Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB Airplanes, 65568-65572 [2024-17834]
Download as PDF
65568
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Federal consolidated supervision by the
FRB and that controls an industrial
bank:
(1) As a result of a change in bank
control pursuant to section 7(j) of the
FDI Act;
(2) As a result of a merger transaction
pursuant to section 18(c) of the FDI Act;
(3) As a result of a conversion
pursuant to section 5(i)(5) of the Home
Owners’ Loan Act;
(4) That is granted deposit insurance
by the FDIC pursuant to section 6 of the
FDI Act; or
(5) As determined by the FDIC after
providing the company an opportunity
to present its views in writing as to why
the provisions of this part should not
apply; or
(b) A company that controls an
industrial bank, if, on or after [the
effective date of the final rule]:
(1) The control of such company
changes, requiring a notice subject to
section 7(j) of the FDI Act; or
(2) The company is the resultant
entity following a merger transaction.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 354.4 by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text and
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 354.4 Required commitments and
provisions of written agreement.
(a) The commitments required to be
made in the written agreements
referenced in § 354.3 are set forth in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (8) of this
section. In addition, with respect to an
industrial bank subject to this part, the
FDIC will condition each grant of
deposit insurance, each issuance of a
non-objection to a change in control,
each approval of a merger, each
approval of a conversion, and each
determination of Covered Company
status on compliance with paragraphs
(a)(1) through (8) of this section by the
parties to the written agreement. As
required, each Covered Company must:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) For each type of filing through
which an industrial bank would become
subject to this part, the FDIC must
evaluate the appropriate statutory
factors pursuant to applicable law. The
required commitments, written
agreement provisions, and industrial
bank subsidiary restrictions, as
described in this part, will be taken into
account as part of the FDIC’s
consideration of the underlying filing,
but do not replace any statutory factor
applicable to an underlying filing and
will not necessarily lead to the favorable
resolution of any statutory factor where
the facts and circumstances are
otherwise unfavorable.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
4. Redesignate § 354.6 as § 354.7, and
add a new § 354.6 to read as follows:
■
§ 354.6
Additional considerations.
(a) Parent company. The FDIC will
consider the degree of risk presented to
the industrial bank from the parent
company and its affiliates. In assessing
the degree of risk presented from the
parent company and its affiliates, the
FDIC will consider the following
elements:
(1) The parent company’s business
purpose for establishing or acquiring
control of the industrial bank;
(2) The existing and proposed
relationships among the parent
company and its affiliates;
(3) The parent company’s history of
regulatory and consumer compliance,
including the status of any significant
pending or outstanding enforcement
actions, investigations, administrative
matters, or contingent liabilities;
(4) The supervisory record of the
parent company and any affiliates
regulated by the Federal banking
agencies;
(5) The novelty of the parent
company’s primary businesses, and the
extent to which new or innovative
processes are being implemented or
utilized;
(6) The accessibility of information,
including the books and records of the
parent company and any affiliated
domestic or foreign entities; and
(7) Any plans or processes that
mitigate risks presented by the parent
company.
(b) Industrial bank. In every case, the
FDIC will also consider the degree to
which the industrial bank will have:
(1) An independent board and
management team; and
(2) A business model that is viable on
a standalone basis and that has
franchise value independent of the
parent organization. A business model
is viable on a standalone basis and has
franchise value if the main business
functions of the industrial bank will not
be reliant on the parent organization,
including the industrial bank’s
operations, loans and investments,
deposits and other funding sources,
client sourcing, and any other primary
business activities.
(c) Rebuttable presumptions regarding
shell or captive industrial banks—(1)
Presumptions. Any proposal for an
industrial bank that presents the
following characteristics will be
presumed to be a shell or captive
industrial bank. The industrial bank—
(i) Could not function independently
of the parent company;
(ii) Would be significantly or
materially reliant on the parent
company or its affiliates; or
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) Would serve only as a funding
channel for an existing parent company
or affiliate business line.
(2) Impact of the presumptions. The
FDIC will presume that the shell or
captive nature of an industrial bank
involved in a filing weighs heavily
against favorably resolving one or more
applicable statutory factors.
