Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Frederick, Maryland, as a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area, 67829-67830 [2024-18740]
Download as PDF
67829
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 163
Thursday, August 22, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Expected Impact of This Rule
5 CFR Part 532
[Docket ID: OPM–2024–0006]
RIN 3206–AO68
Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment
of Frederick, Maryland, as a
Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage
System Wage Area
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing a final
rule to abolish the Frederick, Maryland,
nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal
Wage System (FWS) wage area and
define Frederick County, MD, to the
Anne Arundel, MD, NAF FWS wage
area, and Berkeley County, West
Virginia, to the Washington, DC, NAF
FWS wage area. These changes are
necessary because NAF FWS
employment in the survey area is now
below the minimum criterion of 26
wage employees to maintain a wage
area, and the local activities no longer
have the capability to conduct local
wage surveys.
DATES:
Effective date: This regulation is
effective September 23, 2024.
Applicability date: This change
applies on the first day of the first
applicable pay period beginning on or
after September 23, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana
Paunoiu, by telephone at (202) 606–
2858 or by email at paypolicy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
10, 2024, OPM issued a proposed rule
(89 FR 25186) to abolish the Frederick,
MD, NAF FWS wage area and define
Frederick County, MD, to the Anne
Arundel, MD, NAF FWS wage area, and
Berkeley County, WV, to the
Washington, DC, NAF FWS wage area.
The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 21, 2024
Committee, the national labormanagement committee responsible for
advising OPM on matters concerning
the pay of FWS employees, reviewed
and recommended these changes by
consensus.
The proposed rule had a 30-day
comment period, during which OPM
received no comments. Therefore, this
final rule adopts the proposed rule at 89
FR 25186 without change.
Jkt 262001
Section 5343 of title 5, U.S. Code,
provides OPM with the authority and
responsibility to define the boundaries
of NAF FWS wage areas. Any changes
in wage area definitions can have the
long-term effect of increasing pay for
Federal employees in affected locations.
OPM expects this final rule to impact
approximately 20 NAF FWS employees.
Considering the small number of
employees affected, OPM does not
anticipate this rule will substantially
impact local economies or have a large
impact in local labor markets. As this
and future wage area changes may
impact higher volumes of employees in
geographical areas and could rise to the
level of impacting local labor markets,
OPM will continue to study the
implications of such impacts in future
rules as needed.
Regulatory Review
Executive Orders 13563, 12866, and
14094 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the provisions
of Executive Order 14094 and, therefore,
was not reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of OPM certifies that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Federalism
OPM has examined this rule in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, and has determined that
this rule will not have any negative
impact on the rights, roles and
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
responsibilities of State, local, or tribal
governments.
Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standard set forth in Executive Order
12988.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Congressional Review Act
OMB’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined this
rule does not satisfy the criteria listed in
5 U.S.C. 804(2). OPM will submit to
Congress and the Comptroller General of
the United States a report regarding the
issuance of this rule before its effective
date.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any
reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Kayyonne Marston,
Federal Register Liaison.
Accordingly, OPM is amending 5 CFR
part 532 as follows:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
2. In appendix D to subpart B, amend
the table by revising the wage area
listings for the District of Columbia and
the State of Maryland to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
67830
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
*
*
*
*
*
Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area
Survey Areas
*
*
*
*
*
10 CFR Part 2
[NRC–2023–0210]
RIN 3150–AL09
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Administrative Changes to Agency
Rules of Practice and Procedure
Washington, DC
AGENCY:
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
Survey Area
District of Columbia:
Washington, DC
West Virginia:
Berkeley
*
*
*
*
*
MARYLAND
Anne Arundel
Survey Area
Maryland:
Anne Arundel
Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:
Maryland (city):
Baltimore
Maryland (counties):
Baltimore
Frederick
Charles-St. Mary’s
Survey Area
Maryland:
Charles
St. Mary’s
Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:
Maryland:
Calvert
Virginia:
King George
Harford
Survey Area
Maryland:
Harford
Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:
Maryland:
Cecil
Montgomery-Prince George’s
Survey Area
Maryland:
Montgomery
Prince George’s
Area of Application. Survey Area.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–18740 Filed 8–21–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is amending its
regulations to revise the agency’s rules
of practice and procedure to improve
access to documents and make e-filing
rules technology neutral, to delete an
obsolete regulation, to clarify the
applicability of subpart L and subpart N
procedures, to enhance internal
consistency for page limit requirements,
to enhance consistency with the Federal
Rules of Evidence for ‘‘true copies,’’ and
to better reflect current Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel practice
regarding admission of evidence.
