Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review; Comment Request; Qualified Domestic Relations Orders Submitted to PBGC, 64965-64966 [2024-17609]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action is to amend POL
No. DPR–73 so that TMI–2Solutions can
continue with certain major
decommissioning activities planned
under Phase 2 of its decommissioning
schedule. Phase 2 decommissioning
activities include the removal of any
radioactive components in preparation
for demolition of structures,
decommissioning and dismantlement of
the TMI–2 site to a level that permits the
release of the site, except for an area
potentially to be set aside for storage of
fuel-bearing material (small quantities of
spent nuclear fuel, damaged core
material, and high-level waste) on the
independent spent fuel storage
installation, backfilling of the site,
license termination plan submittal and
implementation, and site restoration
activities. In order to comply with 10
CFR 50.82(a)(6)(ii), TMI–2Solutions
requested that NRC evaluate the impacts
of certain major decommissioning
activities on historic and cultural
resources and NRHP-eligible properties.
The definition of major
decommissioning activity is in 10 CFR
50.2, which states ‘‘major
decommissioning activity means, for a
nuclear power reactor facility, any
activity that results in permanent
removal of major radioactive
components, permanently modifies the
structure of the containment, or results
in dismantling components for
shipment containing greater than class C
waste in accordance with § 61.55 of this
chapter.’’ Due to radioactive
contamination, the TMI–2 structures
must be demolished and removed
during decommissioning.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
In the EA, the staff assessed the
potential environmental impacts from
the proposed license amendment to the
following resource areas: land use;
visual and scenic resources; the geologic
environment; surface and groundwater
resources; ecological resources; air
quality; noise; historic and cultural
resources; socioeconomic conditions;
environmental justice; public and
occupational health; transportation; and
waste generation and management. The
NRC staff also considered the
cumulative impacts from past, present,
and reasonably foreseeable actions
when combined with the proposed
action. The TMI–2 Historic District
would be adversely affected by the
TMI–2 decommissioning, and adverse
effects cannot be avoided. The
mitigation of adverse effects to the TMI–
2 Historic District will be completed in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
accordance with the TMI–2 Demolition
and Decommissioning Programmatic
Agreement (NRC 2024a).
As part of the NRC’s consultation
under section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act, NRC staff determined that
the proposed action may affect but is
not likely to adversely affect the Indiana
bat (Myotis sodalis), northern long-eared
bat (Myotis septentrionalis), tricolored
bat (Perimyotis subflavus), monarch
butterfly (Danaus plexippus),
northeastern bulrush (Scirpus
ancistrochaetus), or green floater
(Lasmigona subviridis). The NRC staff
transmitted a letter to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) for its review
and concurrence on May 24, 2024
(ADAMS Accession No. ML24120A324).
The FWS concurred with the NRC’s
findings on July 15, 2024 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML24199A062).
All other potential impacts from the
proposed action were determined to be
not significant, as described in the EA.
The NRC staff found that there would be
no significant negative cumulative
impact to any resource area from the
proposed action when added to other
past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable actions.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternative to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the NRC staff considered denial
of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘noaction’’ alternative). Under the no-action
alternative, the NRC would deny the
licensee’s request to allow for the
continuation of major decommissioning
activities under Phase 2. In this case, the
NRC staff would not review the historic
and cultural resource impacts of the
major decommissioning activities as
defined in 10 CFR 50.2 and would
therefore disallow the removal of NRHPeligible structures and any impacts to
historic and cultural resources.
However, due to the presence of
radioactive contamination, TMI–2
structures, including the NRHP-eligible
structures, must be removed during the
decommissioning process. Therefore,
the NRC staff concludes that denying
the amendment request is not a
reasonable alternative.
IV. Finding of No Significant Impact
In accordance with the NEPA and 10
CFR part 51, the NRC staff has
conducted an environmental review of a
request for an amendment to POL No.
DPR–73. The proposed amendment
would revise the POL to allow the
licensee to conduct decommissioning at
TMI–2 covering activities that were not
previously addressed in the staff’s
environmental assessments (site-specific
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64965
historical and cultural resources). Based
on its environmental review of the
proposed action, the NRC staff has made
a finding of no significant impact in the
EA. Therefore, the NRC staff has
determined, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.31,
that preparation of an environmental
impact statement is not required for the
proposed action and a FONSI is
appropriate.
Dated: August 2, 2024.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christopher M. Regan,
Director, Division of Rulemaking,
Environmental, and Financial Support, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2024–17521 Filed 8–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
Proposed Submission of Information
Collection for OMB Review; Comment
Request; Qualified Domestic Relations
Orders Submitted to PBGC
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of intent to request
extension of OMB approval, with
modifications.
AGENCY:
The Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) intends to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget extend its approval (with
modifications), under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, of the
information collection related to PBGC’s
booklet, Qualified Domestic Relations
Orders & PBGC. This notice informs the
public of PBGC’s intent and solicits
public comment on the collection of
information.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be submitted on
or before October 7, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: paperwork.comments@
pbgc.gov. Refer to OMB control number
1212–0054 in the subject line.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory
Affairs Division, Office of the General
Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20245–2101.
Commenters are strongly encouraged
to submit public comments
electronically. Commenters who submit
comments on paper by mail should
allow sufficient time for mailed
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
64966
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2024 / Notices
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
All submissions received must
include the agency’s name (Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or PBGC)
and refer to OMB control number 1212–
0054. All comments received will be
posted without change to PBGC’s
website www.pbgc.gov, including any
personal information provided. Do not
submit comments that include any
personally identifiable information or
confidential business information.
