Notice of Availability for a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Floodplain Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Kenneth G. Ward (Lynden) and Sumas Land Ports of Entry Modernization and Expansion Projects in Lynden and Sumas, Washington, 65626-65628 [2024-17864]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
65626
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2024 / Notices
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
applications are set forth in paragraph 7
of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The public portions of the
applications listed below, as well as
other related filings required by the
Board, if any, are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
This information may also be obtained
on an expedited basis, upon request, by
contacting the appropriate Federal
Reserve Bank and from the Board’s
Freedom of Information Office at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/
request.htm. Interested persons may
express their views in writing on the
standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of
the Act.
Comments received are subject to
public disclosure. In general, comments
received will be made available without
change and will not be modified to
remove personal or business
information including confidential,
contact, or other identifying
information. Comments should not
include any information such as
confidential information that would not
be appropriate for public disclosure.
Comments regarding each of these
applications must be received at the
Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of
the Board of Governors, Ann E.
Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20551–0001, not later
than August 27, 2024.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
(Karen Smith, Director, Mergers &
Acquisitions) 2200 North Pearl Street,
Dallas, Texas 75201–2272. Comments
can also be sent electronically to
Comments.applications@dal.frb.org:
1. The Tim Tregellas Trust—Perryton
Bancshares Trust S, Tim Tregellas, as
trustee Aledo, Texas; and The William
Mac Tregellas Trust—Perryton
Bancshares Trust S, William Mac
Tregellas, as trustee, Perryton, Texas; to
join the Tregellas Family Group, a group
acting in concert, to acquire voting
shares of Perryton Bancshares, Inc., and
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares
of The Perryton National Bank, both of
Perryton, Texas. In addition, Chad
Tregellas, Aledo, Texas, Tiffany
Tregellas, Fort Worth, Texas, and
William Seth Tregellas, Perryton, Texas,
to join the Tregellas Family Group, to
retain voting shares of Perryton
Bancshares, Inc., Perryton, Texas.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Aug 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
Erin Cayce,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024–17925 Filed 8–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[Notice-ME–2024–03; Docket No. 2024–
0002; Sequence No. 39]
Notice of General Services
Administration’s (GSA) Office of
Government-Wide Policy Emerging
Trends and Policy Symposium
Office of Government-wide
Policy (OGP), General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of hybrid symposium.
AGENCY:
GSA’s Office of Technology
Policy is hosting an Emerging Trends
and Policy Symposium to bring the
Federal, academia, and industry
communities together for a series of
presentations and a fireside chat to
discuss trends and policies that foster
innovation within the field of artificial
intelligence.
DATES: Thursday, September 19, from 8
a.m. to noon, eastern time (ET).
ADDRESSES: All attendees, including
industry partners, must register for the
event here: https://gsa.zoomgov.com/
webinar/register/WN_
oySkVOReT8aprYXHEoCPig.
Members of the press are invited to
attend but are required to register with
the GSA Press Office via email to press@
gsa.gov by Friday, September 6, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
GSA’s Office of Technology Policy Front
Office(mefrontoffice@gsa.gov) and
Shawn Watson at shawn.watson@
gsa.gov or 202–368–0854.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
promoting innovation and acting
ethically.
Format
The Emerging Trends and Policy
Symposium convenes leaders from the
Federal Government, academia, and
industry to discuss their experiences
with artificial intelligence. The summit
will include four presentations and a
fireside chat panel discussion.
If you have questions for the
panelists, you can email them to
mefrontoffice@gsa.gov.
Special Accommodations
ASL Interpreter will be in attendance
online and in person. Zoom will have
the option to enable closed captioning.
If additional accommodations are
needed, please note them on the Zoom
Webinar registration form.
In-Person and Webinar Speakers
(Subject to Change Without Notice)
Hosted by:
• Shawn Watson, Program
Management Officer; GSA Office of
Government-wide Policy, Office of
Technology Policy
• Babur Kohy, Director (Acting),
Identity Assurance and Trusted Access
Division, GSA Office of Governmentwide Policy, Office of Technology Policy
Agenda Topic Areas
• Acquisition Approaches to
Emerging Technologies
• Past, Present, and Future
Possibilities of Government Adoption of
AI
• A Generative AI Flexible
Architecture Approach and Roadmap
• Artificial Intelligence Policy
Katherine Joyce,
General Services Administration, Office of
Government-wide Policy, Office of
Technology Policy, Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2024–17866 Filed 8–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–68–P
Background
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
technologies are rapidly transforming
industries, economies, and societies.
