Medical Devices; General Hospital and Personal Use Devices; Classification of the Intravenous Catheter Force-Activated Separation Device, 66558-66560 [2024-18267]
Download as PDF
66558
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814, subparts A through E,
regarding premarket approval, have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
parts 801 and 809, regarding labeling,
have been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is
amended as follows:
PART 866—IMMUNOLOGY AND
MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 866
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
■
2. Add § 866.3966 to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 866.3966 Device to detect and identify
selected microbial agents that cause acute
febrile illness.
(a) Identification. A device to detect
and identify selected microbial agents
that cause acute febrile illness is
identified as an in vitro device intended
for the detection and identification of
microbial agents in human clinical
specimens from patients with signs and
symptoms of acute febrile illness who
are at risk for exposure or who may have
been exposed to these agents. It is
intended to aid in the diagnosis of acute
febrile illness in conjunction with other
clinical, epidemiologic, and laboratory
data, including patient travel, pathogen
endemicity, or other risk factors.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Any sample collection device used
must be FDA-cleared, -approved, or
-classified as 510(k) exempt (standalone
or as part of a test system) for the
collection of specimen types claimed by
this device; alternatively, the sample
collection device must be cleared in a
premarket submission as a part of this
device.
(2) The labeling required under
§ 809.10(b) of this chapter must include:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
(i) An intended use that includes a
detailed description of targets the device
detects and measures, the results
provided to the user, the clinical
indications appropriate for test use, and
the specific population(s) for which the
device is intended.
(ii) Limiting statements indicating:
(A) Not all pathogens that cause
febrile illness are detected by this test
and negative results do not rule out the
presence of other infections;
(B) Evaluation of more common
causes of acute febrile illness should be
considered prior to evaluation with this
test;
(C) Test results are to be interpreted
in conjunction with other clinical,
epidemiologic, and laboratory data
available to the clinician; and
(D) When using this test, consider
patient travel history and exposure risk,
as some pathogens are more common in
certain geographical locations.
(iii) A detailed device description,
including reagents, instruments,
ancillary materials, all control elements,
and a detailed explanation of the
methodology, including all preanalytical methods for processing of
specimens.
(iv) Detailed discussion of the
performance characteristics of the
device for all claimed specimen types as
shown by the analytical and clinical
studies required under paragraphs
(b)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this section, except
specimen stability performance
characteristics.
(v) A statement that nationally
notifiable results are to be reported to
public health authorities in accordance
with local, state, and federal law.
(3) Design verification and validation
must include:
(i) A detailed device description (e.g.,
all device parts, control elements
incorporated into the test procedure,
reagents required but not provided, the
principle of device operation and test
methodology), and the computational
path from collected raw data to reported
result (e.g., how collected raw signals
are converted into a reported result).
(ii) Detailed documentation of
analytical studies, including those
demonstrating Limit of Detection (LoD),
inclusivity, cross-reactivity, microbial
interference, interfering substances,
competitive inhibition, carryover/cross
contamination, specimen stability,
within lab precision, and
reproducibility, as appropriate.
(iii) Detailed documentation and
performance results from a clinical
study that includes prospective
(sequentially collected) samples for each
claimed specimen type and, when
determined to be appropriate by FDA,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
additional characterized clinical
samples. The study must be performed
on a study population consistent with
the intended use population and
compare the device performance to
results obtained from FDA-accepted
comparator methods. Documentation
from the clinical studies must include
the clinical study protocol (including a
predefined statistical analysis plan),
study report, testing results, and results
of all statistical analyses.
(iv) A detailed description of the
impact of any software, including
software applications and hardwarebased devices that incorporate software,
on the device’s functions.
Dated: August 12, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024–18264 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 880
[Docket No. FDA–2024–N–3356]
Medical Devices; General Hospital and
Personal Use Devices; Classification
of the Intravenous Catheter ForceActivated Separation Device
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the intravenous catheter
force-activated separation device into
class II (special controls). The special
controls that apply to the device type
are identified in this order and will be
part of the codified language for the
intravenous catheter force-activated
separation device’s classification. We
are taking this action because we have
determined that classifying the device
into class II (special controls) will
provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness of the device. We
believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices.
