to another party, or
to correct an equipment malfunction
and the concentration is immediately
returned to no more than 10 percent
above the initial rate of concentration
after the correction.
(2) For a non-automated detergent
blending facility, the VAR period
constitutes the blending of one batch of
gasoline.
*
*
*
*
*
Wholesale purchaser-consumer (WPC)
means any person who is an ultimate
consumer of fuels and who purchases or
obtains fuels for use in motor vehicles,
nonroad vehicles, nonroad engines, or
nonroad equipment, including
locomotive or marine engines, and, in
the case of liquid fuels, receives
delivery of that product into a storage
tank of at least 550-gallon capacity
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70064
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(g) Generic terms. Certain terms that
are generically defined in this part (e.g.,
‘‘fuel manufacturing facility’’ or
‘‘importer’’) may also be used to refer to
a specific fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock type (e.g., ‘‘diesel
fuel manufacturing facility’’ or ‘‘gasoline
importer’’).
substantially under the control of that
person.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 1090.85 by adding
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
§ 1090.85
*
*
Explanatory terms.
*
*
*
■
§ 1090.90
Acronyms and abbreviations.
*
*
*
*
*
PLOQ ........................................................................................................ pooled limit of quantitation.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
VAR ........................................................................................................... volume additive reconciliation.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
11. Amend § 1090.95 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (b) and (c)(1),
(3), and (c)(6) through (8);
■ b. Removing paragraph (c)(9) and
redesignating paragraphs (c)(10) through
(37) as paragraphs (c)(9) through (36);
■ c. Revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (c)(9), (10), (12) through (14),
(17), (19), (20), (23), (24), (29), (31), and
(35);
■ d. Removing paragraph (c)(38) and
redesignating paragraphs (c)(39) and
(40) as paragraphs (c)(37) and (38).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 1090.95
Incorporation by reference.
*
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
10. Amend § 1090.90 by:
a. Revising entry ‘‘PLOQ’’; and
■ b. Adding in alphabetical order entry
‘‘VAR’’.
The revision and addition read as
follows:
■
*
*
*
*
(b) American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, 220 Leigh Farm
Rd., Durham, NC 27707–8110, (919)
402–4500, or www.aicpa-cima.org.
(1) AICPA Code of Professional
Conduct, updated through December
2023; IBR approved for § 1090.1800(b).
(2) Statements on Quality Control
Standards (SQCS) No. 8, QC Section 10:
A Firm’s System of Quality Control,
current as of July 1, 2019; IBR approved
for § 1090.1800(b). This includes the
following quality control standards for
attestation engagements starting
December 15, 2025:
(i) System of Quality Management
Standard No. 1, A Firm’s System of
Quality Management; Issued June 2022;
IBR approved for § 1090.1800(b).
(ii) System of Quality Management
Standard No. 2, Engagement Quality
Reviews; Issued June 2022; IBR
approved for § 1090.1800(b).
(iii) System of Quality Management
Standard No. 3, Amendments to Quality
Management Standard Section 10, ‘‘A
Firm’s System of Quality Management’’
and Section 20, ‘‘Engagement Quality
Reviews;’’ Issued March 2023; IBR
approved for § 1090.1800(b).
(3) Statement on Standards for
Attestation Engagements No. 19,
Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagement,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
*
*
Issued December 2019; IBR approved for
§ 1090.1800(b).
(c) * * *
(1) ASTM D86–23ae1, Standard Test
Method for Distillation of Petroleum
Products and Liquid Fuels at
Atmospheric Pressure, approved
December 1, 2023 (‘‘ASTM D86’’); IBR
approved for § 1090.1350(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(3) ASTM D975–24, Standard
Specification for Diesel Fuel, approved
May 1, 2024 (‘‘ASTM D975’’); IBR
approved for § 1090.80.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) ASTM D1319–20a, Standard Test
Method for Hydrocarbon Types in
Liquid Petroleum Products by
Fluorescent Indicator Adsorption,
approved August 1, 2020 (‘‘ASTM
D1319’’); IBR approved for
§ 1090.1350(b).
(7) ASTM D2163–23, Standard Test
Method for Determination of
Hydrocarbons in Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases and Propane/Propene
Mixtures by Gas Chromatography,
approved March 1, 2023 (‘‘ASTM
D2163’’); IBR approved for
§ 1090.1350(b).
(8) ASTM D2622–21, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive Xray Fluorescence Spectrometry,
approved December 1, 2021 (‘‘ASTM
D2622’’); IBR approved for
§§ 1090.1350(b), 1090.1360(d), and
1090.1375(c).
(9) ASTM D3231–24, Standard Test
Method for Phosphorus in Gasoline,
approved March 1, 2024 (‘‘ASTM
D3231’’); IBR approved for
§ 1090.1350(b).
(10) ASTM D3237–22, Standard Test
Method for Lead in Gasoline by Atomic
Absorption Spectroscopy, approved
October 1, 2022 (‘‘ASTM D3237’’); IBR
approved for § 1090.1350(b).
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(12) ASTM D4052–22, Standard Test
Method for Density, Relative Density,
and API Gravity of Liquids by Digital
Density Meter, approved May 1, 2022
(‘‘ASTM D4052’’); IBR approved for
§ 1090.1337(d) and (f).
(13) ASTM D4057–22, Standard
Practice for Manual Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products,
approved May 1, 2022 (‘‘ASTM
D4057’’); IBR approved for
§§ 1090.1335(b) and 1090.1605(b).
(14) ASTM D4177–22e1, Standard
Practice for Automatic Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products,
approved July 1, 2022 (‘‘ASTM D4177’’);
IBR approved for §§ 1090.1315(a) and
1090.1335(c).
*
*
*
*
*
(17) ASTM D4814–24a, Standard
Specification for Automotive SparkIgnition Engine Fuel, approved July 1,
2024 (‘‘ASTM D4814’’); IBR approved
for §§ 1090.80 and 1090.1395(a).
*
*
*
*
*
(19) ASTM D5186–24, Standard Test
Method for Determination of the
Aromatic Content and Polynuclear
Aromatic Content of Diesel Fuels By
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography,
approved July 1, 2024 (‘‘ASTM D5186’’);
IBR approved for § 1090.1350(b).
(20) ASTM D5191–22, Standard Test
Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum
Products and Liquid Fuels (Mini
Method), approved July 1, 2022 (‘‘ASTM
D5191’’); IBR approved for
§ 1090.1360(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(23) ASTM D5599–22, Standard Test
Method for Determination of
Oxygenates in Gasoline by Gas
Chromatography and Oxygen Selective
Flame Ionization Detection, approved
April 1, 2022 (‘‘ASTM D5599’’); IBR
approved for § 1090.1360(d).
(24) ASTM D5769–22, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Benzene,
Toluene, and Total Aromatics in
Finished Gasolines by Gas
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry,
approved July 1, 2022 (‘‘ASTM D5769’’);
IBR approved for §§ 1090.1350(b) and
1090.1360(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(29) ASTM D6299–23a, Standard
Practice for Applying Statistical Quality
Assurance and Control Charting
Techniques to Evaluate Analytical
Measurement System Performance,
approved December 1, 2023 (‘‘ASTM
D6299’’); IBR approved for
§§ 1090.1370(c), 1090.1375(a), (b), (c),
and (d), and 1090.1450(c).
*
*
*
*
*
(31) ASTM D6667–21, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Total
Volatile Sulfur in Gaseous
Hydrocarbons and Liquefied Petroleum
Gases by Ultraviolet Fluorescence,
approved April 1, 2021 (‘‘ASTM
D6667’’); IBR approved for
§§ 1090.1360(d) and 1090.1375(c).
*
*
*
*
*
(35) ASTM D6751–24, Standard
Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend
Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels,
approved March 1, 2024 (‘‘ASTM
D6751’’); IBR approved for
§ 1090.1350(b).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—General Requirements and
Provisions for Regulated Parties
12. Amend § 1090.100 by revising the
introductory text and paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1090.100
General provisions.
This subpart provides an overview of
the general requirements and provisions
applicable to any regulated party under
this part. A person who meets the
definition of more than one type of
regulated party must comply with the
requirements applicable to each of those
types of regulated parties. For example,
a fuel manufacturer that also transports
fuel must meet the requirements
applicable to a fuel manufacturer and a
distributor. A regulated party is required
to comply with all applicable
requirements of this part, regardless of
whether they are identified in this
subpart. Any person who produces,
sells, transfers, supplies, dispenses, or
distributes fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must comply with
all applicable requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Importers. In addition to the
requirements of paragraphs (a) through
(c) of this section and §§ 1090.105 and
1090.155, an importer must also comply
with subpart Q of this part.
■ 13. Amend § 1090.105 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(8), (b)(4), and (b)(8)
to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 1090.105
Fuel manufacturers.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) Producing compliant gasoline. A
gasoline manufacturer must produce or
import gasoline that meets the standards
in subpart C of this part and must
comply with the ABT requirements of
subpart H of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Annual attestation engagement. A
gasoline manufacturer must submit
annual attestation engagement reports to
EPA under subpart S of this part.
(b) * * *
(4) Certification and designation. (i) A
diesel fuel or ECA marine fuel
manufacturer must certify and designate
the diesel fuel or ECA marine fuel they
produce under subpart K of this part.
(ii) A distillate global marine fuel
manufacturer must designate the
distillate global marine fuel they
produce under subpart K of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Distillate global marine fuel
manufacturers. A distillate global
marine fuel manufacturer does not need
to comply with the requirements of
paragraphs (b)(1), (2), (3), and (6) of this
section for distillate global marine fuel
that is exempt from the standards in
subpart D of this part, as specified in
§ 1090.650.
§ 1090.110
[Amended]
14. Amend § 1090.110 by removing
paragraph (c) and redesignating
paragraph (d) as paragraph (c).
■ 15. Amend § 1090.130 by revising
paragraphs (d), (f), and (g) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1090.130
Certified butane blenders.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) PTDs. On each occasion when a
certified butane blender transfers
custody of or title to any gasoline
blended with certified butane, the
transferor must provide to the transferee
PTDs under subpart L of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Survey. A certified butane blender
may participate in the applicable fuel
surveys under subpart O of this part.
(g) Annual attestation engagement. A
certified butane blender must submit
annual attestation engagement reports to
EPA under subpart S of this part.
■ 16. Amend § 1090.140 by revising
paragraphs (d), (f), and (g) to read as
follows:
§ 1090.140
Certified pentane blenders.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) PTDs. On each occasion when a
certified pentane blender transfers
custody of or title to any gasoline
blended with certified pentane, the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70065
transferor must provide to the transferee
PTDs under subpart L of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Survey. A certified pentane blender
may participate in the applicable fuel
surveys under subpart O of this part.
(g) Annual attestation engagement. A
certified pentane blender must submit
annual attestation engagement reports to
EPA under subpart S of this part.
■ 17. Amend § 1090.145 by revising
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
§ 1090.145
Transmix processors.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Annual attestation engagement. A
transmix processor must submit annual
attestation engagement reports to EPA
under subpart S of this part.
■ 18. Amend § 1090.155 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1), and (b)(3) to
read as follows:
§ 1090.155
Fuel additive manufacturers.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) Gasoline additive standards. A
gasoline additive manufacturer must
comply with the applicable
requirements of subpart C of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Diesel fuel additive standards. A
diesel fuel additive manufacturer must
comply with the applicable
requirements of subpart D of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) PTDs. On each occasion when a
diesel fuel additive manufacturer
transfers custody of or title to any diesel
fuel additive, the transferor must
provide to the transferee PTDs under
subpart L of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. Amend § 1090.160 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
§ 1090.160
resellers.
Distributors, carriers, and
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Gasoline and diesel fuel standards.
A distributor, carrier, or reseller must
comply with the applicable
requirements of subparts C and D of this
part.
(b) Registration. A distributor or
carrier must register with EPA under
subpart I of this part if they are part of
the 500 ppm LM diesel fuel distribution
chain in a compliance plan submitted
under § 1090.515(g).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. Amend § 1090.165 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 1090.165
Retailers and WPCs.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Gasoline and diesel fuel standards.
A retailer or WPC must comply with the
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70066
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
applicable requirements of subparts C
and D of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Fuels produced through fuel
dispensers. A retailer or WPC that
produces gasoline (e.g., E15) through a
fuel dispenser with anything other than
PCG and DFE is also a blending
manufacturer and must comply with the
applicable requirements in § 1090.105.
■ 21. Amend § 1090.175 by revising
paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
§ 1090.175
Auditors.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Attestation engagements. An
auditor must conduct audits under
subpart S of this part.
(d) Independence requirements. In
order to perform an annual attestation
engagement under subpart S of this part,
an auditor must meet the independence
requirements in § 1090.55 unless they
are a certified internal auditor under
§ 1090.1800(b)(1)(i).
■ 22. Amend § 1090.180 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 1090.180
Pipeline operators.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Gasoline and diesel fuel standards.
A pipeline operator must comply with
the applicable requirements of subparts
C and D of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Transmix requirements. A pipeline
operator must comply with all
applicable requirements of subpart F of
this part.
Subpart C—Gasoline Standards
23. Amend § 1090.200 by revising
paragraph (c)(2)(i) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.200 Overview and general
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Importers that import gasoline by
rail or truck using the provisions of
§ 1090.1610 to meet the alternative pergallon standards of §§ 1090.205(d) and
1090.210(c).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 24. Amend § 1090.210 by revising
paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
§ 1090.210
Benzene standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) An importer that imports gasoline
by rail or truck under § 1090.1610 must
comply with a benzene per-gallon
standard of 0.62 volume percent instead
of the standards specified in paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 25. Revise and republish § 1090.215 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.215
Gasoline RVP standards.
Except as specified in subpart G of
this part and paragraph (d) of this
section, all gasoline designated as
summer gasoline or located at any
location in the United States during the
summer season is subject to a maximum
RVP per-gallon standard in this section.
(a)(1) Federal 9.0 psi maximum RVP
per-gallon standard. Gasoline
designated as summer gasoline or
located at any location in the United
States during the summer season must
meet a maximum RVP per-gallon
standard of 9.0 psi unless the gasoline
is subject to one of the lower maximum
RVP per-gallon standards specified in
paragraphs (a)(2) through (5) of this
section.
(2) Federal 7.8 maximum RVP pergallon standard. (i) Except as specified
in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section,
gasoline designated as 7.8 psi summer
gasoline, or located in the following
areas during the summer season, must
meet a maximum RVP per-gallon
standard of 7.8 psi:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(2)(i)—FEDERAL 7.8 PSI RVP AREAS
Area designation
State
Counties
Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. CollinsLoveland.
Reno ........................................................
Portland ...................................................
Colorado ................
Salem ......................................................
Oregon ...................
Beaumont-Port Arthur .............................
Salt Lake City ..........................................
Texas .....................
Utah .......................
Adams Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, Larimer,1
Weld.2
Washoe.
Clackamas (only the Air Quality Maintenance Area), Multnomah (only the Air
Quality Maintenance Area), Washington (only the Air Quality Maintenance
Area).
Marion (only the Salem Area Transportation Study), Polk (only the Salem Area
Transportation Study).
Hardin, Jefferson, Orange.
Davis, Salt Lake.
Nevada ..................
Oregon ...................
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1 That portion of Larimer County, CO that lies south of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on Larimer County’s eastern boundary
and Weld County’s western boundary intersected by 40 degrees, 42 minutes, and 47.1 seconds north latitude, proceed west to a point defined
by the intersection of 40 degrees, 42 minutes, 47.1 seconds north latitude and 105 degrees, 29 minutes, and 40.0 seconds west longitude,
thence proceed south on 105 degrees, 29 minutes, 40.0 seconds west longitude to the intersection with 40 degrees, 33 minutes and 17.4 seconds north latitude, thence proceed west on 40 degrees, 33 minutes, 17.4 seconds north latitude until this line intersects Larimer County’s western boundary and Grand County’s eastern boundary. (Includes part of Rocky Mtn. Nat. Park.)
2 That portion of Weld County, CO that lies south of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on Weld County’s eastern boundary and
Logan County’s western boundary intersected by 40 degrees, 42 minutes, 47.1 seconds north latitude, proceed west on 40 degrees, 42 minutes,
47.1 seconds north latitude until this line intersects Weld County’s western boundary and Larimer County’s eastern boundary.
(ii) Gasoline designated as 9.0 psi
summer gasoline may be located in the
areas specified in Table 1 to paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section between May 1
and May 31.
(3) RFG maximum RVP per-gallon
standard. Gasoline designated as
Summer RFG or located in an RFG
covered area during the summer season
must meet a maximum RVP per-gallon
standard of 7.4 psi.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(4) California gasoline. Gasoline
designated as California gasoline or
used in areas subject to the California
reformulated gasoline regulations must
comply with those regulations under
Title 13, California Code of Regulations,
sections 2250–2273.5.
(5) SIP-controlled gasoline. Gasoline
designated as SIP-controlled gasoline or
used in areas subject to a SIP-approved
state fuel rule that requires an RVP of
less than 9.0 psi must meet the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
requirements of the federally approved
SIP.
(b) Ethanol 1.0 psi waiver. (1) Except
as specified in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, any gasoline subject to a federal
9.0 psi or 7.8 psi RVP standard in
paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section
that meets the requirements of
paragraph (b)(2) of this section is not in
violation of this section if its RVP does
not exceed the applicable standard by
more than 1.0 psi.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(2) To qualify for the special
regulatory treatment specified in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, gasoline
must meet the applicable RVP standard
in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section
prior to the addition of ethanol and
must contain ethanol at a concentration
of at least 9 volume percent and no
more than 10 volume percent.
(3)(i) RFG and SIP-controlled gasoline
that does not allow for the ethanol 1.0
psi waiver does not qualify for the
special regulatory treatment specified in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
70067
(ii) Gasoline subject to the 9.0 psi RVP
standard in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section in the following areas is
excluded from the special regulatory
treatment specified in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section:
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (b)(3)(ii)—AREAS EXCLUDED FROM THE ETHANOL 1.0 PSI WAIVER
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
State
Counties
Illinois .................................................................
Iowa ...................................................................
Minnesota ..........................................................
Missouri .............................................................
Nebraska ...........................................................
Ohio ...................................................................
South Dakota .....................................................
Wisconsin ..........................................................
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
(c) Gasoline subject to more than one
RVP standard. Gasoline located in an
area of the United States subject to more
than one RVP standard specified in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this
section must meet the most stringent
standard.
(d) Exceptions. The RVP standard in
paragraph (a) of this section for the area
in which the gasoline is located does
not apply to that gasoline if the
person(s) who produced, imported,
sold, offered for sale, distributed,
offered to distribute, supplied, offered
for supply, dispensed, stored,
transported, or introduced the gasoline
into commerce can demonstrate one of
the following:
(1) The gasoline is designated as
winter gasoline and was not sold,
offered for sale, supplied, offered for
supply, dispensed, or introduced into
commerce for use during the summer
season and was not delivered to any
retail outlet or WPC during the summer
season.
(2) The gasoline is designated as
summer gasoline for use in an area other
than the area in which it is located and
was not sold, offered for sale, supplied,
offered for supply, dispensed, or
introduced into commerce in the area in
which the gasoline is located. In this
case, the standard that applies to the
gasoline is the standard applicable to
the area for which the gasoline is
designated.
■ 26. Amend § 1090.220 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.220
RFG standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Certified butane and certified
pentane blending limitation. Certified
butane and certified pentane must not
be blended with Summer RFG or
Summer RBOB under § 1090.1320(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
Effective date
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
27. Revise and republish § 1090.230 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.230 Limitation on use of gasolineethanol blends.
(a) No person may sell, introduce,
cause, or permit the sale or introduction
of gasoline containing greater than 10
volume percent ethanol (e.g., E15) into
any model year 2000 or older light-duty
gasoline motor vehicle, any heavy-duty
gasoline motor vehicle or engine, any
highway or off-highway motorcycle, or
any gasoline-powered nonroad engine,
vehicle, or equipment.
(b) Paragraph (a) of this section does
not prohibit a person from producing,
selling, introducing, causing, or
allowing the sale or introduction of
gasoline containing greater than 10
volume percent ethanol into any flexfuel vehicle or flex-fuel engine.
■ 28. Amend § 1090.265 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 1090.265
Gasoline additive standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Any person who blends any fuel
additive that does not meet the
requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section is a gasoline manufacturer
and must comply with all the
requirements applicable to a gasoline
manufacturer under this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 29. Amend § 1090.285 by revising the
introductory text to read as follows:
April
April
April
April
April
April
April
April
28,
28,
28,
28,
28,
28,
28,
28,
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
(4) EPA will publish a document in
the Federal Register announcing the
approval of an RFG opt-out request and
its effective date.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 31. Amend § 1090.290 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 1090.295 Procedures for relaxing the
federal 7.8 psi RVP standard.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) EPA will publish a document in
the Federal Register announcing the
approval of any federal 7.8 psi gasoline
relaxation request and its effective date.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart D—Diesel Fuel and ECA
Marine Fuel Standards
32. Amend § 1090.300 by revising
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.300 Overview and general
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) No person may introduce used
motor oil, or used motor oil blended
with diesel fuel, into the fuel system of
model year 2007 or later diesel fuel
motor vehicles or engines or model year
2011 or later nonroad diesel fuel
vehicles or engines (not including
locomotive or marine engines).
■ 33. Amend § 1090.310 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 1090.310
Diesel fuel additives standards.
The RFG covered areas are as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 30. Amend § 1090.290 by revising
paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) The provisions of this section do
not apply to additives used in 500 ppm
LM diesel fuel or ECA marine fuel.
■ 34. Revise and republish § 1090.315 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.290 Changes to RFG covered areas
and procedures for opting out of RFG.
§ 1090.315 Heating oil, kerosene, ECA
marine fuel, and jet fuel provisions.
*
Heating oil, kerosene, ECA marine
fuel, or jet fuel must not be sold for use
§ 1090.285
RFG covered areas.
*
*
(d) * * *
PO 00000
*
Frm 00021
*
Fmt 4701
*
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70068
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
in motor vehicles or nonroad equipment
and are not subject to the ULSD
standards in § 1090.305 unless it is also
designated as ULSD under
§ 1090.1015(a).
■ 35. Amend § 1090.325 by revising
paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
§ 1090.325
ECA marine fuel standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Residual fuel made available for
use in a steamship or C3 marine vessel
if the U.S. government exempts or
excludes the vessel from MARPOL
Annex VI fuel standards. Diesel fuel and
other distillate fuel used in diesel fuel
engines operated on such vessels is
subject to the standards in this section
instead of the standards in § 1090.305 or
§ 1090.320.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart F—Transmix and Pipeline
Interface Provisions
36. Amend § 1090.500 by revising
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.500 Gasoline produced from
blending transmix into PCG.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) A letter signed by the RCO, or
their delegate, stating that the
information contained in the
submission is true to the best of their
belief must accompany the petition.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 37. Amend § 1090.510 by revising the
section heading to read as follows:
§ 1090.510 Diesel fuel and distillate fuel
produced from TDP.
*
*
*
*
*
38. Amend § 1090.515 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.515 500 ppm LM diesel fuel
produced from TDP.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Use restrictions. 500 ppm LM
diesel fuel may only be used in
locomotive or marine engines that are
not required to use ULSD under 40 CFR
1033.815 or 40 CFR 1042.660,
respectively. No person may use 500
ppm LM diesel fuel in locomotive or
marine engines that are required to use
ULSD, in any other nonroad vehicle or
engine, or in any motor vehicle engine.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 39. Amend § 1090.520 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 1090.520 Handling practices for pipeline
interface that is not transmix.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) During the summer season, a
pipeline operator must not cut pipeline
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
interface from two batches of gasoline
subject to different RVP standards that
are shipped adjacent to each other by
pipeline into the batch of gasoline that
is subject to the more stringent RVP
standard. For example, during the
summer season, a pipeline operator
must not cut pipeline interface from a
batch of RFG shipped adjacent to a
batch of conventional gasoline into the
batch of RFG.
Subpart G—Exemptions
40. The heading of subpart G is
revised to read as set forth above.
■ 41. Revise and republish § 1090.605 to
read as follows:
■
§ 1090.605 Exemptions for national
security and military use.
(a) Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock that is produced, imported,
sold, offered for sale, supplied, offered
for supply, stored, dispensed, or
transported for use in the following
tactical military vehicles, engines, or
equipment, including locomotive or
marine engines, is exempt from the
standards specified in this part:
(1) Tactical military vehicles, engines,
or equipment, including locomotive or
marine engines, that have an EPA
national security exemption from the
emission standards in this chapter. See
40 CFR part 85, subpart R, and 40 CFR
1068.225.
(2) Tactical military vehicles, engines,
or equipment, including locomotive or
marine engines, that are not subject to
a national security exemption from
vehicle or engine emissions standards
specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section but, for national security
purposes (e.g., for purposes of readiness,
including training, for deployment
overseas), need to be fueled on the same
fuel as the vehicles, engines, or
equipment that EPA has granted such a
national security exemption.
(b) The exempt fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must meet all the
following requirements:
(1) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be
accompanied by PTDs that meet the
requirements of subpart L of this part.
(2) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be
completely segregated from non-exempt
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock at all points in the
distribution system.
(3) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be dispensed
from a fuel dispenser stand, fueling
truck, or tank that is labeled with the
appropriate designation of the exempt
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(4) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must not be used
in any vehicles, engines, or equipment,
including locomotive or marine engines,
other than those specified in paragraph
(a) of this section.
■ 42. Revise and republish § 1090.610 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.610 Exemptions for temporary
research, development, and testing.
(a) Requests for an exemption. (1) Any
person may receive an exemption from
the standards specified in this part for
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock used for research,
development, or testing (‘‘R&D’’)
purposes under paragraph (b) of this
section by submitting the information
specified in paragraph (c) of this section
as specified in § 1090.10 and meeting
the requirements of paragraph (d) of this
section.
(2) Any person who performs
emissions certification testing for a
motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine
under 42 U.S.C. 7525 or nonroad engine
or nonroad vehicle under 42 U.S.C.
7546 is exempt from the standards
specified in this part for the fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock they
use for emissions certification testing if
they have an exemption under 40 CFR
parts 85 and 86 to perform such testing.
(b) Criteria for an R&D exemption. For
an R&D exemption to be granted, the
person requesting an exemption must
do all the following:
(1) Demonstrate that the exemption is
for an appropriate R&D purpose.
(2) Demonstrate that an exemption is
necessary.
(3) Design an R&D program that is
reasonable in scope.
(4) Have a degree of control consistent
with the purpose of the R&D program
and EPA’s monitoring requirements.
(5) Meet the requirements specified in
paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
(c) Information required to be
submitted. To aid in demonstrating each
of the elements in paragraph (b) of this
section, the person requesting an
exemption must include, at a minimum,
all the following information:
(1) A concise statement of the purpose
of the R&D program demonstrating that
the R&D program has an appropriate
R&D purpose.
(2) An explanation of why the stated
purpose of the R&D program is unable
to be achieved in a practicable manner
without meeting the requirements of
this part.
(3) A demonstration of the
reasonableness of the scope of the R&D
program, including all the following:
(i) An estimate of the R&D program’s
duration in time (including beginning
and ending dates).
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(ii) An estimate of the maximum
number of vehicles, engines, and
equipment involved in the program, and
the number of miles and engine hours
that will be accumulated on each.
(iii) The manner in which the
information on the vehicles, engines, or
equipment used in the R&D program
will be recorded and made available to
EPA upon request.
(iv) An estimate of the volume of fuel,
fuel additive, or regulated blendstock
expected to be used in the R&D program
that does not comply with the
requirements of this part, as applicable.
(v) A list of how all applicable
standards of this part would or would
not apply to the fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock expected to be
used in the R&D program.
(4) With regard to control, a
demonstration that the R&D program
affords EPA a monitoring capability,
including all the following:
(i) A description of the technical and
operational aspects of the R&D program.
(ii) The site of the R&D program
(including facility name, street address,
city, county, state, and ZIP code).
(iii) The manner in which information
on the vehicles, engines, or equipment
used in the R&D program will be
recorded and made available to EPA
upon request.
(iv) The manner in which information
on the fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock used in the R&D program
(including quantity, properties, name,
address, telephone number, and contact
person of the supplier, and the date
received from the supplier) will be
recorded and made available to EPA
upon request.
(v) The manner in which the person
will ensure that fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock used in the R&D
program will be segregated from nonexempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock and how fuel dispensers will
be labeled to ensure that fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock used
in the R&D program is not dispensed for
use in motor vehicles or nonroad
engines, vehicles, or equipment,
including locomotive or marine engines,
that are not part of the R&D program.
(vi) The name, business address,
telephone number, and title of the
person in the organization requesting an
exemption from whom further
information on the application may be
obtained.
(vii) The name, business address,
telephone number, and title of the
person in the organization requesting an
exemption who is responsible for
recording and making available the
information specified in this paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(c), and the location where such
information will be maintained.
(viii) Any other information requested
by EPA to determine whether the R&D
program satisfies the criteria in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Additional requirements. (1) Fuel,
fuel additive, or regulated blendstock
used in the R&D program must meet all
the following requirements:
(i) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock must be accompanied by
PTDs that meet the requirements of
subpart L of this part.
(ii) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be designated
as exempt fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock by the fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock
manufacturer or supplier, as applicable.
(iii) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be
completely segregated from non-exempt
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock at all points in the
distribution system.
(iv) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must not be sold,
distributed, offered for sale or
distribution, dispensed, supplied,
offered for supply, transported to or
from, or stored by a retail outlet or WPC
facility, unless the WPC facility is
associated with the R&D program that
uses the fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock.
(2) At the completion of the R&D
program, any emission control systems
or elements of design that are damaged
or rendered inoperative must be
replaced on vehicles, engines, or
equipment remaining in service or the
responsible person will be liable for a
violation of 42 U.S.C. 7522(a)(3), unless
sufficient evidence is supplied that the
emission controls or elements of design
were not damaged.
(e) Approval of exemption. EPA may
grant an R&D exemption upon a
demonstration that the requirements of
this section have been met. The R&D
exemption approval may include such
terms and conditions as EPA determines
necessary to monitor the exemption and
to carry out the purposes of this part,
including restoration of emission
control systems.
(1) The volume of fuel, fuel additive,
or regulated blendstock used in the R&D
program must not exceed the amount
estimated in paragraph (c)(3)(iv) of this
section, unless EPA grants an approval
for a greater amount.
(2) Any R&D exemption granted under
this section will expire at the
completion of the R&D program or 1
year from the date of approval,
whichever occurs first, and may only be
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70069
extended upon re-application consistent
with the requirements of this section.
(3) If any information required in
paragraph (c) of this section changes
after approval of the R&D exemption,
the responsible person must notify EPA
in writing immediately.
(f) Notification of completion. Any
person with an approved R&D
exemption under this section must
notify EPA in writing within 30 days
after completion of the R&D program.
■ 43. Revise and republish § 1090.615 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.615
aviation.
Exemptions for racing and
Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock that is used in aircraft, or is
used in racing vehicles or racing boats
in sanctioned racing events, is exempt
from the standards in subparts C and D
of this part if all the following
requirements are met:
(a) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be identified
on PTDs and on any fuel dispenser from
which the fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock is dispensed as
restricted for use either in aircraft or in
racing motor vehicles or racing boats
that are used only in sanctioned racing
events.
(b) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be
completely segregated from non-exempt
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock at all points in the
distribution system.
(c) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must not made
available for use as gasoline or diesel
fuel subject to the standards in subpart
C or D of this part, respectively, or
dispensed for use in motor vehicles or
nonroad engines, vehicles, or
equipment, including locomotive or
marine engines, except for those used
only in aircraft or in sanctioned racing
events.
■ 44. Revise and republish § 1090.620 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.620 Exemptions for Guam,
American Samoa, and the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Fuel that is produced, imported, sold,
offered for sale, supplied, offered for
supply, stored, dispensed, or
transported for use in the territories of
Guam, American Samoa, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, is exempt from the standards in
subparts C and D of this part if all the
following requirements are met:
(a) The fuel must be designated by the
fuel manufacturer as gasoline, diesel
fuel, or ECA marine fuel for use only in
Guam, American Samoa, or the
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70070
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
(b) The fuel must be used only in
Guam, American Samoa, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
(c) The fuel must be accompanied by
PTDs that meet the requirements of
subpart L of this part.
(d) The fuel must be completely
segregated from non-exempt fuel at all
points from the point the fuel is
designated as exempt fuel for use only
in Guam, American Samoa, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, while the exempt fuel is in the
United States (including an ECA or an
ECA associated area under 40 CFR
1043.20) but outside these territories.
■ 45. Amend § 1090.625 by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (b)(2), (b)(5),
and (c)(1);
■ b. Revising and republishing
paragraph (d)(2); and
■ c. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
§ 1090.625 Exemptions for California
gasoline and diesel fuel.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Designated California gasoline or
diesel fuel must be completely
segregated from fuel that is not
California gasoline or diesel fuel at all
points in the distribution system.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Each transferor and transferee of
California gasoline or diesel fuel
produced outside the state of California
must maintain copies of PTDs as
specified in subpart M of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Comply with the sampling and
testing provisions specified in subpart N
of this part, as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Redesignates the California
gasoline as gasoline under this part
without recertification and does all the
following:
(i) Demonstrates that the gasoline
meets all applicable requirements for
California reformulated gasoline under
Title 13 of the California Code of
Regulations.
(ii) Properly redesignates the gasoline
under § 1090.1010(b)(2)(vi).
(iii) Generates PTDs under subpart L
of this part.
(iv) Keeps records under subpart M of
this part.
(v) Does not include the redesignated
California gasoline in their average
standard compliance calculations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(e) California diesel fuel used outside
of California. California diesel fuel may
be used in any part of the United States
outside of the state of California without
recertification if the manufacturer or
distributor of the California diesel fuel
redesignates the California diesel fuel as
diesel fuel under this part and does all
the following:
(1) Demonstrates that the diesel fuel
meets all applicable requirements for
California diesel fuel under Title 13 of
the California Code of Regulations.
(2) Properly redesignates the diesel
fuel under § 1090.1015(b)(3)(iii).
(3) Generates PTDs under subpart L of
this part.
(4) Keeps records under subpart M of
this part.
■ 46. Revise and republish § 1090.630 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.630 Exemptions for Alaska, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands
summer gasoline.
Summer gasoline that is produced,
imported, sold, offered for sale,
supplied, offered for supply, stored,
dispensed, or transported for use in
Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or the U.S.
Virgin Islands is exempt from the RVP
standards in § 1090.215 if all the
following requirements are met:
(a) The summer gasoline must be
designated by the fuel manufacturer as
summer gasoline for use only in Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin
Islands.
(b) The summer gasoline must be used
only in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or
the U.S. Virgin Islands.
(c) The summer gasoline must be
accompanied by PTDs that meet the
requirements of subpart L of this part.
(d) The summer gasoline must be
completely segregated from non-exempt
gasoline at all points from the point the
summer gasoline is designated as
exempt fuel for use only in Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin
Islands, while the exempt summer
gasoline is in the United States but
outside these states or territories.
■ 47. Amend § 1090.635 by revising the
section heading to read as follows:
§ 1090.635 Exemptions for refinery
extreme, unusual, and unforeseen hardship.
*
*
*
*
*
48. Revise and republish § 1090.640 to
read as follows:
■
§ 1090.640
Exemptions for E85.
(a) Gasoline that is used to produce
E85 is exempt from the gasoline deposit
control requirements in § 1090.260.
(b) Any person who uses the
exemption in paragraph (a) of this
section must keep records to
demonstrate that such exempt gasoline
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
was used to produce E85 and was not
distributed from a terminal for use as
gasoline.
■ 49. Revise and republish § 1090.645 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.645 Exemptions for exports of fuel,
fuel additive, and regulated blendstock.
(a) Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock that is exported for sale
outside of the United States is exempt
from the standards in subparts C and D
of this part if all the following
requirements are met:
(1) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be designated
for export by the fuel manufacturer, fuel
additive manufacturer, or regulated
blendstock producer.
(2) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock designated for
export must be accompanied by PTDs
that meet the requirements of subpart L
of this part.
(3) The fuel manufacturer, fuel
additive manufacturer, or regulated
blendstock producer must keep records
that demonstrate that the fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock was
ultimately exported from the United
States.
(4) The fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must be
completely segregated from non-exempt
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock at all points from the point
the fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock is designated for export to
the point where it is ultimately exported
from the United States.
(b) Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock certified and designated for
export may be certified for use in the
United States if all the applicable
requirements of this part are met.
(c) Any fuel dispensed from a retail
outlet within the geographic boundaries
of the United States is not exempt under
this section.
■ 50. Revise and republish § 1090.650 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.650 Exemptions for distillate global
marine fuel.
(a) Distillate global marine fuel that is
produced, imported, sold, offered for
sale, supplied, offered for supply,
stored, dispensed, or transported for use
in steamships or Category 3 marine
vessels is exempt from the standards in
subpart D of this part when operating
outside of ECA boundaries if all the
following requirements are met:
(1) The fuel must not exceed 0.50
weight percent sulfur (5,000 ppm).
(2) The fuel must be accompanied by
PTDs that meet the requirements of
subpart L of this part.
(3) The fuel must be designated as
distillate global marine fuel.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
51. Amend § 1090.700 by:
a. Revising and republishing
paragraphs (a) and (b); and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (e)(7) and (8).
The revisions and republications read
as follows:
■
■
§ 1090.700 Compliance with average
standards.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
(a) Compliance with the sulfur
average standard. For each of their
facilities, a gasoline manufacturer must
demonstrate compliance with the sulfur
average standard in § 1090.205(a) by
using the equations in paragraphs (a)(1)
and (2) of this section.
(1) Compliance sulfur value
calculation. (i) The compliance sulfur
value is determined as follows:
CSVy = Stot,y + Ds,(y¥1) + DS_Oxy_Total,y ¥
CS
Where:
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for
compliance period y, in ppm-gallons.
Stot,y = Total amount of sulfur produced
during compliance period y, per
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, in
ppm-gallons.
Ds,(y¥1) = Sulfur deficit from compliance
period y–1, per § 1090.715(a)(1), in ppmgallons.
DS_Oxy_Total,y = Total sulfur deficit from
downstream BOB recertification during
compliance period y, per
§ 1090.740(b)(1), in ppm-gallons.
CS = Sulfur credits used by the gasoline
manufacturer, per § 1090.720, in ppmgallons.
(ii) The total amount of sulfur
produced is determined as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
If the calculation of Stot,y results in a
negative number, replace it with zero.
(2) Sulfur compliance calculation. (i)
Compliance with the sulfur average
standard in § 1090.205(a) is achieved if
the following equation is true:
CSVy ≤ Vtot · Sstd
Where:
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for
compliance period y, per paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section, in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
Sstd = Gasoline sulfur average standard, per
§ 1090.205(a), in ppm.
(ii) Compliance with the sulfur
average standard in § 1090.205(a) is not
achieved if a deficit is incurred two or
more consecutive years. A gasoline
manufacturer incurs a deficit under
§ 1090.715 if the following equation is
true:
CSVy > Vtot · Sstd
Where:
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for
compliance period y, per paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section, in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
Sstd = Sulfur average standard, per
§ 1090.205(a), in ppm.
(b) Compliance with the benzene
average standards. For each of their
facilities, a gasoline manufacturer must
demonstrate compliance with the
benzene average standard in
§ 1090.210(a) by using the equations in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section
and with the maximum benzene average
standard in § 1090.210(b) by using the
equations in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of
this section.
(1) Compliance benzene value
calculation. (i) The compliance benzene
value is determined as follows:
CBVy = Bztot,y + DBz,(y¥1) + DBz_Oxy_Total,y
¥ CBz
Where:
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for
compliance period y, in benzene gallons.
Bztot,y = Total amount of benzene produced
during compliance period y, per
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, in
benzene gallons.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
DBz,(y¥1) = Benzene deficit from compliance
period y–1, per § 1090.715(a)(2), in
benzene gallons.
DBz_Oxy_Total,y = Total benzene deficit from
downstream BOB recertification during
compliance period y, per
§ 1090.740(b)(3), in benzene gallons.
CBz = Benzene credits used by the gasoline
manufacturer, per § 1090.720, in benzene
gallons.
(ii) The total amount of benzene
produced is determined as follows:
Where:
Bztot,y = Total amount of benzene produced
during compliance period y, in benzene
gallons.
Vi = Volume of gasoline produced or
imported in batch i, in gallons.
Bzi = Benzene content of batch i, in volume
percent.
i = Individual batch of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period.
n = Number of batches of gasoline produced
or imported during the compliance
period.
If the calculation of Bztot,y results in a
negative number, replace it with zero.
(2) Benzene average compliance
calculation. (i) Compliance with the
benzene average standard in
§ 1090.210(a) is achieved if the
following equation is true:
CBVy ≤ Vtot · Bzavg_std
Where:
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for
compliance period y, per paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, in benzene
gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
Bzavg_std = Benzene average standard, per
§ 1090.210(a), in volume percent.
(ii) Compliance with the benzene
average standard in § 1090.210(a) is not
achieved if a deficit is incurred two or
more consecutive years. A gasoline
manufacturer incurs a deficit under
§ 1090.715 if the following equation is
true:
CBVy > Vtot· Bzavg_std
Where:
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for
compliance period y, per paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, in benzene
gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
Bzavg_std = Benzene average standard, per
§ 1090.210(a), in volume percent.
(3) Average benzene concentration
calculation. The average benzene
concentration is determined as follows:
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
EP28AU24.384
Subpart H—Averaging, Banking, and
Trading Provisions
Where:
Stot,y = Total amount of sulfur produced
during compliance period y, in ppmgallons.
Vi = Volume of gasoline produced or
imported in batch i, in gallons.
Si = Sulfur content of batch i, in ppm.
i = Individual batch of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period.
n = Number of batches of gasoline produced
or imported during the compliance
period.
EP28AU24.383
(4) The fuel must be completely
segregated from non-exempt fuel at all
points in the distribution system.
(5) The fuel must not be used in
vehicles, engines, or equipment other
than in steamships or Category 3 marine
vessels.
(b)(1) Fuel that does not meet the
requirements specified in paragraph (a)
of this section is subject to the
standards, requirements, and
prohibitions that apply for ULSD under
this part.
(2) Any person who produces,
imports, sells, offers for sale, supplies,
offers for supply, stores, dispenses, or
transports distillate global marine fuel
without meeting the applicable
recordkeeping requirements of subpart
M of this part must not claim the fuel
is exempt from the standards,
requirements, and prohibitions that
apply for ULSD under this part.
70071
70072
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
=
Vtot
Where:
Bzavg,y = Average benzene concentration for
compliance period y, in volume percent.
Vi = Volume of gasoline produced or
imported in batch i, in gallons.
Bzi = Benzene content of batch i, in volume
percent.
i = Individual batch of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period.
n = Number of batches of gasoline produced
or imported during the compliance
period.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
(4) Maximum benzene average
compliance calculation. Compliance
with the maximum benzene average
standard in § 1090.210(b) is achieved if
the following equation is true:
Bzavg,y ≤ Bzmax_std
Where:
Bzavg,y = Average benzene concentration for
compliance period y, per paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, in volume percent.
Bzmax_std = Maximum benzene average
standard, per § 1090.210(b), in volume
percent.
(5) Rounding and reporting benzene
values. (i) The total amount of benzene
produced, as calculated in paragraph
(b)(1)(ii) of this section, must be
rounded to the nearest whole benzene
gallon in accordance with § 1090.50.
(ii) The average benzene
concentration, as calculated in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, must be
rounded and reported to two decimal
places in accordance with § 1090.50.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(7) Gasoline imported by rail or truck
using the provisions of § 1090.1610 to
meet the alternative per-gallon
standards of §§ 1090.205(d) and
1090.210(c).
(8) Gasoline exempt under subpart G
of this part from the average standards
in subpart C of this part (e.g., California
gasoline, racing fuel, etc.).
■ 52. Amend § 1090.710 by revising the
introductory text to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1090.710 Downstream oxygenate
accounting.
The requirements of this section
apply to BOB for which a gasoline
manufacturer accounts for the effects of
the oxygenate blending that occurs
downstream of the fuel manufacturing
facility gate in the gasoline
manufacturer’s average standard
compliance calculations under this
subpart. This section also includes
requirements for oxygenate blenders to
ensure that oxygenate is added in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 1090.715
Deficit carryforward.
(a) A gasoline manufacturer incurs a
compliance deficit if they exceed the
average standard specified in subpart C
of this part for a given compliance
period. The deficit incurred must be
determined as specified in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section for sulfur and
paragraph (a)(2) of this section for
benzene.
(1) The sulfur deficit incurred is
determined as follows:
DS,y = CSVy ¥ Vtot · Sstd
Where:
DS,y = Sulfur deficit incurred for compliance
period y, in ppm-gallons.
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for
compliance period y, per
§ 1090.700(a)(1), in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
Sstd = Sulfur average standard, per
§ 1090.205(a), in ppm.
(2) The benzene deficit incurred is
determined as follows:
DBz,y = CBVy ¥ Vtot · Bzavg_std
Where:
DBz,y = Benzene deficit incurred for
compliance period y, in benzene gallons.
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for
compliance period y, per
§ 1090.700(b)(1)(i), in benzene gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
Bzavg_std = Benzene average standard, per
§ 1090.210(a), in volume percent.
*
*
*
*
*
54. Amend § 1090.720 by revising
paragraphs (c)(5) and (d) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1090.720
Credit use.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) A gasoline manufacturer must only
use credits that they own at the time of
use.
(d) Credit reporting. A gasoline
manufacturer that generates, transacts,
or uses credits under this subpart must
submit reports to EPA that include all
information regarding credits as
specified in § 1090.905 using forms and
procedures specified by EPA.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 55. Amend § 1090.725 by revising
paragraphs (a)(2)(vi), (c)(1), (d)(1), and
(f) to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 1090.725
Credit generation.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) Importation of gasoline by rail or
truck using the alternative sampling and
testing requirements in § 1090.1610.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) The number of sulfur credits
generated is determined as follows:
CS,y = Vtot · Sstd ¥ CSVy
Where:
CS,y = Sulfur credits generated for compliance
period y, in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
Sstd = Sulfur average standard, per
§ 1090.205(a), in ppm.
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for
compliance period y, per
§ 1090.700(a)(1), in ppm-gallons.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) The number of benzene credits
generated is determined as follows:
CBz,y = Vtot · Bzavg_std ¥ CBVy
Where:
CBz,y = Benzene credits generated for
compliance period y, in benzene gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
Bzavg_std = Benzene average standard, per
§ 1090.210(a), in volume percent.
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for
compliance period y, per
§ 1090.700(b)(1)(i), in benzene gallons.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Credit generation reporting. A
gasoline manufacturer that generates
credits under this section must submit
reports to EPA that contain all
information regarding credit generation
as specified in § 1090.905 using forms
and procedures specified by EPA.
■ 56. Amend § 1090.730 by revising
paragraphs (f) and (h) to read as follows:
§ 1090.730
Credit transfers.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) No person may transfer credits if
the transfer would cause them to incur
a compliance deficit under § 1090.715.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) The transferor and the transferee
must submit reports to EPA that include
all information regarding the transaction
as specified in § 1090.905 using forms
and procedures specified by EPA.
■ 57. Amend § 1090.735 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 1090.735
actions.
Invalid credits and remedial
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Invalid credits must not be used to
achieve compliance with an average
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
EP28AU24.385
BZavg,y
accordance with the blending
instructions specified by the gasoline
manufacturer in order to ensure fuel
quality standards are met.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 53. Amend § 1090.715 by revising and
republishing paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Ds_Oxy_Total,y
Ds_oxy_Batch,i
Where:
DS_Oxy_Batch,i = Sulfur deficit for batch i of
recertified BOB, in ppm-gallons.
VBOB = Volume of BOB in the batch being
recertified, in gallons.
DS_Oxy_Batch,i = Sulfur deficit for batch i of
recertified BOB, per paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, in ppm-gallons.
i = Individual batch of BOB recertified
during compliance period y.
n = Number of batches of BOB recertified
during compliance period y.
