Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions-Spring 2024, 66912-66960 [2024-16467]
Download as PDF
66912
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Ch. I
Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory
and Deregulatory Actions—Spring
2024
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.
In the Spring and Fall of each
year, the Federal Communications
Commission publishes in the Federal
Register a list in the Unified Agenda of
those major items and other significant
regulatory proceedings under
development or review that pertain to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
602). The Unified Agenda also provides
the Code of Federal Regulations
citations and legal authorities that
govern these proceedings. The complete
Unified Agenda will be published on
the internet in a searchable format at
www.reginfo.gov.
SUMMARY:
Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Brown, Program Specialist,
Office of Communications Business
Opportunities, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418–1663.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Unified Agenda of Major and Other
Significant Proceedings
The Commission encourages public
participation in its rulemaking process.
To help keep the public informed of
significant rulemaking proceedings, the
Commission has prepared a list of
important proceedings now in progress.
The General Services Administration
publishes the Unified Agenda in the
Federal Register in the spring and fall
of each year.
The following terms may clarify the
status of the proceedings included in
this report:
Docket Number—assigned to a
proceeding if the Commission has
issued either a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking or a Notice of Inquiry
concerning the matter under
consideration. The Commission has
used docket numbers since January 1,
1978. Docket numbers consist of the last
two digits of the calendar year in which
the docket was established plus a
sequential number that begins at 1 with
the first docket initiated during a
calendar year (e.g., Docket No. 15–1 or
Docket No. 17–1). The abbreviation for
the responsible bureau usually precedes
the docket number, as in ‘‘MB Docket
No. 15–137,’’ which indicates that the
responsible bureau is the Media Bureau.
A docket number consisting of only five
digits (e.g., Docket No. 29622) indicates
that the docket was established before
January 1, 1978.
Notice of Inquiry (NOI)—the
Commission will issue an NOI when it
is seeking information on a broad
subject or trying to generate ideas on a
given topic. Interested parties may
submit comments during the specified
comment period.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM)—the Commission will issue an
NPRM when it is proposing new rules
or changes to existing rules and
regulations. Before any changes are
made, the Commission requests
interested parties to submit written
comments on the proposed rules or
revisions.
Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (FNPRM)—the Commission
will issue an FNPRM when it is seeking
additional information from the public
and requests the public to submit
comments in the proceeding.
Memorandum Opinion and Order
(MO&O)—the Commission will issue an
MO&O in response to a petition for
rulemaking, to conclude an inquiry,
modify a decision, amend a Report and
Order, or state that the Report and Order
will not be changed.
Rulemaking (RM) Number—assigned
to a proceeding after the appropriate
bureau or office has reviewed a petition
for rulemaking, but before the
Commission has acted on the petition.
Report and Order (R&O)—the
Commission may issue an R&O that will
either adopt new rules, change existing
rules, or state that no rule or regulation
changes will be made.
Sanford S. Williams,
Deputy Chief of Staff for Chairwoman
Rosenworcel.
CONSUMER AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Title
262 ....................
Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991 (CG Docket No. 02–278).
Rules and Regulations Implementing Section 225 of the Communications Act (Telecommunications Relay
Service) (CG Docket No. 03–123).
Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service (VRS) Program (CG Docket No. 10–51) ......................
Implementation of the Middle-Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012/Establishment of a Public
Safety Answering Point Do-Not-Call Registry (CG Docket No. 12–129).
Implementation of Sections 716 and 717 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the TwentyFirst Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CG Docket No. 10–213).
Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP) Captioned Telephone Service; Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech-to-Speech Services; CG Docket No. 13–24.
Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls (CG Docket No. 17–59) ............................
Empowering Broadband Consumers Through Transparency (CG Docket No 22–2) .....................................
Targeting and Eliminating Unlawful Text Messages, CG Docket 21–403, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP) Relay Service; CG Docket No. 12–38 .........................................................
Compensation for Internet Protocol Captioned Telephone Service, (CG Docket No. 22–408) ......................
Access to Video Conferencing, (CG Docket No. 23–161) ..............................................................................
263 ....................
264 ....................
265 ....................
266 ....................
267 ....................
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
268
269
270
271
272
273
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
3060–AI14
3060–AI15
3060–AJ42
3060–AJ84
3060–AK00
3060–AK01
3060–AK62
3060–AL33
3060–AL49
3060–AL58
3060–AL59
3060–AL66
ECONOMICS—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
274 ....................
Development of Nationwide Broadband Data to Evaluate Reasonable and Timely Deployment of Advanced Services to All Americans.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
3060–AJ15
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
66913
ECONOMICS—LONG-TERM ACTIONS—Continued
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
275 ....................
Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions (GN
Docket No. 12–268).
Broadband Data Collection ..............................................................................................................................
276 ....................
3060–AJ82
3060–AL42
OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Sequence No.
277
278
279
280
....................
....................
....................
....................
281 ....................
282 ....................
283 ....................
284 ....................
285 ....................
Regulation
Identifier No.
Title
Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands (ET Docket No. 04–186) .................................................
Use of the 5.850–5.925 GHz Band; (ET Docket No. 19–138), FCC 19–129 .................................................
Unlicensed White Space Device Operations in the Television Bands, ET Docket No. 20–36 .......................
Protecting Against National Security Threats to the Communications Supply Chain Through the Equipment Authorization and Competitive Bidding Programs; ET Docket No. 21–232, EA Docket No. 21–233.
Wireless Microphones in the TV Bands (ET Docket No. 21–115), 600 MHz Guard Band, 600 MHz Duplex
Gap, and the 941.5–944 MHz, 944–952 MHz, 952.850–956.250 MHz, 956.45–959.85 MHz, 1435–1525
MHz.
FCC Seeks to Enable State-of-the-Art Radar Sensors in 60 GHz Band (ET Docket No. 21–264) ...............
FCC Proposes to Update Equipment Authorization Rules to Incorporate New and Revised Industry Standards, (ET Docket No. 21–363).
Allocation of Spectrum for Non-Federal Space Launch Operations (ET Docket No. 13–115) .......................
FCC Implements and Proposes Final Acts of the WRC–19 and WRC–15, ET Docket No. 21–120 & 21–
121, and RM–11785.
3060–AI52
3060–AK96
3060–AL22
3060–AL23
3060–AL27
3060–AL36
3060–AL39
3060–AL44
3060–AL77
MEDIA BUREAU—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
286 ....................
287 ....................
Revision of EEO Rules and Policies (MB Docket No. 98–204) ......................................................................
Establishment of Rules for Digital Low-Power Television, Television Translator, and Television Booster
Stations (MB Docket No. 03–185).
Authorizing Permissive Use of the ‘‘Next Generation’’ Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16–
142).
2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules (MB Docket 18–
349).
Equal Employment Opportunity Enforcement (MB Docket 19–177) ...............................................................
Duplication of Programming on Commonly Owned Radio Stations (MB Docket No. 19–310) ......................
Sponsorship Identification Requirements for Foreign Government-Provided Programming (MB Docket No.
20–299).
FM Broadcast Booster Stations (MB Docket 20–401) ....................................................................................
Amendment of Part 73 Rules to Update Television and Class A Television Broadcast Station Rules, and
Rules Applicable to All Broadcast Stations (MB Docket No. 22–227).
Implementation of the Low Power Protection Act, MB Docket No. 23–126 ...................................................
Video Description, MB Docket No. 11–43 .......................................................................................................
2022 Quadrennial Review of Media Ownership Rules, MB Docket No. 22–459 ............................................
Modifying Rules for FM Terrestrial Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems, MB Docket No. 22–405 ................
Customer Rebates for Undelivered Video Programming During Blackouts, MB Docket No 24–20 ...............
Priority Application Review for Broadcast Stations That Provide Local Journalism or Other Locally Originated Programming, MB Docket No 24–14.
Cable Operator and DBS Provider Billing Practices, MB Docket No 23–405 ................................................
Reporting Requirements for Commercial Television Broadcast Station Blackouts, MB Docket No 23–427
All-In Pricing for Cable and Satellite Television Service, MB Docket No 23–203 ..........................................
288 ....................
289 ....................
290 ....................
291 ....................
292 ....................
293 ....................
294 ....................
295
296
297
298
299
300
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
301 ....................
302 ....................
303 ....................
3060–AH95
3060–AI38
3060–AK56
3060–AK77
3060–AK86
3060–AL19
3060–AL20
3060–AL21
3060–AL50
3060–AL63
3060–AL64
3060–AL65
3060–AL70
3060–AL71
3060–AL72
3060–AL73
3060–AL74
3060–AL75
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
OFFICE OF MANAGING DIRECTOR—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
304 ....................
Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees ..............................................................................................
3060–AK64
OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
305 ....................
Process Reform for Executive Branch Review of Certain FCC Applications and Petitions Involving Foreign
Ownership, IB Docket No. 16–155.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
3060–AL12
66914
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS—LONG-TERM ACTIONS—Continued
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
306 ....................
Review of International Section 214 Authorizations to Assess Evolving National Security, Law Enforcement, Foreign Policy, and Trade Policy Risks, IB Docket No 23–119, MD Docket No 23–134.
3060–AL76
PUBLIC SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY BUREAU—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
307 ....................
308 ....................
Wireless E911 Location Accuracy Requirements: PS Docket No. 07–114 ....................................................
Improving Outage Reporting for Submarine Cables and Enhancing Submarine Cable Outage Data; GN
Docket No. 15–206.
Amendments to Part 4 of the Commission’s Rules Concerning Disruptions to Communications: (PS Docket No. 15–80, 18–336, 23–5).
New Part 4 of the Commission’s Rules Concerning Disruptions to Communications; ET Docket No. 04–35
Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA): PS Docket No. 15–91, 15–94, 22–329 ..................................................
911 Fee Diversion Rulemaking: PS Docket Nos. 20–291, 09–14 ..................................................................
Resilient Networks, Amendments to Part 4 of the Commission’s Rules Concerning Disruptions to Communications; PS Docket No 21–346.
Location-Based Routing for Wireless 911 Calls (P.S. Docket 18–64) ............................................................
Next Generation 9–1–1, PS Docket No. 21–479, FCC 23–47 ........................................................................
309 ....................
310
311
312
313
....................
....................
....................
....................
314 ....................
315 ....................
3060–AJ52
3060–AK39
3060–AK40
3060–AK41
3060–AK54
3060–AL31
3060–AL43
3060–AL52
3060–AL67
SPACE BUREAU—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
316 ....................
Update to Parts 2 and 25 Concerning NonGeostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service Systems, and Related
Matters: IB Docket No. I6–408.
Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the FCC Rules to Facilitate the Use of Earth Stations in Motion Communicating With Geostationary Orbit Space Stations in FSS Bands: IB Docket No. 17–95.
Facilitating the Communications of Earth Stations in Motion With Non-Geostationary Orbit Space Stations:
IB Docket No. 18–315.
Space Innovation; Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space Age: IB Docket Nos. 18–313, 22–271 .....
Parts 2 and 25 to Enable GSO FSS in the 17.3–17.8 GHz Band, Modernize Rules for 17/24 GHz BSS
Space Stations, and Establish Off-Axis Uplink Power Limits for Extended Ka-Band FSS (IB Doc. No.
20–330).
Revising Spectrum Sharing Rules for Non-Geostationary Orbit, Fixed-Satellite Service Systems: IB Docket No. 21–456.
Expediting Initial Processing of Satellite and Earth Station Applications; Space Innovation, IB Docket Nos.
22–411 and 22–271.
Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission’s Rules to Enable NGSO Fixed-Satellite Service
(Space-to-Earth) Operations in the 17.3–17.8 GHz Band.
317 ....................
318 ....................
319 ....................
320 ....................
321 ....................
322 ....................
323 ....................
3060–AK59
3060–AK84
3060–AK89
3060–AK90
3060–AL28
3060–AL41
3060–AL51
3060–AL79
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Title
324 ....................
Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90, and 95 of the Commission’s Rules to Improve Wireless Coverage Through the Use of Signal Boosters (WT Docket No. 10–4).
Promoting Technological Solutions to Combat Wireless Contraband Device Use in Correctional Facilities;
GN Docket No. 13–111.
Promoting Investment in the 3550–3700 MHz Band; GN Docket No. 17–258 ...............................................
Updating Part 1 Competitive Bidding Rules (WT Docket No. 14–170) ...........................................................
Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz for Mobile Services—Spectrum Frontiers: WT Docket 10–112 ......
Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz Band: GN Docket No. 18–122 ..............................................
Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Promote Aviation Safety: WT Docket No. 19–140 .....................
Implementation of State and Local Governments’ Obligation to Approve Certain Wireless Facility Modification Requests Under Section 6409(a) of the Spectrum Act of 2012 (WT Docket No.19–250).
Expanding Flexible Use of the 12.2–12.7 GHz Band, et al., WT Docket No. 20–443, et al ..........................
Facilitating Shared Use in the 3100–3550 MHz Band ....................................................................................
Shared Use of the 42–42.5 GHz Band (WT Docket No. 23–158, GN Docket No. 14–177) ..........................
Single Network Future: Supplemental Coverage from Space, GN Docket No. 23–65 ...................................
Modifying Emissions Limits for the 24.25–24.45 GHz and 24.75–25.25 GHz Bands (ET Docket No. 21–
186).
Alaska Connect Fund Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ..................................................................................
Indian Peak Properties LLC Petitions for Declaratory Ruling Seeking Preemption Under The Rule Governing Over-the-Air Reception Devices.
325 ....................
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
326
327
328
329
330
331
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
332
333
334
335
336
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
337 ....................
338 ....................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
3060–AJ87
3060–AK06
3060–AK12
3060–AK28
3060–AK44
3060–AK76
3060–AK92
3060–AL29
3060–AL40
3060–AL57
3060–AL68
3060–AL69
3060–AL80
3060–AL81
3060–AL82
66915
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU—LONG-TERM ACTIONS
Title
339 ....................
Telecommunications Carriers’ Use of Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information (CC Docket No. 96–115), Data Breach Reporting Requirements (WC Docket No. 22–21).
Local Telephone Networks That LECs Must Make Available to Competitors ................................................
Jurisdictional Separations ................................................................................................................................
Rates for Inmate Calling Services; WC Docket No. 12–375; Incarcerated People’s Communications Services; Implementation of the Martha Wright-Reed Act, WC Docket No. 23–62.
Comprehensive Review of the Part 32 Uniform System of Accounts (WC Docket No. 14–130) ...................
Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17–108; Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, GN
Docket No. 14–28; Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet, WC Docket No. 23–320.
Technology Transitions; GN Docket No 13–5, WC Docket No. 05–25; Accelerating Wireline Broadband
Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment; WC Docket No. 17–84.
Numbering Policies for Modern Communications, WC Docket No. 13–97 .....................................................
Implementation of the Universal Service Portions of the 1996 Telecommunications Act ..............................
Toll Free Assignment Modernization and Toll-Free Service Access Codes: WC Docket No. 17–192, CC
Docket No. 95–155.
Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection; WC Docket Nos. 19–195 and 11–10 ..........................
Call Authentication Trust Anchor .....................................................................................................................
Implementation of the National Suicide Improvement Act of 2018, 988 Suicide Prevention Hotline (WC
Docket 18–336, PS Docket No. 23.5, PS Docket No. 15–80).
Modernizing Unbundling and Resale Requirements in an Era of Next-Generation Networks and Services
Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America; GN Docket No. 20–32 ................................................................
Protecting Consumers From SIM Swap and Port-Out Fraud, WC Docket No. 21–341 .................................
Supporting Survivors of Domestic and Sexual Violence (WC Docket No. 22–238,11–42, 21–450) ..............
340 ....................
341 ....................
342 ....................
343 ....................
344 ....................
345 ....................
346 ....................
347 ....................
348 ....................
349 ....................
350 ....................
351 ....................
352
353
354
355
....................
....................
....................
....................
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Action
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau
Long-Term Actions
262. Rules and Regulations
Implementing the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991 (CG
Docket No. 02–278) [3060–AI14]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 227
Abstract: In this docket, the
Commission considers rules and
policies to implement the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act of 1991
(TCPA). The TCPA places requirements
on robocalls (calls using an automatic
telephone dialing system, an autodialer,
a prerecorded or, an artificial voice),
telemarketing calls, and unsolicited fax
advertisements.
Timetable:
Action
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Date
NPRM ..................
FNPRM ...............
Order ...................
Order Effective ....
Order on Reconsideration.
Order ...................
FNPRM ...............
Order ...................
Order ...................
Order on Reconsideration.
Order ...................
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Order ...................
NPRM ..................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FR Cite
10/08/02
04/03/03
07/25/03
08/25/03
08/25/03
67 FR 62667
68 FR 16250
68 FR 44144
10/14/03
03/31/04
10/08/04
10/28/04
04/13/05
68
69
69
69
70
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
59130
16873
60311
62816
19330
06/30/05
12/19/05
04/26/06
05/03/06
12/14/07
70
70
71
71
72
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
37705
75102
24634
25967
71099
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
68 FR 50978
Jkt 250001
Date
Declaratory Ruling
R&O ....................
Order on Reconsideration.
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice (Reconsideration
Petitions Filed).
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Opposition End
Date.
Rule Corrections
Declaratory Ruling
(release date).
Declaratory Ruling
(release date).
Declaratory Ruling
and Order.
NPRM ..................
Declaratory Ruling
R&O ....................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Declaratory Ruling
Declaratory Ruling
Order ...................
Declaratory Ruling
Declaratory Ruling
Declaratory Ruling
and Order.
Order on Reconsideration.
Declaratory Ruling
Declaratory Ruling
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Declaratory Ruling
Declaratory Ruling
Order on Recon ..
R&O ....................
PO 00000
Frm 00005
FR Cite
Action
02/01/08
07/14/08
10/30/08
73 FR 6041
73 FR 40183
73 FR 64556
03/22/10
06/11/12
06/30/10
10/03/12
75
77
75
77
10/16/12
77 FR 63240
Public Notice (Reconsideration
Petitions Filed).
Declaratory Ruling
and Order.
Order on Reconsideration and
Declaratory Ruling.
NPRM ..................
NPRM ..................
Report and Order
FNPRM ...............
Report and Order
FR
FR
FR
FR
13471
34233
34244
60343
10/18/12
11/08/12
11/29/12
3060–AG43
3060–AH44
3060–AJ06
3060–AK08
3060–AK20
3060–AK21
3060–AK32
3060–AK36
3060–AK57
3060–AK91
3060–AK93
3060–AL00
3060–AL01
3060–AL02
3060–AL15
3060–AL34
3060–AL48
Date
FR Cite
04/12/21
86 FR 18934
12/14/22
87 FR 76425
01/20/23
88 FR 3668
06/29/23
06/16/23
12/18/23
12/18/23
03/05/24
88
88
88
88
89
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
42034
20800
5098
5177
15756
77 FR 66935
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
05/09/13
10/09/15
80 FR 61129
05/20/16
07/05/16
11/16/16
06/28/18
10/03/18
12/06/19
12/09/19
03/17/20
03/20/20
06/25/20
06/25/20
81 FR 31889
81 FR 80594
83 FR 26284
08/28/20
09/04/20
09/21/20
10/09/20
12/17/20
12/18/20
01/15/21
02/12/21
02/25/21
Fmt 4701
85 FR 64091
86 FR 9299
86 FR 11443
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kristi Thornton,
Deputy Division Chief, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2467, Email:
kristi.thornton@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AI14
263. Rules and Regulations
Implementing Section 225 of the
Communications Act
(Telecommunications Relay Service)
(CG Docket No. 03–123) [3060–AI15]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 225
Abstract: This proceeding continues
the Commission’s inquiry into
improving the quality of
telecommunications relay service (TRS)
and furthering the goal of functional
equivalency, consistent with Congress’
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66916
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
mandate that TRS regulations encourage
the use of existing technology and not
discourage or impair the development of
new technology. In this docket, the
Commission explores ways to improve
emergency preparedness for TRS
facilities and services, new TRS
technologies, public access to
information and outreach, and issues
related to payments from the Interstate
TRS Fund.
Timetable:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
R&O, Order on
Reconsideration.
FNPRM ...............
Public Notice .......
Declaratory Ruling/Interpretation.
Public Notice .......
Order ...................
Public Notice/Announcement of
Date.
Order ...................
Order on Reconsideration.
R&O ....................
Order ...................
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
R&O/Order on
Reconsideration.
Order ...................
Order ...................
NPRM ..................
Declaratory Ruling/Clarification.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM ...............
Declaratory Ruling/Dismissal of
Petition.
Clarification .........
Declaratory Ruling
on Reconsideration.
Order on Reconsideration.
MO&O .................
Clarification .........
FNPRM ...............
Final Rule; Clarification.
Order ...................
R&O ....................
Public Notice .......
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
R&O/Declaratory
Ruling.
Order ...................
Order ...................
R&O ....................
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
Order ...................
Declaratory Ruling
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
Public Notice .......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FR Cite
08/25/03
09/01/04
68 FR 50993
69 FR 53346
09/01/04
02/17/05
02/25/05
69 FR 53382
70 FR 8034
70 FR 9239
03/07/05
03/23/05
04/06/05
70 FR 10930
70 FR 14568
70 FR 17334
07/01/05
08/31/05
70 FR 38134
70 FR 51643
08/31/05
09/14/05
09/14/05
10/12/05
12/23/05
70
70
70
70
70
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
51649
54294
54298
59346
76208
12/28/05
12/29/05
02/01/06
05/31/06
70
70
71
71
FR
FR
FR
FR
76712
77052
5221
30818
05/31/06
06/01/06
06/21/06
71 FR 30848
71 FR 31131
71 FR 35553
06/28/06
07/06/06
71 FR 36690
71 FR 38268
08/16/06
71 FR 47141
08/16/06
08/23/06
09/13/06
02/14/07
71
71
71
72
FR
FR
FR
FR
47145
49380
54009
6960
03/14/07
08/06/07
08/16/07
11/01/07
01/04/08
01/17/08
72
72
72
72
73
73
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
11789
43546
46060
61813
863
3197
02/19/08
04/21/08
04/21/08
04/23/08
04/30/08
05/15/08
07/08/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
08/01/08
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
9031
21347
21252
21843
23361
28057
38928
41307
41286
45006
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Action
Date
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Order ...................
2nd R&O and
Order on Reconsideration.
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
Order ...................
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
Order Denying
Stay Motion
(Release Date).
Order ...................
Order ...................
NPRM ..................
NPRM ..................
Order ...................
Final Rule (Order)
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Proposed Rule
(Public Notice).
Proposed Rule
(FNPRM).
First R&O ............
Public Notice .......
Order on Reconsideration.
Order ...................
Order (Interim
Rule).
NPRM ..................
Announcement of
Effective Date.
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
NPRM ..................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Petiton for Reconsideration; Request for Comment.
Petition for Reconsideration;
Request for
Comment.
Request for Clarification; Request for Comment; Correction.
Petition for Reconsideration
Comment Period End.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
08/05/08
10/10/08
10/23/08
12/30/08
FR Cite
73
73
73
73
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
45354
60172
63078
79683
05/06/09
05/07/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
06/12/09
07/29/09
08/07/09
09/18/09
10/26/09
05/12/10
07/09/10
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
75
08/13/10
09/03/10
11/02/10
05/02/11
07/25/11
09/27/11
11/22/11
75
75
75
76
76
76
76
02/28/12
77 FR 11997
02/01/12
77 FR 4948
07/25/12
10/29/12
12/26/12
77 FR 43538
77 FR 65526
77 FR 75894
02/05/13
02/05/13
78 FR 8030
78 FR 8032
02/05/13
03/07/13
78 FR 8090
78 FR 14701
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
20892
21364
23815
23859
28046
37624
39699
47894
54913
26701
49491
54040
67333
24442
44326
59551
72124
03/13/13
07/05/13
09/18/13
78 FR 40407
07/05/13
08/15/13
08/15/13
09/30/13
78 FR 40582
78 FR 49693
78 FR 49717
08/30/13
09/03/13
10/23/13
11/18/13
78 FR 53684
78 FR 54201
78FR 63152
12/16/13
78 FR 76096
12/16/13
12/30/13
78 FR 76097
78 FR 79362
01/10/14
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Action
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Correction—Announcement of
Effective Date.
Technical Amendments.
Public Notice .......
R&O and Order ...
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Action (Announcement of
Effective Date).
Final Rule Effective.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
NOI and FNPRM
NOI and FNPRM
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice—
Correction.
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Public Notice—
Correction
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Public Notice; Petition for Reconsideration.
Oppositions Due
Date.
R&O and Declaratory Ruling.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice Opposition Period
End.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
FR Cite
01/21/14
07/11/14
79 FR 40003
08/28/14
79 FR 51446
08/28/14
79 FR 51450
09/09/14
79 FR 53303
09/15/14
10/21/14
10/21/14
12/22/14
79 FR 54979
79 FR 62875
79 FR 62935
10/30/14
79 FR 64515
10/30/14
11/08/15
01/01/16
80 FR 72029
01/20/16
02/16/16
81 FR 3085
03/21/16
08/24/16
09/14/16
81 FR 14984
81 FR 57851
04/12/17
05/30/17
82 FR 17613
04/13/17
04/27/17
04/27/17
07/11/17
82 FR 17754
82 FR 19322
82 FR 19347
06/23/17
07/21/17
07/25/17
82 FR 28566
82 FR 33856
82 FR 34471
07/31/17
08/17/17
08/22/17
10/17/17
82 FR 39673
82 FR 48203
10/25/17
82 FR 49303
11/20/17
06/27/18
83 FR 30082
07/18/18
11/15/18
83 FR 33899
08/23/18
09/17/18
83 FR 42630
02/04/19
84 FR 1409
03/08/19
03/14/19
84 FR 8457
84 FR 9276
66917
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Action
Date
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
Petition for Recon
Request for
Comment.
Petition for Recon
Comment Period End.
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Final Rule; removal of compliance notices.
Report & Order ...
Final Rule; correction.
R&O and Order
on Recon.
Final Rule; announcement of
effective and
compliance
dates.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice; Petition for Reconsideration.
Oppositions Due
Date.
R&O ....................
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Correction
Order on Recon ..
Public Notice .......
NPRM Correction
Comment Period End.
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Order on Recon;
Correction.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
Report & Order ...
Report & Order ...
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice Opposition Period
End.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Order on Reconsideration.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FR Cite
Action
04/29/19
06/06/19
06/06/19
06/18/19
84 FR 26364
84 FR 26379
84 FR 28264
07/15/19
08/05/19
01/06/20
01/09/20
01/09/20
02/13/20
85 FR 462
85 FR 1125
85 FR 1134
02/19/20
85 FR 9392
05/06/20
85 FR 26857
05/08/20
08/26/20
85 FR 27309
85 FR 52489
10/14/20
85 FR 64971
10/23/20
85 FR 67447
02/01/21
04/02/21
86 FR 7681
02/22/21
86 FR 10458
03/19/21
02/23/21
03/19/21
05/03/21
86 FR 10844
86 FR 14859
06/04/21
06/15/21
07/07/21
07/15/21
07/30/21
86
86
86
86
FR
FR
FR
FR
29969
31668
35632
37328
08/09/21
10/05/21
86 FR 54871
10/05/21
01/18/22
86 FR 64440
07/18/22
09/21/22
11/25/22
12/08/22
02/06/23
87
87
87
87
01/31/23
02/27/23
88 FR 6220
02/02/23
04/03/23
88 FR 7049
FR
FR
FR
FR
42656
57645
72409
75199
02/22/23
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Date
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Report and Order
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Report and Order
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Correction; Technical Amendments.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Report and Order
FR Cite
Action
03/08/23
88 FR 14251
08/01/23
08/07/23
09/06/23
88 FR 50053
88 FR 52088
Declaratory Ruling
Declaratory Ruling
Order ...................
Notice of Inquiry ..
NPRM ..................
Interim Final Rule
Public Notice .......
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
NPRM ..................
R&O (Correction)
Order ...................
2nd R&O .............
Order (Interim
Final Rule).
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Petition for Reconsideration; Public Notice.
Oppositions Due
Date.
Final Rule; Clarification (MO&O).
FNPRM ...............
Interim Final Rule;
Announcement
of Effective
Date.
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule; Correction.
Correcting
Amendments.
Order (Release
Date).
Correcting
Amendments.
Public Notice .......
Comment Period
End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Comment Period
End.
Final Action (Announcement of
Effective Date).
Final Rule Effective.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
NOI and FNPRM
10/06/23
10/19/23
12/21/23
88 FR 71994
88 FR 88257
02/08/24
89 FR 8549
03/14/24
04/15/24
89 FR 18589
04/29/24
03/21/24
Next Action Undetermined.
89 FR 20125
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Scott,
Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1264, Email:
michael.scott@fcc.gov.
Eliot Greenwald, Deputy Chief,
Disability Rights Office, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2235, Email:
eliot.greenwald@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AI15
264. Structure and Practices of the
Video Relay Service (VRS) Program
(CG Docket No. 10–51) [3060–AJ42]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 225; 47 U.S.C.
303(r)
Abstract: The Commission takes a
fresh look at its VRS rules to ensure that
it is available to and used by the full
spectrum of eligible users, encourages
innovation, and is provided efficiently
to be less susceptible to the waste,
fraud, and abuse that have plagued the
program and threatened its long-term
viability. The Commission also
considers the most effective and
efficient way to make VRS available and
to determine what is the most fair,
efficient, and transparent cost-recovery
methodology. In addition, the
Commission looks at various ways to
measure the quality of VRS so as to
ensure a better consumer experience.
Timetable:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
FR Cite
05/07/10
07/13/10
07/13/10
07/19/10
08/23/10
02/15/11
03/02/11
05/02/11
05/02/11
05/02/11
05/27/11
07/25/11
08/05/11
08/05/11
75
75
75
75
75
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
FR 25255
FR 39945
FR 39859
FR 41863
FR 51735
FR 8659
R 11462
FR 24393
FR 24437
FR 24442
FR 30841
FR 44326
FR 47469
FR 47476
09/26/11
76 FR 59269
09/27/11
76 FR 59557
10/07/11
10/31/11
76 FR 67070
10/31/11
11/03/11
76 FR 67118
76 FR 68116
11/04/11
76 FR 68328
11/07/11
76 FR 68642
12/30/11
02/01/12
03/19/12
77 FR 4948
03/27/12
77 FR 18106
06/07/12
77 FR 33662
07/25/12
10/04/12
77 FR 60630
10/29/12
11/29/12
77 FR 65526
07/05/13
07/05/13
09/18/13
78 FR 40407
78 FR 40582
09/11/13
09/15/14
10/10/14
78 FR 55696
79 FR 54979
10/30/14
79 FR 64515
10/30/14
11/18/15
02/01/16
80 FR 72029
03/21/16
08/24/16
09/14/16
81 FR 14984
81 FR 57851
04/12/17
82 FR 17613
66918
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Action
Date
NOI and FNPRM
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Public Notice Correction.
Public Notice Correction Comment Period
End.
R&O and Order ...
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Public Notice; Petition for Reconsideration.
Oppositions Due
Date.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
R&O and Order
on Recon.
Final rule; announcement of
effective and
compliance
dates.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice; Petition for Reconsideration.
Oppositions Due
Date.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Correction
NPRM Correction
Comment Period End.
Order on Recon ..
Order on Recon;
Correction.
Report & Order ...
Report & Order ...
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice Opposition Period
End.
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FR Cite
Action
05/30/17
04/13/17
04/27/17
04/27/17
07/01/17
82 FR 17754
82 FR 19322
82 FR 19347
06/23/17
07/21/17
07/31/17
82 FR 28566
82 FR 33856
07/25/17
82 FR 34471
08/17/17
Date
Public Notice
Reply Comment
Period End.
Report and Order
Final Rule Effective.
Correction; Technical Amendments.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Report and Order
05/19/23
10/19/23
12/21/23
88 FR 71994
88 FR 88257
02/08/24
89 FR 8549
03/14/24
04/15/24
89 FR 18589
04/29/24
03/21/24
Next Action Undetermined.
08/22/17
10/17/17
82 FR 39673
82 FR 48203
10/25/17
82 FR 49303
11/20/17
06/06/19
06/06/19
08/05/19
84 FR 26364
84 FR 26379
05/08/20
10/14/20
85 FR 27309
85 FR 64971
10/23/20
85 FR 67447
02/01/21
04/02/21
86 FR 7681
02/22/21
86 FR 10458
03/19/21
03/19/21
05/03/21
86 FR 14859
06/04/21
06/15/21
07/30/21
86 FR 29969
86 FR 31668
86 FR 35632
86 FR 54871
09/21/22
11/25/22
12/08/22
02/06/23
87 FR 57645
87 FR 72409
87 FR 75199
01/31/23
02/27/23
88 FR 6220
03/08/23
88 FR 14251
04/25/23
05/09/23
88 FR 24986
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
89 FR 20125
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Eliot Greenwald,
Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2235, Email:
eliot.greenwald@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AJ42
265. Implementation of the MiddleClass Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
of 2012/Establishment of a Public Safety
Answering Point Do-Not-Call Registry
(CG Docket No. 12–129) [3060–AJ84]
Legal Authority: Pub. L. 112–96, sec.
6507
Abstract: The Middle Class Tax Relief
and Job Creation Act of 2012 required
the Commission to create a Do-Not-Call
Registry for public safety answering
point (PSAP) telephone numbers and to
prohibit the use of automated dialing
equipment to place calls to PSAP
numbers on the Registry. In this docket,
the Commission adopted rules and
policies implementing these statutory
requirements.
Timetable:
Action
07/07/21
10/05/21
FR Cite
Date
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
Correction
Amendments.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
06/21/12
10/29/12
02/13/13
77 FR 37362
77 FR 71131
78 FR 10099
03/26/13
78 FR 18246
11/01/21
12/01/21
86 FR 60189
Next Action Undetermined.
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
To Be Determined
Sfmt 4702
266. Implementation of Sections 716
and 717 of the Communications Act of
1934, as Enacted by the Twenty-First
Century Communications and Video
Accessibility Act of 2010 (CG Docket
No. 10–213) [3060–AK00]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 255; 47 U.S.C. 617
to 619
Abstract: These proceedings
implement sections 716, 717, and 718 of
the Communications Act, which were
added by the Twenty-First Century
Communications and Video
Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA),
related to the accessibility of advanced
communications services and
equipment (section 716), recordkeeping
and enforcement requirements for
entities subject to sections 255, 716, and
718 (section 717), and accessibility of
internet browsers built into mobile
phones (section 718).
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period Extended.
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
2nd R&O .............
R&O on Remand,
Declaratory Ruling, and Order.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Report and Order
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Next Action Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Richard D. Smith,
Special Counsel, Consumer Policy
Division, Federal Communications
PO 00000
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 717 338–
2797, Fax: 717 338–2574, Email:
richard.smith@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AJ84
Date
03/14/11
04/12/11
FR Cite
76 FR 13800
76 FR 20297
05/13/11
12/30/11
12/30/11
03/14/12
76 FR 82240
76 FR 82354
04/25/12
77 FR 24632
05/22/13
04/13/15
78 FR 30226
80 FR 19738
05/19/22
07/18/22
87 FR 30442
08/01/23
08/07/23
09/06/23
88 FR 50053
88 FR 52088
10/06/23
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ike Ofobike, Attorney
Advisor, Consumer & Governmental
Affairs Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Phone: 202 418–1028, Email:
ike.ofobike@fcc.gov.
Darryl Cooper, Attorney, Disability
Rights Office, CGB, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7131, Email:
darryl.cooper@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK00
Action
267. Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP)
Captioned Telephone Service;
Telecommunications Relay Services
and Speech-to-Speech Services; CG
Docket No. 13–24 [3060–AK01]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 225
Abstract: The Federal
Communications Commission (FCC)
initiated this proceeding in its effort to
ensure that internet-Protocol Captioned
Telephone Service (IP CTS) is provided
effectively and in the most efficient
manner. In doing so, the FCC adopted
rules to address certain practices related
to the provision and marketing of IP
CTS, as well as compensation of TRS
providers. IP CTS is a form of relay
service designed to allow people with
hearing loss to speak directly to another
party on a telephone call and to
simultaneously listen to the other party
and read captions of what that party is
saying over an IP-enabled device. To
ensure that IP CTS is provided
efficiently to persons who need to use
this service, the Commission adopted
rules establishing several requirements
and issued an FNPRM to address
additional issues.
Timetable:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Order (Interim
Rule).
Order ...................
Announcement of
Effective Date.
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Petition for Reconsideration
Request for
Comment.
Petition for Reconsideration
Comment Period End.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Correction—Announcement of
Effective Date.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FR Cite
02/05/13
02/05/13
78 FR 8090
78 FR 8032
02/05/13
03/07/13
78 FR 8030
78 FR 14701
03/12/13
08/30/13
09/03/13
11/18/13
78 FR 53684
78 FR 54201
12/16/13
78 FR 76097
01/10/14
07/11/14
79 FR 40003
08/28/14
79 FR 51446
08/28/14
79 FR 51450
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Date
Technical Amendments.
R&O and Declaratory Ruling.
FNPRM ...............
Public Notice .......
Public Notice Opposition Period
End.
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Announcement of
Effective Date.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Petition for Recon
Request for
Comment.
Petition for Recon
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
Announcement of
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Removal of Compliance Notes.
Final Rule; correction.
R&O and Order
on Recon.
FNPRM ...............
Public Notice; Petition for Reconsideration.
NPRM ..................
Oppositions Due
Date.
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Report & Order ...
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice Opposition Period
End.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Order on Reconsideration.
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Correction; Technical Amendments.
09/09/14
79 FR 53303
06/27/18
83 FR 30082
07/18/18
08/23/18
09/17/18
83 FR 33899
83 FR 42630
11/15/18
02/04/19
84 FR 1409
03/08/19
03/14/19
04/29/19
84 FR 8457
84 FR 9276
06/18/19
84 FR 28264
07/15/19
01/06/20
02/19/20
85 FR 462
85 FR 9392
05/06/20
85 FR 26857
08/26/20
85 FR 52489
10/14/20
85 FR 64971
02/01/21
02/22/21
86 FR 7681
86 FR 10458
03/19/21
03/19/21
86 FR 14859
04/02/21
05/03/21
Frm 00009
86 FR 37328
09/21/22
12/08/22
02/06/23
87 FR 57645
87 FR 75199
01/31/23
02/27/23
88 FR 6220
02/02/23
04/03/23
88 FR 7049
02/22/23
88 FR 10853
03/08/23
88 FR 14251
12/21/23
88 FR 88257
02/08/24
89 FR 8549
Fmt 4701
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Scott,
Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1264, Email:
michael.scott@fcc.gov.
Eliot Greenwald, Deputy Chief,
Disability Rights Office, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2235, Email:
eliot.greenwald@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK01
268. Advanced Methods To Target and
Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls (CG
Docket No. 17–59) [3060–AK62]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 201 and
202; 47 U.S.C. 227; 47 U.S.C. 251(e)
Abstract: The Telephone Consumer
Protection Act of 1991 restricts the use
of robocalls autodialed or prerecorded
calls in certain instances. In CG Docket
No. 17–59, the Commission considers
rules and policies aimed at eliminating
unlawful robocalling. Among the issues
it examines in this docket are whether
to allow carriers to block calls that
purport to be from unallocated or
unassigned phone numbers through the
use of spoofing, whether to allow
carriers to block calls based on their
own analyses of which calls are likely
to be unlawful and whether to establish
a database of reassigned phone numbers
to help prevent robocalls to consumers,
who did not consent to such calls.
Timetable:
Action
07/15/21
08/09/21
Next Action Undetermined.
PO 00000
FR Cite
To Be Determined
Sfmt 4702
66919
NPRM/NOI ..........
2nd NOI ...............
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
2nd FNPRM ........
2nd FNPRM
Comment Period End.
2nd FNPRM
Reply Comment
Period End.
2nd R&O .............
3rd FNPRM .........
Declaratory Ruling
Public Notice
Seeking Input
on Report.
Public Notice
Seeking Comment on Reassigned Numbers.
Public Notice
Seeking Comment on RND
Cost/Fee Structure.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
FR Cite
05/17/17
07/13/17
07/31/17
82 FR 22625
01/08/18
01/12/18
04/23/18
06/07/18
83 FR 770
83 FR 1566
83 FR 17631
07/09/18
03/26/19
06/24/19
06/24/19
12/30/19
01/24/20
02/26/20
84 FR 11226
84 FR 29478
84 FR 29387
66920
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
Public Notice Establishing
Guidelines for
RND.
Report .................
3rd NPRM Comment Date.
Announcement of
Compliance
Dates.
3rd R&O, Order of
Reconsideration, 4th
FNPRM.
4th R&O (release
date).
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
5th FNPRM .........
Public Notice .......
Order on Reconsideration, 6th
FNPRM, Waiver
Order.
Public Notice .......
Seventh Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
Sixth Report and
Order.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Seventh Report
and Order (Proposed Rule).
Eighth Further
Notice, and
Third Notice of
Inquiry (Final
Rule).
Next Action Undetermined.
management practices, among other
things.
Timetable:
FR Cite
04/16/20
Action
06/25/20
06/26/20
06/26/20
85 FR 38334
07/31/20
85 FR 46063
12/30/20
02/08/21
04/13/21
06/15/21
10/01/21
10/26/21
12/29/21
12/30/21
86 FR 8558
86 FR 61077
86 FR 59084
86 FR 74399
02/08/22
05/19/22
87 FR 7044
87 FR 42670
05/19/22
87 FR 42916
08/24/22
11/18/22
05/19/23
87 FR 51920
87 FR 69206
88 FR 43489
05/19/23
88 FR 43446
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jerusha Burnett,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0526, Email:
jerusha.burnett@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK62
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Legal Authority: Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act, Pub. L. 117–
58, 135 Stat. 429, 60504(a) (2021)
Abstract: In this docket, the
Commission adopted rules requiring
broadband internet access service
providers (ISPs) to display, at the point
of sale, labels to disclose to consumers
certain information about prices,
introductory rates or promotions, data
allowances, broadband speeds, and
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Report & Order
and FNPRM.
FNPRM Comment
Period Extended.
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Petition for Reconsideration.
Petition for Reconsideration
Comment Period End.
Order ...................
Order of Reconsideration.
02/07/22
03/09/22
FR Cite
87 FR 6827
03/24/22
12/16/22
87 FR 77048
01/04/23
03/16/23
01/31/23
88 FR 6219
02/27/23
08/07/23
09/18/23
Next Action Undetermined.
88 FR 52043
88 FR 63853
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zac Champ, Deputy
Division Chief, Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1495, Email:
zac.champ@fcc.gov.
Erica McMahon, Attorney Advisor,
Federal Communications Commission,
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418–0346, Email:
erica.mcmahon@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL33
270. Targeting and Eliminating
Unlawful Text Messages, CG Docket
21–403, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
[3060–AL49]
269. Empowering Broadband
Consumers Through Transparency (CG
Docket No. 22–2) [3060–AL33]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Date
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i),
227(e), 251(e), 303
Abstract: In this docket, the
Commission considers rules and
policies concerning the ability for
mobile wireless service providers to
block illegal text messages.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Report & Order ...
FNPRM ...............
NPRM ..................
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
09/27/22
03/17/23
03/17/23
01/26/24
01/26/24
Fmt 4701
FR Cite
87
88
88
89
89
Sfmt 4702
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
61271
21497
20800
5177
5098
Action
Final Rule; Announcement of
Effective Date.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
03/01/24
FR Cite
89 FR 15061
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mika Savir, Attorney,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0384, Email:
mika.savir@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL49
271. Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP)
Relay Service; CG Docket No. 12–38
[3060–AL58]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 152 and 154; 47 U.S.C. 225; 47
U.S.C. 616
Abstract: Title IV of the Americans
with Disabilities Act requires the
Federal Communications Commission
to ensure the availability of
telecommunications relay services. IP
Relay is a form of TRS that permits an
individual with a hearing or a speech
disability to communicate in text using
an Internet Protocol-enabled device via
the internet. In CG Docket No. 12–38,
the Commission considers rules and
policy for the provision of IP Relay,
including the process for registering
users for IP CTS and the methodology
for determining TRS Fund support. The
Commission takes these steps to ensure
the provision of IP Relay in a
functionally equivalent manner to
persons who are deaf, hard of hearing,
deaf blind or have speech disabilities. In
doing so, the Commission balances
several different factors including
regulating the recovery of costs caused
by the service, encouraging the use of
existing technology and not
discouraging or impairing the
development of improved technology,
and ensuring IP Relay is available, to the
extent possible and in the most efficient
manner.
Timetable:
Action
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Final Rule ............
Final Rule Effective.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
FR Cite
02/08/12
03/20/12
77 FR 11997
07/25/12
07/25/12
77 FR 43538
03/19/21
05/03/21
86 FR 14859
11/25/22
87 FR 72409
66921
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
Final Rule Effective.
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
12/27/22
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Scott,
Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1264, Email:
michael.scott@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL58
272. Compensation for Internet Protocol
Captioned Telephone Service, (CG
Docket No. 22–408) [3060–AL59]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and
152; 47 U.S.C. 225
Abstract: Title IV of the Americans
with Disabilities Act requires the
Federal Communications Commission
to ensure the availability of
telecommunications relay. Internet
Protocol Captioned Telephone Services
(IP CTS) is a form of relay service
designed to allow people with hearing
loss to speak directly to another party
on a telephone call and to
simultaneously listen to the other party
and read captions of what that party is
saying over an IP-enabled device. In CG
Docket No. 22–408, the Commission
considers rules and policy for the
adoption of a compensation
methodology and compensation levels
for Telecommunications Relay Services
(TRS) Fund support of providers of IP
CTS.The Commission takes these steps
to ensure the provision of IP CTS in a
functionally equivalent manner to
persons who are deaf, hard of hearing,
deaf, blind or have speech disabilities.
In doing so, the Commission balances
several different factors including
regulating the recovery of costs caused
by the service, encouraging the use of
existing technology and not
discouraging or impairing the
development of improved technology,
and ensuring IP CTS is available, to the
extent possible and in the most efficient
manner.
Timetable:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Next Action Undetermined.
02/02/23
FR Cite
88 FR 7049
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Scott,
Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1264, Email:
michael.scott@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL59
Phone: 202 418–1028, Email:
ike.ofobike@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL66
273. Access to Video Conferencing, (CG
Docket No. 23–161) [3060–AL66]
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and
152; 47 U.S.C. 225 ; 47 U.S.C. 617
Abstract: Section 716 of the TwentyFirst Century Communications and
Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA)
(47 U.S.C. 617) requires the Federal
Communications Commission to ensure
the accessibility and usability of
advanced communications services
(ACS), including interoperable video
conferencing services (IVCS), for
individual with disabilities, unless such
requirements are not achievable. IVCS is
defined by the CVAA as a service that
provides real-time video
communications, including audio, to
enable users to share information of the
user’s choosing.’’ In CG Docket No. 23–
161, the Commission considers rules
and policies for the adoption of
usability and accessibility requirements
for IVCS and the integration of IVCS
with telecommunications relay services
(TRS). The Commission takes these
steps to ensure that IVCS are accessible
to and usable by persons with
disabilities and that users of TRS are
able to participate in video conferencing
services in a functionally equivalent
manner to persons without hearing and
speech disabilities. In doing so, the
Commission balances several different
factors including regulating IVCS,
encouraging the use of advanced
technology, not discouraging or
impairing the development of improved
technology, and ensuring IVCS are
accessible to and usable by persons with
disabilities.
Timetable:
Economics
Action
Date
Report and Order
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
08/01/23
08/07/23
09/06/23
FR Cite
88 FR 50053
88 FR 52088
10/06/23
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ike Ofobike, Attorney
Advisor, Consumer & Governmental
Affairs Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Long-Term Actions
274. Development of Nationwide
Broadband Data To Evaluate
Reasonable and Timely Deployment of
Advanced Services to All Americans
[3060–AJ15]
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 251; 47
U.S.C. 252; 47 U.S.C. 257; 47 U.S.C. 271;
47 U.S.C. 1302; 47 U.S.C. 160(b); 47
U.S.C. 161(a)(2)
Abstract: The 09/09/2022 Order
ended the collection of broadband
deployment data through Form 477.
Broadband and voice subscribership
data will continue to be submitted
through Form 477. Beginning with data
as of December 31, 2022, and beyond,
Form 477 subscribership data is
submitted in the Broadband Data
Collection (BDC) filing system. The
Form 477 filing system remains open for
filers to submit and make corrections to
filings through June 30, 2022.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
Order ...................
Order ...................
NPRM ..................
Order ...................
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
R&O and FNPRM
Order ...................
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
05/16/07
07/02/08
10/15/08
02/08/11
06/27/13
08/24/17
09/25/17
FR Cite
72
73
73
76
78
82
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
27519
37861
60997
10827
49126
40118
10/10/17
08/22/19
12/16/22
84 FR 43764
87 FR 76949
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Suzanne Mendez,
Associate Division Chief, OEA, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0941, Email:
suzanne.mendez@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AJ15
275. Expanding the Economic and
Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum
Through Incentive Auctions (GN
Docket No. 12–268) [3060–AJ82]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C.
309(j)(8)(G); 47 U.S.C. 1452
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
66922
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Abstract: In February 2012, the
Middle-Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act was enacted (Pub. L. 112–
96, 126 Stat. 156 (2012)). Title VI of that
statute, commonly known as the
Spectrum Act, provides the Commission
with the authority to conduct incentive
auctions to meet the growing demand
for wireless broadband. Pursuant to the
Spectrum Act, the Commission may
conduct incentive auctions that will
offer new initial spectrum licenses
subject to flexible-use service rules on
spectrum made available by licensees
that voluntarily relinquish some or all of
their spectrum usage rights in exchange
for a portion, based on the value of the
relinquished rights as determined by an
auction, of the proceeds of bidding for
the new licenses. In addition to granting
the Commission general authority to
conduct incentive auctions, the
Spectrum Act requires the Commission
to conduct an incentive auction of
broadcast TV spectrum and sets forth
special requirements for such an
auction.
The Spectrum Act requires that the
BIA consist of a reverse auction ‘‘to
determine the amount of compensation
that each broadcast television licensee
would accept in return for voluntarily
relinquishing some or all of its spectrum
usage rights’’ and a forward auction of
licenses in the reallocated spectrum for
flexible-use services, including mobile
broadband. Broadcast television
licensees who elected to voluntarily
participate in the auction had three
bidding options: go off-the-air, share
spectrum with another broadcast
television licensee, or move channels to
the upper or lower VHS band in
exchange for receiving part of the
proceeds from auctioning that spectrum
to wireless providers. The Spectrum Act
also authorized the Commission to
reorganize the 600 MHz band following
the BIA including, as necessary,
reassigning full power and Class A
television stations to new channels in
order to clear the spectrum sold in the
BIA. That post-auction reorganization
(known as the repack) is currently
underway and all of the stations who
were assigned new channels are
scheduled to have vacated their preauction channels by July 3, 2020,
pursuant to a 10-phase transition
schedule adopted by the Commission.
In May 2014, the Commission
adopted a Report and Order that laid out
the general framework for the BIA. The
auction started on March 29, 2016, with
the submission of initial commitments
by eligible broadcast licensees. The BIA
ended on April 13, 2017, with the
release of the Auction Closing and
Channel Reassignment Public Notice
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
that also marked the start of the 39month transition period during which
987 of the full power and Class A
television stations remaining on-the-air
will transition their stations to their
post-auction channel assignments in the
reorganized television band. Pursuant to
the Spectrum Act, the Commission will
reimburse 957 of those full power and
Class A stations for the reasonable costs
associated with relocating to their postauction channel assignments and will
reimburse multichannel video
programming distributors for their costs
associated with continuing to carry the
signals of those stations.
In March 2018, the Consolidated
Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 115–141, at
Div. E, Title V, 511, 132 Stat. 348 (2018),
codified at 47 U.S.C. 1452(j)-(n)) (the
Reimbursement Expansion Act or REA),
extended the deadline for
reimbursement of eligible entities from
April 2020 to no later than July 3, 2023,
and also expanded the universe of
entities eligible for reimbursement to
include low-power television stations
and TV translator stations displaced by
the BIA for their reasonably incurred
costs to relocate to a new channel, and
FM broadcast stations for their
reasonably incurred costs for facilities
necessary to reasonably minimize
disruption of service as a result of the
post-auction reorganization of the
television band. On March 15, 2019, the
Commission adopted a Report and
Order setting rules for the
reimbursement of eligible costs to those
newly eligible entities.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
Final Rule ............
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
11/21/12
08/15/14
10/11/17
08/27/18
03/26/19
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
77
79
82
83
84
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
69933
48441
47155
43613
11233
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jean L. Kiddoo,
Chair, Broadband Data Task Force, OEA,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7757, Email:
jean.kiddoo@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AJ82
276. Broadband Data Collection [3060–
AL42]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 to 154;
47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C.
254; 47 U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47
U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 332;
47 U.S.C. 641 to 646
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Abstract: The Commission has long
recognized that precise, granular data on
the availability of fixed and mobile
broadband are vital to bringing digital
opportunity to all Americans, no matter
where they live, work, or travel.
On March 23, 2020, the Broadband
Deployment Accuracy and
Technological Availability Act
(Broadband DATA Act) was signed into
law requiring the Commission to create
a new set of broadband availability
maps. Among other things, the
Broadband DATA Act requires the
Commission to collect standardized,
granular data on the availability and
quality of both fixed and mobile
broadband internet access services, to
create a common dataset of all locations
where fixed broadband internet access
service can be installed (the Broadband
Serviceable Location Fabric or Fabric),
and to create publicly available coverage
maps. The Act further requires the
Commission to establish processes for
members of the public and other entities
to (1) provide verified data for use in the
coverage maps; (2) challenge the
coverage maps, the broadband
availability data submitted by
broadband internet access service
providers (providers), and the Fabric;
and (3) submit specific crowdsource
information about the development and
availability of broadband service.
In July 2020, implementing the
Broadband DATA Act and building off
of an August 2019 Report and Order and
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
Commission adopted a Second Report
and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking that adopted rules
for the collection and verification of
improved, more precise data on both
fixed broadband availability. In January
2021, the Commission released a Third
Report and Order that established new
requirements for the BDC and took
additional steps to implement the
Broadband DATA Act. The rules to
specify which fixed and mobile
providers are required to report
broadband availability data and
expanded the reporting and certification
requirements for filing data in the BDC.
It also adopted standards for collecting
verified broadband data from state,
local, and Tribal governmental entities
and certain third parties, and for
identifying locations that would be
included in the Fabric. Importantly, in
the Third Report and Order, the
Commission also established processes
for verifying the accuracy of providersubmitted data and the Fabric,
including challenge processes which
invite input from the public and other
stakeholders in order to improve the
accuracy of the maps.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Implementing the Broadband DATA
Act and these new rules, the
Commission created a new data
platform and system to collect and map
availability data collected from over
2,500 providers and for consumers and
other stakeholders to submit challenges
to that data; established the Fabric
dataset of locations upon which to
overlay provider availability data; and
established a dedicated help center to
provide technical assistance to
providers, consumers, and other
stakeholders.
In July 2021, the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau (WTB),
Office of Economics and Analytics
(OEA), and Office of Engineering and
Technology (OET) released a Public
Notice seeking comment on the
technical requirements for the mobile
challenge, verification, and
crowdsourcing processes required under
the Broadband DATA Act for the new
Broadband Data Collection (BDC). In
March 2022, the Broadband Data Task
Force (Task Force), WTB, OEA, and
OET released a detailed order, technical
appendix, rules, and technical data
specifications setting forth technical
requirements and specifications for the
mobile challenge, verification, and
crowdsource processes required by the
Act.
To help facilitate the mobile challenge
process, in April 2022, the Task Force
and OET issued a Public Notice
announcing the technical requirements
and procedures for approving thirdparty mobile speed test procedures for
use in collecting and submitting mobile
network performance data as part of the
BDC. To assist entities that choose to
file mobile challenges in bulk, in
September 2022 the Task Force and
WTB established a process for entities to
use their own software and hardware to
collect on-the-ground mobile speed test
data for use in the BDC mobile
challenge process.
Also in April 2022, the Task Force,
WCB, WTB, OEA, and OET released a
Public Notice providing details on the
procedures for state, local, and Tribal
governmental entities to submit verified
availability data through the BDC
system.
To clarify the Commission’s rules for
filing data in the BDC, in July 2022,
WCB, WTB, OEA, and the Taskforce
issued a Declaratory Ruling on certain
aspects of a rule regarding the
engineering certification in BDC filings
and issued a limited waiver of the
requirement that providers have an
engineer certification their biannual
BDC filings for the first three filing
cycles of the BDC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
On June 15, 2022, the FCC
Enforcement Bureau issued an
Enforcement Advisory reminding all
facilities-based providers of their duty
to timely file complete and accurate
data in the BDC by September 1, 2022.
In February 2022, the Commission
announced that the initial filing
window of the BDC would open on June
30, 2022, and that availability data as of
June 30 were due no later than
September 1, 2022. In September 2022,
the Commission announced that as of
September 12, 2022, state, local, and
Tribal governments, service providers,
and other entities may begin to file bulk
challenges to location data in the Fabric.
In November 2022, the Commission
released a pre-production draft of its
new National Broadband Map
displaying version 1 of the Fabric
overlayed with provider reported
availability data as of June 30, 2022. The
new map was the most comprehensive,
granular, and standardized data the
Commission had ever published on
broadband availability.
With the launch of the pre-production
draft map, the Commission began
accepting challenges to provider
reported availability data, as well as
individual consumer challenges to the
location data in the Fabric. To date, the
mapping team has reviewed and
processed more than 4 million
availability challenges. Most of those
challenges have already been resolved
and the majority have led to updates in
the data on the map showing where
broadband is available.
The Commission adopted an Order in
December 2022, to sunset the Form 477
broadband deployment data collection
and eliminate a largely duplicative
requirement on providers. As a result,
providers will no longer be required to
submit Form 477 broadband
deployment data, but must still submit
broadband and voice subscription data
using the FCC Form 477. To further
streamline the FCC’s data collection
efforts the BDC system allows filers to
submit both their BDC data and 477
subscription data as a combined filing
using a single interface.
The Commission has long recognized
that precise, granular data on the
availability of fixed and mobile
broadband are vital to bringing digital
opportunity to all Americans, no matter
where they live, work, or travel.
On March 23, 2020, the Broadband
Deployment Accuracy and
Technological Availability Act
(Broadband DATA Act) was signed into
law requiring the Commission to create
a new set of broadband availability
maps. Among other things, the
Broadband DATA Act requires the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66923
Commission to collect standardized,
granular data on the availability and
quality of both fixed and mobile
broadband internet access services, to
create a common dataset of all locations
where fixed broadband internet access
service can be installed (the Broadband
Serviceable Location Fabric or Fabric),
and to create publicly available coverage
maps. The Act further requires the
Commission to establish processes for
members of the public and other entities
to (1) provide verified data for use in the
coverage maps; (2) challenge the
coverage maps, the broadband
availability data submitted by
broadband internet access service
providers (providers), and the Fabric;
and (3) submit specific crowdsource
information about the development and
availability of broadband service.
In July 2020, implementing the
Broadband DATA Act and building off
of an August 2019 Report and Order and
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
Commission adopted a Second Report
and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking that adopted rules
for the collection and verification of
improved, more precise data on both
fixed and mobile broadband availability.
In January 2021, the Commission
released a Third Report and Order that
established new requirements for the
BDC and took additional steps to
implement the Broadband DATA Act.
The Commission adopted rules to
specify which fixed and mobile
providers are required to report
broadband availability data and
expanded the reporting and certification
requirements for filing data in the BDC.
It also adopted standards for collecting
verified broadband data from state,
local, and Tribal governmental entities
and certain third parties, and for
identifying locations that would be
included in the Fabric. Importantly, in
the Third Report and Order, the
Commission also established processes
for verifying the accuracy of providersubmitted data and the Fabric,
including challenge processes which
invite input from the public and other
stakeholders in order to improve the
accuracy of the maps.
