Classification for Victims of Severe Forms of Trafficking in Persons; Eligibility for “T” Nonimmigrant Status; Correction, 68081-68083 [2024-18735]
Download as PDF
68081
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 164
Friday, August 23, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Parts 212, 214, 245, and 274a
[CIS No. 2783–24; DHS Docket No. USCIS
2011–0010]
RIN 1615–AA59
Classification for Victims of Severe
Forms of Trafficking in Persons;
Eligibility for ‘‘T’’ Nonimmigrant Status;
Correction
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS),
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
USCIS is correcting a final
rule that published in the Federal
Register on April 30, 2024. The final
rule amended DHS regulations
governing the requirements and
procedures for victims of a severe form
of trafficking in persons seeking T
nonimmigrant status. These technical
corrections will fix typographical and
non-substantive technical errors.
DATES: Effective August 28, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rená Cutlip-Mason, Office of Policy and
Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, 5900 Capital
Gateway Dr., Camp Springs, MD 20746;
telephone 240–721–3000 (this is not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Background
On April 30, 2024, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) published a
final rule in the Federal Register at 89
FR 34864 (FR Doc. 2024–09022). The
final rule amends DHS regulations
governing the requirements and
procedures for victims of a severe form
of trafficking in persons seeking T
nonimmigrant status. After review of the
published document, DHS identified a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Aug 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
few errors in the preamble and
regulatory text.
This document, in the section titled
‘‘Correction of Errors and Technical
Amendments,’’ identifies and corrects
several technical and typographical
errors in the final rule. The provisions
in this document are effective as if they
had been included in the final rule that
published in the Federal Register on
April 30, 2024.
Accordingly, the corrections are
effective on August 28, 2024 at 12 a.m.
Eastern Time. This document does not
change how DHS will apply the final
rule, i.e., DHS will apply the corrected
provisions to applications pending on,
or filed on or after, August 28, 2024.
II. Summary and Explanation of
Technical Corrections
A. Minimum Contact With Law
Enforcement
At 8 CFR 214.208(b), the final rule
discusses what constitutes ‘‘minimum
contact’’ with law enforcement for
purposes of meeting the requirement
that an applicant comply with any
reasonable request for assistance from
law enforcement. In one sentence in the
preamble, the rule mistakenly refers to
a minimum ‘‘conduct’’ requirement,
rather than ‘‘contact.’’ 1 Therefore, on
page 34882, second column, DHS
removes the word ‘‘conduct’’ and
replaces it with the word ‘‘contact’’ to
correctly refer to the requirement that an
applicant must have contact with law
enforcement.
B. Any Credible Evidence
This document corrects an
inadvertently omitted phrase in the
regulatory text describing the ‘‘any
credible evidence’’ provision.2 The
preamble states the rule makes clear that
applicants can submit any credible
evidence related to all the eligibility
requirements for both principal
applicants and derivative applicants,
citing specifically to 8 CFR 214.204(c)
and (l) as examples.3 The regulation at
8 CFR 214.204(c)(2) reinforces the
preamble’s discussion of the ‘‘any
credible evidence’’ provision and is
consistent with the regulatory text at 8
CFR 214.204(l), which emphasizes that
applicants may submit such evidence to
establish any of the eligibility
requirements.
At 8 CFR 214.204(c)(2), the final rule
states an Application for T
Nonimmigrant Status must include any
credible evidence supporting any of the
eligibility requirements set out in
§§ 214.206 through 214.208. The
eligibility requirements, however,
extend through 8 CFR 214.209 (Extreme
Hardship).
DHS inadvertently omitted this
reference to extreme hardship as one of
the eligibility requirements to be proven
by any credible evidence,4 as indicated
by the specific preamble language
referenced above, as well as by DHS’s
clear intent throughout the preamble
and regulatory text. Therefore, DHS is
correcting the regulatory text at
214.204(c)(2) on page 34933, second
column, to provide that an Application
for T Nonimmigrant Status must include
any credible evidence supporting any of
the eligibility requirements set out in
§§ 214.206 through 214.209.