The Federal Government aims to
address the dynamic landscape of AI
through informed policy discussions,
ensuring these technologies are
developed and deployed responsibly.
Emerging AI trends include machine
learning advancements, natural
language processing, applications in
vehicles, drones, and robots, as well as
the integration of big data.
Considerations to policy should be
informed by ethical AI development,
privacy and security, workforce impact,
collaboration, and standardization while
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[Notice–P–2024–08; Docket No. 2024–0002;
Sequence No. 36]
Notice of Availability for a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement and
Floodplain Assessment and Statement
of Findings for the Kenneth G. Ward
(Lynden) and Sumas Land Ports of
Entry Modernization and Expansion
Projects in Lynden and Sumas,
Washington
Public Buildings Service (PBS),
United States (U.S.) General Services
Administration (GSA).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2024 / Notices
Notice of availability (NOA);
public notice of floodplain assessment
and statement of findings;
announcement of public hearing.
ACTION:
This notice announces the
availability of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), which examines
potential environmental impacts from
the modernization and expansion of the
Lynden and Sumas Land Ports of Entry
(LPOE) in Lynden and Sumas,
Washington. The existing Lynden and
Sumas LPOEs are owned and managed
by GSA and operated by the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security’s
Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
The Draft EIS describes the purpose and
need for the project; alternatives
considered; the existing environment
that could be affected; the potential
impacts resulting from each of the
alternatives; and proposed best
management practices and/or mitigation
measures. The Draft EIS also includes a
Floodplain Assessment and Statement
of Findings due to the construction in
a floodplain at the Sumas LPOE.
DATES:
Public Comment Period—The Public
Comment Period begins with
publication of this NOA in the Federal
Register and will last until September
26, 2024. Written comments must be
received or postmarked by the last day
of the Public Comment Period (see the
ADDRESSES section of this NOA on how
to submit comments).
Hearing Date—GSA will host an inperson, open house public hearing on
Wednesday, September 4, 2024, from 6
p.m. to 8 p.m., Pacific Time (PT) (see
the ADDRESSES section below for
location address).
ADDRESSES:
Hearing Location—The public may
attend the hearing at the American
Legion Post 212 Building at 134
Harrison St., Sumas, WA 98295, to view
the presentation and provide comments
on the Draft EIS. GSA staff members
will be available to assist the public in
providing public comments.
Public Comments—In addition to oral
comments and written comments
provided at the public hearing, members
of the public may also submit comments
by one of the following methods. All
oral and written comments will be
considered equally and will be part of
the public record.
• Electronic comments should be
submitted to the Lynden and Sumas
LPOE email addresses listed below.
D lyndenlpoe@gsa.gov
D sumaslpoe@gsa.gov
Please include ‘Lynden and Sumas
LPOEs EIS’ in the subject line of the
message.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Aug 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
• Written comments on the EIS
should be mailed to: ATTN: Patrick
Manning, Capital Project Manager,
Lynden and Sumas LPOEs EIS, U.S.
General Services Administration,
Northwest/Artic, Region 10, 1301 A
Street, Suite 610, Tacoma, WA 98402.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Manning, Capital Project
Manager, GSA at the Lynden and Sumas
LPOE email addresses at lyndenlpoe@
gsa.gov or sumaslpoe@gsa.gov, or at
202–501–4755.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comment Period
The views and comments of the
public are necessary in helping GSA in
its decision-making process regarding
environmental, cultural, and economic
impacts. Public comments will be
solicited through an in-person public
hearing; direct mail correspondence to
appropriate Federal, state, and local
agencies, Tribes, and to private
organizations and citizens who have
previously expressed or are known to
have an interest in the project; and in
local newspapers. The Draft EIS has
considered previous input provided
during the scoping period.
Public Hearing Information
The public hearing will begin with
presentations on the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) processes, which are being
executed concurrently for this project,
as well as an overview of the proposed
project, and then will continue with the
findings of the Draft EIS. A copy of the
presentation slideshow will be made
available within days of the hearing at
the GSA websites at www.gsa.gov/
lynden and www.gsa.gov/sumas.
Following the presentation, GSA will
hold an open house meeting where
members of the public can discuss the
projects with GSA staff members and
provide written comments on the Draft
EIS.
Background
The existing 4.8-acre Lynden LPOE
serves as the port of entry for people
and vehicles connecting Lynden,
Washington to Aldergrove, British
Columbia, Canada. The LPOE currently
operates 16 hours per day, 7 days per
week and processes privately owned
vehicles (POVs), buses, pedestrians, and
permitted commercial traffic. The
existing 4.0-acre Sumas LPOE serves as
the port of entry for people and vehicles
connecting Sumas, Washington to
Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada.