(3) Rebuttal of presumptions. The
FDIC will afford any company seeking
to rebut a presumption in this paragraph
(c) an opportunity to present its views
in writing. While the FDIC is
considering any such materials, the
FDIC will suspend consideration of any
related filings, time periods will be
tolled, and transactions will not be
consummated.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, on July 30, 2024.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–17637 Filed 8–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2024–2016; Project
Identifier MCAI–2024–00111–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2017–21–05, which applies to certain
Saab AB Model 340A (SAAB/SF340A)
and SAAB 340B airplanes. AD 2017–
21–05 requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate airworthiness
limitations, including new inspection
tasks for the drag brace support fitting
of the main landing gear (MLG) and to
implement corrosion prevention and
control program (CPCP) related tasks.
Since the FAA issued AD 2017–21–05,
the FAA has determined that new or
more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. This proposed
AD would continue to require the
actions in AD 2017–21–05 and would
require revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate new or more
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
restrictive airworthiness limitations, as
specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is
proposed for incorporation by reference
(IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by September 26,
2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2024–2016; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For EASA material identified in this
proposed AD, contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–
2024–2016.
• For Saab AB material identified in
this proposed AD, contact Saab AB, SE–
581 88, Linköping, Sweden; telephone
+46 13 18 5591; fax +46 13 18 4874;
email saab340techsupport@
saabgroup.com; website saab.com/
products/air/regional-aircraft.
• You may view this material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone 206–231–3220; email
Shahram.Daneshmandi@faa.gov.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2024–2016; Project Identifier
MCAI–2024–00111–T’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Shahram
Daneshmandi, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206–
231–3220; email
Shahram.Daneshmandi@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives that
is not specifically designated as CBI will
be placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2017–21–05,
Amendment 39–19076 (82 FR 48917,
October 23, 2017) (AD 2017–21–05), for
certain Saab AB Model 340A (SAAB/
SF340A) and SAAB 340B airplanes. AD
2017–21–05 was prompted by an MCAI
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65569
originated EASA, which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States
of the European Union. EASA issued
AD 2017–0033, dated February 17, 2017
(EASA AD 2017–0033) (which
corresponds to FAA AD 2017–21–05), to
correct an unsafe condition.
AD 2017–21–05 requires revising the
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate airworthiness
limitations, including new inspection
tasks for the drag brace support fitting
of the MLG and to implement CPCP
related tasks. The FAA issued AD 2017–
21–05 to prevent reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
Actions Since AD 2017–21–05 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2017–21–
05, EASA superseded AD 2017–0033
and issued EASA AD 2024–0042, dated
February 13, 2024 (EASA AD 2024–
0042) (referred to after this as the
MCAI), for all Saab AB Model 340A
(SAAB/SF340A) and SAAB 340B
airplanes. The MCAI states that new or
more restrictive airworthiness
limitations have been developed.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address reduced structural integrity of
the airplane. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–
2024–2016.
Material Incorporated by Reference
Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2024–
0042. This material specifies new or
more restrictive airworthiness
limitations for airplane structures and
safe life limits.
This proposed AD would also require
SAAB 340 Airworthiness Limitation
Manual, Revision 1, dated December 1,
2016, which the Director of the Federal
Register approved for incorporation by
reference as of November 27, 2017 (82
FR 48917, October 23, 2017).
This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in ADDRESSES.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in
the United States. Pursuant to the FAA’s
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, it has notified the
FAA of the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA
is issuing this NPRM after determining
that the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
65570
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
in other products of the same type
design.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed AD Requirements in This
NPRM
This proposed AD would retain all
the requirements of AD 2017–21–05.
This proposed AD would also require
revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate additional new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations,
which are specified in EASA AD 2024–
0042 already described, as proposed for
incorporation by reference. Any
differences with EASA AD 2024–0042
are identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD.