DATES: This order is effective August 16,
2024. The classification was applicable
on May 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Florencia Wilson, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2458, Silver Spring,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM
16AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
MD 20993–0002, 240–402–9978,
Florencia.Wilson@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
intravenous catheter force-activated
separation device as class II (special
controls), which we have determined
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness. In addition, we
believe this action will enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovation,
in part by placing the device into a
lower device class than the automatic
class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 (Pub. L. 105–115) established
the first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144)
modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure.
A device sponsor may utilize either
procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially
equivalent device (see section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act, defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
when necessary, to market their device.
66559
II. De Novo Classification
On September 18, 2019, FDA received
Site Saver, Inc. d/b/a Lineus Medical’s
request for De Novo classification of the
SafeBreak Vascular. FDA reviewed the
request to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on May 27, 2021, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 880.5220.1 We have named the
generic type of device intravenous
catheter force-activated separation
device and it is identified as a device
placed in-line with an intravenous (IV)
catheter and an intravascular
administration set, including any
administration set accessories. It
separates into two parts when a
specified force is applied. The device is
intended to reduce the risk of IV
catheter failure(s) requiring IV catheter
replacement.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
TABLE 1—INTRAVENOUS CATHETER FORCE-ACTIVATED SEPARATION DEVICE RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Identified risks to health
Mitigation measures
Delays of therapy due to failure of device to function as expected (e.g.,
if separation force too low).
Mechanical complications (e.g., IV dislodgement, IV infiltration, occlusion, and phlebitis events requiring IV replacement) due to failure of
device to function as expected (e.g., if separation force too high).
Infection ....................................................................................................
Air embolism .............................................................................................
1 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
Performance data, Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
Performance data, Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
Sterilization validation, Shelf life testing, Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations
(1 CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM
16AUR1
66560
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—INTRAVENOUS CATHETER FORCE-ACTIVATED SEPARATION DEVICE RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES—
Continued
Identified risks to health
Mitigation measures
Adverse tissue reaction ............................................................................
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo
classification have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0844; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814, subparts A through E,
regarding premarket approval, have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 880
Medical devices.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
Biocompatibility evaluation, Pyrogenicity testing, and Non-clinical performance testing.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 880 is
amended as follows:
PART 880—GENERAL HOSPITAL AND
PERSONAL USE DEVICES
(6) Device labeling must include:
(i) Instructions for use; and
(ii) A discussion of catheter dressings
intended to be used with the device.
Dated: August 12, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024–18267 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
1. The authority citation for part 880
continues to read as follows:
■
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
■
2. Add § 880.5220 to read as follows:
§ 880.5220 Intravenous catheter forceactivated separation device.
(a) Identification. An intravenous
catheter force-activated separation
device is placed in-line with an
intravenous (IV) catheter and an
intravascular administration set,
including any administration set
accessories. It separates into two parts
when a specified force is applied. The
device is intended to reduce the risk of
IV catheter failure(s) requiring IV
catheter replacement.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Performance data must be
provided to demonstrate clinically
acceptable performance for the intended
use of the device.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be
tested:
(i) Separation force testing;
(ii) Validation of anti-reconnect
features;
(iii) Air and liquid leakage testing,
both before and after separation;
(iv) Luer connection testing;
(v) Flow rate testing;
(vi) Particulate testing; and
(vii) Microbial ingress testing.
(3) The device must be demonstrated
to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance testing must
demonstrate that the device is sterile
and non-pyrogenic.
(5) Performance testing must support
the shelf life of the device by
demonstrating continued sterility and
device functionality over the identified
shelf life.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9998]
RIN 1545–BQ62
Increased Amounts of Credit or
Deduction for Satisfying Certain
Prevailing Wage and Registered
Apprenticeship Requirements;
Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
This document contains
corrections to Treasury Decision 9998
published in the Federal Register on
Tuesday, June 25, 2024. Treasury
Decision 9998 sets forth final
regulations regarding the increased
credit amounts or the increased
deduction amount available for
taxpayers satisfying prevailing wage and
registered apprenticeship (collectively,
PWA) requirements established by the
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.