The LPOE operates 24 hours per day, 7
days per week and processes POVs,
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65627
buses, pedestrians, and commercial
traffic.
The purpose of these expansion and
modernization projects is for GSA to
support the CBP mission through
modernizing and expanding the Lynden
and Sumas LPOEs. Accomplishing this
purpose would increase the
functionality, capacity, operational
efficiency, effectiveness, security,
sustainability, and safety of the Lynden
and Sumas LPOEs. The projects are
generally needed to update the current
facilities at the Lynden and Sumas
LPOEs, which no longer function
adequately and cannot meet CBP
current operational needs or Program of
Requirements. The existing Lynden and
Sumas LPOEs have not undergone major
improvements since their initial
construction in the late 1980s and do
not have sufficient space for
modernization and expansion. Both
facilities also have configuration and
space issues that cause traffic, delays in
processing times, and safety and
security issues for inspection personnel.
Additionally, these facilities do not
have the ability to incorporate new
technologies as they become available.
The projects at the Lynden and Sumas
LPOEs are analyzed jointly in this Draft
EIS due to their proximity
(approximately 10 miles) to one another.
Operational changes at one of the two
LPOEs could have impacts on the other
LPOE, especially during construction.
GSA has prepared a Draft EIS to assess
the potential impacts of these expansion
and modernization projects.
Alternatives Under Consideration
The EIS considers two action
alternatives for the Lynden LPOE and
three action alternatives for the Sumas
LPOE, along with two construction
sequencing options. GSA also considers
the No Action Alternatives for each
project location.
Action alternatives for the Lynden
LPOE are described below.
Lynden Alternative 2 (East-West
Oriented LPOE Expansion) would
involve potential acquisition of
primarily agricultural land to the west
of the LPOE, site preparation, and
construction to modernize and expand
the LPOE. The maximum proposed
limits of disturbance for Lynden
Alternative 2 would be approximately
14.5 acres.
Lynden Alternative 3 (North-South
Oriented LPOE Expansion) would
include the same action as Lynden
Alternative 2, with a difference of
alignment. The maximum proposed
limits of disturbance for Alternative 3
would be approximately 10.3 acres.
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
65628
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2024 / Notices
Action Alternatives for the Sumas
LPOE are described below.
Sumas Alternative 2 (Feasibility
Study Preferred Alternative) would
involve potential acquisition of land
south and east of the LPOE, site
preparation, and construction to
modernize and expand the LPOE. The
maximum proposed limits of
disturbance for Sumas Alternative 2
would be approximately 12.9 acres.
Sumas Alternative 3 (Commercial
Inspection West) would include the
same action and maximum proposed
limits of disturbance as Alternative 2,
with a difference of a ‘‘flipped’’
alignment of the commercial inspection
facility.
Sumas Alternative 4 (Multi-Story
Construction LPOE Expansion) would
include the same action and maximum
proposed limits of disturbance as Sumas
Alternative 2, with a difference of multistory Main Building being constructed.
Construction sequencing options are
described below.
Under the Concurrent Construction
option, both ports would remain open
during construction. Pedestrian access
would be maintained through the ports
by utilizing and resetting, as necessary,
various access and safety controls. POV
access would also be maintained
through both ports using various
controls, which may require limits on
the number of open processing lanes
and shifting of POVs to commercial
owned vehicle (COV) lanes for limited
times. COVs may need to be detoured at
times to other ports to permit adequate
space for continued POV processing.
Under the Sequential Construction
Option, GSA and CBP are considering
the potential for closure of the Lynden
LPOE. All traffic, pedestrians, POVs,
and COVs would be detoured from the
Lynden LPOE during the majority of its
construction. Once the modernized and
expanded Lynden LPOE is reopened,
construction that impacts traffic would
begin on the Sumas LPOE. The Sumas
LPOE would remain open to pedestrians
and POVs during construction to the
greatest extent possible. COVs would be
detoured from the Sumas LPOE to other
LPOEs during portions of the
construction period.
