Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers: Revised Implementation of the HUD-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Program, 65769-65779 [2024-17957]
Download as PDF
65769
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
From
To
§ 95.7223
MAA
Jet Route J223—Is Amended To Delete
LA GUARDIA, NY VOR/DME ..........................................
§ 95.7227
MEA
CORDS, PA WP .............................................................
18000
MAA—
17500
25000
MAA—17500
*18000
MAA—
17500
23000
MAA—17500
18000
MAA—
17500
45000
MAA—17500
Jet Route J227—Is Amended To Delete
ARMEL, VA VOR/DME ....................................................
ELMIRA, NY VOR/DME ..................................................
*ARMEL R—009 UNUSABLE BYD 74 NM
*ELMIRA R—205 UNUSABLE BYD 73 NM
§ 95.7533
Jet Route J533—Is Amended To Delete
DULUTH, MN VORTAC ...................................................
U.S. CANADIAN BORDER .............................................
Airway Segment
Changeover Points
From
To
§ 95.8003
V161
INTERNATIONAL FALLS, MN VOR/DME ................
V189
WRIGHT BROTHERS, NC VOR/DME .....................
V300
SAULT STE MARIE, MI VOR/DME ..........................
V454
LIBERTY, NC VORTAC ............................................
[FR Doc. 2024–17928 Filed 8–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
24 CFR Parts 982 and 983
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
[Docket No. FR–6476–N–01]
Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers:
Revised Implementation of the HUDVeterans Affairs Supportive Housing
Program
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing, HUD.
AGENCY:
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
TAR RIVER, NC VORTAC ......................................
INTERNATIONAL
FALLS
25
WRIGHT BROTHERS
94
SAULT STE MARIE
82
LIBERTY
21
30
SISTERS ISLAND
HAINES
68
SPARREVOHN
Is Amended To Delete Changeover Point
THUNDER BAY, CA VOR/DME ..............................
Is Amended To Delete Changeover Point
LAWRENCEVILLE, VA VORTAC ............................
Is Amended To Delete Changeover Point
HAINES, AK NDB ....................................................
WHITEHORSE, AK VOR/DME ................................
Is Amended To Delete Changeover Point
ANIAK, AK NDB .......................................................
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice sets forth the
policies and procedures for the
administration of tenant-based and
project-based Section 8 Housing Choice
Voucher (HCV) rental assistance under
the Department of Housing and Urban
Development-Veterans Affairs
Supportive Housing (HUD–VASH)
program administered by local public
housing agencies (PHAs) that have
partnered with local Veterans Affairs
(VA) medical facilities or other entities
as designated by the Secretary of the
VA. This notice includes new waivers
and program flexibilities as well as
additional general guidance. This notice
also incorporates updated policy based
PO 00000
77
Is Amended To Delete Changeover Point
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VerDate Sep<11>2014
VOR Federal Airway Changeover Point
WINNIPEG, CA VORTAC ........................................
ALASKA V508
SPARREVOHN, AK VOR/DME ................................
From
Is Amended To Delete Changeover Point
ALASKA V428
SISTERS ISLAND, AK VORTAC ..............................
HAINES, AK NDB .....................................................
Distance
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on further implementation of the
Housing Opportunity Through
Modernization Act of 2016 (HOTMA).
DATES: Applicability date: August 13,
2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Jones, Director, Housing Voucher
Management and Operations Division,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street SW,
Room 4216, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone number (202) 708–0477. (This
is not a toll-free number.) HUD
welcomes and is prepared to receive
calls from individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing, as well as individuals
with speech or communication
disabilities. To learn more about how to
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
65770
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
make an accessible telephone call,
please visit: https://www.fcc.gov/
consumers/guides/telecommunicationsrelay-service-trs.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Special Rules for the HUD–VASH Voucher
Program
a. Family Eligibility, Selection, and
Documentation
b. Income and Asset Eligibility
c. Initial Term of the HCV
d. Initial Lease Term
e. Eligible Housing
f. Mobility and Portability of HUD–VASH
Vouchers
g. Case Management and Supportive
Services
h. Termination of Assistance
i. Turnover of HUD–VASH Vouchers
j. Moving to Work (MTW) Agencies
k. HUD–VASH PBV
l. Section Eight Management Assessment
Program (SEMAP)
m. Reallocation of HUD–VASH Vouchers
n. Inspections
o. Exception Payment Standards
p. Special Housing Types
q. Minimum Rents
III. Reporting Requirements
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
I. Background
A. Reasons for Changes and Process of
Development
Through the HUD–VASH program,
HUD and VA increase access to
affordable housing for homeless
veterans and provide the support
necessary to obtain and maintain
permanent housing in the community.
Since 2008, HCV program funding has
provided rental assistance under a
supportive housing program for
homeless veterans authorized by section
8(o)(19) of the United States Housing
Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(19). The
HUD–VASH program combines HUD
HCV rental assistance for homeless
veterans administered by PHAs with
case management and supportive
services provided through VA. VA may
provide these services directly through
VA medical facilities or through a DSP
approved by the VA Secretary. PHAs
may be approved to act as DSPs but only
in a limited capacity to do initial intake
and provide temporary case
management of HUD–VASH veterans
until they are referred to the VA medical
facility or DSP that will provide ongoing
services. For simplicity, this document
will generally refer to the combination
of VA and DSPs as ‘‘VA’’.
Based on a review of existing
permanent supportive housing (PSH)
models, typical acuity levels of veterans
in the program, and the availability of
providers within VA medical facilities
and in the community who can augment
care provided by HUD–VASH case
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
managers, the Secretaries of HUD and
VA jointly determined that the
appropriate caseload ratio in HUD–
VASH is a weighted average of 25
veterans per case manager. It is
important to note that actual caseload
sizes can vary considerably, based
primarily on the needs of the veterans
being served. Veterans in HUD–VASH
are weighted based on their stage in the
program, with higher weightings
applied to veterans in more intensive
stages of the program, and lower
weightings applied to those who have
stabilized. These weightings and target
caseload ratio ensure that all veterans in
receipt of a HUD–VASH voucher are
seen as needed by their case manager.
The current HUD–VASH program was
further authorized pursuant to Division
K, Title II of The Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008 (Pub. L. 110–
161) (‘‘2008 Appropriation Act’’)
enacted on December 26, 2007 (see
proviso (7) under the heading ‘‘TenantBased Rental Assistance’’). All
Congressional Appropriations Acts
since 2008 have continued to authorize
this program. Therefore, the
implementation requirements will
remain in effect until the HUD–VASH
program is no longer authorized by
Congress or the authorization
requirements change.
The Appropriations Acts have
required HUD to ‘‘make such funding
available, notwithstanding section 203
(competition provision) of this title, to
PHAs that partner with eligible VA
Medical Centers or other entities as
designated by the Secretary of the VA,
based on geographical need for such
assistance as identified by the Secretary
of the VA, PHA administrative
performance, and other factors as
specified by the Secretary of HUD in
consultation with the Secretary of the
Department of the VA.’’
Based on this language, the allocation
of HUD–VASH vouchers has been a
collaborative, data-driven effort
conducted by HUD and the VA. The
HUD–VASH allocation formula relies on
several pieces of data which include
HUD’s point-in-time data submitted by
Continuums of Care (CoC) and VA data
on contacts with homeless veterans.
PHA and VA performance is also taken
into consideration.
Additional information on program
requirements and procedures may be
found on the HUD–VASH website at
https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/
public_indian_housing/programs/hcv/
vash.
B. Summary of Changes
The new flexibilities and
requirements include: (1) new flexibility
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
around verifying social security number
(SSN) based on HOTMA updates
(section II.a.); (2) new requirement for
PHAs to serve veterans up to the low
income limit (i.e., 80% area median
income (AMI)) in the HUD–VASH
program (section II.b); (3) new
requirement to exclude VA disability
income to determine initial eligibility
(section II.b); (4) new requirement for
PHAs to accept self-certification of
assets under $50,000 as established in
HOTMA and allow self-certification of
zero-income (section II.b); (5) new
authorization for PHAs to apply
reasonable accommodation exception
payment standards for HUD–VASH
families without additional HUD
approval (section II.o.); (6) new
flexibility to allow noncompetitive
selection of one or more PBV projects
where all units in the project(s) are
made exclusively available to HUD–
VASH families on the site of a VA
facility (section II.k.); new flexibility
allowing admittance of zero-HAP
families for HUD–VASH PBV (section
II.k.); and (7) new flexibility to allow
PHAs to set a lower minimum rent
(including a minimum rent of $0)
specifically for their HUD–VASH
program (section II.q.).
Updates made to existing
requirements include: (1) updates to
description and requirements for
designated service providers (DSPs) and
PHAs as DSPs (section II.a); (2)
clarification on applicability of initial
search term (section II.c); (3)
explanation that HUD–VASH families
are not be subject to rescreening when
porting (section II.f.); (4) additional
explanation regarding the application of
HUD–VASH waivers and flexibilities to
HUD–VASH PBV (section II.k); (5)
additional explanation of HUD–VASH
PBV exceptions under HOTMA (section
II.k.); (6) explanation that when a HUD–
VASH family is eligible to move or
required to move from its PBV unit, the
family must be able to move with a
HUD–VASH tenant-based voucher
(section II.k.); (7) updated explanation
of the HUD–VASH reallocation process
through voluntary moves between PHAs
and voucher recapture for future
reallocation (section II.m.); and (8)
update to allow pre-inspection of units
up to 90 days before the Request for
Tenancy Approval (section II.n.).
II. Special Rules for the HUD–VASH
Voucher Program
This section sets forth the design
features of the HUD–VASH program,
including family eligibility and
selection, income eligibility, portability,
case management, and the turnover of
these vouchers. This document replaces
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
the special rules published in the
Federal Register on September 27, 2021
(86 FR 53207). The FY 2008–2024
Appropriations Acts stated ‘‘that the
Secretary of HUD (in consultation with
the Secretary of the VA) may waive, or
specify alternative requirements for any
provision of any statute or regulation
that the Secretary of HUD administers in
connection with the use of funds made
available under this paragraph (except
for requirements related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and
the environment) upon a finding by the
Secretary that any such waivers or
alternative requirements are necessary
for the effective delivery and
administration of such voucher
assistance: Provided further, that
assistance made available under this
paragraph shall continue to remain
available for homeless veterans upon
turnover.’’
This notice outlines below the
waivers or alternative requirements
determined by the Secretary to be
necessary for the effective delivery and
administration of the HUD–VASH
program. These waivers or alternative
requirements are exceptions to the
normal HCV requirements, which
otherwise govern the provision of HUD–
VASH assistance. In addition, a PHA
may request additional good cause
regulatory waivers. These requests may
be submitted to the Secretary for review
and decision through the Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian Housing
(PIH) through the regular PIH waiver
process.
HUD–VASH vouchers under this part
are administered in accordance with the
tenant-based HCV and PBV program
regulations set forth at 24 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 982 and
983, respectively. In both programs, the
PHA pays monthly rental subsidies so
that eligible families can afford decent,
safe, and sanitary housing. HUD
provides housing assistance funds to the
PHA, as well as funds for PHA
administration of the program.
Under the HCV program, families
select and rent units that meet program
housing quality standards (HQS). If the
PHA approves a family’s unit and
tenancy, the PHA contracts with the
property owner to make rent subsidy
payments (housing assistance payments)
directly to the owner on behalf of the
family on a monthly basis. The family
enters into a lease with the owner and
pays its share of the rent to the owner
in accordance with the lease. Under the
HCV tenant-based voucher program, the
housing assistance payments (HAP)
contract between the PHA and the
owner covers only a single unit and a
specific assisted family. If the family
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
moves out of the leased unit, the HAP
contract with the owner terminates. The
family may generally move to another
unit with continued assistance so long
as the family is complying with program
requirements.
Under the PBV program, families
occupy units under a PBV HAP
contract. Generally, there are multiple
units under the PBV HAP contract. In
many cases supportive services are
provided on-site. All of the PBV
requirements in 24 CFR part 983 apply
except where waived as described
below.
Unless expressly noted below, all
regulatory requirements and HUD
directives regarding the HCV tenantbased voucher and PBV programs are
applicable to HUD–VASH vouchers,
including the use of all HUD-required
contracts and other forms. The PHA’s
local discretionary policies adopted in
the PHA’s written administrative plan
apply to HUD–VASH vouchers unless
such local policy conflicts with the
requirements of the HUD–VASH
vouchers outlined below, in which case
the requirements in this document
supersede the administrative plan.
PHAs are required to maintain records
that allow for the easy identification of
families receiving HUD–VASH
vouchers. PHAs must identify these
families in the Information Management
System/PIH Information Center (IMS/
PIC), or any successor system. This
record-keeping will help ensure that, in
accordance with appropriations renewal
language, HUD–VASH vouchers that are
in use will remain available for
homeless veterans upon turnover.
The alternative requirements
established in this Notice apply to all
PHAs that administer HUD–VASH
vouchers, including those that have not
received an allocation of HUD–VASH
vouchers, but administer these vouchers
as a receiving PHA under the portability
feature of the HCV program.
A Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) with respect to the
environment has been made in
accordance with HUD regulations in 24
CFR part 50 that implement section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)). The FONSI is available for
public inspection between the hours of
8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in the
Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Room 10276, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC
20410–0500. The FONSI is also
available through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65771
A. Family Eligibility, Selection, and
Documentation
HUD–VASH eligible families are
homeless veterans and their families.
The Appropriations Acts have provided
for statutory or regulatory waivers or
alternative requirements upon a finding
by the Secretary that such waivers or
alternatives are necessary for the
effective administration and delivery of
voucher assistance (except for
requirements related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and
the environment). The December 17,
2007, Explanatory Statement for the
2008 Appropriation Act provides, ‘‘The
Appropriations Committees expect that
these vouchers will be made available to
all homeless veterans, including
recently returning veterans.’’ (153 Cong.
Rec. H16514 (daily ed., Dec. 17, 2007)).1
Section 8(o)(19) of the United States
Housing Act of 1937 (USHA of 1937),
which requires homeless veterans to
have chronic mental illnesses or chronic
substance use disorders with required
treatment of these disorders as a
condition of receipt of HUD–VASH
assistance, is waived.
By agreeing to administer the HUD–
VASH program, the PHA is
relinquishing its authority to determine
the eligibility of families in accordance
with regular HCV program rules and
PHA policies with the exceptions of
income eligibility and lifetime sex
offender status. Specifically, under the
HUD–VASH program, PHAs will not
have the authority to screen any
potentially eligible family members or
deny assistance for any grounds
permitted under 24 CFR 982.552 (broad
denial for violations of HCV program
requirements) and 982.553 (specific
denial for criminal activity and alcohol
abusers), with one exception. PHAs will
still be required to prohibit admission if
any member of the household is subject
to a lifetime registration requirement
under a State sex offender registration
program. However, unless the family
member that is subject to lifetime
registration under a State sex offender
registration program is the homeless
veteran (which would result in denial of
admission for the family), the remaining
family member(s) may be served if the
family agrees to remove the sex offender
from its family composition.
