USDA Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 68321-68337 [2024-18544]
Download as PDF
68321
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 165
Monday, August 26, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
2 CFR Chapter IV
[Docket No. USDA–2024–0002]
RIN 0505–AA18
USDA Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal
Awards
Office of the Chief Financial
Officer, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is revising parts of
the USDA Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
USDA’s revision provides policy
changes and clarifications including
plain language revisions. These
revisions are intended in many cases to
reduce agency and recipient burden.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
1, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tyson P. Whitney, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer, Director,
Transparency and Accountability
Reporting Division, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20250–9011, 202–
720–8978, tyson.whitney@usda.gov.
Individuals who require alternative
means for communication should
contact the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Target Center at
(202) 720–2600 (voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Background
The regulations found at 2 CFR
Chapter IV provide the USDA adoption
of subparts A through F of 2 CFR part
200, as supplemented by USDA-specific
exceptions and requirements. 2 CFR
Chapter IV additionally includes the
regulatory implementation of several
statutory requirements which provide
USDA-wide applicability.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
On July 1, 2024, USDA published a
proposed rule to provide conforming
updates to OMB’s April 22, 2024
updates to 2 CFR part 200, implement
plain language use, and to propose
revisions intended in many cases to
reduce agency and recipient burden.
USDA proposed both policy changes
and clarifications to existing
requirements. See 89 FR 54372. A
correction was published to clarify that
the public comment period extended
through July 31, 2024. See 89 FR 55114.
USDA solicited comments concerning
the proposed rule ending July 31, 2024,
and received one comment by that date.
An anonymous submitter requested that
USDA prioritize environmental
protection due to concern over costs
from damages to public lands and the
environment from commercial
operations. The submitter also requested
that USDA only provide grants for
research or projects that reduce fossil
fuel production and consumption. As
this regulation does not propose specific
environmental regulations, describe
specific program activities that would
impact public lands, or authorize
specific USDA grant programs, the
public comment is not relevant to the
regulations and will not be addressed in
the regulatory text.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
proposed rule and in this document, we
are adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule, without change.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’ direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. The assessment should
include potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity.
Executive Order 13563 emphasized the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) designated this
proposed rule as not significant under
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ and therefore,
OMB has not reviewed it.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under E.O. 12988 on ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform.’’ This proposed rule would not
preempt state or local laws, regulations,
or policies unless they represent an
irreconcilable conflict with it.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
USDA Non-Discrimination Policy
In accordance with Federal civil
rights law and USDA civil rights
regulations and policies, the USDA, its
agencies, offices, and employees, and
institutions participating in or
administering USDA programs are
prohibited from discriminating based on
race, color, national origin, religion, sex,
gender identity (including gender
expression), sexual orientation,
disability, age, marital status, family or
parental status, income derived from a
public assistance program, political
beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior
civil rights activity, in any program or
activity conducted or funded by USDA
(not all bases apply to all programs).
Remedies and complaint filing
deadlines vary by program or incident.
Individuals who require alternative
means of communication for program
information (for example, braille, large
print, audiotape, American Sign
Language, etc.) should contact the
responsible agency or the USDA
TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice and text telephone (TTY)) or dial
711 for Telecommunications Relay
Service (both voice and text telephone
users can initiate this call from any
telephone). Additionally, program
information may be made available in
languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination
complaint, complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, AD–
3027, found online at https://
www.usda.gov/oascr/how-to-file-aprogram-discrimination-complaint and
at any USDA office or write a letter
addressed to USDA and provide in the
letter all the information requested in
the form. To request a copy of the
complaint form, call (866) 632–9992.
Submit your completed form or letter to
USDA by: (1) mail to: U.S. Department
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
68322
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–9410; (2) fax: (202) 690–7442;
or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity
provider, employer, and lender.
List of Subjects
2 CFR Part 400
Administration of Federal financial
assistance, Administrative practice and
procedure, Federal financial assistance
programs
2 CFR Part 401
Federal financial assistance programs,
Construction Industry
2 CFR Part 415
Agriculture programs, Administration
of Federal financial assistance,
Administrative practice and procedure
2 CFR Part 416
Agriculture programs, Administration
of Federal financial assistance,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Government procurement procedure
2 CFR Part 417
Administrative practice and
procedure; Grant programs; Loan
programs; Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements
2 CFR Part 418
Lobbying procedures, Administration
of Federal financial assistance,
Government procurement procedure
2 CFR Part 421
Administration of Federal financial
assistance, Administrative practice and
procedure, Drugs
2 CFR Part 422
Agricultural research, Administration
of Federal financial assistance,
Administrative practice and procedure
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
2 CFR Part 423
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Administration of Federal
financial assistance
Accordingly, USDA amends 2 CFR
Chapter IV as follows:
■ 1. Revise part 400 to read as follows:
PART 400—UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS,
COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT
REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL
AWARDS
Sec.
400.0
400.1
400.2
Definitions.
Applicability.
Conflict of interest.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 2 CFR part 200.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 400.0
Definitions.
The definitions in this part are for
terms used in this chapter, and to define
for USDA terms present in 2 CFR
Subtitle A but not defined in that
subtitle. Different definitions may be
found in Federal statutes, regulations, or
other sources that apply more
specifically to particular programs or
activities. Where parts of this chapter
provide alternate definitions than those
in this part, those definitions take
precedence over any definition in this
part. For terms used in this chapter that
are not defined in this part, the
definitions in 2 CFR part 200 apply. All
terms not otherwise defined will use the
dictionary definition.
Audiovisual means a product
containing visual imagery or sound or
both. Examples of audiovisuals are
motion pictures, live or prerecorded
radio or television programs, slide
shows, filmstrips, audio recordings, and
multimedia presentations.
Awarding official means a person
with the authority to enter into,
administer, and/or terminate financial
assistance awards and make related
determinations and findings.
Construction means construction,
alteration, or repair (including dredging,
excavating, and painting) of buildings,
structures, or other real property. For
purposes of this definition, the terms
‘‘buildings, structures, or other real
property’’ include, but are not limited
to, improvements of all types, such as
bridges, dams, plants, highways,
parkways, streets, subways, tunnels,
sewers, mains, power lines, cemeteries,
pumping stations, railways, airport
facilities, terminals, docks, piers,
wharves, ways, lighthouses, buoys,
jetties, breakwaters, levees, canals, and
channels. For the purposes of 2 CFR
part 184, construction also encompasses
structures, facilities, and equipment
incorporated into an infrastructure
project regardless of whether they
constitute real property.
Department means the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
Discretionary award means an award
in which the Federal awarding agency,
in keeping with specific statutory
authority that enables the agency to
exercise judgment (‘‘discretion’’), selects
the recipient and/or the amount of
Federal funding awarded through a
competitive process or based on merit of
proposals. A discretionary award may
be selected by a USDA awarding agency
on a non-competitive basis exclusively
under the conditions set forth at 2 CFR
415.1.
Eligible applications means those
materials which have been submitted by
a recipient for consideration for an
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
award of Federal financial assistance
and have been determined to comply
with the minimum documentation and
other requirements, which may be
identified in respective notices of
funding opportunities and applicable
Federal statutes or regulations that
apply more specifically to particular
programs or activities.
Federal financial assistance support
means the transfer of anything of value
by a USDA awarding agency through a
Federal financial assistance instrument
as defined at 2 CFR part 200.1, inclusive
of Federally funded subawards and
subcontracts under such instruments, to
a recipient. Such support may be
provided as a cash or in-kind
contribution.
Geospatial data means information
that is tied to a location on the Earth,
including by identifying the geographic
location and characteristics of natural or
constructed features and boundaries on
the Earth, and that is generally
represented in vector datasets by points,
lines, polygons, or other complex
geographic features or phenomena; may
be derived from, among other things,
remote sensing, mapping, and surveying
technologies; includes images and raster
datasets, aerial photographs, and other
forms of geospatial data or datasets in
digitized or non-digitized form.
Information means any
communication or representation of
knowledge, such as facts, data, or
opinions in any medium or form,
including textual, numerical, graphic,
cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual
forms.
Information dissemination product
means any recorded information,
regardless of physical form or
characteristics, disseminated to the
public.
Maintenance means those activities
conducted for the repair or upkeep of
buildings, structures, facilities, and
equipment which neither add to the
permanent value of the property nor
appreciably prolong its intended life,
but keep it in an efficient operating
condition.
Production of an audiovisual means
any steps that lead to a finished
audiovisual, including but not limited
to design, layout, script-writing, filming,
editing, fabrication, sound recording or
taping. The term does not include the
placing of captions to make accessible
films or videotapes not originally
produced for use by individuals who are
Deaf or hard of hearing.
Secretary means the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture.
USDA means the U.S. Department of
Agriculture.
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
USDA awarding agency means any
component agency or staff office of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture which
provides any Federal financial
assistance to or executes a Federal
financial assistance instrument with a
recipient.
§ 400.1
Applicability.
This part adopts the OMB guidance in
subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200,
as supplemented by this chapter, as
USDA policies and procedures for
uniform administrative requirements,
cost principles, and audit requirements
for Federal awards. It thereby gives
regulatory effect for the USDA to the
OMB guidance, as supplemented by this
chapter.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 400.2
Conflict of interest.
(a) Each USDA awarding agency must
establish conflict of interest policies for
its Federal financial assistance actions.
Each USDA awarding agency employee
must comply with the requirements set
forth at 5 CFR part 2635, as well as 5
CFR part 8301 where applicable, when
the USDA employee takes any action
related to Federal financial assistance.
(b) Recipients must disclose in
writing any potential conflicts of
interest to the USDA awarding agency
or pass-through entity.
(1) Recipients must maintain written
standards of conduct covering conflicts
of interest and governing the
performance of their employees in the
selection, award and administration of
Federal awards. No employee, officer or
agent may participate in the selection,
award, or administration of a Federal
award if he or she has a real or apparent
conflict of interest. Such a conflict of
interest would arise when the employee,
officer, or agent, any member of his or
her immediate family, his or her
partner, or an organization which
employs or is about to employ any of
the parties indicated herein, has a
financial or other interest in or a
tangible personal benefit from an entity
considered for a Federal award. The
recipient may set standards for
situations in which the financial interest
is not substantial or the gift is an
unsolicited item of nominal value. The
standards of conduct must provide for
disciplinary actions to be applied for
violations of such standards by officers,
employees, or agents of the recipient.
(2) If the recipient has a parent,
affiliate, or subsidiary organization that
is not a state, local government, or
Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity
must also maintain written standards of
conduct covering organizational
conflicts of interest. Organizational
conflicts of interest means that because
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
68323
of the relationships with a parent
company, affiliate, or subsidiary
organization, the recipient is unable or
appears to be unable to be impartial in
conducting a Federal award action
involving a related organization.
(3) Recipients must establish internal
controls that include, at a minimum,
procedures to identify, disclose, and
mitigate or eliminate identified conflicts
of interest. Recipients are responsible
for notifying the respective USDA
awarding agency in writing of any
conflicts of interest that may arise
during the period of performance of an
award, including those which have been
reported by subrecipients, no later than
5 calendar days following discovery.
Upon receipt of such a disclosure, the
respective USDA awarding agency must
review and make a determination in
writing if a potential or real conflict of
interest exists and develop a plan for
addressing or mitigating the issue,
which may include remedies found at 2
CFR 200.339. USDA awarding agencies
must make a determination within 30
calendar days of disclosure unless a
longer period of time is necessary due
to the complexity of the situation.
■ 2. Add part 401 to read as follows:
Subpart A—Application for Federal
Assistance
PART 401—BUY AMERICA
PREFERENCES FOR
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Subpart A—Application for Federal
Assistance
Sec.
401.1
401.2
What does this part do?
Waivers.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Pub. L. 117–58,
135 Stat. 1294; 2 CFR part 184; 2 CFR part
200.
§ 401.1
What does this part do?
This part identifies the USDA policy
for the implementation of waivers to the
domestic content procurement
preferences as required by 2 CFR
184.7(b).
§ 401.2
Waivers.
On its public website, USDA must
maintain waiver request submission
instructions and guidance on the format,
contents, and supporting materials
required for waiver requests by which:
(a) USDA awarding agencies may
request waivers to the application of the
Buy America Preference; and,
(b) Prime recipients and subrecipients
may request project-specific waivers
from the respective USDA awarding
agencies to the application of the Buy
America Preference.
■ 3. Revise part 415 to read as follows:
PART 415—GENERAL PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
Sec.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
415.1 Administrative standards for
discretionary grants and cooperative
agreements.
Subpart B— Miscellaneous
415.2 Acknowledgement of USDA Support
on Information Dissemination Products.
Subpart C—Intergovernmental Review of
Department of Agriculture Programs and
Activities
415.3 Purpose.
415.4 Definitions.
415.5 Applicability.
415.6 Secretary’s general responsibilities.
415.7 Federal interagency coordination.
415.8 State selection of programs and
activities.
415.9 Communication with State and local
elected officials.
415.10 State comments on proposed
Federal financial assistance and direct
Federal development.
415.11 Processing comments.
415.12 Accommodation of
intergovernmental concerns.
415.13 Interstate situations.
415.14 Simplification, consolidation, or
substitution of State plans.
415.15 Waivers.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 901–
903; 2 CFR part 200; 7 CFR 2.28.
§ 415.1 Administrative standards for
discretionary grants and cooperative
agreements.
(a) All USDA awarding agencies must
demonstrate a commitment to
encouraging free and open competition
in all discretionary grant and
cooperative agreement funding
opportunities. USDA awarding agencies
must ensure that all eligible
applications for discretionary grants and
cooperative agreements receive fair and
impartial review, be evaluated only on
criteria as stated in the respective notice
of funding opportunity, and that no
applicant receive an unfair advantage.
(b) USDA awarding agencies must
enter into discretionary grants and
cooperative agreements only after
competition. Exceptions to this
requirement may only be made by
USDA awarding agencies where
expressly provided by statute, when
directed by Congress, where the
requirement is determined to be
inconsistent with international
assistance objectives of USDA, or as
specified in paragraph (d) of this section
or as approved by the Secretary and
OMB under paragraph (e). A USDA
awarding agency’s competitive award
process must adhere to the following
standards:
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
68324
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(1) All notices of funding
opportunities for discretionary grants
and cooperative agreements must be
published on Grants.gov as described in
2 CFR 200.204(a). When notices of
funding opportunities contain an
information collection requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) or its
implementing regulations at 5 CFR part
1320, USDA awarding agencies must
seek and obtain OMB approval before
collecting information from the public.
(i) Supplementary to the requirements
at paragraph (b)(1), USDA awarding
agencies may make use of other
methods of disseminating public
information concerning notices of
funding opportunities. In doing so,
USDA awarding agencies must:
(A) Pursue the broadest dissemination
of information concerning notices of
funding opportunities in order to reach
the greatest number and diversity of
potential applicants.
(B) Avoid any appearance that an
unfair advantage has been provided to
any entity, inclusive of the
memberships or networks of such
entities, which may arise from the use
of any dissemination method.
(C) Provide only public information
concerning notices of funding
opportunities.
(D) Seek the greatest cost savings to
the Government, whenever possible.
(ii) Nothing in this part will be
interpreted as to limit, impede, or
otherwise prevent the attendance of any
USDA awarding agency’s staff, acting in
their official capacity, at a conference,
event, or similar activity, for the
purposes of disseminating public
information concerning notices of
funding opportunities.
(2) Applications must be evaluated
objectively by independent reviewers in
accordance with evaluation criteria set
forth in writing by the USDA awarding
agency. USDA awarding agencies must
establish written procedures to gain
reasonable assurance that individuals
selected to serve as independent
reviewers are qualified to conduct any
assigned review activity and that
applications are scored by independent
reviewers solely on the basis of criteria
announced in the respective published
notice of funding opportunity.
Independent reviewers must make
written comments or make a written
determination of scoring, as appropriate,
concerning each application to which
they are assigned.
(i) Independent reviewers may be
from the private or public sector,
including another Federal agency, or
within the awarding agency.
Independent reviewers must not be any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
individual who holds or has been
delegated approval or award authority
for the applications being reviewed or
components thereof.
(ii) Anyone who has or might appear
to have a conflict of interest with any
element of an application considered for
selection or funding will be ineligible to
serve as an independent reviewer. A
conflict of interest might arise when the
prospective independent reviewer, the
reviewer’s immediate family members,
or the reviewer’s partner, have been
associated with the applicant or
applicant organization within the past
two years as an owner, partner, officer,
director, employee, or consultant; has
any financial or other interest in or
tangible personal benefit from the
applicant or applicant organizations; or
is negotiating for, or has any
arrangement, concerning prospective
employment.
(3) Notwithstanding this paragraph
(b), unless directed by Congress or
authorized by statute, USDA awarding
agencies may, but are not required to,
review, evaluate for eligibility, or
otherwise consider for funding any
unsolicited application, proposal
materials, ideas, pitches, or any other
request for Federal funds provided by
any entity for the purpose of obtaining
Federal financial assistance.
(c) The final decision to award is at
the discretion of the awarding official in
each USDA awarding agency. The
awarding official must consider the
ranking, comments, and
recommendations from the respective
independent reviewers, and any other
pertinent information before deciding
which applications to approve and their
order of approval. Any appeals by
applicants regarding the awarding
decision must be handled by the
awarding agency using existing, written
agency appeal procedures.
(d) The awarding official may make a
determination that competition is not
deemed appropriate for a particular
transaction. Such determination must be
made in writing on a case-by-case basis
and be limited to transactions where it
can be adequately justified that a
noncompetitive award is in the best
interest of the Government and
necessary to the accomplishment of the
goals of USDA. Reasons for considering
noncompetitive awards are:
(1) Nonmonetary awards of property
or services.
(2) Awards of less than $100,000.
(3) Awards to fund continuing work
already started under a previous award
for which competition for continued
support would have a significant
adverse effect on continuity or
completion of the activity.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(4) Time constraints associated with a
public health, safety, welfare, or
national security requirement preclude
competition.
(e) USDA awarding agencies may
establish alternate exceptions from
competition for discretionary awards.
All such alternative exceptions will be
subject to review and approval both by
the Secretary and by OMB, pursuant to
pursuant to 2 CFR 200.102, and 2 CFR
200.107 when applicable, and publicly
set forth in writing by the USDA
awarding agency.
(f) All actions taken USDA awarding
agencies for the purpose of
accomplishing any element of Federal
financial assistance programs, awards,
and any related or subsequent
transactions, must comply with the
direction set forth in Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP) Policy
Letter 11–01 and successor policy
regarding the performance of inherently
governmental and critical functions.
Subpart B—Miscellaneous
§ 415.2 Acknowledgement of USDA
support on information dissemination
products.
Recipients must have an
acknowledgement of USDA awarding
agency support placed on any
information dissemination products
produced with any Federal financial
assistance support, including those
which report the results or, or describe,
a Federal financial assistance-supported
activity.
(a) Unless the provisions of the
Federal financial assistance award make
it apply, this requirement does not
apply to:
(1) Audiovisuals produced as research
instruments or for documenting
experimentation or findings and not
intended for presentation or distribution
to the public.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) USDA awarding agencies must
require award terms and conditions
imposed for the specific purpose of
complying with law, regulation, or
USDA policy, related to the
acknowledgement of USDA awarding
agency Federal financial assistance
support.
Subpart C—Intergovernmental Review
of Department of Agriculture Programs
and Activities
§ 415.3
Purpose.
(a) The regulations in this part
implement Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs’’, issued July 14, 1982, and
amended on April 8, 1983. These
regulations also implement applicable
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
provisions of section 401 of the
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of
1968 and section 204 of the
Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan
Development Act of 1966.
(b) These regulations are intended to
foster an intergovernmental partnership
and a strengthened Federalism by
relying on State processes and on State,
areawide, regional and local
coordination for review of proposed
Federal financial assistance and direct
Federal development.
(c) The regulations are intended to aid
the internal management of the
Department, and are not intended to
create any right or benefit enforceable at
law by a party against the Department
or its officers.
§ 415.4
Definitions.
As used in this part, the following
definitions apply:
Order means Executive Order 12372,
issued July 14, 1982, and amended
April 8, 1983, and titled
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.
State means any of the 50 states, the
District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands.
§ 415.5
Applicability.
The Secretary must publish, no less
than annually, a list of the Department’s
programs and activities that are subject
to these regulations and identifies
which of these are subject to the
requirements of section 204 of the
Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan
Development Act. This list must be
available on the USDA’s public website.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 415.6 Secretary’s general
responsibilities.
(a) The Secretary provides
opportunities for consultation by
elected officials of those State and local
governments that would provide the
non-Federal funds for, or that would be
directly affected by, proposed Federal
financial assistance from, or direct
Federal development by, the
Department.
