Periodic Reporting, 65301-65302 [2024-16787]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2024 / Proposed Rules
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, visit
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@
nara.gov. The material may be obtained
from Nacha, 2550 Wasser Terrace, Suite
400, Herndon, Virginia 20171; phone:
703–561–1100; email: info@nacha.org.
(a) 2024 Nacha Operating Rules &
Guidelines: The Guide to the Rules
governing the ACH Network, copyright
2024; into § 210.2.
(b) Supplement #1–2024, Notice of
Amendment to the 2024 Nacha
Operating Rules, dated April 12, 2024;
into § 210.2.
■ 3. In § 210.2:
■ a. Revise paragraph (a);
■ b. Remove paragraphs (d)(4) and
(d)(8); and
■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(5)
through (7) as paragraphs (d)(4) through
(6).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 210.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) ACH Rules means the 2024 Nacha
Operating Rules & Guidelines: The
Guide to the Rules Governing the ACH
Network, as updated through
Supplement #1–2024 (both incorporated
by reference, see § 210.0) and published
by Nacha, a national association of
regional member clearing house
associations, ACH Operators, and
participating financial institutions
located in the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 210.3
[Amended]
4. In § 210.3, remove and reserve
paragraph (b).
■
David A. Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–17413 Filed 8–8–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AS–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2024–10; Order No. 7309]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
ACTION:
The Commission is
acknowledging a recent Postal Service
filing requesting the Commission
initiate a rulemaking proceeding to
consider changes to analytical
principles relating to periodic reports
(Proposal Four). This document informs
the public of the filing, invites public
comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Aug 08, 2024
Jkt 262001
DATES:
Comments are due: August 27,
2024.
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820. For Media Inquiries:
Gail Adams, Gail.Adams@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Proposal Four
III. Notice and Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On July 24, 2024, the Postal Service
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR
3050.11 requesting that the Commission
initiate a rulemaking proceeding to
consider changes to analytical
principles relating to periodic reports.1
The Petition identifies the proposed
analytical changes filed in this docket as
Proposal Four.
II. Proposal Four
The Postal Service explains that
Proposal Four has two components,
both aimed at improving estimates for
First-Class Mail. Petition at 1. The
Postal Service explains that the first
component would improve unit mail
processing cost estimates ‘‘by expanding
the use of Mail.dat information’’ while
the second would improve workshare
cost-avoidance estimates by replacing
the Non-automation Presort Cards
Benchmark with a new Non-automation
Mixed automated area distribution
center (AADC) barcode (BC)Benchmark. Petition, Proposal Four at 1.
A. Component One
Background. In terms of the first
component, the Postal Service states
that it develops yearly mail processing
unit cost estimates for First-Class Mail
using cost models and calibrations filed
in the Annual Compliance Review
(ACR). Id. at 2. These estimates are
based on a field study conducted in
January of 2005. Id. at 2–3. In contrast,
the Postal Service has used Mail.dat
files and stratified inflation methods for
the cost estimates for other classes of
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service for
the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed
Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Four),
July 24, 2024 (Petition).
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65301
mail. Id. at 3. The Postal Service states
that ‘‘Mail.dat files were initially
developed to prepare a mailing virtually
from a known address list and from
user-specified preparation parameters—
piece length, height, thickness and
weight, bundle, and container
minimums and maximums, etc.—that
would mimic the actual physical
preparation.’’ Id. The Postal Service
explains that, initially, Mail.dat files
could not accurately reflect First-Class
Mail mailings; however, recently the
mailing industry and the Postal Service
have developed a methodology to create
accurate Mail.dat files for First-Class
Mail. Id. at 3–4.
Proposal. The Postal Service seeks to
use Mail.dat files to estimate the
preparation characteristics of the
universe of First-Class Mail Presorted
Letters/Postcards, thus improving the
processing unit cost estimates for those
mailpieces. Id. at 4. The Postal Service
explains that, because Mail.dat files
alone do not constitute a ‘‘census’’
encompassing all First-Class Mail
Presorted Letters/Postcards pieces, it
also proposes to use a stratified inflation
methodology utilizing PostalOne!