Accordingly, HUD is exercising its
authority to waive 42 U.S.C. 1437d(s),
42 U.S.C. 13661(a), (b), and (c), and 24
CFR 982.552 and 982.553 both in regard
to denial of admission, with the
exception of 982.553(a)(2)(i), which
1 https://www.congress.gov/crec/2007/12/17/
CREC-2007-12-17-pt3-PgH16381.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
65772
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
requires denial of admission to certain
registered sex offenders, and with the
exceptions of 982.552(c)(2)(v) and
982.553(e), which contain the fair
housing and equal opportunity
provisions and protections for victims of
domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, and stalking. These
provisions also apply to PBV assistance.
Eligibility determination and veteran
selection is done by the VA, as
described later in this section. HUD–
VASH eligible families are referred to
the partnering PHA for the issuance of
a voucher or selection for a PBV unit.
As stated above, the PHA must accept
these referrals. Written documentation
of these referrals must be maintained in
the tenant file at the PHA.
PHAs are not authorized to maintain
a waiting list or apply local preferences
for the HUD–VASH program. Instead,
VA refers HUD–VASH eligible families
to the PHA for the issuance of a HUD–
VASH voucher or identification of a
PBV unit that is exclusively made
available to HUD–VASH families. If a
HUD–VASH-eligible family is referred
and there is an available PBV unit that
is not exclusively made available to
HUD–VASH families, the PHA may also
offer to refer the family to the owner for
occupancy of that unit if allowable
under the selection policy applicable to
that project, and the owner and PHA
may amend the PBV HAP contract to
designate the PBV unit as a HUD–VASH
PBV unit. Accordingly, sections
8(o)(6)(A) and (B) and 8(o)(13)(J) of the
USHA of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(6)(A)
and (B) and (o)(13)(J), in regard to
preferences, has been waived to provide
for the effective administration of the
program. In addition, provisions relating
to applicant selection from the waiting
list and local preferences of 24 CFR
982.202, 982.204, 982.207, and 983.251
are also waived. Note that 24 CFR
983.251(a)(4), which disallows renting
to relatives except when it may be
necessary as a reasonable
accommodation, is not waived. Note
that 24 CFR 982.202(b)(3) (Family
characteristics), 24 CFR 982.202(d)
(Admission policy), and 24 CFR
983.251(a)(3) (protections for survivors
of domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, or stalking covered by
part 5, subpart L apply to admission to
the PBV program) continue to apply. 24
CFR 982.203, 982.205, and 982.206
regarding special admissions, crosslisting of the waiting list, and opening
and closing the waiting list do not apply
to the HUD–VASH program.
The VA may approve a PHA with
unleased HUD–VASH vouchers as a
DSP for the purposes of veteran
selection and intake. This PHA-specific
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
DSP authority allows a PHA to issue a
HUD–VASH voucher to a veteran
without a referral from the VA. The
PHA is responsible for determining,
through processes agreed upon with the
partnering VA medical facility, that the
veteran meets the VA program
participant requirements established by
the VA national office. The
determination of whether an individual
qualifies as a veteran for the purposes of
a HUD–VASH voucher is made by the
VA medical facility. The PHA must refer
the veteran to the VA for case
management and must provide
temporary case management (not to
exceed 180 days) until the VA has
completed intake of the veteran. At
present, PHAs may not use HCV
administrative fees for case
management. Further guidance will be
provided on the provision of case
management by the PHA as the DSP.
PHAs approved as DSPs under this
authority must also ensure that while
using unleased HUD–VASH vouchers,
they maintain sufficient HUD–VASH
vouchers available to immediately issue
a HUD–VASH voucher to veterans
referred by the VA. Guidance on the
requirements for a PHA to be approved
and additional details on the
application process are available on
VA’s HUD–VASH website at https://
www.va.gov/HOMELESS/HUD-VASH_
Designated-Service-Providers.asp and
may be periodically updated.
In regard to verifying SSN for
homeless veterans and their family
members, PHAs must follow the SSN
verification hierarchy. PHAs must use
available flexibilities in accordance with
24 CFR 5.216(g)(1)(iii) to accept selfcertification of SSN and at least one
third-party document, such as a bank
statement, utility or cell phone bill, or
benefit letter that contains the name of
the individual in the absence of other
documentation. For the homeless
veteran, the third-party document could
be the VA-issued photo ID or document
with the veteran’s name. If verifying an
individual’s SSN using this method, the
PHA must document why the other SSN
documentation was not available. In the
case of the homeless veteran, the PHA
must accept the Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty (DD 214) or
the VA-verified Application for Health
Benefits (10–10EZ) as verification of
SSN if these forms are available;
however, these forms are not required to
verify SSN. These documents must also
be accepted for proof of age purposes.
Please note that veterans are also issued
photo identification cards by the VA
and these cards must be accepted by the
PHA in lieu of another type of
government-issued photo identification.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
When adding a family member after
the HUD–VASH family is admitted to
the program, the rules of 24 CFR
982.551(h)(2) apply. Other than the
birth, adoption or court-awarded
custody of a child, the PHA must
approve additional family members and
may apply its regular screening criteria
in doing so.
Civil rights requirements cannot be
waived. The HUD–VASH program is
administered in accordance with
applicable civil rights and fair housing
requirements. These include applicable
authorities under 24 CFR 5.105(a) and
24 CFR 982.53 including, but not
limited to, the Fair Housing Act, Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
the Age Discrimination Act, the
Americans with Disabilities Act, and
HUD’s Equal Access Rule.2
When HUD–VASH applicants or
recipients include veterans with
disabilities or family members with
disabilities, HUD’s reasonable
accommodation requirements apply.
These standards require PHAs to make
a reasonable adjustment to rules,
policies, practices, and procedures
when it may be necessary in order to
enable an applicant or resident with a
disability to have an equal opportunity
to use and enjoy a dwelling, the
common areas of a dwelling, or
participate in or access a recipient’s
programs and activities. These
standards extend to various aspects of
program implementation, including, for
example, denial or termination of
assistance, initial search term of the
HCV, initial lease term, and informal
reviews and hearings. Under the PBV
program, this also includes providing
structural changes to a unit or public or
common use area when they may be
needed as a reasonable accommodation
for an applicant or participant or their
household members with a disability.
Other obligations include, for example,
effective communication with persons
with disabilities, physical accessibility
requirements, and overall
nondiscrimination in the administration
of the program.
B. Income and Asset Eligibility
The PHA must determine income and
asset eligibility for HUD–VASH families
in accordance with 24 CFR 982.201 and
24 CFR 5.618. Income targeting
requirements of section 16(b) of the
USHA of 1937, as well as 24 CFR
982.201(b)(2), do not apply for HUD–
VASH families so that participating
2 See 24 CFR 5.105(a); See also https://
www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_
opp/fair_housing_rights_and_obligations.
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
PHAs can effectively serve the eligible
population specified in the
Appropriations Acts; that is, homeless
veterans, who may be at a variety of
income levels, including low-income. In
addition, PHAs must serve all income
eligible veterans, including low-income
veterans (up to 80% AMI) in HUD–
VASH. HUD is exercising its authority
to waive 24 CFR 982.201(b)(iii) to
provide that, for HUD–VASH, lowincome families are eligible for
assistance and PHAs may not condition
this eligibility based on ‘‘additional
eligibility criteria’’ specified in its
administrative plan.
Under Section 3(b) of the USHA of
1937, the definition of income
specifically excludes ‘‘deferred
disability benefits from the Department
of Veterans Affairs that are received in
a lump sum amount or in prospective
monthly amounts’’ and ‘‘any expenses
related to aid and attendance under
section 1521 of title 38, United States
Code, to veterans who are in need of
regular aid and attendance.’’ All other
VA service-connected benefits are
included in determining income
eligibility for the HCV program. For a
very small percentage of homeless
veterans, the amount of VA serviceconnected benefits received due to the
severity of their disabilities results in
the veteran being over the low-income
limit.
In order to ensure that homeless
veterans are not excluded from
participation in the HUD–VASH
program because of their VA serviceconnected disability benefits,
particularly with respect to the
opportunity to reside in HUD–VASH
PBV projects located on the site of a VA
facility or where HUD–VASH
supportive services are provided on-site
at the project, HUD is exercising its
waiver authority and establishing
alternative requirements for purposes of
determining income eligibility for HUD–
VASH. For HUD–VASH applicants
receiving VA service-connected
disability benefits, HUD is waiving
section 3(b) of the USHA of 1937, which
applies for purposes of determinations
of lower income family eligibility based
on median income under the USHA of
1937, including Section 8 programs, as
well as 24 CFR 5.609(a)(1), which
provides that annual income includes
all amounts not specifically excluded in
paragraph (b) of § 5.609.
As an alternative requirement, the
PHA must determine the applicant’s
annual income for purposes of income
eligibility by excluding all VA serviceconnected benefits received by the
HUD–VASH applicant in addition to the
income exclusions listed under 24 CFR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
5.609(b). This special income exclusion
only applies to the definition of annual
income for purposes of determining
income eligibility. If the HUD–VASH
applicant now qualifies as a low-income
family under this alternative
requirement, the VA service-connected
benefits (with the exception of the
normally excluded deferred VA
disability payments under 24 CFR
5.609(b)(16) and the payments related to
aid and attendance under 24 CFR
5.609(b)(17)) must still be included as
annual income when calculating the
family’s adjusted income under 24 CFR
5.611. In other words, the VA serviceconnected disability benefits are
excluded for purposes of determining
income eligibility but included for
purposes of calculating the total tenant
payment (TTP), housing assistance
payment, and family share.
Because there needs to be a monthly
housing assistance payment (HAP) in
order to enter into a HAP contract on
behalf of a tenant-based voucher family,
the utilization of tenant-based HUD–
VASH assistance by families determined
income eligible under this waiver and
alternative requirement will be limited
to those areas where the family’s (TTP)
(see 24 CFR 5.628) is less than the
applicable payment standard or
exception payment standard (including
any HUD–VASH specific exception
payment standard established by the
PHA in accordance with section II.o
below). The family would also need to
select a unit with a gross rent that is
above the family TTP in order to lease
a unit with the tenant-based HUD–
VASH voucher.
Under the PBV program, the PHA may
select an occupied unit to be included
under a PBV HAP Contract only if the
unit’s occupants are eligible for
assistance under 24 CFR 982.201 and
the TTP for the family must be less than
the gross rent for the unit, such that the
unit will be eligible for a monthly HAP
(24 CFR 983.52(c)). In addition, in
selecting a family for an available PBV
unit, the PHA must determine the TTP
for the family is less than the gross rent,
meaning that the unit will be eligible for
a monthly HAP (24 CFR 983.251(a)(2)).
However, under section II.k below, HUD
is providing a waiver and alternative
requirement where the PHA may opt to
select an occupied unit or admit a
family to a unit if such unit is made
exclusively available to HUD–VASH
families if the PBV project is either on
the grounds of a VA facility or there are
HUD–VASH supportive services
provided on-site at the project. Please
see section II.k regarding this PBV zeroHAP option for PHAs.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65773
The PHA may choose to include the
admission of extremely low-income
HUD–VASH families in its income
targeting numbers for the fiscal year in
which these families are admitted. In
conformance with normal program
rules, PHAs may not deny admission to
a family with zero income. When the
veteran family reports that they have
zero income, the PHA must accept a
self-certification of zero income from
the family at admission and at
reexamination without taking any
additional steps to require that the
family verify zero reported income. The
self-certification does not need to be
notarized. The PHA must verify
families’ income in the Enterprise
Income Verification (EIV) System within
120 days after admission.
In determining compliance with the
asset limitation at 24 CFR 5.618 at
admission, for the HUD–VASH program,
PHAs must accept a self-certification by
the family that the family’s total assets
are equal to or less than $50,000,
adjusted annually for inflation, and that
the family does not have any present
ownership interest in real property,
without taking additional steps to verify
the accuracy of the declaration. The
PHA may accept a self-certification of
net family assets at reexamination but
must fully verify the family’s assets
every three years. For net family assets
exceeding $50,000, adjusted annually
for inflation, the PHA must fully verify
the family’s assets as required for all
HCV families.
PHAs must not enforce the asset
limitation for HUD–VASH families at
reexamination.
C. Initial Search Term of the Voucher
Recognizing the challenges that HUD–
VASH participants may face with their
housing search, HUD–VASH vouchers
must have an initial search term of at
least 120 days. This applies to the
search term at both initial issuance and
moves with assistance. Therefore, 24
CFR 982.303(a), which states that the
initial search term must be at least 60
days, shall not apply, since the initial
term must be at least 120 days. Any
extensions, suspensions, and progress
reports will remain under the policies in
the PHA’s administrative plan but will
apply after the minimum 120-day initial
search term. PHAs are encouraged to
use flexibility allowing for needed
extensions of search terms. Extensions
may also be needed as a reasonable
accommodation for a household with a
member with a disability, such as for
example, due to the difficulty in finding
a unit that meets one’s disability-related
needs, e.g., physically accessible unit,
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
65774
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
unit near accessible transportation, unit
near medical or other facilities.
D. Initial Lease Term
Under the HCV tenant-based voucher
program, voucher participants must
enter into an initial lease with the
owner for at least one year, unless a
shorter term would improve housing
opportunities for the tenant and the
shorter term is a prevailing market
practice. To provide a greater range of
housing opportunities for HUD–VASH
voucher holders, initial leases may be
less than 12 months; therefore, both
section 8(o)(7)(A) of the USHA of 1937,
42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(7)(A), and 24 CFR
982.309(a)(2)(ii) are waived to allow a
term less than one year, without regard
to the PHA independently determining
that a shorter term would improve
housing opportunities and that a shorter
term is the prevailing market practice.
Note that this waiver does not apply to
PBVs.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
E. Eligible Housing
24 CFR 982.352(a)(5) and 983.52(a)(2)
prohibit assistance for units on the
physical grounds of a medical, mental,
or similar public or private institution.
HUD is waiving these prohibitions for
the limited purpose of allowing
assistance on the grounds of a VA
facility for both HCV tenant-based
vouchers for HUD–VASH families and
all PBV units made exclusively
available for HUD–VASH families.
F. Mobility and Portability of HUD–
VASH Vouchers
An eligible family issued a HUD–
VASH voucher must receive required
case management services provided by
the partnering VA medical facility.
Therefore, special mobility and
portability procedures must be
established. HUD–VASH participant
families may reside only in those
jurisdictional areas that are accessible to
case management services as
determined by the VA medical facility.
Since the VA will be identifying
homeless veterans eligible to participate
in the HUD–VASH program, section
8(r)(1)(B)(i) of the USHA of 1937, 42
U.S.C. 1437f(r)(1)(B)(i), which restricts
portability in cases where the family did
not reside in the jurisdiction of the PHA
at the time of application for HCV
assistance, and 24 CFR 982.353(a), (b),
and (c), which affects where a family
can lease a unit with HCV assistance, do
not apply. A family that moves under
the portability procedures must not be
subject to rescreening by the receiving
PHA. HUD may publish PIH notices
from time to time to further explain
portability requirements under the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
HUD–VASH program. In all porting
scenarios, with the exception of victims
of domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, and stalking, the PHA
must consult with the VA prior to
approving the port.