(b) If a State adopts a process under
the Order to review and coordinate
proposed Federal financial assistance
and direct Federal development, the
Secretary, to the extent permitted by
law:
(1) Uses the State process to
determine official views of State and
local elected officials;
(2) Communicates with State and
local elected officials as early in a
program planning cycle as is reasonably
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
feasible to explain specific plans and
actions;
(3) Makes efforts to accommodate
State and local elected officials’
concerns with proposed Federal
financial assistance and direct Federal
development that are communicated
through the State process;
(4) Allows the States to simplify and
consolidate existing Federally required
State plan submissions;
(5) Where State planning and
budgeting systems are sufficient and
where permitted by law, encourages the
substitution of State plans for Federally
required State plans;
(6) Seeks the coordination of views of
affected State and local elected officials
in one State with those of another State
when proposed Federal financial
assistance or direct Federal
development has an impact on interstate
metropolitan urban centers or other
interstate areas; and
(7) Supports State and local
governments by discouraging the
reauthorization or creation of any
planning organization which is
Federally funded, which has a limited
purpose, and which is not adequately
representative of, or accountable to,
State or local elected officials.
§ 415.7
Federal interagency coordination.
The Secretary, to the extent
practicable, consults with and seeks
advice from all other substantially
affected Federal departments and
agencies in an effort to assure full
coordination between such agencies and
the Department regarding programs and
activities covered under these
regulations.
§ 415.8 State selection of programs and
activities.
(a) A State may select any program or
activity published in the Federal
Register or on Grants.gov, in accordance
with § 415.5 for intergovernmental
review under these regulations. Each
State, before selecting programs and
activities, must consult with local
elected officials.
(b) Each State that adopts a process
must notify the Secretary of the
Department’s programs and activities
selected for that process.
(c) A State may notify the Secretary of
changes in its selections at any time. For
each change, the State must submit to
the Secretary an assurance that the State
has consulted with elected local
officials regarding the change. The
Department may establish deadlines by
which States are required to inform the
Secretary of changes in their program
selections.
(d) The Secretary uses a State’s
process as soon as feasible, depending
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68325
on individual programs and activities,
after the Secretary is notified of its
selections.
§ 415.9 Communication with State and
local elected officials.
(a) The Secretary provides notice to
directly affected State, areawide,
regional, and local entities in a State of
proposed Federal financial assistance or
direct Federal development if:
(1) The State has not adopted a
process under the Order; or
(2) The assistance or development
involves a program or an activity that is
not covered under the State process.
(b) This notice may be made by
publication in the Federal Register or
other appropriate means, which the
Department in its discretion deems
appropriate.
(c) In order to facilitate
communication with State and local
officials the Secretary has established an
office within the Department to receive
all communications pertinent to this
Order. Communications should be sent
to:
(1) The Office of the Chief Financial
Officer, Room 143–W, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250, Attention: E.O. 12372; or,
(2) As identified on the USDA’s
public website, an email address for
electronic communications.
§ 415.10 State comments on proposed
Federal financial assistance and direct
Federal development.
(a) Except in unusual circumstances,
the Secretary gives State processes or
directly affected State, areawide,
regional, and local officials and entities:
(1) At least 30 days from the date
established by the Secretary to comment
on proposed Federal financial assistance
in the form of noncompetitive
continuation awards; and
(2) At least 60 days from the date
established by the Secretary to comment
on proposed direct Federal development
or Federal financial assistance other
than noncompetitive continuation
awards.
(b) This section also applies to
comments in cases in which the review,
coordination and communication with
the Department have been delegated.
(c) Applicants for programs and
activities subject to section 204 of the
Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan
Development Act must allow areawide
agencies a 60-day opportunity for
review and comment.
§ 415.11
Processing comments.
(a) The Secretary follows the
procedures in § 415.12 if:
(1) A State office or official is
designated to act as a single point of
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
68326
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
contact between a State process and all
Federal agencies; and
(2) That office or official transmits a
State process recommendation for a
program selected under § 415.8.
(b)(1) The single point of contact is
not obligated to transmit comments
from State, areawide, regional or local
officials and entities where there is no
State process recommendation.
(2) If a State process recommendation
is transmitted by a single point of
contact, all comments from State,
areawide, regional and local officials
and entities that differ from it must also
be transmitted.
(c) If a State has not established a
process, or is unable to submit a State
process recommendation, State,
areawide, regional and local officials
and entities may submit comments
either to the applicant or to the
Department.
(d) If a program or activity is not
selected by a State process, State,
areawide, regional and local officials
and entities may submit comments
either to the applicant or to the
Department. In addition, if a State
process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is
transmitted to the Department by the
single point of contact, the Secretary
follows the procedures of § 415.12.
(e) The Secretary considers comments
which do not constitute a State process
recommendation submitted under these
regulations and for which the Secretary
is not required to apply the procedures
of § 415.12, when such comments are
provided by a single point of contact by
the applicant, or directly to the
Department by a commenting party.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 415.12 Accommodation of
intergovernmental concerns.
(a) If a State process provides a State
process recommendation to the
Department through its single point of
contact, the Secretary either—
(1) Accepts the recommendations;
(2) Reaches a mutually agreeable
solution with the State process; or
(3) Provides the single point of
contact with a written explanation of
the decision, as determined by the
Secretary. The Secretary may also
supplement the written explanation by
also providing the explanation to the
single point of contact by telephone,
other telecommunication, or other
means.
(b) In any explanation under
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the
Secretary informs the single point of
contact that:
(1) The Department will not
implement its decision for at least ten
days after the single point of contact
receives the explanation; or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
(2) The Secretary has reviewed the
decision and determined that, because
of unusual circumstances, the waiting
period of at least ten days is not feasible.
(c) For purposes of computing the
waiting period under paragraph (b)(1) of
this section, a single point of contact is
presumed to have received written
notification five days after the date of
mailing of such notification.
§ 415.13
Interstate situations.
(a) The Secretary is responsible for:
(1) Identifying proposed Federal
financial assistance and direct Federal
development that have an impact on
interstate areas;
(2) Notifying appropriate officials in
States which have adopted a process
and which selected the Department’s
program or activity;
(3) Making efforts to identify and
notify the affected State, areawide,
regional and local officials and entities
in those States that have not adopted a
process under the Order or do not select
the Department’s program or activity;
and
(4) Responding, pursuant to § 415.12,
if the Secretary receives a
recommendation from a designated
areawide agency transmitted by a single
point of contact, in cases in which the
review, coordination, and
communication with the Department
have been delegated.
(b) The Secretary uses the procedures
in § 415.12 if a State process provides a
State process recommendation to the
Department through a single point of
contact.
§ 415.14 Simplification, consolidation, or
substitution of State plans.
(a) As used in this section:
(1) Simplify means that a State may
develop its own format, choose its own
submission date, and select the
planning period for a State plan.
(2) Consolidate means that a State
may meet statutory and regulatory
requirements by combining two or more
plans into one document and that the
State can select the format, submission
date, and the planning period for the
consolidated plan.
(3) Substitute means that a State may
use a plan or other document that it has
developed for its own purposes to meet
Federal requirements.
(b) If not inconsistent with law, a
State may decide to try to simplify,
consolidate, or substitute Federally
required State plans without prior
approval by the Secretary.
(c) The Secretary reviews each State
plan a State has simplified, consolidated
or substituted and accepts the plan only
if its contents meet Federal
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 415.15
Waivers.
In an emergency, the Secretary may
waive any provision in Subpart C—
Intergovernmental Review of
Department of Agriculture Programs and
Activities, 2 CFR 415.3 to 415.14.
■ 4. Revise part 416 to read as follows:
PART 416—GENERAL PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS FOR
GRANTS AND COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENTS TO STATE AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS
Sec.
416.1
416.2
Special procurement provisions.
[Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 901–
903; 7 CFR 2.28.
§ 416.1
Special procurement provisions.
(a) In order to ensure objective
contractor performance and eliminate
unfair competitive advantage, a
prospective contractor that develops or
drafts specifications, requirements,
statements of work, invitations for bids,
request for proposals, contract term and
conditions or other documents for use
by a State in conducting a procurement
under the USDA entitlement programs
specified in 2 CFR 200.101(f)(4) through
(7) must be excluded from competing
for such procurements. Such
prospective contractors are ineligible for
contract awards resulting from such
procurements regardless of the
procurement method used. However,
prospective contractors may provide
States with specification information
related to a State procurement under the
USDA entitlement programs specified in
2 CFR 200.101(f)(4) through (7) and still
compete for the procurement if the
State, and not the prospective
contractor, develops or drafts the
specifications, requirements, statements
of work, invitations for bid, and/or
requests for proposals used to conduct
the procurement.
(b) Procurements by States under
USDA entitlement programs specified in
2 CFR 200.101(f)(4) through (7) must be
conducted in a manner that prohibits
the use of statutorily or administratively
imposed in-State or local geographic
preferences.
§ 416.2
■
[Reserved]
5. Revise part 417 to read as follows:
PART 417—NONPROCUREMENT
DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Sec.
417.10 What does this part do?
417.20 Does this part apply to me?
417.30 What policies and procedures must
I follow?
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart A—General
417.137 Who in the USDA may grant an
exception to let an excluded person
participate in a covered transaction?
Subpart B—Covered Transactions
417.210 Which nonprocurement
transactions are covered transactions?
417.215 Which nonprocurement
transactions, in addition to those listed
in 2 CFR 180.215, are not covered
transactions?
417.220 Are any procurement contracts
included as covered transactions?
417.221 How would the exclusions from
coverage for the USDA’s foreign
assistance programs apply?
417.222 How would the exclusions from
coverage for the USDA’s export credit
guarantee and direct credit programs
apply?
Subpart C—Responsibilities of Participants
Regarding Transactions
417.332 What methods must I use to pass
down requirements to participants in
lower-tier covered transactions with
whom I intend to do business?
Subpart D—Responsibilities of Department
of Agriculture Officials Regarding
Transactions
417.437 What method do I use to
communicate to a participant the
requirements described in the OMB
guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?
Subpart E—[Reserved]
Subpart F—[Reserved]
Subpart G—Suspension
417.755 When will I know whether the
USDA suspension is continued or
terminated?
Subpart H—Debarment
417.865 How long may my debarment last?
417.870 When do I know if the USDA
debarring official debars me?
Subpart I—Definitions
417.930 Debarring official (USDA
supplement to government-wide
definition at 2 CFR 180.930).
417.935 Disqualified (USDA supplement to
government-wide definition at 2 CFR
180.935).
417.1010 Suspending official (USDA
supplement to government-wide
definition at 2 CFR 180.1010).
Subpart J—[Reserved]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 2209j;
Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103–355, 108 Stat. 3327
(31 U.S.C. 6101 note); Pub. L. 101–576, 104
Stat. 2838; E.O. 12549 (51 FR 6370, 3 CFR,
1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O. 12689 (54 FR
34131, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 235); 2 CFR
part 180; 7 CFR 2.28.
§ 417.10
What does this part do?
This part adopts the OMB guidance in
subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180,
as supplemented by this part, as the
USDA policies and procedures for
nonprocurement debarment and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
suspension. It thereby gives regulatory
effect for the USDA to the OMB
guidance, as supplemented by this part.
For any section of OMB guidance in
subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180
that has no corresponding section in
this part, USDA policies and procedures
are those in the OMB guidance. This
part satisfies the requirements in section
3 of Executive Order 12549, ‘‘Debarment
and Suspension’’ (3 CFR, 1986 Comp.,
p. 189), Executive Order 12689,
‘‘Debarment and Suspension’’ (3 CFR,
1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101
note (Section 2455, Pub. L. 103–355,
108 Stat. 3327).
§ 417.20
Does this part apply to me?
Through this part, pertinent portions
of the OMB guidance in subparts A
through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table
at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you
are a:
(a) Participant or principal in a
‘‘covered transaction’’ (see subpart B of
2 CFR part 180 and the definition of
‘‘nonprocurement transaction’’ at 2 CFR
180.970, as supplemented by §§ 417.215
and 417.220);
(b) Respondent in a USDA debarment
and suspension action;
(c) USDA debarment or suspension
official; or
(d) USDA grants officer, agreements
officer, or other official authorized to
enter into any type of nonprocurement
transaction that is a covered transaction.
§ 417.30 What policies and procedures
must I follow?
The USDA policies and procedures
that you must follow are the policies
and procedures specified in this
regulation and each applicable section
of the OMB guidance in subparts A
through I of 2 CFR part 180, as that
section is supplemented by the section
in this part with the same section
number. The contracts that are covered
transactions, for example, are specified
by 2 CFR 180.220 as supplemented by
§ 417.220. For any section of OMB
guidance in subparts A through I of 2
CFR part 180 that has no corresponding
section in this part, USDA policies and
procedures are those in the OMB
guidance.
Subpart A—General
§ 417.137 Who in the USDA may grant an
exception to let an excluded person
participate in a covered transaction?
Within the USDA, a debarring official
may grant an exception to let an
excluded person participate in a
covered transaction as provided under 2
CFR 180.135.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68327
Subpart B—Covered Transactions
§ 417.210 Which nonprocurement
transactions are covered transactions?
All nonprocurement transactions, as
defined in 2 CFR 180.970, are covered
transactions unless listed in § 417.215.
§ 417.215 Which nonprocurement
transactions, in addition to those listed in
2 CFR 180.215, are not covered
transactions?
(a) Transactions not covered. In
addition to the nonprocurement
transactions listed in 2 CFR 180.215, the
following nonprocurement transactions
are not covered transactions:
(1) An entitlement or mandatory
award required by a statute, including a
lower tier entitlement or mandatory
award that is required by a statute.
(2) The export or substitution of
Federal timber governed by the Forest
Resources Conservation and Shortage
Relief Act of 1990, 16 U.S.C. 620 et seq.
(The ‘‘Export Act’’), which prevents a
debarred person from entering into any
contract for the purchase of unprocessed
timber from Federal lands. See 16 U.S.C.
620d(d)(1)(A).
(3) The receipt of licenses, permits,
certificates, and indemnification under
regulatory programs conducted in the
interest of public health and safety, and
animal and plant health and safety.
(4) The receipt of official grading and
inspection services, animal damage
control services, public health and
safety inspection services, and animal
and plant health and safety inspection
services.
(5) If the person is a State or local
government, the provision of official
grading and inspection services, animal
damage control services, animal and
plant health and safety inspection
services.
(6) The receipt of licenses, permits, or
certificates under regulatory programs
conducted in the interest of ensuring
fair trade practices.
(7) Permits, licenses, exchanges and
other acquisitions of real property,
rights of way, and easements under
natural resource management programs.
(8) Any transaction to be
implemented outside the United States
that is below the primary tier covered
transaction in a USDA foreign assistance
program.
(9) Any transaction to be
implemented outside the United States
that is below the primary tier covered
transaction in a USDA export credit
guarantee program or direct credit
program.
(b) Limited requirement to check
SAM.gov. Notwithstanding the fact that
transactions to be implemented outside
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
68328
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
the United States that are below the
primary tier covered transaction in a
USDA foreign assistance program,
export credit guarantee program or
direct credit program are not covered
transactions, pursuant to paragraphs
(a)(8) and (9) of this section, primary tier
participants under these programs must
check SAM.gov prior to entering into
any transaction with a person at the first
lower tier and must not enter into such
a transaction if the person is excluded
or disqualified in SAM.gov.
(c) Exception. A cause for suspension
or debarment under 2 CFR 180.700 or 2
CFR 180.800 may be based on the
actions of a person with respect to a
procurement or nonprocurement
transaction under a USDA program even
if such transaction has been excluded
from covered transaction status by this
section or § 417.220.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 417.220 Are any procurement contracts
included as covered transactions?
In addition to the procurement
contracts listed in 2 CFR 180.220, the
following procurement contracts are
covered transactions:
(a) Specifically, a contract for goods or
services is a covered transaction if any
of the following applies:
(1) The contract is awarded by a
participant in a nonprocurement
transaction covered under § 417.210,
and the contract amount is expected to
equal or exceed $25,000.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Any procurement contract to be
implemented outside the United States
that is below the primary tier covered
transaction in a USDA foreign assistance
program is not a covered transaction,
notwithstanding the provisions in 2 CFR
180.220(a) and 2 CFR 180.220(b) and
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Any procurement contract to be
implemented outside the United States
that is below the primary tier covered
transaction in a USDA export credit
guarantee program or direct credit
program is not a covered transaction,
notwithstanding the provisions in 2 CFR
180.220(a) and 2 CFR 180.220(b) and
paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Notwithstanding the fact that
procurement contracts to be
implemented outside the United States
that are below the primary tier covered
transaction in a USDA foreign assistance
program, export credit guarantee
program or direct credit program are not
covered transactions, pursuant to
paragraph (b) and (c) of this section,
primary tier participants under these
programs must check SAM.gov prior to
entering into any procurement contract
that is expected to equal or exceed
$25,000 with a person at the first lower
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
tier and must not enter into such a
procurement contract if the person is
excluded or disqualified in SAM.gov.
§ 417.221 How would the exclusions from
coverage for the USDA’s foreign assistance
programs apply?
The primary tier covered transaction
would be the food aid grant agreement
entered into between USDA and a
program participant, such as a U.S.
private voluntary organization. USDA
would have to check SAM.gov before
entering into the food aid grant
agreement to ensure that the U.S.
private voluntary organization that
would be the primary tier participant is
not excluded or disqualified. A
transaction at the first lower tier might
be a subrecipient agreement between the
U.S. private voluntary organization and
a foreign subrecipient of the
commodities that were provided under
the food aid grant agreement. Pursuant
to § 417.215(a)(8), this nonprocurement
transaction would not be a covered
transaction. In addition, a transaction at
the first lower tier might be a
procurement contract entered into
between the U.S. private voluntary
organization and a foreign entity to
provide supplies or services that are
expected to equal or exceed $25,000 in
value and that are needed by such
organization to implement activities
under the food aid grant agreement.
Pursuant to § 417.220(b), this
procurement contract would not be a
covered transaction. However, pursuant
to §§ 417.215(b) and 417.220(d), the U.S.
private voluntary organization would be
prohibited from entering into, at the first
lower tier, an agreement with a
subrecipient or a procurement contract
that is expected to equal or exceed
$25,000 with an entity that appears in
SAM.gov as excluded or disqualified.
§ 417.222 How would the exclusions from
coverage for the USDA’s export credit
guarantee and direct credit programs
apply?
(a) Export credit guarantee program.
In the case of the export credit guarantee
program, the primary tier covered
transaction would be the guarantee
issued by the USDA to a U.S. exporter.
The U.S. exporter usually assigns the
guarantee to a U.S. financial institution,
and this would create another primary
tier covered transaction between USDA
and the U.S. financial institution. USDA
would have to check the SAM.gov
before issuing a guarantee or accepting
a guarantee assignment to ensure that
the U.S. exporter or financial institution
that would be the primary tier
participant is not excluded or
disqualified. A transaction at the first
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
lower tier under the export credit
guarantee program might be a payment
obligation of a foreign bank to the U.S.
exporter to pay on behalf of the importer
for the exported U.S. commodities that
are covered by the guarantee. Similarly,
a transaction at the first lower tier might
be a payment obligation of a foreign
bank under an instrument, such as a
loan agreement or letter of credit, to the
U.S. financial institution assigned the
guarantee, which has paid the exporter
for the exported U.S. commodities and,
in so doing, issued a loan to the foreign
bank, which the foreign bank is
obligated to repay on deferred payment
terms. Pursuant to § 417.215(a)(9), these
nonprocurement transactions would not
be covered transactions. In addition, a
transaction at the first lower tier under
the export credit guarantee program
might be a procurement contract (i.e., a
contract for the purchase and sale of
goods) that is expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 entered into between
the U.S. exporter and the foreign
importer for the U.S. commodities, the
payment for which is covered by the
guarantee. Pursuant to § 417.220(c), this
procurement contract would not be a
covered transaction. However, pursuant
to §§ 417.215(b) and 417.220(d), the U.S.
exporter or U.S. financial institution
would be prohibited from entering into,
at the first lower tier, an agreement with
an importer (or intervening purchaser)
or foreign bank or a procurement
contract that is expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 with an entity that
appears on the SAM.gov as excluded or
disqualified.
(b) Direct credit program. In the case
of the direct credit program, the primary
tier covered transaction would be the
financing agreement between the USDA
and the U.S. exporter. USDA purchases
the exporter’s account receivable in a
particular transaction pursuant to the
financing agreement. On occasion, such
a transaction may contemplate a
payment obligation of a U.S. or foreign
bank to make the required payments.
