Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of N-Desethyl Isotonitazene and N-Piperidinyl Etonitazene in Schedule I, 60817-60823 [2024-16391]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
in which it is approved. Once approved,
a TEM IPA is effective until December
31 of the first year in which it is
effective or until December 31 of the
year in which the TEM IPA
representative notifies NMFS in writing
that the TEM IPA is no longer in effect,
whichever is later. A TEM IPA may not
expire mid-year. No party may leave a
TEM IPA once it is approved, except as
allowed under paragraph (d)(3) of this
section.
(d) NMFS review of a proposed TEM
IPA.—(1) Approval. A TEM IPA will be
approved by NMFS if the TEM IPA
meets the following requirements:
(i) Complies with the submission
requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of
this section; and
(ii) Contains the information required
in paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Amendments to a TEM IPA.
Amendments in writing to an approved
TEM IPA may be submitted to NMFS at
any time and will be reviewed under the
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section. An amendment to an approved
TEM IPA is effective when NMFS
notifies the TEM IPA representative in
writing of NMFS approval.
(3) Disapproval. (i) NMFS will
disapprove a proposed TEM IPA or a
proposed amendment to a TEM IPA:
(A) If the proposed TEM IPA fails to
meet any of the requirements of
paragraph (b) of this section; or
(B) If a proposed amendment to a
TEM IPA would cause the TEM IPA to
no longer comply with the requirements
of paragraph (b) of this section.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) Initial Administrative
Determination (IAD). If NMFS identifies
deficiencies in the proposed TEM IPA,
NMFS will notify the applicant in
writing that the proposed TEM IPA will
not be approved. The TEM IPA
representative will be provided one 30day period to address, in writing, all
deficiencies identified by NMFS.
Additional information or a revised
TEM IPA received by NMFS after the
expiration of the 30-day period
specified by NMFS will not be
considered. NMFS will evaluate any
additional information submitted by the
TEM IPA representative within the 30day period. If the Regional
Administrator determines that the
additional information addresses the
deficiencies in the proposed TEM IPA,
the Regional Administrator will approve
the proposed TEM IPA under paragraph
(d) of this section. However, if NMFS
determines that the proposed TEM IPA
does not comply with the requirements
of paragraph (b) of this section, NMFS
will issue an IAD providing the reasons
for disapproving the proposed TEM IPA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jul 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
(5) Appeal. A TEM IPA representative
who receives an IAD disapproving a
proposed TEM IPA may appeal under
the procedures set forth at 15 CFR part
906. If the TEM IPA representative fails
to timely file an appeal of the IAD
pursuant to 15 CFR part 906, the IAD
will become the final agency action. If
the IAD is appealed and the final agency
action approves the proposed TEM IPA,
the TEM IPA will be effective as
described in paragraph (c) of this
section.
(6) Pending approval. While appeal of
an IAD disapproving a proposed TEM
IPA is pending, proposed parties to the
TEM IPA subject to the IAD, which are
not currently parties to an approved
TEM IPA, are not authorized to
participate in trawl EM category.
(e) Public release of a TEM IPA and
performance metrics. Each fishing year
NMFS will release to the public and
publish on the NMFS Alaska Region
website:
(1) Approvals. Approved TEM IPAs
and Approval Memos;
(2) Parties. List of parties to each
approved TEM IPA; and
(3) Names. Names of vessels covered
by each approved TEM IPA that:
(i) On average, harvesting pollock
catch in excess of 300,000 pounds (136
mt) per fishing trip in the GOA;
(ii) Harvest bycatch in quantities that
exceed MRAs; and
(iii) Vessels’ performance under the
TEM IPA and any restrictions, penalties,
or performance criteria imposed under
the TEM IPA by vessel name.
(f) TEM IPA Annual Report. The
representative of each approved TEM
IPA must submit a written annual report
to the Council at the address specified
in § 679.61(f). The Council will make
the annual report available to the
public.
(1) Submission deadline. The TEM
IPA Annual Report must be received by
the Council no later than May 15 of the
following fishing year.
(2) Information requirements. The
TEM IPA Annual Report must contain
the following information:
(i) A comprehensive description of
the incentive measures in effect in the
previous year;
(ii) A description of how these
incentive measures affected individual
vessels;
(iii) An evaluation of whether
incentive measures were effective in
limiting changes in vessel behavior
including the effectiveness of:
(A) Measures to discourage
participating vessels, on average, from
harvesting pollock catch in excess of
300,000 pounds (136 mt) per fishing trip
in the GOA;
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60817
(B) Measures that incentivize
participating vessels to avoid exceeding
MRAs established in § 679.20(e)
applicable to non-EM vessels;
(C) Restrictions, penalties, or
performance criteria that were imposed
to prevent vessels from consistently
exceeding catcher vessel harvest limit
for pollock in the GOA or MRAs relative
to non-EM vessels by vessel name (see
§§ 679.7(b)(2) and 679.20(e));
(D) The frequency of vessels
exceeding the catcher vessel harvest
limit for pollock in the GOA and MRA
limits relative to non-EM vessels (see
§§ 679.7(b)(2) and 679.20(e)); and
(E) Identification of, and the TEM
IPA’s response to, vessels directed
fishing in conflict with harvest
specifications or directed fishing for
Steller Sea Lion forage species within
closed Steller Sea Lion protection areas.
(iv) A description of any amendments
to the TEM IPA that were approved by
NMFS since the last annual report and
the reasons that the amendments to the
TEM IPA were requested.
[FR Doc. 2024–15931 Filed 7–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–1143]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of N-Desethyl
Isotonitazene and N-Piperidinyl
Etonitazene in Schedule I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Temporary amendment;
temporary scheduling order.
AGENCY:
The Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration is issuing
this temporary order to schedule two
synthetic benzimidazole-opioid
substances, as identified in this order, in
schedule I of the Controlled Substances
Act. This action is based on a finding by
the Administrator that the placement of
these two substances in schedule I is
necessary to avoid imminent hazard to
the public safety. This order imposes
the regulatory controls and
administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions applicable to schedule I
controlled substances on persons who
handle (manufacture, distribute, reverse
distribute, import, export, engage in
research, conduct instructional
activities or chemical analysis with, or
possess) or propose to handle these two
specified controlled substances.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
60818
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
This temporary scheduling order
is effective July 29, 2024, until July 29,
2026. If this order is extended or made
permanent, DEA will publish a
document in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terrence L. Boos, Ph.D., Drug and
Chemical Evaluation Section, Diversion
Control Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (571) 362–3249.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA)
issues a temporary scheduling order 1
(in the form of a temporary amendment)
to add the following two substances,
including their isomers, esters, ethers,
salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and
ethers whenever the existence of such
isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is
possible, to schedule I under the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA):
• N-ethyl-2-(2-(4-isopropoxybenzyl)5-nitro-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)ethan-1amine (commonly known as N-desethyl
isotonitazene), and
• 2-(4-ethoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1-(2(piperidin-1-yl)ethyl)-1H-benzimidazole
(commonly known as either Npiperidinyl etonitazene or
etonitazepipne).
DATES:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Legal Authority
Under 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1), the
Attorney General, as delegated to the
Administrator of DEA (Administrator)
pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100, has the
authority to temporarily place a
substance in schedule I of the CSA for
two years without regard to the
evaluation requirements of 21 U.S.C.
811(b), if the Administrator finds that
such action is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.2
In addition, if proceedings to control a
substance are initiated under 21 U.S.C.
811(a)(1) while the substance is
temporarily controlled under section
811(h), the Attorney General may
extend the temporary scheduling for up
to one year.3
Where the necessary findings are
made, a substance may be temporarily
scheduled if it is not listed in any other
schedule under 21 U.S.C. 812, or if there
is no exemption or approval in effect for
the substance under section 505 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,
21 U.S.C. 355.4
1 Though DEA has used the term ‘‘final order’’
with respect to temporary scheduling orders in the
past, this action adheres to the statutory language
of 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which refers to a ‘‘temporary
scheduling order.’’ No substantive change is
intended.
2 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
3 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
4 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1); 21 CFR part 1308.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jul 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
Background
The CSA requires the Administrator
to notify the Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) of an intent to place a
substance in schedule I of the CSA
temporarily (i.e., to issue a temporary
scheduling order).5 The Administrator
transmitted the required notice to the
Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS
(Assistant Secretary),6 by letter dated
April 3, 2023, regarding N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene. The Assistant Secretary
responded to this notice by letter dated
May 11, 2023, and advised that based on
a review by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), there are
currently no investigational new drug
applications (IND) or approved new
drug applications (NDA) for N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene. The Assistant Secretary
also stated that HHS had no objection to
the temporary placement of these
substances in schedule I. N-Desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene currently are not listed in
any schedule under the CSA, and no
exemptions or approvals under 21
U.S.C. 355 are in effect for these
substances.