1. Portability Moves Within Same
Catchment Area (or Area of Operation)
Where Case Management Is Provided by
the Initial PHA’s Partnering VA Medical
Facility
If the family initially leases up, or
moves, under portability provisions, but
the initial PHA’s partnering VA medical
facility will still be able to provide the
necessary case management services
due to the family’s proximity to the
partnering VA medical facility, the
receiving PHA must process the move in
accordance with the portability
procedures of 24 CFR 982.355.
However, since the initial PHA must
maintain records on all HUD–VASH
families receiving case management
services from its partnering VA medical
facility, receiving PHAs without a HUD–
VASH program must bill the initial
PHA. Therefore, 24 CFR 982.355(d),
which gives the receiving PHA the
option to absorb the family into its own
HCV program or bill the initial PHA, is
not applicable.
2. Portability Moves Within Same
Catchment Area Where Both PHAs Have
Received HUD–VASH Vouchers
The receiving PHA may bill the initial
PHA or absorb the family into its own
HUD–VASH program if the VA medical
facility providing the initial case
management agrees to the absorption by
the receiving PHA and the transfer of
case management. The absorption will
also entail the availability of a HUD–
VASH voucher and case management
provision by the receiving PHA’s
partnering VA medical facility.
3. Portability Moves Where Receiving
PHA Is Beyond VA Medical Facility
Catchment Area
If a family wants to move to another
jurisdiction where it will not be possible
for the initial PHA’s partnering VA
medical facility to provide case
management services, the VA must first
determine that the HUD–VASH family
could be served by another VA medical
facility that is participating in this
program, and the receiving PHA must
have a HUD–VASH voucher available
for this family. In these cases, the family
must be absorbed by the receiving PHA
either as a new admission (upon initial
participation in the HUD–VASH
program) or as a portability move-in
(after an initial leasing in the initial
PHA’s jurisdiction). Upon absorption,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the initial PHA’s HUD–VASH voucher
will be available to lease to a new HUD–
VASH eligible family, as determined by
the partnering VA medical facility, and
the absorbed family will count toward
the number of HUD–VASH slots
awarded to the receiving PHA.
When the receiving PHA completes
the Family Report (HUD–50058 or
HUD–50058 MTW) under the scenario
described above, the action type that
must be recorded on line 2a is ‘‘1’’ for
a new admission (a family that is new
to the HCV program) or ‘‘4’’ for a
portability move-in (a family that was
previously leased up in the jurisdiction
of the initial PHA). Whether the family
is a new admission or portability movein, in section 12 of the HUD–50058, line
12d is always marked ‘‘Y.’’ In cases of
portability where families move out of
the catchment area of the initial PHA,
12e must be 0 since the family must be
absorbed, and 12f must be left blank.
4. Portability Moves Where Receiving
PHA Is Beyond Catchment Area for
Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating
Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking
Veterans who request to port beyond
the catchment area of the VA medical
facility where they are receiving case
management in order to protect the
health or safety of a person who is or
has been the victim of domestic
violence, dating violence, sexual
assault, or stalking, and who reasonably
believes themselves to be threatened
with imminent harm from further
violence by remaining in the dwelling
unit (or any family member has been the
victim of a sexual assault that occurred
on the premises during the 90-calendarday period preceding the family’s move
or request to move), may port prior to
receiving approval from the receiving
VA medical facility but must notify the
VA medical facility at the earliest time
possible to ensure appropriate supports
are provided to the veteran family. The
initial PHA must follow its emergency
transfer plan as described in 24 CFR
5.2005(e). Consistent with
documentation requirements at 24 CFR
5.2005(e)(10) and 5.200, PHAs may
require verbal self-certification or a
written request from a participant
seeking a move beyond the catchment
area of the VA medical facility. A
participant may provide a completed
form HUD–5383 to satisfy a requirement
to provide a written request.
The verbal self-certification or written
request must include either (a) a
statement expressing that the
participant reasonably believes that
there is a threat of imminent harm from
further violence if the participant were
to remain in the same dwelling unit
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
assisted under the PHA; or (b) in the
case of a participant who is a victim of
sexual assault and is seeking a transfer
on the basis that the sexual assault
occurred on the premises during the 90day period preceding the participant’s
request for the move, a statement that
says this. The veteran escaping violence
must be admitted to the VA medical
facility caseload. For participants
seeking a move beyond the catchment
area of the VA medical facility while
maintaining a HUD–VASH voucher, the
participant must still port to a PHA that
has a HUD–VASH program; if the
receiving PHA does not have a HUD–
VASH voucher available to lease, they
may bill the initial PHA until a HUD–
VASH voucher is available, at which
point the porting veteran must be
absorbed into the receiving PHA’s
program.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
5. Portability Moves When Case
Management Is No Longer Required
If the family no longer requires case
management, as determined by the VA
medical facility, there are no portability
restrictions. PHAs must follow the
regulatory requirements for portability
found at 24 CFR 982.355. When
completing the HUD–50058, the family
will continue to be coded as ‘‘VASH’’ on
line 2n unless the family has been
moved to a regular voucher, in which
case the code in 2n would be left blank.
G. Case Management and Supportive
Services
In general, the VA medical facility
responsibilities include: (1) the
screening of homeless veterans to
determine whether they meet the HUD–
VASH program participation criteria
established by the VA national office;
(2) assisting veterans with the PHA
application and assisting the veteran
family with obtaining needed PHA
documentation to ensure rapid voucher
issuance; (3) referrals of homeless
veterans to the PHA; (4) providing case
management and supportive services to
potential HUD–VASH program
participants, as needed, prior to PHA
issuance of rental vouchers; (5)
providing housing search assistance to
HUD–VASH participants with rental
vouchers; (6) identifying the social
service and medical needs of HUD–
VASH participants and providing, or
ensuring the provision of, regular
ongoing case management, outpatient
health services, hospitalization, and
other supportive services, as needed,
throughout this initiative; and (7)
maintaining records and providing
information for evaluation purposes, as
required by HUD and the VA. In cases
where a DSP (including a PHA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
approved as a DSP) is approved, the
applicable responsibilities may be
completed by the DSP.
As a condition of HCV rental
assistance, both tenant-based voucher
and PBV, a HUD–VASH eligible veteran
must receive the case management
services noted above, as needed,
directly from or arranged by the VA.
The VA, in consultation with the
veteran, is responsible for determining if
case management is required and if the
case management requirement is
satisfied.
If a veteran no longer requires case
management, but maintains their HUD–
VASH voucher assistance, the VA will
maintain contact with the veteran
family to provide support and planning
assistance with the recertification and
reinspection process. The VA will
remain available to provide support to
the veteran family, as needed.
H. Termination of Assistance
There are two alternative
requirements for termination of
assistance for HUD–VASH participants.
As detailed above, HUD–VASH voucher
assistance is contingent upon
participation in case management, when
required by the VA. If the VA has
determined that a veteran is not
participating in required case
management, without good cause, the
PHA must terminate the family from the
HUD–VASH program. However, the
PHA may offer the family continued
assistance through one of its regular
vouchers or a PBV unit not exclusively
made available for HUD–VASH.
A VA determination that the veteran
does not require or no longer requires
case management is never grounds for
termination of HCV assistance. In such
case, and in consultation with the VA,
the PHA may offer the family continued
assistance through one of its regular
vouchers, to free up the HUD–VASH
voucher for another eligible family
referred by the VA. The decision to
transfer assistance to a regular voucher
must consider veteran preference and
must be communicated to the VA prior
to occurring. If the PHA has no voucher
to offer, the family will retain its HUD–
VASH voucher, or PBV unit, until such
time as the PHA has an available
voucher (or PBV unit not exclusively
made available for HUD–VASH) for the
family. If the family no longer requires
case management, there are no
portability restrictions. Normal
portability rules apply.
Second, 24 CFR 982.552(b)(2) states
that ‘‘The PHA must terminate program
assistance for a family evicted from
housing assisted under the program for
serious violation of the lease.’’ HUD is
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65775
waiving this provision, and establishing
the alternative requirement that the
PHA may terminate program assistance
in these cases. Prior to terminating
HUD–VASH participants, HUD strongly
encourages PHAs to exercise their
discretion under 24 CFR 982.552(c)(2)
and consider all relevant circumstances
of the specific case, as well as including
the role of the case manager and the
impact that ongoing case management
services can have on mitigating the
conditions that led to the potential
termination, prior to determining
whether to terminate assistance. PHAs
also must grant reasonable
accommodations for persons with
disabilities in accordance with 24 CFR
part 8. The PHA may not terminate
assistance on the basis or as a direct
result that a member of the participant
family is or has been a victim of
domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, or stalking. 24 CFR
5.2005(b). In addition, a HUD–VASH
participant family must not be
terminated after admission, for a
circumstance or activity that occurred
before admission and was known to the
PHA but could not be considered at the
time of admission due to the HUD–
VASH Operating Requirements. The
PHA can only terminate the family’s
assistance for program violations that
occur after the family’s admission to the
voucher program.
Generally, in the case of a family
break-up, the HUD–VASH assistance
must stay with the HUD–VASH veteran.
However, in the case of domestic
violence, dating violence, sexual
assault, or stalking, in which the HUD–
VASH veteran is the perpetrator, the
victim must continue to be assisted.
Upon termination of the perpetrator’s
HUD–VASH voucher due to the
perpetrator’s acts of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, or
stalking, the victim must be given a
regular HCV if one is available, and the
perpetrator’s HUD–VASH voucher must
be used to serve another eligible veteran
family. If a regular HCV is not available
for the victim, the perpetrator must be
terminated from assistance, and the
victim will continue to utilize the HUD–
VASH voucher.
I. Turnover of HUD–VASH Vouchers
In accordance with the
Appropriations Acts, upon turnover,
HUD–VASH vouchers must be issued to
eligible veteran families as identified by
the VA, as noted above.
J. MTW Agencies
HUD–VASH vouchers may be
administered in accordance with
flexibilities approved under a PHA’s
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
65776
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Standard MTW Agreement or MTW
Operations Notice with approval from
HUD’s HCV office. Until such time that
additional guidance is issued, MTW
PHAs must submit a request through
their local field office to operate HUD–
VASH in accordance with approved
MTW flexibilities. Requests will be
approved provided the flexibilities do
not conflict with the HUD–VASH
program requirements or objectives.
HUD–VASH vouchers are never eligible
for MTW fungibility. However, MTW
agencies may use their MTW funding
for HUD–VASH vouchers. HUD–VASH
vouchers must be reported in the IMS/
PIC system, or any successor system, on
either the regular HUD–50058 or HUD50058 MTW (or HUD–50058–MTW
Expansion where appropriate) for
vouchers under the agency’s MTW
Agreement.
K. HUD–VASH PBV
Section 8(o)(13)(D) of the USHA of
1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437(o)(13)(D)) is
waived for HUD–VASH vouchers so that
all units exclusively made available to
HUD–VASH families in a PBV project
are exempted from the PBV incomemixing requirements (project cap). The
project cap refers to the number of units
in a project that may receive PBV
assistance and is generally the higher of
25 units or 25 percent of units in the
project. Units exclusively made
available to HUD–VASH families are
excluded from (do not count against)
this PBV project cap. Additionally,
HUD–VASH supportive services only
need to be provided to all HUD–VASH
families in the project, not all families
receiving PBV assistance in the project.
If a HUD–VASH family does not require
or no longer requires case management,
the unit continues to count as an
excepted PBV unit for as long as the
family resides in that unit.
Likewise, HUD waives Section
8(o)(13)(B) of the USHA of 1937, 42
U.S.C. 1437f(o)(13)(B) so that HUD–
VASH units made available under a
competitive PIH notice for HUD–VASH
PBV units (‘‘HUD–VASH PBV setaside’’) are excluded from the PBV
percentage limitation (program cap).
This exclusion only applies to HUD–
VASH PBV vouchers awarded through
the HUD–VASH PBV set-aside notice.
All other HUD–VASH vouchers that the
PHA opts to project-base, are still
subject to the PBV program cap.
(Generally, a PHA may project-base up
to 20% of its authorized HCV units. The
PHA may also project-base an additional
10% of its authorized HCVs for units
that meet the conditions of 24 CFR
983.6(d)(1) or (d)(2) and any number of
units that are excluded from the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
program cap pursuant to 24 CFR 983.58
and 983.59.)
Pursuant to the HUD–VASH case
management and termination
requirements, a HUD–VASH family’s
PBV assistance must be terminated for
failure to participate in case
management when required by the VA
If the PHA has a policy in place to allow
the veteran to receive a regular (nonVASH) HCV or PBV unit instead of the
family’s assistance being terminated, the
PHA may: substitute the family’s unit
on the PBV HAP contract for another
unit if it is possible to do so in
accordance with § 983.207(a) and this
notice (the PHA may, in conjunction
with such substitution, add the original
unit to the PBV HAP contract with a
non-VASH voucher if it is possible to do
so in accordance with § 983.207(b));
remove the unit from the PBV HAP
contract so the family may remain with
tenant-based assistance, if the family
and the owner agree to use the tenantbased voucher in the unit; or change the
unit’s status in the PBV HAP contract
from a unit exclusively made available
for HUD–VASH to a regular PBV unit,
if doing so is allowable under program
rules and this notice. If the PHA does
not have a policy in place to allow the
veteran to receive a regular (non-VASH)
HCV or PBV unit instead of the family’s
assistance being terminated, then upon
notification by the VA of the family’s
failure to participate in VA-required
case management, the PHA must
provide the family a reasonable period
of time (as established by the PHA) to
vacate the unit. The PHA must
terminate assistance to the family at the
earlier of (1) the time the family vacates
or (2) the expiration of the reasonable
period of time given to vacate (the lease
terminates at the same time as
termination of assistance per 24 CFR
983.256(f)(3)(v)). If the family fails to
vacate the unit within the established
time, the owner may evict the family. If
the owner does not evict the family, the
PHA must remove the unit from the
HAP contract or amend the HAP
contract to substitute a different unit in
the project if the project is partially
assisted. If the PHA has a policy in
place to allow the veteran to be moved
onto a regular HCV or PBV unit, the
owner may substitute a PBV unit not
exclusively made available for HUD–
VASH. A PHA may add the removed
unit to the HAP contract after the
ineligible family vacates the property.
The PBV program requirements
governing additions and substitutions at
24 CFR 983.207 apply, except that
paragraph (c) governing additions and
substitutions of occupied units does not
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
apply to units exclusively made
available to HUD–VASH families in
most cases. Because only homeless
veterans may be referred for occupancy
of a HUD–VASH PBV unit, only
occupied units whose occupants are
families already receiving tenant-based
HUD–VASH assistance may be added to
a PBV HAP contract as units exclusively
made available to HUD–VASH families.
Families who are not homeless cannot
receive HUD–VASH assistance as a
result of the family’s unit being added
to a PBV HAP contract. Therefore, the
provisions of 24 CFR 983.207(a), (b)(3),
and (c) are waived with respect to the
option to add or substitute an occupied
unit unless the unit is already occupied
by a family receiving tenant-based
HUD–VASH assistance.