This proposed AD would require
revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new
actions (e.g., inspections) and Critical
Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance with
these actions and CDCCLs is required by
14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that
have been previously modified, altered,
or repaired in the areas addressed by
this proposed AD, the operator may not
be able to accomplish the actions
described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR
91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) according to
paragraph (l)(1) of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to
use some civil aviation authority (CAA)
ADs as the primary source of
information for compliance with
requirements for corresponding FAA
ADs. The FAA has been coordinating
this process with manufacturers and
CAAs. As a result, the FAA proposes to
incorporate EASA AD 2024–0042 by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2024–0042
through that incorporation, except for
any differences identified as exceptions
in the regulatory text of this proposed
AD. Using common terms that are the
same as the heading of a particular
section in EASA AD 2024–0042 does
not mean that operators need comply
only with that section. For example,
where the AD requirement refers to ‘‘all
required actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in EASA AD 2024–0042.
Material required by EASA AD 2024–
0042 for compliance will be available at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2024–2016
after the FAA final rule is published.
Airworthiness Limitation ADs Using
the New Process
The FAA’s process of incorporating
by reference MCAI ADs as the primary
source of information for compliance
with corresponding FAA ADs has been
limited to certain MCAI ADs (primarily
those with service bulletins as the
primary source of information for
accomplishing the actions required by
the FAA AD). However, the FAA is now
expanding the process to include MCAI
ADs that require a change to
airworthiness limitation documents,
such as airworthiness limitation
sections.
For these ADs that incorporate by
reference an MCAI AD that changes
airworthiness limitations, the FAA
requirements are unchanged. Operators
must revise the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the information specified in
the new airworthiness limitation
document. The airworthiness
limitations must be followed according
to 14 CFR 91.403(c) and 91.409(e).
The previous format of the
airworthiness limitation ADs included a
paragraph that specified that no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections),
intervals, or CDCCLs may be used
unless the actions. intervals, and
CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in
accordance with the procedures
specified in the AMOCs paragraph
under ‘‘Additional AD Provisions.’’ This
new format includes a ‘‘New Provisions
for Alternative Actions, Intervals, and
CDCCLs’’ paragraph that does not
specifically refer to AMOCs, but
operators may still request an AMOC to
use an alternative action. interval, or
CDCCL.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if
adopted as proposed, would affect 81
airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA
estimates the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
The FAA estimates the total cost per
operator for the retained actions from
AD 2017–21–05 to be $7,650 (90 workhours × $85 per work-hour).
The FAA has determined that revising
the existing maintenance or inspection
program takes an average of 90 workhours per operator, although the agency
recognizes that this number may vary
from operator to operator. Since
operators incorporate maintenance or
inspection program changes for their
affected fleet(s), the FAA has
determined that a per-operator estimate
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate.
The FAA estimates the total cost per
operator for the new proposed actions to
be $7,650 (90 work-hours × $85 per
work-hour).
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate
aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2017–21–05, Amendment 39–
19076 (82 FR 48917, October 23, 2017);
and
■ b. Adding the following new AD:
■
■
Saab AB (Formerly Known as Saab AB,
Support and Services): Docket No. FAA–
2024–2016; Project Identifier MCAI–
2024–00111–T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by September
26, 2024.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2017–21–05,
Amendment 39–19076 (82 FR 48917, October
23, 2017) (AD 2017–21–05).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Saab AB (formerly
known as Saab AB, Support and Services)
Model 340A (SAAB/SF340A) and SAAB
340B airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 05, Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a determination
that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Revision of the Existing
Maintenance or Inspection Program, With
No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of AD 2017–21–05, with no
changes. For airplanes with an original
certificate of airworthiness or original export
certificate of airworthiness issued on or
before December 1, 2016. Within 30 days
after November 27, 2017 (the effective date of
AD 2017–21–05): Revise the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate airworthiness limitations,
including inspection tasks for the drag brace
support fitting of the main landing gear
(MLG) and corrosion prevention and control
(CPCP) related tasks, specified in SAAB 340
Airworthiness Limitation Manual, Revision
1, dated December 1, 2016. The compliance
time for the initial airworthiness limitation
tasks is at the applicable compliance time
specified in SAAB 340 Airworthiness
Limitation Manual, Revision 1, dated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
December 1, 2016, or within 30 days after
November 27, 2017, whichever occurs later.