DEA has taken into consideration the
Assistant Secretary’s comments as
required by subsection 811(h)(4). DEA
has found the control of N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene in schedule I on a
temporary basis is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
As required by 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1)(A),
DEA published a notice of intent (NOI)
to temporarily schedule N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene on October 25, 2023.7 That
NOI discussed findings from DEA’s
three-factor analysis dated January 2023,
which DEA made available on
www.regulations.gov.
To find that temporarily placing a
substance in schedule I of the CSA is
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety, the Administrator
must consider three of the eight factors
set forth in 21 U.S.C. 811(c): the
substance’s history and current pattern
of abuse; the scope, duration, and
significance of abuse; and what, if any,
risk there is to the public health.8
Consideration of these factors includes
any information indicating actual abuse,
U.S.C. 811(h)(4).
Secretary of HHS has delegated to the
Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS the authority
to make domestic drug scheduling
recommendations. 58 FR 35460 (July 1, 1993).
7 88 FR 73293 (Oct. 25, 2023).
8 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
PO 00000
5 21
6 The
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
diversion from legitimate channels, and
clandestine importation, manufacture,
or distribution of these substances.9
Substances meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling
may only be placed in schedule I.10
Substances in schedule I have high
potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical
supervision.11
Two Benzimidazole-Opioids: Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene
The continued encounter of novel
psychoactive substances (NPS) on the
recreational drug market poses a threat
to public safety. Following the classwide scheduling of fentanyl-related
substances,12 there has been an increase
in the emergence of synthetic opioids
that are not structurally related to
fentanyl. Beginning in 2019, a new class
of synthetic opioids known as
benzimidazole-opioids, commonly
referred to as ‘‘nitazenes,’’ emerged on
the recreational drug market. This class
of substances was first synthesized in
the 1950s by CIBA Aktiengesellschaft in
Switzerland, and it has a similar
pharmacological profile to fentanyl,
morphine, and other mu-opioid receptor
agonists. Between August 2020 and
April 2022, DEA temporarily controlled
eight benzimidazole-opioids because
they posed a threat to public safety.13
Recently, additional benzimidazoleopioids have been identified within the
rapidly expanding class of ‘‘nitazene’’
compounds on the recreational drug
market. N-Desethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene are some of the
recently encountered ‘‘nitazene’’
9 Id.
10 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
U.S.C. 812(b)(1).
12 On February 6, 2018, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(h), the then Acting Administrator of Drug
Enforcement Administration temporarily placed
fentanyl-related substances in schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (83 FR 5188) to
avoid an imminent hazard to public safety. Through
the Temporary Reauthorization and Study of
Emergency Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues Act,
Public Law 116–114, which became law on
February 6, 2020, Congress extended the temporary
control of fentanyl-related substances until May 6,
2021. This temporary order was subsequently
extended multiple times, most recently through the
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, Public
Law 117–328, which extended the order until
December 31, 2024.
13 Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of Butonitazene,
Etodesnitazene, flunitazene, Metodesnitazene,
Metonitazene, N-Pyrrolidino etonitazene, and
Protonitazene in Schedule I, 87 FR 21556 (Apr. 12,
2022); Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of Isotonitazene in Schedule
I, 85 FR 51342 (Aug. 20, 2020).
11 21
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
synthetic opioids identified on the illicit
drug market.
The continued trafficking and
identification of benzimidazole-opioids
in toxicology cases pose a significant
threat to public health and safety.
Adverse health effects associated with
the misuse and abuse of synthetic
opioids have led to devastating
consequences including death.
Preclinical pharmacology data
demonstrate that N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene have pharmacological
profiles similar to those of the potent
benzimidazole-opioids etonitazene and
isotonitazene, schedule I opioid
substances.14 N-Desethyl isotonitazene,
an active metabolite of isotonitazene,
has been positively identified in at least
ten toxicology cases.15 N-Piperidinyl
etonitazene has been positively
identified in at least three toxicology
cases.16 As the United States continues
to experience a high number of opioidinvolved overdoses and mortalities, the
introduction of new designer opioids
further exacerbates the current opioid
epidemic.
Available data and information for Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene, summarized
below, indicate that these substances
have high potentials for abuse, no
currently accepted medical uses in
treatment in the United States,17 and a
14 DEA–VA Interagency Agreement. ‘‘In Vitro
Receptor and Transporter Assays for Abuse
Liability Testing for the DEA by the VA’’. Binding
and Functional Activity at Delta, Kappa and Mu
Opioid Receptors. 2022.
15 Walton SE, Krotulski AJ, Logan BK. A ForwardThinking Approach to Addressing the New
Synthetic Opioid 2-Benzylbenzimidazole Nitazene
Analogs by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem
Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry (LC–QQQ–MS). J
Anal Toxicol. 2022 Mar 21;46(3):221–231.
16 Calello DP, Aldy K, Jefri M, Nguyen TT,
Krotulski A, Logan B, Brent J, Wax P, Walton S,
Manini AF; ToxIC Fentalog Study Group.
Identification of a novel opioid, N-piperidinyl
etonitazene (etonitazepipne), in patients with
suspected opioid overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila).
2022 Sep;60(9):1067–1069.
17 When finding that placing a substance in
schedule I on a temporary basis is necessary to
avoid imminent hazard to the public, 21 U.S.C.
811(h) does not require DEA to consider whether
the substance has a currently accepted medical use
in treatment in the United States. Nonetheless,
there is no evidence suggesting that N-desethyl
isonitazene and etonitazepipne have a currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the United
States. To determine whether a drug or other
substance has a currently accepted medical use,
DEA has traditionally applied a five-part test to a
drug or substance that has not been approved by the
FDA: i. The drug’s chemistry must be known and
reproducible; ii. there must be adequate safety
studies; iii. there must be adequate and wellcontrolled studies proving efficacy; iv. the drug
must be accepted by qualified experts; and v. the
scientific evidence must be widely available. See
Marijuana Scheduling Petition; Denial of Petition;
Remand, 57 FR 10499 (Mar. 26, 1992), pet. for rev.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jul 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
lack of accepted safety for use under
medical supervision. N-Desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene have been positively
identified toxicology cases. As the
United States continues to experience a
high number of opioid-involved
overdoses and mortalities, the
introduction of new designer opioids
further exacerbates the current opioid
epidemic Thus, the Administrator
concludes that N-desethyl isotonitazene
and N-piperidinyl etonitazene meet the
statutory requirements to be temporarily
placed in schedule I under the CSA.
DEA’s three-factor analysis is available
in its entirety under ‘‘Supporting and
Related Material’’ of the public docket
for this action at www.regulations.gov
under Docket Number DEA–1143.
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of
Abuse
In the late 1950s, pharmaceutical
research laboratories of the Swiss
chemical company CIBA
Aktiengesellschaft synthesized a group
of structurally unique benzimidazole
derivatives with analgesic properties;
however, the research effort did not
produce any medically approved
analgesic products. These
benzimidazole derivatives include
schedule I substances, such as synthetic
opioids clonitazene, etonitazene, and
isotonitazene.
Since 2019, there has been an
emergence of nitazene compounds on
the illicit drug market, which have been
positively identified in numerous cases
denied, Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics v. Drug
Enforcement Admin., 15 F.3d 1131, 1135 (D.C. Cir.
1994). DEA and HHS applied the traditional fivepart test for currently accepted medical use in this
matter. In a recent published letter in a different
context, HHS applied an additional two-part test to
determine currently accepted medical use for
substances that do not satisfy the five-part test: (1)
whether there exists widespread, current
experience with medical use of the substance by
licensed health care practitioners operating in
accordance with implemented jurisdictionauthorized programs, where medical use is
recognized by entities that regulate the practice of
medicine, and, if so, (2) whether there exists some
credible scientific support for at least one of the
medical conditions for which part (1) is satisfied.
On April 11, 2024, the Department of Justice’s
Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued an opinion,
which, among other things, concluded that the
HHS’s two-part test would be sufficient to establish
that a drug has a currently accepted medical use.
Office of Legal Counsel, Memorandum for Merrick
B. Garland Attorney General Re: Questions Related
to the Potential Rescheduling of Marijuana at 3
(April 11, 2024). For purposes of this temporary
scheduling action, there is no evidence that health
care providers have widespread experience with
medical use of N-desethyl isonitazene and
etonitazepipne, or that the use of N-desethyl
isonitazene and etonitazepipne is recognized by
entities that regulate the practice of medicine under
either the traditional five-part test or the two-part
test.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60819
of fatal overdose events. In August 2020,
isotonitazene was placed in schedule I
of the CSA (85 FR 51342). Subsequently,
seven additional benzimidazoleopioids 18 have been placed in schedule
I of the CSA.