If a HUD–VASH family is eligible to
move from its PBV unit pursuant to 24
CFR 983.261 and there is no HUD–
VASH tenant-based voucher available at
the time the family requests to move,
the PHA may require a family that still
requires case management to wait for a
HUD–VASH tenant-based voucher for a
period not to exceed 180 days. To
effectuate this requirement, section
8(o)(13)(E)(ii) of the USHA of 1937, 42
U.S.C. 1437f(o)(13)(E)(ii), and 24 CFR
983.261(c) are waived solely for the
purpose of allowing the PHA to delay
issuance of a voucher. If a HUD–VASH
tenant-based voucher is still not
available after that period of time, the
family must be allowed to move using
its HUD–VASH voucher as tenant-based
assistance. Alternatively, the PHA may
allow the family to move using its
HUD–VASH voucher as tenant-based
assistance without having to meet this
180-day waiting period. In either case,
the PHA may either amend the PBV
HAP contract to replace the assistance
in the PBV unit with one of its regular
vouchers if the unit is eligible for a
regular PBV (for instance, so long as the
unit is eligible under the PHA’s program
and project caps) or the PHA and owner
may agree to temporarily remove the
unit from the HAP contract. If a HUD–
VASH veteran has been determined to
no longer require case management, the
PHA must allow the family to move
with the first available tenant-based
voucher if no HUD–VASH voucher is
immediately available and cannot
require the family to wait for a HUD–
VASH voucher to become available.
If the PHA determines that a HUD–
VASH family is occupying a wrong-size
PBV unit or a PBV unit with
accessibility features that the family
does not require and the PBV unit is
needed by a family that requires the
accessibility features, the PHA must
notify the family and the owner within
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
30 days of the PHA’s determination in
accordance with 24 CFR
983.260(a)(2)(i). HUD applies an
alternative requirement for HUD–VASH
PBV units with respect to 24 CFR
983.260(b), however. Specifically, the
PHA’s offer of continued housing
assistance (that must be made within 60
days of the PHA’s determination) must
be in the form of either a HUD–VASH
tenant-based voucher or another HUD–
VASH PBV unit. If no HUD–VASH
assistance is available for the PHA to
offer within 60 days of the PHA’s
determination, the PHA must remove
the wrong-sized or accessible unit from
the HAP contract to make HUD–VASH
voucher assistance available to issue the
family a tenant-based HUD–VASH
voucher. 24 CFR 983.206(b), which
covers the required provision of tenantbased assistance requires that the family
may elect to use its tenant-based
assistance to remain in the same project
when a PBV HAP contract terminates or
expires, does not apply to families
issued a HUD–VASH tenant-based
voucher under this circumstance. The
PHA may use another voucher to add
the unit removed under this alternative
requirement to the HAP contract after
the family vacates the property, in
accordance with 24 CFR 983.207(b).
PHAs do not need authorization from
HUD to use HUD–VASH vouchers as
PBVs (though PHAs must comply with
all standard PBV program requirements
that are not waived in this notice in
order to do so), per Section 8(o)(13)(O)
of the USHA of 1937, 42 U.S.C.
1437f(o)(13)(O). However, PHAs must
consult with the partnering VA medical
facility to ensure approval of the project.
PHAs and the partnering VA medical
facility are expected to communicate
regarding the PBV planning and
development. PHAs may project-base
HUD–VASH vouchers in projects
alongside other PBV units (in
accordance with all applicable PBV
requirements) and may execute a single
HAP contract covering both the HUD–
VASH PBVs and the other PBVs.
However, the contract rents may not be
different based on whether the unit is a
| HUD–VASH PBV unit or a non-HUD–
VASH PBV unit. In determining the rent
to owner for the PBV project, if the cap
on the amount of rent to owner under
24 CFR 983.301(b)(1) is lower for nonHUD–VASH units than it is for the
HUD–VASH units (e.g., the PHA has
established a HUD–VASH exception
payment standard under section II.o
below and there is either no exception
payment standard or a lower exception
payment standard for the regular HCV
program for the area in question), that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
lower cap is applicable when setting the
rent to owner for the PBV units in the
project, including the HUD–VASH
units. In the description of units in
Exhibit A of the HAP contract, PHAs
must indicate the number of units that
will be exclusively made available to
HUD–VASH families. The PHA must
refer only HUD–VASH families to PBV
units exclusively made available to
HUD–VASH families and to PBV units
funded through a HUD–VASH PBV setaside award. The PHA and owner may
agree to amend a PBV HAP contract to
re-designate a regular PBV unit as a unit
specifically designated for HUD–VASH
families, so long as the PHA first
consults with and obtains concurrence
from the VA medical facility.
Additionally, the PHA and owner may
agree to amend a PBV HAP contract to
re-designate a unit specifically
designated for HUD–VASH families as a
regular PBV unit, so long as the unit is
not funded through a HUD–VASH PBV
set-aside award and is eligible for a
regular PBV (for instance the unit is
eligible under the PHA’s program and
project caps). The PHA and owner may
also agree to temporarily remove a unit
from the HAP contract in cases where a
HUD–VASH eligible veteran has been
identified by the VA as appropriate for
a HUD–VASH PBV unit, but the veteran
is not income eligible to receive voucher
assistance (even after applying the VA
service-connected disability benefit
exclusion waiver and alternative
requirement under section II.b) or may
not be selected for the PBV unit because
the family’s TTP exceeds the gross rent
of the unit (i.e., there is no HAP).
Although the family would not be a
program participant in the housing
portion of the HUD–VASH program in
such a case, the family would still
benefit from the project’s location on the
grounds of a VA facility or from the
HUD–VASH supportive services on-site
at the project, while the HUD–VASH
voucher would be available to assist
another HUD–VASH family. The PHA
and owner could agree to add a HUD–
VASH voucher back onto the PBV HAP
contract if the family’ income
subsequently decreased to the point that
there would be a HAP or when the
family vacates the unit.
As discussed earlier in section II.b, a
PHA may select an occupied unit to be
included under a PBV HAP Contract
only if the unit’s occupants are eligible
for assistance under 24 CFR 982.201 and
the TTP for the family must be less than
the gross rent for the unit, such that the
unit will be eligible for a monthly HAP
(24 CFR 983.52(c)). Furthermore, in
selecting a family for an available PBV
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65777
unit, the PHA must determine the TTP
for the family is less than the gross rent,
meaning that the unit will be eligible for
a monthly HAP (24 CFR 983.251((a)(2)).
However, if the PBV project is either on
the grounds of a VA facility or there are
HUD–VASH supportive services
provided on-site at the project, the PHA
may opt to select a unit occupied by a
‘‘zero-HAP’’ HUD–VASH eligible family
or admit a ‘‘zero-HAP’’ HUD–VASH
family to a unit if such unit is made
exclusively available to HUD–VASH
families. Until such time that the HUD–
VASH family’s TTP falls below the gross
rent, the family is responsible for paying
the entire rent to owner (the total
monthly rent payable by the family and
the PHA to the owner under the lease
for a contract unit), in addition to being
responsible for paying all tenantsupplied utilities. During any period
that the family’s TTP falls below the
gross rent, normal PBV requirements
apply. To effectuate this zero-HAP
family option and the alternative
requirement, Section 8(o)(2)(C) of the
USHA of 1937, 24 CFR. 983.52(c), 24
CFR 983.251(a)(2), and 24 CFR
983.353(b)(1) are waived.
Under normally applicable rules,
units occupied by families whose
incomes have increased during their
tenancy resulting in the total tenant
payment equaling the gross rent shall be
removed from the HAP contract 180
days following the last housing
assistance payment on behalf of the
family (24 CFR 983.211, 24 CFR
983.258). These regulations do not
apply to zero HAP families admitted to
the PBV project under this waiver and
alternative requirement because there is
no last housing assistance payment that
would trigger the unit removal date of
180 days. As an alternative requirement,
PHAs have the option of removing the
unit in which the zero HAP family
resides from the HAP contract, but no
earlier than 180 days from the start of
the family PBV tenancy. If the PHA
exercises this option, the family may not
be required to move from the unit as a
consequence and continues to receive
the HUD–VASH supportive services. If
the project is fully assisted the PHA may
reinstate the unit removed to the HAP
contract after the family either vacates
the unit or their income decreases to the
point that there would be a HAP. If the
project is partially assisted, the PHA
may substitute a different unit for the
unit removed from the HAP contact
when the first eligible substitute unit
becomes available (in accordance with
24 CFR 983.207). Alternatively, the PHA
may choose to simply leave the unit on
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
65778
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
the HAP contract while the zero HAP
family continues to reside there.
PBV proposal and/or project selection
for HUD–VASH must follow all regular
proposal and/or project selection
regulations, with the following
exception. HUD is establishing an
alternative requirement under 24 CFR
983.51(c) to permit noncompetitive
selection of one or more PBV projects
with units made exclusively available to
HUD–VASH families on the site of a VA
facility. Note that the method of project
selection must comply with all other
requirements under 24 CFR 983.51,
including that the PHA must notify the
public of its intent to noncompetitively
select one or more projects for PBV
assistance through its 5-Year Plan and to
ensure any project selection is
consistent with the PHA Administrative
Plan.
PHAs may consult with their
partnering VA medical facility about the
option for using PBVs in conjunction
with the VA’s Enhanced-Use Lease
(EUL) Program. The EUL Program
authorizes the VA to lease underutilized
real estate under its jurisdiction or
control to the private sector. Through
this program, lessees can develop
supportive housing for homeless
veterans who will be provided an
expanded range of services that would
not otherwise be available on medical
center campuses.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
L. Section Eight Management
Assessment Program (SEMAP)
HUD–VASH vouchers remain
excluded from the SEMAP leasing
indicator. Therefore, 24 CFR
985.3(n)(1)(i) and (ii) are still waived.
During a HUD–VASH PHA’s calendar
year, the prorated budget authority
available for HUD–VASH vouchers and
the units associated with that budget
authority will be excluded from the
denominators for both units leased and
dollars expended.
M. Reallocation of HUD–VASH
Vouchers
HUD–VASH vouchers have been
allocated based on geographic need at
the time of each allocation. In
recognition that there may be changes
and shifts in the population of homeless
veterans over time, it may become
necessary for the VA and HUD to jointly
reallocate HUD–VASH vouchers to
better address the current needs of the
homeless veteran population. This
reallocation may be done in one of two
ways. If there is continued need at the
VA medical facility, HUD–VASH
vouchers may be voluntarily moved
between PHAs administering HUD–
VASH programs within the same VA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
medical facility catchment area.
Alternatively, if it has been determined
that a VA medical facility no longer has
sufficient need and will not be able to
utilize their available HUD–VASH
vouchers, HUD and VA may choose to
jointly recapture HUD–VASH vouchers
from the VA medical facility and any
partnering PHA(s). Recaptured
vouchers, and any associated funding,
will be reallocated through a national
allocation process, to areas with current
need. PHAs must follow the process
detailed in Notice PIH 2022–25:
Voluntary Reallocation or Recapture of
HUD–VASH or any superseding notice.
N. Inspections
To expedite the leasing process for
tenant-based HUD–VASH, PHAs may
pre-inspect available units that veterans
may be interested in leasing with a
HUD–VASH tenant-based voucher in
order to maintain a pool of eligible
units. If a HUD–VASH family selects a
unit that passed a HQS inspection
(without intervening occupancy) within
90 days of the date of the Request for
Tenancy Approval (form HUD–52517),
the unit may be approved as long as it
meets all other conditions under 24 CFR
982.305. As required by 24 CFR
982.353(e), a PHA is prohibited from
directly or indirectly reducing the
family’s opportunity to select among all
available units. All regulatory
requirements pertaining to HQS found
at 24 CFR 5.703 apply to HUD–VASH.
O. Exception Payment Standards
Many housing markets with a high
need for HUD–VASH are very
competitive with a shortage of
affordable rental units. In addition,
landlords may be reluctant to rent to
individuals experiencing homelessness
due to poor credit history or lack of
recent rental history. To assist HUD–
VASH participants in finding affordable
housing, especially in competitive
markets, HUD is waiving 24 CFR
982.503(a)(2) and (b) to allow a PHA to
establish a separate HUD–VASH
exception payment standard. Without
this waiver, a PHA is required to
establish a single payment standard
amount for each unit size. Additionally,
24 CFR 982.503(c) is waived so that
PHAs may go up to, but no higher than
120 percent of the published
metropolitan area-wide Fair Market
Rents (FMRs) or Small Area FMRs
(based on the PHA’s applicable FMR)
specifically for their HUD–VASH
program. A PHA that wants to establish
a HUD–VASH exception payment
standard over 120 percent, as allowed
by 24 CFR 982.503(d)(4), must still
request approval from HUD through the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
process outlined in notice PIH 2018–16,
or any successor notices. Exception
payment standards implemented by the
PHA under this Section also apply in
determining rents under 24 CFR
983.301(b) for PBV projects only when
the project is comprised solely of units
exclusively made available to HUD–
VASH families. This is because the
contract rents established for the project
may not be different based on whether
the unit is a | HUD–VASH PBV unit or
a non-HUD–VASH PBV unit. HUD–
VASH PHAs may also establish an
exception payment standard up to 140
percent of the published FMR or Small
Area FMR (based on which FMR the
PHA is applying) only to be applied if
required as a reasonable accommodation
in accordance with 24 CFR part 8 for a
family that includes a person with a
disability. Any unit approved under an
exception payment standard must still
meet the reasonable rent requirements
found at § 982.507. To allow this, HUD
is waiving Section 8(o)(1)(D) of the
United States Housing Act of 1937 (42
U.S.C. 1437f(o)(1)(D)) and 24 CFR
982.503(d)(5). A PHA may use a
payment standard that is greater than
140 percent of FMR as a reasonable
accommodation for a person with a
disability, but only with HUD approval.
P. Special Housing Types
Special housing types can be
particularly useful to HUD–VASH
clients, as it can increase the availability
of housing and, for some veterans, can
be a better housing environment than a
single-family unit. As such, PHAs must
permit HUD–VASH clients to use the
following special housing types for
tenant-based HUD–VASH assistance,
regardless of whether these types are
permitted in their administrative plan
for other families: single room
occupancy (SRO); congregate housing;
group home; shared housing; and
cooperative housing. Regulations for
these housing types can be found at 24
CFR 982 subpart M. Consistent with the
regulations, HUD–VASH PBV can never
be applied to shared housing.
Q. Minimum Rents
PHAs must consider hardship
circumstances before charging a
minimum rent in accordance with 24
CFR 5.630(b). HUD–VASH veteran
families may often require hardship
exemptions of a PHA established
minimum rent. For this reason, PHAs
may choose to charge a lower minimum
rent (including a minimum rent of $0)
specifically for their HUD–VASH
program regardless of the minimum rent
policies established in their
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
administrative plan for other HCV
families.
III. Reporting Requirements
The VASH code was established for
use on line 2n of the Family Report
(form HUD–50058) or 2p of the MTW
50058, to indicate if the family
participates in a special program. The
information collection requested on
both Family Reports has been approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and given OMB control
number 2577–0083. No person is
required to respond to, nor shall any
person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
unless that collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
This code must remain on the HUD–
50058 and MTW 50058 for the duration
of the HUD–VASH family’s
participation in the program. The PHA
that administers the HUD–VASH
voucher on behalf of the family
(regardless of whether the PHA has
received an allocation of HUD–VASH
vouchers) must enter and maintain this
code on the HUD–50058 or MTW 50058.