Mailing Statement data to infer the
characteristics of the entire population.
Id. at 5–12.
Impact. The Postal Service explains
that it ‘‘measured and evaluated the
impacts of Component One by applying
its procedures to data from the ACR
2023 reporting period, inputting the
resulting data into downstream models
(folders USPS–FY23–10 and USPS–
FY23–11), and examining the
consequent changes in reported unit
costs.’’ Id. at 12. The Postal Service
states that the results are in accord with
what would be expected when
transitioning from a model predicated
on data from 2005 to ‘‘a procedure that
is capable of incorporating much more
recent mail entry patterns.’’ Id. at 14–16.
B. Component Two
Background. In terms of the second
component, the Postal Service states
that it ‘‘seeks to improve the precision
of the barcoding cost avoidance for
First-Class Mail Automation Mixed
AADC (MAADC) Presort Cards by
replacing the Nonautomation Presort
Cards benchmark with a proposed
Nonautomation MAADC BCBenchmark.’’ Id. at 17. Specifically, it
explains that the most accurate measure
of barcode cost avoidance is the
difference between a barcoded presorted
rate category and a similarly situated
rate category that does not contain a
barcode. Id. However, the current
benchmark for Automation MAADC
Cards is Presorted Cards, which the
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
65302
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Postal Service states is not analogous
and therefore ‘‘does not provide the true
value of the MAADC barcode.’’ Id. at 18.
Proposal. In order to provide a
benchmark that more accurately
measures the cost avoidance for
Automation MAADC Cards, the Postal
Service seeks to create a new
benchmark—the Non-automation
MAADC BC-Benchmark. Id. In order to
do so, the Postal Service ‘‘would make
changes to the First-Class Mail Letters
cost avoidance model last filed in
Docket No. ACR2023 as folder USPS–
FY23–10, while simultaneously
employing the Mail Characteristics
Study (MCS) changes from Component
One,’’ discussed above. Id.
Impact. According to the Postal
Service, the changes suggested in
Proposal Four would result in a barcode
cost avoidance of 0.617 cents (compared
to the negative cost avoidance of
¥0.110 cents resulting from use of the
current benchmark), which would
‘‘enable the Postal Service to set
appropriate discounts for commercial
mailers for pre-barcoding First-Class
Mail cards.’’ Id. at 20. Further, the
Postal Service explains that its changes
would reduce the avoided cost from
$0.018 to $0.006 for Automation Mixed
AADC Cards and increase its
passthrough from 88.9 percent to 266.7
percent. Id.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
III. Notice and Comment
The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2024–10 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition. More
information on the Petition may be
accessed via the Commission’s website
at https://www.prc.gov. Interested
persons may submit comments on the
Petition and Proposal Four no later than
August 27, 2024. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
505, Gregory S. Stanton is designated as
an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2024–10 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Petition of the
United States Postal Service for the
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
Proposed Changes in Analytical
Principles (Proposal Four), filed July 24,
2024.
2. Comments by interested persons in
this proceeding are due no later than
August 27, 2024.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Gregory S.
Stanton to serve as an officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Aug 08, 2024
Jkt 262001
represent the interests of the general
public in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for the
publication of this Order in the Federal
Register.
Commission reopens this docket for the
limited purpose of considering the
issues raised by the Response and
invites public comments on the
Response.
By the Commission.
Jennie L. Jbara,
Primary Certifying Official.
II. Background
In Order No. 7049, the Commission
approved the changes in analytical
principles proposed by the Postal
Service in Proposal Eight with two
modifications: (1) the aggregated
coverage model specification for box
time was approved rather than the
Three-Group Coverage Model; and (2)
the errors identified in the Postal
Service’s costing files were corrected as
discussed in the order. Order No. 7049
at 37. The Commission also ordered the
Postal Service to conduct additional
research to justify the groupings
presented in the Three-Group Coverage
Model or other specification of its
choosing for estimating the volume
variability of box time, as well as to
report the findings of such research by
July 1, 2024. Id. In addition, the
Commission ordered the Postal Service
to provide by July 1, 2024 a detailed
description of how it plans to assess the
potential partial volume variabilities of
sequences 026, 049, 051, 052, 037, 038,
083, 053, and 063. Id.
