Request for Information on Collaboration and Data Sharing for Railroad Operations Analysis, 63471-63473 [2024-17185]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2024 / Notices
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
5,672.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
1,049 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Burden Hour
Dollar Cost Equivalent: $92,419.
FRA informs all interested parties that
it may not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, a collection of information that does
not display a currently valid OMB
control number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Christopher S. Van Nostrand,
Deputy Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024–17186 Filed 8–2–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2015–0062]
Florida East Coast Railway’s Request
To Amend Its Positive Train Control
Safety Plan and Positive Train Control
System
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
This document provides the
public with notice that, on June 4, 2024,
and July 22, 2024, Florida East Coast
Railway (FECR) submitted a request for
amendment (RFA) to its FRA-approved
Positive Train Control Safety Plan
(PTCSP). As this RFA involves a request
for FRA’s approval of proposed material
modifications to an FRA-certified
positive train control (PTC) system, FRA
is publishing this notice and inviting
public comment on the railroad’s RFA
to its PTCSP.
DATES: FRA will consider comments
received by August 26, 2024. FRA may
consider comments received after that
date to the extent practicable and
without delaying implementation of
valuable or necessary modifications to a
PTC system.
ADDRESSES:
Comments: Comments may be
submitted by going to https://
www.regulations.gov and following the
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
6 The dollar equivalent cost is derived from the
2023 Surface Transportation Board Full Year Wage
A&B data series using the employee group 200
(Professional & Administrative) hourly wage rate of
$50.93 and group 400 (Maintenance of Equipment
& Stores) hourly wage rate of $39.77. The total
burden wage rate (Straight time plus 75%) used in
the table is $89.13 ($50.93 × 1.75 = $89.13), and
$69.60 ($39.77 × 1.75 = $69.60).
7 Totals may not add up due to rounding.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Aug 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and the
applicable docket number. The relevant
PTC docket number for this host
railroad is Docket No. FRA–2015–0062.
For convenience, all active PTC dockets
are hyperlinked on FRA’s website at
https://railroads.dot.gov/researchdevelopment/program-areas/traincontrol/ptc/railroads-ptc-dockets. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov; this includes any
personal information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gabe Neal, Staff Director, Signal, Train
Control, and Crossings Division,
telephone: 816–516–7168, email:
Gabe.Neal@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In general,
title 49 United States Code (U.S.C.)
section 20157(h) requires FRA to certify
that a host railroad’s PTC system
complies with title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 236, subpart I,
before the technology may be operated
in revenue service. Before making
certain changes to an FRA-certified PTC
system or the associated FRA-approved
PTCSP, a host railroad must submit, and
obtain FRA’s approval of, an RFA to its
PTCSP under 49 CFR 236.1021.
Under 49 CFR 236.1021(e), FRA’s
regulations provide that FRA will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
and invite public comment in
accordance with 49 CFR part 211, if an
RFA includes a request for approval of
a material modification of a signal or
train control system. Accordingly, this
notice informs the public that, on June
4, 2024, FECR submitted an RFA to its
PTCSP for its Interoperable Electronic
Train Management System (I–ETMS),
which seeks FRA’s approval of FECR’s
request to implement I–ETMS Protect
7.0.3.0 which allows for the details of
the fixed high-speed consist to be
modifiable in the onboard computer
configuration files. This change
supports Brightline Trains Florida’s
plan to add passenger cars in order to
operate high speed trains with a consist
of 2 locomotives with more than 4
passenger cars. On July 22, 2024, FECR
submitted the pertinent software release
notes, which are a required element of
an RFA to a PTCSP under 49 CFR
236.1021(m). FECR’s completed RFA is
available in Docket No. FRA–2015–
0062.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on FECR’s RFA to its PTCSP
by submitting written comments or data.