-1)
l
= Veoe. PSV. ( 1- (PTDoxy -ACTUAL
0 xy)
PSV = Presumed sulfur value of recertified
BOB, in ppm. For purposes of this
equation, PSV equals 11 ppm.
PTDOxy = Volume fraction of oxygenate that
would have been added to the BOB as
specified on PTDs.
ACTUALOxy = Volume fraction of oxygenate
that was actually added to the BOB. If no
Dez_Oxy_Total,y
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Where:
DBz_Oxy_Total,y = Total benzene deficit from
downstream BOB recertification during
compliance period y, in benzene gallons.
Dez_oxy_Batch,i
Where:
DBz_Oxy_Batch,i = Benzene deficit for batch i of
recertified BOB, in benzene gallons.
VBOB = Volume of BOB in the batch being
recertified, in gallons.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(2) Sulfur deficits from downstream
BOB recertification. Calculate the sulfur
deficit from BOB recertification for each
individual batch of BOB recertified as
follows:
oxygenate was added to the BOB, then
ACTUALOxy equals 0.
(3) Total benzene deficit from
downstream BOB recertification.
Calculate the total benzene deficit from
downstream BOB recertification for
each facility as follows:
= L~=l Dez_Oxy_Batch,i
DBz_Oxy_Batch,i = Benzene deficit for batch i of
recertified BOB, per paragraph (b)(4) of
this section, in benzene gallons.
i = Individual batch of BOB recertified during
compliance period y.
n = Number of batches of BOB recertified
during compliance period y.
(4) Benzene deficits from downstream
BOB recertification. Calculate the
benzene deficit from BOB recertification
for each individual batch of BOB
recertified as follows:
-1)
l
= Veoe. PBV. ( 1- (PTDoxy -ACTUALoxy)
PBV = Presumed benzene value of recertified
BOB, in volume percent. For purposes of
this equation, PBV equals 0.68 volume
percent.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
PTDOxy = Volume fraction of oxygenate that
would have been added to the BOB as
specified on PTDs.
ACTUALOxy = Volume fraction of oxygenate
that was actually added to the BOB. If no
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
EP28AU24.389
Where:
DS_Oxy_Total,y = Total sulfur deficit from
downstream BOB recertification during
compliance period y, in ppm-gallons.
= L~=l Ds_Oxy_Batch,i
EP28AU24.388
(a) * * *
(2) A gasoline manufacturer must
comply with applicable requirements of
this part and incur deficits to be
conduct an audit under subpart S of this
part. The party must still comply with
all other applicable provisions of this
part (e.g., register and keep records
under subparts I and M of this part,
respectively).
(b) A gasoline manufacturer that
recertifies a BOB under this section
must calculate sulfur and benzene
deficits for each batch and the total
deficits for sulfur and benzene as
follows:
(1) Total sulfur deficit from
downstream BOB recertification.
Calculate the total sulfur deficit from
downstream BOB recertification for
each facility as follows:
EP28AU24.387
§ 1090.740 Downstream BOB
recertification.
included in their compliance
calculations under § 1090.700 for each
facility at which the gasoline
manufacturer recertifies BOB.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) A party that only recertifies BOB
that contains a greater amount of a
specified oxygenate (e.g., a party adds
15 volume percent ethanol instead of 10
volume percent ethanol to an E10 BOB)
or a different oxygenate at an equal or
greater amount (e.g., a party adds 16
volume percent isobutanol instead of 10
volume percent ethanol to an E10 BOB)
does not incur deficits under this
section, does not need to submit reports
under subpart J of this part, and does
not need to arrange for an auditor to
EP28AU24.386
standard specified in subpart C of this
part, regardless of the good faith belief
that the credits were validly generated.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 58. Amend § 1090.740 by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (a)(2) and (4);
and
■ c. Revising and republishing
paragraph (b).
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
70073
70074
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Subpart I—Registration
(a) A gasoline manufacturer must
calculate and report annual average
sulfur and benzene concentrations for
each of their facilities as specified in
this section. The values calculated and
reported under this section are not used
to demonstrate compliance with average
standards under this part.
(b) A gasoline manufacturer must
calculate and report their unadjusted
average sulfur concentration as follows:
Savg,y
=
'\'TI
L,jc=l
(V·S·)
I
I
Where:
Savg,y = Facility unadjusted average sulfur
concentration for compliance period y,
in ppm. Round and report Savg,y to two
decimal places.
Vi = Volume of gasoline produced or
imported in batch i, in gallons.
Si = Sulfur content of batch i, in ppm.
i = Individual batch of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period.
n = Number of batches of gasoline produced
or imported during the compliance
period.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
(c) A gasoline manufacturer must
calculate and report their net average
sulfur concentration as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Snet_avg,y -
CSVy
Vtot
Where:
Snet_avg,y = Facility net average sulfur
concentration for compliance period y,
in ppm. Round and report Snet_avg,y to
two decimal places.
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for
compliance period y, per
§ 1090.700(a)(1), in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
(d) A gasoline manufacturer must
calculate and report their net average
benzene concentration as follows:
CBV
Bnet_avg,y - Vtot
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
60. Amend § 1090.800 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.800
*
*
*
*
(d) RCO submission. Registration
information must be submitted by the
RCO. The RCO may delegate
responsibility to a person who is
familiar with the requirements of this
part and who is no lower in the
organization than a fuel manufacturing
facility manager, or equivalent.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 61. Amend § 1090.805 by revising and
republishing paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Contents of registration.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Additional information required
for certified pentane producers. In
addition to the information in paragraph
(a) of this section, a certified pentane
producer must also submit the following
information:
(1) A description of the certified
pentane production facility that
demonstrates that the facility is capable
of producing certified pentane that is
compliant with the requirements of this
part without significant modifications to
the existing facility.
(2) A description of how certified
pentane will be shipped from the
certified pentane production facility to
the certified pentane blender(s) and the
associated quality assurance practices
that demonstrate that contamination
during distribution can be adequately
controlled so as not to cause certified
pentane to be in violation of the
standards in this part.
■ 62. Amend § 1090.815 by revising
paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
§ 1090.815 Deactivation (involuntary
cancellation) of registration.
(a) * * *
(4) Any required attestation
engagement report has not been
received within 30 days of the required
submission date.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 63. Amend § 1090.820 by revising
paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) A letter, signed by the RCO from
the company that currently owns or will
own the company or facility and, if
possible, documentation from the
company that previously registered the
company or facility that details the
effective date of the transfer of
ownership of the company or facility
and summarizes any changes to the
registration information.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart J—Reporting
General provisions.
*
§ 1090.805
Changes of ownership.
*
64. Amend § 1090.900 by revising
paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.900
General provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Report deadlines. All annual,
batch, and credit transaction reports
required under this subpart, except
attestation engagement reports, must be
submitted by March 31 for the
preceding compliance period (e.g.,
reports covering the calendar year 2021
must be submitted to EPA by no later
than March 31, 2022). Attestation
engagement reports must be submitted
by June 1 for the preceding compliance
period (e.g., attestation engagement
reports covering calendar year 2021
must be submitted to EPA by no later
than June 1, 2022). Independent survey
quarterly reports must be submitted by
the deadlines in Table 1 to paragraph
(a)(4) in § 1090.925.
(d) RCO submission. Reports must be
signed and submitted by the RCO or
their delegate.
■ 65. Amend § 1090.905 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading;
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a)(2)(iv)(E),
(b)(2)(vi)(E), (c)(1)(viii)(A), (c)(2)(ii) and
(iii), and (c)(2)(viii)(A);
■ c. Removing paragraph (c)(3)(i)(H) and
redesignating paragraphs (c)(3)(i)(I) and
(J) as paragraphs (c)(3)(i)(H) and (I); and
■ d. Revising paragraphs (c)(4)
introductory text, (c)(5)(i)(E), and
(c)(8)(vii)(A).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1090.905 Reports by gasoline
manufacturers.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) * * *
(E) The total sulfur deficit from
downstream BOB recertification, per
§ 1090.740(b)(1).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) * * *
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
EP28AU24.392
§ 1090.745 Informational annual average
calculations.
§ 1090.820
EP28AU24.391
(5) Deficit rounding. The deficits
calculated in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(4) of this section must be rounded and
reported to the nearest sulfur ppmgallon or benzene gallon in accordance
with § 1090.50, as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 59. Revise and republish § 1090.745 to
read as follows:
Where:
Bnet_avg,y = Facility net average benzene
concentration for compliance period y,
in volume percent. Round and report
Bnet_avg,y to two decimal places.
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for
compliance period y, per
§ 1090.700(b)(1)(i), in benzene gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or
imported during the compliance period,
in gallons.
EP28AU24.390
oxygenate was added to the BOB, then
ACTUALOxy equals 0.
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(E) The total benzene deficit from
downstream BOB recertification, per
§ 1090.740(b)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) * * *
(A) The applicable RVP standard, as
specified in § 1090.215, and whether the
ethanol 1.0 psi waiver under
§ 1090.215(b) applies.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(ii) The batch number.
(iii) The date the batch was produced
or imported.
*
*
*
*
*
(viii) * * *
(A) The applicable RVP standard, as
specified in § 1090.215, and whether the
ethanol 1.0 psi waiver under
§ 1090.215(b) applies, for the neat
CBOB, or hand blend of RBOB and
oxygenate prepared under § 1090.1340.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) For blendstock(s) added to PCG by
a gasoline manufacturer complying by
addition under § 1090.1320(a)(2), report
each blendstock as a separate batch and
all the following information:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) The volume percentage of butane
in batches of butane, or pentane in
batches of pentane, provided by the
certified butane or certified pentane
supplier.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * *
(vii) * * *
(A) The applicable RVP standard, as
specified in § 1090.215, and whether the
ethanol 1.0 psi waiver under
§ 1090.215(b) applies.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 66. Amend § 1090.910 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading; and
■ b. Revising the introductory text and
paragraphs (a)(1)(ix) and (x).
The revisions read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1090.910 Reports by gasoline
manufacturers that recertify BOB to
gasoline.
A gasoline manufacturer that
recertifies BOB under § 1090.740 must
report the information of this section, as
applicable.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(ix) The sulfur deficit for the batch
calculated under § 1090.740(b)(2).
(x) The benzene deficit for the batch
calculated under § 1090.740(b)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 67. Amend § 1090.915 by:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
70075
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) The sulfur content of the batch, in
ppm, and the method used to determine
the sulfur content.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 68. Amend § 1090.925 by revising
paragraphs (b)(3) introductory text and
(c)(3)(ii) through (iv) to read as follows:
(d) A single attestation engagement
report submission by the auditor may
include procedures performed under
this part and under 40 CFR part 80,
subpart M. If a single submission
method is used, the auditor must clearly
and separately describe the procedures
and findings for each program.
(e) The auditor must submit written
acknowledgement from the RCO that the
gasoline manufacturer has reviewed the
attestation engagement report.
■ 70. Amend § 1090.935 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1) introductory text and
(a)(1)(i) to read as follows:
§ 1090.925 Reports by independent
surveyors.
§ 1090.935 Reports by diesel fuel
manufacturers.
*
(a) * * *
(1) For each compliance period, a
diesel fuel manufacturer that produces
ULSD must submit the following
information:
(i) The EPA-issued company and
facility identifiers for the diesel fuel
manufacturer.
*
*
*
*
*
■
■
a. Revising the section heading; and
b. Revising paragraph (c)(5).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1090.915 Reports by oxygenate
producers and importers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) For each diesel fuel sample
collected at a retail outlet by the
independent surveyor:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) The mean, median, and range
expressed in appropriate units for each
measured fuel parameter.
(iii) The standard deviation for each
measured fuel parameter.
(iv) The estimated compliance rate for
each measured fuel parameter subject to
a per-gallon standard in subpart C or D
of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 69. Revise and republish § 1090.930 to
read as follows:
§ 1090.930
Reports by auditors.
(a) Attestation engagement reports
required under subpart S of this part
must be submitted by an independent
auditor registered with EPA and
associated with a company, or
companies, through registration under
subpart I of this part. Each attestation
engagement report must clearly identify
the company and compliance level (e.g.,
facility), time period, and scope covered
by the report. Attestation engagement
reports covered by this section include
those required under this part and those
required under 40 CFR part 80, subpart
M, beginning with the report due June
1, 2022.
(b) An attestation engagement report
must be submitted to EPA covering each
compliance period by June 1 of the
following calendar year. The auditor
must make the attestation engagement
report available to the company for
which it was performed.
(c) The attestation engagement must
comply with subpart S of this part and
the attestation engagement report must
clearly identify the methodologies
followed and any findings, exceptions,
and variances.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Subpart K—Batch Certification and
Designation
71. Amend § 1090.1000 by revising
paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (b)(4) introductory
text, (b)(5), (c)(2)(ii), and (e)(2)(i)(A) to
read as follows:
■
§ 1090.1000 Batch certification
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Ensure that each batch of gasoline
meets the applicable requirements of
subpart C of this part using the
applicable procedures specified in
subpart N of this part. A transmix
processor must also meet all applicable
requirements of subpart F of this part to
ensure that each batch of gasoline meets
the applicable requirements of subpart C
of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Any person who mixes summer
gasoline with summer or winter
gasoline that has a different designation
must comply with one of the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Any person who mixes summer
gasoline with winter gasoline to
transition any storage tank from winter
to summer gasoline is exempt from the
requirement in paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of
this section but must ensure that the
gasoline meets the applicable RVP
standard in § 1090.215.
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Ensure that each batch of diesel
fuel or ECA marine fuel meets the
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70076
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
applicable requirements of subpart D of
this part using the applicable
procedures specified in subpart N of
this part. A transmix processor must
also meet all applicable requirements
specified in subpart F of this part to
ensure that each batch of diesel fuel or
ECA marine fuel meets the applicable
requirements of subpart D of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Testing must occur after the most
recent delivery into the certified butane
producer’s storage tank, before
transferring the certified butane batch
for delivery.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 72. Amend § 1090.1005 by revising
the section heading to read as follows:
§ 1090.1005 Designation of batches of fuel,
fuel additive, and regulated blendstock.
*
*
*
*
*
73. Amend § 1090.1010 by revising
paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.1010 Designation requirements for
gasoline and regulated blendstocks.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) The name of the specific oxygenate
(e.g., isobutanol).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 74. Amend § 1090.1015 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading; and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a)
introductory text, (b) introductory text,
and (b)(3)(iii) through (v).
The revisions read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1090.1015 Designation requirements for
diesel fuel and distillate fuel.
(a) Designation requirements for
diesel fuel and distillate fuel
manufacturers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Designation requirements for
distributors of diesel fuel and distillate
fuel. A distributor of diesel fuel or
distillate fuel must accurately and
clearly designate each batch of diesel
fuel or distillate fuel for which they
transfer custody as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(iii) California diesel fuel may be
redesignated as ULSD if the
requirements specified in § 1090.625(e)
are met.
(iv) Heating oil, kerosene, ECA marine
fuel, or jet fuel may be redesignated as
ULSD if it meets the ULSD standards in
§ 1090.305 and was designated as ULSD
under paragraph (a) of this section.
(v) 500 ppm LM diesel fuel may be
redesignated as ECA marine fuel,
distillate global marine fuel, or heating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
oil. Any person who redesignates 500
ppm LM diesel fuel to ECA marine fuel
or distillate global marine fuel must
maintain records from the producer of
the 500 ppm LM diesel fuel (i.e., PTDs
accompanying the fuel under
§ 1090.1115) to demonstrate compliance
with the 500 ppm sulfur standard in
§ 1090.320(b).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart L—Product Transfer
Documents
75. Amend § 1090.1100 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.1100
General requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Part 80 PTD requirements. For any
product subject to 40 CFR part 80,
subpart M, a party must also include the
applicable PTD information required
under 40 CFR 80.1453.
■ 76. Revise and republish § 1090.1105
to read as follows:
§ 1090.1105 PTD requirements for exempt
fuel, fuel additive, and regulated
blendstock.
(a) In addition to the information
required under § 1090.1100, on each
occasion when any person transfers
custody or title to any exempt fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock under
subpart G of this part, other than when
the exempt fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock is sold or
dispensed to the ultimate end user at a
retail outlet or WPC facility, the
transferor must provide the transferee
PTDs that include the following
statements, as applicable:
(1) National security exemption
language. For fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock with a national
security exemption specified in
§ 1090.605: ‘‘This fuel is for use in
vehicles, engines, or equipment under
an EPA-approved national security
exemption only.’’
(2) R&D exemption language. For fuel,
fuel additive, or regulated blendstock
used for an R&D program specified in
§ 1090.610: ‘‘This fuel is for use in
research, development, and test
programs only.’’
(3) Racing fuel language. For fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock used
for racing purposes specified in
§ 1090.615: ‘‘This fuel is for racing
purposes only.’’
(4) Aviation fuel language. For fuel,
fuel additive, or regulated blendstock
used in aircraft specified in § 1090.615:
‘‘This fuel is for aviation use only.’’
(5) Territory fuel exemption language.
For fuel for use in American Samoa,
Guam, or the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands specified in
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 1090.620: ‘‘This fuel is for use only in
Guam, American Samoa, or the
Northern Mariana Islands.’’
(6) California gasoline language. For
California gasoline specified in
§ 1090.625: ‘‘California gasoline’’.
(7) California diesel fuel language. For
California diesel fuel specified in
§ 1090.625: ‘‘California diesel fuel’’.
(8) Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and
U.S. Virgin Islands summer gasoline
language. For summer gasoline for use
in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or the
U.S. Virgin Islands specified in
§ 1090.630: ‘‘This summer gasoline is
for use only in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto
Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands.’’
(9) Exported fuel language. For
exported fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock specified in § 1090.645:
‘‘This fuel is for export from the United
States only.’’
(b) In statements required by
paragraph (a) of this section, where
‘‘fuel’’ is designated in a statement, the
specific fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock type (e.g., ‘‘diesel fuel’’ or
‘‘gasoline’’) may be used in place of the
word ‘‘fuel’’.
■ 77. Amend § 1090.1110 by revising
paragraphs (b)(2)(i) introductory text,
(c)(1)(i) introductory text, and (e) to read
as follows:
§ 1090.1110 PTD requirements for
gasoline, gasoline additives, and gasoline
regulated blendstocks.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Except as specified in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section, for batches of
summer BOB, identification of the
product with one of the following
statements indicating the applicable
RVP standard, as specified in
§ 1090.215:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as specified in paragraph
(c)(1)(ii) of this section, for summer
gasoline, identification of the product
with one of the following statements
indicating the applicable RVP standard,
as specified in § 1090.215:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Gasoline detergent language
requirements. (1) In addition to any
other PTD requirements of this subpart,
on each occasion when any person
transfers custody or title to any gasoline
detergent, the transferor must provide to
the transferee PTDs that include the
following information:
(i) The identity of the product being
transferred as detergent.
(ii) The name of the registered
detergent must be used to identify the
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
detergent additive package on its PTD
and the LAC on the PTD must be
consistent with the requirements in
§ 1090.260.
(2) In addition to any other PTD
requirements of this subpart, on each
occasion when any person transfers
custody or title to any gasoline, the
transferor must provide to the transferee
PTDs that include the following
information:
(i) The identify of the gasoline being
transferred as detergent-additized
gasoline or non-detergent-additized
gasoline.
(ii) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 78. Amend § 1090.1115 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading; and
■ b. Revising paragraph (a).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1090.1115 PTD requirements for distillate
fuel and residual fuel.
(a) General requirements. On each
occasion when any person transfers
custody or title of any distillate fuel or
residual fuel, other than when fuel is
sold or dispensed to the ultimate end
user at a retail outlet or WPC facility,
the transferor must provide the
transferee PTDs that include the
following information:
(1) The sulfur per-gallon standard that
the transferor represents the distillate
fuel or residual fuel to meet under
subpart D of this part (e.g., 15 ppm
sulfur for ULSD or 1,000 ppm sulfur for
ECA marine fuel).
(2) An accurate and clear statement of
the applicable designation(s) of the
distillate fuel or residual fuel under
§ 1090.1015 (e.g., ‘‘ULSD’’, ‘‘500 ppm
LM diesel fuel’’, or ‘‘ECA marine fuel’’).
(3) If the distillate fuel or residual fuel
does not meet the sulfur standard in
§ 1090.305(b) for ULSD, the following
statement: ‘‘Not for use in highway
vehicles or engines or nonroad,
locomotive, or marine engines.’’
*
*
*
*
*
■ 79. Amend § 1090.1120 by revising
paragraph (b)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1090.1120 PTD requirements for diesel
fuel additives.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) The contribution to the sulfur
content of the diesel fuel, in ppm, that
would result if the diesel fuel additive
package is used at the maximum
recommended concentration.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
Subpart M—Recordkeeping
80. Amend § 1090.1205 by revising
paragraphs (c) introductory text and
(c)(1) through (4) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.1205 Recordkeeping requirements
for all regulated parties.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Sampling and testing. Any party
that performs any sampling and testing
on any fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock must keep records of the
following information for each sample
collected:
(1) The date, time, location, and
identification of the storage tank, railcar,
truck, or vessel from which the sample
was collected.
(2) The name and title of the person
who collected the sample and the
person who performed the test.
(3) The results of all tests, including
where more than one test is performed,
as originally printed by the testing
apparatus, or where no printed result is
produced, the results as originally
recorded by the person that performed
the test.
(4) The test methodology used.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 81. Amend § 1090.1210 by revising
paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
§ 1090.1210 Recordkeeping requirements
for gasoline manufacturers.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Records that reflect the storage and
movement of the PCG or TGP and
blendstock within the gasoline
manufacturing facility to the point such
PCG or TGP is used to produce gasoline
or BOB.
(2) * * *
(i) The results of tests to determine
the sulfur content, benzene content,
oxygenate(s) content, and in the
summer, RVP, for the PCG or TGP and
volume of the PCG or TGP when
received at the gasoline manufacturing
facility.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 82. Amend § 1090.1215 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b) introductory text, and
(c) introductory text to read as follows:
§ 1090.1215 Recordkeeping requirements
for diesel fuel, ECA marine fuel, and
distillate global marine fuel manufacturers.
(a) Overview. In addition to the
requirements in § 1090.1205, a diesel
fuel, ECA marine fuel, or distillate
global marine fuel manufacturer must
keep records for each of their facilities
that include the information in this
section.
(b) Diesel fuel and ECA marine fuel
records. For each batch of ULSD, 500
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70077
ppm LM diesel fuel, or ECA marine fuel,
a diesel fuel or ECA marine fuel
manufacturer must keep records of the
following information:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Distillate global marine fuel
records. For distillate global marine
fuel, a distillate global marine fuel
manufacturer must keep records of the
following information:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 83. Amend § 1090.1230 by revising
paragraph (b)(8) to read as follows:
§ 1090.1230 Recordkeeping requirements
for oxygenate producers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) The neat ethanol production
quality control records or the test results
on the neat ethanol, as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 84. Amend § 1090.1240 by revising
paragraphs (b)(2)(i), (b)(2)(ii)(B), and
(b)(2)(vi) to read as follows:
§ 1090.1240 Recordkeeping requirements
for gasoline detergent blenders.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The dates of the VAR period.
(ii) * * *
(B) For a facility that uses a gauge to
measure the inventory of the detergent
storage tank, the total volume of
detergent must be calculated as follows:
VD = DIi ¥ DIf + DIa ¥ DIw
Where:
VD = Volume of detergent, in gallons.
DIi = Initial detergent inventory of the tank,
in gallons.
DIf = Final detergent inventory of the tank,
in gallons.
DIa = Sum of any additions to detergent
inventory, in gallons.
DIw = Sum of any withdrawals from detergent
inventory for purposes other than the
additization of gasoline, in gallons.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) If the detergent injector is set
below the applicable LAC, or adjusted
by more than 10 percent above the
concentration initially set in the VAR
period, documentation establishing that
the purpose of the change is to correct
a batch misadditization prior to the end
of the VAR period and prior to the
transfer of the batch to another party or
to correct an equipment malfunction
and the date and adjustments of the
correction.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 85. Amend § 1090.1245 by revising
paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
§ 1090.1245 Recordkeeping requirements
for independent surveyors.
*
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
*
*
28AUP2
*
*
70078
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(b) * * *
(2) Records related to a geographically
focused E15 survey program under
§ 1090.1420(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 86. Amend § 1090.1250 by revising
paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
§ 1090.1250 Recordkeeping requirements
for auditors.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Copies of each attestation
engagement report prepared and all
related records developed to prepare
each report.
■ 87. Amend § 1090.1255 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading; and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a), (c)(4), and
(d).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1090.1255 Recordkeeping requirements
for transmix, 500 ppm LM diesel fuel, and
pipeline interface.
(a) Overview. In addition to the
requirements in § 1090.1205, a transmix
processor, transmix blender, transmix
distributor, manufacturer or distributor
of 500 ppm LM diesel fuel using
transmix, or pipeline operator must
keep records that include the
information in this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) Documents or information that
demonstrates that the 500 ppm LM
diesel fuel was only used in locomotive
or marine engines that are not required
to use ULSD under 40 CFR 1033.815 or
40 CFR 1042.660, respectively.
(d) Pipeline interface. A pipeline
operator must keep records that
demonstrate compliance with the
pipeline interface handling practices in
§ 1090.520.
Subpart N—Sampling, Testing, and
Retention
88. Amend § 1090.1300 by revising
paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1090.1300
General provisions.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) If you need to meet requirements
for a quality assurance program at a
minimum frequency, the first shipment
of product you receive from each
distributor triggers the testing
requirement for that distributor. Perform
testing with the first shipment of
product to demonstrate compliance for
the testing period. The following
example illustrates the requirements for
testing based on sampling the more
frequent of every 90 days or 500,000
gallons of certified butane you receive
from each distributor:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(1) If you receive an initial shipment
of certified butane from a distributor on
March 1, perform testing on that batch
to show that it meets standards. A
passing result qualifies all further
shipments of certified butane from that
distributor until May 29, as long as you
receive less than 500,000 gallons of
certified butane from that distributor
during those 90 days. In that case, the
testing period ends May 29 and the next
testing period starts when you receive
another shipment of certified butane
from that distributor on or after May 30.
(2) If you receive a shipment from that
distributor before May 29 that that
causes the total volume of certified
butane from that distributor to exceed
500,000 gallons over the testing period,
the date that batch is received
represents the end of the testing period.
The next testing period starts when you
receive another shipment of certified
butane from that distributor.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Anyone performing tests under
this subpart must apply good laboratory
practices for all sampling, measurement,
and calculations related to testing
required under this part. This requires
performing these procedures in a way
that is consistent with generally
accepted scientific and engineering
principles and properly accounting for
all available relevant information. The
following examples illustrate how to
apply good laboratory practices:
(1) You may exclude outlier data
points for quality testing under
§ 1090.1375 as specified in ASTM
D6299 (incorporated by reference in
§ 1090.95), subject to the following
requirements:
(i) The justification for exclusion must
be an assignable cause that is not part
of the normal process and does not
result from common causes.
(ii) You must meet requirements for
documenting and supporting exclusion
of data points as specified in
§ 1090.1375(a)(5).
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 89. Amend § 1090.1310 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (b) introductory
text; and
■ b. Adding paragraph (f).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 1090.1310 Testing to demonstrate
compliance with standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) A fuel manufacturer, fuel additive
manufacturer, or regulated blendstock
producer must perform the following
measurements before fuel, fuel additive,
or regulated blendstock from a given
batch leaves the facility, except as
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
specified in paragraph (f) of this section
and § 1090.1315:
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Refiners and blending
manufacturers may meet the testing
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section by loading gasoline or diesel
fuel onto a marine vessel, subject to the
following conditions:
(1) The marine vessel remains within
15 miles of the fuel manufacturing
facility after loading.
(2) Each vessel compartment is
sampled for meeting certification testing
requirements as specified in
§ 1090.1605(b)(1).
(3) No additional loading occurs after
sampling is complete.
(4) The refiner or blending
manufacturer ensures that the fuel
meets all applicable per-gallon
standards before the fuel leaves the area
specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section.
■ 90. Amend § 1090.1315 by:
■ a. Revising the introductory text and
paragraph (a) introductory text;
■ b. Adding paragraphs (a)(7) through
(14); and
■ c. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1090.1315
In-line blending.
A fuel manufacturer using in-line
blending equipment may qualify for a
waiver from the requirement in
§ 1090.1310(b) to test every batch of fuel
before the fuel leaves the fuel
manufacturing facility. This section
describes in-line blending waiver
provisions that apply instead of or in
addition to the requirements in
§ 1090.1335(c).
(a) Submit a request signed by the
RCO, or their delegate, to EPA with the
following information:
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Describe which blendstock
parameters you intend to measure for
managing the blending process and the
typical sampling frequency for those
measurements.
(8) Describe any circumstances in
which it is not possible to achieve a
sampling frequency corresponding to a
margin of error of 0.01. Also describe
how you will adjust target values to
account for the greater measurement
variability. For example, if the greater
margin of error corresponds to a 2
percent increase in measurement
variability, adjust measured values of all
parameters subject to per-gallon and
average standards upward by 2 percent.
(9) Describe an alternative sampling
plan to meet requirements to test head,
middle, and tail samples for small
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
batches. Your alternative sampling plan
may allow you to collect a single sample
anytime during the blend for a batch
involving up to 8 hours of blending or
up to 1 million gallons of fuel, and it
may allow you to collect two evenly
distributed samples during the blend for
a batch involving up to 16 hours of
blending or up to 2 million gallons of
fuel.
(10) Describe your plans to meet
requirements to test head, middle, and
tail samples in cases where unforeseen
circumstances cause the batch to be
complete before blending the
anticipated batch volume. Any failure to
perform required tests must not occur in
more than 10 percent of in-line blending
batches for the calendar year.
(11) Describe contingency plans for
alternative sampling and testing in cases
involving failure of the automatic
compositor or other essential
equipment. Where possible, include
collecting a second composite sample
with a redundant system.
(12) Describe any contingency plans
for an alternative sampling
demonstration if an automatic sampling
test result fails to meet a per-gallon
standard. Your plan may include
certifying the batch based on manual
sampling in a tank if you collect the
whole batch in the tank before it leaves
the fuel manufacturing facility gate.
Similarly, as long as the fuel remains at
the facility, you may certify the batch
based on secondary automatic sampling
as fuel comes out of a holding tank that
you use to collect the fuel that failed to
meet a per-gallon standard.
(13) In the case of in-line blending
into a marine vessel, describe an
alternative, equivalent method for
meeting the requirement in
§ 1090.1335(c)(4) to collect headmiddle-tail samples.
(14) Include the following statement:
‘‘The information in this submission is
true, accurate, and complete to the best
of my knowledge. I am aware that there
are significant civil and criminal
penalties for submitting false,
misleading, or incomplete information.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The following provisions apply for
amending an approved waiver under
this section:
(1) You must submit an updated
waiver request to EPA 60 days before
making any material change to your inline blending process. Examples of
material changes include changing
analyzer hardware or programming,
changing the location of the analyzer,
changing the piping configuration,
changing the mixing control hardware
or programming logic, changing sample
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
compositors or compositor settings, or
expanding fuel blending capacity.
Changing the name of the company or
business unit is an example of a change
that is not material.
(2) The request must include a
description of the intended changes and
a comparison document that clearly and
comprehensively identifies the
proposed changes to the waiver. The
request must also include the statement
in paragraph (a)(14) of this section.
(3) Your request to amend a waiver
under this section is deemed to be
approved effective 60 days after EPA
acknowledges receiving the request if
there is no EPA response to the request.
Such a response may be in the form of
denying the request, identifying
deficiencies, or requiring additional
information. If we require that you
correct a deficiency or submit additional
information, your waiver request is
deemed to be approved effective 60 days
after EPA acknowledges receiving the
responsive submission.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 91. Amend § 1090.1320 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a) introductory
text;
■ b. Revising and republishing
paragraph (a)(1)(i);
■ c. Revising paragraphs (b)
introductory text and (b)(1);
■ d. Adding paragraphs (b)(5) and (6);
and
■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
The revisions, republication, and
additions read as follows:
§ 1090.1320
Adding blendstock to PCG.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Sample and test using one of the
following methods to exclude PCG from
the compliance demonstration for sulfur
content and benzene content:
(1) * * *
(i) Determine the sulfur content,
benzene content, and oxygenate content
of the PCG before blending blendstocks
to produce a new batch of gasoline as
follows:
(A) Sample and test the sulfur
content, benzene content, and oxygenate
content of each batch of PCG using the
procedures in § 1090.1350. Demonstrate
homogeneity as specified in § 1090.1337
if blending involves multiple batches of
PCG, or if a single batch of PCG was
certified without demonstrating
homogeneity under § 1090.1337(a)(4).
The blending manufacturer does not
need to test PCG for oxygenate content
if they can demonstrate that the PCG
does not contain oxygenates as specified
in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(C) of this section
or § 1090.1310(e)(1).
(B) If the PCG is a BOB and the
blending manufacturer is accounting for
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70079
downstream oxygenate under
§ 1090.710, also prepare a hand blend
under § 1090.1340 and test the hand
blend for sulfur content and benzene
content.
(C) The blending manufacturer may
use the PCG manufacturer’s certification
test results if the PCG was received
directly from the PCG manufacturer by
an in-tank transfer or tank-to-tank
transfer within the same terminal as
long as the results are from the PCG that
is being transferred.
(D) If you are unable to measure a
PCG parameter, you must comply using
either the presumed value for the PCG
volume or an EPA-approved alternative
value as described in § 1090.1710(g).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) A certified butane or certified
pentane blender that blends certified
butane or certified pentane into PCG,
other than Summer RFG or Summer
RBOB, to make a new batch of gasoline
may comply with the following
requirements instead of the
requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section:
(1) For summer gasoline, measure the
RVP of the blended fuel. The fuel
manufacturer may rely on test results
from the certified butane or certified
pentane producer for sulfur content and
benzene content.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) If the quality assurance testing
under paragraph (b)(4) of this section
shows that certified butane or certified
pentane fails to meet one or more of the
standards specified in § 1090.250 or
§ 1090.255, the certified butane or
certified pentane received from that
distributor during that testing period is
deemed to be in violation of the relevant
per-gallon standard. Any later shipment
of certified butane or certified pentane
received from that distributor will also
be deemed to be in violation of the
relevant per-gallon standard unless
another quality assurance test is
conducted demonstrating that certified
butane or certified pentane received
from that distributor meets the
standards specified in § 1090.250 or
§ 1090.255.
(6) If certified butane or certified
pentane is deemed to be in violation
under paragraph (b)(5) of this section,
the certified butane or certified pentane
blender must calculate its compliance
obligations using paragraph (a)(2) of this
section using the test results from the
quality assurance program and obtain
any necessary sulfur or benzene credits.
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70080
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(1) Calculate and incur sulfur and
benzene deficits under the BOB
recertification provisions of § 1090.740.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 92. Revise and republish § 1090.1335
to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1090.1335 Collecting, preparing, and
testing samples.
(a) General provisions. Use good
laboratory practice to collect samples to
represent the batch you are testing. For
example, take steps to ensure that a
batch is always well mixed before
sampling. Also, always take steps to
prevent sample contamination, such as
completely flushing sampling taps and
piping and pre-rinsing sample
containers with the product being
sampled. Follow the procedures in
paragraph (b) of this section for manual
sampling. Follow the procedures in
paragraph (c) of this section for
automatic sampling. Additional
requirements for measuring RVP are
specified in paragraph (d) of this
section. A description of how to
determine compliance based on single
or multiple tests on single or multiple
samples is specified in paragraph (e) of
this section.
(b) Manual sampling. Perform manual
sampling using one of the methods
specified in ASTM D4057 (incorporated
by reference in § 1090.95) to
demonstrate compliance with standards
as follows:
(1) Collect a ‘‘running’’ or ‘‘all-levels’’
sample from the top of the tank.
Drawing a sample from a standpipe is
acceptable only if it is slotted or
perforated to ensure that the drawn
sample properly represents the whole
batch.
(2) Use tap sampling (or other spot
sampling) to collect upper, middle, and
lower samples. Collect samples that
most closely match the
recommendations in ASTM D4057.
Adjust spot sampling for partially filled
tanks as shown in Table 1, Table 5, or
Table 6 of ASTM D4057, as applicable.
(3) If the procedures in paragraphs
(b)(1) and (2) of this section are
impractical for a given storage
configuration, you may use alternative
sampling procedures as specified in
ASTM D4057. This applies primarily for
sampling with railcars, trucks, retail
outlets, and other downstream
locations.
(4) Test results with manual sampling
are valid only after you demonstrate
homogeneity as specified in
§ 1090.1337. Once a batch meets
homogeneity specifications, you may
use any properly drawn sample to
represent the batch, subject to the handblending provisions of § 1090.1340. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
entire batch volume is noncompliant if
a sample fails to meet any applicable
per-gallon standard.
(5) Except as specified for marine
vessels in § 1090.1605, you must not do
certification testing with a composite
sample from manual sampling.
(c) Automatic sampling. Perform
automatic sampling as specified in
ASTM D4177 (incorporated by reference
in § 1090.95), with the additional
provisions specified in this paragraph
(c). Automatic sampling is intended to
apply for in-line blending, including
configurations that involve a pipeline
filling a tank that will be certified as
compliant before it leaves the fuel
manufacturing facility gate.
(1) Follow all specifications for
automatic sampling in this paragraph (c)
unless EPA approves an in-line
blending waiver that authorizes specific
exceptions under § 1090.1315.
(2) Configure the system to ensure a
well-mixed stream at the sampling
point. Align the start and end of
sampling with the start and end of
creating the batch.
(3) Set a sampling frequency based on
collecting 9,604 grabs or a smaller
number of grabs that achieves a margin
of error of 0.01 or less as specified in
Section 19.1.3 of ASTM D4177;
however, less frequent sampling is
acceptable as long as the interval
between samples does not exceed 20
seconds throughout the batch. Keep
records to show that the sampling
frequency meets specifications.
(4) Collect three samples for
individual measurements in addition to
the composite sample. Draw head,
middle, and tail samples that come from
the initial, middle, and final thirds of
the estimated batch volume,
respectively.
(5) If the composite sample fails to
meet any applicable per-gallon
standard, the entire batch volume is
noncompliant. If one or more separate
samples fail to meet any applicable pergallon standard, the volume of
noncompliant fuel is the volume
starting with the last valid passing result
before the failing result (or the start of
the batch), up to the first valid passing
result after the failing result (or the end
of the batch).
(6) EPA may approve a different
sampling strategy under an approved inline blending waiver under § 1090.1315
if it is appropriate for a given facility or
for a small-volume batch.
(d) Sampling provisions related to
measuring RVP of summer gasoline. The
following additional provisions apply
for preparing samples to measure the
RVP of summer gasoline:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(1) Meet the additional specifications
for manual and automatic sampling in
ASTM D5842 (incorporated by reference
in § 1090.95).
(2) If you measure other fuel
parameters for a given sample in
addition to RVP testing, always measure
RVP first.
(e) Testing and reporting to
demonstrate compliance with
standards. Perform testing as specified
in this subpart and report values to
demonstrate compliance with per-gallon
and average standards as follows:
(1) For parameters subject to pergallon standards, report the highest
measured value (or the lowest measured
value for testing related to cetane index
or other parameters that are subject to a
standard representing a minimum
value). This applies for repeat tests on
a given sample and for testing multiple
samples (including head, middle, and
tail samples from automatic sampling).
(2) In the case of automatic sampling
for parameters subject to average
standards, report the result from the
composite sample to represent the batch
for demonstrating compliance with the
average standard. For any repeat testing
with the composite sample, calculate
the arithmetic average from all tests to
represent the batch.
(3) In the case of manual sampling for
parameters subject to average standards,
determine the value representing the
batch as follows:
(i) For testing with only a single
sample, report that value to represent
the batch. If there are repeat tests with
that sample, report the arithmetic
average from all tests to represent the
sample.
(ii) For testing with more than one
sample, report the arithmetic average
from all tested samples to represent the
batch. If there are repeat tests for any
sample, calculate the arithmetic average
of those repeat tests to determine a
single value to represent that sample
before calculating the average value to
represent the batch.
■ 93. Revise and republish § 1090.1337
to read as follows:
§ 1090.1337
Demonstrating homogeneity.
(a) Certification test results
corresponding to manual sampling as
specified in § 1090.1335(b) are valid
only if collected samples meet the
homogeneity specifications in this
section, except that the homogeneity
testing requirement does not apply in
the following cases:
(1) There is only a single sample using
the procedure specified in
§ 1090.1335(b)(2).
(2) Upright cylindrical tanks that have
a liquid depth of less than 10 feet.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(3) Horizontal tanks with circular or
elliptical cross section with a volume
less than 42,000 gallons used for storing
ethanol denaturant. Draw samples from
the approximate mid-depth of the
product level.
(4) You draw spot samples as
specified in paragraph (c) of this
section, test each sample for every
parameter subject to a testing
requirement, and use the worst-case test
result for each parameter for purposes of
reporting, meeting per-gallon and
average standards, and all other aspects
of compliance.
(5) Your tank configuration depends
on roof sampling for homogeneity
demonstration, but inclement weather
prevents collecting roof samples and
EPA has already approved a plan for a
mixing procedure to ensure a
homogeneous batch for your specific
tank configuration. EPA approval of the
mixing procedure will include
consideration of product type, fill level,
and other relevant parameters for
specific tank configurations and batch
characteristics. Keep records to
document EPA approval of the mixing
procedure, your actions to follow the
approved mixing procedure, and the
forcing weather event.
(6) Sampling occurs at a downstream
location where it is not possible to
collect separate samples and steps are
taken to ensure that the batch is well
mixed.
(7) The product being tested is
certified butane or certified pentane.
(b) Any test to establish homogeneity
is considered a certification test relative
to a per-gallon standard for a given
parameter if the test result is the worstcase value from all testing performed for
the batch. Report the highest measured
value as specified in § 1090.1335(e)(2).
(c) Use spot sampling as specified in
§ 1090.1335(b)(2) for homogeneity
testing.
(d) Demonstrate homogeneity for
gasoline, GTAB, and TGP using two of
the procedures specified in this
paragraph (d) with each sample. For
summer gasoline, the homogeneity
demonstration must include RVP
measurement.
(1) Measure density or API gravity
using ASTM D287, ASTM D1298,
ASTM D4052, or ASTM D7777
(incorporated by reference in § 1090.95).
(2) Measure the sulfur content as
specified in § 1090.1360.
(3) Measure the benzene content as
specified § 1090.1360.
(4) Measure the RVP as specified in
§ 1090.1360.
(e) Homogeneity requirements apply
as follows for other products:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(1) Demonstrate homogeneity for
diesel fuel using one of the procedures
specified in paragraph (d)(1) or (2) of
this section.
(2) Demonstrate homogeneity for
certified ethanol denaturant and
oxygenate based on measured sulfur
content as specified in § 1090.1360,
except that no homogeneity testing is
required for DFE if you calculate sulfur
content as specified in § 1090.1330.
(f) Consider the batch to be
homogeneous for a given parameter if
the measured values for all tested
samples vary by no more than the
published reproducibility of the test
method multiplied by 0.75 (R × 0.75). If
reproducibility is a function of
measured values, calculate
reproducibility using the average value
of the measured parameter representing
all tested samples. Calculate using all
meaningful significant figures as
specified for the test method, even if
§ 1090.1350(c) describes a different
precision. For cases that do not require
a homogeneity demonstration under
paragraph (a) of this section, the lack of
homogeneity demonstration does not
prevent a quantity of fuel, fuel additive,
or regulated blendstock from being
considered a batch for demonstrating
compliance with the requirements of
this part. The following additional
provisions apply for special cases:
(1) Do not use test results for a given
test method for a parameter to
demonstrate homogeneity if multiple
measured values are at or below the test
method’s PLOQ, LLOQ, or valid range,
as applicable. You may instead use a
different test method as allowed under
this subpart to get test results with the
same parameter or with a different
parameter.
(2) If you have homogeneity test
results for more than the required
number of parameters and not all
parameters meet the criteria, all testing
results except density or API gravity
must meet applicable homogeneity
criteria to demonstrate that the batch is
homogeneous.
(3) If using ASTM D4052
(incorporated by reference in § 1090.95)
for measuring density or API gravity to
demonstrate homogeneity through
December 31, 2026, you may calculate
the homogeneity criterion based on the
reproducibility of the test method at the
limit of the valid range for testing, even
if measured results extend beyond the
valid range.
■ 94. Amend § 1090.1340 by revising
paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1),
and (a)(2)(iii) to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 1090.1340
BOB.
70081
Preparing a hand blend from
(a) If you produce or import BOB and
instruct downstream blenders to add
oxygenate, you must meet the
requirements of this subpart by blending
oxygenate that reflects the anticipated
sulfur content and benzene content of
the oxygenate for blending into a BOB
sample. To do this, prepare each hand
blend by adding oxygenate to the BOB
sample in a way that corresponds to
your instructions to downstream
blenders for the sampled batch of fuel.
Prepare hand blends as follows:
(1) Take steps to avoid introducing
high or low bias in sulfur content when
selecting from available samples to
prepare the hand blend. For example, if
there are three samples with discrete
sulfur content measurements, select the
sample with the mid-range sulfur
content. In other cases, randomly select
the sample. If you omit the homogeneity
demonstration under § 1090.1337(a)(4),
prepare a single hand blend using the
BOB sample that has the highest sulfur
content.
(2) * * *
(iii) As an example, if you give
instructions for a given batch of BOB to
perform downstream blending to make
E10, E15, and a blend that contains 8
volume percent butanol, prepare a hand
blend for testing winter gasoline with 8
volume percent butanol, and prepare an
E10 hand blend for testing summer
gasoline.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 95. Amend § 1090.1345 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(5);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (a)(6) and (7);
and
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (c)
through (e) as paragraphs (b) through
(d).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
§ 1090.1345
Retaining samples.
(a) * * *
(5) The nominal volume of retained
liquid samples must be at least 330 ml.
(6) If you have only a single sample
for testing, keep that sample after testing
is complete. If you collect multiple
samples from a single batch, keep an
untested sample that represents the
batch.
(7) If you test a hand blend under
§ 1090.1340, keep a sample of the BOB
and a sample representative of the
oxygenate used to prepare the hand
blend.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 96. Amend § 1090.1350 by revising
paragraphs (c)(4) and (5) to read as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70082
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
§ 1090.1350
Overview of test procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) Record oxygenate content to the
nearest 0.01 mass percent for each
measured oxygenate.
(5) Record diesel fuel aromatic
content to the nearest 0.1 volume
percent, or record cetane index to the
nearest whole number.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 97. Amend § 1090.1355 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) and (2) to read
as follows:
§ 1090.1355 Calculation adjustments and
corrections.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Adjust measured values for total
vapor pressure as follows:
RVP = 0.956 · Ptotal ¥ 0.347
Where:
RVP = Reid vapor pressure, in psi.
Ptotal = Measured total vapor pressure, in psi.
(b) * * *
(1) If your test method involves a
published procedure with a Pooled
Limit of Quantitation (PLOQ), treat the
PLOQ as your final result if your
measured result is below the PLOQ.
(2) If your test method involves a
published procedure with a limited
scope but no PLOQ, treat the lower
bound of the scope as your final result
if your measured result is less than that
value.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 98. Amend § 1090.1360 by revising
paragraph (b)(1)(i) to read as follows:
§ 1090.1360 Performance-based
Measurement System.
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
(i) Sulfur.
*
*
*
*
■ 99. Amend § 1090.1365 by:
■ a. Revising the introductory text and
paragraphs (a)(3) and (4);
■ b. Revising and republishing
paragraphs (b) and (c)(3);
■ c. Revising paragraphs (f)(2) and (5).
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
*
§ 1090.1365 Qualifying criteria for
alternative measurement procedures.
This section specifies how to qualify
alternative procedures for measuring
absolute and method-defined fuel
parameters under the Performancebased Measurement System specified in
§ 1090.1360.