Data will also be captured in the
Voucher Management System (VMS), or
any successor system, on monthly
leasing and expenditures for HUD–
VASH vouchers.
For any additional systems reporting
requirements that may be established,
HUD will provide further guidance.
Dominique Blom,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office
of Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. 2024–17957 Filed 8–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
29 CFR Part 2550
[Application No. D–12022]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Z–RIN 1210 ZA07
Prohibited Transaction Class
Exemption 84–14 for Transactions
Determined by Independent Qualified
Professional Asset Managers (the
QPAM Exemption); Correction
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Final amendment to class
exemption; technical correction.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
This document gives notice of
a technical correction to the Department
of Labor’s final amendment to class
prohibited transaction exemption (PTE)
84–14 (the QPAM Exemption), which
was published in the Federal Register
on April 3, 2024. The QPAM Exemption
provides relief from certain prohibited
transaction restrictions of Title I of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) and
Title II of ERISA, as codified in the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code). The corrections in
this document fix a typographical error
and make a minor clarification to a
provision to reflect the Department’s
original intent for the effect of the
amendment. These technical corrections
are consistent with the amended
exemption’s intended scope and the
analysis and data relied upon in the
Department’s final regulatory impact
analysis (RIA).
DATES:
Issuance date: This technical
correction is issued on August 13, 2024
without further action or notice.
Exemption Date: The PTE 84–14
amendment, as corrected herein, is
effective on June 17, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Mica, telephone (202) 693–8540,
Office of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document makes a technical correction
to the Department of Labor’s final
amendment to class prohibited
transaction exemption (PTE) 84–14 (the
QPAM Exemption), which was
published in the Federal Register on
April 3, 2024 (89 FR 23090).
SUMMARY:
Background of the QPAM Exemption
A QPAM must be a registered
investment adviser, bank, or insurance
company that meets asset and equity
thresholds set forth in the exemption.
Section I of The QPAM Exemption
permits an investment fund managed by
a QPAM to engage in a broad range of
transactions with parties in interest with
respect to an ERISA-covered employee
benefit plan that invests in the fund as
long as the QPAM satisfies certain
protective conditions that are set forth
in the exemption. These transactions
would be prohibited by ERISA and the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code)
without the relief provided in the
exemption. Section I of the QPAM
Exemption does not include relief for
the QPAM to engage in any transactions
involving its own self-dealing or
conflicts of interest.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65779
The QPAM Final Amendment
The final amendment to the QPAM
Exemption the Department published
on April 3, 2024 (the Final
Amendment) 1 modifies Section I(g) of
the exemption, a provision under which
a QPAM may become ineligible to rely
on the QPAM Exemption for a period of
10 years if the QPAM, various affiliates,
or certain owners of the QPAM are
convicted of certain crimes or
participate in prohibited misconduct.
Among other changes, the final
amendment provides a One-Year
Transition period to help Plans and
IRAs avoid or minimize possible
negative impacts of terminating or
switching QPAMs or adjusting asset
management arrangements when a
QPAM becomes ineligible pursuant to
Section I(g). During the transition
period, ineligible QPAMs must send a
notice to their plan clients. Section
I(i)(1)(B)(i) of the Final Amendment
requires ineligible QPAMs to agree in
their Transition Period notice that they
will not restrict withdrawals during the
Transition Period (the Termination
Provision). Also, Section I(i)(1)(B)(ii) of
the Final Amendment prohibits
Ineligible QPAMs from imposing any
‘‘fees, penalties, or charges on client
Plans in connection with the process of
terminating or withdrawing from and
Investment Fund managed by the
QPAM. . . .’’ (The Penalty-Free
Withdrawal Provision).
Explanation of Corrections to the Final
Amendment
This document makes the following
technical corrections to the Final
Amendment:
1. Extraneous Word ‘‘or’’ at the End of
Section I(g)(1)(B)
The Department is removing the
extraneous word ‘‘or’’ that appears at
the end of Section I(g)(1)(B) of the Final
Amendment due to a scrivener’s error.
2. Requirement for Ineligible QPAMs
Not To Restrict Withdrawals During the
One-Year Transition Period—Section
I(i)((1)(B)(i)
As stated above, Section I(i)(1)(B)(i)
and (ii) of the Final Amendment require
ineligible QPAMs to include the
Termination and Penalty-Free
Withdrawal Provisions in the One-Year
Transition Period notices they send to
their plan clients. Both requirements are
based on conditions the Department has
1 See Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Class
Exemption 84–14 for Transactions Determined by
Independent Qualified Professional Asset Managers
(the QPAM Exemption) 89 FR 23090 (April 3,
2024).
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 13, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65769-65779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17957]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 982 and 983
[Docket No. FR-6476-N-01]
Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers: Revised Implementation of the
HUD-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Program
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the policies and procedures for the
administration of tenant-based and project-based Section 8 Housing
Choice Voucher (HCV) rental assistance under the Department of Housing
and Urban Development-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
program administered by local public housing agencies (PHAs) that have
partnered with local Veterans Affairs (VA) medical facilities or other
entities as designated by the Secretary of the VA. This notice includes
new waivers and program flexibilities as well as additional general
guidance. This notice also incorporates updated policy based on further
implementation of the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act of
2016 (HOTMA).
DATES: Applicability date: August 13, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Jones, Director, Housing Voucher
Management and Operations Division, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room 4216, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone number (202) 708-0477. (This is not a toll-free number.) HUD
welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf
or hard of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication
disabilities. To learn more about how to
[[Page 65770]]
make an accessible telephone call, please visit: https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Special Rules for the HUD-VASH Voucher Program
a. Family Eligibility, Selection, and Documentation
b. Income and Asset Eligibility
c. Initial Term of the HCV
d. Initial Lease Term
e. Eligible Housing
f. Mobility and Portability of HUD-VASH Vouchers
g. Case Management and Supportive Services
h. Termination of Assistance
i. Turnover of HUD-VASH Vouchers
j. Moving to Work (MTW) Agencies
k. HUD-VASH PBV
l. Section Eight Management Assessment Program (SEMAP)
m. Reallocation of HUD-VASH Vouchers
n. Inspections
o. Exception Payment Standards
p. Special Housing Types
q. Minimum Rents
III. Reporting Requirements
I. Background
A. Reasons for Changes and Process of Development
Through the HUD-VASH program, HUD and VA increase access to
affordable housing for homeless veterans and provide the support
necessary to obtain and maintain permanent housing in the community.
Since 2008, HCV program funding has provided rental assistance under a
supportive housing program for homeless veterans authorized by section
8(o)(19) of the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C.
1437f(o)(19). The HUD-VASH program combines HUD HCV rental assistance
for homeless veterans administered by PHAs with case management and
supportive services provided through VA. VA may provide these services
directly through VA medical facilities or through a DSP approved by the
VA Secretary. PHAs may be approved to act as DSPs but only in a limited
capacity to do initial intake and provide temporary case management of
HUD-VASH veterans until they are referred to the VA medical facility or
DSP that will provide ongoing services. For simplicity, this document
will generally refer to the combination of VA and DSPs as ``VA''.
Based on a review of existing permanent supportive housing (PSH)
models, typical acuity levels of veterans in the program, and the
availability of providers within VA medical facilities and in the
community who can augment care provided by HUD-VASH case managers, the
Secretaries of HUD and VA jointly determined that the appropriate
caseload ratio in HUD-VASH is a weighted average of 25 veterans per
case manager. It is important to note that actual caseload sizes can
vary considerably, based primarily on the needs of the veterans being
served. Veterans in HUD-VASH are weighted based on their stage in the
program, with higher weightings applied to veterans in more intensive
stages of the program, and lower weightings applied to those who have
stabilized. These weightings and target caseload ratio ensure that all
veterans in receipt of a HUD-VASH voucher are seen as needed by their
case manager.
The current HUD-VASH program was further authorized pursuant to
Division K, Title II of The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Pub.
L. 110-161) (``2008 Appropriation Act'') enacted on December 26, 2007
(see proviso (7) under the heading ``Tenant-Based Rental Assistance'').
All Congressional Appropriations Acts since 2008 have continued to
authorize this program. Therefore, the implementation requirements will
remain in effect until the HUD-VASH program is no longer authorized by
Congress or the authorization requirements change.
The Appropriations Acts have required HUD to ``make such funding
available, notwithstanding section 203 (competition provision) of this
title, to PHAs that partner with eligible VA Medical Centers or other
entities as designated by the Secretary of the VA, based on
geographical need for such assistance as identified by the Secretary of
the VA, PHA administrative performance, and other factors as specified
by the Secretary of HUD in consultation with the Secretary of the
Department of the VA.''
Based on this language, the allocation of HUD-VASH vouchers has
been a collaborative, data-driven effort conducted by HUD and the VA.
The HUD-VASH allocation formula relies on several pieces of data which
include HUD's point-in-time data submitted by Continuums of Care (CoC)
and VA data on contacts with homeless veterans. PHA and VA performance
is also taken into consideration.
Additional information on program requirements and procedures may
be found on the HUD-VASH website at https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/hcv/vash.
B. Summary of Changes
The new flexibilities and requirements include: (1) new flexibility
around verifying social security number (SSN) based on HOTMA updates
(section II.a.); (2) new requirement for PHAs to serve veterans up to
the low income limit (i.e., 80% area median income (AMI)) in the HUD-
VASH program (section II.b); (3) new requirement to exclude VA
disability income to determine initial eligibility (section II.b); (4)
new requirement for PHAs to accept self-certification of assets under
$50,000 as established in HOTMA and allow self-certification of zero-
income (section II.b); (5) new authorization for PHAs to apply
reasonable accommodation exception payment standards for HUD-VASH
families without additional HUD approval (section II.o.); (6) new
flexibility to allow noncompetitive selection of one or more PBV
projects where all units in the project(s) are made exclusively
available to HUD-VASH families on the site of a VA facility (section
II.k.); new flexibility allowing admittance of zero-HAP families for
HUD-VASH PBV (section II.k.); and (7) new flexibility to allow PHAs to
set a lower minimum rent (including a minimum rent of $0) specifically
for their HUD-VASH program (section II.q.).
Updates made to existing requirements include: (1) updates to
description and requirements for designated service providers (DSPs)
and PHAs as DSPs (section II.a); (2) clarification on applicability of
initial search term (section II.c); (3) explanation that HUD-VASH
families are not be subject to rescreening when porting (section
II.f.); (4) additional explanation regarding the application of HUD-
VASH waivers and flexibilities to HUD-VASH PBV (section II.k); (5)
additional explanation of HUD-VASH PBV exceptions under HOTMA (section
II.k.); (6) explanation that when a HUD-VASH family is eligible to move
or required to move from its PBV unit, the family must be able to move
with a HUD-VASH tenant-based voucher (section II.k.); (7) updated
explanation of the HUD-VASH reallocation process through voluntary
moves between PHAs and voucher recapture for future reallocation
(section II.m.); and (8) update to allow pre-inspection of units up to
90 days before the Request for Tenancy Approval (section II.n.).
II. Special Rules for the HUD-VASH Voucher Program
This section sets forth the design features of the HUD-VASH
program, including family eligibility and selection, income
eligibility, portability, case management, and the turnover of these
vouchers. This document replaces
[[Page 65771]]
the special rules published in the Federal Register on September 27,
2021 (86 FR 53207). The FY 2008-2024 Appropriations Acts stated ``that
the Secretary of HUD (in consultation with the Secretary of the VA) may
waive, or specify alternative requirements for any provision of any
statute or regulation that the Secretary of HUD administers in
connection with the use of funds made available under this paragraph
(except for requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination,
labor standards, and the environment) upon a finding by the Secretary
that any such waivers or alternative requirements are necessary for the
effective delivery and administration of such voucher assistance:
Provided further, that assistance made available under this paragraph
shall continue to remain available for homeless veterans upon
turnover.''
This notice outlines below the waivers or alternative requirements
determined by the Secretary to be necessary for the effective delivery
and administration of the HUD-VASH program. These waivers or
alternative requirements are exceptions to the normal HCV requirements,
which otherwise govern the provision of HUD-VASH assistance. In
addition, a PHA may request additional good cause regulatory waivers.
These requests may be submitted to the Secretary for review and
decision through the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing
(PIH) through the regular PIH waiver process.
HUD-VASH vouchers under this part are administered in accordance
with the tenant-based HCV and PBV program regulations set forth at 24
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 982 and 983, respectively. In
both programs, the PHA pays monthly rental subsidies so that eligible
families can afford decent, safe, and sanitary housing. HUD provides
housing assistance funds to the PHA, as well as funds for PHA
administration of the program.
Under the HCV program, families select and rent units that meet
program housing quality standards (HQS). If the PHA approves a family's
unit and tenancy, the PHA contracts with the property owner to make
rent subsidy payments (housing assistance payments) directly to the
owner on behalf of the family on a monthly basis. The family enters
into a lease with the owner and pays its share of the rent to the owner
in accordance with the lease. Under the HCV tenant-based voucher
program, the housing assistance payments (HAP) contract between the PHA
and the owner covers only a single unit and a specific assisted family.
If the family moves out of the leased unit, the HAP contract with the
owner terminates. The family may generally move to another unit with
continued assistance so long as the family is complying with program
requirements.
Under the PBV program, families occupy units under a PBV HAP
contract. Generally, there are multiple units under the PBV HAP
contract. In many cases supportive services are provided on-site. All
of the PBV requirements in 24 CFR part 983 apply except where waived as
described below.
Unless expressly noted below, all regulatory requirements and HUD
directives regarding the HCV tenant-based voucher and PBV programs are
applicable to HUD-VASH vouchers, including the use of all HUD-required
contracts and other forms. The PHA's local discretionary policies
adopted in the PHA's written administrative plan apply to HUD-VASH
vouchers unless such local policy conflicts with the requirements of
the HUD-VASH vouchers outlined below, in which case the requirements in
this document supersede the administrative plan.
PHAs are required to maintain records that allow for the easy
identification of families receiving HUD-VASH vouchers. PHAs must
identify these families in the Information Management System/PIH
Information Center (IMS/PIC), or any successor system. This record-
keeping will help ensure that, in accordance with appropriations
renewal language, HUD-VASH vouchers that are in use will remain
available for homeless veterans upon turnover.
The alternative requirements established in this Notice apply to
all PHAs that administer HUD-VASH vouchers, including those that have
not received an allocation of HUD-VASH vouchers, but administer these
vouchers as a receiving PHA under the portability feature of the HCV
program.
A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to the
environment has been made in accordance with HUD regulations in 24 CFR
part 50 that implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). The FONSI is available for
public inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in
the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Room 10276,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW,
Washington, DC 20410-0500. The FONSI is also available through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
A. Family Eligibility, Selection, and Documentation
HUD-VASH eligible families are homeless veterans and their
families. The Appropriations Acts have provided for statutory or
regulatory waivers or alternative requirements upon a finding by the
Secretary that such waivers or alternatives are necessary for the
effective administration and delivery of voucher assistance (except for
requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor
standards, and the environment). The December 17, 2007, Explanatory
Statement for the 2008 Appropriation Act provides, ``The Appropriations
Committees expect that these vouchers will be made available to all
homeless veterans, including recently returning veterans.'' (153 Cong.