Implementing the Broadband DATA
Act and these new rules, the
Commission created a new data
platform and system to collect and map
availability data collected from over
2,500 providers and for consumers and
other stakeholders to submit challenges
to that data; established the Fabric
dataset of locations upon which to
overlay provider availability data; and
established a dedicated help center to
provide technical assistance to
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
66924
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
providers, consumers and other
stakeholders.
In July 2021, the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau (WTB),
Office of Economics and Analytics
(OEA), and Office of Engineering and
Technology (OET) released a Public
Notice seeking comment on the
technical requirements for the mobile
challenge, verification, and
crowdsourcing processes required under
the Broadband DATA Act for the new
Broadband Data Collection (BDC). In
March 2022, the Broadband Data Task
Force (Task Force), WTB, OEA, and
OET released a detailed order, technical
appendix, rules, and technical data
specifications setting forth technical
requirements and specifications for the
mobile challenge, verification, and
crowdsource processes required by the
Act.
To help facilitate the mobile challenge
process, in April 2022, the Task Force
and OET issued a Public Notice
announcing the technical requirements
and procedures for approving thirdparty mobile speed test procedures for
use in collecting and submitting mobile
network performance data as part of the
BDC. To assist entities that choose to
file mobile challenges in bulk, in
September 2022 the Task Force and
WTB established a process for entities to
use their own software and hardware to
collect on-the-ground mobile speed test
data for use in the BDC mobile
challenge process.
Also in April 2022, the Task Force,
WCB, WTB, OEA, and OET released a
Public Notice providing details on the
procedures for state, local, and Tribal
governmental entities to submit verified
availability data through the BDC
system.
To clarify the Commission’s rules for
filing data in the BDC, in July 2022,
WCB, WTB, OEA, and the Taskforce
issued a Declaratory Ruling on certain
aspects of a rule regarding the
engineering certification in BDC filings
and issued a limited waiver of the
requirement that providers have an
engineer certification their biannual
BDC filings for the first three filing
cycles of the BDC.
On June 15, 2022, the FCC
Enforcement Bureau issued an
Enforcement Advisory reminding all
facilities-based providers of their duty
to timely file complete and accurate
data in the BDC by September 1, 2022.
In February 2022, the Commission
announced that the initial filing
window of the BDC would open on June
30, 2022, and that availability data as of
June 30 were due no later than
September 1, 2022. In September 2022,
the Commission announced that as of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
September 12, 2022, state, local, and
Tribal governments, service providers,
and other entities may begin to file bulk
challenges to location data in the Fabric.
In November 2022, the Commission
released a pre-production draft of its
new National Broadband Map
displaying version 1 of the Fabric
overlayed with provider reported
availability data as of June 30, 2022. The
new map was the most comprehensive,
granular, and standardized data the
Commission had ever published on
broadband availability.
With the launch of the pre-production
draft map, the Commission began
accepting challenges to provider
reported availability data, as well as
individual consumer challenges to the
location data in the Fabric. To date, the
mapping team has reviewed and
processed more than 4 million
availability challenges. Most of those
challenges have already been resolved
and the majority have led to updates in
the data on the map showing where
broadband is available.
The Commission adopted an Order in
December 2022, to sunset the Form 477
broadband deployment data collection
and eliminate a largely duplicative
requirement on providers. As a result,
providers will no longer be required to
submit Form 477 broadband
deployment data, but must still submit
broadband and voice subscription data
using the FCC Form 477. To further
streamline the FCC’s data collection
efforts the BDC system allows filers to
submit both their BDC data and 477
subscription data as a combined filing
using a single interface.
The second version of the Fabric was
made available to providers and other
stakeholders in December 2022. This
updated Fabric contained a net increase
of more than one million new
serviceable locations, as compared to
the initial version. It also reflected the
outcome of over 1 million location
challenges. The second filing window of
the BDC opened on January 3, 2023, and
required all fixed and mobile providers
to submit broadband availability data as
of December 31, 2022, no later than
March 1, 2023. On May 30, 2023, the
National Broadband Map was updated
to reflect availability data as of
December 31, 2022, and version 2 of the
Fabric.
On July 3, 2023, the Commission
announced the opening of the third
filing window for broadband availability
data as of June 30, 2023. The BDC will
continue to collect updated availability
data from providers every 6 months.
Updates to the National Broadband Map
will be iterative and ongoing. The
challenge processes will also continue
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
on an ongoing basis in order to allow
the public to provide input and help
improve the accuracy of the National
Broadband Map.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
Second Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
Second Further
NPRM Comment Period
End.
2nd R&O .............
3rd FNPRM .........
3rd R&O ..............
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Order ...................
Order ...................
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
08/03/17
09/25/17
82 FR 40118
08/01/19
08/01/19
84 FR 43705
84 FR 43764
10/07/19
07/16/20
07/16/20
01/13/21
07/16/21
09/27/21
85
85
86
86
FR
FR
FR
FR
50886
50911
18124
40398
03/09/22
12/16/22
87 FR 21476
87 FR 76949
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jean L. Kiddoo,
Chair, Broadband Data Task Force, OEA,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7757, Email:
jean.kiddoo@fcc.gov.
Eduard Bartholme, Senior Outreach
Director, Broadband Data Task Force,
OEA, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1463, Email: eduard.bartholme@fcc.gov.
Kimia Nikseresht, Legal Advisor,
Broadband Data Task Force, OEA,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1636, Email:
kimia.nikseresht@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL42
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Office of Engineering and Technology
Long-Term Actions
277. Unlicensed Operation in the TV
Broadcast Bands (ET Docket No. 04–
186) [3060–AI52]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 302; 47 U.S.C. 303(e) and 303(f);
47 U.S.C. 303(r); 47 U.S.C. 307
Abstract: The Commission adopted
rules to allow unlicensed radio
transmitters to operate in the broadcast
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
television spectrum at locations where
that spectrum is not being used by
licensed services. (This unused TV
spectrum is often termed ‘‘white
spaces.’’) This action will make a
significant amount of spectrum
available for new and innovative
products and services, including
broadband data and other services for
businesses and consumers. The actions
taken are a conservative first step that
includes many safeguards to prevent
harmful interference to incumbent
communications services. Moreover, the
Commission will closely oversee the
development and introduction of these
devices to the market and will take
whatever actions may be necessary to
avoid and, if necessary, correct any
interference that may occur. The Second
Memorandum Opinion and Order
finalizes rules to make the unused
spectrum in the TV bands available for
unlicensed broadband wireless devices.
This particular spectrum has excellent
propagation characteristics that allow
signals to reach farther and penetrate
walls and other structures. Access to
this spectrum could enable more
powerful public internet connections—
super Wi-Fi hot spots—with extended
range, fewer dead spots, and improved
individual speeds as a result of reduced
congestion on existing networks. This
type of ‘‘opportunistic use’’ of spectrum
has great potential for enabling access to
other spectrum bands and improving
spectrum efficiency. The Commission’s
actions here are expected to spur
investment and innovation in
applications and devices that will be
used not only in the TV band, but
eventually in other frequency bands as
well. This Order addressed five
petitions for reconsideration of the
Commission’s decisions in the Second
Memorandum Opinion and Order
(‘‘Second MO&O’’) in these proceeding
and modified rules in certain respects.
In particular, the Commission: (1)
increased the maximum height above
average terrain (HAAT) for sites where
fixed devices may operate; (2) modified
the adjacent channel emission limits to
specify fixed rather than relative levels;
and (3) slightly increased the maximum
permissible power spectral density
(PSD) for each category of TV bands
device. These changes will result in
decreased operating costs for fixed
TVBDs and allow them to provide
greater coverage, thus increasing the
availability of wireless broadband
services in rural and underserved areas
without increasing the risk of
interference to incumbent services. The
Commission also revised and amended
several of its rules to better effectuate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
the Commission’s earlier decisions in
this docket and to remove ambiguities.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
First R&O ............
FNPRM ...............
R&O and MO&O
Petitions for Reconsideration.
Second MO&O ....
Petitions for Reconsideration.
2 Order on Reconsideration,
FNPRM, and
Order.
FNPRM—Proposed Rule.
FR Cite
06/18/04
11/17/06
11/17/06
02/17/09
04/13/09
69
71
71
74
74
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
34103
66876
66897
7314
16870
12/06/10
02/09/11
75 FR 75814
76 FR 7208
05/17/12
77 FR 29236
Next Action Undetermined.
87 FR 33109
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Hugh Van Tuyl,
Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7506, Fax: 202 418–
1944, Email: hugh.vantuyl@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AI52
278. Use of the 5.850–5.925 GHz Band;
(ET Docket No. 19–138), FCC 19–129
[3060–AK96]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 1; 47 U.S.C.
4(i); 47 U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 302; 47
U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 316; 47 U.S.C. 332;
47 CFR 1.411
Abstract: In this proceeding, we
repurpose 45 megahertz of the 5.850–
5.925 GHz band (the 5.9 GHz band) to
allow for the expansion of unlicensed
mid-band spectrum operations, while
continuing to dedicate 30 megahertz of
spectrum for vital intelligent
transportation system (ITS) operations.
In addition, to promote the most
efficient and effective use of this ITS
spectrum, we are requiring the ITS
service to use cellular vehicle-toeverything (C–V2X) based technology at
the end of a transition period. By
splitting the 5.9 GHz band between
unlicensed and ITS uses, today’s
decision puts the 5.9 GHz band in the
best position to serve the needs of the
American public.
In the Further Notice, the Commission
addresses issues remaining to finalize
the restructuring of the 5.9 GHz band.
Specifically, the Commission addresses:
The transition of ITS operations in the
5.895- 5.925 GHz band from Dedicated
Short Range Communications (DSRC)
based technology to Cellular Vehicle-toEverything (C–V2X) based technology;
the codification of C–V2X technical
PO 00000
Frm 00015
parameters in the Commission’s rules;
other transition considerations; and the
transmitter power and emissions limits,
and other issues, related to full-power
outdoor unlicensed operations across
the entire 5.850–5.895 GHz portion of
the 5.9 GHz band. The Commission
modified the Further Notice released on
November 20, 2020, with an Erratum
released on December 11, 2020. The
Commission released a Second Erratum
on February 9, 2021. The corrections
from these errata are included in this
document.
Timetable:
Action
06/01/22
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66925
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O & Order of
Proposed Modification.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
02/06/20
03/09/20
85 FR 6841
05/03/21
05/03/21
86 FR 23323
86 FR 23281
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Howard Griboff,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0657, Fax: 202 418–
2824, Email: howard.griboff@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK96
279. Unlicensed White Space Device
Operations in the Television Bands, ET
Docket No. 20–36 [3060–AL22]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C.154(i); 47
U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 302a; 47 U.S.C.
303; 47 U.S.C. 1.407 and 1.411
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission revises its rules to provide
additional opportunities for unlicensed
white space devices operating in the
broadcast television bands (TV bands) to
deliver wireless broadband services in
rural areas and applications associated
with the Internet of Things (IoT). This
region of the spectrum has excellent
propagation characteristics that make it
particularly attractive for delivering
communications services over long
distances, coping with variations in
terrain, as well as providing coverage
into and within buildings. We offer
several proposals to spur continued
growth of the white space device
ecosystem, especially for providing
affordable broadband service to rural
and underserved communities that can
help close the digital divide.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
04/03/20
FR Cite
85 FR 18901
66926
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
R&O—Final Rule
FNPRM—Proposed Rule.
2nd Order on
Recon,
FNPRM, and
Order.
Order of Reconsideration,
R&O, MO&O—
Final Rule.
Next Action Undetermined.
Timetable:
FR Cite
Action
04/03/20
01/12/21
01/12/21
02/25/21
86 FR 2278
86 FR 2278
86 FR 11490
06/01/22
87 FR 33109
05/22/23
88 FR 32682
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Date
NPRM and NOI ...
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order
and FNPRM.
FNPRM—Proposed Rule.
Report & Order—
Final Rule.
08/19/21
09/20/21
To Be Determined
Jkt 250001
Next Action Undetermined.
03/08/23
88 FR 14312
02/06/23
88 FR 7592
To Be Determined
281. Wireless Microphones in the TV
Bands (ET Docket No. 21–115), 600
MHz Guard Band, 600 MHz Duplex
Gap, and the 941.5–944 MHz, 944–952
MHz, 952.850–956.250 MHz, 956.45–
959.85 MHz, 1435–1525 MHz [3060–
AL27]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. secs. 154(i),
201, 302a, 303, and secs. 1.407 and
1.411
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks to enhance the
spectral efficiency of wireless
microphones by permitting a recently
developed type of wireless microphone
system, termed herein as a Wireless
Multi-Channel Audio System (WMAS),
to operate in certain frequency bands.
This emerging technology would enable
more wireless microphones to operate
in the spectrum available for wireless
microphone operations, and thus
advances an important Commission goal
of promoting efficient spectrum use.
The Commission proposes to revise the
applicable technical rules for operation
of low-power auxiliary station (LPAS)
devices to permit WMAS to operate in
the broadcast television (TV) bands and
other LPAS frequency bands on a
licensed basis. The Commission also
proposes to update the existing LPAS
and wireless microphone rules to reflect
the end of the post-Incentive auction
transition period and update references
to international wireless microphone
standards.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
PO 00000
Frm 00016
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
08/02/21
86 FR 46644
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jamie Coleman,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2705, Email:
jaime.coleman@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL23
280. Protecting Against National
Security Threats to the
Communications Supply Chain
Through the Equipment Authorization
and Competitive Bidding Programs; ET
Docket No. 21–232, EA Docket No. 21–
233 [3060–AL23]
Legal Authority: secs. 4(i), 301, 302,
303, 309(j), 312, and 316 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. secs. 154(i), 301,
302a, 303, 309(j), 312, 316, and sec.
1.411
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission proposes prohibiting the
authorization of any communications
equipment on the list of equipment and
services (Covered List) that the
Commission maintains pursuant to the
Secure and Trusted Communications
Networks Act of 2019. Such equipment
has been found to pose an unacceptable
risk to the national security of the
United States or the security and safety
of United States persons. We also seek
comment on whether and under what
circumstances we should revoke any
existing authorizations of such covered
communications equipment. We invite
comment on whether we should require
additional certifications relating to
national security from applicants who
wish to participate in Commission
auctions. In the Notice of Inquiry, we
seek comment on other actions the
Commission should consider taking to
create incentives in its equipment
authorization processes for improved
trust through the adoption of
cybersecurity best practices in consumer
devices.
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
FR Cite
Date
To Be Determined
11/25/22
Next Action Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Hugh Van Tuyl,
Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7506, Fax: 202 418–
1944, Email: hugh.vantuyl@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL22
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Action
07/01/21
Fmt 4701
FR Cite
86 FR 35046
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Hugh Van Tuyl,
Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7506, Fax: 202 418–
1944, Email: hugh.vantuyl@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL27
282. FCC Seeks To Enable State-of-theArt Radar Sensors in 60 GHz Band (ET
Docket No. 21–264) [3060–AL36]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 201,
302a, 303, and secs. 1.407 and 1.411
Abstract: In this preceding, the
Commission proposes to revise the
Commission’s rules to provide
expanded operational flexibility to
unlicensed field disturbance sensor
(FDS) devices (e.g., radars) that operate
in the 57–64 GHz band (60 GHz band).
The Commission’s proposal recognizes
the increasing practicality of using
mobile radar devices in the 60 GHz
band to perform innovative and lifesaving functions, including gesture
control, detection of unattended
children in vehicles, and monitoring of
vulnerable medical patients, and it is
designed to stimulate the development
of new products and services in a wide
variety of areas to include, for example,
personal safety, autonomous vehicles,
home automation, environmental
control, and healthcare monitoring,
while also ensuring coexistence among
unlicensed FDS devices and current and
future unlicensed communications
devices in the 60 GHz band.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report and
Order—Final
Rule.
2nd Report and
Order—Final
Rule.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
08/19/21
10/18/21
86 FR 46661
07/24/23
88 FR 47384
08/23/23
88 FR 47384
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Anh Wride,
Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20554,
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66927
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
launch operations. Finally, the
Commission seeks to refresh the record
on potential ways to facilitate Federal
use of commercial satellite services in
what are currently non-Federal satellite
bands and enable more robust federal
use of the 399.9–400.05 MHz band.
Timetable:
Phone: 202 418–0577, Fax: 202 418–
1944, Email: anh.wride@fcc.gov.
Thomas Struble, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2470, Email:
thomas.struble@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL36
283. FCC Proposes To Update
Equipment Authorization Rules To
Incorporate New and Revised Industry
Standards, (ET Docket No. 21–363)
[3060–AL39]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 301,
302a, 303, and secs. 1.407 and 1.411
Abstract: We propose targeted
updates to our rules to incorporate four
new and updated standards that are
integral to the testing of equipment and
accreditation of laboratories that test RF
devices.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Next Action Undetermined.
03/17/22
04/16/22
FR Cite
87 FR 15180
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brian Butler,
Engineer, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
2702, Email: brian.butler@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL39
284. Allocation of Spectrum for NonFederal Space Launch Operations (ET
Docket No. 13–115) [3060–AL44]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152,
154(i), 155(c), 301, 303(c), 303(f), and
303(r)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Federal Communications Commission
(Commission) takes steps towards
establishing a spectrum allocation and
licensing framework that will provide
regulatory certainty and improved
efficiency and that will promote
innovation and investment in the
United States commercial space launch
industry. In the Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission
seeks comment on the definition of
space launch operations, the potential
allocation of spectrum for the
commercial space launch industry,
including the 420–430 MHz, 2025–2110
MHz, and 5650–5925 MHz bands. In
addition, the Commission seeks
comment on establishing service rules,
including licensing and technical rules
and coordination procedures, for the use
of spectrum for commercial space
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Action
Date
NPRM and NOI ...
FNPRM—Proposed Rule.
Report & Order—
Final Rule.
Order on Recon.,
R&O, MO&O,
and Final Rule.
FR Cite
07/01/13
06/10/21
78 FR 39200
86 FR 30860
06/28/21
86 FR 33902
06/21/23
88 FR 32682
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Nicholas Oros,
Supervisory Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0636, Email:
nicholas.oros@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL44
285. • FCC Implements and Proposes
Final Acts of the WRC–19 and WRC–15,
ET Docket No. 21–120 & 21–121, and
RM–11785 [3060–AL77]
Legal Authority: Part 2—47 U.S.C.
154; 47 U.S.C. 302a and 303; 47 U.S.C.
336
Abstract: In this document, the
Federal Communications Commission
(Commission) makes non-substantive,
editorial revisions to the Commission’s
Table of Frequency Allocations
(Allocation Table), primarily to reflect
decisions from the Final Acts of the
World Radiocommunication Conference
2019 (WRC19 Final Acts). The purpose
of this administrative action is to revise
the Allocation Table by updating the
International Table of Frequency
Allocations (International Table) portion
of the Allocation Table to reflect the
International Telecommunication
Union’s (ITU’s) Table of Frequency
Allocations in its Radio Regulations
(Edition of 2020) (Radio Regulations),
and by making updates and corrections
in the United States Table of Frequency
Allocations (U.S. Table) portion of the
Allocation Table. The Commission also
proposes implementation of certain
allocation decisions from the Final Acts
of the World Radiocommunication
Conference 2015 (WRC15 Final Acts)
concerning portions of the radio
spectrum between 5330.5 kHz and 29.5
GHz, other spectrum allocation changes,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
and related updates to the Commission’s
service rules.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Action .........
Final Action Effective.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
09/29/23
12/28/23
88 FR 67160
88 FR 73810
09/28/23
10/30/23
88 FR 67514
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Patrick Forster,
Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7061, Email: pforster@
fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL77
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Media Bureau
Long-Term Actions
286. Revision of EEO Rules and Policies
(MB Docket No. 98–204) [3060–AH95]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 257; 47 U.S.C. 301;
47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 to 309; 47
U.S.C. 334; 47 U.S.C. 403; 47 U.S.C. 554
Abstract: FCC authority to govern
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)
responsibilities of cable television
operators was codified in the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984.
This authority was extended to
television broadcast licensees and other
multi-channel video programming
distributors (MVPDs) in the Cable and
Television Consumer Protection Act of
1992. In the Second Report and Order,
the FCC adopted new EEO rules and
policies. This action was in response to
a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit that
found prior EEO rules unconstitutional.
In 2004, the Third Report and Order
adopted revised forms for broadcast
station and MVPD Annual Employment
Reports. The Fourth Report and Order
reinstated the collection of workforce
composition data for television and
radio broadcasters. The Second Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking sought
to refresh the record on the collection of
workforce composition data for MVPDs.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
01/14/02
FR Cite
67 FR 1704
66928
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
Second R&O and
Third NPRM.
Correction ............
Fourth NPRM ......
Third R&O ...........
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Fourth Report and
Order, Order of
Recon., and
2nd FNPRM.
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
01/07/03
68 FR 670
01/13/03
06/23/04
06/23/04
08/31/21
09/30/21
68
69
69
86
FR
FR
FR
FR
Action
5th NPRM ...........
Report and Order
1657
34986
34950
48610
02/22/24
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar,
Chief, Industry Analysis Division,
Media Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1523, Email: radhika.karmarkar@
fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AH95
287. Establishment of Rules for Digital
Low-Power Television, Television
Translator, and Television Booster
Stations (MB Docket No. 03–185) [3060–
AI38]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 309; 47
U.S.C. 336
Abstract: This proceeding initiated
the digital television conversion for lowpower television (LPTV) and television
translator stations. The rules and
policies adopted as a result of this
proceeding provide the framework for
these stations’ conversion from analog
to digital broadcasting. The revised
rules reflect an effort to simplify,
streamline, and modernize existing
rules and procedures that will enable
stations to comply with licensing
requirements more easily through
familiar and low-cost measures.
Timetable:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM and
MO&O.
2nd R&O .............
3rd NPRM ...........
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
3rd R&O ..............
4th NPRM ...........
Comment Period
End.
NPRM ..................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FR Cite
09/26/03
11/25/03
68 FR 55566
11/29/04
10/18/10
69 FR 69325
75 FR 63766
07/07/11
11/28/14
12/29/14
76 FR 44821
79 FR 70824
01/12/15
02/01/16
02/01/16
02/22/16
81 FR 5041
81 FR 5086
12/23/19
84 FR 70489
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Date
06/17/22
05/12/23
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
87 FR 36440
88 FR 30654
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Shaun Maher,
Attorney, Video Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media
Bureau, 45 L. Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–2324, Fax:
202 418–2827, Email: shaun.maher@
fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AI38
288. Authorizing Permissive Use of the
‘‘Next Generation’’ Broadcast
Television Standard (GN Docket No.
16–142) [3060–AK56]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 301;
47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 to 309; 47
U.S.C. 316; 47 U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C.
325(b); 47 U.S.C. 336; 47 U.S.C. 399(b);
47 U.S.C. 403; 47 U.S.C. 534; 47 U.S.C.
535
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks to authorize
television broadcasters to use the ‘‘Next
Generation’’ ATSC 3.0 broadcast
television transmission standard on a
voluntary, market-driven basis, while
they continue to deliver currentgeneration digital television broadcast
service to their viewers. In the Report
and Order, the Commission adopted
rules to afford broadcasters flexibility to
deploy ATSC 3.0-based transmissions,
while minimizing the impact on, and
costs to, consumers and other industry
stakeholders.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
NPRM ..................
2nd R&O Order
on Recon.
Report & Order ...
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
3rd FNPRM .........
3rd R&O ..............
4th FNPRM .........
03/10/17
05/09/17
82 FR 13285
12/20/17
02/02/18
02/20/18
82 FR 60350
83 FR 4998
03/20/18
05/13/20
07/17/20
85 FR 28586
85 FR 43478
04/22/21
12/13/21
02/11/22
86 FR 21217
86 FR 70793
07/07/22
07/17/23
07/17/23
87 FR 40464
88 FR 45347
88 FR 45378
Next Action Undetermined.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
FR Cite
Fmt 4701
To Be Determined
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ty Bream, Attorney
Advisor, Industry Analysis Div., Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0644, Email: ty.bream@
fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK56
289. 2018 Quadrennial Regulatory
Review of the Commission’s Broadcast
Ownership Rules (MB Docket 18–349)
[3060–AK77]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 152(a); 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C.
257; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47
U.S.C. 309 and 310; 47 U.S.C. 403; sec.
202(h) of the Telecommunications Act
Abstract: Section 202(h) of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996
requires the Commission to review its
broadcast ownership rules every 4 years
and to determine whether any such
rules are necessary in the public interest
as the result of competition. The rules
subject to review in the 2018
quadrennial review are the Local Radio
Ownership Rule, the Local Television
Ownership Rule, and the Dual Network
Rule. Based on a careful review of the
record, the Commission found that the
existing rules, with some minor
modifications, remain necessary in the
public interest.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
Report and Order
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
02/28/19
02/15/24
FR Cite
84 FR 6741
89 FR 12196
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar,
Chief, Industry Analysis Division,
Media Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1523, Email: radhika.karmarkar@
fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK77
290. Equal Employment Opportunity
Enforcement (MB Docket 19–177)
[3060–AK86]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 154(j); 47 U.S.C.
334; 47 U.S.C. 554
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks comment on ways in
which it can make improvements to
equal employment opportunity (EEO)
compliance and enforcement.
Timetable:
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Next Action Undetermined.
07/22/19
FR Cite
Timetable:
84 FR 35063
Action
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
Second NPRM ....
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar,
Chief, IAD, Media Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1523, Email:
radhika.karmarkar@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK86
291. Duplication of Programming on
Commonly Owned Radio Stations (MB
Docket No. 19–310) [3060–AL19]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j) and 303(r); 47
U.S.C. 303(r)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission eliminated the radio
duplication rule. The rule bars sameservice (AM or FM) commercial radio
stations from duplicating more than
25% of their total hours of programming
in an average broadcast week if the
stations have 50% or more contours
overlap and are commonly owned or
subject to a time brokerage agreement.
Petitions for reconsideration are
pending.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Report & Order ...
Next Action Undetermined.
12/23/19
10/22/20
FR Cite
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
FR Cite
85 FR 74955
86 FR 32221
87 FR 68960
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar,
Chief, IAD, Media Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1523, Email:
radhika.karmarkar@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL20
293. FM Broadcast Booster Stations
(MB Docket No. 20–401) [3060–AL21]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154 and 157; 47 U.S.C. 301 to
303; 47 U.S.C. 307 to 309; 47 U.S.C. 316
and 319; 47 U.S.C. 324
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks comment on a
proposal to amend its rules to enable
FM broadcasters to use FM booster
stations to air geo-targeted content (e.g.,
news, weather, and advertisements)
independent of the signals of its primary
station within different portions of the
primary station’s protected service
contour for a limited period of time
during the broadcast hour.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
292. Sponsorship Identification
Requirements for Foreign GovernmentProvided Programming (MB Docket No.
20–299) [3060–AL20]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and
154; 47 U.S.C. 155; 47 U.S.C. 301 and
303; 47 U.S.C. 307 and 309 ; 47 U.S.C.
310; 47 U.S.C. 334; 47 U.S.C. 336 and
339
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission modifies its rules to require
specific disclosure requirements for
broadcast programming that is paid for,
or provided by a foreign government or
its representative.
11/24/20
06/17/21
11/17/22
Next Action Undetermined.
84 FR 70485
85 FR 67303
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar,
Chief, Industry Analysis Division,
Media Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1523, Email: radhika.karmarkar@
fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL19
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Date
01/11/21
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
86 FR 1909
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Al Shuldiner,
Division Chief, Audio Div., Media
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
2700, Email: albert.shuldiner@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL21
294. Amendment of Part 73 Rules To
Update Television and Class A
Television Broadcast Station Rules, and
Rules Applicable to All Broadcast
Stations (MB Docket No. 22–227) [3060–
AL50]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and
154; 47 U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47 U.S.C.
307 to 308; 47 U.S.C. 309 to 310; 47
U.S.C. 316 and 319; 47 U.S.C. 336
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks to adopt revisions to
rules in part 0, part 27, subparts E, H,
I, J, and L of part 73, and certain parts
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66929
of parts 74 and 90 in light of the fact that
all television services have ceased
analog operations. The Commission
proposes to amend section headings and
language in rules to remove references
to DTV, digital, and analog television
service, as these distinctions are no
longer necessary. The Commission also
propose to delete outdated rules that are
no longer valid given changes in
Commission-adopted policy. The
Commission also proposes other nonsubstantive, technical revisions. The
Commission also proposes to update
rules to reference the current
designation for form numbers (e.g., FCC
Form 2100) and by requiring electronic
filing in the Commission’s Licensing
and Management System. The
Commission also propose to make
corrections or updates, inter alia, to
section headings, spelling, contact
information, and rule cross-references,
or to language inadvertently omitted
from a rule.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
Report and Order
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
02/09/23
02/01/24
FR Cite
88 FR 8636
89 FR 7224
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Emily Harrison,
Attorney Advisor, Media Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1665, Email:
emily.harrison@fcc.gov.
Joyce Bernstein, Attorney Advisor,
Media Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1647, Email: joyce.bernstein@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL50
295. Implementation of the Low Power
Protection Act, MB Docket No. 23–126
[3060–AL63]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and
152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47
U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 and 309; 47
U.S.C. 311 and 336(f)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks to implement the
Low Power Protection Act (LPPA)
consistent with Congressional direction.
The LPPA provides certain low power
television stations with an opportunity
to apply for primary spectrum use status
as Class A television stations. In the
Report and Order, the Commission
established the Class A eligibility
requirements and the process for
submitting applications.
Timetable:
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66930
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Report and Order
Next Action Undetermined.
04/14/23
01/10/24
FR Cite
Action
88 FR 2980
89 FR 1466
296. Video Description, MB Docket No.
11–43 [3060–AL64]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 613
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks to expand audio
description requirements to additional
market areas. The proposed expansion
would help ensure that a greater number
of individuals who are blind or visually
impaired can be connected, informed,
and entertained by television
programming.
Timetable:
Date
NPRM ..................
Report and Order
Next Action Undetermined.
03/29/23
10/27/23
FR Cite
88 FR 18505
88 FR 73758
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Diana Sokolow,
Attorney, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418–2120, Email:
diana.sokolow@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL64
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
297. 2022 Quadrennial Review of
Media Ownership Rules, MB Docket
No. 22–459 [3060–AL65]
Legal Authority: 202(h) of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996
Abstract: Section 202(h) of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996
requires the Commission to review its
media ownership rules every four years
to determine whether they remain
necessary in the public interest as the
result of competition. This proceeding
will examine the media ownership rules
in light of the media landscape of 2022
and beyond.
Timetable:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Public Notice .......
01/17/23
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kim Matthews,
Attorney, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418–2154, Fax: 202
418–2053, Email: kim.matthews@
fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL63
Action
Date
FR Cite
88 FR 2595
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ty Bream, Attorney
Advisor, Industry Analysis Div., Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0644, Email: ty.bream@
fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL65
298. • Modifying Rules for FM
Terrestrial Digital Audio Broadcasting
Systems, MB Docket No. 22–405 [3060–
AL70]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47 U.S.C. 301
and 302(a)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission proposes changes to the
digital audio broadcasting technical
rules that would permit additional FM
stations to increase FM hybrid digital
effective radiated power beyond the
existing levels without the need for
individual Commission authorization.
In addition, the Commission propose to
allow a digital FM station to operate
with asymmetric power on the digital
sidebands. These rule changes are
intended to improve digital FM signal
quality and minimize the effect of the
digital FM station signal on adjacent
channel FM transmissions.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
08/22/23
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
88 FR 57033
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Al Shuldiner,
Division Chief, Audio Div., Media
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
2700, Email: albert.shuldiner@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL70
299. • Customer Rebates for
Undelivered Video Programming
During Blackouts, MB Docket No. 24–20
[3060–AL71]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47 U.S.C. 303
and 335(a)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks comment on whether
to require cable operators and direct
broadcast satellite (DBS) providers to
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
give their subscribers rebates when
those subscribers are deprived of video
programming they expect to receive
during programming blackouts that
result from failed retransmission
consent negotiations or failed nonbroadcast carriage negotiations. In the
event that such a requirement is
adopted, the Commission seeks
comment below on how to apply the
rule, and whether to specify the method
that cable operators and DBS providers
use to offer the rebates and if so, how
they should issue rebates. The
Commission also seeks comment on its
our authority to adopt a rebate rule. The
Commission also invites comment on
any other proposals to ensure that
subscribers are made whole when they
lose access to programming that they
expected to receive in exchange for
paying a monthly subscription fee when
they signed up for service.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
02/07/24
FR Cite
89 FR 8385
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brendan Murray,
Deputy Division Chief, Policy Division,
Media Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1573, Email: brendan.murray@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL71
300. • Priority Application Review for
Broadcast Stations That Provide Local
Journalism or Other Locally Originated
Programming, MB Docket No. 24–14
[3060–AL72]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 ; 47
U.S.C. 152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j);
47 U.S.C. 303
Abstract: This proceeding addresses
certain billing practices of cable and
direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service
providers that penalize subscribers for
terminating video service or switching
video service providers. Comment is
sought on proposals to protect
consumers and promote competition in
the video programming marketplace.
The proposed customer service
protection rules include prohibiting
cable operators and DBS service
providers from imposing early
termination fees and billing cycle fees
on subscribers.
Timetable:
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66931
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Next Action Undetermined.
01/05/24
FR Cite
89 FR 740
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Katie Costello, Policy
Division, Media Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, Media
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418–2233, Fax: 202
418–1069, Email: katie.costello@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL72
301. • Cable Operator and DBS
Provider Billing Practices, MB Docket
No. 23–405 [3060–AL73]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i) ; 47 U.S.C. 303(v) and
335(a); 47 U.S.C. 552(b)
Abstract: This proceeding addresses
certain billing practices of cable and
direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service
providers that penalize subscribers for
terminating video service or switching
video service providers. Comment is
sought on proposals to protect
consumers and promote competition in
the video programming marketplace.
The proposed customer service
protection rules include prohibiting
cable operators and DBS service
providers from imposing early
termination fees and billing cycle fees
on subscribers.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Next Action Undetermined.
01/05/24
FR Cite
89 FR 740
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Katie Costello, Policy
Division, Media Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, Media
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418–2233, Fax: 202
418–1069, Email: katie.costello@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL73
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
302. • Reporting Requirements for
Commercial Television Broadcast
Station Blackouts, MB Docket No. 23–
427 [3060–AL74]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47
U.S.C. 307; . . .
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission proposes a reporting
framework for TV station blackouts
occurring on video service platforms
offered by cable operators, satellite TV
providers, and other multichannel video
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
programming distributors (MVPDs). The
proposed reporting framework would
require MVPDs to publicly report to the
Commission the beginning and end of
any qualifying blackout of a commercial
broadcast television station, or stations,
and disclose either publicly or
confidentially the number of subscribers
affected by the blackout.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
01/26/24
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
89 FR 42277
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brooke Olaussen,
Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1060, Email:
brooke.olaussen@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL74
303. • All-In Pricing for Cable and
Satellite Television Service, MB Docket
No. 23–203 [3060–AL75]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 303 and 316; 47
U.S.C. 335(a); . . .
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission proposes to require cable
operators and direct broadcast satellite
providers to specify the all-in price for
video programming as a prominent
single line item on subscribers’ bills and
in promotional materials that state a
price.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
06/30/23
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Office of Managing Director
Long-Term Actions
304. Assessment and Collection of
Regulatory Fees [3060–AK64]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 159
Abstract: Section 9 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (47 U.S.C. 159), requires the
Federal Communications Commission
to recover the cost of its activities by
assessing and collecting annual
regulatory fees from beneficiaries of the
activities.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM ..................
Report & Order ...
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report and Order
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
06/06/17
09/22/17
06/14/18
06/21/18
82 FR 26019
82 FR 44322
83 FR 27846
09/18/18
06/05/19
06/07/19
83 FR 47079
84 FR 26234
09/26/19
05/08/20
06/22/20
05/13/21
05/17/21
09/21/21
09/22/21
10/21/21
84
85
85
86
86
86
86
06/28/22
09/14/22
06/01/23
06/29/23
87 FR 38588
87 FR 56494
88 FR 36154
09/15/23
88 FR 63694
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
50890
32256
37364
26262
26677
52429
52742
To Be Determined
88 FR 42277
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brendan Murray,
Deputy Division Chief, Policy Division,
Media Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1573, Email: brendan.murray@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL75
PO 00000
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Roland Helvajian,
Office of the Managing Director, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0444, Email:
roland.helvajian@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK64
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66932
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Office of International Affairs
Long-Term Actions
305. Process Reform for Executive
Brance Review of Certain FCC
Applications and Petitions Involving
Foreign Ownership, IB Docket No. 16–
155 [3060–AL12]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(l); 47
U.S.C. 154(j); 47 U.S.C. 214; 47 U.S.C.
303; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 310; 47
U.S.C. 413; 47 U.S.C. 34–39; E.O. 10530;
3 U.S.C. 301
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission considers rules and
procedures that streamline and improve
the timeliness and transparency of the
process by which the Commission refers
certain applications and petitions for
declaratory ruling to the Executive
Branch agencies for assessment of any
national security, law enforcement,
foreign policy or trade policy issues
related to foreign investment in the
applicants and petitioners. The
Commission, in this proceeding, also
adopted Standard Questions that certain
applicants with reportable foreign
ownership will be required to answer as
part of the Executive Branch review
process of their applications.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Report & Order ...
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Secord Report
and Order
Adopted.
Second R&O Released.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS20
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
06/24/16
09/02/16
81 FR 46870
04/27/20
09/02/20
85 FR 29914
10/01/20
12/30/20
04/19/21
85 FR 76360
85 FR 12312
09/30/21
86 FR 68428
10/01/21
86 FR 68428
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
06/01/23
10/02/23
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
88 FR 50486
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Gabrielle Kim,
Attorney Advisor, Office of
International Affairs, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0730, Email:
gabrielle.kim@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL76
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau
To Be Determined
Long-Term Actions
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Arthur T. Lechtman,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission,
International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1465, Fax: 202 418–0175, Email:
arthur.lechtman@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL12
VerDate Sep<11>2014
306. • Review of International Section
214 Authorizations To Assess Evolving
National Security, Law Enforcement,
Foreign Policy, and Trade Policy Risks,
IB Docket No. 23–119, MD Docket No.
23–134 [3060–AL76]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and
154(j); 47 U.S.C. 201 and 214; 47 U.S.C.
218 and 219; 47 U.S.C. 403 and 413
Abstract: By this Notice, the
Commission proposes rules that would
require carriers to renew, every 10 years,
their international section 214 authority.
In the alternative, the Commission seeks
comment on adopting rules that would
require all international section 214
authorization holders to periodically
update information enabling the
Commission to review the public
interest and national security
implications of those authorizations
based on that updated information.
Through these proposals, the
Commission seeks to ensure that the
Commission is exercising appropriate
oversight of international section 214
authorization holders to safeguard U.S.
telecommunications networks.
Timetable:
Jkt 250001
307. Wireless E911 Location Accuracy
Requirements: PS Docket No. 07–114
[3060–AJ52]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 332
Abstract: This rulemaking is related to
the proceedings in which the FCC
previously acted to improve the quality
of all emergency services. Wireless
carriers must provide specific automatic
location information in connection with
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
911 emergency calls to Public Safety
Answering Points (PSAPs). Wireless
licensees must satisfy enhanced 911
location accuracy standards at either a
county-based or a PSAP-based
geographic level.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
Public Notice .......
FNPRM; NOI .......
Public Notice .......
2nd R&O .............
Second NPRM ....
Second NPRM
Comment Period End.
Final Rule ............
NPRM, 3rd R&O,
and 2nd
FNPRM.
3rd FNPRM .........
Order Extending
Comment Period.
3rd FNPRM Comment Period
End.
Public Notice (Release Date).
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
4th R&O ..............
Final Rule ............
Order Granting
Waiver.
NPRM ..................
4th NPRM ...........
5th R&O ..............
5th NPRM ...........
5th NPRM Comment Period
End.
6th R&O and
Order on Recon.
Order of Reconsideration.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
06/20/07
02/14/08
09/25/08
11/02/10
11/18/09
11/18/10
08/04/11
11/02/11
72
73
73
75
74
75
76
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
33948
8617
55473
67321
59539
70604
47114
04/28/11
09/28/11
76 FR 23713
76 FR 59916
03/28/14
06/10/14
79 FR 17820
79 FR 33163
07/14/14
11/20/14
12/17/14
03/04/15
08/03/15
07/10/17
80 FR 11806
80 FR 45897
09/26/18
03/18/19
01/16/20
01/16/20
03/16/20
83
84
85
85
08/28/20
85 FR 53234
01/01/21
86 FR 8714
FR
FR
FR
FR
54180
13211
2660
2683
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brenda Boykin,
Deputy Chief, Policy & Licensing
Division, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2062, Email:
brenda.boykin@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AJ52
308. Improving Outage Reporting for
Submarine Cables and Enhancing
Submarine Cable Outage Data; GN
Docket No. 15–206 [3060–AK39]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 34 to 39; 47 U.S.C.
301
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Abstract: This proceeding takes steps
toward assuring the reliability and
resiliency of submarine cables, a critical
piece of the Nation’s communications
infrastructure, by proposing to require
submarine cable licensees to report to
the Commission when outages occur
and communications are disrupted. The
Commission’s intent is to enhance
national security and emergency
preparedness by these actions. In
December 2019, the Commission
adopted an Order on Reconsideration
that modifies the requirement for
submarine cable licensees to report
outages to the Commission.
The compliance date for the new
mandatory submarine cable outage
reporting rules was October 28, 2021.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM (Release
Date).
R&O ....................
Petitions for
Recon.
Petitions for
Recon—Public
Comment.
Order on Recon.
PRA Approval for
new collection.
Public Notice re
effective date.
Compliance Date
for New Rules.
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
09/18/15
06/24/16
09/08/16
81 FR 52354
10/17/16
81 FR 75368
12/20/19
03/25/21
84 FR 15733
04/28/21
10/28/21
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Scott Cinnamon,
Attorney-Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2319, Email:
scott.cinnamon@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK39
309. Amendments to Part 4 of the
Commission’s Rules Concerning
Disruptions to Communications: (PS
Docket No. 15–80, 18–336, 23–5) [3060–
AK40]
Legal Authority: sec. 1, 4(i), 4(j), 4(o),
251(e)(3), 254, 301, 303(b), 303(g),
303(r), 307, 309(a), 309(j); 316, 332, 403,
615a–1, and 615c of Pub. L. 73–416, 4
Stat. 1064, as amended; and sec. 706 of
Pub. L. 104–104, 110 Stat. 56; 47 U.S.C.
151, 154(i)–(j) & (o), 251(e)(3), 254, 301,
303(b), 303(g), 303(r), 307; 309(a), 309(j),
316, 332, 403, 615a–1, 615c, and 1302,
unless otherwise noted
Abstract: The 2004 Report and Order
(R&O) extended the Commission’s
communication disruptions reporting
rules to non-wireline carriers and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
streamlined reporting through a new
electronic template (see docket ET
Docket 04–35). In 2015, this proceeding,
PS Docket 15–80, was opened to amend
the original communications disruption
reporting rules from 2004 in order to
reflect technology transitions observed
throughout the telecommunications
sector. The Commission seeks to further
study the possibility to share the
reporting database information and
access with State and other Federal
entities. In May 2016, the Commission
released a Report and Order, FNPRM,
and Order on Reconsideration (see also
Dockets 11–82 and 04–35). The R&O
adopted rules to update the part 4
requirements to reflect technology
transitions. The FNPRM sought
comment on sharing information in the
reporting database. Comments and
replies were received by the
Commission in August and September
2016.
In March 2020, the Commission
adopted a Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in PS Docket No.
15–80 that proposed a framework to
provide state and federal agencies with
access to outage information to improve
their situational awareness while
preserving the confidentiality of this
data, including proposals to: provide
direct, read-only access to NORS and
DIRS filings to qualified agencies of the
50 states, the District of Columbia,
Tribal nations, territories, and federal
government; allow these agencies to
share NORS and DIRS information with
other public safety officials that
reasonably require NORS and DIRS
information to prepare for and respond
to disasters; allow participating agencies
to publicly disclose NORS or DIRS filing
information that is aggregated and
anonymized across at least four service
providers; condition a participating
agency’s direct access to NORS and
DIRS filings on their agreement to treat
the filings as confidential and not
disclose them absent a finding by the
Commission that allows them to do so;
and establish an application process
that would grant agencies access to
NORS and DIRS after those agencies
certify to certain requirements related to
maintaining confidentiality of the data
and the security of the databases. In
March 2021, the Commission adopted
the proposed information sharing
framework with some modifications in
a Second Report and Order. In April
2021, in a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, the Commission proposed
to codify a rule adopted in 2016 that
exempts satellite and terrestrial wireless
providers from reporting outages that
potentially affect special offices and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66933
facilities, as defined in Commission
rules. This proceeding addresses the
Commission’s efforts to improve the
utility of its efforts to track network
outages and disruptions and does not
promote the administration’s specified
priorities.
In May 2021, the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC) filed a
Petition for Reconsideration (PFR)
requesting that the Commission
reconsider its decision in the Second
Report and Order to maintain the
presumption of confidentiality applied
to NORS and DIRS filings. The
Commission sought comment on the
PFR’s requests.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM, 2nd R&O,
Order on
Recon..
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM, 1 Part 4
R&O, Order on
Recon..
Order Denying
Reply Comment
Deadline Extension Request.
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Announcement of
Effective Date
for Rule
Changes in
R&O.
Announcement of
Effective Date
for Rule
Changes in
R&O.
Second Further
NPRM.
Second Further
NPRM Comment Period
End.
2nd R&O .............
3rd NPRM ...........
CPUC PFR Comment Period
End.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
06/16/15
FR Cite
80 FR 34321
07/31/15
07/12/16
08/11/16
81 FR 45055
81 FR 45059
09/08/16
09/12/16
06/22/17
82 FR 28410
06/22/17
82 FR 28410
02/28/20
85 FR 17818
06/01/20
04/29/21
06/30/21
08/23/21
86 FR 22796
86 FR 34679
86 FR 40801
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Logan Bennett,
Attorney Advisor, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7790, Email:
logan.bennett@fcc.gov.
Saswat Misra, Attorney-Advisor,
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau, Federal Communications
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66934
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
0944, Email: saswat.misra@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK40
310. New Part 4 of the Commission’s
Rules Concerning Disruptions to
Communications; ET Docket No. 04–35
[3060–AK41]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154 and
155; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 251; 47
U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: The proceeding creates a
new part 4 in title 47 and amends part
63.100. The proceeding updates the
Commission’s communication
disruptions reporting rules for wireline
providers formerly in 47 CFR 63.100
and extends these rules to other nonwireline providers. Through this
proceeding, the Commission streamlines
the reporting process through an
electronic template. The Report and
Order received several petitions for
reconsideration, of which two were
eventually withdrawn. In 2015, seven
were addressed in an Order on
Reconsideration and in 2016 another
petition was addressed in an Order on
Reconsideration. One petition (CPUC
Petition) remains pending regarding
NORS database sharing with States,
which is addressed in a separate
proceeding, PS Docket 15–80. To the
extent the communication disruption
rules cover VoIP, the Commission
studies and addresses these questions in
a separate docket, PS Docket 11–82.
In May 2016, the Commission
released a Report and Order, FNPRM,
and Order on Reconsideration (see
Dockets 11–82 and 15–80). The Order
on Reconsideration addressed outage
reporting for events at airports, and the
FNPRM sought comment on database
sharing. The Commission received
comments and replies in August and
September 2016.
Timetable:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
Denial for Petition
for Partial Stay.
Seek Comment
on Petition for
Recon.
Reply Period End
Seek Comment
on Broadband
and Interconnected
VOIP Service
Providers.
Reply Period End
2nd R&O, and
Order on
Recon, NPRM.
R&O ....................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
03/26/04
11/26/04
12/02/04
FR Cite
69 FR 15761
69 FR 68859
02/02/10
03/19/10
07/02/10
08/16/12
06/16/15
07/12/16
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Action
Date
FNPRM, 1 Part 4
R&O, Order on
Recon.
Order Denying
Extension of
Time to File
Reply Comments.
Announcement of
Effective Date
for Rule
Changes in
R&O.
08/11/16
FR Cite
Action
81 FR
45095, 81
FR 45055
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Order ...................
FNPRM ...............
Comment Period
End.
Petition for Recon
Order on Recon ..
2nd R&O and 2nd
Order on Recon.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Public Notice
Reply Comment
Period End.
Report and Order
and FNPRM.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM ...............
Report and Order
Correction ............
09/08/16
06/22/17
Next Action Undetermined.
82 FR 28410
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Logan Bennett,
Attorney Advisor, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7790, Email:
logan.bennett@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK41
311. Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA):
PS Docket No. 15–91, 15–94, 22–329
[3060–AK54]
Legal Authority: Pub. L. 109–347, title
VI; 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i)
Abstract: This proceeding was
initiated to improve Wireless
Emergency Alerts (WEA) messaging,
ensure that WEA alerts reach only those
individuals to whom they are relevant,
and establish an end-to-end testing
program based on advancements in
technology.
In April 2023, the Commission
released an FNPRM seeking comment
on proposals to make WEA alerts
understandable to people with
disabilities and people with native
languages other than English and
Spanish, communities that would
otherwise be underserved by WEA.
In October 2023, the Commission
adopted a Report and Order adopting
some of the proposals from the April
FNPRM. Proposals adopted include
making WEA multilingual, including
location-aware maps with alerting,
permitting two live WEA tests per
county or county equivalent per year,
and creating a publicly available WEA
Database which will include
information about where WEA is and is
not available and by what providers.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
80 FR 34321
81 FR 45055
Jkt 250001
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
11/19/15
01/13/16
Fmt 4701
80 FR 77289
Sfmt 4702
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
02/12/16
12/08/16
09/29/16
12/08/16
81 FR 75710
81 FR 78539
12/19/16
02/04/17
02/28/18
81 FR 91899
82 FR 57158
83 FR 8619
04/26/18
05/29/18
83 FR 18257
06/11/18
06/17/21
86 FR 46783
04/21/22
11/23/22
06/21/23
12/15/23
01/17/24
87
87
88
88
89
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
30857
71539
40606
86824
2885
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Antonino,
Attorney Advisor, PSHSB, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7965, Email:
michael.antonino@fcc.gov.
James Wiley, Deputy Division Chief,
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1678, Email: james.wiley@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK54
312. 911 Fee Diversion Rulemaking: PS
Docket Nos. 20–291, 09–14 [3060–AL31]
Legal Authority: Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. L. 116–
260, Division FF, title 1X, sec. 902,
Don’t Break Up the T-Band Act of 2020
(sec. 902)
Abstract: In 2020, Congress adopted
the ‘‘Don’t Break Up the T-Band Act’’
(section 902) to help address the
diversion of 911 fees by states and other
jurisdictions for purposes unrelated to
911. Among other requirements,
Congress mandated that the
Commission should issue final rules
designating the uses of 911 fees by states
and taxing jurisdictions that constitute
911 fee diversion for purposes of 47
U.S.C. 615a-1, as amended by section
902. The Commission initiated this
proceeding and issued new rules at 47
CFR 9.21–9.26 that: (1) clarify the
purposes and functions for which
expenditures of 911 fees are acceptable
and which would be considered
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
unacceptable and constitute diversion,
with illustrative, non-exhaustive
examples of each; (2) establish a
declaratory ruling process for providing
further guidance to states and taxing
jurisdictions on fee diversion issues;
and (3) codify the specific obligations
and restrictions that section 902
imposes on states and taxing
jurisdictions, including those that
engage in diversion as defined by the
Commission’s rules.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Notice of Inquiry ..
NOI Comment
Period End.
NOI Reply Comment Period
End.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Report & Order ...
R&O Erratum ......
Petition for Recon
Oppositions to
Petition for
Recon.
Replies to Oppositions to Petition for Recon.
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
10/02/20
11/02/20
12/02/20
02/17/21
03/23/21
86 FR 12399
04/02/21
86 FR 12399
06/25/21
08/12/21
12/22/21
01/06/22
86 FR 45892
86 FR 45892
86 FR 72546
01/18/22
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brenda Boykin,
Deputy Chief, Policy & Licensing
Division, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2062, Email:
brenda.boykin@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL31
313. Resilient Networks, Amendments
to Part 4 of the Commission’s Rules
Concerning Disruptions to
Communications; PS Docket No. 21–346
[3060–AL43]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 1; 47 U.S.C.
4(i) and 4(o); 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and
214(d); 47 U.S.C. 218 and 251(e)(3); 47
U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 303(b) and 303(g);
47 U.S.C. 303(j) and 303(r); 47 U.S.C.
307; 47 U.S.C. 309(a) and 309(j); 47
U.S.C. 316 and 332; 47 U.S.C. 403; 47
U.S.C. 615a–1 ; 47 U.S.C. 615c of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended; 47 U.S.C. 154(i)–(j) and (o); 47
U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C 4(j); . . .
Abstract: In October 2021, the
Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
investigate ways to improve the
reliability and resiliency of
communications networks during
emergencies and ways to ensure that
communications services remain
operational when disasters strike. The
NPRM sought comment on: (i) potential
improvements to the voluntary Wireless
Resiliency Cooperative Framework
(Framework), including evaluating what
triggers its activation, its scope of
participants, whether existing
Framework elements can be
strengthened, any gaps that need to be
addressed, and whether the public
would benefit from codifying some or
all of the Framework, (ii) ways to
enhance the information available to the
Commission through Network Outage
Reporting System (NORS) and Disaster
Information Reporting System (DIRS)
during disasters and network outages to
improve situational awareness, and (iii)
communications resiliency strategies for
power outages, including improved
coordination between communications
service providers and power companies
and deploying onsite backup power or
other alternative measures to reduce the
frequency, duration, or severity of
power-related disruptions to
communications services.
In June 2022, the Commission
adopted a Report & Order (R&O) and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(FNPRM) following up on and further
addressing matters related to the
Framework. The R&O introduced the
Mandatory Disaster Response Initiative
(MDRI), which largely codified the
Framework’s five substantive provisions
as mandatory, extended the reach of
these provisions to all facilities-based
mobile wireless providers, expanded the
real-world criteria that trigger activation
of the MDRI (as compared to the
Framework) and introduced new
provisions requiring providers to test
their roaming capabilities and report on
the performance of their
implementation of the MDRI to the
Commission after disaster events. The
FNPRM examined whether and how the
new reporting requirement can be
standardized to ensure that the
Commission obtains vital and actionable
information on the performance of
providers’ implementation of the MDRI
in the aftermath of exigency, while also
minimizing associated burdens. This
proceeding addresses network reliability
in the context of public safety and does
not promote the administration’s
specified priorities.
In October 2022, CTIA and the
Competitive Carriers Association (CCA)
filed a Petition for Clarification and
Partial Reconsideration in response to
the 2022 Resilient Networks R&O.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66935
Particularly, Petitioners asked that the
Commission: (1) provide a list of
potential providers to which the MDRI
may apply; (2) provide sufficient time
for wireless providers to achieve
compliance (by requesting 12 months
for non-small providers and 18 months
for small providers); (3) align the
definitions of ‘‘non-small’’ and ‘‘small’’
with the Commission’s existing
definitions of ‘‘nationwide’’ and ‘‘nonnationwide’’ as used in the 911 context;
(4) establish the process in which the
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau (Bureau) will inform providers
that the MDRI is active; and (5) affirm
that Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) review is required for all
information collection obligations and
that the Commission will treat all
roaming arrangements as presumptively
confidential under Section 4.17(d). A
draft Order on Reconsideration was
circulated for Commission
consideration on July 28, 2023.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Petition for Reconsideration.
Public Notice
Comment.
Extends Deadline
to File Replies.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
10/01/21
01/14/22
86 FR 61103
06/27/22
06/27/22
10/31/22
87 FR 59379
87 FR 59329
11/29/22
10/31/22
12/02/22
87 FR 7102
12/19/22
87 FR 79263
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Logan Bennett,
Attorney Advisor, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7790, Email:
logan.bennett@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL43
314. Location-Based Routing for
Wireless 911 Calls (P.S. Docket 18–64)
[3060–AL52]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 152(a); 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C.
160; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 214; 47
U.S.C. 222; 47 U.S.C. 251(e); 47 U.S.C.
301 to 303; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C. 309;
47 U.S.C. 316 and 332; 47 U.S.C. 615;
47 U.S.C. 615a; 47 U.S.C. 615b; 47
U.S.C. 615c
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66936
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Federal Communications Commission
proposes rules to more precisely route
wireless 911 calls and texts to Public
Safety Answering Points (PSAPs),
which can result in faster response
times during emergencies. Wireless 911
calls have historically been routed to
PSAPs based on the location of the cell
tower that handles the call. Sometimes,
however, the 911 call is routed to the
wrong PSAP because the cell tower is
not in the same jurisdiction as the 911
caller. This can happen, for instance,
when an emergency call is placed near
a county border. These misrouted 911
calls must be transferred from one PSAP
to another, which consumes time and
resources and can cause confusion and
delay in emergency response. The
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
proposes to require wireless and
covered text providers to deploy
technology that supports location-based
routing, a method that relies on precise
information about the location of the
wireless caller’s device, on some
networks and to use location-based
routing to route 911 voice calls and texts
originating on those networks when
caller location is accurate and timely. In
addition, the NPRM proposes to require
CMRS and covered text providers to
deliver 911 calls, texts, and associated
routing information in internet Protocol
(IP) format upon request of certain 911
authorities.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Reply Comments
Due.
Report and Order
Next Action Undetermined.
01/17/23
02/16/23
FR Cite
88 FR 2565
03/20/23
03/13/24
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Date
NPRM ..................
07/10/23
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
Jkt 250001
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brenda Boykin,
Deputy Chief, Policy & Licensing
Division, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2062, Email:
brenda.boykin@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL67
Space Bureau
Long-Term Actions
316. Update to Parts 2 and 25
Concerning Nongeostationary, FixedSatellite Service Systems, and Related
Matters: IB Docket No. I6–408 [3060–
AK59]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: On January 11, 2017, the
Commission began a rulemaking to
update its rules and policies concerning
non-geostationary-satellite orbit
(NGSO), fixed-satellite service (FSS)
systems and related matters. The
Commission proposed among other
things, to provide for more flexible use
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
of the 17.8–20.2 GHz bands for FSS,
promote shared use of spectrum among
NGSO FSS satellite systems, and
remove unnecessary design restrictions
on NGSO FSS systems. The Commission
subsequently adopted a Report and
Order establishing new sharing criteria
among NGSO FSS systems and
providing additional flexibility for FSS
spectrum use. The Commission also
released a Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking proposing to remove the
domestic coverage requirement for
NGSO FSS systems and later adopted a
Second Report and Order removing this
requirement.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
2nd R&O .............
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
01/11/17
04/10/17
82 FR 3258
11/15/17
12/18/17
01/02/18
82 FR 52869
82 FR 59972
02/21/21
86 FR 11642
To Be Determined
88 FR 43514
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
315. Next Generation 9–1–1, PS Docket
No. 21–479, FCC 23–47 [3060–AL67]
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
Abstract: The Federal
Communications Commission (the FCC
or Commission) proposes rules that will
advance the nationwide transition to
Next Generation 911 (NG911). The
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Action
89 FR 18488
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brenda Boykin,
Deputy Chief, Policy and Licensing Div,
PSHSB, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
2062, Email: brenda.boykin@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL52
VerDate Sep<11>2014
proposes requiring certain service
providers to complete all translation
and routing to deliver 911 calls in the
requested internet Protocol (IP)-based
format to an Emergency Services IP
network (ESInet) or other designated
point(s) that allow emergency calls to be
answered upon request of 911
authorities who have certified the
capability to accept IP-based 911
communications. In addition, the NPRM
proposes to require service providers to
transmit all 911 calls to destination
point(s) in those networks designated by
a 911 authority upon request of 911
authorities who have certified the
capability to accept IP-based 911
communications. Finally, the NPRM
proposes that in the absence of
agreements by states or localities on
alternative cost recovery mechanisms,
service providers must cover the costs of
transmitting 911 calls to the point(s)
designated by a 911 authority. In
addition, the NPRM seeks comment on
promoting diversity and inclusion.