The Draft EIS addresses the potential
environmental impacts of the proposed
alternatives on environmental resources
including land use; water resources;
biological resources; geology,
topography, and soils; air quality,
climate change, and greenhouse gases;
human health and safety; infrastructure
and utilities; traffic and transportation;
noise and vibration; socioeconomics;
and environmental justice and
protection of children’s health and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Aug 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
safety. Based on the analysis presented
in the Draft EIS, impacts to all resource
areas would be less-than-significant
(i.e., negligible, minor, or moderate)
adverse or beneficial. Impact reduction
measures are presented in the Draft EIS
to reduce potential adverse effects.
GSA is currently undergoing formal
consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) and
consulting parties to follow
coordination procedures as required
under section 106 of the NHPA to
determine impacts to historic
properties. Mitigation measures may be
determined in consultation between
GSA, SHPO, and applicable consulting
parties.
GSA is in the process of conducting
informal consultation with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
to determine potential effects to
federally protected species and
migratory birds. GSA initiated
consultation with the USFWS regarding
the Lynden LPOE and Sumas LPOE and
is awaiting USFWS responses and
findings. Once received, USFWS
responses and findings would be
included in the Final EIS.
GSA coordinated with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
via email concerning the Federal
Farmland Protection Policy Act
conversion impact rating forms
completed for both the Lynden and
Sumas LPOEs and is awaiting NRCS
responses and findings. Once received,
the NRCS responses and findings would
be included in the Final EIS.
The Sumas LPOE project area is
located within the 1-percent-annualchance floodplain (also referred to as
the base flood or 100-year flood) and
0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain
(also referred to as the 500-year flood).
In compliance with Executive Order
11988 (Floodplain Management), GSA
prepared a Floodplain Assessment and
Statement of Findings addressing
potential impacts on floodplains, which
is included in the Draft EIS for public
review and comment. As described in
the Draft EIS, GSA would follow
Federal, state, and local regulatory
compliance requirements and
incorporate design standards at the
Sumas LPOE to minimize impacts to
floodplains.
Anamarie Crawley,
Director, R10 Facilities Management Division
Northwest/Arctic Region 10, U.S. General
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024–17864 Filed 8–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–DL–P
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Common Formats for Patient Safety
Data Collection
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of availability—new
common formats.
AGENCY:
As authorized by the
Secretary of HHS, AHRQ coordinates
the development of common definitions
and reporting formats (Common
Formats or formats) for reporting on
health care quality and patient safety.
The purpose of this notice is to
announce the availability of Common
Formats for Surveillance—Hospital
(CFS–H) Version 1.0.
DATES: Ongoing public input.
ADDRESSES: The Common Formats for
Surveillance—Hospital Version 1.0 can
be accessed electronically at the
following website: https://
www.psoppc.org/psoppc_web/
publicpages/surveillance
commonformats.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Hamid Jalal, Center for Quality
Improvement and Patient Safety, AHRQ,
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD
20857; Telephone (toll free): (866) 403–
3697; Telephone (local): (301) 427–
1111; TTY (toll free): (866) 438–7231;
TTY (local): (301) 427–1130; Email:
pso@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on Common Formats
Development
The Patient Safety and Quality
Improvement Act of 2005, 42 U.S.C.
299b-21 to 299b-26, (Patient Safety Act)
and the related Patient Safety and
Quality Improvement Final Rule, 42
CFR part 3 (Patient Safety Rule),
published in the Federal Register on
November 21, 2008, 73 FR 70731–
70814, provide for the formation of
Patient Safety Organizations (PSOs),
which collect and analyze confidential
and privileged information regarding
the quality and safety of health care
delivery that meets the definition of
PSWP. Aggregation of these data enables
PSOs and others to identify and address
underlying causal factors of patient
safety and quality issues.
The Patient Safety Act provides for
the development of standardized
reporting formats using common
language and definitions to ensure that
health care quality and patient safety
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 155 (Monday, August 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65626-65628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17864]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[Notice-P-2024-08; Docket No. 2024-0002; Sequence No. 36]
Notice of Availability for a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
and Floodplain Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Kenneth G.
Ward (Lynden) and Sumas Land Ports of Entry Modernization and Expansion
Projects in Lynden and Sumas, Washington
AGENCY: Public Buildings Service (PBS), United States (U.S.) General
Services Administration (GSA).
[[Page 65627]]
ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA); public notice of floodplain
assessment and statement of findings; announcement of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which examines potential
environmental impacts from the modernization and expansion of the
Lynden and Sumas Land Ports of Entry (LPOE) in Lynden and Sumas,
Washington. The existing Lynden and Sumas LPOEs are owned and managed
by GSA and operated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The Draft EIS describes the
purpose and need for the project; alternatives considered; the existing
environment that could be affected; the potential impacts resulting
from each of the alternatives; and proposed best management practices
and/or mitigation measures. The Draft EIS also includes a Floodplain
Assessment and Statement of Findings due to the construction in a
floodplain at the Sumas LPOE.
