Request for Information on Collaboration and Data Sharing for Railroad Operations Analysis, 63471-63473 [2024-17185]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2024 / Notices Total Estimated Annual Responses: 5,672. Total Estimated Annual Burden: 1,049 hours. Total Estimated Annual Burden Hour Dollar Cost Equivalent: $92,419. FRA informs all interested parties that it may not conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a collection of information that does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. Christopher S. Van Nostrand, Deputy Chief Counsel. [FR Doc. 2024–17186 Filed 8–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–06–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad Administration [Docket Number FRA–2015–0062] Florida East Coast Railway’s Request To Amend Its Positive Train Control Safety Plan and Positive Train Control System Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments. AGENCY: This document provides the public with notice that, on June 4, 2024, and July 22, 2024, Florida East Coast Railway (FECR) submitted a request for amendment (RFA) to its FRA-approved Positive Train Control Safety Plan (PTCSP). As this RFA involves a request for FRA’s approval of proposed material modifications to an FRA-certified positive train control (PTC) system, FRA is publishing this notice and inviting public comment on the railroad’s RFA to its PTCSP. DATES: FRA will consider comments received by August 26, 2024. FRA may consider comments received after that date to the extent practicable and without delaying implementation of valuable or necessary modifications to a PTC system. ADDRESSES: Comments: Comments may be submitted by going to https:// www.regulations.gov and following the lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: 6 The dollar equivalent cost is derived from the 2023 Surface Transportation Board Full Year Wage A&B data series using the employee group 200 (Professional & Administrative) hourly wage rate of $50.93 and group 400 (Maintenance of Equipment & Stores) hourly wage rate of $39.77. The total burden wage rate (Straight time plus 75%) used in the table is $89.13 ($50.93 × 1.75 = $89.13), and $69.60 ($39.77 × 1.75 = $69.60). 7 Totals may not add up due to rounding. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Aug 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 online instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the applicable docket number. The relevant PTC docket number for this host railroad is Docket No. FRA–2015–0062. For convenience, all active PTC dockets are hyperlinked on FRA’s website at https://railroads.dot.gov/researchdevelopment/program-areas/traincontrol/ptc/railroads-ptc-dockets. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov; this includes any personal information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gabe Neal, Staff Director, Signal, Train Control, and Crossings Division, telephone: 816–516–7168, email: Gabe.Neal@dot.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In general, title 49 United States Code (U.S.C.) section 20157(h) requires FRA to certify that a host railroad’s PTC system complies with title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 236, subpart I, before the technology may be operated in revenue service. Before making certain changes to an FRA-certified PTC system or the associated FRA-approved PTCSP, a host railroad must submit, and obtain FRA’s approval of, an RFA to its PTCSP under 49 CFR 236.1021. Under 49 CFR 236.1021(e), FRA’s regulations provide that FRA will publish a notice in the Federal Register and invite public comment in accordance with 49 CFR part 211, if an RFA includes a request for approval of a material modification of a signal or train control system. Accordingly, this notice informs the public that, on June 4, 2024, FECR submitted an RFA to its PTCSP for its Interoperable Electronic Train Management System (I–ETMS), which seeks FRA’s approval of FECR’s request to implement I–ETMS Protect 7.0.3.0 which allows for the details of the fixed high-speed consist to be modifiable in the onboard computer configuration files. This change supports Brightline Trains Florida’s plan to add passenger cars in order to operate high speed trains with a consist of 2 locomotives with more than 4 passenger cars. On July 22, 2024, FECR submitted the pertinent software release notes, which are a required element of an RFA to a PTCSP under 49 CFR 236.1021(m). FECR’s completed RFA is available in Docket No. FRA–2015– 0062. Interested parties are invited to comment on FECR’s RFA to its PTCSP by submitting written comments or data. During FRA’s review of this railroad’s RFA, FRA will consider any comments PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63471 or data submitted within the timeline specified in this notice and to the extent practicable, without delaying implementation of valuable or necessary modifications to a PTC system. See 49 CFR 236.1021; see also 49 CFR 236.1011(e). Under 49 CFR 236.1021, FRA maintains the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a railroad’s RFA to its PTCSP at FRA’s sole discretion. Privacy Act Notice In accordance with 49 CFR 211.3, FRA solicits comments from the public to better inform its decisions. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to https:// www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL– 14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See https://www.regulations.gov/ privacy-notice for the privacy notice of regulations.gov. To facilitate comment tracking, we encourage commenters to provide their name, or the name of their organization; however, submission of names is completely optional. If you wish to provide comments containing proprietary or confidential information, please contact FRA for alternate submission instructions. Issued in Washington, DC. Carolyn R. Hayward-Williams, Director, Office of Railroad Systems and Technology. [FR Doc. 2024–17136 Filed 8–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–06–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad Administration [Docket No. FRA–2024–0083] Request for Information on Collaboration and Data Sharing for Railroad Operations Analysis Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Request for information (RFI). AGENCY: On November 15, 2021, President Biden signed into law the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL). The BIL provides historic appropriations for railroad transportation grant programs administered by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and authorizes new programs to enhance rail safety and to repair, restore, improve, and expand the nation’s rail network. Among those new programs is the Corridor SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 63472 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2024 / Notices Identification and Development Program (CID Program), which