Rec. H16514 (daily ed., Dec. 17, 2007)).\1\ Section 8(o)(19) of the
United States Housing Act of 1937 (USHA of 1937), which requires
homeless veterans to have chronic mental illnesses or chronic substance
use disorders with required treatment of these disorders as a condition
of receipt of HUD-VASH assistance, is waived.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.congress.gov/crec/2007/12/17/CREC-2007-12-17-pt3-PgH16381.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By agreeing to administer the HUD-VASH program, the PHA is
relinquishing its authority to determine the eligibility of families in
accordance with regular HCV program rules and PHA policies with the
exceptions of income eligibility and lifetime sex offender status.
Specifically, under the HUD-VASH program, PHAs will not have the
authority to screen any potentially eligible family members or deny
assistance for any grounds permitted under 24 CFR 982.552 (broad denial
for violations of HCV program requirements) and 982.553 (specific
denial for criminal activity and alcohol abusers), with one exception.
PHAs will still be required to prohibit admission if any member of the
household is subject to a lifetime registration requirement under a
State sex offender registration program. However, unless the family
member that is subject to lifetime registration under a State sex
offender registration program is the homeless veteran (which would
result in denial of admission for the family), the remaining family
member(s) may be served if the family agrees to remove the sex offender
from its family composition. Accordingly, HUD is exercising its
authority to waive 42 U.S.C. 1437d(s), 42 U.S.C. 13661(a), (b), and
(c), and 24 CFR 982.552 and 982.553 both in regard to denial of
admission, with the exception of 982.553(a)(2)(i), which
[[Page 65772]]
requires denial of admission to certain registered sex offenders, and
with the exceptions of 982.552(c)(2)(v) and 982.553(e), which contain
the fair housing and equal opportunity provisions and protections for
victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and
stalking. These provisions also apply to PBV assistance.
Eligibility determination and veteran selection is done by the VA,
as described later in this section. HUD-VASH eligible families are
referred to the partnering PHA for the issuance of a voucher or
selection for a PBV unit. As stated above, the PHA must accept these
referrals. Written documentation of these referrals must be maintained
in the tenant file at the PHA.
PHAs are not authorized to maintain a waiting list or apply local
preferences for the HUD-VASH program. Instead, VA refers HUD-VASH
eligible families to the PHA for the issuance of a HUD-VASH voucher or
identification of a PBV unit that is exclusively made available to HUD-
VASH families. If a HUD-VASH-eligible family is referred and there is
an available PBV unit that is not exclusively made available to HUD-
VASH families, the PHA may also offer to refer the family to the owner
for occupancy of that unit if allowable under the selection policy
applicable to that project, and the owner and PHA may amend the PBV HAP
contract to designate the PBV unit as a HUD-VASH PBV unit. Accordingly,
sections 8(o)(6)(A) and (B) and 8(o)(13)(J) of the USHA of 1937, 42
U.S.C. 1437f(o)(6)(A) and (B) and (o)(13)(J), in regard to preferences,
has been waived to provide for the effective administration of the
program. In addition, provisions relating to applicant selection from
the waiting list and local preferences of 24 CFR 982.202, 982.204,
982.207, and 983.251 are also waived. Note that 24 CFR 983.251(a)(4),
which disallows renting to relatives except when it may be necessary as
a reasonable accommodation, is not waived. Note that 24 CFR
982.202(b)(3) (Family characteristics), 24 CFR 982.202(d) (Admission
policy), and 24 CFR 983.251(a)(3) (protections for survivors of
domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking covered
by part 5, subpart L apply to admission to the PBV program) continue to
apply. 24 CFR 982.203, 982.205, and 982.206 regarding special
admissions, cross-listing of the waiting list, and opening and closing
the waiting list do not apply to the HUD-VASH program.
The VA may approve a PHA with unleased HUD-VASH vouchers as a DSP
for the purposes of veteran selection and intake. This PHA-specific DSP
authority allows a PHA to issue a HUD-VASH voucher to a veteran without
a referral from the VA. The PHA is responsible for determining, through
processes agreed upon with the partnering VA medical facility, that the
veteran meets the VA program participant requirements established by
the VA national office. The determination of whether an individual
qualifies as a veteran for the purposes of a HUD-VASH voucher is made
by the VA medical facility. The PHA must refer the veteran to the VA
for case management and must provide temporary case management (not to
exceed 180 days) until the VA has completed intake of the veteran. At
present, PHAs may not use HCV administrative fees for case management.
Further guidance will be provided on the provision of case management
by the PHA as the DSP.
PHAs approved as DSPs under this authority must also ensure that
while using unleased HUD-VASH vouchers, they maintain sufficient HUD-
VASH vouchers available to immediately issue a HUD-VASH voucher to
veterans referred by the VA. Guidance on the requirements for a PHA to
be approved and additional details on the application process are
available on VA's HUD-VASH website at https://www.va.gov/HOMELESS/HUD-VASH_Designated-Service-Providers.asp and may be periodically updated.
In regard to verifying SSN for homeless veterans and their family
members, PHAs must follow the SSN verification hierarchy. PHAs must use
available flexibilities in accordance with 24 CFR 5.216(g)(1)(iii) to
accept self-certification of SSN and at least one third-party document,
such as a bank statement, utility or cell phone bill, or benefit letter
that contains the name of the individual in the absence of other
documentation. For the homeless veteran, the third-party document could
be the VA-issued photo ID or document with the veteran's name. If
verifying an individual's SSN using this method, the PHA must document
why the other SSN documentation was not available. In the case of the
homeless veteran, the PHA must accept the Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty (DD 214) or the VA-verified Application for
Health Benefits (10-10EZ) as verification of SSN if these forms are
available; however, these forms are not required to verify SSN. These
documents must also be accepted for proof of age purposes. Please note
that veterans are also issued photo identification cards by the VA and
these cards must be accepted by the PHA in lieu of another type of
government-issued photo identification.
When adding a family member after the HUD-VASH family is admitted
to the program, the rules of 24 CFR 982.551(h)(2) apply. Other than the
birth, adoption or court-awarded custody of a child, the PHA must
approve additional family members and may apply its regular screening
criteria in doing so.
Civil rights requirements cannot be waived. The HUD-VASH program is
administered in accordance with applicable civil rights and fair
housing requirements. These include applicable authorities under 24 CFR
5.105(a) and 24 CFR 982.53 including, but not limited to, the Fair
Housing Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination Act, the Americans
with Disabilities Act, and HUD's Equal Access Rule.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 24 CFR 5.105(a); See also https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/fair_housing_rights_and_obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When HUD-VASH applicants or recipients include veterans with
disabilities or family members with disabilities, HUD's reasonable
accommodation requirements apply. These standards require PHAs to make
a reasonable adjustment to rules, policies, practices, and procedures
when it may be necessary in order to enable an applicant or resident
with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a
dwelling, the common areas of a dwelling, or participate in or access a
recipient's programs and activities. These standards extend to various
aspects of program implementation, including, for example, denial or
termination of assistance, initial search term of the HCV, initial
lease term, and informal reviews and hearings. Under the PBV program,
this also includes providing structural changes to a unit or public or
common use area when they may be needed as a reasonable accommodation
for an applicant or participant or their household members with a
disability. Other obligations include, for example, effective
communication with persons with disabilities, physical accessibility
requirements, and overall nondiscrimination in the administration of
the program.
B. Income and Asset Eligibility
The PHA must determine income and asset eligibility for HUD-VASH
families in accordance with 24 CFR 982.201 and 24 CFR 5.618. Income
targeting requirements of section 16(b) of the USHA of 1937, as well as
24 CFR 982.201(b)(2), do not apply for HUD-VASH families so that
participating
[[Page 65773]]
PHAs can effectively serve the eligible population specified in the
Appropriations Acts; that is, homeless veterans, who may be at a
variety of income levels, including low-income. In addition, PHAs must
serve all income eligible veterans, including low-income veterans (up
to 80% AMI) in HUD-VASH. HUD is exercising its authority to waive 24
CFR 982.201(b)(iii) to provide that, for HUD-VASH, low-income families
are eligible for assistance and PHAs may not condition this eligibility
based on ``additional eligibility criteria'' specified in its
administrative plan.
Under Section 3(b) of the USHA of 1937, the definition of income
specifically excludes ``deferred disability benefits from the
Department of Veterans Affairs that are received in a lump sum amount
or in prospective monthly amounts'' and ``any expenses related to aid
and attendance under section 1521 of title 38, United States Code, to
veterans who are in need of regular aid and attendance.'' All other VA
service-connected benefits are included in determining income
eligibility for the HCV program. For a very small percentage of
homeless veterans, the amount of VA service-connected benefits received
due to the severity of their disabilities results in the veteran being
over the low-income limit.
In order to ensure that homeless veterans are not excluded from
participation in the HUD-VASH program because of their VA service-
connected disability benefits, particularly with respect to the
opportunity to reside in HUD-VASH PBV projects located on the site of a
VA facility or where HUD-VASH supportive services are provided on-site
at the project, HUD is exercising its waiver authority and establishing
alternative requirements for purposes of determining income eligibility
for HUD-VASH. For HUD-VASH applicants receiving VA service-connected
disability benefits, HUD is waiving section 3(b) of the USHA of 1937,
which applies for purposes of determinations of lower income family
eligibility based on median income under the USHA of 1937, including
Section 8 programs, as well as 24 CFR 5.609(a)(1), which provides that
annual income includes all amounts not specifically excluded in
paragraph (b) of Sec. 5.609.
As an alternative requirement, the PHA must determine the
applicant's annual income for purposes of income eligibility by
excluding all VA service-connected benefits received by the HUD-VASH
applicant in addition to the income exclusions listed under 24 CFR
5.609(b). This special income exclusion only applies to the definition
of annual income for purposes of determining income eligibility. If the
HUD-VASH applicant now qualifies as a low-income family under this
alternative requirement, the VA service-connected benefits (with the
exception of the normally excluded deferred VA disability payments
under 24 CFR 5.609(b)(16) and the payments related to aid and
attendance under 24 CFR 5.609(b)(17)) must still be included as annual
income when calculating the family's adjusted income under 24 CFR
5.611. In other words, the VA service-connected disability benefits are
excluded for purposes of determining income eligibility but included
for purposes of calculating the total tenant payment (TTP), housing
assistance payment, and family share.
Because there needs to be a monthly housing assistance payment
(HAP) in order to enter into a HAP contract on behalf of a tenant-based
voucher family, the utilization of tenant-based HUD-VASH assistance by
families determined income eligible under this waiver and alternative
requirement will be limited to those areas where the family's (TTP)
(see 24 CFR 5.628) is less than the applicable payment standard or
exception payment standard (including any HUD-VASH specific exception
payment standard established by the PHA in accordance with section II.o
below). The family would also need to select a unit with a gross rent
that is above the family TTP in order to lease a unit with the tenant-
based HUD-VASH voucher.
Under the PBV program, the PHA may select an occupied unit to be
included under a PBV HAP Contract only if the unit's occupants are
eligible for assistance under 24 CFR 982.201 and the TTP for the family
must be less than the gross rent for the unit, such that the unit will
be eligible for a monthly HAP (24 CFR 983.52(c)). In addition, in
selecting a family for an available PBV unit, the PHA must determine
the TTP for the family is less than the gross rent, meaning that the
unit will be eligible for a monthly HAP (24 CFR 983.251(a)(2)).
However, under section II.k below, HUD is providing a waiver and
alternative requirement where the PHA may opt to select an occupied
unit or admit a family to a unit if such unit is made exclusively
available to HUD-VASH families if the PBV project is either on the
grounds of a VA facility or there are HUD-VASH supportive services
provided on-site at the project. Please see section II.k regarding this
PBV zero-HAP option for PHAs.
The PHA may choose to include the admission of extremely low-income
HUD-VASH families in its income targeting numbers for the fiscal year
in which these families are admitted. In conformance with normal
program rules, PHAs may not deny admission to a family with zero
income. When the veteran family reports that they have zero income, the
PHA must accept a self-certification of zero income from the family at
admission and at reexamination without taking any additional steps to
require that the family verify zero reported income. The self-
certification does not need to be notarized. The PHA must verify
families' income in the Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) System
within 120 days after admission.
In determining compliance with the asset limitation at 24 CFR 5.618
at admission, for the HUD-VASH program, PHAs must accept a self-
certification by the family that the family's total assets are equal to
or less than $50,000, adjusted annually for inflation, and that the
family does not have any present ownership interest in real property,
without taking additional steps to verify the accuracy of the
declaration. The PHA may accept a self-certification of net family
assets at reexamination but must fully verify the family's assets every
three years. For net family assets exceeding $50,000, adjusted annually
for inflation, the PHA must fully verify the family's assets as
required for all HCV families.
PHAs must not enforce the asset limitation for HUD-VASH families at
reexamination.
C. Initial Search Term of the Voucher
Recognizing the challenges that HUD-VASH participants may face with
their housing search, HUD-VASH vouchers must have an initial search
term of at least 120 days. This applies to the search term at both
initial issuance and moves with assistance. Therefore, 24 CFR
982.303(a), which states that the initial search term must be at least
60 days, shall not apply, since the initial term must be at least 120
days. Any extensions, suspensions, and progress reports will remain
under the policies in the PHA's administrative plan but will apply
after the minimum 120-day initial search term. PHAs are encouraged to
use flexibility allowing for needed extensions of search terms.
Extensions may also be needed as a reasonable accommodation for a
household with a member with a disability, such as for example, due to
the difficulty in finding a unit that meets one's disability-related
needs, e.g., physically accessible unit,
[[Page 65774]]
unit near accessible transportation, unit near medical or other
facilities.
D. Initial Lease Term
Under the HCV tenant-based voucher program, voucher participants
must enter into an initial lease with the owner for at least one year,
unless a shorter term would improve housing opportunities for the
tenant and the shorter term is a prevailing market practice. To provide
a greater range of housing opportunities for HUD-VASH voucher holders,
initial leases may be less than 12 months; therefore, both section
8(o)(7)(A) of the USHA of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(7)(A), and 24 CFR
982.309(a)(2)(ii) are waived to allow a term less than one year,
without regard to the PHA independently determining that a shorter term
would improve housing opportunities and that a shorter term is the
prevailing market practice. Note that this waiver does not apply to
PBVs.
E. Eligible Housing
24 CFR 982.352(a)(5) and 983.52(a)(2) prohibit assistance for units
on the physical grounds of a medical, mental, or similar public or
private institution. HUD is waiving these prohibitions for the limited
purpose of allowing assistance on the grounds of a VA facility for both
HCV tenant-based vouchers for HUD-VASH families and all PBV units made
exclusively available for HUD-VASH families.
F. Mobility and Portability of HUD-VASH Vouchers
An eligible family issued a HUD-VASH voucher must receive required
case management services provided by the partnering VA medical
facility. Therefore, special mobility and portability procedures must
be established. HUD-VASH participant families may reside only in those
jurisdictional areas that are accessible to case management services as
determined by the VA medical facility.