Timetable:
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Clay DeCell,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission,
International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
0803, Email: clay.decell@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK59
317. Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of
the FCC Rules to Facilitate the Use of
Earth Stations in Motion
Communicating With Geostationary
Orbit Space Stations in FSS Bands: IB
Docket No. 17–95 [3060–AK84]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C.
308(b); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: In June 2017, the
Commission began a rulemaking to
streamline, consolidate, and harmonize
rules governing earth stations in motion
(ESIMs) used to provide satellite-based
services on ships, airplanes and vehicles
communicating with geostationarysatellite orbit (GSO), fixed-satellite
service (FSS) satellite systems. In
September 2018, the Commission
adopted rules governing
communications of ESIMs with GSO
satellites. These rules addressed
communications in the conventional
C-, Ku-, and Ka-bands, as well as
portions of the extended Ku-band. At
the same time, the Commission also
released a Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking that sought comment on
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
allowing ESIMs to operate in all of the
frequency bands in which earth stations
at fixed locations operating in GSO FSS
satellite networks can be blanketlicensed. Specifically, comment was
sought on expanding the frequencies
available for communications of ESIMs
with GSO FSS satellites to include the
following frequency bands: 10.7–10.95
GHz, 11.2–11.45 GHz, 17.8–18.3 GHz,
18.8–19.3 GHz, 19.3–19.4 GHz, 19.6–
19.7 GHz (space-to-Earth); and 28.6–
29.1 GHz (Earth-to-space).
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
OMB-approval for
Information Collection of R&O
Comment Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Next Action Undetermined.
06/16/17
08/30/17
FR Cite
Action
82 FR 27652
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
08/28/18
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Date
12/28/18
03/13/19
07/24/20
07/24/20
09/22/20
85 fr 44818
85 FR 44772
To Be Determined
318. Facilitating the Communications of
Earth Stations in Motion With NonGeostationary Orbit Space Stations: IB
Docket No. 18–315 [3060–AK89]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C.
308(b); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: In November 2018, the
Commission adopted a notice of
proposed rulemaking that proposed to
expand the scope of the Commission’s
rules governing ESIMs operations to
cover communications with NGSO FSS
satellites. Comment was sought on
establishing a regulatory framework for
communications of ESIMs with NGSO
FSS satellites that would be analogous
to that which exists for ESIMs
communicating with GSO FSS satellites.
In this context, comment was sought on:
(1) allowing ESIMs to communicate in
many of the same conventional Kuband, extended Ku-band, and Ka-band
frequencies that were allowed for
communications of ESIMs with GSO
FSS satellites (with the exception of the
18.6–18.8 GHz and 29.25–29.5 GHz
frequency bands); (2) extending blanket
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
FR Cite
83 FR 67180
07/24/20
Next Action Undetermined.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cindy Spiers,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission,
International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1593, Email: cindy.spiers@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK84
VerDate Sep<11>2014
licensing to ESIMs communicating with
NGSO satellites; and (3) revisions to
specific provisions in the Commission’s
rules to implement these changes. The
specific frequency bands for
communications of ESIMs with NGOS
FSS satellites on which comment was
sought are as follows: 10.7–11.7 GHz;
11.7–12.2 GHz; 14.0–14.5 GHz; 17.8–
18.3 GHz; 18.3–18.6 GHz; 18.8–19.3
GHz; 19.3–19.4 GHz; 19.6–19.7 GHz;
19.7–20.2 GHz; 28.35–28.6 GHz; 28.6–
29.1 GHz; and 29.5–30.0 GHz.
Timetable:
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cindy Spiers,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission,
International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1593, Email: cindy.spiers@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK89
319. Space Innovation; Mitigation of
Orbital Debris in the New Space Age: IB
Docket Nos. 18–313, 22–271 [3060–
AK90]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154; 47
U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 302;
47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C.
308; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 310; 47
U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47 U.S.C. 336;
47 U.S.C. 605; 47 U.S.C. 721
Abstract: The Commission’s current
orbital debris rules were first adopted in
2004. Since then, significant changes
have occurred in satellite technologies
and market conditions, particularly in
Low Earth Orbit, i.e., below 2000
kilometers altitude. These changes
include the increasing use of lower cost
small satellites and proposals to deploy
large constellations of non-geostationary
satellite orbit (NGSO) systems, some
involving thousands of satellites.
The NPRM proposes changes to
improve disclosure of debris mitigation
plans. The NPRM also makes proposals
and seeks comment related to satellite
disposal reliability and methodology,
appropriate deployment altitudes in
low-Earth-orbit, and on-orbit lifetime,
with a particular focus on large NGSO
satellite constellations. Other aspects of
the NPRM include new rule proposals
for geostationary orbit satellite (GSO)
license term extension requests, and
consideration of disclosure
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66937
requirements related to several emerging
technologies and new types of
commercial operations, including
rendezvous and proximity operations.
The Report and Order in this
proceeding adopted a number of these
proposals. In addition a Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking sought
comment on topics such as collision
risk and casualty risk for multi-satellite
systems, de-orbit timelines,
maneuverability requirements, and
indemnification and post mission
disposal bond issues. The Commission
issued a Second Report and Order
adopting a 5-year de-orbit timeframe for
satellites ending their missions in or
passing through the low-Earth Orbit
region.
Three petitions for reconsideration
were filed in response to the initial
Report and Order, which were all
subsequently denied.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Second R&O .......
Notice of Petition
for Reconsideration.
Denial of Reconsideration.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
02/19/19
05/06/19
84 FR 4742
08/25/20
08/25/20
10/09/20
85 FR 52422
85 FR 52455
09/29/22
11/09/20
85 FR 71296
02/22/24
89 FR 13276
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Alexandra Horn,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1376, Email:
alexandra.horn@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK90
320. Parts 2 and 25 To Enable GSO FSS
in the 17.3–17.8 GHz Band, Modernize
Rules for 17/24 GHz BSS Space
Stations, and Establish Off-Axis Uplink
Power Limits for Extended KA-Band
FSS (IB Doc. No. 20–330) [3060–AL28]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 303(r); 47 U.S.C. 309(j)
Abstract: This item addresses the
addition of an allocation in the 17.3–
17.7 GHz and 17.7–17.8 GHz bands to
the fixed-satellite service in the spaceto-Earth direction. The Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking proposes to add
these allocations to the U.S. Table of
Frequency Allocations (non-Federal),
and proposes modification of existing
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66938
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
technical rules to prevent harmful
interference between services in these
bands.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
Erraturn ...............
Next Action Undetermined.
02/01/21
03/03/21
FR Cite
86 FR 7660
03/18/21
09/03/22
09/03/22
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Stephanie Neville,
Attorney Advisor, Satellite Programs
and Policy Div., Space Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1672, Email:
stephanie.neville@fcc.gov.
Sean O’More, Attorney Advisor,
International Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 245 418–2453, Email:
sean.omore@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL28
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
321. Revising Spectrum Sharing Rules
for Non-Geostationary Orbit, FixedSatellite Service Systems: IB Docket No.
21–456 [3060–AL41]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C.
308(b); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: In 2021, the Commission
released a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking comment
on revisions to the spectrum sharing
requirements among non-geostationary
satellite orbit (NGSO), fixed-satellite
service (FSS) systems. The NPRM
proposed that the Commission’s existing
spectrum sharing mechanism for NGSO
FSS systems will be limited to those
systems approved in the same
processing round. The NPRM also
proposed to adopt a rule providing that
later-round NGSO FSS systems will
have to protect earlier-round systems,
and invited comment on how to define
such protection. In addition, the NPRM
sought comment on whether to sunset,
after a period of time, the interference
protection afforded to an NGSO FSS
system because of its processing round
status.
In 2023, the Commission released a
Report and Order (R&O) in this
proceeding. The R&O adopted rules
clarifying protection obligations
between NGSO FSS systems authorized
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
through different processing rounds by
using a degraded throughput
methodology, and subjected those
protections to a sunset period. After the
sunset period, new entrants authorized
in later processing rounds would share
spectrum on an equal basis with earlierround incumbents. The R&O also
clarified that all NGSO FSS operators
licensed or granted market access in the
United States must coordinate with each
other in good faith, regardless of their
processing round status, and explained
the Commission’s expectations for
information sharing during this goodfaith coordination. In an accompanying
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(FNPRM), the Commission sought
comment on which specific metrics
should be used to define the protection
afforded to an earlier-round NGSO FSS
system from a later-round system, and
sought specific comment on
implementation of the degraded
throughput methodology.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report and Order
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
01/24/22
03/25/22
87 FR 3481
06/20/23
06/21/23
09/05/23
88 FR 39783
88 FR 40142
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Clay DeCell,
Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission,
International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
0803, Email: clay.decell@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL41
322. Expediting Initial Processing of
Satellite and Earth Station
Applications; Space Innovation, IB
Docket Nos. 22–411 and 22–271 [3060–
AL51]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and
157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303 and 308(b)
Abstract: In December 2022, the
Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to seek comment
on changes to its rules, policies, or
practices to facilitate the acceptance for
filing of satellite and earth station
applications under 47 CFR part 25. In
September 2023 the Commission
adopted a Report and Order
implementing its proposed changes as
well as establishing timeframes for
placing space and earth stations on
public notice, creating a new,
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
streamlined processing framework for
earth station operators to add satellite
points of communication, and
establishing a Transparency Initiative
led by the Space Bureau to provide
clarity and access to applicants. The
Commission also adopted a Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to seek
comment on additional proposed
changes to further expedite satellite and
earth station licensing.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
Report and
Order—Final
Rule.
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
01/17/23
04/03/23
FR Cite
88 FR 2590
12/08/23
01/05/24
02/06/24
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Julia Malette,
Attorney Advisor, Space Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2453, Email:
julia.malette@fcc.gov.
Clay DeCell, Attorney Advisor,
Federal Communications Commission,
International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
0803, Email: clay.decell@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL51
323. • Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of
the Commission’s Rules To Enable
NGSO Fixed-Satellite Service (Space-toEarth) Operations in the 17.3–17.8 GHz
Band [3060–AL79]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303(c) and
303(f),; 47 U.S.C. 303(g) and 303(r)
Abstract: Amendment of Parts 2 and
25 of the Commission’s Rules to Enable
NGSO Fixed-Satellite Service (Space-toEarth) Operations in the 17.3–17.8 GHz
Band.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment End.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
10/26/22
12/27/22
FR Cite
87 FR 64750
01/24/23
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66939
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Agency Contact: Stephanie Neville,
Attorney Advisor, Satellite Programs
and Policy Div., Space Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1672, Email:
stephanie.neville@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL79
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
Long-Term Actions
324. Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 22, 24,
27, 90, and 95 of the Commission’s
Rules to Improve Wireless Coverage
Through the Use of Signal Boosters (WT
Docket No. 10–4) [3060–AJ87]
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79; 47
U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C.
154(j); 47 U.S.C. 155; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47
U.S.C. 225; 47 U.S.C. 227; 47 U.S.C.
303(r)
Abstract: This action adopts new
technical, operational, and registration
requirements for signal boosters. It
creates two classes of signal boosters—
consumer and industrial—with distinct
regulatory requirements for each,
thereby establishing a two-step
transition process for equipment
certification for both consumer and
industrial signal boosters sold and
marketed in the United States.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
R&O ....................
Petition for Reconsideration.
Order on Reconsideration.
FNPRM ...............
2nd R&O and 2nd
FNPRM.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
05/10/11
04/11/13
06/06/13
76 FR 26983
78 FR 21555
78 FR 34015
11/08/14
79 FR 70790
11/28/14
03/23/18
79 FR 70837
83 FR 17131
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Morgan Mendenhall,
Attorney Advisor, Wireless Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0154, Email:
morgan.mendenhall@fcc.gov.
Jaclyn Rosen, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0154, Email:
jaclyn.rosen@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AJ87
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
325. Promoting Technological Solutions
to Combat Wireless Contraband Device
Use in Correctional Facilities; GN
Docket No. 13–111 [3060–AK06]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 to 152;
47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 154(j); 47
U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 303(a); 47 U.S.C.
303(b); 47 U.S.C. 307 to 310; 47 U.S.C.
332; 47 U.S.C. 302(a)
Abstract: In the 2017 Report and
Order, 82 FR 22742, the Commission
addressed the problem of illegal use of
contraband wireless devices by inmates
in correctional facilities by streamlining
the process of deploying contraband
wireless device interdiction systems
(CIS)—systems that use radio
communications signals requiring
Commission authorization—in
correctional facilities. In particular, the
Commission eliminated certain filing
requirements and provides for
immediate approval of the lease
applications needed to operate these
systems. In the 2017 Further Notice, 82
FR 22780, the Commission sought
comment on a process for wireless
providers to disable contraband wireless
devices once they have been identified.
The Commission also sought comment
on additional methods and technologies
that might prove successful in
combating contraband device use in
correctional facilities, and on various
other proposals related to the
authorization process for CISs and their
deployment.
In the Second Report and Order, the
Commission takes further steps to
facilitate the deployment and viability
of technological solutions used to
combat contraband wireless devices in
correctional facilities. The Second
Report and Order adopts a framework
requiring the disabling of contraband
wireless devices detected in correctional
facilities upon satisfaction of certain
criteria, and the Commission addresses
issues involving oversight, wireless
provider liability, and treatment of 911
calls. The Second Report and Order
further adopts rules requiring advance
notice of certain wireless provider
network changes to promote and
maintain contraband interdiction
system effectiveness. In the Second
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
the Commission takes further steps to
facilitate the deployment and viability
of technological solutions used to
combat contraband wireless devices in
correctional facilities. The Second
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
seeks further comment on the relative
effectiveness, viability, and cost of
additional technological solutions to
combat contraband phone use in
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
correctional facilities previously
identified in the record.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
Final Rule Effective (Except for
Rules Requiring
OMB Approval).
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule Effective for 47 CFR
1.9020(n),
1.9030(m),
1.9035 (o), and
20.23(a).
Final Rule Effective for 47 CFR
1.902(d)(8),
1.9035(d)(4),
20.18(a), and
20.18(r).
2nd FNPRM ........
2nd R&O .............
2nd FNPRM
Comment Period End.
Final Rules Effective (except for
those requiring
OMB approval).
Reply Comment
Period End.
Final Rule Effective.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
06/18/13
08/08/13
78 FR 36469
05/18/17
05/18/17
06/19/17
82 FR 22780
82 FR 22742
07/17/17
10/20/17
82 FR 48773
02/12/18
08/13/21
08/13/21
09/13/21
86 FR 44681
86 FR 44635
09/13/21
10/12/21
05/03/22
87 FR 26139
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Melissa Conway,
Attorney Advisor, Mobility Div.,
Wireless Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2887, Email:
melissa.conway@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK06
326. Promoting Investment in the 3550–
3700 MHz Band; GN Docket No. 17–258
[3060–AK12]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and
152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 154(j) ;
47 U.S.C. 302(a); 47 U.S.C. 303 and 304;
47 U.S.C. 307(e); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: The Report and Order and
Second Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) adopted by the
Commission established a new Citizens
Broadband Radio Service for shared
wireless broadband use of the 3550 to
3700 MHz band. The Citizens
Broadband Radio Service is governed by
a three-tiered spectrum authorization
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66940
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
framework to accommodate a variety of
commercial uses on a shared basis with
incumbent Federal and non-Federal
users of the band. Access and operations
will be managed by a dynamic spectrum
access system. The three tiers are:
Incumbent Access, Priority Access, and
General Authorized Access. Rules
governing the Citizens Broadband Radio
Service are found in part 96 of the
Commission’s rules.
The Order on Reconsideration and
Second Report and Order addressed
several Petitions for Reconsideration
submitted in response to the Report and
Order and resolved the outstanding
issues raised in the Second Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
The 2017 NPRM sought comment on
limited changes to the rules governing
Priority Access Licenses in the band,
adjacent channel emissions limits, and
public release of base station
registration information.
The 2018 Report and Order addressed
the issues raised in the 2017 NPRM and
implemented changes rules governing
Priority Access Licenses in the band and
public release of base station
registration information.
On July 2020, the Commission
commenced an auction of Priority
Access Licenses in the band. ‘‘Winning
bidders were announced on September
2, 2020’’.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O and 2nd
FNPRM.
2nd FNPRM
Comment Period End.
Order on Recon
and 2nd R&O.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Next Action Undetermined.
01/08/13
03/19/13
FR Cite
78 FR 1188
06/02/14
08/15/14
79 FR 31247
06/15/15
80 FR 34119
08/14/15
07/26/16
81 FR 49023
11/28/17
01/29/18
82 FR 56193
12/07/18
83 FR 6306
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Paul Powell,
Assistant Chief, Mobility Division,
WTB, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1613 Email:
paul.powell@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK12
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
327. Updating Part 1 Competitive
Bidding Rules (WT Docket No. 14–170)
[3060–AK28]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 303(r); 47 U.S.C.
309(j); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: This proceeding was
initiated to revise some of the
Commission’s general part 1 rules
governing competitive bidding for
spectrum licenses to reflect changes in
the marketplace, including the
challenges faced by new entrants, as
well as to advance the statutory
directive to ensure that small
businesses, rural telephone companies,
and businesses owned by members of
minority groups and women are given
the opportunity to participate in the
provision of spectrum-based services. In
July 2015, the Commission revised its
competitive bidding rules, specifically
adopting revised requirements for
eligibility for bidding credits, a new
rural service provider bidding credit, a
prohibition on joint bidding agreements
and other changes.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
R&O ....................
Public Notice on
Petitions for Reconsideration.
11/14/14
03/16/15
04/23/15
09/18/15
11/10/15
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
79
80
80
80
80
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
68172
15715
22690
56764
69630
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kelly Quinn,
Assistant Chief, Auctions and Spectrum
Access Division, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0660, Email:
kelly.quinn@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK28
328. Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24
GHz for Mobile Services—Spectrum
Frontiers: WT Docket 10–112 [3060–
AK44]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 to 154;
47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 160; 47 U.S.C.
201; 47 U.S.C. 225; 47 U.S.C. 227; 47
U.S.C. 301 and 302; 47 U.S.C. 302(a); 47
U.S.C. 303 and 304; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47
U.S.C. 309 and 310; 47 U.S.C. 316; 47
U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47 U.S.C. 336;
47 U.S.C. 1302
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission adopted service rules for
licensing of mobile and other uses for
millimeter wave (mmW) bands. These
high frequencies previously have been
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
best suited for satellite or fixed
microwave applications; however,
recent technological breakthroughs have
newly enabled advanced mobile
services in these bands, notably
including very high speed and low
latency services. This action will help
facilitate Fifth Generation mobile
services and other mobile services. In
developing service rules for mmW
bands, the Commission will facilitate
access to spectrum, develop a flexible
spectrum policy, and encourage
wireless innovation.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM ...............
Comment Period
End.
FNPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
NPRM–Correction
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
01/13/16
02/26/16
81 FR 1802
08/24/16
09/30/16
81 FR 58269
10/31/16
11/14/16
01/02/18
01/02/18
01/23/18
81 FR 79894
83 FR 37
83 FR 85
07/20/18
07/20/18
09/28/18
83 FR 34478
83 FR 34520
02/05/19
05/01/19
04/25/19
84 FR 1618
84 FR 18405
84 FR 17360
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: John Schauble,
Deputy Chief, Broadband Division,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0797, Email:
john.schauble@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK44
329. Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7
to 4.2 GHz Band: GN Docket No. 18–122
[3060–AK76]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 to 153;
47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 157; 47
U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 301 to 304; 47
U.S.C. 307 to 310; 47 U.S.C. 1302; . . .
Abstract: In the 2020 Report and
Order, the Commission adopted rules to
make 280 megahertz of mid-band
spectrum available for flexible use (plus
a 20-megahertz guard band) throughout
the contiguous United States. Pursuant
to the Report and Order, existing fixed
satellite service (FSS) and fixed services
(FS) must relocate operations out of the
lower portion of the 3.7–4.0 GHz band.
The Commission will issue flexible use
licenses in the 3.7–3.98 GHz portion of
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
the band in the contiguous United
States via a system of competitive
bidding. The Commission established
rules to govern the transition including
optional payments for satellite operators
that choose to relocate on an accelerated
schedule and provide reimbursement to
FSS operators and their associated earth
stations for reasonable expenses
incurred to facilitate the transition. The
Report and Order also established
service and technical rules for the new
flexible use licenses that will be issued
in the 3.7–3.98 GHz portion of the band.
‘‘On December 8, 2020, the Commission
began an auction of licenses in the 3.7–
3.98 GHz portion of the band. The
winning bidders were announced on
February 24, 2021’’.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Certifications and
Data Filing
Deadline.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Public Notice
Reply Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
83 FR 44128
05/20/19
05/28/19
84 FR 22733
06/03/19
07/03/19
84 FR 22514
07/18/19
85 FR 22804
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Paul Powell,
Assistant Chief, Mobility Division,
WTB, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1613, Email:
paul.powell@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK76
330. Amendment of the Commission’s
Rules To Promote Aviation Safety: WT
Docket No. 19–140 [3060–AK92]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154; 47
U.S.C. 303; 307(e)
Abstract: The Federal
Communications Commission regulates
the Aviation Radio Service, a family of
services using dedicated spectrum to
enhance the safety of aircraft in flight,
facilitate the efficient movement of
aircraft both in the air and on the
ground, and otherwise ensure the
reliability and effectiveness of aviation
communications. Recent technological
advances have prompted the
Commission to open this new
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
07/02/19
09/03/19
FR Cite
84 FR 31542
09/30/19
Next Action Undetermined.
08/29/18
11/27/18
04/23/20
rulemaking proceeding to ensure the
timely deployment and use of today’s
state-of-the-art safety-enhancing
technologies. With this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission
proposes changes to its part 87 Aviation
Radio Service rules to support the
deployment of more advanced avionics
technology, increase the efficient use of
limited spectrum resources, and
generally improve aviation safety.
Timetable:
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jeff Tobias, Attorney
Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1617, Email:
jeff.tobias@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK92
331. Implementation of State and Local
Governments’ Obligation To Approve
Certain Wireless Facility Modification
Requests Under Section 6409(a) of the
Spectrum Act of 2012 (WT Docket No.
19–250) [3060–AL29]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. chs. 2, 5, 9,
13; 28 U.S.C. 2461, unless otherwise
noted.
Abstract: In this proceeding, the
Commission seeks to reduce regulatory
barriers to wireless infrastructure
deployment by further streamlining the
state and local government review
process for modifications to existing
wireless infrastructure under section
6409(a) of the Spectrum Act of 2012.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Declaratory Ruling
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
Petition for Recon
FR Cite
07/02/20
07/27/20
08/03/20
85 FR 39859
85 FR 45126
12/03/20
03/03/21
85 FR 78005
86 FR 12898
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Allison Jones,
Associate Division Chief, CIPD, Wireless
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66941
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1571, Email: allison.jones@fcc.gov.
Garnet Hanly, Division Chief,
Wireless Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0995, Email:
garnet.hanly@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL29
332. Expanding Flexible Use of the
12.2–12.7 GHz Band, et al., WT Docket
No. 20–443, ET AL [3060–AL40]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 152; 47 U.S.C. 153; 47 U.S.C. 154;
47 U.S.C. 155; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C.
301; 47 U.S.C. 302; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47
U.S.C. 304; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C. 309;
47 U.S.C. 310; 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: The Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission or FCC) finds that it is not
in the public interest to add a mobile
allocation to permit a two-way
terrestrial 5G service in the 12.2 GHz
band based on the current record and
seeks further comment on how it could
facilitate more robust terrestrial
operations in the 12.212.7 GHz band.
The item specifically seeks comment on
how its proposals may promote or
inhibit advances in diversity, equity,
inclusion, and accessibility, as well as
the scope of the Commission’s relevant
legal authority.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Extension
Comment Period End.
NPRM Extension
Reply Comment
Period End.
NPRM Denial of
Further Extension of Deadlines for Filing
Comments and
Reply Comments.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Extension
Reply Comment
Period.
Report and Order
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
03/08/21
04/07/21
FR Cite
86 FR 13266
05/07/21
04/16/21
05/07/21
86 FR 20111
06/07/21
05/27/21
86 FR 28520
06/22/21
07/07/21
86 FR 32669
07/10/23
07/10/23
08/09/23
88 FR 43462
88 FR 43502
09/08/23
66942
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Next Action Undetermined.
09/18/23
09/08/23
FR Cite
Action
88 FR 63890
333. Facilitating Shared Use in the
3100–3550 MHz Band [3060–AL57]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and
152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 155(c)
and 157; 47 U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47
U.S.C. 307 and 308; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47
U.S.C. 309(j)(3)(B) and 309(j)(4)(D); 47
U.S.C. 310 and 316; 47 U.S.C. 923(g)
and 928; 47 U.S.C. 1502; Pub. L. 115–
141, sec. 603; Pub. L. 116–260, sec. 905
Abstract: In the 3.45 GHz Band
Second R&O, the Commission adopted
rules to make 100 megahertz of midband spectrum available for flexible use
throughout the contiguous United
States. To facilitate this goal, the
Commission previously had determined
that secondary, nonfederal radiolocation
licensees in the band would be
relocated to the 2.9–3.0 GHz band. In
the 3.45 GHz Band Second R&O, the
Commission further determined that
secondary, non-federal radiolocation
authorizations would sunset 180 days
after new 3.45 GHz Service licenses are
granted in the band. On January 4, 2022,
the auction for these new licenses
concluded and licenses were granted on
May 4, 2022. The non-federal
radiolocation authorizations sunset on
October 31, 2022.
Timetable:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
Report & Order
and FNPRM.
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Correction to Final
Rule.
Report & Order,
Order on Reconsideration
and Order of
Proposed Modification.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12/22/22
FR Cite
87 FR 78579
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Morgan Mendenhall,
Attorney Advisor, Wireless Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0154, Email:
morgan.mendenhall@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL57
334. Shared Use of the 42–42.5 GHz
Band (WT Docket No. 23–158, GN
Docket No. 14–177) [3060–AL68]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 thru
152; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 301 and
302a; 47 U.S.C. 303 and 304; 47 U.S.C.
307 and 309
Abstract: The Federal
Communications Commission seeks
comment on how innovative, nonexclusive spectrum access models might
be deployed in the 42 GHz band (42–
42.5 GHz) to provide increased access to
high-band spectrum, particularly by
smaller wireless service providers, and
to support efficient, intensive use of the
band. The Commission also seeks
comment on how potential sharing and
licensing regimes might lower barriers
to entry for smaller or emerging wireless
service providers, encourage
competition, and prevent spectrum
warehousing.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
07/31/23
08/30/23
FR Cite
88 FR 49423
09/29/23
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
FR Cite
01/22/20
03/23/20
85 FR 3579
10/09/20
10/21/20
85 FR 64062
85 FR 66888
11/20/20
11/03/20
85 FR 69515
04/07/21
86 FR 17920
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Final Rule and
Order.
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Madelaine Maior,
Assistant Division Chief, Broadband
Div., WTB, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1466, Email: madelaine.maior@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL40
Action
Date
Jkt 250001
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Catherine Schroeder,
Attorney Advisor, Broadband Div.,
Wireless Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 428–1956, Email:
catherine.schroeder@fcc.gov.
Katherine Schroder, Attorney, Federal
Communications Commission, Common
Carrier Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
7400, Email: klschrod@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL68
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
335. • Single Network Future:
Supplemental Coverage From Space,
GN Docket No. 23–65 [3060–AL69]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C.
301 and 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 and 308; 47
U.S.C. 309 and 310
Abstract: In the 2023 Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission
proposed a new regulatory framework
for Supplemental Coverage from Space
(SCS) that would facilitate the
integration of satellite and terrestrial
networks through partnerships between
satellite operators and terrestrial service
providers on flexible-use spectrum
licensed to terrestrial services. The
proposed framework would enable
expanded coverage to a terrestrial
licensee’s subscribers, especially in
remote, unserved, and underserved
areas, and would increase the
availability of emergency
communications.
In the 2024 Report and Order, the
Commission adopted a regulatory
framework for SCS that will serve
important public interest goals,
including expanding the reach of
communications services, particularly
emergency services, so that connectivity
and emergency assistance is available in
more remote places. The framework will
also spur advancements in space-based
technologies that will position the
United States as a global leader in this
arena, and promote the innovative and
efficient use of our nation’s spectrum
resources. The Commission authorized
SCS only in certain spectrum bands and
only where one or more terrestrial
licensees together holding all licenses
on the relevant channel throughout a
defined geographically independent
area lease access to their spectrum rights
to a participating satellite operator. The
Report and Order also imposed
technical rules in an effort to mitigate
harmful interference.
In the Report and Order, in
recognition that this new offering has
the potential to bring life-saving
connectivity to remote areas, the
Commission adopted interim 911 call
and text routing requirements to ensure
that help is available to those who need
it today while the Commission works
toward enabling automatic locationbased routing of all emergency
communications. In the 2024 Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
Commission sought to further develop
the record on 911 service for SCS
connections, including the use of
location-based routing to route SCS
voice calls directly to an appropriate
Public Safety Answering Point. In
addition, the Commission sought further
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
comment on procedures related to the
protection of radio astronomy.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report and Order
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule Effective (Rules Requiring OMB
Approval).
04/12/23
06/12/23
Action
Interim Final Rule
Comment Period End.
FR Cite
88 FR 21944
03/15/24
03/15/24
04/15/24
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jonathan Markman,
Attorney Advisor, Mobility Division,
Wireless Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7090, Email:
jonathan.markman@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL69
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
336. • Modifying Emissions Limits For
the 24.25–24.45 GHz and 24.75–25.25
GHz Bands (ET Docket No. 21–186)
[3060–AL80]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 302; 47 U.S.C.
302(a) and 302(r) ; 47 U.S.C. 308; 47
U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 333
Abstract: In this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, the Federal
Communications Commission propose
to implement certain decisions
regarding the 24.25–27.5 GHz band
made in the World
Radiocommunication Conference held
by the International Telecommunication
Union (ITU) in 2019 (WRC–19).
Specifically, it proposes to align part 30
of the Commission’s rules for mobile
operations with the Resolution 750
limits on unwanted emissions into the
passive 23.6–24.0 GHz band that were
adopted at WRC–19. These proposed
rule changes would help to facilitate the
protection of passive sensors used for
weather forecasting and scientific
research in the 23.6 GHz–24.0 GHz
band, while continuing to promote
flexible commercial use of the 24.25–
24.45 GHz and 24.75–25.25 GHz bands.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment End.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
01/29/24
02/28/24
FR Cite
89 FR 5440
02/08/24
Next Action Undetermined.
Jkt 250001
FR Cite
89 FR 8621
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Simon Banyai,
Attorney Advisor, Broadband Division,
Wireless Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1443, Email:
simon.banyai@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL80
337. • Alaska Connect Fund Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking [3060–AL81]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 thru
152; 47 U.S.C. 154 thru 155; 47 U.S.C.
201 thru 206; 47 U.S.C. 214; 47 U.S.C.
218 thru 220; 47 U.S.C. 251 thru 252; 47
U.S.C. 254 and 256; 47 U.S.C. 301 and
303; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47
U.S.C. 403
Abstract: On October 19, 2023, the
Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to explore how
the universal service high-cost support
program can continue funding fixed and
mobile broadband services in Alaska
one of the hardest to serve areas in the
country. The Commission sought
comment to better understand the
changes, including technology and the
broadband funding landscape, that have
occurred in Alaska since 2016 when the
Commission adopted the currently
operative, ten-year Alaska Plan, which,
alongside two other fixed-high cost
programs in Alaska, is scheduled to
wind-down in the next few years. The
proposed rulemaking sought comment
on a number of issues to help the
Commission determine the most
effective methodologies and uses for
future universal service funding for
high-cost fixed and mobile services in
Alaska. As part of the rulemaking, the
Commission will leverage data from the
agency’s new and improved broadband
coverage map and broadband funding
map, which provide a more accurate
picture of where service is and is not,
and where deployment has already been
funded, in Alaska.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
11/17/23
02/15/24
Next Action Undetermined.
03/14/24
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Date
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
FR Cite
88 FR 80238
To Be Determined
Sfmt 4702
66943
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Matt Warner,
Attorney Advisor, Wireless Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2419, Email:
matthew.warner@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL81
338. • Indian Peak Properties LLC
Petitions for Declaratory Ruling
Seeking Preemption Under the Rule
Governing Over-the-Air Reception
Devices [3060–AL82]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47 U.S.C.
155(c); 47 U.S.C. 201(b); 47 U.S.C.
202(a); 47 U.S.C. 205; 47 U.S.C. 251; 47
U.S.C. 253; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 316;
47 U.S.C. 332; Pub. L. 104–104, 207,
706, 110 Stat. 56, 114, 153
Abstract: In its Application for
Review, Indian Peak sought review of
decisions by the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau and the
Media Bureau to deny its petition for
protection under the Over-the-AirReception-Device (OTARD) rule of
antennas it had placed on the roof of a
single family home in a residential
neighborhood. Indian Peak was
operating the home as a commercial
communications site. The Order on
Review denies in part and dismisses in
part the application for review. In
denying the application for review, the
Order on Review clarifies that to qualify
for protection under the OTARD rule,
the equipment must benefit a human
end-user on the premises.
Section 207 of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996
directed the Commission to promulgate
regulations to prohibit restrictions that
impair a viewer’s ability to receive
video programming services through
devices designed for over-the-air
reception of television broadcast signals,
multichannel multipoint distribution
service, or direct broadcast satellite
services. To meet this requirement, the
Commission adopted the OTARD rule.
The Commission subsequently
expanded the scope of the rule so that
it now covers wireless broadband
antennas including hub and relay
antennas. Beginning in 2004, when the
rule was expanded to cover equipment
designed to receive wireless broadband
signal, the Commission began using the
term customer in place of viewer.
The facts pled by Indian Peak were
vague but indicated that the property
was largely an unmanned
communications site with equipment
that was controlled remotely by offsite
personnel. In the Order on Review, the
Commission clarifies that the use of the
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66944
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
term viewer in section 207 of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996
signaled Congress’s intent to protect the
rights of a human being to receive
signal, and therefore to qualify for
protection under the OTARD rule an
applicant must plead facts sufficient to
establish that the equipment provides
signal to a human end-user on the
premises. The Commission’s use of the
term customer in place of viewer does
not alter this basic requirement of the
rule.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Allison Jones,
Associate Division Chief, CIPD, Wireless
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1571, Email: allison.jones@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL82
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC)
Wireline Competition Bureau
Long-Term Actions
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
339. Telecommunications Carriers’ Use
of Customer Proprietary Network
Information and Other Customer
Information (CC Docket No. 96–115),
Data Breach Reporting Requirements
(WC Docket No. 22–21) [3060–AG43]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 222; 47 U.S.C. 272;
47 U.S.C. 303(r)
Abstract: The Commission adopted
rules implementing the new statutory
framework governing carrier use and
disclosure of customer proprietary
network information (CPNI) created by
section 222 of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended. CPNI includes,
among other things, to whom, where,
and when a customer places a call, as
well as the types of service offerings to
which the customer subscribes and the
extent to which the service is used.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Second R&O and
FNPRM.
Order on Recon ..
Final Rule, Announcement of
Effective Date.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FR Cite
05/28/96
02/25/97
04/24/98
61 FR 26483
62 FR 8414
63 FR 20364
10/01/99
01/26/01
64 FR 53242
66 FR 7865
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Action
Date
Clarification Order
and Second
NPRM.
Third R&O and
Third FNPRM.
NPRM ..................
NPRM ..................
Final Rule, Announcement of
Effective Date.
Public Notice .......
Final Rule ............
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Report and Order
FR Cite
Action
09/07/01
66 FR 50140
09/20/02
67 FR 59205
03/15/06
06/08/07
06/08/07
71 FR 13317
72 FR 31782
72 FR 31948
07/13/12
09/21/17
01/23/23
02/23/23
77 FR 35336
82 FR 44188
88 FR 3953
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
NPRM ..................
R&O and Order
on Remand.
Errata ..................
Report .................
Order ...................
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Order ...................
Second R&O .......
Order on Recon ..
Interim Order .......
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Order on Recon ..
Order on Remand
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Declaratory Ruling
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
03/24/23
02/12/24
Next Action Undetermined.
89 FR 9968
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Melissa Kirkel,
Deputy Division Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
7958, Fax: 202 418–1413, Email:
melissa.kirkel@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AG43
340. Local Telephone Networks That
LECs Must Make Available to
Competitors [3060–AH44]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 251
Abstract: The Commission adopted
rules applicable to incumbent local
exchange carriers (LECs) to permit
competitive carriers to access portions
of the incumbent LECs’ networks on an
unbundled basis. Unbundling allows
competitors to lease portions of the
incumbent LECs’ network to provide
telecommunications services. These
rules, adopted in dockets CC 96–98, WC
01–338, and WC 04–313, are intended to
accelerate the development of local
exchange competition.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Second FNPRM ..
Fourth FNPRM ....
Errata Third R&O
and Fourth
FNPRM.
Second Errata
Third R&O and
Fourth FNPRM.
Supplemental
Order.
Third R&O ...........
Correction ............
Supplemental
Order Clarification.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
FR Cite
04/26/99
01/14/00
01/18/00
64 FR 20238
65 FR 2367
65 FR 2542
01/18/00
65 FR 2542
01/18/00
65 FR 2542
01/18/00
04/11/00
06/20/00
65 FR 2542
65 FR 19334
65 FR 38214
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
02/01/01
03/05/01
04/10/01
04/23/01
05/14/01
01/15/02
05/29/02
08/01/02
08/13/02
08/21/03
08/21/03
09/17/03
10/09/03
10/28/03
01/09/04
01/09/04
02/18/04
07/08/04
07/08/04
08/09/04
08/20/04
08/20/04
09/10/04
09/13/04
10/20/04
12/29/04
02/04/04
04/25/05
05/25/05
05/26/11
01/06/20
03/06/20
01/08/21
FR Cite
66 FR 8555
66 FR 18279
67 FR 1947
68 FR 52276
68 FR 52276
68 FR 60391
69
69
69
69
FR
FR
FR
FR
43762
54589
55111
55128
69 FR 77950
70 FR 29313
70 FR 34765
85 FR 472
86 FR 1636
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Edward Krachmer,
Deputy Division Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1525, Email: edward.krachmer@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AH44
341. Jurisdictional Separations [3060–
AJ06]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47 U.S.C. 205;
47 U.S.C. 221(c); 47 U.S.C. 254; 47
U.S.C. 403; 47 U.S.C. 410
Abstract: Jurisdictional separations is
the process, pursuant to part 36 of the
Commission’s rules, by which
incumbent local exchange carriers
apportion regulated costs between the
intrastate and interstate jurisdictions. In
1997, the Commission initiated a
proceeding seeking comment on the
extent to which legislative changes,
technological changes, and marketplace
changes warrant comprehensive reform
of the separations process. In 2001, the
Commission adopted the Federal-State
Joint Board on Jurisdictional
Separations’ Joint Board’s
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
recommendation to impose an interim
freeze on the part 36 category
relationships and jurisdictional cost
allocation factors for a period of 5 years,
pending comprehensive reform of the
part 36 separations rules. In 2006, the
Commission issued an Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
that extended the separations freeze for
a period of 3 years and sought comment
on comprehensive reform. In 2009, the
Commission issued a Report and Order
extending the separations freeze an
additional year to June 2010. In 2010,
the Commission issued a Report and
Order extending the separations freeze
for an additional year to June 2011. In
2011, the Commission adopted a Report
and Order extending the separations
freeze for an additional year to June
2012. In 2012, the Commission issued a
Report and Order extending the
separations freeze for an additional 2
years to June 2014. In 2014, the
Commission issued a Report and Order
extending the separations freeze for an
additional 3 years to June 2017.
In 2016, the Commission issued a
Report and Order extending the
separations freeze for an additional 18
months until January 1, 2018. In 2017,
the Joint Board issued a Recommended
Decision recommending changes to the
part 36 rules designed to harmonize
them with the Commission’s previous
amendments to its part 32 accounting
rules. In February 2018, the Commission
issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
proposing amendments to part 36
consistent with the Joint Board’s
recommendations. In October 2018, the
Commission issued a Report and Order
adopting each of the Joint Board’s
recommendations and amending the
Part 36 consistent with those
recommendations. In July 2018, the
Commission issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking proposing to
extend the separations freeze for an
additional 15 years and to provide rateof-return carriers that had elected to
freeze their category relationships a time
limited opportunity to opt out of that
freeze. In December 2018, the
Commission issued a Report and Order
extending the freeze for up to 6 years
until December 31, 2024, and granting
rate-of-return carriers that had elected to
freeze their category relationships a onetime opportunity to opt out of that
freeze.
On March 31, 2020, the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit affirmed the
Commission’s December 2018 Report
and Order.
Timetable:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Order ...................
Order and
FNPRM.
Order and
FNPRM Comment Period
End.
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
Recommended
Decision.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
Announcement of
OMB Approval.
FR Cite
11/05/97
12/10/97
62 FR 59842
06/21/01
05/26/06
66 FR 33202
71 FR 29882
08/22/06
05/15/09
05/25/10
05/27/11
05/23/12
06/13/14
06/02/17
10/27/17
74
75
76
77
79
82
03/13/18
04/27/18
83 FR 10817
07/27/18
09/10/18
83 FR 35589
12/11/18
02/15/19
03/01/19
83 FR 63581
84 FR 4351
84 FR 6977
Next Action Undetermined.
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
23955
30301
30840
30410
36232
25535
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Irina Asoskov,
Assistant Division Chief, Pricing Policy
Div. Wireline Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7122, Fax: 202 418–
1413, Email: irina.asoskov@fcc.gov.
William A. Kehoe III, Senior Counsel,
Policy & Program Planning Division,
Federal Communications Commission,
Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7122, Email:
william.kehoe@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AJ06
342. Rates for Inmate Calling Services;
WC Docket No. 12–375; Incarcerated
People’s Communications Services;
Implementation of the Martha WrightReed Act, WC Docket No. 23–62 [3060–
AK08]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and
152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j); 47 U.S.C.
201(b); 47 U.S.C. 218; 47 U.S.C. 220; 47
U.S.C. 276; 47 U.S.C. 403; 47 CFR 64;
Martha Wright-Reed Just and
Reasonable Communications Act of
2022; Pub. L. 117–338, 136 Stat. 6156;
47 U.S.C. 152(b) and 153(1)(E); 47
U.S.C. 276(b)(1)(A) and (d)
Abstract: In the Second Report and
Order, the Federal Communications
Commission (the Commission) adopted
rule changes to ensure that rates for both
interstate and intrastate inmate calling
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66945
services (ICS) are fair, just, and
reasonable limits on ancillary service
charges imposed by ICS providers. In
the Second Report and Order, the
Commission set caps on all interstate
and intrastate calling rates for ICS,
established a tiered rate structure based
on the size and type of facility being
served, limited the types of ancillary
services that ICS providers may charge
for and capped the charges for permitted
fees, banned flat-rate calling, facilitated
access to ICS by people with disabilities
by requiring providers to offer free or
steeply discounted rates for calls using
TTY, and imposed reporting and
certification requirements to facilitate
continued oversight of the ICS market.
In the Third Further Notice portion of
the item, the Commission sought
comment on ways to promote
competition for ICS, video visitation,
and rates for international calls, and
considered an array of solutions to
further address areas of concern in the
ICS industry. In an Order on
Reconsideration, the Commission
amended its rate caps and the definition
of ‘‘mandatory tax or mandatory fee’’.
On June 13, 2017, the D.C. Circuit
vacated the rate caps adopted in the
Second Report and Order, as well as
reporting requirements related to video
visitation. The court held that the
Commission lacked jurisdiction over
intrastate ICS calls and that the rate caps
the Commission adopted for interstate
calls were arbitrary and capricious. The
court also remanded the Commission’s
caps on ancillary fees. On September 26,
2017, the court denied a petition for
rehearing en banc. On December 21,
2017, the court issued two separate
orders: one vacating the 2016 Order on
Reconsideration insofar as it purported
to set rate caps on inmate calling
services, and one dismissing as moot
challenges to the Commission’s First
Report and Order on ICS.
On February 4, 2020, the
Commission’s Wireline Competition
Bureau (WCB) released a Public Notice
seeking to refresh the record on
ancillary service charges imposed in
connection with ICS.
On August 6, 2020, the Commission
adopted a Report and Order on Remand
and a Fourth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking responding to remands by
the D.C. Circuit and proposing to
comprehensively reform rates and
charges for the ICS within the
Commission’s jurisdiction. The Report
and Order on Remand found that the
Commission’s five permitted ancillary
service charges: (1) automated payment
fees; (2) fees for single-call and related
services; (3) live agent fees; (4) paper
bill/statement fees; and (5) third-party
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
66946
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
financial transaction fees generally,
cannot be practically segregated
between interstate and intrastate inmate
telephone calls, except in a limited
number of cases. Accordingly, the
Commission prohibited ICS providers
from imposing ancillary service fees
higher than the Commission’s caps, or
imposing fees for additional ancillary
services unless imposed in connection
with purely intrastate inmate telephone
service calls.
The Order also reinstated a rule
prohibiting providers from marking up
third-party fees for single-call services;
reinstated rule language that prohibits
providers from marking up mandatory
taxes or fees that they pass on to inmate
telephone service consumers; and
amended certain of the ICS rules
consistent with the D.C. Circuit’s
mandates to reflect that the
Commission’s rate and fee caps on ICS
apply only to interstate and
international inmate calling.
The Fourth Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking proposed to
substantially reduce the interstate rate
cap for inmate telephone calls from the
current interim rate caps of $0.21 per
minute for debit or prepaid calls and
$0.25 per minute for collect calls for all
types of correctional facilities, to
permanent rate caps of $0.14 per minute
for all interstate calls from prisons and
$0.16 for all interstate calls from jails.
The Fourth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking also proposed to adopt rate
caps for international ICS calls for the
first time based on the proposed
interstate rate caps, plus the amount
that the provider must pay its
underlying international service
provider for an international call. It also
proposed a waiver process for providers
that believe the Commission’s rate caps
would not allow them to recover their
costs of serving a particular facility or
contract. Finally, it sought comment on
a further mandatory data collection to
continue efforts to reform these rates
and fees.
On November 23, 2020, Global
Tel*Link Corporation (GTL) filed a
petition for reconsideration of the
August 6, 2020 Order on Remand. On
December 3, 2020, the Commission
established the opposition and reply
comment dates for the petition.
On May 24, 2021, the Commission
released the Third Report and Order,
Order on Reconsideration and Fifth
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
In the Third Report and Order, the
Commission: (1) substantially reduced
the interim rate caps for interstate ICS
from prisons and larger jails (those with
1,000 or more incarcerated people) from
$0.21 per minute for debit and prepaid
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
calls and $0.25 per minute for collect
calls to new uniform interim interstate
caps of $0.12 per minute for prisons and
$0.14 per minute for larger jails; (2)
maintained the interim interstate rate
cap of $0.21 for jails with less than
1,000 incarcerated people because of
insufficient record evidence to
determine providers’ costs of serving
those facilities at the time; (3)
eliminated separate treatment of collect
calls, resulting in a uniform interim
interstate rate cap for all types of calls
at each facility; (4) reformed the
treatment of site commission payments
by specifying that providers may pass
through to consumers (without any
markup) site commission payments that
are mandated by federal, state, or local
law and that providers may pass
through to consumers no more than $
0.02 per minute site commission
payments resulting from contractual
obligations negotiated between
providers and correctional officials; (5)
capped, for the first time, international
calling rates at all facilities at the
applicable facility’s total interstate rate
cap, plus the amount the inmate calling
services provider pays to its underlying
wholesale carriers for completing
international calls; (6) reformed the
ancillary service charge caps for thirdparty financial transaction fees,
including those related to calls that are
billed on a per-call basis; and (7)
adopted a new mandatory data
collection to obtain more uniform cost
data based on consistent, prescribed
allocation methodologies to determine
just and reasonable, permanent,
interstate and international cost-based
rates for facilities of all sizes.
In the Order on Reconsideration, the
Commission denied GTL’s petition for
reconsideration of a single sentence
from the 2020 Remand Order, in which
the Commission reminded providers
that the jurisdictional nature of a call,
that is whether it is interstate or
intrastate, depends on the physical
location of the endpoints of the call and
not on whether the area code or NXX
prefix of the telephone number
associated with the account are
associated with a particular state. The
Commission determined that the end-toend analysis has been, and remains, the
generally applicable test for all
telecommunications carriers in
determining the jurisdiction of their
calls and the Commission continues to
use the traditional end-to-end
jurisdictional analysis in setting rates
for calls placed by ICS consumers.
In the Fifth Further Notice, the
Commission proposed to amend its
rules to require calling service providers
to provide access to all forms of
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Telecommunications Relay Services,
including internet-based services, to
facilitate greater accessibility for
incarcerated people with hearing and
speech disabilities. The Commission
also sought comment on: (1) the
methodology the Commission should
use to set permanent per-minute rate
caps for interstate and international
inmate calling services; (2) site
commission costs for facilities of all
sizes and site commission reform
generally; (3) the costs of providing
services to jails with average daily
populations of fewer than 1,000
incarcerated people; (4) whether and
how the Commission should reform the
ancillary service charge caps and how
the Commission can curtail potentially
abusive practices related to these
charges; (5) whether to institute a
recurring periodic data collection; and
(6) whether some providers have market
power in the bidding process, thereby
impacting the competitiveness of the
bidding process.
On September 22, 2021, WCB and the
Office of Economics and Analytics
(OEA), (collectively, WCB/OEA) issued
a Public Notice seeking comment on the
contours and specific requirements of
the Third Mandatory Data Collection,
including proposed instructions and a
proposed template for that collection. In
issuing this Public Notice, WCB/OEA
were acting pursuant to the
Commission’s directive, made in the
2021 ICS Order, that the new data
collection obtain data on providers’
operations, costs, demand, and
revenues, among other information. As
the Commission explained in that
Order, the collected information would
allow the Commission to set permanent
interstate and international inmate
calling services rate caps and to evaluate
and, if warranted, revise the ancillary
service charge caps.
On December 15, 2021, WCB/OEA
issued a Public Notice seeking comment
on revised requirements for ICS Annual
Reports, including proposed
instructions, templates, and a provider
certification. Specifically, the Public
Notice proposed changes in the
reporting requirements to align them
with ICS rule changes adopted in the
2021 ICS Order.
On January 18, 2022, WCB adopted an
Order implementing the Third
Mandatory Data Collection and adopted
accompanying instructions, reporting
templates, and a certification form. The
collected information would allow the
Commission to set permanent interstate
and international inmate calling
services rate caps and to evaluate and,
if warranted, revise the current ancillary
service charge caps.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
On February 9, 2022, WCB released a
public notice announcing that the
providers’ mandatory data collection
responses will be due no later than June
30, 2022.
On June 24, 2022, WCB adopted an
Order implementing revisions to its
annual reporting requirements,
including accompanying instructions,
reporting templates, and a certification
form. The revisions were consistent
with changes made in the Third Report
and Order.
On September 30, 2022, the
Commission released the Fourth Report
and Order, and Sixth Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking. The Report and
Order required ICS providers to provide
access to all relay services eligible for
Telecommunications Relay Services
fund support in any correctional facility
that is located where broadband is
available and is part of a correctional
system with 50 or more incarcerated
people. This included the ability to
place point-to-point video calls using
American Sign Language. The rules also
restricted provider charges for relay
services and point-to-point video calls.
More generally, the rules reduced
certain charges and curtailed abusive
practices related to ICS to ease the
financial burdens on all incarcerated
people and their families. To ensure that
the rates, terms, and practices related to
interstate and international ICS are just
and reasonable, the Order prohibited
providers from taking control of funds
in inactive calling accounts until at least
180 calendar days of continuous
inactivity had passed, after which
providers are required to refund the
balance or dispose of the funds in
accordance with applicable state law.
The Order also lowered the current
ancillary fee caps on charges for single
call services, and lowered the cap on
provider charges for processing credit
card, debit card, and other payments to
calling services accounts. Finally, the
Commission revised the definitions of
‘‘Prison’’ and ‘‘Jail’’ in its rules to
conform with the Commission’s intent
in adopting them in 2015.
In the Sixth Further Notice, the
Commission sought additional comment
on whether to allow enterprise
registration for internet Protocol
Captioned Telephone Service in carceral
settings and how to address the special
circumstances faced by some ICS
providers in jurisdictions with average
daily populations of fewer than 50
incarcerated persons. This Notice
sought comment on refining the rules
adopted in the Fifth Report and Order
concerning the treatment of balances in
inactive accounts. It also sought
comment on expanding the breadth and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
scope of the Commission’s consumer
disclosure requirements. The
Commission asked for comment on how
it should use the data filed in response
to the Third Mandatory Data Collection
to establish just and reasonable
permanent caps on interstate and
international rates and associated
ancillary service charges consistent with
the Telecommunications Act of 1934
(the Act). The Commission invited
further comment on allowing ICS
providers to offer pilot programs
allowing consumers to purchase calling
services under alternative pricing
structures.
On March 17, 2023, the Commission
opened a new docket, WC Docket No.
23–62, and released a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and Order to
begin implementation of the Martha
Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable
Communications Act of 2022, which
was signed into law on January 5, 2023.
The Martha Wright-Reed Act expands
the Commission’s authority over rates
charged for incarcerated people’s
communications services, including
intrastate services, and directs the
Commission to adopt just and
reasonable rates and charges for
incarcerated people’s audio and video
communications services not earlier
than 18 months and not later than 24
months after the date of its enactment.
The Notice seeks comment on (1) the
expansion of the Commission’s
authority over incarcerated people’s
communications services to include
advanced communications services
(including audio and video services)
and intrastate services; (2) the meaning
of ‘‘just and reasonable’’ in the context
of the Act’s other provisions; (3) the
rate-making methodology the
Commission should use to fulfill its
mandate to ensure that rates and charges
for incarcerated people’s
communications services are just and
reasonable; (4) the safety and security
costs necessary for the provision of
incarcerated people’s communications
services; and (5) the actions the
Commission should take to ensure that
incarcerated people’s communications
services are accessible to, and usable by,
people with communication disabilities.
The accompanying Order reaffirmed the
Commission’s prior delegation of data
collection authority to WCB/OEA and
directed staff to initiate a collection of
provider data to inform the
Commission’s responsibilities to
implement the requirements of the
Martha Wright-Reed Act.
[Note: The Commission has
historically used the term inmate calling
services’’ or ICS’’ when referencing
payphone service in the incarceration
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66947
context. With the passage of the Martha
Wright-Reed Act, the Commission now
uses the term incarcerated people’s
communications services’’ or IPCS’’
instead of inmate calling services’’ or
ICS’’ to refer to the broader range of
communications services and providers
subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction
as a result of the Act.]
On April 28, 2023, the Wireline
Competition Bureau and the Office of
Economics and Analytics released a
Public Notice seeking comment on a
proposal to update the Commission’s
Third Mandatory Data Collection to
encompass and collect data on all
incarcerated people’s communications
services (IPCS) from all providers of
those services subject to the
Commission’s expanded authority
under the Martha Wright-Reed Just and
Reasonable Communications Act. The
proposed modifications included
collecting information concerning any
audio or video communications service
used by incarcerated people for the
purpose of communicating with nonincarcerated individuals, regardless of
technology used. The Public Notice also
sought comment on proposed
modifications to the instructions,
reporting template, and certification
form to implement the modified
mandatory data collection.
On July 26, 2023, the Wireline
Competition Bureau and the Office of
Economics and Analytics released an
Order adopting the modifications to the
Third Mandatory Data Collection
proposed in the April 28, 2023, Public
Notice. The modifications included
collecting information concerning any
audio or video communications service
used by incarcerated people for the
purpose of communicating with nonincarcerated individuals, regardless of
technology used. The Order adopted the
proposed instructions, reporting
template, and certification form.
On August 3, 2023, the Wireline
Competition Bureau and the Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau
released a Public Notice seeking
comment on proposed revisions to the
Annual Reports and Annual
Certifications that the Commission
requires certain providers of IPCS to
submit. The Public Notice proposed
changes to the Annual Reports to (1)
reflect expanded reporting requirements
regarding access to IPCS by persons
with communication disabilities and (2)
seek data about video IPCS necessary to
implement the Martha Wright-Reed Just
and Reasonable Communications Act.
The Public Notice also sought comment
on proposed modifications to the
instructions, reporting templates, and
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66948
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
certification form for the Annual
Reports data collection.
On October 31, 2023, IPCS providers
filed their data submissions in response
to the 2023 Mandatory Data Collection.
Commission staff processed the
submissions and on March [XX], 2024,
WCB/OEA released a Public Notice
announcing the availability of the
preliminary 2023 Mandatory Data
Collection database to eligible
individuals pursuant to protective
order. Commission Chairwoman
Rosenworcel hosted IPCS listening
sessions on October 27, 2023 in
Chicago, IL and on February 1, 2024 in
Charleston, SC.
Timetable:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM ..................
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
2nd FNPRM ........
2nd FNPRM
Comment Period End.
2nd FNPRM
Reply Comment
Period End.
3rd FNPRM .........
2nd R&O .............
3rd FNPRM Comment Period
End.
3rd FNPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Order on Reconsideration.
Announcement of
OMB Approval.
Correction to Announcement of
OMB Approval.
Announcement of
OMB Approval.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Public Notice
Reply Comment
Period End.
Letter ...................
R&O on Remand
& 4th FNPRM.
01/22/13
11/13/13
11/13/13
12/20/13
78 FR 4369
78 FR 68005
78 FR 67956
11/21/14
01/15/15
79 FR 69682
Order ...................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
Letter ...................
Public Notice .......
Order Extending
Reply Comment
Deadline.
Public Notice .......
09/01/20
09/24/20
10/23/20
11/13/20
12/03/20
12/17/20
VerDate Sep<11>2014
01/20/15
12/18/15
12/18/15
01/19/16
80 FR 79020
80 FR 79136
02/08/16
09/12/16
81 FR 62818
03/01/17
82 FR 12182
03/08/17
82 FR 12922
02/06/20
85 FR 6947
02/19/20
03/20/20
85 FR 9444
04/06/20
07/15/20
08/06/20
85 FR
67450; 85
FR 67480;
85 FR
73233
85 FR 66512
85 FR 83000
Action
Date
Comment Period
End on 12/3/
2020, Public
Notice End.
Comment Period
End on 12/3/
2020, Public
Notice End.
Public Notice .......
5th FNPRM .........
3rd R&O ..............
3rd R&O ..............
Order ...................
Public Notice
(MDC).
5th NPRM Comment Period
End.
Order Extending
Reply Comment
Deadline.
5th NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Comment Period
End on 09/22/
2021, Public
Notice End.
Reply Comment
Period on 09/
22/2021, Public
Notice End.
5th NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Public Notice on
Annual Reports.
Comment Period
End on 01/04/
2022, Public
Notice End.
Reply Period on
01/04/2022,
Public Notice
End.
Order Adopting
MDC.
Order Adopting
Annual Reports
Revisions.
4th R&O ..............
6th FNPRM .........
NPRM—Proposing Implementation of
Martha WrightReed Act.
Public Notice—
Proposing 2023
MDC.
Order—Adopting
2023 Mandatory
Data Collection.
Public Notice—
Proposing Annual Report Revisions.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Public Notice .......
FR Cite
01/11/21
Next Action Undetermined.
01/21/21
03/03/21
07/28/21
07/28/21
07/28/21
08/10/21
09/22/21
86
86
86
86
86
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
40416
40682
40340
48952
54897
86 FR 60438
10/27/21
11/04/21
11/19/21
12/17/21
01/04/22
87 FR 212
01/12/22
01/27/22
03/22/22
87 FR 16560
08/02/22
87 FR 47103
09/30/22
09/30/22
04/07/23
88 FR 20804
05/03/23
88 FR 27850
08/03/23
88 FR 51240
08/09/23
88 FR 53850
09/21/23
10/20/23
01/16/24
01/25/24
02/28/24
88 FR 65134
89 FR 2514
01/08/21
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
09/27/21
10/15/21
Fmt 4701
Action
Sfmt 4702
Date
FR Cite
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: David Zesiger,
Deputy Division Chief, PPD, WCB,
Federal Communications Commission,
Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–2081, Email:
david.zesiger@fcc.gov.