creates a new framework to facilitate the development of new, enhanced, and restored intercity passenger rail corridors throughout the country. Railroad Operations Analysis (OA) uses data to assess changes to railroad operations and/or capital project improvements to railroad infrastructure and is frequently part of the planning process for rail projects. OA involves the collaboration of various rail stakeholders and the sharing of data and information. As a result of the CID Program, there is an increased need for FRA and rail stakeholders to participate in OA and evaluate OA results. FRA finds value in conducting OA in a collaborative manner to promote increased confidence in the OA among stakeholders and support Federal FRA investments in infrastructure projects. In this RFI, FRA seeks public comments on the challenges involved in OA, how FRA may address those challenges, and how FRA may improve OA for Federally funded railroad projects. DATES: Written comments on this RFI must be received on or before September 19, 2024. FRA may consider comments filed after this date to the extent practicable. ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to docket number FRA–2024–0083 and be submitted by at https:// www.regulations.gov. Search by using the docket number and follow the instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for this RFI. Note: All comments received, including any personal information, will be posted without change to the docket and will be accessible to the public at https:// www.regulations.gov. You should not include information in your comment that you do not want to be made public. Input submitted online via www.regulations.gov is not immediately posted to the site. It may take several business days before your submission is posted. For further information concerning this notice, please contact the FRA Office of Railroad Development staff via email at PAXRAILDEV@dot.gov. If additional assistance is needed, you may contact Bryan Bertoli, Community Planner, at email bryan.bertoli@dot.gov or telephone: 405–406–5575; Eric Pihl, Transportation Industry Analyst, at email: eric.pihl@dot.gov or telephone: 303–594–3559; in FRA’s Office of Railroad Development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Aug 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 Background For purposes of this RFI, Railroad OA means the analytical process for identifying and testing means for achieving operational objectives based on assumptions regarding, and hypothetical variations to, the infrastructure, characteristics of train movements, and the conditions under which those train movements operate. Operational objectives for an OA may include, but are not limited to, the introduction of a new rail service; the expansion of an existing rail service (e.g., the operation of additional service frequencies or trains); changes in train characteristics (e.g., length, horsepower per ton, etc.); changes to stops made by trains en route (e.g., at stations, shipper facilities, or yards); and improvements to the operational performance of an existing service (e.g., through a reduction in travel times and/or improvements to operational reliability). FRA involvement in OA may include funding, overseeing, and participating in project planning and project development studies for the improvement of railroad service, particularly intercity passenger rail service, throughout the country, and funding the implementation of the railroad capital investments identified through those studies. OA, when conducted for projects in which FRA is involved, frequently involves the collaboration of different participants with varying roles, interests, and priorities. OA participants include FRA, Project Sponsors,1 owners and operators of railroad facilities, and consultants acting on behalf of these entities. There are also individuals and organizations that may have an interest in the OA results for federally-funded projects but do not directly participate in the development of OA. OA is an important means for assessing options for capital improvements to railroad facilities (e.g., main line track and signal improvements, station configuration, etc.), as well as potential changes to railroad operations. These alterations to railroad capital improvements and/or operations can represent a major portion of the overall cost of a railroad development project. These alterations may also contribute to a project’s 1 ‘‘Project Sponsor means the entity responsible for implementing a capital project that may also be an applicant seeking or a grantee receiving federal financial assistance.’’ FRA Guidance on Development and Implementation of Railroad Capital Projects (Jan. 11, 2023) at page 3, available at https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/fra-guidancedevelopment-and-implementation-railroad-capitalproject. PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 environmental impacts, which are initially considered during the project planning stage and continue to be assessed through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. For example, project planning elements specifically include environmental resource consideration and resilience planning.2 OA results paired with environmental resource consideration may inform which preliminary project alternatives are identified and then developed based on the project’s purpose and need. After the completion of the project planning stage, preliminary project alternatives are advanced into project development stage activities, which may include environmental review required under NEPA. Generally, the Project Sponsor, or a consultant acting on behalf of the Project Sponsor, will use tools, such as train performance calculators and railroad operations simulation software, to generate OA outputs. Software used for operations modeling requires the integration of existing and proposed conditions relevant to the analysis, referred to as input data. Input data includes train movement information and infrastructure information. Train movement information reflects physical and operational characteristics of trains that have a direct effect on their performance and includes but is not limited to: number of trains operating over the subject territory broken down by general train type; average operating characteristics of trains by train type (e.g., length, horsepower per ton, etc.); specific operating timetables for scheduled services (e.g., including passenger and employee timetables); significant time-specific requirements for unscheduled services; detailed historical movement information; and the recommended Compound Annual Growth Rate by train type. Infrastructure information is data that captures the physical characteristics of the geographic territory being analyzed and is necessary for OA. Engineering track charts are referenced as these typically include information such as signals, platforms, bridges, and grade crossings. Infrastructure information collected for OA includes documentation of other relevant transportation projects under development or in the process of implementation within the study area. Significantly, the infrastructure input data used for OA will directly determine how trains can operate over the subject territory. 