Findings of Failure To Submit State Implementation Plan Revisions for Nonattainment Areas for the 2010 1-Hour Primary Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard, 66603-66607 [2024-17328]
Download as PDF
66603
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Applicable
geographic
area
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
*
*
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for the 2008 ozone
national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS).
*
*
*
*
Statewide ..........
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2024–0168; FRL–11815–01–
OAR]
Findings of Failure To Submit State
Implementation Plan Revisions for
Nonattainment Areas for the 2010 1Hour Primary Sulfur Dioxide National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Jkt 262001
*
Angelina Brashear, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Policy Division (C539–01), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC; telephone
number: (919) 541–4746; email address:
brashear.angelina@epa.gov.
A. How is this Federal Register
document organized?
The information presented in this
preamble is organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. How is this Federal Register document
organized?
B. Notice and Comment Under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
C. Where can I get a copy of this document
and other related information?
D. Where do I go if I have specific State
questions?
II. Background
III. Consequences of Findings of Failure To
Submit
IV. Findings of Failure To Submit for States
That Failed To Make a Nonattainment
Area SIP Submittal
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review, Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and Executive Order
14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
*
*
After reconsideration of previous approval of CTG portion, EPA is now
disapproving, with the exception of
one negative declaration.
*
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Additional explanation
*
8/16/2024, [INSERT FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION].
I. General Information
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
find that four States failed to submit
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions required by the Clean Air Act
(CAA) in a timely manner for certain
nonattainment areas for the 2010 1-hour
sulfur dioxide (SO2) National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The
States that failed to submit the required
SIP revisions are Arizona, Louisiana,
New York, and Virginia. This action
triggers certain CAA deadlines for the
imposition of sanctions if a State does
not submit a complete SIP addressing
the outstanding requirements and for
the EPA to promulgate a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) if the EPA
does not approve the State’s SIP
revision addressing the outstanding
requirements.
DATES: This final action is effective on
September 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2024–0168. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
16:32 Aug 15, 2024
*
8/13/18
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final action.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
EPA approval date
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov.
*
[FR Doc. 2024–18162 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
State
submittal
date
Sfmt 4700
*
*
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority and Low Income Populations
and Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing
Our Nation’s Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
L. Judicial Review
B. Notice and Comment Under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(4)(B), provides that, when an
agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may
issue a rule without providing notice
and an opportunity for public comment.
The EPA has determined that there is
good cause for making this final agency
action without prior proposal and
opportunity for comment because no
significant EPA judgment is involved in
making findings of failure to submit
SIPs, or elements of SIPs, required by
the CAA, where States have made no
submissions to meet the requirement.
Thus, notice and public procedures are
unnecessary to take this action. The
EPA finds that this constitutes good
cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4)(B).
C. Where can I get a copy of this
document and other related
information?
In addition to being available in the
docket, an electronic copy of this
Federal Register document will be
posted at https://www.epa.gov/so2pollution/2010-sulfur-dioxide-nationalambient-air-quality-standardsimplementation-actions.
D. Where do I go if I have specific State
questions?
For questions related to specific States
mentioned in this document, please
contact the appropriate EPA Regional
office:
E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM
16AUR1
66604
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Regional offices
States
EPA Region 2: Mr. Kirk Wieber, Manager, Air Program Branch, EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007.
wieber.kirk@epa.gov.
EPA Region 3: Mr. David Talley, Acting Chief, Planning and Implementation Branch, EPA Region 3, 1600 JFK Boulevard,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. talley.david@epa.gov.
EPA Region 6: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Manager, State Planning and Implementation Branch, EPA Region 6, 1201 Elm Street,
Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75270. donaldson.guy@epa.gov.
EPA Region 9: Ms. Idalia Perez, Manager, Air Planning Section, EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105. perez.idalia@epa.gov.
In June 2010, the EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) promulgated a new
1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS of 75 parts
per billion (ppb), which is met when the
3-year average of the annual 99th
percentile of daily maximum 1-hour
average concentrations does not exceed
75 ppb.1 Following promulgation of a
new or revised NAAQS, the EPA is
required to designate all areas of the
country as either ‘‘attainment,’’
‘‘nonattainment,’’ or ‘‘unclassifiable’’
(CAA section 107(d)(1)). In multiple
separate rules,2 the EPA cumulatively
designated 51 areas within 23 States and
territories as nonattainment for the 2010
1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS.
