Amendment of Class E Airspace; Thomaston, GA, 60558-60559 [2024-16383]
Download as PDF
60558
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
discrimination, financial institutions
can communicate relevant information
to the original preparer of the valuation
and, when appropriate, request an ROV.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Complaint Resolution Process
Financial institutions can capture
consumer feedback regarding potential
valuation deficiencies through existing
complaint resolution processes. The
complaint resolution process may
capture complaints and inquiries about
the financial institution’s products and
services offered across all lines of
business, including those offered by
third parties, as well as complaints from
various channels (such as letters, phone
calls, in person, transmittal from
regulators, third-party valuation service
providers, emails, and social media).
Depending on the nature and volume,
appraisal and other valuation-based
complaints and inquiries can be an
important indicator of potential risks
and risk management weaknesses.
Appropriate policies, procedures, and
control systems can adequately address
the monitoring, escalating, and
resolving of complaints including a
determination of the merits of the
complaint and whether a financial
institution should initiate an ROV.
Examples of Policies, Procedures, and
Control Systems
Financial institutions may consider
developing risk-based ROV-related
policies, procedures, control systems,
and complaint resolution processes 44
that identify, address, and mitigate the
risk of deficient valuations, including
valuations that involve prohibited
discrimination, and that:
• Consider ROVs as a possible
resolution for consumer complaints or
inquiries related to residential property
valuations. If a complaint or inquiry
includes allegations of discrimination,
the institution may consider, in addition
to processing the ROV, separately
initiating the process the institution
may have to respond to allegations of
discrimination.
• Consider whether any information
or other process requirements related to
a consumer’s request for a financial
institution to initiate an ROV create
unreasonable barriers or discourage
consumers from requesting the
institution initiate an ROV.
• Establish a process that provides for
the identification, management,
44 Risk-based ROV-related policies, procedures,
control systems, and complaint processes may
necessarily vary according to the size and
complexity of the financial institution. Smaller
financial institutions that choose to implement the
guidance may have policies and procedures that
differ from those at larger and midsize institutions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Jul 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
analysis, escalation, and resolution of
valuation-related complaints or
inquiries across all relevant lines of
business, from various channels and
sources (such as letters, phone calls, in
person, regulators, third-party service
providers, emails, and social media).
• Establish a process to inform
consumers how to raise concerns about
the valuation early enough in the
underwriting process for any errors or
issues to be resolved before a final credit
decision is made. This may include
educating consumers on the type of
information they may provide when
communicating with the financial
institution about potential valuation
deficiencies.
• Identify stakeholders and clearly
outline each business unit’s roles and
responsibilities for processing an ROV
request (e.g., loan origination,
processing, underwriting, collateral
valuation, compliance, customer
experience, or complaints).
• Establish risk-based ROV systems
that route the request to the appropriate
business unit (e.g., requests that include
concerns or inquiries that allege
discrimination could be routed to the
appropriate compliance, legal, and
appraisal review staff that have the
requisite skills and authority to research
and resolve the request).
• Establish standardized processes to
increase the consistency of
consideration of requests for ROVs:
Æ Use clear, plain language in notices
to consumers of how they may request
the ROV;
Æ Use clear, plain language in ROV
policies that provide a consistent
process for the consumer, appraiser, and
internal stakeholders;
Æ Establish guidelines for the
information the financial institution
may need to initiate the ROV process;
Æ Establish timelines in the
complaint or ROV processes for when
milestones need to be achieved;
Æ Establish guidelines for when a
second appraisal could be ordered and
who assumes the cost; and
Æ Establish protocols for
communicating the status of the
complaint or ROV and the lender’s
determination to consumers.
• Ensure relevant lending and
valuation-related staff, inclusive of third
parties (e.g., appraisal management
companies, fee-appraisers, mortgage
brokers, and mortgage servicers) are
trained to identify deficiencies
(including practices that may result in
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
discrimination) through the valuation
review process.
Michael J. Hsu,
Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dated at Washington, DC, on July 08, 2024.
Hina Z. Hussain,
Acting Assistant Executive Secretary.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on June 27, 2024.
Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
Rohit Chopra,
Director, Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2024–16200 Filed 7–25–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P; 6210–01–P; 6714–01–P;
7535–01–P; 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2024–1235; Airspace
Docket No. 24–ASO–13]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Thomaston, GA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface for ThomastonUpson County Airport, Thomaston, GA,
as the YATES Non-directional Beacon
(NDB) has been decommissioned and
associated instrument approaches
canceled. Controlled airspace is
necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations at this airport.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September
5, 2024. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order JO 7400.11 and publication of
conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), all
comments received, this final rule, and
all background material may be viewed
online at www.regulations.gov using the
FAA Docket number. Electronic
retrieval help and guidelines are
available on the website. It is available
24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
FAA Order JO 7400.11H, Airspace
Designations, and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. For further information,
you can contact the Airspace Policy
Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1701 Columbia Avenue,
College Park, GA 30337; telephone:
(404) 305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority, as it amends
Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface for
Thomaston-Upson County Airport,
Thomaston, GA.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
History
The FAA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA 2024–1235 in the Federal Register
(89 FR 42399; May 15, 2024), proposing
to amend Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
for Thomaston-Upson County Airport,
Thomaston, GA. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
Incorporation by Reference
Class E airspace is published in
paragraph 6005 of FAA Order JO
7400.11, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an
annual basis. This document amends
the current version of that order, FAA
Order JO 7400.11H, dated August 11,
2023, and effective September 15, 2023.
FAA Order JO 7400.11H is publicly
available as listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this document. These
amendments will be published in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Jul 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
next update to FAA Order JO 7400.11.
FAA Order JO 7400.11H lists Class A, B,
C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic
service routes, and reporting points.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 71
amends Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
within an 8.1-mile radius (increased
from a 6.5-mile radius) of ThomastonUpson County Airport, Thomaston, GA,
and within 3.7 miles on each side of the
118° bearing of the airport, extending
from the 8.1-mile radius to 9.8 miles
southeast of the airport. An airspace
evaluation caused this action due to the
decommissioning of the YATES NDB.
This action also updates the airport’s
geographic coordinates to coincide with
the FAA’s database. Controlled airspace
is necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations in the area.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
60559
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order JO 7400.11H,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 11, 2023, and
effective September 15, 2023, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore: (1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
*
Environmental Review
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 5–6.5a. This airspace action
is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant the preparation of an
environmental assessment.
Federal Aviation Administration
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
ASO GA E5 Thomaston, GA [Amended]
Thomaston-Upson County Airport, GA
(Lat. 32°57′18″ N, long. 84°15′51″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 8.1-mile
radius of the Thomaston-Upson County
Airport and 3.7 miles on each side of the
118° bearing from the airport, extending from
the 8.1-mile radius to 9.8 miles southeast of
the airport.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 17,
2024.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2024–16383 Filed 7–25–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2024–1123; Airspace
Docket No. 24–ASW–10]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of Class E Airspace; Llano
and Mason, TX
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends the Class
E airspace at Llano, TX, and Mason, TX.
This action is the result of airspace
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 144 (Friday, July 26, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60558-60559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-16383]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2024-1235; Airspace Docket No. 24-ASO-13]
RIN 2120-AA66
Amendment of Class E Airspace; Thomaston, GA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface for Thomaston-Upson County Airport, Thomaston,
GA, as the YATES Non-directional Beacon (NDB) has been decommissioned
and associated instrument approaches canceled. Controlled airspace is
necessary for the safety and management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations at this airport.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 5, 2024. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), all
comments received, this final rule, and all background material may be
viewed online at www.regulations.gov using the FAA Docket number.
Electronic retrieval help and guidelines are available on the website.
It is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
[[Page 60559]]
FAA Order JO 7400.11H, Airspace Designations, and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; telephone: (404) 305-6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface for Thomaston-Upson County Airport, Thomaston, GA.
History
The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA 2024-1235 in the Federal Register (89 FR 42399; May 15, 2024),
proposing to amend Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface for Thomaston-Upson County Airport, Thomaston, GA.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
Incorporation by Reference
Class E airspace is published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order JO
7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This
document amends the current version of that order, FAA Order JO
7400.11H, dated August 11, 2023, and effective September 15, 2023. FAA
Order JO 7400.11H is publicly available as listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this document. These amendments will be published in the
next update to FAA Order JO 7400.11. FAA Order JO 7400.11H lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 amends Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface within an 8.1-mile radius
(increased from a 6.5-mile radius) of Thomaston-Upson County Airport,
Thomaston, GA, and within 3.7 miles on each side of the 118[deg]
bearing of the airport, extending from the 8.1-mile radius to 9.8 miles
southeast of the airport. An airspace evaluation caused this action due
to the decommissioning of the YATES NDB. This action also updates the
airport's geographic coordinates to coincide with the FAA's database.
Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and management of
instrument flight rules (IFR) operations in the area.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant the preparation of an
environmental assessment.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order JO 7400.11H, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 11, 2023, and effective September 15, 2023, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.
* * * * *
ASO GA E5 Thomaston, GA [Amended]
Thomaston-Upson County Airport, GA
(Lat. 32[deg]57'18'' N, long. 84[deg]15'51'' W)
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within an 8.1-mile radius of the Thomaston-Upson County Airport and
3.7 miles on each side of the 118[deg] bearing from the airport,
extending from the 8.1-mile radius to 9.8 miles southeast of the
airport.
* * * * *
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 17, 2024.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2024-16383 Filed 7-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P