USDA would have to check SAM.gov
before entering into a financing
agreement or accepting such a payor to
ensure that the U.S. exporter or the
bank, if any, that would be the primary
tier participant is not excluded or
disqualified. A transaction at the first
lower tier might be a payment obligation
of the importer to pay the exporter for
the exported U.S. commodities that are
covered by the financing agreement.
Pursuant to § 417.215(a)(9), this
nonprocurement transaction would not
be a covered transaction. In addition, a
transaction at the first lower tier might
be a procurement contract that is
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
expected to equal or exceed $25,000
entered into between the U.S. exporter
and the foreign importer for the U.S.
commodities, the payment for which is
covered by the financing agreement.
Pursuant to § 417.220(c), this
procurement contract would not be a
covered transaction. However, pursuant
to §§ 417.215(b) and 417.220(d), the U.S.
exporter would be prohibited from
entering into, at the first lower tier, an
agreement with an importer (or
intervening purchaser) or bank, or a
procurement contract that is expected to
equal or exceed $25,000 with an entity
that appears in SAM.gov as excluded or
disqualified.
Subpart C—Responsibilities of
Participants Regarding Transactions
§ 417.332 What methods must I use to
pass down requirements to participants in
lower-tier covered transactions with whom
I intend to do business?
You as a participant must include a
term or condition in lower tier covered
transactions requiring lower tier
participants to comply with subpart C of
the OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 180,
as supplemented by subpart C of this
part.
Subpart D—Responsibilities of
Department of Agriculture Officials
Regarding Transactions
§ 417.437 What method do I use to
communicate to a participant the
requirements described in the OMB
guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?
To communicate to a participant the
requirements described in 2 CFR
180.435, you must include a term or
condition in the transaction that
requires the participant’s compliance
with subpart C of 2 CFR part 180, as
supplemented by subpart C of this part,
and requires the participant to include
a similar term or condition in lower tier
covered transactions.
Subpart E—[Reserved]
Subpart G—Suspension
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 417.755 When will I know whether the
USDA suspension is continued or
terminated?
The record will remain open for the
full 30 days, as called for in 2 CFR
180.725, even when you make a
submission before the 30 days expire.
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
§ 417.865
last?
How long may my debarment
The Secretary must permanently
debar from participation in USDA
programs any individual, organization,
corporation, or other entity convicted of
a felony for knowingly defrauding the
United States in connection with any
program administered by USDA.
(a) Reduction. A debarment under this
paragraph may be reduced by the
Secretary to a period of not less than 10
years.
(b) Exemption. A debarment under
this paragraph will not apply with
regard to participation in USDA
domestic food assistance programs. For
purposes of this paragraph,
participation in a domestic food
assistance program does not include
acting as an authorized retail food store
in the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP), the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program for Women, Infants, and
Children (WIC), or as a nonbeneficiary
entity in any of the domestic food
assistance programs. The programs
include:
(1) Special Nutrition Assistance
Program, 7 U.S.C. 2011, et seq.;
(2) Food Distribution Program on
Indian Reservations, 7 U.S.C. 2013(b);
(3) National School Lunch Program,
42 U.S.C. 1751, et seq.;
(4) Summer Food Service Program for
Children, 42 U.S.C. 1761; Child and
Adult Care Food Program, 42 U.S.C.
1766;
(5) Special Milk Program for Children,
42 U.S.C. 1772; School Breakfast
Program, 42 U.S.C. 1773;
(6) Special Supplemental Nutrition
Program for Women, Infants, and
Children, 42 U.S.C. 1786;
(7) Commodity Supplemental Food
Program, 42 U.S.C. 612c note;
(8) WIC Farmers Market Nutrition
Program, 42 U.S.C. 1786;
(9) Senior Farmers’ Market Nutrition
Program, 7 U.S.C. 3007; and
(10) Emergency Food Assistance
Program, 7 U.S.C. 7501, et seq.
§ 417.870 When do I know if the USDA
debarring official debars me?
Subpart F—[Reserved]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Subpart H—Debarment
Jkt 262001
The record will remain open for the
full 30 days, as called for in 2 CFR
180.820, even when you make a
submission before the 30 days expire.
Subpart I—Definitions
§ 417.930 Debarring official (USDA
supplement to government-wide definition
at 2 CFR 180.930).
The head of an organizational unit
within USDA (e.g., Administrator, Food
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68329
and Nutrition Service), who has been
delegated authority in 7 CFR part 2 to
carry out a covered transaction, is
delegated authority to act as the
debarring official in connection with
such transaction. This authority to act as
a debarring official may not be
redelegated below the head of the
organizational unit, except that, in the
case of the Forest Service, the Chief may
redelegate the authority to act as a
debarring official to the Deputy Chief for
the National Forest System or an
Associate Deputy Chief for the National
Forest System.
§ 417.935 Disqualified (USDA supplement
to government-wide definition at 2 CFR
180.935).
Disqualified means that a person is
prohibited from participating in
specified Federal procurement or
nonprocurement transactions as
required under a statute, Executive
order (other than Executive Orders
12549 and 12689), or other authority.
Examples of disqualifications include
persons prohibited under—
(a) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C.
3142);
(b) The equal employment
opportunity acts and Executive orders;
or
(c) The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
7606), Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368),
and E.O. 11738 (38 FR 25161, 3 CFR,
1973 Comp., p. 799);
(d) 515(h) of the Federal Crop
Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1515(h));
(e) Section 12 of the Food and
Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2021).
§ 417.1010 Suspending official (USDA
supplement to government-wide definition
at 2 CFR 180.1010).
The head of an organizational unit
within USDA (e.g., Administrator, Food
and Nutrition Service), who has been
delegated authority in 7 CFR part 2 to
carry out a covered transaction, is
delegated authority to act as the
suspending official in connection with
such transaction. This authority to act as
a suspending official may not be
redelegated below the head of the
organizational unit, except that, in the
case of the Forest Service, the Chief may
redelegate the authority to act as a
suspending official to the Deputy Chief
for the National Forest System or an
Associate Deputy Chief for the National
Forest System.
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
68330
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart A—General
agreed to make any payment using
nonappropriated funds (to include
profits from any covered Federal
action), which would be prohibited
under paragraph (a) of this section if
paid for with appropriated funds.
(d) Each person who requests or
receives from an agency a commitment
providing for the United States to insure
or guarantee a loan must file with that
agency a statement, set forth in
Appendix A, whether that person has
made or has agreed to make any
payment to influence or attempt to
influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an
officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with that loan insurance or
guarantee.
(e) Each person who requests or
receives from an agency a commitment
providing for the United States to insure
or guarantee a loan must file with that
agency a disclosure form, in the OMBapproved format, if that person has
made or has agreed to make any
payment to influence or attempt to
influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an
officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with that loan insurance or
guarantee.
§ 418.100
§ 418.105
Subpart J—[Reserved]
6. Revise and republish part 418 to
read as follows:
■
PART 418—NEW RESTRICTIONS ON
LOBBYING
Sec.
Subpart A—General
418.100 Conditions on use of funds.
418.105 Definitions.
418.110 Certification and disclosure.
Subpart B—Activities by Own Employees
418.200 Agency and legislative liaison.
418.205 Professional and technical services.
418.210 Reporting.
Subpart C—Activities by Other Than Own
Employees
418.300 Professional and technical services.
Subpart D—Penalties and Enforcement
418.400 Penalties.
418.405 Penalty procedures.
418.410 Enforcement.
Subpart E—Exemptions
418.500 Secretary of Defense.
Appendix A to Part 418—Certification
Regarding Lobbying
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 1352; 5 U.S.C. 301; 2
CFR 200.450.
Conditions on use of funds.
(a) No appropriated funds may be
expended by the recipient of a Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement to pay any person for
influencing or attempting to influence
an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee
of a Member of Congress in connection
with any of the following covered
Federal actions: the awarding of any
Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant, the making of any Federal
loan, the entering into of any
cooperative agreement, and the
extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any
Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
(b) Each person who requests or
receives from an agency a Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement must file with that agency a
certification, set forth in Appendix A,
that the person has not made, and will
not make, any payment prohibited by
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Each person who requests or
receives from an agency a Federal
contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative
agreement must file with that agency a
disclosure form, in the OMB-approved
format, if such person has made or has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
Definitions.
For purposes of this part:
(a) Agency, as defined in 5 U.S.C.
552(f), includes Federal executive
departments and agencies as well as
independent regulatory commissions
and Government corporations, as
defined in 31 U.S.C. 9101(1).
(b) Covered Federal action means:
(1) Any of the following Federal
actions:
(i) The awarding of any Federal
contract;
(ii) The making of any Federal grant;
(iii) The making of any Federal loan;
(iv) The entering into of any
cooperative agreement; and,
(v) The extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of
any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
(2) Covered Federal action does not
include receiving from an agency a
commitment providing for the United
States to insure or guarantee a loan.
Loan guarantees and loan insurance are
addressed independently within this
part.
(c) Federal contract means an
acquisition contract awarded by an
agency, including those subject to the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR),
and any other acquisition contract for
real or personal property or services not
subject to the FAR.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(d) Federal cooperative agreement
means a cooperative agreement entered
into by an agency.
(e) Federal grant means an award of
financial assistance in the form of
money, or property in lieu of money, by
the Federal Government or a direct
appropriation made by law to any
person. The term does not include
technical assistance which provides
services instead of money, or other
assistance in the form of revenue
sharing, loans, loan guarantees, loan
insurance, interest subsidies, insurance,
or direct United States cash assistance
to an individual.
(f) Federal loan means a loan made by
an agency. The term does not include
loan guarantee or loan insurance.
(g) Indian Tribe and Tribal
organization have the meaning provided
in section 4 of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304).
Alaskan Natives are included under the
definitions of Indian tribes in that Act.
(h) Influencing or attempting to
influence means making, with the intent
to influence, any communication to or
appearance before an officer or
employee or any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member
of Congress in connection with any
*COM007*covered Federal action.
(i) Loan guarantee and loan insurance
means an agency’s guarantee or
insurance of a loan made by a person.
(j) Local government means a unit of
government in a State and, if chartered,
established, or otherwise recognized by
a State for the performance of a
governmental duty, including a local
public authority, a special district, an
intrastate district, a council of
governments, a sponsor group
representative organization, and any
other instrumentality of a local
government.
(k) Officer or employee of an agency
includes the following individuals who
are employed by an agency:
(1) An individual who is appointed to
a position in the Government under 5
U.S.C., including a position under a
temporary appointment;
(2) A member of the uniformed
services as defined in 37 U.S.C. 101(3);
(3) A special Government employee as
defined in 18 U.S.C. 202; and,
(4) An individual who is a member of
a Federal advisory committee, as
defined by the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2.
(l) Person means an individual,
corporation, company, association,
authority, firm, partnership, society,
State, and local government, regardless
of whether such entity is operated for
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
profit or not for profit. This term
excludes an Indian tribe, tribal
organization, or any other Indian
organization with respect to
expenditures specifically permitted by
other Federal law.
(m) Reasonable compensation means,
with respect to a regularly employed
officer or employee of any person,
compensation that is consistent with the
normal compensation for such officer or
employee for work that is not furnished
to, not funded by, or not furnished in
cooperation with the Federal
Government.
(n) Reasonable payment means, with
respect to professional and other
technical services, a payment in an
amount that is consistent with the
amount normally paid for such services
in the private sector.
(o) Recipient includes all contractors,
subcontractors at any tier, and
subgrantees at any tier of the recipient
of funds received in connection with a
Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement. The term
excludes an Indian tribe, tribal
organization, or any other Indian
organization with respect to
expenditures specifically permitted by
other Federal law.
(p) Regularly employed means, with
respect to an officer or employee of a
person requesting or receiving a Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement or a commitment providing
for the United States to insure or
guarantee a loan, an officer or employee
who is employed by such person for at
least 130 working days within one year
immediately preceding the date of the
submission that initiates agency
consideration of such person for receipt
of such contract, grant, loan, cooperative
agreement, loan insurance commitment,
or loan guarantee commitment. An
officer or employee who is employed by
such person for less than 130 working
days within one year immediately
preceding the date of the submission
that initiates agency consideration of
such person will be considered to be
regularly employed as soon as he or she
is employed by such person for 130
working days.
(q) State means a State of the United
States, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a
territory or possession of the United
States, an agency or instrumentality of
a State, and a multi-State, regional, or
interstate entity having governmental
duties and powers.
§ 418.110
Certification and disclosure.
(a) Each person must file a
certification, and a disclosure form, if
required, with each submission that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
initiates agency consideration of such
person for:
(1) Award of a Federal contract, grant,
or cooperative agreement exceeding
$100,000; or
(2) An award of a Federal loan or a
commitment providing for the United
States to insure or guarantee a loan
exceeding $150,000.
(b)(1) Each person must file a
certification, and a disclosure form, if
required, upon receipt by such person
of:
(i) A Federal contract, grant, or
cooperative agreement exceeding
$100,000; or
(ii) A Federal loan or a commitment
providing for the United States to insure
or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000,
(2) Unless such person previously
filed a certification, and a disclosure
form, if required, under paragraph (a) of
this section.
(c) Each person must file a disclosure
form at the end of each calendar quarter
in which there occurs any event that
requires disclosure or that materially
affects the accuracy of the information
contained in any disclosure form
previously filed by such person under
paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. An
event that materially affects the
accuracy of the information reported
includes:
(1) A cumulative increase of $25,000
or more in the amount paid or expected
to be paid for influencing or attempting
to influence a covered Federal action; or
(2) A change in the person(s) or
individual(s) influencing or attempting
to influence a covered Federal action;
or,
(3) A change in the officer(s),
employee(s), or Member(s) contacted to
influence or attempt to influence a
covered Federal action.
(d) Any person must file a
certification, and a disclosure form, if
required, to the next tier above who
requests or receives from a person
referred to in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this
section:
(1) A subcontract exceeding $100,000
at any tier under a Federal contract;
(2) A subgrant, contract, or
subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any
tier under a Federal grant;
(3) A contract or subcontract
exceeding $100,000 at any tier under a
Federal loan exceeding $150,000; or,
(4) A contract or subcontract
exceeding $100,000 at any tier under a
Federal cooperative agreement.
(e) All disclosure forms, but not
certifications, must be forwarded from
tier to tier until received by the person
referred to in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this
section. That person must forward all
disclosure forms to the agency.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68331
(f) Any certification or disclosure
form filed under paragraph (e) of this
section will be treated as a material
representation of fact upon which all
receiving tiers must rely. All liability
arising from an erroneous representation
will be borne solely by the tier filing
that representation and must not be
shared by any tier to which the
erroneous representation is forwarded.
Submitting an erroneous certification or
disclosure constitutes a failure to file
the required certification or disclosure,
respectively. If a person fails to file a
required certification or disclosure, the
United States may pursue all available
remedies, including those authorized by
31 U.S.C. 1352.
(g) No reporting is required for an
activity paid for with appropriated
funds if that activity is allowable under
either subpart B or C of this part.
Subpart B—Activities by Own
Employees
§ 418.200
Agency and legislative liaison.
(a) The prohibition on the use of
appropriated funds, in § 418.100(a),
does not apply in the case of a payment
of reasonable compensation made to an
officer or employee of a person
requesting or receiving a Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement if the payment is for agency
and legislative liaison activities not
directly related to a covered Federal
action.
(b) For purposes of paragraph (a) of
this section, providing any information
specifically requested by an agency or
Congress is allowable at any time.
(c) For purposes of paragraph (a) of
this section, the following agency and
legislative liaison activities are
allowable at any time only where they
are not related to a specific solicitation
for any covered Federal action:
(1) Discussing with an agency
(including individual demonstrations)
the qualities and characteristics of the
person’s products or services,
conditions or terms of sale, and service
capabilities; and,
(2) Technical discussions and other
activities regarding the application or
adaptation of the person’s products or
services for an agency’s use.
(d) For purposes of paragraph (a) of
this section, the following agencies and
legislative liaison activities are
allowable only where they are prior to
formal solicitation of any covered
Federal action:
(1) Providing any information not
specifically requested but necessary for
an agency to make an informed decision
about initiation of a covered Federal
action;
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
68332
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Technical discussions regarding
the preparation of an unsolicited
proposal prior to its official submission;
and,
(3) Capability presentations by
persons seeking awards from an agency
pursuant to the provisions of the Small
Business Act, as amended by Public
Law 95–507 and other subsequent
amendments.
(e) Only those activities expressly
authorized by this section are allowable
under this section.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 418.205
services.
Professional and technical
(a) The prohibition on the use of
appropriated funds, in § 418.100(a),
does not apply in the case of a payment
of reasonable compensation made to an
officer or employee of a person
requesting or receiving a Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement or an extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of a Federal contract,
grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if
payment is for professional or technical
services rendered directly in the
preparation, submission, or negotiation
of any bid, proposal, or application for
that Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement or for meeting
requirements imposed by or pursuant to
law as a condition for receiving that
Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
(b) For purposes of paragraph (a) of
this section, ‘‘professional and technical
services’’ will be limited to advice and
analysis directly applying any
professional or technical discipline. For
example, drafting of a legal document
accompanying a bid or proposal by a
lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical
advice provided by an engineer on the
performance or operational capability of
a piece of equipment rendered directly
in the negotiation of a contract is
allowable. However, communications
with the intent to influence made by a
professional (such as a licensed lawyer)
or a technical person (such as a licensed
accountant) are not allowable under this
section unless they provide advice and
analysis directly applying their
professional or technical expertise and
unless the advice or analysis is rendered
directly and solely in the preparation,
submission or negotiation of a covered
Federal action. Thus, for example,
communications with the intent to
influence made by a lawyer that do not
provide legal advice or analysis directly
and solely related to the legal aspects of
his or her client’s proposal, but
generally advocate one proposal over
another are not allowable under this
section because the lawyer is not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
providing professional legal services.
Similarly, communications with the
intent to influence made by an engineer
providing an engineering analysis prior
to the preparation or submission of a bid
or proposal are not allowable under this
section since the engineer is providing
technical services but not directly in the
preparation, submission or negotiation
of a covered Federal action.
(c) Requirements imposed by or
pursuant to law as a condition for
receiving a covered Federal award
include those required by law or
regulation, or reasonably expected to be
required by law or regulation, and any
other requirements in the actual award
documents.
(d) Only those services expressly
authorized by this section are allowable
under this section.
§ 418.210
Reporting.
No reporting is required with respect
to payments of reasonable compensation
made to regularly employed officers or
employees of a person.
Subpart C—Activities by Other Than
Own Employees
§ 418.300
services.
Professional and technical
(a) The prohibition on the use of
appropriated funds, in § 418.100(a),
does not apply in the case of any
reasonable payment to a person, other
than an officer or employee of a person
requesting or receiving a covered
Federal action, if the payment is for
professional or technical services
rendered directly in the preparation,
submission, or negotiation of any bid,
proposal, or application for that Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement or for meeting requirements
imposed by or pursuant to law as a
condition for receiving that Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement.
(b) The reporting requirements in
§ 418.110(a) and (b) regarding filing a
disclosure form by each person, if
required, will not apply with respect to
professional or technical services
rendered directly in the preparation,
submission, or negotiation of any
commitment providing for the United
States to insure or guarantee a loan.
(c) For purposes of paragraph (a) of
this section, ‘‘professional and technical
services’’ will be limited to advice and
analysis directly applying any
professional or technical discipline. For
example, drafting of a legal document
accompanying a bid or proposal by a
lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical
advice provided by an engineer on the
performance or operational capability of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
a piece of equipment rendered directly
in the negotiation of a contract is
allowable. However, communications
with the intent to influence made by a
professional (such as a licensed lawyer)
or a technical person (such as a licensed
accountant) are not allowable under this
section unless they provide advice and
analysis directly applying their
professional or technical expertise and
unless the advice or analysis is rendered
directly and solely in the preparation,
submission or negotiation of a covered
Federal action. Thus, for example,
communications with the intent to
influence made by a lawyer that do not
provide legal advice or analysis directly
and solely related to the legal aspects of
his or her client’s proposal, but
generally advocate one proposal over
another are not allowable under this
section because the lawyer is not
providing professional legal services.
Similarly, communications with the
intent to influence made by an engineer
providing an engineering analysis prior
to the preparation or submission of a bid
or proposal are not allowable under this
section since the engineer is providing
technical services but not directly in the
preparation, submission or negotiation
of a covered Federal action.
(d) Requirements imposed by or
pursuant to law as a condition for
receiving a covered Federal award
include those required by law or
regulation, or reasonably expected to be
required by law or regulation, and any
other requirements in the actual award
documents.
(e) Persons other than officers or
employees of a person requesting or
receiving a covered Federal action
include consultants and trade
associations.
(f) Only those services expressly
authorized by this section are allowable
under this section.
Subpart D—Penalties and Enforcement
§ 418.400
Penalties.