During FRA’s review of this railroad’s
RFA, FRA will consider any comments
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63471
or data submitted within the timeline
specified in this notice and to the extent
practicable, without delaying
implementation of valuable or necessary
modifications to a PTC system. See 49
CFR 236.1021; see also 49 CFR
236.1011(e). Under 49 CFR 236.1021,
FRA maintains the authority to approve,
approve with conditions, or deny a
railroad’s RFA to its PTCSP at FRA’s
sole discretion.
Privacy Act Notice
In accordance with 49 CFR 211.3,
FRA solicits comments from the public
to better inform its decisions. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the
commenter provides, to https://
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
See https://www.regulations.gov/
privacy-notice for the privacy notice of
regulations.gov. To facilitate comment
tracking, we encourage commenters to
provide their name, or the name of their
organization; however, submission of
names is completely optional. If you
wish to provide comments containing
proprietary or confidential information,
please contact FRA for alternate
submission instructions.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Carolyn R. Hayward-Williams,
Director, Office of Railroad Systems and
Technology.
[FR Doc. 2024–17136 Filed 8–2–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2024–0083]
Request for Information on
Collaboration and Data Sharing for
Railroad Operations Analysis
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
AGENCY:
On November 15, 2021,
President Biden signed into law the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,
also known as the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law (BIL). The BIL
provides historic appropriations for
railroad transportation grant programs
administered by the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) and authorizes
new programs to enhance rail safety and
to repair, restore, improve, and expand
the nation’s rail network. Among those
new programs is the Corridor
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
63472
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2024 / Notices
Identification and Development
Program (CID Program), which creates a
new framework to facilitate the
development of new, enhanced, and
restored intercity passenger rail
corridors throughout the country.
Railroad Operations Analysis (OA) uses
data to assess changes to railroad
operations and/or capital project
improvements to railroad infrastructure
and is frequently part of the planning
process for rail projects. OA involves
the collaboration of various rail
stakeholders and the sharing of data and
information. As a result of the CID
Program, there is an increased need for
FRA and rail stakeholders to participate
in OA and evaluate OA results. FRA
finds value in conducting OA in a
collaborative manner to promote
increased confidence in the OA among
stakeholders and support Federal FRA
investments in infrastructure projects.
In this RFI, FRA seeks public comments
on the challenges involved in OA, how
FRA may address those challenges, and
how FRA may improve OA for Federally
funded railroad projects.
DATES: Written comments on this RFI
must be received on or before
September 19, 2024. FRA may consider
comments filed after this date to the
extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
docket number FRA–2024–0083 and be
submitted by at https://
www.regulations.gov. Search by using
the docket number and follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this RFI.
Note: All comments received, including
any personal information, will be posted
without change to the docket and will be
accessible to the public at https://
www.regulations.gov. You should not include
information in your comment that you do not
want to be made public. Input submitted
online via www.regulations.gov is not
immediately posted to the site. It may take
several business days before your submission
is posted.
For
further information concerning this
notice, please contact the FRA Office of
Railroad Development staff via email at
PAXRAILDEV@dot.gov. If additional
assistance is needed, you may contact
Bryan Bertoli, Community Planner, at
email bryan.bertoli@dot.gov or
telephone: 405–406–5575; Eric Pihl,
Transportation Industry Analyst, at
email: eric.pihl@dot.gov or telephone:
303–594–3559; in FRA’s Office of
Railroad Development.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Aug 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
Background
For purposes of this RFI, Railroad OA
means the analytical process for
identifying and testing means for
achieving operational objectives based
on assumptions regarding, and
hypothetical variations to, the
infrastructure, characteristics of train
movements, and the conditions under
which those train movements operate.
Operational objectives for an OA may
include, but are not limited to, the
introduction of a new rail service; the
expansion of an existing rail service
(e.g., the operation of additional service
frequencies or trains); changes in train
characteristics (e.g., length, horsepower
per ton, etc.); changes to stops made by
trains en route (e.g., at stations, shipper
facilities, or yards); and improvements
to the operational performance of an
existing service (e.g., through a
reduction in travel times and/or
improvements to operational reliability).