On July 1, 2024, the Postal Service
filed the Response addressing the two
research topics ordered by the
Commission in Order No. 7049.
Regarding the first research topic, the
Postal Service now proposes a TwoGroup Coverage Model for estimating
the volume variability of box time,
grouping products based on whether
they have homogeneous high or low
coverage-causing characteristics on box
time. See Response at 3–14. Based on
the Postal Service’s research, it proposes
that the high coverage impact group
consists of delivery point sequence
(DPS) letters, carrier route flats, walksequence saturation (WSS) letters, WSS
flats, boxholder letters, and boxholder
flats. Id. at 14. The Postal Service also
proposes that the low coverage impact
group consists of random letters,
random flats, mailbox parcels, door
parcels, locker parcels, and
accountables. Id. The Postal Service
then calculates a variability of 33.66
percent for the high coverage impact
group and a variability of 5.63 percent
for the low coverage impact group. Id.
at 17. It then proposes 39.28 percent as
the volume variability for box time. Id.
at 33, Table 15. The Postal Service states
the Two-Group Coverage Model is
preferrable over the aggregated coverage
[FR Doc. 2024–16787 Filed 8–8–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2024–2; Order No. 7321]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is
acknowledging a recent Postal Service
response to Order No. 7049 regarding
proposed changes to analytical
principles relating to periodic reports
(Proposal Eight). This document informs
the public of the filing, invites public
comment on the Postal Service
response, and takes other administrative
steps.
DATES: Comments are due: August 27,
2024.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Notice of Filing and Related Proceeding
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On July 1, 2024, the Postal Service
filed a response to Order No. 7049 1
regarding proposed changes to
analytical principles relating to periodic
reports (Proposal Eight).2 The
1 Order Approving Analytical Principles Used in
Periodic Reporting (Proposal Eight) with Two
Modifications, April 18, 2024 (Order No. 7049).
2 Response of the United States Postal Service to
Order No. 7049 Regarding Rural Carrier Costing,
July 1, 2024 (Response). The Postal Service also
filed a notice of filing of non-public materials
relating to the Response. Notice of Filing of USPS–
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
RM2024–2–NP5 and Application for Nonpublic
Treatment, July 1, 2024.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 154 (Friday, August 9, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65301-65302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-16787]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2024-10; Order No. 7309]
Periodic Reporting
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is acknowledging a recent Postal Service filing
requesting the Commission initiate a rulemaking proceeding to consider
changes to analytical principles relating to periodic reports (Proposal
Four). This document informs the public of the filing, invites public
comment, and takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: August 27, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202-789-6820. For Media Inquiries: Gail Adams, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Proposal Four
III. Notice and Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On July 24, 2024, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant to
39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate a rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to
periodic reports.\1\ The Petition identifies the proposed analytical
changes filed in this docket as Proposal Four.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petition of the United States Postal Service for the
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes in
Analytical Principles (Proposal Four), July 24, 2024 (Petition).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Proposal Four
The Postal Service explains that Proposal Four has two components,
both aimed at improving estimates for First-Class Mail. Petition at 1.
The Postal Service explains that the first component would improve unit
mail processing cost estimates ``by expanding the use of Mail.dat
information'' while the second would improve workshare cost-avoidance
estimates by replacing the Non-automation Presort Cards Benchmark with
a new Non-automation Mixed automated area distribution center (AADC)
barcode (BC)-Benchmark. Petition, Proposal Four at 1.