(a) Any person who makes an
expenditure prohibited herein will be
subject to a civil penalty of not less than
$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for
each such expenditure.
(b) Any person who fails to file or
amend the disclosure form (in the OMBapproved format) to be filed or amended
if required herein, will be subject to a
civil penalty of not less than $10,000
and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
(c) A filing or amended filing on or
after the date on which an
administrative action for the imposition
of a civil penalty is commenced does
not prevent the imposition of such civil
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
penalty for a failure occurring before
that date. An administrative action is
commenced with respect to a failure
when an investigating official
determines in writing to commence an
investigation of an allegation of such
failure.
(d) In determining whether to impose
a civil penalty, and the amount of any
such penalty, by reason of a violation by
any person, the agency will consider the
nature, circumstances, extent, and
gravity of the violation, the effect on the
ability of such person to continue in
business, any prior violations by such
person, the degree of culpability of such
person, the ability of the person to pay
the penalty, and such other matters as
may be appropriate.
(e) First offenders under paragraphs
(a) or (b) of this section will be subject
to a civil penalty of $10,000, absent
aggravating circumstances. Second and
subsequent offenses by persons will be
subject to an appropriate civil penalty
between $10,000 and $100,000, as
determined by the agency head or his or
her designee.
(f) An imposition of a civil penalty
under this section does not prevent the
United States from seeking any other
remedy that may apply to the same
conduct that is the basis for the
imposition of such civil penalty.
§ 418.405
Penalty procedures.
Agencies must impose and collect
civil penalties pursuant to the
provisions of the Program Fraud and
Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. 3803
(except subsection (c)), 3804 through
3808, and 3812, insofar as these
provisions are not inconsistent with the
requirements herein.
§ 418.410
Enforcement.
The head of each agency must take
such actions as are necessary to ensure
that the provisions herein are vigorously
implemented and enforced in that
agency.
Subpart E—Exemptions
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 418.500
Secretary of Defense.
(a) The Secretary of Defense may
exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a
covered Federal action from the
prohibition whenever the Secretary
determines, in writing, that such an
exemption is in the national interest.
The Secretary must transmit a copy of
each such written exemption to
Congress immediately after making such
a determination.
(b) The Department of Defense may
issue supplemental regulations to
implement paragraph (a) of this section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
Appendix A to Part 418—Certification
Regarding Lobbying
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans,
and Cooperative Agreements
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his
or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have
been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of
the undersigned, to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of an agency, a Member
of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with the awarding of
any Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant, the making of any Federal
loan, the entering into of any cooperative
agreement, and the extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of any
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal
appropriated funds have been paid or will be
paid to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress,
or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant,
loan, or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned must complete and submit
Standard Form-LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities,’’ in accordance with its
instructions.
(3) The undersigned must require that the
language of this certification be included in
the award documents for all subawards at all
tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and
contracts under grants, loans, and
cooperative agreements) and that all
subrecipients must certify and disclose
accordingly.
This certification is a material
representation of fact upon which reliance
was placed when this transaction was made
or entered into. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making or
entering into this transaction imposed by 31
U.S.C. 1352. Any person who fails to file the
required certification will be subject to a civil
penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more
than $100,000 for each such failure.
Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan
Insurance
The undersigned states, to the best of his
or her knowledge and belief, that:
If any funds have been paid or will be paid
to any person for influencing or attempting
to influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with this
commitment providing for the United States
to insure or guarantee a loan, the
undersigned must complete and submit
Standard Form-LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities,’’ in accordance with its
instructions.
Submission of this statement is a
prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31,
U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the
required statement will be subject to a civil
penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more
than $100,000 for each such failure.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68333
PART 421—REQUIREMENTS FOR
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
(FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE)
7. The authority citation for part 421
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 701–707.
8. Amend § 421.10 by revising the
introductory text and paragraph (b) as
follows:
■
§ 421.10
What does this part do?
This part requires that the award and
administration of USDA grants and
cooperative agreements comply with
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) guidance implementing the
portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act
of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8101–8106, as
amended, hereafter referred to as ‘‘the
Act’’) that applies to grants. It thereby—
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Establishes USDA policies and
procedures for compliance with the Act
that are the same as those of other
Federal agencies, in conformance with
the requirement in 41 U.S.C. 8106 for
Governmentwide implementing
regulations.
■
9. Revise § 421.400 to read as follows:
§ 421.400 What method do I use as an
agency awarding official to obtain a
recipient’s agreement to comply with the
OMB guidance?
To obtain a recipient’s agreement to
comply with applicable requirements in
the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182,
you must include the following term or
condition in the award:
Drug-free workplace. You as the
recipient must comply with drug-free
workplace requirements in Subpart B
(or Subpart C, if the recipient is an
individual) of part 421, which adopts
the Governmentwide implementation (2
CFR part 182) of sec. 5152–5158 of the
Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub.
L. 100–690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41
U.S.C. 8101–8106).
10. Revise and republish part 422 to
read as follows:
■
PART 422—RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS
CONDUCTING USDA-FUNDED
EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH;
RESEARCH MISCONDUCT
Sec.
422.1 Definitions.
422.2 Procedures.
422.3 Inquiry, investigation, and
adjudication.
422.4 USDA Panel to determine
appropriateness of research misconduct
policy.
422.5 Reservation of right to conduct
subsequent inquiry, investigation, and
adjudication.
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
68334
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
422.6 Notification of USDA of allegations of
research misconduct.
422.7 Notification of ARIO during an
inquiry or investigation.
422.8 Communication of research
misconduct policies and procedures.
422.9 Documents required.
422.10 Reporting to USDA.
422.11 Research records and evidence.
422.12 Remedies for noncompliance.
422.13 Appeals.
422.14 Relationship to other requirements.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 CFR 2610.1(c);
Federal Policy on Research Misconduct (65
FR 76260)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 422.1
Definitions.
The following definitions apply to
this part:
Adjudication. The stage in response to
an allegation of research misconduct
when the outcome of the investigation
is reviewed, and appropriate corrective
actions, if any, are determined.
Corrective actions generally will be
administrative in nature, such as
termination of an award, debarment,
award restrictions, recovery of funds, or
correction of the research record.
However, if there is an indication of
violation of civil or criminal statutes,
civil or criminal sanctions may be
pursued.
Agency Research Integrity Officer
(ARIO). The individual appointed by a
USDA agency that conducts research
and who is responsible for:
(1) Receiving and processing
allegations of research misconduct as
assigned by the USDA RIO;
(2) Informing OIG and the USDA RIO
and the research institution associated
with the alleged research misconduct, of
allegations of research misconduct in
the event it is reported to the USDA
agency;
(3) Ensuring that any records,
documents and other materials relating
to a research misconduct allegation are
provided to OIG when requested;
(4) Coordinating actions taken to
address allegations of research
misconduct with respect to extramural
research with the research institution(s)
at which time the research misconduct
is alleged to have occurred, and with the
USDA RIO;
(5) Overseeing proceedings to address
allegations of extramurally funded
research misconduct at intramural
research institutions and research
institutions where extramural research
occurs;
(6) Ensuring that agency action to
address allegations of research
misconduct at USDA agencies
performing extramurally funded
research is performed at an
organizational level that allows an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
independent, unbiased, and equitable
process;
(7) Immediately notifying OIG, the
USDA RIO, and the applicable research
institution if:
(i) Public health or safety is at risk;
(ii) USDA’s resources, reputation, or
other interests need protecting;
(iii) Research activities should be
suspended;
(iv) Federal action may be needed to
protect the interest of a subject of the
investigation or of others potentially
affected;
(v) A premature public disclosure of
the inquiry into or investigation of the
allegation may compromise the process;
(vi) The scientific community or the
public should be informed; or
(vii) Behavior that is or may be
criminal in nature is discovered at any
point during the inquiry, investigation,
or adjudication phases of the research
misconduct proceedings;
(8) Documenting the dismissal of the
allegation, and ensuring that the name
of the accused individual and/or
institution is cleared if an allegation of
research misconduct is dismissed at any
point during the inquiry or investigation
phase of the proceedings;
(9) Other duties relating to research
misconduct proceedings as assigned.
Allegation. A disclosure of possible
research misconduct through any means
of communication. The disclosure may
be by written or oral statement, or by
other means of communication to an
institutional or USDA official.
Applied research. Systematic study to
gain knowledge or understanding
necessary to determine the means by
which a recognized and specific need
may be met.
Assistant Inspector General for
Investigations. The individual in OIG
who is responsible for OIG’s domestic
and foreign investigative operations
through OIG’s national and regional
investigative offices.
Basic research. Systematic study
directed toward fuller knowledge or
understanding of the fundamental
aspects of phenomena and of observable
facts without specific applications
towards processes or products in mind.
Extramural research. Research
conducted by any research institution or
entity other than the Federal agency to
which the funds supporting the research
were appropriated. Research institutions
conducting extramural research may
include Federal research facilities.
Fabrication. Making up data or results
and recording or reporting them.
Falsification. Manipulating research
materials, equipment, or processes, or
changing or omitting data or results
such that the research is not accurately
represented in the research record.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Finding of research misconduct. The
conclusion, proven by a preponderance
of the evidence, that research
misconduct occurred, that such research
misconduct represented a significant
departure from accepted practices of the
relevant research community, and that
such research misconduct was
committed intentionally, knowingly, or
recklessly.
Inquiry. The stage in the response to
an allegation of research misconduct
when an assessment is made to
determine whether the allegation has
substance and whether an investigation
is warranted.
Intramural research. Research
conducted by a Federal Agency, to
which funds were appropriated for the
purpose of conducting research.
Investigation. The stage in the
response to an allegation of research
misconduct when the factual record is
formally developed and examined to
determine whether to dismiss the case,
recommend a finding of research
misconduct, and/or take other
appropriate remedies.
Office of Inspector General (OIG). The
Office of Inspector General of the United
States Department of Agriculture.
Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP). The Office of Science
and Technology Policy of the Executive
Office of the President.
Plagiarism. The appropriation of
another person’s ideas, processes,
results, or words without giving
appropriate credit.
Preponderance of the evidence. Proof
by information that, compared with that
opposing it, leads to the conclusion that
the fact at issue is more probably true
than not.
Research. All basic, applied, and
demonstration research in all fields of
science, engineering, and mathematics.
This includes, but is not limited to,
research in economics, education,
linguistics, medicine, psychology, social
sciences, statistics, and research
involving human subjects or animals
regardless of the funding mechanism
used to support it.
Research institution. All organizations
using Federal funds for research,
including, for example, colleges and
universities, Federally funded research
and development centers, national user
facilities, industrial laboratories, or
other research institutes. Activities
which meet this definition constitute
research for purposes of this part,
whether or not they are conducted or
supported under a program which is
considered ‘‘research’’ for other
purposes. For example, some
demonstration and service programs
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
may include research/scientific
activities.
Research misconduct. Fabrication,
falsification, or plagiarism in proposing,
performing, or reviewing research, or in
reporting research results. Research
misconduct does not include honest
error or differences of opinion.
Research record. The record of data or
results that embody the facts resulting
from scientific inquiry, and includes,
but is not limited to, research proposals,
research records (including data, notes,
journals, laboratory records (both
physical and electronic)), progress
reports, abstracts, theses, oral
presentations, internal reports, and
journal articles.
USDA. United States Department of
Agriculture.
USDA Research Integrity Officer
(USDA RIO). The individual designated
by the Office of the Under Secretary for
Research, Education, and Economics
(REE) who is responsible for:
(1) Overseeing USDA agency
responses to allegations of research
misconduct;
(2) Ensuring that agency research
misconduct procedures are consistent
with this part;
(3) Receiving and assigning
allegations of research misconduct
reported by the public;
(4) Developing Memoranda of
Understanding with agencies that elect
not to develop their own research
misconduct procedures;
(5) Monitoring the progress of all
research misconduct cases; and
(6) Serving as liaison with OIG to
receive allegations of research
misconduct when they are received via
the OIG Hotline.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 422.2
Procedures.
Research institutions that conduct
extramural research funded by USDA
must foster an atmosphere conducive to
research integrity. They must develop or
have procedures in place to respond to
allegations of research misconduct that
ensure:
(a) Appropriate separations of
responsibility for inquiry, investigation,
and adjudication;
(b) Objectivity;
(c) Due process;
(d) Whistleblower protection;
(e) Confidentiality—to the extent
possible and consistent with a fair and
thorough investigation and as allowed
by law, knowledge about the identity of
subjects and complainants is limited to
those who need to know; and
(f) Timely resolution.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
§ 422.3 Inquiry, investigation, and
adjudication.
A research institution that conducts
extramural research funded by USDA
bears primary responsibility for
prevention and detection of research
misconduct and for the inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication of
research misconduct allegations
reported directly to it. The research
institution must perform an inquiry in
response to an allegation, and must
follow the inquiry with an investigation
if the inquiry determines that the
allegation or apparent instance of
research misconduct has substance. The
responsibilities for adjudication must be
separate from those for inquiry and
investigation. In most instances, USDA
will rely on a research institution
conducting extramural research to
promptly:
(a) Initiate an inquiry into any
suspected or alleged research
misconduct;
(b) Conduct a subsequent
investigation, if warranted;
(c) Acquire, prepare, and maintain
appropriate records of allegations of
extramural research misconduct and all
related inquiries, investigations, and
findings; and
(d) Take action to ensure the
following:
(1) The integrity of research;
(2) The rights and interests of the
subject of the investigation and the
public are protected;
(3) The observance of legal
requirements or responsibilities
including cooperation with criminal
investigations; and
(4) Appropriate safeguards for
subjects of allegations, as well as
complainants (see § 422.6). These
safeguards should include timely
written notification of subjects regarding
substantive allegations made against
them; a description of all such
allegations; reasonable access to the data
and other evidence supporting the
allegations; and the opportunity to
respond to allegations, the supporting
evidence and the proposed findings of
research misconduct, if any.
§ 422.4 USDA Panel to determine
appropriateness of research misconduct
policy.
Before USDA will rely on a research
institution to conduct an inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication of an
allegation in accordance with this part,
the research institution where the
research misconduct is alleged must
provide the ARIO its policies and
procedures related to research
misconduct at the institution. The
research institution has the option of
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68335
providing either a written copy of such
policies and procedures or a website
address where such policies and
procedures can be accessed. The ARIO
to whom the policies and procedures
were made available must convene a
panel comprised of the USDA RIO and
ARIOs from the Forest Service, the
Agricultural Research Service, and the
National Institute of Food and
Agriculture. The Panel will review the
research institution’s policies and
procedures for compliance with the
OSTP Policy and render a decision
regarding the research institution’s
ability to adequately resolve research
misconduct allegations. The ARIO will
inform the research institution of the
Panel’s determination that its inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication
procedures are sufficient. If the Panel
determines that the research institution
does not have sufficient policies and
procedures in place to conduct inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication
proceedings, or that the research
institution is in any way unfit or
unprepared to handle the inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication in a
prompt, unbiased, fair, and independent
manner, the ARIO will inform the
research institution in writing of the
Panel’s decision. An appropriate USDA
agency, as determined by the Panel, will
then conduct the inquiry, investigation,
and adjudication of research
misconduct in accordance with this
part. If an allegation of research
misconduct is made regarding
extramural research conducted at a
Federal research institution (whether
USDA or not), it is presumed that the
Federal research institution has research
misconduct procedures consistent with
the OSTP Policy. USDA reserves the
right to convene the Panel to assess the
sufficiency of a Federal agency’s
research misconduct procedures, should
there be any question whether the
agency’s procedures will ensure a fair,
unbiased, equitable, and independent
inquiry, investigation, and adjudication
process.
§ 422.5 Reservation of right to conduct
subsequent inquiry, investigation, and
adjudication.
(a) USDA reserves the right to conduct
its own inquiry, investigation, and
adjudication into allegations of research
misconduct at a research institution
conducting extramural research
subsequent to the proceedings of the
research institution related to the same
allegation. This may be necessary if the
USDA RIO or ARIO believes, using
sound discretion, that despite the
Panel’s finding that the research
institution in question had appropriate
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
68336
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
and OSTP-compliant research
misconduct procedures in place, the
research institution conducting the
extramural research at issue:
(1) Did not adhere to its own research
misconduct procedures;
(2) Did not conduct research
misconduct proceedings in a fair,
unbiased, or independent manner; or
(3) Has not completed research
misconduct inquiry, investigation, or
adjudication in a timely manner.
(b) Additionally, USDA reserves the
right to conduct its own inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication into
allegations of research misconduct at a
research institution conducting
extramural research subsequent to the
proceedings of the research institution
related to the same allegation for any
other reason that the USDA RIO or
ARIO considers it appropriate to
conduct research misconduct
proceedings in lieu of the research
institution’s conducting the extramural
research at issue. This right is subject to
paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) In cases where the USDA RIO or
ARIO believes it is necessary for USDA
to conduct its own inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication
subsequent to the proceedings of the
research institution related to the same
allegation, the USDA RIO or ARIO will
reconvene the Panel, which will
determine whether it is appropriate for
the relevant USDA agency to conduct
the research misconduct proceedings
related to the allegation(s) of research
misconduct. If the Panel determines that
it is appropriate for a USDA agency to
conduct the proceedings, the ARIO will
immediately notify the research
institution in question. The research
institution must then promptly provide
the relevant USDA agency with
documentation of the research
misconduct proceedings the research
institution has conducted to that point,
and the USDA agency will conduct
research misconduct proceedings in
accordance with the Agency research
misconduct procedures.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 422.6 Notification of USDA of allegations
of research misconduct.
(a) Research institutions that conduct
USDA-funded extramural research must
promptly notify OIG and the USDA RIO
of all allegations of research misconduct
or violations of Federal criminal statutes
involving USDA funds when the
institution inquiry into the allegation
warrants the institution moving on to an
investigation.
(b) Individuals at research institutions
who suspect research misconduct at the
institution should report allegations in
accordance with the institution’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
research misconduct policies and
procedures. Anyone else who suspects
that researchers or research institutions
performing Federally funded research
may have engaged in research
misconduct is encouraged to make a
formal allegation of research
misconduct to OIG.
(1) OIG has established a hotline for
USDA employees and the general public
to report fraud, waste, abuse, and
mismanagement in USDA programs
including allegations of research
misconduct. Complaints, which may be
submitted anonymously, must be filed
with the OIG by submitting a complaint
via the hotline on OIG’s public website,
sending a fax, or writing a letter.
(i) The OIG hotline may be accessed
at https://usdaoig.oversight.gov/hotline.
(ii) Complainants who submit to the
hotline on OIG’s public website and
who wish to provide additional
documentation may fax them to (202)
690–2474.
(iii) Letters may be mailed to: United
States Department of Agriculture, Office
of Inspector General, P.O. Box 23399,
Washington, DC 20026–3399.
(2) The USDA RIO may be reached at:
USDA Research Integrity Officer, 214W
Whitten Building, Washington, DC
20250. Telephone: (202) 690–0745.
Email: researchintegrity@usda.gov.
(c) To the extent known, the following
details should be included in any formal
allegation:
(1) The name of the research projects
involved, the nature of the alleged
misconduct, and the names of the
individual or individuals alleged to be
involved in the misconduct;
(2) The source or sources of funding
for the research project or research
projects involved in the alleged
misconduct;
(3) Important dates;
(4) Any documentation that bears
upon the allegation; and
(5) Any other potentially relevant
information.
(d) Safeguards for complainants give
individuals the confidence that they can
bring allegations of research misconduct
made in good faith to the attention of
appropriate authorities or serve as
complainants to an inquiry or an
investigation without suffering
retribution. Safeguards include
protection against retaliation for
complainants who make good faith
allegations, fair and objective
procedures for the examination and
resolution of allegations of research
misconduct, and diligence in protecting
the positions and reputations of those
persons who make allegations of
research misconduct in good faith. The
identity of complainants who wish to
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
remain anonymous will be kept
confidential to the extent permitted by
law or regulation.
§ 422.7 Notification of ARIO during an
inquiry or investigation.
(a) Research institutions that conduct
USDA-funded extramural research must
promptly notify the ARIO should the
institution become aware during an
inquiry or investigation that:
(1) Public health or safety is at risk;
(2) The resources, reputation, or other
interests of USDA are in need of
protection;
(3) Research activities should be
suspended;
(4) Federal action may be needed to
protect the interest of a subject of the
investigation or of others potentially
affected;
(5) A premature public disclosure of
the inquiry into or investigation of the
allegation may compromise the process;
(6) The scientific community or the
public should be informed; or
(7) There is reasonable indication of
possible violations of civil or criminal
law.
(b) If research misconduct
proceedings reveal behavior that may be
criminal in nature at any point during
the proceedings, the institution must
promptly notify the ARIO.