Recently, two additional
benzimidazole-opioids have emerged on
the illicit drug market. Law enforcement
officers have encountered N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene in several solid forms (e.g.,
powder and tablets). These substances
are not approved pharmaceutical
products and are not approved for
medical use anywhere in the world. The
Assistant Secretary in a letter to DEA
dated May 11, 2023, stated that there are
no FDA-approved NDAs or INDs for Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene in the United
States. There are no legitimate channels
for these substances as marketed drug
products.
The appearance of benzimidazoleopioids on the illicit drug market is
similar to other designer opioid drugs
that are trafficked for their psychoactive
effects. These substances are likely to be
abused in the same manner as schedule
I opioids, such as etonitazene,
isotonitazene, and heroin.
In 2022, N-desethyl isotonitazene was
identified in counterfeit tablets in the
United States and United Kingdom.
Recent reporting by Center for Forensic
Science Research and Education
(CFSRE) indicates that in the United
States, N-desethyl isotonitazene was
identified in counterfeit oxycodone
round blue tablets in Florida. Further, in
December 2022, N-desethyl
isotonitazene was co-identified in
‘‘dope’’ samples containing xylazine,
fentanyl, para-fluorofentanyl, and
designer benzodiazepines (e.g.,
flubromazepam and bromazolam).19
In 2021, N-piperidinyl etonitazene
emerged on the illicit synthetic drug
market, as evidenced by its
identification in toxicological analysis
of biological samples.20 In addition,
there have been encounters of Npiperidinyl etonitazene in Europe. As
reported in January 2022 by the
European Monitoring Center for Drugs
18 Butonitazene, etodesnitazene, flunitazene,
metodesnitazene, metonitazene, N-pyrrolidino
etonitazene, and protonitazene. See 87 FR 21556
(Apr. 12, 2022).
19 CFSRE NPS Discovery Public Alert 2023. Case
Example—N-desethyl isotonitazene. January 2023.
20 A partnership between the American College of
Medical Toxicology (ACMT) and the Center for
Forensic Science Research and Education (CFSRE)
was established to comprehensively assess the role
and prevalence of synthetic opioids and other drugs
among suspected overdose events in the United
States. CFSRE NPS Monograph. N-Piperidinyl
etonitazene. November 22, 2021.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
60820
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), the
European Union Early Warning System
Network identified N-piperidinyl
etonitazene in Germany in October
2021. As of January 23, 2023, a total of
four European countries have reported
identifications of N-piperidinyl
etonitazene in powder form to the
EMCDDA.21
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and
Significance of Abuse
N-Desethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene, similar to
etonitazene and isotonitazene (schedule
I substances), have been described as
potent synthetic opioids, and evidence
suggests they are abused for their
opioidergic effects. The abuse of these
benzimidazole-opioids, similar to other
synthetic opioids, has resulted in
serious adverse health effects. Between
October 2019 and January 2020, Ndesethyl isotonitazene was positively
identified as a metabolite of
isotonitazene in 13 postmortem samples
and 64 driving-under-the-influence-ofdrugs (DUID) in the United States.
However, beginning in 2023, N-desethyl
isotonitazene has been identified in 10
toxicology cases.22 The pharmacological
profile of N-desethyl isotonitazene
demonstrates it is a highly potent
synthetic opioid similar to etonitazene,
isotonitazene, and fentanyl. As such, the
identification of this substance as a
parent drug in the recreational drug
market is worrisome.
Data from law enforcement suggest
that N-desethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene are being
abused in the United States as
recreational drugs.23 Since 2022, there
have been 14 reports to DEA’s National
Forensic Laboratory Information System
(NFLIS)-Drug 24 (Federal, State, and
local laboratories) database pertaining to
21 Email communication with EMCDDA dated
January 23, 2023.
22 CFSRE NPS Opioids Trend Report, 2023 Q1
and Q2. Accessed September 15, 2023.
23 While law enforcement data are not direct
evidence of abuse, it can lead to an inference that
a drug has been diverted and abused. See 76 FR
77330, 77332 (Dec. 12, 2011).
24 NFLIS-Drug represents an important resource
in monitoring illicit drug trafficking, including the
diversion of legally manufactured pharmaceuticals
into illegal markets. NFLIS-Drug is a comprehensive
information system that includes data from forensic
laboratories that handle the nation’s drug analysis
cases. NFLIS-Drug participation rate, defined as the
percentage of the national drug caseload
represented by laboratories that have joined NFLISDrug, is currently 98.5 percent. NFLIS-Drug
includes drug chemistry results from completed
analyses only. While NFLIS-Drug data is not direct
evidence of abuse, it can lead to an inference that
a drug has been diverted and abused. See Schedules
of Controlled Substances: Placement of
Carisoprodol Into Schedule IV, 76 FR 77330, 77332
(Dec. 12, 2011). NFLIS-Drug data was queried on
October 2, 2023.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jul 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
the trafficking, distribution, and abuse
of N-desethyl isotonitazene (n = 5) and
N-piperidinyl etonitazene (n = 9). These
five encounters of N-desethyl
isotonitazene were reported to NFLISDrug from Pennsylvania (2), Florida (2)
and Kansas (1). Encounters of Npiperidinyl etonitazene occurred in
Tennessee (8) and Pennsylvania (1).
Based on information collected from
NFLIS-Drug, N-desethyl isotonitazene
and N-piperidinyl etonitazene were
identified in tablet form or as residue.
Reporting from CFSRE show that Ndesethyl isotonitazene was identified in
a counterfeit oxycodone tablet in
Florida,25 suggesting that it might be
present as a substitute for heroin or
fentanyl and likely abused in the same
manner as either of those substances.
The population likely to be harmed by
these benzimidazole-opioids appears to
be the same as that harmed by
prescription opioid analgesics, fentanyl,
and other synthetic drugs.26 This is
evidenced by the types of other drugs
co-identified in biological samples and
law enforcement reports. Law
enforcement and toxicology reports
demonstrate that N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene are being illicitly
distributed and abused. Because users of
N-desethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene are likely to
obtain these substances through
unregulated sources, the identity,
purity, and quantity of these substances
are uncertain and inconsistent, thus
posing significant adverse health risks
to the end user. Individuals who initiate
(i.e., use a drug for the first time) use of
these benzimidazole-opioids are likely
to be at risk of developing substance use
disorder, overdose, and/or death,
similar to that of other opioid analgesics
(e.g., fentanyl, morphine, etc.).
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to
the Public Health
The increase in opioid overdose
deaths in the United States has been
exacerbated recently by the availability
of potent synthetic opioids on the illicit
drug market. Data obtained from preclinical studies demonstrate that Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene exhibit
pharmacological profiles similar to that
of etonitazene, isotonitazene, and other
25 CFSRE NPS Discovery Public Alert January
2023. Accessed January 25, 2023.
26 According to the most recent data from the
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, as of
2022, an estimated 8.9 million people aged 12 years
or older misused opioids in the past year, including
8.5 million prescription pain reliever misusers and
1.0 million heroin users. This population abusing
opioids is likely to be at risk of abusing N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
mu-opioid receptor agonists.27 These
two benzimidazole-opioids bind to and
act as an agonist at the mu-opioid
receptors. It is well established that
substances that act as mu-opioid
receptor agonists have a high potential
for addiction and can induce dosedependent respiratory depression.
Consistent with any mu-opioid
receptor agonist, the potential health
and safety risks for users of N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene are high. N-Desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene have been positively
identified in toxicology cases. The
public health risks attendant to the
abuse of mu-opioid receptor agonists are
well established. These risks include
large numbers of drug treatment
admissions, emergency department
visits, and fatal overdoses.
N-Piperidinyl etonitazene was
detected in suspected opioid overdose
cases in three patients from New Jersey
over a period of three days in July 2021.
Of those patients, two reported the use
of cocaine; one reported the use of
heroin and alprazolam. Similarly,
according to a 2021 CFSRE report, Npiperidinyl etonitazene was coidentified with fentanyl in two cases
and para-fluorofentanyl in one other
case.28
The pharmacological profile of this
substance demonstrates that it is a
highly potent synthetic opioid similar to
etonitazene, isotonitazene, and fentanyl.
As such, the identification of this
substance as a parent drug in the
recreational drug market is worrisome.
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I
Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
In accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3), based on the available data
and information summarized above, the
uncontrolled manufacture, distribution,
reverse distribution, importation,
exportation, conduct of research and
chemical analysis, possession, and
abuse of N-desethyl isotonitazene and
N-piperidinyl etonitazene pose
imminent hazards to public safety. DEA
is not aware of any currently accepted
medical uses for these substances in the
United States. A substance meeting the
statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling, found in 21 U.S.C.
27 DEA–VA Interagency Agreement. ‘‘In Vitro
Receptor and Transporter Assays for Abuse
Liability Testing for the DEA by the VA’’. Binding
and Functional Activity at Delta, Kappa and Mu
Opioid Receptors. 2022. Unpublished data.
