Proposed Settlement Agreement, Endangered Species Act and Administrative Procedure Act Claims, 66712-66713 [2024-18436]
Download as PDF
66712
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Notices
later than 11:59 p.m., September 6,
2024. To receive full consideration,
nominations should include all
information requested. EPA’s
nomination form requests: contact
information about the person making
the nomination; contact information
about the nominee; the disciplinary and
specific areas of expertise of the
nominee; committee preference; the
nominee’s curriculum vita and/or
resume; and additional information that
would be useful for considering the
nomination such as background and
qualifications (e.g., current position,
educational background, expertise,
research areas), experience relevant to
one or more of ORD’s research
programs, service on other advisory
committees and professional societies,
and availability to participate as a
member of the Executive Committee
and/or Subcommittee. EPA values and
welcomes diversity. To obtain
nominations of diverse candidates, EPA
encourages all qualified candidates to
apply regardless of gender, race,
disability, or ethnicity, as well as from
a variety of backgrounds (e.g., tribal,
industry, non-profit organizations,
academia, and government). Persons
having questions about the nomination
procedures, or who are unable to submit
nominations through the BOSC website,
should contact Mr. Tom Tracy, as
indicated above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Evaluation of Nominations
The BOSC is a balanced and diverse
board of experts designed to possess the
necessary domains of expertise, depth
and breadth of knowledge, and diverse
and balanced scientific perspectives to
best support the needs of the EPA’s
ORD. Nominations will be evaluated on
the basis of several criteria including: (a)
demonstrated scientific and/or technical
credentials and disciplinary expertise,
knowledge, and experience in relevant
fields; (b) availability to serve and
willingness to commit time to the
committee (approximately one to three
meetings per year both by
teleconferences and possibly face-toface meetings); (c) absence of financial
conflicts of interest; (d) absence of an
appearance of a lack of impartiality; (e)
demonstrated ability to work
constructively and effectively on
committees; and (f) background and
experiences that would contribute to the
diversity of viewpoints on the Executive
Committee, e.g., workforce sector,
geographical location, social, cultural,
and educational backgrounds, and
professional affiliations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
To help the Agency in evaluating the
effectiveness of its outreach efforts,
nominees and nominators are requested
to inform the Agency of how you
learned of this opportunity when
completing the nomination form.
Final selection of BOSC members is a
discretionary function of the Agency
and will be announced as soon as
selections are made on the BOSC
website at https://www.epa.gov/bosc.
Kathleen Deener,
Acting Director, Office of Science Advisor,
Policy and Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2024–18373 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–12120–01–OAR]
2025 Clean Air Excellence Awards
Program; Request for Nominations
Correction
In Notice document, 2024–16156,
appearing on pages 59735 through
59736 in the issue of Tuesday July 23,
2024, on page 59735, in the second
column, in the second line and first
lines from the bottom, the text ‘‘October
11, 2024’’ is corrected to read ‘‘October
22, 2024’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2024–16156 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099–10–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OGC–2024–0390; FRL–12174–01–
OGC]
Proposed Settlement Agreement,
Endangered Species Act and
Administrative Procedure Act Claims
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement
agreement; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)Administrator’s March 18, 2022,
memorandum regarding ‘‘Consent
Decrees and Settlement Agreements to
resolve Environmental Claims Against
the Agency,’’ notice is hereby given of
a proposed settlement agreement in
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, et al.,
No. 1:22–cv–486–BAH (D.D.C.). On
February 24, 2022, the Plaintiff Center
for Biological Diversity filed a
complaint in the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia
against the EPA alleging that the Agency
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
had violated the Administrative
Procedure Act and Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) in
connection with EPA’s 1993, 1998, and
2007 approvals under the Clean Water
Act of Washington State’s water quality
criteria for cyanide. EPA seeks public
input on a proposed settlement
agreement prior to its final decisionmaking with regard to potential
settlement of the litigation.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed settlement agreement must be
received by September 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OGC–2024–0390 online at https://
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method). Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID number for
this action. Comments received may be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments, see the ‘‘Additional
Information About Commenting on the
Proposed Settlement Agreement’’
heading under the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eleanor Garretson, Water Law Office,
Office of General Counsel, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency;
telephone: (202) 564–9636; email
address: Garretson.Eleanor@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Settlement Agreement
On February 24, 2022, the Plaintiff
filed a complaint against the EPA, the
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) (collectively ‘‘the
Agencies’’), alleging violations of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq., related to EPA’s
Clean Water Act Section 303(c) actions
to approve Washington’s water quality
criteria for cyanide in 1993, 1998 and
2007. The complaint alleges that the
EPA failed to complete ESA Section 7
consultation on its approvals of
Washington’s cyanide criteria and failed
to ensure those approvals would not
jeopardize ESA-listed species or
adversely modify critical habitat. The
complaint further alleges that the
Agencies violated the ESA by failing to
reinitiate consultation on Washington’s
cyanide criteria following the
designation and revision of critical
habitat and new information regarding
the impact of Washington’s cyanide
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Notices
criteria on listed species and designated
habitat.
