Reciprocal Switching for Inadequate Service; Correction, 66011 [2024-18155]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
49 CFR Part 1145
[Docket No. EP 711 (Sub-No. 2)]
Reciprocal Switching for Inadequate
Service; Correction
Surface Transportation Board.
Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document corrects a
printing error in the preamble of a final
rule that appeared in the Federal
Register on May 7, 2024.
DATES: Effective September 4, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Valerie Quinn at (202) 740–5567. If you
require accommodation under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, please
call (202) 245–0245.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Correction
In FR Doc. 2024–09483 appearing on
page 38665 in the issue of May 7, 2024,
in the second and third columns, make
the following corrections:
1. Remove ‘‘The railroads have
pushed our sites to take on more
expense and change operations to match
the new process and operating
strategies. We have had to increase our
railcar fleet by over 10 percent in the
past couple of years solely due to
inconsistency in the rail service and
increased transit time. And we’re about
to increase our fleet again in the next six
months by approximately seven to eight
percent. This is again due to the
inconsistency in the service and transit
time.’’ Hr’g Tr. 792:19 to 793:6, Mar. 16,
2022, Reciprocal Switching, EP 711
(Sub-No. 1). Another shipper
commented: ‘‘Our plant in the Northeast
lost production of over 57 million
pounds during the first two months of
2022 mostly due to increased transit
time and railroad delays resulting from
crew shortages.’’ Id., Hr’g Tr. 795:7 to
795:10, Mar. 16, 2022.’’
2. Correct footnote 23 to read as
follows:
23 At the March 2022 hearing in Reciprocal
Switching, EP 711 (Sub–No. 1), the Board
heard testimony from shippers about the
following types of problems encountered
during this period: ‘‘The railroads have
pushed our sites to take on more expense and
change operations to match the new process
and operating strategies. We have had to
increase our railcar fleet by over 10 percent
in the past couple of years solely due to
inconsistency in the rail service and
increased transit time. And we’re about to
increase our fleet again in the next six
months by approximately seven to eight
percent. This is again due to the
inconsistency in the service and transit
time.’’ Hr’g Tr. 792:19 to 793:6, Mar. 16,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:50 Aug 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
2022, Reciprocal Switching, EP 711 (Sub-No.
1). Another shipper commented: ‘‘Our plant
in the Northeast lost production of over 57
million pounds during the first two months
of 2022 mostly due to increased transit time
and railroad delays resulting from crew
shortages.’’ Id., Hr’g Tr. 795:7 to 795:10, Mar.
16, 2022.
Dated: August 9, 2024.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024–18155 Filed 8–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 240807–0215]
RIN 0648–BM68
Fisheries off West Coast States; West
Coast Salmon Fisheries; Measures to
Keep Fishery Impacts Within the
Conservation Objective for the
California Coastal Chinook Salmon
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule will implement
a set of management measures to ensure
fishery impacts on California Coastal
(CC) Chinook salmon, which are listed
as threatened under the Endangered
Species Act, remain within the
conservation objective in the Pacific
Coast Salmon Fishery Management Plan
(Salmon FMP). Under the final rule,
management tools (e.g., trip limits (also
known as landing and possession limits)
and inseason management) consistent
with the provisions of the Salmon FMP
will be used to provide greater certainty
in avoiding exceedances of the
conservation objectives for CC Chinook
salmon.
DATES: Effective September 13, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the burden-hour estimates or
other aspects of the collection-ofinformation requirements contained in
this final rule may be submitted to
https://www.reginfor.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shannon Penna, Fishery Management
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66011
Specialist, at 562–980–4239 or
Shannon.Penna@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The ocean salmon fisheries in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) (3–200
nautical miles; 5.6–370.4 kilometers) off
Washington, Oregon, and California are
managed under the Salmon FMP. The
Salmon FMP and implementing
regulations govern the development of
annual management measures at the
spring (March and April) Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
meetings each year. Management
measures for the salmon fisheries are
developed annually because the
abundance of the salmon stocks in the
fishery can fluctuate significantly from
one year to the next and information
about annual stock abundance does not
become available until early in each
year (January–early March).