DATES:
Effective date: These corrections are
effective on August 26, 2024.
Applicability date: For date of
applicability, see §§ 1.30C–3(c), 1.45–
6(d), 1.45–7(e), 1.45–8(h), 1.45–12(f),
1.45L–3(c), 1.45Q–6(c), 1.45U–3(c),
1.45V–3(c), 1.45Y–3(c), 1.45Z–3(c),
1.48C–3(b), 1.179D–3(c).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning these final regulations,
Barbara Campbell or Nicole Cimino of
the Office of the Associate Chief
Counsel (Passthroughs & Special
Industries) at (202) 317–6853 (not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM
16AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66558-66560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18267]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 880
[Docket No. FDA-2024-N-3356]
Medical Devices; General Hospital and Personal Use Devices;
Classification of the Intravenous Catheter Force-Activated Separation
Device
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the intravenous catheter force-activated separation device
into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to
the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the intravenous catheter force-activated
separation device's classification. We are taking this action because
we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special
controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective August 16, 2024. The classification was
applicable on May 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Florencia Wilson, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2458, Silver Spring,
[[Page 66559]]
MD 20993-0002, 240-402-9978, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the intravenous catheter force-
activated separation device as class II (special controls), which we
have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by placing the
device into a lower device class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of
the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De
Novo classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo
application process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo
process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that
type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C
Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval application to market a
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the
less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On September 18, 2019, FDA received Site Saver, Inc. d/b/a Lineus
Medical's request for De Novo classification of the SafeBreak Vascular.
FDA reviewed the request to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on May 27, 2021, FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is
codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
880.5220.\1\ We have named the generic type of device intravenous
catheter force-activated separation device and it is identified as a
device placed in-line with an intravenous (IV) catheter and an
intravascular administration set, including any administration set
accessories. It separates into two parts when a specified force is
applied. The device is intended to reduce the risk of IV catheter
failure(s) requiring IV catheter replacement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Intravenous Catheter Force-Activated Separation Device Risks
and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks to health Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delays of therapy due to failure of Performance data, Non-clinical
device to function as expected (e.g., performance testing, and
if separation force too low). Labeling.
Mechanical complications (e.g., IV Performance data, Non-clinical
dislodgement, IV infiltration, performance testing, and
occlusion, and phlebitis events Labeling.
requiring IV replacement) due to
failure of device to function as
expected (e.g., if separation force
too high).
Infection.............................. Sterilization validation, Shelf
life testing, Non-clinical
performance testing, and
Labeling.
Air embolism........................... Non-clinical performance
testing, and Labeling.
[[Page 66560]]
Adverse tissue reaction................ Biocompatibility evaluation,
Pyrogenicity testing, and Non-
clinical performance testing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo
classification have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844;
the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through
E, regarding premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart
E, regarding premarket notification submissions, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in
21 CFR part 820, regarding quality system regulation, have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 880
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
880 is amended as follows:
PART 880--GENERAL HOSPITAL AND PERSONAL USE DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 880 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 880.5220 to read as follows:
Sec. 880.5220 Intravenous catheter force-activated separation device.
(a) Identification. An intravenous catheter force-activated
separation device is placed in-line with an intravenous (IV) catheter
and an intravascular administration set, including any administration
set accessories. It separates into two parts when a specified force is
applied. The device is intended to reduce the risk of IV catheter
failure(s) requiring IV catheter replacement.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Performance data must be provided to demonstrate clinically
acceptable performance for the intended use of the device.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The
following performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Separation force testing;
(ii) Validation of anti-reconnect features;
(iii) Air and liquid leakage testing, both before and after
separation;
(iv) Luer connection testing;
(v) Flow rate testing;
(vi) Particulate testing; and
(vii) Microbial ingress testing.
(3) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance testing must demonstrate that the device is sterile
and non-pyrogenic.
(5) Performance testing must support the shelf life of the device
by demonstrating continued sterility and device functionality over the
identified shelf life.
(6) Device labeling must include:
(i) Instructions for use; and
(ii) A discussion of catheter dressings intended to be used with
the device.
Dated: August 12, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-18267 Filed 8-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P