Erik Raven-Hansen, Assistant
Division Chief, Pricing Policy Division,
Wireline Comp., Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1532, Email: erik.ravenhansen@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK08
343. Comprehensive Review of the Part
32 Uniform System of Accounts (WC
Docket No. 14–130) [3060–AK20]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 201(b); 47 U.S.C.
219 and 220
Abstract: The Commission initiates a
rulemaking proceeding to review the
Uniform System of Accounts (USOA) to
consider ways to minimize the
compliance burdens on incumbent local
exchange carriers while ensuring that
the Agency retains access to the
information it needs to fulfill its
regulatory duties. In light of the
Commission’s actions in areas of price
cap regulation, universal service reform,
and intercarrier compensation reform,
the Commission stated that it is likely
appropriate to streamline the existing
rules even though those reforms may
not have eliminated the need for
accounting data for some purposes. The
Commission’s analysis and proposals
are divided into three parts. First, the
Commission proposes to streamline the
USOA accounting rules while
preserving their existing structure.
Second, the Commission seeks more
focused comment on the accounting
requirements needed for price cap
carriers to address our statutory and
regulatory obligations. Third, the
Commission seeks comment on several
related issues, including state
requirements, rate effects,
implementation, continuing property
records, and legal authority.
On February 23, 2017, the
Commission adopted a Report and
Order that revised the part 32 USOA to
substantially reduce accounting burdens
for both price cap and rate-of-return
carriers. First, the Order streamlines the
USOA for all carriers. In addition, the
USOA will be aligned more closely with
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP. Second, the Order
allows price cap carriers to use GAAP
for all regulatory accounting purposes as
long as they comply with targeted
accounting rules, which are designed to
mitigate any impact on pole attachment
rates. Alternatively, price cap carriers
can elect to use GAAP accounting for all
purposes other than those associated
with pole attachment rates and continue
to use the part 32 accounts for pole
attachment rates for up to 12 years.
Third, the Order addresses several
miscellaneous issues, including referral
to the Federal-State Joint Board on
Separations the issue of examining
jurisdictional separations rules in light
of the reforms adopted to part 32.
On June 5, 2017, NCTA-The internet
& Television Association filed a petition
for reconsideration of the Report and
Order requesting that the Commission:
(a) clarify that parties making pole
attachments will have access to all
accounting information needed to verify
the reasonableness of pole attachment
rates; and (b) establish additional
substantive protections to ensure that
pole attachment rates based on GAAP
are consistent with the requirements of
Section 224 of the Communication Act
and the assurances contained in the Part
32 Order. Oppositions to that petition
were due on July 21, 2017, and replies
were due on July 31, 2017.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
Petition for Reconsideration.
Comment Period
on Petition for
Reconsideration
End.
Reply Comment
Period on Petition for Reconsideration End.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Next Action Undetermined.
09/15/14
11/14/14
FR Cite
79 FR 54942
12/15/14
04/04/17
06/05/17
07/21/17
07/31/17
To Be Determined
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i) and (j); 47 U.S.C. 201(b)
Abstract: The Commission proposed
to reestablish the framework the
Commission adopted in 2015 to classify
broadband internet access service as a
telecommunications service and to
classify mobile broadband internet
access service as a commercial mobile
service. The Commission also proposed
to forbear from 26 Title II provisions,
and clarify that the Commission will not
regulate rates or require network
unbundling. Finally, the Commission
proposed to reestablish a national
regulatory approach to protect the open
internet by preventing broadband
internet access service providers from
engaging in practices harmful to
consumers, including: (1) proposing to
reinstate straightforward, clear rules that
prohibit blocking, throttling, or engaging
in paid or affiliated prioritization
arrangements; (2) proposing to reinstate
a general conduct standard that would
prohibit unreasonable interference or
unreasonable disadvantage to
consumers or edge providers; and (3)
proposing to retain the disclosure
requirements under the current
transparency rule and seeking comment
on the means of disclosure, the
interplay between the transparency rule
and the broadband label requirements,
and any additional enhancements or
changes.
Timetable:
82 FR 20833
82 FR 31282
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: William A. Kehoe III,
Senior Counsel, Policy & Program
Planning Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
7122, Email: william.kehoe@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK20
VerDate Sep<11>2014
344. Restoring Internet Freedom, WC
Docket No. 17–108; Protecting and
Promoting the Open Internet, GN
Docket No. 14–28; Safeguarding and
Securing the Open Internet, WC Docket
No. 23–320 [3060–AK21]
Jkt 250001
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
R&O on Remand,
Declaratory Ruling, and Order.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Declaratory Ruling, R&O, and
Order.
Order on Remand
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
07/01/14
07/18/14
FR Cite
79 FR 37448
09/15/14
04/13/15
80 FR 19737
06/02/17
07/03/17
82 FR 25568
02/22/18
83 FR 7852
01/07/21
11/03/23
12/14/23
86 FR 994
88 FR 76048
01/17/24
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Action
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
66949
FR Cite
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Melissa Kirkel,
Deputy Division Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
7958, Fax: 202 418–1413, Email:
melissa.kirkel@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK21
345. Technology Transitions; GN
Docket No. 13–5, WC Docket No. 05–25;
Accelerating Wireline Broadband
Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment; WC Docket
No. 17–84 [3060–AK32]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 214; 47
U.S.C. 251
Abstract: On April 20, 2017, the
Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, Notice of
Inquiry, and Request for Comment
(Wireline Infrastructure NPRM, NOl,
and RFC) seeking input on a number of
actions designed to accelerate: (1) the
deployment of next-generation networks
and services by removing barriers to
infrastructure investment at the Federal,
State, and local level; (2) the transition
from legacy copper networks and
services to next-generation fiber-based
networks and services; and (3) the
reduction of Commission regulations
that raise costs and slow, rather than
facilitate, broadband deployment.
On November 16, 2017, the
Commission adopted a Report and
Order (R&O), Declaratory Ruling, and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(Wireline Infrastructure Order) that
takes a number of actions and seeks
comment on further actions designed to
accelerate the deployment of nextgeneration networks and services
through removing barriers to
infrastructure investment.
The Wireline Infrastructure Order
took a number of actions. First, the
Report and Order revised the pole
attachment rules to reduce costs for
attachers, reforms the pole access
complaint procedures to settle access
disputes more swiftly, and increases
access to infrastructure for certain types
of broadband providers. Second, the
Report and Order revised the section
214(a) discontinuance rules and the
network change notification rules,
including those applicable to copper
retirements, to expedite the process for
carriers seeking to replace legacy
network infrastructure and legacy
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
66950
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
services with advanced broadband
networks and innovative new services.
Third, the Report and Order reversed a
2015 ruling that discontinuance
authority is required for solely
wholesale services to carrier-customers.
Fourth, the Declaratory Ruling
abandoned the 2014 ‘‘functional test’’
interpretation of when section 214
discontinuance applications are
required, bringing added clarity to the
section 214(a) discontinuance process
for carriers and consumers alike.
Finally, the Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking sought comment on
additional potential pole attachment
reforms, reforms to the network change
disclosure and section 214(a)
discontinuance processes, and ways to
facilitate rebuilding networks impacted
by natural disasters. Various parties
filed a Petition for Review of the
Wireline Infrastructure Order in the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The Ninth Circuit denied the Petition on
January 23, 2020 on the grounds that the
parties lacked standing.
On June 7, 2018, the Commission
adopted a Second Report and Order
(Wireline Infrastructure Second Report
and Order) taking further actions
designed to expedite the transition from
legacy networks and services to next
generation networks and advanced
services that benefit the American
public and to promote broadband
deployment by further streamlining the
section 214(a) discontinuance rules,
network change disclosure processes,
and part 68 customer notification
process.
The Wireline Infrastructure NPRM,
NOI, and RFC sought comment on
additional issues not addressed in the
November Wireline Infrastructure Order
or the June Wireline Infrastructure
Second Report and Order. It sought
comment on changes to the
Commission’s pole attachment rules to:
(1) streamline the timeframe for gaining
access to utility poles; (2) reduce
charges paid by attachers for work done
to make a pole ready for new
attachments; and (3) establish a formula
for computing the maximum pole
attachment rate that may be imposed on
an incumbent LEC.
The Wireline Infrastructure NPRM,
NOI, and RFC also sought comment on
whether the Commission should enact
rules, consistent with its authority
under section 253 of the Act, to promote
the deployment of broadband
infrastructure by preempting State and
local laws that inhibit broadband
deployment. It also sought comment on
whether there are State laws governing
the maintenance or retirement of copper
facilities that serve as a barrier to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
deploying next-generation technologies
and services that the Commission might
seek to preempt.
Previously, in November 2014, the
Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and Declaratory
Ruling that: (1) proposed new backup
power rules; (2) proposed new or
revised rules for copper retirements and
service discontinuances; and (3)
adopted a functional test in determining
what constitutes a service for purposes
of section 214(a) discontinuance review.
In August 2015, the Commission
adopted a Report and Order, Order on
Reconsideration, and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking that: (i)
lengthened and revised the copper
retirement process; (ii) determined that
a carrier must obtain Commission
approval before discontinuing a service
used as a wholesale input if the carrier’s
actions will discontinue service to a
carrier-customer’s retail end users; (iii)
adopted an interim rule requiring
incumbent LECs that seek to
discontinue certain TDM-based
wholesale services to commit to certain
rates, terms, and conditions; (iv)
proposed further revisions to the copper
retirement discontinuance process; and
(v) upheld the November 2014
Declaratory Ruling. In July 2016, the
Commission adopted a Second Report
and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and
Order on Reconsideration that: (i)
adopted a new test for obtaining
streamlined treatment when carriers
seek Commission authorization to
discontinue legacy services in favor of
services based on newer technologies;
(ii) set forth consumer education
requirements for carriers seeking to
discontinue legacy services in favor of
services based on newer technologies;
(iii) allowed notice to customers of
discontinuance applications by email;
(iv) required carriers to provide notice
of discontinuance applications to Tribal
entities; (v) made a technical rule
change to create a new title for copper
retirement notices and certifications;
and (vi) harmonized the timeline for
competitive LEC discontinuances
caused by incumbent LEC network
changes.
On August 2, 2018, the Commission
adopted a Third Report and Order and
Declaratory Ruling (Wireline
Infrastructure Third Report and Order)
establishing a new framework for the
vast majority of pole attachments
governed by Federal law by instituting
a one-touch make-ready regime, in
which a new attacher may elect to
perform all simple work to prepare a
pole for new wireline attachments in the
communications space. This new
framework includes safeguards to
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
promote coordination among parties
and ensures that new attachers perform
work safely and reliably. The
Commission retained its multi-party
pole attachment process for attachments
that are complex or above the
communications space of a pole, but
made significant modifications to speed
deployment, promote accurate billing,
expand the use of self-help for new
attachers when attachment deadlines
are missed, and reduce the likelihood of
coordination failures that lead to
unwarranted delays. The Commission
also improved its pole attachment rules
by codifying and redefining
Commission precedent that requires
utilities to allow attachers to overlash
existing wires, thus maximizing the
usable space on the pole; eliminating
outdated disparities between the pole
attachment rates that incumbent carriers
must pay compared to other similarlysituated cable and telecommunications
attachers; and clarifying that the
Commission will preempt, on an
expedited case-by-case basis, State and
local laws that inhibit the rebuilding or
restoration of broadband infrastructure
after a disaster. The Commission also
adopted a Declaratory Ruling that
interpreted section 253(a) of the
Communications Act to prohibit State
and local express and de facto moratoria
on the deployment of
telecommunications services or
facilities and directed the Wireline
Competition and Wireless
Telecommunications Bureaus to act
promptly on petitions challenging
specific alleged moratoria. Numerous
parties filed appeals of the Wireline
Infrastructure Third Report and Order,
and the appeals were consolidated in
the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Ninth
Circuit. On August 12, 2020, the Ninth
Circuit issued an opinion upholding the
Wireline Infrastructure Third Report
and Order in all respects.
On August 8, 2018, Public Knowledge
filed a Petition for Reconsideration of
the Second Report and Order and
Motion to Hold in Abeyance. On
October 20, 2020, the Wireline
Competition Bureau (Bureau) adopted a
Declaratory Ruling, Order on
Reconsideration, and Order. In the
Declaratory Ruling, the Bureau clarified
that any carrier seeking to discontinue
legacy voice service to a community or
part of a community that is the last
retail provider of such legacy TDM
service to that community or part of the
community is subject to the
Commission’s technology transition
discontinuance rules, including the
requirements to receive streamlined
treatment of its discontinuance
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
application. In the Order on
Reconsideration, the Bureau denied the
Public Knowledge Petition for
Reconsideration because all of Public
Knowledge’s arguments were fully
considered, and rejected, by the
Commission in the underlying
proceeding. It also dismissed as moot
the accompanying motion to have the
Commission hold that Order in
abeyance pending the outcome of the
appeal that the Ninth Circuit ultimately
denied.
In September 2019, CTIA filed a
Petition for Declaratory Ruling seeking
clarification of certain issues raised in
the 2018 Third Report and Order. On
July 29, 2020, the Wireline Competition
Bureau issued a Declaratory Ruling
clarifying that (1) the imposition of a
blanket ban by a utility on attachments
to any portion of a utility pole is
inconsistent with the federal
requirement that a denial of access . . .
be specific to a particular request; and
(2) while utilities and attachers have the
flexibility to negotiate terms in their
pole attachment agreements that differ
from the requirements in the
Commission’s rules, a utility cannot use
its significant negotiating leverage to
require an attacher to give up rights to
which the attacher is entitled under the
rules without the attacher obtaining a
corresponding benefit.
On July 20, 2020, the Wireline
Competition Bureau issued a Public
Notice seeking comment on a Petition
for Declaratory Ruling filed on July 16,
2020, by NCTA The internet &
Television Association. NCTA asked the
Commission to declare that: (1) pole
owners must share in the cost of pole
replacements in unserved areas
pursuant to section 224 of the
Communications Act, section 1.1408(b)
of the Commission’s rules, and
Commission precedent; (2) pole
attachment complaints arising in
unserved areas should be prioritized
through placement on the Accelerated
Docket under section 1.736 of the
Commission’s rules; and (3) section
1.1407(b) of the Commission’s rules
authorizes the Commission to order any
pole owner to complete a pole
replacement within a specified period of
time or designate an authorized
contractor to do so. Comments on the
NCTA Petition were due by September
2, 2020, and reply comments by
September 17, 2020.
On January 19, 2021, WCB released a
Declaratory Ruling on the subject of
pole replacements. WCB declined to
rule on the NCTA Petition, finding that
the questions raised were better suited
to a rulemaking. However, in response
to the Petition’s record, WCB issued a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
narrow clarification: a utility may not
impose the entire cost of a pole
replacement on a requesting attacher
when the attacher is not the sole cause
of the pole replacement (for instance,
where the pole has been red-tagged i.e.,
placed on a utility’s pole replacement
schedule due to non-compliance with
safety standards).
On July 23, 2021, the Wireline
Competition Bureau issued a Public
Notice seeking comment on a Petition
for Declaratory Ruling filed by the
Edison Electric Institute asking the
Commission to declare that: (1) when
the Commission determines that a pole
attachment rate, term, or condition is
unjust and unreasonable and orders a
refund pursuant to section 1.1407(a)(3)
of the Commission’s rules, the
applicable statute of limitations is the
same as the two-year period prescribed
by section 415(b) of the Act; and (2)
refunds in pole attachment complaint
proceedings are not appropriate for any
period preceding good-faith notice of a
dispute. Deadlines for filing comments
and reply comments were set for August
23, 2021, and September 10, 2021,
respectively.
In March 2022, the Commission began
the rulemaking contemplated by the
January 2021 Declaratory Ruling, by
adopting a Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment
on several issues relating to pole
replacements, including (1) whether and
to what extent utilities directly benefit
from various types of pole replacements
in situations where a pole replacement
is not necessitated solely by a new
attachment request; (2) whether
requiring utilities to pay a portion of the
costs of a pole replacement would
positively or negatively affect
negotiations of pole attachment
agreements and broadband deployment;
(3) what measures the Commission
could adopt to expedite the resolution
of pole replacement disputes; and (4)
what scope of refunds the Commission
should order when it determines that a
pole attachment rate, term, or condition
is unjust and unreasonable. Comments
on the Second FNPRM were due on
June 27, 2022, while reply comments
were due on August 26, 2022.
On December 13, 2023, the
Commission adopted a Fourth Report
and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and
Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking seeking that takes a number
of actions, makes a number of
clarifications, and seeks comment on
further actions designed to accelerate
the deployment of next-generation
networks and services trough removing
barriers to infrastructure investment.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66951
On January 19, 2024, the Wireline
Competition Bureau issued a Public
Notice seeking comment on a Petition
for Reconsideration filed by the Edison
Electric Institute asking the Commission
to reconsider the Declaratory Ruling to
(1) clearly define the narrow
circumstances in which a utility pole
owner is required to provide a copy of
its easement to an attacher that seeks to
access a pole within such easement; and
(2) remove or clarify its ruling that a
pole replacement is not ‘necessitated
solely’ by an attachment requires if a
utility’s previous or contemporaneous
change to its internal construction
standards necessitates replacement of an
existing pole. Deadlines for filing
comments and reply comments were set
for February 13, 2024 and February 23,
2024, respectively.
On February 16, 2024, the Wireline
Competition Bureau issued a Public
Notice seeking comment on a Petition
for Reconsideration filed by the
Concerned Coalition of Utilities asking
the Commission to reconsider the
Fourth Report and Order to eliminate
the requirement that utilities submit a
copy of period pole inspection reports
to attaching entities. Deadlines for filing
comments and reply comments were set
for March 15, 2024 and March 25, 2024,
respectively.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
FNPRM ...............
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
2nd R&O .............
NPRM ..................
01/06/15
02/05/15
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
2nd R&O .............
3rd R&O ..............
NCTA Public Notice.
CTIA Declaratory
Ruling.
Declaratory Ruling
06/15/17
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
FR Cite
80 FR 450
03/09/15
09/25/15
09/25/15
10/26/15
80 FR 57768
80 FR 57768
11/24/15
09/12/16
05/16/17
81 FR 62632
82 FR
224533
07/17/17
12/28/17
01/17/18
82 FR 61520
02/16/18
07/09/18
09/14/18
07/20/20
07/29/20
01/19/21
83 FR 31659
83 FR 46812
66952
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
Order on Reconsideration.
EEI Public Notice
EEI Public Notice
Comment Period End.
EEI Public Notice
Reply Comment
Period End.
Second FNPRM ..
Second Further
NPRM Comment Period
End.
Second Further
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
4th Report and
Order, Declaratory Ruling.
4th Report and
Order, Declaratory Ruling, Erratum.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Public Notice
Reply Comment
Period End.
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Public Notice
Reply Comment
Period End.
Next Action Undetermined.
02/02/21
FR Cite
86 FR 8872
07/23/21
08/23/21
09/10/21
03/18/22
06/27/22
87 FR 25181
08/26/22
01/11/24
89 FR 2151
01/12/24
89 FR 1859
01/29/24
02/13/24
89 FR 5439
02/23/24
02/29/24
03/15/24
89 FR 14797
03/25/24
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michele Berlove,
Assistant Division Chief, Competition
Policy Div., WCB, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1477, Email: michele.berlove@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK32
346. Numbering Policies for Modern
Communications, WC Docket No. 13–97
[3060–AK36]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 153 to 154; 47 U.S.C. 201 to 205;
47 U.S.C. 251; 47 U.S.C. 303(r)
Abstract: This Order establishes a
process to authorize interconnected
VoIP providers to obtain North
American Numbering Plan (NANP)
telephone numbers directly from the
numbering administrators, rather than
through intermediaries. Section
52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission’s rules
limits access to telephone numbers to
entities that demonstrate they are
authorized to provide service in the area
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
for which the numbers are being
requested. The Commission has
interpreted this rule as requiring
evidence of either a State certificate of
public convenience and necessity
(CPCN) or a Commission license.
Neither authorization is typically
available in practice to interconnected
VoIP providers. Thus, as a practical
matter, generally only
telecommunications carriers are able to
provide the proof of authorization
required under our rules, and thus able
to obtain numbers directly from the
numbering administrators. This Order
establishes an authorization process to
enable interconnected VoIP providers
that choose direct access to request
numbers directly from the numbering
administrators. Next, the Order sets
forth several conditions designed to
minimize number exhaust and preserve
the integrity of the numbering system.
The Order requires interconnected
VoIP providers obtaining numbers to
comply with the same requirements
applicable to carriers seeking to obtain
numbers. These requirements include
any State requirements pursuant to
numbering authority delegated to the
States by the Commission, as well as
industry guidelines and practices,
among others. The Order also requires
interconnected VoIP providers to
comply with facilities readiness
requirements adapted to this context,
and with numbering utilization and
optimization requirements. As
conditions to requesting and obtaining
numbers directly from the numbering
administrators, interconnected VoIP
providers are also required to: (1)
provide the relevant State commissions
with regulatory and numbering contacts
when requesting numbers in those
states; (2) request numbers from the
numbering administrators under their
own unique OCN; (3) file any requests
for numbers with the relevant State
commissions at least 30 days prior to
requesting numbers from the numbering
administrators; and (4) provide
customers with the opportunity to
access all abbreviated dialing codes
(N11 numbers) in use in a geographic
area.
The Order also modifies
Commission’s rules in order to permit
VoIP Positioning Center (VPC) providers
to obtain pseudo-Automatic Number
Identification (p-ANI) codes directly
from the numbering administrators for
purposes of providing E911 services.
Based on experiences and review of
the direct access authorization process
established by the 2015 Order, the
Commission adopted a FNPRM which
proposes clarifications and revisions to
the Commission’s rules to better ensure
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
that interconnected VoIP providers that
obtain direct access authorization to not
facilitate illegal robocalls, spoofing, or
fraud, pose national security risks, or
evade or abuse intercarrier
compensation requirements. The
FNPRM proposes to require additional
certifications as part of the direct access
authorization applications process, that
would include certification of
compliance with anti-robocalling
obligations. The FNPRM also proposes
to clarify that applicants disclose
foreign ownership information on their
direct access application. It would also
propose to generally refer those
applications with 10% or greater foreign
ownership to the Executive Branch
agencies for their review, consistent
with the Commission’s referral of other
types of applications. The FNPRM also
propose to clarify that holders of a
direct access authorization must update
the Commission and applicable states
within 30 days of changes to ownership
information submitted to the
Commission. The FNPRM further
proposes to clarify that Commission
staff retain the authority to determine
when to accept filings as complete and
proposes to direct Commission staff to
reject an application if an applicant has
engaged in behavior contrary to the
public interest or has been found to
originate or transmit illegal robocalls.
Finally, the FNPRM seeks comment on
whether to expand the direct access
authorization to one-way VoIP providers
or other entities that use numbering
resources.
In 2023, the Commission established
by Second Report and Order
modifications to and clarifications of the
direct access authorization rules to
reduce access to telephone numbers by
potential perpetrators of illegal
robocalls. Such changes include
certifications to be made by applicants
affirming compliance with the
Commission’s preexisting requirements
concerning STIR/SHAKEN caller ID
authentication and Robocall Mitigation
Database filings.
The Order also adopts important
guardrails to protect national security,
law enforcement, and numbering
resources. These changes include
foreign ownership and control
disclosures, certification of compliance
with State numbering requirements,
certification of compliance with the
Commission’s rules pertaining to access
arbitrage, and ensuring the accuracy of
application contents upon application
as well as after the authorization is
granted.
The Order also codifies Bureau staff
review, rejection, and authorization
revocation matters.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66953
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
The item also includes an FNPRM
which proposes a 30-day deadline for
existing authorization holders to comply
with rule changes. The FNPRM also
proposes a delegation of authority to the
Numbering Administrator via public
notice to suspend all pending and future
requests for numbers if the new
information submitted by an existing
authorization holder indicates a
material change or raises a public
interest concern. The FNPRM further
proposes that authorization holders
continue to use numbers pending
Bureau investigation.
The Second FNPRM also proposes
that new applicants be required to
disclose initial service area where
numbers will be used. The FNPRM also
proposes that authorizations holders
that sell or lease numbers be required to
obtain the direct access certification
requirements from the indirect access
recipients, retain copies, and file with
the Commission a list of the indirect
access recipients. The FNPRM also
seeks comment on enforcement actions
that the Commission could take against
applicants and authorization holders for
violation of the direct access
authorization rules.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
R&O ....................
FNPRM (Release
Date).
FNPRM (Comment Period
End).
Second FNPRM ..
Second Report
and Order.
Second FNPRM
Comment Period Ends.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
06/19/13
07/19/13
78 FR 36725
10/29/15
08/06/21
80 FR 66454
86 FR 51081
10/14/21
86 FR 51081
10/30/23
11/20/23
88 FR 74098
88 FR 80617
11/29/23
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jordan Marie Reth,
Attorney-Advisor (PU), Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1418, Email: jordan.reth@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK36
347. Implementation of the Universal
Service Portions of the 1996
Telecommunications Act [3060–AK57]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.
Abstract: The Telecommunications
Act of 1996 expanded the traditional
goal of universal service to include
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
increased access to both
telecommunications and advanced
services such as high-speed internet for
all consumers at just, reasonable, and
affordable rates. The Act established
principles for universal service that
specifically focused on increasing
access to evolving services for
consumers living in rural and insular
areas, and for consumers with lowincomes. Additional principles called
for increased access to high-speed
internet in the nation’s schools,
libraries, and rural healthcare facilities.
The FCC established four programs
within the Universal Service Fund to
implement the statute: Connect America
Fund (formally known as High-Cost
Support) for rural areas; Lifeline (for
low-income consumers), including
initiatives to expand phone service for
Native Americans; Schools and
Libraries (E-rate); and Rural Healthcare.
The Universal Service Fund is paid
for by contributions from
telecommunications carriers, including
wireline and wireless companies, and
interconnected Voice over internet
Protocol (VoIP) providers, including
cable companies that provide voice
service, based on an assessment on their
interstate and international end-user
revenues. The Universal Service
Administrative Company, or USAC,
administers the four programs and
collects monies for the Universal
Service Fund under the direction of the
FCC.
On July 21, 2023, the Commission
released an NPRM and Order taking
steps to further enhance Tribal
applicants’ access to the E-Rate program
to encourage greater Tribal participation
in the program
On July 24, 2023, the Commission
adopted plan to bring reliable
broadband to rural communities.
On October 20, 2023, the Commission
kicked off rulemaking to explore
innovative ways to continue to address
Alaska’s unique connectivity
challenges.
On November 8, 2023, the
Commission proposed to permit eligible
schools and libraries to receive E-Rate
support for Wi-Fi hotspots and wireless
internet services that can be used offpremises.
On November 13, 2023, the
Commission proposed a three-year pilot
program within the Universal Service
Fund (USF) to provide up to $200
million available to support
cybersecurity and advanced firewall
services for eligible schools and
libraries.
On December 14, 2023, the
Commission adopted rules for further
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
improvements to Rural Health Care
Program.
On December 27, 2023, the
Commission deferred the
commencement of the next fiveyear
deployment obligation term for legacy
rate-of-return carriers receiving Connect
America Fund Broadband Loop Support
(CAF BLS) in 2024 until January 1,
2025.
Timetable:
Action
R&O and FNPRM
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
R&O and Order
on Recon.
Order on Recon ..
Order on Recon ..
Memorandum,
Opinion &
Order.
NPRM ..................
NPRM ..................
R&O and Order
on Recon.
Order on Recon ..
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
R&O ....................
Report & Order ...
Report & Order ...
Declaratory Ruling/2nd FNPRM.
Public Notice .......
Report & Order
on Recon.
R&O ....................
2nd R&O .............
Public Notice .......
NPRM ..................
Order ...................
NPRM ..................
FNPRM ...............
NPRM ..................
NPRM ..................
2nd R&O .............
3rd R&O ..............
Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking.
Public Notice .......
NPRM ..................
Public Notice .......
Report and Order
on Review.
Order ...................
Report and Order,
NPRM, and
NOI.
Report and Order,
NPRM, and
NOI.
Report and Order,
and FNPRM.
Report and Order,
and NPRM.
NPRM ..................
NPRM ..................
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
01/13/17
02/13/17
FR Cite
82 FR 4275
02/27/17
03/21/17
82 FR 14466
05/19/17
06/08/17
06/21/17
82 FR 22901
82 FR 26653
82 FR
228224
07/30/19
08/21/19
11/07/19
84 FR 36865
84 FR 43543
84 FR 59937
12/09/19
12/20/19
12/27/19
01/17/20
03/10/20
05/11/20
08/04/20
84
84
84
85
85
85
85
03/22/21
04/09/21
86 FR 15172
86 FR 18459
05/28/21
07/14/21
08/02/21
10/14/21
12/14/21
01/27/22
03/15/22
06/16/22
06/23/22
09/06/22
09/06/22
11/19/22
86
86
86
86
86
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
29136
37061
41408
57097
70983
4182
14422
36283
37459
54311
54401
67660
01/06/23
03/13/23
04/11/23
05/05/23
88
88
88
88
FR
FR
FR
FR
1035
14529
21580
28993
06/05/23
08/18/23
88 FR 36510
88 FR 56579
08/23/23
88 FR 57383
11/13/23
88 FR 77522
11/17/23
88 FR 80238
12/07/23
12/09/23
88 FR 85157
88 FR 90141
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
67220
70026
71308
3044
13773
19892
48134
66954
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
3rd Report and
Order.
Report and Order
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
01/11/24
89 FR 1834
01/31/24
89 FR 6021
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Nakesha Woodward,
Program Analyst, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireline Competition
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418–1502, Email:
kesha.woodward@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK57
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
348. Toll Free Assignment
Modernization and Toll-Free Service
Access Codes: WC Docket No. 17–192,
CC Docket No. 95–155 [3060–AK91]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 201(b); 47 U.S.C.
251(e)(1)
Abstract: In this Report and Order
(Order), the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) initiates an auction
to distribute certain toll-free numbers.
The numbers to be auctioned will be in
the new 833 toll free code for which
there have been multiple, competing
requests.
By using an auction, the FCC will
ensure that sought-after numbers are
awarded to the parties that value them
most. In addition, the FCC will reserve
certain 833 numbers for distribution to
government and non-profit entities that
request them for public health and
safety purposes. The FCC will study the
results of the auction to determine how
to best use the mechanism to distribute
toll-free numbers equitably and
efficiently in the future as well.
Revenues from the auction will be used
to defray the cost of toll-free numbering
administration, reducing the cost of
numbering for all users. The Order
establishing the toll-free number auction
will also authorize and accommodate
the use of a secondary market for
numbers awarded at auction to further
distribute these numbers to the entities
that value them most. The Order also
adopted several definitional and
technical updates to improve clarity and
flexibility in toll-free number
assignment.
The Commission sought comment and
then adopted auctions procedures and
deadlines on August 2, 2019. Bidding
for the auction occurred on December
17, 2019, and Somos issued an
announcement of the winning bidders
on December 20, 2019. On December 16,
2019, to facilitate the preparation of its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
study of the auction, the Bureau charged
the North American Numbering
Council, via its Toll Free Access
Modernization Working Group, to issue
a report evaluating various aspects of
the 833 Auction, and recommending
improvements for any future toll free
number auctions.
On January 16, 2020, Somos released
all of the 833 Auction data for public
review. On March 13, 2020, the Bureau
invited public comment on the 833
Auction in preparation for issuing a
report on the lessons learned from the
Auction. Comments were due on April
13, 2020. On July 14, 2020, the North
American Numbering Council approved
the Toll-Free Assignment
Modernization Working Group’s report,
Perspectives on the December 2019
Auction of Numbers in the 833
Numbering Plan Area.
On January 15, 2021, the Bureau
released a report that examined various
aspects of this toll-free number
assignment experiment, including
lessons learned, examination of auction
outcomes, and recommendations for
future toll free number assignment. The
Bureau concluded that the 833 Auction
was a successful experiment that
provided invaluable experience and
data that can facilitate further
Commission efforts to continue to
modernize tol-free number allocation in
the future.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
FR Cite
10/13/17
11/13/17
82 FR 47669
10/23/18
83 FR 53377
Next Action Undetermined.
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Heather
Hendrickson, Deputy Division Chief,
Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7295, Email:
heather.hendrickson@fcc.gov.
Matthew Collins, Deputy Division
Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–7141, Email:
matthew.collins@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK91
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
349. Establishing the Digital
Opportunity Data Collection; WC
Docket Nos. 19–195 and 11–10 [3060–
AK93]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 35 to 39; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 211; 47 U.S.C. 219;
47 U.S.C. 220; 47 U.S.C. 402(b)2(B);
Pub. L. 104–104; 47 U.S.C. 151–154; 47
U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 254;
47 U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C.
309; 47 U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47
U.S.C. 641 to 646; Pub. L 116–130; . . .
Abstract: The Commission has long
recognized that precise, granular data on
the availability of fixed and mobile
broadband are vital to bringing digital
opportunity to all Americans, no matter
where they live, work, or travel.
On March 23, 2020, the Broadband
Deployment Accuracy and
Technological Availability Act
(Broadband DATA Act) was signed into
law requiring the Commission to create
a new set of broadband availability
maps. Among other things, the
Broadband DATA Act requires the
Commission to collect standardized,
granular data on the availability and
quality of both fixed and mobile
broadband internet access services, to
create a common dataset of all locations
where fixed broadband internet access
service can be installed (the Broadband
Serviceable Location Fabric or Fabric),
and to create publicly available coverage
maps. The Act further requires the
Commission to establish processes for
members of the public and other entities
to (1) provide verified data for use in the
coverage maps; (2) challenge the
coverage maps, the broadband
availability data submitted by
broadband internet access service
providers (providers), and the Fabric;
and (3) submit specific crowdsource
information about the development and
availability of broadband service.
In July 2020, implementing the
Broadband DATA Act and building off
of an August 2019 Report and Order and
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
Commission adopted a Second Report
and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking that adopted rules
for the collection and verification of
improved, more precise data on both
fixed and mobile broadband availability.
In January 2021, the Commission
adopted a Third Report and Order
establishing new requirements for the
BDC and took additional steps to
implement the Broadband DATA Act.
The Third Report and Order adopted
rules to specify which fixed and mobile
providers are required to report
broadband availability data and
expanded the reporting and certification
requirements for filing data in the BDC.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
It also adopted standards for collecting
verified broadband data from State,
local, and Tribal governmental entities
and certain third parties, and for
identifying locations that would be
included in the Fabric. Importantly, the
Commission also established processes
for verifying the accuracy of provider
submitted data and the Fabric,
including challenge processes which
invite input from the public and other
stakeholders in order to improve the
accuracy of the maps.
To implement the Broadband DATA
Act and these new rules, the
Commission created a new data
platform and system to collect and map
availability data collected from over
2,500 providers and for consumers and
other stakeholders to submit challenges
to that data; created a Fabric dataset of
locations upon which to overlay
provider availability data; and
established a dedicated help center to
provide technical assistance to
providers, consumers, and other
stakeholders.
In July 2021, the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau (WTB),
Office of Economics and Analytics
(OEA), and Office of Engineering and
Technology (OET) released a Public
Notice seeking comment on the
technical requirements for the mobile
challenge, verification, and
crowdsourcing processes required under
the Broadband DATA Act for the new
Broadband Data Collection (BDC). In
March 2022, the Broadband Data Task
Force (Task Force), WTB, OEA, and
OET released a detailed order, technical
appendix, rules, and technical data
specifications setting forth technical
requirements and specifications for the
mobile challenge, verification, and
crowdsource processes required by the
Act.
To clarify the Commission’s rules for
filing data in the BDC, in July 2022,
WCB, WTB, OEA, and the Task Force
issued a Declaratory Ruling on certain
aspects of a rule regarding the
engineering certification in BDC filings
and issued a limited waiver of the
requirement that providers have an
engineer certification their biannual
BDC filings for the first three filing
cycles of the BDC. The Task Force
adopted an Order in November 2023 to
extend the waiver, with new conditions,
for an additional three filing periods. In
addition, staff worked closely with ISPs
to ensure that they were equipped with
the technical information and training
to participate in the BDC’s complex data
collection by effectively and accurately
reporting where they do, and do not,
offer internet services. FCC staff and its
contractors made phone calls and sent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
a series of emails to every ISP that
previously filed Form 477 data to
remind them of their obligation to file
data by September 1, 2022—the initial
filing deadline—and to make them
aware of the many technical assistance
resources that the FCC has made
available, including filing instructions,
FAQs, knowledge base articles, web
tutorials, filing workshops, and a
dedicated BDC Help Center offering
both Tier 1 and Tier 2 support to
entities seeking to file availability data
or challenges including GIS support.
Additionally, FCC staff has attended
numerous conferences, ex parte
meetings, and conference calls with
individual providers and industry
organizations.
In November 2022, the Commission
released a pre-production draft of its
new National Broadband Map
displaying version 1 of the Fabric
overlayed with provider reported
availability data as of June 30, 2022. The
new map is the most comprehensive,
granular, and standardized data the
Commission has ever published on
broadband availability. This date also
marked the beginning of the BDC
processes by which consumers,
governmental entities, and other third
parties can file bulk and individual
challenges to the fixed and mobile
availability data and the Fabric data.
Updates to the National Broadband Map
are iterative and ongoing. The challenge
processes will also continue on an
ongoing basis in order to allow the
public to provide input and help
improve the accuracy of the National
Broadband Map.
State, local, and Tribal governmental
entities are encouraged to participation
in the bulk challenge and crowdsource
processes where the location or
availability data on the map appeared
imprecise. To assist with this process,
staff have hosted technical assistance
workshops and video tutorials to assist
parties seeking to file challenges to the
Fabric and fixed and mobile availability
data. Additionally, the Task Force has
released video tutorials and knowledge
base articles to assist fixed and mobile
providers with responding to
challenges.
In December 2022, the Commission
adopted and Order, to sunset the Form
477 broadband deployment data
collection and eliminate a largely
duplicative requirement on providers.
As a result, providers will no longer be
required to submit Form 477 broadband
deployment data, but must still submit
broadband and voice subscription data
using the FCC Form 477. To further
streamline the FCC’s data collection
efforts the BDC system allows filers to
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66955
submit both their BDC data and 477
subscription data as a combined filing
using a single interface.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
Second Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
Second Further
NPRM Comment Period
End.
2nd R&O .............
3rd FNPRM .........
3rd FNPRM Comment Period
End.
3rd R&O ..............
Public Notice .......
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
Order ...................
Order ...................
Order ...................
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
08/03/17
09/25/17
82 FR 40118
08/01/19
08/01/19
84 FR 43705
84 FR 43764
10/07/19
07/16/20
07/16/20
09/08/20
85 FR 50886
85 FR 50911
01/13/21
07/16/21
09/27/21
86 FR 18124
86 FR 40398
03/09/22
12/16/22
11/30/23
87 FR 21476
87 FR 76949
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Ray,
Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireline Competition
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418–0357, Email:
michael.ray@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AK93
350. Call Authentication Trust Anchor
[3060–AL00]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 201; 47
U.S.C. 251; 47 U.S.C. 227; 47 U.S.C.
227b; 47 U.S.C. 503
Abstract: On June 6, 2019, the
Commission adopted a Declaratory
Ruling and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (CG Docket No.
17–59, WC Docket No. 17–97) that
proposed and sought comment on
mandating implementation of STIR/
SHAKEN in the event that major voice
service providers did not voluntarily
implement the framework by the end of
2019.
On December 30, 2019, Congress
enacted the Pallone-Thune Telephone
Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement
and Deterrence (TRACED) Act. Along
with numerous other provisions
directed at addressing robocalls, the
TRACED Act directs the Commission to
require all voice service providers to
implement STIR/SHAKEN in the
Internet Protocol (IP) portions of their
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
66956
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
networks, and to implement an effective
caller ID authentication framework in
the non-IP portions of their networks.
The TRACED Act further creates
processes by which voice service
providers may be exempt from this
mandate if the Commission determines
they have achieved certain
implementation benchmarks, and by
which voice service providers may be
granted a delay in compliance based on
a finding of undue hardship because of
burdens or barriers to implementation
or based on a delay in development of
a caller ID authentication protocol for
calls delivered over non-IP networks.
On March 31, 2020, the Commission
adopted a Report and Order and Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (WC
Docket Nos. 17–97, 20–67). The Report
and Order mandated that all originating
and terminating voice service providers
implement the STIR/SHAKEN caller ID
authentication framework in the IP
portions of their networks by June 30,
2021. In the Further Notice the
Commission sought comment on
proposals to further promote caller ID
authentication and implement the
TRACED Act.
On September 29, 2020, the
Commission adopted a Second Report
and Order (WC Docket No. 17–97). The
Second Report and Order implemented
rules (1) granting extensions for
compliance with the STIR/SHAKEN
implementation mandate for small voice
service providers, voice service
providers that cannot obtain a SPC
token from the Governance Authority,
services scheduled for section 214
discontinuance, for those portions of a
voice service provider’s network that
rely on non-IP technology, and
establishing a process for individual
voice service providers to seek provider
specific extensions; (2) requiring voice
service providers using non-IP
technology either to upgrade their
networks to IP to enable STIR/SHAKEN
implementation, or work to develop
non-IP caller ID authentication
technology and implement a robocall
mitigation program in the interim; (3)
establishing a process where by a voice
service provider may be exempt from
the STIR/SHAKEN implementation
mandate if the provider has achieved
certain implementation benchmarks; (4)
prohibiting voice service providers from
imposing line item charges on consumer
and small business subscribers for caller
ID authentication; and (5) requiring
intermediate providers to implement
STIR/SHAKEN. On May 20, 2021, the
Commissioned released a Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
proposing to shorten the small provider
extension from two years to one for a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
subset of small voice service providers
that are at a heightened risk of
originating an especially large amount
of robocall traffic.
On January 13, 2021, the Commission
adopted a Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking proposing and
seeking comment on a limited role for
the Commission to oversee certificate
revocation decisions by the private
STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority
that would have the effect of placing
providers in noncompliance with the
Commission’s rules. On August 5, 2021,
the Commission adopted a Third Report
and Order which adopted rules creating
this oversight role.
On September 30, 2021, the
Commission adopted a Fourth Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
proposing to require gateway providers
to apply STIR/SHAKEN caller ID
authentication to, and perform robocall
mitigation on, foreign-originated calls
with U.S. numbers, seeking comment on
revisions to the information that filers
must submit to the Robocall Mitigation
Database, and clarifying the obligations
of voice service providers and
intermediate providers with respect to
calls to and from Public Safety Answer
Points and other emergency services
providers.
On December 9, 2021, the
Commission adopted a Fourth Report
and Order adopting rules requiring nonfacilities based small voice providers
implement SITR/SHAKEN by June 30,
2022, and requiring small voice
providers of any kind suspected of
originating illegal robocalls to
implement STIR/SHAKEN on an
accelerated timeline.
On May 19, 2022, the Commission
adopted a Fifth Report and Order, Order
on Reconsideration, Order, and Fifth
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
The Fifth Report and Order and Order
required gateway providers to submit a
certification to the Robocall Mitigation
Database, implement STIR/SHAKEN
caller ID authentication as well as
several other requirements, including an
obligation to mitigate illegal robocall
traffic and submit a mitigation plan to
the Robocall Mitigation Database
regardless of their STIR/SHAKEN
implementation status. The Order on
Reconsideration expanded the
obligation of domestic providers to
block calls carrying US NANP numbers
from foreign providers not listed in the
Robocall Mitigation Database. The Fifth
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
sought comment on further steps to
combat illegal robocalls, including
extending requirements for
authentication and filing in the Robocall
Mitigation Database, requiring
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
additional measures for robocall
mitigation, enhancing enforcement
mechanisms and other related issues
aimed at closing existing potential
loopholes.
On March 16, 2023, the Commission
adopted a Sixth Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
The Sixth Report and Order required
intermediate providers to implement
STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication
for certain calls, expanded robocall
mitigation requirements for all
providers, and adopted more robust
enforcement tools. The Sixth Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeks
comment on additional measures to
combat illegal robocalls, including
whether any changes should be made to
the Commission’s rules to permit,
prohibit, or limit the use of third-party
caller ID authentication solutions and
whether to eliminate the STIR/SHAKEN
implementation extension for providers
that cannot obtain Service Provider
Code tokens, which are necessary to
participate in the STIR/SHAKEN caller
ID authentication framework’’.
On May 18, 2023, the Commission
adopted a Seventh Repot and Order.
The Seventh Report and Order required
voice service providers and nongateway intermediate providers to
commit in their Robocall Mitigation
Database certification to respond to
traceback requests from the
Commission, law enforcement, and the
industry traceback consortium within
24 hours.
Timetable:
Action
NOI ......................
DR and 3rd
FNPRM.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
3rd FNPRM Comment Period
End.
R&O and FNPRM
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
2nd R&O .............
2nd FNPRM ........
2nd FNPRM
Comment Period.
3rd FNPRM .........
3rd R&O ..............
3rd FNPRM Comment Period
End.
4th FNPRM .........
4th FNPRM Comment Period
End.
4th R&O ..............
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
07/14/17
06/06/19
06/24/19
08/23/19
FR Cite
84 FR 29478
84 FR 29478
08/23/19
03/31/20
05/29/20
85 FR 22029
09/29/20
01/13/21
03/19/21
85 FR 73360
86 FR 9894
05/20/21
08/05/21
08/19/21
86 FR 30571
86 FR 48511
10/01/21
11/26/21
86 FR 59084
12/09/21
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
5th R&O, Order
on Reconsideration.
5th FNPRM .........
5th FNPRM Comment Period
End.
6th Report and
Order.
6th FNPRM .........
6th FNPRM Comment Period
End.
7th Report and
Order.
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
05/19/22
87 FR 42916
05/19/22
09/16/22
87 FR 42670
03/16/23
88 FR 40096
03/16/23
07/05/23
88 FR 29035
05/18/23
88 FR 43446
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jonathan Lechter,
Attorney Advisor, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
0984, Email: jonathan.lechter@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL00
351. Implementation of the National
Suicide Improvement Act of 2018, 988
Suicide Prevention Hotline (WC Docket
18–336, PS Docket No. 23.5, PS Docket
No. 15–80) [3060–AL01]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 201; 47
U.S.C. 251
Abstract: On August 14, 2018,
Congress passed the National Suicide
Hotline Improvement Act (Act). Public
Law 115–233, 132 Stat. 2424 (2018). The
purpose of the Act was to study and
report on the feasibility of designating a
3-digit dialing code to be used for a
national suicide prevention and mental
health crisis hotline system by
considering each of the current N11
designations. The Act directed the
Commission to: (1) conduct a study that
examines the feasibility of designating a
simple, easy-to-remember, 3-digit
dialing code to be used for a national
suicide prevention and mental health
crisis hotline system; and (2) analyze
how well the current National Suicide
Prevention Lifeline is working to
address the needs of veterans. The Act
also directed the Commission to
coordinate with the Department of
Health and Human Services’ Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA), the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the
North American Numbering Council
(NANC) in conducting the study, and to
produce a report on the study by August
14, 2019.
On August 14, 2019, the Wireline
Competition Bureau and Office of
Economics and Analytics submitted its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
report to Congress recommending that:
(1) a 3-digit dialing code be used for a
national suicide prevention and mental
health crisis hotline system; and (2) the
Commission should initiate a
rulemaking proceeding to consider
designating 988 as the 3-digit code.
On December 12, 2019, the
Commission released a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) proposing
to designate 988 as a new, nationwide,
3-digit dialing code for a suicide
prevention and mental health crisis
hotline. WC Docket No. 18–336. The
NPRM proposes that calls made to 988
be directed to the existing National
Suicide Prevention Lifeline, which is
made up of an expansive network of
over 170 crisis centers located across the
United States, and to the Veterans Crisis
Line. The NPRM also proposes to
require all telecommunications carriers
and interconnected VoIP service
providers to make, within 18 months,
any changes necessary to ensure that
users can dial 988 to reach the National
Suicide Prevention Lifeline and
Veterans Crisis Line.
On July 16, 2020, the Commission
adopted an Order designating 988 as the
3-digit number to reach the Lifeline and
Veterans Crisis Line (800–273–TALK or
800–273–8255) and requiring all
telecommunications carriers,
interconnected voice over internet
Protocol (VoIP) providers, and one-way
VoIP providers to make any network
changes necessary to ensure that users
can dial 988 to reach the Lifeline by July
16, 2022.
On October 16, 2020, the
Communications Equality Advocates
filed a petition for partial
reconsideration of the FCC’s July 16,
2020 Report and Order. In their petition,
Communications Equality Advocates
requested that the FCC revise the Order
to mandate text-to-988 and direct video
calling (DVC) requirements and to have
such requirements be implemented on
the same timeline as voice calls to 988,
by July 16, 2022.
On October 17, 2020, Congress
enacted the National Suicide Hotline
Designation Act of 2020 (2020 Act).
Public Law 116–172, 134 Stat. 832
(2020). The 2020 Act, among other
things, designates 988 as the universal
telephone number within the United
States for the purpose of the national
suicide prevention and mental health
crisis hotline system operating through
the National Suicide Prevention
Lifeline,’’ with designation occurring
one year after enactment.
On November 9, 2020, pursuant to
2020 Act’s requirements that the
Commission submit a report on the
feasibility and cost of attaching an
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66957
automatic dispatchable location with
988 calls, the Commission issued a
Public Notice that sought comment on
these issues.
On April 22, 2021, the Commission
adopted a Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (FNPRM) that proposes to
require text service providers support
text messages to 988 by routing texts to
the toll free number.
On November 19, 2020, pursuant to
2020 Act’s requirements that the
Commission submit a report on the
feasibility and cost of attaching an
automatic dispatchable location with
988 calls, the Commission issued a
Public Notice that sought comment on
these issues. A Report to Congress
regarding geolocation was released on
April 15, 2021.
On April 22, 2021, the Commission
adopted a Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (FNPRM) that proposes to
require text service providers support
text messages to 988 by routing texts to
the toll free number. On November 19,
2021, the Commission adopted an Order
requiring the industry to enable texting
to 988 by the same deadline as for voice
calls, July 16, 2022.
On May 24, 2022, the Commission,
following up on its report to Congress,
hosted a forum in coordination with the
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services and the U.S. Department of
Veterans Affairs that convened various
stakeholders to discuss issues
surrounding geolocation. Participants
included state and local entities; suicide
prevention and mental health experts
and advocates; communications
industry leaders; and technical experts.
The Commission opened the event to
the public via live feed on the
Commission’s website, and audience
members submitted questions to
panelists by email.
On October 14, 2022, in accordance
with the National Suicide Hotline
Designation Act of 2020, the Wireline
Competition Bureau submitted its first
988 Fee Accountability Report to
Congress reporting on the collection and
distribution of 988 fees and charges by
the states, the District of Columbia, U.S.
territories, and Tribal authorities for the
period of January 1, 2021 to December
31, 2021.
On January 26, 2023, the Commission
adopted a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to help ensure that the
public has access to the 988 Suicide &
Crisis Lifeline if a service outage occurs.
Those rules were adopted on July 20,
2023.
On October 17, 2023, in accordance
with the National Suicide Hotline
Designation Act of 2020, the Wireline
Competition Bureau submitted its
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
66958
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
second 988 Fee Accountability Report to
Congress reporting on the collection and
distribution of 988 fees and charges by
the states, the District of Columbia, U.S.
territories, and Tribal authorities for the
period of January 1, 2022 to December
31, 2022.
On October 30, 2023, the Commission
released an Erratum amending
Appendix A of the July 2023 Report and
Order.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
PFR .....................
Oppositions Due
Public Notice .......
Replies Due ........
Public Notice
Comment Period End.
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
NPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Report and Order
Erratum ...............
Next Action Undetermined.
01/15/20
03/16/20
07/16/20
10/16/20
12/02/20
12/08/20
12/14/20
01/11/21
06/11/21
08/10/21
11/19/21
01/27/23
05/08/23
FR Cite
85 FR 2359
85 FR 79014
86 FR 31404
88 FR 20790
06/06/23
07/21/23
10/23/23
88 FR 2503
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michelle Sclater,
Attorney, Wireline Competition Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–0388, Email:
michelle.sclater@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL01
352. Modernizing Unbundling and
Resale Requirements in an ERA of
Next-Generation Networks and
Services [3060–AL02]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 10; 47
U.S.C. 251
Abstract: On November 22, 2019, the
Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking
comment on proposals to update the
unbundling and avoided-cost resale
obligations stemming from the 1996 Act
and applicable only to incumbent LECs.
Many of these obligations appear to no
longer be necessary in many geographic
areas due to vigorous competition for
mass market broadband services in
urban areas and numerous intermodal
voice capabilities and services. But
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
recognizing that rural areas pose special
challenges for broadband deployment,
the NPRM did not propose any change
to unbundling requirements for
broadband-capable loops in rural areas.
The NPRM sought to promote the
Commission’s efforts to reduce
unnecessary and outdated regulatory
burdens that appear to discourage the
deployment of next-generation
networks, delay the IP transition,
unnecessarily burden incumbent LECs
with no similar obligations placed on
their competitors, and no longer benefit
consumers or serve the purpose for
which they were intended.
On October 27, 2020, the Commission
adopted a Report and Order (1)
eliminating unbundling requirements,
subject to a reasonable transition period,
for enterprise-grade DS1 and DS3 loops
where there is evidence of actual and
potential competition, for broadbandcapable DS0 loops and associated
subloops in the most densely populated
areas, and for voice-grade narrowband
loops nationwide, but preserving
unbundling requirements for DS0 loops
in less densely populated areas and DS1
and DS3 loops in areas without
sufficient evidence of competition; (2)
eliminating unbundling requirements
for network interface devices and
multiunit premises subloops; (3)
eliminating unbundled dark fiber
transport provisioned from wire centers
within a half-mile of competitive fiber
networks, but providing an eight-year
transition period for existing circuits so
as to avoid stranding investment and
last-mile deployment by competitive
LECs that may harm consumers; (4)
eliminating unbundling requirements
for operations support systems, except
where carriers are continuing to manage
UNEs and for purposes of local
interconnection and local number
portability; and (5) eliminating
remaining avoided-cost resale
requirements. The Report and Order
ended unbundling and resale
requirements where they stifle
technology transitions and broadband
deployment, but preserved unbundling
requirements where they are still
necessary to realize the 1996 Act’s goal
of robust intermodal competition
benefiting all Americans.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report & Order ...
Petition for Reconsideration
filed by Sonic
Telecom.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
FR Cite
01/06/20
03/06/20
85 FR 472
01/08/21
09/29/22
86 FR 1636
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Action
Replies to Oppositions to Petition for Reconsideration.
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
FR Cite
10/04/22
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michele Berlove,
Assistant Division Chief, Competition
Policy Div., WCB, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1477, Email: michele.berlove@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL02
353. Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural
America; GN Docket No. 20–32 [3060–
AL15]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 214; 47 U.S.C. 254; 47 U.S.C.
303(r); 47 U.S.C. 403
Abstract: The 5G Fund for Rural
America will distribute up to $9 billion
in universal service support through
competitive bidding in two phases to
bring mobile voice and 5G broadband
service to rural areas of the country. 5G
public interest obligations and
performance requirements imposed on
carriers continuing to receive legacy
mobile high-cost support will help
ensure that the areas they serve enjoy
the benefits that 5G promises.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
Final Action .........
Next Action Undetermined.
Date
05/26/20
11/25/20
FR Cite
85 FR 31616
85 FR 75770
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kirk Burgee, Chief of
Staff, Wireline Competition Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1599, Email:
kirk.burgee@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL15
354. Protecting Consumers From SIM
Swap and Port-Out Fraud, WC Docket
No. 21–341 [3060–AL34]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154,
201, 222, 251, 303(r), 332
Abstract: The Commission revised its
Customer Proprietary Network
Information (CPNI) and Local Number
Portability (LNP) rules to require
wireless providers to adopt secure
methods of authenticating a customer
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
before redirecting a customer’s phone
number to a new device or provider.
The Commission also required wireless
providers to immediately notify
customers whenever a SIM change or
port-out request is made on customers’
accounts, and take additional steps to
protect customers from SIM swap and
port-out fraud. In a Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission
sought comment on whether to
harmonize the existing requirements
governing customer access to CPNI with
the SIM change authentication and
protection measures, and on what steps
the Commission can take to harmonize
government efforts to address SIM swap
and port-out fraud.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Report and Order
FNPRM ...............
FNPRM Comment
Period End.
FNPRM Reply
Comment Period End.
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
10/15/21
12/15/21
86 FR 57390
12/18/23
12/14/23
01/16/24
88 FR 85794
88 FR 86614
02/12/24
To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jordan Marie Reth,
Attorney-Advisor (PU), Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418–
1418, Email: jordan.reth@fcc.gov.
RIN: 3060–AL34
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
355. Supporting Survivors of Domestic
and Sexual Violence (WC Docket No.
22–238,11–42, 21–450) [3060–AL48]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151.201(b);
47 U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47 U.S.C. 307
and 309; 47 U.S.C. 316 and 345; 47
U.S.C. 403 and sec. 5(b); Pub. L. 117–
223 and 136 Stat. 2280
Abstract: On July 14, 2022, the
Commission initiated an inquiry into
steps that the Commission could take to
assist survivors of domestic violence. In
the Notice of Inquiry, the Commission
sought information on the scope of
connectivity-based difficulties survivors
face, as well as potential means by
which current Commission programs
could be better adapted and new
programs could be developed to address
survivors’ needs. In particular, the
Commission sought comment relating to
potentially developing a centralized
database of telephone numbers relating
to domestic abuse support that could be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
used by service providers to prevent
survivors’ communications with
support organizations from appearing
on logs of calls and text messages that
may be available to abusers.
In the NPRM, the Commission begins
the process of implementing the Safe
Connections Act of 2022 (Safe
Connections Act), enacted on December
7, 2022. The legislation amends the
Communications Act of 1934
(Communications Act) to require mobile
service providers to separate the line of
a survivor of domestic violence (and
other related crimes and abuse), and any
individuals in the care of the survivor,
from a mobile service contract shared
with an abuser within two business
days after receiving a request from the
survivor. The Safe Connections Act also
directs the Commission to issue rules,
within 18 months of the statute’s
enactment, implementing the line
separation requirement. Further, the
legislation also requires the Commission
to open a rulemaking within 180 days
of enactment to consider whether to,
and how the Commission should,
establish a central database of domestic
abuse hotlines to be used by service
providers and require such providers to
omit, subject to certain conditions, any
records of calls or text messages to the
hotlines from consumer-facing call and
text message logs. The NPRM proposes
rules as directed by these statutory
requirements.
On November 16, 2023, the
Commission released a Report and
Order. The rules largely track the
statutory language, with key additions
and clarifications to address privacy,
account security, fraud detection, and
operational or technical infeasibility.
Among other things, the Commission
established requirements regarding the
information that survivors must submit
to request a line separation and the
options providers must offer to
survivors making a line separation
request. The Commission also adopted
requirements regarding communications
with consumers and survivors and
restrictions on various practices in
connection with line separation
requests. In addition, the Commission
required covered providers to train
employees who may interact with
survivors on how to assist them or
direct them to other employees who
have received such training. The
Commission also delineated the
financial responsibilities for monthly
service costs and mobile device
following a line separation, and
established a compliance date of July
14, 2024, six months after the effective
date of the Report and Order . Further,
the Commission designated the Lifeline
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
66959
program to support emergency
communications service for survivors
that have pursued the line separation
process and are suffering a financial
hardship. The Commission directed
USAC to develop processes to allow
survivors experiencing financial
hardship to apply for and enroll in the
Lifeline program, and to transition
survivors from emergency
communications support at the end of
the six-month emergency support
period mandated by the Safe
Connections Act. [1] With regard to
protecting the privacy of calls and text
messages to domestic violence hotlines,
the Commission required covered
providers and wireline, fixed wireless,
and fixed satellite providers of voice
service to: (1) omit from consumerfacing logs of calls and text messages
any records of calls or text messages to
covered hotlines in the central database
established by the Commission; and (2)
maintain internal records of calls and
text messages excluded from consumerfacing logs of calls and text messages.