On August 8, 2023, the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia
denied the government’s Motion to
Dismiss the complaint. The parties then
initiated settlement discussions, which
produced the proposed settlement
agreement. Under the settlement
agreement, EPA would be obligated to
complete a biological evaluation
pursuant to 50 CFR 402.13(c)(1) and 50
CFR 402.14(c)(1) of Washington State’s
current marine and Puget Sound
cyanide criteria and submit its request
to initiate formal consultation or a letter
requesting concurrence with any ‘‘not
likely to adversely affect’’ findings
within 18 months of Washington State’s
submission of revised freshwater
cyanide criteria. As noted in the
proposed settlement agreement,
Washington recently proposed revisions
to its freshwater criteria for cyanide and
intends to submit the revised criteria to
EPA for review and action under CWA
Section 303(c). In the event Washington
does not submit revised freshwater
criteria for cyanide by September 24,
2024, the settlement obligates EPA to
complete a biological evaluation on
Washington’s current freshwater criteria
for cyanide. Under the proposed
agreement, EPA would be required to
complete and submit its biological
evaluation of Washington’s cyanide
criteria within an 18-month period
starting no later than September 24,
2024. If NMFS and/or FWS determine
the data requirements of 50 CFR
402.14(c) have not been met, EPA would
be obligated to resolve any data
deficiencies within 60 days of such
notification consistent with 40 CFR
402.14(f). Finally, under the proposed
agreement, NMFS and FWS would be
obligated to issue a concurrence or nonconcurrence within 120 days of any
EPA request for concurrence or issue
biological opinions within 12 months of
initiating formal consultation. The
schedule set forth in the proposed
settlement agreement reflects the
Agencies’ reasoned consideration of the
time needed to address ESA Section 7
consultation requirements.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, EPA will accept written
comments relating to the proposed EPA
obligations in the settlement agreement
from persons who are not parties to the
litigation. EPA or the Department of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
Justice may withdraw or withhold
consent to the proposed settlement
agreement if the comments received
disclose facts or considerations that
indicate that such settlement agreement
is inappropriate, improper, inadequate,
or inconsistent with the requirements of
the ESA or APA.
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed
Settlement Agreement
A. How can I get a copy of the proposed
settlement agreement?
The official public docket for this
action (identified by Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OGC–2024–0390) contains a
copy of the proposed settlement
agreement. The official public docket is
available for public viewing at the
Office of Environmental Information
(OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The EPA Docket Center Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the OEI Docket is (202) 566–1752.
The electronic version of the public
docket for this action contains a copy of
the proposed consent decree and is
available through https://
www.regulations.gov. You may use
https://www.regulations.gov to submit
or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search.’’
B. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OGC–2024–
0390 via https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from this docket.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit to
EPA’s docket at https://
www.regulations.gov any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
66713
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. For additional information
about submitting information identified
as CBI, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment. This ensures
that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the https://
www.regulations.gov website to submit
comments to EPA electronically is
EPA’s preferred method for receiving
comments. The electronic public docket
system is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity, email address, or
other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA does not plan to
consider these late comments.