(a) * * *
(3) Except as specified in paragraph
(d) of this section, testing to
demonstrate compliance with the
precision and accuracy specifications in
this section apply only for the
laboratory where the testing occurred.
At a given laboratory, qualifying a test
method applies for all associated
instruments used for testing to certify
fuel.
(4) If a procedure for measuring
benzene or sulfur in gasoline has no
published PLOQ and no published
scope with a lower bound, you must
establish a LLOQ.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) All alternative procedures must
meet precision criteria based on a
calculated maximum allowable standard
deviation for a given fuel parameter as
specified in this paragraph (b). The
precision criteria apply for measuring
the parameters and fuels specified in
paragraph (b)(4) of this section. Take the
following steps to qualify the
measurement procedure for measuring a
given fuel parameter:
(1) The fuel must meet the parameter
specifications in Table 1 to paragraph
(b)(4) of this section. This may require
that you modify the fuel you typically
produce to be within the specified
range. Absent a specification (maximum
or minimum), select a fuel representing
values that are typical for your testing.
Store and mix the fuel to maintain a
homogenous mixture throughout the
measurement period to ensure that each
fuel sample drawn from the batch has
the same properties.
(2) Measure the fuel parameter from a
homogeneous fuel batch at least 20
times. Record each result in sequence.
Do not omit any valid results unless you
use good engineering judgment to
determine that the omission is necessary
and you document those results and the
reason for excluding them. Perform this
analysis over a 20-day period. You may
make up to 4 separate measurements in
a 24-hour period, as long as the interval
between measurements is at least 4
hours. Do not measure RVP more than
once from a single sample.
(3) An alternative procedure for
measuring oxygenate in gasoline must
account for every type of oxygenate
covered by the referee method.
(4) Calculate the maximum allowable
standard deviation as follows:
Xz
amax -x
- 1 ·X3
Where:
smax = Maximum allowable standard
deviation.
x1, x2, and x3 have the values from the
following table:
Fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock
Fuel
parameter
Range
ULSD ..............................
Sulfur .........
500 ppm LM diesel fuel ..
Sulfur .........
ECA marine fuel .............
Sulfur .........
Butane ............................
Gasoline ..........................
Gasoline ..........................
Gasoline ..........................
Gasoline ..........................
Sulfur .........
Sulfur .........
Oxygenate
RVP 3 .........
Benzene .....
5 ppm minimum.
350 ppm
minimum.
700 ppm
minimum.
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
x2 =
Repeatability
(r) or
reproducibility
(R) 1
x1
x3
Fixed
values of
smax
Source 2
1.5
r = 1.33 ..........................
2.77
0.72
ASTM D3120–08.
1.5
r = 21.3 ..........................
2.77
11.5
ASTM D2622–16.
1.5
r = 37.1 ..........................
2.77
20.1
ASTM D2622–16.
1.5
1.5
0.3
0.3
0.15
r = 0.1152 · x .................
r = 0.4998 · x0.54 ............
R = 0.13 · x0.83 ..............
R = 0.40 .........................
R = 0.221 · x0.67 ............
2.77
2.77
1
1
1
....................
....................
....................
0.12
....................
ASTM
ASTM
ASTM
ASTM
ASTM
D6667–14.
D7039–15a.
D5599–18.
D5191–15.
D5769–20.
1 Calculate
repeatability and reproducibility using the average value determined from testing. Use units as specified in § 1090.1350(c).
that the listed procedure may be different than the referee procedure identified in § 1090.1360(d), or it may be an older version of the
referee procedure.
3 Use only 1-liter containers for testing to qualify alternative methods.
2 Note
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
EP28AU24.393
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (b)(4)—PRECISION CRITERIA FOR QUALIFYING ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(c) * * *
(3) The measurement procedure meets
the accuracy requirement as follows:
(i) Demonstrate accuracy for
measuring sulfur in gasoline and butane
using samples to represent sulfur values
from 1 to 10 ppm, 11 to 20 ppm, and
21 to 95 ppm. You may omit any of
these ranges if you do not perform
testing with fuel in that range. Calculate
the maximum allowable difference
between the average measured value
and the ARV for each applicable range
as follows:
Where:
Dmax = 0.75 · smax
Dmax = Maximum allowable difference.
smax = Maximum allowable standard
deviation, per paragraph (b)(4) of this
section, using the sulfur content
represented by the ARV.
(ii) Demonstrate accuracy for
measuring sulfur in diesel fuel using
test fuels meeting the specifications in
Table 2 to this section. For testing diesel
70083
fuel-related blendstocks and additives,
use representative test samples meeting
the appropriate sulfur specification.
Table 2 to this paragraph also identifies
the maximum allowable difference
between average measured value and
the ARV corresponding to the ARV at
the upper end of each specified range.
These values are based on calculations
with the equation in paragraph (c)(3)(i)
of this section, with parameter values
set equal to the standard.
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (C)(3)(II)—ACCURACY CRITERIA FOR QUALIFYING ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES WITH DIESEL FUEL
AND DIESEL FUEL-RELATED BLENDSTOCKS AND ADDITIVES
Sulfur
content
(ppm)
Fuel
ULSD .......................................................................................................................................................................
500 ppm LM diesel fuel ...........................................................................................................................................
ECA marine fuel ......................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) Test with a range of fuels that are
typical of those you will analyze at your
laboratory. Use either consensus-named
fuels or locally named reference
materials. Consensus-named fuels are
homogeneous fuel quantities sent
around to different laboratories for
analysis, which results in a ‘‘consensus
name’’ representing the average value of
the parameter for all participating
laboratories. Locally named reference
materials are fuel samples analyzed
using the reference test method, either
at your laboratory or at a reference
installation, to establish an estimated
value for the fuel parameter; locally
named reference materials usually come
from the fuel you produce.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Perform testing at your laboratory
as specified in paragraph (b) of this
section to establish the repeatability of
the alternative procedure. The
repeatability must be as good as or
better than that specified in paragraph
(b)(4) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 100. Amend § 1090.1375 by:
a. Redesignating paragraph (a)(4) as
(a)(5) and adding new paragraph (a)(4);
■ b. Revising paragraphs (c)
introductory text, (c)(2), and (c)(4); and
■ c. Adding paragraphs (d) and (e).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
§ 1090.1375
Quality control procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) Keep records to document any test
results excluded for being out of control
under Section 8.5 and A1.5.4.1 of ASTM
D6299 (incorporated by reference in
§ 1090.95). Identify the assignable cause
and include any appropriate additional
supporting justification.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Accuracy demonstration. For
absolute fuel parameters (VCSB and
non-VCSB) and for method-defined fuel
parameters using non-VCSB methods,
you must show that you meet accuracy
criteria as specified in this paragraph
(c). For method-defined VCSB
procedures, you may meet accuracy
requirements as specified in this
paragraph (c) or by comparing your
results to the accepted reference value
in an inter-laboratory crosscheck
10–20
450–500
900–1,000
0.54
8.65
15.1
program as specified in paragraph (d) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Except as specified in paragraph
(c)(3) of this section, test every
instrument using a check standard
meeting the specifications of ASTM
D6299. Select a fuel sample with an
ARV representing fuel that is typical for
your testing.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) You meet accuracy requirements
under this section if the difference
between your measured value for the
check standard and the ARV is less than
the value from the following equation:
Where:
Dmax = Maximum allowable difference.
L = Total number of test results used to
determine the ARV of a consensusnamed fuel. For testing locally named
fuels for which no consensus-based ARV
applies, use L equal to ∞.
R = Reproducibility of the referee procedure
identified in § 1090.1360(d), as noted in
Table 1 to paragraph (b)(4) of
§ 1090.1365 or in the following table:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (c)(4)—CRITERIA FOR QUALIFYING ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES
Tested product
Referee procedure 1
ULSD, 500 ppm diesel fuel, ECA marine fuel, diesel fuel additive, gasoline, gasoline regulated blendstock, and gasoline additive.
Butane .....................................................................................................
ASTM D2622 .................................
R = 0.4273 · x0.8015
ASTM D6667 .................................
R = 0.3130 · x
1 ASTM
Reproducibility (R) 2
specifications are incorporated by reference, see § 1090.95.
reproducibility using the average value determined from testing. Use units as specified in § 1090.1350(c).
2 Calculate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
EP28AU24.394
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
Illustrated
maximum
allowable
difference
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
70084
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(d) Demonstrating accuracy by
participating in crosscheck programs.
You may meet accuracy requirements
under paragraph (c) of this section by
comparing your results to the accepted
reference value in an inter-laboratory
crosscheck program sponsored by
ASTM International or another VCSB at
least three times per year (two times per
year for RVP), subject to the following
provisions:
(1) Your results from the crosscheck
program are not valid for demonstrating
compliance with accuracy requirements
for an instrument under this section if
any of the following apply:
(i) The crosscheck program does not
have a robust ARV based on the check
standard requirements in Section 6.2 of
ASTM D6299 (incorporated by
reference, see § 1090.95).
(ii) The difference between the test
result and the ARV is greater than the
maximum allowable difference in
paragraph (c)(4) of this section.
(iii) The difference between the test
result and the ARV is greater than the
method-defined limit for check standard
accuracy, if applicable.
(iv) The measured value lies outside
of two Z-scores.
(2) If your results from the crosscheck
program are not valid under paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, perform a root
cause analysis and document your
findings and the steps you take to
correct the problem. You continue to
meet accuracy requirements under this
section for the affected parameter only
if you correct the problem and
demonstrate compliance with the
accuracy requirements of this section
within 35 days after learning of a failure
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
The compliance demonstration may be
based on in-house testing using a check
standard qualified by a third party, or
on testing in the next crosscheck
program.
(e) Failure to meet precision or
accuracy requirements. The presumed
values specified in § 1090.1710(g) apply
for parameter measurements with
instruments failing to meet precision or
accuracy requirements under this
section. If you fail to meet the deadlines
for resolving crosscheck-related issues
under paragraph (d)(2) of this section,
the presumed values apply starting at
the point of learning of a failure under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
■ 101. Amend § 1090.1390 by revising
the section heading to read as follows:
§ 1090.1390 Requirement for automated
detergent blending equipment calibration.
*
*
*
*
*
102. Amend § 1090.1395 by revising
paragraphs (a) introductory text,
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(a)(1)(i), and (b) introductory text to read
as follows:
§ 1090.1395 Gasoline deposit control test
procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Top Tier-based test method. Use
the procedures specified in ASTM
D6201 (incorporated by reference in
§ 1090.95), as follows:
(1) * * *
(i) 8.0–10.0 volume percent ethanol
that meets the requirements in
§ 1090.270 and conforms to the
specifications of ASTM D4806
(incorporated by reference in § 1090.95).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) CARB test method. Use the
procedures specified by CARB in Title
13, California Code of Regulations,
section 2257 (incorporated by reference
in § 1090.95).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart O—Survey Provisions
103. Amend § 1090.1400 by revising
paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.1400
General provisions.
(a) * * *
(2) The program plan must be signed
by the RCO of the independent surveyor
conducting the program.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 104. Amend § 1090.1405 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 1090.1405
program.
National fuels survey
(a) * * *
(1) A gasoline manufacturer that
elects to account for oxygenate added
downstream under § 1090.710 must
participate in the national fuels survey
program (NFSP) specified in paragraph
(b) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) The survey program must be
conducted by collecting samples
representative of retail outlets in the
United States as specified in
§ 1090.1415.
■ 105. Amend § 1090.1410 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1) and (2), (c)(3) and (5),
(d), and (e) to read as follows:
§ 1090.1410 Independent surveyor
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Obtain samples representative of
the gasoline and diesel fuel (including
diesel fuel made available at retail
outlets to nonroad vehicles, engines,
and equipment) offered for sale
separately from all retail outlets in
accordance with the survey program
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
plan approved by EPA, or immediately
notify EPA of any refusal of a retailer to
allow samples to be taken.
(2) Obtain the number of samples
representative of the number of retail
outlets offering E15.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Diesel fuel samples must be
analyzed for sulfur content.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) All testing must be completed by
an EPA-approved laboratory within 10
business days after receipt of the
sample.
(d) Verify E15 labeling requirements
at retail outlets that offer E15 for sale.
(e)(1) Using procedures specified in
an EPA-approved plan under
§ 1090.1415, notify EPA, the retailer,
and the branded fuel manufacturer (if
applicable) within 24 hours after an
EPA-approved laboratory has completed
analysis when any of the following
occur:
(i) A test result for a gasoline sample
yields a sulfur content result that
exceeds the downstream sulfur pergallon standard in § 1090.205(c).
(ii) A test result for a gasoline sample
yields an RVP result that exceeds the
applicable RVP standard in § 1090.215.
(iii) A test result for a diesel fuel
sample yields a sulfur content result
that exceeds the sulfur standard in
§ 1090.305(b).
(iv) A test result for a gasoline sample
identified as ‘‘E15’’ yields an ethanol
content result that exceeds 15 volume
percent.
(v) A test result for a gasoline sample
not identified as ‘‘E15’’ yields an
ethanol content of more than 10 volume
percent ethanol.
(2) Any notification to EPA or a
branded fuel manufacturer under
paragraph (e)(1) of this section must
include the retail outlet’s contact
information, including name, title,
mailing address, telephone number, and
email address of a representative of the
retail outlet, if available.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 106. Amend § 1090.1415 by:
■ a. Revising and republishing
paragraph (d); and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (e)(2) and (f)
introductory text.
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
§ 1090.1415 Survey program plan design
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Retail outlet selection. (1) Retail
outlets to be sampled in a sampling area
must be selected from among all
gasoline retail outlets in the United
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
70085
States with the probability of selection
proportionate to the volume of gasoline
sold at the retail outlet. The sample of
retail outlets must also include gasoline
retail outlets with different brand names
as well as those gasoline retail outlets
that are unbranded.
(2) For any retail outlet from which a
sample of gasoline or diesel fuel was
collected during a survey and was
reported to EPA under § 1090.1410(e),
that retail outlet must be included in the
subsequent survey.
(3) At least one sample of a product
dispensed as E15 must be collected at
each gasoline retail outlet when E15 is
present, and separate samples must be
taken that represent the gasoline
contained in each storage tank at the
gasoline retail outlet unless collection of
separate samples is not practicable.
(4) At least one sample of diesel fuel
must be collected at each retail outlet
when diesel fuel is present. Samples of
diesel fuel may be collected at retail
outlets that sell gasoline.
(e) * * *
(2) The minimum number of samples
to be included in the survey program
plan for each calendar year is calculated
as follows:
Where:
n = Minimum number of samples in a yearlong survey series. However, n must be
greater than or equal to 2,000 for the
number of diesel fuel samples or 5,000
for the number of gasoline samples.
Za = Upper percentile point from the normal
distribution to achieve a one-tailed 95
percent confidence level (5 percent alevel). For purposes of this survey
program, Za equals 1.645.
Zb = Upper percentile point to achieve 95
percent power. For purposes of this
survey program, Zb equals 1.645.
j1 = Maximum proportion of non-compliant
outlets for a region to be deemed
compliant. This parameter needs to be 5
percent or greater (i.e., 5 percent or more
of the outlets, within a stratum such that
the region is considered non-compliant).
j0 = Underlying proportion of non-compliant
outlets in a sample. For the first survey
program plan, j0 will be 2.3 percent. For
subsequent survey program plans, j0
will be the average of the proportion of
outlets found to be non-compliant over
the previous 4 surveys.
Fa = Adjustment factor for the number of
extra samples required to compensate for
samples that could not be included in
the survey (e.g., due to technical or
logistical considerations), based on the
number of additional samples required
during the previous 4 surveys. Fa must
be greater than or equal to 1.1.
Fb = Adjustment factor for the number of
samples required to resample each retail
outlet with test results reported to EPA
under § 1090.1410(e), based on the rate
of resampling required during the
previous 4 surveys. Fb must be greater
than or equal to 1.1.
Sun = Number of surveys per year. For
purposes of this survey program, Sun
equals 4.
Stn = Number of sampling strata. For
purposes of this survey program, Stn
equals 3.
§ 1090.1400(a). In the survey program
plan submitted to EPA, the independent
surveyor must include the following
information regarding any laboratory
they intend to use to test samples:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 107. Amend § 1090.1420 by revising
and republishing paragraph (a) to read
as follows:
text, (c)(10)(iii), (d)(2)(i), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(4)
introductory text, (d)(4)(iv), and (d)(5).
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Laboratory designation. Any
laboratory that the independent
surveyor intends to use to test samples
collected as part of the NFSP must be
approved annually as part of the survey
program plan approval process under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 1090.1420 Additional requirements for
E15 misfueling mitigation surveying.
(a) E15 misfueling mitigation survey
requirement. (1) Any gasoline
manufacturer, oxygenate blender, or
oxygenate producer that produces,
introduces into commerce, sells, or
offers for sale gasoline, BOB, DFE, or
gasoline-ethanol blended fuel that is
intended for use in or as E15 must
comply with either survey program
Option 1 (as specified in paragraph (b)
of this section) or Option 2 (as specified
in paragraph (c) of this section).
(2) For an oxygenate producer that
produces or imports DFE, the DFE is
deemed as intended for use in E15
unless the oxygenate producer
demonstrates that it was not intended
for such use. The oxygenate producer
may demonstrate, at a minimum, that
DFE is not intended for use in E15 by
including language on PTDs stating that
the DFE is not intended for use in E15,
entering into contracts with oxygenate
blenders to limit the use of their DFE to
gasoline-ethanol blended fuels of no
more than 10 volume percent ethanol,
and limiting the concentration of their
DFE to no more than 10 volume percent
ethanol in their fuel additive
registration under 40 CFR part 79.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 108. Amend § 1090.1450 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(v);
■ b. Revising and republishing
paragraph (c)(3); and
■ c. Revising paragraphs (c)(4)
introductory text, (c)(10) introductory
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 1090.1450 National sampling and testing
oversight program.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) Samples collected must be
shipped via ground service within 2
business days from when the samples
are collected to an EPA-approved
laboratory as established in an approved
NSTOP plan under this section. A
random subset of collected samples
must also be shipped to the EPA
National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions
Laboratory as established in an
approved NSTOP plan under this
section.
(3) Test, or arrange to be tested,
samples collected under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section as follows:
(i) Winter gasoline samples must be
analyzed for oxygenate content, sulfur
content, benzene content, distillation
parameters, aromatics, and olefins.
(ii) Summer gasoline samples must be
analyzed for oxygenate content, sulfur
content, benzene content, distillation
parameters, aromatics, olefins, and RVP,
except that samples of exempt gasoline
under § 1090.630 do not need to be
analyzed for RVP.
(iii) All samples must be tested by an
EPA-approved laboratory using test
methods specified in subpart N of this
part.
(iv) All analyses must be completed
by an EPA-approved laboratory within
10 business days after receipt of the
sample.
(v) A gasoline manufacturer must
analyze gasoline samples for sulfur
content, benzene content, and for
summer gasoline, RVP, except that
samples of exempt gasoline under
§ 1090.630 do not need to be analyzed
for RVP.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
EP28AU24.395
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
70086
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(4) Using procedures specified in an
EPA-approved NSTOP plan under this
section, notify EPA and the gasoline
manufacturer within 24 hours after an
EPA-approved laboratory has completed
analysis when any of the following
occur:
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Review the test performance
index and precision ratio for each
method and instrument the laboratory
used to test gasoline samples collected
under this section as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) A gasoline manufacturer must
supply copies of the necessary
information to the independent
surveyor to review the TPI and PR for
each method and instrument used to
test gasoline samples collected under
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Each participating gasoline
manufacturing facility must be sampled
at least once during each season they
produce fuel. The NSTOP plan must
demonstrate how these facilities will be
randomly selected within the summer
and winter seasons.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(ii) The minimum number of samples
to be included in the NSTOP plan for
each calendar year is calculated as
follows:
n = R · Fa · Fb · Sun
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Where:
n = Minimum number of samples in a year.
R = Number of participating gasoline
manufacturing facilities.
Fa = Adjustment factor for the number of
extra samples required to compensate for
samples that could not be included in
the NSTOP (e.g., due to technical or
logistical considerations), based on the
number of additional samples required
during the previous 2 calendar years. Fa
must be greater than or equal to 1.1.
Fb = Adjustment factor for the number of
samples required to ensure oversight. For
purposes of this program, Fb equals 1.25.
Sun = Number of samples required per
participating facility per year. For
purposes of this program, Sun equals 2.
(4) Laboratory designation. Any
laboratory that the independent
surveyor intends to use to test samples
collected as part of the NSTOP must be
approved annually as part of the NSTOP
plan approval process in § 1090.1400(a).
The independent surveyor must include
the following information regarding
each laboratory it intends to use to test
samples:
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) Records demonstrating the
laboratory’s performance in a laboratory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
crosscheck program for the most recent
12 months prior to submission of the
NSTOP plan.
(5) Sampling procedure. The NSTOP
plan must include a detailed description
of the sampling procedures used to
collect samples at participating gasoline
manufacturing facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart P—Retailer and Wholesale
Purchaser-Consumer Provisions
109. Amend § 1090.1515 by revising
the section heading to read as follows:
■
§ 1090.1515
provisions.
*
*
Diesel fuel sulfur labeling
*
*
§ 1090.1610
*
Subpart Q—Importer and Exporter
Provisions
110. Amend § 1090.1600 by revising
paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1090.1600
importers.
General provisions for
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) Except as specified in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, all applicable
standards in subparts C and D of this
part apply to imported gasoline and
diesel fuel, respectively.
(2) An importer that imports gasoline
at multiple import facilities must
comply with the gasoline average
standards in §§ 1090.205(a) and
1090.210(a) as specified in
§ 1090.705(b), unless the importer
complies with the provisions of
§ 1090.1610 to meet the alternative pergallon standards for rail or truck imports
specified in §§ 1090.205(d) and
1090.210(c).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Alternative testing requirements
for an importer that imports fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock by rail
or truck are specified in § 1090.1610.
■ 111. Amend § 1090.1605 by revising
and republishing paragraph (b)(1) to
read as follows:
§ 1090.1605
Importation by marine vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The importer must sample each
compartment of the vessel and use one
of the following methods to meet testing
requirements:
(i) Treat each compartment as a
separate batch. Each individual
compartment is deemed to meet the
homogeneity requirements in
§ 1090.1337.
(ii) Except as specified in paragraph
(b)(1)(iii) of this section, combine
samples from separate compartments
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
into a single, vessel-volumetric
composite sample using the procedures
in Section 9.2.4 of ASTM D4057
(incorporated by reference in § 1090.95).
Test results from the composite sample
are valid only if single samples
collected from each affected
compartment together meet the
homogeneity requirements in
§ 1090.1337.
(iii) Measure the RVP of a sample
collected from each compartment for
summer gasoline.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 112. Revise and republish § 1090.1610
to read as follows:
Importation by rail or truck.
(a) An importer that imports fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock by rail
or truck must meet the sampling and
testing requirements of subpart N of this
part by sampling and testing each
compartment of the railcar or truck
unless they do one of the following:
(1) Use supplier results. The importer
may rely on test results from the
supplier for fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock imported by rail or
truck if the importer meets all the
following requirements:
(i) The importer obtains
documentation of test results from the
supplier for each batch of fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock in
accordance with the following
requirements:
(A) The testing includes
measurements for all the parameters
specified in § 1090.1310 using the
measurement procedures specified in
§ 1090.1350.
(B) Testing for a given batch occurs
after the most recent delivery into the
supplier’s storage tank and before
transferring the fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock to the railcar or
truck.
(ii) The importer conducts testing to
verify test results from each supplier as
follows:
(A) Collect a sample at least once
every 30 days or every 50 rail or
truckloads from a given supplier,
whichever is more frequent. Test the
sample as specified in paragraphs
(a)(1)(i)(A) and (B) of this section.
(B) Treat importation of each fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock
separately, but treat railcars or
truckloads together if the fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock is
imported from a given supplier by rail
or truck.
(2) Certify in a storage tank. The
importer may transfer the fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock
imported by rail or truck into storage
tanks that also contain the same product
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
if the importer meets the following
requirements:
(i) For gasoline, the importer transfers
gasoline into one or more empty tanks
or tanks containing PCG that the
importer owns.
(A) If the importer transfers gasoline
into one or more empty tanks, they must
sample and test the sulfur content,
benzene content, and for summer
gasoline, RVP, of each tank into which
the gasoline was transferred.
(B) If the importer transfers gasoline
into one or more tanks containing PCG,
they must sample the PCG already in
the tank prior to transferring gasoline
from the train or truck, test the sulfur
content and benzene content, and report
this PCG as a negative batch as specified
in § 1090.905(c)(3)(i). After transferring
the gasoline into the tanks, the importer
must sample and test the sulfur content,
benzene content, and for summer
gasoline, RVP, of each tank into which
the gasoline was transferred and report
the volume, sulfur content, and benzene
content as a positive batch.
(C) Include the PCG in the tank before
transferring and the volume and
properties after transferring in
compliance calculations as specified in
§ 1090.700(d)(4)(i).
(D) The sample retention
requirements in § 1090.1345 apply to
the samples taken prior to transferring
and those taken after transferring.
(ii) For all other fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock, the importer must
sample and test the fuel, fuel additive,
or regulated blendstock in each tank
into which it was transferred. The
importer must ensure that all applicable
per-gallon standards are met before the
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock is shipped from the tank.
(b) If an importer that elects to comply
with paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this
section fails to meet the applicable
requirements, they must meet the
sampling and testing requirements of
subpart N of this part for each
compartment of the railcar or truck until
EPA determines that the importer has
adequately addressed the cause of the
failure.
■ 113. Amend § 1090.1615 by revising
and republishing paragraph (d) to read
as follows:
§ 1090.1615 Gasoline treated as a
blendstock.
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) The importer must treat the
GTAB as if it were imported gasoline
and complete all the requirements for a
gasoline manufacturer under
§ 1090.105(a) (except for the sampling,
testing, and sample retention
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
requirements in § 1090.105(a)(6)) for the
GTAB at the time it is imported.
(2) Any GTAB that ultimately is not
used to produce gasoline (e.g., a tank
bottom of GTAB) must be treated as
newly imported gasoline and must meet
all applicable requirements for imported
gasoline.
Subpart R—Compliance and
Enforcement Provisions
114. Amend § 1090.1710 by revising
paragraph (g) introductory text to read
as follows:
■
§ 1090.1710
Penalties.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) The presumed fuel parameter
values in this paragraph (g) apply for
cases in which any person fails to
comply with the sampling or testing
requirements and must be reported,
unless EPA, in its sole discretion,
approves a different value. Any person
requesting the use of alternative test
values must submit their request to EPA
as specified in § 1090.10 within 30 days
of discovering failure to comply with
sampling and testing requirements. EPA
may consider any relevant information
to determine whether a different value
is appropriate.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 115. Amend § 1090.1715 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (c); and
■ b. Revising and republishing
paragraph (e).
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
§ 1090.1715
Liability provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Any parent corporation is liable for
any violation committed by any of its
wholly owned subsidiaries.
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) Any person who produced,
imported, sold, offered for sale,
dispensed, supplied, offered for supply,
stored, transported, caused the
transportation or storage of, or
introduced into commerce fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock that is
in the storage tank containing fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock that is
found to be in violation of a per-gallon
standard is liable for the violation.
(2) In order for a carrier to be liable
under paragraph (e)(1) of this section,
EPA must demonstrate by reasonably
specific showing, by direct or
circumstantial evidence, that the carrier
caused the violation.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart S—Attestation Engagements
■
■
116. Amend § 1090.1800 by:
a. Adding paragraph (a)(3); and
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70087
b. Revising paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and
(d)(1).
The addition and revisions read as
follows:
■
§ 1090.1800
General provisions.
(a) * * *
(3) A gasoline manufacturer that
transacts sulfur or benzene credits
under this part.
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The auditor may be a certified
public accountant, or firm of such
accountants, that is independent of the
gasoline manufacturer. Such an auditor
must comply with the AICPA Code of
Professional Conduct, including its
independence requirements, the AICPA
Statements on Quality Control
Standards (SQCS) No. 8, A Firm’s
System of Quality Control (both
incorporated by reference in § 1090.95),
and applicable rules of state boards of
public accountancy. Such an auditor
must also perform the attestation
engagement in accordance with the
AICPA Statement on Standards for
Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 19,
Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements,
especially as noted in sections AT–C
105, 215, and 315 (incorporated by
reference in § 1090.95).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) The auditor must prepare an
attestation engagement report
identifying the applicable procedures
specified in this subpart along with the
auditor’s corresponding findings for
each procedure. The auditor must
submit the attestation engagement
report electronically to EPA by June 1 of
the year following the compliance
period.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 117. Amend § 1090.1805 by revising
paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
§ 1090.1805
Representative samples.
(a) * * *
(3) Determine sample size using an
alternate method that is equivalent to or
better than the methods specified in
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section
with respect to strength of inference and
freedom from bias. An auditor that
determines a sample size using an
alternate method must describe and
justify the alternate method in the
attestation engagement report.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 118. Revise and republish § 1090.1810
to read as follows:
§ 1090.1810 General procedures for
gasoline manufacturers.
An auditor must perform the
procedures specified in this section for
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
70088
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
a gasoline manufacturer that produces
gasoline in the United States.
(a) Registration and reports. An
auditor must review registration and
reports as follows:
(1) Obtain copies of the gasoline
manufacturer’s registration information
submitted under subpart I of this part
and all reports (except batch reports)
submitted by the gasoline manufacturer
under subpart J of this part.
(2) For each gasoline manufacturing
facility, confirm that the facility’s
registration is accurate based on the
activities reported during the
compliance period, including that the
registration for the facility and any
related updates were completed prior to
conducting regulated activities at the
facility and report any discrepancies.
(3) Confirm that the gasoline
manufacturer submitted all reports
required under subpart J of this part for
activities they performed during the
compliance period and report any
exceptions.
(4) Obtain a written statement from
the gasoline manufacturer’s RCO that
the submitted reports are complete and
accurate.
(5) Report the name of any
commercial computer program used to
track any data required under this part.
(b) Inventory reconciliation analysis.
An auditor must review an inventory
reconciliation analysis as follows:
(1) Obtain an inventory reconciliation
analysis from the gasoline manufacturer
for each gasoline type produced at each
facility (e.g., RFG, CG, RBOB, CBOB),
including the inventory at the beginning
and end of the compliance period and
inventory records (e.g., receipts,
production volumes, shipments,
transfers, and gain/loss).
(2) Foot and cross-foot the volumes by
gasoline type.
(3) Compare the beginning and ending
inventory to the inventory records for
each gasoline type and report any
variances.
(4) Report the total volume of each
gasoline type.
(c) Listing of gasoline tenders. An
auditor must review a listing of gasoline
tenders as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of
gasoline tenders from the gasoline
manufacturer, by gasoline type.
(2) Foot the tender volumes by
gasoline type.
(3) Compare the total volume from the
tenders to the inventory reconciliation
analysis obtained under paragraph (b) of
this section for each gasoline type and
report any variances.
(d) Listing of gasoline batches. An
auditor must review a listing of gasoline
batches as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(1) Obtain the gasoline batch reports
submitted by the gasoline manufacturer
under subpart J of this part.
(2) Foot the batch volumes by gasoline
type.
(3) Compare the total volume from the
batch reports to the inventory
reconciliation analysis obtained under
paragraph (b) of this section for each
gasoline type and report any variances.
(4) Report as a finding any batch with
a reported value that does not meet a
per-gallon standard in subpart C of this
part.
(e) Test methods. An auditor must
follow the procedures specified in
§ 1090.1845 to determine whether the
gasoline manufacturer complies with
the applicable quality control
requirements specified in § 1090.1375.
(f) Detailed testing of BOB tenders. An
auditor must review a detailed listing of
BOB tenders as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
BOB tenders from the listing of tenders
obtained under paragraph (c) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the associated PTD for each
selected tender.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm
that the correct PTDs are obtained for
the selected tenders.
(4) Compare the volume on the listing
for each selected tender to the
associated PTD and report any
exceptions.
(5) Confirm that the PTD associated
with each selected tender contains all
the applicable language required under
subpart L of this part and report any
exceptions.
(g) Detailed testing of BOB batches.
An auditor must review a detailed
listing of BOB batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
BOB batches from the batch reports
obtained under paragraph (d) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation
and laboratory analysis for each selected
batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for
each selected batch to the volume
documentation and report any
exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties
for each selected batch to the laboratory
analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods
used for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any
exceptions.
(6) Determine each oxygenate type
and amount that was required for
blending with each selected batch.
(7) Confirm that each oxygenate type
and amount included in the BOB hand
blend agrees with the gasoline
manufacturer’s blending instructions for
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
each selected batch and report any
exceptions.
(8) Confirm that the gasoline
manufacturer participates in the NFSP
under § 1090.1405, if applicable.
(9)(i) For a blending manufacturer,
confirm that the laboratory analysis
includes test results for oxygenate
content, if applicable, and distillation
parameters (i.e., T10, T50, T90, final
boiling point, and percent residue).
(ii) For a blending manufacturer not
required to measure oxygenate content,
confirm that records demonstrate that
the PCG or blendstock contained no
oxygenate, no oxygenate was added to
the final gasoline batch, and the
blending manufacturer did not account
for oxygenate added downstream under
§ 1090.710.
(h) Detailed testing of finished
gasoline tenders. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of finished
gasoline tenders as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
finished gasoline tenders from the
listing of tenders obtained under
paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) Obtain the associated PTD for each
selected tender.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm
that the correct PTDs are obtained for
the selected tenders.
(4) Compare the volume on the listing
for each selected tender to the
associated PTD and report any
exceptions.
(5) Confirm that the PTD associated
with each selected tender contains all
the applicable language required under
subpart L of this part and report any
exceptions.
(i) Detailed testing of finished
gasoline batches. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of finished
gasoline batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
finished gasoline batches from the batch
reports obtained under paragraph (d) of
this section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation
and laboratory analysis for each selected
batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for
each selected batch to the volume
documentation and report any
exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties
for each selected batch to the laboratory
analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods
used for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any
exceptions.
(6)(i) For a blending manufacturer,
confirm that the laboratory analysis
includes test results for oxygenate
content, if applicable, and distillation
parameters (i.e., T10, T50, T90, final
boiling point, and percent residue).
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(ii) For a blending manufacturer not
required to measure oxygenate content,
confirm that records demonstrate that
the PCG or blendstock contained no
oxygenate, no oxygenate was added to
the final gasoline batch, and the
blending manufacturer did not account
for oxygenate added downstream under
§ 1090.710.
(j) Detailed testing of blendstock
batches. In the case of adding
blendstock to TGP or PCG under
§ 1090.1320(a)(2), an auditor must
review a detailed listing of blendstock
batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
blendstock batches from the batch
reports obtained under paragraph (d) of
this section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation
and laboratory analysis for each selected
batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for
each selected batch to the volume
documentation and report any
exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties
for each selected batch to the laboratory
analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods
used for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any
exceptions.
(6) For a blending manufacturer not
required to measure oxygenate content,
confirm that records demonstrate that
the PCG or blendstock contained no
oxygenate, no oxygenate was added to
the final gasoline batch, and the
blending manufacturer did not account
for oxygenate added downstream under
§ 1090.710.
■ 119. Revise and republish § 1090.1815
to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1090.1815 General procedures for
gasoline importers.
An auditor must perform the
procedures specified in this section for
a gasoline importer.
(a) Registration and reports. An
auditor must review registration and
reports for the importer as specified in
§ 1090.1810(a).
(b) Listing of gasoline imports. An
auditor must review a listing of gasoline
imports as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of
gasoline imports from the importer, by
gasoline type.
(2) Foot the import volumes from the
importer by gasoline type.
(3) Obtain a detailed listing of
gasoline imports directly from the thirdparty customs broker, by gasoline type.
(4) Foot the import volumes from the
third-party customs broker by gasoline
type.
(5) Compare the total volume from the
listing of imports supplied by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
importer to the listing of imports
supplied by the third-party customs
broker for each gasoline type and report
any variances.
(6) Report the total imported volume
of each gasoline type.
(c) Listing of gasoline batches. An
auditor must review a listing of gasoline
batches as follows:
(1) Obtain the gasoline batch reports
submitted by the importer under
subpart J of this part.
(2) Foot the batch volumes by gasoline
type.
(3) Compare the total volume from the
batch reports to the listing of imports
supplied by the importer under
paragraph (b) of this section for each
gasoline type and report any variances.
(4) Report as a finding any batch with
a reported value that does not meet a
per-gallon standard in subpart C of this
part.
(d) Test methods. An auditor must
follow the procedures specified in
§ 1090.1845 to determine whether the
importer complies with the applicable
quality control requirements specified
in § 1090.1375.
(e) Detailed testing of BOB imports.
An auditor must review a detailed
listing of BOB imports as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
BOB imports from the listing of imports
supplied by the importer under
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Obtain the associated U.S.
Customs Entry Summary and PTD for
each selected import.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm
that the correct U.S. Customs Entry
Summaries are obtained for the selected
imports.
(4) Compare the volume and location
the import arrived in the United States
on the listing for each selected import
to the associated U.S. Customs Entry
Summary and report any exceptions.
(5) Using a unique identifier, confirm
that the correct PTDs are obtained for
the selected imports.
(6) Compare the volume on the listing
for each selected import to the
associated PTD and report any
exceptions.
(7) Confirm that the PTD associated
with each selected import contains all
the applicable language required under
subpart L of this part and report any
exceptions.
(f) Detailed testing of BOB batches. An
auditor must review a detailed listing of
BOB batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
BOB batches from the batch reports
obtained under paragraph (c) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the volume inspection
report and laboratory analysis for each
selected batch.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70089
(3) Compare the reported volume for
each selected batch to the volume
inspection report and report any
exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties
for each selected batch to the laboratory
analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods
used for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any
exceptions.
(6) Determine each oxygenate type
and amount that was required for
blending with each selected batch.
(7) Confirm that each oxygenate type
and amount included in the BOB hand
blend agrees with the importer’s
blending instructions for each selected
batch and report any exceptions.
(8) Confirm that the importer
participates in the NFSP under
§ 1090.1405, if applicable.
(g) Detailed testing of finished
gasoline imports. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of finished
gasoline imports as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
finished gasoline imports from the
listing of imports supplied by the
importer under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the associated U.S.
Customs Entry Summary and PTD for
each selected import.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm
that the correct U.S. Customs Entry
Summaries are obtained for the selected
imports.
(4) Compare the volume and location
the import arrived in the United States
on the listing for each selected import
to the associated U.S. Customs Entry
Summary and report any exceptions.
(5) Using a unique identifier, confirm
that the correct PTDs are obtained for
the selected imports.
(6) Compare the volume on the listing
for each selected import to the
associated PTD and report any
exceptions.
(7) Confirm that the PTD associated
with each selected import contains all
the applicable language required under
subpart L of this part and report any
exceptions.
(h) Detailed testing of finished
gasoline batches. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of finished
gasoline batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
finished gasoline batches from the batch
reports obtained under paragraph (c) of
this section.
(2) Obtain the volume inspection
report and laboratory analysis for each
selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for
each selected batch to the volume
inspection report and report any
exceptions.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
70090
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(4) Compare the reported properties
for each selected batch to the laboratory
analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods
used for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any
exceptions.
(i) Additional procedures for gasoline
imported by rail or truck. An auditor
must perform the following additional
procedures for an importer that imports
gasoline into the United States by rail or
truck under § 1090.1610:
(1)(i) Select a representative sample of
gasoline batches from the batch reports
obtained under paragraph (c) of this
section.
(ii) Obtain the tank activity records for
each selected batch from the party that
supplied the gasoline to the importer.
(iii) Identify the point of sampling and
testing associated with each selected
batch in the tank activity records.
(iv) Confirm that the sampling and
testing for each selected batch occurred
after the most recent delivery into the
supplier’s storage tank and before
transferring gasoline to the railcar or
truck.
(2)(i) Obtain a detailed listing of the
importer’s quality assurance program
sampling and testing results.
(ii) Determine whether the frequency
of sampling and testing meets the
requirements in § 1090.1610(a)(2) and
report any discrepancies.
(iii)(A) Select a representative sample
of gasoline batches from the sampling
and testing results.
(B) Obtain the laboratory analysis for
each selected batch.
(C) Determine whether the importer
analyzed the test sample for each
selected batch, and report as a finding
any batch where the importer failed to
perform the analysis using the methods
specified in subpart N of this part.
(D) Obtain and review any terminal
test results corresponding to the time of
collecting the quality assurance test
samples.
(E) Compare the terminal test results
to the test results from the quality
assurance program. Report as a finding
any test result with a difference that is
greater than the reproducibility of the
applicable method specified in subpart
N of this part.
■ 120. Revise and republish § 1090.1820
to read as follows:
§ 1090.1820
GTAB.
Additional procedures for
In addition to any other procedure
required under this subpart, an auditor
must perform the procedures specified
in this section for a gasoline
manufacturer that imports GTAB under
§ 1090.1615.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(a) Listing of GTAB imports. An
auditor must review a listing of GTAB
imports as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of GTAB
imports from the importer.
(2) Foot the import volumes from the
importer.
(3) Obtain a detailed listing of GTAB
imports directly from the third-party
customs broker.
(4) Foot the import volumes from the
third-party customs broker.
(5) Compare the total volume from the
listing of imports supplied by the
importer to the listing of imports
supplied by the third-party customs
broker and report any variances.
(6) Report the total imported volume
of GTAB and the corresponding
facilities at which the GTAB was
blended.
(b) Listing of GTAB batches. An
auditor must review a listing of GTAB
batches as follows:
(1) Obtain the GTAB batch reports
submitted by the importer under
subpart J of this part.
(2) Foot the batch volumes.
(3) Compare the total volume from the
batch reports to the listing of imports
supplied by the importer under
paragraph (a) of this section and report
any variances.
(c) Detailed testing of GTAB imports.
An auditor must review a detailed
listing of GTAB imports as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
GTAB imports from the listing of
imports supplied by the importer under
paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) Obtain the associated U.S.
Customs Entry Summary for each
selected import.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm
that the correct U.S. Customs Entry
Summaries are obtained for the selected
imports.
(4) Compare the volume and location
the import arrived in the United States
on the listing for each selected import
to the associated U.S. Customs Entry
Summary and report any exceptions.
(d) Detailed testing of GTAB batches.
An auditor must review a detailed
listing of GTAB batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
GTAB batches from the batch reports
obtained under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the volume inspection
report for each selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for
each selected batch to the volume
inspection report and report any
exceptions.
(e) GTAB tracing. An auditor must
trace and review the movement of
GTAB from importation to gasoline
production as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(1) Compare the total volume from the
batch reports obtained under paragraph
(b) of this section to the inventory
reconciliation analysis obtained under
§ 1090.1810(b).
(2)(i) Obtain tank activity records that
describe the movement of each selected
batch under paragraph (d) of this section
from importation to gasoline
production.
(ii) Identify each selected batch in the
tank activity records and trace each
selected batch to subsequent reported
batches of BOB or finished gasoline and
report any exceptions.
(iii) Match the location of the facility
where gasoline was produced from each
selected batch to the location where
each selected batch arrived in the
United States, or to the facility directly
receiving the selected batch from the
import facility.
(iv) Determine the status of the tank(s)
before receiving each selected batch
(e.g., empty tank, tank containing
blendstock, tank containing GTAB, tank
containing PCG).
(v) If the tank(s) contained PCG before
receiving the selected batch, take the
following additional steps:
(A) Obtain and review a copy of the
documented tank mixing procedures.
(B) Determine the volume and
properties of the tank bottom that was
PCG before adding GTAB.
(C) Confirm that the gasoline
manufacturer determined the volume
and properties of the BOB or finished
gasoline produced using GTAB by
excluding the volume and properties of
any PCG, and that the gasoline
manufacturer separately reported the
PCG volume and properties under
subpart J of this part and report any
discrepancies.
■ 121. Revise and republish § 1090.1825
to read as follows:
§ 1090.1825 Additional procedures for
PCG used to produce gasoline.
In addition to any other procedure
required under this subpart, an auditor
must perform the procedures specified
in this section for a gasoline
manufacturer that produces gasoline
from PCG under § 1090.1320.
(a) Listing of PCG batches. An auditor
must review a listing of PCG batches as
follows:
(1) Obtain the PCG batch reports
submitted by the gasoline manufacturer
under subpart J of this part.
(2) Foot the batch volumes.
(3) Compare the total volume from the
batch reports to the inventory
reconciliation analysis obtained under
§ 1090.1810(b) and report any variances.
(b) Detailed testing of PCG batches.
An auditor must review a detailed
listing of PCG batches as follows:
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(1) Select a representative sample of
PCG batches from the batch reports
obtained under paragraph (a) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation,
laboratory analysis, associated PTD, and
tank activity records for each selected
batch.
(3) Identify each selected batch in the
tank activity records and trace each
selected batch to subsequent reported
batches of BOB or finished gasoline and
report any exceptions.
(4) For each selected batch, report as
a finding any instance where the
reported volume was adjusted from the
original receipt volume, such as for
exported PCG.
(5) Compare the reported volume for
each selected batch to the volume
documentation and report any
exceptions.
(6) Compare the reported gasoline
type for each selected batch to the
associated PTD and report any
exceptions.
(7) Compare the reported properties
for each selected batch to the laboratory
analysis and report any exceptions.
(8) Compare the reported test methods
used for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any
exceptions.
■ 122. Revise and republish § 1090.1830
to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 1090.1830 Alternative procedures for
certified butane blenders.
An auditor must perform the
procedures specified in this section
instead of or in addition to the
applicable procedures in § 1090.1810 for
a certified butane blender that blends
certified butane into PCG under
§ 1090.1320(b).
(a) Registration and reports. An
auditor must review registration and
reports as follows:
(1) Obtain copies of the certified
butane blender’s registration
information submitted under subpart I
of this part and all reports submitted by
the certified butane blender under
subpart J of this part, including the
batch reports for the certified butane
received and blended.
(2) For each butane blending facility,
confirm that the facility’s registration is
accurate based on the activities reported
during the compliance period, including
that the registration for the facility and
any related updates were completed
prior to conducting regulated activities
at the facility and report any
discrepancies.
(3) Confirm that the certified butane
blender submitted all reports required
under subpart J of this part for activities
they performed during the compliance
period and report any exceptions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(4) Obtain a written statement from
the certified butane blender’s RCO that
the submitted reports are complete and
accurate.
(5) Report the name of any
commercial computer program used to
track any data required under this part.
(b) Inventory reconciliation analysis.
An auditor must review an inventory
reconciliation analysis as follows:
(1) Obtain an inventory reconciliation
analysis from the certified butane
blender for each butane blending facility
related to all certified butane
movements, including the inventory at
the beginning and end of the
compliance period, receipts, blending/
production volumes, shipments,
transfers, and gain/loss.
(2) Foot and cross-foot the volumes.
(3) Compare the beginning and ending
inventory to the certified butane
blender’s inventory records and report
any variances.
(4) Compare the total volume of
certified butane received from the
inventory reconciliation analysis to the
batch reports obtained under paragraph
(a) of this section and report any
variances.
(5) Compare the total volume of
certified butane blended from the
inventory reconciliation analysis to the
batch reports obtained under paragraph
(a) of this section and report any
variances.
(6) Report the total volume of certified
butane received and blended.
(c) Listing of certified butane receipts.
An auditor must review a listing of
certified butane receipts as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of
certified butane receipts for certified
butane received at each butane blending
facility from the certified butane
blender.
(2) Foot the receipt volumes.
(3) Compare the total volume from the
receipts to the batch reports obtained
under paragraph (a) of this section and
report any variances.
(d) Detailed testing of certified butane
batches. An auditor must review a
detailed listing of certified butane
batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of
certified butane batches from the batch
reports obtained under paragraph (a) of
this section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation
and laboratory analysis for each selected
batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for
each selected batch to the volume
documentation and report any
exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties
for each selected batch to the laboratory
analysis and report any exceptions.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
70091
(5) Compare the reported test methods
used for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any
exceptions.
(6) Report as a finding any batch with
a reported value that does not meet a
standard for certified butane in subpart
C of this part.