Providers were generally given 12
months to comply with these
requirements, except that small service
providers were given 18 months.
[1] Id. at paras. 167–73. In addition to
these provisions, the Commission also
considered matters relating to protecting
the privacy of calls and text messages to
domestic violence hotlines. In the Safe
Connections Report and Order, the
Commission required covered providers
and wireline, fixed wireless, and fixed
satellite providers of voice service to: (1)
omit from consumer-facing logs of calls
and text messages any records of calls
or text messages to covered hotlines in
the central database established by the
Commission; and (2) maintain internal
records of calls and text messages
excluded from consumer-facing logs of
calls and text messages. Id. at 59–76,
paras. 105–49. Providers were generally
given 12 months to comply with these
requirements, except that small service
providers were given 18 months. Id. at
70–74, paras. 137–44.
Timetable:
Action
NOI ......................
Comment Period
End.
Reply Comment
Period End.
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Reply Comment
Period End.
Report and Order
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Date
FR Cite
08/18/22
08/18/22
09/19/22
02/17/23
04/10/23
88 FR 15558
05/10/23
11/16/23
88 FR 84406
66960
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda
Action
Date
Next Action Undetermined.
FR Cite
To Be Determined
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS22
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Edward Kracher,
Deputy Division Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:17 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 250001
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418–1525.
RIN: 3060–AL48
[FR Doc. 2024–16467 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\16AUP22.SGM
16AUP22
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2024)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 66912-66960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-16467]
[[Page 66911]]
Vol. 89
Friday,
No. 159
August 16, 2024
Part XXII
Federal Communications Commission
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / UA:
Reg Flex Agenda
[[Page 66912]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Ch. I
Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions--
Spring 2024
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In the Spring and Fall of each year, the Federal
Communications Commission publishes in the Federal Register a list in
the Unified Agenda of those major items and other significant
regulatory proceedings under development or review that pertain to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602). The Unified Agenda also
provides the Code of Federal Regulations citations and legal
authorities that govern these proceedings. The complete Unified Agenda
will be published on the internet in a searchable format at
www.reginfo.gov.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Brown, Program Specialist,
Office of Communications Business Opportunities, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418-1663.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Unified Agenda of Major and Other Significant Proceedings
The Commission encourages public participation in its rulemaking
process. To help keep the public informed of significant rulemaking
proceedings, the Commission has prepared a list of important
proceedings now in progress. The General Services Administration
publishes the Unified Agenda in the Federal Register in the spring and
fall of each year.
The following terms may clarify the status of the proceedings
included in this report:
Docket Number--assigned to a proceeding if the Commission has
issued either a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking or a Notice of Inquiry
concerning the matter under consideration. The Commission has used
docket numbers since January 1, 1978. Docket numbers consist of the
last two digits of the calendar year in which the docket was
established plus a sequential number that begins at 1 with the first
docket initiated during a calendar year (e.g., Docket No. 15-1 or
Docket No. 17-1). The abbreviation for the responsible bureau usually
precedes the docket number, as in ``MB Docket No. 15-137,'' which
indicates that the responsible bureau is the Media Bureau. A docket
number consisting of only five digits (e.g., Docket No. 29622)
indicates that the docket was established before January 1, 1978.
Notice of Inquiry (NOI)--the Commission will issue an NOI when it
is seeking information on a broad subject or trying to generate ideas
on a given topic. Interested parties may submit comments during the
specified comment period.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)--the Commission will issue an
NPRM when it is proposing new rules or changes to existing rules and
regulations. Before any changes are made, the Commission requests
interested parties to submit written comments on the proposed rules or
revisions.
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM)--the Commission will
issue an FNPRM when it is seeking additional information from the
public and requests the public to submit comments in the proceeding.
Memorandum Opinion and Order (MO&O)--the Commission will issue an
MO&O in response to a petition for rulemaking, to conclude an inquiry,
modify a decision, amend a Report and Order, or state that the Report
and Order will not be changed.
Rulemaking (RM) Number--assigned to a proceeding after the
appropriate bureau or office has reviewed a petition for rulemaking,
but before the Commission has acted on the petition.
Report and Order (R&O)--the Commission may issue an R&O that will
either adopt new rules, change existing rules, or state that no rule or
regulation changes will be made.
Sanford S. Williams,
Deputy Chief of Staff for Chairwoman Rosenworcel.
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
262....................... Rules and Regulations 3060-AI14
Implementing the
Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA) of
1991 (CG Docket No. 02-
278).
263....................... Rules and Regulations 3060-AI15
Implementing Section 225
of the Communications Act
(Telecommunications Relay
Service) (CG Docket No.
03-123).
264....................... Structure and Practices of 3060-AJ42
the Video Relay Service
(VRS) Program (CG Docket
No. 10-51).
265....................... Implementation of the 3060-AJ84
Middle-Class Tax Relief
and Job Creation Act of
2012/Establishment of a
Public Safety Answering
Point Do-Not-Call
Registry (CG Docket No.
12-129).
266....................... Implementation of Sections 3060-AK00
716 and 717 of the
Communications Act of
1934, as Enacted by the
Twenty-First Century
Communications and Video
Accessibility Act of 2010
(CG Docket No. 10-213).
267....................... Misuse of Internet 3060-AK01
Protocol (IP) Captioned
Telephone Service;
Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech-to-
Speech Services; CG
Docket No. 13-24.
268....................... Advanced Methods to Target 3060-AK62
and Eliminate Unlawful
Robocalls (CG Docket No.
17-59).
269....................... Empowering Broadband 3060-AL33
Consumers Through
Transparency (CG Docket
No 22-2).
270....................... Targeting and Eliminating 3060-AL49
Unlawful Text Messages,
CG Docket 21-403, Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking.
271....................... Misuse of Internet 3060-AL58
Protocol (IP) Relay
Service; CG Docket No. 12-
38.
272....................... Compensation for Internet 3060-AL59
Protocol Captioned
Telephone Service, (CG
Docket No. 22-408).
273....................... Access to Video 3060-AL66
Conferencing, (CG Docket
No. 23-161).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economics--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
274....................... Development of Nationwide 3060-AJ15
Broadband Data to
Evaluate Reasonable and
Timely Deployment of
Advanced Services to All
Americans.
[[Page 66913]]
275....................... Expanding the Economic and 3060-AJ82
Innovation Opportunities
of Spectrum Through
Incentive Auctions (GN
Docket No. 12-268).
276....................... Broadband Data Collection. 3060-AL42
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of Engineering and Technology--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
277....................... Unlicensed Operation in 3060-AI52
the TV Broadcast Bands
(ET Docket No. 04-186).
278....................... Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz 3060-AK96
Band; (ET Docket No. 19-
138), FCC 19-129.
279....................... Unlicensed White Space 3060-AL22
Device Operations in the
Television Bands, ET
Docket No. 20-36.
280....................... Protecting Against 3060-AL23
National Security Threats
to the Communications
Supply Chain Through the
Equipment Authorization
and Competitive Bidding
Programs; ET Docket No.
21-232, EA Docket No. 21-
233.
281....................... Wireless Microphones in 3060-AL27
the TV Bands (ET Docket
No. 21-115), 600 MHz
Guard Band, 600 MHz
Duplex Gap, and the 941.5-
944 MHz, 944-952 MHz,
952.850-956.250 MHz,
956.45-959.85 MHz, 1435-
1525 MHz.
282....................... FCC Seeks to Enable State- 3060-AL36
of-the-Art Radar Sensors
in 60 GHz Band (ET Docket
No. 21-264).
283....................... FCC Proposes to Update 3060-AL39
Equipment Authorization
Rules to Incorporate New
and Revised Industry
Standards, (ET Docket No.
21-363).
284....................... Allocation of Spectrum for 3060-AL44
Non-Federal Space Launch
Operations (ET Docket No.
13-115).
285....................... FCC Implements and 3060-AL77
Proposes Final Acts of
the WRC-19 and WRC-15, ET
Docket No. 21-120 & 21-
121, and RM-11785.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Media Bureau--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
286....................... Revision of EEO Rules and 3060-AH95
Policies (MB Docket No.
98-204).
287....................... Establishment of Rules for 3060-AI38
Digital Low-Power
Television, Television
Translator, and
Television Booster
Stations (MB Docket No.
03-185).
288....................... Authorizing Permissive Use 3060-AK56
of the ``Next
Generation'' Broadcast
Television Standard (GN
Docket No. 16-142).
289....................... 2018 Quadrennial 3060-AK77
Regulatory Review of the
Commission's Broadcast
Ownership Rules (MB
Docket 18-349).
290....................... Equal Employment 3060-AK86
Opportunity Enforcement
(MB Docket 19-177).
291....................... Duplication of Programming 3060-AL19
on Commonly Owned Radio
Stations (MB Docket No.
19-310).
292....................... Sponsorship Identification 3060-AL20
Requirements for Foreign
Government-Provided
Programming (MB Docket
No. 20-299).
293....................... FM Broadcast Booster 3060-AL21
Stations (MB Docket 20-
401).
294....................... Amendment of Part 73 Rules 3060-AL50
to Update Television and
Class A Television
Broadcast Station Rules,
and Rules Applicable to
All Broadcast Stations
(MB Docket No. 22-227).
295....................... Implementation of the Low 3060-AL63
Power Protection Act, MB
Docket No. 23-126.
296....................... Video Description, MB 3060-AL64
Docket No. 11-43.
297....................... 2022 Quadrennial Review of 3060-AL65
Media Ownership Rules, MB
Docket No. 22-459.
298....................... Modifying Rules for FM 3060-AL70
Terrestrial Digital Audio
Broadcasting Systems, MB
Docket No. 22-405.
299....................... Customer Rebates for 3060-AL71
Undelivered Video
Programming During
Blackouts, MB Docket No
24-20.
300....................... Priority Application 3060-AL72
Review for Broadcast
Stations That Provide
Local Journalism or Other
Locally Originated
Programming, MB Docket No
24-14.
301....................... Cable Operator and DBS 3060-AL73
Provider Billing
Practices, MB Docket No
23-405.
302....................... Reporting Requirements for 3060-AL74
Commercial Television
Broadcast Station
Blackouts, MB Docket No
23-427.
303....................... All-In Pricing for Cable 3060-AL75
and Satellite Television
Service, MB Docket No 23-
203.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of Managing Director--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
304....................... Assessment and Collection 3060-AK64
of Regulatory Fees.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of International Affairs--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
305....................... Process Reform for 3060-AL12
Executive Branch Review
of Certain FCC
Applications and
Petitions Involving
Foreign Ownership, IB
Docket No. 16-155.
[[Page 66914]]
306....................... Review of International 3060-AL76
Section 214
Authorizations to Assess
Evolving National
Security, Law
Enforcement, Foreign
Policy, and Trade Policy
Risks, IB Docket No 23-
119, MD Docket No 23-134.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
307....................... Wireless E911 Location 3060-AJ52
Accuracy Requirements: PS
Docket No. 07-114.
308....................... Improving Outage Reporting 3060-AK39
for Submarine Cables and
Enhancing Submarine Cable
Outage Data; GN Docket
No. 15-206.
309....................... Amendments to Part 4 of 3060-AK40
the Commission's Rules
Concerning Disruptions to
Communications: (PS
Docket No. 15-80, 18-336,
23-5).
310....................... New Part 4 of the 3060-AK41
Commission's Rules
Concerning Disruptions to
Communications; ET Docket
No. 04-35.
311....................... Wireless Emergency Alerts 3060-AK54
(WEA): PS Docket No. 15-
91, 15-94, 22-329.
312....................... 911 Fee Diversion 3060-AL31
Rulemaking: PS Docket
Nos. 20-291, 09-14.
313....................... Resilient Networks, 3060-AL43
Amendments to Part 4 of
the Commission's Rules
Concerning Disruptions to
Communications; PS Docket
No 21-346.
314....................... Location-Based Routing for 3060-AL52
Wireless 911 Calls (P.S.
Docket 18-64).
315....................... Next Generation 9-1-1, PS 3060-AL67
Docket No. 21-479, FCC 23-
47.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Space Bureau--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
316....................... Update to Parts 2 and 25 3060-AK59
Concerning
NonGeostationary, Fixed-
Satellite Service
Systems, and Related
Matters: IB Docket No. I6-
408.
317....................... Amendment of Parts 2 and 3060-AK84
25 of the FCC Rules to
Facilitate the Use of
Earth Stations in Motion
Communicating With
Geostationary Orbit Space
Stations in FSS Bands: IB
Docket No. 17-95.
318....................... Facilitating the 3060-AK89
Communications of Earth
Stations in Motion With
Non-Geostationary Orbit
Space Stations: IB Docket
No. 18-315.
319....................... Space Innovation; 3060-AK90
Mitigation of Orbital
Debris in the New Space
Age: IB Docket Nos. 18-
313, 22-271.
320....................... Parts 2 and 25 to Enable 3060-AL28
GSO FSS in the 17.3-17.8
GHz Band, Modernize Rules
for 17/24 GHz BSS Space
Stations, and Establish
Off-Axis Uplink Power
Limits for Extended Ka-
Band FSS (IB Doc. No. 20-
330).
321....................... Revising Spectrum Sharing 3060-AL41
Rules for Non-
Geostationary Orbit,
Fixed-Satellite Service
Systems: IB Docket No. 21-
456.
322....................... Expediting Initial 3060-AL51
Processing of Satellite
and Earth Station
Applications; Space
Innovation, IB Docket
Nos. 22-411 and 22-271.
323....................... Amendment of Parts 2 and 3060-AL79
25 of the Commission's
Rules to Enable NGSO
Fixed-Satellite Service
(Space-to-Earth)
Operations in the 17.3-
17.8 GHz Band.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
324....................... Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 3060-AJ87
22, 24, 27, 90, and 95 of
the Commission's Rules to
Improve Wireless Coverage
Through the Use of Signal
Boosters (WT Docket No.
10-4).
325....................... Promoting Technological 3060-AK06
Solutions to Combat
Wireless Contraband
Device Use in
Correctional Facilities;
GN Docket No. 13-111.
326....................... Promoting Investment in 3060-AK12
the 3550-3700 MHz Band;
GN Docket No. 17-258.
327....................... Updating Part 1 3060-AK28
Competitive Bidding Rules
(WT Docket No. 14-170).
328....................... Use of Spectrum Bands 3060-AK44
Above 24 GHz for Mobile
Services--Spectrum
Frontiers: WT Docket 10-
112.
329....................... Expanding Flexible Use of 3060-AK76
the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz Band:
GN Docket No. 18-122.
330....................... Amendment of the 3060-AK92
Commission's Rules to
Promote Aviation Safety:
WT Docket No. 19-140.
331....................... Implementation of State 3060-AL29
and Local Governments'
Obligation to Approve
Certain Wireless Facility
Modification Requests
Under Section 6409(a) of
the Spectrum Act of 2012
(WT Docket No.19-250).
332....................... Expanding Flexible Use of 3060-AL40
the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band,
et al., WT Docket No. 20-
443, et al.
333....................... Facilitating Shared Use in 3060-AL57
the 3100-3550 MHz Band.
334....................... Shared Use of the 42-42.5 3060-AL68
GHz Band (WT Docket No.
23-158, GN Docket No. 14-
177).
335....................... Single Network Future: 3060-AL69
Supplemental Coverage
from Space, GN Docket No.
23-65.
336....................... Modifying Emissions Limits 3060-AL80
for the 24.25-24.45 GHz
and 24.75-25.25 GHz Bands
(ET Docket No. 21-186).
337....................... Alaska Connect Fund Notice 3060-AL81
of Proposed Rulemaking.
338....................... Indian Peak Properties LLC 3060-AL82
Petitions for Declaratory
Ruling Seeking Preemption
Under The Rule Governing
Over-the-Air Reception
Devices.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 66915]]
Wireline Competition Bureau--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
339....................... Telecommunications 3060-AG43
Carriers' Use of Customer
Proprietary Network
Information and Other
Customer Information (CC
Docket No. 96-115), Data
Breach Reporting
Requirements (WC Docket
No. 22-21).
340....................... Local Telephone Networks 3060-AH44
That LECs Must Make
Available to Competitors.
341....................... Jurisdictional Separations 3060-AJ06
342....................... Rates for Inmate Calling 3060-AK08
Services; WC Docket No.
12-375; Incarcerated
People's Communications
Services; Implementation
of the Martha Wright-Reed
Act, WC Docket No. 23-62.
343....................... Comprehensive Review of 3060-AK20
the Part 32 Uniform
System of Accounts (WC
Docket No. 14-130).
344....................... Restoring Internet 3060-AK21
Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-
108; Protecting and
Promoting the Open
Internet, GN Docket No.
14-28; Safeguarding and
Securing the Open
Internet, WC Docket No.
23-320.
345....................... Technology Transitions; GN 3060-AK32
Docket No 13-5, WC Docket
No. 05-25; Accelerating
Wireline Broadband
Deployment by Removing
Barriers to
Infrastructure
Investment; WC Docket No.
17-84.
346....................... Numbering Policies for 3060-AK36
Modern Communications, WC
Docket No. 13-97.
347....................... Implementation of the 3060-AK57
Universal Service
Portions of the 1996
Telecommunications Act.
348....................... Toll Free Assignment 3060-AK91
Modernization and Toll-
Free Service Access
Codes: WC Docket No. 17-
192, CC Docket No. 95-155.
349....................... Establishing the Digital 3060-AK93
Opportunity Data
Collection; WC Docket
Nos. 19-195 and 11-10.
350....................... Call Authentication Trust 3060-AL00
Anchor.
351....................... Implementation of the 3060-AL01
National Suicide
Improvement Act of 2018,
988 Suicide Prevention
Hotline (WC Docket 18-
336, PS Docket No. 23.5,
PS Docket No. 15-80).
352....................... Modernizing Unbundling and 3060-AL02
Resale Requirements in an
Era of Next-Generation
Networks and Services.
353....................... Establishing a 5G Fund for 3060-AL15
Rural America; GN Docket
No. 20-32.
354....................... Protecting Consumers From 3060-AL34
SIM Swap and Port-Out
Fraud, WC Docket No. 21-
341.
355....................... Supporting Survivors of 3060-AL48
Domestic and Sexual
Violence (WC Docket No.
22-238,11-42, 21-450).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
Long-Term Actions
262. Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991 (CG Docket No. 02-278) [3060-AI14]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 227
Abstract: In this docket, the Commission considers rules and
policies to implement the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
(TCPA). The TCPA places requirements on robocalls (calls using an
automatic telephone dialing system, an autodialer, a prerecorded or, an
artificial voice), telemarketing calls, and unsolicited fax
advertisements.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 10/08/02 67 FR 62667
FNPRM............................... 04/03/03 68 FR 16250
Order............................... 07/25/03 68 FR 44144
Order Effective..................... 08/25/03
Order on Reconsideration............ 08/25/03 68 FR 50978
Order............................... 10/14/03 68 FR 59130
FNPRM............................... 03/31/04 69 FR 16873
Order............................... 10/08/04 69 FR 60311
Order............................... 10/28/04 69 FR 62816
Order on Reconsideration............ 04/13/05 70 FR 19330
Order............................... 06/30/05 70 FR 37705
NPRM................................ 12/19/05 70 FR 75102
Public Notice....................... 04/26/06 71 FR 24634
Order............................... 05/03/06 71 FR 25967
NPRM................................ 12/14/07 72 FR 71099
Declaratory Ruling.................. 02/01/08 73 FR 6041
R&O................................. 07/14/08 73 FR 40183
Order on Reconsideration............ 10/30/08 73 FR 64556
NPRM................................ 03/22/10 75 FR 13471
R&O................................. 06/11/12 77 FR 34233
Public Notice....................... 06/30/10 75 FR 34244
Public Notice (Reconsideration 10/03/12 77 FR 60343
Petitions Filed).
Announcement of Effective Date...... 10/16/12 77 FR 63240
Opposition End Date................. 10/18/12
Rule Corrections.................... 11/08/12 77 FR 66935
Declaratory Ruling (release date)... 11/29/12
Declaratory Ruling (release date)... 05/09/13
Declaratory Ruling and Order........ 10/09/15 80 FR 61129
NPRM................................ 05/20/16 81 FR 31889
Declaratory Ruling.................. 07/05/16
R&O................................. 11/16/16 81 FR 80594
Public Notice....................... 06/28/18 83 FR 26284
Public Notice....................... 10/03/18
Declaratory Ruling.................. 12/06/19
Declaratory Ruling.................. 12/09/19
Order............................... 03/17/20
Declaratory Ruling.................. 03/20/20
Declaratory Ruling.................. 06/25/20
Declaratory Ruling and Order........ 06/25/20
Order on Reconsideration............ 08/28/20
Declaratory Ruling.................. 09/04/20
Declaratory Ruling.................. 09/21/20
NPRM................................ 10/09/20 85 FR 64091
Public Notice....................... 12/17/20
Declaratory Ruling.................. 12/18/20
Declaratory Ruling.................. 01/15/21
Order on Recon...................... 02/12/21 86 FR 9299
R&O................................. 02/25/21 86 FR 11443
Public Notice (Reconsideration 04/12/21 86 FR 18934
Petitions Filed).
Declaratory Ruling and Order........ 12/14/22 87 FR 76425
Order on Reconsideration and 01/20/23 88 FR 3668
Declaratory Ruling.
NPRM................................ 06/29/23 88 FR 42034
NPRM................................ 06/16/23 88 FR 20800
Report and Order.................... 12/18/23 88 FR 5098
FNPRM............................... 12/18/23 88 FR 5177
Report and Order.................... 03/05/24 89 FR 15756
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kristi Thornton, Deputy Division Chief, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-2467, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AI14
263. Rules and Regulations Implementing Section 225 of the
Communications Act (Telecommunications Relay Service) (CG Docket No.
03-123) [3060-AI15]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 225
Abstract: This proceeding continues the Commission's inquiry into
improving the quality of telecommunications relay service (TRS) and
furthering the goal of functional equivalency, consistent with
Congress'
[[Page 66916]]
mandate that TRS regulations encourage the use of existing technology
and not discourage or impair the development of new technology. In this
docket, the Commission explores ways to improve emergency preparedness
for TRS facilities and services, new TRS technologies, public access to
information and outreach, and issues related to payments from the
Interstate TRS Fund.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 08/25/03 68 FR 50993
R&O, Order on Reconsideration....... 09/01/04 69 FR 53346
FNPRM............................... 09/01/04 69 FR 53382
Public Notice....................... 02/17/05 70 FR 8034
Declaratory Ruling/Interpretation... 02/25/05 70 FR 9239
Public Notice....................... 03/07/05 70 FR 10930
Order............................... 03/23/05 70 FR 14568
Public Notice/Announcement of Date.. 04/06/05 70 FR 17334
Order............................... 07/01/05 70 FR 38134
Order on Reconsideration............ 08/31/05 70 FR 51643
R&O................................. 08/31/05 70 FR 51649
Order............................... 09/14/05 70 FR 54294
Order............................... 09/14/05 70 FR 54298
Public Notice....................... 10/12/05 70 FR 59346
R&O/Order on Reconsideration........ 12/23/05 70 FR 76208
Order............................... 12/28/05 70 FR 76712
Order............................... 12/29/05 70 FR 77052
NPRM................................ 02/01/06 71 FR 5221
Declaratory Ruling/Clarification.... 05/31/06 71 FR 30818
FNPRM............................... 05/31/06 71 FR 30848
FNPRM............................... 06/01/06 71 FR 31131
Declaratory Ruling/Dismissal of 06/21/06 71 FR 35553
Petition.
Clarification....................... 06/28/06 71 FR 36690
Declaratory Ruling on 07/06/06 71 FR 38268
Reconsideration.
Order on Reconsideration............ 08/16/06 71 FR 47141
MO&O................................ 08/16/06 71 FR 47145
Clarification....................... 08/23/06 71 FR 49380
FNPRM............................... 09/13/06 71 FR 54009
Final Rule; Clarification........... 02/14/07 72 FR 6960
Order............................... 03/14/07 72 FR 11789
R&O................................. 08/06/07 72 FR 43546
Public Notice....................... 08/16/07 72 FR 46060
Order............................... 11/01/07 72 FR 61813
Public Notice....................... 01/04/08 73 FR 863
R&O/Declaratory Ruling.............. 01/17/08 73 FR 3197
Order............................... 02/19/08 73 FR 9031
Order............................... 04/21/08 73 FR 21347
R&O................................. 04/21/08 73 FR 21252
Order............................... 04/23/08 73 FR 21843
Public Notice....................... 04/30/08 73 FR 23361
Order............................... 05/15/08 73 FR 28057
Declaratory Ruling.................. 07/08/08 73 FR 38928
FNPRM............................... 07/18/08 73 FR 41307
R&O................................. 07/18/08 73 FR 41286
Public Notice....................... 08/01/08 73 FR 45006
Public Notice....................... 08/05/08 73 FR 45354
Public Notice....................... 10/10/08 73 FR 60172
Order............................... 10/23/08 73 FR 63078
2nd R&O and Order on Reconsideration 12/30/08 73 FR 79683
Order............................... 05/06/09 74 FR 20892
Public Notice....................... 05/07/09 74 FR 21364
NPRM................................ 05/21/09 74 FR 23815
Public Notice....................... 05/21/09 74 FR 23859
Public Notice....................... 06/12/09 74 FR 28046
Order............................... 07/29/09 74 FR 37624
Public Notice....................... 08/07/09 74 FR 39699
Order............................... 09/18/09 74 FR 47894
Order............................... 10/26/09 74 FR 54913
Public Notice....................... 05/12/10 75 FR 26701
Order Denying Stay Motion (Release 07/09/10 .......................
Date).
Order............................... 08/13/10 75 FR 49491
Order............................... 09/03/10 75 FR 54040
NPRM................................ 11/02/10 75 FR 67333
NPRM................................ 05/02/11 76 FR 24442
Order............................... 07/25/11 76 FR 44326
Final Rule (Order).................. 09/27/11 76 FR 59551
Final Rule; Announcement of 11/22/11 76 FR 72124
Effective Date.
Proposed Rule (Public Notice)....... 02/28/12 77 FR 11997
Proposed Rule (FNPRM)............... 02/01/12 77 FR 4948
First R&O........................... 07/25/12 77 FR 43538
Public Notice....................... 10/29/12 77 FR 65526
Order on Reconsideration............ 12/26/12 77 FR 75894
Order............................... 02/05/13 78 FR 8030
Order (Interim Rule)................ 02/05/13 78 FR 8032
NPRM................................ 02/05/13 78 FR 8090
Announcement of Effective Date...... 03/07/13 78 FR 14701
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/13/13 .......................
FNPRM............................... 07/05/13 78 FR 40407
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/18/13 .......................
R&O................................. 07/05/13 78 FR 40582
R&O................................. 08/15/13 78 FR 49693
FNPRM............................... 08/15/13 78 FR 49717
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/30/13 .......................
R&O................................. 08/30/13 78 FR 53684
FNPRM............................... 09/03/13 78 FR 54201
NPRM................................ 10/23/13 78FR 63152
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 11/18/13 .......................
Petiton for Reconsideration; Request 12/16/13 78 FR 76096
for Comment.
Petition for Reconsideration; 12/16/13 78 FR 76097
Request for Comment.
Request for Clarification; Request 12/30/13 78 FR 79362
for Comment; Correction.
Petition for Reconsideration Comment 01/10/14 .......................
Period End.
NPRM Comment Period End............. 01/21/14 .......................
Announcement of Effective Date...... 07/11/14 79 FR 40003
Announcement of Effective Date...... 08/28/14 79 FR 51446
Correction--Announcement of 08/28/14 79 FR 51450
Effective Date.
Technical Amendments................ 09/09/14 79 FR 53303
Public Notice....................... 09/15/14 79 FR 54979
R&O and Order....................... 10/21/14 79 FR 62875
FNPRM............................... 10/21/14 79 FR 62935
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 12/22/14 .......................
Final Action (Announcement of 10/30/14 79 FR 64515
Effective Date).
Final Rule Effective................ 10/30/14 .......................
FNPRM............................... 11/08/15 80 FR 72029
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 01/01/16 .......................
Public Notice....................... 01/20/16 81 FR 3085
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 02/16/16 .......................
R&O................................. 03/21/16 81 FR 14984
FNPRM............................... 08/24/16 81 FR 57851
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/14/16 .......................
NOI and FNPRM....................... 04/12/17 82 FR 17613
NOI and FNPRM Comment Period End.... 05/30/17 .......................
R&O................................. 04/13/17 82 FR 17754
R&O................................. 04/27/17 82 FR 19322
FNPRM............................... 04/27/17 82 FR 19347
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 07/11/17 .......................
R&O................................. 06/23/17 82 FR 28566
Public Notice....................... 07/21/17 82 FR 33856
Public Notice--Correction........... 07/25/17 82 FR 34471
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 07/31/17 .......................
Public Notice--Correction Comment 08/17/17 .......................
Period End.
R&O................................. 08/22/17 82 FR 39673
Announcement of Effective Date...... 10/17/17 82 FR 48203
Public Notice; Petition for 10/25/17 82 FR 49303
Reconsideration.
Oppositions Due Date................ 11/20/17 .......................
R&O and Declaratory Ruling.......... 06/27/18 83 FR 30082
FNPRM............................... 07/18/18 83 FR 33899
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 11/15/18 .......................
Public Notice....................... 08/23/18 83 FR 42630
Public Notice Opposition Period End. 09/17/18 .......................
Announcement of Effective Date...... 02/04/19 84 FR 1409
R&O................................. 03/08/19 84 FR 8457
FNPRM............................... 03/14/19 84 FR 9276
[[Page 66917]]
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 04/29/19 .......................
R&O................................. 06/06/19 84 FR 26364
FNPRM............................... 06/06/19 84 FR 26379
Petition for Recon Request for 06/18/19 84 FR 28264
Comment.
Petition for Recon Comment Period 07/15/19 .......................
End.
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 08/05/19 .......................
R&O................................. 01/06/20 85 FR 462
R&O................................. 01/09/20 85 FR 1125
NPRM................................ 01/09/20 85 FR 1134
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/13/20 .......................
Announcement of Effective Date...... 02/19/20 85 FR 9392
Final Rule; removal of compliance 05/06/20 85 FR 26857
notices.
Report & Order...................... 05/08/20 85 FR 27309
Final Rule; correction.............. 08/26/20 85 FR 52489
R&O and Order on Recon.............. 10/14/20 85 FR 64971
Final Rule; announcement of 10/23/20 85 FR 67447
effective and compliance dates.
FNPRM............................... 02/01/21 86 FR 7681
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 04/02/21 .......................
Public Notice; Petition for 02/22/21 86 FR 10458
Reconsideration.
Oppositions Due Date................ 03/19/21 .......................
R&O................................. 02/23/21 86 FR 10844
NPRM................................ 03/19/21 86 FR 14859
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/03/21 .......................
NPRM................................ 06/04/21 86 FR 29969
NPRM Correction..................... 06/15/21 86 FR 31668
Order on Recon...................... 07/07/21 86 FR 35632
Public Notice....................... 07/15/21 86 FR 37328
NPRM Correction Comment Period End.. 07/30/21 .......................
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 08/09/21 .......................
Order on Recon; Correction.......... 10/05/21 86 FR 54871
NPRM................................ 10/05/21 86 FR 64440
NPRM Comment Period End............. 01/18/22 .......................
Report & Order...................... 07/18/22 87 FR 42656
Report & Order...................... 09/21/22 87 FR 57645
Report & Order...................... 11/25/22 87 FR 72409
NPRM................................ 12/08/22 87 FR 75199
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/06/23 .......................
Public Notice....................... 01/31/23 88 FR 6220
Public Notice Opposition Period End. 02/27/23 .......................
NPRM................................ 02/02/23 88 FR 7049
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/03/23 .......................
Order on Reconsideration............ 02/22/23 .......................
Final Rule; Announcement of 03/08/23 88 FR 14251
Effective Date.
Report and Order.................... 08/01/23 88 FR 50053
NPRM................................ 08/07/23 88 FR 52088
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/06/23 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 10/06/23 .......................
Report and Order.................... 10/19/23 88 FR 71994
Final Rule; Announcement of 12/21/23 88 FR 88257
Effective Date.
Correction; Technical Amendments.... 02/08/24 89 FR 8549
NPRM................................ 03/14/24 89 FR 18589
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/15/24
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 04/29/24
Report and Order.................... 03/21/24 89 FR 20125
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Scott, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights
Office, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1264, Email: [email protected].
Eliot Greenwald, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-2235, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AI15
264. Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service (VRS) Program
(CG Docket No. 10-51) [3060-AJ42]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 225; 47
U.S.C. 303(r)
Abstract: The Commission takes a fresh look at its VRS rules to
ensure that it is available to and used by the full spectrum of
eligible users, encourages innovation, and is provided efficiently to
be less susceptible to the waste, fraud, and abuse that have plagued
the program and threatened its long-term viability. The Commission also
considers the most effective and efficient way to make VRS available
and to determine what is the most fair, efficient, and transparent
cost-recovery methodology. In addition, the Commission looks at various
ways to measure the quality of VRS so as to ensure a better consumer
experience.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Declaratory Ruling.................. 05/07/10 75 FR 25255
Declaratory Ruling.................. 07/13/10 75 FR 39945
Order............................... 07/13/10 75 FR 39859
Notice of Inquiry................... 07/19/10 75 FR 41863
NPRM................................ 08/23/10 75 FR 51735
Interim Final Rule.................. 02/15/11 76 FR 8659
Public Notice....................... 03/02/11 76 R 11462
R&O................................. 05/02/11 76 FR 24393
FNPRM............................... 05/02/11 76 FR 24437
NPRM................................ 05/02/11 76 FR 24442
R&O (Correction).................... 05/27/11 76 FR 30841
Order............................... 07/25/11 76 FR 44326
2nd R&O............................. 08/05/11 76 FR 47469
Order (Interim Final Rule).......... 08/05/11 76 FR 47476
Final Rule; Announcement of 09/26/11 76 FR 59269
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Petition for 09/27/11 76 FR 59557
Reconsideration; Public Notice.
Oppositions Due Date................ 10/07/11
Final Rule; Clarification (MO&O).... 10/31/11 76 FR 67070
FNPRM............................... 10/31/11 76 FR 67118
Interim Final Rule; Announcement of 11/03/11 76 FR 68116
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Announcement of 11/04/11 76 FR 68328
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Announcement of 11/07/11 76 FR 68642
Effective Date.
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 12/30/11
FNPRM............................... 02/01/12 77 FR 4948
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 03/19/12
Final Rule; Correction.............. 03/27/12 77 FR 18106
Correcting Amendments............... 06/07/12 77 FR 33662
Order (Release Date)................ 07/25/12
Correcting Amendments............... 10/04/12 77 FR 60630
Public Notice....................... 10/29/12 77 FR 65526
Comment Period End.................. 11/29/12
FNPRM............................... 07/05/13 78 FR 40407
R&O................................. 07/05/13 78 FR 40582
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/18/13
Public Notice....................... 09/11/13 78 FR 55696
Public Notice....................... 09/15/14 79 FR 54979
Comment Period End.................. 10/10/14
Final Action (Announcement of 10/30/14 79 FR 64515
Effective Date).
Final Rule Effective................ 10/30/14
FNPRM............................... 11/18/15 80 FR 72029
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 02/01/16
R&O................................. 03/21/16 81 FR 14984
FNPRM............................... 08/24/16 81 FR 57851
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/14/16
NOI and FNPRM....................... 04/12/17 82 FR 17613
[[Page 66918]]
NOI and FNPRM Comment Period End.... 05/30/17
R&O................................. 04/13/17 82 FR 17754
R&O................................. 04/27/17 82 FR 19322
FNPRM............................... 04/27/17 82 FR 19347
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 07/01/17
Order............................... 06/23/17 82 FR 28566
Public Notice....................... 07/21/17 82 FR 33856
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 07/31/17
Public Notice Correction............ 07/25/17 82 FR 34471
Public Notice Correction Comment 08/17/17
Period End.
R&O and Order....................... 08/22/17 82 FR 39673
Announcement of Effective Date...... 10/17/17 82 FR 48203
Public Notice; Petition for 10/25/17 82 FR 49303
Reconsideration.
Oppositions Due Date................ 11/20/17
R&O................................. 06/06/19 84 FR 26364
FNPRM............................... 06/06/19 84 FR 26379
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 08/05/19
Report & Order...................... 05/08/20 85 FR 27309
R&O and Order on Recon.............. 10/14/20 85 FR 64971
Final rule; announcement of 10/23/20 85 FR 67447
effective and compliance dates.
FNPRM............................... 02/01/21 86 FR 7681
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 04/02/21
Public Notice; Petition for 02/22/21 86 FR 10458
Reconsideration.
Oppositions Due Date................ 03/19/21
NPRM................................ 03/19/21 86 FR 14859
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/03/21
NPRM................................ 06/04/21 86 FR 29969
NPRM Correction..................... 06/15/21 86 FR 31668
NPRM Correction Comment Period End.. 07/30/21
Order on Recon...................... 07/07/21 86 FR 35632
Order on Recon; Correction.......... 10/05/21 86 FR 54871
Report & Order...................... 09/21/22 87 FR 57645
Report & Order...................... 11/25/22 87 FR 72409
NPRM................................ 12/08/22 87 FR 75199
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/06/23
Public Notice....................... 01/31/23 88 FR 6220
Public Notice Opposition Period End. 02/27/23
Final Rule; Announcement of 03/08/23 88 FR 14251
Effective Date.
Public Notice....................... 04/25/23 88 FR 24986
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 05/09/23
Public Notice Reply Comment Period 05/19/23
End.
Report and Order.................... 10/19/23 88 FR 71994
Final Rule Effective................ 12/21/23 88 FR 88257
Correction; Technical Amendments.... 02/08/24 89 FR 8549
NPRM................................ 03/14/24 89 FR 18589
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/15/24
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 04/29/24
Report and Order.................... 03/21/24 89 FR 20125
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Eliot Greenwald, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights
Office, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2235, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AJ42
265. Implementation of the Middle-Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
of 2012/Establishment of a Public Safety Answering Point Do-Not-Call
Registry (CG Docket No. 12-129) [3060-AJ84]
Legal Authority: Pub. L. 112-96, sec. 6507
Abstract: The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012
required the Commission to create a Do-Not-Call Registry for public
safety answering point (PSAP) telephone numbers and to prohibit the use
of automated dialing equipment to place calls to PSAP numbers on the
Registry. In this docket, the Commission adopted rules and policies
implementing these statutory requirements.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/21/12 77 FR 37362
R&O................................. 10/29/12 77 FR 71131
Correction Amendments............... 02/13/13 78 FR 10099
Announcement of Effective Date...... 03/26/13 78 FR 18246
FNPRM............................... 11/01/21 86 FR 60189
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 12/01/21
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Richard D. Smith, Special Counsel, Consumer Policy
Division, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 717 338-2797, Fax: 717 338-2574, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AJ84
266. Implementation of Sections 716 and 717 of the Communications Act
of 1934, as Enacted by the Twenty-First Century Communications and
Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CG Docket No. 10-213) [3060-AK00]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 255; 47
U.S.C. 617 to 619
Abstract: These proceedings implement sections 716, 717, and 718 of
the Communications Act, which were added by the Twenty-First Century
Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA), related to
the accessibility of advanced communications services and equipment
(section 716), recordkeeping and enforcement requirements for entities
subject to sections 255, 716, and 718 (section 717), and accessibility
of internet browsers built into mobile phones (section 718).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/14/11 76 FR 13800
NPRM Comment Period Extended........ 04/12/11 76 FR 20297
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/13/11
FNPRM............................... 12/30/11 76 FR 82240
R&O................................. 12/30/11 76 FR 82354
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 03/14/12
Announcement of Effective Date...... 04/25/12 77 FR 24632
2nd R&O............................. 05/22/13 78 FR 30226
R&O on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, 04/13/15 80 FR 19738
and Order.
Public Notice....................... 05/19/22 87 FR 30442
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 07/18/22
Report and Order.................... 08/01/23 88 FR 50053
NPRM................................ 08/07/23 88 FR 52088
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/06/23
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 10/06/23
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ike Ofobike, Attorney Advisor, Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
[[Page 66919]]
Phone: 202 418-1028, Email: [email protected].
Darryl Cooper, Attorney, Disability Rights Office, CGB, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-7131, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK00
267. Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP) Captioned Telephone Service;
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services; CG
Docket No. 13-24 [3060-AK01]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 225
Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) initiated
this proceeding in its effort to ensure that internet-Protocol
Captioned Telephone Service (IP CTS) is provided effectively and in the
most efficient manner. In doing so, the FCC adopted rules to address
certain practices related to the provision and marketing of IP CTS, as
well as compensation of TRS providers. IP CTS is a form of relay
service designed to allow people with hearing loss to speak directly to
another party on a telephone call and to simultaneously listen to the
other party and read captions of what that party is saying over an IP-
enabled device. To ensure that IP CTS is provided efficiently to
persons who need to use this service, the Commission adopted rules
establishing several requirements and issued an FNPRM to address
additional issues.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/05/13 78 FR 8090
Order (Interim Rule)................ 02/05/13 78 FR 8032
Order............................... 02/05/13 78 FR 8030
Announcement of Effective Date...... 03/07/13 78 FR 14701
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/12/13
R&O................................. 08/30/13 78 FR 53684
FNPRM............................... 09/03/13 78 FR 54201
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 11/18/13
Petition for Reconsideration Request 12/16/13 78 FR 76097
for Comment.
Petition for Reconsideration Comment 01/10/14
Period End.
Announcement of Effective Date...... 07/11/14 79 FR 40003
Announcement of Effective Date...... 08/28/14 79 FR 51446
Correction--Announcement of 08/28/14 79 FR 51450
Effective Date.
Technical Amendments................ 09/09/14 79 FR 53303
R&O and Declaratory Ruling.......... 06/27/18 83 FR 30082
FNPRM............................... 07/18/18 83 FR 33899
Public Notice....................... 08/23/18 83 FR 42630
Public Notice Opposition Period End. 09/17/18
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 11/15/18
Announcement of Effective Date...... 02/04/19 84 FR 1409
R&O................................. 03/08/19 84 FR 8457
FNPRM............................... 03/14/19 84 FR 9276
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 04/29/19
Petition for Recon Request for 06/18/19 84 FR 28264
Comment.
Petition for Recon Comment Period 07/15/19
End.
R&O................................. 01/06/20 85 FR 462
Announcement of Effective Date...... 02/19/20 85 FR 9392
Final Rule; Removal of Compliance 05/06/20 85 FR 26857
Notes.
Final Rule; correction.............. 08/26/20 85 FR 52489
R&O and Order on Recon.............. 10/14/20 85 FR 64971
FNPRM............................... 02/01/21 86 FR 7681
Public Notice; Petition for 02/22/21 86 FR 10458
Reconsideration.
NPRM................................ 03/19/21 86 FR 14859
Oppositions Due Date................ 03/19/21
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 04/02/21
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/03/21
Public Notice....................... 07/15/21 86 FR 37328
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 08/09/21
Report & Order...................... 09/21/22 87 FR 57645
NPRM................................ 12/08/22 87 FR 75199
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/06/23
Public Notice....................... 01/31/23 88 FR 6220
Public Notice Opposition Period End. 02/27/23
NPRM................................ 02/02/23 88 FR 7049
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/03/23
Order on Reconsideration............ 02/22/23 88 FR 10853
Final Rule; Announcement of 03/08/23 88 FR 14251
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Announcement of 12/21/23 88 FR 88257
Effective Date.
Correction; Technical Amendments.... 02/08/24 89 FR 8549
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Scott, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights
Office, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1264, Email: [email protected].
Eliot Greenwald, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-2235, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK01
268. Advanced Methods To Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls (CG
Docket No. 17-59) [3060-AK62]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 201 and 202; 47 U.S.C. 227; 47 U.S.C.
251(e)
Abstract: The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 restricts
the use of robocalls autodialed or prerecorded calls in certain
instances. In CG Docket No. 17-59, the Commission considers rules and
policies aimed at eliminating unlawful robocalling. Among the issues it
examines in this docket are whether to allow carriers to block calls
that purport to be from unallocated or unassigned phone numbers through
the use of spoofing, whether to allow carriers to block calls based on
their own analyses of which calls are likely to be unlawful and whether
to establish a database of reassigned phone numbers to help prevent
robocalls to consumers, who did not consent to such calls.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM/NOI............................ 05/17/17 82 FR 22625
2nd NOI............................. 07/13/17
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/31/17
FNPRM............................... 01/08/18 83 FR 770
R&O................................. 01/12/18 83 FR 1566
2nd FNPRM........................... 04/23/18 83 FR 17631
2nd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 06/07/18
2nd FNPRM Reply Comment Period End.. 07/09/18
2nd R&O............................. 03/26/19 84 FR 11226
3rd FNPRM........................... 06/24/19 84 FR 29478
Declaratory Ruling.................. 06/24/19 84 FR 29387
Public Notice Seeking Input on 12/30/19
Report.
Public Notice Seeking Comment on 01/24/20
Reassigned Numbers.
Public Notice Seeking Comment on RND 02/26/20
Cost/Fee Structure.
[[Page 66920]]
Public Notice Establishing 04/16/20
Guidelines for RND.
Report.............................. 06/25/20
3rd NPRM Comment Date............... 06/26/20
Announcement of Compliance Dates.... 06/26/20 85 FR 38334
3rd R&O, Order of Reconsideration, 07/31/20 85 FR 46063
4th FNPRM.
4th R&O (release date).............. 12/30/20
Public Notice....................... 02/08/21 86 FR 8558
Public Notice....................... 04/13/21
Public Notice....................... 06/15/21
Public Notice....................... 10/01/21 86 FR 61077
5th FNPRM........................... 10/26/21 86 FR 59084
Public Notice....................... 12/29/21
Order on Reconsideration, 6th FNPRM, 12/30/21 86 FR 74399
Waiver Order.
Public Notice....................... 02/08/22 87 FR 7044
Seventh Further Notice of Proposed 05/19/22 87 FR 42670
Rulemaking.
Sixth Report and Order.............. 05/19/22 87 FR 42916
Public Notice....................... 08/24/22 87 FR 51920
Public Notice....................... 11/18/22 87 FR 69206
Seventh Report and Order (Proposed 05/19/23 88 FR 43489
Rule).
Eighth Further Notice, and Third 05/19/23 88 FR 43446
Notice of Inquiry (Final Rule).
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jerusha Burnett, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-0526, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK62
269. Empowering Broadband Consumers Through Transparency (CG Docket No.
22-2) [3060-AL33]
Legal Authority: Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Pub. L.
117-58, 135 Stat. 429, 60504(a) (2021)
Abstract: In this docket, the Commission adopted rules requiring
broadband internet access service providers (ISPs) to display, at the
point of sale, labels to disclose to consumers certain information
about prices, introductory rates or promotions, data allowances,
broadband speeds, and management practices, among other things.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/07/22 87 FR 6827
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/09/22
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 03/24/22
Report & Order and FNPRM............ 12/16/22 87 FR 77048
FNPRM Comment Period Extended....... 01/04/23
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 03/16/23
Petition for Reconsideration........ 01/31/23 88 FR 6219
Petition for Reconsideration Comment 02/27/23
Period End.
Order............................... 08/07/23 88 FR 52043
Order of Reconsideration............ 09/18/23 88 FR 63853
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zac Champ, Deputy Division Chief, Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1495, Email:
[email protected].
Erica McMahon, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications Commission,
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0346, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL33
270. Targeting and Eliminating Unlawful Text Messages, CG Docket 21-
403, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking [3060-AL49]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 227(e), 251(e), 303
Abstract: In this docket, the Commission considers rules and
policies concerning the ability for mobile wireless service providers
to block illegal text messages.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 09/27/22 87 FR 61271
Report & Order...................... 03/17/23 88 FR 21497
FNPRM............................... 03/17/23 88 FR 20800
NPRM................................ 01/26/24 89 FR 5177
Final Rule; Announcement of 01/26/24 89 FR 5098
Effective Date.
Final Rule; Announcement of 03/01/24 89 FR 15061
Effective Date.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mika Savir, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0384,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL49
271. Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP) Relay Service; CG Docket No. 12-
38 [3060-AL58]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 152 and 154; 47 U.S.C.
225; 47 U.S.C. 616
Abstract: Title IV of the Americans with Disabilities Act requires
the Federal Communications Commission to ensure the availability of
telecommunications relay services. IP Relay is a form of TRS that
permits an individual with a hearing or a speech disability to
communicate in text using an Internet Protocol-enabled device via the
internet. In CG Docket No. 12-38, the Commission considers rules and
policy for the provision of IP Relay, including the process for
registering users for IP CTS and the methodology for determining TRS
Fund support. The Commission takes these steps to ensure the provision
of IP Relay in a functionally equivalent manner to persons who are
deaf, hard of hearing, deaf blind or have speech disabilities. In doing
so, the Commission balances several different factors including
regulating the recovery of costs caused by the service, encouraging the
use of existing technology and not discouraging or impairing the
development of improved technology, and ensuring IP Relay is available,
to the extent possible and in the most efficient manner.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Notice....................... 02/08/12 77 FR 11997
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 03/20/12
Final Rule.......................... 07/25/12 77 FR 43538
Final Rule Effective................ 07/25/12
NPRM................................ 03/19/21 86 FR 14859
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/03/21
Final Rule.......................... 11/25/22 87 FR 72409
[[Page 66921]]
Final Rule Effective................ 12/27/22
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Scott, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights
Office, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1264, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL58
272. Compensation for Internet Protocol Captioned Telephone Service,
(CG Docket No. 22-408) [3060-AL59]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and 152; 47 U.S.C. 225
Abstract: Title IV of the Americans with Disabilities Act requires
the Federal Communications Commission to ensure the availability of
telecommunications relay. Internet Protocol Captioned Telephone
Services (IP CTS) is a form of relay service designed to allow people
with hearing loss to speak directly to another party on a telephone
call and to simultaneously listen to the other party and read captions
of what that party is saying over an IP-enabled device. In CG Docket
No. 22-408, the Commission considers rules and policy for the adoption
of a compensation methodology and compensation levels for
Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) Fund support of providers of IP
CTS.The Commission takes these steps to ensure the provision of IP CTS
in a functionally equivalent manner to persons who are deaf, hard of
hearing, deaf, blind or have speech disabilities. In doing so, the
Commission balances several different factors including regulating the
recovery of costs caused by the service, encouraging the use of
existing technology and not discouraging or impairing the development
of improved technology, and ensuring IP CTS is available, to the extent
possible and in the most efficient manner.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/02/23 88 FR 7049
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Scott, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights
Office, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1264, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL59
273. Access to Video Conferencing, (CG Docket No. 23-161) [3060-AL66]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and 152; 47 U.S.C. 225 ; 47 U.S.C.
617
Abstract: Section 716 of the Twenty-First Century Communications
and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA) (47 U.S.C. 617) requires the
Federal Communications Commission to ensure the accessibility and
usability of advanced communications services (ACS), including
interoperable video conferencing services (IVCS), for individual with
disabilities, unless such requirements are not achievable. IVCS is
defined by the CVAA as a service that provides real-time video
communications, including audio, to enable users to share information
of the user's choosing.'' In CG Docket No. 23-161, the Commission
considers rules and policies for the adoption of usability and
accessibility requirements for IVCS and the integration of IVCS with
telecommunications relay services (TRS). The Commission takes these
steps to ensure that IVCS are accessible to and usable by persons with
disabilities and that users of TRS are able to participate in video
conferencing services in a functionally equivalent manner to persons
without hearing and speech disabilities. In doing so, the Commission
balances several different factors including regulating IVCS,
encouraging the use of advanced technology, not discouraging or
impairing the development of improved technology, and ensuring IVCS are
accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report and Order.................... 08/01/23 88 FR 50053
NPRM................................ 08/07/23 88 FR 52088
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/06/23
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 10/06/23
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ike Ofobike, Attorney Advisor, Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1028, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL66
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Economics
Long-Term Actions
274. Development of Nationwide Broadband Data To Evaluate Reasonable
and Timely Deployment of Advanced Services to All Americans [3060-AJ15]
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 251; 47 U.S.C. 252; 47 U.S.C. 257; 47
U.S.C. 271; 47 U.S.C. 1302; 47 U.S.C. 160(b); 47 U.S.C. 161(a)(2)
Abstract: The 09/09/2022 Order ended the collection of broadband
deployment data through Form 477. Broadband and voice subscribership
data will continue to be submitted through Form 477. Beginning with
data as of December 31, 2022, and beyond, Form 477 subscribership data
is submitted in the Broadband Data Collection (BDC) filing system. The
Form 477 filing system remains open for filers to submit and make
corrections to filings through June 30, 2022.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/16/07 72 FR 27519
Order............................... 07/02/08 73 FR 37861
Order............................... 10/15/08 73 FR 60997
NPRM................................ 02/08/11 76 FR 10827
Order............................... 06/27/13 78 FR 49126
NPRM................................ 08/24/17 82 FR 40118
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/25/17
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 10/10/17
R&O and FNPRM....................... 08/22/19 84 FR 43764
Order............................... 12/16/22 87 FR 76949
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Suzanne Mendez, Associate Division Chief, OEA,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-0941, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AJ15
275. Expanding the Economic and Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum
Through Incentive Auctions (GN Docket No. 12-268) [3060-AJ82]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(8)(G); 47 U.S.C. 1452
[[Page 66922]]
Abstract: In February 2012, the Middle-Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act was enacted (Pub. L. 112-96, 126 Stat. 156 (2012)). Title
VI of that statute, commonly known as the Spectrum Act, provides the
Commission with the authority to conduct incentive auctions to meet the
growing demand for wireless broadband. Pursuant to the Spectrum Act,
the Commission may conduct incentive auctions that will offer new
initial spectrum licenses subject to flexible-use service rules on
spectrum made available by licensees that voluntarily relinquish some
or all of their spectrum usage rights in exchange for a portion, based
on the value of the relinquished rights as determined by an auction, of
the proceeds of bidding for the new licenses. In addition to granting
the Commission general authority to conduct incentive auctions, the
Spectrum Act requires the Commission to conduct an incentive auction of
broadcast TV spectrum and sets forth special requirements for such an
auction.
The Spectrum Act requires that the BIA consist of a reverse auction
``to determine the amount of compensation that each broadcast
television licensee would accept in return for voluntarily
relinquishing some or all of its spectrum usage rights'' and a forward
auction of licenses in the reallocated spectrum for flexible-use
services, including mobile broadband. Broadcast television licensees
who elected to voluntarily participate in the auction had three bidding
options: go off-the-air, share spectrum with another broadcast
television licensee, or move channels to the upper or lower VHS band in
exchange for receiving part of the proceeds from auctioning that
spectrum to wireless providers. The Spectrum Act also authorized the
Commission to reorganize the 600 MHz band following the BIA including,
as necessary, reassigning full power and Class A television stations to
new channels in order to clear the spectrum sold in the BIA. That post-
auction reorganization (known as the repack) is currently underway and
all of the stations who were assigned new channels are scheduled to
have vacated their pre-auction channels by July 3, 2020, pursuant to a
10-phase transition schedule adopted by the Commission.
In May 2014, the Commission adopted a Report and Order that laid
out the general framework for the BIA. The auction started on March 29,
2016, with the submission of initial commitments by eligible broadcast
licensees. The BIA ended on April 13, 2017, with the release of the
Auction Closing and Channel Reassignment Public Notice that also marked
the start of the 39-month transition period during which 987 of the
full power and Class A television stations remaining on-the-air will
transition their stations to their post-auction channel assignments in
the reorganized television band. Pursuant to the Spectrum Act, the
Commission will reimburse 957 of those full power and Class A stations
for the reasonable costs associated with relocating to their post-
auction channel assignments and will reimburse multichannel video
programming distributors for their costs associated with continuing to
carry the signals of those stations.
In March 2018, the Consolidated Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 115-
141, at Div. E, Title V, 511, 132 Stat. 348 (2018), codified at 47
U.S.C. 1452(j)-(n)) (the Reimbursement Expansion Act or REA), extended
the deadline for reimbursement of eligible entities from April 2020 to
no later than July 3, 2023, and also expanded the universe of entities
eligible for reimbursement to include low-power television stations and
TV translator stations displaced by the BIA for their reasonably
incurred costs to relocate to a new channel, and FM broadcast stations
for their reasonably incurred costs for facilities necessary to
reasonably minimize disruption of service as a result of the post-
auction reorganization of the television band. On March 15, 2019, the
Commission adopted a Report and Order setting rules for the
reimbursement of eligible costs to those newly eligible entities.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 11/21/12 77 FR 69933
R&O................................. 08/15/14 79 FR 48441
Final Rule.......................... 10/11/17 82 FR 47155
NPRM................................ 08/27/18 83 FR 43613
R&O................................. 03/26/19 84 FR 11233
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jean L. Kiddoo, Chair, Broadband Data Task Force,
OEA, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-7757, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AJ82
276. Broadband Data Collection [3060-AL42]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 to 154; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C.
201; 47 U.S.C. 254; 47 U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47
U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47 U.S.C. 641 to 646
Abstract: The Commission has long recognized that precise, granular
data on the availability of fixed and mobile broadband are vital to
bringing digital opportunity to all Americans, no matter where they
live, work, or travel.
On March 23, 2020, the Broadband Deployment Accuracy and
Technological Availability Act (Broadband DATA Act) was signed into law
requiring the Commission to create a new set of broadband availability
maps. Among other things, the Broadband DATA Act requires the
Commission to collect standardized, granular data on the availability
and quality of both fixed and mobile broadband internet access
services, to create a common dataset of all locations where fixed
broadband internet access service can be installed (the Broadband
Serviceable Location Fabric or Fabric), and to create publicly
available coverage maps. The Act further requires the Commission to
establish processes for members of the public and other entities to (1)
provide verified data for use in the coverage maps; (2) challenge the
coverage maps, the broadband availability data submitted by broadband
internet access service providers (providers), and the Fabric; and (3)
submit specific crowdsource information about the development and
availability of broadband service.
In July 2020, implementing the Broadband DATA Act and building off
of an August 2019 Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
the Commission adopted a Second Report and Order and Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that adopted rules for the collection and
verification of improved, more precise data on both fixed broadband
availability. In January 2021, the Commission released a Third Report
and Order that established new requirements for the BDC and took
additional steps to implement the Broadband DATA Act. The rules to
specify which fixed and mobile providers are required to report
broadband availability data and expanded the reporting and
certification requirements for filing data in the BDC. It also adopted
standards for collecting verified broadband data from state, local, and
Tribal governmental entities and certain third parties, and for
identifying locations that would be included in the Fabric.
Importantly, in the Third Report and Order, the Commission also
established processes for verifying the accuracy of provider-submitted
data and the Fabric, including challenge processes which invite input
from the public and other stakeholders in order to improve the accuracy
of the maps.
[[Page 66923]]
Implementing the Broadband DATA Act and these new rules, the
Commission created a new data platform and system to collect and map
availability data collected from over 2,500 providers and for consumers
and other stakeholders to submit challenges to that data; established
the Fabric dataset of locations upon which to overlay provider
availability data; and established a dedicated help center to provide
technical assistance to providers, consumers, and other stakeholders.
In July 2021, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB), Office
of Economics and Analytics (OEA), and Office of Engineering and
Technology (OET) released a Public Notice seeking comment on the
technical requirements for the mobile challenge, verification, and
crowdsourcing processes required under the Broadband DATA Act for the
new Broadband Data Collection (BDC). In March 2022, the Broadband Data
Task Force (Task Force), WTB, OEA, and OET released a detailed order,
technical appendix, rules, and technical data specifications setting
forth technical requirements and specifications for the mobile
challenge, verification, and crowdsource processes required by the Act.