Since the VA will be identifying homeless veterans eligible to
participate in the HUD-VASH program, section 8(r)(1)(B)(i) of the USHA
of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437f(r)(1)(B)(i), which restricts portability in
cases where the family did not reside in the jurisdiction of the PHA at
the time of application for HCV assistance, and 24 CFR 982.353(a), (b),
and (c), which affects where a family can lease a unit with HCV
assistance, do not apply. A family that moves under the portability
procedures must not be subject to rescreening by the receiving PHA. HUD
may publish PIH notices from time to time to further explain
portability requirements under the HUD-VASH program. In all porting
scenarios, with the exception of victims of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, and stalking, the PHA must consult with the
VA prior to approving the port.
1. Portability Moves Within Same Catchment Area (or Area of Operation)
Where Case Management Is Provided by the Initial PHA's Partnering VA
Medical Facility
If the family initially leases up, or moves, under portability
provisions, but the initial PHA's partnering VA medical facility will
still be able to provide the necessary case management services due to
the family's proximity to the partnering VA medical facility, the
receiving PHA must process the move in accordance with the portability
procedures of 24 CFR 982.355. However, since the initial PHA must
maintain records on all HUD-VASH families receiving case management
services from its partnering VA medical facility, receiving PHAs
without a HUD-VASH program must bill the initial PHA. Therefore, 24 CFR
982.355(d), which gives the receiving PHA the option to absorb the
family into its own HCV program or bill the initial PHA, is not
applicable.
2. Portability Moves Within Same Catchment Area Where Both PHAs Have
Received HUD-VASH Vouchers
The receiving PHA may bill the initial PHA or absorb the family
into its own HUD-VASH program if the VA medical facility providing the
initial case management agrees to the absorption by the receiving PHA
and the transfer of case management. The absorption will also entail
the availability of a HUD-VASH voucher and case management provision by
the receiving PHA's partnering VA medical facility.
3. Portability Moves Where Receiving PHA Is Beyond VA Medical Facility
Catchment Area
If a family wants to move to another jurisdiction where it will not
be possible for the initial PHA's partnering VA medical facility to
provide case management services, the VA must first determine that the
HUD-VASH family could be served by another VA medical facility that is
participating in this program, and the receiving PHA must have a HUD-
VASH voucher available for this family. In these cases, the family must
be absorbed by the receiving PHA either as a new admission (upon
initial participation in the HUD-VASH program) or as a portability
move-in (after an initial leasing in the initial PHA's jurisdiction).
Upon absorption, the initial PHA's HUD-VASH voucher will be available
to lease to a new HUD-VASH eligible family, as determined by the
partnering VA medical facility, and the absorbed family will count
toward the number of HUD-VASH slots awarded to the receiving PHA.
When the receiving PHA completes the Family Report (HUD-50058 or
HUD-50058 MTW) under the scenario described above, the action type that
must be recorded on line 2a is ``1'' for a new admission (a family that
is new to the HCV program) or ``4'' for a portability move-in (a family
that was previously leased up in the jurisdiction of the initial PHA).
Whether the family is a new admission or portability move-in, in
section 12 of the HUD-50058, line 12d is always marked ``Y.'' In cases
of portability where families move out of the catchment area of the
initial PHA, 12e must be 0 since the family must be absorbed, and 12f
must be left blank.
4. Portability Moves Where Receiving PHA Is Beyond Catchment Area for
Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and
Stalking
Veterans who request to port beyond the catchment area of the VA
medical facility where they are receiving case management in order to
protect the health or safety of a person who is or has been the victim
of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, and
who reasonably believes themselves to be threatened with imminent harm
from further violence by remaining in the dwelling unit (or any family
member has been the victim of a sexual assault that occurred on the
premises during the 90-calendar-day period preceding the family's move
or request to move), may port prior to receiving approval from the
receiving VA medical facility but must notify the VA medical facility
at the earliest time possible to ensure appropriate supports are
provided to the veteran family. The initial PHA must follow its
emergency transfer plan as described in 24 CFR 5.2005(e). Consistent
with documentation requirements at 24 CFR 5.2005(e)(10) and 5.200, PHAs
may require verbal self-certification or a written request from a
participant seeking a move beyond the catchment area of the VA medical
facility. A participant may provide a completed form HUD-5383 to
satisfy a requirement to provide a written request.
The verbal self-certification or written request must include
either (a) a statement expressing that the participant reasonably
believes that there is a threat of imminent harm from further violence
if the participant were to remain in the same dwelling unit
[[Page 65775]]
assisted under the PHA; or (b) in the case of a participant who is a
victim of sexual assault and is seeking a transfer on the basis that
the sexual assault occurred on the premises during the 90-day period
preceding the participant's request for the move, a statement that says
this. The veteran escaping violence must be admitted to the VA medical
facility caseload. For participants seeking a move beyond the catchment
area of the VA medical facility while maintaining a HUD-VASH voucher,
the participant must still port to a PHA that has a HUD-VASH program;
if the receiving PHA does not have a HUD-VASH voucher available to
lease, they may bill the initial PHA until a HUD-VASH voucher is
available, at which point the porting veteran must be absorbed into the
receiving PHA's program.
5. Portability Moves When Case Management Is No Longer Required
If the family no longer requires case management, as determined by
the VA medical facility, there are no portability restrictions. PHAs
must follow the regulatory requirements for portability found at 24 CFR
982.355. When completing the HUD-50058, the family will continue to be
coded as ``VASH'' on line 2n unless the family has been moved to a
regular voucher, in which case the code in 2n would be left blank.
G. Case Management and Supportive Services
In general, the VA medical facility responsibilities include: (1)
the screening of homeless veterans to determine whether they meet the
HUD-VASH program participation criteria established by the VA national
office; (2) assisting veterans with the PHA application and assisting
the veteran family with obtaining needed PHA documentation to ensure
rapid voucher issuance; (3) referrals of homeless veterans to the PHA;
(4) providing case management and supportive services to potential HUD-
VASH program participants, as needed, prior to PHA issuance of rental
vouchers; (5) providing housing search assistance to HUD-VASH
participants with rental vouchers; (6) identifying the social service
and medical needs of HUD-VASH participants and providing, or ensuring
the provision of, regular ongoing case management, outpatient health
services, hospitalization, and other supportive services, as needed,
throughout this initiative; and (7) maintaining records and providing
information for evaluation purposes, as required by HUD and the VA. In
cases where a DSP (including a PHA approved as a DSP) is approved, the
applicable responsibilities may be completed by the DSP.
As a condition of HCV rental assistance, both tenant-based voucher
and PBV, a HUD-VASH eligible veteran must receive the case management
services noted above, as needed, directly from or arranged by the VA.
The VA, in consultation with the veteran, is responsible for
determining if case management is required and if the case management
requirement is satisfied.
If a veteran no longer requires case management, but maintains
their HUD-VASH voucher assistance, the VA will maintain contact with
the veteran family to provide support and planning assistance with the
recertification and reinspection process. The VA will remain available
to provide support to the veteran family, as needed.
H. Termination of Assistance
There are two alternative requirements for termination of
assistance for HUD-VASH participants. As detailed above, HUD-VASH
voucher assistance is contingent upon participation in case management,
when required by the VA. If the VA has determined that a veteran is not
participating in required case management, without good cause, the PHA
must terminate the family from the HUD-VASH program. However, the PHA
may offer the family continued assistance through one of its regular
vouchers or a PBV unit not exclusively made available for HUD-VASH.
A VA determination that the veteran does not require or no longer
requires case management is never grounds for termination of HCV
assistance. In such case, and in consultation with the VA, the PHA may
offer the family continued assistance through one of its regular
vouchers, to free up the HUD-VASH voucher for another eligible family
referred by the VA. The decision to transfer assistance to a regular
voucher must consider veteran preference and must be communicated to
the VA prior to occurring. If the PHA has no voucher to offer, the
family will retain its HUD-VASH voucher, or PBV unit, until such time
as the PHA has an available voucher (or PBV unit not exclusively made
available for HUD-VASH) for the family. If the family no longer
requires case management, there are no portability restrictions. Normal
portability rules apply.
Second, 24 CFR 982.552(b)(2) states that ``The PHA must terminate
program assistance for a family evicted from housing assisted under the
program for serious violation of the lease.'' HUD is waiving this
provision, and establishing the alternative requirement that the PHA
may terminate program assistance in these cases. Prior to terminating
HUD-VASH participants, HUD strongly encourages PHAs to exercise their
discretion under 24 CFR 982.552(c)(2) and consider all relevant
circumstances of the specific case, as well as including the role of
the case manager and the impact that ongoing case management services
can have on mitigating the conditions that led to the potential
termination, prior to determining whether to terminate assistance. PHAs
also must grant reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities
in accordance with 24 CFR part 8. The PHA may not terminate assistance
on the basis or as a direct result that a member of the participant
family is or has been a victim of domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, or stalking. 24 CFR 5.2005(b). In addition, a HUD-VASH
participant family must not be terminated after admission, for a
circumstance or activity that occurred before admission and was known
to the PHA but could not be considered at the time of admission due to
the HUD-VASH Operating Requirements. The PHA can only terminate the
family's assistance for program violations that occur after the
family's admission to the voucher program.
Generally, in the case of a family break-up, the HUD-VASH
assistance must stay with the HUD-VASH veteran. However, in the case of
domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, in
which the HUD-VASH veteran is the perpetrator, the victim must continue
to be assisted. Upon termination of the perpetrator's HUD-VASH voucher
due to the perpetrator's acts of domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, or stalking, the victim must be given a regular HCV if
one is available, and the perpetrator's HUD-VASH voucher must be used
to serve another eligible veteran family. If a regular HCV is not
available for the victim, the perpetrator must be terminated from
assistance, and the victim will continue to utilize the HUD-VASH
voucher.
I. Turnover of HUD-VASH Vouchers
In accordance with the Appropriations Acts, upon turnover, HUD-VASH
vouchers must be issued to eligible veteran families as identified by
the VA, as noted above.
J. MTW Agencies
HUD-VASH vouchers may be administered in accordance with
flexibilities approved under a PHA's
[[Page 65776]]
Standard MTW Agreement or MTW Operations Notice with approval from
HUD's HCV office. Until such time that additional guidance is issued,
MTW PHAs must submit a request through their local field office to
operate HUD-VASH in accordance with approved MTW flexibilities.
Requests will be approved provided the flexibilities do not conflict
with the HUD-VASH program requirements or objectives. HUD-VASH vouchers
are never eligible for MTW fungibility. However, MTW agencies may use
their MTW funding for HUD-VASH vouchers. HUD-VASH vouchers must be
reported in the IMS/PIC system, or any successor system, on either the
regular HUD-50058 or HUD- 50058 MTW (or HUD-50058-MTW Expansion where
appropriate) for vouchers under the agency's MTW Agreement.
K. HUD-VASH PBV
Section 8(o)(13)(D) of the USHA of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437(o)(13)(D))
is waived for HUD-VASH vouchers so that all units exclusively made
available to HUD-VASH families in a PBV project are exempted from the
PBV income-mixing requirements (project cap). The project cap refers to
the number of units in a project that may receive PBV assistance and is
generally the higher of 25 units or 25 percent of units in the project.
Units exclusively made available to HUD-VASH families are excluded from
(do not count against) this PBV project cap. Additionally, HUD-VASH
supportive services only need to be provided to all HUD-VASH families
in the project, not all families receiving PBV assistance in the
project. If a HUD-VASH family does not require or no longer requires
case management, the unit continues to count as an excepted PBV unit
for as long as the family resides in that unit.
Likewise, HUD waives Section 8(o)(13)(B) of the USHA of 1937, 42
U.S.C. 1437f(o)(13)(B) so that HUD-VASH units made available under a
competitive PIH notice for HUD-VASH PBV units (``HUD-VASH PBV set-
aside'') are excluded from the PBV percentage limitation (program cap).
This exclusion only applies to HUD-VASH PBV vouchers awarded through
the HUD-VASH PBV set-aside notice. All other HUD-VASH vouchers that the
PHA opts to project-base, are still subject to the PBV program cap.
(Generally, a PHA may project-base up to 20% of its authorized HCV
units. The PHA may also project-base an additional 10% of its
authorized HCVs for units that meet the conditions of 24 CFR
983.6(d)(1) or (d)(2) and any number of units that are excluded from
the program cap pursuant to 24 CFR 983.58 and 983.59.)
Pursuant to the HUD-VASH case management and termination
requirements, a HUD-VASH family's PBV assistance must be terminated for
failure to participate in case management when required by the VA If
the PHA has a policy in place to allow the veteran to receive a regular
(non-VASH) HCV or PBV unit instead of the family's assistance being
terminated, the PHA may: substitute the family's unit on the PBV HAP
contract for another unit if it is possible to do so in accordance with
Sec. 983.207(a) and this notice (the PHA may, in conjunction with such
substitution, add the original unit to the PBV HAP contract with a non-
VASH voucher if it is possible to do so in accordance with Sec.
983.207(b)); remove the unit from the PBV HAP contract so the family
may remain with tenant-based assistance, if the family and the owner
agree to use the tenant-based voucher in the unit; or change the unit's
status in the PBV HAP contract from a unit exclusively made available
for HUD-VASH to a regular PBV unit, if doing so is allowable under
program rules and this notice. If the PHA does not have a policy in
place to allow the veteran to receive a regular (non-VASH) HCV or PBV
unit instead of the family's assistance being terminated, then upon
notification by the VA of the family's failure to participate in VA-
required case management, the PHA must provide the family a reasonable
period of time (as established by the PHA) to vacate the unit. The PHA
must terminate assistance to the family at the earlier of (1) the time
the family vacates or (2) the expiration of the reasonable period of
time given to vacate (the lease terminates at the same time as
termination of assistance per 24 CFR 983.256(f)(3)(v)). If the family
fails to vacate the unit within the established time, the owner may
evict the family. If the owner does not evict the family, the PHA must
remove the unit from the HAP contract or amend the HAP contract to
substitute a different unit in the project if the project is partially
assisted. If the PHA has a policy in place to allow the veteran to be
moved onto a regular HCV or PBV unit, the owner may substitute a PBV
unit not exclusively made available for HUD-VASH. A PHA may add the
removed unit to the HAP contract after the ineligible family vacates
the property. The PBV program requirements governing additions and
substitutions at 24 CFR 983.207 apply, except that paragraph (c)
governing additions and substitutions of occupied units does not apply
to units exclusively made available to HUD-VASH families in most cases.
Because only homeless veterans may be referred for occupancy of a HUD-
VASH PBV unit, only occupied units whose occupants are families already
receiving tenant-based HUD-VASH assistance may be added to a PBV HAP
contract as units exclusively made available to HUD-VASH families.
Families who are not homeless cannot receive HUD-VASH assistance as a
result of the family's unit being added to a PBV HAP contract.
Therefore, the provisions of 24 CFR 983.207(a), (b)(3), and (c) are
waived with respect to the option to add or substitute an occupied unit
unless the unit is already occupied by a family receiving tenant-based
HUD-VASH assistance.