DATES:
Public Comment Period--The Public Comment Period begins with
publication of this NOA in the Federal Register and will last until
September 26, 2024. Written comments must be received or postmarked by
the last day of the Public Comment Period (see the ADDRESSES section of
this NOA on how to submit comments).
Hearing Date--GSA will host an in-person, open house public hearing
on Wednesday, September 4, 2024, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., Pacific Time
(PT) (see the ADDRESSES section below for location address).
ADDRESSES:
Hearing Location--The public may attend the hearing at the American
Legion Post 212 Building at 134 Harrison St., Sumas, WA 98295, to view
the presentation and provide comments on the Draft EIS. GSA staff
members will be available to assist the public in providing public
comments.
Public Comments--In addition to oral comments and written comments
provided at the public hearing, members of the public may also submit
comments by one of the following methods. All oral and written comments
will be considered equally and will be part of the public record.
Electronic comments should be submitted to the Lynden and
Sumas LPOE email addresses listed below.
[ssquf] [email protected]
[ssquf] [email protected]
Please include `Lynden and Sumas LPOEs EIS' in the subject line of
the message.
Written comments on the EIS should be mailed to: ATTN:
Patrick Manning, Capital Project Manager, Lynden and Sumas LPOEs EIS,
U.S. General Services Administration, Northwest/Artic, Region 10, 1301
A Street, Suite 610, Tacoma, WA 98402.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Manning, Capital Project
Manager, GSA at the Lynden and Sumas LPOE email addresses at
[email protected] or [email protected], or at 202-501-4755.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comment Period
The views and comments of the public are necessary in helping GSA
in its decision-making process regarding environmental, cultural, and
economic impacts. Public comments will be solicited through an in-
person public hearing; direct mail correspondence to appropriate
Federal, state, and local agencies, Tribes, and to private
organizations and citizens who have previously expressed or are known
to have an interest in the project; and in local newspapers. The Draft
EIS has considered previous input provided during the scoping period.
Public Hearing Information
The public hearing will begin with presentations on the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) processes, which are being executed concurrently for this
project, as well as an overview of the proposed project, and then will
continue with the findings of the Draft EIS. A copy of the presentation
slideshow will be made available within days of the hearing at the GSA
websites at www.gsa.gov/lynden and www.gsa.gov/sumas. Following the
presentation, GSA will hold an open house meeting where members of the
public can discuss the projects with GSA staff members and provide
written comments on the Draft EIS.
Background
The existing 4.8-acre Lynden LPOE serves as the port of entry for
people and vehicles connecting Lynden, Washington to Aldergrove,
British Columbia, Canada. The LPOE currently operates 16 hours per day,
7 days per week and processes privately owned vehicles (POVs), buses,
pedestrians, and permitted commercial traffic. The existing 4.0-acre
Sumas LPOE serves as the port of entry for people and vehicles
connecting Sumas, Washington to Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada.
The LPOE operates 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and processes POVs,
buses, pedestrians, and commercial traffic.
The purpose of these expansion and modernization projects is for
GSA to support the CBP mission through modernizing and expanding the
Lynden and Sumas LPOEs. Accomplishing this purpose would increase the
functionality, capacity, operational efficiency, effectiveness,
security, sustainability, and safety of the Lynden and Sumas LPOEs. The
projects are generally needed to update the current facilities at the
Lynden and Sumas LPOEs, which no longer function adequately and cannot
meet CBP current operational needs or Program of Requirements. The
existing Lynden and Sumas LPOEs have not undergone major improvements
since their initial construction in the late 1980s and do not have
sufficient space for modernization and expansion. Both facilities also
have configuration and space issues that cause traffic, delays in
processing times, and safety and security issues for inspection
personnel. Additionally, these facilities do not have the ability to
incorporate new technologies as they become available. The projects at
the Lynden and Sumas LPOEs are analyzed jointly in this Draft EIS due
to their proximity (approximately 10 miles) to one another. Operational
changes at one of the two LPOEs could have impacts on the other LPOE,
especially during construction. GSA has prepared a Draft EIS to assess
the potential impacts of these expansion and modernization projects.
Alternatives Under Consideration
The EIS considers two action alternatives for the Lynden LPOE and
three action alternatives for the Sumas LPOE, along with two
construction sequencing options. GSA also considers the No Action
Alternatives for each project location.