2 See E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM id. at 6. 05AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2024 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Based on a specific set of train movement and infrastructure inputs for a given case, OA outputs can capture the way in which trains move over the subject territory and include trainspecific metrics that allow for evaluation of operational performance and reliability. OA output data includes but is not limited to: train performance calculator outputs; time-distance diagrams; tabular results of operational performance metrics with description of variables calibrated for the OA (e.g., locomotive performance); proposed infrastructure improvements under analyzed scenarios, including existing, no-action, and action scenarios; and native OA software files of both inputs and outputs. Access to the underlying information supporting an OA (i.e., input and output data) is essential for understanding the OA model itself and the results it produces. Moreover, access to OA data allows stakeholders, including FRA, to understand the nature of existing and proposed future railroad operations and to better assess the feasibility of Federally funded transportation investments and projects. Access to OA data also supports a more collaborative OA approach, allows stakeholders to have greater confidence in the OA model and output, and may reduce disputes related to OA data that can increase the time and costs for a railroad project. Information Requested FRA seeks to ensure that the creative and problem-solving process at the core of OA is as effective and collaborative as possible. As such, with the questions below, FRA is requesting public comment to gain a better understanding of the potential challenges involved in the development of OA and the review of OA results to assess what improvements can be made for Federally funded railroad projects. Respondents to this RFI are encouraged to consider the full range of railroad development efforts in which FRA may be involved or otherwise support, including, but not limited to intercity passenger rail development projects. FRA requests that responses include, as applicable, a reference to the numbered questions. Respondents are also encouraged to address in their responses any topics they believe to be relevant and are not limited to addressing the questions listed below. 1. What challenges and issues have you experienced with the development of OA? 2. What challenges and issues have you experienced with the review of OA results for Federally funded projects? VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Aug 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 3. What type of assistance from FRA would be beneficial for the development of OA? 4. Have you experienced any challenges or issues that limit access to OA data? Please explain. 5. How do you suggest FRA encourage data sharing for OA? 6. What roles and responsibilities should participants undertake to promote a collaborative OA? 7. What factors contribute to the success of a collaborative OA? 8. In the absence of access to all data inputs required for an OA, are there alternative methods or means to obtain sufficient information to conduct an OA or review OA results? 9. Please share any other additional feedback or comments on OA and/or data sharing. FRA will review responses to this RFI to better understand challenges involved in OA by responsive parties. FRA will determine how and whether FRA may address those challenges, and what further steps FRA should take with respect to OA. Privacy Act Statement FRA notes that anyone is able to search (at https://www.regulations.gov) the electronic form of all filings received into any of DOT’s dockets by the name of the individual submitting the filing (or signing the filing, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, or other organization). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement published in the Federal Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19476), or you may view the privacy notice of regulations.gov at https:// www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice. Issued in Washington, DC. Paul Nissenbaum, Associate Administrator, Office of Railroad Development. [FR Doc. 2024–17185 Filed 8–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–06–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA–2023–0038] Supplemental Initial Decision That Certain Frontal Driver and Passenger Air Bag Inflators Manufactured by ARC Automotive Inc. and Delphi Automotive Systems LLC, and Vehicles in Which Those Inflators Were Installed, Contain a Safety Defect National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63473 Notice of supplemental initial decision; request for public comments. ACTION: NHTSA is confirming its initial decision that certain frontal driver and passenger air bag inflators manufactured by ARC Automotive Inc. and Delphi Automotive Systems LLC, and vehicles in which those inflators were installed, contain a defect related to motor vehicle safety. NHTSA is issuing this supplemental initial decision to address in greater detail the basis for the agency’s initial decision and to ensure that all vehicles and manufacturers that would be impacted by any recall order are included within the scope of the initial decision. DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 4, 2024. ADDRESSES: You may submit written submissions to the docket number identified in the heading of this document by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. • Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number. Note that all written submissions received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act discussion below. We will consider all written submissions received before the close of business on September 4, 2024. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or written submissions received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov at any time or to 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Telephone 202–366–9826. Privacy Act: In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 30118(b)(1), NHTSA will make a final decision only after providing an opportunity for manufacturers and any interested person to present information, views, and arguments. DOT posts written submissions submitted by manufacturers and SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 150 (Monday, August 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63471-63473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2024-0083]