C. Bona Fide Determinations (BFD)
DHS noted several technical and
typographical errors in the portion of
the final rule that creates a modified
BFD process that generally applies only
to applications that are filed on or after
the effective date of the rule, August 28,
2024.5 Through this process, USCIS may
grant deferred action and employment
authorization to applicants with bona
fide Applications for T Nonimmigrant
Status if they merit a favorable exercise
of discretion.6
Effective Date of Modified Bona Fide
Determination Process
In the preamble to the final rule, DHS
indicated that this BFD process applies
to cases filed ‘‘on or after the effective
date’’ of the final rule.7 The regulatory
text, however, indicates that DHS will
conduct bona fide reviews on
applications ‘‘submitted after August 28,
2024.’’ 8 The regulatory text
inadvertently omitted the text ‘‘on or’’
before the word ‘‘after’’ to indicate that
the BFD process would apply to
applications received on August 28,
2024. Therefore, DHS corrects the
regulatory text, 8 CFR 214.205(a) (on
4 See
1 89
FR at 34882.
2 See, e.g., 8 CFR 214.204(l); 89 FR at 34866,
34868, 34871, 34885.
3 89 FR at 34885.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
89 FR at 34933.
8 CFR 214.205.
6 See 8 CFR 214.205; 89 FR at 34875.
7 89 FR at 34875.
8 8 CFR 214.205(a).
5 See
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
68082
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 164 / Friday, August 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
page 34934, second column) to indicate
that if an Application for T
Nonimmigrant Status is submitted on or
after August 28, 2024, USCIS will
conduct an initial review to determine
if the application is bona fide.9
Bona Fide Determination Employment
Authorizations Documents (EAD)
This document corrects an
erroneously omitted reference in the
section describing the automatic
conversion for previously filed
applications for employment
authorization to applications for the
newly created BFD EAD classification.10
DHS identified those previously filed
applications as being under the
categories (a)(16) or (25); however, there
is no (a)(25) category. DHS inadvertently
failed to include the ‘‘(c)’’ prior to
‘‘(25)’’ to signify the EAD category for T
derivatives. Therefore, on page 34875,
second column, DHS adds the text ‘‘(c)’’
in front of ‘‘(25)’’ to include the
appropriate EAD category, thus
indicating that DHS will automatically
convert previously filed applications for
employment authorization filed under 8
CFR 274a.12(a)(16) and (c)(25) to
applications for the newly created BFD
EAD classification.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Bona Fide Determinations for
Applicants in Removal Proceedings
The final rule inadvertently omitted a
reference to the Application for T
Nonimmigrant Status in the section
describing bona fide determinations for
applicants in removal proceedings,
which applies to individuals with
Applications for T Nonimmigrant Status
or Applications for Derivative T
Nonimmigrant Status.11 However, the
next sentence indicates that in such
cases, ICE may exercise prosecutorial
discretion while USCIS adjudicates an
Application for Derivative T
Nonimmigrant Status, and does not
mention an Application for T
Nonimmigrant Status.12 This omission
was inadvertent, as the prior sentence
clearly indicates the section should
apply to both principal and derivative
applications for T nonimmigrant status.
Therefore, DHS is correcting the
regulatory text at 8 CFR 214.205(f), on
page 34935, first column, to indicate
that ICE may exercise prosecutorial
discretion while USCIS adjudicates an
Application for T Nonimmigrant Status
or an Application for Derivative T
Nonimmigrant Status. This correction is
9 See
89 FR at 34934, second column.
89 FR at 34875.
11 See 214.204(f); 89 FR at 34935, first column.
12 Id.
10 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Aug 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
consistent with the remainder of the
section and DHS’s intent.13
D. Age-Out Provisions
This document corrects an
erroneously omitted change to
regulatory text for consistency and
clarity. The final rule contained new 8
CFR 214.211(e)(3), on page 34939, first
column, which stated that the age-out
protections apply to a derivative child
applicant who is under age 21 at the
time the principal filed the Application
for T Nonimmigrant Status, but turns 21
during the pendency of the principal’s
Application for T Nonimmigrant Status.
This change conformed the regulatory
provisions with INA section 214(o)(4), 8
U.S.C. 1184(o)(4), which only applies
the age-out protections if the child turns
21 after the principal’s Application for
T Nonimmigrant Status is filed, but
while it is pending.14 However, the final
rule erroneously did not change 8 CFR
214.211(e)(2)(i), the age-out protection
relating to principal applicants under
the age of 21, to be consistent with
identical age-out protection language at
INA section 214(o)(5), 8 U.S.C.