§ 422.8 Communication of research
misconduct policies and procedures.
Institutions that conduct USDAfunded extramural research are to
maintain and effectively communicate
to their staff policies and procedures
relating to research misconduct,
including the guidelines in this part.
The institution is to inform their
researchers and staff members who
conduct USDA-funded extramural
research when and under what
circumstances USDA is to be notified of
allegations of research misconduct, and
when and under what circumstances
USDA is to be updated on research
misconduct proceedings.
§ 422.9
Documents required.
(a) A research institution that
conducts USDA-funded extramural
research must maintain the following
documents related to an allegation of
research misconduct at the research
institution:
(1) A written statement describing the
original allegation;
(2) A copy of the formal notification
presented to the subject of the
allegation;
(3) A written report describing the
inquiry stage and its outcome including
copies of all supporting documentation;
(4) A description of the methods and
procedures used to gather and evaluate
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
information pertinent to the alleged
misconduct during inquiry and
investigation stages;
(5) A written report of the
investigation, including the evidentiary
record and supporting documentation;
(6) A written statement of the
findings; and
(7) If applicable, a statement of
recommended corrective actions, and
any response to such a statement by the
subject of the original allegation, and/or
other interested parties, including any
corrective action plan.
(b) The research institution must
retain the documents specified in
paragraph (a) of this section for at least
3 years following the final adjudication
of the alleged research misconduct.
§ 422.10
Reporting to USDA.
Following completion of an
investigation into allegations of research
misconduct, the institution conducting
extramural research must provide to the
ARIO a copy of the evidentiary record,
the report of the investigation,
recommendations made to the
institution’s adjudicating official, the
adjudicating official’s determination,
the institution’s corrective action taken
or planned, and the written response of
the individual who is the subject of the
allegation to any recommendations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 422.11
Research records and evidence.
(a) A research institution that
conducts extramural research supported
by USDA funds, as the responsible legal
entity for the USDA-supported research,
has a continuing obligation to create and
maintain adequate records (including
documents and other evidentiary
matter) as may be required by any
subsequent inquiry, investigation,
finding, adjudication, or other
proceeding.
(b) Whenever an investigation is
initiated, the research institution must
promptly take all reasonable and
practical steps to obtain custody of all
relevant research records and evidence
as may be necessary to conduct the
research misconduct proceedings. This
must be accomplished before the
research institution notifies the
researcher/respondent of the allegation,
or immediately thereafter.
(c) The original research records and
evidence taken into custody by the
research institution must be inventoried
and stored in a secure place and
manner. Research records involving raw
data must include the devices or
instruments on which they reside.
However, if deemed appropriate by the
research institution or investigator,
research data or records that reside on
or in instruments or devices may be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
copied and removed from those
instruments or devices as long as the
copies are complete, accurate, and have
substantially equivalent evidentiary
value as the data or records have when
the data or records reside on the
instruments or devices. Such copies of
data or records must be made by a
disinterested, qualified technician and
not by the subject of the original
allegation or other interested parties.
When the relevant data or records have
been removed from the devices or
instruments, the instruments or devices
need not be maintained as evidence.
§ 422.12
Remedies for noncompliance.
USDA agencies’ implementation
procedures identify the administrative
actions available to remedy a finding of
research misconduct. Such actions may
include the recovery of funds,
correction of the research record,
debarment of the researcher(s) that
engaged in the research misconduct,
proper attribution, or any other action
deemed appropriate to remedy the
instance(s) of research misconduct. The
agency should consider the seriousness
of the misconduct, including, but not
limited to, the degree to which the
misconduct was knowingly conducted,
intentional, or reckless; was an isolated
event or part of a pattern; or had
significant impact on the research
record, research subjects, other
researchers, institutions, or the public
welfare. In determining the appropriate
administrative action, the appropriate
agency must impose a remedy that is
commensurate with the infraction as
described in the finding of research
misconduct.
§ 422.13
Appeals.
68337
is not the lead agency, it will rely on the
lead agency following its policies and
procedures in determining whether
there is a finding of research
misconduct. Further, USDA may, in
consultation with the lead agency, take
action to protect the health and safety of
the public, to promote the integrity of
the USDA-supported research and
research process, or to conserve public
funds. When appropriate, USDA will
seek to resolve allegations jointly with
the other agency or agencies.
■ 11. Add part 423 to read as follows:
PART 423—GEOSPATIAL DATA
MANAGEMENT AND STANDARDS FOR
FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
AWARDS
Sec.
423.1
423.2
What does this part do?
Disclosure of geospatial investments.
Authority: 43 U.S.C. Ch. 46; 5 U.S.C. 301.
§ 423.1
What does this part do?
This part implements the
requirements at 43 U.S.C. 2808(b)(3)
which pertain to the disclosure of USDA
Federal financial assistance that
involves geospatial data, as
supplemented by this part.
§ 423.2 Disclosure of geospatial
investments.
USDA awarding agencies must ensure
that all Federal financial assistance
instruments which involve the
acquisition, storage, or distribution of
geospatial data comply with USDA
policy. For all such instruments, USDA
awarding agencies must require award
terms and conditions necessary for the
specific purpose of complying with law,
regulation, and USDA policy.
(a) If USDA relied on an institution to
conduct an inquiry, investigation, and
adjudication, the alleged person(s)
should first follow the institution’s
appeal policy and procedures.
(b) USDA agencies’ implementation
procedures, which must be made
available on a designated USDA public
website, identify the appeal process
when a finding of research misconduct
is elevated to the agency.
Lynn Moaney,
Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Office of the
Chief Financial Officer.
§ 422.14 Relationship to other
requirements.
14 CFR Part 71
Some of the research covered by this
part also may be subject to regulations
of other governmental agencies (e.g., a
university that receives funding from a
USDA agency and also under a grant
from another Federal agency). If more
than one agency of the Federal
Government has jurisdiction, USDA will
cooperate with the other agency(ies) in
designating a lead agency. When USDA
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2024–18544 Filed 8–23–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KS–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2024–2061; Amendment
No. 71–56]
RIN 2120–AA66
Airspace Designations; Incorporation
by Reference
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 165 (Monday, August 26, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68321-68337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18544]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 68321]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
2 CFR Chapter IV
[Docket No. USDA-2024-0002]
RIN 0505-AA18
USDA Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Financial Officer, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is revising parts of
the USDA Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. USDA's revision provides policy
changes and clarifications including plain language revisions. These
revisions are intended in many cases to reduce agency and recipient
burden.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 1, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tyson P. Whitney, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer, Director, Transparency and Accountability Reporting
Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20250-9011, 202-720-8978, [email protected].
Individuals who require alternative means for communication should
contact the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Target Center at
(202) 720-2600 (voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations found at 2 CFR Chapter IV provide the USDA adoption
of subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by USDA-
specific exceptions and requirements. 2 CFR Chapter IV additionally
includes the regulatory implementation of several statutory
requirements which provide USDA-wide applicability.
On July 1, 2024, USDA published a proposed rule to provide
conforming updates to OMB's April 22, 2024 updates to 2 CFR part 200,
implement plain language use, and to propose revisions intended in many
cases to reduce agency and recipient burden. USDA proposed both policy
changes and clarifications to existing requirements. See 89 FR 54372. A
correction was published to clarify that the public comment period
extended through July 31, 2024. See 89 FR 55114.
USDA solicited comments concerning the proposed rule ending July
31, 2024, and received one comment by that date. An anonymous submitter
requested that USDA prioritize environmental protection due to concern
over costs from damages to public lands and the environment from
commercial operations. The submitter also requested that USDA only
provide grants for research or projects that reduce fossil fuel
production and consumption. As this regulation does not propose
specific environmental regulations, describe specific program
activities that would impact public lands, or authorize specific USDA
grant programs, the public comment is not relevant to the regulations
and will not be addressed in the regulatory text.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this
document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, without
change.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. The assessment should
include potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity. Executive Order 13563
emphasized the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designated this proposed rule as
not significant under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and
Review,'' and therefore, OMB has not reviewed it.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under E.O. 12988 on ``Civil
Justice Reform.'' This proposed rule would not preempt state or local
laws, regulations, or policies unless they represent an irreconcilable
conflict with it.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
USDA Non-Discrimination Policy
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and USDA civil rights
regulations and policies, the USDA, its agencies, offices, and
employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA
programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color,
national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender
expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status,
family or parental status, income derived from a public assistance
program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil
rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA
(not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing
deadlines vary by program or incident.
Individuals who require alternative means of communication for
program information (for example, braille, large print, audiotape,
American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible agency or
the USDA TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and text telephone
(TTY)) or dial 711 for Telecommunications Relay Service (both voice and
text telephone users can initiate this call from any telephone).
Additionally, program information may be made available in languages
other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA
Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at https://www.usda.gov/oascr/how-to-file-a-program-discrimination-complaint and
at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in
the letter all the information requested in the form. To request a copy
of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form
or letter to USDA by: (1) mail to: U.S. Department
[[Page 68322]]
of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202)
690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected].
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
List of Subjects
2 CFR Part 400
Administration of Federal financial assistance, Administrative
practice and procedure, Federal financial assistance programs
2 CFR Part 401
Federal financial assistance programs, Construction Industry
2 CFR Part 415
Agriculture programs, Administration of Federal financial
assistance, Administrative practice and procedure
2 CFR Part 416
Agriculture programs, Administration of Federal financial
assistance, Administrative practice and procedure, Government
procurement procedure
2 CFR Part 417
Administrative practice and procedure; Grant programs; Loan
programs; Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
2 CFR Part 418
Lobbying procedures, Administration of Federal financial
assistance, Government procurement procedure
2 CFR Part 421
Administration of Federal financial assistance, Administrative
practice and procedure, Drugs
2 CFR Part 422
Agricultural research, Administration of Federal financial
assistance, Administrative practice and procedure
2 CFR Part 423
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Administration of Federal
financial assistance
Accordingly, USDA amends 2 CFR Chapter IV as follows:
0
1. Revise part 400 to read as follows:
PART 400--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
Sec.
400.0 Definitions.
400.1 Applicability.
400.2 Conflict of interest.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 2 CFR part 200.
Sec. 400.0 Definitions.
The definitions in this part are for terms used in this chapter,
and to define for USDA terms present in 2 CFR Subtitle A but not
defined in that subtitle. Different definitions may be found in Federal
statutes, regulations, or other sources that apply more specifically to
particular programs or activities. Where parts of this chapter provide
alternate definitions than those in this part, those definitions take
precedence over any definition in this part. For terms used in this
chapter that are not defined in this part, the definitions in 2 CFR
part 200 apply. All terms not otherwise defined will use the dictionary
definition.
Audiovisual means a product containing visual imagery or sound or
both. Examples of audiovisuals are motion pictures, live or prerecorded
radio or television programs, slide shows, filmstrips, audio
recordings, and multimedia presentations.
Awarding official means a person with the authority to enter into,
administer, and/or terminate financial assistance awards and make
related determinations and findings.
Construction means construction, alteration, or repair (including
dredging, excavating, and painting) of buildings, structures, or other
real property. For purposes of this definition, the terms ``buildings,
structures, or other real property'' include, but are not limited to,
improvements of all types, such as bridges, dams, plants, highways,
parkways, streets, subways, tunnels, sewers, mains, power lines,
cemeteries, pumping stations, railways, airport facilities, terminals,
docks, piers, wharves, ways, lighthouses, buoys, jetties, breakwaters,
levees, canals, and channels. For the purposes of 2 CFR part 184,
construction also encompasses structures, facilities, and equipment
incorporated into an infrastructure project regardless of whether they
constitute real property.
Department means the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Discretionary award means an award in which the Federal awarding
agency, in keeping with specific statutory authority that enables the
agency to exercise judgment (``discretion''), selects the recipient
and/or the amount of Federal funding awarded through a competitive
process or based on merit of proposals. A discretionary award may be
selected by a USDA awarding agency on a non-competitive basis
exclusively under the conditions set forth at 2 CFR 415.1.
Eligible applications means those materials which have been
submitted by a recipient for consideration for an award of Federal
financial assistance and have been determined to comply with the
minimum documentation and other requirements, which may be identified
in respective notices of funding opportunities and applicable Federal
statutes or regulations that apply more specifically to particular
programs or activities.
Federal financial assistance support means the transfer of anything
of value by a USDA awarding agency through a Federal financial
assistance instrument as defined at 2 CFR part 200.1, inclusive of
Federally funded subawards and subcontracts under such instruments, to
a recipient. Such support may be provided as a cash or in-kind
contribution.
Geospatial data means information that is tied to a location on the
Earth, including by identifying the geographic location and
characteristics of natural or constructed features and boundaries on
the Earth, and that is generally represented in vector datasets by
points, lines, polygons, or other complex geographic features or
phenomena; may be derived from, among other things, remote sensing,
mapping, and surveying technologies; includes images and raster
datasets, aerial photographs, and other forms of geospatial data or
datasets in digitized or non-digitized form.
Information means any communication or representation of knowledge,
such as facts, data, or opinions in any medium or form, including
textual, numerical, graphic, cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual
forms.
Information dissemination product means any recorded information,
regardless of physical form or characteristics, disseminated to the
public.
Maintenance means those activities conducted for the repair or
upkeep of buildings, structures, facilities, and equipment which
neither add to the permanent value of the property nor appreciably
prolong its intended life, but keep it in an efficient operating
condition.
Production of an audiovisual means any steps that lead to a
finished audiovisual, including but not limited to design, layout,
script-writing, filming, editing, fabrication, sound recording or
taping. The term does not include the placing of captions to make
accessible films or videotapes not originally produced for use by
individuals who are Deaf or hard of hearing.
Secretary means the Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture.
USDA means the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
[[Page 68323]]
USDA awarding agency means any component agency or staff office of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture which provides any Federal financial
assistance to or executes a Federal financial assistance instrument
with a recipient.
Sec. 400.1 Applicability.
This part adopts the OMB guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR
part 200, as supplemented by this chapter, as USDA policies and
procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles,
and audit requirements for Federal awards. It thereby gives regulatory
effect for the USDA to the OMB guidance, as supplemented by this
chapter.
Sec. 400.2 Conflict of interest.
(a) Each USDA awarding agency must establish conflict of interest
policies for its Federal financial assistance actions. Each USDA
awarding agency employee must comply with the requirements set forth at
5 CFR part 2635, as well as 5 CFR part 8301 where applicable, when the
USDA employee takes any action related to Federal financial assistance.
(b) Recipients must disclose in writing any potential conflicts of
interest to the USDA awarding agency or pass-through entity.
(1) Recipients must maintain written standards of conduct covering
conflicts of interest and governing the performance of their employees
in the selection, award and administration of Federal awards. No
employee, officer or agent may participate in the selection, award, or
administration of a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent
conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the
employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family,
his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to
employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other
interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered
for a Federal award. The recipient may set standards for situations in
which the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an
unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must
provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such
standards by officers, employees, or agents of the recipient.
(2) If the recipient has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary
organization that is not a state, local government, or Indian tribe,
the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct
covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts
of interest means that because of the relationships with a parent
company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the recipient is unable
or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a Federal award
action involving a related organization.
(3) Recipients must establish internal controls that include, at a
minimum, procedures to identify, disclose, and mitigate or eliminate
identified conflicts of interest. Recipients are responsible for
notifying the respective USDA awarding agency in writing of any
conflicts of interest that may arise during the period of performance
of an award, including those which have been reported by subrecipients,
no later than 5 calendar days following discovery. Upon receipt of such
a disclosure, the respective USDA awarding agency must review and make
a determination in writing if a potential or real conflict of interest
exists and develop a plan for addressing or mitigating the issue, which
may include remedies found at 2 CFR 200.339. USDA awarding agencies
must make a determination within 30 calendar days of disclosure unless
a longer period of time is necessary due to the complexity of the
situation.
0
2. Add part 401 to read as follows:
PART 401--BUY AMERICA PREFERENCES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Sec.
401.1 What does this part do?
401.2 Waivers.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Pub. L. 117-58, 135 Stat. 1294; 2 CFR
part 184; 2 CFR part 200.
Sec. 401.1 What does this part do?
This part identifies the USDA policy for the implementation of
waivers to the domestic content procurement preferences as required by
2 CFR 184.7(b).
Sec. 401.2 Waivers.
On its public website, USDA must maintain waiver request submission
instructions and guidance on the format, contents, and supporting
materials required for waiver requests by which:
(a) USDA awarding agencies may request waivers to the application
of the Buy America Preference; and,
(b) Prime recipients and subrecipients may request project-specific
waivers from the respective USDA awarding agencies to the application
of the Buy America Preference.
0
3. Revise part 415 to read as follows:
PART 415--GENERAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
Sec.
Subpart A--Application for Federal Assistance
415.1 Administrative standards for discretionary grants and
cooperative agreements.
Subpart B-- Miscellaneous
415.2 Acknowledgement of USDA Support on Information Dissemination
Products.
Subpart C--Intergovernmental Review of Department of Agriculture
Programs and Activities
415.3 Purpose.
415.4 Definitions.
415.5 Applicability.
415.6 Secretary's general responsibilities.
415.7 Federal interagency coordination.
415.8 State selection of programs and activities.
415.9 Communication with State and local elected officials.
415.10 State comments on proposed Federal financial assistance and
direct Federal development.
415.11 Processing comments.
415.12 Accommodation of intergovernmental concerns.
415.13 Interstate situations.
415.14 Simplification, consolidation, or substitution of State
plans.
415.15 Waivers.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 901-903; 2 CFR part 200; 7
CFR 2.28.
Subpart A--Application for Federal Assistance
Sec. 415.1 Administrative standards for discretionary grants and
cooperative agreements.
(a) All USDA awarding agencies must demonstrate a commitment to
encouraging free and open competition in all discretionary grant and
cooperative agreement funding opportunities. USDA awarding agencies
must ensure that all eligible applications for discretionary grants and
cooperative agreements receive fair and impartial review, be evaluated
only on criteria as stated in the respective notice of funding
opportunity, and that no applicant receive an unfair advantage.
(b) USDA awarding agencies must enter into discretionary grants and
cooperative agreements only after competition. Exceptions to this
requirement may only be made by USDA awarding agencies where expressly
provided by statute, when directed by Congress, where the requirement
is determined to be inconsistent with international assistance
objectives of USDA, or as specified in paragraph (d) of this section or
as approved by the Secretary and OMB under paragraph (e). A USDA
awarding agency's competitive award process must adhere to the
following standards:
[[Page 68324]]
(1) All notices of funding opportunities for discretionary grants
and cooperative agreements must be published on Grants.gov as described
in 2 CFR 200.204(a). When notices of funding opportunities contain an
information collection requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) or its implementing regulations at 5 CFR
part 1320, USDA awarding agencies must seek and obtain OMB approval
before collecting information from the public.
(i) Supplementary to the requirements at paragraph (b)(1), USDA
awarding agencies may make use of other methods of disseminating public
information concerning notices of funding opportunities. In doing so,
USDA awarding agencies must:
(A) Pursue the broadest dissemination of information concerning
notices of funding opportunities in order to reach the greatest number
and diversity of potential applicants.
(B) Avoid any appearance that an unfair advantage has been provided
to any entity, inclusive of the memberships or networks of such
entities, which may arise from the use of any dissemination method.
(C) Provide only public information concerning notices of funding
opportunities.
(D) Seek the greatest cost savings to the Government, whenever
possible.
(ii) Nothing in this part will be interpreted as to limit, impede,
or otherwise prevent the attendance of any USDA awarding agency's
staff, acting in their official capacity, at a conference, event, or
similar activity, for the purposes of disseminating public information
concerning notices of funding opportunities.
(2) Applications must be evaluated objectively by independent
reviewers in accordance with evaluation criteria set forth in writing
by the USDA awarding agency. USDA awarding agencies must establish
written procedures to gain reasonable assurance that individuals
selected to serve as independent reviewers are qualified to conduct any
assigned review activity and that applications are scored by
independent reviewers solely on the basis of criteria announced in the
respective published notice of funding opportunity. Independent
reviewers must make written comments or make a written determination of
scoring, as appropriate, concerning each application to which they are
assigned.
(i) Independent reviewers may be from the private or public sector,
including another Federal agency, or within the awarding agency.
Independent reviewers must not be any individual who holds or has been
delegated approval or award authority for the applications being
reviewed or components thereof.
(ii) Anyone who has or might appear to have a conflict of interest
with any element of an application considered for selection or funding
will be ineligible to serve as an independent reviewer. A conflict of
interest might arise when the prospective independent reviewer, the
reviewer's immediate family members, or the reviewer's partner, have
been associated with the applicant or applicant organization within the
past two years as an owner, partner, officer, director, employee, or
consultant; has any financial or other interest in or tangible personal
benefit from the applicant or applicant organizations; or is
negotiating for, or has any arrangement, concerning prospective
employment.