FRA involvement in OA may include
funding, overseeing, and participating
in project planning and project
development studies for the
improvement of railroad service,
particularly intercity passenger rail
service, throughout the country, and
funding the implementation of the
railroad capital investments identified
through those studies.
OA, when conducted for projects in
which FRA is involved, frequently
involves the collaboration of different
participants with varying roles,
interests, and priorities.
OA participants include FRA, Project
Sponsors,1 owners and operators of
railroad facilities, and consultants
acting on behalf of these entities. There
are also individuals and organizations
that may have an interest in the OA
results for federally-funded projects but
do not directly participate in the
development of OA.
OA is an important means for
assessing options for capital
improvements to railroad facilities (e.g.,
main line track and signal
improvements, station configuration,
etc.), as well as potential changes to
railroad operations. These alterations to
railroad capital improvements and/or
operations can represent a major portion
of the overall cost of a railroad
development project. These alterations
may also contribute to a project’s
1 ‘‘Project Sponsor means the entity responsible
for implementing a capital project that may also be
an applicant seeking or a grantee receiving federal
financial assistance.’’ FRA Guidance on
Development and Implementation of Railroad
Capital Projects (Jan. 11, 2023) at page 3, available
at https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/fra-guidancedevelopment-and-implementation-railroad-capitalproject.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental impacts, which are
initially considered during the project
planning stage and continue to be
assessed through the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
process. For example, project planning
elements specifically include
environmental resource consideration
and resilience planning.2 OA results
paired with environmental resource
consideration may inform which
preliminary project alternatives are
identified and then developed based on
the project’s purpose and need. After
the completion of the project planning
stage, preliminary project alternatives
are advanced into project development
stage activities, which may include
environmental review required under
NEPA.
Generally, the Project Sponsor, or a
consultant acting on behalf of the
Project Sponsor, will use tools, such as
train performance calculators and
railroad operations simulation software,
to generate OA outputs. Software used
for operations modeling requires the
integration of existing and proposed
conditions relevant to the analysis,
referred to as input data. Input data
includes train movement information
and infrastructure information. Train
movement information reflects physical
and operational characteristics of trains
that have a direct effect on their
performance and includes but is not
limited to: number of trains operating
over the subject territory broken down
by general train type; average operating
characteristics of trains by train type
(e.g., length, horsepower per ton, etc.);
specific operating timetables for
scheduled services (e.g., including
passenger and employee timetables);
significant time-specific requirements
for unscheduled services; detailed
historical movement information; and
the recommended Compound Annual
Growth Rate by train type.
Infrastructure information is data that
captures the physical characteristics of
the geographic territory being analyzed
and is necessary for OA. Engineering
track charts are referenced as these
typically include information such as
signals, platforms, bridges, and grade
crossings. Infrastructure information
collected for OA includes
documentation of other relevant
transportation projects under
development or in the process of
implementation within the study area.
Significantly, the infrastructure input
data used for OA will directly determine
how trains can operate over the subject
territory.
2 See
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
id. at 6.
05AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Based on a specific set of train
movement and infrastructure inputs for
a given case, OA outputs can capture
the way in which trains move over the
subject territory and include trainspecific metrics that allow for
evaluation of operational performance
and reliability. OA output data includes
but is not limited to: train performance
calculator outputs; time-distance
diagrams; tabular results of operational
performance metrics with description of
variables calibrated for the OA (e.g.,
locomotive performance); proposed
infrastructure improvements under
analyzed scenarios, including existing,
no-action, and action scenarios; and
native OA software files of both inputs
and outputs.
Access to the underlying information
supporting an OA (i.e., input and output
data) is essential for understanding the
OA model itself and the results it
produces. Moreover, access to OA data
allows stakeholders, including FRA, to
understand the nature of existing and
proposed future railroad operations and
to better assess the feasibility of
Federally funded transportation
investments and projects. Access to OA
data also supports a more collaborative
OA approach, allows stakeholders to
have greater confidence in the OA
model and output, and may reduce
disputes related to OA data that can
increase the time and costs for a railroad
project.