Request for Information on Collaboration and Data Sharing for 
Railroad Operations Analysis

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Request for information (RFI).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 15, 2021, President Biden signed into law the 
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the Bipartisan 
Infrastructure Law (BIL). The BIL provides historic appropriations for 
railroad transportation grant programs administered by the Federal 
Railroad Administration (FRA) and authorizes new programs to enhance 
rail safety and to repair, restore, improve, and expand the nation's 
rail network. Among those new programs is the Corridor

[[Page 63472]]

Identification and Development Program (CID Program), which creates a 
new framework to facilitate the development of new, enhanced, and 
restored intercity passenger rail corridors throughout the country. 
Railroad Operations Analysis (OA) uses data to assess changes to 
railroad operations and/or capital project improvements to railroad 
infrastructure and is frequently part of the planning process for rail 
projects. OA involves the collaboration of various rail stakeholders 
and the sharing of data and information. As a result of the CID 
Program, there is an increased need for FRA and rail stakeholders to 
participate in OA and evaluate OA results. FRA finds value in 
conducting OA in a collaborative manner to promote increased confidence 
in the OA among stakeholders and support Federal FRA investments in 
infrastructure projects. In this RFI, FRA seeks public comments on the 
challenges involved in OA, how FRA may address those challenges, and 
how FRA may improve OA for Federally funded railroad projects.