DATES: The final rule is effective
November 5, 2024, unless significant
adverse comments are received by
September 23, 2024. If the direct final
rule is withdrawn as a result of such
comments, timely notice of the
withdrawal will be published in the
Federal Register. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the NRC is able
to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this
date. Comments received on this direct
final rule will also be considered to be
comments on a companion proposed
rule published in the Proposed Rules
section of this issue of the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2023–0210 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information for this action. You may
obtain publicly available information
related to this action by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2023–0210. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Helen
Chang; telephone: 301–415–3228; email:
Helen.Chang@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
SUMMARY:
Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
16:38 Aug 21, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
publicly available documents, is open
by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern
time, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
You can read a plain language
description of this direct final rule at
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/
NRC-2023-0210. For additional
direction on obtaining information and
submitting comments, see ‘‘Obtaining
Information and Submitting Comments’’
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ethan Licon, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–1016, email:
Ethan.Licon@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting
Comments
II. Rulemaking Procedure
III. Background
IV. Discussion
V. Plain Writing
VI. National Environmental Policy Act
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
VIII. Congressional Review Act
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2023–
0210 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2023–0210.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 163 (Thursday, August 22, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67829-67830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18740]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2024 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 67829]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
[Docket ID: OPM-2024-0006]
RIN 3206-AO68
Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Frederick, Maryland, as a
Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final
rule to abolish the Frederick, Maryland, nonappropriated fund (NAF)
Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area and define Frederick County, MD, to
the Anne Arundel, MD, NAF FWS wage area, and Berkeley County, West
Virginia, to the Washington, DC, NAF FWS wage area. These changes are
necessary because NAF FWS employment in the survey area is now below
the minimum criterion of 26 wage employees to maintain a wage area, and
the local activities no longer have the capability to conduct local
wage surveys.
DATES:
Effective date: This regulation is effective September 23, 2024.
Applicability date: This change applies on the first day of the
first applicable pay period beginning on or after September 23, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202)
606-2858 or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 10, 2024, OPM issued a proposed
rule (89 FR 25186) to abolish the Frederick, MD, NAF FWS wage area and
define Frederick County, MD, to the Anne Arundel, MD, NAF FWS wage
area, and Berkeley County, WV, to the Washington, DC, NAF FWS wage
area. The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, the national
labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters
concerning the pay of FWS employees, reviewed and recommended these
changes by consensus.
The proposed rule had a 30-day comment period, during which OPM
received no comments. Therefore, this final rule adopts the proposed
rule at 89 FR 25186 without change.
Expected Impact of This Rule
Section 5343 of title 5, U.S. Code, provides OPM with the authority
and responsibility to define the boundaries of NAF FWS wage areas. Any
changes in wage area definitions can have the long-term effect of
increasing pay for Federal employees in affected locations. OPM expects
this final rule to impact approximately 20 NAF FWS employees.
Considering the small number of employees affected, OPM does not
anticipate this rule will substantially impact local economies or have
a large impact in local labor markets. As this and future wage area
changes may impact higher volumes of employees in geographical areas
and could rise to the level of impacting local labor markets, OPM will
continue to study the implications of such impacts in future rules as
needed.
Regulatory Review
Executive Orders 13563, 12866, and 14094 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). This rule
is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the provisions of
Executive Order 14094 and, therefore, was not reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of OPM certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Federalism
OPM has examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order
13132, Federalism, and has determined that this rule will not have any
negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State,
local, or tribal governments.
Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in
Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined
this rule does not satisfy the criteria listed in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). OPM
will submit to Congress and the Comptroller General of the United
States a report regarding the issuance of this rule before its
effective date.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Kayyonne Marston,
Federal Register Liaison.
Accordingly, OPM is amending 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
0
2. In appendix D to subpart B, amend the table by revising the wage
area listings for the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland to
read as follows:
[[Page 67830]]
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
* * * * *
Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas
* * * * *
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Washington, DC
Survey Area
District of Columbia:
Washington, DC
Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:
West Virginia:
Berkeley
* * * * *
MARYLAND
Anne Arundel
Survey Area
Maryland:
Anne Arundel
Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:
Maryland (city):
Baltimore
Maryland (counties):
Baltimore
Frederick
Charles-St. Mary's
Survey Area
Maryland:
Charles
St. Mary's
Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:
Maryland:
Calvert
Virginia:
King George
Harford
Survey Area
Maryland:
Harford
Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:
Maryland:
Cecil
Montgomery-Prince George's
Survey Area
Maryland:
Montgomery
Prince George's
Area of Application. Survey Area.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-18740 Filed 8-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P