Copies of the collection of
information may be obtained without
charge by writing to the Disclosure
Division, Office of the General Counsel,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC
20024–2101, or calling 202–229–4040
during business hours. If you are deaf or
hard of hearing, or have a speech
disability, please dial 7–1–1 to access
telecommunications relay services.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Levin (levin.karen@pbgc.gov),
Attorney, Regulatory Affairs Division,
Office of the General Counsel, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20024–2101;
202–229–3559. If you are deaf or hard
of hearing, or have a speech disability,
please dial 7–1–1 to access
telecommunications relay services.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A defined
benefit pension plan that does not have
enough money to pay benefits may be
terminated if the employer responsible
for the plan faces severe financial
difficulty, such as bankruptcy, and is
unable to maintain the plan. In such an
event, PBGC becomes trustee of the plan
and pays benefits, subject to legal limits,
to plan participants and beneficiaries.
The benefits of a pension plan
participant generally may not be
assigned or alienated. Title I of ERISA
provides an exception for domestic
relations orders (DRO) that relate to
child support, alimony payments, or
marital property rights of an alternate
payee (a spouse, former spouse, child,
or other dependent of a plan
participant). The exception applies only
if the DRO meets specific legal
requirements that make it a qualified
domestic relations order (QDRO).
When PBGC is trustee of a plan, it
reviews submitted domestic relations
orders to determine whether the order is
qualified before paying benefits to an
alternate payee. The requirements for
submitting a domestic relations order
and the contents of such orders are
established by statute. The models and
the guidance provided by PBGC assist
parties by making it easier for them to
comply with ERISA’s QDRO
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 07, 2024
Jkt 262001
requirements in plans trusteed by PBGC;
they do not create any additional
requirements and result in a reduction
of the statutory burden.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has approved the collection of
information in PBGC’s booklet,
Qualified Domestic Relations Orders &
PBGC under control number 1212–0054
through January 31, 2025. PBGC intends
to request that OMB extend approval of
the collection of information with
modifications for 3 years. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
PBGC is adding one term and is
making clarifying changes to other terms
in the Glossary. PBGC is making other
editorial and clarifying changes to the
QDRO booklet.
PBGC estimates that it will receive
approximately 253 DROs each year.
PBGC further estimates that the total
average annual burden of this collection
of information will be approximately
190 hours and $177,100.
PBGC is soliciting public comments
to—
• evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodologies and assumptions used;
• enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Hilary Duke,
Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory
Affairs, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2024–17609 Filed 8–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2024–15; MC2024–471 and
CP2024–478; MC2024–472 and CP2024–479;
MC2024–475 and CP2024–482; MC2024–476
and CP2024–483]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
a negotiated service agreement. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: August 12,
2024.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the Market Dominant or
the Competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the Market
Dominant or the Competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s website (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 153 (Thursday, August 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64965-64966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17609]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Qualified Domestic Relations Orders Submitted to PBGC
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of intent to request extension of OMB approval, with
modifications.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) intends to
request that the Office of Management and Budget extend its approval
(with modifications), under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, of the
information collection related to PBGC's booklet, Qualified Domestic
Relations Orders & PBGC. This notice informs the public of PBGC's
intent and solicits public comment on the collection of information.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 7, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Refer to OMB control
number 1212-0054 in the subject line.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory Affairs Division, Office
of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20245-2101.
Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Commenters who submit comments on paper by mail should
allow sufficient time for mailed
[[Page 64966]]
comments to be received before the close of the comment period.
All submissions received must include the agency's name (Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or PBGC) and refer to OMB control number
1212-0054. All comments received will be posted without change to
PBGC's website www.pbgc.gov, including any personal information
provided. Do not submit comments that include any personally
identifiable information or confidential business information.
Copies of the collection of information may be obtained without
charge by writing to the Disclosure Division, Office of the General
Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20024-2101, or calling 202-229-4040 during business
hours. If you are deaf or hard of hearing, or have a speech disability,
please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Levin ([email protected]),
Attorney, Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of the General Counsel,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 445 12th Street SW, Washington,
DC 20024-2101; 202-229-3559. If you are deaf or hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access
telecommunications relay services.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A defined benefit pension plan that does not
have enough money to pay benefits may be terminated if the employer
responsible for the plan faces severe financial difficulty, such as
bankruptcy, and is unable to maintain the plan. In such an event, PBGC
becomes trustee of the plan and pays benefits, subject to legal limits,
to plan participants and beneficiaries.
The benefits of a pension plan participant generally may not be
assigned or alienated. Title I of ERISA provides an exception for
domestic relations orders (DRO) that relate to child support, alimony
payments, or marital property rights of an alternate payee (a spouse,
former spouse, child, or other dependent of a plan participant). The
exception applies only if the DRO meets specific legal requirements
that make it a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO).
When PBGC is trustee of a plan, it reviews submitted domestic
relations orders to determine whether the order is qualified before
paying benefits to an alternate payee. The requirements for submitting
a domestic relations order and the contents of such orders are
established by statute. The models and the guidance provided by PBGC
assist parties by making it easier for them to comply with ERISA's QDRO
requirements in plans trusteed by PBGC; they do not create any
additional requirements and result in a reduction of the statutory
burden.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the
collection of information in PBGC's booklet, Qualified Domestic
Relations Orders & PBGC under control number 1212-0054 through January
31, 2025. PBGC intends to request that OMB extend approval of the
collection of information with modifications for 3 years. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
PBGC is adding one term and is making clarifying changes to other
terms in the Glossary. PBGC is making other editorial and clarifying
changes to the QDRO booklet.
PBGC estimates that it will receive approximately 253 DROs each
year. PBGC further estimates that the total average annual burden of
this collection of information will be approximately 190 hours and
$177,100.
PBGC is soliciting public comments to--
evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodologies and assumptions used;
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Hilary Duke,
Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2024-17609 Filed 8-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-02-P