Accomplishing the revision of the existing
maintenance or inspection program required
by paragraph (i) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph.
(h) Retained Restrictions on Alternative
Actions, Intervals, and Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs),
With a New Exception
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (h) of AD 2017–21–05, with a new
exception. Except as required by paragraph
(i) of this AD, after the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, has been
revised as required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections),
intervals, and/or CDCCLs may be used unless
the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD.
(i) New Revision of the Existing Maintenance
or Inspection Program
Except as specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2024–0042, dated
February 13, 2024 (EASA AD 2024–0042).
Accomplishing the revision of the existing
maintenance or inspection program required
by this paragraph terminates the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) Exceptions to EASA AD 2024–0042
(1) This AD does not adopt the
requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and
(2) of EASA AD 2024–0042.
(2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2024–0042
specifies revising ‘‘the approved AMP,’’
within 12 months after its effective date, but
this AD requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, within 90 days after the effective
date of this AD.
(3) The initial compliance time for doing
the tasks specified in paragraph (3) of EASA
AD 2024–0042 is at the applicable
‘‘limitations’’ and ‘‘associated thresholds’’ as
incorporated by the requirements of
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2024–0042, or
within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later.
(4) This AD does not adopt the provisions
specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA
AD 2024–0042.
(5) This AD does not adopt the ‘‘Remarks’’
section of EASA AD 2024–0042.
(k) New Provisions for Alternative Actions,
Intervals, and CDCCLs
After the existing maintenance or
inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections),
intervals, and CDCCLs are allowed unless
they are approved as specified in the
provisions of the ‘‘Ref. Publications’’ section
of EASA AD 2024–0042.
(l) Additional AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65571
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, mail it to the address identified in
paragraph (m) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR-730-AMOC@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Saab AB’s EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(m) Additional Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Shahram Daneshmandi, Aviation
Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
206–231–3220; email
Shahram.Daneshmandi@faa.gov.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the material listed in this paragraph
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this material as
applicable to do the actions required by this
AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following material was approved
for IBR on [DATE 35 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL RULE].
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2024–0042, dated February 13,
2024.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) The following material was approved
for IBR on November 27, 2017 (82 FR 48917,
October 23, 2017).
(i) SAAB 340 Airworthiness Limitation
Manual, Revision 1, dated December 1, 2016.
(ii) [Reserved]
(5) For EASA AD 2024–0042, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA AD
on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
(6) For Saab AB material identified in this
AD, contact Saab AB, SE–581 88, Linköping,
Sweden; telephone +46 13 18 5591; fax +46
13 18 4874; email saab340techsupport@
saabgroup.com; website saab.com/products/
air/regional-aircraft.
(7) You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
(8) You may view this material at the
National Archives and Records
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
65572
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov.
Issued on August 6, 2024.
Victor Wicklund,
Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–17834 Filed 8–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900–AS13
Veterans Legacy Grants Program
Improvements
Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
Veterans Legacy Grants Program (VLGP)
regulations to align them with
regulatory updates to the uniform
administrative requirements and other
requirements for Federal awards and
makes additional revisions to improve
the process for administration of the
grant program. This rulemaking
proposes housekeeping amendments to
key terms, legal citations, and
definitions and extends timelines for
reporting and other grant recipient
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before October 11, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments
received before the close of the
comment period will be available at
www.regulations.gov for public viewing,
inspection, or copying, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post the comments
received before the close of the
comment period on
www.regulations.gov as soon as possible
after they have been received. VA will
not post on Regulations.gov public
comments that make threats to
individuals or institutions or suggest
that the commenter will take actions to
harm an individual. VA encourages
individuals not to submit duplicative
comments; however, we will post
comments from multiple unique
commenters even if the content is
identical or nearly identical to other
comments. Any public comment
received after the comment period’s
closing date is considered late and will
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
not be considered in the final
rulemaking. In accordance with the
Providing Accountability Through
Transparency Act of 2023, a 100 word
Plain-Language Summary of this
proposed rule is available at
Regulations.gov, under RIN 2900–AS13.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Williams, Senior Grants Management
Specialist, Veterans Legacy Grants
Program, National Cemetery
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20420. Telephone:
(314) 348–4073 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA
proposes changes to the regulations
governing Veterans Legacy grants to
make housekeeping and clarifying edits,
described below. These revisions would
implement various programmatic
improvements for applicants.