28 NPS Discovery Program at the Center for
Forensic Science Research and Education:
Monograph. N-Piperidinyl etonitazene Toxicology
Analytical Report. November 22, 2021.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
811(h)(1), may only be placed in
schedule I. Substances in schedule I
must have a high potential for abuse, no
currently accepted medical use in
treatment in the United States, and a
lack of accepted safety for use under
medical supervision. Available data and
information for N-desethyl isotonitazene
and N-piperidinyl etonitazene indicate
that these substances meet the three
statutory criteria.
As required by 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4),
the Administrator transmitted to the
Assistant Secretary, via letter dated
April 3, 2023, notice of her intent to
place N-desethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene in schedule I on
a temporary basis. HHS had no
objection to the temporary placement of
these substances in schedule I. DEA
subsequently published a NOI in the
Federal Register on October 25, 2023.29
Conclusion
In accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1) and (3), the Administrator
considered available data and
information, herein set forth the
grounds for her determination that it is
necessary to temporarily schedule Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene in schedule I of
the CSA, and finds that placement of
these substances in schedule I is
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety.
This temporary placement of Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene in schedule I of
the CSA will take effect on the date the
order is published in the Federal
Register and remain in effect for two
years, with a possible extension of one
year, pending completion of the regular
(permanent) scheduling process.30
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for
scheduling drugs or other substances.
Regular scheduling actions in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a) are
subject to formal rulemaking procedures
‘‘on the record after opportunity for a
hearing’’ conducted pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.31
The regular scheduling process of
formal rulemaking affords interested
parties appropriate process and the
government any additional relevant
information needed to make a
determination. Final decisions that
conclude the regular scheduling process
of formal rulemaking are subject to
judicial review.32 Temporary
29 Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of N-Desethyl Isotonitazene
and N-Piperidinyl Etionitazene in Schedule I, 88 FR
73293 (Oct. 25, 2023).
30 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and (2).
31 21 U.S.C. 811.
32 21 U.S.C. 877.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jul 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
scheduling orders are not subject to
judicial review.33
Requirements for Handling
Upon the effective date of this
temporary order, N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene will be subject to the
regulatory controls and administrative,
civil, and criminal sanctions applicable
to the manufacture, distribution, reverse
distribution, importation, exportation,
possession of, and engagement in
research and conduct of instructional
activities or chemical analysis with,
schedule I controlled substances,
including the following:
1. Registration. Any person who
handles (possesses, manufactures,
distributes, reverse distributes, imports,
exports, engages in research, or
conducts instructional activities or
chemical analysis with) or desires to
handle, N-desethyl isotonitazene or Npiperidinyl etonitazene must be
registered with DEA to conduct such
activities, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822,
823, 957, and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312, as of
July 29, 2024. Any person who
thereafter handles N-desethyl
isotonitazene or N-piperidinyl
etonitazene and is not registered with
DEA must submit an application for
registration and may not continue to
handle N-desethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene as of July 29,
2024, unless DEA has approved that
application for registration pursuant to
21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 957, and 958, and
in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301
and 1312. Retail sales of schedule I
controlled substances to the general
public are not allowed under the CSA.
Possession of any quantity of these
substances in a manner not authorized
by the CSA on or after July 29, 2024 is
unlawful, and those in possession of
any quantity of these substances may be
subject to prosecution pursuant to the
CSA.
2. Disposal of stocks. Any person who
does not desire or is unable to obtain a
schedule I registration to handle Ndesethyl isotonitazene or N-piperidinyl
etonitazene must surrender all currently
held quantities of these substances.
3. Security. N-Desethyl isotonitazene
and N-piperidinyl etonitazene are
subject to schedule I security
requirements and must be handled in
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.71–
1301.93, as of July 29, 2024.
4. Labeling and Packaging. All labels,
labeling, and packaging for commercial
containers of N-desethyl isotonitazene
and N-piperidinyl etonitazene must
PO 00000
33 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60821
comply with 21 U.S.C. 825 and 958(e)
and 21 CFR part 1302. Current DEA
registrants will have 30 calendar days
from July 29, 2024 to comply with all
labeling and packaging requirements.
5. Inventory. Every DEA registrant
who possesses any quantity of Ndesethyl isotonitazene or N-piperidinyl
etonitazene on the effective date of this
order must take an inventory of all
stocks of these substances on hand
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958, and
in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03,
1304.04, and 1304.11. Current DEA
registrants will have 30 calendar days
from the effective date of this order to
comply with all inventory requirements.
After the initial inventory, every DEA
registrant must take an inventory of all
controlled substances (including Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene) on hand on a
biennial basis pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827
and 958 and in accordance with 21 CFR
1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
6. Records. All DEA registrants must
maintain records with respect to Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 827 and 958(e) and in accordance
with 21 CFR parts 1304, 1312, and 1317,
and section 1307.11. Current DEA
registrants authorized to handle these
two substances shall have 30 calendar
days from the effective date of this order
to comply with all recordkeeping
requirements.
7. Reports. All DEA registrants must
submit reports with respect to Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 827 and in accordance with 21
CFR parts 1304, 1312, and 1317, and
sections 1301.74(c) and 1301.76(b), as of
July 29, 2024. Manufacturers and
distributors must also submit reports
regarding these substances to the
Automation of Reports and
Consolidated Order System pursuant to
21 U.S.C. 827 and in accordance with 21
CFR parts 1304 and 1312.
8. Order Forms. All DEA registrants
who distribute N-desethyl isotonitazene
or N-piperidinyl etonitazene must
comply with order form requirements
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 828 and in
accordance with 21 CFR part 1305 as of
July 29, 2024.
9. Importation and Exportation. All
importation and exportation of Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene must be in
compliance with 21 U.S.C. 952, 953,
957, and 958, and in accordance with 21
CFR part 1312 as of July 29, 2024.
10. Quota. Only DEA-registered
manufacturers may manufacture Ndesethyl isotonitazene and Npiperidinyl etonitazene in accordance
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
60822
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
with a quota assigned pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 826 and in accordance with 21
CFR part 1303, as of July 29, 2024.
11. Liability. Any activity involving
N-desethyl isotonitazene or Npiperidinyl etonitazene not authorized
by or in violation of the CSA, occurring
as of July 29, 2024, is unlawful, and may
subject the person to administrative,
civil, and/or criminal sanctions.
Regulatory Matters
The CSA provides for expedited
temporary scheduling actions where
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety. Under 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1), the Administrator, as
delegated by the Attorney General, may,
by order, temporarily place substances
in schedule I. Such orders may not be
issued before the expiration of 30 days
from: (1) The publication of a notice in
the Federal Register of the intent to
issue such order and the grounds upon
which such order is to be issued, and (2)
the date that notice of the proposed
temporary scheduling order is
transmitted to the Assistant Secretary,
as delegated by the Secretary of HHS.34
Inasmuch as section 811(h) directs
that temporary scheduling actions be
issued by order (as distinct from a rule)
and sets forth the procedures by which
such orders are to be issued, DEA
believes the notice-and-comment
requirements of section 553 of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553, which are applicable to
rulemaking, do not apply to this
temporary scheduling order. The APA
expressly differentiates between orders
and rules, as it defines an ‘‘order’’ to
mean a ‘‘final disposition, whether
affirmative, negative, injunctive, or
declaratory in form, of an agency in a
matter other than rule making.’’ 5 U.S.C.
551(6) (emphasis added). This contrasts
with permanent scheduling actions,
which are subject to formal rulemaking
procedures done ‘‘on the record after
opportunity for a hearing,’’ and final
decisions that conclude the scheduling
process and are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 811(a) and 877. The
specific language chosen by Congress
indicates its intent that DEA issue
orders instead of proceeding by
rulemaking when temporarily
scheduling substances. Given that
Congress specifically requires the
Administrator (as delegated by the
Attorney General) to follow rulemaking
34 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jul 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
procedures for other kinds of scheduling
actions, see 21 U.S.C. 811(a), it is
noteworthy that, in section 811(h)(1),
Congress authorized the issuance of
temporary scheduling actions by order
rather than by rule.
Assuming for the sake of argument
that this action is subject to section 553
of the APA, the Administrator finds that
there is good cause to forgo its noticeand-comment requirements, as any
further delays in the process for issuing
temporary scheduling orders would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest given the manifest urgency to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety.
Although DEA believes this
temporary scheduling order is not
subject to the notice-and-comment
requirements of section 553 of the APA,
DEA notes that in accordance with 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Administrator took
into consideration comments submitted
by the Assistant Secretary in response to
the notices that DEA transmitted to the
Assistant Secretary pursuant to such
subsection.