(e) Quality assurance program review.
An auditor must review a certified
butane blender’s quality assurance
program as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of the
certified butane blender’s quality
assurance program sampling and testing
results.
(2) Determine whether the frequency
of sampling and testing meets the
requirements in § 1090.1320(b)(4) and
report any discrepancies.
■ 123. Amend § 1090.1835 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 1090.1835 Alternative procedures for
certified pentane blenders.
(a) An auditor must perform the
procedures specified in this section
instead of or in addition to the
applicable procedures in § 1090.1810 for
a certified pentane blender that blends
certified pentane into PCG under
§ 1090.1320(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 124. Revise and republish § 1090.1840
to read as follows:
§ 1090.1840 Additional procedures related
to compliance with gasoline average
standards.
In addition to any other procedure
required under this subpart, an auditor
must perform the procedures specified
in this section for a gasoline
manufacturer that complies with the
standards in subpart C of this part using
the procedures specified in subpart H of
this part.
(a) Annual compliance demonstration
review. An auditor must review annual
compliance demonstrations as follows:
(1) Obtain the annual compliance
reports for sulfur and benzene and
associated batch reports submitted by
the gasoline manufacturer under subpart
J of this part.
(2)(i) For a gasoline refiner or gasoline
blending manufacturer, compare the
total volume of gasoline produced at
each facility from the annual
compliance report to the inventory
reconciliation analysis obtained under
§ 1090.1810(b) and report any variances.
(ii) For a gasoline importer, compare
the total volume of gasoline imported
from the annual compliance report to
the listing of imports supplied by the
importer under § 1090.1815(b) and
report any variances.
(3) For each facility, recalculate and
report the following values:
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
70092
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(i) Compliance sulfur value, per
§ 1090.700(a)(1), and compliance
benzene value, per § 1090.700(b)(1)(i).
(ii) Unadjusted average sulfur
concentration, per § 1090.745(b), and
average benzene concentration, per
§ 1090.700(b)(3).
(iii) Number of credits generated
during the compliance period, or
number of banked or traded credits
needed to meet standards for the
compliance period.
(iv) Number of credits from the
preceding compliance period that are
expired or otherwise no longer available
for the compliance period being
reviewed.
(v) Net average sulfur concentration,
per § 1090.745(c), and net average
benzene concentration, per
§ 1090.745(d).
(4) Compare the recalculated values
under paragraph (a)(3) of this section to
the reported values in the annual
compliance reports and report any
exceptions.
(5) Report whether the gasoline
manufacturer had a deficit for both the
compliance period being reviewed and
the preceding compliance period.
(b) Credit transaction review. An
auditor must review credit transactions
as follows:
(1) Obtain the credit transaction
reports submitted by the gasoline
manufacturer under subpart J of this
part and contracts or other information
that documents all credit transfers. Also
obtain records that support
intracompany transfers.
(2) For each reported transaction,
compare the supporting documentation
with the credit transaction reports for
the following elements and report any
exceptions:
(i) Compliance period of creation.
(ii) Credit type (i.e., sulfur or benzene)
and number of times traded.
(iii) Quantity.
(iv) The name of the other company
participating in the credit transfer.
(v) Transaction type.
(c) Facility-level credit reconciliation.
Except as specified in paragraph (c)(4)
of this section, an auditor must perform
a facility-level credit reconciliation
separately for each gasoline
manufacturing facility as follows:
(1) Obtain the credits remaining or the
credit deficit from the previous
compliance period from the credit
transaction reports obtained under
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Calculate and report as a finding
the net credits remaining at the end of
the compliance period.
(3) Compare the ending balance of
credits or credit deficit recalculated
under paragraph (c)(2) of this section to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
the corresponding value from the
annual compliance report obtained
under paragraph (a) of this section and
report any variances.
(4) For an importer, the procedures of
this paragraph (c) apply at the company
level.
(d) Company-level credit
reconciliation. An auditor must perform
a company-level credit reconciliation as
follows:
(1) Obtain a credit reconciliation
listing company-wide credits aggregated
by facility for the compliance period.
(2) Foot and cross-foot the credit
quantities.
(3) Compare and report the beginning
balance of credits, the ending balance of
credits, the associated credit activity at
the company level in accordance with
the credit reconciliation listing, and the
corresponding credit balances and
activity submitted by the gasoline
manufacturer under subpart J of this
part.
(e) Procedures for gasoline
manufacturers that recertify BOB. An
auditor must perform the following
procedures for a gasoline manufacturer
that recertifies BOB under § 1090.740
and incurs a deficit:
(1) Perform the procedures specified
in § 1090.1810(a) to review the gasoline
manufacturer’s registration and reports.
(2)(i) Obtain the recertified BOB batch
reports submitted by the gasoline
manufacturer under subpart J of this
part.
(ii) Select a representative sample of
recertified BOB batches from the batch
reports.
(iii) Obtain supporting documentation
(e.g., PTDs, bills of lading, etc.) for each
selected batch.
(iv) Compare the information on the
batch reports to the supporting
documentation and report any
exceptions.
(v) Recalculate the deficits in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 1090.740 and report any
discrepancies.
(vi) Confirm that the deficits are
included in the annual compliance
report and report any exceptions.
■ 125. Revise and republish § 1090.1845
to read as follows:
§ 1090.1845 Procedures related to meeting
performance-based measurement and
statistical quality control for test methods.
(a) General provisions. (1) In addition
to any other procedure required under
this subpart, an auditor must perform
the procedures specified in this section
for a gasoline manufacturer.
(2) The auditor performing the
procedures in this section must meet the
laboratory experience requirements
specified in § 1090.55(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(3) In cases where the auditor
employs, contracts, or subcontracts an
external specialist, all the requirements
in § 1090.55 apply to the external
specialist. The auditor is responsible for
overseeing the work of the specialist,
consistent with applicable professional
standards specified in § 1090.1800.
(4) In the case of quality control
testing at a third-party laboratory, the
auditor may perform a single attestation
engagement on the third-party
laboratory for multiple gasoline
manufacturers if the auditor directly
reviewed the information from the
third-party laboratory. The third-party
laboratory may also arrange for the
auditor to perform a single attestation
engagement on the third-party
laboratory and make that available to
gasoline manufacturers that have testing
performed by the third-party laboratory.
(b) Non-referee method qualification
review. For each test method used to
measure a gasoline parameter as
specified in a report submitted under
subpart J of this part that is not one of
the referee procedures listed in
§ 1090.1360(d), the auditor must review
the following:
(1) Obtain supporting documentation
showing that the laboratory has
qualified the alternative test method by
meeting the precision and accuracy
criteria specified under § 1090.1365.
(2) Report a list of the alternative test
methods used.
(3) Confirm that the gasoline
manufacturer supplied the supporting
documentation for each alternative test
method and report any exceptions.
(4) If the auditor has previously
reviewed supporting documentation
under this paragraph (b) for an
alternative test method at the laboratory,
the auditor does not have to review the
supporting documentation again.
(c) Reference installation review. For
each reference installation used by the
gasoline manufacturer during the
compliance period, the auditor must
review the following:
(1) Obtain supporting documentation
demonstrating that the reference
installation followed the qualification
procedures specified in
§ 1090.1370(c)(1) and (2) and the quality
control procedures specified in
§ 1090.1370(c)(3).
(2) Confirm that the laboratory
completed the qualification procedures
and report any exceptions.
(d) Instrument control review. For
each test instrument used to measure
gasoline parameters for batches selected
as part of a representative sample under
§ 1090.1810, the auditor must review
whether test instruments were in
control as follows:
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(1) Obtain a listing from the laboratory
of the instruments and period when the
instruments were used to measure
gasoline parameters during the
compliance period for batches selected
as part of the representative sample
under § 1090.1810.
(2) Obtain statistical quality assurance
data and control charts demonstrating
ongoing quality testing to meet the
accuracy and precision requirements
specified in § 1090.1375 or 40 CFR
80.47, as applicable.
(3) Confirm that the laboratory
performed statistical quality assurance
monitoring of its instruments under
§ 1090.1375 and report any exceptions.
(4) Report as a finding any test result
that was excluded for being out of
control and the laboratory did not have
an assignable cause with appropriate
supporting justification.
(5) Report as a finding the listing of
instruments obtained under paragraph
(d)(1) of this section and the compliance
period when the instrument control
review was completed.
■ 126. Revise and republish § 1090.1850
to read as follows:
§ 1090.1850 Procedures related to in-line
blending waivers.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
In addition to any other procedure
required under this subpart, an auditor
must perform the procedures specified
in this section for a gasoline
manufacturer that relies on an in-line
blending waiver under § 1090.1315.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Aug 27, 2024
Jkt 262001
(a)(1) Obtain a copy of the gasoline
manufacturer’s in-line blending waiver
submission and EPA’s approval letter.
(2) Confirm that the sampling
procedures and composite calculations
conform to the specifications in
§ 1090.1315(a)(2).
(3) Review the gasoline
manufacturer’s procedure for defining a
batch for compliance purposes. Review
available test data demonstrating that
the test results from in-line blending
correctly characterize the fuel
parameters for the designated batch.
(4) Confirm that the gasoline
manufacturer corrected their operations
because of previous audits, if
applicable.
(5) Confirm that the equipment and
procedures have not materially changed
from the gasoline manufacturer’s in-line
blending waiver. In cases of material
change in equipment or procedure,
confirm that the gasoline manufacturer
updated their in-line blending waiver
and report any exceptions.
(6) Perform any additional procedures
unique to the blending operation, as
specified in the in-line blending waiver,
and report any findings, variances, or
exceptions, as applicable.
(7) Confirm that the gasoline
manufacturer has complied with all
provisions related to their in-line
blending waiver and report any
exceptions.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
70093
(b)(1) Obtain test data, including
head, middle, and tail results, for each
batch produced under the gasoline
manufacturer’s in-line blending waiver.
(2) Review the alternative sampling
plan to meet requirements to test head,
middle, and tail samples for small
batches under § 1090.1315(a)(9).
(3) Report as a finding any instance
where only a single sample was taken
for a small batch involving more than 8
hours of blending or more than 1
million gallons of fuel.
(4) Report as a finding any instance
where two samples were unevenly
distributed for a small batch or where
only two samples were taken for a small
batch involving more than 16 hours of
blending or up to 2 million gallons of
fuel.
(5) Determine and report the
percentage of in-line blending batches
where the gasoline manufacturer failed
to perform the required head, middle,
and tail samples due to unforeseen
circumstances. Report as a finding if
this percentage is greater than 10
percent of in-line blending batches for
the calendar year.
(6) Determine and report each
instance where a contingency plan for
alternative sampling was utilized under
§ 1090.1315(a)(12).
[FR Doc. 2024–18773 Filed 8–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\28AUP2.SGM
28AUP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70048-70093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18773]
[[Page 70047]]
Vol. 89
Wednesday,
No. 167
August 28, 2024
Part III
Environmental Protection Agency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR Part 1090
Fuels Regulatory Streamlining Amendments; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2024 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 70048]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 1090
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2024-0143; FRL-8513-02-OAR]
RIN 2060-AV26
Fuels Regulatory Streamlining Amendments
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes revisions, updates, and corrections to
EPA's streamlined fuel quality regulations. This action does not
propose to change the stringency of the existing fuel quality
standards.
DATES: Comments. Comments must be received on or before October 15,
2024.
Public hearing: If anyone contacts EPA requesting a public hearing
by September 4, 2024, EPA will hold a virtual public hearing on
September 12, 2024. Please refer to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for additional information on the public hearing.
ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2024-0143, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from the docket. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit to EPA's docket at https://www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). Please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets for additional submission methods; the
full EPA public comment policy; information about CBI or multimedia
submissions; and general guidance on making effective comments.
Public hearing. If a virtual public hearing is requested by
September 4, 2024, it will be held on September 12, 2024. The hearing
will begin at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) and end when all
parties who wish to speak have had an opportunity to do so. All hearing
attendees (including even those who do not intend to provide testimony)
should register for the virtual public hearing by September 4, 2024.
Information on the status of the hearing and how to register can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/diesel-fuel-standards/fuels-regulatory-streamlining. Additional information regarding the hearing appears
below under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nick Parsons, Office of Transportation
and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division, Environmental
Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105;
telephone number: 734-214-4479; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this proposed rule are those
involved with the production, distribution, and sale of transportation
fuels, including gasoline and diesel fuel. Potentially affected
categories include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of potentially affected
Category NAICS \1\ code entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry.... 211130 Natural gas liquids extraction and
fractionation.
Industry.... 221210 Natural gas production and distribution.
Industry.... 324110 Petroleum refineries (including
importers).
Industry.... 325110 Butane and pentane manufacturers.
Industry.... 325193 Ethyl alcohol manufacturing.
Industry.... 325199 Manufacturers of gasoline additives.
Industry.... 424710 Petroleum bulk stations and terminals.
Industry.... 424720 Petroleum and petroleum products
wholesalers.
Industry.... 457110, 457120 Fuel retailers.
Industry.... 457210 Other fuel dealers.
Industry.... 486910 Natural gas liquids pipelines, refined
petroleum products pipelines.
Industry.... 493190 Other warehousing and storage--bulk
petroleum storage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities potentially affected by this
action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware
could potentially be affected by this action. Other types of entities
not listed in the table could also be affected. To determine whether
your entity would be affected by this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR part 1090. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Participation in Virtual Public Hearing
Information on the status of the virtual public hearing and how to
register can be found at https://www.epa.gov/diesel-fuel-standards/fuels-regulatory-streamlining. The last day to pre-register to speak at
the hearing is September 4, 2024. Please note that any updates made to
any aspect of the hearing will be posted online at https://www.epa.gov/diesel-fuel-standards/fuels-regulatory-streamlining. Please monitor the
website or contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to determine if there are any updates. EPA does not
intend to publish a document in the Federal Register announcing
updates.
If a virtual public hearing is held, each commenter will have 3
minutes to provide oral testimony. EPA may ask clarifying questions
during the oral presentations, but will not respond to the
presentations at that time. Written statements and supporting
information submitted during the comment period will be considered with
the same weight as oral comments and supporting information presented
at the public hearing.
If you require the services of a translator or special
accommodations such as audio description, please pre-register for the
hearing and describe your needs by September 4, 2024. EPA
[[Page 70049]]
may not be able to arrange accommodations without advance notice.
Preamble Acronyms and Abbreviations
Throughout this document the use of ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is
intended to refer to EPA. We use multiple acronyms and terms in this
preamble. While this list may not be exhaustive, to ease the reading of
this preamble and for reference purposes, EPA defines the following
terms and acronyms here:
ARV accepted reference value
BOB gasoline before oxygenate blending
DFE denatured fuel ethanol
EMTS EPA Moderated Transaction System
GTAB gasoline treated as blendstock
NFSP National Fuel Survey Program
OFR Office of the Federal Register
PBMS Performance-based Measurement System
PCG previously certified gasoline
RVP Reid vapor pressure
SQC statistical quality control
TGP transmix gasoline product
Table of Contents
I. Background and Overview
II. Sampling and Testing
A. Determining the Volume of Non-Compliant Fuel
B. Requirements for In-Line Blending
C. Process for Amending In-Line Blending Waivers
D. Changes to Manual Sampling Provisions
E. Homogeneity Samples Used for Batch Certification
F. Retaining Samples
G. Homogeneity Testing of PCG
H. Precision and Accuracy Demonstration
I. Excluding SQC Data Points
J. Testing of Oxygenates for PCG Under Compliance by Subtraction
III. Other Technical Amendments
A. Definition of Batch
B. Truthful Reporting
C. Clarification of RVP Standard in Federal 7.8 psi RVP Areas
D. National Fuel Survey Program Notifications
E. Fuel Certification With Domestic Marine Vessels
F. Technical Corrections
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and
1 CFR Part 51
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations and Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation's
Commitment to Environmental Justice for All
V. Amendatory Instructions
VI. Statutory Authority
I. Background and Overview
On December 4, 2020, EPA finalized the Fuels Regulatory
Streamlining Rule (``streamlining rule'') that replaced EPA's prior
gasoline, diesel fuel, and other fuel quality programs in 40 CFR part
80 with a new set of provisions and definitions in 40 CFR part 1090.\1\
Since that time, EPA found that several provisions in 40 CFR part 1090
require further correction or clarification to better align with
current market practices; this action proposes such changes. As further
discussed in Section V, the regulatory text in this document includes
both text that EPA is proposing to change as well as text that EPA is
republishing without change for context and clarity in keeping with new
guidance by the Office of the Federal Register (OFR). EPA is not
reopening for comment any of the unchanged text. Specifically, EPA is
not reopening any fuel quality standard (e.g., the sulfur, benzene, and
Reid vapor pressure (RVP) standards for gasoline in 40 CFR part 1090,
subpart C, and the sulfur and cetane standards for diesel fuel in 40
CFR part 1090, subpart D), the general requirements that regulated
parties register with EPA, maintain records, submit reports, etc., or
the general requirements for averaging, banking, and trading. Any
comments received on these topics or on portions of the regulations
that are not the subject of this action will be considered as beyond
the scope of this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 85 FR 78412.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This action proposes amendments to two main areas of EPA's fuel
quality regulations. First, EPA is proposing minor revisions to provide
clarity and flexibility to provisions that govern how fuel, fuel
additives, and regulated blendstocks are sampled and tested to
demonstrate compliance. Since finalizing the streamlining rule, EPA
identified, with stakeholder input, several areas in the sampling and
testing provisions that need further consideration and clarification.
These areas include the in-line blending waiver provisions,
instructions for collecting samples through automatic and manual
sampling, the process for demonstrating homogeneity for certification
testing, and requirements related to demonstrating the accuracy and
precision of test methods. The sampling and testing amendments are
discussed in Section II.
Second, EPA is proposing the following technical amendments, which
are discussed in Section III:
Clarification of definitions and general provisions.
Clarification of the truthful reporting requirement.
Clarification of the RVP standard in federal 7.8 psi RVP
areas.
Adjustments to notifications under the National Fuel
Survey Program (NFSP).
Addition of provisions to allow for certifying fuel loaded
onto domestic marine vessels.
Numerous clarifications, corrections, and consistency
edits to the regulations.
II. Sampling and Testing
A. Determining the Volume of Non-Compliant Fuel
EPA is proposing to clarify how batches of fuel certified through
automatic sampling would be treated when a test result indicates that a
regulated parameter exceeds a per-gallon standard. A per-gallon
standard is defined as ``the maximum or minimum value for any parameter
that applies to every volume unit of a specified fuel, fuel additive,
or regulated blendstock.'' \2\ This definition is consistent with EPA's
historic approach to per-gallon standards. Whether fuel is produced and
tested by in-line blending or in storage tanks, each gallon of fuel
must meet all applicable per-gallon standards. EPA expects fuel
manufacturers to apply a margin of safety to their production targets
to ensure that all fuel meets all applicable per-gallon standards in 40
CFR part 1090.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 40 CFR 1090.80.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current regulation states that ``[a] batch is noncompliant if
any tested sample does not meet all applicable per-gallon standards.''
\3\ Since the streamlining rule was finalized in 2020, several
stakeholders expressed concern that this language could be construed to
mean that EPA would consider the entire volume of a batch produced by
in-line blending to be in violation of a per-gallon standard whenever
any test result exceeded the per-gallon standard. To address this
concern, EPA is proposing to remove the above-referenced language in 40
CFR 1090.1335(e)(2) and add clarifying
[[Page 70050]]
language to 40 CFR 1090.1335(b) and (c). Specifically, EPA is proposing
first to modify the manual-sampling provisions in 40 CFR 1090.1335(b)
to include the statement that ``The entire batch volume is noncompliant
if a sample fails to meet any applicable per-gallon standard.'' This is
intended to be consistent with the provision described above from 40
CFR 1090.1335(e)(2). Second, EPA is proposing to modify the automatic-
sampling provisions in 40 CFR 1090.1335(c) to clarify that the entire
batch volume is noncompliant if the composite sample fails to meet any
applicable per-gallon standard. However, if an in-line sample fails to
meet any applicable per-gallon standard, EPA would consider the volume
of noncompliant fuel to be the volume starting with the last passing
result before the failing result (or the start of the batch), up to the
first passing result after the failing result (or the end of the
batch). For example, if a head sample exceeds a standard, followed
shortly by a middle sample with a valid passing result, the volume of
noncompliant fuel would be limited to the portion of the batch
preceding the middle sample with the passing result. Also, if the fuel
manufacturer took an extra sample between the head and middle samples
and determined that the extra sample had a passing result, that would
further limit the volume of fuel considered noncompliant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 40 CFR 1090.1335(e)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed approach is intended to preserve the long-standing
principle of requiring every tested sample to meet all applicable per-
gallon standards, while allowing us to consider a portion of the in-
line blended batch to be compliant based on tested samples that
establish the boundaries of what should be considered noncompliant. We
believe the proposed approach properly incentivizes fuel manufacturers
both to design and manage their processes to provide for appropriate
compliance margins and to perform spot testing as appropriate to verify
that the blended fuel continues to meet all applicable per-gallon
standards for the whole batch.
Fuel manufacturers can measure fuel parameters using procedures
that are different than the test methods used to generate official test
results for certification. We recognize that those nonstandard
measurements provide value to fuel manufacturers to inform the blending
process and add assurance that the blend settings continue to maintain
compliant fuel across the batch. However, as nonstandard tests, those
measurements cannot be used to reduce the volume of fuel considered
noncompliant if there are test results from any official test method
showing that a sample fails to meet a per-gallon standard.
We request comment on this approach to quantify the volume of
noncompliant fuel when a test result from in-line blending indicates an
exceedance of a per-gallon standard.
B. Requirements for In-Line Blending
The current in-line blending waiver provisions require that
interested fuel manufacturers submit general information about their
in-line blending equipment, including the location, layout, operation,
and monitoring of equipment.\4\ During EPA review and approval of in-
line blending waiver requests following finalization of the
streamlining rule, multiple stakeholders raised concerns regarding the
requirement to follow ASTM D4177 \5\ and the sampling and testing of
spot samples. Through iterative discussion with these stakeholders, EPA
approved multiple flexibilities addressing these and other concerns in
individual waiver requests. In this action, EPA is proposing to codify
these previously approved flexibilities in the regulations to ensure a
consistent and transparent framework. These proposed in-line blending
flexibilities would codify existing industry practices, and thus would
not impose a new or greater burden on industry. EPA is not reopening
for comment the existing provisions for in-line blending waivers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 40 CFR 1090.1315.
\5\ ASTM D4177-22e1, ``Standard Practice for Automatic Sampling
of Petroleum and Petroleum Products,'' approved July 1, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rest of this section describes several additional proposed
provisions for in-line blending waivers to provide further flexibility,
or to provide EPA with additional information to help with overseeing
in-line blending processes.
We request comment on the proposed amendments for in-line blending
waivers. In particular, we note that in some cases fuel manufacturers
are already including elements of the proposed additional information
in their existing in-line blending waivers and accordingly invite those
fuel manufacturers to describe how their experiences either align with
the proposed provisions or lead them to make specific recommendations
for adjusting the proposed provisions, along with any appropriate
supporting information.
1. Scope of Measurements and Sampling Frequency
EPA is proposing to require fuel manufacturers to identify which
blendstock parameters will be measured for managing the blending
process and the typical sampling frequency for those measurements. This
would enable EPA to better understand the fuel manufacturer's ability
to manage the blending process to keep fuel parameters within targeted
values over the course of the blend and to not exceed per-gallon
standards.
Regarding sampling frequency, the general instruction for automatic
sampling at 40 CFR 1090.1335(c) is to follow ASTM D4177 and to create a
composite sample from at least 9,604 grabs to represent the batch, with
a secondary specification to collect samples with a sampling frequency
that does not exceed 20 seconds throughout the batch. The underlying
objective is to require a sampling frequency that corresponds to a
margin of error of 0.01. EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR 1090.1335(c)
to include a direct reference to the 0.01 error specification to allow
for less frequent sampling, as long as sampling does not exceed a
margin of error of 0.01. In addition, we recognize that such a sampling
frequency may be difficult to achieve for certain batch
characteristics. EPA is therefore proposing to allow fuel manufacturers
to describe in their in-line blending waiver requests circumstances in
which they cannot meet the requirement to achieve a margin of error at
or below 0.01. Any fuel manufacturer in those circumstances must
quantify their measurement variability and adjust target values as
needed to account for the greater margin of error. This proposed
approach is intended to accommodate special circumstances without
relaxing the per-gallon standards that apply for the fuel.
2. Reduced Spot Sampling for Small Batches
As described in Section II.A, automatic sampling generally requires
collection of head, middle, and tail samples to confirm that the
blended fuel meets all applicable per-gallon standards across the
batch. We acknowledge that collecting all three of these spot samples
can be difficult for small batches due to the logistics of collecting
and analyzing samples during the blending process. EPA is therefore
proposing that in-line blending waivers may allow for reduced sampling
requirements for certain batch sizes to provide additional flexibility.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to allow for collecting a single sample
anytime during the blend for a batch involving up to 8 hours of
blending or up to 1 million gallons of fuel, and for
[[Page 70051]]
collecting two evenly distributed samples during the blend for a batch
involving up to 16 hours of blending or up to 2 million gallons of
fuel. These specified values would be based on actual volume and
duration. If a batch volume or duration extends beyond what was
anticipated and exceeds the specified threshold for relief from
sampling requirements, that would trigger the need to collect
additional samples. We request comment on whether the proposed
threshold values for volume and duration should be adjusted to larger
or smaller volumes to properly reflect the competing interests of
reducing test burden for small batches and ensuring that the whole
batch meets requirements. We also request comment on whether to apply
the reduced sampling requirements based on meeting the specified
threshold values for both the volume and duration of the batch, rather
than just one or the other.
Another possible challenge for complying with the requirement to
collect head, middle, and tail samples for automatic sampling is the
possibility of process dynamics that cause the fuel manufacturer to
terminate the batch earlier than planned. Any number of factors may
cause the early termination, and the termination may involve different
levels of urgency. We are aware that such an early termination may not
allow for an orderly process of collecting all the required fuel
samples. EPA is therefore proposing that in-line blending waivers may
allow for failing to perform required tests. The allowance for reduced
sampling and testing would be limited to unforeseen circumstances. When
the unforeseen circumstances allow for it, fuel manufacturers should
collect required samples whenever possible. This may involve shifting
toward an earlier collection when there is uncertainty about blending
duration for the batch, and there should be an effort to adjust plans
for an earlier collection when the adjusted batch termination allows
for it. However, to ensure that fuel manufacturers do not always rely
on this reduced-sampling option, EPA is proposing that fuel
manufacturers may exercise this reduced-sampling option for no more
than 10 percent of their in-line blending batches for the calendar
year.\6\ If a fuel manufacturer exceeds the 10 percent limit, EPA may
consider that their in-line blending waiver has proven inadequate in
practice.\7\ We request comment on these proposed provisions, including
on the appropriateness of capping the allowance for reduced sampling to
10 percent of annual batches.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ We note that we have already allowed fuel manufacturers to
use this proposed approach of a 10 percent limit under the current
regulations as a way to address situations where reduced sampling
and testing of in-line blending batches is necessary.
\7\ 40 CFR 1090.20(d) and (e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Contingency Plans for Equipment Failure
Some current in-line blending waivers include provisions that
describe how the fuel manufacturer would respond if their essential
test equipment fails, which we believe is an important contingency to
plan for. EPA is therefore proposing that all in-line blending waivers
include this element of emergency planning. Rather than specifying a
standard practice, EPA is proposing that fuel manufacturers describe
their contingency plans for alternative sampling and testing in cases
involving failure of the automatic compositor or other essential
equipment. Such contingency plans might appropriately consider a wide
range of possible scenarios. The overall goal of this contingency plan
would be to preserve the ability to collect an appropriate sample to
properly represent the batch for purposes of demonstrating that the
fuel meets all applicable per-gallon standards. EPA is proposing to
require that, where possible, contingency plans include collecting a
second composite sample with a redundant system to minimize the risk of
shipping fuel without proper documentation for compliance, or
alternatively to avoid the burden of finding a different sampling
method to demonstrate compliance.
4. Alternative Compliance Demonstration To Remedy Noncompliance
The current regulation contains a general requirement to
demonstrate that a batch of fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock meets all applicable per-gallon standards before any portion
of the batch leaves the facility.\8\ In-line blending waivers create an
exception to that general requirement, with the understanding that the
terms and conditions for a specific facility's blending process
includes process controls to give adequate assurance that fuel from in-
line blending will comply with all applicable per-gallon standards. The
question of possible remedies by a fuel manufacturer arises when
considering the possibility of test results showing that fuel coming
out of an in-line blending process does not in fact meet all applicable
per-gallon standards. To the extent that fuel has already left the
facility, EPA would expect to take appropriate action to address the
violation of failing to meet standards. However, fuel manufacturers may
be able to take further measures before the blended fuel leaves the
facility to demonstrate that the fuel meets all applicable per-gallon
standards. Such remedies would involve additional testing, and it may
also involve modifying or further blending the fuel to comply. EPA is
proposing to allow fuel manufacturers to specify an alternative
sampling demonstration in their contingency plan if an automatic
sampling test result fails to meet an applicable per-gallon standard,
as opposed to being subject to EPA action to address the violation of
failing to meet standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 40 CFR 1090.1310(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed amendment identifies two example remedies that would
be available as long as the fuel remains at the facility. First, we
describe batch certification based on manual sampling in a tank if the
fuel manufacturer collects the entire batch of blended fuel represented
by the noncompliant test result in the tank before it leaves the fuel
manufacturing facility gate. Second, we describe batch certification
based on secondary automatic sampling as fuel comes out of a holding
tank used to collect the fuel that failed to meet a per-gallon
standard. Such an approved alternative sampling demonstration would
allow the fuel manufacturer to disregard the earlier failing result if
the subsequent valid measurements show that all shipped fuel meets all
applicable per-gallon standards.
C. Process for Amending In-Line Blending Waivers
Section II.B describes additional information for fuel
manufacturers to include in in-line blending waivers. In most cases,
fuel manufacturers already include the proposed information in their
approved in-line blending waivers. However, in some cases, fuel
manufacturers will likely need to make updates to their approved in-
line blending waivers to comport with the proposed changes. EPA is
therefore proposing that all in-line blending waivers must comply with
the proposed new specifications starting March 1, 2025, with all the
proposed new flexibilities being optionally available before that
deadline.
To accommodate the timely review of these anticipated changes and
other periodic updates to fuel manufacturers' in-line blending waivers,
EPA is also proposing changes to the process for amending approved in-
line blending
[[Page 70052]]
waivers. EPA is proposing to specify that requests for an amended
waiver must include a description of the intended changes and a
comparison document that comprehensively and clearly identifies the
proposed changes to the waiver. The request must also include the
statement attesting to the truthfulness of the submitted information,
as described in Section III.B. These proposed specifications are
intended to standardize the format and substance of the information
submitted for the requested approval, with the intent of streamlining
EPA review of the submitted material. It is particularly important for
the comparison document to include all intended changes to the approved
in-line blending waiver so that EPA staff can focus their review on the
suggested amendments to the waiver instead of previously approved
elements of the waiver.
While these proposed specifications for requests to amend in-line
blending waivers will facilitate timely review by EPA staff, we are
aware that fuel manufacturers depend on timely processing of their
requests even when circumstances lead to a protracted review period.
EPA is therefore proposing that approval of a waiver amendment request
is deemed to be effective 60 days after EPA acknowledges receiving the
request if there is no further EPA response to the request. Keying the
date to our acknowledgement is important to avoid a case where the fuel
manufacturer submits the request in a way that does not come directly
to our attention. An EPA response to the request may be in the form of
denying the request, identifying deficiencies, or requiring additional
information. Under the proposed approach, if EPA identifies
deficiencies or requires additional information, the deemed approval
date would be 60 days after EPA acknowledges receipt of the subsequent
submission that addresses the deficiencies or includes the requested
information.
Considering the proposed timing items together, fuel manufacturers
could expect requests to amend their in-line blending waivers to comply
with the proposed new requirements to be deemed approved by the March
1, 2025, deadline if the requests are submitted by December 31, 2024.
We also note that depending on when the final rule promulgating these
changes becomes effective, EPA may also extend the proposed March 1,
2025, deadline to provide fuel manufacturers sufficient time to update
their in-line blending waivers to meet the proposed new specifications.
We request comment on whether additional time is needed for fuel
manufacturers to update their in-line blending waivers to meet the
proposed new specifications.
D. Changes to Manual Sampling Provisions
EPA is proposing to allow for the collection of spot samples or tap
samples to be used as a default method in addition to the currently
specified ``running'' or ``all-levels'' sampling. Under the current
regulation, a fuel manufacturer must collect a ``running'' or ``all-
levels'' sample from the top of the tank and may use tap sampling or
spot sampling to collect upper, middle, and lower samples only ``if a
running or all-levels sample is impractical for a given storage
configuration.'' \9\ Since finalization of the streamlining rule,
stakeholders have expressed concern over the ambiguity of the term
``impractical'' and contended that tap or spot sampling is as robust as
running or all-levels sampling. EPA agrees that testing with spot
samples or tap samples can be used to routinely collect tank samples
for testing. Homogeneity requirements further ensure that spot samples
and tap samples can properly represent the batch. EPA is therefore
proposing to allow spot sampling and tap sampling to be treated on par
with running or all-levels sampling.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 40 CFR 1090.1335(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Homogeneity Samples Used for Batch Certification
The streamlining rule added provisions describing a much more
detailed approach for demonstrating that a batch can be considered
homogeneous when drawing manual samples for certification.\10\ Industry
efforts to comply with these more detailed specifications have led to
requests for EPA to provide further clarification and adjustments to
accommodate several specific circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 40 CFR 1090.1337.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Waivers From the Homogeneity Requirement
Under the current regulations, the homogeneity requirement is
waived for several certain situations.\11\ EPA is proposing to waive
the homogeneity requirement for three additional circumstances. First,
we recognize that homogeneity testing is impractical for horizontal
tanks used for storing ethanol denaturant. Therefore, EPA is proposing
to waive the homogeneity requirement for horizontal tanks with a
circular or elliptical cross section and with a volume less than 42,000
gallons to align with current practice for storing ethanol denaturant.
The proposed waiver includes a requirement to draw samples from the
approximate mid-depth of the product level to ensure that the measured
parameters best represent the batch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 40 CFR 1090.1337(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, EPA is proposing to waive the homogeneity requirement for
certified butane and certified pentane. Certified butane and certified
pentane are stored under pressure, which makes it impractical to
collect homogeneity samples using the methods of ASTM D4057.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ ASTM D4057-22, ``Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products,'' approved May 1, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, we are aware that a small number of fuel tanks allow for tap
sampling only at ground level, along with sampling from the roof.
Homogeneity testing with such a tank configuration therefore depends on
sampling from the roof. Section II.D describes how EPA is proposing to
allow tap sampling as a method that is equivalent to running or all-
levels sampling. Based on those same concerns, we are aware that
homogeneity testing is not possible with a tank that has only a single
location for tap sampling when it is not an option to sample from the
roof. EPA is proposing to allow an alternative homogeneity
demonstration when inclement weather prevents sampling from the roof
for such a fuel tank based on prior approval of a mixing process that
has been shown to achieve homogeneity. The mixing demonstration must
apply for the specific tank configuration and include consideration of
a range of product types, fill levels, and other relevant parameters to
ensure that the specific circumstances that apply for a given
certification support the conclusion that the mixed fuel would meet
homogeneity specifications. Anyone relying on this waiver from the
homogeneity requirement would be required to keep records documenting
EPA approval of the mixing procedure, the specific actions taken to
follow the approved mixing procedure, and the forcing weather event.
We request comment on these three additional waivers from the
homogeneity requirement, and on any other circumstances where
collecting samples to meet homogeneity specifications is impractical or
infeasible. Any suggestion for additional waivers from the homogeneity
requirement should describe the need for relief and any possible
mitigating
[[Page 70053]]
factors or actions that would address concerns for variability of
measured properties from different samples. We also request comment on
the proposed qualifying conditions and corresponding compliance
requirements for each of the proposed additional waivers from the
homogeneity requirement.
2. Homogeneity Testing Requirements
EPA is proposing to clarify homogeneity testing requirements for
special cases.\13\ The first case addresses homogeneity test results
that fall below the lower range for a given parameter. The homogeneity
demonstration depends on showing that multiple samples collected in
different places inside the tank have measured values that are
consistent. Test results are not helpful for comparing results across
samples if measured values are at or below the lower limit of the test
method. EPA is therefore proposing to disallow using measurements for
demonstrating homogeneity if multiple measured values are at or below
the pooled limit of quantitation (PLOQ), laboratory limit of
quantitation (LLOQ), or the valid range of the test method. In those
cases, EPA is proposing that homogeneity testing would instead be based
on one of the following: (1) Testing with a different qualifying, valid
test method for the same parameter; or (2) Testing a different
parameter identified in 40 CFR 1090.1337(d) and (e). For example, if a
fuel manufacturer tested a summer gasoline for both RVP (required) and
sulfur, and multiple sulfur measurements using ASTM D2622 \14\ were
below the valid range of the test method, EPA is proposing that the
fuel manufacturer could not use those values to demonstrate
homogeneity. In this situation, the fuel manufacturer would need to
perform homogeneity testing by one of the following: (1) Measuring
sulfur with an approved alternative test method; (2) Measuring benzene
with the referee test method or an approved alternative test method; or
(3) Measuring density or API gravity using one of the test methods
specified in 40 CFR 1090.1337(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 40 CFR 1090.1337(f).
\14\ ASTM D2622-16, ``Standard Test Method for Sulfur in
Petroleum Products by Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence
Spectrometry,'' approved January 1, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The second case relates to testing that includes results for more
than the required number of parameters. Homogeneity testing for
gasoline, gasoline treated as blendstock (GTAB), and transmix gasoline
product (TGP) involves measurements of at least two parameters, while
homogeneity testing for diesel fuel involves measurements of at least
one parameter. A laboratory may have commercial or other reasons to
perform measurements that include more than the minimum number of tests
for demonstrating homogeneity. EPA is proposing that if more than the
required parameters are tested, homogeneity testing fails when testing
for any parameter other than density or API gravity does not meet the
applicable homogeneity criterion.
The third case is for density or API gravity results that fall
above the current scope of ASTM D4052.\15\ For valid testing, ASTM
D4052 currently specifies an upper limit of 66[deg] API. EPA is
proposing to temporarily allow using test results above 66[deg] API for
homogeneity testing with ASTM D4052. Calculations for samples that
exceed 66[deg] API would be based on the same equation that applies for
results that are (51-66[deg] API). The proposed allowance applies only
for testing performed with ASTM D4052 through December 31, 2026. This
temporary provision allows for continued testing for this commonly used
test method, with the expectation that the ongoing ASTM process for
updating the test method will allow for valid measurements above
66[deg] API by the end of 2026. EPA is aware that ASTM has started the
process to update the precision statements for ASTM D4052, which would
allow for expanding the acceptable upper API gravity range in the
specified timeframe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ ASTM D4052-18a, ``Standard Test Method for Density,
Relative Density, and API Gravity of Liquids by Digital Density
Meter,'' approved December 15, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These proposed changes are intended to clarify how to apply the
established homogeneity principles for addressing the identified
special circumstances. We request comment on the proposed provisions
and whether the proposed end of the temporary provisions (i.e., the end
of 2026) is enough time for ASTM to complete its inter-laboratory study
and update ASTM D4052.
F. Retaining Samples
Fuel manufacturers and oxygenate producers are currently required
to retain untested (or less tested) samples for summer gasoline and
tested (or most tested) samples for winter gasoline, diesel fuel, and
oxygenate.\16\ The requirement for such parties to retain tested
samples (other than summer gasoline) was based on minimizing any test
differences for cases involving EPA duplication of measurements already
made to certify a batch. The requirement for retaining untested samples
of summer gasoline was based on ASTM 5191,\17\ which calls for RVP
measurements to be from an aliquot that is the first test specimen
withdrawn from a sample container.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 40 CFR 1090.1345.
\17\ ASTM D5191-22, ``Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of
Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels (Mini Method),'' approved July
1, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry stakeholders have expressed concern about the burden of
complying with these sample retention requirements. We acknowledge that
the advantage of repeating a measurement on a tested sample is offset
by the risk that the sampling process could introduce errors caused by
changing the characteristics of the sample. Accordingly, EPA is
proposing to simplify the sample retention regulations by requiring
parties to only retain an untested sample that is representative of the
batch. This proposed approach relies on the principle that
demonstrating homogeneity allows for any sample from the batch to be
used for measurements to establish test values to characterize the
batch. Untested samples allow for testing summer gasoline for RVP, and
they provide an unadulterated starting point for measuring any other
parameters.
We request comment on the proposed simplified instruction for
retaining samples, specifically on the relative risks of introducing
measurement error from using tested and untested samples to make new
measurements, the need to allow for additional flexibility to retain
tested samples in certain circumstances, and the need for separate
instructions for batches not demonstrated to be homogeneous.
G. Homogeneity Testing of PCG
The regulations specify requirements that apply for a refiner or
blending manufacturer that adds blendstock to previously certified
gasoline (PCG) to produce a new batch of gasoline.\18\ Refiners and
blending manufacturers can meet the requirements based on either
``compliance by subtraction'' or ``compliance by addition.'' The
streamlining rule established that homogeneity requirements apply to
the blendstocks and finished gasoline for compliance by addition but
did not address homogeneity for compliance by subtraction for the
PCG.\19\ Compliance by subtraction in many cases does not depend on
homogeneity testing because the relevant fuel parameters for the PCG
are already known, as the PCG previously underwent certification
testing consistent with the sampling and
[[Page 70054]]
testing requirements in 40 CFR part 1090, subpart N. However, if a
batch of PCG was mixed with other batches of PCG or if the batch of PCG
was exempt from homogeneity testing under 40 CFR 1090.1337(a)(4), the
relevant fuel parameters are not known, and the batch of PCG should be
demonstrated to be homogeneous prior to testing for compliance by
subtraction to ensure the test results are valid. As such, EPA is
proposing to require homogeneity testing for compliance by subtraction
if blending involves multiple batches of PCG, or if a single batch of
PCG was certified without demonstrating homogeneity under 40 CFR
1090.1337(a)(4). Homogeneity testing for these cases ensures that
tested samples properly represent the batch after blending.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 40 CFR 1090.1320.
\19\ Note that the finished gasoline created in a PCG compliance
by subtraction situation must meet the homogeneity requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We request comment on applying homogeneity requirements in these
specific circumstances related to compliance by subtraction. We also
request comment on either further narrowing these specified
circumstances or adjusting the proposal to require homogeneity testing
more broadly. We also request comment on how to address the situation
where a party blends an aborted in-line blending batch of gasoline into
a tank that also contains PCG with unknown parameters prior to leaving
the fuel manufacturing facility.
H. Precision and Accuracy Demonstration
The streamlining rule carried the principles for the Performance-
based Measurement System (PBMS) from 40 CFR part 80 into 40 CFR part
1090. The streamlining rule added specifications to clarify how to
apply quality-control testing requirements for meeting precision and
accuracy requirements. Demonstrating precision and accuracy is critical
for ensuring that test results are valid and properly represent the
sample.\20\ In reviewing program implementation for quality-control
testing, we recognized the need to address two shortcomings. First,
while in-house testing for accuracy requires that test results meet
specifications, the option to demonstrate compliance with accuracy
requirements by periodically participating in a crosscheck program does
not identify a ``fail'' condition for nonconforming test results.
Second, for both precision and accuracy, the regulations do not
describe the consequence for failing to meet requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 40 CFR 1090.1375.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA is proposing that any of the following outcomes would result in
a failed test result from a crosscheck program and thus are not valid
for demonstrating compliance with accuracy requirements:
The crosscheck program does not have a robust accepted
reference value (ARV) based on the check standard requirements in
Section 6.2 of ASTM D6299.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ ASTM D6299-23a, ``Standard Practice for Applying
Statistical Quality Assurance and Control Charting Techniques to
Evaluate Analytical Measurement System Performance,'' approved
December 1, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The difference between the test result and the ARV is
greater than the maximum allowable difference for accuracy under 40 CFR
1090.1375.
The difference between the test result and the ARV is
greater than the method-defined limit for check standard accuracy, if
applicable.
The measured value lies outside of two Z-scores.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ The Z-score is a standardized dimensionless measure of the
difference between an individual result in a data set and the sample
arithmetic mean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If test results from a crosscheck program are found to be invalid
for demonstrating compliance, EPA is proposing to allow a laboratory to
make timely corrections to avoid a compliance or enforcement
consequence. Specifically, EPA is proposing that the laboratory would
need to respond to a problematic test result by performing a root cause
analysis and correcting the problem, which we understand to already be
standard practice across the industry. The laboratory would need to
document the findings of the root cause analysis and the steps taken to
correct the problem. Under this proposal, the laboratory would have a
grace period to continue testing for 35 days without being out of
compliance. After that grace period, the laboratory would need to
demonstrate that they again meet accuracy and precision requirements.
The laboratory would be considered to continue to meet accuracy
requirements if, after correcting the problems identified by the root
cause analysis, in-house testing meets accuracy requirements using a
check standard qualified by a third party. Alternatively, the
laboratory could participate in the next crosscheck program and receive
test results meeting specifications. We believe the proposed deadline
for correcting issues represent a reasonable timeframe for taking
remedial action and getting new test results.
Failing to meet precision or accuracy requirements indicates that
test instruments are not suitable for generating valid test results for
certification. As a result, EPA is proposing to specify that presumed
fuel parameters \23\ would apply any time a laboratory fails to meet
precision or accuracy requirements that prevent it from demonstrating
compliance with standards using valid test results. For meeting
accuracy requirements by participating in a crosscheck program, the
presumed fuel parameters would apply only if the laboratory failed to
correct the problems identified by the root cause analysis and repeat
testing with valid test results within the specified timeframe. On the
other hand, if corrective action is not taken to remedy the failing
result within the specified timeframe, the presumed fuel parameters
would apply for all relevant tests starting on the date the laboratory
received the first failing report from the crosscheck program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 40 CFR 1090.1710(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We request comment on these proposed revisions to precision and
accuracy requirements. We specifically request comment on the proposed
criteria for evaluating test results from crosscheck programs, the
proposed process and timeline for remedying an adverse result from
crosscheck programs, and the proposed approach and timeline to address
a finding that a laboratory has failed to meet precision and accuracy
requirements.
The proposed criteria for crosscheck programs create a boundary to
ensure that individual test results are accurate for purposes of
meeting standards; they do not address a scenario in which a laboratory
would manage measurement error in a way that consistently undershoots
the true value by a small amount. We accordingly request comment on
specific provisions that would address such a possibility of long-term
bias in test results.
It bears note that these proposed revisions narrowly address
failures to meet precision and accuracy requirements in quality-control
testing under 40 CFR 1090.1375. Any broader or different failure to
meet testing specifications under 40 CFR part 1090 would be treated as
its own violation based on the circumstances that apply.
I. Excluding SQC Data Points
EPA is proposing to allow for the exclusion of certain test results
from statistical quality control (SQC) testing, as long as the fuel
manufacturer or their third-party laboratory meets certain criteria.
The regulations currently incorporate by reference ASTM D6299-20;
however, neither 40 CFR part 1090 nor ASTM D6299-20 clearly addresses
how to handle suspected outlier results obtained as part of SQC
testing.\24\ Since
[[Page 70055]]
the streamlining rule was promulgated in 2020, however, ASTM has
updated this method to ASTM D6299-23a, which allows for the exclusion
of outliers in SQC testing. Fuel manufacturers have asked EPA to update
its incorporation by reference of ASTM D6299-20 in 40 CFR part 1090 to
ASTM D6299-23a to also address outliers as part of SQC testing. EPA is
proposing to update the regulations to reference the updated standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 40 CFR 1090.95(c)(30) and 1090.1375.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of SQC testing is to ensure that a fuel manufacturer or
their third-party laboratory is conducting valid tests to ensure
compliance with EPA's fuel quality requirements. Under ASTM D6299-23a,
excluding an SQC test result can be appropriate under two scenarios:
Scenario 1: When identified as an outlier using an
appropriate statistical test, such as the Generalized Extreme
Studentized Deviate (GESD), and evidence gathered from an investigation
supports the exclusion. Supporting evidence could include a
transcription error or other assignable cause that is not part of the
normal process and needs to be properly documented.