To help facilitate the mobile challenge process, in April 2022, the
Task Force and OET issued a Public Notice announcing the technical
requirements and procedures for approving third-party mobile speed test
procedures for use in collecting and submitting mobile network
performance data as part of the BDC. To assist entities that choose to
file mobile challenges in bulk, in September 2022 the Task Force and
WTB established a process for entities to use their own software and
hardware to collect on-the-ground mobile speed test data for use in the
BDC mobile challenge process.
Also in April 2022, the Task Force, WCB, WTB, OEA, and OET released
a Public Notice providing details on the procedures for state, local,
and Tribal governmental entities to submit verified availability data
through the BDC system.
To clarify the Commission's rules for filing data in the BDC, in
July 2022, WCB, WTB, OEA, and the Taskforce issued a Declaratory Ruling
on certain aspects of a rule regarding the engineering certification in
BDC filings and issued a limited waiver of the requirement that
providers have an engineer certification their biannual BDC filings for
the first three filing cycles of the BDC.
On June 15, 2022, the FCC Enforcement Bureau issued an Enforcement
Advisory reminding all facilities-based providers of their duty to
timely file complete and accurate data in the BDC by September 1, 2022.
In February 2022, the Commission announced that the initial filing
window of the BDC would open on June 30, 2022, and that availability
data as of June 30 were due no later than September 1, 2022. In
September 2022, the Commission announced that as of September 12, 2022,
state, local, and Tribal governments, service providers, and other
entities may begin to file bulk challenges to location data in the
Fabric.
In November 2022, the Commission released a pre-production draft of
its new National Broadband Map displaying version 1 of the Fabric
overlayed with provider reported availability data as of June 30, 2022.
The new map was the most comprehensive, granular, and standardized data
the Commission had ever published on broadband availability.
With the launch of the pre-production draft map, the Commission
began accepting challenges to provider reported availability data, as
well as individual consumer challenges to the location data in the
Fabric. To date, the mapping team has reviewed and processed more than
4 million availability challenges. Most of those challenges have
already been resolved and the majority have led to updates in the data
on the map showing where broadband is available.
The Commission adopted an Order in December 2022, to sunset the
Form 477 broadband deployment data collection and eliminate a largely
duplicative requirement on providers. As a result, providers will no
longer be required to submit Form 477 broadband deployment data, but
must still submit broadband and voice subscription data using the FCC
Form 477. To further streamline the FCC's data collection efforts the
BDC system allows filers to submit both their BDC data and 477
subscription data as a combined filing using a single interface.
The Commission has long recognized that precise, granular data on
the availability of fixed and mobile broadband are vital to bringing
digital opportunity to all Americans, no matter where they live, work,
or travel.
On March 23, 2020, the Broadband Deployment Accuracy and
Technological Availability Act (Broadband DATA Act) was signed into law
requiring the Commission to create a new set of broadband availability
maps. Among other things, the Broadband DATA Act requires the
Commission to collect standardized, granular data on the availability
and quality of both fixed and mobile broadband internet access
services, to create a common dataset of all locations where fixed
broadband internet access service can be installed (the Broadband
Serviceable Location Fabric or Fabric), and to create publicly
available coverage maps. The Act further requires the Commission to
establish processes for members of the public and other entities to (1)
provide verified data for use in the coverage maps; (2) challenge the
coverage maps, the broadband availability data submitted by broadband
internet access service providers (providers), and the Fabric; and (3)
submit specific crowdsource information about the development and
availability of broadband service.
In July 2020, implementing the Broadband DATA Act and building off
of an August 2019 Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
the Commission adopted a Second Report and Order and Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that adopted rules for the collection and
verification of improved, more precise data on both fixed and mobile
broadband availability. In January 2021, the Commission released a
Third Report and Order that established new requirements for the BDC
and took additional steps to implement the Broadband DATA Act. The
Commission adopted rules to specify which fixed and mobile providers
are required to report broadband availability data and expanded the
reporting and certification requirements for filing data in the BDC. It
also adopted standards for collecting verified broadband data from
state, local, and Tribal governmental entities and certain third
parties, and for identifying locations that would be included in the
Fabric. Importantly, in the Third Report and Order, the Commission also
established processes for verifying the accuracy of provider-submitted
data and the Fabric, including challenge processes which invite input
from the public and other stakeholders in order to improve the accuracy
of the maps.
Implementing the Broadband DATA Act and these new rules, the
Commission created a new data platform and system to collect and map
availability data collected from over 2,500 providers and for consumers
and other stakeholders to submit challenges to that data; established
the Fabric dataset of locations upon which to overlay provider
availability data; and established a dedicated help center to provide
technical assistance to
[[Page 66924]]
providers, consumers and other stakeholders.
In July 2021, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB), Office
of Economics and Analytics (OEA), and Office of Engineering and
Technology (OET) released a Public Notice seeking comment on the
technical requirements for the mobile challenge, verification, and
crowdsourcing processes required under the Broadband DATA Act for the
new Broadband Data Collection (BDC). In March 2022, the Broadband Data
Task Force (Task Force), WTB, OEA, and OET released a detailed order,
technical appendix, rules, and technical data specifications setting
forth technical requirements and specifications for the mobile
challenge, verification, and crowdsource processes required by the Act.
To help facilitate the mobile challenge process, in April 2022, the
Task Force and OET issued a Public Notice announcing the technical
requirements and procedures for approving third-party mobile speed test
procedures for use in collecting and submitting mobile network
performance data as part of the BDC. To assist entities that choose to
file mobile challenges in bulk, in September 2022 the Task Force and
WTB established a process for entities to use their own software and
hardware to collect on-the-ground mobile speed test data for use in the
BDC mobile challenge process.
Also in April 2022, the Task Force, WCB, WTB, OEA, and OET released
a Public Notice providing details on the procedures for state, local,
and Tribal governmental entities to submit verified availability data
through the BDC system.
To clarify the Commission's rules for filing data in the BDC, in
July 2022, WCB, WTB, OEA, and the Taskforce issued a Declaratory Ruling
on certain aspects of a rule regarding the engineering certification in
BDC filings and issued a limited waiver of the requirement that
providers have an engineer certification their biannual BDC filings for
the first three filing cycles of the BDC.
On June 15, 2022, the FCC Enforcement Bureau issued an Enforcement
Advisory reminding all facilities-based providers of their duty to
timely file complete and accurate data in the BDC by September 1, 2022.
In February 2022, the Commission announced that the initial filing
window of the BDC would open on June 30, 2022, and that availability
data as of June 30 were due no later than September 1, 2022. In
September 2022, the Commission announced that as of September 12, 2022,
state, local, and Tribal governments, service providers, and other
entities may begin to file bulk challenges to location data in the
Fabric.
In November 2022, the Commission released a pre-production draft of
its new National Broadband Map displaying version 1 of the Fabric
overlayed with provider reported availability data as of June 30, 2022.
The new map was the most comprehensive, granular, and standardized data
the Commission had ever published on broadband availability.
With the launch of the pre-production draft map, the Commission
began accepting challenges to provider reported availability data, as
well as individual consumer challenges to the location data in the
Fabric. To date, the mapping team has reviewed and processed more than
4 million availability challenges. Most of those challenges have
already been resolved and the majority have led to updates in the data
on the map showing where broadband is available.
The Commission adopted an Order in December 2022, to sunset the
Form 477 broadband deployment data collection and eliminate a largely
duplicative requirement on providers. As a result, providers will no
longer be required to submit Form 477 broadband deployment data, but
must still submit broadband and voice subscription data using the FCC
Form 477. To further streamline the FCC's data collection efforts the
BDC system allows filers to submit both their BDC data and 477
subscription data as a combined filing using a single interface.
The second version of the Fabric was made available to providers
and other stakeholders in December 2022. This updated Fabric contained
a net increase of more than one million new serviceable locations, as
compared to the initial version. It also reflected the outcome of over
1 million location challenges. The second filing window of the BDC
opened on January 3, 2023, and required all fixed and mobile providers
to submit broadband availability data as of December 31, 2022, no later
than March 1, 2023. On May 30, 2023, the National Broadband Map was
updated to reflect availability data as of December 31, 2022, and
version 2 of the Fabric.
On July 3, 2023, the Commission announced the opening of the third
filing window for broadband availability data as of June 30, 2023. The
BDC will continue to collect updated availability data from providers
every 6 months. Updates to the National Broadband Map will be iterative
and ongoing. The challenge processes will also continue on an ongoing
basis in order to allow the public to provide input and help improve
the accuracy of the National Broadband Map.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 08/03/17 82 FR 40118
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/25/17 .......................
Report & Order...................... 08/01/19 84 FR 43705
Second Further Notice of Proposed 08/01/19 84 FR 43764
Rulemaking.
Second Further NPRM Comment Period 10/07/19 .......................
End.
2nd R&O............................. 07/16/20 85 FR 50886
3rd FNPRM........................... 07/16/20 85 FR 50911
3rd R&O............................. 01/13/21 86 FR 18124
Public Notice....................... 07/16/21 86 FR 40398
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 09/27/21 .......................
Order............................... 03/09/22 87 FR 21476
Order............................... 12/16/22 87 FR 76949
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jean L. Kiddoo, Chair, Broadband Data Task Force,
OEA, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-7757, Email: [email protected].
Eduard Bartholme, Senior Outreach Director, Broadband Data Task
Force, OEA, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1463, Email:
[email protected].
Kimia Nikseresht, Legal Advisor, Broadband Data Task Force, OEA,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-1636, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL42
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Office of Engineering and Technology
Long-Term Actions
277. Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands (ET Docket No. 04-
186) [3060-AI52]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 302; 47 U.S.C. 303(e)
and 303(f); 47 U.S.C. 303(r); 47 U.S.C. 307
Abstract: The Commission adopted rules to allow unlicensed radio
transmitters to operate in the broadcast
[[Page 66925]]
television spectrum at locations where that spectrum is not being used
by licensed services. (This unused TV spectrum is often termed ``white
spaces.'') This action will make a significant amount of spectrum
available for new and innovative products and services, including
broadband data and other services for businesses and consumers. The
actions taken are a conservative first step that includes many
safeguards to prevent harmful interference to incumbent communications
services. Moreover, the Commission will closely oversee the development
and introduction of these devices to the market and will take whatever
actions may be necessary to avoid and, if necessary, correct any
interference that may occur. The Second Memorandum Opinion and Order
finalizes rules to make the unused spectrum in the TV bands available
for unlicensed broadband wireless devices. This particular spectrum has
excellent propagation characteristics that allow signals to reach
farther and penetrate walls and other structures. Access to this
spectrum could enable more powerful public internet connections--super
Wi-Fi hot spots--with extended range, fewer dead spots, and improved
individual speeds as a result of reduced congestion on existing
networks. This type of ``opportunistic use'' of spectrum has great
potential for enabling access to other spectrum bands and improving
spectrum efficiency. The Commission's actions here are expected to spur
investment and innovation in applications and devices that will be used
not only in the TV band, but eventually in other frequency bands as
well. This Order addressed five petitions for reconsideration of the
Commission's decisions in the Second Memorandum Opinion and Order
(``Second MO&O'') in these proceeding and modified rules in certain
respects. In particular, the Commission: (1) increased the maximum
height above average terrain (HAAT) for sites where fixed devices may
operate; (2) modified the adjacent channel emission limits to specify
fixed rather than relative levels; and (3) slightly increased the
maximum permissible power spectral density (PSD) for each category of
TV bands device. These changes will result in decreased operating costs
for fixed TVBDs and allow them to provide greater coverage, thus
increasing the availability of wireless broadband services in rural and
underserved areas without increasing the risk of interference to
incumbent services. The Commission also revised and amended several of
its rules to better effectuate the Commission's earlier decisions in
this docket and to remove ambiguities.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/18/04 69 FR 34103
First R&O........................... 11/17/06 71 FR 66876
FNPRM............................... 11/17/06 71 FR 66897
R&O and MO&O........................ 02/17/09 74 FR 7314
Petitions for Reconsideration....... 04/13/09 74 FR 16870
Second MO&O......................... 12/06/10 75 FR 75814
Petitions for Reconsideration....... 02/09/11 76 FR 7208
2 Order on Reconsideration, FNPRM, 05/17/12 77 FR 29236
and Order.
FNPRM--Proposed Rule................ 06/01/22 87 FR 33109
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Hugh Van Tuyl, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-7506, Fax: 202 418-1944, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AI52
278. Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band; (ET Docket No. 19-138), FCC 19-
129 [3060-AK96]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 1; 47 U.S.C. 4(i); 47 U.S.C. 301; 47
U.S.C. 302; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 316; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47 CFR 1.411
Abstract: In this proceeding, we repurpose 45 megahertz of the
5.850-5.925 GHz band (the 5.9 GHz band) to allow for the expansion of
unlicensed mid-band spectrum operations, while continuing to dedicate
30 megahertz of spectrum for vital intelligent transportation system
(ITS) operations. In addition, to promote the most efficient and
effective use of this ITS spectrum, we are requiring the ITS service to
use cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) based technology at the end
of a transition period. By splitting the 5.9 GHz band between
unlicensed and ITS uses, today's decision puts the 5.9 GHz band in the
best position to serve the needs of the American public.
In the Further Notice, the Commission addresses issues remaining to
finalize the restructuring of the 5.9 GHz band. Specifically, the
Commission addresses: The transition of ITS operations in the 5.895-
5.925 GHz band from Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) based
technology to Cellular Vehicle-to-Everything (C-V2X) based technology;
the codification of C-V2X technical parameters in the Commission's
rules; other transition considerations; and the transmitter power and
emissions limits, and other issues, related to full-power outdoor
unlicensed operations across the entire 5.850-5.895 GHz portion of the
5.9 GHz band. The Commission modified the Further Notice released on
November 20, 2020, with an Erratum released on December 11, 2020. The
Commission released a Second Erratum on February 9, 2021. The
corrections from these errata are included in this document.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/06/20 85 FR 6841
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/09/20 .......................
FNPRM............................... 05/03/21 86 FR 23323
R&O & Order of Proposed Modification 05/03/21 86 FR 23281
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Howard Griboff, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-0657, Fax: 202 418-2824, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK96
279. Unlicensed White Space Device Operations in the Television Bands,
ET Docket No. 20-36 [3060-AL22]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C.154(i); 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 302a; 47
U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 1.407 and 1.411
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission revises its rules to
provide additional opportunities for unlicensed white space devices
operating in the broadcast television bands (TV bands) to deliver
wireless broadband services in rural areas and applications associated
with the Internet of Things (IoT). This region of the spectrum has
excellent propagation characteristics that make it particularly
attractive for delivering communications services over long distances,
coping with variations in terrain, as well as providing coverage into
and within buildings. We offer several proposals to spur continued
growth of the white space device ecosystem, especially for providing
affordable broadband service to rural and underserved communities that
can help close the digital divide.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/03/20 85 FR 18901
[[Page 66926]]
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/03/20 .......................
Report & Order...................... 01/12/21 86 FR 2278
R&O--Final Rule..................... 01/12/21 86 FR 2278
FNPRM--Proposed Rule................ 02/25/21 86 FR 11490
2nd Order on Recon, FNPRM, and Order 06/01/22 87 FR 33109
Order of Reconsideration, R&O, MO&O-- 05/22/23 88 FR 32682
Final Rule.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Hugh Van Tuyl, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-7506, Fax: 202 418-1944, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL22
280. Protecting Against National Security Threats to the Communications
Supply Chain Through the Equipment Authorization and Competitive
Bidding Programs; ET Docket No. 21-232, EA Docket No. 21-233 [3060-
AL23]
Legal Authority: secs. 4(i), 301, 302, 303, 309(j), 312, and 316 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. secs. 154(i),
301, 302a, 303, 309(j), 312, 316, and sec. 1.411
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission proposes prohibiting
the authorization of any communications equipment on the list of
equipment and services (Covered List) that the Commission maintains
pursuant to the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019.
Such equipment has been found to pose an unacceptable risk to the
national security of the United States or the security and safety of
United States persons. We also seek comment on whether and under what
circumstances we should revoke any existing authorizations of such
covered communications equipment. We invite comment on whether we
should require additional certifications relating to national security
from applicants who wish to participate in Commission auctions. In the
Notice of Inquiry, we seek comment on other actions the Commission
should consider taking to create incentives in its equipment
authorization processes for improved trust through the adoption of
cybersecurity best practices in consumer devices.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM and NOI........................ 08/19/21 86 FR 46644
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/20/21 .......................
Report & Order and FNPRM............ 11/25/22 .......................
FNPRM--Proposed Rule................ 03/08/23 88 FR 14312
Report & Order--Final Rule.......... 02/06/23 88 FR 7592
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jamie Coleman, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-2705, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL23
281. Wireless Microphones in the TV Bands (ET Docket No. 21-115), 600
MHz Guard Band, 600 MHz Duplex Gap, and the 941.5-944 MHz, 944-952 MHz,
952.850-956.250 MHz, 956.45-959.85 MHz, 1435-1525 MHz [3060-AL27]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. secs. 154(i), 201, 302a, 303, and secs.
1.407 and 1.411
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks to enhance the
spectral efficiency of wireless microphones by permitting a recently
developed type of wireless microphone system, termed herein as a
Wireless Multi-Channel Audio System (WMAS), to operate in certain
frequency bands. This emerging technology would enable more wireless
microphones to operate in the spectrum available for wireless
microphone operations, and thus advances an important Commission goal
of promoting efficient spectrum use. The Commission proposes to revise
the applicable technical rules for operation of low-power auxiliary
station (LPAS) devices to permit WMAS to operate in the broadcast
television (TV) bands and other LPAS frequency bands on a licensed
basis. The Commission also proposes to update the existing LPAS and
wireless microphone rules to reflect the end of the post-Incentive
auction transition period and update references to international
wireless microphone standards.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 07/01/21 86 FR 35046
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/02/21
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Hugh Van Tuyl, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-7506, Fax: 202 418-1944, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL27
282. FCC Seeks To Enable State-of-the-Art Radar Sensors in 60 GHz Band
(ET Docket No. 21-264) [3060-AL36]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 201, 302a, 303, and secs. 1.407
and 1.411
Abstract: In this preceding, the Commission proposes to revise the
Commission's rules to provide expanded operational flexibility to
unlicensed field disturbance sensor (FDS) devices (e.g., radars) that
operate in the 57-64 GHz band (60 GHz band). The Commission's proposal
recognizes the increasing practicality of using mobile radar devices in
the 60 GHz band to perform innovative and life-saving functions,
including gesture control, detection of unattended children in
vehicles, and monitoring of vulnerable medical patients, and it is
designed to stimulate the development of new products and services in a
wide variety of areas to include, for example, personal safety,
autonomous vehicles, home automation, environmental control, and
healthcare monitoring, while also ensuring coexistence among unlicensed
FDS devices and current and future unlicensed communications devices in
the 60 GHz band.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 08/19/21 86 FR 46661
NPRM Comment Period End............. 10/18/21
Report and Order--Final Rule........ 07/24/23 88 FR 47384
2nd Report and Order--Final Rule.... 08/23/23 88 FR 47384
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Anh Wride, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554,
[[Page 66927]]
Phone: 202 418-0577, Fax: 202 418-1944, Email: [email protected].
Thomas Struble, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2470, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL36
283. FCC Proposes To Update Equipment Authorization Rules To
Incorporate New and Revised Industry Standards, (ET Docket No. 21-363)
[3060-AL39]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 301, 302a, 303, and secs. 1.407
and 1.411
Abstract: We propose targeted updates to our rules to incorporate
four new and updated standards that are integral to the testing of
equipment and accreditation of laboratories that test RF devices.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/17/22 87 FR 15180
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/16/22
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brian Butler, Engineer, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2702,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL39
284. Allocation of Spectrum for Non-Federal Space Launch Operations (ET
Docket No. 13-115) [3060-AL44]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 155(c), 301, 303(c),
303(f), and 303(r)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Federal Communications Commission
(Commission) takes steps towards establishing a spectrum allocation and
licensing framework that will provide regulatory certainty and improved
efficiency and that will promote innovation and investment in the
United States commercial space launch industry. In the Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission seeks comment on the definition
of space launch operations, the potential allocation of spectrum for
the commercial space launch industry, including the 420-430 MHz, 2025-
2110 MHz, and 5650-5925 MHz bands. In addition, the Commission seeks
comment on establishing service rules, including licensing and
technical rules and coordination procedures, for the use of spectrum
for commercial space launch operations. Finally, the Commission seeks
to refresh the record on potential ways to facilitate Federal use of
commercial satellite services in what are currently non-Federal
satellite bands and enable more robust federal use of the 399.9-400.05
MHz band.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM and NOI........................ 07/01/13 78 FR 39200
FNPRM--Proposed Rule................ 06/10/21 86 FR 30860
Report & Order--Final Rule.......... 06/28/21 86 FR 33902
Order on Recon., R&O, MO&O, and 06/21/23 88 FR 32682
Final Rule.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Nicholas Oros, Supervisory Attorney Advisor,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-0636, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL44
285. FCC Implements and Proposes Final Acts of the WRC-19 and
WRC-15, ET Docket No. 21-120 & 21-121, and RM-11785 [3060-AL77]
Legal Authority: Part 2--47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 302a and 303; 47
U.S.C. 336
Abstract: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission
(Commission) makes non-substantive, editorial revisions to the
Commission's Table of Frequency Allocations (Allocation Table),
primarily to reflect decisions from the Final Acts of the World
Radiocommunication Conference 2019 (WRC19 Final Acts). The purpose of
this administrative action is to revise the Allocation Table by
updating the International Table of Frequency Allocations
(International Table) portion of the Allocation Table to reflect the
International Telecommunication Union's (ITU's) Table of Frequency
Allocations in its Radio Regulations (Edition of 2020) (Radio
Regulations), and by making updates and corrections in the United
States Table of Frequency Allocations (U.S. Table) portion of the
Allocation Table. The Commission also proposes implementation of
certain allocation decisions from the Final Acts of the World
Radiocommunication Conference 2015 (WRC15 Final Acts) concerning
portions of the radio spectrum between 5330.5 kHz and 29.5 GHz, other
spectrum allocation changes, and related updates to the Commission's
service rules.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 09/29/23 88 FR 67160
NPRM Comment Period End............. 12/28/23 88 FR 73810
Final Action........................ 09/28/23 88 FR 67514
Final Action Effective.............. 10/30/23
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Patrick Forster, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-7061, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL77
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Media Bureau
Long-Term Actions
286. Revision of EEO Rules and Policies (MB Docket No. 98-204) [3060-
AH95]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 257; 47
U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 to 309; 47 U.S.C. 334; 47
U.S.C. 403; 47 U.S.C. 554
Abstract: FCC authority to govern Equal Employment Opportunity
(EEO) responsibilities of cable television operators was codified in
the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984. This authority was
extended to television broadcast licensees and other multi-channel
video programming distributors (MVPDs) in the Cable and Television
Consumer Protection Act of 1992. In the Second Report and Order, the
FCC adopted new EEO rules and policies. This action was in response to
a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit that found prior EEO rules unconstitutional. In 2004, the Third
Report and Order adopted revised forms for broadcast station and MVPD
Annual Employment Reports. The Fourth Report and Order reinstated the
collection of workforce composition data for television and radio
broadcasters. The Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking sought
to refresh the record on the collection of workforce composition data
for MVPDs.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/14/02 67 FR 1704
[[Page 66928]]
Second R&O and Third NPRM........... 01/07/03 68 FR 670
Correction.......................... 01/13/03 68 FR 1657
Fourth NPRM......................... 06/23/04 69 FR 34986
Third R&O........................... 06/23/04 69 FR 34950
FNPRM............................... 08/31/21 86 FR 48610
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/30/21
Fourth Report and Order, Order of 02/22/24
Recon., and 2nd FNPRM.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar, Chief, Industry Analysis
Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street
NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1523, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AH95
287. Establishment of Rules for Digital Low-Power Television,
Television Translator, and Television Booster Stations (MB Docket No.
03-185) [3060-AI38]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 336
Abstract: This proceeding initiated the digital television
conversion for low-power television (LPTV) and television translator
stations. The rules and policies adopted as a result of this proceeding
provide the framework for these stations' conversion from analog to
digital broadcasting. The revised rules reflect an effort to simplify,
streamline, and modernize existing rules and procedures that will
enable stations to comply with licensing requirements more easily
through familiar and low-cost measures.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 09/26/03 68 FR 55566
NPRM Comment Period End............. 11/25/03
R&O................................. 11/29/04 69 FR 69325
FNPRM and MO&O...................... 10/18/10 75 FR 63766
2nd R&O............................. 07/07/11 76 FR 44821
3rd NPRM............................ 11/28/14 79 FR 70824
NPRM Comment Period End............. 12/29/14
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 01/12/15
3rd R&O............................. 02/01/16 81 FR 5041
4th NPRM............................ 02/01/16 81 FR 5086
Comment Period End.................. 02/22/16
NPRM................................ 12/23/19 84 FR 70489
5th NPRM............................ 06/17/22 87 FR 36440
Report and Order.................... 05/12/23 88 FR 30654
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Shaun Maher, Attorney, Video Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 45 L. Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2324, Fax: 202 418-2827, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AI38
288. Authorizing Permissive Use of the ``Next Generation'' Broadcast
Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142) [3060-AK56]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47
U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 to 309; 47 U.S.C. 316; 47
U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 325(b); 47 U.S.C. 336; 47 U.S.C. 399(b); 47
U.S.C. 403; 47 U.S.C. 534; 47 U.S.C. 535
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks to authorize
television broadcasters to use the ``Next Generation'' ATSC 3.0
broadcast television transmission standard on a voluntary, market-
driven basis, while they continue to deliver current-generation digital
television broadcast service to their viewers. In the Report and Order,
the Commission adopted rules to afford broadcasters flexibility to
deploy ATSC 3.0-based transmissions, while minimizing the impact on,
and costs to, consumers and other industry stakeholders.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/10/17 82 FR 13285
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/09/17
FNPRM............................... 12/20/17 82 FR 60350
R&O................................. 02/02/18 83 FR 4998
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 02/20/18
FNPRM Reply Comment Period End...... 03/20/18
NPRM................................ 05/13/20 85 FR 28586
2nd R&O Order on Recon.............. 07/17/20 85 FR 43478
Report & Order...................... 04/22/21 86 FR 21217
FNPRM............................... 12/13/21 86 FR 70793
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 02/11/22
3rd FNPRM........................... 07/07/22 87 FR 40464
3rd R&O............................. 07/17/23 88 FR 45347
4th FNPRM........................... 07/17/23 88 FR 45378
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ty Bream, Attorney Advisor, Industry Analysis Div.,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-0644, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK56
289. 2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review of the Commission's Broadcast
Ownership Rules (MB Docket 18-349) [3060-AK77]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 152(a); 47 U.S.C. 154(i);
47 U.S.C. 257; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C. 309 and 310; 47
U.S.C. 403; sec. 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act
Abstract: Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996
requires the Commission to review its broadcast ownership rules every 4
years and to determine whether any such rules are necessary in the
public interest as the result of competition. The rules subject to
review in the 2018 quadrennial review are the Local Radio Ownership
Rule, the Local Television Ownership Rule, and the Dual Network Rule.
Based on a careful review of the record, the Commission found that the
existing rules, with some minor modifications, remain necessary in the
public interest.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/28/19 84 FR 6741
Report and Order.................... 02/15/24 89 FR 12196
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar, Chief, Industry Analysis
Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street
NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1523, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK77
290. Equal Employment Opportunity Enforcement (MB Docket 19-177) [3060-
AK86]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 154(j);
47 U.S.C. 334; 47 U.S.C. 554
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks comment on ways
in which it can make improvements to equal employment opportunity (EEO)
compliance and enforcement.
Timetable:
[[Page 66929]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 07/22/19 84 FR 35063
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar, Chief, IAD, Media Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-1523, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK86
291. Duplication of Programming on Commonly Owned Radio Stations (MB
Docket No. 19-310) [3060-AL19]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j) and
303(r); 47 U.S.C. 303(r)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission eliminated the radio
duplication rule. The rule bars same-service (AM or FM) commercial
radio stations from duplicating more than 25% of their total hours of
programming in an average broadcast week if the stations have 50% or
more contours overlap and are commonly owned or subject to a time
brokerage agreement. Petitions for reconsideration are pending.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 12/23/19 84 FR 70485
Report & Order...................... 10/22/20 85 FR 67303
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar, Chief, Industry Analysis
Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street
NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1523, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL19
292. Sponsorship Identification Requirements for Foreign Government-
Provided Programming (MB Docket No. 20-299) [3060-AL20]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and 154; 47 U.S.C. 155; 47 U.S.C.
301 and 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 and 309 ; 47 U.S.C. 310; 47 U.S.C. 334; 47
U.S.C. 336 and 339
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission modifies its rules to
require specific disclosure requirements for broadcast programming that
is paid for, or provided by a foreign government or its representative.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 11/24/20 85 FR 74955
R&O................................. 06/17/21 86 FR 32221
Second NPRM......................... 11/17/22 87 FR 68960
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Radhika Karmarkar, Chief, IAD, Media Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-1523, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL20
293. FM Broadcast Booster Stations (MB Docket No. 20-401) [3060-AL21]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154 and 157; 47 U.S.C.
301 to 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 to 309; 47 U.S.C. 316 and 319; 47 U.S.C. 324
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks comment on a
proposal to amend its rules to enable FM broadcasters to use FM booster
stations to air geo-targeted content (e.g., news, weather, and
advertisements) independent of the signals of its primary station
within different portions of the primary station's protected service
contour for a limited period of time during the broadcast hour.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/11/21 86 FR 1909
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Al Shuldiner, Division Chief, Audio Div., Media
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2700, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL21
294. Amendment of Part 73 Rules To Update Television and Class A
Television Broadcast Station Rules, and Rules Applicable to All
Broadcast Stations (MB Docket No. 22-227) [3060-AL50]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and 154; 47 U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47
U.S.C. 307 to 308; 47 U.S.C. 309 to 310; 47 U.S.C. 316 and 319; 47
U.S.C. 336
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks to adopt
revisions to rules in part 0, part 27, subparts E, H, I, J, and L of
part 73, and certain parts of parts 74 and 90 in light of the fact that
all television services have ceased analog operations. The Commission
proposes to amend section headings and language in rules to remove
references to DTV, digital, and analog television service, as these
distinctions are no longer necessary. The Commission also propose to
delete outdated rules that are no longer valid given changes in
Commission-adopted policy. The Commission also proposes other non-
substantive, technical revisions. The Commission also proposes to
update rules to reference the current designation for form numbers
(e.g., FCC Form 2100) and by requiring electronic filing in the
Commission's Licensing and Management System. The Commission also
propose to make corrections or updates, inter alia, to section
headings, spelling, contact information, and rule cross-references, or
to language inadvertently omitted from a rule.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/09/23 88 FR 8636
Report and Order.................... 02/01/24 89 FR 7224
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Emily Harrison, Attorney Advisor, Media Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-1665, Email: [email protected].
Joyce Bernstein, Attorney Advisor, Media Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-1647, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL50
295. Implementation of the Low Power Protection Act, MB Docket No. 23-
126 [3060-AL63]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and 152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and
154(j); 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 and 309; 47 U.S.C. 311 and 336(f)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks to implement the
Low Power Protection Act (LPPA) consistent with Congressional
direction. The LPPA provides certain low power television stations with
an opportunity to apply for primary spectrum use status as Class A
television stations. In the Report and Order, the Commission
established the Class A eligibility requirements and the process for
submitting applications.
Timetable:
[[Page 66930]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/14/23 88 FR 2980
Report and Order.................... 01/10/24 89 FR 1466
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kim Matthews, Attorney, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-2154, Fax: 202 418-2053, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL63
296. Video Description, MB Docket No. 11-43 [3060-AL64]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 613
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks to expand audio
description requirements to additional market areas. The proposed
expansion would help ensure that a greater number of individuals who
are blind or visually impaired can be connected, informed, and
entertained by television programming.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/29/23 88 FR 18505
Report and Order.................... 10/27/23 88 FR 73758
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Diana Sokolow, Attorney, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-2120, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL64
297. 2022 Quadrennial Review of Media Ownership Rules, MB Docket No.
22-459 [3060-AL65]
Legal Authority: 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996
Abstract: Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996
requires the Commission to review its media ownership rules every four
years to determine whether they remain necessary in the public interest
as the result of competition. This proceeding will examine the media
ownership rules in light of the media landscape of 2022 and beyond.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Notice....................... 01/17/23 88 FR 2595
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Ty Bream, Attorney Advisor, Industry Analysis Div.,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-0644, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL65
298. Modifying Rules for FM Terrestrial Digital Audio
Broadcasting Systems, MB Docket No. 22-405 [3060-AL70]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47
U.S.C. 301 and 302(a)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission proposes changes to
the digital audio broadcasting technical rules that would permit
additional FM stations to increase FM hybrid digital effective radiated
power beyond the existing levels without the need for individual
Commission authorization. In addition, the Commission propose to allow
a digital FM station to operate with asymmetric power on the digital
sidebands. These rule changes are intended to improve digital FM signal
quality and minimize the effect of the digital FM station signal on
adjacent channel FM transmissions.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 08/22/23 88 FR 57033
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Al Shuldiner, Division Chief, Audio Div., Media
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2700, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL70
299. Customer Rebates for Undelivered Video Programming During
Blackouts, MB Docket No. 24-20 [3060-AL71]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47
U.S.C. 303 and 335(a)
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks comment on
whether to require cable operators and direct broadcast satellite (DBS)
providers to give their subscribers rebates when those subscribers are
deprived of video programming they expect to receive during programming
blackouts that result from failed retransmission consent negotiations
or failed non-broadcast carriage negotiations. In the event that such a
requirement is adopted, the Commission seeks comment below on how to
apply the rule, and whether to specify the method that cable operators
and DBS providers use to offer the rebates and if so, how they should
issue rebates. The Commission also seeks comment on its our authority
to adopt a rebate rule. The Commission also invites comment on any
other proposals to ensure that subscribers are made whole when they
lose access to programming that they expected to receive in exchange
for paying a monthly subscription fee when they signed up for service.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/07/24 89 FR 8385
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brendan Murray, Deputy Division Chief, Policy
Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street
NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1573, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL71
300. Priority Application Review for Broadcast Stations That
Provide Local Journalism or Other Locally Originated Programming, MB
Docket No. 24-14 [3060-AL72]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 ; 47 U.S.C. 152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i)
and 154(j); 47 U.S.C. 303
Abstract: This proceeding addresses certain billing practices of
cable and direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service providers that
penalize subscribers for terminating video service or switching video
service providers. Comment is sought on proposals to protect consumers
and promote competition in the video programming marketplace. The
proposed customer service protection rules include prohibiting cable
operators and DBS service providers from imposing early termination
fees and billing cycle fees on subscribers.
Timetable:
[[Page 66931]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/05/24 89 FR 740
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Katie Costello, Policy Division, Media Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2233, Fax: 202 418-1069, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL72
301. Cable Operator and DBS Provider Billing Practices, MB
Docket No. 23-405 [3060-AL73]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) ; 47 U.S.C. 303(v)
and 335(a); 47 U.S.C. 552(b)
Abstract: This proceeding addresses certain billing practices of
cable and direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service providers that
penalize subscribers for terminating video service or switching video
service providers. Comment is sought on proposals to protect consumers
and promote competition in the video programming marketplace. The
proposed customer service protection rules include prohibiting cable
operators and DBS service providers from imposing early termination
fees and billing cycle fees on subscribers.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/05/24 89 FR 740
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Katie Costello, Policy Division, Media Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2233, Fax: 202 418-1069, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL73
302. Reporting Requirements for Commercial Television
Broadcast Station Blackouts, MB Docket No. 23-427 [3060-AL74]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 301 and
303; 47 U.S.C. 307; . . .
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission proposes a reporting
framework for TV station blackouts occurring on video service platforms
offered by cable operators, satellite TV providers, and other
multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs). The proposed
reporting framework would require MVPDs to publicly report to the
Commission the beginning and end of any qualifying blackout of a
commercial broadcast television station, or stations, and disclose
either publicly or confidentially the number of subscribers affected by
the blackout.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/26/24 89 FR 42277
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brooke Olaussen, Policy Division, Media Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-1060, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL74
303. All-In Pricing for Cable and Satellite Television
Service, MB Docket No. 23-203 [3060-AL75]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 303 and
316; 47 U.S.C. 335(a); . . .
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission proposes to require
cable operators and direct broadcast satellite providers to specify the
all-in price for video programming as a prominent single line item on
subscribers' bills and in promotional materials that state a price.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/30/23 88 FR 42277
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brendan Murray, Deputy Division Chief, Policy
Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street
NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1573, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL75
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Office of Managing Director
Long-Term Actions
304. Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees [3060-AK64]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 159
Abstract: Section 9 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
(47 U.S.C. 159), requires the Federal Communications Commission to
recover the cost of its activities by assessing and collecting annual
regulatory fees from beneficiaries of the activities.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/06/17 82 FR 26019
R&O................................. 09/22/17 82 FR 44322
NPRM................................ 06/14/18 83 FR 27846
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/21/18 .......................
R&O................................. 09/18/18 83 FR 47079
NPRM................................ 06/05/19 84 FR 26234
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/07/19 .......................
R&O................................. 09/26/19 84 FR 50890
NPRM................................ 05/08/20 85 FR 32256
R&O................................. 06/22/20 85 FR 37364
NPRM................................ 05/13/21 86 FR 26262
R&O................................. 05/17/21 86 FR 26677
NPRM................................ 09/21/21 86 FR 52429
R&O................................. 09/22/21 86 FR 52742
NPRM Comment Period End............. 10/21/21 .......................
NPRM................................ 06/28/22 87 FR 38588
Report & Order...................... 09/14/22 87 FR 56494
NPRM................................ 06/01/23 88 FR 36154
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/29/23 .......................
Report and Order.................... 09/15/23 88 FR 63694
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Roland Helvajian, Office of the Managing Director,
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-0444, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK64
[[Page 66932]]
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Office of International Affairs
Long-Term Actions
305. Process Reform for Executive Brance Review of Certain FCC
Applications and Petitions Involving Foreign Ownership, IB Docket No.
16-155 [3060-AL12]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(l); 47 U.S.C. 154(j); 47 U.S.C. 214;
47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 310; 47 U.S.C. 413; 47 U.S.C.
34-39; E.O. 10530; 3 U.S.C. 301
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission considers rules and
procedures that streamline and improve the timeliness and transparency
of the process by which the Commission refers certain applications and
petitions for declaratory ruling to the Executive Branch agencies for
assessment of any national security, law enforcement, foreign policy or
trade policy issues related to foreign investment in the applicants and
petitioners. The Commission, in this proceeding, also adopted Standard
Questions that certain applicants with reportable foreign ownership
will be required to answer as part of the Executive Branch review
process of their applications.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/24/16 81 FR 46870
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/02/16 .......................
Public Notice....................... 04/27/20 85 FR 29914
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 09/02/20 .......................
Report & Order...................... 10/01/20 85 FR 76360
Public Notice....................... 12/30/20 85 FR 12312
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 04/19/21 .......................
Secord Report and Order Adopted..... 09/30/21 86 FR 68428
Second R&O Released................. 10/01/21 86 FR 68428
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Arthur T. Lechtman, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1465, Fax: 202 418-0175, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL12
306. Review of International Section 214 Authorizations To
Assess Evolving National Security, Law Enforcement, Foreign Policy, and
Trade Policy Risks, IB Docket No. 23-119, MD Docket No. 23-134 [3060-
AL76]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47 U.S.C. 201 and
214; 47 U.S.C. 218 and 219; 47 U.S.C. 403 and 413
Abstract: By this Notice, the Commission proposes rules that would
require carriers to renew, every 10 years, their international section
214 authority. In the alternative, the Commission seeks comment on
adopting rules that would require all international section 214
authorization holders to periodically update information enabling the
Commission to review the public interest and national security
implications of those authorizations based on that updated information.
Through these proposals, the Commission seeks to ensure that the
Commission is exercising appropriate oversight of international section
214 authorization holders to safeguard U.S. telecommunications
networks.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/01/23 88 FR 50486
NPRM Comment Period End............. 10/02/23 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Gabrielle Kim, Attorney Advisor, Office of
International Affairs, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street
NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0730, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL76
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
Long-Term Actions
307. Wireless E911 Location Accuracy Requirements: PS Docket No. 07-114
[3060-AJ52]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 332
Abstract: This rulemaking is related to the proceedings in which
the FCC previously acted to improve the quality of all emergency
services. Wireless carriers must provide specific automatic location
information in connection with 911 emergency calls to Public Safety
Answering Points (PSAPs). Wireless licensees must satisfy enhanced 911
location accuracy standards at either a county-based or a PSAP-based
geographic level.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/20/07 72 FR 33948
R&O................................. 02/14/08 73 FR 8617
Public Notice....................... 09/25/08 73 FR 55473
FNPRM; NOI.......................... 11/02/10 75 FR 67321
Public Notice....................... 11/18/09 74 FR 59539
2nd R&O............................. 11/18/10 75 FR 70604
Second NPRM......................... 08/04/11 76 FR 47114
Second NPRM Comment Period End...... 11/02/11 .......................
Final Rule.......................... 04/28/11 76 FR 23713
NPRM, 3rd R&O, and 2nd FNPRM........ 09/28/11 76 FR 59916
3rd FNPRM........................... 03/28/14 79 FR 17820
Order Extending Comment Period...... 06/10/14 79 FR 33163
3rd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 07/14/14 .......................
Public Notice (Release Date)........ 11/20/14 .......................
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 12/17/14 .......................
4th R&O............................. 03/04/15 80 FR 11806
Final Rule.......................... 08/03/15 80 FR 45897
Order Granting Waiver............... 07/10/17 .......................
NPRM................................ 09/26/18 83 FR 54180
4th NPRM............................ 03/18/19 84 FR 13211
5th R&O............................. 01/16/20 85 FR 2660
5th NPRM............................ 01/16/20 85 FR 2683
5th NPRM Comment Period End......... 03/16/20 .......................
6th R&O and Order on Recon.......... 08/28/20 85 FR 53234
Order of Reconsideration............ 01/01/21 86 FR 8714
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brenda Boykin, Deputy Chief, Policy & Licensing
Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-2062, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AJ52
308. Improving Outage Reporting for Submarine Cables and Enhancing
Submarine Cable Outage Data; GN Docket No. 15-206 [3060-AK39]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 34 to 39;
47 U.S.C. 301
[[Page 66933]]
Abstract: This proceeding takes steps toward assuring the
reliability and resiliency of submarine cables, a critical piece of the
Nation's communications infrastructure, by proposing to require
submarine cable licensees to report to the Commission when outages
occur and communications are disrupted. The Commission's intent is to
enhance national security and emergency preparedness by these actions.
In December 2019, the Commission adopted an Order on Reconsideration
that modifies the requirement for submarine cable licensees to report
outages to the Commission.
The compliance date for the new mandatory submarine cable outage
reporting rules was October 28, 2021.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM (Release Date)................. 09/18/15 .......................
R&O................................. 06/24/16 81 FR 52354
Petitions for Recon................. 09/08/16 .......................
Petitions for Recon--Public Comment. 10/17/16 81 FR 75368
Order on Recon...................... 12/20/19 84 FR 15733
PRA Approval for new collection..... 03/25/21 .......................
Public Notice re effective date..... 04/28/21 .......................
Compliance Date for New Rules....... 10/28/21 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Scott Cinnamon, Attorney-Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-2319, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK39
309. Amendments to Part 4 of the Commission's Rules Concerning
Disruptions to Communications: (PS Docket No. 15-80, 18-336, 23-5)
[3060-AK40]
Legal Authority: sec. 1, 4(i), 4(j), 4(o), 251(e)(3), 254, 301,
303(b), 303(g), 303(r), 307, 309(a), 309(j); 316, 332, 403, 615a-1, and
615c of Pub. L. 73-416, 4 Stat. 1064, as amended; and sec. 706 of Pub.
L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i)-(j) & (o), 251(e)(3),
254, 301, 303(b), 303(g), 303(r), 307; 309(a), 309(j), 316, 332, 403,
615a-1, 615c, and 1302, unless otherwise noted
Abstract: The 2004 Report and Order (R&O) extended the Commission's
communication disruptions reporting rules to non-wireline carriers and
streamlined reporting through a new electronic template (see docket ET
Docket 04-35). In 2015, this proceeding, PS Docket 15-80, was opened to
amend the original communications disruption reporting rules from 2004
in order to reflect technology transitions observed throughout the
telecommunications sector. The Commission seeks to further study the
possibility to share the reporting database information and access with
State and other Federal entities. In May 2016, the Commission released
a Report and Order, FNPRM, and Order on Reconsideration (see also
Dockets 11-82 and 04-35). The R&O adopted rules to update the part 4
requirements to reflect technology transitions. The FNPRM sought
comment on sharing information in the reporting database. Comments and
replies were received by the Commission in August and September 2016.
In March 2020, the Commission adopted a Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in PS Docket No. 15-80 that proposed a framework to
provide state and federal agencies with access to outage information to
improve their situational awareness while preserving the
confidentiality of this data, including proposals to: provide direct,
read-only access to NORS and DIRS filings to qualified agencies of the
50 states, the District of Columbia, Tribal nations, territories, and
federal government; allow these agencies to share NORS and DIRS
information with other public safety officials that reasonably require
NORS and DIRS information to prepare for and respond to disasters;
allow participating agencies to publicly disclose NORS or DIRS filing
information that is aggregated and anonymized across at least four
service providers; condition a participating agency's direct access to
NORS and DIRS filings on their agreement to treat the filings as
confidential and not disclose them absent a finding by the Commission
that allows them to do so; and establish an application process that
would grant agencies access to NORS and DIRS after those agencies
certify to certain requirements related to maintaining confidentiality
of the data and the security of the databases. In March 2021, the
Commission adopted the proposed information sharing framework with some
modifications in a Second Report and Order. In April 2021, in a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission proposed to codify a rule
adopted in 2016 that exempts satellite and terrestrial wireless
providers from reporting outages that potentially affect special
offices and facilities, as defined in Commission rules. This proceeding
addresses the Commission's efforts to improve the utility of its
efforts to track network outages and disruptions and does not promote
the administration's specified priorities.
In May 2021, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
filed a Petition for Reconsideration (PFR) requesting that the
Commission reconsider its decision in the Second Report and Order to
maintain the presumption of confidentiality applied to NORS and DIRS
filings. The Commission sought comment on the PFR's requests.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM, 2nd R&O, Order on Recon....... 06/16/15 80 FR 34321
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/31/15 .......................
R&O................................. 07/12/16 81 FR 45055
FNPRM, 1 Part 4 R&O, Order on Recon. 08/11/16 81 FR 45059
Order Denying Reply Comment Deadline 09/08/16 .......................
Extension Request.
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/12/16 .......................
Announcement of Effective Date for 06/22/17 82 FR 28410
Rule Changes in R&O.
Announcement of Effective Date for 06/22/17 82 FR 28410
Rule Changes in R&O.
Second Further NPRM................. 02/28/20 85 FR 17818
Second Further NPRM Comment Period 06/01/20 .......................
End.
2nd R&O............................. 04/29/21 86 FR 22796
3rd NPRM............................ 06/30/21 86 FR 34679
CPUC PFR Comment Period End......... 08/23/21 86 FR 40801
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Logan Bennett, Attorney Advisor, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-7790, Email:
[email protected].
Saswat Misra, Attorney-Advisor, Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau, Federal Communications
[[Page 66934]]
Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0944,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK40
310. New Part 4 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Disruptions to
Communications; ET Docket No. 04-35 [3060-AK41]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154 and 155; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C.
251; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: The proceeding creates a new part 4 in title 47 and
amends part 63.100. The proceeding updates the Commission's
communication disruptions reporting rules for wireline providers
formerly in 47 CFR 63.100 and extends these rules to other non-wireline
providers. Through this proceeding, the Commission streamlines the
reporting process through an electronic template. The Report and Order
received several petitions for reconsideration, of which two were
eventually withdrawn. In 2015, seven were addressed in an Order on
Reconsideration and in 2016 another petition was addressed in an Order
on Reconsideration. One petition (CPUC Petition) remains pending
regarding NORS database sharing with States, which is addressed in a
separate proceeding, PS Docket 15-80. To the extent the communication
disruption rules cover VoIP, the Commission studies and addresses these
questions in a separate docket, PS Docket 11-82.
In May 2016, the Commission released a Report and Order, FNPRM, and
Order on Reconsideration (see Dockets 11-82 and 15-80). The Order on
Reconsideration addressed outage reporting for events at airports, and
the FNPRM sought comment on database sharing. The Commission received
comments and replies in August and September 2016.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/26/04 69 FR 15761
R&O................................. 11/26/04 69 FR 68859
Denial for Petition for Partial Stay 12/02/04 .......................
Seek Comment on Petition for Recon.. 02/02/10 .......................
Reply Period End.................... 03/19/10 .......................
Seek Comment on Broadband and 07/02/10 .......................
Interconnected VOIP Service
Providers.
Reply Period End.................... 08/16/12 .......................
2nd R&O, and Order on Recon, NPRM... 06/16/15 80 FR 34321
R&O................................. 07/12/16 81 FR 45055
FNPRM, 1 Part 4 R&O, Order on Recon. 08/11/16 81 FR 45095, 81 FR
45055
Order Denying Extension of Time to 09/08/16 .......................
File Reply Comments.
Announcement of Effective Date for 06/22/17 82 FR 28410
Rule Changes in R&O.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Logan Bennett, Attorney Advisor, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-7790, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK41
311. Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA): PS Docket No. 15-91, 15-94, 22-
329 [3060-AK54]
Legal Authority: Pub. L. 109-347, title VI; 47 U.S.C. 151; 47
U.S.C. 154(i)
Abstract: This proceeding was initiated to improve Wireless
Emergency Alerts (WEA) messaging, ensure that WEA alerts reach only
those individuals to whom they are relevant, and establish an end-to-
end testing program based on advancements in technology.
In April 2023, the Commission released an FNPRM seeking comment on
proposals to make WEA alerts understandable to people with disabilities
and people with native languages other than English and Spanish,
communities that would otherwise be underserved by WEA.
In October 2023, the Commission adopted a Report and Order adopting
some of the proposals from the April FNPRM. Proposals adopted include
making WEA multilingual, including location-aware maps with alerting,
permitting two live WEA tests per county or county equivalent per year,
and creating a publicly available WEA Database which will include
information about where WEA is and is not available and by what
providers.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 11/19/15 80 FR 77289
NPRM Comment Period End............. 01/13/16 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 02/12/16 .......................
Order............................... 12/08/16 81 FR 75710
FNPRM............................... 09/29/16 81 FR 78539
Comment Period End.................. 12/08/16 .......................
Petition for Recon.................. 12/19/16 81 FR 91899
Order on Recon...................... 02/04/17 82 FR 57158
2nd R&O and 2nd Order on Recon...... 02/28/18 83 FR 8619
Public Notice....................... 04/26/18 83 FR 18257
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 05/29/18 .......................
Public Notice Reply Comment Period 06/11/18 .......................
End.
Report and Order and FNPRM.......... 06/17/21 86 FR 46783
FNPRM............................... 04/21/22 87 FR 30857
FNPRM............................... 11/23/22 87 FR 71539
FNPRM............................... 06/21/23 88 FR 40606
Report and Order.................... 12/15/23 88 FR 86824
Correction.......................... 01/17/24 89 FR 2885
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Antonino, Attorney Advisor, PSHSB, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-7965, Email: [email protected].
James Wiley, Deputy Division Chief, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1678, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK54
312. 911 Fee Diversion Rulemaking: PS Docket Nos. 20-291, 09-14 [3060-
AL31]
Legal Authority: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. L.
116-260, Division FF, title 1X, sec. 902, Don't Break Up the T-Band Act
of 2020 (sec. 902)
Abstract: In 2020, Congress adopted the ``Don't Break Up the T-Band
Act'' (section 902) to help address the diversion of 911 fees by states
and other jurisdictions for purposes unrelated to 911. Among other
requirements, Congress mandated that the Commission should issue final
rules designating the uses of 911 fees by states and taxing
jurisdictions that constitute 911 fee diversion for purposes of 47
U.S.C. 615a-1, as amended by section 902. The Commission initiated this
proceeding and issued new rules at 47 CFR 9.21-9.26 that: (1) clarify
the purposes and functions for which expenditures of 911 fees are
acceptable and which would be considered
[[Page 66935]]
unacceptable and constitute diversion, with illustrative, non-
exhaustive examples of each; (2) establish a declaratory ruling process
for providing further guidance to states and taxing jurisdictions on
fee diversion issues; and (3) codify the specific obligations and
restrictions that section 902 imposes on states and taxing
jurisdictions, including those that engage in diversion as defined by
the Commission's rules.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Inquiry................... 10/02/20 .......................
NOI Comment Period End.............. 11/02/20 .......................
NOI Reply Comment Period End........ 12/02/20 .......................
NPRM................................ 02/17/21 86 FR 12399
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/23/21 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 04/02/21 86 FR 12399
Report & Order...................... 06/25/21 86 FR 45892
R&O Erratum......................... 08/12/21 86 FR 45892
Petition for Recon.................. 12/22/21 86 FR 72546
Oppositions to Petition for Recon... 01/06/22 .......................
Replies to Oppositions to Petition 01/18/22 .......................
for Recon.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brenda Boykin, Deputy Chief, Policy & Licensing
Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-2062, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL31
313. Resilient Networks, Amendments to Part 4 of the Commission's Rules
Concerning Disruptions to Communications; PS Docket No. 21-346 [3060-
AL43]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 1; 47 U.S.C. 4(i) and 4(o); 47 U.S.C.
201(b) and 214(d); 47 U.S.C. 218 and 251(e)(3); 47 U.S.C. 301; 47
U.S.C. 303(b) and 303(g); 47 U.S.C. 303(j) and 303(r); 47 U.S.C. 307;
47 U.S.C. 309(a) and 309(j); 47 U.S.C. 316 and 332; 47 U.S.C. 403; 47
U.S.C. 615a-1 ; 47 U.S.C. 615c of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended; 47 U.S.C. 154(i)-(j) and (o); 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C 4(j); .
. .
Abstract: In October 2021, the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to investigate ways to improve the
reliability and resiliency of communications networks during
emergencies and ways to ensure that communications services remain
operational when disasters strike. The NPRM sought comment on: (i)
potential improvements to the voluntary Wireless Resiliency Cooperative
Framework (Framework), including evaluating what triggers its
activation, its scope of participants, whether existing Framework
elements can be strengthened, any gaps that need to be addressed, and
whether the public would benefit from codifying some or all of the
Framework, (ii) ways to enhance the information available to the
Commission through Network Outage Reporting System (NORS) and Disaster
Information Reporting System (DIRS) during disasters and network
outages to improve situational awareness, and (iii) communications
resiliency strategies for power outages, including improved
coordination between communications service providers and power
companies and deploying onsite backup power or other alternative
measures to reduce the frequency, duration, or severity of power-
related disruptions to communications services.
In June 2022, the Commission adopted a Report & Order (R&O) and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) following up on and
further addressing matters related to the Framework. The R&O introduced
the Mandatory Disaster Response Initiative (MDRI), which largely
codified the Framework's five substantive provisions as mandatory,
extended the reach of these provisions to all facilities-based mobile
wireless providers, expanded the real-world criteria that trigger
activation of the MDRI (as compared to the Framework) and introduced
new provisions requiring providers to test their roaming capabilities
and report on the performance of their implementation of the MDRI to
the Commission after disaster events. The FNPRM examined whether and
how the new reporting requirement can be standardized to ensure that
the Commission obtains vital and actionable information on the
performance of providers' implementation of the MDRI in the aftermath
of exigency, while also minimizing associated burdens. This proceeding
addresses network reliability in the context of public safety and does
not promote the administration's specified priorities.
In October 2022, CTIA and the Competitive Carriers Association
(CCA) filed a Petition for Clarification and Partial Reconsideration in
response to the 2022 Resilient Networks R&O. Particularly, Petitioners
asked that the Commission: (1) provide a list of potential providers to
which the MDRI may apply; (2) provide sufficient time for wireless
providers to achieve compliance (by requesting 12 months for non-small
providers and 18 months for small providers); (3) align the definitions
of ``non-small'' and ``small'' with the Commission's existing
definitions of ``nationwide'' and ``non-nationwide'' as used in the 911
context; (4) establish the process in which the Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau (Bureau) will inform providers that the MDRI
is active; and (5) affirm that Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
review is required for all information collection obligations and that
the Commission will treat all roaming arrangements as presumptively
confidential under Section 4.17(d). A draft Order on Reconsideration
was circulated for Commission consideration on July 28, 2023.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 10/01/21 86 FR 61103
NPRM Comment Period End............. 01/14/22 .......................
FNPRM............................... 06/27/22 87 FR 59379
R&O................................. 06/27/22 87 FR 59329
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 10/31/22 .......................
FNPRM Reply Comment Period End...... 11/29/22 .......................
Petition for Reconsideration........ 10/31/22 .......................
Public Notice Comment............... 12/02/22 87 FR 7102
Extends Deadline to File Replies.... 12/19/22 87 FR 79263
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Logan Bennett, Attorney Advisor, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-7790, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL43
314. Location-Based Routing for Wireless 911 Calls (P.S. Docket 18-64)
[3060-AL52]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 152(a); 47 U.S.C. 154(i);
47 U.S.C. 160; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 214; 47 U.S.C. 222; 47 U.S.C.
251(e); 47 U.S.C. 301 to 303; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C.
316 and 332; 47 U.S.C. 615; 47 U.S.C. 615a; 47 U.S.C. 615b; 47 U.S.C.
615c
[[Page 66936]]
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Federal Communications Commission
proposes rules to more precisely route wireless 911 calls and texts to
Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs), which can result in faster
response times during emergencies. Wireless 911 calls have historically
been routed to PSAPs based on the location of the cell tower that
handles the call. Sometimes, however, the 911 call is routed to the
wrong PSAP because the cell tower is not in the same jurisdiction as
the 911 caller. This can happen, for instance, when an emergency call
is placed near a county border. These misrouted 911 calls must be
transferred from one PSAP to another, which consumes time and resources
and can cause confusion and delay in emergency response. The Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposes to require wireless and covered
text providers to deploy technology that supports location-based
routing, a method that relies on precise information about the location
of the wireless caller's device, on some networks and to use location-
based routing to route 911 voice calls and texts originating on those
networks when caller location is accurate and timely. In addition, the
NPRM proposes to require CMRS and covered text providers to deliver 911
calls, texts, and associated routing information in internet Protocol
(IP) format upon request of certain 911 authorities.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/17/23 88 FR 2565
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/16/23 .......................
Reply Comments Due.................. 03/20/23 .......................