Information Requested
FRA seeks to ensure that the creative
and problem-solving process at the core
of OA is as effective and collaborative
as possible. As such, with the questions
below, FRA is requesting public
comment to gain a better understanding
of the potential challenges involved in
the development of OA and the review
of OA results to assess what
improvements can be made for
Federally funded railroad projects.
Respondents to this RFI are encouraged
to consider the full range of railroad
development efforts in which FRA may
be involved or otherwise support,
including, but not limited to intercity
passenger rail development projects.
FRA requests that responses include, as
applicable, a reference to the numbered
questions. Respondents are also
encouraged to address in their responses
any topics they believe to be relevant
and are not limited to addressing the
questions listed below.
1. What challenges and issues have
you experienced with the development
of OA?
2. What challenges and issues have
you experienced with the review of OA
results for Federally funded projects?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Aug 02, 2024
Jkt 262001
3. What type of assistance from FRA
would be beneficial for the development
of OA?
4. Have you experienced any
challenges or issues that limit access to
OA data? Please explain.
5. How do you suggest FRA encourage
data sharing for OA?
6. What roles and responsibilities
should participants undertake to
promote a collaborative OA?
7. What factors contribute to the
success of a collaborative OA?
8. In the absence of access to all data
inputs required for an OA, are there
alternative methods or means to obtain
sufficient information to conduct an OA
or review OA results?
9. Please share any other additional
feedback or comments on OA and/or
data sharing.
FRA will review responses to this RFI
to better understand challenges
involved in OA by responsive parties.
FRA will determine how and whether
FRA may address those challenges, and
what further steps FRA should take with
respect to OA.
Privacy Act Statement
FRA notes that anyone is able to
search (at https://www.regulations.gov)
the electronic form of all filings received
into any of DOT’s dockets by the name
of the individual submitting the filing
(or signing the filing, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, or other organization). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19476), or you may view the privacy
notice of regulations.gov at https://
www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Paul Nissenbaum,
Associate Administrator, Office of Railroad
Development.
[FR Doc. 2024–17185 Filed 8–2–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2023–0038]
Supplemental Initial Decision That
Certain Frontal Driver and Passenger
Air Bag Inflators Manufactured by ARC
Automotive Inc. and Delphi Automotive
Systems LLC, and Vehicles in Which
Those Inflators Were Installed, Contain
a Safety Defect
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63473
Notice of supplemental initial
decision; request for public comments.
ACTION:
NHTSA is confirming its
initial decision that certain frontal
driver and passenger air bag inflators
manufactured by ARC Automotive Inc.
and Delphi Automotive Systems LLC,
and vehicles in which those inflators
were installed, contain a defect related
to motor vehicle safety. NHTSA is
issuing this supplemental initial
decision to address in greater detail the
basis for the agency’s initial decision
and to ensure that all vehicles and
manufacturers that would be impacted
by any recall order are included within
the scope of the initial decision.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 4, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
submissions to the docket number
identified in the heading of this
document by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number. Note that all written
submissions received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act discussion below.
We will consider all written
submissions received before the close of
business on September 4, 2024.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or written
submissions received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or to
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. Telephone
202–366–9826.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 49
U.S.C. 30118(b)(1), NHTSA will make a
final decision only after providing an
opportunity for manufacturers and any
interested person to present
information, views, and arguments.
DOT posts written submissions
submitted by manufacturers and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 150 (Monday, August 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63471-63473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17185]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA-2024-0083]
Request for Information on Collaboration and Data Sharing for
Railroad Operations Analysis
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On November 15, 2021, President Biden signed into law the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law (BIL). The BIL provides historic appropriations for
railroad transportation grant programs administered by the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) and authorizes new programs to enhance
rail safety and to repair, restore, improve, and expand the nation's
rail network. Among those new programs is the Corridor
[[Page 63472]]
Identification and Development Program (CID Program), which creates a
new framework to facilitate the development of new, enhanced, and
restored intercity passenger rail corridors throughout the country.