Scenario 2: During what is perceived to be normal
operations of the SQC process, an SQC test result might fall outside of
the Upper or Lower Control Limit, which is a strong indication of a
system that is out-of-statistical-control (OOS). However, an immediate
retest SQC sample should be performed to confirm the OOS event. If the
retest indicates the system is in control as described in ASTM D6299-
23a, then the OOS is not confirmed and the original SQC result might be
excluded following further statistical analysis as addressed in section
A1.5.4.1 of ASTM D6299-23a.
To provide clarity, EPA is proposing to allow outliers to be
excluded from SQC samples--but not certification samples--under the
certain circumstances outlined in ASTM D6299-23a.
However, we are concerned that parties may dub certain test results
as outliers even though the test result is valid and should be included
as part of SQC simply because the party does not like the test result.
Therefore, EPA is also proposing to add recordkeeping requirements for
exclusion events. If SQC data are excluded using the protocols outlined
in ASTM D6299-23a, the laboratory would need to document the result as
well as the assignable cause and justification for exclusion. EPA
expects that SQC exclusions should be visible on the user's quality
control chart while at the same time be excluded from ongoing SQC
statistics. Under this proposed approach, if EPA determines that the
assignable cause for a test result treated as an outlier was not
consistent with the circumstances described in ASTM D6299-23a, then
such a test result would need to be retroactively included in the
party's SQC. Furthermore, if documentation of the result as well as the
assignable cause and justification are not maintained, EPA is proposing
that the test result must also be included as part of the party's SQC.
We request comment on this proposed approach to excluding outliers
for SQC testing.
J. Testing of Oxygenates for PCG Under Compliance by Subtraction
EPA is proposing a separate procedure for blending manufacturers
that make a new batch of fuel with PCG that was a gasoline before
oxygenate blending (BOB) and do not want to account for oxygenate added
downstream under the compliance by subtraction provisions at 40 CFR
1090.1320(a)(1).\25\ Under the existing regulations, a blending
manufacturer certifying a batch using the PCG by subtraction procedures
must create a hand blend of the PCG if the PCG was a BOB to determine
the parameters of the PCG that will be used for the blending
manufacturer's compliance calculations.\26\ EPA established this
requirement to ensure consistent accounting of sulfur and benzene
levels of the PCG and believes that this approach is reasonable in the
case where both the manufacturer of the PCG (a BOB in this case) and
the manufacturer of the new finished fuel have accounted for oxygenate
added downstream. However, after finalization of the streamlining rule,
one stakeholder suggested that the creation of a hand blend for the PCG
would not result in an accurate accounting of sulfur and benzene levels
of the new finished fuel if the manufacturer of such fuel did not
account for oxygenate added downstream. Rather, this stakeholder
highlighted that testing both the PCG and the finished fuel without the
addition of oxygenates would result in the correct sulfur and benzene
levels of the reported sulfur and benzene values for average annual
compliance if the manufacturer did not intend to account for oxygenate
added downstream. Thus, in this circumstance there is no need to create
a hand blend. EPA agrees with this assessment and as such is proposing
to clarify the regulations to accommodate the scenario where a blending
manufacturer complies by subtraction for PCG and does not account for
oxygenate added downstream. Under this proposal, the blending
manufacturer would test and report the sulfur and benzene values of the
PCG and the finished fuel without the addition of oxygenates, which
would be netted during the fuel manufacturer's annual compliance
demonstration to report the correct sulfur and benzene values of the
added blendstock. EPA still believes blending manufacturers that use
the compliance by subtraction provisions to certify batches of fuels
produced from PCG and elect to account for oxygenate added downstream
should follow the existing requirement to create a hand blend of both
the PCG and the finished fuel and are therefore not proposing to change
that requirement. We request comment on this approach.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ Under EPA's fuel quality regulations, a gasoline
manufacturer may add additional blendstocks to PCG to create a new
batch of gasoline so long as the gasoline manufacturer certifies the
new batch as meeting all applicable per-gallon standards, and
properly accounts for the sulfur and benzene levels of the gasoline
manufacturer's annual average compliance calculations. The
regulations at 40 CFR 1090.1320 provide two options for the
certification of a new batch using PCG. First, the gasoline
manufacturer may directly measure the gasoline and sulfur levels of
the added blendstock and report those measurements and the volume as
a positive batch thereby adding those values to the gasoline
manufacturer's annual sulfur and benzene compliance calculations;
this procedure is called compliance by addition. The gasoline
manufacturer may also determine the sulfur and benzene levels of the
new blendstocks by measuring the sulfur and benzene levels of the
PCG and the finished fuel then subtracting the PCG from the finished
fuel to determine the values of the added blendstock; as such, this
procedure is called compliance by subtraction. Gasoline
manufacturers often use the compliance by subtraction method for PCG
because it is often impractical to directly measure the sulfur and
benzene values of blendstocks.
\26\ 40 CFR 1090.1320(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Other Technical Amendments
A. Definition of Batch
EPA is proposing to modify the definition of batch to better align
with how the sampling and testing regulatory provisions establish the
values for the regulated parameters for batches. Under the current
definition, a batch is defined as a ``quantity of fuel, fuel additive,
or regulated blendstock that has a homogeneous set of properties.''
\27\ The definition notes further that ``[t]his also includes fuel,
fuel additive, or regulated blendstock for which homogeneity testing is
not required under Sec. 1090.1337(a).'' Since this definition was
promulgated in the streamlining rule, industry stakeholders have
identified that the definition appears inconsistent because it says
that a batch must be homogeneous, but the
[[Page 70056]]
regulations also allow for certifying a batch without demonstrating
homogeneity. It is also the case that fuel produced with in-line
blending procedures is not subject to any homogeneity requirement. To
address these concerns, EPA is proposing to revise the definition of
batch to mean ``a quantity of fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock with properties that can be characterized by a single set of
values using the measurement procedures in subpart N of this part.'' We
believe this framing better reflects our intent to have the values
established through the sampling and testing provisions reflect the
volume identified as the batch for manual sampling in cases where
homogeneity has been determined and in cases where a party is allowed
to certify a batch without demonstrating homogeneity. The proposed
definition also aligns with the requirement that fuel manufacturers
using in-line blending must collect a single composite sample that
represents the whole batch being certified. We request comment on this
revised definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 40 CFR 1090.80.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Truthful Reporting
EPA is proposing to clarify a requirement that applies to all
information submitted to the Agency. Parties that submit information to
EPA must, among other things, ensure that the information is complete,
accurate, and not misleading according to the submitter's personal
knowledge and belief. This requirement is codified at 18 U.S.C. 1001
and in several other statutory provisions. EPA's data systems--such as
DCFuel and the EPA Moderated Transaction System (EMTS)--require the
submitter to actively acknowledge this responsibility. For DCFuel, the
submitter confirms that the information ``meets all the requirements of
the'' applicable regulations by actively checking the certification
box. Similarly, when information is submitted through EMTS, the
submitter certifies that, ``the information shown is a correct and
accurate account of the transaction(s) that have taken place'' or,
``under penalty of law, that the information provided in this document
is, to the best of [the submitter's] knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. [The submitter is] aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.'' When
information is submitted to EPA through email, however, there is
currently no equivalent certification made, though the same requirement
to submit complete, accurate, and not misleading information still
applies. Therefore, EPA is proposing to add language in 40 CFR 1090.20
to ensure that the regulated community is aware that this obligation
applies to all information submitted under 40 CFR part 1090, regardless
of the form of that submission. We note that the statutory requirement
to submit complete, accurate, and not misleading information applies
with or without the proposed regulatory clarification. We request
comment on this language.
C. Clarification of RVP Standard in Federal 7.8 psi RVP Areas
EPA is proposing to correct the RVP standards for federal 7.8 psi
RVP areas to allow for the use of 9.0 psi RVP summer gasoline in
federal 7.8 psi RVP areas during the month of May. Prior to the
streamlining rule, gasoline used in federal 7.8 psi RVP areas had to
meet a 9.0 psi RVP standard during the month of May and a 7.8 psi RVP
standard for the remainder of the summer season (i.e., June 1 to
September 15). In the gasoline RVP standards specified in 40 CFR part
1090.215, EPA inadvertently modified the RVP standard for federal 7.8
psi RVP areas for the month of May in transcribing the previous RVP
standards table in 40 CFR 80.27. This proposed revision would fix that
transcription error.
D. National Fuel Survey Program Notifications
EPA is proposing that independent surveyors include additional
information in notifications to EPA and branded fuel manufacturers when
the surveyor identifies potential non-compliance as part of the NFSP.
Under the current NFSP requirements, the independent surveyor utilizes
information about retail outlets to identify potential locations and
ultimately randomly selects retail outlets for sampling. When the
independent surveyor collects samples, it tests the sample to determine
whether it meets the applicable fuel quality standards. If a test
result exceeds one or more applicable standards, the independent
surveyor is required to notify EPA, the retailer, and the branded fuel
manufacturer (if applicable) within 24 hours of identifying the issue.
The current regulations do not specify that the surveyor indicate the
contact information of the retail outlet in the notification provided
to EPA or the branded fuel manufacturer (if applicable), even though
the independent surveyor has this information readily available. Based
on EPA's experience with the NFSP to date, we believe that including
such information as part of the notifications for potentially non-
compliant samples would help EPA and branded fuel manufacturers more
expeditiously resolve these issues consistent with EPA's original
intent in setting up the NFSP. As such, EPA is proposing that any
notification to EPA or a branded fuel manufacturer of a potential non-
compliant sample would be required to include the retail outlet's
contact information, including name, title, mailing address, telephone
number, and email address of a representative of the retail outlet, if
available. We request comment on this proposed requirement.
E. Fuel Certification With Domestic Marine Vessels
Several stakeholders requested flexibility to meet testing
requirements for fuel certification when loading gasoline or diesel
fuel onto domestic marine vessels, specifically by sampling and testing
with the procedures that apply for importing fuel on marine vessels as
specified in 40 CFR 1090.1605. EPA is proposing to provide this
flexibility subject to the stipulations that each vessel compartment
would need to be sampled and tested independently, and that no
additional product would be loaded after sampling has been completed.
The marine vessel would also not be permitted to navigate beyond 15
miles from the fuel manufacturing facility or discharge fuel until
demonstrating compliance with all applicable per-gallon standards. This
proposed condition is intended to allow fuel manufacturers to free up
dock space while waiting on test results. However, the fuel
manufacturer would still be accountable for any noncompliance and would
maintain responsibility for addressing any noncompliance before the
fuel is discharged. EPA selected the 15-mile limit based on prior
discussions with industry and believes this distance would be
sufficient to allow for vessels to travel to free up dock space and
still return to port to bring fuel back to the fuel manufacturing
facility if an issue is identified with the fuel after it has left the
dock.
We request comment on this proposed flexibility for certifying fuel
on domestic marine vessels, including the appropriateness of the 15-
mile limit.
F. Technical Corrections
EPA is proposing numerous technical amendments to 40 CFR part 1090.
These amendments are being made to correct minor inaccuracies and
clarify the current regulations. These changes are described in Table
III.F-1. We seek comment on the proposed changes.
[[Page 70057]]
Table III.F-1--Miscellaneous Technical Corrections and Clarifications to
Fuel Quality Regulations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part and section of Title 40 Description of revision
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1090.50(a)............................. Removing explanatory text that
noted that the rounding
provisions at 1090.50 are
consistent with ASTM E29 and
NIST SP 811.
1090.55(b)(1), 1090.215(d)(1), and Changing the term ``retail
1090.1335(b)(3). station'' to ``retail outlet''
to be consistent with the
defined terms in 1090.80.
1090.55(b)(2).......................... Adding cross-references to
1090.1335 to ensure that
auditors for in-line blending
waivers have experience with
sampling VCSBs.
1090.55(b)(3).......................... Clarifying that auditing in-
line blending operations
requires an auditor to be
familiar with the in-line
blending waiver provisions of
1090.1315 and to demonstrate
work experience and be
proficient with the automatic
sampling procedures specified
in 1090.1335(c).
1090.80................................ Adding missing definitions of
``Distillate global marine
fuel'', ``ECA associated
area'', ``Emission control
area (ECA)'', ``Fuel additive
manufacturing facility'',
``Regulated blendstock import
facility'', and ``Regulated
blendstock production
facility''.
1090.85(g)............................. Adding paragraph to clarify
that generic terms may also be
used to refer to specific
fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock types.
1090.90................................ Adding missing acronym for
volume additive reconciliation
(VAR).
1090.110(c)............................ Removing requirement for
detergent blenders to
demonstrate compliance with
1090.260(a) and 1090.1240
because it is duplicative of
existing requirements at
1090.100(a) and 1090.110(a).
1090.215(c)............................ Adding paragraph to clarify
that the most stringent RVP
standard applies when more
than one summer gasoline RVP
standard applies in the same
geographic area.
1090.220(e) and 1090.1320(b)........... Clarifying that parties may not
blend certified butane and
certified pentane into
previously certified summer
reformulated gasoline (RFG) or
summer RBOB under
1090.1320(b).
1090.515(d)............................ Adding the term ``other'' prior
to nonroad engines to clarify
that the provision that limits
the use of 500 ppm LM diesel
in nonroad engines does not
include locomotive and marine
engines that are allowed to
use it.
1090.605, 1090.610, 1090.615, 1090.620, Amending to use consistent
1090.625, 1090.630, 1090.635, language for all exemption
1090.640, 1090.645, and 1090.650. provisions and clarifying
which exemption provisions
also apply to fuel additives
and regulated blendstocks.
1090.605(a)(1)......................... Updating national security
exemption to remove obsolete
references to engine and
vehicle emission standards.
1090.700, 1090.715, 1090.725, 1090.740, Clarifying and simplifying the
and 1090.745. existing equations for sulfur
and benzene, but not changing
the overall calculations.
1090.905(c)(1)(viii)(A), Clarifying that batch reports
(c)(2)(viii)(A), and (c)(8)(vii)(A). must include whether the 1-psi
waiver applies to the batch of
summer gasoline.
1090.905(c)(3)(i)(H)................... Removing requirement to report
RVP standard and RVP test
results for gasoline produced
from PCG using compliance by
subtraction because it is
duplicative of the reporting
requirement at
1090.905(c)(3)(ii).
1090.915(c)(5)......................... Clarifying that oxygenate
producers may report sulfur
levels as allowed under
1090.1330 instead of only
through testing.
1090.1000(e)(2)(i)(A).................. Clarifying that a certified
butane producer must test
certified butane before
transferring the certified
butane batch for delivery.
1090.1105.............................. Clarifying that the PTD
requirements of this section
apply to exempt fuel additive
and regulated blendstock in
addition to exempt fuel.
1090.1110(e)........................... Clarifying which PTD
requirements apply to gasoline
detergent and which PTD
requirements apply to
gasoline.
1090.1215(a)........................... Clarifying that distillate
global marine fuel
manufacturers must comply with
the recordkeeping requirements
of this section.
1090.1230(b)(8)........................ Removing recordkeeping
requirements for the sampling
and testing of undenatured
ethanol because they are
duplicative of the general
recordkeeping requirements for
all sampling and testing at
1090.1205(c).
1090.1240(b)(2)(ii)(B)................. Clarifying that the total
volume of detergent must be
calculated in gallons.
1090.1255(a)........................... Clarifying that a manufacturer
or distributor of 500 ppm LM
diesel fuel using transmix
must comply with the
recordkeeping requirements of
this section.
1090.1315(a)(1)........................ Amending to allow for an RCO's
delegate to submit in-line
blending waiver requests.
1090.1335(b)........................... Adding a reference to the
latest version of ASTM D4057
for manual sampling and
updating the regulation to
include proper cites to
content in ASTM D4057.
1090.1335(b)(4)........................ Adding a statement for manual
sampling to clarify that, once
the batch meets homogeneity
specifications, any properly
drawn sample may be used to
represent the batch.
1090.1335(c)........................... Reorganizing paragraph content
to align with manual sampling.
[[Page 70058]]
1090.1337(b)........................... Clarifying how samples tested
for homogeneity may be used to
certify a batch of fuel.
1090.1337(c)........................... Removing separate reference to
tap sampling, since that is
just one kind of spot
sampling.
1090.1337(d)........................... Clarifying that the homogeneity
parameters for gasoline apply
equally for GTAB and TGP.
1090.1337(d)........................... Allowing for homogeneity
testing based on density as
being equivalent to API
gravity.
1090.1337(e)........................... Expanding paragraph to describe
homogeneity testing parameters
for oxygenate and certified
ethanol denaturant.
1090.1337(f)........................... Adjusting wording to allow for
a passing result for
homogeneity testing if the
variation among measured
values is exactly equal to the
pass-fail criterion.
1090.1340(a)(1)........................ Clarifying that a hand blend
from the worst-case BOB sample
is required if fuel
manufacturers rely on worst-
case results instead of
performing homogeneity
testing.
1090.1350(c)(4)........................ Clarifying that the specified
recording precision applies
for all measured oxygenate
compounds.
1090.1355(b)........................... Updating for consistent
reference to test methods
rather than test procedures.
1090.1360(b)(1)(i)..................... Clarifying the absolute fuel
parameters by removing text
that is duplicative of the
PBMS requirements at
1090.1350(a).
1090.1365(a)(3)........................ Clarifying that qualifying a
test method applies for all
instruments needed for those
measurements.
1090.1365(b)(3)........................ Clarifying that laboratories
qualifying an alternative
method for oxygenate
measurements must include all
the oxygenate compounds
identified in the referee
method (ASTM D5599).
1090.1365(b)(3), Table 3............... Referencing an older version of
ASTM D5191 to properly
identify the version
corresponding to the specified
reproducibility value for
gasoline RVP measurements to
qualify alternative
measurement procedures.
1090.1365(c)(3)(i)..................... Narrowing the scope of the
demonstration to exclude fuel
additives and regulated
blendstocks (other than
butane) that are not covered
by PBMS.
1090.1375(c)........................... Simplifying the instruction to
select a test fuel for quality
testing by requiring that the
fuel sample have an ARV
representing fuel that is
typical for testing, rather
than requiring selecting a
sample with an ARV that is
connected to a standard. This
is especially important for
RVP measurements, where there
might be multiple standards.
1090.1375(d)........................... Decreasing the crosscheck
program requirements for RVP
testing from three to two
times per year. This is based
on RVP standards applying only
for summer gasoline.
1090.1395(a)(1)(i)..................... Clarifying that baseline fuel
for detergent testing must
contain between 8.0 and 10.0
volume percent ethanol instead
of denatured fuel ethanol
(DFE). This is consistent with
the previous provisions at 40
CFR part 80.
1090.1420(a)(2)........................ Clarifying that the two
references to ``10 volume
percent'' are referring to 10
volume percent ethanol and not
10 volume percent DFE.
1090.1450(c)(3)(ii) and (v)............ Clarifying that summer gasoline
samples that are not subject
to EPA's federal RVP standards
under 1090.630 do not need to
be tested for RVP under the
National Sampling and Testing
Oversight Program (NSTOP).
1090.1605(b)(1)(i)..................... Making explicit the assumption
that fuel in an individual
compartment on a marine vessel
is homogeneous.
1090.1605(b)(1)(ii).................... Clarifying how to demonstrate
that a composite sample is
valid.
1090.1605(b)(1)(iii)................... Clarifying that RVP
measurements are on individual
samples, not composite
samples.
1090.1610(a)(1)(i)(A).................. Removing the word ``fuel'' to
account for parameter
measurements in fuel
additives, etc.
1090.1800(a)(3)........................ Adding 1090.1800(a)(3) to
clarify that gasoline
manufacturers that transact
sulfur/benzene credits for a
compliance period but that did
not produce gasoline in that
compliance period must still
undergo an annual attest audit
for the credit transactions.
1090.1810, 1090.1815, 1090.1820, Amending to use consistent
1090.1825, 1090.1830, 1090.1835, language for all attestation
1090.1840, 1090.1845. engagement provisions.
[[Page 70059]]
1090.1, 1090.5, 1090.15, 1090.20, Correcting typographical,
1090.80, 1090.90, 1090.95, 1090.100, grammatical, and consistency
1090.105, 1090.110, 1090.130, errors.
1090.140, 1090.145, 1090.155,
1090.160, 1090.165, 1090.175,
1090.180, 1090.200, 1090.210,
1090.215, 1090.230, 1090.265,
1090.285, 1090.290, 1090.295,
1090.300, 1090.310, 1090.315,
1090.325, 1090.500, 1090.510,
1090.520, 1090.605, 1090.610,
1090.615, 1090.620, 1090.625,
1090.630, 1090.635, 1090.640,
1090.645, 1090.650, 1090.700,
1090.710, 1090.715, 1090.720,
1090.725, 1090.730, 1090.735,
1090.740, 1090.745, 1090.800,
1090.805, 1090.815, 1090.820,
1090.900, 1090.905, 1090.910,
1090.915, 1090.925, 1090.930,
1090.935, 1090.1000, 1090.1005,
1090.1010, 1090.1015, 1090.1100,
1090.1105, 1090.1110, 1090.1115,
1090.1120, 1090.1205, 1090.1210,
1090.1215, 1090.1230, 1090.1240,
1090.1245, 1090.1250, 1090.1255,
1090.1320, 1090.1335, 1090.1340,
1090.1350, 1090.1355, 1090.1365,
1090.1375, 1090.1390, 1090.1395,
1090.1400, 1090.1405, 1090.1410,
1090.1415, 1090.1420, 1090.1450,
1090.1515, 1090.1600, 1090.1610,
1090.1615, 1090.1710, 1090.1715,
1090.1800, 1090.1805, 1090.1810,
1090.1815, 1090.1820, 1090.1825,
1090.1830, 1090.1835, 1090.1840,
1090.1845, 1090.1850.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094, and was
therefore not subject to a requirement for Executive Order 12866
review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing regulations and has assigned OMB
control number 2060-0731.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, EPA concludes that the impact of concern for
this rule is any significant adverse economic impact on small entities
and that the agency is certifying that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
because the rule has no net regulatory burden on the small entities
subject to the rule.
The small entities directly regulated by the RFS program are small
refiners, which are defined at 13 CFR 121.201. This action proposes
relatively minor corrections and modifications to EPA's fuel quality
regulations, and we do not anticipate that there will be any
significant cost increases associated with these proposed changes. We
have therefore concluded that this action will have no net regulatory
burden for all directly regulated small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action imposes
no enforceable duty on any state, local, or tribal governments.
Requirements for the private sector do not exceed $100 million in any
one year.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action will be implemented at the Federal
level and potentially affects transportation fuel refiners, blenders,
marketers, distributors, importers, exporters, and renewable fuel
producers and importers. Tribal governments would be affected only to
the extent they produce, purchase, and use regulated fuels. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children,
per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of
the Executive Order. Therefore, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or
safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
Part 51
This action involves technical standards. Except for the standards
discussed in this section, the standards included in the regulatory
text as incorporated by reference were all
[[Page 70060]]
previously approved for incorporation by reference (IBR) and no change
is included in this action.
In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are proposing
to incorporate by reference the use of attestation standards from the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The
referenced standards may be obtained from AICPA, 220 Leigh Farm Rd.,
Durham, NC 27707-8110, (919) 402-4500, or www.aicpa-cima.org. We are
proposing to incorporate by reference the following standards from
AICPA:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard or test method Part and section of Title 40 Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, 1090.95 and 1090.1800..................... This updated document
updated through December 2023. describes standardized
accounting practices for
performing audits.
Statement on Standards for 1090.95 and 1090.1800..................... This updated document
Attestation Engagements No. 19, describes standardized
Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements, practices for performing
Issued December 2019. attestation engagements.
System of Quality Management Standard 1090.95 and 1090.1800..................... This new standard describes
No. 1, A Firm's System of Quality requirements for designing
Management; Issued June 2022. quality standards.
System of Quality Management Standard 1090.95 and 1090.1800..................... This new standard describes
No. 2, Engagement Quality Reviews; quality standards for
Issued June 2022. performing attestation
engagements.
System of Quality Management Standard 1090.95 and 1090.1800..................... This new standard describes
No. 3, Amendments to Quality amended requirements for
Management Standard Section 10, ``A designing quality standards
Firm's System of Quality and performing attestation
Management'' and Section 20, engagements.
``Engagement Quality Reviews;''
Issued March 2023.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are proposing
to incorporate by reference the use of certain standards and test
methods from ASTM International. The referenced standards and test
methods may be obtained from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA, 19428-2959, (610) 832-9585, or
www.astm.org. We are proposing to incorporate by reference the
following standards from ASTM International:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard or test method Part and section of Title 40 Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASTM D86-23ae1, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1350..................... This updated standard
for Distillation of Petroleum describes procedures to
Products and Liquid Fuels at characterize a fuel's
Atmospheric Pressure, approved distillation parameters.
December 1, 2023.
ASTM D975-24, Standard Specification 1090.80 and 1090.95....................... This updated standard
for Diesel Fuel, approved May 1, describes parameters to
2024. characterize a range of
properties and grades of
diesel fuel.
ASTM D1319-20a, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1350..................... This updated standard
for Hydrocarbon Types in Liquid describes procedures to
Petroleum Products by Fluorescent measure the aromatic content
Indicator Adsorption, approved of diesel fuel.
August 1, 2020.
ASTM D2163-23, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1350..................... This updated standard
for Determination of Hydrocarbons in describes procedures to
Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gases and measure the purity and
Propane/Propene Mixtures by Gas benzene content of butane
Chromatography, approved March 1, and pentane.
2023.
ASTM D2622-21, Standard Test Method 1090.95, 1090.1350, 1090.1360, and This updated standard
for Sulfur in Petroleum Products by 1090.1375. describes procedures to
Wavelength Dispersive X-ray measure sulfur content.
Fluorescence Spectrometry, approved
December 1, 2021.
ASTM D3231-24, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1350..................... This updated standard
for Phosphorus in Gasoline, approved describes procedures to
March 1, 2024. measure the phosphorus
content of gasoline.
ASTM D3237-22, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1350..................... This updated standard
for Lead in Gasoline by Atomic describes procedures to
Absorption Spectroscopy, approved measure the lead content of
October 1, 2022. gasoline.
ASTM D4052-22, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1337..................... This updated standard
for Density, Relative Density, and describes procedures to
API Gravity of Liquids by Digital measure fuel density.
Density Meter, approved May 1, 2022.
ASTM D4057-22, Standard Practice for 1090.95, 1090.1335, and 1090.1605......... This updated standard
Manual Sampling of Petroleum and describes procedures to
Petroleum Products, approved May 1, normalize manual sampling
2022. procedures for measuring
fuel parameters.
ASTM D4177-22e1, Standard Practice 1090.95, 1090.1315, and 1090.1335......... This updated standard
for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum describes procedures to
and Petroleum Products, approved normalize automatic sampling
July 1, 2022. procedures for an in-line
blending configuration.
ASTM D4814-24a, Standard 1090.80, 1090.95, and 1090.1395........... This updated standard
Specification for Automotive Spark- describes parameters to
Ignition Engine Fuel, approved July characterize a range of
1, 2024. properties and grades of
motor gasoline.
ASTM D5186-24, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1350..................... This updated standard
for Determination of the Aromatic describes procedures to
Content and Polynuclear Aromatic measure the aromatic content
Content of Diesel Fuels By of diesel fuel.
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography,
approved July 1, 2024.
ASTM D5191-22, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1360..................... This updated standard
for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum describes procedures to
Products and Liquid Fuels (Mini measure the volatility of
Method), approved July 1, 2022. gasoline.
[[Page 70061]]
ASTM D5599-22, Standard Test Method 1090.95 and 1090.1360..................... This updated standard
for Determination of Oxygenates in describes procedures to
Gasoline by Gas Chromatography and measure the oxygenate
Oxygen Selective Flame Ionization content of gasoline.
Detection, approved April 1, 2022.
ASTM D5769-22, Standard Test Method 1090.95, 1090.1350, and 1090.1360......... This updated standard
for Determination of Benzene, describes procedures to
Toluene, and Total Aromatics in measure a fuel's
Finished Gasolines by Gas concentration of benzene and
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, other aromatic compounds.
approved July 1, 2022.
ASTM D6299-23a, Standard Practice for 1090.95, 1090.1370, 1090.1375, and This updated standard
Applying Statistical Quality 1090.1450. describes numerical and
Assurance and Control Charting statistical methods for
Techniques to Evaluate Analytical evaluating procedures for
Measurement System Performance, measuring various fuel
approved December 1, 2023. parameters.
ASTM D6667-21, Standard Test Method 1090.95, 1090.1360, and 1090.1375......... This updated standard
for Determination of Total Volatile describes procedures to
Sulfur in Gaseous Hydrocarbons and measure the sulfur content
Liquefied Petroleum Gases by of butane.
Ultraviolet Fluorescence, approved
April 1, 2021.
ASTM D6751-24, Standard Specification 1090.95 and 1090.1350..................... This updated standard
for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock describes the
(B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, characteristics of
approved March 1, 2024. biodiesel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASTM International and AICPA regularly publish updated versions of
their standards, with the potential that there will be a published
version of one or more of the documents listed above before we adopt
the final rule that is more recent than the documents we identify in
this proposed rule. For any of these more recently updated versions, we
will consider including a reference to the latest document when we
finalize the revisions covered by this proposed rule.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations and
Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All
EPA believes this type of action does not concern human health or
environmental conditions and therefore cannot be evaluated with respect
to potentially disproportionate and adverse effects on communities with
environmental justice concerns. This action does not affect the level
of protection provided to human health or the environment by applicable
air quality standards. This action proposes relatively minor
corrections and modifications to EPA's existing fuel quality
regulations and therefore will not cause emissions increases from these
sources.
V. Amendatory Instructions
Amendatory instructions are the standard terms that OFR uses to
give specific instructions to agencies on how to change the CFR. OFR's
historical guidance was to include amendatory instructions accompanying
each individual change that was being made (e.g., each sentence or
individual paragraph). The piecemeal amendments served as an indication
of changes EPA was proposing for public comment. Due to the extensive
number of technical and conforming amendments being proposed in this
action, however, EPA is utilizing OFR's new amendatory instruction
``revise and republish'' for proposed revisions that will become
effective when this action is finalized.\28\ Therefore, instead of the
past practice of piecemeal amendments for proposed revisions to the
CFR, EPA is using the ``revise and republish'' instruction to both
revise regulatory text that is being proposed for comment and republish
in their entirety certain sections of 40 CFR part 1090 that contain the
regulatory text being revised and proposed for comment. To indicate
those portions of provisions where changes are being proposed for
comment, EPA has created a red-line version of 40 CFR part 1090 that
incorporates the proposed changes. This red-line version is available
in the docket for this action, as well as on EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/diesel-fuel-standards/fuels-regulatory-streamlining. This
red-line version provides further context to assist the public in
reviewing and making meaningful comments on the proposed regulatory
text changes. As previously noted, EPA is not reopening those unchanged
provisions for comment. Republishing provisions that are unchanged in
this proposal is consistent with guidance from OFR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ OFR's Document Drafting Handbook (Chapter 2, 2-38) explains
that agencies ``[u]se [r]epublish to set out unchanged text for the
convenience of the reader, often to provide context for your
regulatory changes.'' https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/write/handbook. Additional information on OFR's mandatory use of
``revise and republish'' is available at https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/write/ddh/revise-republish.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Statutory Authority
Statutory authority for this action comes from sections 114, 202,
203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 211, 213, 216, and 301 of the Clean
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7521, 7522, 7523, 7524, 7525, 7541, 7542,
7543, 7545, 7547, 7550, and 7601.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 1090
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Diesel fuel, Fuel additives, Gasoline, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Oil imports, Petroleum, Renewable fuel.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR part 1090 as follows:
PART 1090--REGULATION OF FUELS, FUEL ADDITIVES, AND REGULATED
BLENDSTOCKS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1090 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7521, 7522-7525, 7541, 7542, 7543,
7545, 7547, 7550, and 7601.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. Amend Sec. 1090.1 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1 Applicability and relationship to other parts.
(a) * * *
(1) The regulations include standards for fuel parameters that
directly or indirectly affect vehicle, engine, and equipment emissions,
air quality, and public health. The regulations also include standards
and requirements for
[[Page 70062]]
fuel additives and regulated blendstocks that are components of any
fuel regulated under this part.
(2) This part also specifies requirements for any person who
engages in activities associated with the production, distribution,
storage, and sale of any fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock,
such as collecting and testing samples for regulated parameters,
reporting information to EPA to demonstrate compliance with fuel
quality requirements, and performing other compliance measures to
implement the standards. A party that produces and distributes other
related products, such as heating oil, may need to meet certain
reporting, recordkeeping, labeling, or other requirements of this part.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 1090.5 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (b)(3) and (c)(4); and
0
b. Adding paragraph (d).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1090.5 Implementation dates.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Unless otherwise specified, a regulated party must use the
provisions of 40 CFR part 80 in 2021 to demonstrate compliance with
regulatory requirements for the 2020 calendar year. This applies to
calculating credits for the 2020 compliance period, and to any
sampling, testing, reporting, or auditing related to any fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock produced or imported in 2020.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) The independent surveyor may collect only one summer or winter
gasoline sample for each participating gasoline manufacturing facility
instead of the minimum two samples required under Sec.
1090.1450(c)(2)(i).
(d) The provisions of Sec. 1090.1315(a)(7) through (14) apply
beginning March 1, 2025. Fuel manufacturers may optionally apply those
new provisions before March 1, 2025.
0
4. Amend Sec. 1090.15 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.15 Confidential business information.
* * * * *
(e) EPA may disclose the information specified in paragraphs (b)
through (d) of this section on its website, or otherwise make it
available to interested parties, without additional notice,
notwithstanding any claims that the information is entitled to
confidential treatment under 40 CFR part 2, subpart B or 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4).
0
5. Amend Sec. 1090.20 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (f); and
0
b. Adding paragraph (g).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1090.20 Approval of submissions under this part.
* * * * *
(f) Any person who has an approval revoked or voided under this
part is liable for any resulting violation of the requirements of this
part.
(g) Submitting false, misleading, or incomplete information is a
violation of law.
0
6. Amend Sec. 1090.50 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.50 Rounding.
(a) Unless otherwise specified, round values to the number of
significant digits necessary to match the number of decimal places of
the applicable standard or specification. Perform all rounding as
specified in 40 CFR 1065.20(e)(1) through (6).
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 1090.55 by revising and republishing paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1090.55 Requirements for independent parties.
* * * * *
(b) Technical ability. The third party must meet all the following
requirements in order to demonstrate their technical capability to
perform specified activities under this part:
(1) An independent surveyor that conducts a survey under subpart O
of this part must have personnel familiar with petroleum marketing, the
sampling and testing of gasoline and diesel fuel at retail outlets, and
the designing of surveys to estimate compliance rates for fuel
parameters nationwide. The independent surveyor must demonstrate this
technical ability in plans submitted under subpart O of this part.
(2) A laboratory attempting to qualify alternative procedures must
contract with an independent third party to verify the accuracy and
precision of measured values as specified in Sec. 1090.1365. The
independent third party must demonstrate work experience and a good
working knowledge of the VCSB methods specified in Sec. Sec.
1090.1335, 1090.1365, and 1090.1370, with training and expertise
corresponding to a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering, or
combined bachelor's degrees in chemistry and statistics.
(3) Any person auditing in-line blending operations must be
familiar with the waiver provisions of Sec. 1090.1315 and be
proficient with the sampling procedures specified in Sec.
1090.1335(c).
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 1090.80 by:
0
a. Revising the definitions of ``Auditor'', ``Automated detergent
blending facility'', and ``Batch'';
0
b. Removing the definition of ``California diesel'' and adding in
alphabetical order the definition of ``California diesel fuel'';
0
c. Revising the definitions of ``Certified ethanol denaturant
producer'', ``Detergent additive package'', ``Detergent blender'', and
``Diesel fuel manufacturer'';
0
d. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Distillate global
marine fuel'';
0
e. Revising the definitions of ``Downstream location'', ``E0'', and
``E85'';
0
f. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``ECA associated
area'';
0
g. Revising the definition of ``ECA marine fuel'';
0
h. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Emission control
area (ECA)'';
0
i. Revising the definitions of ``Fuel additive'' and ``Fuel additive
manufacturer'';
0
j. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Fuel additive
manufacturing facility'';
0
k. Revising the definitions of ``Fuel manufacturing facility'',
``Gasoline before oxygenate blending (BOB)'', ``Gasoline
manufacturer'', ``Global marine fuel'', ``Marine engine'', ``Non-
automated detergent blending facility'', and ``Reformulated gasoline
(RFG)'';
0
l. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Regulated
blendstock import facility'';
0
m. Revising the definition of ``Regulated blendstock producer'';
0
n. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Regulated
blendstock production facility'';
0
o. Revising the definitions of ``Sampling strata'' and ``Transmix
processor'';
0
p. Removing the definition of ``Volume Additive Reconciliation (VAR)
Period'' and adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Volume
additive reconciliation (VAR) period''; and
0
q. Revising the definition of ``Wholesale purchaser-consumer (WPC)''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.80 Definitions.
* * * * *
[[Page 70063]]
Auditor means any person who conducts audits under subpart S of
this part.
Automated detergent blending facility means any facility
(including, but not limited to, a truck or individual storage tank) at
which detergent is blended with gasoline by means of an injector system
calibrated to automatically deliver a specified amount of detergent.
* * * * *
Batch means a quantity of fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock with properties that can be characterized by a single set of
values using the measurement procedures in subpart N of this part.
* * * * *
California diesel fuel means diesel fuel designated by a diesel
fuel manufacturer as for use in California.
* * * * *
Certified ethanol denaturant producer means any person who
certifies ethanol denaturant as meeting the requirements in Sec.
1090.275.
* * * * *
Detergent additive package means an additive package containing
detergent and may also contain carrier oils and other active components
such as corrosion inhibitors, antioxidants, metal deactivators, and
handling solvents.
Detergent blender means any person who owns, leases, operates,
controls, or supervises the blending operation of a detergent blending
facility, or who imports detergent-additized gasoline.
* * * * *
Diesel fuel manufacturer means a fuel manufacturer that owns,
leases, operates, controls, or supervises a diesel fuel manufacturing
facility.
* * * * *
Distillate global marine fuel means global marine fuel that is
distillate fuel.
* * * * *
Downstream location means any point in the fuel distribution system
other than a fuel manufacturing facility through which fuel passes
after it leaves the fuel manufacturing facility gate at which it was
certified (e.g., fuel at facilities of distributors, pipelines,
terminals, carriers, retailers, oxygenate blenders, and WPCs).
E0 means gasoline that contains no ethanol.
* * * * *
E85 means a fuel that contains more than 50 and no more than 83
volume percent ethanol and is used, intended for use, or made available
for use in flex-fuel vehicles or flex-fuel engines. E85 is not
gasoline.
ECA associated area has the meaning given in 40 CFR 1043.20.
ECA marine fuel means diesel fuel, distillate fuel, or residual
fuel used, intended for use, or made available for use in C3 marine
vessels while the vessels are operating within an ECA, or an ECA
associated area.
Emission control area (ECA) has the meaning given in 40 CFR
1043.20.
* * * * *
Fuel additive has the same meaning as additive in 40 CFR 79.2(e).
* * * * *
Fuel additive manufacturer means any person who owns, leases,
operates, controls, or supervises a fuel additive manufacturing
facility.
Fuel additive manufacturing facility means any facility where fuel
additive is produced or imported.
* * * * *
Fuel manufacturing facility means any facility where fuel is
produced, imported, or recertified. Fuel manufacturing facilities
include refineries, fuel blending facilities, transmix processing
facilities, import facilities, and any facility where fuel is
recertified.
* * * * *
Gasoline before oxygenate blending (BOB) means gasoline for which a
gasoline manufacturer has accounted for oxygenate added downstream
under Sec. 1090.710. BOB is subject to all the requirements and
standards that apply to gasoline, unless subject to a specific
alternative standard or requirement under this part.
Gasoline manufacturer means a fuel manufacturer that owns, leases,
operates, controls, or supervises a gasoline manufacturing facility.
* * * * *
Global marine fuel means diesel fuel, distillate fuel, or residual
fuel used, intended for use, or made available for use in steamships or
Category 3 marine vessels while the vessels are operating in
international waters or in any waters outside the boundaries of an ECA.
Global marine fuel is subject to the provisions of MARPOL Annex VI.
(Note: This part regulates only distillate global marine fuel.)
* * * * *
Marine engine has the meaning given in 40 CFR 1042.901.
* * * * *
Non-automated detergent blending facility means any facility
(including a truck or individual storage tank) at which detergent
additive is blended using a hand-blending technique or any other non-
automated method.
* * * * *
Reformulated gasoline (RFG) means gasoline that is certified under
Sec. 1090.1000(b) and that meets the standards and requirements in
Sec. 1090.220.
* * * * *
Regulated blendstock import facility means any facility where
regulated blendstock is imported into the United States.
Regulated blendstock producer means any person who produces or
imports regulated blendstock in the United States, or any person who
owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises a facility where
regulated blendstock is produced or imported.
Regulated blendstock production facility means any facility where
regulated blendstock is produced.
* * * * *
Sampling strata means the following types of areas sampled during a
survey:
(1) Densely populated areas.
(2) Transportation corridors.
(3) Rural areas.
* * * * *
Transmix processor means any person who owns, leases, operates,
controls, or supervises a transmix processing facility in the United
States. A transmix processor is a fuel manufacturer.
* * * * *
Volume additive reconciliation (VAR) period means the following:
(1) For an automated detergent blending facility, the VAR period is
a time period lasting no more than 31 days or until an adjustment to a
detergent concentration rate that increases the initial rate by more
than 10 percent, whichever occurs first. The concentration setting for
a detergent injector may be adjusted by more than 10 percent above the
initial rate without terminating the VAR period, provided the purpose
of the change is to correct a batch misadditization prior to the
transfer of the batch to another party, or to correct an equipment
malfunction and the concentration is immediately returned to no more
than 10 percent above the initial rate of concentration after the
correction.
(2) For a non-automated detergent blending facility, the VAR period
constitutes the blending of one batch of gasoline.
* * * * *
Wholesale purchaser-consumer (WPC) means any person who is an
ultimate consumer of fuels and who purchases or obtains fuels for use
in motor vehicles, nonroad vehicles, nonroad engines, or nonroad
equipment, including locomotive or marine engines, and, in the case of
liquid fuels, receives delivery of that product into a storage tank of
at least 550-gallon capacity
[[Page 70064]]
substantially under the control of that person.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 1090.85 by adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.85 Explanatory terms.
* * * * *
(g) Generic terms. Certain terms that are generically defined in
this part (e.g., ``fuel manufacturing facility'' or ``importer'') may
also be used to refer to a specific fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock type (e.g., ``diesel fuel manufacturing facility'' or
``gasoline importer'').
0
10. Amend Sec. 1090.90 by:
0
a. Revising entry ``PLOQ''; and
0
b. Adding in alphabetical order entry ``VAR''.
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1090.90 Acronyms and abbreviations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
PLOQ................................... pooled limit of quantitation.
* * * * * * *
VAR.................................... volume additive reconciliation.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
11. Amend Sec. 1090.95 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (b) and (c)(1), (3), and (c)(6) through (8);
0
b. Removing paragraph (c)(9) and redesignating paragraphs (c)(10)
through (37) as paragraphs (c)(9) through (36);
0
c. Revising newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(9), (10), (12) through
(14), (17), (19), (20), (23), (24), (29), (31), and (35);
0
d. Removing paragraph (c)(38) and redesignating paragraphs (c)(39) and
(40) as paragraphs (c)(37) and (38).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.95 Incorporation by reference.
* * * * *
(b) American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 220 Leigh
Farm Rd., Durham, NC 27707-8110, (919) 402-4500, or www.aicpa-cima.org.
(1) AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, updated through December
2023; IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1800(b).
(2) Statements on Quality Control Standards (SQCS) No. 8, QC
Section 10: A Firm's System of Quality Control, current as of July 1,
2019; IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1800(b). This includes the following
quality control standards for attestation engagements starting December
15, 2025:
(i) System of Quality Management Standard No. 1, A Firm's System of
Quality Management; Issued June 2022; IBR approved for Sec.
1090.1800(b).
(ii) System of Quality Management Standard No. 2, Engagement
Quality Reviews; Issued June 2022; IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1800(b).
(iii) System of Quality Management Standard No. 3, Amendments to
Quality Management Standard Section 10, ``A Firm's System of Quality
Management'' and Section 20, ``Engagement Quality Reviews;'' Issued
March 2023; IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1800(b).
(3) Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 19,
Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagement, Issued December 2019; IBR approved
for Sec. 1090.1800(b).
(c) * * *
(1) ASTM D86-23ae1, Standard Test Method for Distillation of
Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels at Atmospheric Pressure, approved
December 1, 2023 (``ASTM D86''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1350(b).
* * * * *
(3) ASTM D975-24, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel, approved
May 1, 2024 (``ASTM D975''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.80.
* * * * *
(6) ASTM D1319-20a, Standard Test Method for Hydrocarbon Types in
Liquid Petroleum Products by Fluorescent Indicator Adsorption, approved
August 1, 2020 (``ASTM D1319''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1350(b).
(7) ASTM D2163-23, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Hydrocarbons in Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gases and Propane/Propene
Mixtures by Gas Chromatography, approved March 1, 2023 (``ASTM
D2163''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1350(b).
(8) ASTM D2622-21, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry,
approved December 1, 2021 (``ASTM D2622''); IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
1090.1350(b), 1090.1360(d), and 1090.1375(c).
(9) ASTM D3231-24, Standard Test Method for Phosphorus in Gasoline,
approved March 1, 2024 (``ASTM D3231''); IBR approved for Sec.
1090.1350(b).
(10) ASTM D3237-22, Standard Test Method for Lead in Gasoline by
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy, approved October 1, 2022 (``ASTM
D3237''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1350(b).
* * * * *
(12) ASTM D4052-22, Standard Test Method for Density, Relative
Density, and API Gravity of Liquids by Digital Density Meter, approved
May 1, 2022 (``ASTM D4052''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1337(d) and
(f).
(13) ASTM D4057-22, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products, approved May 1, 2022 (``ASTM
D4057''); IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 1090.1335(b) and 1090.1605(b).
(14) ASTM D4177-22e1, Standard Practice for Automatic Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products, approved July 1, 2022 (``ASTM
D4177''); IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 1090.1315(a) and 1090.1335(c).
* * * * *
(17) ASTM D4814-24a, Standard Specification for Automotive Spark-
Ignition Engine Fuel, approved July 1, 2024 (``ASTM D4814''); IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 1090.80 and 1090.1395(a).
* * * * *
(19) ASTM D5186-24, Standard Test Method for Determination of the
Aromatic Content and Polynuclear Aromatic Content of Diesel Fuels By
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography, approved July 1, 2024 (``ASTM
D5186''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1350(b).
(20) ASTM D5191-22, Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of
Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels (Mini Method), approved July 1,
2022 (``ASTM D5191''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1360(d).
* * * * *
(23) ASTM D5599-22, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Oxygenates in Gasoline by Gas Chromatography and Oxygen Selective Flame
Ionization Detection, approved April 1, 2022 (``ASTM D5599''); IBR
approved for Sec. 1090.1360(d).
(24) ASTM D5769-22, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Benzene, Toluene, and Total Aromatics in Finished Gasolines by Gas
[[Page 70065]]
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, approved July 1, 2022 (``ASTM
D5769''); IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 1090.1350(b) and 1090.1360(d).
* * * * *
(29) ASTM D6299-23a, Standard Practice for Applying Statistical
Quality Assurance and Control Charting Techniques to Evaluate
Analytical Measurement System Performance, approved December 1, 2023
(``ASTM D6299''); IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 1090.1370(c),
1090.1375(a), (b), (c), and (d), and 1090.1450(c).