Report and Order.................... 03/13/24 89 FR 18488
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brenda Boykin, Deputy Chief, Policy and Licensing
Div, PSHSB, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2062, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL52
315. Next Generation 9-1-1, PS Docket No. 21-479, FCC 23-47 [3060-AL67]
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission (the FCC or
Commission) proposes rules that will advance the nationwide transition
to Next Generation 911 (NG911). The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) proposes requiring certain service providers to complete all
translation and routing to deliver 911 calls in the requested internet
Protocol (IP)-based format to an Emergency Services IP network (ESInet)
or other designated point(s) that allow emergency calls to be answered
upon request of 911 authorities who have certified the capability to
accept IP-based 911 communications. In addition, the NPRM proposes to
require service providers to transmit all 911 calls to destination
point(s) in those networks designated by a 911 authority upon request
of 911 authorities who have certified the capability to accept IP-based
911 communications. Finally, the NPRM proposes that in the absence of
agreements by states or localities on alternative cost recovery
mechanisms, service providers must cover the costs of transmitting 911
calls to the point(s) designated by a 911 authority. In addition, the
NPRM seeks comment on promoting diversity and inclusion.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 07/10/23 88 FR 43514
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Brenda Boykin, Deputy Chief, Policy & Licensing
Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-2062, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL67
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Space Bureau
Long-Term Actions
316. Update to Parts 2 and 25 Concerning Nongeostationary, Fixed-
Satellite Service Systems, and Related Matters: IB Docket No. I6-408
[3060-AK59]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: On January 11, 2017, the Commission began a rulemaking to
update its rules and policies concerning non-geostationary-satellite
orbit (NGSO), fixed-satellite service (FSS) systems and related
matters. The Commission proposed among other things, to provide for
more flexible use of the 17.8-20.2 GHz bands for FSS, promote shared
use of spectrum among NGSO FSS satellite systems, and remove
unnecessary design restrictions on NGSO FSS systems. The Commission
subsequently adopted a Report and Order establishing new sharing
criteria among NGSO FSS systems and providing additional flexibility
for FSS spectrum use. The Commission also released a Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking proposing to remove the domestic coverage
requirement for NGSO FSS systems and later adopted a Second Report and
Order removing this requirement.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/11/17 82 FR 3258
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/10/17 .......................
FNPRM............................... 11/15/17 82 FR 52869
R&O................................. 12/18/17 82 FR 59972
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 01/02/18 .......................
2nd R&O............................. 02/21/21 86 FR 11642
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Clay DeCell, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0803, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK59
317. Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the FCC Rules to Facilitate the Use
of Earth Stations in Motion Communicating With Geostationary Orbit
Space Stations in FSS Bands: IB Docket No. 17-95 [3060-AK84]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303;
47 U.S.C. 308(b); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: In June 2017, the Commission began a rulemaking to
streamline, consolidate, and harmonize rules governing earth stations
in motion (ESIMs) used to provide satellite-based services on ships,
airplanes and vehicles communicating with geostationary-satellite orbit
(GSO), fixed-satellite service (FSS) satellite systems. In September
2018, the Commission adopted rules governing communications of ESIMs
with GSO satellites. These rules addressed communications in the
conventional C-, Ku-, and Ka-bands, as well as portions of the extended
Ku-band. At the same time, the Commission also released a Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that sought comment on
[[Page 66937]]
allowing ESIMs to operate in all of the frequency bands in which earth
stations at fixed locations operating in GSO FSS satellite networks can
be blanket-licensed. Specifically, comment was sought on expanding the
frequencies available for communications of ESIMs with GSO FSS
satellites to include the following frequency bands: 10.7-10.95 GHz,
11.2-11.45 GHz, 17.8-18.3 GHz, 18.8-19.3 GHz, 19.3-19.4 GHz, 19.6-19.7
GHz (space-to-Earth); and 28.6-29.1 GHz (Earth-to-space).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/16/17 82 FR 27652
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/30/17 .......................
OMB-approval for Information 08/28/18 .......................
Collection of R&O Comment Period
End.
FNPRM............................... 07/24/20 85 fr 44818
R&O................................. 07/24/20 85 FR 44772
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/22/20 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cindy Spiers, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1593, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK84
318. Facilitating the Communications of Earth Stations in Motion With
Non-Geostationary Orbit Space Stations: IB Docket No. 18-315 [3060-
AK89]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303;
47 U.S.C. 308(b); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: In November 2018, the Commission adopted a notice of
proposed rulemaking that proposed to expand the scope of the
Commission's rules governing ESIMs operations to cover communications
with NGSO FSS satellites. Comment was sought on establishing a
regulatory framework for communications of ESIMs with NGSO FSS
satellites that would be analogous to that which exists for ESIMs
communicating with GSO FSS satellites. In this context, comment was
sought on: (1) allowing ESIMs to communicate in many of the same
conventional Ku-band, extended Ku-band, and Ka-band frequencies that
were allowed for communications of ESIMs with GSO FSS satellites (with
the exception of the 18.6-18.8 GHz and 29.25-29.5 GHz frequency bands);
(2) extending blanket licensing to ESIMs communicating with NGSO
satellites; and (3) revisions to specific provisions in the
Commission's rules to implement these changes. The specific frequency
bands for communications of ESIMs with NGOS FSS satellites on which
comment was sought are as follows: 10.7-11.7 GHz; 11.7-12.2 GHz; 14.0-
14.5 GHz; 17.8-18.3 GHz; 18.3-18.6 GHz; 18.8-19.3 GHz; 19.3-19.4 GHz;
19.6-19.7 GHz; 19.7-20.2 GHz; 28.35-28.6 GHz; 28.6-29.1 GHz; and 29.5-
30.0 GHz.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 12/28/18 83 FR 67180
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/13/19 .......................
R&O................................. 07/24/20 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cindy Spiers, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1593, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK89
319. Space Innovation; Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space
Age: IB Docket Nos. 18-313, 22-271 [3060-AK90]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 301; 47
U.S.C. 302; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C. 308; 47 U.S.C. 309;
47 U.S.C. 310; 47 U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47 U.S.C. 336; 47 U.S.C.
605; 47 U.S.C. 721
Abstract: The Commission's current orbital debris rules were first
adopted in 2004. Since then, significant changes have occurred in
satellite technologies and market conditions, particularly in Low Earth
Orbit, i.e., below 2000 kilometers altitude. These changes include the
increasing use of lower cost small satellites and proposals to deploy
large constellations of non-geostationary satellite orbit (NGSO)
systems, some involving thousands of satellites.
The NPRM proposes changes to improve disclosure of debris
mitigation plans. The NPRM also makes proposals and seeks comment
related to satellite disposal reliability and methodology, appropriate
deployment altitudes in low-Earth-orbit, and on-orbit lifetime, with a
particular focus on large NGSO satellite constellations. Other aspects
of the NPRM include new rule proposals for geostationary orbit
satellite (GSO) license term extension requests, and consideration of
disclosure requirements related to several emerging technologies and
new types of commercial operations, including rendezvous and proximity
operations.
The Report and Order in this proceeding adopted a number of these
proposals. In addition a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking sought
comment on topics such as collision risk and casualty risk for multi-
satellite systems, de-orbit timelines, maneuverability requirements,
and indemnification and post mission disposal bond issues. The
Commission issued a Second Report and Order adopting a 5-year de-orbit
timeframe for satellites ending their missions in or passing through
the low-Earth Orbit region.
Three petitions for reconsideration were filed in response to the
initial Report and Order, which were all subsequently denied.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/19/19 84 FR 4742
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/06/19 .......................
R&O................................. 08/25/20 85 FR 52422
FNPRM............................... 08/25/20 85 FR 52455
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 10/09/20 .......................
Second R&O.......................... 09/29/22 .......................
Notice of Petition for 11/09/20 85 FR 71296
Reconsideration.
Denial of Reconsideration........... 02/22/24 89 FR 13276
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Alexandra Horn, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-1376, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK90
320. Parts 2 and 25 To Enable GSO FSS in the 17.3-17.8 GHz Band,
Modernize Rules for 17/24 GHz BSS Space Stations, and Establish Off-
Axis Uplink Power Limits for Extended KA-Band FSS (IB Doc. No. 20-330)
[3060-AL28]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 303(r); 47 U.S.C.
309(j)
Abstract: This item addresses the addition of an allocation in the
17.3-17.7 GHz and 17.7-17.8 GHz bands to the fixed-satellite service in
the space-to-Earth direction. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
proposes to add these allocations to the U.S. Table of Frequency
Allocations (non-Federal), and proposes modification of existing
[[Page 66938]]
technical rules to prevent harmful interference between services in
these bands.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/01/21 86 FR 7660
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/03/21 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 03/18/21 .......................
R&O................................. 09/03/22 .......................
Erraturn............................ 09/03/22 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Stephanie Neville, Attorney Advisor, Satellite
Programs and Policy Div., Space Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1672,
Email: [email protected].
Sean O'More, Attorney Advisor, International Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
245 418-2453, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL28
321. Revising Spectrum Sharing Rules for Non-Geostationary Orbit,
Fixed-Satellite Service Systems: IB Docket No. 21-456 [3060-AL41]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303;
47 U.S.C. 308(b); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: In 2021, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking comment on revisions to the spectrum sharing
requirements among non-geostationary satellite orbit (NGSO), fixed-
satellite service (FSS) systems. The NPRM proposed that the
Commission's existing spectrum sharing mechanism for NGSO FSS systems
will be limited to those systems approved in the same processing round.
The NPRM also proposed to adopt a rule providing that later-round NGSO
FSS systems will have to protect earlier-round systems, and invited
comment on how to define such protection. In addition, the NPRM sought
comment on whether to sunset, after a period of time, the interference
protection afforded to an NGSO FSS system because of its processing
round status.
In 2023, the Commission released a Report and Order (R&O) in this
proceeding. The R&O adopted rules clarifying protection obligations
between NGSO FSS systems authorized through different processing rounds
by using a degraded throughput methodology, and subjected those
protections to a sunset period. After the sunset period, new entrants
authorized in later processing rounds would share spectrum on an equal
basis with earlier-round incumbents. The R&O also clarified that all
NGSO FSS operators licensed or granted market access in the United
States must coordinate with each other in good faith, regardless of
their processing round status, and explained the Commission's
expectations for information sharing during this good-faith
coordination. In an accompanying Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(FNPRM), the Commission sought comment on which specific metrics should
be used to define the protection afforded to an earlier-round NGSO FSS
system from a later-round system, and sought specific comment on
implementation of the degraded throughput methodology.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/24/22 87 FR 3481
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/25/22 .......................
Report and Order.................... 06/20/23 88 FR 39783
FNPRM............................... 06/21/23 88 FR 40142
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/05/23 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Clay DeCell, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, International Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0803, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL41
322. Expediting Initial Processing of Satellite and Earth Station
Applications; Space Innovation, IB Docket Nos. 22-411 and 22-271 [3060-
AL51]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 157(a); 47 U.S.C. 303 and
308(b)
Abstract: In December 2022, the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to seek comment on changes to its rules, policies,
or practices to facilitate the acceptance for filing of satellite and
earth station applications under 47 CFR part 25. In September 2023 the
Commission adopted a Report and Order implementing its proposed changes
as well as establishing timeframes for placing space and earth stations
on public notice, creating a new, streamlined processing framework for
earth station operators to add satellite points of communication, and
establishing a Transparency Initiative led by the Space Bureau to
provide clarity and access to applicants. The Commission also adopted a
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to seek comment on additional
proposed changes to further expedite satellite and earth station
licensing.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/17/23 88 FR 2590
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/03/23 .......................
FNPRM............................... 12/08/23 .......................
Report and Order--Final Rule........ 01/05/24 .......................
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 02/06/24 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Julia Malette, Attorney Advisor, Space Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-2453, Email: [email protected].
Clay DeCell, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications Commission,
International Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202
418-0803, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL51
323. Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission's Rules To
Enable NGSO Fixed-Satellite Service (Space-to-Earth) Operations in the
17.3-17.8 GHz Band [3060-AL79]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 157(a); 47 U.S.C.
303(c) and 303(f),; 47 U.S.C. 303(g) and 303(r)
Abstract: Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission's Rules to
Enable NGSO Fixed-Satellite Service (Space-to-Earth) Operations in the
17.3-17.8 GHz Band.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 10/26/22 87 FR 64750
NPRM Comment Period End............. 12/27/22 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment End.............. 01/24/23 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
[[Page 66939]]
Agency Contact: Stephanie Neville, Attorney Advisor, Satellite
Programs and Policy Div., Space Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1672,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL79
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
Long-Term Actions
324. Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90, and 95 of the
Commission's Rules to Improve Wireless Coverage Through the Use of
Signal Boosters (WT Docket No. 10-4) [3060-AJ87]
Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79; 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47
U.S.C. 154(j); 47 U.S.C. 155; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 225; 47 U.S.C.
227; 47 U.S.C. 303(r)
Abstract: This action adopts new technical, operational, and
registration requirements for signal boosters. It creates two classes
of signal boosters--consumer and industrial--with distinct regulatory
requirements for each, thereby establishing a two-step transition
process for equipment certification for both consumer and industrial
signal boosters sold and marketed in the United States.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/10/11 76 FR 26983
R&O................................. 04/11/13 78 FR 21555
Petition for Reconsideration........ 06/06/13 78 FR 34015
Order on Reconsideration............ 11/08/14 79 FR 70790
FNPRM............................... 11/28/14 79 FR 70837
2nd R&O and 2nd FNPRM............... 03/23/18 83 FR 17131
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Morgan Mendenhall, Attorney Advisor, Wireless
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0154, Email: [email protected].
Jaclyn Rosen, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-0154, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AJ87
325. Promoting Technological Solutions to Combat Wireless Contraband
Device Use in Correctional Facilities; GN Docket No. 13-111 [3060-AK06]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 to 152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C.
154(j); 47 U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 303(a); 47 U.S.C. 303(b); 47 U.S.C.
307 to 310; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47 U.S.C. 302(a)
Abstract: In the 2017 Report and Order, 82 FR 22742, the Commission
addressed the problem of illegal use of contraband wireless devices by
inmates in correctional facilities by streamlining the process of
deploying contraband wireless device interdiction systems (CIS)--
systems that use radio communications signals requiring Commission
authorization--in correctional facilities. In particular, the
Commission eliminated certain filing requirements and provides for
immediate approval of the lease applications needed to operate these
systems. In the 2017 Further Notice, 82 FR 22780, the Commission sought
comment on a process for wireless providers to disable contraband
wireless devices once they have been identified. The Commission also
sought comment on additional methods and technologies that might prove
successful in combating contraband device use in correctional
facilities, and on various other proposals related to the authorization
process for CISs and their deployment.
In the Second Report and Order, the Commission takes further steps
to facilitate the deployment and viability of technological solutions
used to combat contraband wireless devices in correctional facilities.
The Second Report and Order adopts a framework requiring the disabling
of contraband wireless devices detected in correctional facilities upon
satisfaction of certain criteria, and the Commission addresses issues
involving oversight, wireless provider liability, and treatment of 911
calls. The Second Report and Order further adopts rules requiring
advance notice of certain wireless provider network changes to promote
and maintain contraband interdiction system effectiveness. In the
Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission takes
further steps to facilitate the deployment and viability of
technological solutions used to combat contraband wireless devices in
correctional facilities. The Second Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking seeks further comment on the relative effectiveness,
viability, and cost of additional technological solutions to combat
contraband phone use in correctional facilities previously identified
in the record.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/18/13 78 FR 36469
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/08/13 .......................
FNPRM............................... 05/18/17 82 FR 22780
R&O................................. 05/18/17 82 FR 22742
Final Rule Effective (Except for 06/19/17 .......................
Rules Requiring OMB Approval).
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 07/17/17 .......................
Final Rule Effective for 47 CFR 10/20/17 82 FR 48773
1.9020(n), 1.9030(m), 1.9035 (o),
and 20.23(a).
Final Rule Effective for 47 CFR 02/12/18 .......................
1.902(d)(8), 1.9035(d)(4),
20.18(a), and 20.18(r).
2nd FNPRM........................... 08/13/21 86 FR 44681
2nd R&O............................. 08/13/21 86 FR 44635
2nd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 09/13/21 .......................
Final Rules Effective (except for 09/13/21 .......................
those requiring OMB approval).
Reply Comment Period End............ 10/12/21 .......................
Final Rule Effective................ 05/03/22 87 FR 26139
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Melissa Conway, Attorney Advisor, Mobility Div.,
Wireless Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2887, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK06
326. Promoting Investment in the 3550-3700 MHz Band; GN Docket No. 17-
258 [3060-AK12]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and 152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C.
154(j) ; 47 U.S.C. 302(a); 47 U.S.C. 303 and 304; 47 U.S.C. 307(e); 47
U.S.C. 316
Abstract: The Report and Order and Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) adopted by the Commission established a new
Citizens Broadband Radio Service for shared wireless broadband use of
the 3550 to 3700 MHz band. The Citizens Broadband Radio Service is
governed by a three-tiered spectrum authorization
[[Page 66940]]
framework to accommodate a variety of commercial uses on a shared basis
with incumbent Federal and non-Federal users of the band. Access and
operations will be managed by a dynamic spectrum access system. The
three tiers are: Incumbent Access, Priority Access, and General
Authorized Access. Rules governing the Citizens Broadband Radio Service
are found in part 96 of the Commission's rules.
The Order on Reconsideration and Second Report and Order addressed
several Petitions for Reconsideration submitted in response to the
Report and Order and resolved the outstanding issues raised in the
Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
The 2017 NPRM sought comment on limited changes to the rules
governing Priority Access Licenses in the band, adjacent channel
emissions limits, and public release of base station registration
information.
The 2018 Report and Order addressed the issues raised in the 2017
NPRM and implemented changes rules governing Priority Access Licenses
in the band and public release of base station registration
information.
On July 2020, the Commission commenced an auction of Priority
Access Licenses in the band. ``Winning bidders were announced on
September 2, 2020''.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/08/13 78 FR 1188
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/19/13 .......................
FNPRM............................... 06/02/14 79 FR 31247
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 08/15/14 .......................
R&O and 2nd FNPRM................... 06/15/15 80 FR 34119
2nd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 08/14/15 .......................
Order on Recon and 2nd R&O.......... 07/26/16 81 FR 49023
NPRM................................ 11/28/17 82 FR 56193
NPRM Comment Period End............. 01/29/18 .......................
R&O................................. 12/07/18 83 FR 6306
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Paul Powell, Assistant Chief, Mobility Division,
WTB, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1613
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK12
327. Updating Part 1 Competitive Bidding Rules (WT Docket No. 14-170)
[3060-AK28]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 303(r);
47 U.S.C. 309(j); 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: This proceeding was initiated to revise some of the
Commission's general part 1 rules governing competitive bidding for
spectrum licenses to reflect changes in the marketplace, including the
challenges faced by new entrants, as well as to advance the statutory
directive to ensure that small businesses, rural telephone companies,
and businesses owned by members of minority groups and women are given
the opportunity to participate in the provision of spectrum-based
services. In July 2015, the Commission revised its competitive bidding
rules, specifically adopting revised requirements for eligibility for
bidding credits, a new rural service provider bidding credit, a
prohibition on joint bidding agreements and other changes.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 11/14/14 79 FR 68172
Public Notice....................... 03/16/15 80 FR 15715
Public Notice....................... 04/23/15 80 FR 22690
R&O................................. 09/18/15 80 FR 56764
Public Notice on Petitions for 11/10/15 80 FR 69630
Reconsideration.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kelly Quinn, Assistant Chief, Auctions and Spectrum
Access Division, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0660, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK28
328. Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz for Mobile Services--Spectrum
Frontiers: WT Docket 10-112 [3060-AK44]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 to 154; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C.
160; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 225; 47 U.S.C. 227; 47 U.S.C. 301 and
302; 47 U.S.C. 302(a); 47 U.S.C. 303 and 304; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C.
309 and 310; 47 U.S.C. 316; 47 U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47 U.S.C.
336; 47 U.S.C. 1302
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission adopted service rules
for licensing of mobile and other uses for millimeter wave (mmW) bands.
These high frequencies previously have been best suited for satellite
or fixed microwave applications; however, recent technological
breakthroughs have newly enabled advanced mobile services in these
bands, notably including very high speed and low latency services. This
action will help facilitate Fifth Generation mobile services and other
mobile services. In developing service rules for mmW bands, the
Commission will facilitate access to spectrum, develop a flexible
spectrum policy, and encourage wireless innovation.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/13/16 81 FR 1802
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/26/16 .......................
FNPRM............................... 08/24/16 81 FR 58269
Comment Period End.................. 09/30/16 .......................
FNPRM Reply Comment Period End...... 10/31/16 .......................
R&O................................. 11/14/16 81 FR 79894
R&O................................. 01/02/18 83 FR 37
FNPRM............................... 01/02/18 83 FR 85
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 01/23/18 .......................
R&O................................. 07/20/18 83 FR 34478
FNPRM............................... 07/20/18 83 FR 34520
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 09/28/18 .......................
R&O................................. 02/05/19 84 FR 1618
R&O................................. 05/01/19 84 FR 18405
NPRM-Correction..................... 04/25/19 84 FR 17360
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: John Schauble, Deputy Chief, Broadband Division,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-0797, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK44
329. Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz Band: GN Docket No.
18-122 [3060-AK76]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 to 153; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C.
157; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 301 to 304; 47 U.S.C. 307 to 310; 47
U.S.C. 1302; . . .
Abstract: In the 2020 Report and Order, the Commission adopted
rules to make 280 megahertz of mid-band spectrum available for flexible
use (plus a 20-megahertz guard band) throughout the contiguous United
States. Pursuant to the Report and Order, existing fixed satellite
service (FSS) and fixed services (FS) must relocate operations out of
the lower portion of the 3.7-4.0 GHz band. The Commission will issue
flexible use licenses in the 3.7-3.98 GHz portion of
[[Page 66941]]
the band in the contiguous United States via a system of competitive
bidding. The Commission established rules to govern the transition
including optional payments for satellite operators that choose to
relocate on an accelerated schedule and provide reimbursement to FSS
operators and their associated earth stations for reasonable expenses
incurred to facilitate the transition. The Report and Order also
established service and technical rules for the new flexible use
licenses that will be issued in the 3.7-3.98 GHz portion of the band.
``On December 8, 2020, the Commission began an auction of licenses in
the 3.7-3.98 GHz portion of the band. The winning bidders were
announced on February 24, 2021''.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 08/29/18 83 FR 44128
NPRM Comment Period End............. 11/27/18 .......................
Public Notice....................... 05/20/19 84 FR 22733
Certifications and Data Filing 05/28/19 .......................
Deadline.
Public Notice....................... 06/03/19 84 FR 22514
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 07/03/19 .......................
Public Notice Reply Comment Period 07/18/19 .......................
End.
R&O................................. 04/23/20 85 FR 22804
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Paul Powell, Assistant Chief, Mobility Division,
WTB, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1613,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK76
330. Amendment of the Commission's Rules To Promote Aviation Safety: WT
Docket No. 19-140 [3060-AK92]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 303; 307(e)
Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission regulates the
Aviation Radio Service, a family of services using dedicated spectrum
to enhance the safety of aircraft in flight, facilitate the efficient
movement of aircraft both in the air and on the ground, and otherwise
ensure the reliability and effectiveness of aviation communications.
Recent technological advances have prompted the Commission to open this
new rulemaking proceeding to ensure the timely deployment and use of
today's state-of-the-art safety-enhancing technologies. With this
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission proposes changes to its
part 87 Aviation Radio Service rules to support the deployment of more
advanced avionics technology, increase the efficient use of limited
spectrum resources, and generally improve aviation safety.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 07/02/19 84 FR 31542
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/03/19 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 09/30/19 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jeff Tobias, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1617, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK92
331. Implementation of State and Local Governments' Obligation To
Approve Certain Wireless Facility Modification Requests Under Section
6409(a) of the Spectrum Act of 2012 (WT Docket No. 19-250) [3060-AL29]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. chs. 2, 5, 9, 13; 28 U.S.C. 2461, unless
otherwise noted.
Abstract: In this proceeding, the Commission seeks to reduce
regulatory barriers to wireless infrastructure deployment by further
streamlining the state and local government review process for
modifications to existing wireless infrastructure under section 6409(a)
of the Spectrum Act of 2012.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 07/02/20 85 FR 39859
Declaratory Ruling.................. 07/27/20 85 FR 45126
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/03/20 .......................
R&O................................. 12/03/20 85 FR 78005
Petition for Recon.................. 03/03/21 86 FR 12898
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Allison Jones, Associate Division Chief, CIPD,
Wireless Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1571, Email:
[email protected].
Garnet Hanly, Division Chief, Wireless Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone:
202 418-0995, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL29
332. Expanding Flexible Use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band, et al., WT
Docket No. 20-443, ET AL [3060-AL40]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 152; 47 U.S.C. 153; 47
U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 155; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 301; 47 U.S.C. 302;
47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 304; 47 U.S.C. 307; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C.
310; 47 U.S.C. 316
Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission (Commission or FCC)
finds that it is not in the public interest to add a mobile allocation
to permit a two-way terrestrial 5G service in the 12.2 GHz band based
on the current record and seeks further comment on how it could
facilitate more robust terrestrial operations in the 12.212.7 GHz band.
The item specifically seeks comment on how its proposals may promote or
inhibit advances in diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility, as
well as the scope of the Commission's relevant legal authority.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/08/21 86 FR 13266
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/07/21 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 05/07/21 .......................
NPRM................................ 04/16/21 86 FR 20111
NPRM Extension Comment Period End... 05/07/21 .......................
NPRM Extension Reply Comment Period 06/07/21 .......................
End.
NPRM Denial of Further Extension of 05/27/21 86 FR 28520
Deadlines for Filing Comments and
Reply Comments.
NPRM................................ 06/22/21 86 FR 32669
NPRM Extension Reply Comment Period. 07/07/21 .......................
Report and Order.................... 07/10/23 88 FR 43462
FNPRM............................... 07/10/23 88 FR 43502
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 08/09/23 .......................
FNPRM Reply Comment Period End...... 09/08/23 .......................
[[Page 66942]]
NPRM................................ 09/18/23 88 FR 63890
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/08/23 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Madelaine Maior, Assistant Division Chief,
Broadband Div., WTB, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1466, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL40
333. Facilitating Shared Use in the 3100-3550 MHz Band [3060-AL57]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and 152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C.
155(c) and 157; 47 U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 and 308; 47 U.S.C.
309; 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(3)(B) and 309(j)(4)(D); 47 U.S.C. 310 and 316; 47
U.S.C. 923(g) and 928; 47 U.S.C. 1502; Pub. L. 115-141, sec. 603; Pub.
L. 116-260, sec. 905
Abstract: In the 3.45 GHz Band Second R&O, the Commission adopted
rules to make 100 megahertz of mid-band spectrum available for flexible
use throughout the contiguous United States. To facilitate this goal,
the Commission previously had determined that secondary, nonfederal
radiolocation licensees in the band would be relocated to the 2.9-3.0
GHz band. In the 3.45 GHz Band Second R&O, the Commission further
determined that secondary, non-federal radiolocation authorizations
would sunset 180 days after new 3.45 GHz Service licenses are granted
in the band. On January 4, 2022, the auction for these new licenses
concluded and licenses were granted on May 4, 2022. The non-federal
radiolocation authorizations sunset on October 31, 2022.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/22/20 85 FR 3579
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/23/20 .......................
Final Rule.......................... 10/09/20 85 FR 64062
Report & Order and FNPRM............ 10/21/20 85 FR 66888
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 11/20/20 .......................
Correction to Final Rule............ 11/03/20 85 FR 69515
Report & Order, Order on 04/07/21 86 FR 17920
Reconsideration and Order of
Proposed Modification.
Final Rule and Order................ 12/22/22 87 FR 78579
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Morgan Mendenhall, Attorney Advisor, Wireless
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0154, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL57
334. Shared Use of the 42-42.5 GHz Band (WT Docket No. 23-158, GN
Docket No. 14-177) [3060-AL68]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 thru 152; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C.
301 and 302a; 47 U.S.C. 303 and 304; 47 U.S.C. 307 and 309
Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission seeks comment on
how innovative, non-exclusive spectrum access models might be deployed
in the 42 GHz band (42-42.5 GHz) to provide increased access to high-
band spectrum, particularly by smaller wireless service providers, and
to support efficient, intensive use of the band. The Commission also
seeks comment on how potential sharing and licensing regimes might
lower barriers to entry for smaller or emerging wireless service
providers, encourage competition, and prevent spectrum warehousing.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 07/31/23 88 FR 49423
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/30/23 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 09/29/23 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Catherine Schroeder, Attorney Advisor, Broadband
Div., Wireless Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street
NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 428-1956, Email:
[email protected].
Katherine Schroder, Attorney, Federal Communications Commission,
Common Carrier Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202
418-7400, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL68
335. Single Network Future: Supplemental Coverage From Space,
GN Docket No. 23-65 [3060-AL69]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 157; 47
U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47 U.S.C. 307 and 308; 47 U.S.C. 309 and 310
Abstract: In the 2023 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission
proposed a new regulatory framework for Supplemental Coverage from
Space (SCS) that would facilitate the integration of satellite and
terrestrial networks through partnerships between satellite operators
and terrestrial service providers on flexible-use spectrum licensed to
terrestrial services. The proposed framework would enable expanded
coverage to a terrestrial licensee's subscribers, especially in remote,
unserved, and underserved areas, and would increase the availability of
emergency communications.
In the 2024 Report and Order, the Commission adopted a regulatory
framework for SCS that will serve important public interest goals,
including expanding the reach of communications services, particularly
emergency services, so that connectivity and emergency assistance is
available in more remote places. The framework will also spur
advancements in space-based technologies that will position the United
States as a global leader in this arena, and promote the innovative and
efficient use of our nation's spectrum resources. The Commission
authorized SCS only in certain spectrum bands and only where one or
more terrestrial licensees together holding all licenses on the
relevant channel throughout a defined geographically independent area
lease access to their spectrum rights to a participating satellite
operator. The Report and Order also imposed technical rules in an
effort to mitigate harmful interference.
In the Report and Order, in recognition that this new offering has
the potential to bring life-saving connectivity to remote areas, the
Commission adopted interim 911 call and text routing requirements to
ensure that help is available to those who need it today while the
Commission works toward enabling automatic location-based routing of
all emergency communications. In the 2024 Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, the Commission sought to further develop the record on 911
service for SCS connections, including the use of location-based
routing to route SCS voice calls directly to an appropriate Public
Safety Answering Point. In addition, the Commission sought further
[[Page 66943]]
comment on procedures related to the protection of radio astronomy.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/12/23 88 FR 21944
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/12/23 .......................
Report and Order.................... 03/15/24 .......................
FNPRM............................... 03/15/24 .......................
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 04/15/24 .......................
-----------------------------------
Final Rule Effective (Rules To Be Determined
Requiring OMB Approval).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jonathan Markman, Attorney Advisor, Mobility
Division, Wireless Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-7090, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL69
336. Modifying Emissions Limits For the 24.25-24.45 GHz and
24.75-25.25 GHz Bands (ET Docket No. 21-186) [3060-AL80]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 302; 47
U.S.C. 302(a) and 302(r) ; 47 U.S.C. 308; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 333
Abstract: In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Federal
Communications Commission propose to implement certain decisions
regarding the 24.25-27.5 GHz band made in the World Radiocommunication
Conference held by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) in
2019 (WRC-19). Specifically, it proposes to align part 30 of the
Commission's rules for mobile operations with the Resolution 750 limits
on unwanted emissions into the passive 23.6-24.0 GHz band that were
adopted at WRC-19. These proposed rule changes would help to facilitate
the protection of passive sensors used for weather forecasting and
scientific research in the 23.6 GHz-24.0 GHz band, while continuing to
promote flexible commercial use of the 24.25-24.45 GHz and 24.75-25.25
GHz bands.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/29/24 89 FR 5440
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/28/24 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment End.............. 03/14/24 .......................
Interim Final Rule Comment Period 02/08/24 89 FR 8621
End.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Simon Banyai, Attorney Advisor, Broadband Division,
Wireless Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1443, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL80
337. Alaska Connect Fund Notice of Proposed Rulemaking [3060-
AL81]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 thru 152; 47 U.S.C. 154 thru 155; 47
U.S.C. 201 thru 206; 47 U.S.C. 214; 47 U.S.C. 218 thru 220; 47 U.S.C.
251 thru 252; 47 U.S.C. 254 and 256; 47 U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47 U.S.C.
309; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47 U.S.C. 403
Abstract: On October 19, 2023, the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to explore how the universal service high-cost
support program can continue funding fixed and mobile broadband
services in Alaska one of the hardest to serve areas in the country.
The Commission sought comment to better understand the changes,
including technology and the broadband funding landscape, that have
occurred in Alaska since 2016 when the Commission adopted the currently
operative, ten-year Alaska Plan, which, alongside two other fixed-high
cost programs in Alaska, is scheduled to wind-down in the next few
years. The proposed rulemaking sought comment on a number of issues to
help the Commission determine the most effective methodologies and uses
for future universal service funding for high-cost fixed and mobile
services in Alaska. As part of the rulemaking, the Commission will
leverage data from the agency's new and improved broadband coverage map
and broadband funding map, which provide a more accurate picture of
where service is and is not, and where deployment has already been
funded, in Alaska.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 11/17/23 88 FR 80238
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/15/24 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Matt Warner, Attorney Advisor, Wireless Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-2419, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL81
338. Indian Peak Properties LLC Petitions for Declaratory
Ruling Seeking Preemption Under the Rule Governing Over-the-Air
Reception Devices [3060-AL82]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47
U.S.C. 155(c); 47 U.S.C. 201(b); 47 U.S.C. 202(a); 47 U.S.C. 205; 47
U.S.C. 251; 47 U.S.C. 253; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 316; 47 U.S.C. 332;
Pub. L. 104-104, 207, 706, 110 Stat. 56, 114, 153
Abstract: In its Application for Review, Indian Peak sought review
of decisions by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Media
Bureau to deny its petition for protection under the Over-the-Air-
Reception-Device (OTARD) rule of antennas it had placed on the roof of
a single family home in a residential neighborhood. Indian Peak was
operating the home as a commercial communications site. The Order on
Review denies in part and dismisses in part the application for review.
In denying the application for review, the Order on Review clarifies
that to qualify for protection under the OTARD rule, the equipment must
benefit a human end-user on the premises.
Section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 directed the
Commission to promulgate regulations to prohibit restrictions that
impair a viewer's ability to receive video programming services through
devices designed for over-the-air reception of television broadcast
signals, multichannel multipoint distribution service, or direct
broadcast satellite services. To meet this requirement, the Commission
adopted the OTARD rule. The Commission subsequently expanded the scope
of the rule so that it now covers wireless broadband antennas including
hub and relay antennas. Beginning in 2004, when the rule was expanded
to cover equipment designed to receive wireless broadband signal, the
Commission began using the term customer in place of viewer.
The facts pled by Indian Peak were vague but indicated that the
property was largely an unmanned communications site with equipment
that was controlled remotely by offsite personnel. In the Order on
Review, the Commission clarifies that the use of the
[[Page 66944]]
term viewer in section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996
signaled Congress's intent to protect the rights of a human being to
receive signal, and therefore to qualify for protection under the OTARD
rule an applicant must plead facts sufficient to establish that the
equipment provides signal to a human end-user on the premises. The
Commission's use of the term customer in place of viewer does not alter
this basic requirement of the rule.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Allison Jones, Associate Division Chief, CIPD,
Wireless Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1571, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL82
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
Wireline Competition Bureau
Long-Term Actions
339. Telecommunications Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network
Information and Other Customer Information (CC Docket No. 96-115), Data
Breach Reporting Requirements (WC Docket No. 22-21) [3060-AG43]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 222; 47
U.S.C. 272; 47 U.S.C. 303(r)
Abstract: The Commission adopted rules implementing the new
statutory framework governing carrier use and disclosure of customer
proprietary network information (CPNI) created by section 222 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended. CPNI includes, among other
things, to whom, where, and when a customer places a call, as well as
the types of service offerings to which the customer subscribes and the
extent to which the service is used.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/28/96 61 FR 26483
Public Notice....................... 02/25/97 62 FR 8414
Second R&O and FNPRM................ 04/24/98 63 FR 20364
Order on Recon...................... 10/01/99 64 FR 53242
Final Rule, Announcement of 01/26/01 66 FR 7865
Effective Date.
Clarification Order and Second NPRM. 09/07/01 66 FR 50140
Third R&O and Third FNPRM........... 09/20/02 67 FR 59205
NPRM................................ 03/15/06 71 FR 13317
NPRM................................ 06/08/07 72 FR 31782
Final Rule, Announcement of 06/08/07 72 FR 31948
Effective Date.
Public Notice....................... 07/13/12 77 FR 35336
Final Rule.......................... 09/21/17 82 FR 44188
NPRM................................ 01/23/23 88 FR 3953
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/23/23 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 03/24/23 .......................
Report and Order.................... 02/12/24 89 FR 9968
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Melissa Kirkel, Deputy Division Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202
418-7958, Fax: 202 418-1413, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AG43
340. Local Telephone Networks That LECs Must Make Available to
Competitors [3060-AH44]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 251
Abstract: The Commission adopted rules applicable to incumbent
local exchange carriers (LECs) to permit competitive carriers to access
portions of the incumbent LECs' networks on an unbundled basis.
Unbundling allows competitors to lease portions of the incumbent LECs'
network to provide telecommunications services. These rules, adopted in
dockets CC 96-98, WC 01-338, and WC 04-313, are intended to accelerate
the development of local exchange competition.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second FNPRM........................ 04/26/99 64 FR 20238
Fourth FNPRM........................ 01/14/00 65 FR 2367
Errata Third R&O and Fourth FNPRM... 01/18/00 65 FR 2542
Second Errata Third R&O and Fourth 01/18/00 65 FR 2542
FNPRM.
Supplemental Order.................. 01/18/00 65 FR 2542
Third R&O........................... 01/18/00 65 FR 2542
Correction.......................... 04/11/00 65 FR 19334
Supplemental Order Clarification.... 06/20/00 65 FR 38214
Public Notice....................... 02/01/01 66 FR 8555
Public Notice....................... 03/05/01 66 FR 18279
Public Notice....................... 04/10/01 .......................
Public Notice....................... 04/23/01 .......................
Public Notice....................... 05/14/01 .......................
NPRM................................ 01/15/02 67 FR 1947
Public Notice....................... 05/29/02 .......................
Public Notice....................... 08/01/02 .......................
Public Notice....................... 08/13/02 .......................
NPRM................................ 08/21/03 68 FR 52276
R&O and Order on Remand............. 08/21/03 68 FR 52276
Errata.............................. 09/17/03 .......................
Report.............................. 10/09/03 68 FR 60391
Order............................... 10/28/03 .......................
Order............................... 01/09/04 .......................
Public Notice....................... 01/09/04 .......................
Public Notice....................... 02/18/04 .......................
Order............................... 07/08/04 .......................
Second R&O.......................... 07/08/04 69 FR 43762
Order on Recon...................... 08/09/04 69 FR 54589
Interim Order....................... 08/20/04 69 FR 55111
NPRM................................ 08/20/04 69 FR 55128
Public Notice....................... 09/10/04 .......................
Public Notice....................... 09/13/04 .......................
Public Notice....................... 10/20/04 .......................
Order on Recon...................... 12/29/04 69 FR 77950
Order on Remand..................... 02/04/04 .......................
Public Notice....................... 04/25/05 70 FR 29313
Public Notice....................... 05/25/05 70 FR 34765
Declaratory Ruling.................. 05/26/11 .......................
NPRM................................ 01/06/20 85 FR 472
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/06/20 .......................
Report & Order...................... 01/08/21 86 FR 1636
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Edward Krachmer, Deputy Division Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202
418-1525, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AH44
341. Jurisdictional Separations [3060-AJ06]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j); 47
U.S.C. 205; 47 U.S.C. 221(c); 47 U.S.C. 254; 47 U.S.C. 403; 47 U.S.C.
410
Abstract: Jurisdictional separations is the process, pursuant to
part 36 of the Commission's rules, by which incumbent local exchange
carriers apportion regulated costs between the intrastate and
interstate jurisdictions. In 1997, the Commission initiated a
proceeding seeking comment on the extent to which legislative changes,
technological changes, and marketplace changes warrant comprehensive
reform of the separations process. In 2001, the Commission adopted the
Federal-State Joint Board on Jurisdictional Separations' Joint Board's
[[Page 66945]]
recommendation to impose an interim freeze on the part 36 category
relationships and jurisdictional cost allocation factors for a period
of 5 years, pending comprehensive reform of the part 36 separations
rules. In 2006, the Commission issued an Order and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking that extended the separations freeze for a period
of 3 years and sought comment on comprehensive reform. In 2009, the
Commission issued a Report and Order extending the separations freeze
an additional year to June 2010. In 2010, the Commission issued a
Report and Order extending the separations freeze for an additional
year to June 2011. In 2011, the Commission adopted a Report and Order
extending the separations freeze for an additional year to June 2012.
In 2012, the Commission issued a Report and Order extending the
separations freeze for an additional 2 years to June 2014. In 2014, the
Commission issued a Report and Order extending the separations freeze
for an additional 3 years to June 2017.
In 2016, the Commission issued a Report and Order extending the
separations freeze for an additional 18 months until January 1, 2018.
In 2017, the Joint Board issued a Recommended Decision recommending
changes to the part 36 rules designed to harmonize them with the
Commission's previous amendments to its part 32 accounting rules. In
February 2018, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
proposing amendments to part 36 consistent with the Joint Board's
recommendations. In October 2018, the Commission issued a Report and
Order adopting each of the Joint Board's recommendations and amending
the Part 36 consistent with those recommendations. In July 2018, the
Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to extend
the separations freeze for an additional 15 years and to provide rate-
of-return carriers that had elected to freeze their category
relationships a time limited opportunity to opt out of that freeze. In
December 2018, the Commission issued a Report and Order extending the
freeze for up to 6 years until December 31, 2024, and granting rate-of-
return carriers that had elected to freeze their category relationships
a one-time opportunity to opt out of that freeze.
On March 31, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the Commission's December 2018
Report and Order.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 11/05/97 62 FR 59842
NPRM Comment Period End............. 12/10/97 .......................
Order............................... 06/21/01 66 FR 33202
Order and FNPRM..................... 05/26/06 71 FR 29882
Order and FNPRM Comment Period End.. 08/22/06 .......................
R&O................................. 05/15/09 74 FR 23955
R&O................................. 05/25/10 75 FR 30301
R&O................................. 05/27/11 76 FR 30840
R&O................................. 05/23/12 77 FR 30410
R&O................................. 06/13/14 79 FR 36232
R&O................................. 06/02/17 82 FR 25535
Recommended Decision................ 10/27/17 .......................
NPRM................................ 03/13/18 83 FR 10817
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/27/18 .......................
NPRM................................ 07/27/18 83 FR 35589
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/10/18 .......................
R&O................................. 12/11/18 83 FR 63581
R&O................................. 02/15/19 84 FR 4351
Announcement of OMB Approval........ 03/01/19 84 FR 6977
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Irina Asoskov, Assistant Division Chief, Pricing
Policy Div. Wireline Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-7122, Fax: 202 418-
1413, Email: [email protected].
William A. Kehoe III, Senior Counsel, Policy & Program Planning
Division, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition
Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-7122,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AJ06
342. Rates for Inmate Calling Services; WC Docket No. 12-375;
Incarcerated People's Communications Services; Implementation of the
Martha Wright-Reed Act, WC Docket No. 23-62 [3060-AK08]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 and 152; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j);
47 U.S.C. 201(b); 47 U.S.C. 218; 47 U.S.C. 220; 47 U.S.C. 276; 47
U.S.C. 403; 47 CFR 64; Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable
Communications Act of 2022; Pub. L. 117-338, 136 Stat. 6156; 47 U.S.C.
152(b) and 153(1)(E); 47 U.S.C. 276(b)(1)(A) and (d)
Abstract: In the Second Report and Order, the Federal
Communications Commission (the Commission) adopted rule changes to
ensure that rates for both interstate and intrastate inmate calling
services (ICS) are fair, just, and reasonable limits on ancillary
service charges imposed by ICS providers. In the Second Report and
Order, the Commission set caps on all interstate and intrastate calling
rates for ICS, established a tiered rate structure based on the size
and type of facility being served, limited the types of ancillary
services that ICS providers may charge for and capped the charges for
permitted fees, banned flat-rate calling, facilitated access to ICS by
people with disabilities by requiring providers to offer free or
steeply discounted rates for calls using TTY, and imposed reporting and
certification requirements to facilitate continued oversight of the ICS
market. In the Third Further Notice portion of the item, the Commission
sought comment on ways to promote competition for ICS, video
visitation, and rates for international calls, and considered an array
of solutions to further address areas of concern in the ICS industry.
In an Order on Reconsideration, the Commission amended its rate caps
and the definition of ``mandatory tax or mandatory fee''.
On June 13, 2017, the D.C. Circuit vacated the rate caps adopted in
the Second Report and Order, as well as reporting requirements related
to video visitation. The court held that the Commission lacked
jurisdiction over intrastate ICS calls and that the rate caps the
Commission adopted for interstate calls were arbitrary and capricious.
The court also remanded the Commission's caps on ancillary fees. On
September 26, 2017, the court denied a petition for rehearing en banc.
On December 21, 2017, the court issued two separate orders: one
vacating the 2016 Order on Reconsideration insofar as it purported to
set rate caps on inmate calling services, and one dismissing as moot
challenges to the Commission's First Report and Order on ICS.
On February 4, 2020, the Commission's Wireline Competition Bureau
(WCB) released a Public Notice seeking to refresh the record on
ancillary service charges imposed in connection with ICS.
On August 6, 2020, the Commission adopted a Report and Order on
Remand and a Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking responding to
remands by the D.C. Circuit and proposing to comprehensively reform
rates and charges for the ICS within the Commission's jurisdiction. The
Report and Order on Remand found that the Commission's five permitted
ancillary service charges: (1) automated payment fees; (2) fees for
single-call and related services; (3) live agent fees; (4) paper bill/
statement fees; and (5) third-party
[[Page 66946]]
financial transaction fees generally, cannot be practically segregated
between interstate and intrastate inmate telephone calls, except in a
limited number of cases. Accordingly, the Commission prohibited ICS
providers from imposing ancillary service fees higher than the
Commission's caps, or imposing fees for additional ancillary services
unless imposed in connection with purely intrastate inmate telephone
service calls.
The Order also reinstated a rule prohibiting providers from marking
up third-party fees for single-call services; reinstated rule language
that prohibits providers from marking up mandatory taxes or fees that
they pass on to inmate telephone service consumers; and amended certain
of the ICS rules consistent with the D.C. Circuit's mandates to reflect
that the Commission's rate and fee caps on ICS apply only to interstate
and international inmate calling.
The Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposed to
substantially reduce the interstate rate cap for inmate telephone calls
from the current interim rate caps of $0.21 per minute for debit or
prepaid calls and $0.25 per minute for collect calls for all types of
correctional facilities, to permanent rate caps of $0.14 per minute for
all interstate calls from prisons and $0.16 for all interstate calls
from jails. The Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking also
proposed to adopt rate caps for international ICS calls for the first
time based on the proposed interstate rate caps, plus the amount that
the provider must pay its underlying international service provider for
an international call. It also proposed a waiver process for providers
that believe the Commission's rate caps would not allow them to recover
their costs of serving a particular facility or contract. Finally, it
sought comment on a further mandatory data collection to continue
efforts to reform these rates and fees.
On November 23, 2020, Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL) filed a
petition for reconsideration of the August 6, 2020 Order on Remand. On
December 3, 2020, the Commission established the opposition and reply
comment dates for the petition.
On May 24, 2021, the Commission released the Third Report and
Order, Order on Reconsideration and Fifth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. In the Third Report and Order, the Commission: (1)
substantially reduced the interim rate caps for interstate ICS from
prisons and larger jails (those with 1,000 or more incarcerated people)
from $0.21 per minute for debit and prepaid calls and $0.25 per minute
for collect calls to new uniform interim interstate caps of $0.12 per
minute for prisons and $0.14 per minute for larger jails; (2)
maintained the interim interstate rate cap of $0.21 for jails with less
than 1,000 incarcerated people because of insufficient record evidence
to determine providers' costs of serving those facilities at the time;
(3) eliminated separate treatment of collect calls, resulting in a
uniform interim interstate rate cap for all types of calls at each
facility; (4) reformed the treatment of site commission payments by
specifying that providers may pass through to consumers (without any
markup) site commission payments that are mandated by federal, state,
or local law and that providers may pass through to consumers no more
than $ 0.02 per minute site commission payments resulting from
contractual obligations negotiated between providers and correctional
officials; (5) capped, for the first time, international calling rates
at all facilities at the applicable facility's total interstate rate
cap, plus the amount the inmate calling services provider pays to its
underlying wholesale carriers for completing international calls; (6)
reformed the ancillary service charge caps for third-party financial
transaction fees, including those related to calls that are billed on a
per-call basis; and (7) adopted a new mandatory data collection to
obtain more uniform cost data based on consistent, prescribed
allocation methodologies to determine just and reasonable, permanent,
interstate and international cost-based rates for facilities of all
sizes.
In the Order on Reconsideration, the Commission denied GTL's
petition for reconsideration of a single sentence from the 2020 Remand
Order, in which the Commission reminded providers that the
jurisdictional nature of a call, that is whether it is interstate or
intrastate, depends on the physical location of the endpoints of the
call and not on whether the area code or NXX prefix of the telephone
number associated with the account are associated with a particular
state. The Commission determined that the end-to-end analysis has been,
and remains, the generally applicable test for all telecommunications
carriers in determining the jurisdiction of their calls and the
Commission continues to use the traditional end-to-end jurisdictional
analysis in setting rates for calls placed by ICS consumers.
In the Fifth Further Notice, the Commission proposed to amend its
rules to require calling service providers to provide access to all
forms of Telecommunications Relay Services, including internet-based
services, to facilitate greater accessibility for incarcerated people
with hearing and speech disabilities. The Commission also sought
comment on: (1) the methodology the Commission should use to set
permanent per-minute rate caps for interstate and international inmate
calling services; (2) site commission costs for facilities of all sizes
and site commission reform generally; (3) the costs of providing
services to jails with average daily populations of fewer than 1,000
incarcerated people; (4) whether and how the Commission should reform
the ancillary service charge caps and how the Commission can curtail
potentially abusive practices related to these charges; (5) whether to
institute a recurring periodic data collection; and (6) whether some
providers have market power in the bidding process, thereby impacting
the competitiveness of the bidding process.
On September 22, 2021, WCB and the Office of Economics and
Analytics (OEA), (collectively, WCB/OEA) issued a Public Notice seeking
comment on the contours and specific requirements of the Third
Mandatory Data Collection, including proposed instructions and a
proposed template for that collection. In issuing this Public Notice,
WCB/OEA were acting pursuant to the Commission's directive, made in the
2021 ICS Order, that the new data collection obtain data on providers'
operations, costs, demand, and revenues, among other information. As
the Commission explained in that Order, the collected information would
allow the Commission to set permanent interstate and international
inmate calling services rate caps and to evaluate and, if warranted,
revise the ancillary service charge caps.
On December 15, 2021, WCB/OEA issued a Public Notice seeking
comment on revised requirements for ICS Annual Reports, including
proposed instructions, templates, and a provider certification.
Specifically, the Public Notice proposed changes in the reporting
requirements to align them with ICS rule changes adopted in the 2021
ICS Order.
On January 18, 2022, WCB adopted an Order implementing the Third
Mandatory Data Collection and adopted accompanying instructions,
reporting templates, and a certification form. The collected
information would allow the Commission to set permanent interstate and
international inmate calling services rate caps and to evaluate and, if
warranted, revise the current ancillary service charge caps.
[[Page 66947]]
On February 9, 2022, WCB released a public notice announcing that
the providers' mandatory data collection responses will be due no later
than June 30, 2022.
On June 24, 2022, WCB adopted an Order implementing revisions to
its annual reporting requirements, including accompanying instructions,
reporting templates, and a certification form. The revisions were
consistent with changes made in the Third Report and Order.
On September 30, 2022, the Commission released the Fourth Report
and Order, and Sixth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The Report
and Order required ICS providers to provide access to all relay
services eligible for Telecommunications Relay Services fund support in
any correctional facility that is located where broadband is available
and is part of a correctional system with 50 or more incarcerated
people. This included the ability to place point-to-point video calls
using American Sign Language. The rules also restricted provider
charges for relay services and point-to-point video calls. More
generally, the rules reduced certain charges and curtailed abusive
practices related to ICS to ease the financial burdens on all
incarcerated people and their families. To ensure that the rates,
terms, and practices related to interstate and international ICS are
just and reasonable, the Order prohibited providers from taking control
of funds in inactive calling accounts until at least 180 calendar days
of continuous inactivity had passed, after which providers are required
to refund the balance or dispose of the funds in accordance with
applicable state law. The Order also lowered the current ancillary fee
caps on charges for single call services, and lowered the cap on
provider charges for processing credit card, debit card, and other
payments to calling services accounts. Finally, the Commission revised
the definitions of ``Prison'' and ``Jail'' in its rules to conform with
the Commission's intent in adopting them in 2015.
In the Sixth Further Notice, the Commission sought additional
comment on whether to allow enterprise registration for internet
Protocol Captioned Telephone Service in carceral settings and how to
address the special circumstances faced by some ICS providers in
jurisdictions with average daily populations of fewer than 50
incarcerated persons. This Notice sought comment on refining the rules
adopted in the Fifth Report and Order concerning the treatment of
balances in inactive accounts. It also sought comment on expanding the
breadth and scope of the Commission's consumer disclosure requirements.
The Commission asked for comment on how it should use the data filed in
response to the Third Mandatory Data Collection to establish just and
reasonable permanent caps on interstate and international rates and
associated ancillary service charges consistent with the
Telecommunications Act of 1934 (the Act). The Commission invited
further comment on allowing ICS providers to offer pilot programs
allowing consumers to purchase calling services under alternative
pricing structures.
On March 17, 2023, the Commission opened a new docket, WC Docket
No. 23-62, and released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order to
begin implementation of the Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable
Communications Act of 2022, which was signed into law on January 5,
2023. The Martha Wright-Reed Act expands the Commission's authority
over rates charged for incarcerated people's communications services,
including intrastate services, and directs the Commission to adopt just
and reasonable rates and charges for incarcerated people's audio and
video communications services not earlier than 18 months and not later
than 24 months after the date of its enactment. The Notice seeks
comment on (1) the expansion of the Commission's authority over
incarcerated people's communications services to include advanced
communications services (including audio and video services) and
intrastate services; (2) the meaning of ``just and reasonable'' in the
context of the Act's other provisions; (3) the rate-making methodology
the Commission should use to fulfill its mandate to ensure that rates
and charges for incarcerated people's communications services are just
and reasonable; (4) the safety and security costs necessary for the
provision of incarcerated people's communications services; and (5) the
actions the Commission should take to ensure that incarcerated people's
communications services are accessible to, and usable by, people with
communication disabilities. The accompanying Order reaffirmed the
Commission's prior delegation of data collection authority to WCB/OEA
and directed staff to initiate a collection of provider data to inform
the Commission's responsibilities to implement the requirements of the
Martha Wright-Reed Act.
[Note: The Commission has historically used the term inmate calling
services'' or ICS'' when referencing payphone service in the
incarceration context. With the passage of the Martha Wright-Reed Act,
the Commission now uses the term incarcerated people's communications
services'' or IPCS'' instead of inmate calling services'' or ICS'' to
refer to the broader range of communications services and providers
subject to the Commission's jurisdiction as a result of the Act.]
On April 28, 2023, the Wireline Competition Bureau and the Office
of Economics and Analytics released a Public Notice seeking comment on
a proposal to update the Commission's Third Mandatory Data Collection
to encompass and collect data on all incarcerated people's
communications services (IPCS) from all providers of those services
subject to the Commission's expanded authority under the Martha Wright-
Reed Just and Reasonable Communications Act. The proposed modifications
included collecting information concerning any audio or video
communications service used by incarcerated people for the purpose of
communicating with non-incarcerated individuals, regardless of
technology used. The Public Notice also sought comment on proposed
modifications to the instructions, reporting template, and
certification form to implement the modified mandatory data collection.
On July 26, 2023, the Wireline Competition Bureau and the Office of
Economics and Analytics released an Order adopting the modifications to
the Third Mandatory Data Collection proposed in the April 28, 2023,
Public Notice. The modifications included collecting information
concerning any audio or video communications service used by
incarcerated people for the purpose of communicating with non-
incarcerated individuals, regardless of technology used. The Order
adopted the proposed instructions, reporting template, and
certification form.
On August 3, 2023, the Wireline Competition Bureau and the Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau released a Public Notice seeking
comment on proposed revisions to the Annual Reports and Annual
Certifications that the Commission requires certain providers of IPCS
to submit. The Public Notice proposed changes to the Annual Reports to
(1) reflect expanded reporting requirements regarding access to IPCS by
persons with communication disabilities and (2) seek data about video
IPCS necessary to implement the Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable
Communications Act. The Public Notice also sought comment on proposed
modifications to the instructions, reporting templates, and
[[Page 66948]]
certification form for the Annual Reports data collection.
On October 31, 2023, IPCS providers filed their data submissions in
response to the 2023 Mandatory Data Collection. Commission staff
processed the submissions and on March [XX], 2024, WCB/OEA released a
Public Notice announcing the availability of the preliminary 2023
Mandatory Data Collection database to eligible individuals pursuant to
protective order. Commission Chairwoman Rosenworcel hosted IPCS
listening sessions on October 27, 2023 in Chicago, IL and on February
1, 2024 in Charleston, SC.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/22/13 78 FR 4369
FNPRM............................... 11/13/13 78 FR 68005
R&O................................. 11/13/13 78 FR 67956
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 12/20/13 .......................
2nd FNPRM........................... 11/21/14 79 FR 69682
2nd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 01/15/15 .......................
2nd FNPRM Reply Comment Period End.. 01/20/15 .......................
3rd FNPRM........................... 12/18/15 80 FR 79020
2nd R&O............................. 12/18/15 80 FR 79136
3rd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 01/19/16 .......................
3rd FNPRM Reply Comment Period End.. 02/08/16 .......................
Order on Reconsideration............ 09/12/16 81 FR 62818
Announcement of OMB Approval........ 03/01/17 82 FR 12182
Correction to Announcement of OMB 03/08/17 82 FR 12922
Approval.
Announcement of OMB Approval........ 02/06/20 85 FR 6947
Public Notice....................... 02/19/20 85 FR 9444
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 03/20/20 .......................
Public Notice Reply Comment Period 04/06/20 .......................
End.
Letter.............................. 07/15/20 .......................
R&O on Remand & 4th FNPRM........... 08/06/20 85 FR 67450; 85 FR
67480; 85 FR 73233
Order............................... 09/01/20 .......................
Public Notice....................... 09/24/20 85 FR 66512
Public Notice....................... 10/23/20 .......................
Letter.............................. 11/13/20 .......................
Public Notice....................... 12/03/20 85 FR 83000
Order Extending Reply Comment 12/17/20 .......................
Deadline.
Public Notice....................... 01/08/21 .......................
Comment Period End on 12/3/2020, 01/11/21 .......................
Public Notice End.
Comment Period End on 12/3/2020, 01/21/21 .......................
Public Notice End.
Public Notice....................... 03/03/21 .......................
5th FNPRM........................... 07/28/21 86 FR 40416
3rd R&O............................. 07/28/21 86 FR 40682
3rd R&O............................. 07/28/21 86 FR 40340
Order............................... 08/10/21 86 FR 48952
Public Notice (MDC)................. 09/22/21 86 FR 54897
5th NPRM Comment Period End......... 09/27/21 .......................
Order Extending Reply Comment 10/15/21 86 FR 60438
Deadline.
5th NPRM Reply Comment Period End... 10/27/21 .......................
Comment Period End on 09/22/2021, 11/04/21 .......................
Public Notice End.
Reply Comment Period on 09/22/2021, 11/19/21 .......................
Public Notice End.
5th NPRM Reply Comment Period End... 12/17/21 .......................
Public Notice on Annual Reports..... 01/04/22 87 FR 212
Comment Period End on 01/04/2022, 01/12/22 .......................
Public Notice End.
Reply Period on 01/04/2022, Public 01/27/22 .......................
Notice End.
Order Adopting MDC.................. 03/22/22 87 FR 16560
Order Adopting Annual Reports 08/02/22 87 FR 47103
Revisions.
4th R&O............................. 09/30/22 .......................
6th FNPRM........................... 09/30/22 .......................
NPRM--Proposing Implementation of 04/07/23 88 FR 20804
Martha Wright-Reed Act.
Public Notice--Proposing 2023 MDC... 05/03/23 88 FR 27850
Order--Adopting 2023 Mandatory Data 08/03/23 88 FR 51240
Collection.