1184(o)(5), which similarly preserves
the eligibility of parents and siblings
under the age of 18 as derivative
applicants only if the principal
applicant turns 21 after the Application
for T Nonimmigrant Status is filed, but
while it is pending.15 Therefore, DHS is
correcting the regulatory text at 8 CFR
214.211(e)(2)(i), on page 34938, third
column, to clarify that the age-out
protection only applies if the principal
applicant turns 21 after the principal’s
Application for T Nonimmigrant Status
is filed, but while it is pending.
III. Administrative Procedure Act
Section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) generally requires
agencies to publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register to
provide a period for public comment
before the provisions of a rule take
effect. 5 U.S.C. 553(b). In addition,
section 553(d) of the APA requires
13 See
8 CFR 214.205(f).
unmarried alien who seeks to accompany,
or follow to join, a parent granted status under
section 1101(a)(15)(T)(i) of this title, and who was
under 21 years of age on the date on which such
parent applied for such status, shall continue to be
classified as a child for purposes of section
1101(a)(15)(T)(ii) of this title, if the alien attains 21
years of age after such parent’s application was
filed but while it was pending.’’ INA section
214(o)(4); 8 U.S.C 1184(o)(4) (emphasis added).
15 ‘‘An alien described in clause (i) of section
1101(a)(15)(T) of this title shall continue to be
treated as an alien described in clause (ii)(I) of such
section if the alien attains 21 years of age after the
alien’s application for status under such clause (i)
is filed but while it is pending.’’ INA section
214(o)(5); 8 U.S.C 1184(o)(5) (emphasis added).
14 ‘‘An
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
agencies to delay the effective date of
final rules by a minimum of 30 days
after the date of their publication in the
Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). Both
of these requirements can be waived if
an agency finds, for good cause, that the
notice and comment process and/or
delayed effective date is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, and incorporates a statement of
the finding and the reasons therefore in
the notice. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), (d)(3).
DHS believes there is good cause for
publishing this document without prior
notice and opportunity for public
comment and with an effective date of
less than 30 days because such
procedures are unnecessary. This
document corrects technical and
typographic errors in the preamble and
regulatory text and does not make
substantive changes to the policies in
the final rule. This document merely
conforms erroneous portions of the final
rule to the agency’s clearly expressed
contemporaneous intent. Therefore,
DHS believes that it has good cause to
waive the notice and comment and
effective date requirements of section
553 of the APA.
IV. Correction of Errors and Technical
Amendments
Accordingly, the publication final
rule at 89 FR 34864 (FR Doc. 2024–
09022) is corrected as follows:
A. Correction of Errors in the Preamble
1. On page 34875, in the second
column, lines 35–36, the language ‘‘8
CFR 274a.12(a)(16) and (25)’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘8 CFR 274a.12(a)(16)
and (c)(25).’’
2. On page 34882, in the second
column, line 36, remove the word
‘‘conduct’’ and add in its place the word
‘‘contact.’’
3. On page 34886, in the first column,
lines 50–52, remove the sentence ‘‘DHS
has also amended new 8 CFR
214.211(e)(3) to state that the age-out
protections apply to a child who may
turn 21 during the pendency of the
principal’s application for T
nonimmigrant status’’ and add in its
place the sentence ‘‘DHS has also
amended new 8 CFR 214.211(e)(2) and
(3) to state that the age-out protections
apply to a child (principal or derivative)
who may turn 21 during the pendency
of the principal’s application for T
nonimmigrant status.’’
B. Correction of Errors in the Regulatory
Text
4. On page 34933, in the second
column, in instruction 7 in Subpart C,
at § 214.204, correct paragraph (c)(2) to
read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 164 / Friday, August 23, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
§ 214.204
[Corrected]
unmarried sibling as an eligible family
member.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Any credible evidence that
supports any of the eligibility
requirements set out in §§ 214.206
through 214.209.
Christina E. McDonald,
Associate General Counsel for Regulatory
Affairs, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2024–18735 Filed 8–22–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
5. On page 34934, in the second
column, in instruction 7 in Subpart C,
at § 214.205, correct paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 214.205
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Corrected]
10 CFR Part 37
(a) Bona fide determinations for
principal applicants for T
nonimmigrant status. If an Application
for T Nonimmigrant Status is submitted
on or after August 28, 2024, USCIS will
conduct an initial review to determine
if the application is bona fide.