The CAA directs States containing an
area designated nonattainment for the
2010 SO2 1-hour primary NAAQS to
develop and submit a nonattainment
area (NAA) SIP to the EPA within 18
months of the effective date of an area’s
designation as nonattainment. The
nonattainment (NAA) SIP (also referred
to as an attainment plan) must meet the
requirements of subparts l and 5 of part
D of Title I of the CAA, and provide for
attainment of the NAAQS by the
applicable statutory attainment date. All
components of the SO2 part D NAA SIP,
including the emissions inventory,
attainment demonstration, reasonably
available control measures (RACM)
including reasonably available control
technology (RACT), enforceable
emission limitations and control
measures, reasonable further progress
(RFP) plan, nonattainment new source
review (NNSR), and contingency
measures, are due under CAA section
191(a) to the EPA within 18 months of
the effective date of designation of an
area. Under CAA section 192(a), these
NAA SIPs must provide for attainment
of the NAAQS as expeditiously as
practicable, but no later than 3 years
from the effective date of the
nonattainment designation. Responsible
State air agencies were required to
prepare and submit to the EPA a NAA
SIP revision within 18 months of the
effective date of the nonattainment
designation to bring the NAAs into
attainment by the relevant attainment
date.
Pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(1)(B),
the EPA must determine no later than 6
months after the date by which a State
is required to submit a SIP whether a
State has made a submission that meets
the minimum completeness criteria
established pursuant to CAA section
110(k)(1)(A). These criteria are set forth
at 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. For those
States that have not yet made a
submittal that was complete with
respect to the minimum completeness
criteria for the 2010 1-hour primary SO2
NAAQS, the EPA is making a finding of
failure to submit a complete SIP.
On August 5, 2013, the EPA finalized
its first-round designation of 29 areas as
nonattainment for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS, effective October 4, 2013.3
This designation was based on air
quality monitoring data from 2009–2011
and included the Miami, Arizona and
St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana NAAs.
Pursuant to CAA section 192(a), the
Miami and St. Bernard Parish NAAs had
until October 4, 2018—5 years after the
1 On June 2, 2010, the EPA signed the final rule
title, ‘‘Primary National Ambient Air Quality
Standard for Sulfur Dioxide.’’ 75 FR 35520 (June 22,
2010), codified at 40 CFR part 50.17.
2 A series of rules designated nonattainment areas
of the country for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS: Round 1
(78 FR 47191) on August 5, 2013; Round 2 (81 FR
45039) on July 12, 2016; Round 2 Supplement (81
FR 89870) on December 13, 2016; Round 3 (83 FR
1098) on January 9, 2018; Round 3 Supplement (83
FR 14597) on April 5, 2018; and Round 4 (86 FR
16055) on March 26, 2021.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
II. Background
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
New York.
Virginia.
Louisiana.
Arizona.
effective date of the final action—to
demonstrate attainment of the 2010 SO2
NAAQS. Both NAAs failed to attain the
standard by this statutory deadline and
as such, under CAA section 179(c) the
EPA issued findings of failure to attain
(FFA) for Miami, Arizona on January 31,
2022 4 and for St. Bernard Parish,
Louisiana on October 5, 2022.5 These
FFAs set a deadline for the responsible
States to submit a revised SIP to the
EPA within 1 year, under CAA section
179(d). The deadlines for the revised
SIPs were January 31, 2023, for Miami,
Arizona and October 5, 2023, for St.
Bernard Parish, Louisiana. Neither
Arizona nor Louisiana submitted a
complete revised SIP addressing these
areas by the appropriate deadline.
On March 26, 2021, the EPA finalized
its fourth-round designation of 9 areas
as nonattainment for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS, effective April 30, 2021.6 This
Round 4 designation included St.
Lawrence County (part), New York and
Giles County (part), Virginia. Section
191 of the CAA directs States to submit
SIPs for areas designated as
nonattainment for the SO2 NAAQS to
the EPA within 18 months of the
effective date of the nonattainment
designation, i.e., by no later than
October 30, 2022, in this case. New York
and Virginia failed to submit complete
revised SIPs by this deadline.
Based on a review of SIP submittals
received and deemed complete as of the
date of this final action, the EPA is
finding that the States listed in Table 1
have failed to submit specific required
SIP elements.
3 78
FR 47191.
FR 4805.
5 87 FR 60273.
6 86 FR 16055.
4 87
E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM
16AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
66605
TABLE 1—FINDINGS OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT CERTAIN REQUIRED SIP ELEMENTS FOR THE 2010 SULFUR DIOXIDE NAAQS
Region
State
Area name
Required SIP
elements *
Emissions Inventory .....................................