A. Component One
Background. In terms of the first component, the Postal Service
states that it develops yearly mail processing unit cost estimates for
First-Class Mail using cost models and calibrations filed in the Annual
Compliance Review (ACR). Id. at 2. These estimates are based on a field
study conducted in January of 2005. Id. at 2-3. In contrast, the Postal
Service has used Mail.dat files and stratified inflation methods for
the cost estimates for other classes of mail. Id. at 3. The Postal
Service states that ``Mail.dat files were initially developed to
prepare a mailing virtually from a known address list and from user-
specified preparation parameters--piece length, height, thickness and
weight, bundle, and container minimums and maximums, etc.--that would
mimic the actual physical preparation.'' Id. The Postal Service
explains that, initially, Mail.dat files could not accurately reflect
First-Class Mail mailings; however, recently the mailing industry and
the Postal Service have developed a methodology to create accurate
Mail.dat files for First-Class Mail. Id. at 3-4.
Proposal. The Postal Service seeks to use Mail.dat files to
estimate the preparation characteristics of the universe of First-Class
Mail Presorted Letters/Postcards, thus improving the processing unit
cost estimates for those mailpieces. Id. at 4. The Postal Service
explains that, because Mail.dat files alone do not constitute a
``census'' encompassing all First-Class Mail Presorted Letters/
Postcards pieces, it also proposes to use a stratified inflation
methodology utilizing PostalOne! Mailing Statement data to infer the
characteristics of the entire population. Id. at 5-12.
Impact. The Postal Service explains that it ``measured and
evaluated the impacts of Component One by applying its procedures to
data from the ACR 2023 reporting period, inputting the resulting data
into downstream models (folders USPS-FY23-10 and USPS-FY23-11), and
examining the consequent changes in reported unit costs.'' Id. at 12.
The Postal Service states that the results are in accord with what
would be expected when transitioning from a model predicated on data
from 2005 to ``a procedure that is capable of incorporating much more
recent mail entry patterns.'' Id. at 14-16.
B. Component Two
Background. In terms of the second component, the Postal Service
states that it ``seeks to improve the precision of the barcoding cost
avoidance for First-Class Mail Automation Mixed AADC (MAADC) Presort
Cards by replacing the Nonautomation Presort Cards benchmark with a
proposed Nonautomation MAADC BC-Benchmark.'' Id. at 17. Specifically,
it explains that the most accurate measure of barcode cost avoidance is
the difference between a barcoded presorted rate category and a
similarly situated rate category that does not contain a barcode. Id.
However, the current benchmark for Automation MAADC Cards is Presorted
Cards, which the
[[Page 65302]]
Postal Service states is not analogous and therefore ``does not provide
the true value of the MAADC barcode.'' Id. at 18.
Proposal. In order to provide a benchmark that more accurately
measures the cost avoidance for Automation MAADC Cards, the Postal
Service seeks to create a new benchmark--the Non-automation MAADC BC-
Benchmark. Id. In order to do so, the Postal Service ``would make
changes to the First-Class Mail Letters cost avoidance model last filed
in Docket No. ACR2023 as folder USPS-FY23-10, while simultaneously
employing the Mail Characteristics Study (MCS) changes from Component
One,'' discussed above. Id.
Impact. According to the Postal Service, the changes suggested in
Proposal Four would result in a barcode cost avoidance of 0.617 cents
(compared to the negative cost avoidance of -0.110 cents resulting from
use of the current benchmark), which would ``enable the Postal Service
to set appropriate discounts for commercial mailers for pre-barcoding
First-Class Mail cards.'' Id. at 20. Further, the Postal Service
explains that its changes would reduce the avoided cost from $0.018 to
$0.006 for Automation Mixed AADC Cards and increase its passthrough
from 88.9 percent to 266.7 percent. Id.
III. Notice and Comment
The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2024-10 for consideration
of matters raised by the Petition. More information on the Petition may
be accessed via the Commission's website at https://www.prc.gov.
Interested persons may submit comments on the Petition and Proposal
Four no later than August 27, 2024. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Gregory
S. Stanton is designated as an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in
this proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2024-10 for
consideration of the matters raised by the Petition of the United
States Postal Service for the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
Proposed Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Four), filed July
24, 2024.
2. Comments by interested persons in this proceeding are due no
later than August 27, 2024.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Gregory S.
Stanton to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in
this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for the publication of this Order in
the Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Jennie L. Jbara,
Primary Certifying Official.
[FR Doc. 2024-16787 Filed 8-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P