Action alternatives for the Lynden LPOE are described below.
Lynden Alternative 2 (East-West Oriented LPOE Expansion) would
involve potential acquisition of primarily agricultural land to the
west of the LPOE, site preparation, and construction to modernize and
expand the LPOE. The maximum proposed limits of disturbance for Lynden
Alternative 2 would be approximately 14.5 acres.
Lynden Alternative 3 (North-South Oriented LPOE Expansion) would
include the same action as Lynden Alternative 2, with a difference of
alignment. The maximum proposed limits of disturbance for Alternative 3
would be approximately 10.3 acres.
[[Page 65628]]
Action Alternatives for the Sumas LPOE are described below.
Sumas Alternative 2 (Feasibility Study Preferred Alternative) would
involve potential acquisition of land south and east of the LPOE, site
preparation, and construction to modernize and expand the LPOE. The
maximum proposed limits of disturbance for Sumas Alternative 2 would be
approximately 12.9 acres.
Sumas Alternative 3 (Commercial Inspection West) would include the
same action and maximum proposed limits of disturbance as Alternative
2, with a difference of a ``flipped'' alignment of the commercial
inspection facility.
Sumas Alternative 4 (Multi-Story Construction LPOE Expansion) would
include the same action and maximum proposed limits of disturbance as
Sumas Alternative 2, with a difference of multi-story Main Building
being constructed.
Construction sequencing options are described below.
Under the Concurrent Construction option, both ports would remain
open during construction. Pedestrian access would be maintained through
the ports by utilizing and resetting, as necessary, various access and
safety controls. POV access would also be maintained through both ports
using various controls, which may require limits on the number of open
processing lanes and shifting of POVs to commercial owned vehicle (COV)
lanes for limited times. COVs may need to be detoured at times to other
ports to permit adequate space for continued POV processing.
Under the Sequential Construction Option, GSA and CBP are
considering the potential for closure of the Lynden LPOE. All traffic,
pedestrians, POVs, and COVs would be detoured from the Lynden LPOE
during the majority of its construction. Once the modernized and
expanded Lynden LPOE is reopened, construction that impacts traffic
would begin on the Sumas LPOE. The Sumas LPOE would remain open to
pedestrians and POVs during construction to the greatest extent
possible. COVs would be detoured from the Sumas LPOE to other LPOEs
during portions of the construction period.
The Draft EIS addresses the potential environmental impacts of the
proposed alternatives on environmental resources including land use;
water resources; biological resources; geology, topography, and soils;
air quality, climate change, and greenhouse gases; human health and
safety; infrastructure and utilities; traffic and transportation; noise
and vibration; socioeconomics; and environmental justice and protection
of children's health and safety. Based on the analysis presented in the
Draft EIS, impacts to all resource areas would be less-than-significant
(i.e., negligible, minor, or moderate) adverse or beneficial. Impact
reduction measures are presented in the Draft EIS to reduce potential
adverse effects.
GSA is currently undergoing formal consultation with the State
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and consulting parties to follow
coordination procedures as required under section 106 of the NHPA to
determine impacts to historic properties. Mitigation measures may be
determined in consultation between GSA, SHPO, and applicable consulting
parties.
GSA is in the process of conducting informal consultation with the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act to determine potential effects to federally
protected species and migratory birds. GSA initiated consultation with
the USFWS regarding the Lynden LPOE and Sumas LPOE and is awaiting
USFWS responses and findings. Once received, USFWS responses and
findings would be included in the Final EIS.
GSA coordinated with the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) via email concerning the Federal Farmland Protection Policy Act
conversion impact rating forms completed for both the Lynden and Sumas
LPOEs and is awaiting NRCS responses and findings. Once received, the
NRCS responses and findings would be included in the Final EIS.
The Sumas LPOE project area is located within the 1-percent-annual-
chance floodplain (also referred to as the base flood or 100-year
flood) and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain (also referred to as
the 500-year flood). In compliance with Executive Order 11988
(Floodplain Management), GSA prepared a Floodplain Assessment and
Statement of Findings addressing potential impacts on floodplains,
which is included in the Draft EIS for public review and comment. As
described in the Draft EIS, GSA would follow Federal, state, and local
regulatory compliance requirements and incorporate design standards at
the Sumas LPOE to minimize impacts to floodplains.
Anamarie Crawley,
Director, R10 Facilities Management Division Northwest/Arctic Region
10, U.S. General Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-17864 Filed 8-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-DL-P