Attainment Demonstration.
RACM/RACT.
RFP.
NNSR.
Contingency Measures.
Emissions Inventory .....................................
Attainment Demonstration.****
RACM/RACT.
RFP.
NNSR.
Contingency Measures.
Emissions Inventory .....................................
Attainment Demonstration.
RACM/RACT.
RFP.
NNSR.
Contingency Measures.
Emissions Inventory .....................................
Attainment Demonstration.
RACM/RACT.
RFP.
NNSR.
Contingency Measures.
2 .......................
NY
St. Lawrence County (part) * * ......................
3 .......................
VA
Giles County (part) ** ....................................
6 .......................
LA
St. Bernard Parish ........................................
9 .......................
AZ
Miami *** .......................................................
SIP revision due date
October 30, 2022.
October 30, 2022.
October 5, 2023.
January 31, 2023.
* Listed SIP elements are requirements of subparts l and 5 of part D, of Title I of the CAA, and provide for attainment of the NAAQS. Components of the SO2 part D NAA SIP include the emissions inventory, attainment demonstration, reasonably available control measures (RACM) including reasonably available control technology (RACT), enforceable emission limitations and control measures, reasonable further progress
(RFP) plan, nonattainment new source review (NNSR), and contingency measures.
** The term ‘‘part’’ is used to indicate that only a portion of the county or counties is designated nonattainment. Area boundaries are described
in 86 FR 16055 and codified at 40 CFR 81.333, 81.347, and 81.318 respectively for St. Lawrence County and Giles County
*** Area boundaries are described in 78 FR at 47198 and codified at 40 CFR 81.303.
**** The EPA’s State Planning Electronic Collaboration System (SPeCS) incorrectly indicated that Virginia had submitted the attainment demonstration component of the attainment plan for the SO2 Giles County NAA. The EPA corrected the error on March 12, 2024, and SPeCS now
shows that Virginia has not yet submitted any component of the attainment plan
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
III. Consequences of Findings of Failure
To Submit
If the EPA finds that a State has failed
to make the required SIP submittal or
that a submitted SIP is incomplete, then
CAA section 179(a) establishes specific
consequences, after a period of time,
including the imposition of mandatory
sanctions for the affected area.
Additionally, such a finding also
triggers an obligation under CAA
section 110(c) for the EPA to promulgate
a FIP no later than 2 years after the
finding of failure to submit if the
affected State has not submitted, and the
EPA has not approved, the required SIP
submittal.
If the EPA has not affirmatively
determined that a State has made the
required complete SIP submittal for an
area within 18 months of the effective
date of this action, then, pursuant to
CAA section 179(a) and (b) and 40 CFR
52.31, the offset sanction identified in
CAA section 179(b)(2) will apply in the
affected nonattainment area. If the EPA
has not affirmatively determined that
the State has made a complete
submission within 6 months after the
offset sanction is imposed, then the
highway funding sanction will apply in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
the affected nonattainment area, in
accordance with CAA section 179(b)(1)
and 40 CFR 52.31. The sanctions will
not take effect if, within 18 months after
the date of these findings, the EPA
affirmatively determines that the
affected State has made a complete SIP
submittal addressing the deficiency for
which the finding was made.
Additionally, if the State makes the
required SIP submittal and the EPA
takes final action to approve the
submittal within 2 years of the effective
date of these findings, the EPA is not
required to promulgate a FIP for the
affected nonattainment area.
IV. Findings of Failure To Submit for
States That Failed To Make a
Nonattainment Area SIP Submittal
Based on a review of SIP submittals
received and deemed complete as of the
date of signature of this action, the EPA
finds that the States listed in Table 1
failed to submit the indicated SIP
elements required under part D of Title
I of the CAA within 18 months of their
associated effective dates of designation.
The EPA is, therefore, issuing a finding
of failure to submit for the required SIP
elements listed in Table 1 of this action.
The effective date of this finding starts
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the 18-month emission offset sanctions
clock, the 24-month highway funding
sanctions clock, and a 24-month clock
for the EPA to promulgate a FIP.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders (‘‘E.O.’’)