Railroad Operations Analysis (OA) uses data to assess changes to
railroad operations and/or capital project improvements to railroad
infrastructure and is frequently part of the planning process for rail
projects. OA involves the collaboration of various rail stakeholders
and the sharing of data and information. As a result of the CID
Program, there is an increased need for FRA and rail stakeholders to
participate in OA and evaluate OA results. FRA finds value in
conducting OA in a collaborative manner to promote increased confidence
in the OA among stakeholders and support Federal FRA investments in
infrastructure projects. In this RFI, FRA seeks public comments on the
challenges involved in OA, how FRA may address those challenges, and
how FRA may improve OA for Federally funded railroad projects.
DATES: Written comments on this RFI must be received on or before
September 19, 2024. FRA may consider comments filed after this date to
the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to docket number FRA-2024-0083 and be
submitted by at https://www.regulations.gov. Search by using the docket
number and follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this RFI.
Note: All comments received, including any personal
information, will be posted without change to the docket and will be
accessible to the public at https://www.regulations.gov. You should
not include information in your comment that you do not want to be
made public. Input submitted online via www.regulations.gov is not
immediately posted to the site. It may take several business days
before your submission is posted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning
this notice, please contact the FRA Office of Railroad Development
staff via email at [email protected]. If additional assistance is
needed, you may contact Bryan Bertoli, Community Planner, at email
[email protected] or telephone: 405-406-5575; Eric Pihl,
Transportation Industry Analyst, at email: [email protected] or
telephone: 303-594-3559; in FRA's Office of Railroad Development.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
For purposes of this RFI, Railroad OA means the analytical process
for identifying and testing means for achieving operational objectives
based on assumptions regarding, and hypothetical variations to, the
infrastructure, characteristics of train movements, and the conditions
under which those train movements operate. Operational objectives for
an OA may include, but are not limited to, the introduction of a new
rail service; the expansion of an existing rail service (e.g., the
operation of additional service frequencies or trains); changes in
train characteristics (e.g., length, horsepower per ton, etc.); changes
to stops made by trains en route (e.g., at stations, shipper
facilities, or yards); and improvements to the operational performance
of an existing service (e.g., through a reduction in travel times and/
or improvements to operational reliability).
FRA involvement in OA may include funding, overseeing, and
participating in project planning and project development studies for
the improvement of railroad service, particularly intercity passenger
rail service, throughout the country, and funding the implementation of
the railroad capital investments identified through those studies.
OA, when conducted for projects in which FRA is involved,
frequently involves the collaboration of different participants with
varying roles, interests, and priorities.
OA participants include FRA, Project Sponsors,\1\ owners and
operators of railroad facilities, and consultants acting on behalf of
these entities. There are also individuals and organizations that may
have an interest in the OA results for federally-funded projects but do
not directly participate in the development of OA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Project Sponsor means the entity responsible for
implementing a capital project that may also be an applicant seeking
or a grantee receiving federal financial assistance.'' FRA Guidance
on Development and Implementation of Railroad Capital Projects (Jan.
11, 2023) at page 3, available at https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/fra-guidance-development-and-implementation-railroad-capital-project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OA is an important means for assessing options for capital
improvements to railroad facilities (e.g., main line track and signal
improvements, station configuration, etc.), as well as potential
changes to railroad operations. These alterations to railroad capital
improvements and/or operations can represent a major portion of the
overall cost of a railroad development project. These alterations may
also contribute to a project's environmental impacts, which are
initially considered during the project planning stage and continue to
be assessed through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
process. For example, project planning elements specifically include
environmental resource consideration and resilience planning.\2\ OA
results paired with environmental resource consideration may inform
which preliminary project alternatives are identified and then
developed based on the project's purpose and need. After the completion
of the project planning stage, preliminary project alternatives are
advanced into project development stage activities, which may include
environmental review required under NEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See id. at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generally, the Project Sponsor, or a consultant acting on behalf of
the Project Sponsor, will use tools, such as train performance
calculators and railroad operations simulation software, to generate OA
outputs. Software used for operations modeling requires the integration
of existing and proposed conditions relevant to the analysis, referred
to as input data. Input data includes train movement information and
infrastructure information. Train movement information reflects
physical and operational characteristics of trains that have a direct
effect on their performance and includes but is not limited to: number
of trains operating over the subject territory broken down by general
train type; average operating characteristics of trains by train type
(e.g., length, horsepower per ton, etc.); specific operating timetables
for scheduled services (e.g., including passenger and employee
timetables); significant time-specific requirements for unscheduled
services; detailed historical movement information; and the recommended
Compound Annual Growth Rate by train type.