Public Notice--Proposing Annual 08/09/23 88 FR 53850
Report Revisions.
Public Notice....................... 09/21/23 88 FR 65134
Public Notice....................... 10/20/23 .......................
NPRM................................ 01/16/24 89 FR 2514
Public Notice....................... 01/25/24 .......................
Public Notice....................... 02/28/24 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: David Zesiger, Deputy Division Chief, PPD, WCB,
Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-2081, Email:
[email protected].
Erik Raven-Hansen, Assistant Division Chief, Pricing Policy
Division, Wireline Comp., Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1532, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK08
343. Comprehensive Review of the Part 32 Uniform System of Accounts (WC
Docket No. 14-130) [3060-AK20]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 201(b);
47 U.S.C. 219 and 220
Abstract: The Commission initiates a rulemaking proceeding to
review the Uniform System of Accounts (USOA) to consider ways to
minimize the compliance burdens on incumbent local exchange carriers
while ensuring that the Agency retains access to the information it
needs to fulfill its regulatory duties. In light of the Commission's
actions in areas of price cap regulation, universal service reform, and
intercarrier compensation reform, the Commission stated that it is
likely appropriate to streamline the existing rules even though those
reforms may not have eliminated the need for accounting data for some
purposes. The Commission's analysis and proposals are divided into
three parts. First, the Commission proposes to streamline the USOA
accounting rules while preserving their existing structure. Second, the
Commission seeks more focused comment on the accounting requirements
needed for price cap carriers to address our statutory and regulatory
obligations. Third, the Commission seeks comment on several related
issues, including state requirements, rate effects, implementation,
continuing property records, and legal authority.
On February 23, 2017, the Commission adopted a Report and Order
that revised the part 32 USOA to substantially reduce accounting
burdens for both price cap and rate-of-return carriers. First, the
Order streamlines the USOA for all carriers. In addition, the USOA will
be aligned more closely with
[[Page 66949]]
generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Second, the Order
allows price cap carriers to use GAAP for all regulatory accounting
purposes as long as they comply with targeted accounting rules, which
are designed to mitigate any impact on pole attachment rates.
Alternatively, price cap carriers can elect to use GAAP accounting for
all purposes other than those associated with pole attachment rates and
continue to use the part 32 accounts for pole attachment rates for up
to 12 years. Third, the Order addresses several miscellaneous issues,
including referral to the Federal-State Joint Board on Separations the
issue of examining jurisdictional separations rules in light of the
reforms adopted to part 32.
On June 5, 2017, NCTA-The internet & Television Association filed a
petition for reconsideration of the Report and Order requesting that
the Commission: (a) clarify that parties making pole attachments will
have access to all accounting information needed to verify the
reasonableness of pole attachment rates; and (b) establish additional
substantive protections to ensure that pole attachment rates based on
GAAP are consistent with the requirements of Section 224 of the
Communication Act and the assurances contained in the Part 32 Order.
Oppositions to that petition were due on July 21, 2017, and replies
were due on July 31, 2017.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 09/15/14 79 FR 54942
NPRM Comment Period End............. 11/14/14 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 12/15/14 .......................
R&O................................. 04/04/17 82 FR 20833
Petition for Reconsideration........ 06/05/17 82 FR 31282
Comment Period on Petition for 07/21/17 .......................
Reconsideration End.
Reply Comment Period on Petition for 07/31/17 .......................
Reconsideration End.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: William A. Kehoe III, Senior Counsel, Policy &
Program Planning Division, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202
418-7122, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK20
344. Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108; Protecting and
Promoting the Open Internet, GN Docket No. 14-28; Safeguarding and
Securing the Open Internet, WC Docket No. 23-320 [3060-AK21]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j); 47 U.S.C.
201(b)
Abstract: The Commission proposed to reestablish the framework the
Commission adopted in 2015 to classify broadband internet access
service as a telecommunications service and to classify mobile
broadband internet access service as a commercial mobile service. The
Commission also proposed to forbear from 26 Title II provisions, and
clarify that the Commission will not regulate rates or require network
unbundling. Finally, the Commission proposed to reestablish a national
regulatory approach to protect the open internet by preventing
broadband internet access service providers from engaging in practices
harmful to consumers, including: (1) proposing to reinstate
straightforward, clear rules that prohibit blocking, throttling, or
engaging in paid or affiliated prioritization arrangements; (2)
proposing to reinstate a general conduct standard that would prohibit
unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage to consumers or
edge providers; and (3) proposing to retain the disclosure requirements
under the current transparency rule and seeking comment on the means of
disclosure, the interplay between the transparency rule and the
broadband label requirements, and any additional enhancements or
changes.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 07/01/14 79 FR 37448
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/18/14 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 09/15/14 .......................
R&O on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, 04/13/15 80 FR 19737
and Order.
NPRM................................ 06/02/17 82 FR 25568
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/03/17 .......................
Declaratory Ruling, R&O, and Order.. 02/22/18 83 FR 7852
Order on Remand..................... 01/07/21 86 FR 994
NPRM................................ 11/03/23 88 FR 76048
NPRM Comment Period End............. 12/14/23 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 01/17/24 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Melissa Kirkel, Deputy Division Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202
418-7958, Fax: 202 418-1413, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK21
345. Technology Transitions; GN Docket No. 13-5, WC Docket No. 05-25;
Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment; WC Docket No. 17-84 [3060-AK32]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 214; 47 U.S.C. 251
Abstract: On April 20, 2017, the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, Notice of Inquiry, and Request for Comment
(Wireline Infrastructure NPRM, NOl, and RFC) seeking input on a number
of actions designed to accelerate: (1) the deployment of next-
generation networks and services by removing barriers to infrastructure
investment at the Federal, State, and local level; (2) the transition
from legacy copper networks and services to next-generation fiber-based
networks and services; and (3) the reduction of Commission regulations
that raise costs and slow, rather than facilitate, broadband
deployment.
On November 16, 2017, the Commission adopted a Report and Order
(R&O), Declaratory Ruling, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(Wireline Infrastructure Order) that takes a number of actions and
seeks comment on further actions designed to accelerate the deployment
of next-generation networks and services through removing barriers to
infrastructure investment.
The Wireline Infrastructure Order took a number of actions. First,
the Report and Order revised the pole attachment rules to reduce costs
for attachers, reforms the pole access complaint procedures to settle
access disputes more swiftly, and increases access to infrastructure
for certain types of broadband providers. Second, the Report and Order
revised the section 214(a) discontinuance rules and the network change
notification rules, including those applicable to copper retirements,
to expedite the process for carriers seeking to replace legacy network
infrastructure and legacy
[[Page 66950]]
services with advanced broadband networks and innovative new services.
Third, the Report and Order reversed a 2015 ruling that discontinuance
authority is required for solely wholesale services to carrier-
customers. Fourth, the Declaratory Ruling abandoned the 2014
``functional test'' interpretation of when section 214 discontinuance
applications are required, bringing added clarity to the section 214(a)
discontinuance process for carriers and consumers alike. Finally, the
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking sought comment on additional
potential pole attachment reforms, reforms to the network change
disclosure and section 214(a) discontinuance processes, and ways to
facilitate rebuilding networks impacted by natural disasters. Various
parties filed a Petition for Review of the Wireline Infrastructure
Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth
Circuit denied the Petition on January 23, 2020 on the grounds that the
parties lacked standing.
On June 7, 2018, the Commission adopted a Second Report and Order
(Wireline Infrastructure Second Report and Order) taking further
actions designed to expedite the transition from legacy networks and
services to next generation networks and advanced services that benefit
the American public and to promote broadband deployment by further
streamlining the section 214(a) discontinuance rules, network change
disclosure processes, and part 68 customer notification process.
The Wireline Infrastructure NPRM, NOI, and RFC sought comment on
additional issues not addressed in the November Wireline Infrastructure
Order or the June Wireline Infrastructure Second Report and Order. It
sought comment on changes to the Commission's pole attachment rules to:
(1) streamline the timeframe for gaining access to utility poles; (2)
reduce charges paid by attachers for work done to make a pole ready for
new attachments; and (3) establish a formula for computing the maximum
pole attachment rate that may be imposed on an incumbent LEC.
The Wireline Infrastructure NPRM, NOI, and RFC also sought comment
on whether the Commission should enact rules, consistent with its
authority under section 253 of the Act, to promote the deployment of
broadband infrastructure by preempting State and local laws that
inhibit broadband deployment. It also sought comment on whether there
are State laws governing the maintenance or retirement of copper
facilities that serve as a barrier to deploying next-generation
technologies and services that the Commission might seek to preempt.
Previously, in November 2014, the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and Declaratory Ruling that: (1) proposed new
backup power rules; (2) proposed new or revised rules for copper
retirements and service discontinuances; and (3) adopted a functional
test in determining what constitutes a service for purposes of section
214(a) discontinuance review. In August 2015, the Commission adopted a
Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking that: (i) lengthened and revised the copper
retirement process; (ii) determined that a carrier must obtain
Commission approval before discontinuing a service used as a wholesale
input if the carrier's actions will discontinue service to a carrier-
customer's retail end users; (iii) adopted an interim rule requiring
incumbent LECs that seek to discontinue certain TDM-based wholesale
services to commit to certain rates, terms, and conditions; (iv)
proposed further revisions to the copper retirement discontinuance
process; and (v) upheld the November 2014 Declaratory Ruling. In July
2016, the Commission adopted a Second Report and Order, Declaratory
Ruling, and Order on Reconsideration that: (i) adopted a new test for
obtaining streamlined treatment when carriers seek Commission
authorization to discontinue legacy services in favor of services based
on newer technologies; (ii) set forth consumer education requirements
for carriers seeking to discontinue legacy services in favor of
services based on newer technologies; (iii) allowed notice to customers
of discontinuance applications by email; (iv) required carriers to
provide notice of discontinuance applications to Tribal entities; (v)
made a technical rule change to create a new title for copper
retirement notices and certifications; and (vi) harmonized the timeline
for competitive LEC discontinuances caused by incumbent LEC network
changes.
On August 2, 2018, the Commission adopted a Third Report and Order
and Declaratory Ruling (Wireline Infrastructure Third Report and Order)
establishing a new framework for the vast majority of pole attachments
governed by Federal law by instituting a one-touch make-ready regime,
in which a new attacher may elect to perform all simple work to prepare
a pole for new wireline attachments in the communications space. This
new framework includes safeguards to promote coordination among parties
and ensures that new attachers perform work safely and reliably. The
Commission retained its multi-party pole attachment process for
attachments that are complex or above the communications space of a
pole, but made significant modifications to speed deployment, promote
accurate billing, expand the use of self-help for new attachers when
attachment deadlines are missed, and reduce the likelihood of
coordination failures that lead to unwarranted delays. The Commission
also improved its pole attachment rules by codifying and redefining
Commission precedent that requires utilities to allow attachers to
overlash existing wires, thus maximizing the usable space on the pole;
eliminating outdated disparities between the pole attachment rates that
incumbent carriers must pay compared to other similarly-situated cable
and telecommunications attachers; and clarifying that the Commission
will preempt, on an expedited case-by-case basis, State and local laws
that inhibit the rebuilding or restoration of broadband infrastructure
after a disaster. The Commission also adopted a Declaratory Ruling that
interpreted section 253(a) of the Communications Act to prohibit State
and local express and de facto moratoria on the deployment of
telecommunications services or facilities and directed the Wireline
Competition and Wireless Telecommunications Bureaus to act promptly on
petitions challenging specific alleged moratoria. Numerous parties
filed appeals of the Wireline Infrastructure Third Report and Order,
and the appeals were consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals of the
Ninth Circuit. On August 12, 2020, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion
upholding the Wireline Infrastructure Third Report and Order in all
respects.
On August 8, 2018, Public Knowledge filed a Petition for
Reconsideration of the Second Report and Order and Motion to Hold in
Abeyance. On October 20, 2020, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau)
adopted a Declaratory Ruling, Order on Reconsideration, and Order. In
the Declaratory Ruling, the Bureau clarified that any carrier seeking
to discontinue legacy voice service to a community or part of a
community that is the last retail provider of such legacy TDM service
to that community or part of the community is subject to the
Commission's technology transition discontinuance rules, including the
requirements to receive streamlined treatment of its discontinuance
[[Page 66951]]
application. In the Order on Reconsideration, the Bureau denied the
Public Knowledge Petition for Reconsideration because all of Public
Knowledge's arguments were fully considered, and rejected, by the
Commission in the underlying proceeding. It also dismissed as moot the
accompanying motion to have the Commission hold that Order in abeyance
pending the outcome of the appeal that the Ninth Circuit ultimately
denied.
In September 2019, CTIA filed a Petition for Declaratory Ruling
seeking clarification of certain issues raised in the 2018 Third Report
and Order. On July 29, 2020, the Wireline Competition Bureau issued a
Declaratory Ruling clarifying that (1) the imposition of a blanket ban
by a utility on attachments to any portion of a utility pole is
inconsistent with the federal requirement that a denial of access . . .
be specific to a particular request; and (2) while utilities and
attachers have the flexibility to negotiate terms in their pole
attachment agreements that differ from the requirements in the
Commission's rules, a utility cannot use its significant negotiating
leverage to require an attacher to give up rights to which the attacher
is entitled under the rules without the attacher obtaining a
corresponding benefit.
On July 20, 2020, the Wireline Competition Bureau issued a Public
Notice seeking comment on a Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed on
July 16, 2020, by NCTA The internet & Television Association. NCTA
asked the Commission to declare that: (1) pole owners must share in the
cost of pole replacements in unserved areas pursuant to section 224 of
the Communications Act, section 1.1408(b) of the Commission's rules,
and Commission precedent; (2) pole attachment complaints arising in
unserved areas should be prioritized through placement on the
Accelerated Docket under section 1.736 of the Commission's rules; and
(3) section 1.1407(b) of the Commission's rules authorizes the
Commission to order any pole owner to complete a pole replacement
within a specified period of time or designate an authorized contractor
to do so. Comments on the NCTA Petition were due by September 2, 2020,
and reply comments by September 17, 2020.
On January 19, 2021, WCB released a Declaratory Ruling on the
subject of pole replacements. WCB declined to rule on the NCTA
Petition, finding that the questions raised were better suited to a
rulemaking. However, in response to the Petition's record, WCB issued a
narrow clarification: a utility may not impose the entire cost of a
pole replacement on a requesting attacher when the attacher is not the
sole cause of the pole replacement (for instance, where the pole has
been red-tagged i.e., placed on a utility's pole replacement schedule
due to non-compliance with safety standards).
On July 23, 2021, the Wireline Competition Bureau issued a Public
Notice seeking comment on a Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed by
the Edison Electric Institute asking the Commission to declare that:
(1) when the Commission determines that a pole attachment rate, term,
or condition is unjust and unreasonable and orders a refund pursuant to
section 1.1407(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, the applicable statute
of limitations is the same as the two-year period prescribed by section
415(b) of the Act; and (2) refunds in pole attachment complaint
proceedings are not appropriate for any period preceding good-faith
notice of a dispute. Deadlines for filing comments and reply comments
were set for August 23, 2021, and September 10, 2021, respectively.
In March 2022, the Commission began the rulemaking contemplated by
the January 2021 Declaratory Ruling, by adopting a Second Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on several issues
relating to pole replacements, including (1) whether and to what extent
utilities directly benefit from various types of pole replacements in
situations where a pole replacement is not necessitated solely by a new
attachment request; (2) whether requiring utilities to pay a portion of
the costs of a pole replacement would positively or negatively affect
negotiations of pole attachment agreements and broadband deployment;
(3) what measures the Commission could adopt to expedite the resolution
of pole replacement disputes; and (4) what scope of refunds the
Commission should order when it determines that a pole attachment rate,
term, or condition is unjust and unreasonable. Comments on the Second
FNPRM were due on June 27, 2022, while reply comments were due on
August 26, 2022.
On December 13, 2023, the Commission adopted a Fourth Report and
Order, Declaratory Ruling, and Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking seeking that takes a number of actions, makes a number of
clarifications, and seeks comment on further actions designed to
accelerate the deployment of next-generation networks and services
trough removing barriers to infrastructure investment.
On January 19, 2024, the Wireline Competition Bureau issued a
Public Notice seeking comment on a Petition for Reconsideration filed
by the Edison Electric Institute asking the Commission to reconsider
the Declaratory Ruling to (1) clearly define the narrow circumstances
in which a utility pole owner is required to provide a copy of its
easement to an attacher that seeks to access a pole within such
easement; and (2) remove or clarify its ruling that a pole replacement
is not `necessitated solely' by an attachment requires if a utility's
previous or contemporaneous change to its internal construction
standards necessitates replacement of an existing pole. Deadlines for
filing comments and reply comments were set for February 13, 2024 and
February 23, 2024, respectively.
On February 16, 2024, the Wireline Competition Bureau issued a
Public Notice seeking comment on a Petition for Reconsideration filed
by the Concerned Coalition of Utilities asking the Commission to
reconsider the Fourth Report and Order to eliminate the requirement
that utilities submit a copy of period pole inspection reports to
attaching entities. Deadlines for filing comments and reply comments
were set for March 15, 2024 and March 25, 2024, respectively.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/06/15 80 FR 450
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/05/15 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 03/09/15 .......................
FNPRM............................... 09/25/15 80 FR 57768
R&O................................. 09/25/15 80 FR 57768
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 10/26/15 .......................
FNPRM Reply Comment Period End...... 11/24/15 .......................
2nd R&O............................. 09/12/16 81 FR 62632
NPRM................................ 05/16/17 82 FR 224533
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/15/17 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 07/17/17 .......................
R&O................................. 12/28/17 82 FR 61520
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 01/17/18 .......................
FNPRM Reply Comment Period End...... 02/16/18 .......................
2nd R&O............................. 07/09/18 83 FR 31659
3rd R&O............................. 09/14/18 83 FR 46812
NCTA Public Notice.................. 07/20/20 .......................
CTIA Declaratory Ruling............. 07/29/20 .......................
Declaratory Ruling.................. 01/19/21 .......................
[[Page 66952]]
Order on Reconsideration............ 02/02/21 86 FR 8872
EEI Public Notice................... 07/23/21 .......................
EEI Public Notice Comment Period End 08/23/21 .......................
EEI Public Notice Reply Comment 09/10/21 .......................
Period End.
Second FNPRM........................ 03/18/22 87 FR 25181
Second Further NPRM Comment Period 06/27/22 .......................
End.
Second Further NPRM Reply Comment 08/26/22 .......................
Period End.
4th Report and Order, Declaratory 01/11/24 89 FR 2151
Ruling.
4th Report and Order, Declaratory 01/12/24 89 FR 1859
Ruling, Erratum.
Public Notice....................... 01/29/24 89 FR 5439
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 02/13/24 .......................
Public Notice Reply Comment Period 02/23/24 .......................
End.
Public Notice....................... 02/29/24 89 FR 14797
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 03/15/24 .......................
Public Notice Reply Comment Period 03/25/24 .......................
End.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michele Berlove, Assistant Division Chief,
Competition Policy Div., WCB, Federal Communications Commission,
Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418-1477, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK32
346. Numbering Policies for Modern Communications, WC Docket No. 13-97
[3060-AK36]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 153 to 154; 47 U.S.C. 201
to 205; 47 U.S.C. 251; 47 U.S.C. 303(r)
Abstract: This Order establishes a process to authorize
interconnected VoIP providers to obtain North American Numbering Plan
(NANP) telephone numbers directly from the numbering administrators,
rather than through intermediaries. Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the
Commission's rules limits access to telephone numbers to entities that
demonstrate they are authorized to provide service in the area for
which the numbers are being requested. The Commission has interpreted
this rule as requiring evidence of either a State certificate of public
convenience and necessity (CPCN) or a Commission license. Neither
authorization is typically available in practice to interconnected VoIP
providers. Thus, as a practical matter, generally only
telecommunications carriers are able to provide the proof of
authorization required under our rules, and thus able to obtain numbers
directly from the numbering administrators. This Order establishes an
authorization process to enable interconnected VoIP providers that
choose direct access to request numbers directly from the numbering
administrators. Next, the Order sets forth several conditions designed
to minimize number exhaust and preserve the integrity of the numbering
system.
The Order requires interconnected VoIP providers obtaining numbers
to comply with the same requirements applicable to carriers seeking to
obtain numbers. These requirements include any State requirements
pursuant to numbering authority delegated to the States by the
Commission, as well as industry guidelines and practices, among others.
The Order also requires interconnected VoIP providers to comply with
facilities readiness requirements adapted to this context, and with
numbering utilization and optimization requirements. As conditions to
requesting and obtaining numbers directly from the numbering
administrators, interconnected VoIP providers are also required to: (1)
provide the relevant State commissions with regulatory and numbering
contacts when requesting numbers in those states; (2) request numbers
from the numbering administrators under their own unique OCN; (3) file
any requests for numbers with the relevant State commissions at least
30 days prior to requesting numbers from the numbering administrators;
and (4) provide customers with the opportunity to access all
abbreviated dialing codes (N11 numbers) in use in a geographic area.
The Order also modifies Commission's rules in order to permit VoIP
Positioning Center (VPC) providers to obtain pseudo-Automatic Number
Identification (p-ANI) codes directly from the numbering administrators
for purposes of providing E911 services.
Based on experiences and review of the direct access authorization
process established by the 2015 Order, the Commission adopted a FNPRM
which proposes clarifications and revisions to the Commission's rules
to better ensure that interconnected VoIP providers that obtain direct
access authorization to not facilitate illegal robocalls, spoofing, or
fraud, pose national security risks, or evade or abuse intercarrier
compensation requirements. The FNPRM proposes to require additional
certifications as part of the direct access authorization applications
process, that would include certification of compliance with anti-
robocalling obligations. The FNPRM also proposes to clarify that
applicants disclose foreign ownership information on their direct
access application. It would also propose to generally refer those
applications with 10% or greater foreign ownership to the Executive
Branch agencies for their review, consistent with the Commission's
referral of other types of applications. The FNPRM also propose to
clarify that holders of a direct access authorization must update the
Commission and applicable states within 30 days of changes to ownership
information submitted to the Commission. The FNPRM further proposes to
clarify that Commission staff retain the authority to determine when to
accept filings as complete and proposes to direct Commission staff to
reject an application if an applicant has engaged in behavior contrary
to the public interest or has been found to originate or transmit
illegal robocalls. Finally, the FNPRM seeks comment on whether to
expand the direct access authorization to one-way VoIP providers or
other entities that use numbering resources.
In 2023, the Commission established by Second Report and Order
modifications to and clarifications of the direct access authorization
rules to reduce access to telephone numbers by potential perpetrators
of illegal robocalls. Such changes include certifications to be made by
applicants affirming compliance with the Commission's preexisting
requirements concerning STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication and
Robocall Mitigation Database filings.
The Order also adopts important guardrails to protect national
security, law enforcement, and numbering resources. These changes
include foreign ownership and control disclosures, certification of
compliance with State numbering requirements, certification of
compliance with the Commission's rules pertaining to access arbitrage,
and ensuring the accuracy of application contents upon application as
well as after the authorization is granted.
The Order also codifies Bureau staff review, rejection, and
authorization revocation matters.
[[Page 66953]]
The item also includes an FNPRM which proposes a 30-day deadline
for existing authorization holders to comply with rule changes. The
FNPRM also proposes a delegation of authority to the Numbering
Administrator via public notice to suspend all pending and future
requests for numbers if the new information submitted by an existing
authorization holder indicates a material change or raises a public
interest concern. The FNPRM further proposes that authorization holders
continue to use numbers pending Bureau investigation.
The Second FNPRM also proposes that new applicants be required to
disclose initial service area where numbers will be used. The FNPRM
also proposes that authorizations holders that sell or lease numbers be
required to obtain the direct access certification requirements from
the indirect access recipients, retain copies, and file with the
Commission a list of the indirect access recipients. The FNPRM also
seeks comment on enforcement actions that the Commission could take
against applicants and authorization holders for violation of the
direct access authorization rules.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/19/13 78 FR 36725
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/19/13 .......................
R&O................................. 10/29/15 80 FR 66454
FNPRM (Release Date)................ 08/06/21 86 FR 51081
FNPRM (Comment Period End).......... 10/14/21 86 FR 51081
Second FNPRM........................ 10/30/23 88 FR 74098
Second Report and Order............. 11/20/23 88 FR 80617
Second FNPRM Comment Period Ends.... 11/29/23 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jordan Marie Reth, Attorney-Advisor (PU), Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1418, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK36
347. Implementation of the Universal Service Portions of the 1996
Telecommunications Act [3060-AK57]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.
Abstract: The Telecommunications Act of 1996 expanded the
traditional goal of universal service to include increased access to
both telecommunications and advanced services such as high-speed
internet for all consumers at just, reasonable, and affordable rates.
The Act established principles for universal service that specifically
focused on increasing access to evolving services for consumers living
in rural and insular areas, and for consumers with low-incomes.
Additional principles called for increased access to high-speed
internet in the nation's schools, libraries, and rural healthcare
facilities. The FCC established four programs within the Universal
Service Fund to implement the statute: Connect America Fund (formally
known as High-Cost Support) for rural areas; Lifeline (for low-income
consumers), including initiatives to expand phone service for Native
Americans; Schools and Libraries (E-rate); and Rural Healthcare.
The Universal Service Fund is paid for by contributions from
telecommunications carriers, including wireline and wireless companies,
and interconnected Voice over internet Protocol (VoIP) providers,
including cable companies that provide voice service, based on an
assessment on their interstate and international end-user revenues. The
Universal Service Administrative Company, or USAC, administers the four
programs and collects monies for the Universal Service Fund under the
direction of the FCC.
On July 21, 2023, the Commission released an NPRM and Order taking
steps to further enhance Tribal applicants' access to the E-Rate
program to encourage greater Tribal participation in the program
On July 24, 2023, the Commission adopted plan to bring reliable
broadband to rural communities.
On October 20, 2023, the Commission kicked off rulemaking to
explore innovative ways to continue to address Alaska's unique
connectivity challenges.
On November 8, 2023, the Commission proposed to permit eligible
schools and libraries to receive E-Rate support for Wi-Fi hotspots and
wireless internet services that can be used off-premises.
On November 13, 2023, the Commission proposed a three-year pilot
program within the Universal Service Fund (USF) to provide up to $200
million available to support cybersecurity and advanced firewall
services for eligible schools and libraries.
On December 14, 2023, the Commission adopted rules for further
improvements to Rural Health Care Program.
On December 27, 2023, the Commission deferred the commencement of
the next fiveyear deployment obligation term for legacy rate-of-return
carriers receiving Connect America Fund Broadband Loop Support (CAF
BLS) in 2024 until January 1, 2025.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R&O and FNPRM....................... 01/13/17 82 FR 4275
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/13/17 .......................
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 02/27/17 .......................
R&O and Order on Recon.............. 03/21/17 82 FR 14466
Order on Recon...................... 05/19/17 82 FR 22901
Order on Recon...................... 06/08/17 82 FR 26653
Memorandum, Opinion & Order......... 06/21/17 82 FR 228224
NPRM................................ 07/30/19 84 FR 36865
NPRM................................ 08/21/19 84 FR 43543
R&O and Order on Recon.............. 11/07/19 84 FR 59937
Order on Recon...................... 12/09/19 84 FR 67220
R&O................................. 12/20/19 84 FR 70026
R&O................................. 12/27/19 84 FR 71308
R&O................................. 01/17/20 85 FR 3044
Report & Order...................... 03/10/20 85 FR 13773
Report & Order...................... 05/11/20 85 FR 19892
Declaratory Ruling/2nd FNPRM........ 08/04/20 85 FR 48134
Public Notice....................... 03/22/21 86 FR 15172
Report & Order on Recon............. 04/09/21 86 FR 18459
R&O................................. 05/28/21 86 FR 29136
2nd R&O............................. 07/14/21 86 FR 37061
Public Notice....................... 08/02/21 86 FR 41408
NPRM................................ 10/14/21 86 FR 57097
Order............................... 12/14/21 86 FR 70983
NPRM................................ 01/27/22 87 FR 4182
FNPRM............................... 03/15/22 87 FR 14422
NPRM................................ 06/16/22 87 FR 36283
NPRM................................ 06/23/22 87 FR 37459
2nd R&O............................. 09/06/22 87 FR 54311
3rd R&O............................. 09/06/22 87 FR 54401
Further Notice of Proposed 11/19/22 87 FR 67660
Rulemaking.
Public Notice....................... 01/06/23 88 FR 1035
NPRM................................ 03/13/23 88 FR 14529
Public Notice....................... 04/11/23 88 FR 21580
Report and Order on Review.......... 05/05/23 88 FR 28993
Order............................... 06/05/23 88 FR 36510
Report and Order, NPRM, and NOI..... 08/18/23 88 FR 56579
Report and Order, NPRM, and NOI..... 08/23/23 88 FR 57383
Report and Order, and FNPRM......... 11/13/23 88 FR 77522
Report and Order, and NPRM.......... 11/17/23 88 FR 80238
NPRM................................ 12/07/23 88 FR 85157
NPRM................................ 12/09/23 88 FR 90141
[[Page 66954]]
3rd Report and Order................ 01/11/24 89 FR 1834
Report and Order.................... 01/31/24 89 FR 6021
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Nakesha Woodward, Program Analyst, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline
Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202
418-1502, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK57
348. Toll Free Assignment Modernization and Toll-Free Service Access
Codes: WC Docket No. 17-192, CC Docket No. 95-155 [3060-AK91]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151; 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 201(b);
47 U.S.C. 251(e)(1)
Abstract: In this Report and Order (Order), the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) initiates an auction to distribute
certain toll-free numbers. The numbers to be auctioned will be in the
new 833 toll free code for which there have been multiple, competing
requests.
By using an auction, the FCC will ensure that sought-after numbers
are awarded to the parties that value them most. In addition, the FCC
will reserve certain 833 numbers for distribution to government and
non-profit entities that request them for public health and safety
purposes. The FCC will study the results of the auction to determine
how to best use the mechanism to distribute toll-free numbers equitably
and efficiently in the future as well. Revenues from the auction will
be used to defray the cost of toll-free numbering administration,
reducing the cost of numbering for all users. The Order establishing
the toll-free number auction will also authorize and accommodate the
use of a secondary market for numbers awarded at auction to further
distribute these numbers to the entities that value them most. The
Order also adopted several definitional and technical updates to
improve clarity and flexibility in toll-free number assignment.
The Commission sought comment and then adopted auctions procedures
and deadlines on August 2, 2019. Bidding for the auction occurred on
December 17, 2019, and Somos issued an announcement of the winning
bidders on December 20, 2019. On December 16, 2019, to facilitate the
preparation of its study of the auction, the Bureau charged the North
American Numbering Council, via its Toll Free Access Modernization
Working Group, to issue a report evaluating various aspects of the 833
Auction, and recommending improvements for any future toll free number
auctions.
On January 16, 2020, Somos released all of the 833 Auction data for
public review. On March 13, 2020, the Bureau invited public comment on
the 833 Auction in preparation for issuing a report on the lessons
learned from the Auction. Comments were due on April 13, 2020. On July
14, 2020, the North American Numbering Council approved the Toll-Free
Assignment Modernization Working Group's report, Perspectives on the
December 2019 Auction of Numbers in the 833 Numbering Plan Area.
On January 15, 2021, the Bureau released a report that examined
various aspects of this toll-free number assignment experiment,
including lessons learned, examination of auction outcomes, and
recommendations for future toll free number assignment. The Bureau
concluded that the 833 Auction was a successful experiment that
provided invaluable experience and data that can facilitate further
Commission efforts to continue to modernize tol-free number allocation
in the future.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 10/13/17 82 FR 47669
NPRM Comment Period End............. 11/13/17 .......................
Final Rule.......................... 10/23/18 83 FR 53377
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Heather Hendrickson, Deputy Division Chief,
Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-7295, Email:
[email protected].
Matthew Collins, Deputy Division Chief, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-7141, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK91
349. Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection; WC Docket
Nos. 19-195 and 11-10 [3060-AK93]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 35 to 39; 47 U.S.C. 154; 47 U.S.C. 211;
47 U.S.C. 219; 47 U.S.C. 220; 47 U.S.C. 402(b)2(B); Pub. L. 104-104; 47
U.S.C. 151-154; 47 U.S.C. 157; 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 254; 47 U.S.C.
301; 47 U.S.C. 303; 47 U.S.C. 309; 47 U.S.C. 319; 47 U.S.C. 332; 47
U.S.C. 641 to 646; Pub. L 116-130; . . .
Abstract: The Commission has long recognized that precise, granular
data on the availability of fixed and mobile broadband are vital to
bringing digital opportunity to all Americans, no matter where they
live, work, or travel.
On March 23, 2020, the Broadband Deployment Accuracy and
Technological Availability Act (Broadband DATA Act) was signed into law
requiring the Commission to create a new set of broadband availability
maps. Among other things, the Broadband DATA Act requires the
Commission to collect standardized, granular data on the availability
and quality of both fixed and mobile broadband internet access
services, to create a common dataset of all locations where fixed
broadband internet access service can be installed (the Broadband
Serviceable Location Fabric or Fabric), and to create publicly
available coverage maps. The Act further requires the Commission to
establish processes for members of the public and other entities to (1)
provide verified data for use in the coverage maps; (2) challenge the
coverage maps, the broadband availability data submitted by broadband
internet access service providers (providers), and the Fabric; and (3)
submit specific crowdsource information about the development and
availability of broadband service.
In July 2020, implementing the Broadband DATA Act and building off
of an August 2019 Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
the Commission adopted a Second Report and Order and Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that adopted rules for the collection and
verification of improved, more precise data on both fixed and mobile
broadband availability. In January 2021, the Commission adopted a Third
Report and Order establishing new requirements for the BDC and took
additional steps to implement the Broadband DATA Act. The Third Report
and Order adopted rules to specify which fixed and mobile providers are
required to report broadband availability data and expanded the
reporting and certification requirements for filing data in the BDC.
[[Page 66955]]
It also adopted standards for collecting verified broadband data from
State, local, and Tribal governmental entities and certain third
parties, and for identifying locations that would be included in the
Fabric. Importantly, the Commission also established processes for
verifying the accuracy of provider submitted data and the Fabric,
including challenge processes which invite input from the public and
other stakeholders in order to improve the accuracy of the maps.
To implement the Broadband DATA Act and these new rules, the
Commission created a new data platform and system to collect and map
availability data collected from over 2,500 providers and for consumers
and other stakeholders to submit challenges to that data; created a
Fabric dataset of locations upon which to overlay provider availability
data; and established a dedicated help center to provide technical
assistance to providers, consumers, and other stakeholders.
In July 2021, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB), Office
of Economics and Analytics (OEA), and Office of Engineering and
Technology (OET) released a Public Notice seeking comment on the
technical requirements for the mobile challenge, verification, and
crowdsourcing processes required under the Broadband DATA Act for the
new Broadband Data Collection (BDC). In March 2022, the Broadband Data
Task Force (Task Force), WTB, OEA, and OET released a detailed order,
technical appendix, rules, and technical data specifications setting
forth technical requirements and specifications for the mobile
challenge, verification, and crowdsource processes required by the Act.
To clarify the Commission's rules for filing data in the BDC, in
July 2022, WCB, WTB, OEA, and the Task Force issued a Declaratory
Ruling on certain aspects of a rule regarding the engineering
certification in BDC filings and issued a limited waiver of the
requirement that providers have an engineer certification their
biannual BDC filings for the first three filing cycles of the BDC. The
Task Force adopted an Order in November 2023 to extend the waiver, with
new conditions, for an additional three filing periods. In addition,
staff worked closely with ISPs to ensure that they were equipped with
the technical information and training to participate in the BDC's
complex data collection by effectively and accurately reporting where
they do, and do not, offer internet services. FCC staff and its
contractors made phone calls and sent a series of emails to every ISP
that previously filed Form 477 data to remind them of their obligation
to file data by September 1, 2022--the initial filing deadline--and to
make them aware of the many technical assistance resources that the FCC
has made available, including filing instructions, FAQs, knowledge base
articles, web tutorials, filing workshops, and a dedicated BDC Help
Center offering both Tier 1 and Tier 2 support to entities seeking to
file availability data or challenges including GIS support.
Additionally, FCC staff has attended numerous conferences, ex parte
meetings, and conference calls with individual providers and industry
organizations.
In November 2022, the Commission released a pre-production draft of
its new National Broadband Map displaying version 1 of the Fabric
overlayed with provider reported availability data as of June 30, 2022.
The new map is the most comprehensive, granular, and standardized data
the Commission has ever published on broadband availability. This date
also marked the beginning of the BDC processes by which consumers,
governmental entities, and other third parties can file bulk and
individual challenges to the fixed and mobile availability data and the
Fabric data. Updates to the National Broadband Map are iterative and
ongoing. The challenge processes will also continue on an ongoing basis
in order to allow the public to provide input and help improve the
accuracy of the National Broadband Map.
State, local, and Tribal governmental entities are encouraged to
participation in the bulk challenge and crowdsource processes where the
location or availability data on the map appeared imprecise. To assist
with this process, staff have hosted technical assistance workshops and
video tutorials to assist parties seeking to file challenges to the
Fabric and fixed and mobile availability data. Additionally, the Task
Force has released video tutorials and knowledge base articles to
assist fixed and mobile providers with responding to challenges.
In December 2022, the Commission adopted and Order, to sunset the
Form 477 broadband deployment data collection and eliminate a largely
duplicative requirement on providers. As a result, providers will no
longer be required to submit Form 477 broadband deployment data, but
must still submit broadband and voice subscription data using the FCC
Form 477. To further streamline the FCC's data collection efforts the
BDC system allows filers to submit both their BDC data and 477
subscription data as a combined filing using a single interface.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 08/03/17 82 FR 40118
NPRM Comment Period End............. 09/25/17 .......................
Report & Order...................... 08/01/19 84 FR 43705
Second Further Notice of Proposed 08/01/19 84 FR 43764
Rulemaking.
Second Further NPRM Comment Period 10/07/19 .......................
End.
2nd R&O............................. 07/16/20 85 FR 50886
3rd FNPRM........................... 07/16/20 85 FR 50911
3rd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 09/08/20 .......................
3rd R&O............................. 01/13/21 86 FR 18124
Public Notice....................... 07/16/21 86 FR 40398
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 09/27/21 .......................
Order............................... 03/09/22 87 FR 21476
Order............................... 12/16/22 87 FR 76949
Order............................... 11/30/23 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael Ray, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC
20554, Phone: 202 418-0357, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AK93
350. Call Authentication Trust Anchor [3060-AL00]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 251; 47 U.S.C. 227; 47
U.S.C. 227b; 47 U.S.C. 503
Abstract: On June 6, 2019, the Commission adopted a Declaratory
Ruling and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (CG Docket No.
17-59, WC Docket No. 17-97) that proposed and sought comment on
mandating implementation of STIR/SHAKEN in the event that major voice
service providers did not voluntarily implement the framework by the
end of 2019.
On December 30, 2019, Congress enacted the Pallone-Thune Telephone
Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act. Along
with numerous other provisions directed at addressing robocalls, the
TRACED Act directs the Commission to require all voice service
providers to implement STIR/SHAKEN in the Internet Protocol (IP)
portions of their
[[Page 66956]]
networks, and to implement an effective caller ID authentication
framework in the non-IP portions of their networks. The TRACED Act
further creates processes by which voice service providers may be
exempt from this mandate if the Commission determines they have
achieved certain implementation benchmarks, and by which voice service
providers may be granted a delay in compliance based on a finding of
undue hardship because of burdens or barriers to implementation or
based on a delay in development of a caller ID authentication protocol
for calls delivered over non-IP networks.
On March 31, 2020, the Commission adopted a Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (WC Docket Nos. 17-97, 20-67).
The Report and Order mandated that all originating and terminating
voice service providers implement the STIR/SHAKEN caller ID
authentication framework in the IP portions of their networks by June
30, 2021. In the Further Notice the Commission sought comment on
proposals to further promote caller ID authentication and implement the
TRACED Act.
On September 29, 2020, the Commission adopted a Second Report and
Order (WC Docket No. 17-97). The Second Report and Order implemented
rules (1) granting extensions for compliance with the STIR/SHAKEN
implementation mandate for small voice service providers, voice service
providers that cannot obtain a SPC token from the Governance Authority,
services scheduled for section 214 discontinuance, for those portions
of a voice service provider's network that rely on non-IP technology,
and establishing a process for individual voice service providers to
seek provider specific extensions; (2) requiring voice service
providers using non-IP technology either to upgrade their networks to
IP to enable STIR/SHAKEN implementation, or work to develop non-IP
caller ID authentication technology and implement a robocall mitigation
program in the interim; (3) establishing a process where by a voice
service provider may be exempt from the STIR/SHAKEN implementation
mandate if the provider has achieved certain implementation benchmarks;
(4) prohibiting voice service providers from imposing line item charges
on consumer and small business subscribers for caller ID
authentication; and (5) requiring intermediate providers to implement
STIR/SHAKEN. On May 20, 2021, the Commissioned released a Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to shorten the small provider
extension from two years to one for a subset of small voice service
providers that are at a heightened risk of originating an especially
large amount of robocall traffic.
On January 13, 2021, the Commission adopted a Second Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking proposing and seeking comment on a limited role
for the Commission to oversee certificate revocation decisions by the
private STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority that would have the effect of
placing providers in noncompliance with the Commission's rules. On
August 5, 2021, the Commission adopted a Third Report and Order which
adopted rules creating this oversight role.
On September 30, 2021, the Commission adopted a Fourth Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to require gateway providers to
apply STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication to, and perform robocall
mitigation on, foreign-originated calls with U.S. numbers, seeking
comment on revisions to the information that filers must submit to the
Robocall Mitigation Database, and clarifying the obligations of voice
service providers and intermediate providers with respect to calls to
and from Public Safety Answer Points and other emergency services
providers.
On December 9, 2021, the Commission adopted a Fourth Report and
Order adopting rules requiring non-facilities based small voice
providers implement SITR/SHAKEN by June 30, 2022, and requiring small
voice providers of any kind suspected of originating illegal robocalls
to implement STIR/SHAKEN on an accelerated timeline.
On May 19, 2022, the Commission adopted a Fifth Report and Order,
Order on Reconsideration, Order, and Fifth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. The Fifth Report and Order and Order required gateway
providers to submit a certification to the Robocall Mitigation
Database, implement STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication as well as
several other requirements, including an obligation to mitigate illegal
robocall traffic and submit a mitigation plan to the Robocall
Mitigation Database regardless of their STIR/SHAKEN implementation
status. The Order on Reconsideration expanded the obligation of
domestic providers to block calls carrying US NANP numbers from foreign
providers not listed in the Robocall Mitigation Database. The Fifth
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking sought comment on further steps
to combat illegal robocalls, including extending requirements for
authentication and filing in the Robocall Mitigation Database,
requiring additional measures for robocall mitigation, enhancing
enforcement mechanisms and other related issues aimed at closing
existing potential loopholes.
On March 16, 2023, the Commission adopted a Sixth Report and Order
and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The Sixth Report and Order
required intermediate providers to implement STIR/SHAKEN caller ID
authentication for certain calls, expanded robocall mitigation
requirements for all providers, and adopted more robust enforcement
tools. The Sixth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeks comment on
additional measures to combat illegal robocalls, including whether any
changes should be made to the Commission's rules to permit, prohibit,
or limit the use of third-party caller ID authentication solutions and
whether to eliminate the STIR/SHAKEN implementation extension for
providers that cannot obtain Service Provider Code tokens, which are
necessary to participate in the STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication
framework''.
On May 18, 2023, the Commission adopted a Seventh Repot and Order.
The Seventh Report and Order required voice service providers and non-
gateway intermediate providers to commit in their Robocall Mitigation
Database certification to respond to traceback requests from the
Commission, law enforcement, and the industry traceback consortium
within 24 hours.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOI................................. 07/14/17 .......................
DR and 3rd FNPRM.................... 06/06/19 84 FR 29478
NPRM................................ 06/24/19 84 FR 29478
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/23/19 .......................
3rd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 08/23/19 .......................
R&O and FNPRM....................... 03/31/20 85 FR 22029
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 05/29/20 .......................
2nd R&O............................. 09/29/20 85 FR 73360
2nd FNPRM........................... 01/13/21 86 FR 9894
2nd FNPRM Comment Period............ 03/19/21 .......................
3rd FNPRM........................... 05/20/21 86 FR 30571
3rd R&O............................. 08/05/21 86 FR 48511
3rd FNPRM Comment Period End........ 08/19/21 .......................
4th FNPRM........................... 10/01/21 86 FR 59084
4th FNPRM Comment Period End........ 11/26/21 .......................
4th R&O............................. 12/09/21 .......................
[[Page 66957]]
5th R&O, Order on Reconsideration... 05/19/22 87 FR 42916
5th FNPRM........................... 05/19/22 87 FR 42670
5th FNPRM Comment Period End........ 09/16/22 .......................
6th Report and Order................ 03/16/23 88 FR 40096
6th FNPRM........................... 03/16/23 88 FR 29035
6th FNPRM Comment Period End........ 07/05/23 .......................
7th Report and Order................ 05/18/23 88 FR 43446
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jonathan Lechter, Attorney Advisor, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0984, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL00
351. Implementation of the National Suicide Improvement Act of 2018,
988 Suicide Prevention Hotline (WC Docket 18-336, PS Docket No. 23.5,
PS Docket No. 15-80) [3060-AL01]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 201; 47 U.S.C. 251
Abstract: On August 14, 2018, Congress passed the National Suicide
Hotline Improvement Act (Act). Public Law 115-233, 132 Stat. 2424
(2018). The purpose of the Act was to study and report on the
feasibility of designating a 3-digit dialing code to be used for a
national suicide prevention and mental health crisis hotline system by
considering each of the current N11 designations. The Act directed the
Commission to: (1) conduct a study that examines the feasibility of
designating a simple, easy-to-remember, 3-digit dialing code to be used
for a national suicide prevention and mental health crisis hotline
system; and (2) analyze how well the current National Suicide
Prevention Lifeline is working to address the needs of veterans. The
Act also directed the Commission to coordinate with the Department of
Health and Human Services' Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the
North American Numbering Council (NANC) in conducting the study, and to
produce a report on the study by August 14, 2019.
On August 14, 2019, the Wireline Competition Bureau and Office of
Economics and Analytics submitted its report to Congress recommending
that: (1) a 3-digit dialing code be used for a national suicide
prevention and mental health crisis hotline system; and (2) the
Commission should initiate a rulemaking proceeding to consider
designating 988 as the 3-digit code.
On December 12, 2019, the Commission released a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to designate 988 as a new, nationwide, 3-
digit dialing code for a suicide prevention and mental health crisis
hotline. WC Docket No. 18-336. The NPRM proposes that calls made to 988
be directed to the existing National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, which
is made up of an expansive network of over 170 crisis centers located
across the United States, and to the Veterans Crisis Line. The NPRM
also proposes to require all telecommunications carriers and
interconnected VoIP service providers to make, within 18 months, any
changes necessary to ensure that users can dial 988 to reach the
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline and Veterans Crisis Line.
On July 16, 2020, the Commission adopted an Order designating 988
as the 3-digit number to reach the Lifeline and Veterans Crisis Line
(800-273-TALK or 800-273-8255) and requiring all telecommunications
carriers, interconnected voice over internet Protocol (VoIP) providers,
and one-way VoIP providers to make any network changes necessary to
ensure that users can dial 988 to reach the Lifeline by July 16, 2022.
On October 16, 2020, the Communications Equality Advocates filed a
petition for partial reconsideration of the FCC's July 16, 2020 Report
and Order. In their petition, Communications Equality Advocates
requested that the FCC revise the Order to mandate text-to-988 and
direct video calling (DVC) requirements and to have such requirements
be implemented on the same timeline as voice calls to 988, by July 16,
2022.
On October 17, 2020, Congress enacted the National Suicide Hotline
Designation Act of 2020 (2020 Act). Public Law 116-172, 134 Stat. 832
(2020). The 2020 Act, among other things, designates 988 as the
universal telephone number within the United States for the purpose of
the national suicide prevention and mental health crisis hotline system
operating through the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline,'' with
designation occurring one year after enactment.
On November 9, 2020, pursuant to 2020 Act's requirements that the
Commission submit a report on the feasibility and cost of attaching an
automatic dispatchable location with 988 calls, the Commission issued a
Public Notice that sought comment on these issues.
On April 22, 2021, the Commission adopted a Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) that proposes to require text service
providers support text messages to 988 by routing texts to the toll
free number.
On November 19, 2020, pursuant to 2020 Act's requirements that the
Commission submit a report on the feasibility and cost of attaching an
automatic dispatchable location with 988 calls, the Commission issued a
Public Notice that sought comment on these issues. A Report to Congress
regarding geolocation was released on April 15, 2021.
On April 22, 2021, the Commission adopted a Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) that proposes to require text service
providers support text messages to 988 by routing texts to the toll
free number. On November 19, 2021, the Commission adopted an Order
requiring the industry to enable texting to 988 by the same deadline as
for voice calls, July 16, 2022.
On May 24, 2022, the Commission, following up on its report to
Congress, hosted a forum in coordination with the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
that convened various stakeholders to discuss issues surrounding
geolocation. Participants included state and local entities; suicide
prevention and mental health experts and advocates; communications
industry leaders; and technical experts. The Commission opened the
event to the public via live feed on the Commission's website, and
audience members submitted questions to panelists by email.
On October 14, 2022, in accordance with the National Suicide
Hotline Designation Act of 2020, the Wireline Competition Bureau
submitted its first 988 Fee Accountability Report to Congress reporting
on the collection and distribution of 988 fees and charges by the
states, the District of Columbia, U.S. territories, and Tribal
authorities for the period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021.
On January 26, 2023, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to help ensure that the public has access to the 988 Suicide
& Crisis Lifeline if a service outage occurs. Those rules were adopted
on July 20, 2023.
On October 17, 2023, in accordance with the National Suicide
Hotline Designation Act of 2020, the Wireline Competition Bureau
submitted its
[[Page 66958]]
second 988 Fee Accountability Report to Congress reporting on the
collection and distribution of 988 fees and charges by the states, the
District of Columbia, U.S. territories, and Tribal authorities for the
period of January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022.
On October 30, 2023, the Commission released an Erratum amending
Appendix A of the July 2023 Report and Order.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/15/20 85 FR 2359
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/16/20
Report & Order...................... 07/16/20
PFR................................. 10/16/20
Oppositions Due..................... 12/02/20
Public Notice....................... 12/08/20 85 FR 79014
Replies Due......................... 12/14/20
Public Notice Comment Period End.... 01/11/21
FNPRM............................... 06/11/21 86 FR 31404
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 08/10/21
Report & Order...................... 11/19/21
NPRM................................ 01/27/23 88 FR 20790
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/08/23
NPRM Reply Comment Period End....... 06/06/23
Report and Order.................... 07/21/23
Erratum............................. 10/23/23 88 FR 2503
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michelle Sclater, Attorney, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-0388, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL01
352. Modernizing Unbundling and Resale Requirements in an ERA of Next-
Generation Networks and Services [3060-AL02]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 10; 47 U.S.C. 251
Abstract: On November 22, 2019, the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking comment on proposals to update the
unbundling and avoided-cost resale obligations stemming from the 1996
Act and applicable only to incumbent LECs. Many of these obligations
appear to no longer be necessary in many geographic areas due to
vigorous competition for mass market broadband services in urban areas
and numerous intermodal voice capabilities and services. But
recognizing that rural areas pose special challenges for broadband
deployment, the NPRM did not propose any change to unbundling
requirements for broadband-capable loops in rural areas. The NPRM
sought to promote the Commission's efforts to reduce unnecessary and
outdated regulatory burdens that appear to discourage the deployment of
next-generation networks, delay the IP transition, unnecessarily burden
incumbent LECs with no similar obligations placed on their competitors,
and no longer benefit consumers or serve the purpose for which they
were intended.
On October 27, 2020, the Commission adopted a Report and Order (1)
eliminating unbundling requirements, subject to a reasonable transition
period, for enterprise-grade DS1 and DS3 loops where there is evidence
of actual and potential competition, for broadband-capable DS0 loops
and associated subloops in the most densely populated areas, and for
voice-grade narrowband loops nationwide, but preserving unbundling
requirements for DS0 loops in less densely populated areas and DS1 and
DS3 loops in areas without sufficient evidence of competition; (2)
eliminating unbundling requirements for network interface devices and
multiunit premises subloops; (3) eliminating unbundled dark fiber
transport provisioned from wire centers within a half-mile of
competitive fiber networks, but providing an eight-year transition
period for existing circuits so as to avoid stranding investment and
last-mile deployment by competitive LECs that may harm consumers; (4)
eliminating unbundling requirements for operations support systems,
except where carriers are continuing to manage UNEs and for purposes of
local interconnection and local number portability; and (5) eliminating
remaining avoided-cost resale requirements. The Report and Order ended
unbundling and resale requirements where they stifle technology
transitions and broadband deployment, but preserved unbundling
requirements where they are still necessary to realize the 1996 Act's
goal of robust intermodal competition benefiting all Americans.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/06/20 85 FR 472
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/06/20 .......................
Report & Order...................... 01/08/21 86 FR 1636
Petition for Reconsideration filed 09/29/22 .......................
by Sonic Telecom.
Replies to Oppositions to Petition 10/04/22 .......................
for Reconsideration.
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michele Berlove, Assistant Division Chief,
Competition Policy Div., WCB, Federal Communications Commission,
Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554,
Phone: 202 418-1477, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL02
353. Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America; GN Docket No. 20-32
[3060-AL15]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i); 47 U.S.C. 214; 47 U.S.C. 254; 47
U.S.C. 303(r); 47 U.S.C. 403
Abstract: The 5G Fund for Rural America will distribute up to $9
billion in universal service support through competitive bidding in two
phases to bring mobile voice and 5G broadband service to rural areas of
the country. 5G public interest obligations and performance
requirements imposed on carriers continuing to receive legacy mobile
high-cost support will help ensure that the areas they serve enjoy the
benefits that 5G promises.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/26/20 85 FR 31616
Final Action........................ 11/25/20 85 FR 75770
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Kirk Burgee, Chief of Staff, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington,
DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1599, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL15
354. Protecting Consumers From SIM Swap and Port-Out Fraud, WC Docket
No. 21-341 [3060-AL34]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 201, 222, 251, 303(r), 332
Abstract: The Commission revised its Customer Proprietary Network
Information (CPNI) and Local Number Portability (LNP) rules to require
wireless providers to adopt secure methods of authenticating a customer
[[Page 66959]]
before redirecting a customer's phone number to a new device or
provider. The Commission also required wireless providers to
immediately notify customers whenever a SIM change or port-out request
is made on customers' accounts, and take additional steps to protect
customers from SIM swap and port-out fraud. In a Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission sought comment on whether to
harmonize the existing requirements governing customer access to CPNI
with the SIM change authentication and protection measures, and on what
steps the Commission can take to harmonize government efforts to
address SIM swap and port-out fraud.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 10/15/21 86 FR 57390
NPRM Comment Period End............. 12/15/21 .......................
Report and Order.................... 12/18/23 88 FR 85794
FNPRM............................... 12/14/23 88 FR 86614
FNPRM Comment Period End............ 01/16/24 .......................
FNPRM Reply Comment Period End...... 02/12/24 .......................
-----------------------------------
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Jordan Marie Reth, Attorney-Advisor (PU), Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1418, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 3060-AL34
355. Supporting Survivors of Domestic and Sexual Violence (WC Docket
No. 22-238,11-42, 21-450) [3060-AL48]
Legal Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151.201(b); 47 U.S.C. 301 and 303; 47
U.S.C. 307 and 309; 47 U.S.C. 316 and 345; 47 U.S.C. 403 and sec. 5(b);
Pub. L. 117-223 and 136 Stat. 2280
Abstract: On July 14, 2022, the Commission initiated an inquiry
into steps that the Commission could take to assist survivors of
domestic violence. In the Notice of Inquiry, the Commission sought
information on the scope of connectivity-based difficulties survivors
face, as well as potential means by which current Commission programs
could be better adapted and new programs could be developed to address
survivors' needs. In particular, the Commission sought comment relating
to potentially developing a centralized database of telephone numbers
relating to domestic abuse support that could be used by service
providers to prevent survivors' communications with support
organizations from appearing on logs of calls and text messages that
may be available to abusers.
In the NPRM, the Commission begins the process of implementing the
Safe Connections Act of 2022 (Safe Connections Act), enacted on
December 7, 2022. The legislation amends the Communications Act of 1934
(Communications Act) to require mobile service providers to separate
the line of a survivor of domestic violence (and other related crimes
and abuse), and any individuals in the care of the survivor, from a
mobile service contract shared with an abuser within two business days
after receiving a request from the survivor. The Safe Connections Act
also directs the Commission to issue rules, within 18 months of the
statute's enactment, implementing the line separation requirement.
Further, the legislation also requires the Commission to open a
rulemaking within 180 days of enactment to consider whether to, and how
the Commission should, establish a central database of domestic abuse
hotlines to be used by service providers and require such providers to
omit, subject to certain conditions, any records of calls or text
messages to the hotlines from consumer-facing call and text message
logs. The NPRM proposes rules as directed by these statutory
requirements.
On November 16, 2023, the Commission released a Report and Order.
The rules largely track the statutory language, with key additions and
clarifications to address privacy, account security, fraud detection,
and operational or technical infeasibility. Among other things, the
Commission established requirements regarding the information that
survivors must submit to request a line separation and the options
providers must offer to survivors making a line separation request. The
Commission also adopted requirements regarding communications with
consumers and survivors and restrictions on various practices in
connection with line separation requests. In addition, the Commission
required covered providers to train employees who may interact with
survivors on how to assist them or direct them to other employees who
have received such training. The Commission also delineated the
financial responsibilities for monthly service costs and mobile device
following a line separation, and established a compliance date of July
14, 2024, six months after the effective date of the Report and Order .
Further, the Commission designated the Lifeline program to support
emergency communications service for survivors that have pursued the
line separation process and are suffering a financial hardship. The
Commission directed USAC to develop processes to allow survivors
experiencing financial hardship to apply for and enroll in the Lifeline
program, and to transition survivors from emergency communications
support at the end of the six-month emergency support period mandated
by the Safe Connections Act. [1] With regard to protecting the privacy
of calls and text messages to domestic violence hotlines, the
Commission required covered providers and wireline, fixed wireless, and
fixed satellite providers of voice service to: (1) omit from consumer-
facing logs of calls and text messages any records of calls or text
messages to covered hotlines in the central database established by the
Commission; and (2) maintain internal records of calls and text
messages excluded from consumer-facing logs of calls and text messages.
Providers were generally given 12 months to comply with these
requirements, except that small service providers were given 18 months.
[1] Id. at paras. 167-73. In addition to these provisions, the
Commission also considered matters relating to protecting the privacy
of calls and text messages to domestic violence hotlines. In the Safe
Connections Report and Order, the Commission required covered providers
and wireline, fixed wireless, and fixed satellite providers of voice
service to: (1) omit from consumer-facing logs of calls and text
messages any records of calls or text messages to covered hotlines in
the central database established by the Commission; and (2) maintain
internal records of calls and text messages excluded from consumer-
facing logs of calls and text messages. Id. at 59-76, paras. 105-49.
Providers were generally given 12 months to comply with these
requirements, except that small service providers were given 18 months.
Id. at 70-74, paras. 137-44.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOI................................. 08/18/22
Comment Period End.................. 08/18/22
Reply Comment Period End............ 09/19/22
NPRM................................ 02/17/23 88 FR 15558
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/10/23
Reply Comment Period End............ 05/10/23
Report and Order.................... 11/16/23 88 FR 84406
-----------------------------------
[[Page 66960]]
Next Action Undetermined............ To Be Determined
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Edward Kracher, Deputy Division Chief, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554, Phone: 202 418-1525.
RIN: 3060-AL48
[FR Doc. 2024-16467 Filed 8-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P