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/
laws-regulations/laws-and-executiveorders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review, Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and Executive Order
14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as amended by
Executive Order 14094, and was
therefore not subject to a requirement
for Executive Order 12866 review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This final
rule does not establish any new
information collection requirement
E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM
16AUR1
66606
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
apart from what is already required by
law. This action relates to the
requirement in the CAA for States to
submit SIPs under CAA sections 172,
191, and 192 that address the
requirements that apply to areas
designated as nonattainment for the SO2
NAAQS.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action is a finding that the
named States have not made the
necessary SIP submissions for certain
nonattainment areas to meet the
requirements of part D of Title I of the
CAA.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538) and does not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
The action imposes no new enforceable
duty on any State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have Tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action finds that
several States failed to submit SIP
revisions that satisfy the nonattainment
area planning requirements under
sections 172, 191, and 192 of the CAA.
No Tribe is subject to the requirement
to submit an implementation plan under
section 172, 191, and 192 of the CAA.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern health or
safety risks that the EPA has reason to
believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ‘‘covered
regulatory action’’ in section 2–202 of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
the Executive order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it is a finding that several States
failed to submit required SIP revisions
that satisfy the nonattainment area
planning requirements under sections
172, 191, and 192 of the CAA and does
not concern an environmental health
risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve technical
standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations and Executive
Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation’s
Commitment to Environmental Justice
for All
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. Executive Order
14096 (88 FR 25251, April 26, 2023)
directs the Federal Government to build
upon and strengthen its commitment to
deliver environmental justice to all
communities across the country through
an approach that is informed by
scientific research, high-quality data,
and meaningful Federal engagement
with communities experiencing
environmental justice concerns.
The EPA believes that the human
health or environmental conditions that
exist prior to this action have the
potential to result in disproportionate
and adverse human health or
environmental effects on communities
with environmental justice concerns.
The EPA believes that this action is not
likely to change existing
disproportionate and adverse effects on
communities with environmental justice
concerns. The areas impacted by this
action are designated as nonattainment
for the 2010 1-hour primary SO2
NAAQS and this action is intended to
comply with the CAA program to ensure
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS. From a programmatic
perspective, this action is intended to
ensure that affected air agencies comply
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with CAA obligations for the applicable
nonattainment areas.
The EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this
action. In this action, the EPA is
performing a nondiscretionary duty to
find that required State submissions
were not timely. There is not an
alternative action that can be taken by
the EPA to this action and thus, these
determinations are not informed by
additional EJ related analyses. Further,
there is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goals of
Executive Orders 12898 or 14096 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and indigenous peoples.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Determinations Under CAA Section
307(b)(1)
Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA governs
judicial review of final actions by the
EPA. This section provides, in part, that
petitions for review must be filed in the
United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit if (i) the
agency action consists of ‘‘nationally
applicable regulations promulgated, or
final action taken, by the
Administrator,’’ or (ii) such action is
locally or regionally applicable, but
‘‘such action is based on a
determination of nationwide scope or
effect and if in taking such action the
Administrator finds and publishes that
such action is based on such a
determination.’’
This final action is ‘‘nationally
applicable’’ within the meaning of CAA
section 307(b)(1). This final action
consists of findings of failure to submit
required SIPs for four areas designated
nonattainment for the 2010 primary 1hour SO2 NAAQS, which are located in
four States in four of the 10 EPA
Regions and in four different federal
judicial circuits. This final action is also
based on a common core of factual
findings concerning the receipt and
completeness of the relevant SIP
submittals.
Accordingly, under section 307(b)(1)
of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit by October 15,
2024.
E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM
16AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Approval and
promulgation of implementation plans,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
Oxides.
Joseph Goffman,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024–17328 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2023–0190; FRL–12117–
02–R5]
Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Ozone SIP
Modifications Due to the Municipal
Solid Waste Landfill Update
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving the Indiana
Department of Environmental
Management’s (IDEM) request to repeal
and replace portions of the Indiana
Administrative Code (IAC) for Lake,
Porter, Clark, and Floyd Counties in
Indiana. This new regulation includes
Federal updates to municipal solid
waste landfill rules with the
incorporation by reference of the
Federal plan for Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills. EPA finds that this action is
approvable because it is consistent with
the EPA’s Emission Guidelines for
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills and is
a SIP strengthening measure.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective October 15, 2024, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by
September 16, 2024. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2023–0190 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
arra.sarah@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at https://
www.regulations.gov, follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from the docket. EPA
may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI), Proprietary Business
Information (PBI), or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI, PBI, or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katie Mullen, Air and Radiation
Division (AR18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–3490,
mullen.kathleen@epa.gov. The EPA
Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
I. What is the background of this SIP
submission?