* * * * *
(31) ASTM D6667-21, Standard Test Method for Determination of Total
Volatile Sulfur in Gaseous Hydrocarbons and Liquefied Petroleum Gases
by Ultraviolet Fluorescence, approved April 1, 2021 (``ASTM D6667'');
IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 1090.1360(d) and 1090.1375(c).
* * * * *
(35) ASTM D6751-24, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend
Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, approved March 1, 2024
(``ASTM D6751''); IBR approved for Sec. 1090.1350(b).
* * * * *
Subpart B--General Requirements and Provisions for Regulated
Parties
0
12. Amend Sec. 1090.100 by revising the introductory text and
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.100 General provisions.
This subpart provides an overview of the general requirements and
provisions applicable to any regulated party under this part. A person
who meets the definition of more than one type of regulated party must
comply with the requirements applicable to each of those types of
regulated parties. For example, a fuel manufacturer that also
transports fuel must meet the requirements applicable to a fuel
manufacturer and a distributor. A regulated party is required to comply
with all applicable requirements of this part, regardless of whether
they are identified in this subpart. Any person who produces, sells,
transfers, supplies, dispenses, or distributes fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock must comply with all applicable requirements.
* * * * *
(d) Importers. In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a)
through (c) of this section and Sec. Sec. 1090.105 and 1090.155, an
importer must also comply with subpart Q of this part.
0
13. Amend Sec. 1090.105 by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(8), (b)(4),
and (b)(8) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.105 Fuel manufacturers.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) Producing compliant gasoline. A gasoline manufacturer must
produce or import gasoline that meets the standards in subpart C of
this part and must comply with the ABT requirements of subpart H of
this part.
* * * * *
(8) Annual attestation engagement. A gasoline manufacturer must
submit annual attestation engagement reports to EPA under subpart S of
this part.
(b) * * *
(4) Certification and designation. (i) A diesel fuel or ECA marine
fuel manufacturer must certify and designate the diesel fuel or ECA
marine fuel they produce under subpart K of this part.
(ii) A distillate global marine fuel manufacturer must designate
the distillate global marine fuel they produce under subpart K of this
part.
* * * * *
(8) Distillate global marine fuel manufacturers. A distillate
global marine fuel manufacturer does not need to comply with the
requirements of paragraphs (b)(1), (2), (3), and (6) of this section
for distillate global marine fuel that is exempt from the standards in
subpart D of this part, as specified in Sec. 1090.650.
Sec. 1090.110 [Amended]
0
14. Amend Sec. 1090.110 by removing paragraph (c) and redesignating
paragraph (d) as paragraph (c).
0
15. Amend Sec. 1090.130 by revising paragraphs (d), (f), and (g) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1090.130 Certified butane blenders.
* * * * *
(d) PTDs. On each occasion when a certified butane blender
transfers custody of or title to any gasoline blended with certified
butane, the transferor must provide to the transferee PTDs under
subpart L of this part.
* * * * *
(f) Survey. A certified butane blender may participate in the
applicable fuel surveys under subpart O of this part.
(g) Annual attestation engagement. A certified butane blender must
submit annual attestation engagement reports to EPA under subpart S of
this part.
0
16. Amend Sec. 1090.140 by revising paragraphs (d), (f), and (g) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1090.140 Certified pentane blenders.
* * * * *
(d) PTDs. On each occasion when a certified pentane blender
transfers custody of or title to any gasoline blended with certified
pentane, the transferor must provide to the transferee PTDs under
subpart L of this part.
* * * * *
(f) Survey. A certified pentane blender may participate in the
applicable fuel surveys under subpart O of this part.
(g) Annual attestation engagement. A certified pentane blender must
submit annual attestation engagement reports to EPA under subpart S of
this part.
0
17. Amend Sec. 1090.145 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.145 Transmix processors.
* * * * *
(g) Annual attestation engagement. A transmix processor must submit
annual attestation engagement reports to EPA under subpart S of this
part.
0
18. Amend Sec. 1090.155 by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1), and
(b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.155 Fuel additive manufacturers.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) Gasoline additive standards. A gasoline additive manufacturer
must comply with the applicable requirements of subpart C of this part.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Diesel fuel additive standards. A diesel fuel additive
manufacturer must comply with the applicable requirements of subpart D
of this part.
* * * * *
(3) PTDs. On each occasion when a diesel fuel additive manufacturer
transfers custody of or title to any diesel fuel additive, the
transferor must provide to the transferee PTDs under subpart L of this
part.
* * * * *
0
19. Amend Sec. 1090.160 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.160 Distributors, carriers, and resellers.
* * * * *
(a) Gasoline and diesel fuel standards. A distributor, carrier, or
reseller must comply with the applicable requirements of subparts C and
D of this part.
(b) Registration. A distributor or carrier must register with EPA
under subpart I of this part if they are part of the 500 ppm LM diesel
fuel distribution chain in a compliance plan submitted under Sec.
1090.515(g).
* * * * *
0
20. Amend Sec. 1090.165 by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.165 Retailers and WPCs.
* * * * *
(a) Gasoline and diesel fuel standards. A retailer or WPC must
comply with the
[[Page 70066]]
applicable requirements of subparts C and D of this part.
* * * * *
(c) Fuels produced through fuel dispensers. A retailer or WPC that
produces gasoline (e.g., E15) through a fuel dispenser with anything
other than PCG and DFE is also a blending manufacturer and must comply
with the applicable requirements in Sec. 1090.105.
0
21. Amend Sec. 1090.175 by revising paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.175 Auditors.
* * * * *
(c) Attestation engagements. An auditor must conduct audits under
subpart S of this part.
(d) Independence requirements. In order to perform an annual
attestation engagement under subpart S of this part, an auditor must
meet the independence requirements in Sec. 1090.55 unless they are a
certified internal auditor under Sec. 1090.1800(b)(1)(i).
0
22. Amend Sec. 1090.180 by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.180 Pipeline operators.
* * * * *
(a) Gasoline and diesel fuel standards. A pipeline operator must
comply with the applicable requirements of subparts C and D of this
part.
* * * * *
(c) Transmix requirements. A pipeline operator must comply with all
applicable requirements of subpart F of this part.
Subpart C--Gasoline Standards
0
23. Amend Sec. 1090.200 by revising paragraph (c)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.200 Overview and general requirements.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Importers that import gasoline by rail or truck using the
provisions of Sec. 1090.1610 to meet the alternative per-gallon
standards of Sec. Sec. 1090.205(d) and 1090.210(c).
* * * * *
0
24. Amend Sec. 1090.210 by revising paragraph (c)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.210 Benzene standards.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) An importer that imports gasoline by rail or truck under Sec.
1090.1610 must comply with a benzene per-gallon standard of 0.62 volume
percent instead of the standards specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section.
* * * * *
0
25. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.215 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.215 Gasoline RVP standards.
Except as specified in subpart G of this part and paragraph (d) of
this section, all gasoline designated as summer gasoline or located at
any location in the United States during the summer season is subject
to a maximum RVP per-gallon standard in this section.
(a)(1) Federal 9.0 psi maximum RVP per-gallon standard. Gasoline
designated as summer gasoline or located at any location in the United
States during the summer season must meet a maximum RVP per-gallon
standard of 9.0 psi unless the gasoline is subject to one of the lower
maximum RVP per-gallon standards specified in paragraphs (a)(2) through
(5) of this section.
(2) Federal 7.8 maximum RVP per-gallon standard. (i) Except as
specified in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, gasoline designated
as 7.8 psi summer gasoline, or located in the following areas during
the summer season, must meet a maximum RVP per-gallon standard of 7.8
psi:
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(2)(i)--Federal 7.8 psi RVP Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area designation State Counties
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Colorado......... Adams Arapahoe,
Collins-Loveland. Boulder, Broomfield,
Denver, Douglas,
Jefferson,
Larimer,\1\ Weld.\2\
Reno.......................... Nevada........... Washoe.
Portland...................... Oregon........... Clackamas (only the
Air Quality
Maintenance Area),
Multnomah (only the
Air Quality
Maintenance Area),
Washington (only the
Air Quality
Maintenance Area).
Salem......................... Oregon........... Marion (only the
Salem Area
Transportation
Study), Polk (only
the Salem Area
Transportation
Study).
Beaumont-Port Arthur.......... Texas............ Hardin, Jefferson,
Orange.
Salt Lake City................ Utah............. Davis, Salt Lake.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ That portion of Larimer County, CO that lies south of a line
described as follows: Beginning at a point on Larimer County's eastern
boundary and Weld County's western boundary intersected by 40 degrees,
42 minutes, and 47.1 seconds north latitude, proceed west to a point
defined by the intersection of 40 degrees, 42 minutes, 47.1 seconds
north latitude and 105 degrees, 29 minutes, and 40.0 seconds west
longitude, thence proceed south on 105 degrees, 29 minutes, 40.0
seconds west longitude to the intersection with 40 degrees, 33 minutes
and 17.4 seconds north latitude, thence proceed west on 40 degrees, 33
minutes, 17.4 seconds north latitude until this line intersects
Larimer County's western boundary and Grand County's eastern boundary.
(Includes part of Rocky Mtn. Nat. Park.)
\2\ That portion of Weld County, CO that lies south of a line described
as follows: Beginning at a point on Weld County's eastern boundary and
Logan County's western boundary intersected by 40 degrees, 42 minutes,
47.1 seconds north latitude, proceed west on 40 degrees, 42 minutes,
47.1 seconds north latitude until this line intersects Weld County's
western boundary and Larimer County's eastern boundary.
(ii) Gasoline designated as 9.0 psi summer gasoline may be located
in the areas specified in Table 1 to paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this
section between May 1 and May 31.
(3) RFG maximum RVP per-gallon standard. Gasoline designated as
Summer RFG or located in an RFG covered area during the summer season
must meet a maximum RVP per-gallon standard of 7.4 psi.
(4) California gasoline. Gasoline designated as California gasoline
or used in areas subject to the California reformulated gasoline
regulations must comply with those regulations under Title 13,
California Code of Regulations, sections 2250-2273.5.
(5) SIP-controlled gasoline. Gasoline designated as SIP-controlled
gasoline or used in areas subject to a SIP-approved state fuel rule
that requires an RVP of less than 9.0 psi must meet the requirements of
the federally approved SIP.
(b) Ethanol 1.0 psi waiver. (1) Except as specified in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, any gasoline subject to a federal 9.0 psi or
7.8 psi RVP standard in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section that
meets the requirements of paragraph (b)(2) of this section is not in
violation of this section if its RVP does not exceed the applicable
standard by more than 1.0 psi.
[[Page 70067]]
(2) To qualify for the special regulatory treatment specified in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, gasoline must meet the applicable RVP
standard in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section prior to the
addition of ethanol and must contain ethanol at a concentration of at
least 9 volume percent and no more than 10 volume percent.
(3)(i) RFG and SIP-controlled gasoline that does not allow for the
ethanol 1.0 psi waiver does not qualify for the special regulatory
treatment specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(ii) Gasoline subject to the 9.0 psi RVP standard in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section in the following areas is excluded from the
special regulatory treatment specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section:
Table 2 to Paragraph (b)(3)(ii)--Areas Excluded From the Ethanol 1.0 psi
Waiver
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Counties Effective date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Illinois........................ All............... April 28, 2025.
Iowa............................ All............... April 28, 2025.
Minnesota....................... All............... April 28, 2025.
Missouri........................ All............... April 28, 2025.
Nebraska........................ All............... April 28, 2025.
Ohio............................ All............... April 28, 2025.
South Dakota.................... All............... April 28, 2025.
Wisconsin....................... All............... April 28, 2025.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Gasoline subject to more than one RVP standard. Gasoline
located in an area of the United States subject to more than one RVP
standard specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section
must meet the most stringent standard.
(d) Exceptions. The RVP standard in paragraph (a) of this section
for the area in which the gasoline is located does not apply to that
gasoline if the person(s) who produced, imported, sold, offered for
sale, distributed, offered to distribute, supplied, offered for supply,
dispensed, stored, transported, or introduced the gasoline into
commerce can demonstrate one of the following:
(1) The gasoline is designated as winter gasoline and was not sold,
offered for sale, supplied, offered for supply, dispensed, or
introduced into commerce for use during the summer season and was not
delivered to any retail outlet or WPC during the summer season.
(2) The gasoline is designated as summer gasoline for use in an
area other than the area in which it is located and was not sold,
offered for sale, supplied, offered for supply, dispensed, or
introduced into commerce in the area in which the gasoline is located.
In this case, the standard that applies to the gasoline is the standard
applicable to the area for which the gasoline is designated.
0
26. Amend Sec. 1090.220 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.220 RFG standards.
* * * * *
(e) Certified butane and certified pentane blending limitation.
Certified butane and certified pentane must not be blended with Summer
RFG or Summer RBOB under Sec. 1090.1320(b).
0
27. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.230 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.230 Limitation on use of gasoline-ethanol blends.
(a) No person may sell, introduce, cause, or permit the sale or
introduction of gasoline containing greater than 10 volume percent
ethanol (e.g., E15) into any model year 2000 or older light-duty
gasoline motor vehicle, any heavy-duty gasoline motor vehicle or
engine, any highway or off-highway motorcycle, or any gasoline-powered
nonroad engine, vehicle, or equipment.
(b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not prohibit a person from
producing, selling, introducing, causing, or allowing the sale or
introduction of gasoline containing greater than 10 volume percent
ethanol into any flex-fuel vehicle or flex-fuel engine.
0
28. Amend Sec. 1090.265 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.265 Gasoline additive standards.
* * * * *
(c) Any person who blends any fuel additive that does not meet the
requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section is a gasoline
manufacturer and must comply with all the requirements applicable to a
gasoline manufacturer under this part.
* * * * *
0
29. Amend Sec. 1090.285 by revising the introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.285 RFG covered areas.
The RFG covered areas are as follows:
* * * * *
0
30. Amend Sec. 1090.290 by revising paragraph (d)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.290 Changes to RFG covered areas and procedures for opting
out of RFG.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) EPA will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing
the approval of an RFG opt-out request and its effective date.
* * * * *
0
31. Amend Sec. 1090.290 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.295 Procedures for relaxing the federal 7.8 psi RVP
standard.
* * * * *
(d) EPA will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing
the approval of any federal 7.8 psi gasoline relaxation request and its
effective date.
* * * * *
Subpart D--Diesel Fuel and ECA Marine Fuel Standards
0
32. Amend Sec. 1090.300 by revising paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.300 Overview and general requirements.
* * * * *
(h) No person may introduce used motor oil, or used motor oil
blended with diesel fuel, into the fuel system of model year 2007 or
later diesel fuel motor vehicles or engines or model year 2011 or later
nonroad diesel fuel vehicles or engines (not including locomotive or
marine engines).
0
33. Amend Sec. 1090.310 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.310 Diesel fuel additives standards.
* * * * *
(c) The provisions of this section do not apply to additives used
in 500 ppm LM diesel fuel or ECA marine fuel.
0
34. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.315 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.315 Heating oil, kerosene, ECA marine fuel, and jet fuel
provisions.
Heating oil, kerosene, ECA marine fuel, or jet fuel must not be
sold for use
[[Page 70068]]
in motor vehicles or nonroad equipment and are not subject to the ULSD
standards in Sec. 1090.305 unless it is also designated as ULSD under
Sec. 1090.1015(a).
0
35. Amend Sec. 1090.325 by revising paragraph (c)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.325 ECA marine fuel standards.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Residual fuel made available for use in a steamship or C3
marine vessel if the U.S. government exempts or excludes the vessel
from MARPOL Annex VI fuel standards. Diesel fuel and other distillate
fuel used in diesel fuel engines operated on such vessels is subject to
the standards in this section instead of the standards in Sec.
1090.305 or Sec. 1090.320.
* * * * *
Subpart F--Transmix and Pipeline Interface Provisions
0
36. Amend Sec. 1090.500 by revising paragraph (c)(3)(ii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.500 Gasoline produced from blending transmix into PCG.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) A letter signed by the RCO, or their delegate, stating that
the information contained in the submission is true to the best of
their belief must accompany the petition.
* * * * *
0
37. Amend Sec. 1090.510 by revising the section heading to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.510 Diesel fuel and distillate fuel produced from TDP.
* * * * *
0
38. Amend Sec. 1090.515 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.515 500 ppm LM diesel fuel produced from TDP.
* * * * *
(d) Use restrictions. 500 ppm LM diesel fuel may only be used in
locomotive or marine engines that are not required to use ULSD under 40
CFR 1033.815 or 40 CFR 1042.660, respectively. No person may use 500
ppm LM diesel fuel in locomotive or marine engines that are required to
use ULSD, in any other nonroad vehicle or engine, or in any motor
vehicle engine.
* * * * *
0
39. Amend Sec. 1090.520 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.520 Handling practices for pipeline interface that is not
transmix.
* * * * *
(b) During the summer season, a pipeline operator must not cut
pipeline interface from two batches of gasoline subject to different
RVP standards that are shipped adjacent to each other by pipeline into
the batch of gasoline that is subject to the more stringent RVP
standard. For example, during the summer season, a pipeline operator
must not cut pipeline interface from a batch of RFG shipped adjacent to
a batch of conventional gasoline into the batch of RFG.
Subpart G--Exemptions
0
40. The heading of subpart G is revised to read as set forth above.
0
41. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.605 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.605 Exemptions for national security and military use.
(a) Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock that is produced,
imported, sold, offered for sale, supplied, offered for supply, stored,
dispensed, or transported for use in the following tactical military
vehicles, engines, or equipment, including locomotive or marine
engines, is exempt from the standards specified in this part:
(1) Tactical military vehicles, engines, or equipment, including
locomotive or marine engines, that have an EPA national security
exemption from the emission standards in this chapter. See 40 CFR part
85, subpart R, and 40 CFR 1068.225.
(2) Tactical military vehicles, engines, or equipment, including
locomotive or marine engines, that are not subject to a national
security exemption from vehicle or engine emissions standards specified
in paragraph (a)(1) of this section but, for national security purposes
(e.g., for purposes of readiness, including training, for deployment
overseas), need to be fueled on the same fuel as the vehicles, engines,
or equipment that EPA has granted such a national security exemption.
(b) The exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must
meet all the following requirements:
(1) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
accompanied by PTDs that meet the requirements of subpart L of this
part.
(2) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
completely segregated from non-exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock at all points in the distribution system.
(3) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
dispensed from a fuel dispenser stand, fueling truck, or tank that is
labeled with the appropriate designation of the exempt fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock.
(4) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must not be
used in any vehicles, engines, or equipment, including locomotive or
marine engines, other than those specified in paragraph (a) of this
section.
0
42. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.610 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.610 Exemptions for temporary research, development, and
testing.
(a) Requests for an exemption. (1) Any person may receive an
exemption from the standards specified in this part for fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock used for research, development, or
testing (``R&D'') purposes under paragraph (b) of this section by
submitting the information specified in paragraph (c) of this section
as specified in Sec. 1090.10 and meeting the requirements of paragraph
(d) of this section.
(2) Any person who performs emissions certification testing for a
motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine under 42 U.S.C. 7525 or nonroad
engine or nonroad vehicle under 42 U.S.C. 7546 is exempt from the
standards specified in this part for the fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock they use for emissions certification testing if
they have an exemption under 40 CFR parts 85 and 86 to perform such
testing.
(b) Criteria for an R&D exemption. For an R&D exemption to be
granted, the person requesting an exemption must do all the following:
(1) Demonstrate that the exemption is for an appropriate R&D
purpose.
(2) Demonstrate that an exemption is necessary.
(3) Design an R&D program that is reasonable in scope.
(4) Have a degree of control consistent with the purpose of the R&D
program and EPA's monitoring requirements.
(5) Meet the requirements specified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of
this section.
(c) Information required to be submitted. To aid in demonstrating
each of the elements in paragraph (b) of this section, the person
requesting an exemption must include, at a minimum, all the following
information:
(1) A concise statement of the purpose of the R&D program
demonstrating that the R&D program has an appropriate R&D purpose.
(2) An explanation of why the stated purpose of the R&D program is
unable to be achieved in a practicable manner without meeting the
requirements of this part.
(3) A demonstration of the reasonableness of the scope of the R&D
program, including all the following:
(i) An estimate of the R&D program's duration in time (including
beginning and ending dates).
[[Page 70069]]
(ii) An estimate of the maximum number of vehicles, engines, and
equipment involved in the program, and the number of miles and engine
hours that will be accumulated on each.
(iii) The manner in which the information on the vehicles, engines,
or equipment used in the R&D program will be recorded and made
available to EPA upon request.
(iv) An estimate of the volume of fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock expected to be used in the R&D program that does not comply
with the requirements of this part, as applicable.
(v) A list of how all applicable standards of this part would or
would not apply to the fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock
expected to be used in the R&D program.
(4) With regard to control, a demonstration that the R&D program
affords EPA a monitoring capability, including all the following:
(i) A description of the technical and operational aspects of the
R&D program.
(ii) The site of the R&D program (including facility name, street
address, city, county, state, and ZIP code).
(iii) The manner in which information on the vehicles, engines, or
equipment used in the R&D program will be recorded and made available
to EPA upon request.
(iv) The manner in which information on the fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock used in the R&D program (including quantity,
properties, name, address, telephone number, and contact person of the
supplier, and the date received from the supplier) will be recorded and
made available to EPA upon request.
(v) The manner in which the person will ensure that fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock used in the R&D program will be
segregated from non-exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock
and how fuel dispensers will be labeled to ensure that fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock used in the R&D program is not
dispensed for use in motor vehicles or nonroad engines, vehicles, or
equipment, including locomotive or marine engines, that are not part of
the R&D program.
(vi) The name, business address, telephone number, and title of the
person in the organization requesting an exemption from whom further
information on the application may be obtained.
(vii) The name, business address, telephone number, and title of
the person in the organization requesting an exemption who is
responsible for recording and making available the information
specified in this paragraph (c), and the location where such
information will be maintained.
(viii) Any other information requested by EPA to determine whether
the R&D program satisfies the criteria in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(d) Additional requirements. (1) Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock used in the R&D program must meet all the following
requirements:
(i) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
accompanied by PTDs that meet the requirements of subpart L of this
part.
(ii) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
designated as exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock by
the fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock manufacturer or
supplier, as applicable.
(iii) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
completely segregated from non-exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock at all points in the distribution system.
(iv) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must not be
sold, distributed, offered for sale or distribution, dispensed,
supplied, offered for supply, transported to or from, or stored by a
retail outlet or WPC facility, unless the WPC facility is associated
with the R&D program that uses the fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock.
(2) At the completion of the R&D program, any emission control
systems or elements of design that are damaged or rendered inoperative
must be replaced on vehicles, engines, or equipment remaining in
service or the responsible person will be liable for a violation of 42
U.S.C. 7522(a)(3), unless sufficient evidence is supplied that the
emission controls or elements of design were not damaged.
(e) Approval of exemption. EPA may grant an R&D exemption upon a
demonstration that the requirements of this section have been met. The
R&D exemption approval may include such terms and conditions as EPA
determines necessary to monitor the exemption and to carry out the
purposes of this part, including restoration of emission control
systems.
(1) The volume of fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock used
in the R&D program must not exceed the amount estimated in paragraph
(c)(3)(iv) of this section, unless EPA grants an approval for a greater
amount.
(2) Any R&D exemption granted under this section will expire at the
completion of the R&D program or 1 year from the date of approval,
whichever occurs first, and may only be extended upon re-application
consistent with the requirements of this section.
(3) If any information required in paragraph (c) of this section
changes after approval of the R&D exemption, the responsible person
must notify EPA in writing immediately.
(f) Notification of completion. Any person with an approved R&D
exemption under this section must notify EPA in writing within 30 days
after completion of the R&D program.
0
43. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.615 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.615 Exemptions for racing and aviation.
Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock that is used in
aircraft, or is used in racing vehicles or racing boats in sanctioned
racing events, is exempt from the standards in subparts C and D of this
part if all the following requirements are met:
(a) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
identified on PTDs and on any fuel dispenser from which the fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock is dispensed as restricted for use
either in aircraft or in racing motor vehicles or racing boats that are
used only in sanctioned racing events.
(b) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
completely segregated from non-exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock at all points in the distribution system.
(c) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must not made
available for use as gasoline or diesel fuel subject to the standards
in subpart C or D of this part, respectively, or dispensed for use in
motor vehicles or nonroad engines, vehicles, or equipment, including
locomotive or marine engines, except for those used only in aircraft or
in sanctioned racing events.
0
44. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.620 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.620 Exemptions for Guam, American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Fuel that is produced, imported, sold, offered for sale, supplied,
offered for supply, stored, dispensed, or transported for use in the
territories of Guam, American Samoa, or the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, is exempt from the standards in subparts C
and D of this part if all the following requirements are met:
(a) The fuel must be designated by the fuel manufacturer as
gasoline, diesel fuel, or ECA marine fuel for use only in Guam,
American Samoa, or the
[[Page 70070]]
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(b) The fuel must be used only in Guam, American Samoa, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(c) The fuel must be accompanied by PTDs that meet the requirements
of subpart L of this part.
(d) The fuel must be completely segregated from non-exempt fuel at
all points from the point the fuel is designated as exempt fuel for use
only in Guam, American Samoa, or the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, while the exempt fuel is in the United States
(including an ECA or an ECA associated area under 40 CFR 1043.20) but
outside these territories.
0
45. Amend Sec. 1090.625 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (b)(2), (b)(5), and (c)(1);
0
b. Revising and republishing paragraph (d)(2); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions and republication read as follows:
Sec. 1090.625 Exemptions for California gasoline and diesel fuel.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Designated California gasoline or diesel fuel must be
completely segregated from fuel that is not California gasoline or
diesel fuel at all points in the distribution system.
* * * * *
(5) Each transferor and transferee of California gasoline or diesel
fuel produced outside the state of California must maintain copies of
PTDs as specified in subpart M of this part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Comply with the sampling and testing provisions specified in
subpart N of this part, as applicable.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Redesignates the California gasoline as gasoline under this
part without recertification and does all the following:
(i) Demonstrates that the gasoline meets all applicable
requirements for California reformulated gasoline under Title 13 of the
California Code of Regulations.
(ii) Properly redesignates the gasoline under Sec.
1090.1010(b)(2)(vi).
(iii) Generates PTDs under subpart L of this part.
(iv) Keeps records under subpart M of this part.
(v) Does not include the redesignated California gasoline in their
average standard compliance calculations.
(e) California diesel fuel used outside of California. California
diesel fuel may be used in any part of the United States outside of the
state of California without recertification if the manufacturer or
distributor of the California diesel fuel redesignates the California
diesel fuel as diesel fuel under this part and does all the following:
(1) Demonstrates that the diesel fuel meets all applicable
requirements for California diesel fuel under Title 13 of the
California Code of Regulations.
(2) Properly redesignates the diesel fuel under Sec.
1090.1015(b)(3)(iii).
(3) Generates PTDs under subpart L of this part.
(4) Keeps records under subpart M of this part.
0
46. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.630 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.630 Exemptions for Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the
U.S. Virgin Islands summer gasoline.
Summer gasoline that is produced, imported, sold, offered for sale,
supplied, offered for supply, stored, dispensed, or transported for use
in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands is exempt
from the RVP standards in Sec. 1090.215 if all the following
requirements are met:
(a) The summer gasoline must be designated by the fuel manufacturer
as summer gasoline for use only in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or the
U.S. Virgin Islands.
(b) The summer gasoline must be used only in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto
Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands.
(c) The summer gasoline must be accompanied by PTDs that meet the
requirements of subpart L of this part.
(d) The summer gasoline must be completely segregated from non-
exempt gasoline at all points from the point the summer gasoline is
designated as exempt fuel for use only in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico,
or the U.S. Virgin Islands, while the exempt summer gasoline is in the
United States but outside these states or territories.
0
47. Amend Sec. 1090.635 by revising the section heading to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.635 Exemptions for refinery extreme, unusual, and
unforeseen hardship.
* * * * *
0
48. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.640 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.640 Exemptions for E85.
(a) Gasoline that is used to produce E85 is exempt from the
gasoline deposit control requirements in Sec. 1090.260.
(b) Any person who uses the exemption in paragraph (a) of this
section must keep records to demonstrate that such exempt gasoline was
used to produce E85 and was not distributed from a terminal for use as
gasoline.
0
49. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.645 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.645 Exemptions for exports of fuel, fuel additive, and
regulated blendstock.
(a) Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock that is exported
for sale outside of the United States is exempt from the standards in
subparts C and D of this part if all the following requirements are
met:
(1) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
designated for export by the fuel manufacturer, fuel additive
manufacturer, or regulated blendstock producer.
(2) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock designated for
export must be accompanied by PTDs that meet the requirements of
subpart L of this part.
(3) The fuel manufacturer, fuel additive manufacturer, or regulated
blendstock producer must keep records that demonstrate that the fuel,
fuel additive, or regulated blendstock was ultimately exported from the
United States.
(4) The fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must be
completely segregated from non-exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock at all points from the point the fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock is designated for export to the point where it is
ultimately exported from the United States.
(b) Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock certified and
designated for export may be certified for use in the United States if
all the applicable requirements of this part are met.
(c) Any fuel dispensed from a retail outlet within the geographic
boundaries of the United States is not exempt under this section.
0
50. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.650 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.650 Exemptions for distillate global marine fuel.
(a) Distillate global marine fuel that is produced, imported, sold,
offered for sale, supplied, offered for supply, stored, dispensed, or
transported for use in steamships or Category 3 marine vessels is
exempt from the standards in subpart D of this part when operating
outside of ECA boundaries if all the following requirements are met:
(1) The fuel must not exceed 0.50 weight percent sulfur (5,000
ppm).
(2) The fuel must be accompanied by PTDs that meet the requirements
of subpart L of this part.
(3) The fuel must be designated as distillate global marine fuel.
[[Page 70071]]
(4) The fuel must be completely segregated from non-exempt fuel at
all points in the distribution system.
(5) The fuel must not be used in vehicles, engines, or equipment
other than in steamships or Category 3 marine vessels.
(b)(1) Fuel that does not meet the requirements specified in
paragraph (a) of this section is subject to the standards,
requirements, and prohibitions that apply for ULSD under this part.
(2) Any person who produces, imports, sells, offers for sale,
supplies, offers for supply, stores, dispenses, or transports
distillate global marine fuel without meeting the applicable
recordkeeping requirements of subpart M of this part must not claim the
fuel is exempt from the standards, requirements, and prohibitions that
apply for ULSD under this part.
Subpart H--Averaging, Banking, and Trading Provisions
0
51. Amend Sec. 1090.700 by:
0
a. Revising and republishing paragraphs (a) and (b); and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (e)(7) and (8).
The revisions and republications read as follows:
Sec. 1090.700 Compliance with average standards.
(a) Compliance with the sulfur average standard. For each of their
facilities, a gasoline manufacturer must demonstrate compliance with
the sulfur average standard in Sec. 1090.205(a) by using the equations
in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) Compliance sulfur value calculation. (i) The compliance sulfur
value is determined as follows:
CSVy = Stot,y + Ds,(y-1) +
DS_Oxy_Total,y - CS
Where:
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for compliance period y,
in ppm-gallons.
Stot,y = Total amount of sulfur produced during
compliance period y, per paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, in
ppm-gallons.
Ds,(y-1) = Sulfur deficit from compliance period y-1, per
Sec. 1090.715(a)(1), in ppm-gallons.
DS_Oxy_Total,y = Total sulfur deficit from downstream BOB
recertification during compliance period y, per Sec.
1090.740(b)(1), in ppm-gallons.
CS = Sulfur credits used by the gasoline manufacturer,
per Sec. 1090.720, in ppm-gallons.
(ii) The total amount of sulfur produced is determined as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.383
Where:
Stot,y = Total amount of sulfur produced during
compliance period y, in ppm-gallons.
Vi = Volume of gasoline produced or imported in batch i,
in gallons.
Si = Sulfur content of batch i, in ppm.
i = Individual batch of gasoline produced or imported during the
compliance period.
n = Number of batches of gasoline produced or imported during the
compliance period.
If the calculation of Stot,y results in a negative
number, replace it with zero.
(2) Sulfur compliance calculation. (i) Compliance with the sulfur
average standard in Sec. 1090.205(a) is achieved if the following
equation is true:
CSVy <= Vtot [middot] Sstd
Where:
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for compliance period y,
per paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Sstd = Gasoline sulfur average standard, per Sec.
1090.205(a), in ppm.
(ii) Compliance with the sulfur average standard in Sec.
1090.205(a) is not achieved if a deficit is incurred two or more
consecutive years. A gasoline manufacturer incurs a deficit under Sec.
1090.715 if the following equation is true:
CSVy > Vtot [middot] Sstd
Where:
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for compliance period y,
per paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Sstd = Sulfur average standard, per Sec. 1090.205(a), in
ppm.
(b) Compliance with the benzene average standards. For each of
their facilities, a gasoline manufacturer must demonstrate compliance
with the benzene average standard in Sec. 1090.210(a) by using the
equations in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section and with the
maximum benzene average standard in Sec. 1090.210(b) by using the
equations in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section.
(1) Compliance benzene value calculation. (i) The compliance
benzene value is determined as follows:
CBVy = Bztot,y + DBz,(y-1) +
DBz_Oxy_Total,y - CBz
Where:
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for compliance period y,
in benzene gallons.
Bztot,y = Total amount of benzene produced during
compliance period y, per paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, in
benzene gallons.
DBz,(y-1) = Benzene deficit from compliance period y-1,
per Sec. 1090.715(a)(2), in benzene gallons.
DBz_Oxy_Total,y = Total benzene deficit from downstream
BOB recertification during compliance period y, per Sec.
1090.740(b)(3), in benzene gallons.
CBz = Benzene credits used by the gasoline manufacturer,
per Sec. 1090.720, in benzene gallons.
(ii) The total amount of benzene produced is determined as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.384
Where:
Bztot,y = Total amount of benzene produced during
compliance period y, in benzene gallons.
Vi = Volume of gasoline produced or imported in batch i,
in gallons.
Bzi = Benzene content of batch i, in volume percent.
i = Individual batch of gasoline produced or imported during the
compliance period.
n = Number of batches of gasoline produced or imported during the
compliance period.
If the calculation of Bztot,y results in a negative
number, replace it with zero.
(2) Benzene average compliance calculation. (i) Compliance with the
benzene average standard in Sec. 1090.210(a) is achieved if the
following equation is true:
CBVy <= Vtot [middot] Bzavg_std
Where:
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for compliance period y,
per paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, in benzene gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Bzavg_std = Benzene average standard, per Sec.
1090.210(a), in volume percent.
(ii) Compliance with the benzene average standard in Sec.
1090.210(a) is not achieved if a deficit is incurred two or more
consecutive years. A gasoline manufacturer incurs a deficit under Sec.
1090.715 if the following equation is true:
CBVy > Vtot[middot] Bzavg_std
Where:
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for compliance period y,
per paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, in benzene gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Bzavg_std = Benzene average standard, per Sec.
1090.210(a), in volume percent.
(3) Average benzene concentration calculation. The average benzene
concentration is determined as follows:
[[Page 70072]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.385
Where:
Bzavg,y = Average benzene concentration for compliance
period y, in volume percent.
Vi = Volume of gasoline produced or imported in batch i,
in gallons.
Bzi = Benzene content of batch i, in volume percent.
i = Individual batch of gasoline produced or imported during the
compliance period.
n = Number of batches of gasoline produced or imported during the
compliance period.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
(4) Maximum benzene average compliance calculation. Compliance with
the maximum benzene average standard in Sec. 1090.210(b) is achieved
if the following equation is true:
Bzavg,y <= Bzmax_std
Where:
Bzavg,y = Average benzene concentration for compliance
period y, per paragraph (b)(3) of this section, in volume percent.
Bzmax_std = Maximum benzene average standard, per Sec.
1090.210(b), in volume percent.
(5) Rounding and reporting benzene values. (i) The total amount of
benzene produced, as calculated in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this
section, must be rounded to the nearest whole benzene gallon in
accordance with Sec. 1090.50.
(ii) The average benzene concentration, as calculated in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, must be rounded and reported to two decimal
places in accordance with Sec. 1090.50.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(7) Gasoline imported by rail or truck using the provisions of
Sec. 1090.1610 to meet the alternative per-gallon standards of
Sec. Sec. 1090.205(d) and 1090.210(c).
(8) Gasoline exempt under subpart G of this part from the average
standards in subpart C of this part (e.g., California gasoline, racing
fuel, etc.).
0
52. Amend Sec. 1090.710 by revising the introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.710 Downstream oxygenate accounting.
The requirements of this section apply to BOB for which a gasoline
manufacturer accounts for the effects of the oxygenate blending that
occurs downstream of the fuel manufacturing facility gate in the
gasoline manufacturer's average standard compliance calculations under
this subpart. This section also includes requirements for oxygenate
blenders to ensure that oxygenate is added in accordance with the
blending instructions specified by the gasoline manufacturer in order
to ensure fuel quality standards are met.
* * * * *
0
53. Amend Sec. 1090.715 by revising and republishing paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1090.715 Deficit carryforward.
(a) A gasoline manufacturer incurs a compliance deficit if they
exceed the average standard specified in subpart C of this part for a
given compliance period. The deficit incurred must be determined as
specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section for sulfur and paragraph
(a)(2) of this section for benzene.
(1) The sulfur deficit incurred is determined as follows:
DS,y = CSVy - Vtot [middot]
Sstd
Where:
DS,y = Sulfur deficit incurred for compliance period y,
in ppm-gallons.
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for compliance period y,
per Sec. 1090.700(a)(1), in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Sstd = Sulfur average standard, per Sec. 1090.205(a), in
ppm.
(2) The benzene deficit incurred is determined as follows:
DBz,y = CBVy - Vtot [middot]
Bzavg_std
Where:
DBz,y = Benzene deficit incurred for compliance period y,
in benzene gallons.
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for compliance period y,
per Sec. 1090.700(b)(1)(i), in benzene gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Bzavg_std = Benzene average standard, per Sec.
1090.210(a), in volume percent.
* * * * *
0
54. Amend Sec. 1090.720 by revising paragraphs (c)(5) and (d) to read
as follows:
Sec. 1090.720 Credit use.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) A gasoline manufacturer must only use credits that they own at
the time of use.
(d) Credit reporting. A gasoline manufacturer that generates,
transacts, or uses credits under this subpart must submit reports to
EPA that include all information regarding credits as specified in
Sec. 1090.905 using forms and procedures specified by EPA.
* * * * *
0
55. Amend Sec. 1090.725 by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(vi), (c)(1),
(d)(1), and (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.725 Credit generation.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) Importation of gasoline by rail or truck using the alternative
sampling and testing requirements in Sec. 1090.1610.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) The number of sulfur credits generated is determined as
follows:
CS,y = Vtot [middot] Sstd -
CSVy
Where:
CS,y = Sulfur credits generated for compliance period y,
in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Sstd = Sulfur average standard, per Sec. 1090.205(a), in
ppm.
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for compliance period y,
per Sec. 1090.700(a)(1), in ppm-gallons.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) The number of benzene credits generated is determined as
follows:
CBz,y = Vtot [middot] Bzavg_std -
CBVy
Where:
CBz,y = Benzene credits generated for compliance period
y, in benzene gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Bzavg_std = Benzene average standard, per Sec.
1090.210(a), in volume percent.
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for compliance period y,
per Sec. 1090.700(b)(1)(i), in benzene gallons.
* * * * *
(f) Credit generation reporting. A gasoline manufacturer that
generates credits under this section must submit reports to EPA that
contain all information regarding credit generation as specified in
Sec. 1090.905 using forms and procedures specified by EPA.
0
56. Amend Sec. 1090.730 by revising paragraphs (f) and (h) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.730 Credit transfers.
* * * * *
(f) No person may transfer credits if the transfer would cause them
to incur a compliance deficit under Sec. 1090.715.
* * * * *
(h) The transferor and the transferee must submit reports to EPA
that include all information regarding the transaction as specified in
Sec. 1090.905 using forms and procedures specified by EPA.
0
57. Amend Sec. 1090.735 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.735 Invalid credits and remedial actions.
* * * * *
(a) Invalid credits must not be used to achieve compliance with an
average
[[Page 70073]]
standard specified in subpart C of this part, regardless of the good
faith belief that the credits were validly generated.
* * * * *
0
58. Amend Sec. 1090.740 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(2) and (4); and
0
c. Revising and republishing paragraph (b).
The revisions and republication read as follows:
Sec. 1090.740 Downstream BOB recertification.
(a) * * *
(2) A gasoline manufacturer must comply with applicable
requirements of this part and incur deficits to be included in their
compliance calculations under Sec. 1090.700 for each facility at which
the gasoline manufacturer recertifies BOB.
* * * * *
(4) A party that only recertifies BOB that contains a greater
amount of a specified oxygenate (e.g., a party adds 15 volume percent
ethanol instead of 10 volume percent ethanol to an E10 BOB) or a
different oxygenate at an equal or greater amount (e.g., a party adds
16 volume percent isobutanol instead of 10 volume percent ethanol to an
E10 BOB) does not incur deficits under this section, does not need to
submit reports under subpart J of this part, and does not need to
arrange for an auditor to conduct an audit under subpart S of this
part. The party must still comply with all other applicable provisions
of this part (e.g., register and keep records under subparts I and M of
this part, respectively).
(b) A gasoline manufacturer that recertifies a BOB under this
section must calculate sulfur and benzene deficits for each batch and
the total deficits for sulfur and benzene as follows:
(1) Total sulfur deficit from downstream BOB recertification.
Calculate the total sulfur deficit from downstream BOB recertification
for each facility as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.386
Where:
DS_Oxy_Total,y = Total sulfur deficit from downstream BOB
recertification during compliance period y, in ppm-gallons.
DS_Oxy_Batch,i = Sulfur deficit for batch i of
recertified BOB, per paragraph (b)(2) of this section, in ppm-
gallons.
i = Individual batch of BOB recertified during compliance period
y.
n = Number of batches of BOB recertified during compliance
period y.
(2) Sulfur deficits from downstream BOB recertification. Calculate
the sulfur deficit from BOB recertification for each individual batch
of BOB recertified as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.387
Where:
DS_Oxy_Batch,i = Sulfur deficit for batch i of
recertified BOB, in ppm-gallons.
VBOB = Volume of BOB in the batch being recertified, in
gallons.
PSV = Presumed sulfur value of recertified BOB, in ppm. For purposes
of this equation, PSV equals 11 ppm.
PTDOxy = Volume fraction of oxygenate that would have
been added to the BOB as specified on PTDs.
ACTUALOxy = Volume fraction of oxygenate that was
actually added to the BOB. If no oxygenate was added to the BOB,
then ACTUALOxy equals 0.
(3) Total benzene deficit from downstream BOB recertification.
Calculate the total benzene deficit from downstream BOB recertification
for each facility as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.388
Where:
DBz_Oxy_Total,y = Total benzene deficit from downstream
BOB recertification during compliance period y, in benzene gallons.
DBz_Oxy_Batch,i = Benzene deficit for batch i of
recertified BOB, per paragraph (b)(4) of this section, in benzene
gallons.
i = Individual batch of BOB recertified during compliance period y.
n = Number of batches of BOB recertified during compliance period y.
(4) Benzene deficits from downstream BOB recertification. Calculate
the benzene deficit from BOB recertification for each individual batch
of BOB recertified as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.389
Where:
DBz_Oxy_Batch,i = Benzene deficit for batch i of
recertified BOB, in benzene gallons.
VBOB = Volume of BOB in the batch being recertified, in
gallons.
PBV = Presumed benzene value of recertified BOB, in volume percent.
For purposes of this equation, PBV equals 0.68 volume percent.
PTDOxy = Volume fraction of oxygenate that would have
been added to the BOB as specified on PTDs.
ACTUALOxy = Volume fraction of oxygenate that was
actually added to the BOB. If no
[[Page 70074]]
oxygenate was added to the BOB, then ACTUALOxy equals 0.
(5) Deficit rounding. The deficits calculated in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (4) of this section must be rounded and reported to the nearest
sulfur ppm-gallon or benzene gallon in accordance with Sec. 1090.50,
as applicable.
* * * * *
0
59. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.745 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.745 Informational annual average calculations.
(a) A gasoline manufacturer must calculate and report annual
average sulfur and benzene concentrations for each of their facilities
as specified in this section. The values calculated and reported under
this section are not used to demonstrate compliance with average
standards under this part.
(b) A gasoline manufacturer must calculate and report their
unadjusted average sulfur concentration as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.390
Where:
Savg,y = Facility unadjusted average sulfur concentration
for compliance period y, in ppm. Round and report Savg,y
to two decimal places.
Vi = Volume of gasoline produced or imported in batch i,
in gallons.
Si = Sulfur content of batch i, in ppm.
i = Individual batch of gasoline produced or imported during the
compliance period.
n = Number of batches of gasoline produced or imported during the
compliance period.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
(c) A gasoline manufacturer must calculate and report their net
average sulfur concentration as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.391
Where:
Snet_avg,y = Facility net average sulfur concentration
for compliance period y, in ppm. Round and report
Snet_avg,y to two decimal places.
CSVy = Compliance sulfur value for compliance period y,
per Sec. 1090.700(a)(1), in ppm-gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
(d) A gasoline manufacturer must calculate and report their net
average benzene concentration as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.392
Where:
Bnet_avg,y = Facility net average benzene concentration
for compliance period y, in volume percent. Round and report
Bnet_avg,y to two decimal places.
CBVy = Compliance benzene value for compliance period y,
per Sec. 1090.700(b)(1)(i), in benzene gallons.
Vtot = Total volume of gasoline produced or imported
during the compliance period, in gallons.
Subpart I--Registration
0
60. Amend Sec. 1090.800 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.800 General provisions.
* * * * *
(d) RCO submission. Registration information must be submitted by
the RCO. The RCO may delegate responsibility to a person who is
familiar with the requirements of this part and who is no lower in the
organization than a fuel manufacturing facility manager, or equivalent.
* * * * *
0
61. Amend Sec. 1090.805 by revising and republishing paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1090.805 Contents of registration.
* * * * *
(b) Additional information required for certified pentane
producers. In addition to the information in paragraph (a) of this
section, a certified pentane producer must also submit the following
information:
(1) A description of the certified pentane production facility that
demonstrates that the facility is capable of producing certified
pentane that is compliant with the requirements of this part without
significant modifications to the existing facility.
(2) A description of how certified pentane will be shipped from the
certified pentane production facility to the certified pentane
blender(s) and the associated quality assurance practices that
demonstrate that contamination during distribution can be adequately
controlled so as not to cause certified pentane to be in violation of
the standards in this part.
0
62. Amend Sec. 1090.815 by revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.815 Deactivation (involuntary cancellation) of
registration.
(a) * * *
(4) Any required attestation engagement report has not been
received within 30 days of the required submission date.
* * * * *
0
63. Amend Sec. 1090.820 by revising paragraph (b)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.820 Changes of ownership.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) A letter, signed by the RCO from the company that currently
owns or will own the company or facility and, if possible,
documentation from the company that previously registered the company
or facility that details the effective date of the transfer of
ownership of the company or facility and summarizes any changes to the
registration information.
* * * * *
Subpart J--Reporting
0
64. Amend Sec. 1090.900 by revising paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.900 General provisions.
* * * * *
(c) Report deadlines. All annual, batch, and credit transaction
reports required under this subpart, except attestation engagement
reports, must be submitted by March 31 for the preceding compliance
period (e.g., reports covering the calendar year 2021 must be submitted
to EPA by no later than March 31, 2022). Attestation engagement reports
must be submitted by June 1 for the preceding compliance period (e.g.,
attestation engagement reports covering calendar year 2021 must be
submitted to EPA by no later than June 1, 2022). Independent survey
quarterly reports must be submitted by the deadlines in Table 1 to
paragraph (a)(4) in Sec. 1090.925.
(d) RCO submission. Reports must be signed and submitted by the RCO
or their delegate.