Further, DEA believes that this
temporary scheduling action is not a
‘‘rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2),
and, accordingly, is not subject to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The requirements for the
preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are
not applicable where, as here, DEA is
not required by section 553 of the APA
or any other law to publish a general
notice of proposed rulemaking.
Therefore, in this instance, since DEA
believes this temporary scheduling
action is not a ‘‘rule,’’ it is not subject
to the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act when issuing this
temporary action.
In accordance with the principles of
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866, 13563,
and 14094, this action is not a
significant regulatory action. E.O. 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health, and safety
effects; distributive impacts; and
equity). E.O. 13563 is supplemental to
and reaffirms the principles, structures,
and definitions governing regulatory
review as established in E.O. 12866.
E.O. 12866, sec. 3(f), as amended by
E.O. 14094, sec. 1(b), provides the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
definition of a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ requiring review by the Office
of Management and Budget. Because
this is not a rulemaking action, this is
not a significant regulatory action as
defined in Section 3(f) of E.O. 12866.
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with E.O. 13132, it is
determined that this action does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Signing Authority
This document of the Drug
Enforcement Administration was signed
on July 16, 2024, by Administrator Anne
Milgram. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DEA. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DEA Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
DEA. This administrative process in no
way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Scott Brinks,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Drug
Enforcement Administration.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out above, DEA
amends 21 CFR part 1308 as follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for part 1308
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
956(b), unless otherwise noted.
2. In § 1308.11, add paragraphs (h)(68)
and (69) to read as follows:
■
§ 1308.11
*
Schedule I
*
*
(h) * * *
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
*
*
60823
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
*
(68) N-ethyl-2-(2-(4-isopropoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)ethan-1-amine, its isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of
isomers, esters and ethers (Other name: N-desethyl isotonitazene) ..............................................................................................
(69) 2-(4-ethoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1-(2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethyl)-1H-benzimidazole, its isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters and ethers (Other names: N-piperidinyl etonitazene; etonitazepipne) .......................................................................
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
email Lieutenant Eyobe Mills, Marine
Safety Unit, Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast
Guard, at telephone 412–221–0807,
email Eyobe.D.Mills@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
I. Table of Abbreviations
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–16391 Filed 7–26–24; 8:45 am]
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0658]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Demolition of Lock and
Dam 3, Monongahela River Mile Marker
23.5 to 24.5, Elizabeth, PA
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary interim rule and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of the Monongahela River
from mile marker 23.5 to mile marker
24.5 in Elizabeth, PA. This rule is
substantially similar to a temporary
safety zone published on June 27, 2024.
We must establish this temporary safety
zone because of the continuation of lock
and dam demolition. This regulation
will prohibit entry of vessels or persons
into the safety zone to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
during demolition activities planned
from August 1, 2024, through December
31, 2024.
DATES: This rule is effective from
August 1, 2024, through December 31,
2024. Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 27, 2024.
ADDRESSES: We encourage you to submit
comments identified by docket number
USCG–2024–0658 using the Federal
Decision Making Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
*
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jul 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The similar rule published at 89 FR
53491 on June 27, 2024. The Coast
Guard is issuing this interim temporary
rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to the
authority in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This
statutory provision authorizes an agency
to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ The Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable and contrary
to public interest. The notice allowing
the demolition project to proceed and
providing updated timelines for the
project was only recently finalized and
provided to the Coast Guard, which did
not give the Coast Guard enough time to
publish an NPRM, take public
comments, and issue a final rule before
ethe existing regulation expires. Timely
action is needed to respond to the
potential safety hazards associated with
demolition of the lock and dam, which
involves the use of explosives. It would
be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest to publish an NPRM
because we must establish the safety
zone to protect the safety of the
waterway users, demolition crew, other
personnel associated with the project,
and the public. A delay of the project to
accommodate a full notice and comment
period would delay necessary
operations, result in increased costs,
and delay the completion date of the
demolition project and subsequent
opening of the navigation channel. We
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
9760
9761
*
must establish this safety zone by
August 1, 2024, and lack sufficient time
to provide a reasonable comment period
and then consider those comments
before issuing this rule.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. For the reasons stated in the
preceding paragraph, delaying the
effective date of this rule is
impracticable and contrary to public
interest because timely action is needed
to respond to the potential safety
hazards associated with the demolition
of the lock and dam starting August 1,
2024.
Although this regulation is published
as an interim rule without prior notice,
public comment is nevertheless
desirable to ensure that the regulation is
both workable and reasonable.
Accordingly, persons wishing to
comment may do so by submitting
written comments as set out under
ADDRESSES in this preamble.
Commenters should include their names
and addresses, identify the docket
number for the regulation, and give
reasons for their comments. If the Coast
Guard determines that changes to the
temporary interim rule are necessary,
we will publish a temporary final rule
or other appropriate document.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary interim rule under the
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port Pittsburgh (COTP)
has determined that potential hazards
associated with this lock and dam
demolition will be a safety concern for
anyone on the Monongahela River
within mile marker 23.5 through 24.5.
The use of explosives and other
activities involved in demolishing the
lock and dam involve inherent risk. To
minimize risk to personnel, vessels,
property, and the marine environment,
no vessel may moor, anchor, transit, or
otherwise be present in the designated
safety zone at any time during the
periods of enforcement unless receiving
prior permission from the COTP or their
designated representative.
This temporary interim rule is needed
to protect personnel, vessels, and the
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 145 (Monday, July 29, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60817-60823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-16391]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-1143]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of N-
Desethyl Isotonitazene and N-Piperidinyl Etonitazene in Schedule I
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Temporary amendment; temporary scheduling order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration is
issuing this temporary order to schedule two synthetic benzimidazole-
opioid substances, as identified in this order, in schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act. This action is based on a finding by the
Administrator that the placement of these two substances in schedule I
is necessary to avoid imminent hazard to the public safety. This order
imposes the regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions applicable to schedule I controlled substances on persons who
handle (manufacture, distribute, reverse distribute, import, export,
engage in research, conduct instructional activities or chemical
analysis with, or possess) or propose to handle these two specified
controlled substances.
[[Page 60818]]
DATES: This temporary scheduling order is effective July 29, 2024,
until July 29, 2026. If this order is extended or made permanent, DEA
will publish a document in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terrence L. Boos, Ph.D., Drug and
Chemical Evaluation Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug
Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (571) 362-3249.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
issues a temporary scheduling order \1\ (in the form of a temporary
amendment) to add the following two substances, including their
isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and
ethers whenever the existence of such isomers, esters, ethers, and
salts is possible, to schedule I under the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Though DEA has used the term ``final order'' with respect to
temporary scheduling orders in the past, this action adheres to the
statutory language of 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which refers to a
``temporary scheduling order.'' No substantive change is intended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
N-ethyl-2-(2-(4-isopropoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1H-benzimidazol-
1-yl)ethan-1-amine (commonly known as N-desethyl isotonitazene), and
2-(4-ethoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1-(2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethyl)-1H-
benzimidazole (commonly known as either N-piperidinyl etonitazene or
etonitazepipne).
Legal Authority
Under 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1), the Attorney General, as delegated to
the Administrator of DEA (Administrator) pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100, has
the authority to temporarily place a substance in schedule I of the CSA
for two years without regard to the evaluation requirements of 21
U.S.C. 811(b), if the Administrator finds that such action is necessary
to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.\2\ In addition, if
proceedings to control a substance are initiated under 21 U.S.C.
811(a)(1) while the substance is temporarily controlled under section
811(h), the Attorney General may extend the temporary scheduling for up
to one year.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
\3\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where the necessary findings are made, a substance may be
temporarily scheduled if it is not listed in any other schedule under
21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no exemption or approval in effect for
the substance under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act, 21 U.S.C. 355.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1); 21 CFR part 1308.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The CSA requires the Administrator to notify the Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) of an intent to place a
substance in schedule I of the CSA temporarily (i.e., to issue a
temporary scheduling order).\5\ The Administrator transmitted the
required notice to the Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS (Assistant
Secretary),\6\ by letter dated April 3, 2023, regarding N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene. The Assistant Secretary
responded to this notice by letter dated May 11, 2023, and advised that
based on a review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there are
currently no investigational new drug applications (IND) or approved
new drug applications (NDA) for N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-
piperidinyl etonitazene. The Assistant Secretary also stated that HHS
had no objection to the temporary placement of these substances in
schedule I. N-Desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene
currently are not listed in any schedule under the CSA, and no
exemptions or approvals under 21 U.S.C. 355 are in effect for these
substances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4).
\6\ The Secretary of HHS has delegated to the Assistant
Secretary for Health of HHS the authority to make domestic drug
scheduling recommendations. 58 FR 35460 (July 1, 1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEA has taken into consideration the Assistant Secretary's comments
as required by subsection 811(h)(4). DEA has found the control of N-
desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene in schedule I on a
temporary basis is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety.