Municipal solid waste landfills
(MSWLFs) are discrete areas of land or
excavation that receive household waste
or other types of nonhazardous wastes
such as commercial solid waste,
nonhazardous sludge, and industrial
nonhazardous solid waste. The original
New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) (40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW)
for MSWLFs and Emission Guidelines
(40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc) for existing
MSWLFs were promulgated by EPA on
March 12, 1996 (61 FR 9905), based on
the determination that MSWLFs cause
or significantly contribute to air
pollution that is considered to endanger
public health and welfare.
326 IAC 8–8 implements the Federal
1996 Emission Guidelines and applies
to landfills located in Lake, Porter,
Clark, and Floyd counties. On January
17, 1997, EPA approved 326 IAC 8–8
into Indiana’s SIP to address volatile
organic compound (VOC) emission
reductions for the nonattainment
counties under the 1-hour ozone
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66607
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). Specifically, 326 IAC 8–8
addresses Indiana’s 15% Rate of
Progress Plan to control VOC emissions
in Clark and Floyd Counties and is
included in the VOC contingency plans
for Lake and Porter Counties (January
17, 1997, 62 FR 2591).
On August 29, 2016, EPA revised the
MSWLF NSPS and Emission Guidelines
in 40 CFR part 60, subparts XXX and Cf,
respectively (81 FR 59332; 81 FR
59276). The 2016 Emission Guidelines
revision updates the control
requirements and monitoring, reporting,
and recordkeeping provisions for
existing MSWLF sources. In particular,
the 2016 Emissions Guidelines
implement changes to existing landfills
that lower the emissions threshold of
non-methane organic compounds
(which include VOCs), at which an
operator must install controls.
On May 21, 2021, EPA promulgated
40 CFR part 62, subpart OOO as the
Federal plan for existing landfills (86 FR
27770). Indiana promulgated 326 IAC 8–
8.2 to incorporate by reference the
Federal plan to use as the underlying
rule which implements and enforces the
applicable provisions under the MSWLF
2016 Emission Guidelines in 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Cf.
Consequently, MSWLFs in Indiana
are subject to both 326 IAC 8–8 and the
Federal plan for existing landfills if EPA
does not repeal 326 IAC 8–8 and replace
it with rule 326 IAC 8–8.2.
II. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP
revision
326 IAC 8–8.2 includes Federal
updates to MSWLF rules with the
incorporation by reference of the
Federal plan for MSWLFs at 40 CFR part
62, subpart OOO. The Federal plan
implements and enforces the 2016
MSWLF Emission Guidelines, codified
in 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf.
The updated 2016 Emission
Guidelines apply to landfills
constructed, modified, or reconstructed
on or before July 17, 2014. These
Emission Guidelines achieve additional
emissions reductions of landfill gas and
its components, including VOCs, by
lowering the emissions threshold at
which a landfill must install controls.
In particular, the 2016 Emission
Guidelines are more stringent since they
require affected landfills to install and
operate gas collection control systems
within 30 months after landfill gas
emissions reach a new, lower threshold
of 34 metric tons of non-methane
organic compounds, which includes
VOCs, or more per year. This threshold
previously was higher at 50 metric tons
per year in the 1996 Emission
E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM
16AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66603-66607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17328]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2024-0168; FRL-11815-01-OAR]
Findings of Failure To Submit State Implementation Plan Revisions
for Nonattainment Areas for the 2010 1-Hour Primary Sulfur Dioxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final action.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to find that four States failed to submit State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revisions required by the Clean Air Act (CAA) in a timely
manner for certain nonattainment areas for the 2010 1-hour sulfur
dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
The States that failed to submit the required SIP revisions are
Arizona, Louisiana, New York, and Virginia. This action triggers
certain CAA deadlines for the imposition of sanctions if a State does
not submit a complete SIP addressing the outstanding requirements and
for the EPA to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) if the
EPA does not approve the State's SIP revision addressing the
outstanding requirements.
DATES: This final action is effective on September 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2024-0168. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelina Brashear, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division (C539-01),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC;
telephone number: (919) 541-4746; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. How is this Federal Register document organized?
The information presented in this preamble is organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. How is this Federal Register document organized?
B. Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA)
C. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related
information?