*
*
*
*
*
6. On page 34935, in the first column,
in instruction 7 in Subpart C, at
§ 214.205, correct paragraph (f) to read
as follows:
■
§ 214.205
[Corrected]
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Bona fide determinations for
applicants in removal proceedings. This
section applies to applicants whose
Applications for T Nonimmigrant Status
or Applications for Derivative T
Nonimmigrant Status have been deemed
bona fide and who are in removal
proceedings under section 240 of the
Act, or in exclusion or deportation
proceedings under former sections 236
or 242 of the Act (as in effect prior to
April 1, 1997). In such cases, ICE may
exercise prosecutorial discretion, as
appropriate, while USCIS adjudicates an
Application for T Nonimmigrant Status
or an Application for Derivative T
Nonimmigrant Status.
*
*
*
*
*
7. On page 34938, in the third column,
in instruction 7 in Subpart C, at
§ 214.211, correct paragraph (e)(2)(i) to
read as follows:
■
§ 214.211
[Corrected]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) Age-out protection for eligible
family members of a principal applicant
under 21 years of age. (i) If the T–1
principal applicant was under 21 years
of age when they applied for T–1
nonimmigrant status but reached 21
years of age while the principal
application was still pending, USCIS
will continue to consider a parent or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Aug 22, 2024
Jkt 262001
[NRC–2023–0030]
Interim Enforcement Policy for
Dispositioning Violations With Respect
to Large Components or Robust
Structures Containing Category 1 or
Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive
Material
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Policy statement; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an Interim
Enforcement Policy that allows staff to
exercise enforcement discretion for
certain violations of regulations
involving robust structures containing
category 1 or category 2 quantities of
radioactive material, or to large
components containing category 1 or 2
quantities of radioactive material,
provided the licensee meets certain
conditions.
SUMMARY:
The policy statement is effective
on August 23, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2023–0030 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information for this action. You may
obtain publicly available information
related to this action by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2023–0030. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Helen
Chang; telephone: 301–415–3228; email:
Helen.Chang@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68083
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The
Enforcement Policy is available in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML23333A447.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
publicly available documents, is open
by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern
time, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Furst, Office of Enforcement; U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone:
301–287–9087; email: David.Furst@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On June 15, 2010 (75 FR 33901), the
NRC issued the proposed rule ‘‘Physical
Protection of Byproduct Material,’’ for
an initial public comment period. The
agency subsequently published an
extension notice on October 8, 2010 (75
FR 62330), which extended the public
comment period until January 18, 2011.
Several commenters expressed
concern about extending applicability
for the proposed rule beyond byproduct
material licensees to power reactor
licensees. Specifically, the commenters
stated that extending the requirements
to large components or radioactive
storage facilities located at power
reactor plant sites appeared
unwarranted. Accordingly, they
recommended limiting the applicability
of the rule to exclude large components
and radioactive storage facilities and
developing an appropriate threshold to
exempt single items or items of
aggregated quantities of large volume or
weight, such that exemption requests
would not be necessary and the security
provisions of part 37 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
would not apply.
The NRC agreed, in part, with the
commenters and determined that it is
appropriate to include a partial
exemption in the regulation instead of
treating exemption requests on a caseby-case basis. The staff added paragraph
(c) to § 37.11, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ to
address radioactive waste materials. The
provision does require the application
of some security measures to waste
exempted under § 37.11, but the
majority of 10 CFR part 37 requirements
would not apply. Security measures
include the use of continuous physical
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 164 (Friday, August 23, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68081-68083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18735]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 164 / Friday, August 23, 2024 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 68081]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Parts 212, 214, 245, and 274a
[CIS No. 2783-24; DHS Docket No. USCIS 2011-0010]
RIN 1615-AA59
Classification for Victims of Severe Forms of Trafficking in
Persons; Eligibility for ``T'' Nonimmigrant Status; Correction
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Department
of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: USCIS is correcting a final rule that published in the Federal
Register on April 30, 2024. The final rule amended DHS regulations
governing the requirements and procedures for victims of a severe form
of trafficking in persons seeking T nonimmigrant status. These
technical corrections will fix typographical and non-substantive
technical errors.