As required by 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1)(A), DEA published a notice of
intent (NOI) to temporarily schedule N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-
piperidinyl etonitazene on October 25, 2023.\7\ That NOI discussed
findings from DEA's three-factor analysis dated January 2023, which DEA
made available on www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 88 FR 73293 (Oct. 25, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find that temporarily placing a substance in schedule I of the
CSA is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety, the
Administrator must consider three of the eight factors set forth in 21
U.S.C. 811(c): the substance's history and current pattern of abuse;
the scope, duration, and significance of abuse; and what, if any, risk
there is to the public health.\8\ Consideration of these factors
includes any information indicating actual abuse, diversion from
legitimate channels, and clandestine importation, manufacture, or
distribution of these substances.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Substances meeting the statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling may only be placed in schedule I.\10\ Substances in schedule
I have high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in
treatment in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
\11\ 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two Benzimidazole-Opioids: N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene
The continued encounter of novel psychoactive substances (NPS) on
the recreational drug market poses a threat to public safety. Following
the class-wide scheduling of fentanyl-related substances,\12\ there has
been an increase in the emergence of synthetic opioids that are not
structurally related to fentanyl. Beginning in 2019, a new class of
synthetic opioids known as benzimidazole-opioids, commonly referred to
as ``nitazenes,'' emerged on the recreational drug market. This class
of substances was first synthesized in the 1950s by CIBA
Aktiengesellschaft in Switzerland, and it has a similar pharmacological
profile to fentanyl, morphine, and other mu-opioid receptor agonists.
Between August 2020 and April 2022, DEA temporarily controlled eight
benzimidazole-opioids because they posed a threat to public safety.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ On February 6, 2018, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(h), the then
Acting Administrator of Drug Enforcement Administration temporarily
placed fentanyl-related substances in schedule I of the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA) (83 FR 5188) to avoid an imminent hazard to
public safety. Through the Temporary Reauthorization and Study of
Emergency Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues Act, Public Law 116-114,
which became law on February 6, 2020, Congress extended the
temporary control of fentanyl-related substances until May 6, 2021.
This temporary order was subsequently extended multiple times, most
recently through the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, Public
Law 117-328, which extended the order until December 31, 2024.
\13\ Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of
Butonitazene, Etodesnitazene, flunitazene, Metodesnitazene,
Metonitazene, N-Pyrrolidino etonitazene, and Protonitazene in
Schedule I, 87 FR 21556 (Apr. 12, 2022); Schedules of Controlled
Substances: Temporary Placement of Isotonitazene in Schedule I, 85
FR 51342 (Aug. 20, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently, additional benzimidazole-opioids have been identified
within the rapidly expanding class of ``nitazene'' compounds on the
recreational drug market. N-Desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene are some of the recently encountered ``nitazene''
[[Page 60819]]
synthetic opioids identified on the illicit drug market.
The continued trafficking and identification of benzimidazole-
opioids in toxicology cases pose a significant threat to public health
and safety. Adverse health effects associated with the misuse and abuse
of synthetic opioids have led to devastating consequences including
death. Preclinical pharmacology data demonstrate that N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene have pharmacological
profiles similar to those of the potent benzimidazole-opioids
etonitazene and isotonitazene, schedule I opioid substances.\14\ N-
Desethyl isotonitazene, an active metabolite of isotonitazene, has been
positively identified in at least ten toxicology cases.\15\ N-
Piperidinyl etonitazene has been positively identified in at least
three toxicology cases.\16\ As the United States continues to
experience a high number of opioid-involved overdoses and mortalities,
the introduction of new designer opioids further exacerbates the
current opioid epidemic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ DEA-VA Interagency Agreement. ``In Vitro Receptor and
Transporter Assays for Abuse Liability Testing for the DEA by the
VA''. Binding and Functional Activity at Delta, Kappa and Mu Opioid
Receptors. 2022.
\15\ Walton SE, Krotulski AJ, Logan BK. A Forward-Thinking
Approach to Addressing the New Synthetic Opioid 2-
Benzylbenzimidazole Nitazene Analogs by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem
Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry (LC-QQQ-MS). J Anal Toxicol. 2022 Mar
21;46(3):221-231.
\16\ Calello DP, Aldy K, Jefri M, Nguyen TT, Krotulski A, Logan
B, Brent J, Wax P, Walton S, Manini AF; ToxIC Fentalog Study Group.
Identification of a novel opioid, N-piperidinyl etonitazene
(etonitazepipne), in patients with suspected opioid overdose. Clin
Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Sep;60(9):1067-1069.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Available data and information for N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-
piperidinyl etonitazene, summarized below, indicate that these
substances have high potentials for abuse, no currently accepted
medical uses in treatment in the United States,\17\ and a lack of
accepted safety for use under medical supervision. N-Desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene have been positively
identified toxicology cases. As the United States continues to
experience a high number of opioid-involved overdoses and mortalities,
the introduction of new designer opioids further exacerbates the
current opioid epidemic Thus, the Administrator concludes that N-
desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene meet the statutory
requirements to be temporarily placed in schedule I under the CSA.
DEA's three-factor analysis is available in its entirety under
``Supporting and Related Material'' of the public docket for this
action at www.regulations.gov under Docket Number DEA-1143.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ When finding that placing a substance in schedule I on a
temporary basis is necessary to avoid imminent hazard to the public,
21 U.S.C. 811(h) does not require DEA to consider whether the
substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States. Nonetheless, there is no evidence suggesting that N-
desethyl isonitazene and etonitazepipne have a currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the United States. To determine whether
a drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use, DEA
has traditionally applied a five-part test to a drug or substance
that has not been approved by the FDA: i. The drug's chemistry must
be known and reproducible; ii. there must be adequate safety
studies; iii. there must be adequate and well-controlled studies
proving efficacy; iv. the drug must be accepted by qualified
experts; and v. the scientific evidence must be widely available.
See Marijuana Scheduling Petition; Denial of Petition; Remand, 57 FR
10499 (Mar. 26, 1992), pet. for rev. denied, Alliance for Cannabis
Therapeutics v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 15 F.3d 1131, 1135 (D.C.
Cir. 1994). DEA and HHS applied the traditional five-part test for
currently accepted medical use in this matter. In a recent published
letter in a different context, HHS applied an additional two-part
test to determine currently accepted medical use for substances that
do not satisfy the five-part test: (1) whether there exists
widespread, current experience with medical use of the substance by
licensed health care practitioners operating in accordance with
implemented jurisdiction-authorized programs, where medical use is
recognized by entities that regulate the practice of medicine, and,
if so, (2) whether there exists some credible scientific support for
at least one of the medical conditions for which part (1) is
satisfied. On April 11, 2024, the Department of Justice's Office of
Legal Counsel (OLC) issued an opinion, which, among other things,
concluded that the HHS's two-part test would be sufficient to
establish that a drug has a currently accepted medical use. Office
of Legal Counsel, Memorandum for Merrick B. Garland Attorney General
Re: Questions Related to the Potential Rescheduling of Marijuana at
3 (April 11, 2024). For purposes of this temporary scheduling
action, there is no evidence that health care providers have
widespread experience with medical use of N-desethyl isonitazene and
etonitazepipne, or that the use of N-desethyl isonitazene and
etonitazepipne is recognized by entities that regulate the practice
of medicine under either the traditional five-part test or the two-
part test.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of Abuse
In the late 1950s, pharmaceutical research laboratories of the
Swiss chemical company CIBA Aktiengesellschaft synthesized a group of
structurally unique benzimidazole derivatives with analgesic
properties; however, the research effort did not produce any medically
approved analgesic products. These benzimidazole derivatives include
schedule I substances, such as synthetic opioids clonitazene,
etonitazene, and isotonitazene.
Since 2019, there has been an emergence of nitazene compounds on
the illicit drug market, which have been positively identified in
numerous cases of fatal overdose events. In August 2020, isotonitazene
was placed in schedule I of the CSA (85 FR 51342). Subsequently, seven
additional benzimidazole-opioids \18\ have been placed in schedule I of
the CSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Butonitazene, etodesnitazene, flunitazene, metodesnitazene,
metonitazene, N-pyrrolidino etonitazene, and protonitazene. See 87
FR 21556 (Apr. 12, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently, two additional benzimidazole-opioids have emerged on the
illicit drug market. Law enforcement officers have encountered N-
desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene in several solid
forms (e.g., powder and tablets). These substances are not approved
pharmaceutical products and are not approved for medical use anywhere
in the world. The Assistant Secretary in a letter to DEA dated May 11,
2023, stated that there are no FDA-approved NDAs or INDs for N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene in the United States. There
are no legitimate channels for these substances as marketed drug
products.
The appearance of benzimidazole-opioids on the illicit drug market
is similar to other designer opioid drugs that are trafficked for their
psychoactive effects. These substances are likely to be abused in the
same manner as schedule I opioids, such as etonitazene, isotonitazene,
and heroin.