0
65. Amend Sec. 1090.905 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. Revising paragraphs (a)(2)(iv)(E), (b)(2)(vi)(E), (c)(1)(viii)(A),
(c)(2)(ii) and (iii), and (c)(2)(viii)(A);
0
c. Removing paragraph (c)(3)(i)(H) and redesignating paragraphs
(c)(3)(i)(I) and (J) as paragraphs (c)(3)(i)(H) and (I); and
0
d. Revising paragraphs (c)(4) introductory text, (c)(5)(i)(E), and
(c)(8)(vii)(A).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.905 Reports by gasoline manufacturers.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) * * *
(E) The total sulfur deficit from downstream BOB recertification,
per Sec. 1090.740(b)(1).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) * * *
[[Page 70075]]
(E) The total benzene deficit from downstream BOB recertification,
per Sec. 1090.740(b)(3).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) * * *
(A) The applicable RVP standard, as specified in Sec. 1090.215,
and whether the ethanol 1.0 psi waiver under Sec. 1090.215(b) applies.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) The batch number.
(iii) The date the batch was produced or imported.
* * * * *
(viii) * * *
(A) The applicable RVP standard, as specified in Sec. 1090.215,
and whether the ethanol 1.0 psi waiver under Sec. 1090.215(b) applies,
for the neat CBOB, or hand blend of RBOB and oxygenate prepared under
Sec. 1090.1340.
* * * * *
(4) For blendstock(s) added to PCG by a gasoline manufacturer
complying by addition under Sec. 1090.1320(a)(2), report each
blendstock as a separate batch and all the following information:
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) The volume percentage of butane in batches of butane, or
pentane in batches of pentane, provided by the certified butane or
certified pentane supplier.
* * * * *
(8) * * *
(vii) * * *
(A) The applicable RVP standard, as specified in Sec. 1090.215,
and whether the ethanol 1.0 psi waiver under Sec. 1090.215(b) applies.
* * * * *
0
66. Amend Sec. 1090.910 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading; and
0
b. Revising the introductory text and paragraphs (a)(1)(ix) and (x).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.910 Reports by gasoline manufacturers that recertify BOB to
gasoline.
A gasoline manufacturer that recertifies BOB under Sec. 1090.740
must report the information of this section, as applicable.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(ix) The sulfur deficit for the batch calculated under Sec.
1090.740(b)(2).
(x) The benzene deficit for the batch calculated under Sec.
1090.740(b)(4).
* * * * *
0
67. Amend Sec. 1090.915 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading; and
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(5).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.915 Reports by oxygenate producers and importers.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) The sulfur content of the batch, in ppm, and the method used to
determine the sulfur content.
* * * * *
0
68. Amend Sec. 1090.925 by revising paragraphs (b)(3) introductory
text and (c)(3)(ii) through (iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.925 Reports by independent surveyors.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) For each diesel fuel sample collected at a retail outlet by the
independent surveyor:
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) The mean, median, and range expressed in appropriate units for
each measured fuel parameter.
(iii) The standard deviation for each measured fuel parameter.
(iv) The estimated compliance rate for each measured fuel parameter
subject to a per-gallon standard in subpart C or D of this part.
* * * * *
0
69. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.930 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.930 Reports by auditors.
(a) Attestation engagement reports required under subpart S of this
part must be submitted by an independent auditor registered with EPA
and associated with a company, or companies, through registration under
subpart I of this part. Each attestation engagement report must clearly
identify the company and compliance level (e.g., facility), time
period, and scope covered by the report. Attestation engagement reports
covered by this section include those required under this part and
those required under 40 CFR part 80, subpart M, beginning with the
report due June 1, 2022.
(b) An attestation engagement report must be submitted to EPA
covering each compliance period by June 1 of the following calendar
year. The auditor must make the attestation engagement report available
to the company for which it was performed.
(c) The attestation engagement must comply with subpart S of this
part and the attestation engagement report must clearly identify the
methodologies followed and any findings, exceptions, and variances.
(d) A single attestation engagement report submission by the
auditor may include procedures performed under this part and under 40
CFR part 80, subpart M. If a single submission method is used, the
auditor must clearly and separately describe the procedures and
findings for each program.
(e) The auditor must submit written acknowledgement from the RCO
that the gasoline manufacturer has reviewed the attestation engagement
report.
0
70. Amend Sec. 1090.935 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) introductory
text and (a)(1)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.935 Reports by diesel fuel manufacturers.
(a) * * *
(1) For each compliance period, a diesel fuel manufacturer that
produces ULSD must submit the following information:
(i) The EPA-issued company and facility identifiers for the diesel
fuel manufacturer.
* * * * *
Subpart K--Batch Certification and Designation
0
71. Amend Sec. 1090.1000 by revising paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (b)(4)
introductory text, (b)(5), (c)(2)(ii), and (e)(2)(i)(A) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1000 Batch certification requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Ensure that each batch of gasoline meets the applicable
requirements of subpart C of this part using the applicable procedures
specified in subpart N of this part. A transmix processor must also
meet all applicable requirements of subpart F of this part to ensure
that each batch of gasoline meets the applicable requirements of
subpart C of this part.
* * * * *
(4) Any person who mixes summer gasoline with summer or winter
gasoline that has a different designation must comply with one of the
following:
* * * * *
(5) Any person who mixes summer gasoline with winter gasoline to
transition any storage tank from winter to summer gasoline is exempt
from the requirement in paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this section but must
ensure that the gasoline meets the applicable RVP standard in Sec.
1090.215.
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Ensure that each batch of diesel fuel or ECA marine fuel meets
the
[[Page 70076]]
applicable requirements of subpart D of this part using the applicable
procedures specified in subpart N of this part. A transmix processor
must also meet all applicable requirements specified in subpart F of
this part to ensure that each batch of diesel fuel or ECA marine fuel
meets the applicable requirements of subpart D of this part.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Testing must occur after the most recent delivery into the
certified butane producer's storage tank, before transferring the
certified butane batch for delivery.
* * * * *
0
72. Amend Sec. 1090.1005 by revising the section heading to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1005 Designation of batches of fuel, fuel additive, and
regulated blendstock.
* * * * *
0
73. Amend Sec. 1090.1010 by revising paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1010 Designation requirements for gasoline and regulated
blendstocks.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) The name of the specific oxygenate (e.g., isobutanol).
* * * * *
0
74. Amend Sec. 1090.1015 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading; and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (a) introductory text, (b) introductory text,
and (b)(3)(iii) through (v).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1015 Designation requirements for diesel fuel and
distillate fuel.
(a) Designation requirements for diesel fuel and distillate fuel
manufacturers.
* * * * *
(b) Designation requirements for distributors of diesel fuel and
distillate fuel. A distributor of diesel fuel or distillate fuel must
accurately and clearly designate each batch of diesel fuel or
distillate fuel for which they transfer custody as follows:
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) California diesel fuel may be redesignated as ULSD if the
requirements specified in Sec. 1090.625(e) are met.
(iv) Heating oil, kerosene, ECA marine fuel, or jet fuel may be
redesignated as ULSD if it meets the ULSD standards in Sec. 1090.305
and was designated as ULSD under paragraph (a) of this section.
(v) 500 ppm LM diesel fuel may be redesignated as ECA marine fuel,
distillate global marine fuel, or heating oil. Any person who
redesignates 500 ppm LM diesel fuel to ECA marine fuel or distillate
global marine fuel must maintain records from the producer of the 500
ppm LM diesel fuel (i.e., PTDs accompanying the fuel under Sec.
1090.1115) to demonstrate compliance with the 500 ppm sulfur standard
in Sec. 1090.320(b).
* * * * *
Subpart L--Product Transfer Documents
0
75. Amend Sec. 1090.1100 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1100 General requirements.
* * * * *
(c) Part 80 PTD requirements. For any product subject to 40 CFR
part 80, subpart M, a party must also include the applicable PTD
information required under 40 CFR 80.1453.
0
76. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1105 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1105 PTD requirements for exempt fuel, fuel additive, and
regulated blendstock.
(a) In addition to the information required under Sec. 1090.1100,
on each occasion when any person transfers custody or title to any
exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock under subpart G of
this part, other than when the exempt fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock is sold or dispensed to the ultimate end user at a retail
outlet or WPC facility, the transferor must provide the transferee PTDs
that include the following statements, as applicable:
(1) National security exemption language. For fuel, fuel additive,
or regulated blendstock with a national security exemption specified in
Sec. 1090.605: ``This fuel is for use in vehicles, engines, or
equipment under an EPA-approved national security exemption only.''
(2) R&D exemption language. For fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock used for an R&D program specified in Sec. 1090.610: ``This
fuel is for use in research, development, and test programs only.''
(3) Racing fuel language. For fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock used for racing purposes specified in Sec. 1090.615: ``This
fuel is for racing purposes only.''
(4) Aviation fuel language. For fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock used in aircraft specified in Sec. 1090.615: ``This fuel is
for aviation use only.''
(5) Territory fuel exemption language. For fuel for use in American
Samoa, Guam, or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
specified in Sec. 1090.620: ``This fuel is for use only in Guam,
American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana Islands.''
(6) California gasoline language. For California gasoline specified
in Sec. 1090.625: ``California gasoline''.
(7) California diesel fuel language. For California diesel fuel
specified in Sec. 1090.625: ``California diesel fuel''.
(8) Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands summer
gasoline language. For summer gasoline for use in Alaska, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands specified in Sec. 1090.630:
``This summer gasoline is for use only in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico,
or the U.S. Virgin Islands.''
(9) Exported fuel language. For exported fuel, fuel additive, or
regulated blendstock specified in Sec. 1090.645: ``This fuel is for
export from the United States only.''
(b) In statements required by paragraph (a) of this section, where
``fuel'' is designated in a statement, the specific fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock type (e.g., ``diesel fuel'' or
``gasoline'') may be used in place of the word ``fuel''.
0
77. Amend Sec. 1090.1110 by revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i) introductory
text, (c)(1)(i) introductory text, and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1110 PTD requirements for gasoline, gasoline additives, and
gasoline regulated blendstocks.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Except as specified in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section,
for batches of summer BOB, identification of the product with one of
the following statements indicating the applicable RVP standard, as
specified in Sec. 1090.215:
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as specified in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section,
for summer gasoline, identification of the product with one of the
following statements indicating the applicable RVP standard, as
specified in Sec. 1090.215:
* * * * *
(e) Gasoline detergent language requirements. (1) In addition to
any other PTD requirements of this subpart, on each occasion when any
person transfers custody or title to any gasoline detergent, the
transferor must provide to the transferee PTDs that include the
following information:
(i) The identity of the product being transferred as detergent.
(ii) The name of the registered detergent must be used to identify
the
[[Page 70077]]
detergent additive package on its PTD and the LAC on the PTD must be
consistent with the requirements in Sec. 1090.260.
(2) In addition to any other PTD requirements of this subpart, on
each occasion when any person transfers custody or title to any
gasoline, the transferor must provide to the transferee PTDs that
include the following information:
(i) The identify of the gasoline being transferred as detergent-
additized gasoline or non-detergent-additized gasoline.
(ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
78. Amend Sec. 1090.1115 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading; and
0
b. Revising paragraph (a).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1115 PTD requirements for distillate fuel and residual
fuel.
(a) General requirements. On each occasion when any person
transfers custody or title of any distillate fuel or residual fuel,
other than when fuel is sold or dispensed to the ultimate end user at a
retail outlet or WPC facility, the transferor must provide the
transferee PTDs that include the following information:
(1) The sulfur per-gallon standard that the transferor represents
the distillate fuel or residual fuel to meet under subpart D of this
part (e.g., 15 ppm sulfur for ULSD or 1,000 ppm sulfur for ECA marine
fuel).
(2) An accurate and clear statement of the applicable
designation(s) of the distillate fuel or residual fuel under Sec.
1090.1015 (e.g., ``ULSD'', ``500 ppm LM diesel fuel'', or ``ECA marine
fuel'').
(3) If the distillate fuel or residual fuel does not meet the
sulfur standard in Sec. 1090.305(b) for ULSD, the following statement:
``Not for use in highway vehicles or engines or nonroad, locomotive, or
marine engines.''
* * * * *
0
79. Amend Sec. 1090.1120 by revising paragraph (b)(3)(iii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1120 PTD requirements for diesel fuel additives.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) The contribution to the sulfur content of the diesel fuel, in
ppm, that would result if the diesel fuel additive package is used at
the maximum recommended concentration.
* * * * *
Subpart M--Recordkeeping
0
80. Amend Sec. 1090.1205 by revising paragraphs (c) introductory text
and (c)(1) through (4) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1205 Recordkeeping requirements for all regulated parties.
* * * * *
(c) Sampling and testing. Any party that performs any sampling and
testing on any fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock must keep
records of the following information for each sample collected:
(1) The date, time, location, and identification of the storage
tank, railcar, truck, or vessel from which the sample was collected.
(2) The name and title of the person who collected the sample and
the person who performed the test.
(3) The results of all tests, including where more than one test is
performed, as originally printed by the testing apparatus, or where no
printed result is produced, the results as originally recorded by the
person that performed the test.
(4) The test methodology used.
* * * * *
0
81. Amend Sec. 1090.1210 by revising paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2)(i)
to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1210 Recordkeeping requirements for gasoline manufacturers.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Records that reflect the storage and movement of the PCG or TGP
and blendstock within the gasoline manufacturing facility to the point
such PCG or TGP is used to produce gasoline or BOB.
(2) * * *
(i) The results of tests to determine the sulfur content, benzene
content, oxygenate(s) content, and in the summer, RVP, for the PCG or
TGP and volume of the PCG or TGP when received at the gasoline
manufacturing facility.
* * * * *
0
82. Amend Sec. 1090.1215 by revising paragraphs (a), (b) introductory
text, and (c) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1215 Recordkeeping requirements for diesel fuel, ECA marine
fuel, and distillate global marine fuel manufacturers.
(a) Overview. In addition to the requirements in Sec. 1090.1205, a
diesel fuel, ECA marine fuel, or distillate global marine fuel
manufacturer must keep records for each of their facilities that
include the information in this section.
(b) Diesel fuel and ECA marine fuel records. For each batch of
ULSD, 500 ppm LM diesel fuel, or ECA marine fuel, a diesel fuel or ECA
marine fuel manufacturer must keep records of the following
information:
* * * * *
(c) Distillate global marine fuel records. For distillate global
marine fuel, a distillate global marine fuel manufacturer must keep
records of the following information:
* * * * *
0
83. Amend Sec. 1090.1230 by revising paragraph (b)(8) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1230 Recordkeeping requirements for oxygenate producers.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) The neat ethanol production quality control records or the test
results on the neat ethanol, as applicable.
* * * * *
0
84. Amend Sec. 1090.1240 by revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i),
(b)(2)(ii)(B), and (b)(2)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1240 Recordkeeping requirements for gasoline detergent
blenders.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The dates of the VAR period.
(ii) * * *
(B) For a facility that uses a gauge to measure the inventory of
the detergent storage tank, the total volume of detergent must be
calculated as follows:
VD = DIi - DIf + DIa -
DIw
Where:
VD = Volume of detergent, in gallons.
DIi = Initial detergent inventory of the tank, in
gallons.
DIf = Final detergent inventory of the tank, in gallons.
DIa = Sum of any additions to detergent inventory, in
gallons.
DIw = Sum of any withdrawals from detergent inventory for
purposes other than the additization of gasoline, in gallons.
* * * * *
(vi) If the detergent injector is set below the applicable LAC, or
adjusted by more than 10 percent above the concentration initially set
in the VAR period, documentation establishing that the purpose of the
change is to correct a batch misadditization prior to the end of the
VAR period and prior to the transfer of the batch to another party or
to correct an equipment malfunction and the date and adjustments of the
correction.
* * * * *
0
85. Amend Sec. 1090.1245 by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1245 Recordkeeping requirements for independent surveyors.
* * * * *
[[Page 70078]]
(b) * * *
(2) Records related to a geographically focused E15 survey program
under Sec. 1090.1420(b).
* * * * *
0
86. Amend Sec. 1090.1250 by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1250 Recordkeeping requirements for auditors.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Copies of each attestation engagement report prepared and all
related records developed to prepare each report.
0
87. Amend Sec. 1090.1255 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading; and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (a), (c)(4), and (d).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1255 Recordkeeping requirements for transmix, 500 ppm LM
diesel fuel, and pipeline interface.
(a) Overview. In addition to the requirements in Sec. 1090.1205, a
transmix processor, transmix blender, transmix distributor,
manufacturer or distributor of 500 ppm LM diesel fuel using transmix,
or pipeline operator must keep records that include the information in
this section.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) Documents or information that demonstrates that the 500 ppm LM
diesel fuel was only used in locomotive or marine engines that are not
required to use ULSD under 40 CFR 1033.815 or 40 CFR 1042.660,
respectively.
(d) Pipeline interface. A pipeline operator must keep records that
demonstrate compliance with the pipeline interface handling practices
in Sec. 1090.520.
Subpart N--Sampling, Testing, and Retention
0
88. Amend Sec. 1090.1300 by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1300 General provisions.
* * * * *
(b) If you need to meet requirements for a quality assurance
program at a minimum frequency, the first shipment of product you
receive from each distributor triggers the testing requirement for that
distributor. Perform testing with the first shipment of product to
demonstrate compliance for the testing period. The following example
illustrates the requirements for testing based on sampling the more
frequent of every 90 days or 500,000 gallons of certified butane you
receive from each distributor:
(1) If you receive an initial shipment of certified butane from a
distributor on March 1, perform testing on that batch to show that it
meets standards. A passing result qualifies all further shipments of
certified butane from that distributor until May 29, as long as you
receive less than 500,000 gallons of certified butane from that
distributor during those 90 days. In that case, the testing period ends
May 29 and the next testing period starts when you receive another
shipment of certified butane from that distributor on or after May 30.
(2) If you receive a shipment from that distributor before May 29
that that causes the total volume of certified butane from that
distributor to exceed 500,000 gallons over the testing period, the date
that batch is received represents the end of the testing period. The
next testing period starts when you receive another shipment of
certified butane from that distributor.
* * * * *
(d) Anyone performing tests under this subpart must apply good
laboratory practices for all sampling, measurement, and calculations
related to testing required under this part. This requires performing
these procedures in a way that is consistent with generally accepted
scientific and engineering principles and properly accounting for all
available relevant information. The following examples illustrate how
to apply good laboratory practices:
(1) You may exclude outlier data points for quality testing under
Sec. 1090.1375 as specified in ASTM D6299 (incorporated by reference
in Sec. 1090.95), subject to the following requirements:
(i) The justification for exclusion must be an assignable cause
that is not part of the normal process and does not result from common
causes.
(ii) You must meet requirements for documenting and supporting
exclusion of data points as specified in Sec. 1090.1375(a)(5).
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
89. Amend Sec. 1090.1310 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b) introductory text; and
0
b. Adding paragraph (f).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1310 Testing to demonstrate compliance with standards.
* * * * *
(b) A fuel manufacturer, fuel additive manufacturer, or regulated
blendstock producer must perform the following measurements before
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock from a given batch leaves
the facility, except as specified in paragraph (f) of this section and
Sec. 1090.1315:
* * * * *
(f) Refiners and blending manufacturers may meet the testing
requirements of paragraph (b) of this section by loading gasoline or
diesel fuel onto a marine vessel, subject to the following conditions:
(1) The marine vessel remains within 15 miles of the fuel
manufacturing facility after loading.
(2) Each vessel compartment is sampled for meeting certification
testing requirements as specified in Sec. 1090.1605(b)(1).
(3) No additional loading occurs after sampling is complete.
(4) The refiner or blending manufacturer ensures that the fuel
meets all applicable per-gallon standards before the fuel leaves the
area specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
0
90. Amend Sec. 1090.1315 by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text and paragraph (a) introductory text;
0
b. Adding paragraphs (a)(7) through (14); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1315 In-line blending.
A fuel manufacturer using in-line blending equipment may qualify
for a waiver from the requirement in Sec. 1090.1310(b) to test every
batch of fuel before the fuel leaves the fuel manufacturing facility.
This section describes in-line blending waiver provisions that apply
instead of or in addition to the requirements in Sec. 1090.1335(c).
(a) Submit a request signed by the RCO, or their delegate, to EPA
with the following information:
* * * * *
(7) Describe which blendstock parameters you intend to measure for
managing the blending process and the typical sampling frequency for
those measurements.
(8) Describe any circumstances in which it is not possible to
achieve a sampling frequency corresponding to a margin of error of
0.01. Also describe how you will adjust target values to account for
the greater measurement variability. For example, if the greater margin
of error corresponds to a 2 percent increase in measurement
variability, adjust measured values of all parameters subject to per-
gallon and average standards upward by 2 percent.
(9) Describe an alternative sampling plan to meet requirements to
test head, middle, and tail samples for small
[[Page 70079]]
batches. Your alternative sampling plan may allow you to collect a
single sample anytime during the blend for a batch involving up to 8
hours of blending or up to 1 million gallons of fuel, and it may allow
you to collect two evenly distributed samples during the blend for a
batch involving up to 16 hours of blending or up to 2 million gallons
of fuel.
(10) Describe your plans to meet requirements to test head, middle,
and tail samples in cases where unforeseen circumstances cause the
batch to be complete before blending the anticipated batch volume. Any
failure to perform required tests must not occur in more than 10
percent of in-line blending batches for the calendar year.
(11) Describe contingency plans for alternative sampling and
testing in cases involving failure of the automatic compositor or other
essential equipment. Where possible, include collecting a second
composite sample with a redundant system.
(12) Describe any contingency plans for an alternative sampling
demonstration if an automatic sampling test result fails to meet a per-
gallon standard. Your plan may include certifying the batch based on
manual sampling in a tank if you collect the whole batch in the tank
before it leaves the fuel manufacturing facility gate. Similarly, as
long as the fuel remains at the facility, you may certify the batch
based on secondary automatic sampling as fuel comes out of a holding
tank that you use to collect the fuel that failed to meet a per-gallon
standard.
(13) In the case of in-line blending into a marine vessel, describe
an alternative, equivalent method for meeting the requirement in Sec.
1090.1335(c)(4) to collect head-middle-tail samples.
(14) Include the following statement: ``The information in this
submission is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge.
I am aware that there are significant civil and criminal penalties for
submitting false, misleading, or incomplete information.''
* * * * *
(c) The following provisions apply for amending an approved waiver
under this section:
(1) You must submit an updated waiver request to EPA 60 days before
making any material change to your in-line blending process. Examples
of material changes include changing analyzer hardware or programming,
changing the location of the analyzer, changing the piping
configuration, changing the mixing control hardware or programming
logic, changing sample compositors or compositor settings, or expanding
fuel blending capacity. Changing the name of the company or business
unit is an example of a change that is not material.
(2) The request must include a description of the intended changes
and a comparison document that clearly and comprehensively identifies
the proposed changes to the waiver. The request must also include the
statement in paragraph (a)(14) of this section.
(3) Your request to amend a waiver under this section is deemed to
be approved effective 60 days after EPA acknowledges receiving the
request if there is no EPA response to the request. Such a response may
be in the form of denying the request, identifying deficiencies, or
requiring additional information. If we require that you correct a
deficiency or submit additional information, your waiver request is
deemed to be approved effective 60 days after EPA acknowledges
receiving the responsive submission.
* * * * *
0
91. Amend Sec. 1090.1320 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a) introductory text;
0
b. Revising and republishing paragraph (a)(1)(i);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (b) introductory text and (b)(1);
0
d. Adding paragraphs (b)(5) and (6); and
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(1).
The revisions, republication, and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1320 Adding blendstock to PCG.
* * * * *
(a) Sample and test using one of the following methods to exclude
PCG from the compliance demonstration for sulfur content and benzene
content:
(1) * * *
(i) Determine the sulfur content, benzene content, and oxygenate
content of the PCG before blending blendstocks to produce a new batch
of gasoline as follows:
(A) Sample and test the sulfur content, benzene content, and
oxygenate content of each batch of PCG using the procedures in Sec.
1090.1350. Demonstrate homogeneity as specified in Sec. 1090.1337 if
blending involves multiple batches of PCG, or if a single batch of PCG
was certified without demonstrating homogeneity under Sec.
1090.1337(a)(4). The blending manufacturer does not need to test PCG
for oxygenate content if they can demonstrate that the PCG does not
contain oxygenates as specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(C) of this
section or Sec. 1090.1310(e)(1).
(B) If the PCG is a BOB and the blending manufacturer is accounting
for downstream oxygenate under Sec. 1090.710, also prepare a hand
blend under Sec. 1090.1340 and test the hand blend for sulfur content
and benzene content.
(C) The blending manufacturer may use the PCG manufacturer's
certification test results if the PCG was received directly from the
PCG manufacturer by an in-tank transfer or tank-to-tank transfer within
the same terminal as long as the results are from the PCG that is being
transferred.
(D) If you are unable to measure a PCG parameter, you must comply
using either the presumed value for the PCG volume or an EPA-approved
alternative value as described in Sec. 1090.1710(g).
* * * * *
(b) A certified butane or certified pentane blender that blends
certified butane or certified pentane into PCG, other than Summer RFG
or Summer RBOB, to make a new batch of gasoline may comply with the
following requirements instead of the requirements of paragraph (a) of
this section:
(1) For summer gasoline, measure the RVP of the blended fuel. The
fuel manufacturer may rely on test results from the certified butane or
certified pentane producer for sulfur content and benzene content.
* * * * *
(5) If the quality assurance testing under paragraph (b)(4) of this
section shows that certified butane or certified pentane fails to meet
one or more of the standards specified in Sec. 1090.250 or Sec.
1090.255, the certified butane or certified pentane received from that
distributor during that testing period is deemed to be in violation of
the relevant per-gallon standard. Any later shipment of certified
butane or certified pentane received from that distributor will also be
deemed to be in violation of the relevant per-gallon standard unless
another quality assurance test is conducted demonstrating that
certified butane or certified pentane received from that distributor
meets the standards specified in Sec. 1090.250 or Sec. 1090.255.
(6) If certified butane or certified pentane is deemed to be in
violation under paragraph (b)(5) of this section, the certified butane
or certified pentane blender must calculate its compliance obligations
using paragraph (a)(2) of this section using the test results from the
quality assurance program and obtain any necessary sulfur or benzene
credits.
(c) * * *
[[Page 70080]]
(1) Calculate and incur sulfur and benzene deficits under the BOB
recertification provisions of Sec. 1090.740.
* * * * *
0
92. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1335 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1335 Collecting, preparing, and testing samples.
(a) General provisions. Use good laboratory practice to collect
samples to represent the batch you are testing. For example, take steps
to ensure that a batch is always well mixed before sampling. Also,
always take steps to prevent sample contamination, such as completely
flushing sampling taps and piping and pre-rinsing sample containers
with the product being sampled. Follow the procedures in paragraph (b)
of this section for manual sampling. Follow the procedures in paragraph
(c) of this section for automatic sampling. Additional requirements for
measuring RVP are specified in paragraph (d) of this section. A
description of how to determine compliance based on single or multiple
tests on single or multiple samples is specified in paragraph (e) of
this section.
(b) Manual sampling. Perform manual sampling using one of the
methods specified in ASTM D4057 (incorporated by reference in Sec.
1090.95) to demonstrate compliance with standards as follows:
(1) Collect a ``running'' or ``all-levels'' sample from the top of
the tank. Drawing a sample from a standpipe is acceptable only if it is
slotted or perforated to ensure that the drawn sample properly
represents the whole batch.
(2) Use tap sampling (or other spot sampling) to collect upper,
middle, and lower samples. Collect samples that most closely match the
recommendations in ASTM D4057. Adjust spot sampling for partially
filled tanks as shown in Table 1, Table 5, or Table 6 of ASTM D4057, as
applicable.
(3) If the procedures in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section
are impractical for a given storage configuration, you may use
alternative sampling procedures as specified in ASTM D4057. This
applies primarily for sampling with railcars, trucks, retail outlets,
and other downstream locations.
(4) Test results with manual sampling are valid only after you
demonstrate homogeneity as specified in Sec. 1090.1337. Once a batch
meets homogeneity specifications, you may use any properly drawn sample
to represent the batch, subject to the hand-blending provisions of
Sec. 1090.1340. The entire batch volume is noncompliant if a sample
fails to meet any applicable per-gallon standard.
(5) Except as specified for marine vessels in Sec. 1090.1605, you
must not do certification testing with a composite sample from manual
sampling.
(c) Automatic sampling. Perform automatic sampling as specified in
ASTM D4177 (incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95), with the
additional provisions specified in this paragraph (c). Automatic
sampling is intended to apply for in-line blending, including
configurations that involve a pipeline filling a tank that will be
certified as compliant before it leaves the fuel manufacturing facility
gate.
(1) Follow all specifications for automatic sampling in this
paragraph (c) unless EPA approves an in-line blending waiver that
authorizes specific exceptions under Sec. 1090.1315.
(2) Configure the system to ensure a well-mixed stream at the
sampling point. Align the start and end of sampling with the start and
end of creating the batch.
(3) Set a sampling frequency based on collecting 9,604 grabs or a
smaller number of grabs that achieves a margin of error of 0.01 or less
as specified in Section 19.1.3 of ASTM D4177; however, less frequent
sampling is acceptable as long as the interval between samples does not
exceed 20 seconds throughout the batch. Keep records to show that the
sampling frequency meets specifications.
(4) Collect three samples for individual measurements in addition
to the composite sample. Draw head, middle, and tail samples that come
from the initial, middle, and final thirds of the estimated batch
volume, respectively.
(5) If the composite sample fails to meet any applicable per-gallon
standard, the entire batch volume is noncompliant. If one or more
separate samples fail to meet any applicable per-gallon standard, the
volume of noncompliant fuel is the volume starting with the last valid
passing result before the failing result (or the start of the batch),
up to the first valid passing result after the failing result (or the
end of the batch).
(6) EPA may approve a different sampling strategy under an approved
in-line blending waiver under Sec. 1090.1315 if it is appropriate for
a given facility or for a small-volume batch.
(d) Sampling provisions related to measuring RVP of summer
gasoline. The following additional provisions apply for preparing
samples to measure the RVP of summer gasoline:
(1) Meet the additional specifications for manual and automatic
sampling in ASTM D5842 (incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95).
(2) If you measure other fuel parameters for a given sample in
addition to RVP testing, always measure RVP first.
(e) Testing and reporting to demonstrate compliance with standards.
Perform testing as specified in this subpart and report values to
demonstrate compliance with per-gallon and average standards as
follows:
(1) For parameters subject to per-gallon standards, report the
highest measured value (or the lowest measured value for testing
related to cetane index or other parameters that are subject to a
standard representing a minimum value). This applies for repeat tests
on a given sample and for testing multiple samples (including head,
middle, and tail samples from automatic sampling).
(2) In the case of automatic sampling for parameters subject to
average standards, report the result from the composite sample to
represent the batch for demonstrating compliance with the average
standard. For any repeat testing with the composite sample, calculate
the arithmetic average from all tests to represent the batch.
(3) In the case of manual sampling for parameters subject to
average standards, determine the value representing the batch as
follows:
(i) For testing with only a single sample, report that value to
represent the batch. If there are repeat tests with that sample, report
the arithmetic average from all tests to represent the sample.
(ii) For testing with more than one sample, report the arithmetic
average from all tested samples to represent the batch. If there are
repeat tests for any sample, calculate the arithmetic average of those
repeat tests to determine a single value to represent that sample
before calculating the average value to represent the batch.
0
93. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1337 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1337 Demonstrating homogeneity.
(a) Certification test results corresponding to manual sampling as
specified in Sec. 1090.1335(b) are valid only if collected samples
meet the homogeneity specifications in this section, except that the
homogeneity testing requirement does not apply in the following cases:
(1) There is only a single sample using the procedure specified in
Sec. 1090.1335(b)(2).
(2) Upright cylindrical tanks that have a liquid depth of less than
10 feet.
[[Page 70081]]
(3) Horizontal tanks with circular or elliptical cross section with
a volume less than 42,000 gallons used for storing ethanol denaturant.
Draw samples from the approximate mid-depth of the product level.
(4) You draw spot samples as specified in paragraph (c) of this
section, test each sample for every parameter subject to a testing
requirement, and use the worst-case test result for each parameter for
purposes of reporting, meeting per-gallon and average standards, and
all other aspects of compliance.
(5) Your tank configuration depends on roof sampling for
homogeneity demonstration, but inclement weather prevents collecting
roof samples and EPA has already approved a plan for a mixing procedure
to ensure a homogeneous batch for your specific tank configuration. EPA
approval of the mixing procedure will include consideration of product
type, fill level, and other relevant parameters for specific tank
configurations and batch characteristics. Keep records to document EPA
approval of the mixing procedure, your actions to follow the approved
mixing procedure, and the forcing weather event.
(6) Sampling occurs at a downstream location where it is not
possible to collect separate samples and steps are taken to ensure that
the batch is well mixed.
(7) The product being tested is certified butane or certified
pentane.
(b) Any test to establish homogeneity is considered a certification
test relative to a per-gallon standard for a given parameter if the
test result is the worst-case value from all testing performed for the
batch. Report the highest measured value as specified in Sec.
1090.1335(e)(2).
(c) Use spot sampling as specified in Sec. 1090.1335(b)(2) for
homogeneity testing.
(d) Demonstrate homogeneity for gasoline, GTAB, and TGP using two
of the procedures specified in this paragraph (d) with each sample. For
summer gasoline, the homogeneity demonstration must include RVP
measurement.
(1) Measure density or API gravity using ASTM D287, ASTM D1298,
ASTM D4052, or ASTM D7777 (incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95).
(2) Measure the sulfur content as specified in Sec. 1090.1360.
(3) Measure the benzene content as specified Sec. 1090.1360.
(4) Measure the RVP as specified in Sec. 1090.1360.
(e) Homogeneity requirements apply as follows for other products:
(1) Demonstrate homogeneity for diesel fuel using one of the
procedures specified in paragraph (d)(1) or (2) of this section.
(2) Demonstrate homogeneity for certified ethanol denaturant and
oxygenate based on measured sulfur content as specified in Sec.
1090.1360, except that no homogeneity testing is required for DFE if
you calculate sulfur content as specified in Sec. 1090.1330.
(f) Consider the batch to be homogeneous for a given parameter if
the measured values for all tested samples vary by no more than the
published reproducibility of the test method multiplied by 0.75 (R x
0.75). If reproducibility is a function of measured values, calculate
reproducibility using the average value of the measured parameter
representing all tested samples. Calculate using all meaningful
significant figures as specified for the test method, even if Sec.
1090.1350(c) describes a different precision. For cases that do not
require a homogeneity demonstration under paragraph (a) of this
section, the lack of homogeneity demonstration does not prevent a
quantity of fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock from being
considered a batch for demonstrating compliance with the requirements
of this part. The following additional provisions apply for special
cases:
(1) Do not use test results for a given test method for a parameter
to demonstrate homogeneity if multiple measured values are at or below
the test method's PLOQ, LLOQ, or valid range, as applicable. You may
instead use a different test method as allowed under this subpart to
get test results with the same parameter or with a different parameter.
(2) If you have homogeneity test results for more than the required
number of parameters and not all parameters meet the criteria, all
testing results except density or API gravity must meet applicable
homogeneity criteria to demonstrate that the batch is homogeneous.
(3) If using ASTM D4052 (incorporated by reference in Sec.
1090.95) for measuring density or API gravity to demonstrate
homogeneity through December 31, 2026, you may calculate the
homogeneity criterion based on the reproducibility of the test method
at the limit of the valid range for testing, even if measured results
extend beyond the valid range.
0
94. Amend Sec. 1090.1340 by revising paragraphs (a) introductory text,
(a)(1), and (a)(2)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1340 Preparing a hand blend from BOB.
(a) If you produce or import BOB and instruct downstream blenders
to add oxygenate, you must meet the requirements of this subpart by
blending oxygenate that reflects the anticipated sulfur content and
benzene content of the oxygenate for blending into a BOB sample. To do
this, prepare each hand blend by adding oxygenate to the BOB sample in
a way that corresponds to your instructions to downstream blenders for
the sampled batch of fuel. Prepare hand blends as follows:
(1) Take steps to avoid introducing high or low bias in sulfur
content when selecting from available samples to prepare the hand
blend. For example, if there are three samples with discrete sulfur
content measurements, select the sample with the mid-range sulfur
content. In other cases, randomly select the sample. If you omit the
homogeneity demonstration under Sec. 1090.1337(a)(4), prepare a single
hand blend using the BOB sample that has the highest sulfur content.
(2) * * *
(iii) As an example, if you give instructions for a given batch of
BOB to perform downstream blending to make E10, E15, and a blend that
contains 8 volume percent butanol, prepare a hand blend for testing
winter gasoline with 8 volume percent butanol, and prepare an E10 hand
blend for testing summer gasoline.
* * * * *
0
95. Amend Sec. 1090.1345 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(5);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (a)(6) and (7); and
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (c) through (e) as paragraphs (b) through
(d).
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1345 Retaining samples.
(a) * * *
(5) The nominal volume of retained liquid samples must be at least
330 ml.
(6) If you have only a single sample for testing, keep that sample
after testing is complete. If you collect multiple samples from a
single batch, keep an untested sample that represents the batch.
(7) If you test a hand blend under Sec. 1090.1340, keep a sample
of the BOB and a sample representative of the oxygenate used to prepare
the hand blend.
* * * * *
0
96. Amend Sec. 1090.1350 by revising paragraphs (c)(4) and (5) to read
as follows:
[[Page 70082]]
Sec. 1090.1350 Overview of test procedures.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) Record oxygenate content to the nearest 0.01 mass percent for
each measured oxygenate.
(5) Record diesel fuel aromatic content to the nearest 0.1 volume
percent, or record cetane index to the nearest whole number.
* * * * *
0
97. Amend Sec. 1090.1355 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) and (2)
to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1355 Calculation adjustments and corrections.
* * * * *
(a) Adjust measured values for total vapor pressure as follows:
RVP = 0.956 [middot] Ptotal - 0.347
Where:
RVP = Reid vapor pressure, in psi.
Ptotal = Measured total vapor pressure, in psi.
(b) * * *
(1) If your test method involves a published procedure with a
Pooled Limit of Quantitation (PLOQ), treat the PLOQ as your final
result if your measured result is below the PLOQ.
(2) If your test method involves a published procedure with a
limited scope but no PLOQ, treat the lower bound of the scope as your
final result if your measured result is less than that value.
* * * * *
0
98. Amend Sec. 1090.1360 by revising paragraph (b)(1)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1360 Performance-based Measurement System.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Sulfur.
* * * * *
0
99. Amend Sec. 1090.1365 by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text and paragraphs (a)(3) and (4);
0
b. Revising and republishing paragraphs (b) and (c)(3);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (f)(2) and (5).
The revisions and republication read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1365 Qualifying criteria for alternative measurement
procedures.
This section specifies how to qualify alternative procedures for
measuring absolute and method-defined fuel parameters under the
Performance-based Measurement System specified in Sec. 1090.1360.
(a) * * *
(3) Except as specified in paragraph (d) of this section, testing
to demonstrate compliance with the precision and accuracy
specifications in this section apply only for the laboratory where the
testing occurred. At a given laboratory, qualifying a test method
applies for all associated instruments used for testing to certify
fuel.
(4) If a procedure for measuring benzene or sulfur in gasoline has
no published PLOQ and no published scope with a lower bound, you must
establish a LLOQ.
* * * * *
(b) All alternative procedures must meet precision criteria based
on a calculated maximum allowable standard deviation for a given fuel
parameter as specified in this paragraph (b). The precision criteria
apply for measuring the parameters and fuels specified in paragraph
(b)(4) of this section. Take the following steps to qualify the
measurement procedure for measuring a given fuel parameter:
(1) The fuel must meet the parameter specifications in Table 1 to
paragraph (b)(4) of this section. This may require that you modify the
fuel you typically produce to be within the specified range. Absent a
specification (maximum or minimum), select a fuel representing values
that are typical for your testing. Store and mix the fuel to maintain a
homogenous mixture throughout the measurement period to ensure that
each fuel sample drawn from the batch has the same properties.
(2) Measure the fuel parameter from a homogeneous fuel batch at
least 20 times. Record each result in sequence. Do not omit any valid
results unless you use good engineering judgment to determine that the
omission is necessary and you document those results and the reason for
excluding them. Perform this analysis over a 20-day period. You may
make up to 4 separate measurements in a 24-hour period, as long as the
interval between measurements is at least 4 hours. Do not measure RVP
more than once from a single sample.
(3) An alternative procedure for measuring oxygenate in gasoline
must account for every type of oxygenate covered by the referee method.
(4) Calculate the maximum allowable standard deviation as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.393
Where:
[sigma]max = Maximum allowable standard deviation.
x1, x2, and x3 have the values from
the following table:
Table 1 to Paragraph (b)(4)--Precision Criteria for Qualifying Alternative Procedures
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x2 = Repeatability
Fuel, fuel additive, or regulated (r) or Fixed values
blendstock Fuel parameter Range x1 reproducibility x3 of [sigma]max Source \2\
(R) \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ULSD............................. Sulfur.............. 5 ppm minimum...... 1.5 r = 1.33........... 2.77 0.72 ASTM D3120-08.
500 ppm LM diesel fuel........... Sulfur.............. 350 ppm minimum.... 1.5 r = 21.3........... 2.77 11.5 ASTM D2622-16.
ECA marine fuel.................. Sulfur.............. 700 ppm minimum.... 1.5 r = 37.1........... 2.77 20.1 ASTM D2622-16.
Butane........................... Sulfur.............. ................... 1.5 r = 0.1152 [middot] 2.77 .............. ASTM D6667-14.
x.
Gasoline......................... Sulfur.............. ................... 1.5 r = 0.4998 [middot] 2.77 .............. ASTM D7039-15a.
x\0.54\.
Gasoline......................... Oxygenate........... ................... 0.3 R = 0.13 [middot] 1 .............. ASTM D5599-18.
x\0.83\.
Gasoline......................... RVP \3\............. ................... 0.3 R = 0.40........... 1 0.12 ASTM D5191-15.
Gasoline......................... Benzene............. ................... 0.15 R = 0.221 [middot] 1 .............. ASTM D5769-20.
x\0.67\.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Calculate repeatability and reproducibility using the average value determined from testing. Use units as specified in Sec. 1090.1350(c).
\2\ Note that the listed procedure may be different than the referee procedure identified in Sec. 1090.1360(d), or it may be an older version of the
referee procedure.
\3\ Use only 1-liter containers for testing to qualify alternative methods.
[[Page 70083]]
(c) * * *
(3) The measurement procedure meets the accuracy requirement as
follows:
(i) Demonstrate accuracy for measuring sulfur in gasoline and
butane using samples to represent sulfur values from 1 to 10 ppm, 11 to
20 ppm, and 21 to 95 ppm. You may omit any of these ranges if you do
not perform testing with fuel in that range. Calculate the maximum
allowable difference between the average measured value and the ARV for
each applicable range as follows:
Where:
[Delta]max = 0.75 [middot] [sigma]max
[Delta]max = Maximum allowable difference.
[sigma]max = Maximum allowable standard deviation, per
paragraph (b)(4) of this section, using the sulfur content
represented by the ARV.
(ii) Demonstrate accuracy for measuring sulfur in diesel fuel using
test fuels meeting the specifications in Table 2 to this section. For
testing diesel fuel-related blendstocks and additives, use
representative test samples meeting the appropriate sulfur
specification. Table 2 to this paragraph also identifies the maximum
allowable difference between average measured value and the ARV
corresponding to the ARV at the upper end of each specified range.
These values are based on calculations with the equation in paragraph
(c)(3)(i) of this section, with parameter values set equal to the
standard.
Table 2 to Paragraph (c)(3)(ii)--Accuracy Criteria for Qualifying
Alternative Procedures With Diesel Fuel and Diesel Fuel-Related
Blendstocks and Additives
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Illustrated
Sulfur maximum
Fuel content (ppm) allowable
difference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ULSD.................................... 10-20 0.54
500 ppm LM diesel fuel.................. 450-500 8.65
ECA marine fuel......................... 900-1,000 15.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) Test with a range of fuels that are typical of those you will
analyze at your laboratory. Use either consensus-named fuels or locally
named reference materials. Consensus-named fuels are homogeneous fuel
quantities sent around to different laboratories for analysis, which
results in a ``consensus name'' representing the average value of the
parameter for all participating laboratories. Locally named reference
materials are fuel samples analyzed using the reference test method,
either at your laboratory or at a reference installation, to establish
an estimated value for the fuel parameter; locally named reference
materials usually come from the fuel you produce.
* * * * *
(5) Perform testing at your laboratory as specified in paragraph
(b) of this section to establish the repeatability of the alternative
procedure. The repeatability must be as good as or better than that
specified in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
* * * * *
0
100. Amend Sec. 1090.1375 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraph (a)(4) as (a)(5) and adding new paragraph
(a)(4);
0
b. Revising paragraphs (c) introductory text, (c)(2), and (c)(4); and
0
c. Adding paragraphs (d) and (e).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1375 Quality control procedures.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) Keep records to document any test results excluded for being
out of control under Section 8.5 and A1.5.4.1 of ASTM D6299
(incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95). Identify the assignable
cause and include any appropriate additional supporting justification.
* * * * *
(c) Accuracy demonstration. For absolute fuel parameters (VCSB and
non-VCSB) and for method-defined fuel parameters using non-VCSB
methods, you must show that you meet accuracy criteria as specified in
this paragraph (c). For method-defined VCSB procedures, you may meet
accuracy requirements as specified in this paragraph (c) or by
comparing your results to the accepted reference value in an inter-
laboratory crosscheck program as specified in paragraph (d) of this
section.
* * * * *
(2) Except as specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, test
every instrument using a check standard meeting the specifications of
ASTM D6299. Select a fuel sample with an ARV representing fuel that is
typical for your testing.
* * * * *
(4) You meet accuracy requirements under this section if the
difference between your measured value for the check standard and the
ARV is less than the value from the following equation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.394
Where:
[Delta]max = Maximum allowable difference.
L = Total number of test results used to determine the ARV of a
consensus-named fuel. For testing locally named fuels for which no
consensus-based ARV applies, use L equal to [infin].
R = Reproducibility of the referee procedure identified in Sec.
1090.1360(d), as noted in Table 1 to paragraph (b)(4) of Sec.
1090.1365 or in the following table:
Table 1 to Paragraph (c)(4)--Criteria for Qualifying Alternative
Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Referee procedure Reproducibility
Tested product \1\ (R) \2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ULSD, 500 ppm diesel fuel, ECA ASTM D2622........ R = 0.4273
marine fuel, diesel fuel [middot]
additive, gasoline, gasoline x\0.8015\
regulated blendstock, and
gasoline additive.
Butane.......................... ASTM D6667........ R = 0.3130
[middot] x
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ASTM specifications are incorporated by reference, see Sec.
1090.95.
\2\ Calculate reproducibility using the average value determined from
testing. Use units as specified in Sec. 1090.1350(c).
[[Page 70084]]
(d) Demonstrating accuracy by participating in crosscheck programs.
You may meet accuracy requirements under paragraph (c) of this section
by comparing your results to the accepted reference value in an inter-
laboratory crosscheck program sponsored by ASTM International or
another VCSB at least three times per year (two times per year for
RVP), subject to the following provisions:
(1) Your results from the crosscheck program are not valid for
demonstrating compliance with accuracy requirements for an instrument
under this section if any of the following apply:
(i) The crosscheck program does not have a robust ARV based on the
check standard requirements in Section 6.2 of ASTM D6299 (incorporated
by reference, see Sec. 1090.95).
(ii) The difference between the test result and the ARV is greater
than the maximum allowable difference in paragraph (c)(4) of this
section.
(iii) The difference between the test result and the ARV is greater
than the method-defined limit for check standard accuracy, if
applicable.
(iv) The measured value lies outside of two Z-scores.
(2) If your results from the crosscheck program are not valid under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, perform a root cause analysis and
document your findings and the steps you take to correct the problem.