Steven Neugeboren,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024–18436 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66712-66713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18436]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OGC-2024-0390; FRL-12174-01-OGC]
Proposed Settlement Agreement, Endangered Species Act and
Administrative Procedure Act Claims
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement agreement; request for public
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)Administrator's March 18, 2022, memorandum regarding ``Consent
Decrees and Settlement Agreements to resolve Environmental Claims
Against the Agency,'' notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement
agreement in Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, et al., No. 1:22-cv-486-BAH (D.D.C.). On February
24, 2022, the Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity filed a
complaint in the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia against the EPA alleging that the Agency had violated the
Administrative Procedure Act and Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) in connection with EPA's 1993, 1998, and 2007 approvals under
the Clean Water Act of Washington State's water quality criteria for
cyanide. EPA seeks public input on a proposed settlement agreement
prior to its final decision-making with regard to potential settlement
of the litigation.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be
received by September 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OGC-2024-0390 online at https://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred
method). Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
number for this action. Comments received may be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments, see the
``Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement
Agreement'' heading under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eleanor Garretson, Water Law Office,
Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;
telephone: (202) 564-9636; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement
On February 24, 2022, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the
EPA, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), and the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS) (collectively ``the Agencies''), alleging
violations of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.,
related to EPA's Clean Water Act Section 303(c) actions to approve
Washington's water quality criteria for cyanide in 1993, 1998 and 2007.
The complaint alleges that the EPA failed to complete ESA Section 7
consultation on its approvals of Washington's cyanide criteria and
failed to ensure those approvals would not jeopardize ESA-listed
species or adversely modify critical habitat. The complaint further
alleges that the Agencies violated the ESA by failing to reinitiate
consultation on Washington's cyanide criteria following the designation
and revision of critical habitat and new information regarding the
impact of Washington's cyanide
[[Page 66713]]
criteria on listed species and designated habitat.
On August 8, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia denied the government's Motion to Dismiss the complaint. The
parties then initiated settlement discussions, which produced the
proposed settlement agreement. Under the settlement agreement, EPA
would be obligated to complete a biological evaluation pursuant to 50
CFR 402.13(c)(1) and 50 CFR 402.14(c)(1) of Washington State's current
marine and Puget Sound cyanide criteria and submit its request to
initiate formal consultation or a letter requesting concurrence with
any ``not likely to adversely affect'' findings within 18 months of
Washington State's submission of revised freshwater cyanide criteria.
As noted in the proposed settlement agreement, Washington recently
proposed revisions to its freshwater criteria for cyanide and intends
to submit the revised criteria to EPA for review and action under CWA
Section 303(c). In the event Washington does not submit revised
freshwater criteria for cyanide by September 24, 2024, the settlement
obligates EPA to complete a biological evaluation on Washington's
current freshwater criteria for cyanide. Under the proposed agreement,
EPA would be required to complete and submit its biological evaluation
of Washington's cyanide criteria within an 18-month period starting no
later than September 24, 2024. If NMFS and/or FWS determine the data
requirements of 50 CFR 402.14(c) have not been met, EPA would be
obligated to resolve any data deficiencies within 60 days of such
notification consistent with 40 CFR 402.14(f). Finally, under the
proposed agreement, NMFS and FWS would be obligated to issue a
concurrence or non-concurrence within 120 days of any EPA request for
concurrence or issue biological opinions within 12 months of initiating
formal consultation. The schedule set forth in the proposed settlement
agreement reflects the Agencies' reasoned consideration of the time
needed to address ESA Section 7 consultation requirements.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, EPA will accept written comments relating to the
proposed EPA obligations in the settlement agreement from persons who
are not parties to the litigation. EPA or the Department of Justice may
withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed settlement agreement if
the comments received disclose facts or considerations that indicate
that such settlement agreement is inappropriate, improper, inadequate,
or inconsistent with the requirements of the ESA or APA.
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement
Agreement
A. How can I get a copy of the proposed settlement agreement?
The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2024-0390) contains a copy of the proposed settlement
agreement. The official public docket is available for public viewing
at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA
Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-
1752.
The electronic version of the public docket for this action
contains a copy of the proposed consent decree and is available through
https://www.regulations.gov. You may use https://www.regulations.gov to
submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the
contents of the official public docket, and access those documents in
the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket identification number then select
``search.''
B. How and to whom do I submit comments?
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2024-
0390 via https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from this docket. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit to EPA's docket at https://www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. For additional information about submitting information
identified as CBI, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment. This ensures that you
can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to
contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your
comment. Any identifying or contact information provided in the body of
a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the
official public docket and made available in EPA's electronic public
docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment.
Use of the https://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments
to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA does not plan to consider these late
comments.
Steven Neugeboren,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024-18436 Filed 8-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P