DATES: Effective August 28, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ren[aacute] Cutlip-Mason, Office of
Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Department of Homeland Security, 5900 Capital Gateway Dr., Camp
Springs, MD 20746; telephone 240-721-3000 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 30, 2024, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
published a final rule in the Federal Register at 89 FR 34864 (FR Doc.
2024-09022). The final rule amends DHS regulations governing the
requirements and procedures for victims of a severe form of trafficking
in persons seeking T nonimmigrant status. After review of the published
document, DHS identified a few errors in the preamble and regulatory
text.
This document, in the section titled ``Correction of Errors and
Technical Amendments,'' identifies and corrects several technical and
typographical errors in the final rule. The provisions in this document
are effective as if they had been included in the final rule that
published in the Federal Register on April 30, 2024.
Accordingly, the corrections are effective on August 28, 2024 at 12
a.m. Eastern Time. This document does not change how DHS will apply the
final rule, i.e., DHS will apply the corrected provisions to
applications pending on, or filed on or after, August 28, 2024.
II. Summary and Explanation of Technical Corrections
A. Minimum Contact With Law Enforcement
At 8 CFR 214.208(b), the final rule discusses what constitutes
``minimum contact'' with law enforcement for purposes of meeting the
requirement that an applicant comply with any reasonable request for
assistance from law enforcement. In one sentence in the preamble, the
rule mistakenly refers to a minimum ``conduct'' requirement, rather
than ``contact.'' \1\ Therefore, on page 34882, second column, DHS
removes the word ``conduct'' and replaces it with the word ``contact''
to correctly refer to the requirement that an applicant must have
contact with law enforcement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 89 FR at 34882.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Any Credible Evidence
This document corrects an inadvertently omitted phrase in the
regulatory text describing the ``any credible evidence'' provision.\2\
The preamble states the rule makes clear that applicants can submit any
credible evidence related to all the eligibility requirements for both
principal applicants and derivative applicants, citing specifically to
8 CFR 214.204(c) and (l) as examples.\3\ The regulation at 8 CFR
214.204(c)(2) reinforces the preamble's discussion of the ``any
credible evidence'' provision and is consistent with the regulatory
text at 8 CFR 214.204(l), which emphasizes that applicants may submit
such evidence to establish any of the eligibility requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See, e.g., 8 CFR 214.204(l); 89 FR at 34866, 34868, 34871,
34885.
\3\ 89 FR at 34885.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 8 CFR 214.204(c)(2), the final rule states an Application for T
Nonimmigrant Status must include any credible evidence supporting any
of the eligibility requirements set out in Sec. Sec. 214.206 through
214.208. The eligibility requirements, however, extend through 8 CFR
214.209 (Extreme Hardship).
DHS inadvertently omitted this reference to extreme hardship as one
of the eligibility requirements to be proven by any credible
evidence,\4\ as indicated by the specific preamble language referenced
above, as well as by DHS's clear intent throughout the preamble and
regulatory text. Therefore, DHS is correcting the regulatory text at
214.204(c)(2) on page 34933, second column, to provide that an
Application for T Nonimmigrant Status must include any credible
evidence supporting any of the eligibility requirements set out in
Sec. Sec. 214.206 through 214.209.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 89 FR at 34933.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Bona Fide Determinations (BFD)
DHS noted several technical and typographical errors in the portion
of the final rule that creates a modified BFD process that generally
applies only to applications that are filed on or after the effective
date of the rule, August 28, 2024.\5\ Through this process, USCIS may
grant deferred action and employment authorization to applicants with
bona fide Applications for T Nonimmigrant Status if they merit a
favorable exercise of discretion.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 8 CFR 214.205.
\6\ See 8 CFR 214.205; 89 FR at 34875.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Date of Modified Bona Fide Determination Process
In the preamble to the final rule, DHS indicated that this BFD
process applies to cases filed ``on or after the effective date'' of
the final rule.\7\ The regulatory text, however, indicates that DHS
will conduct bona fide reviews on applications ``submitted after August
28, 2024.'' \8\ The regulatory text inadvertently omitted the text ``on
or'' before the word ``after'' to indicate that the BFD process would
apply to applications received on August 28, 2024. Therefore, DHS
corrects the regulatory text, 8 CFR 214.205(a) (on
[[Page 68082]]
page 34934, second column) to indicate that if an Application for T
Nonimmigrant Status is submitted on or after August 28, 2024, USCIS
will conduct an initial review to determine if the application is bona
fide.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 89 FR at 34875.