In 2022, N-desethyl isotonitazene was identified in counterfeit
tablets in the United States and United Kingdom. Recent reporting by
Center for Forensic Science Research and Education (CFSRE) indicates
that in the United States, N-desethyl isotonitazene was identified in
counterfeit oxycodone round blue tablets in Florida. Further, in
December 2022, N-desethyl isotonitazene was co-identified in ``dope''
samples containing xylazine, fentanyl, para-fluorofentanyl, and
designer benzodiazepines (e.g., flubromazepam and bromazolam).\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ CFSRE NPS Discovery Public Alert 2023. Case Example--N-
desethyl isotonitazene. January 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2021, N-piperidinyl etonitazene emerged on the illicit synthetic
drug market, as evidenced by its identification in toxicological
analysis of biological samples.\20\ In addition, there have been
encounters of N-piperidinyl etonitazene in Europe. As reported in
January 2022 by the European Monitoring Center for Drugs
[[Page 60820]]
and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), the European Union Early Warning System
Network identified N-piperidinyl etonitazene in Germany in October
2021. As of January 23, 2023, a total of four European countries have
reported identifications of N-piperidinyl etonitazene in powder form to
the EMCDDA.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ A partnership between the American College of Medical
Toxicology (ACMT) and the Center for Forensic Science Research and
Education (CFSRE) was established to comprehensively assess the role
and prevalence of synthetic opioids and other drugs among suspected
overdose events in the United States. CFSRE NPS Monograph. N-
Piperidinyl etonitazene. November 22, 2021.
\21\ Email communication with EMCDDA dated January 23, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and Significance of Abuse
N-Desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene, similar to
etonitazene and isotonitazene (schedule I substances), have been
described as potent synthetic opioids, and evidence suggests they are
abused for their opioidergic effects. The abuse of these benzimidazole-
opioids, similar to other synthetic opioids, has resulted in serious
adverse health effects. Between October 2019 and January 2020, N-
desethyl isotonitazene was positively identified as a metabolite of
isotonitazene in 13 postmortem samples and 64 driving-under-the-
influence-of-drugs (DUID) in the United States. However, beginning in
2023, N-desethyl isotonitazene has been identified in 10 toxicology
cases.\22\ The pharmacological profile of N-desethyl isotonitazene
demonstrates it is a highly potent synthetic opioid similar to
etonitazene, isotonitazene, and fentanyl. As such, the identification
of this substance as a parent drug in the recreational drug market is
worrisome.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ CFSRE NPS Opioids Trend Report, 2023 Q1 and Q2. Accessed
September 15, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data from law enforcement suggest that N-desethyl isotonitazene and
N-piperidinyl etonitazene are being abused in the United States as
recreational drugs.\23\ Since 2022, there have been 14 reports to DEA's
National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS)-Drug \24\
(Federal, State, and local laboratories) database pertaining to the
trafficking, distribution, and abuse of N-desethyl isotonitazene (n =
5) and N-piperidinyl etonitazene (n = 9). These five encounters of N-
desethyl isotonitazene were reported to NFLIS-Drug from Pennsylvania
(2), Florida (2) and Kansas (1). Encounters of N-piperidinyl
etonitazene occurred in Tennessee (8) and Pennsylvania (1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ While law enforcement data are not direct evidence of
abuse, it can lead to an inference that a drug has been diverted and
abused. See 76 FR 77330, 77332 (Dec. 12, 2011).
\24\ NFLIS-Drug represents an important resource in monitoring
illicit drug trafficking, including the diversion of legally
manufactured pharmaceuticals into illegal markets. NFLIS-Drug is a
comprehensive information system that includes data from forensic
laboratories that handle the nation's drug analysis cases. NFLIS-
Drug participation rate, defined as the percentage of the national
drug caseload represented by laboratories that have joined NFLIS-
Drug, is currently 98.5 percent. NFLIS-Drug includes drug chemistry
results from completed analyses only. While NFLIS-Drug data is not
direct evidence of abuse, it can lead to an inference that a drug
has been diverted and abused. See Schedules of Controlled
Substances: Placement of Carisoprodol Into Schedule IV, 76 FR 77330,
77332 (Dec. 12, 2011). NFLIS-Drug data was queried on October 2,
2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on information collected from NFLIS-Drug, N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene were identified in tablet
form or as residue. Reporting from CFSRE show that N-desethyl
isotonitazene was identified in a counterfeit oxycodone tablet in
Florida,\25\ suggesting that it might be present as a substitute for
heroin or fentanyl and likely abused in the same manner as either of
those substances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ CFSRE NPS Discovery Public Alert January 2023. Accessed
January 25, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The population likely to be harmed by these benzimidazole-opioids
appears to be the same as that harmed by prescription opioid
analgesics, fentanyl, and other synthetic drugs.\26\ This is evidenced
by the types of other drugs co-identified in biological samples and law
enforcement reports. Law enforcement and toxicology reports demonstrate
that N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene are being
illicitly distributed and abused. Because users of N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene are likely to obtain these
substances through unregulated sources, the identity, purity, and
quantity of these substances are uncertain and inconsistent, thus
posing significant adverse health risks to the end user. Individuals
who initiate (i.e., use a drug for the first time) use of these
benzimidazole-opioids are likely to be at risk of developing substance
use disorder, overdose, and/or death, similar to that of other opioid
analgesics (e.g., fentanyl, morphine, etc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ According to the most recent data from the National Survey
on Drug Use and Health, as of 2022, an estimated 8.9 million people
aged 12 years or older misused opioids in the past year, including
8.5 million prescription pain reliever misusers and 1.0 million
heroin users. This population abusing opioids is likely to be at
risk of abusing N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to the Public Health
The increase in opioid overdose deaths in the United States has
been exacerbated recently by the availability of potent synthetic
opioids on the illicit drug market. Data obtained from pre-clinical
studies demonstrate that N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene exhibit pharmacological profiles similar to that of
etonitazene, isotonitazene, and other mu-opioid receptor agonists.\27\
These two benzimidazole-opioids bind to and act as an agonist at the
mu-opioid receptors. It is well established that substances that act as
mu-opioid receptor agonists have a high potential for addiction and can
induce dose-dependent respiratory depression.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ DEA-VA Interagency Agreement. ``In Vitro Receptor and
Transporter Assays for Abuse Liability Testing for the DEA by the
VA''. Binding and Functional Activity at Delta, Kappa and Mu Opioid
Receptors. 2022. Unpublished data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with any mu-opioid receptor agonist, the potential
health and safety risks for users of N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-
piperidinyl etonitazene are high. N-Desethyl isotonitazene and N-
piperidinyl etonitazene have been positively identified in toxicology
cases. The public health risks attendant to the abuse of mu-opioid
receptor agonists are well established. These risks include large
numbers of drug treatment admissions, emergency department visits, and
fatal overdoses.
N-Piperidinyl etonitazene was detected in suspected opioid overdose
cases in three patients from New Jersey over a period of three days in
July 2021. Of those patients, two reported the use of cocaine; one
reported the use of heroin and alprazolam. Similarly, according to a
2021 CFSRE report, N-piperidinyl etonitazene was co-identified with
fentanyl in two cases and para-fluorofentanyl in one other case.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ NPS Discovery Program at the Center for Forensic Science
Research and Education: Monograph. N-Piperidinyl etonitazene
Toxicology Analytical Report. November 22, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The pharmacological profile of this substance demonstrates that it
is a highly potent synthetic opioid similar to etonitazene,
isotonitazene, and fentanyl. As such, the identification of this
substance as a parent drug in the recreational drug market is
worrisome.
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3), based on the available data
and information summarized above, the uncontrolled manufacture,
distribution, reverse distribution, importation, exportation, conduct
of research and chemical analysis, possession, and abuse of N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene pose imminent hazards to
public safety. DEA is not aware of any currently accepted medical uses
for these substances in the United States. A substance meeting the
statutory requirements for temporary scheduling, found in 21 U.S.C.
[[Page 60821]]
811(h)(1), may only be placed in schedule I. Substances in schedule I
must have a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use
in treatment in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for
use under medical supervision. Available data and information for N-
desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene indicate that
these substances meet the three statutory criteria.