D. Where do I go if I have specific State questions?
II. Background
III. Consequences of Findings of Failure To Submit
IV. Findings of Failure To Submit for States That Failed To Make a
Nonattainment Area SIP Submittal
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review,
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,
and Executive Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority and Low Income Populations and
Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
L. Judicial Review
B. Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4)(B), provides that, when
an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, the
agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for
public comment. The EPA has determined that there is good cause for
making this final agency action without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because no significant EPA judgment is involved in making
findings of failure to submit SIPs, or elements of SIPs, required by
the CAA, where States have made no submissions to meet the requirement.
Thus, notice and public procedures are unnecessary to take this action.
The EPA finds that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(4)(B).
C. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related
information?
In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of
this Federal Register document will be posted at https://www.epa.gov/so2-pollution/2010-sulfur-dioxide-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-implementation-actions.
D. Where do I go if I have specific State questions?
For questions related to specific States mentioned in this
document, please contact the appropriate EPA Regional office:
[[Page 66604]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regional offices States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA Region 2: Mr. Kirk Wieber, Manager, Air New York.
Program Branch, EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway,
New York, New York 10007.
[email protected].
EPA Region 3: Mr. David Talley, Acting Chief, Virginia.
Planning and Implementation Branch, EPA
Region 3, 1600 JFK Boulevard, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. [email protected].
EPA Region 6: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Manager, Louisiana.
State Planning and Implementation Branch,
EPA Region 6, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500,
Dallas, Texas 75270. [email protected].
EPA Region 9: Ms. Idalia Perez, Manager, Air Arizona.
Planning Section, EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California 94105.
[email protected].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Background
In June 2010, the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) promulgated
a new 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS of 75 parts per billion
(ppb), which is met when the 3-year average of the annual 99th
percentile of daily maximum 1-hour average concentrations does not
exceed 75 ppb.\1\ Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the
EPA is required to designate all areas of the country as either
``attainment,'' ``nonattainment,'' or ``unclassifiable'' (CAA section
107(d)(1)). In multiple separate rules,\2\ the EPA cumulatively
designated 51 areas within 23 States and territories as nonattainment
for the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On June 2, 2010, the EPA signed the final rule title,
``Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur
Dioxide.'' 75 FR 35520 (June 22, 2010), codified at 40 CFR part
50.17.
\2\ A series of rules designated nonattainment areas of the
country for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS: Round 1 (78 FR 47191) on
August 5, 2013; Round 2 (81 FR 45039) on July 12, 2016; Round 2
Supplement (81 FR 89870) on December 13, 2016; Round 3 (83 FR 1098)
on January 9, 2018; Round 3 Supplement (83 FR 14597) on April 5,
2018; and Round 4 (86 FR 16055) on March 26, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAA directs States containing an area designated nonattainment
for the 2010 SO2 1-hour primary NAAQS to develop and submit
a nonattainment area (NAA) SIP to the EPA within 18 months of the
effective date of an area's designation as nonattainment. The
nonattainment (NAA) SIP (also referred to as an attainment plan) must
meet the requirements of subparts l and 5 of part D of Title I of the
CAA, and provide for attainment of the NAAQS by the applicable
statutory attainment date. All components of the SO2 part D
NAA SIP, including the emissions inventory, attainment demonstration,
reasonably available control measures (RACM) including reasonably
available control technology (RACT), enforceable emission limitations
and control measures, reasonable further progress (RFP) plan,
nonattainment new source review (NNSR), and contingency measures, are
due under CAA section 191(a) to the EPA within 18 months of the
effective date of designation of an area. Under CAA section 192(a),
these NAA SIPs must provide for attainment of the NAAQS as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later than 3 years from the
effective date of the nonattainment designation. Responsible State air
agencies were required to prepare and submit to the EPA a NAA SIP
revision within 18 months of the effective date of the nonattainment
designation to bring the NAAs into attainment by the relevant
attainment date.
Pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(1)(B), the EPA must determine no
later than 6 months after the date by which a State is required to
submit a SIP whether a State has made a submission that meets the
minimum completeness criteria established pursuant to CAA section
110(k)(1)(A). These criteria are set forth at 40 CFR part 51, appendix
V. For those States that have not yet made a submittal that was
complete with respect to the minimum completeness criteria for the 2010
1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS, the EPA is making a finding of
failure to submit a complete SIP.
On August 5, 2013, the EPA finalized its first-round designation of
29 areas as nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS, effective
October 4, 2013.\3\ This designation was based on air quality
monitoring data from 2009-2011 and included the Miami, Arizona and St.