Additionally, in April 2024, the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
published revisions to Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards (also known as the
Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200).
Current VLGP regulations reference
outdated 2 CFR part 200 throughout and
in this rulemaking we propose changes
to reflect revised sections, where
appropriate.
Replacing the Term ‘‘Notice of Funding
Availability’’ With ‘‘Notice of Funding
Opportunity’’
VA proposes to replace the terms
‘‘Notice of Funding Availability’’ and
‘‘NOFA’’ with ‘‘Notice of Funding
Opportunity’’ and ‘‘NOFO’’,
respectively, in 38 CFR 38.715(k) and
throughout the VLGP regulations to
align them with OMB’s use and
definition of the term ‘‘Notice of
funding opportunity’’ in 2 CFR 200.1
and 200.204. Under the revised
definition, the term ‘‘NOFO’’ would be
defined as ‘‘a formal announcement of
the availability of a Federal funding
opportunity published in the OMBdesignated government-wide website
Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov) in
accordance with § 38.725 and 2 CFR
200.1 and 200.204.’’ Consistent with the
definition in 2 CFR 200.1, a NOFO
would provide information on the
award, who is eligible to apply, the
evaluation criteria for selection of an
awardee, required components of an
application, and how to submit the
application. This change is intended to
reduce the potential for grant recipient
confusion due to discrepancies between
terminology used in the VLGP
regulations and the Grants.gov website.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Replacing the Term ‘‘Grantee’’ With
‘‘Recipient’’
VA proposes to replace the term
‘‘Grantee’’ with ‘‘Recipient’’ in 38 CFR
38.715(j) and to make similar changes
throughout the VLGP regulations where
applicable. This change would be
consistent with OMB’s use of the term
‘‘Recipient’’ as the entity that receives a
Federal award directly from a Federal
awarding agency. The alignment of
these terms is intended to reduce any
confusion for the public regarding the
VLGP. The definition would clarify that
‘‘recipient’’ does not include a
subrecipient or individual that is a
beneficiary of the award.
Consolidating the Publication Location
of the NOFO
OMB uniform grant guidance requires
a funding agency to provide public
notice of Federal financial assistance
programs. Current 38 CFR 38.725
requires VA to publish funding
opportunity announcements in both the
Federal Register and in Grants.gov. VA
proposes to discontinue the requirement
in its current regulation to post NOFOs
in the Federal Register. Because
Grants.gov is an OMB-designated
government-wide website and is
recognized as the primary Federal
system used for publication of notices
concerning Federal funding
opportunities and financial assistance,
see 89 FR 30072 (Apr. 22, 2024), VA
proposes to use Grants.gov as the
primary source of publication for its
funding opportunity announcements.
VA believes this change would make the
VLGP award procedures more efficient
and would eliminate the duplicative
publication requirement in the Federal
Register, which may often result in
additional processing time.
Updating the Terminology of
Additional Factors for Deciding
Applications
VA proposes to amend 38 CFR 38.735
(Additional factors for deciding
applications) by updating the
terminology in the regulation to align it
with the terminology and process
framework established in 2 CFR part
200. Specifically, VA would amend the
heading in 38 CFR 38.735(a) from
‘‘Applicant’s performance on prior
award’’ to ‘‘Applicant’s history of
performance’’. History of performance is
a principal factor considered when
evaluating an applicant’s application. 2
CFR 200.206(b)(2)(iii). VA would revise
the description for additional clarity
and consistency on this deciding factor.