DATES: Written comments on this RFI must be received on or before 
September 19, 2024. FRA may consider comments filed after this date to 
the extent practicable.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to docket number FRA-2024-0083 and be 
submitted by at https://www.regulations.gov. Search by using the docket 
number and follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and 
docket number for this RFI.

    Note:  All comments received, including any personal 
information, will be posted without change to the docket and will be 
accessible to the public at https://www.regulations.gov. You should 
not include information in your comment that you do not want to be 
made public. Input submitted online via www.regulations.gov is not 
immediately posted to the site. It may take several business days 
before your submission is posted.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For further information concerning 
this notice, please contact the FRA Office of Railroad Development 
staff via email at [email protected]. If additional assistance is 
needed, you may contact Bryan Bertoli, Community Planner, at email 
[email protected] or telephone: 405-406-5575; Eric Pihl, 
Transportation Industry Analyst, at email: [email protected] or 
telephone: 303-594-3559; in FRA's Office of Railroad Development.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    For purposes of this RFI, Railroad OA means the analytical process 
for identifying and testing means for achieving operational objectives 
based on assumptions regarding, and hypothetical variations to, the 
infrastructure, characteristics of train movements, and the conditions 
under which those train movements operate. Operational objectives for 
an OA may include, but are not limited to, the introduction of a new 
rail service; the expansion of an existing rail service (e.g., the 
operation of additional service frequencies or trains); changes in 
train characteristics (e.g., length, horsepower per ton, etc.); changes 
to stops made by trains en route (e.g., at stations, shipper 
facilities, or yards); and improvements to the operational performance 
of an existing service (e.g., through a reduction in travel times and/
or improvements to operational reliability).
    FRA involvement in OA may include funding, overseeing, and 
participating in project planning and project development studies for 
the improvement of railroad service, particularly intercity passenger 
rail service, throughout the country, and funding the implementation of 
the railroad capital investments identified through those studies.
    OA, when conducted for projects in which FRA is involved, 
frequently involves the collaboration of different participants with 
varying roles, interests, and priorities.
    OA participants include FRA, Project Sponsors,\1\ owners and 
operators of railroad facilities, and consultants acting on behalf of 
these entities. There are also individuals and organizations that may 
have an interest in the OA results for federally-funded projects but do 
not directly participate in the development of OA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ``Project Sponsor means the entity responsible for 
implementing a capital project that may also be an applicant seeking 
or a grantee receiving federal financial assistance.'' FRA Guidance 
on Development and Implementation of Railroad Capital Projects (Jan. 
11, 2023) at page 3, available at https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/fra-guidance-development-and-implementation-railroad-capital-project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OA is an important means for assessing options for capital 
improvements to railroad facilities (e.g., main line track and signal 
improvements, station configuration, etc.), as well as potential 
changes to railroad operations. These alterations to railroad capital 
improvements and/or operations can represent a major portion of the 
overall cost of a railroad development project. These alterations may 
also contribute to a project's environmental impacts, which are 
initially considered during the project planning stage and continue to 
be assessed through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
process. For example, project planning elements specifically include 
environmental resource consideration and resilience planning.\2\ OA 
results paired with environmental resource consideration may inform 
which preliminary project alternatives are identified and then 
developed based on the project's purpose and need. After the completion 
of the project planning stage, preliminary project alternatives are 
advanced into project development stage activities, which may include 
environmental review required under NEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See id. at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Generally, the Project Sponsor, or a consultant acting on behalf of 
the Project Sponsor, will use tools, such as train performance 
calculators and railroad operations simulation software, to generate OA 
outputs. Software used for operations modeling requires the integration 
of existing and proposed conditions relevant to the analysis, referred 
to as input data. Input data includes train movement information and 
infrastructure information. Train movement information reflects 
physical and operational characteristics of trains that have a direct 
effect on their performance and includes but is not limited to: number 
of trains operating over the subject territory broken down by general 
train type; average operating characteristics of trains by train type 
(e.g., length, horsepower per ton, etc.); specific operating timetables 
for scheduled services (e.g., including passenger and employee 
timetables); significant time-specific requirements for unscheduled 
services; detailed historical movement information; and the recommended 
Compound Annual Growth Rate by train type.
    Infrastructure information is data that captures the physical 
characteristics of the geographic territory being analyzed and is 
necessary for OA. Engineering track charts are referenced as these 
typically include information such as signals, platforms, bridges, and 
grade crossings. Infrastructure information collected for OA includes 
documentation of other relevant transportation projects under 
development or in the process of implementation within the study area. 
Significantly, the infrastructure input data used for OA will directly 
determine how trains can operate over the subject territory.