The commercial and recreational
salmon fisheries off northern California
and southern Oregon target healthy or
abundant stocks of Chinook and coho
salmon, but may incidentally encounter
Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed CC
Chinook salmon. The CC Chinook
salmon Evolutionarily Significant Unit
(ESU) has been listed as threatened
under the ESA since 1999. The Salmon
FMP includes harvest controls that are
used to manage salmon stocks
sustainablyand requires that the
fisheries be managed consistent with
‘‘consultation standards’’ for stocks
listed as endangered or threatened
under the ESA for which NMFS has
issued biological opinions. NMFS has
issued biological opinions for every
ESA-listed salmon species impacted by
the fisheries governed by the Salmon
FMP. A series of biological opinions on
the CC Chinook salmon ESU (NMFS
2000; McInnis 2005; NMFS 2023; NMFS
2024) have concluded that management
of the salmon fishery that avoids
exceedance of the conservation
objective will avoid jeopardizing the
ESU. As described in these biological
opinions, the available data are
insufficient for developing an ESUspecific conservation objective for CC
Chinook salmon. Thus, NMFS has relied
on a surrogate, Klamath River fall-run
Chinook Salmon (KRFC), to evaluate
and limit impacts on CC Chinook
salmon in ocean salmon fisheries. The
conservation objective is an ocean
harvest rate (HR) on age-4 KRFC of 0.16.
In its 2024 biological opinion, NMFS
confirmed that managing fisheries to
avoid exceeding this conservation
objective would avoid jeopardy to CC
Chinook salmon.
E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM
14AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 14, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18155]
[[Page 66011]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
49 CFR Part 1145
[Docket No. EP 711 (Sub-No. 2)]
Reciprocal Switching for Inadequate Service; Correction
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects a printing error in the preamble of a
final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on May 7, 2024.
DATES: Effective September 4, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie Quinn at (202) 740-5567. If
you require accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act,
please call (202) 245-0245.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
In FR Doc. 2024-09483 appearing on page 38665 in the issue of May
7, 2024, in the second and third columns, make the following
corrections:
1. Remove ``The railroads have pushed our sites to take on more
expense and change operations to match the new process and operating
strategies. We have had to increase our railcar fleet by over 10
percent in the past couple of years solely due to inconsistency in the
rail service and increased transit time. And we're about to increase
our fleet again in the next six months by approximately seven to eight
percent. This is again due to the inconsistency in the service and
transit time.'' Hr'g Tr. 792:19 to 793:6, Mar. 16, 2022, Reciprocal
Switching, EP 711 (Sub-No. 1). Another shipper commented: ``Our plant
in the Northeast lost production of over 57 million pounds during the
first two months of 2022 mostly due to increased transit time and
railroad delays resulting from crew shortages.'' Id., Hr'g Tr. 795:7 to
795:10, Mar. 16, 2022.''
2. Correct footnote 23 to read as follows:
\23\ At the March 2022 hearing in Reciprocal Switching, EP 711
(Sub-No. 1), the Board heard testimony from shippers about the
following types of problems encountered during this period: ``The
railroads have pushed our sites to take on more expense and change
operations to match the new process and operating strategies. We
have had to increase our railcar fleet by over 10 percent in the
past couple of years solely due to inconsistency in the rail service
and increased transit time. And we're about to increase our fleet
again in the next six months by approximately seven to eight
percent. This is again due to the inconsistency in the service and
transit time.'' Hr'g Tr. 792:19 to 793:6, Mar. 16, 2022, Reciprocal
Switching, EP 711 (Sub-No. 1). Another shipper commented: ``Our
plant in the Northeast lost production of over 57 million pounds
during the first two months of 2022 mostly due to increased transit
time and railroad delays resulting from crew shortages.'' Id., Hr'g
Tr. 795:7 to 795:10, Mar. 16, 2022.
Dated: August 9, 2024.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024-18155 Filed 8-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P