(3) Notwithstanding this paragraph (b), unless directed by Congress
or authorized by statute, USDA awarding agencies may, but are not
required to, review, evaluate for eligibility, or otherwise consider
for funding any unsolicited application, proposal materials, ideas,
pitches, or any other request for Federal funds provided by any entity
for the purpose of obtaining Federal financial assistance.
(c) The final decision to award is at the discretion of the
awarding official in each USDA awarding agency. The awarding official
must consider the ranking, comments, and recommendations from the
respective independent reviewers, and any other pertinent information
before deciding which applications to approve and their order of
approval. Any appeals by applicants regarding the awarding decision
must be handled by the awarding agency using existing, written agency
appeal procedures.
(d) The awarding official may make a determination that competition
is not deemed appropriate for a particular transaction. Such
determination must be made in writing on a case-by-case basis and be
limited to transactions where it can be adequately justified that a
noncompetitive award is in the best interest of the Government and
necessary to the accomplishment of the goals of USDA. Reasons for
considering noncompetitive awards are:
(1) Nonmonetary awards of property or services.
(2) Awards of less than $100,000.
(3) Awards to fund continuing work already started under a previous
award for which competition for continued support would have a
significant adverse effect on continuity or completion of the activity.
(4) Time constraints associated with a public health, safety,
welfare, or national security requirement preclude competition.
(e) USDA awarding agencies may establish alternate exceptions from
competition for discretionary awards. All such alternative exceptions
will be subject to review and approval both by the Secretary and by
OMB, pursuant to pursuant to 2 CFR 200.102, and 2 CFR 200.107 when
applicable, and publicly set forth in writing by the USDA awarding
agency.
(f) All actions taken USDA awarding agencies for the purpose of
accomplishing any element of Federal financial assistance programs,
awards, and any related or subsequent transactions, must comply with
the direction set forth in Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
Policy Letter 11-01 and successor policy regarding the performance of
inherently governmental and critical functions.
Subpart B--Miscellaneous
Sec. 415.2 Acknowledgement of USDA support on information
dissemination products.
Recipients must have an acknowledgement of USDA awarding agency
support placed on any information dissemination products produced with
any Federal financial assistance support, including those which report
the results or, or describe, a Federal financial assistance-supported
activity.
(a) Unless the provisions of the Federal financial assistance award
make it apply, this requirement does not apply to:
(1) Audiovisuals produced as research instruments or for
documenting experimentation or findings and not intended for
presentation or distribution to the public.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) USDA awarding agencies must require award terms and conditions
imposed for the specific purpose of complying with law, regulation, or
USDA policy, related to the acknowledgement of USDA awarding agency
Federal financial assistance support.
Subpart C--Intergovernmental Review of Department of Agriculture
Programs and Activities
Sec. 415.3 Purpose.
(a) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372,
``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs'', issued July 14, 1982,
and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement
applicable
[[Page 68325]]
provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of
1968 and section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan
Development Act of 1966.
(b) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on State processes
and on State, areawide, regional and local coordination for review of
proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development.
(c) The regulations are intended to aid the internal management of
the Department, and are not intended to create any right or benefit
enforceable at law by a party against the Department or its officers.
Sec. 415.4 Definitions.
As used in this part, the following definitions apply:
Order means Executive Order 12372, issued July 14, 1982, and
amended April 8, 1983, and titled Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.
State means any of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sec. 415.5 Applicability.
The Secretary must publish, no less than annually, a list of the
Department's programs and activities that are subject to these
regulations and identifies which of these are subject to the
requirements of section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and
Metropolitan Development Act. This list must be available on the USDA's
public website.
Sec. 415.6 Secretary's general responsibilities.
(a) The Secretary provides opportunities for consultation by
elected officials of those State and local governments that would
provide the non-Federal funds for, or that would be directly affected
by, proposed Federal financial assistance from, or direct Federal
development by, the Department.
(b) If a State adopts a process under the Order to review and
coordinate proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal
development, the Secretary, to the extent permitted by law:
(1) Uses the State process to determine official views of State and
local elected officials;
(2) Communicates with State and local elected officials as early in
a program planning cycle as is reasonably feasible to explain specific
plans and actions;
(3) Makes efforts to accommodate State and local elected officials'
concerns with proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal
development that are communicated through the State process;
(4) Allows the States to simplify and consolidate existing
Federally required State plan submissions;
(5) Where State planning and budgeting systems are sufficient and
where permitted by law, encourages the substitution of State plans for
Federally required State plans;
(6) Seeks the coordination of views of affected State and local
elected officials in one State with those of another State when
proposed Federal financial assistance or direct Federal development has
an impact on interstate metropolitan urban centers or other interstate
areas; and
(7) Supports State and local governments by discouraging the
reauthorization or creation of any planning organization which is
Federally funded, which has a limited purpose, and which is not
adequately representative of, or accountable to, State or local elected
officials.
Sec. 415.7 Federal interagency coordination.
The Secretary, to the extent practicable, consults with and seeks
advice from all other substantially affected Federal departments and
agencies in an effort to assure full coordination between such agencies
and the Department regarding programs and activities covered under
these regulations.
Sec. 415.8 State selection of programs and activities.
(a) A State may select any program or activity published in the
Federal Register or on Grants.gov, in accordance with Sec. 415.5 for
intergovernmental review under these regulations. Each State, before
selecting programs and activities, must consult with local elected
officials.
(b) Each State that adopts a process must notify the Secretary of
the Department's programs and activities selected for that process.
(c) A State may notify the Secretary of changes in its selections
at any time. For each change, the State must submit to the Secretary an
assurance that the State has consulted with elected local officials
regarding the change. The Department may establish deadlines by which
States are required to inform the Secretary of changes in their program
selections.
(d) The Secretary uses a State's process as soon as feasible,
depending on individual programs and activities, after the Secretary is
notified of its selections.
Sec. 415.9 Communication with State and local elected officials.
(a) The Secretary provides notice to directly affected State,
areawide, regional, and local entities in a State of proposed Federal
financial assistance or direct Federal development if:
(1) The State has not adopted a process under the Order; or
(2) The assistance or development involves a program or an activity
that is not covered under the State process.
(b) This notice may be made by publication in the Federal Register
or other appropriate means, which the Department in its discretion
deems appropriate.
(c) In order to facilitate communication with State and local
officials the Secretary has established an office within the Department
to receive all communications pertinent to this Order. Communications
should be sent to:
(1) The Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Room 143-W, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250, Attention: E.O. 12372;
or,
(2) As identified on the USDA's public website, an email address
for electronic communications.
Sec. 415.10 State comments on proposed Federal financial assistance
and direct Federal development.
(a) Except in unusual circumstances, the Secretary gives State
processes or directly affected State, areawide, regional, and local
officials and entities:
(1) At least 30 days from the date established by the Secretary to
comment on proposed Federal financial assistance in the form of
noncompetitive continuation awards; and
(2) At least 60 days from the date established by the Secretary to
comment on proposed direct Federal development or Federal financial
assistance other than noncompetitive continuation awards.
(b) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the
review, coordination and communication with the Department have been
delegated.
(c) Applicants for programs and activities subject to section 204
of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act must allow
areawide agencies a 60-day opportunity for review and comment.
Sec. 415.11 Processing comments.
(a) The Secretary follows the procedures in Sec. 415.12 if:
(1) A State office or official is designated to act as a single
point of
[[Page 68326]]
contact between a State process and all Federal agencies; and
(2) That office or official transmits a State process
recommendation for a program selected under Sec. 415.8.
(b)(1) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit
comments from State, areawide, regional or local officials and entities
where there is no State process recommendation.
(2) If a State process recommendation is transmitted by a single
point of contact, all comments from State, areawide, regional and local
officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
(c) If a State has not established a process, or is unable to
submit a State process recommendation, State, areawide, regional and
local officials and entities may submit comments either to the
applicant or to the Department.
(d) If a program or activity is not selected by a State process,
State, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit
comments either to the applicant or to the Department. In addition, if
a State process recommendation for a non-selected program or activity
is transmitted to the Department by the single point of contact, the
Secretary follows the procedures of Sec. 415.12.
(e) The Secretary considers comments which do not constitute a
State process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for
which the Secretary is not required to apply the procedures of Sec.
415.12, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact by
the applicant, or directly to the Department by a commenting party.
Sec. 415.12 Accommodation of intergovernmental concerns.
(a) If a State process provides a State process recommendation to
the Department through its single point of contact, the Secretary
either--
(1) Accepts the recommendations;
(2) Reaches a mutually agreeable solution with the State process;
or
(3) Provides the single point of contact with a written explanation
of the decision, as determined by the Secretary. The Secretary may also
supplement the written explanation by also providing the explanation to
the single point of contact by telephone, other telecommunication, or
other means.
(b) In any explanation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the
Secretary informs the single point of contact that:
(1) The Department will not implement its decision for at least ten
days after the single point of contact receives the explanation; or
(2) The Secretary has reviewed the decision and determined that,
because of unusual circumstances, the waiting period of at least ten
days is not feasible.
(c) For purposes of computing the waiting period under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, a single point of contact is presumed to have
received written notification five days after the date of mailing of
such notification.
Sec. 415.13 Interstate situations.
(a) The Secretary is responsible for:
(1) Identifying proposed Federal financial assistance and direct
Federal development that have an impact on interstate areas;
(2) Notifying appropriate officials in States which have adopted a
process and which selected the Department's program or activity;
(3) Making efforts to identify and notify the affected State,
areawide, regional and local officials and entities in those States
that have not adopted a process under the Order or do not select the
Department's program or activity; and
(4) Responding, pursuant to Sec. 415.12, if the Secretary receives
a recommendation from a designated areawide agency transmitted by a
single point of contact, in cases in which the review, coordination,
and communication with the Department have been delegated.
(b) The Secretary uses the procedures in Sec. 415.12 if a State
process provides a State process recommendation to the Department
through a single point of contact.
Sec. 415.14 Simplification, consolidation, or substitution of State
plans.
(a) As used in this section:
(1) Simplify means that a State may develop its own format, choose
its own submission date, and select the planning period for a State
plan.
(2) Consolidate means that a State may meet statutory and
regulatory requirements by combining two or more plans into one
document and that the State can select the format, submission date, and
the planning period for the consolidated plan.
(3) Substitute means that a State may use a plan or other document
that it has developed for its own purposes to meet Federal
requirements.
(b) If not inconsistent with law, a State may decide to try to
simplify, consolidate, or substitute Federally required State plans
without prior approval by the Secretary.
(c) The Secretary reviews each State plan a State has simplified,
consolidated or substituted and accepts the plan only if its contents
meet Federal requirements.
Sec. 415.15 Waivers.
In an emergency, the Secretary may waive any provision in Subpart
C--Intergovernmental Review of Department of Agriculture Programs and
Activities, 2 CFR 415.3 to 415.14.
0
4. Revise part 416 to read as follows:
PART 416--GENERAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS FOR GRANTS AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Sec.
416.1 Special procurement provisions.
416.2 [Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 901-903; 7 CFR 2.28.
Sec. 416.1 Special procurement provisions.
(a) In order to ensure objective contractor performance and
eliminate unfair competitive advantage, a prospective contractor that
develops or drafts specifications, requirements, statements of work,
invitations for bids, request for proposals, contract term and
conditions or other documents for use by a State in conducting a
procurement under the USDA entitlement programs specified in 2 CFR
200.101(f)(4) through (7) must be excluded from competing for such
procurements. Such prospective contractors are ineligible for contract
awards resulting from such procurements regardless of the procurement
method used. However, prospective contractors may provide States with
specification information related to a State procurement under the USDA
entitlement programs specified in 2 CFR 200.101(f)(4) through (7) and
still compete for the procurement if the State, and not the prospective
contractor, develops or drafts the specifications, requirements,
statements of work, invitations for bid, and/or requests for proposals
used to conduct the procurement.
(b) Procurements by States under USDA entitlement programs
specified in 2 CFR 200.101(f)(4) through (7) must be conducted in a
manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively
imposed in-State or local geographic preferences.
Sec. 416.2 [Reserved]
0
5. Revise part 417 to read as follows:
PART 417--NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Sec.
417.10 What does this part do?
417.20 Does this part apply to me?
417.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?
[[Page 68327]]
Subpart A--General
417.137 Who in the USDA may grant an exception to let an excluded
person participate in a covered transaction?
Subpart B--Covered Transactions
417.210 Which nonprocurement transactions are covered transactions?
417.215 Which nonprocurement transactions, in addition to those
listed in 2 CFR 180.215, are not covered transactions?
417.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered
transactions?
417.221 How would the exclusions from coverage for the USDA's
foreign assistance programs apply?
417.222 How would the exclusions from coverage for the USDA's export
credit guarantee and direct credit programs apply?
Subpart C--Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions
417.332 What methods must I use to pass down requirements to
participants in lower-tier covered transactions with whom I intend
to do business?
Subpart D--Responsibilities of Department of Agriculture Officials
Regarding Transactions
417.437 What method do I use to communicate to a participant the
requirements described in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?
Subpart E--[Reserved]
Subpart F--[Reserved]
Subpart G--Suspension
417.755 When will I know whether the USDA suspension is continued or
terminated?
Subpart H--Debarment
417.865 How long may my debarment last?
417.870 When do I know if the USDA debarring official debars me?
Subpart I--Definitions
417.930 Debarring official (USDA supplement to government-wide
definition at 2 CFR 180.930).
417.935 Disqualified (USDA supplement to government-wide definition
at 2 CFR 180.935).
417.1010 Suspending official (USDA supplement to government-wide
definition at 2 CFR 180.1010).
Subpart J--[Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 2209j; Sec. 2455, Pub. L.
103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); Pub. L. 101-576, 104
Stat. 2838; E.O. 12549 (51 FR 6370, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O.
12689 (54 FR 34131, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 235); 2 CFR part 180; 7
CFR 2.28.
Sec. 417.10 What does this part do?
This part adopts the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR
part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the USDA policies and
procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby
gives regulatory effect for the USDA to the OMB guidance, as
supplemented by this part. For any section of OMB guidance in subparts
A through I of 2 CFR part 180 that has no corresponding section in this
part, USDA policies and procedures are those in the OMB guidance. This
part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549,
``Debarment and Suspension'' (3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive
Order 12689, ``Debarment and Suspension'' (3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 235)
and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat.
3327).
Sec. 417.20 Does this part apply to me?
Through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in
subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b))
apply to you if you are a:
(a) Participant or principal in a ``covered transaction'' (see
subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of ``nonprocurement
transaction'' at 2 CFR 180.970, as supplemented by Sec. Sec. 417.215
and 417.220);
(b) Respondent in a USDA debarment and suspension action;
(c) USDA debarment or suspension official; or
(d) USDA grants officer, agreements officer, or other official
authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is
a covered transaction.
Sec. 417.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?
The USDA policies and procedures that you must follow are the
policies and procedures specified in this regulation and each
applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR
part 180, as that section is supplemented by the section in this part
with the same section number. The contracts that are covered
transactions, for example, are specified by 2 CFR 180.220 as
supplemented by Sec. 417.220. For any section of OMB guidance in
subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 that has no corresponding
section in this part, USDA policies and procedures are those in the OMB
guidance.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 417.137 Who in the USDA may grant an exception to let an
excluded person participate in a covered transaction?
Within the USDA, a debarring official may grant an exception to let
an excluded person participate in a covered transaction as provided
under 2 CFR 180.135.
Subpart B--Covered Transactions
Sec. 417.210 Which nonprocurement transactions are covered
transactions?
All nonprocurement transactions, as defined in 2 CFR 180.970, are
covered transactions unless listed in Sec. 417.215.
Sec. 417.215 Which nonprocurement transactions, in addition to those
listed in 2 CFR 180.215, are not covered transactions?
(a) Transactions not covered. In addition to the nonprocurement
transactions listed in 2 CFR 180.215, the following nonprocurement
transactions are not covered transactions:
(1) An entitlement or mandatory award required by a statute,
including a lower tier entitlement or mandatory award that is required
by a statute.
(2) The export or substitution of Federal timber governed by the
Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990, 16
U.S.C. 620 et seq. (The ``Export Act''), which prevents a debarred
person from entering into any contract for the purchase of unprocessed
timber from Federal lands. See 16 U.S.C. 620d(d)(1)(A).
(3) The receipt of licenses, permits, certificates, and
indemnification under regulatory programs conducted in the interest of
public health and safety, and animal and plant health and safety.
(4) The receipt of official grading and inspection services, animal
damage control services, public health and safety inspection services,
and animal and plant health and safety inspection services.
(5) If the person is a State or local government, the provision of
official grading and inspection services, animal damage control
services, animal and plant health and safety inspection services.
(6) The receipt of licenses, permits, or certificates under
regulatory programs conducted in the interest of ensuring fair trade
practices.
(7) Permits, licenses, exchanges and other acquisitions of real
property, rights of way, and easements under natural resource
management programs.
(8) Any transaction to be implemented outside the United States
that is below the primary tier covered transaction in a USDA foreign
assistance program.
(9) Any transaction to be implemented outside the United States
that is below the primary tier covered transaction in a USDA export
credit guarantee program or direct credit program.
(b) Limited requirement to check SAM.gov. Notwithstanding the fact
that transactions to be implemented outside
[[Page 68328]]
the United States that are below the primary tier covered transaction
in a USDA foreign assistance program, export credit guarantee program
or direct credit program are not covered transactions, pursuant to
paragraphs (a)(8) and (9) of this section, primary tier participants
under these programs must check SAM.gov prior to entering into any
transaction with a person at the first lower tier and must not enter
into such a transaction if the person is excluded or disqualified in
SAM.gov.
(c) Exception. A cause for suspension or debarment under 2 CFR
180.700 or 2 CFR 180.800 may be based on the actions of a person with
respect to a procurement or nonprocurement transaction under a USDA
program even if such transaction has been excluded from covered
transaction status by this section or Sec. 417.220.
Sec. 417.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered
transactions?
In addition to the procurement contracts listed in 2 CFR 180.220,
the following procurement contracts are covered transactions:
(a) Specifically, a contract for goods or services is a covered
transaction if any of the following applies:
(1) The contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement
transaction covered under Sec. 417.210, and the contract amount is
expected to equal or exceed $25,000.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Any procurement contract to be implemented outside the United
States that is below the primary tier covered transaction in a USDA
foreign assistance program is not a covered transaction,
notwithstanding the provisions in 2 CFR 180.220(a) and 2 CFR 180.220(b)
and paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Any procurement contract to be implemented outside the United
States that is below the primary tier covered transaction in a USDA
export credit guarantee program or direct credit program is not a
covered transaction, notwithstanding the provisions in 2 CFR 180.220(a)
and 2 CFR 180.220(b) and paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Notwithstanding the fact that procurement contracts to be
implemented outside the United States that are below the primary tier
covered transaction in a USDA foreign assistance program, export credit
guarantee program or direct credit program are not covered
transactions, pursuant to paragraph (b) and (c) of this section,
primary tier participants under these programs must check SAM.gov prior
to entering into any procurement contract that is expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 with a person at the first lower tier and must not enter
into such a procurement contract if the person is excluded or
disqualified in SAM.gov.
Sec. 417.221 How would the exclusions from coverage for the USDA's
foreign assistance programs apply?
The primary tier covered transaction would be the food aid grant
agreement entered into between USDA and a program participant, such as
a U.S. private voluntary organization. USDA would have to check SAM.gov
before entering into the food aid grant agreement to ensure that the
U.S. private voluntary organization that would be the primary tier
participant is not excluded or disqualified. A transaction at the first
lower tier might be a subrecipient agreement between the U.S. private
voluntary organization and a foreign subrecipient of the commodities
that were provided under the food aid grant agreement. Pursuant to
Sec. 417.215(a)(8), this nonprocurement transaction would not be a
covered transaction. In addition, a transaction at the first lower tier
might be a procurement contract entered into between the U.S. private
voluntary organization and a foreign entity to provide supplies or
services that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 in value and that
are needed by such organization to implement activities under the food
aid grant agreement. Pursuant to Sec. 417.220(b), this procurement
contract would not be a covered transaction. However, pursuant to
Sec. Sec. 417.215(b) and 417.220(d), the U.S. private voluntary
organization would be prohibited from entering into, at the first lower
tier, an agreement with a subrecipient or a procurement contract that
is expected to equal or exceed $25,000 with an entity that appears in
SAM.gov as excluded or disqualified.
Sec. 417.222 How would the exclusions from coverage for the USDA's
export credit guarantee and direct credit programs apply?