\8\ 8 CFR 214.205(a).
\9\ See 89 FR at 34934, second column.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bona Fide Determination Employment Authorizations Documents (EAD)
This document corrects an erroneously omitted reference in the
section describing the automatic conversion for previously filed
applications for employment authorization to applications for the newly
created BFD EAD classification.\10\ DHS identified those previously
filed applications as being under the categories (a)(16) or (25);
however, there is no (a)(25) category. DHS inadvertently failed to
include the ``(c)'' prior to ``(25)'' to signify the EAD category for T
derivatives. Therefore, on page 34875, second column, DHS adds the text
``(c)'' in front of ``(25)'' to include the appropriate EAD category,
thus indicating that DHS will automatically convert previously filed
applications for employment authorization filed under 8 CFR
274a.12(a)(16) and (c)(25) to applications for the newly created BFD
EAD classification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 89 FR at 34875.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bona Fide Determinations for Applicants in Removal Proceedings
The final rule inadvertently omitted a reference to the Application
for T Nonimmigrant Status in the section describing bona fide
determinations for applicants in removal proceedings, which applies to
individuals with Applications for T Nonimmigrant Status or Applications
for Derivative T Nonimmigrant Status.\11\ However, the next sentence
indicates that in such cases, ICE may exercise prosecutorial discretion
while USCIS adjudicates an Application for Derivative T Nonimmigrant
Status, and does not mention an Application for T Nonimmigrant
Status.\12\ This omission was inadvertent, as the prior sentence
clearly indicates the section should apply to both principal and
derivative applications for T nonimmigrant status. Therefore, DHS is
correcting the regulatory text at 8 CFR 214.205(f), on page 34935,
first column, to indicate that ICE may exercise prosecutorial
discretion while USCIS adjudicates an Application for T Nonimmigrant
Status or an Application for Derivative T Nonimmigrant Status. This
correction is consistent with the remainder of the section and DHS's
intent.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 214.204(f); 89 FR at 34935, first column.
\12\ Id.
\13\ See 8 CFR 214.205(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Age-Out Provisions
This document corrects an erroneously omitted change to regulatory
text for consistency and clarity. The final rule contained new 8 CFR
214.211(e)(3), on page 34939, first column, which stated that the age-
out protections apply to a derivative child applicant who is under age
21 at the time the principal filed the Application for T Nonimmigrant
Status, but turns 21 during the pendency of the principal's Application
for T Nonimmigrant Status. This change conformed the regulatory
provisions with INA section 214(o)(4), 8 U.S.C. 1184(o)(4), which only
applies the age-out protections if the child turns 21 after the
principal's Application for T Nonimmigrant Status is filed, but while
it is pending.\14\ However, the final rule erroneously did not change 8
CFR 214.211(e)(2)(i), the age-out protection relating to principal
applicants under the age of 21, to be consistent with identical age-out
protection language at INA section 214(o)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1184(o)(5),
which similarly preserves the eligibility of parents and siblings under
the age of 18 as derivative applicants only if the principal applicant
turns 21 after the Application for T Nonimmigrant Status is filed, but
while it is pending.\15\ Therefore, DHS is correcting the regulatory
text at 8 CFR 214.211(e)(2)(i), on page 34938, third column, to clarify
that the age-out protection only applies if the principal applicant
turns 21 after the principal's Application for T Nonimmigrant Status is
filed, but while it is pending.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ ``An unmarried alien who seeks to accompany, or follow to
join, a parent granted status under section 1101(a)(15)(T)(i) of
this title, and who was under 21 years of age on the date on which
such parent applied for such status, shall continue to be classified
as a child for purposes of section 1101(a)(15)(T)(ii) of this title,
if the alien attains 21 years of age after such parent's application
was filed but while it was pending.'' INA section 214(o)(4); 8 U.S.C
1184(o)(4) (emphasis added).