[[Page 63473]]

    Based on a specific set of train movement and infrastructure inputs 
for a given case, OA outputs can capture the way in which trains move 
over the subject territory and include train-specific metrics that 
allow for evaluation of operational performance and reliability. OA 
output data includes but is not limited to: train performance 
calculator outputs; time-distance diagrams; tabular results of 
operational performance metrics with description of variables 
calibrated for the OA (e.g., locomotive performance); proposed 
infrastructure improvements under analyzed scenarios, including 
existing, no-action, and action scenarios; and native OA software files 
of both inputs and outputs.
    Access to the underlying information supporting an OA (i.e., input 
and output data) is essential for understanding the OA model itself and 
the results it produces. Moreover, access to OA data allows 
stakeholders, including FRA, to understand the nature of existing and 
proposed future railroad operations and to better assess the 
feasibility of Federally funded transportation investments and 
projects. Access to OA data also supports a more collaborative OA 
approach, allows stakeholders to have greater confidence in the OA 
model and output, and may reduce disputes related to OA data that can 
increase the time and costs for a railroad project.

Information Requested

    FRA seeks to ensure that the creative and problem-solving process 
at the core of OA is as effective and collaborative as possible. As 
such, with the questions below, FRA is requesting public comment to 
gain a better understanding of the potential challenges involved in the 
development of OA and the review of OA results to assess what 
improvements can be made for Federally funded railroad projects. 
Respondents to this RFI are encouraged to consider the full range of 
railroad development efforts in which FRA may be involved or otherwise 
support, including, but not limited to intercity passenger rail 
development projects. FRA requests that responses include, as 
applicable, a reference to the numbered questions. Respondents are also 
encouraged to address in their responses any topics they believe to be 
relevant and are not limited to addressing the questions listed below.
    1. What challenges and issues have you experienced with the 
development of OA?
    2. What challenges and issues have you experienced with the review 
of OA results for Federally funded projects?
    3. What type of assistance from FRA would be beneficial for the 
development of OA?
    4. Have you experienced any challenges or issues that limit access 
to OA data? Please explain.
    5. How do you suggest FRA encourage data sharing for OA?
    6. What roles and responsibilities should participants undertake to 
promote a collaborative OA?
    7. What factors contribute to the success of a collaborative OA?
    8. In the absence of access to all data inputs required for an OA, 
are there alternative methods or means to obtain sufficient information 
to conduct an OA or review OA results?
    9. Please share any other additional feedback or comments on OA 
and/or data sharing.
    FRA will review responses to this RFI to better understand 
challenges involved in OA by responsive parties. FRA will determine how 
and whether FRA may address those challenges, and what further steps 
FRA should take with respect to OA.

Privacy Act Statement

    FRA notes that anyone is able to search (at https://www.regulations.gov) the electronic form of all filings received into 
any of DOT's dockets by the name of the individual submitting the 
filing (or signing the filing, if submitted on behalf of an 
association, business, labor union, or other organization). You may 
review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement published in the Federal 
Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19476), or you may view the privacy 
notice of regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Paul Nissenbaum,
Associate Administrator, Office of Railroad Development.
[FR Doc. 2024-17185 Filed 8-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.