(a) Export credit guarantee program. In the case of the export
credit guarantee program, the primary tier covered transaction would be
the guarantee issued by the USDA to a U.S. exporter. The U.S. exporter
usually assigns the guarantee to a U.S. financial institution, and this
would create another primary tier covered transaction between USDA and
the U.S. financial institution. USDA would have to check the SAM.gov
before issuing a guarantee or accepting a guarantee assignment to
ensure that the U.S. exporter or financial institution that would be
the primary tier participant is not excluded or disqualified. A
transaction at the first lower tier under the export credit guarantee
program might be a payment obligation of a foreign bank to the U.S.
exporter to pay on behalf of the importer for the exported U.S.
commodities that are covered by the guarantee. Similarly, a transaction
at the first lower tier might be a payment obligation of a foreign bank
under an instrument, such as a loan agreement or letter of credit, to
the U.S. financial institution assigned the guarantee, which has paid
the exporter for the exported U.S. commodities and, in so doing, issued
a loan to the foreign bank, which the foreign bank is obligated to
repay on deferred payment terms. Pursuant to Sec. 417.215(a)(9), these
nonprocurement transactions would not be covered transactions. In
addition, a transaction at the first lower tier under the export credit
guarantee program might be a procurement contract (i.e., a contract for
the purchase and sale of goods) that is expected to equal or exceed
$25,000 entered into between the U.S. exporter and the foreign importer
for the U.S. commodities, the payment for which is covered by the
guarantee. Pursuant to Sec. 417.220(c), this procurement contract
would not be a covered transaction. However, pursuant to Sec. Sec.
417.215(b) and 417.220(d), the U.S. exporter or U.S. financial
institution would be prohibited from entering into, at the first lower
tier, an agreement with an importer (or intervening purchaser) or
foreign bank or a procurement contract that is expected to equal or
exceed $25,000 with an entity that appears on the SAM.gov as excluded
or disqualified.
(b) Direct credit program. In the case of the direct credit
program, the primary tier covered transaction would be the financing
agreement between the USDA and the U.S. exporter. USDA purchases the
exporter's account receivable in a particular transaction pursuant to
the financing agreement. On occasion, such a transaction may
contemplate a payment obligation of a U.S. or foreign bank to make the
required payments. USDA would have to check SAM.gov before entering
into a financing agreement or accepting such a payor to ensure that the
U.S. exporter or the bank, if any, that would be the primary tier
participant is not excluded or disqualified. A transaction at the first
lower tier might be a payment obligation of the importer to pay the
exporter for the exported U.S. commodities that are covered by the
financing agreement. Pursuant to Sec. 417.215(a)(9), this
nonprocurement transaction would not be a covered transaction. In
addition, a transaction at the first lower tier might be a procurement
contract that is
[[Page 68329]]
expected to equal or exceed $25,000 entered into between the U.S.
exporter and the foreign importer for the U.S. commodities, the payment
for which is covered by the financing agreement. Pursuant to Sec.
417.220(c), this procurement contract would not be a covered
transaction. However, pursuant to Sec. Sec. 417.215(b) and 417.220(d),
the U.S. exporter would be prohibited from entering into, at the first
lower tier, an agreement with an importer (or intervening purchaser) or
bank, or a procurement contract that is expected to equal or exceed
$25,000 with an entity that appears in SAM.gov as excluded or
disqualified.
Subpart C--Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions
Sec. 417.332 What methods must I use to pass down requirements to
participants in lower-tier covered transactions with whom I intend to
do business?
You as a participant must include a term or condition in lower tier
covered transactions requiring lower tier participants to comply with
subpart C of the OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by
subpart C of this part.
Subpart D--Responsibilities of Department of Agriculture Officials
Regarding Transactions
Sec. 417.437 What method do I use to communicate to a participant the
requirements described in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?
To communicate to a participant the requirements described in 2 CFR
180.435, you must include a term or condition in the transaction that
requires the participant's compliance with subpart C of 2 CFR part 180,
as supplemented by subpart C of this part, and requires the participant
to include a similar term or condition in lower tier covered
transactions.
Subpart E--[Reserved]
Subpart F--[Reserved]
Subpart G--Suspension
Sec. 417.755 When will I know whether the USDA suspension is
continued or terminated?
The record will remain open for the full 30 days, as called for in
2 CFR 180.725, even when you make a submission before the 30 days
expire.
Subpart H--Debarment
Sec. 417.865 How long may my debarment last?
The Secretary must permanently debar from participation in USDA
programs any individual, organization, corporation, or other entity
convicted of a felony for knowingly defrauding the United States in
connection with any program administered by USDA.
(a) Reduction. A debarment under this paragraph may be reduced by
the Secretary to a period of not less than 10 years.
(b) Exemption. A debarment under this paragraph will not apply with
regard to participation in USDA domestic food assistance programs. For
purposes of this paragraph, participation in a domestic food assistance
program does not include acting as an authorized retail food store in
the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants, and
Children (WIC), or as a nonbeneficiary entity in any of the domestic
food assistance programs. The programs include:
(1) Special Nutrition Assistance Program, 7 U.S.C. 2011, et seq.;
(2) Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations, 7 U.S.C.
2013(b);
(3) National School Lunch Program, 42 U.S.C. 1751, et seq.;
(4) Summer Food Service Program for Children, 42 U.S.C. 1761; Child
and Adult Care Food Program, 42 U.S.C. 1766;
(5) Special Milk Program for Children, 42 U.S.C. 1772; School
Breakfast Program, 42 U.S.C. 1773;
(6) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and
Children, 42 U.S.C. 1786;
(7) Commodity Supplemental Food Program, 42 U.S.C. 612c note;
(8) WIC Farmers Market Nutrition Program, 42 U.S.C. 1786;
(9) Senior Farmers' Market Nutrition Program, 7 U.S.C. 3007; and
(10) Emergency Food Assistance Program, 7 U.S.C. 7501, et seq.
Sec. 417.870 When do I know if the USDA debarring official debars me?
The record will remain open for the full 30 days, as called for in
2 CFR 180.820, even when you make a submission before the 30 days
expire.
Subpart I--Definitions
Sec. 417.930 Debarring official (USDA supplement to government-wide
definition at 2 CFR 180.930).
The head of an organizational unit within USDA (e.g.,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service), who has been delegated
authority in 7 CFR part 2 to carry out a covered transaction, is
delegated authority to act as the debarring official in connection with
such transaction. This authority to act as a debarring official may not
be redelegated below the head of the organizational unit, except that,
in the case of the Forest Service, the Chief may redelegate the
authority to act as a debarring official to the Deputy Chief for the
National Forest System or an Associate Deputy Chief for the National
Forest System.
Sec. 417.935 Disqualified (USDA supplement to government-wide
definition at 2 CFR 180.935).
Disqualified means that a person is prohibited from participating
in specified Federal procurement or nonprocurement transactions as
required under a statute, Executive order (other than Executive Orders
12549 and 12689), or other authority. Examples of disqualifications
include persons prohibited under--
(a) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3142);
(b) The equal employment opportunity acts and Executive orders; or
(c) The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7606), Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1368), and E.O. 11738 (38 FR 25161, 3 CFR, 1973 Comp., p. 799);
(d) 515(h) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1515(h));
(e) Section 12 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C.
2021).
Sec. 417.1010 Suspending official (USDA supplement to government-wide
definition at 2 CFR 180.1010).
The head of an organizational unit within USDA (e.g.,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service), who has been delegated
authority in 7 CFR part 2 to carry out a covered transaction, is
delegated authority to act as the suspending official in connection
with such transaction. This authority to act as a suspending official
may not be redelegated below the head of the organizational unit,
except that, in the case of the Forest Service, the Chief may
redelegate the authority to act as a suspending official to the Deputy
Chief for the National Forest System or an Associate Deputy Chief for
the National Forest System.
[[Page 68330]]
Subpart J--[Reserved]
0
6. Revise and republish part 418 to read as follows:
PART 418--NEW RESTRICTIONS ON LOBBYING
Sec.
Subpart A--General
418.100 Conditions on use of funds.
418.105 Definitions.
418.110 Certification and disclosure.
Subpart B--Activities by Own Employees
418.200 Agency and legislative liaison.
418.205 Professional and technical services.
418.210 Reporting.
Subpart C--Activities by Other Than Own Employees
418.300 Professional and technical services.
Subpart D--Penalties and Enforcement
418.400 Penalties.
418.405 Penalty procedures.
418.410 Enforcement.
Subpart E--Exemptions
418.500 Secretary of Defense.
Appendix A to Part 418--Certification Regarding Lobbying
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 1352; 5 U.S.C. 301; 2 CFR 200.450.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 418.100 Conditions on use of funds.
(a) No appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement to pay any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any
of the following covered Federal actions: the awarding of any Federal
contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal
loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the
extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(b) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement must file with that
agency a certification, set forth in Appendix A, that the person has
not made, and will not make, any payment prohibited by paragraph (a) of
this section.
(c) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal
contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative agreement must file with that
agency a disclosure form, in the OMB-approved format, if such person
has made or has agreed to make any payment using nonappropriated funds
(to include profits from any covered Federal action), which would be
prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section if paid for with
appropriated funds.
(d) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a
commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a
loan must file with that agency a statement, set forth in Appendix A,
whether that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to
influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency,
a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance
or guarantee.
(e) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a
commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a
loan must file with that agency a disclosure form, in the OMB-approved
format, if that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to
influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency,
a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance
or guarantee.
Sec. 418.105 Definitions.
For purposes of this part:
(a) Agency, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 552(f), includes Federal
executive departments and agencies as well as independent regulatory
commissions and Government corporations, as defined in 31 U.S.C.
9101(1).
(b) Covered Federal action means:
(1) Any of the following Federal actions:
(i) The awarding of any Federal contract;
(ii) The making of any Federal grant;
(iii) The making of any Federal loan;
(iv) The entering into of any cooperative agreement; and,
(v) The extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement.
(2) Covered Federal action does not include receiving from an
agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or
guarantee a loan. Loan guarantees and loan insurance are addressed
independently within this part.
(c) Federal contract means an acquisition contract awarded by an
agency, including those subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR), and any other acquisition contract for real or personal property
or services not subject to the FAR.
(d) Federal cooperative agreement means a cooperative agreement
entered into by an agency.
(e) Federal grant means an award of financial assistance in the
form of money, or property in lieu of money, by the Federal Government
or a direct appropriation made by law to any person. The term does not
include technical assistance which provides services instead of money,
or other assistance in the form of revenue sharing, loans, loan
guarantees, loan insurance, interest subsidies, insurance, or direct
United States cash assistance to an individual.
(f) Federal loan means a loan made by an agency. The term does not
include loan guarantee or loan insurance.
(g) Indian Tribe and Tribal organization have the meaning provided
in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance
Act (25 U.S.C. 5304). Alaskan Natives are included under the
definitions of Indian tribes in that Act.
(h) Influencing or attempting to influence means making, with the
intent to influence, any communication to or appearance before an
officer or employee or any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with any covered Federal action.
(i) Loan guarantee and loan insurance means an agency's guarantee
or insurance of a loan made by a person.
(j) Local government means a unit of government in a State and, if
chartered, established, or otherwise recognized by a State for the
performance of a governmental duty, including a local public authority,
a special district, an intrastate district, a council of governments, a
sponsor group representative organization, and any other
instrumentality of a local government.
(k) Officer or employee of an agency includes the following
individuals who are employed by an agency:
(1) An individual who is appointed to a position in the Government
under 5 U.S.C., including a position under a temporary appointment;
(2) A member of the uniformed services as defined in 37 U.S.C.
101(3);
(3) A special Government employee as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202; and,
(4) An individual who is a member of a Federal advisory committee,
as defined by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2.
(l) Person means an individual, corporation, company, association,
authority, firm, partnership, society, State, and local government,
regardless of whether such entity is operated for
[[Page 68331]]
profit or not for profit. This term excludes an Indian tribe, tribal
organization, or any other Indian organization with respect to
expenditures specifically permitted by other Federal law.
(m) Reasonable compensation means, with respect to a regularly
employed officer or employee of any person, compensation that is
consistent with the normal compensation for such officer or employee
for work that is not furnished to, not funded by, or not furnished in
cooperation with the Federal Government.
(n) Reasonable payment means, with respect to professional and
other technical services, a payment in an amount that is consistent
with the amount normally paid for such services in the private sector.
(o) Recipient includes all contractors, subcontractors at any tier,
and subgrantees at any tier of the recipient of funds received in
connection with a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement. The term excludes an Indian tribe, tribal organization, or
any other Indian organization with respect to expenditures specifically
permitted by other Federal law.
(p) Regularly employed means, with respect to an officer or
employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant,
loan, or cooperative agreement or a commitment providing for the United
States to insure or guarantee a loan, an officer or employee who is
employed by such person for at least 130 working days within one year
immediately preceding the date of the submission that initiates agency
consideration of such person for receipt of such contract, grant, loan,
cooperative agreement, loan insurance commitment, or loan guarantee
commitment. An officer or employee who is employed by such person for
less than 130 working days within one year immediately preceding the
date of the submission that initiates agency consideration of such
person will be considered to be regularly employed as soon as he or she
is employed by such person for 130 working days.
(q) State means a State of the United States, the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a territory or possession of
the United States, an agency or instrumentality of a State, and a
multi-State, regional, or interstate entity having governmental duties
and powers.
Sec. 418.110 Certification and disclosure.
(a) Each person must file a certification, and a disclosure form,
if required, with each submission that initiates agency consideration
of such person for:
(1) Award of a Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement
exceeding $100,000; or
(2) An award of a Federal loan or a commitment providing for the
United States to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000.
(b)(1) Each person must file a certification, and a disclosure
form, if required, upon receipt by such person of:
(i) A Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement exceeding
$100,000; or
(ii) A Federal loan or a commitment providing for the United States
to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000,
(2) Unless such person previously filed a certification, and a
disclosure form, if required, under paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Each person must file a disclosure form at the end of each
calendar quarter in which there occurs any event that requires
disclosure or that materially affects the accuracy of the information
contained in any disclosure form previously filed by such person under
paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. An event that materially affects
the accuracy of the information reported includes:
(1) A cumulative increase of $25,000 or more in the amount paid or
expected to be paid for influencing or attempting to influence a
covered Federal action; or
(2) A change in the person(s) or individual(s) influencing or
attempting to influence a covered Federal action; or,
(3) A change in the officer(s), employee(s), or Member(s) contacted
to influence or attempt to influence a covered Federal action.
(d) Any person must file a certification, and a disclosure form, if
required, to the next tier above who requests or receives from a person
referred to in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section:
(1) A subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any tier under a Federal
contract;
(2) A subgrant, contract, or subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any
tier under a Federal grant;
(3) A contract or subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any tier under
a Federal loan exceeding $150,000; or,
(4) A contract or subcontract exceeding $100,000 at any tier under
a Federal cooperative agreement.
(e) All disclosure forms, but not certifications, must be forwarded
from tier to tier until received by the person referred to in
paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. That person must forward all
disclosure forms to the agency.
(f) Any certification or disclosure form filed under paragraph (e)
of this section will be treated as a material representation of fact
upon which all receiving tiers must rely. All liability arising from an
erroneous representation will be borne solely by the tier filing that
representation and must not be shared by any tier to which the
erroneous representation is forwarded. Submitting an erroneous
certification or disclosure constitutes a failure to file the required
certification or disclosure, respectively. If a person fails to file a
required certification or disclosure, the United States may pursue all
available remedies, including those authorized by 31 U.S.C. 1352.
(g) No reporting is required for an activity paid for with
appropriated funds if that activity is allowable under either subpart B
or C of this part.
Subpart B--Activities by Own Employees
Sec. 418.200 Agency and legislative liaison.
(a) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in Sec.
418.100(a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable
compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or
receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if
the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not
directly related to a covered Federal action.
(b) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any
information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is
allowable at any time.
(c) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following
agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time
only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any
covered Federal action:
(1) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations)
the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services,
conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
(2) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the
application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an
agency's use.
(d) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following
agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where
they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action:
(1) Providing any information not specifically requested but
necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation
of a covered Federal action;
[[Page 68332]]
(2) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an
unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
(3) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an
agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended
by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
(e) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are
allowable under this section.
Sec. 418.205 Professional and technical services.
(a) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in Sec.
418.100(a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable
compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or
receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or
an extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of a
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if payment is
for professional or technical services rendered directly in the
preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or
application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as
a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
(b) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, ``professional
and technical services'' will be limited to advice and analysis
directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For
example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by
a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an
engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of
equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is
allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by
a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such
as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless
they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional
or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered
directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a
covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the
intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice
or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or
her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another
are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not
providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with
the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering
analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal
are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing
technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or
negotiation of a covered Federal action.
(c) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for
receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or
regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation,
and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
(d) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are
allowable under this section.
Sec. 418.210 Reporting.
No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable
compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a
person.
Subpart C--Activities by Other Than Own Employees
Sec. 418.300 Professional and technical services.
(a) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in Sec.
418.100(a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a
person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or
receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional
or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission,
or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting
requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving
that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(b) The reporting requirements in Sec. 418.110(a) and (b)
regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, will
not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered
directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any
commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a
loan.
(c) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, ``professional
and technical services'' will be limited to advice and analysis
directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For
example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by
a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an
engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of
equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is
allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by
a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such
as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless
they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional
or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered
directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a
covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the
intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice
or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or
her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another
are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not
providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with
the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering
analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal
are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing
technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or
negotiation of a covered Federal action.
(d) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for
receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or
regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation,
and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
(e) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting
or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade
associations.
(f) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are
allowable under this section.
Subpart D--Penalties and Enforcement
Sec. 418.400 Penalties.
(a) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein will be
subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than
$100,000 for each such expenditure.
(b) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (in
the OMB-approved format) to be filed or amended if required herein,
will be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not
more than $100,000 for each such failure.
(c) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an
administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is
commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil
[[Page 68333]]
penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative
action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating
official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an
allegation of such failure.
(d) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the
amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the
agency will consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of
the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in
business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of
culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the
penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
(e) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section
will be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000, absent aggravating
circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons will be
subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $10,000 and $100,000,
as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
(f) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not
prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply
to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil
penalty.
Sec. 418.405 Penalty procedures.
Agencies must impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the
provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. 3803
(except subsection (c)), 3804 through 3808, and 3812, insofar as these
provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
Sec. 418.410 Enforcement.
The head of each agency must take such actions as are necessary to
ensure that the provisions herein are vigorously implemented and
enforced in that agency.
Subpart E--Exemptions
Sec. 418.500 Secretary of Defense.
(a) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a
covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary
determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national
interest. The Secretary must transmit a copy of each such written
exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
(b) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to
implement paragraph (a) of this section.
Appendix A to Part 418--Certification Regarding Lobbying
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge
and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be
paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding
of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making
of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement,
and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification
of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been
paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant,
loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned must complete and
submit Standard Form-LLL, ``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,'' in
accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned must require that the language of this
certification be included in the award documents for all subawards
at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under
grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all
subrecipients must certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon
which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered
into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into this transaction imposed by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Any
person who fails to file the required certification will be subject
to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than
$100,000 for each such failure.
Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan Insurance
The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and
belief, that:
If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a
loan, the undersigned must complete and submit Standard Form-LLL,
``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,'' in accordance with its
instructions.
Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or
entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31,
U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required statement will
be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more
than $100,000 for each such failure.
PART 421--REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE)
0
7. The authority citation for part 421 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 701-707.
0
8. Amend Sec. 421.10 by revising the introductory text and paragraph
(b) as follows:
Sec. 421.10 What does this part do?
This part requires that the award and administration of USDA grants
and cooperative agreements comply with Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act
of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8101-8106, as amended, hereafter referred to as
``the Act'') that applies to grants. It thereby--
* * * * *
(b) Establishes USDA policies and procedures for compliance with
the Act that are the same as those of other Federal agencies, in
conformance with the requirement in 41 U.S.C. 8106 for Governmentwide
implementing regulations.
0
9. Revise Sec. 421.400 to read as follows:
Sec. 421.400 What method do I use as an agency awarding official to
obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with the OMB guidance?
To obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with applicable
requirements in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, you must include
the following term or condition in the award:
Drug-free workplace. You as the recipient must comply with drug-
free workplace requirements in Subpart B (or Subpart C, if the
recipient is an individual) of part 421, which adopts the
Governmentwide implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sec. 5152-5158 of the
Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D;
41 U.S.C. 8101-8106).
0
10. Revise and republish part 422 to read as follows:
PART 422--RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS CONDUCTING USDA-FUNDED EXTRAMURAL
RESEARCH; RESEARCH MISCONDUCT
Sec.