\15\ ``An alien described in clause (i) of section
1101(a)(15)(T) of this title shall continue to be treated as an
alien described in clause (ii)(I) of such section if the alien
attains 21 years of age after the alien's application for status
under such clause (i) is filed but while it is pending.'' INA
section 214(o)(5); 8 U.S.C 1184(o)(5) (emphasis added).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Administrative Procedure Act
Section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally
requires agencies to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the
provisions of a rule take effect. 5 U.S.C. 553(b). In addition, section
553(d) of the APA requires agencies to delay the effective date of
final rules by a minimum of 30 days after the date of their publication
in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). Both of these requirements
can be waived if an agency finds, for good cause, that the notice and
comment process and/or delayed effective date is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a
statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice. 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), (d)(3).
DHS believes there is good cause for publishing this document
without prior notice and opportunity for public comment and with an
effective date of less than 30 days because such procedures are
unnecessary. This document corrects technical and typographic errors in
the preamble and regulatory text and does not make substantive changes
to the policies in the final rule. This document merely conforms
erroneous portions of the final rule to the agency's clearly expressed
contemporaneous intent. Therefore, DHS believes that it has good cause
to waive the notice and comment and effective date requirements of
section 553 of the APA.
IV. Correction of Errors and Technical Amendments
Accordingly, the publication final rule at 89 FR 34864 (FR Doc.
2024-09022) is corrected as follows:
A. Correction of Errors in the Preamble
1. On page 34875, in the second column, lines 35-36, the language
``8 CFR 274a.12(a)(16) and (25)'' is corrected to read ``8 CFR
274a.12(a)(16) and (c)(25).''
2. On page 34882, in the second column, line 36, remove the word
``conduct'' and add in its place the word ``contact.''
3. On page 34886, in the first column, lines 50-52, remove the
sentence ``DHS has also amended new 8 CFR 214.211(e)(3) to state that
the age-out protections apply to a child who may turn 21 during the
pendency of the principal's application for T nonimmigrant status'' and
add in its place the sentence ``DHS has also amended new 8 CFR
214.211(e)(2) and (3) to state that the age-out protections apply to a
child (principal or derivative) who may turn 21 during the pendency of
the principal's application for T nonimmigrant status.''
B. Correction of Errors in the Regulatory Text
0
4. On page 34933, in the second column, in instruction 7 in Subpart C,
at Sec. 214.204, correct paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
[[Page 68083]]
Sec. 214.204 [Corrected]
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Any credible evidence that supports any of the eligibility
requirements set out in Sec. Sec. 214.206 through 214.209.
0
5. On page 34934, in the second column, in instruction 7 in Subpart C,
at Sec. 214.205, correct paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 214.205 [Corrected]
(a) Bona fide determinations for principal applicants for T
nonimmigrant status. If an Application for T Nonimmigrant Status is
submitted on or after August 28, 2024, USCIS will conduct an initial
review to determine if the application is bona fide.
* * * * *
0
6. On page 34935, in the first column, in instruction 7 in Subpart C,
at Sec. 214.205, correct paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 214.205 [Corrected]
* * * * *
(f) Bona fide determinations for applicants in removal proceedings.
This section applies to applicants whose Applications for T
Nonimmigrant Status or Applications for Derivative T Nonimmigrant
Status have been deemed bona fide and who are in removal proceedings
under section 240 of the Act, or in exclusion or deportation
proceedings under former sections 236 or 242 of the Act (as in effect
prior to April 1, 1997). In such cases, ICE may exercise prosecutorial
discretion, as appropriate, while USCIS adjudicates an Application for
T Nonimmigrant Status or an Application for Derivative T Nonimmigrant
Status.
* * * * *
0
7. On page 34938, in the third column, in instruction 7 in Subpart C,
at Sec. 214.211, correct paragraph (e)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 214.211 [Corrected]
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) Age-out protection for eligible family members of a principal
applicant under 21 years of age. (i) If the T-1 principal applicant was
under 21 years of age when they applied for T-1 nonimmigrant status but
reached 21 years of age while the principal application was still
pending, USCIS will continue to consider a parent or unmarried sibling
as an eligible family member.
* * * * *
Christina E. McDonald,
Associate General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2024-18735 Filed 8-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P