The revised language would state that
VA may consider the applicant’s record
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 155 (Monday, August 12, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65568-65572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17834]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2024-2016; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00111-T]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2017-21-05, which applies to certain Saab AB Model 340A (SAAB/SF340A)
and SAAB 340B airplanes. AD 2017-21-05 requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate
airworthiness limitations, including new inspection tasks for the drag
brace support fitting of the main landing gear (MLG) and to implement
corrosion prevention and control program (CPCP) related tasks. Since
the FAA issued AD 2017-21-05, the FAA has determined that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. This proposed AD
would continue to require the actions in AD 2017-21-05 and would
require revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate new or more
[[Page 65569]]
restrictive airworthiness limitations, as specified in a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation
by reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by September
26, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2024-2016; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
For EASA material identified in this proposed AD, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email [email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may
find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also
available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2024-2016.
For Saab AB material identified in this proposed AD,
contact Saab AB, SE-581 88, Link[ouml]ping, Sweden; telephone +46 13 18
5591; fax +46 13 18 4874; email [email protected];
website saab.com/products/air/regional-aircraft.
You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206-231-3195.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone 206-231-3220; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2024-2016; Project Identifier
MCAI-2024-00111-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206-231-3220; email
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives that
is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public
docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2017-21-05, Amendment 39-19076 (82 FR 48917,
October 23, 2017) (AD 2017-21-05), for certain Saab AB Model 340A
(SAAB/SF340A) and SAAB 340B airplanes. AD 2017-21-05 was prompted by an
MCAI originated EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Union. EASA issued AD 2017-0033, dated February
17, 2017 (EASA AD 2017-0033) (which corresponds to FAA AD 2017-21-05),
to correct an unsafe condition.
AD 2017-21-05 requires revising the maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate airworthiness limitations,
including new inspection tasks for the drag brace support fitting of
the MLG and to implement CPCP related tasks. The FAA issued AD 2017-21-
05 to prevent reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
Actions Since AD 2017-21-05 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2017-21-05, EASA superseded AD 2017-0033
and issued EASA AD 2024-0042, dated February 13, 2024 (EASA AD 2024-
0042) (referred to after this as the MCAI), for all Saab AB Model 340A
(SAAB/SF340A) and SAAB 340B airplanes. The MCAI states that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations have been developed.
The FAA is proposing this AD to address reduced structural
integrity of the airplane. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2024-2016.
Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2024-0042. This material specifies new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations for airplane structures and
safe life limits.
This proposed AD would also require SAAB 340 Airworthiness
Limitation Manual, Revision 1, dated December 1, 2016, which the
Director of the Federal Register approved for incorporation by
reference as of November 27, 2017 (82 FR 48917, October 23, 2017).
This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in ADDRESSES.
FAA's Determination
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
[[Page 65570]]
in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM
This proposed AD would retain all the requirements of AD 2017-21-
05. This proposed AD would also require revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate
additional new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations, which are
specified in EASA AD 2024-0042 already described, as proposed for
incorporation by reference. Any differences with EASA AD 2024-0042 are
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD.
This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections) and
Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance
with these actions and CDCCLs is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) according to
paragraph (l)(1) of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2024-0042 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2024-0042 through that incorporation, except for any
differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this
proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a
particular section in EASA AD 2024-0042 does not mean that operators
need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2024-
0042. Material required by EASA AD 2024-0042 for compliance will be
available at regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2024-2016 after the FAA final rule is published.
Airworthiness Limitation ADs Using the New Process
The FAA's process of incorporating by reference MCAI ADs as the
primary source of information for compliance with corresponding FAA ADs
has been limited to certain MCAI ADs (primarily those with service
bulletins as the primary source of information for accomplishing the
actions required by the FAA AD). However, the FAA is now expanding the
process to include MCAI ADs that require a change to airworthiness
limitation documents, such as airworthiness limitation sections.
For these ADs that incorporate by reference an MCAI AD that changes
airworthiness limitations, the FAA requirements are unchanged.
Operators must revise the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the information specified in the new
airworthiness limitation document. The airworthiness limitations must
be followed according to 14 CFR 91.403(c) and 91.409(e).