422.1 Definitions.
422.2 Procedures.
422.3 Inquiry, investigation, and adjudication.
422.4 USDA Panel to determine appropriateness of research misconduct
policy.
422.5 Reservation of right to conduct subsequent inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication.
[[Page 68334]]
422.6 Notification of USDA of allegations of research misconduct.
422.7 Notification of ARIO during an inquiry or investigation.
422.8 Communication of research misconduct policies and procedures.
422.9 Documents required.
422.10 Reporting to USDA.
422.11 Research records and evidence.
422.12 Remedies for noncompliance.
422.13 Appeals.
422.14 Relationship to other requirements.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 CFR 2610.1(c); Federal Policy on
Research Misconduct (65 FR 76260)
Sec. 422.1 Definitions.
The following definitions apply to this part:
Adjudication. The stage in response to an allegation of research
misconduct when the outcome of the investigation is reviewed, and
appropriate corrective actions, if any, are determined. Corrective
actions generally will be administrative in nature, such as termination
of an award, debarment, award restrictions, recovery of funds, or
correction of the research record. However, if there is an indication
of violation of civil or criminal statutes, civil or criminal sanctions
may be pursued.
Agency Research Integrity Officer (ARIO). The individual appointed
by a USDA agency that conducts research and who is responsible for:
(1) Receiving and processing allegations of research misconduct as
assigned by the USDA RIO;
(2) Informing OIG and the USDA RIO and the research institution
associated with the alleged research misconduct, of allegations of
research misconduct in the event it is reported to the USDA agency;
(3) Ensuring that any records, documents and other materials
relating to a research misconduct allegation are provided to OIG when
requested;
(4) Coordinating actions taken to address allegations of research
misconduct with respect to extramural research with the research
institution(s) at which time the research misconduct is alleged to have
occurred, and with the USDA RIO;
(5) Overseeing proceedings to address allegations of extramurally
funded research misconduct at intramural research institutions and
research institutions where extramural research occurs;
(6) Ensuring that agency action to address allegations of research
misconduct at USDA agencies performing extramurally funded research is
performed at an organizational level that allows an independent,
unbiased, and equitable process;
(7) Immediately notifying OIG, the USDA RIO, and the applicable
research institution if:
(i) Public health or safety is at risk;
(ii) USDA's resources, reputation, or other interests need
protecting;
(iii) Research activities should be suspended;
(iv) Federal action may be needed to protect the interest of a
subject of the investigation or of others potentially affected;
(v) A premature public disclosure of the inquiry into or
investigation of the allegation may compromise the process;
(vi) The scientific community or the public should be informed; or
(vii) Behavior that is or may be criminal in nature is discovered
at any point during the inquiry, investigation, or adjudication phases
of the research misconduct proceedings;
(8) Documenting the dismissal of the allegation, and ensuring that
the name of the accused individual and/or institution is cleared if an
allegation of research misconduct is dismissed at any point during the
inquiry or investigation phase of the proceedings;
(9) Other duties relating to research misconduct proceedings as
assigned.
Allegation. A disclosure of possible research misconduct through
any means of communication. The disclosure may be by written or oral
statement, or by other means of communication to an institutional or
USDA official.
Applied research. Systematic study to gain knowledge or
understanding necessary to determine the means by which a recognized
and specific need may be met.
Assistant Inspector General for Investigations. The individual in
OIG who is responsible for OIG's domestic and foreign investigative
operations through OIG's national and regional investigative offices.
Basic research. Systematic study directed toward fuller knowledge
or understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of
observable facts without specific applications towards processes or
products in mind.
Extramural research. Research conducted by any research institution
or entity other than the Federal agency to which the funds supporting
the research were appropriated. Research institutions conducting
extramural research may include Federal research facilities.
Fabrication. Making up data or results and recording or reporting
them.
Falsification. Manipulating research materials, equipment, or
processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the
research is not accurately represented in the research record.
Finding of research misconduct. The conclusion, proven by a
preponderance of the evidence, that research misconduct occurred, that
such research misconduct represented a significant departure from
accepted practices of the relevant research community, and that such
research misconduct was committed intentionally, knowingly, or
recklessly.
Inquiry. The stage in the response to an allegation of research
misconduct when an assessment is made to determine whether the
allegation has substance and whether an investigation is warranted.
Intramural research. Research conducted by a Federal Agency, to
which funds were appropriated for the purpose of conducting research.
Investigation. The stage in the response to an allegation of
research misconduct when the factual record is formally developed and
examined to determine whether to dismiss the case, recommend a finding
of research misconduct, and/or take other appropriate remedies.
Office of Inspector General (OIG). The Office of Inspector General
of the United States Department of Agriculture.
Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). The Office of
Science and Technology Policy of the Executive Office of the President.
Plagiarism. The appropriation of another person's ideas, processes,
results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
Preponderance of the evidence. Proof by information that, compared
with that opposing it, leads to the conclusion that the fact at issue
is more probably true than not.
Research. All basic, applied, and demonstration research in all
fields of science, engineering, and mathematics. This includes, but is
not limited to, research in economics, education, linguistics,
medicine, psychology, social sciences, statistics, and research
involving human subjects or animals regardless of the funding mechanism
used to support it.
Research institution. All organizations using Federal funds for
research, including, for example, colleges and universities, Federally
funded research and development centers, national user facilities,
industrial laboratories, or other research institutes. Activities which
meet this definition constitute research for purposes of this part,
whether or not they are conducted or supported under a program which is
considered ``research'' for other purposes. For example, some
demonstration and service programs
[[Page 68335]]
may include research/scientific activities.
Research misconduct. Fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in
proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research
results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or
differences of opinion.
Research record. The record of data or results that embody the
facts resulting from scientific inquiry, and includes, but is not
limited to, research proposals, research records (including data,
notes, journals, laboratory records (both physical and electronic)),
progress reports, abstracts, theses, oral presentations, internal
reports, and journal articles.
USDA. United States Department of Agriculture.
USDA Research Integrity Officer (USDA RIO). The individual
designated by the Office of the Under Secretary for Research,
Education, and Economics (REE) who is responsible for:
(1) Overseeing USDA agency responses to allegations of research
misconduct;
(2) Ensuring that agency research misconduct procedures are
consistent with this part;
(3) Receiving and assigning allegations of research misconduct
reported by the public;
(4) Developing Memoranda of Understanding with agencies that elect
not to develop their own research misconduct procedures;
(5) Monitoring the progress of all research misconduct cases; and
(6) Serving as liaison with OIG to receive allegations of research
misconduct when they are received via the OIG Hotline.
Sec. 422.2 Procedures.
Research institutions that conduct extramural research funded by
USDA must foster an atmosphere conducive to research integrity. They
must develop or have procedures in place to respond to allegations of
research misconduct that ensure:
(a) Appropriate separations of responsibility for inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication;
(b) Objectivity;
(c) Due process;
(d) Whistleblower protection;
(e) Confidentiality--to the extent possible and consistent with a
fair and thorough investigation and as allowed by law, knowledge about
the identity of subjects and complainants is limited to those who need
to know; and
(f) Timely resolution.
Sec. 422.3 Inquiry, investigation, and adjudication.
A research institution that conducts extramural research funded by
USDA bears primary responsibility for prevention and detection of
research misconduct and for the inquiry, investigation, and
adjudication of research misconduct allegations reported directly to
it. The research institution must perform an inquiry in response to an
allegation, and must follow the inquiry with an investigation if the
inquiry determines that the allegation or apparent instance of research
misconduct has substance. The responsibilities for adjudication must be
separate from those for inquiry and investigation. In most instances,
USDA will rely on a research institution conducting extramural research
to promptly:
(a) Initiate an inquiry into any suspected or alleged research
misconduct;
(b) Conduct a subsequent investigation, if warranted;
(c) Acquire, prepare, and maintain appropriate records of
allegations of extramural research misconduct and all related
inquiries, investigations, and findings; and
(d) Take action to ensure the following:
(1) The integrity of research;
(2) The rights and interests of the subject of the investigation
and the public are protected;
(3) The observance of legal requirements or responsibilities
including cooperation with criminal investigations; and
(4) Appropriate safeguards for subjects of allegations, as well as
complainants (see Sec. 422.6). These safeguards should include timely
written notification of subjects regarding substantive allegations made
against them; a description of all such allegations; reasonable access
to the data and other evidence supporting the allegations; and the
opportunity to respond to allegations, the supporting evidence and the
proposed findings of research misconduct, if any.
Sec. 422.4 USDA Panel to determine appropriateness of research
misconduct policy.
Before USDA will rely on a research institution to conduct an
inquiry, investigation, and adjudication of an allegation in accordance
with this part, the research institution where the research misconduct
is alleged must provide the ARIO its policies and procedures related to
research misconduct at the institution. The research institution has
the option of providing either a written copy of such policies and
procedures or a website address where such policies and procedures can
be accessed. The ARIO to whom the policies and procedures were made
available must convene a panel comprised of the USDA RIO and ARIOs from
the Forest Service, the Agricultural Research Service, and the National
Institute of Food and Agriculture. The Panel will review the research
institution's policies and procedures for compliance with the OSTP
Policy and render a decision regarding the research institution's
ability to adequately resolve research misconduct allegations. The ARIO
will inform the research institution of the Panel's determination that
its inquiry, investigation, and adjudication procedures are sufficient.
If the Panel determines that the research institution does not have
sufficient policies and procedures in place to conduct inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication proceedings, or that the research
institution is in any way unfit or unprepared to handle the inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication in a prompt, unbiased, fair, and
independent manner, the ARIO will inform the research institution in
writing of the Panel's decision. An appropriate USDA agency, as
determined by the Panel, will then conduct the inquiry, investigation,
and adjudication of research misconduct in accordance with this part.
If an allegation of research misconduct is made regarding extramural
research conducted at a Federal research institution (whether USDA or
not), it is presumed that the Federal research institution has research
misconduct procedures consistent with the OSTP Policy. USDA reserves
the right to convene the Panel to assess the sufficiency of a Federal
agency's research misconduct procedures, should there be any question
whether the agency's procedures will ensure a fair, unbiased,
equitable, and independent inquiry, investigation, and adjudication
process.
Sec. 422.5 Reservation of right to conduct subsequent inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication.
(a) USDA reserves the right to conduct its own inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication into allegations of research misconduct
at a research institution conducting extramural research subsequent to
the proceedings of the research institution related to the same
allegation. This may be necessary if the USDA RIO or ARIO believes,
using sound discretion, that despite the Panel's finding that the
research institution in question had appropriate
[[Page 68336]]
and OSTP-compliant research misconduct procedures in place, the
research institution conducting the extramural research at issue:
(1) Did not adhere to its own research misconduct procedures;
(2) Did not conduct research misconduct proceedings in a fair,
unbiased, or independent manner; or
(3) Has not completed research misconduct inquiry, investigation,
or adjudication in a timely manner.
(b) Additionally, USDA reserves the right to conduct its own
inquiry, investigation, and adjudication into allegations of research
misconduct at a research institution conducting extramural research
subsequent to the proceedings of the research institution related to
the same allegation for any other reason that the USDA RIO or ARIO
considers it appropriate to conduct research misconduct proceedings in
lieu of the research institution's conducting the extramural research
at issue. This right is subject to paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) In cases where the USDA RIO or ARIO believes it is necessary
for USDA to conduct its own inquiry, investigation, and adjudication
subsequent to the proceedings of the research institution related to
the same allegation, the USDA RIO or ARIO will reconvene the Panel,
which will determine whether it is appropriate for the relevant USDA
agency to conduct the research misconduct proceedings related to the
allegation(s) of research misconduct. If the Panel determines that it
is appropriate for a USDA agency to conduct the proceedings, the ARIO
will immediately notify the research institution in question. The
research institution must then promptly provide the relevant USDA
agency with documentation of the research misconduct proceedings the
research institution has conducted to that point, and the USDA agency
will conduct research misconduct proceedings in accordance with the
Agency research misconduct procedures.
Sec. 422.6 Notification of USDA of allegations of research
misconduct.
(a) Research institutions that conduct USDA-funded extramural
research must promptly notify OIG and the USDA RIO of all allegations
of research misconduct or violations of Federal criminal statutes
involving USDA funds when the institution inquiry into the allegation
warrants the institution moving on to an investigation.
(b) Individuals at research institutions who suspect research
misconduct at the institution should report allegations in accordance
with the institution's research misconduct policies and procedures.
Anyone else who suspects that researchers or research institutions
performing Federally funded research may have engaged in research
misconduct is encouraged to make a formal allegation of research
misconduct to OIG.
(1) OIG has established a hotline for USDA employees and the
general public to report fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement in USDA
programs including allegations of research misconduct. Complaints,
which may be submitted anonymously, must be filed with the OIG by
submitting a complaint via the hotline on OIG's public website, sending
a fax, or writing a letter.
(i) The OIG hotline may be accessed at https://usdaoig.oversight.gov/hotline.
(ii) Complainants who submit to the hotline on OIG's public website
and who wish to provide additional documentation may fax them to (202)
690-2474.
(iii) Letters may be mailed to: United States Department of
Agriculture, Office of Inspector General, P.O. Box 23399, Washington,
DC 20026-3399.
(2) The USDA RIO may be reached at: USDA Research Integrity
Officer, 214W Whitten Building, Washington, DC 20250. Telephone: (202)
690-0745. Email: [email protected].
(c) To the extent known, the following details should be included
in any formal allegation:
(1) The name of the research projects involved, the nature of the
alleged misconduct, and the names of the individual or individuals
alleged to be involved in the misconduct;
(2) The source or sources of funding for the research project or
research projects involved in the alleged misconduct;
(3) Important dates;
(4) Any documentation that bears upon the allegation; and
(5) Any other potentially relevant information.
(d) Safeguards for complainants give individuals the confidence
that they can bring allegations of research misconduct made in good
faith to the attention of appropriate authorities or serve as
complainants to an inquiry or an investigation without suffering
retribution. Safeguards include protection against retaliation for
complainants who make good faith allegations, fair and objective
procedures for the examination and resolution of allegations of
research misconduct, and diligence in protecting the positions and
reputations of those persons who make allegations of research
misconduct in good faith. The identity of complainants who wish to
remain anonymous will be kept confidential to the extent permitted by
law or regulation.
Sec. 422.7 Notification of ARIO during an inquiry or investigation.
(a) Research institutions that conduct USDA-funded extramural
research must promptly notify the ARIO should the institution become
aware during an inquiry or investigation that:
(1) Public health or safety is at risk;
(2) The resources, reputation, or other interests of USDA are in
need of protection;
(3) Research activities should be suspended;
(4) Federal action may be needed to protect the interest of a
subject of the investigation or of others potentially affected;
(5) A premature public disclosure of the inquiry into or
investigation of the allegation may compromise the process;
(6) The scientific community or the public should be informed; or
(7) There is reasonable indication of possible violations of civil
or criminal law.
(b) If research misconduct proceedings reveal behavior that may be
criminal in nature at any point during the proceedings, the institution
must promptly notify the ARIO.
Sec. 422.8 Communication of research misconduct policies and
procedures.
Institutions that conduct USDA-funded extramural research are to
maintain and effectively communicate to their staff policies and
procedures relating to research misconduct, including the guidelines in
this part. The institution is to inform their researchers and staff
members who conduct USDA-funded extramural research when and under what
circumstances USDA is to be notified of allegations of research
misconduct, and when and under what circumstances USDA is to be updated
on research misconduct proceedings.
Sec. 422.9 Documents required.
(a) A research institution that conducts USDA-funded extramural
research must maintain the following documents related to an allegation
of research misconduct at the research institution:
(1) A written statement describing the original allegation;
(2) A copy of the formal notification presented to the subject of
the allegation;
(3) A written report describing the inquiry stage and its outcome
including copies of all supporting documentation;
(4) A description of the methods and procedures used to gather and
evaluate
[[Page 68337]]
information pertinent to the alleged misconduct during inquiry and
investigation stages;
(5) A written report of the investigation, including the
evidentiary record and supporting documentation;
(6) A written statement of the findings; and
(7) If applicable, a statement of recommended corrective actions,
and any response to such a statement by the subject of the original
allegation, and/or other interested parties, including any corrective
action plan.
(b) The research institution must retain the documents specified in
paragraph (a) of this section for at least 3 years following the final
adjudication of the alleged research misconduct.
Sec. 422.10 Reporting to USDA.
Following completion of an investigation into allegations of
research misconduct, the institution conducting extramural research
must provide to the ARIO a copy of the evidentiary record, the report
of the investigation, recommendations made to the institution's
adjudicating official, the adjudicating official's determination, the
institution's corrective action taken or planned, and the written
response of the individual who is the subject of the allegation to any
recommendations.
Sec. 422.11 Research records and evidence.
(a) A research institution that conducts extramural research
supported by USDA funds, as the responsible legal entity for the USDA-
supported research, has a continuing obligation to create and maintain
adequate records (including documents and other evidentiary matter) as
may be required by any subsequent inquiry, investigation, finding,
adjudication, or other proceeding.
(b) Whenever an investigation is initiated, the research
institution must promptly take all reasonable and practical steps to
obtain custody of all relevant research records and evidence as may be
necessary to conduct the research misconduct proceedings. This must be
accomplished before the research institution notifies the researcher/
respondent of the allegation, or immediately thereafter.
(c) The original research records and evidence taken into custody
by the research institution must be inventoried and stored in a secure
place and manner. Research records involving raw data must include the
devices or instruments on which they reside. However, if deemed
appropriate by the research institution or investigator, research data
or records that reside on or in instruments or devices may be copied
and removed from those instruments or devices as long as the copies are
complete, accurate, and have substantially equivalent evidentiary value
as the data or records have when the data or records reside on the
instruments or devices. Such copies of data or records must be made by
a disinterested, qualified technician and not by the subject of the
original allegation or other interested parties. When the relevant data
or records have been removed from the devices or instruments, the
instruments or devices need not be maintained as evidence.
Sec. 422.12 Remedies for noncompliance.
USDA agencies' implementation procedures identify the
administrative actions available to remedy a finding of research
misconduct. Such actions may include the recovery of funds, correction
of the research record, debarment of the researcher(s) that engaged in
the research misconduct, proper attribution, or any other action deemed
appropriate to remedy the instance(s) of research misconduct. The
agency should consider the seriousness of the misconduct, including,
but not limited to, the degree to which the misconduct was knowingly
conducted, intentional, or reckless; was an isolated event or part of a
pattern; or had significant impact on the research record, research
subjects, other researchers, institutions, or the public welfare. In
determining the appropriate administrative action, the appropriate
agency must impose a remedy that is commensurate with the infraction as
described in the finding of research misconduct.
Sec. 422.13 Appeals.
(a) If USDA relied on an institution to conduct an inquiry,
investigation, and adjudication, the alleged person(s) should first
follow the institution's appeal policy and procedures.
(b) USDA agencies' implementation procedures, which must be made
available on a designated USDA public website, identify the appeal
process when a finding of research misconduct is elevated to the
agency.
Sec. 422.14 Relationship to other requirements.
Some of the research covered by this part also may be subject to
regulations of other governmental agencies (e.g., a university that
receives funding from a USDA agency and also under a grant from another
Federal agency). If more than one agency of the Federal Government has
jurisdiction, USDA will cooperate with the other agency(ies) in
designating a lead agency. When USDA is not the lead agency, it will
rely on the lead agency following its policies and procedures in
determining whether there is a finding of research misconduct. Further,
USDA may, in consultation with the lead agency, take action to protect
the health and safety of the public, to promote the integrity of the
USDA-supported research and research process, or to conserve public
funds. When appropriate, USDA will seek to resolve allegations jointly
with the other agency or agencies.
0
11. Add part 423 to read as follows:
PART 423--GEOSPATIAL DATA MANAGEMENT AND STANDARDS FOR FEDERAL
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AWARDS
Sec.
423.1 What does this part do?
423.2 Disclosure of geospatial investments.
Authority: 43 U.S.C. Ch. 46; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Sec. 423.1 What does this part do?
This part implements the requirements at 43 U.S.C. 2808(b)(3) which
pertain to the disclosure of USDA Federal financial assistance that
involves geospatial data, as supplemented by this part.
Sec. 423.2 Disclosure of geospatial investments.
USDA awarding agencies must ensure that all Federal financial
assistance instruments which involve the acquisition, storage, or
distribution of geospatial data comply with USDA policy. For all such
instruments, USDA awarding agencies must require award terms and
conditions necessary for the specific purpose of complying with law,
regulation, and USDA policy.
Lynn Moaney,
Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Office of the Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-18544 Filed 8-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KS-P