If a HUD-VASH family is eligible to move from its PBV unit pursuant
to 24 CFR 983.261 and there is no HUD-VASH tenant-based voucher
available at the time the family requests to move, the PHA may require
a family that still requires case management to wait for a HUD-VASH
tenant-based voucher for a period not to exceed 180 days. To effectuate
this requirement, section 8(o)(13)(E)(ii) of the USHA of 1937, 42
U.S.C. 1437f(o)(13)(E)(ii), and 24 CFR 983.261(c) are waived solely for
the purpose of allowing the PHA to delay issuance of a voucher. If a
HUD-VASH tenant-based voucher is still not available after that period
of time, the family must be allowed to move using its HUD-VASH voucher
as tenant-based assistance. Alternatively, the PHA may allow the family
to move using its HUD-VASH voucher as tenant-based assistance without
having to meet this 180-day waiting period. In either case, the PHA may
either amend the PBV HAP contract to replace the assistance in the PBV
unit with one of its regular vouchers if the unit is eligible for a
regular PBV (for instance, so long as the unit is eligible under the
PHA's program and project caps) or the PHA and owner may agree to
temporarily remove the unit from the HAP contract. If a HUD-VASH
veteran has been determined to no longer require case management, the
PHA must allow the family to move with the first available tenant-based
voucher if no HUD-VASH voucher is immediately available and cannot
require the family to wait for a HUD-VASH voucher to become available.
If the PHA determines that a HUD-VASH family is occupying a wrong-
size PBV unit or a PBV unit with accessibility features that the family
does not require and the PBV unit is needed by a family that requires
the accessibility features, the PHA must notify the family and the
owner within
[[Page 65777]]
30 days of the PHA's determination in accordance with 24 CFR
983.260(a)(2)(i). HUD applies an alternative requirement for HUD-VASH
PBV units with respect to 24 CFR 983.260(b), however. Specifically, the
PHA's offer of continued housing assistance (that must be made within
60 days of the PHA's determination) must be in the form of either a
HUD-VASH tenant-based voucher or another HUD-VASH PBV unit. If no HUD-
VASH assistance is available for the PHA to offer within 60 days of the
PHA's determination, the PHA must remove the wrong-sized or accessible
unit from the HAP contract to make HUD-VASH voucher assistance
available to issue the family a tenant-based HUD-VASH voucher. 24 CFR
983.206(b), which covers the required provision of tenant-based
assistance requires that the family may elect to use its tenant-based
assistance to remain in the same project when a PBV HAP contract
terminates or expires, does not apply to families issued a HUD-VASH
tenant-based voucher under this circumstance. The PHA may use another
voucher to add the unit removed under this alternative requirement to
the HAP contract after the family vacates the property, in accordance
with 24 CFR 983.207(b).
PHAs do not need authorization from HUD to use HUD-VASH vouchers as
PBVs (though PHAs must comply with all standard PBV program
requirements that are not waived in this notice in order to do so), per
Section 8(o)(13)(O) of the USHA of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(13)(O).
However, PHAs must consult with the partnering VA medical facility to
ensure approval of the project. PHAs and the partnering VA medical
facility are expected to communicate regarding the PBV planning and
development. PHAs may project-base HUD-VASH vouchers in projects
alongside other PBV units (in accordance with all applicable PBV
requirements) and may execute a single HAP contract covering both the
HUD-VASH PBVs and the other PBVs. However, the contract rents may not
be different based on whether the unit is a [verbar] HUD-VASH PBV unit
or a non-HUD-VASH PBV unit. In determining the rent to owner for the
PBV project, if the cap on the amount of rent to owner under 24 CFR
983.301(b)(1) is lower for non-HUD-VASH units than it is for the HUD-
VASH units (e.g., the PHA has established a HUD-VASH exception payment
standard under section II.o below and there is either no exception
payment standard or a lower exception payment standard for the regular
HCV program for the area in question), that lower cap is applicable
when setting the rent to owner for the PBV units in the project,
including the HUD-VASH units. In the description of units in Exhibit A
of the HAP contract, PHAs must indicate the number of units that will
be exclusively made available to HUD-VASH families. The PHA must refer
only HUD-VASH families to PBV units exclusively made available to HUD-
VASH families and to PBV units funded through a HUD-VASH PBV set-aside
award. The PHA and owner may agree to amend a PBV HAP contract to re-
designate a regular PBV unit as a unit specifically designated for HUD-
VASH families, so long as the PHA first consults with and obtains
concurrence from the VA medical facility. Additionally, the PHA and
owner may agree to amend a PBV HAP contract to re-designate a unit
specifically designated for HUD-VASH families as a regular PBV unit, so
long as the unit is not funded through a HUD-VASH PBV set-aside award
and is eligible for a regular PBV (for instance the unit is eligible
under the PHA's program and project caps). The PHA and owner may also
agree to temporarily remove a unit from the HAP contract in cases where
a HUD-VASH eligible veteran has been identified by the VA as
appropriate for a HUD-VASH PBV unit, but the veteran is not income
eligible to receive voucher assistance (even after applying the VA
service-connected disability benefit exclusion waiver and alternative
requirement under section II.b) or may not be selected for the PBV unit
because the family's TTP exceeds the gross rent of the unit (i.e.,
there is no HAP). Although the family would not be a program
participant in the housing portion of the HUD-VASH program in such a
case, the family would still benefit from the project's location on the
grounds of a VA facility or from the HUD-VASH supportive services on-
site at the project, while the HUD-VASH voucher would be available to
assist another HUD-VASH family. The PHA and owner could agree to add a
HUD-VASH voucher back onto the PBV HAP contract if the family' income
subsequently decreased to the point that there would be a HAP or when
the family vacates the unit.
As discussed earlier in section II.b, a PHA may select an occupied
unit to be included under a PBV HAP Contract only if the unit's
occupants are eligible for assistance under 24 CFR 982.201 and the TTP
for the family must be less than the gross rent for the unit, such that
the unit will be eligible for a monthly HAP (24 CFR 983.52(c)).
Furthermore, in selecting a family for an available PBV unit, the PHA
must determine the TTP for the family is less than the gross rent,
meaning that the unit will be eligible for a monthly HAP (24 CFR
983.251((a)(2)). However, if the PBV project is either on the grounds
of a VA facility or there are HUD-VASH supportive services provided on-
site at the project, the PHA may opt to select a unit occupied by a
``zero-HAP'' HUD-VASH eligible family or admit a ``zero-HAP'' HUD-VASH
family to a unit if such unit is made exclusively available to HUD-VASH
families. Until such time that the HUD-VASH family's TTP falls below
the gross rent, the family is responsible for paying the entire rent to
owner (the total monthly rent payable by the family and the PHA to the
owner under the lease for a contract unit), in addition to being
responsible for paying all tenant-supplied utilities. During any period
that the family's TTP falls below the gross rent, normal PBV
requirements apply. To effectuate this zero-HAP family option and the
alternative requirement, Section 8(o)(2)(C) of the USHA of 1937, 24
CFR. 983.52(c), 24 CFR 983.251(a)(2), and 24 CFR 983.353(b)(1) are
waived.
Under normally applicable rules, units occupied by families whose
incomes have increased during their tenancy resulting in the total
tenant payment equaling the gross rent shall be removed from the HAP
contract 180 days following the last housing assistance payment on
behalf of the family (24 CFR 983.211, 24 CFR 983.258). These
regulations do not apply to zero HAP families admitted to the PBV
project under this waiver and alternative requirement because there is
no last housing assistance payment that would trigger the unit removal
date of 180 days. As an alternative requirement, PHAs have the option
of removing the unit in which the zero HAP family resides from the HAP
contract, but no earlier than 180 days from the start of the family PBV
tenancy. If the PHA exercises this option, the family may not be
required to move from the unit as a consequence and continues to
receive the HUD-VASH supportive services. If the project is fully
assisted the PHA may reinstate the unit removed to the HAP contract
after the family either vacates the unit or their income decreases to
the point that there would be a HAP. If the project is partially
assisted, the PHA may substitute a different unit for the unit removed
from the HAP contact when the first eligible substitute unit becomes
available (in accordance with 24 CFR 983.207). Alternatively, the PHA
may choose to simply leave the unit on
[[Page 65778]]
the HAP contract while the zero HAP family continues to reside there.
PBV proposal and/or project selection for HUD-VASH must follow all
regular proposal and/or project selection regulations, with the
following exception. HUD is establishing an alternative requirement
under 24 CFR 983.51(c) to permit noncompetitive selection of one or
more PBV projects with units made exclusively available to HUD-VASH
families on the site of a VA facility. Note that the method of project
selection must comply with all other requirements under 24 CFR 983.51,
including that the PHA must notify the public of its intent to
noncompetitively select one or more projects for PBV assistance through
its 5-Year Plan and to ensure any project selection is consistent with
the PHA Administrative Plan.
PHAs may consult with their partnering VA medical facility about
the option for using PBVs in conjunction with the VA's Enhanced-Use
Lease (EUL) Program. The EUL Program authorizes the VA to lease
underutilized real estate under its jurisdiction or control to the
private sector. Through this program, lessees can develop supportive
housing for homeless veterans who will be provided an expanded range of
services that would not otherwise be available on medical center
campuses.
L. Section Eight Management Assessment Program (SEMAP)
HUD-VASH vouchers remain excluded from the SEMAP leasing indicator.
Therefore, 24 CFR 985.3(n)(1)(i) and (ii) are still waived. During a
HUD-VASH PHA's calendar year, the prorated budget authority available
for HUD-VASH vouchers and the units associated with that budget
authority will be excluded from the denominators for both units leased
and dollars expended.
M. Reallocation of HUD-VASH Vouchers
HUD-VASH vouchers have been allocated based on geographic need at
the time of each allocation. In recognition that there may be changes
and shifts in the population of homeless veterans over time, it may
become necessary for the VA and HUD to jointly reallocate HUD-VASH
vouchers to better address the current needs of the homeless veteran
population. This reallocation may be done in one of two ways. If there
is continued need at the VA medical facility, HUD-VASH vouchers may be
voluntarily moved between PHAs administering HUD-VASH programs within
the same VA medical facility catchment area. Alternatively, if it has
been determined that a VA medical facility no longer has sufficient
need and will not be able to utilize their available HUD-VASH vouchers,
HUD and VA may choose to jointly recapture HUD-VASH vouchers from the
VA medical facility and any partnering PHA(s). Recaptured vouchers, and
any associated funding, will be reallocated through a national
allocation process, to areas with current need. PHAs must follow the
process detailed in Notice PIH 2022-25: Voluntary Reallocation or
Recapture of HUD-VASH or any superseding notice.
N. Inspections
To expedite the leasing process for tenant-based HUD-VASH, PHAs may
pre-inspect available units that veterans may be interested in leasing
with a HUD-VASH tenant-based voucher in order to maintain a pool of
eligible units. If a HUD-VASH family selects a unit that passed a HQS
inspection (without intervening occupancy) within 90 days of the date
of the Request for Tenancy Approval (form HUD-52517), the unit may be
approved as long as it meets all other conditions under 24 CFR 982.305.
As required by 24 CFR 982.353(e), a PHA is prohibited from directly or
indirectly reducing the family's opportunity to select among all
available units. All regulatory requirements pertaining to HQS found at
24 CFR 5.703 apply to HUD-VASH.
O. Exception Payment Standards
Many housing markets with a high need for HUD-VASH are very
competitive with a shortage of affordable rental units. In addition,
landlords may be reluctant to rent to individuals experiencing
homelessness due to poor credit history or lack of recent rental
history. To assist HUD-VASH participants in finding affordable housing,
especially in competitive markets, HUD is waiving 24 CFR 982.503(a)(2)
and (b) to allow a PHA to establish a separate HUD-VASH exception
payment standard. Without this waiver, a PHA is required to establish a
single payment standard amount for each unit size. Additionally, 24 CFR
982.503(c) is waived so that PHAs may go up to, but no higher than 120
percent of the published metropolitan area-wide Fair Market Rents
(FMRs) or Small Area FMRs (based on the PHA's applicable FMR)
specifically for their HUD-VASH program. A PHA that wants to establish
a HUD-VASH exception payment standard over 120 percent, as allowed by
24 CFR 982.503(d)(4), must still request approval from HUD through the
process outlined in notice PIH 2018-16, or any successor notices.
Exception payment standards implemented by the PHA under this Section
also apply in determining rents under 24 CFR 983.301(b) for PBV
projects only when the project is comprised solely of units exclusively
made available to HUD-VASH families. This is because the contract rents
established for the project may not be different based on whether the
unit is a [verbar] HUD-VASH PBV unit or a non-HUD-VASH PBV unit. HUD-
VASH PHAs may also establish an exception payment standard up to 140
percent of the published FMR or Small Area FMR (based on which FMR the
PHA is applying) only to be applied if required as a reasonable
accommodation in accordance with 24 CFR part 8 for a family that
includes a person with a disability. Any unit approved under an
exception payment standard must still meet the reasonable rent
requirements found at Sec. 982.507. To allow this, HUD is waiving
Section 8(o)(1)(D) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C.
1437f(o)(1)(D)) and 24 CFR 982.503(d)(5). A PHA may use a payment
standard that is greater than 140 percent of FMR as a reasonable
accommodation for a person with a disability, but only with HUD
approval.
P. Special Housing Types
Special housing types can be particularly useful to HUD-VASH
clients, as it can increase the availability of housing and, for some
veterans, can be a better housing environment than a single-family
unit. As such, PHAs must permit HUD-VASH clients to use the following
special housing types for tenant-based HUD-VASH assistance, regardless
of whether these types are permitted in their administrative plan for
other families: single room occupancy (SRO); congregate housing; group
home; shared housing; and cooperative housing. Regulations for these
housing types can be found at 24 CFR 982 subpart M. Consistent with the
regulations, HUD-VASH PBV can never be applied to shared housing.
Q. Minimum Rents
PHAs must consider hardship circumstances before charging a minimum
rent in accordance with 24 CFR 5.630(b). HUD-VASH veteran families may
often require hardship exemptions of a PHA established minimum rent.
For this reason, PHAs may choose to charge a lower minimum rent
(including a minimum rent of $0) specifically for their HUD-VASH
program regardless of the minimum rent policies established in their
[[Page 65779]]
administrative plan for other HCV families.
III. Reporting Requirements
The VASH code was established for use on line 2n of the Family
Report (form HUD-50058) or 2p of the MTW 50058, to indicate if the
family participates in a special program. The information collection
requested on both Family Reports has been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and given OMB control number 2577-0083. No
person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), unless that
collection displays a currently valid OMB control number. This code
must remain on the HUD-50058 and MTW 50058 for the duration of the HUD-
VASH family's participation in the program. The PHA that administers
the HUD-VASH voucher on behalf of the family (regardless of whether the
PHA has received an allocation of HUD-VASH vouchers) must enter and
maintain this code on the HUD-50058 or MTW 50058.
Data will also be captured in the Voucher Management System (VMS),
or any successor system, on monthly leasing and expenditures for HUD-
VASH vouchers.
For any additional systems reporting requirements that may be
established, HUD will provide further guidance.
Dominique Blom,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Public and Indian
Housing.
[FR Doc. 2024-17957 Filed 8-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P