Bernard Parish, Louisiana NAAs. Pursuant to CAA section 192(a), the
Miami and St. Bernard Parish NAAs had until October 4, 2018--5 years
after the effective date of the final action--to demonstrate attainment
of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. Both NAAs failed to attain the
standard by this statutory deadline and as such, under CAA section
179(c) the EPA issued findings of failure to attain (FFA) for Miami,
Arizona on January 31, 2022 \4\ and for St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana
on October 5, 2022.\5\ These FFAs set a deadline for the responsible
States to submit a revised SIP to the EPA within 1 year, under CAA
section 179(d). The deadlines for the revised SIPs were January 31,
2023, for Miami, Arizona and October 5, 2023, for St. Bernard Parish,
Louisiana. Neither Arizona nor Louisiana submitted a complete revised
SIP addressing these areas by the appropriate deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 78 FR 47191.
\4\ 87 FR 4805.
\5\ 87 FR 60273.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 26, 2021, the EPA finalized its fourth-round designation
of 9 areas as nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS,
effective April 30, 2021.\6\ This Round 4 designation included St.
Lawrence County (part), New York and Giles County (part), Virginia.
Section 191 of the CAA directs States to submit SIPs for areas
designated as nonattainment for the SO2 NAAQS to the EPA
within 18 months of the effective date of the nonattainment
designation, i.e., by no later than October 30, 2022, in this case. New
York and Virginia failed to submit complete revised SIPs by this
deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 86 FR 16055.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on a review of SIP submittals received and deemed complete as
of the date of this final action, the EPA is finding that the States
listed in Table 1 have failed to submit specific required SIP elements.
[[Page 66605]]
Table 1--Findings of Failure To Submit Certain Required SIP Elements for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Required SIP
Region State Area name elements * SIP revision due date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2....................... NY St. Lawrence County Emissions October 30, 2022.
(part) * *. Inventory.
Attainment
Demonstration..
RACM/RACT.........
RFP...............
NNSR..............
Contingency
Measures..
3....................... VA Giles County (part) Emissions October 30, 2022.
**. Inventory.
Attainment
Demonstration.***
*.
RACM/RACT.........
RFP...............
NNSR..............
Contingency
Measures..
6....................... LA St. Bernard Parish. Emissions October 5, 2023.
Inventory.
Attainment
Demonstration..
RACM/RACT.........
RFP...............
NNSR..............
Contingency
Measures..
9....................... AZ Miami ***.......... Emissions January 31, 2023.
Inventory.
Attainment
Demonstration..
RACM/RACT.........
RFP...............
NNSR..............
Contingency
Measures..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Listed SIP elements are requirements of subparts l and 5 of part D, of Title I of the CAA, and provide for
attainment of the NAAQS. Components of the SO2 part D NAA SIP include the emissions inventory, attainment
demonstration, reasonably available control measures (RACM) including reasonably available control technology
(RACT), enforceable emission limitations and control measures, reasonable further progress (RFP) plan,
nonattainment new source review (NNSR), and contingency measures.
** The term ``part'' is used to indicate that only a portion of the county or counties is designated
nonattainment. Area boundaries are described in 86 FR 16055 and codified at 40 CFR 81.333, 81.347, and 81.318
respectively for St. Lawrence County and Giles County
*** Area boundaries are described in 78 FR at 47198 and codified at 40 CFR 81.303.
**** The EPA's State Planning Electronic Collaboration System (SPeCS) incorrectly indicated that Virginia had
submitted the attainment demonstration component of the attainment plan for the SO2 Giles County NAA. The EPA
corrected the error on March 12, 2024, and SPeCS now shows that Virginia has not yet submitted any component
of the attainment plan
III. Consequences of Findings of Failure To Submit
If the EPA finds that a State has failed to make the required SIP
submittal or that a submitted SIP is incomplete, then CAA section
179(a) establishes specific consequences, after a period of time,
including the imposition of mandatory sanctions for the affected area.
Additionally, such a finding also triggers an obligation under CAA
section 110(c) for the EPA to promulgate a FIP no later than 2 years
after the finding of failure to submit if the affected State has not
submitted, and the EPA has not approved, the required SIP submittal.