The previous format of the airworthiness limitation ADs included a
paragraph that specified that no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions.
intervals, and CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the
procedures specified in the AMOCs paragraph under ``Additional AD
Provisions.'' This new format includes a ``New Provisions for
Alternative Actions, Intervals, and CDCCLs'' paragraph that does not
specifically refer to AMOCs, but operators may still request an AMOC to
use an alternative action. interval, or CDCCL.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 81 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:
The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the retained
actions from AD 2017-21-05 to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-
hour).
The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator
to operator. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection
program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined
that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate.
The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the new proposed
actions to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[[Page 65571]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-21-05, Amendment 39-19076
(82 FR 48917, October 23, 2017); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
Saab AB (Formerly Known as Saab AB, Support and Services): Docket
No. FAA-2024-2016; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00111-T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by September 26, 2024.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2017-21-05, Amendment 39-19076 (82 FR 48917,
October 23, 2017) (AD 2017-21-05).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Saab AB (formerly known as Saab AB,
Support and Services) Model 340A (SAAB/SF340A) and SAAB 340B
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Revision of the Existing Maintenance or Inspection
Program, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2017-21-05, with no changes. For airplanes with an original
certificate of airworthiness or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or before December 1, 2016. Within 30 days
after November 27, 2017 (the effective date of AD 2017-21-05):
Revise the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate airworthiness limitations, including inspection tasks
for the drag brace support fitting of the main landing gear (MLG)
and corrosion prevention and control (CPCP) related tasks, specified
in SAAB 340 Airworthiness Limitation Manual, Revision 1, dated
December 1, 2016. The compliance time for the initial airworthiness
limitation tasks is at the applicable compliance time specified in
SAAB 340 Airworthiness Limitation Manual, Revision 1, dated December
1, 2016, or within 30 days after November 27, 2017, whichever occurs
later. Accomplishing the revision of the existing maintenance or
inspection program required by paragraph (i) of this AD terminates
the requirements of this paragraph.
(h) Retained Restrictions on Alternative Actions, Intervals, and
Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), With a New
Exception
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2017-21-05, with a new exception. Except as required by paragraph
(i) of this AD, after the maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, has been revised as required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or
CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
(i) New Revision of the Existing Maintenance or Inspection Program
Except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2024-0042, dated February 13, 2024 (EASA AD 2024-0042).
Accomplishing the revision of the existing maintenance or inspection
program required by this paragraph terminates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) Exceptions to EASA AD 2024-0042
(1) This AD does not adopt the requirements specified in
paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA AD 2024-0042.
(2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2024-0042 specifies revising ``the
approved AMP,'' within 12 months after its effective date, but this
AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
(3) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2024-0042 is at the applicable
``limitations'' and ``associated thresholds'' as incorporated by the
requirements of paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2024-0042, or within 90
days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(4) This AD does not adopt the provisions specified in
paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA AD 2024-0042.
(5) This AD does not adopt the ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD
2024-0042.
(k) New Provisions for Alternative Actions, Intervals, and CDCCLs
After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and CDCCLs are allowed
unless they are approved as specified in the provisions of the
``Ref. Publications'' section of EASA AD 2024-0042.
(l) Additional AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
International Validation Branch, mail it to the address identified
in paragraph (m) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Saab AB's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(m) Additional Information
For more information about this AD, contact Shahram Daneshmandi,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206-231-3220; email
[email protected].
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the material listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions
required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following material was approved for IBR on [DATE 35 DAYS
AFTER PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL RULE].
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2024-0042,
dated February 13, 2024.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) The following material was approved for IBR on November 27,
2017 (82 FR 48917, October 23, 2017).
(i) SAAB 340 Airworthiness Limitation Manual, Revision 1, dated
December 1, 2016.
(ii) [Reserved]
(5) For EASA AD 2024-0042, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA
AD on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
(6) For Saab AB material identified in this AD, contact Saab AB,
SE-581 88, Link[ouml]ping, Sweden; telephone +46 13 18 5591; fax +46
13 18 4874; email [email protected]; website
saab.com/products/air/regional-aircraft.
(7) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
(8) You may view this material at the National Archives and
Records
[[Page 65572]]
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email [email protected].
Issued on August 6, 2024.
Victor Wicklund,
Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-17834 Filed 8-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P