As required by 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Administrator transmitted
to the Assistant Secretary, via letter dated April 3, 2023, notice of
her intent to place N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene in schedule I on a temporary basis. HHS had no objection to
the temporary placement of these substances in schedule I. DEA
subsequently published a NOI in the Federal Register on October 25,
2023.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of
N-Desethyl Isotonitazene and N-Piperidinyl Etionitazene in Schedule
I, 88 FR 73293 (Oct. 25, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and (3), the Administrator
considered available data and information, herein set forth the grounds
for her determination that it is necessary to temporarily schedule N-
desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene in schedule I of
the CSA, and finds that placement of these substances in schedule I is
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
This temporary placement of N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-
piperidinyl etonitazene in schedule I of the CSA will take effect on
the date the order is published in the Federal Register and remain in
effect for two years, with a possible extension of one year, pending
completion of the regular (permanent) scheduling process.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for scheduling drugs or other
substances. Regular scheduling actions in accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(a) are subject to formal rulemaking procedures ``on the record
after opportunity for a hearing'' conducted pursuant to the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.\31\ The regular scheduling process of formal
rulemaking affords interested parties appropriate process and the
government any additional relevant information needed to make a
determination. Final decisions that conclude the regular scheduling
process of formal rulemaking are subject to judicial review.\32\
Temporary scheduling orders are not subject to judicial review.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 21 U.S.C. 811.
\32\ 21 U.S.C. 877.
\33\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requirements for Handling
Upon the effective date of this temporary order, N-desethyl
isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene will be subject to the
regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions
applicable to the manufacture, distribution, reverse distribution,
importation, exportation, possession of, and engagement in research and
conduct of instructional activities or chemical analysis with, schedule
I controlled substances, including the following:
1. Registration. Any person who handles (possesses, manufactures,
distributes, reverse distributes, imports, exports, engages in
research, or conducts instructional activities or chemical analysis
with) or desires to handle, N-desethyl isotonitazene or N-piperidinyl
etonitazene must be registered with DEA to conduct such activities,
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 957, and 958, and in accordance with 21
CFR parts 1301 and 1312, as of July 29, 2024. Any person who thereafter
handles N-desethyl isotonitazene or N-piperidinyl etonitazene and is
not registered with DEA must submit an application for registration and
may not continue to handle N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene as of July 29, 2024, unless DEA has approved that
application for registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 957, and
958, and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312. Retail sales of
schedule I controlled substances to the general public are not allowed
under the CSA. Possession of any quantity of these substances in a
manner not authorized by the CSA on or after July 29, 2024 is unlawful,
and those in possession of any quantity of these substances may be
subject to prosecution pursuant to the CSA.
2. Disposal of stocks. Any person who does not desire or is unable
to obtain a schedule I registration to handle N-desethyl isotonitazene
or N-piperidinyl etonitazene must surrender all currently held
quantities of these substances.
3. Security. N-Desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene
are subject to schedule I security requirements and must be handled in
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.71-1301.93, as of July 29, 2024.
4. Labeling and Packaging. All labels, labeling, and packaging for
commercial containers of N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl
etonitazene must comply with 21 U.S.C. 825 and 958(e) and 21 CFR part
1302. Current DEA registrants will have 30 calendar days from July 29,
2024 to comply with all labeling and packaging requirements.
5. Inventory. Every DEA registrant who possesses any quantity of N-
desethyl isotonitazene or N-piperidinyl etonitazene on the effective
date of this order must take an inventory of all stocks of these
substances on hand pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11. Current DEA registrants will
have 30 calendar days from the effective date of this order to comply
with all inventory requirements. After the initial inventory, every DEA
registrant must take an inventory of all controlled substances
(including N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene) on
hand on a biennial basis pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958 and in
accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
6. Records. All DEA registrants must maintain records with respect
to N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene pursuant to
21 U.S.C. 827 and 958(e) and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304,
1312, and 1317, and section 1307.11. Current DEA registrants authorized
to handle these two substances shall have 30 calendar days from the
effective date of this order to comply with all recordkeeping
requirements.
7. Reports. All DEA registrants must submit reports with respect to
N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 827 and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304, 1312, and 1317,
and sections 1301.74(c) and 1301.76(b), as of July 29, 2024.
Manufacturers and distributors must also submit reports regarding these
substances to the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Order System
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304 and
1312.
8. Order Forms. All DEA registrants who distribute N-desethyl
isotonitazene or N-piperidinyl etonitazene must comply with order form
requirements pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 828 and in accordance with 21 CFR
part 1305 as of July 29, 2024.
9. Importation and Exportation. All importation and exportation of
N-desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene must be in
compliance with 21 U.S.C. 952, 953, 957, and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR part 1312 as of July 29, 2024.
10. Quota. Only DEA-registered manufacturers may manufacture N-
desethyl isotonitazene and N-piperidinyl etonitazene in accordance
[[Page 60822]]
with a quota assigned pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 826 and in accordance with
21 CFR part 1303, as of July 29, 2024.
11. Liability. Any activity involving N-desethyl isotonitazene or
N-piperidinyl etonitazene not authorized by or in violation of the CSA,
occurring as of July 29, 2024, is unlawful, and may subject the person
to administrative, civil, and/or criminal sanctions.
Regulatory Matters
The CSA provides for expedited temporary scheduling actions where
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. Under 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1), the Administrator, as delegated by the Attorney
General, may, by order, temporarily place substances in schedule I.
Such orders may not be issued before the expiration of 30 days from:
(1) The publication of a notice in the Federal Register of the intent
to issue such order and the grounds upon which such order is to be
issued, and (2) the date that notice of the proposed temporary
scheduling order is transmitted to the Assistant Secretary, as
delegated by the Secretary of HHS.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inasmuch as section 811(h) directs that temporary scheduling
actions be issued by order (as distinct from a rule) and sets forth the
procedures by which such orders are to be issued, DEA believes the
notice-and-comment requirements of section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, which are applicable to rulemaking,
do not apply to this temporary scheduling order. The APA expressly
differentiates between orders and rules, as it defines an ``order'' to
mean a ``final disposition, whether affirmative, negative, injunctive,
or declaratory in form, of an agency in a matter other than rule
making.'' 5 U.S.C. 551(6) (emphasis added). This contrasts with
permanent scheduling actions, which are subject to formal rulemaking
procedures done ``on the record after opportunity for a hearing,'' and
final decisions that conclude the scheduling process and are subject to
judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 811(a) and 877. The specific language chosen
by Congress indicates its intent that DEA issue orders instead of
proceeding by rulemaking when temporarily scheduling substances. Given
that Congress specifically requires the Administrator (as delegated by
the Attorney General) to follow rulemaking procedures for other kinds
of scheduling actions, see 21 U.S.C. 811(a), it is noteworthy that, in
section 811(h)(1), Congress authorized the issuance of temporary
scheduling actions by order rather than by rule.
Assuming for the sake of argument that this action is subject to
section 553 of the APA, the Administrator finds that there is good
cause to forgo its notice-and-comment requirements, as any further
delays in the process for issuing temporary scheduling orders would be
impracticable and contrary to the public interest given the manifest
urgency to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
Although DEA believes this temporary scheduling order is not
subject to the notice-and-comment requirements of section 553 of the
APA, DEA notes that in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the
Administrator took into consideration comments submitted by the
Assistant Secretary in response to the notices that DEA transmitted to
the Assistant Secretary pursuant to such subsection.
Further, DEA believes that this temporary scheduling action is not
a ``rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2), and, accordingly, is not
subject to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
requirements for the preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are not applicable where, as here, DEA is
not required by section 553 of the APA or any other law to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking. Therefore, in this instance,
since DEA believes this temporary scheduling action is not a ``rule,''
it is not subject to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
when issuing this temporary action.
In accordance with the principles of Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866,
13563, and 14094, this action is not a significant regulatory action.
E.O. 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health, and safety effects;
distributive impacts; and equity). E.O. 13563 is supplemental to and
reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing
regulatory review as established in E.O. 12866. E.O. 12866, sec. 3(f),
as amended by E.O. 14094, sec. 1(b), provides the definition of a
``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget. Because this is not a rulemaking action, this is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Section 3(f) of E.O.
12866.
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with E.O. 13132, it is
determined that this action does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Signing Authority
This document of the Drug Enforcement Administration was signed on
July 16, 2024, by Administrator Anne Milgram. That document with the
original signature and date is maintained by DEA. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the
Federal Register, the undersigned DEA Federal Register Liaison Officer
has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic
format for publication, as an official document of DEA. This
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the Federal Register.
Scott Brinks,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Drug Enforcement Administration.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out above, DEA amends 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), 956(b), unless otherwise
noted.
0
2. In Sec. 1308.11, add paragraphs (h)(68) and (69) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1308.11 Schedule I
* * * * *
(h) * * *
[[Page 60823]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(68) N-ethyl-2-(2-(4-isopropoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1H- 9760
benzimidazol-1-yl)ethan-1-amine, its isomers, esters,
ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters and ethers
(Other name: N-desethyl isotonitazene).................
(69) 2-(4-ethoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1-(2-(piperidin-1- 9761
yl)ethyl)-1H-benzimidazole, its isomers, esters,
ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters and ethers
(Other names: N-piperidinyl etonitazene;
etonitazepipne)........................................
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-16391 Filed 7-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P