If the EPA has not affirmatively determined that a State has made
the required complete SIP submittal for an area within 18 months of the
effective date of this action, then, pursuant to CAA section 179(a) and
(b) and 40 CFR 52.31, the offset sanction identified in CAA section
179(b)(2) will apply in the affected nonattainment area. If the EPA has
not affirmatively determined that the State has made a complete
submission within 6 months after the offset sanction is imposed, then
the highway funding sanction will apply in the affected nonattainment
area, in accordance with CAA section 179(b)(1) and 40 CFR 52.31. The
sanctions will not take effect if, within 18 months after the date of
these findings, the EPA affirmatively determines that the affected
State has made a complete SIP submittal addressing the deficiency for
which the finding was made. Additionally, if the State makes the
required SIP submittal and the EPA takes final action to approve the
submittal within 2 years of the effective date of these findings, the
EPA is not required to promulgate a FIP for the affected nonattainment
area.
IV. Findings of Failure To Submit for States That Failed To Make a
Nonattainment Area SIP Submittal
Based on a review of SIP submittals received and deemed complete as
of the date of signature of this action, the EPA finds that the States
listed in Table 1 failed to submit the indicated SIP elements required
under part D of Title I of the CAA within 18 months of their associated
effective dates of designation. The EPA is, therefore, issuing a
finding of failure to submit for the required SIP elements listed in
Table 1 of this action. The effective date of this finding starts the
18-month emission offset sanctions clock, the 24-month highway funding
sanctions clock, and a 24-month clock for the EPA to promulgate a FIP.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
(``E.O.'') can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and Executive
Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094, and was
therefore not subject to a requirement for Executive Order 12866
review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
This final rule does not establish any new information collection
requirement
[[Page 66606]]
apart from what is already required by law. This action relates to the
requirement in the CAA for States to submit SIPs under CAA sections
172, 191, and 192 that address the requirements that apply to areas
designated as nonattainment for the SO2 NAAQS.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
is a finding that the named States have not made the necessary SIP
submissions for certain nonattainment areas to meet the requirements of
part D of Title I of the CAA.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes
no new enforceable duty on any State, local, or Tribal governments or
the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have Tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action finds that several States failed to
submit SIP revisions that satisfy the nonattainment area planning
requirements under sections 172, 191, and 192 of the CAA. No Tribe is
subject to the requirement to submit an implementation plan under
section 172, 191, and 192 of the CAA. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks that the EPA has
reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the
definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the
Executive order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045
because it is a finding that several States failed to submit required
SIP revisions that satisfy the nonattainment area planning requirements
under sections 172, 191, and 192 of the CAA and does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations and
Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address ``disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects'' of their actions on minority
populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law. Executive Order 14096 (88 FR 25251,
April 26, 2023) directs the Federal Government to build upon and
strengthen its commitment to deliver environmental justice to all
communities across the country through an approach that is informed by
scientific research, high-quality data, and meaningful Federal
engagement with communities experiencing environmental justice
concerns.
The EPA believes that the human health or environmental conditions
that exist prior to this action have the potential to result in
disproportionate and adverse human health or environmental effects on
communities with environmental justice concerns. The EPA believes that
this action is not likely to change existing disproportionate and
adverse effects on communities with environmental justice concerns. The
areas impacted by this action are designated as nonattainment for the
2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS and this action is intended to
comply with the CAA program to ensure attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS. From a programmatic perspective, this action is intended to
ensure that affected air agencies comply with CAA obligations for the
applicable nonattainment areas.
The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in
this action. In this action, the EPA is performing a nondiscretionary
duty to find that required State submissions were not timely. There is
not an alternative action that can be taken by the EPA to this action
and thus, these determinations are not informed by additional EJ
related analyses. Further, there is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goals of Executive Orders 12898 or 14096
of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income
populations, and indigenous peoples.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Determinations Under CAA Section 307(b)(1)
Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA governs judicial review of final
actions by the EPA. This section provides, in part, that petitions for
review must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit if (i) the agency action consists of
``nationally applicable regulations promulgated, or final action taken,
by the Administrator,'' or (ii) such action is locally or regionally
applicable, but ``such action is based on a determination of nationwide
scope or effect and if in taking such action the Administrator finds
and publishes that such action is based on such a determination.''
This final action is ``nationally applicable'' within the meaning
of CAA section 307(b)(1). This final action consists of findings of
failure to submit required SIPs for four areas designated nonattainment
for the 2010 primary 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, which are located in
four States in four of the 10 EPA Regions and in four different federal
judicial circuits. This final action is also based on a common core of
factual findings concerning the receipt and completeness of the
relevant SIP submittals.
Accordingly, under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by October 15, 2024.
[[Page 66607]]
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Approval and promulgation of implementation
plans, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur Oxides.
Joseph Goffman,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-17328 Filed 8-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P