Infrastructure information is data that captures the physical
characteristics of the geographic territory being analyzed and is
necessary for OA. Engineering track charts are referenced as these
typically include information such as signals, platforms, bridges, and
grade crossings. Infrastructure information collected for OA includes
documentation of other relevant transportation projects under
development or in the process of implementation within the study area.
Significantly, the infrastructure input data used for OA will directly
determine how trains can operate over the subject territory.
[[Page 63473]]
Based on a specific set of train movement and infrastructure inputs
for a given case, OA outputs can capture the way in which trains move
over the subject territory and include train-specific metrics that
allow for evaluation of operational performance and reliability. OA
output data includes but is not limited to: train performance
calculator outputs; time-distance diagrams; tabular results of
operational performance metrics with description of variables
calibrated for the OA (e.g., locomotive performance); proposed
infrastructure improvements under analyzed scenarios, including
existing, no-action, and action scenarios; and native OA software files
of both inputs and outputs.
Access to the underlying information supporting an OA (i.e., input
and output data) is essential for understanding the OA model itself and
the results it produces. Moreover, access to OA data allows
stakeholders, including FRA, to understand the nature of existing and
proposed future railroad operations and to better assess the
feasibility of Federally funded transportation investments and
projects. Access to OA data also supports a more collaborative OA
approach, allows stakeholders to have greater confidence in the OA
model and output, and may reduce disputes related to OA data that can
increase the time and costs for a railroad project.
Information Requested
FRA seeks to ensure that the creative and problem-solving process
at the core of OA is as effective and collaborative as possible. As
such, with the questions below, FRA is requesting public comment to
gain a better understanding of the potential challenges involved in the
development of OA and the review of OA results to assess what
improvements can be made for Federally funded railroad projects.
Respondents to this RFI are encouraged to consider the full range of
railroad development efforts in which FRA may be involved or otherwise
support, including, but not limited to intercity passenger rail
development projects. FRA requests that responses include, as
applicable, a reference to the numbered questions. Respondents are also
encouraged to address in their responses any topics they believe to be
relevant and are not limited to addressing the questions listed below.
1. What challenges and issues have you experienced with the
development of OA?
2. What challenges and issues have you experienced with the review
of OA results for Federally funded projects?
3. What type of assistance from FRA would be beneficial for the
development of OA?
4. Have you experienced any challenges or issues that limit access
to OA data? Please explain.
5. How do you suggest FRA encourage data sharing for OA?
6. What roles and responsibilities should participants undertake to
promote a collaborative OA?
7. What factors contribute to the success of a collaborative OA?
8. In the absence of access to all data inputs required for an OA,
are there alternative methods or means to obtain sufficient information
to conduct an OA or review OA results?
9. Please share any other additional feedback or comments on OA
and/or data sharing.
FRA will review responses to this RFI to better understand
challenges involved in OA by responsive parties. FRA will determine how
and whether FRA may address those challenges, and what further steps
FRA should take with respect to OA.
Privacy Act Statement
FRA notes that anyone is able to search (at https://www.regulations.gov) the electronic form of all filings received into
any of DOT's dockets by the name of the individual submitting the
filing (or signing the filing, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, or other organization). You may
review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19476), or you may view the privacy
notice of regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/privacy-notice.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Paul Nissenbaum,
Associate Administrator, Office of Railroad Development.
[FR Doc. 2024-17185 Filed 8-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P