You continue to meet accuracy requirements under this section for the
affected parameter only if you correct the problem and demonstrate
compliance with the accuracy requirements of this section within 35
days after learning of a failure under paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. The compliance demonstration may be based on in-house testing
using a check standard qualified by a third party, or on testing in the
next crosscheck program.
(e) Failure to meet precision or accuracy requirements. The
presumed values specified in Sec. 1090.1710(g) apply for parameter
measurements with instruments failing to meet precision or accuracy
requirements under this section. If you fail to meet the deadlines for
resolving crosscheck-related issues under paragraph (d)(2) of this
section, the presumed values apply starting at the point of learning of
a failure under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
0
101. Amend Sec. 1090.1390 by revising the section heading to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1390 Requirement for automated detergent blending equipment
calibration.
* * * * *
0
102. Amend Sec. 1090.1395 by revising paragraphs (a) introductory
text, (a)(1)(i), and (b) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1395 Gasoline deposit control test procedures.
* * * * *
(a) Top Tier-based test method. Use the procedures specified in
ASTM D6201 (incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95), as follows:
(1) * * *
(i) 8.0-10.0 volume percent ethanol that meets the requirements in
Sec. 1090.270 and conforms to the specifications of ASTM D4806
(incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95).
* * * * *
(b) CARB test method. Use the procedures specified by CARB in Title
13, California Code of Regulations, section 2257 (incorporated by
reference in Sec. 1090.95).
* * * * *
Subpart O--Survey Provisions
0
103. Amend Sec. 1090.1400 by revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1400 General provisions.
(a) * * *
(2) The program plan must be signed by the RCO of the independent
surveyor conducting the program.
* * * * *
0
104. Amend Sec. 1090.1405 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(2) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1405 National fuels survey program.
(a) * * *
(1) A gasoline manufacturer that elects to account for oxygenate
added downstream under Sec. 1090.710 must participate in the national
fuels survey program (NFSP) specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) The survey program must be conducted by collecting samples
representative of retail outlets in the United States as specified in
Sec. 1090.1415.
0
105. Amend Sec. 1090.1410 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (2),
(c)(3) and (5), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1410 Independent surveyor requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Obtain samples representative of the gasoline and diesel fuel
(including diesel fuel made available at retail outlets to nonroad
vehicles, engines, and equipment) offered for sale separately from all
retail outlets in accordance with the survey program plan approved by
EPA, or immediately notify EPA of any refusal of a retailer to allow
samples to be taken.
(2) Obtain the number of samples representative of the number of
retail outlets offering E15.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Diesel fuel samples must be analyzed for sulfur content.
* * * * *
(5) All testing must be completed by an EPA-approved laboratory
within 10 business days after receipt of the sample.
(d) Verify E15 labeling requirements at retail outlets that offer
E15 for sale.
(e)(1) Using procedures specified in an EPA-approved plan under
Sec. 1090.1415, notify EPA, the retailer, and the branded fuel
manufacturer (if applicable) within 24 hours after an EPA-approved
laboratory has completed analysis when any of the following occur:
(i) A test result for a gasoline sample yields a sulfur content
result that exceeds the downstream sulfur per-gallon standard in Sec.
1090.205(c).
(ii) A test result for a gasoline sample yields an RVP result that
exceeds the applicable RVP standard in Sec. 1090.215.
(iii) A test result for a diesel fuel sample yields a sulfur
content result that exceeds the sulfur standard in Sec. 1090.305(b).
(iv) A test result for a gasoline sample identified as ``E15''
yields an ethanol content result that exceeds 15 volume percent.
(v) A test result for a gasoline sample not identified as ``E15''
yields an ethanol content of more than 10 volume percent ethanol.
(2) Any notification to EPA or a branded fuel manufacturer under
paragraph (e)(1) of this section must include the retail outlet's
contact information, including name, title, mailing address, telephone
number, and email address of a representative of the retail outlet, if
available.
* * * * *
0
106. Amend Sec. 1090.1415 by:
0
a. Revising and republishing paragraph (d); and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (e)(2) and (f) introductory text.
The revisions and republication read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1415 Survey program plan design requirements.
* * * * *
(d) Retail outlet selection. (1) Retail outlets to be sampled in a
sampling area must be selected from among all gasoline retail outlets
in the United
[[Page 70085]]
States with the probability of selection proportionate to the volume of
gasoline sold at the retail outlet. The sample of retail outlets must
also include gasoline retail outlets with different brand names as well
as those gasoline retail outlets that are unbranded.
(2) For any retail outlet from which a sample of gasoline or diesel
fuel was collected during a survey and was reported to EPA under Sec.
1090.1410(e), that retail outlet must be included in the subsequent
survey.
(3) At least one sample of a product dispensed as E15 must be
collected at each gasoline retail outlet when E15 is present, and
separate samples must be taken that represent the gasoline contained in
each storage tank at the gasoline retail outlet unless collection of
separate samples is not practicable.
(4) At least one sample of diesel fuel must be collected at each
retail outlet when diesel fuel is present. Samples of diesel fuel may
be collected at retail outlets that sell gasoline.
(e) * * *
(2) The minimum number of samples to be included in the survey
program plan for each calendar year is calculated as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP28AU24.395
Where:
n = Minimum number of samples in a year-long survey series. However,
n must be greater than or equal to 2,000 for the number of diesel
fuel samples or 5,000 for the number of gasoline samples.
Z[alpha] = Upper percentile point from the normal
distribution to achieve a one-tailed 95 percent confidence level (5
percent [alpha]-level). For purposes of this survey program,
Z[alpha] equals 1.645.
Z[beta] = Upper percentile point to achieve 95 percent
power. For purposes of this survey program, Z[beta]
equals 1.645.
[phi]1 = Maximum proportion of non-compliant outlets for
a region to be deemed compliant. This parameter needs to be 5
percent or greater (i.e., 5 percent or more of the outlets, within a
stratum such that the region is considered non-compliant).
[phi]0 = Underlying proportion of non-compliant outlets
in a sample. For the first survey program plan, [phi]0
will be 2.3 percent. For subsequent survey program plans,
[phi]0 will be the average of the proportion of outlets
found to be non-compliant over the previous 4 surveys.
Fa = Adjustment factor for the number of extra samples
required to compensate for samples that could not be included in the
survey (e.g., due to technical or logistical considerations), based
on the number of additional samples required during the previous 4
surveys. Fa must be greater than or equal to 1.1.
Fb = Adjustment factor for the number of samples required
to resample each retail outlet with test results reported to EPA
under Sec. 1090.1410(e), based on the rate of resampling required
during the previous 4 surveys. Fb must be greater than or
equal to 1.1.
Sun = Number of surveys per year. For purposes of this
survey program, Sun equals 4.
Stn = Number of sampling strata. For purposes of this
survey program, Stn equals 3.
* * * * *
(f) Laboratory designation. Any laboratory that the independent
surveyor intends to use to test samples collected as part of the NFSP
must be approved annually as part of the survey program plan approval
process under Sec. 1090.1400(a). In the survey program plan submitted
to EPA, the independent surveyor must include the following information
regarding any laboratory they intend to use to test samples:
* * * * *
0
107. Amend Sec. 1090.1420 by revising and republishing paragraph (a)
to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1420 Additional requirements for E15 misfueling mitigation
surveying.
(a) E15 misfueling mitigation survey requirement. (1) Any gasoline
manufacturer, oxygenate blender, or oxygenate producer that produces,
introduces into commerce, sells, or offers for sale gasoline, BOB, DFE,
or gasoline-ethanol blended fuel that is intended for use in or as E15
must comply with either survey program Option 1 (as specified in
paragraph (b) of this section) or Option 2 (as specified in paragraph
(c) of this section).
(2) For an oxygenate producer that produces or imports DFE, the DFE
is deemed as intended for use in E15 unless the oxygenate producer
demonstrates that it was not intended for such use. The oxygenate
producer may demonstrate, at a minimum, that DFE is not intended for
use in E15 by including language on PTDs stating that the DFE is not
intended for use in E15, entering into contracts with oxygenate
blenders to limit the use of their DFE to gasoline-ethanol blended
fuels of no more than 10 volume percent ethanol, and limiting the
concentration of their DFE to no more than 10 volume percent ethanol in
their fuel additive registration under 40 CFR part 79.
* * * * *
0
108. Amend Sec. 1090.1450 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(v);
0
b. Revising and republishing paragraph (c)(3); and
0
c. Revising paragraphs (c)(4) introductory text, (c)(10) introductory
text, (c)(10)(iii), (d)(2)(i), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(4) introductory text,
(d)(4)(iv), and (d)(5).
The revisions and republication read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1450 National sampling and testing oversight program.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) Samples collected must be shipped via ground service within 2
business days from when the samples are collected to an EPA-approved
laboratory as established in an approved NSTOP plan under this section.
A random subset of collected samples must also be shipped to the EPA
National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory as established in an
approved NSTOP plan under this section.
(3) Test, or arrange to be tested, samples collected under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section as follows:
(i) Winter gasoline samples must be analyzed for oxygenate content,
sulfur content, benzene content, distillation parameters, aromatics,
and olefins.
(ii) Summer gasoline samples must be analyzed for oxygenate
content, sulfur content, benzene content, distillation parameters,
aromatics, olefins, and RVP, except that samples of exempt gasoline
under Sec. 1090.630 do not need to be analyzed for RVP.
(iii) All samples must be tested by an EPA-approved laboratory
using test methods specified in subpart N of this part.
(iv) All analyses must be completed by an EPA-approved laboratory
within 10 business days after receipt of the sample.
(v) A gasoline manufacturer must analyze gasoline samples for
sulfur content, benzene content, and for summer gasoline, RVP, except
that samples of exempt gasoline under Sec. 1090.630 do not need to be
analyzed for RVP.
[[Page 70086]]
(4) Using procedures specified in an EPA-approved NSTOP plan under
this section, notify EPA and the gasoline manufacturer within 24 hours
after an EPA-approved laboratory has completed analysis when any of the
following occur:
* * * * *
(10) Review the test performance index and precision ratio for each
method and instrument the laboratory used to test gasoline samples
collected under this section as follows:
* * * * *
(iii) A gasoline manufacturer must supply copies of the necessary
information to the independent surveyor to review the TPI and PR for
each method and instrument used to test gasoline samples collected
under this section.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Each participating gasoline manufacturing facility must be
sampled at least once during each season they produce fuel. The NSTOP
plan must demonstrate how these facilities will be randomly selected
within the summer and winter seasons.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) The minimum number of samples to be included in the NSTOP plan
for each calendar year is calculated as follows:
n = R [middot] Fa [middot] Fb [middot]
Sun
Where:
n = Minimum number of samples in a year.
R = Number of participating gasoline manufacturing facilities.
Fa = Adjustment factor for the number of extra samples
required to compensate for samples that could not be included in the
NSTOP (e.g., due to technical or logistical considerations), based
on the number of additional samples required during the previous 2
calendar years. Fa must be greater than or equal to 1.1.
Fb = Adjustment factor for the number of samples required
to ensure oversight. For purposes of this program, Fb
equals 1.25.
Sun = Number of samples required per participating
facility per year. For purposes of this program, Sun
equals 2.
(4) Laboratory designation. Any laboratory that the independent
surveyor intends to use to test samples collected as part of the NSTOP
must be approved annually as part of the NSTOP plan approval process in
Sec. 1090.1400(a). The independent surveyor must include the following
information regarding each laboratory it intends to use to test
samples:
* * * * *
(iv) Records demonstrating the laboratory's performance in a
laboratory crosscheck program for the most recent 12 months prior to
submission of the NSTOP plan.
(5) Sampling procedure. The NSTOP plan must include a detailed
description of the sampling procedures used to collect samples at
participating gasoline manufacturing facilities.
* * * * *
Subpart P--Retailer and Wholesale Purchaser-Consumer Provisions
0
109. Amend Sec. 1090.1515 by revising the section heading to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1515 Diesel fuel sulfur labeling provisions.
* * * * *
Subpart Q--Importer and Exporter Provisions
0
110. Amend Sec. 1090.1600 by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read
as follows:
Sec. 1090.1600 General provisions for importers.
* * * * *
(b)(1) Except as specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, all
applicable standards in subparts C and D of this part apply to imported
gasoline and diesel fuel, respectively.
(2) An importer that imports gasoline at multiple import facilities
must comply with the gasoline average standards in Sec. Sec.
1090.205(a) and 1090.210(a) as specified in Sec. 1090.705(b), unless
the importer complies with the provisions of Sec. 1090.1610 to meet
the alternative per-gallon standards for rail or truck imports
specified in Sec. Sec. 1090.205(d) and 1090.210(c).
* * * * *
(d) Alternative testing requirements for an importer that imports
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock by rail or truck are
specified in Sec. 1090.1610.
0
111. Amend Sec. 1090.1605 by revising and republishing paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1605 Importation by marine vessel.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The importer must sample each compartment of the vessel and use
one of the following methods to meet testing requirements:
(i) Treat each compartment as a separate batch. Each individual
compartment is deemed to meet the homogeneity requirements in Sec.
1090.1337.
(ii) Except as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section,
combine samples from separate compartments into a single, vessel-
volumetric composite sample using the procedures in Section 9.2.4 of
ASTM D4057 (incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95). Test results
from the composite sample are valid only if single samples collected
from each affected compartment together meet the homogeneity
requirements in Sec. 1090.1337.
(iii) Measure the RVP of a sample collected from each compartment
for summer gasoline.
* * * * *
0
112. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1610 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1610 Importation by rail or truck.
(a) An importer that imports fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock by rail or truck must meet the sampling and testing
requirements of subpart N of this part by sampling and testing each
compartment of the railcar or truck unless they do one of the
following:
(1) Use supplier results. The importer may rely on test results
from the supplier for fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock
imported by rail or truck if the importer meets all the following
requirements:
(i) The importer obtains documentation of test results from the
supplier for each batch of fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock
in accordance with the following requirements:
(A) The testing includes measurements for all the parameters
specified in Sec. 1090.1310 using the measurement procedures specified
in Sec. 1090.1350.
(B) Testing for a given batch occurs after the most recent delivery
into the supplier's storage tank and before transferring the fuel, fuel
additive, or regulated blendstock to the railcar or truck.
(ii) The importer conducts testing to verify test results from each
supplier as follows:
(A) Collect a sample at least once every 30 days or every 50 rail
or truckloads from a given supplier, whichever is more frequent. Test
the sample as specified in paragraphs (a)(1)(i)(A) and (B) of this
section.
(B) Treat importation of each fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock separately, but treat railcars or truckloads together if the
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock is imported from a given
supplier by rail or truck.
(2) Certify in a storage tank. The importer may transfer the fuel,
fuel additive, or regulated blendstock imported by rail or truck into
storage tanks that also contain the same product
[[Page 70087]]
if the importer meets the following requirements:
(i) For gasoline, the importer transfers gasoline into one or more
empty tanks or tanks containing PCG that the importer owns.
(A) If the importer transfers gasoline into one or more empty
tanks, they must sample and test the sulfur content, benzene content,
and for summer gasoline, RVP, of each tank into which the gasoline was
transferred.
(B) If the importer transfers gasoline into one or more tanks
containing PCG, they must sample the PCG already in the tank prior to
transferring gasoline from the train or truck, test the sulfur content
and benzene content, and report this PCG as a negative batch as
specified in Sec. 1090.905(c)(3)(i). After transferring the gasoline
into the tanks, the importer must sample and test the sulfur content,
benzene content, and for summer gasoline, RVP, of each tank into which
the gasoline was transferred and report the volume, sulfur content, and
benzene content as a positive batch.
(C) Include the PCG in the tank before transferring and the volume
and properties after transferring in compliance calculations as
specified in Sec. 1090.700(d)(4)(i).
(D) The sample retention requirements in Sec. 1090.1345 apply to
the samples taken prior to transferring and those taken after
transferring.
(ii) For all other fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock,
the importer must sample and test the fuel, fuel additive, or regulated
blendstock in each tank into which it was transferred. The importer
must ensure that all applicable per-gallon standards are met before the
fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock is shipped from the tank.
(b) If an importer that elects to comply with paragraph (a)(1) or
(2) of this section fails to meet the applicable requirements, they
must meet the sampling and testing requirements of subpart N of this
part for each compartment of the railcar or truck until EPA determines
that the importer has adequately addressed the cause of the failure.
0
113. Amend Sec. 1090.1615 by revising and republishing paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1615 Gasoline treated as a blendstock.
* * * * *
(d)(1) The importer must treat the GTAB as if it were imported
gasoline and complete all the requirements for a gasoline manufacturer
under Sec. 1090.105(a) (except for the sampling, testing, and sample
retention requirements in Sec. 1090.105(a)(6)) for the GTAB at the
time it is imported.
(2) Any GTAB that ultimately is not used to produce gasoline (e.g.,
a tank bottom of GTAB) must be treated as newly imported gasoline and
must meet all applicable requirements for imported gasoline.
Subpart R--Compliance and Enforcement Provisions
0
114. Amend Sec. 1090.1710 by revising paragraph (g) introductory text
to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1710 Penalties.
* * * * *
(g) The presumed fuel parameter values in this paragraph (g) apply
for cases in which any person fails to comply with the sampling or
testing requirements and must be reported, unless EPA, in its sole
discretion, approves a different value. Any person requesting the use
of alternative test values must submit their request to EPA as
specified in Sec. 1090.10 within 30 days of discovering failure to
comply with sampling and testing requirements. EPA may consider any
relevant information to determine whether a different value is
appropriate.
* * * * *
0
115. Amend Sec. 1090.1715 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c); and
0
b. Revising and republishing paragraph (e).
The revisions and republication read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1715 Liability provisions.
* * * * *
(c) Any parent corporation is liable for any violation committed by
any of its wholly owned subsidiaries.
* * * * *
(e)(1) Any person who produced, imported, sold, offered for sale,
dispensed, supplied, offered for supply, stored, transported, caused
the transportation or storage of, or introduced into commerce fuel,
fuel additive, or regulated blendstock that is in the storage tank
containing fuel, fuel additive, or regulated blendstock that is found
to be in violation of a per-gallon standard is liable for the
violation.
(2) In order for a carrier to be liable under paragraph (e)(1) of
this section, EPA must demonstrate by reasonably specific showing, by
direct or circumstantial evidence, that the carrier caused the
violation.
* * * * *
Subpart S--Attestation Engagements
0
116. Amend Sec. 1090.1800 by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (a)(3); and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
The addition and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1800 General provisions.
(a) * * *
(3) A gasoline manufacturer that transacts sulfur or benzene
credits under this part.
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The auditor may be a certified public accountant, or firm of
such accountants, that is independent of the gasoline manufacturer.
Such an auditor must comply with the AICPA Code of Professional
Conduct, including its independence requirements, the AICPA Statements
on Quality Control Standards (SQCS) No. 8, A Firm's System of Quality
Control (both incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95), and
applicable rules of state boards of public accountancy. Such an auditor
must also perform the attestation engagement in accordance with the
AICPA Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 19,
Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements, especially as noted in sections AT-
C 105, 215, and 315 (incorporated by reference in Sec. 1090.95).
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) The auditor must prepare an attestation engagement report
identifying the applicable procedures specified in this subpart along
with the auditor's corresponding findings for each procedure. The
auditor must submit the attestation engagement report electronically to
EPA by June 1 of the year following the compliance period.
* * * * *
0
117. Amend Sec. 1090.1805 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1805 Representative samples.
(a) * * *
(3) Determine sample size using an alternate method that is
equivalent to or better than the methods specified in paragraphs (a)(1)
and (2) of this section with respect to strength of inference and
freedom from bias. An auditor that determines a sample size using an
alternate method must describe and justify the alternate method in the
attestation engagement report.
* * * * *
0
118. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1810 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1810 General procedures for gasoline manufacturers.
An auditor must perform the procedures specified in this section
for
[[Page 70088]]
a gasoline manufacturer that produces gasoline in the United States.
(a) Registration and reports. An auditor must review registration
and reports as follows:
(1) Obtain copies of the gasoline manufacturer's registration
information submitted under subpart I of this part and all reports
(except batch reports) submitted by the gasoline manufacturer under
subpart J of this part.
(2) For each gasoline manufacturing facility, confirm that the
facility's registration is accurate based on the activities reported
during the compliance period, including that the registration for the
facility and any related updates were completed prior to conducting
regulated activities at the facility and report any discrepancies.
(3) Confirm that the gasoline manufacturer submitted all reports
required under subpart J of this part for activities they performed
during the compliance period and report any exceptions.
(4) Obtain a written statement from the gasoline manufacturer's RCO
that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
(5) Report the name of any commercial computer program used to
track any data required under this part.
(b) Inventory reconciliation analysis. An auditor must review an
inventory reconciliation analysis as follows:
(1) Obtain an inventory reconciliation analysis from the gasoline
manufacturer for each gasoline type produced at each facility (e.g.,
RFG, CG, RBOB, CBOB), including the inventory at the beginning and end
of the compliance period and inventory records (e.g., receipts,
production volumes, shipments, transfers, and gain/loss).
(2) Foot and cross-foot the volumes by gasoline type.
(3) Compare the beginning and ending inventory to the inventory
records for each gasoline type and report any variances.
(4) Report the total volume of each gasoline type.
(c) Listing of gasoline tenders. An auditor must review a listing
of gasoline tenders as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of gasoline tenders from the gasoline
manufacturer, by gasoline type.
(2) Foot the tender volumes by gasoline type.
(3) Compare the total volume from the tenders to the inventory
reconciliation analysis obtained under paragraph (b) of this section
for each gasoline type and report any variances.
(d) Listing of gasoline batches. An auditor must review a listing
of gasoline batches as follows:
(1) Obtain the gasoline batch reports submitted by the gasoline
manufacturer under subpart J of this part.
(2) Foot the batch volumes by gasoline type.
(3) Compare the total volume from the batch reports to the
inventory reconciliation analysis obtained under paragraph (b) of this
section for each gasoline type and report any variances.
(4) Report as a finding any batch with a reported value that does
not meet a per-gallon standard in subpart C of this part.
(e) Test methods. An auditor must follow the procedures specified
in Sec. 1090.1845 to determine whether the gasoline manufacturer
complies with the applicable quality control requirements specified in
Sec. 1090.1375.
(f) Detailed testing of BOB tenders. An auditor must review a
detailed listing of BOB tenders as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of BOB tenders from the listing
of tenders obtained under paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) Obtain the associated PTD for each selected tender.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm that the correct PTDs are
obtained for the selected tenders.
(4) Compare the volume on the listing for each selected tender to
the associated PTD and report any exceptions.
(5) Confirm that the PTD associated with each selected tender
contains all the applicable language required under subpart L of this
part and report any exceptions.
(g) Detailed testing of BOB batches. An auditor must review a
detailed listing of BOB batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of BOB batches from the batch
reports obtained under paragraph (d) of this section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation and laboratory analysis for
each selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for each selected batch to the
volume documentation and report any exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods used for each selected batch
to the laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(6) Determine each oxygenate type and amount that was required for
blending with each selected batch.
(7) Confirm that each oxygenate type and amount included in the BOB
hand blend agrees with the gasoline manufacturer's blending
instructions for each selected batch and report any exceptions.
(8) Confirm that the gasoline manufacturer participates in the NFSP
under Sec. 1090.1405, if applicable.
(9)(i) For a blending manufacturer, confirm that the laboratory
analysis includes test results for oxygenate content, if applicable,
and distillation parameters (i.e., T10, T50, T90, final boiling point,
and percent residue).
(ii) For a blending manufacturer not required to measure oxygenate
content, confirm that records demonstrate that the PCG or blendstock
contained no oxygenate, no oxygenate was added to the final gasoline
batch, and the blending manufacturer did not account for oxygenate
added downstream under Sec. 1090.710.
(h) Detailed testing of finished gasoline tenders. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of finished gasoline tenders as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of finished gasoline tenders
from the listing of tenders obtained under paragraph (c) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the associated PTD for each selected tender.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm that the correct PTDs are
obtained for the selected tenders.
(4) Compare the volume on the listing for each selected tender to
the associated PTD and report any exceptions.
(5) Confirm that the PTD associated with each selected tender
contains all the applicable language required under subpart L of this
part and report any exceptions.
(i) Detailed testing of finished gasoline batches. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of finished gasoline batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of finished gasoline batches
from the batch reports obtained under paragraph (d) of this section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation and laboratory analysis for
each selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for each selected batch to the
volume documentation and report any exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods used for each selected batch
to the laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(6)(i) For a blending manufacturer, confirm that the laboratory
analysis includes test results for oxygenate content, if applicable,
and distillation parameters (i.e., T10, T50, T90, final boiling point,
and percent residue).
[[Page 70089]]
(ii) For a blending manufacturer not required to measure oxygenate
content, confirm that records demonstrate that the PCG or blendstock
contained no oxygenate, no oxygenate was added to the final gasoline
batch, and the blending manufacturer did not account for oxygenate
added downstream under Sec. 1090.710.
(j) Detailed testing of blendstock batches. In the case of adding
blendstock to TGP or PCG under Sec. 1090.1320(a)(2), an auditor must
review a detailed listing of blendstock batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of blendstock batches from the
batch reports obtained under paragraph (d) of this section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation and laboratory analysis for
each selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for each selected batch to the
volume documentation and report any exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods used for each selected batch
to the laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(6) For a blending manufacturer not required to measure oxygenate
content, confirm that records demonstrate that the PCG or blendstock
contained no oxygenate, no oxygenate was added to the final gasoline
batch, and the blending manufacturer did not account for oxygenate
added downstream under Sec. 1090.710.
0
119. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1815 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1815 General procedures for gasoline importers.
An auditor must perform the procedures specified in this section
for a gasoline importer.
(a) Registration and reports. An auditor must review registration
and reports for the importer as specified in Sec. 1090.1810(a).
(b) Listing of gasoline imports. An auditor must review a listing
of gasoline imports as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of gasoline imports from the
importer, by gasoline type.
(2) Foot the import volumes from the importer by gasoline type.
(3) Obtain a detailed listing of gasoline imports directly from the
third-party customs broker, by gasoline type.
(4) Foot the import volumes from the third-party customs broker by
gasoline type.
(5) Compare the total volume from the listing of imports supplied
by the importer to the listing of imports supplied by the third-party
customs broker for each gasoline type and report any variances.
(6) Report the total imported volume of each gasoline type.
(c) Listing of gasoline batches. An auditor must review a listing
of gasoline batches as follows:
(1) Obtain the gasoline batch reports submitted by the importer
under subpart J of this part.
(2) Foot the batch volumes by gasoline type.
(3) Compare the total volume from the batch reports to the listing
of imports supplied by the importer under paragraph (b) of this section
for each gasoline type and report any variances.
(4) Report as a finding any batch with a reported value that does
not meet a per-gallon standard in subpart C of this part.
(d) Test methods. An auditor must follow the procedures specified
in Sec. 1090.1845 to determine whether the importer complies with the
applicable quality control requirements specified in Sec. 1090.1375.
(e) Detailed testing of BOB imports. An auditor must review a
detailed listing of BOB imports as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of BOB imports from the listing
of imports supplied by the importer under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the associated U.S. Customs Entry Summary and PTD for
each selected import.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm that the correct U.S.
Customs Entry Summaries are obtained for the selected imports.
(4) Compare the volume and location the import arrived in the
United States on the listing for each selected import to the associated
U.S. Customs Entry Summary and report any exceptions.
(5) Using a unique identifier, confirm that the correct PTDs are
obtained for the selected imports.
(6) Compare the volume on the listing for each selected import to
the associated PTD and report any exceptions.
(7) Confirm that the PTD associated with each selected import
contains all the applicable language required under subpart L of this
part and report any exceptions.
(f) Detailed testing of BOB batches. An auditor must review a
detailed listing of BOB batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of BOB batches from the batch
reports obtained under paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) Obtain the volume inspection report and laboratory analysis for
each selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for each selected batch to the
volume inspection report and report any exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods used for each selected batch
to the laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(6) Determine each oxygenate type and amount that was required for
blending with each selected batch.
(7) Confirm that each oxygenate type and amount included in the BOB
hand blend agrees with the importer's blending instructions for each
selected batch and report any exceptions.
(8) Confirm that the importer participates in the NFSP under Sec.
1090.1405, if applicable.
(g) Detailed testing of finished gasoline imports. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of finished gasoline imports as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of finished gasoline imports
from the listing of imports supplied by the importer under paragraph
(b) of this section.
(2) Obtain the associated U.S. Customs Entry Summary and PTD for
each selected import.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm that the correct U.S.
Customs Entry Summaries are obtained for the selected imports.
(4) Compare the volume and location the import arrived in the
United States on the listing for each selected import to the associated
U.S. Customs Entry Summary and report any exceptions.
(5) Using a unique identifier, confirm that the correct PTDs are
obtained for the selected imports.
(6) Compare the volume on the listing for each selected import to
the associated PTD and report any exceptions.
(7) Confirm that the PTD associated with each selected import
contains all the applicable language required under subpart L of this
part and report any exceptions.
(h) Detailed testing of finished gasoline batches. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of finished gasoline batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of finished gasoline batches
from the batch reports obtained under paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) Obtain the volume inspection report and laboratory analysis for
each selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for each selected batch to the
volume inspection report and report any exceptions.
[[Page 70090]]
(4) Compare the reported properties for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods used for each selected batch
to the laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(i) Additional procedures for gasoline imported by rail or truck.
An auditor must perform the following additional procedures for an
importer that imports gasoline into the United States by rail or truck
under Sec. 1090.1610:
(1)(i) Select a representative sample of gasoline batches from the
batch reports obtained under paragraph (c) of this section.
(ii) Obtain the tank activity records for each selected batch from
the party that supplied the gasoline to the importer.
(iii) Identify the point of sampling and testing associated with
each selected batch in the tank activity records.
(iv) Confirm that the sampling and testing for each selected batch
occurred after the most recent delivery into the supplier's storage
tank and before transferring gasoline to the railcar or truck.
(2)(i) Obtain a detailed listing of the importer's quality
assurance program sampling and testing results.
(ii) Determine whether the frequency of sampling and testing meets
the requirements in Sec. 1090.1610(a)(2) and report any discrepancies.
(iii)(A) Select a representative sample of gasoline batches from
the sampling and testing results.
(B) Obtain the laboratory analysis for each selected batch.
(C) Determine whether the importer analyzed the test sample for
each selected batch, and report as a finding any batch where the
importer failed to perform the analysis using the methods specified in
subpart N of this part.
(D) Obtain and review any terminal test results corresponding to
the time of collecting the quality assurance test samples.
(E) Compare the terminal test results to the test results from the
quality assurance program. Report as a finding any test result with a
difference that is greater than the reproducibility of the applicable
method specified in subpart N of this part.
0
120. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1820 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1820 Additional procedures for GTAB.
In addition to any other procedure required under this subpart, an
auditor must perform the procedures specified in this section for a
gasoline manufacturer that imports GTAB under Sec. 1090.1615.
(a) Listing of GTAB imports. An auditor must review a listing of
GTAB imports as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of GTAB imports from the importer.
(2) Foot the import volumes from the importer.
(3) Obtain a detailed listing of GTAB imports directly from the
third-party customs broker.
(4) Foot the import volumes from the third-party customs broker.
(5) Compare the total volume from the listing of imports supplied
by the importer to the listing of imports supplied by the third-party
customs broker and report any variances.
(6) Report the total imported volume of GTAB and the corresponding
facilities at which the GTAB was blended.
(b) Listing of GTAB batches. An auditor must review a listing of
GTAB batches as follows:
(1) Obtain the GTAB batch reports submitted by the importer under
subpart J of this part.
(2) Foot the batch volumes.
(3) Compare the total volume from the batch reports to the listing
of imports supplied by the importer under paragraph (a) of this section
and report any variances.
(c) Detailed testing of GTAB imports. An auditor must review a
detailed listing of GTAB imports as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of GTAB imports from the listing
of imports supplied by the importer under paragraph (a) of this
section.
(2) Obtain the associated U.S. Customs Entry Summary for each
selected import.
(3) Using a unique identifier, confirm that the correct U.S.
Customs Entry Summaries are obtained for the selected imports.
(4) Compare the volume and location the import arrived in the
United States on the listing for each selected import to the associated
U.S. Customs Entry Summary and report any exceptions.
(d) Detailed testing of GTAB batches. An auditor must review a
detailed listing of GTAB batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of GTAB batches from the batch
reports obtained under paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Obtain the volume inspection report for each selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for each selected batch to the
volume inspection report and report any exceptions.
(e) GTAB tracing. An auditor must trace and review the movement of
GTAB from importation to gasoline production as follows:
(1) Compare the total volume from the batch reports obtained under
paragraph (b) of this section to the inventory reconciliation analysis
obtained under Sec. 1090.1810(b).
(2)(i) Obtain tank activity records that describe the movement of
each selected batch under paragraph (d) of this section from
importation to gasoline production.
(ii) Identify each selected batch in the tank activity records and
trace each selected batch to subsequent reported batches of BOB or
finished gasoline and report any exceptions.
(iii) Match the location of the facility where gasoline was
produced from each selected batch to the location where each selected
batch arrived in the United States, or to the facility directly
receiving the selected batch from the import facility.
(iv) Determine the status of the tank(s) before receiving each
selected batch (e.g., empty tank, tank containing blendstock, tank
containing GTAB, tank containing PCG).
(v) If the tank(s) contained PCG before receiving the selected
batch, take the following additional steps:
(A) Obtain and review a copy of the documented tank mixing
procedures.
(B) Determine the volume and properties of the tank bottom that was
PCG before adding GTAB.
(C) Confirm that the gasoline manufacturer determined the volume
and properties of the BOB or finished gasoline produced using GTAB by
excluding the volume and properties of any PCG, and that the gasoline
manufacturer separately reported the PCG volume and properties under
subpart J of this part and report any discrepancies.
0
121. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1825 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1825 Additional procedures for PCG used to produce
gasoline.
In addition to any other procedure required under this subpart, an
auditor must perform the procedures specified in this section for a
gasoline manufacturer that produces gasoline from PCG under Sec.
1090.1320.
(a) Listing of PCG batches. An auditor must review a listing of PCG
batches as follows:
(1) Obtain the PCG batch reports submitted by the gasoline
manufacturer under subpart J of this part.
(2) Foot the batch volumes.
(3) Compare the total volume from the batch reports to the
inventory reconciliation analysis obtained under Sec. 1090.1810(b) and
report any variances.
(b) Detailed testing of PCG batches. An auditor must review a
detailed listing of PCG batches as follows:
[[Page 70091]]
(1) Select a representative sample of PCG batches from the batch
reports obtained under paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation, laboratory analysis,
associated PTD, and tank activity records for each selected batch.
(3) Identify each selected batch in the tank activity records and
trace each selected batch to subsequent reported batches of BOB or
finished gasoline and report any exceptions.
(4) For each selected batch, report as a finding any instance where
the reported volume was adjusted from the original receipt volume, such
as for exported PCG.
(5) Compare the reported volume for each selected batch to the
volume documentation and report any exceptions.
(6) Compare the reported gasoline type for each selected batch to
the associated PTD and report any exceptions.
(7) Compare the reported properties for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(8) Compare the reported test methods used for each selected batch
to the laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
0
122. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1830 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1830 Alternative procedures for certified butane blenders.
An auditor must perform the procedures specified in this section
instead of or in addition to the applicable procedures in Sec.
1090.1810 for a certified butane blender that blends certified butane
into PCG under Sec. 1090.1320(b).
(a) Registration and reports. An auditor must review registration
and reports as follows:
(1) Obtain copies of the certified butane blender's registration
information submitted under subpart I of this part and all reports
submitted by the certified butane blender under subpart J of this part,
including the batch reports for the certified butane received and
blended.
(2) For each butane blending facility, confirm that the facility's
registration is accurate based on the activities reported during the
compliance period, including that the registration for the facility and
any related updates were completed prior to conducting regulated
activities at the facility and report any discrepancies.
(3) Confirm that the certified butane blender submitted all reports
required under subpart J of this part for activities they performed
during the compliance period and report any exceptions.
(4) Obtain a written statement from the certified butane blender's
RCO that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
(5) Report the name of any commercial computer program used to
track any data required under this part.
(b) Inventory reconciliation analysis. An auditor must review an
inventory reconciliation analysis as follows:
(1) Obtain an inventory reconciliation analysis from the certified
butane blender for each butane blending facility related to all
certified butane movements, including the inventory at the beginning
and end of the compliance period, receipts, blending/production
volumes, shipments, transfers, and gain/loss.
(2) Foot and cross-foot the volumes.
(3) Compare the beginning and ending inventory to the certified
butane blender's inventory records and report any variances.
(4) Compare the total volume of certified butane received from the
inventory reconciliation analysis to the batch reports obtained under
paragraph (a) of this section and report any variances.
(5) Compare the total volume of certified butane blended from the
inventory reconciliation analysis to the batch reports obtained under
paragraph (a) of this section and report any variances.
(6) Report the total volume of certified butane received and
blended.
(c) Listing of certified butane receipts. An auditor must review a
listing of certified butane receipts as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of certified butane receipts for
certified butane received at each butane blending facility from the
certified butane blender.
(2) Foot the receipt volumes.
(3) Compare the total volume from the receipts to the batch reports
obtained under paragraph (a) of this section and report any variances.
(d) Detailed testing of certified butane batches. An auditor must
review a detailed listing of certified butane batches as follows:
(1) Select a representative sample of certified butane batches from
the batch reports obtained under paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) Obtain the volume documentation and laboratory analysis for
each selected batch.
(3) Compare the reported volume for each selected batch to the
volume documentation and report any exceptions.
(4) Compare the reported properties for each selected batch to the
laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(5) Compare the reported test methods used for each selected batch
to the laboratory analysis and report any exceptions.
(6) Report as a finding any batch with a reported value that does
not meet a standard for certified butane in subpart C of this part.
(e) Quality assurance program review. An auditor must review a
certified butane blender's quality assurance program as follows:
(1) Obtain a detailed listing of the certified butane blender's
quality assurance program sampling and testing results.
(2) Determine whether the frequency of sampling and testing meets
the requirements in Sec. 1090.1320(b)(4) and report any discrepancies.
0
123. Amend Sec. 1090.1835 by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1090.1835 Alternative procedures for certified pentane blenders.
(a) An auditor must perform the procedures specified in this
section instead of or in addition to the applicable procedures in Sec.
1090.1810 for a certified pentane blender that blends certified pentane
into PCG under Sec. 1090.1320(b).
* * * * *
0
124. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1840 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1840 Additional procedures related to compliance with
gasoline average standards.
In addition to any other procedure required under this subpart, an
auditor must perform the procedures specified in this section for a
gasoline manufacturer that complies with the standards in subpart C of
this part using the procedures specified in subpart H of this part.
(a) Annual compliance demonstration review. An auditor must review
annual compliance demonstrations as follows:
(1) Obtain the annual compliance reports for sulfur and benzene and
associated batch reports submitted by the gasoline manufacturer under
subpart J of this part.
(2)(i) For a gasoline refiner or gasoline blending manufacturer,
compare the total volume of gasoline produced at each facility from the
annual compliance report to the inventory reconciliation analysis
obtained under Sec. 1090.1810(b) and report any variances.
(ii) For a gasoline importer, compare the total volume of gasoline
imported from the annual compliance report to the listing of imports
supplied by the importer under Sec. 1090.1815(b) and report any
variances.
(3) For each facility, recalculate and report the following values:
[[Page 70092]]
(i) Compliance sulfur value, per Sec. 1090.700(a)(1), and
compliance benzene value, per Sec. 1090.700(b)(1)(i).
(ii) Unadjusted average sulfur concentration, per Sec.
1090.745(b), and average benzene concentration, per Sec.
1090.700(b)(3).
(iii) Number of credits generated during the compliance period, or
number of banked or traded credits needed to meet standards for the
compliance period.
(iv) Number of credits from the preceding compliance period that
are expired or otherwise no longer available for the compliance period
being reviewed.
(v) Net average sulfur concentration, per Sec. 1090.745(c), and
net average benzene concentration, per Sec. 1090.745(d).
(4) Compare the recalculated values under paragraph (a)(3) of this
section to the reported values in the annual compliance reports and
report any exceptions.
(5) Report whether the gasoline manufacturer had a deficit for both
the compliance period being reviewed and the preceding compliance
period.
(b) Credit transaction review. An auditor must review credit
transactions as follows:
(1) Obtain the credit transaction reports submitted by the gasoline
manufacturer under subpart J of this part and contracts or other
information that documents all credit transfers. Also obtain records
that support intracompany transfers.
(2) For each reported transaction, compare the supporting
documentation with the credit transaction reports for the following
elements and report any exceptions:
(i) Compliance period of creation.
(ii) Credit type (i.e., sulfur or benzene) and number of times
traded.
(iii) Quantity.
(iv) The name of the other company participating in the credit
transfer.
(v) Transaction type.
(c) Facility-level credit reconciliation. Except as specified in
paragraph (c)(4) of this section, an auditor must perform a facility-
level credit reconciliation separately for each gasoline manufacturing
facility as follows:
(1) Obtain the credits remaining or the credit deficit from the
previous compliance period from the credit transaction reports obtained
under paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Calculate and report as a finding the net credits remaining at
the end of the compliance period.
(3) Compare the ending balance of credits or credit deficit
recalculated under paragraph (c)(2) of this section to the
corresponding value from the annual compliance report obtained under
paragraph (a) of this section and report any variances.
(4) For an importer, the procedures of this paragraph (c) apply at
the company level.
(d) Company-level credit reconciliation. An auditor must perform a
company-level credit reconciliation as follows:
(1) Obtain a credit reconciliation listing company-wide credits
aggregated by facility for the compliance period.
(2) Foot and cross-foot the credit quantities.
(3) Compare and report the beginning balance of credits, the ending
balance of credits, the associated credit activity at the company level
in accordance with the credit reconciliation listing, and the
corresponding credit balances and activity submitted by the gasoline
manufacturer under subpart J of this part.
(e) Procedures for gasoline manufacturers that recertify BOB. An
auditor must perform the following procedures for a gasoline
manufacturer that recertifies BOB under Sec. 1090.740 and incurs a
deficit:
(1) Perform the procedures specified in Sec. 1090.1810(a) to
review the gasoline manufacturer's registration and reports.
(2)(i) Obtain the recertified BOB batch reports submitted by the
gasoline manufacturer under subpart J of this part.
(ii) Select a representative sample of recertified BOB batches from
the batch reports.
(iii) Obtain supporting documentation (e.g., PTDs, bills of lading,
etc.) for each selected batch.
(iv) Compare the information on the batch reports to the supporting
documentation and report any exceptions.
(v) Recalculate the deficits in accordance with the provisions of
Sec. 1090.740 and report any discrepancies.
(vi) Confirm that the deficits are included in the annual
compliance report and report any exceptions.
0
125. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1845 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1845 Procedures related to meeting performance-based
measurement and statistical quality control for test methods.
(a) General provisions. (1) In addition to any other procedure
required under this subpart, an auditor must perform the procedures
specified in this section for a gasoline manufacturer.
(2) The auditor performing the procedures in this section must meet
the laboratory experience requirements specified in Sec.
1090.55(b)(2).
(3) In cases where the auditor employs, contracts, or subcontracts
an external specialist, all the requirements in Sec. 1090.55 apply to
the external specialist. The auditor is responsible for overseeing the
work of the specialist, consistent with applicable professional
standards specified in Sec. 1090.1800.
(4) In the case of quality control testing at a third-party
laboratory, the auditor may perform a single attestation engagement on
the third-party laboratory for multiple gasoline manufacturers if the
auditor directly reviewed the information from the third-party
laboratory. The third-party laboratory may also arrange for the auditor
to perform a single attestation engagement on the third-party
laboratory and make that available to gasoline manufacturers that have
testing performed by the third-party laboratory.
(b) Non-referee method qualification review. For each test method
used to measure a gasoline parameter as specified in a report submitted
under subpart J of this part that is not one of the referee procedures
listed in Sec. 1090.1360(d), the auditor must review the following:
(1) Obtain supporting documentation showing that the laboratory has
qualified the alternative test method by meeting the precision and
accuracy criteria specified under Sec. 1090.1365.
(2) Report a list of the alternative test methods used.
(3) Confirm that the gasoline manufacturer supplied the supporting
documentation for each alternative test method and report any
exceptions.
(4) If the auditor has previously reviewed supporting documentation
under this paragraph (b) for an alternative test method at the
laboratory, the auditor does not have to review the supporting
documentation again.
(c) Reference installation review. For each reference installation
used by the gasoline manufacturer during the compliance period, the
auditor must review the following:
(1) Obtain supporting documentation demonstrating that the
reference installation followed the qualification procedures specified
in Sec. 1090.1370(c)(1) and (2) and the quality control procedures
specified in Sec. 1090.1370(c)(3).
(2) Confirm that the laboratory completed the qualification
procedures and report any exceptions.
(d) Instrument control review. For each test instrument used to
measure gasoline parameters for batches selected as part of a
representative sample under Sec. 1090.1810, the auditor must review
whether test instruments were in control as follows:
[[Page 70093]]
(1) Obtain a listing from the laboratory of the instruments and
period when the instruments were used to measure gasoline parameters
during the compliance period for batches selected as part of the
representative sample under Sec. 1090.1810.
(2) Obtain statistical quality assurance data and control charts
demonstrating ongoing quality testing to meet the accuracy and
precision requirements specified in Sec. 1090.1375 or 40 CFR 80.47, as
applicable.
(3) Confirm that the laboratory performed statistical quality
assurance monitoring of its instruments under Sec. 1090.1375 and
report any exceptions.
(4) Report as a finding any test result that was excluded for being
out of control and the laboratory did not have an assignable cause with
appropriate supporting justification.
(5) Report as a finding the listing of instruments obtained under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section and the compliance period when the
instrument control review was completed.
0
126. Revise and republish Sec. 1090.1850 to read as follows:
Sec. 1090.1850 Procedures related to in-line blending waivers.
In addition to any other procedure required under this subpart, an
auditor must perform the procedures specified in this section for a
gasoline manufacturer that relies on an in-line blending waiver under
Sec. 1090.1315.
(a)(1) Obtain a copy of the gasoline manufacturer's in-line
blending waiver submission and EPA's approval letter.
(2) Confirm that the sampling procedures and composite calculations
conform to the specifications in Sec. 1090.1315(a)(2).
(3) Review the gasoline manufacturer's procedure for defining a
batch for compliance purposes. Review available test data demonstrating
that the test results from in-line blending correctly characterize the
fuel parameters for the designated batch.
(4) Confirm that the gasoline manufacturer corrected their
operations because of previous audits, if applicable.
(5) Confirm that the equipment and procedures have not materially
changed from the gasoline manufacturer's in-line blending waiver. In
cases of material change in equipment or procedure, confirm that the
gasoline manufacturer updated their in-line blending waiver and report
any exceptions.
(6) Perform any additional procedures unique to the blending
operation, as specified in the in-line blending waiver, and report any
findings, variances, or exceptions, as applicable.
(7) Confirm that the gasoline manufacturer has complied with all
provisions related to their in-line blending waiver and report any
exceptions.
(b)(1) Obtain test data, including head, middle, and tail results,
for each batch produced under the gasoline manufacturer's in-line
blending waiver.
(2) Review the alternative sampling plan to meet requirements to
test head, middle, and tail samples for small batches under Sec.
1090.1315(a)(9).
(3) Report as a finding any instance where only a single sample was
taken for a small batch involving more than 8 hours of blending or more
than 1 million gallons of fuel.
(4) Report as a finding any instance where two samples were
unevenly distributed for a small batch or where only two samples were
taken for a small batch involving more than 16 hours of blending or up
to 2 million gallons of fuel.
(5) Determine and report the percentage of in-line blending batches
where the gasoline manufacturer failed to perform the required head,
middle, and tail samples due to unforeseen circumstances. Report as a
finding if this percentage is greater than 10 percent of in-line
blending batches for the calendar year.
(6) Determine and report each instance where a contingency plan for
alternative sampling was utilized under Sec. 1090.1315(a)(12).
[FR Doc. 2024-18773 Filed 8-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P