Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 60337-60339 [2024-16275]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2024 / Proposed Rules
FDA is also making a correction to the
filing notice.
DATES: FDA is reopening the comment
period on the notification of petition
published in the Federal Register of
April 26, 2024 (89 FR 32386). Either
electronic or written comments must be
submitted by September 23, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. The https://
www.regulations.gov electronic filing
system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of
September 23, 2024. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for
written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are received
on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Jul 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2024–F–1912 for ‘‘Filing of Food
Additive Petition From Environmental
Defense Fund, Breast Cancer Prevention
Partners, Center for Food Safety,
Environmental Working Group, Tom
Neltner, and Maricel Maffini; Request
To Amend the Food Additive
Regulations To Remove Authorization
of Fluorinated Polyethylene; Reopening
of the Comment Period.’’ Received
comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ We
will review this copy, including the
claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second
copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/
blacked out, will be available for public
viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff.
If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60337
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lillian Mawby, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration, 5001 Campus Dr.,
College Park, MD 20740, 301–796–4041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of April 26, 2024 (89
FR 32386), FDA published a notification
of filing of a food additive petition (FAP
3B4837), submitted by Environmental
Defense Fund, Breast Cancer Prevention
Partners, Center for Food Safety,
Environmental Working Group, Tom
Neltner, and Maricel Maffini, c/o
Maricel Maffini, Frederick, MD 21701.
The petition proposes that FDA revoke
§ 177.1615 (21 CFR 177.1615,
‘‘Polyethylene, fluorinated’’). Interested
persons were originally given until June
25, 2024, to comment.
Following publication of the filing
notice in the Federal Register of April
26, 2024, FDA was alerted that FAP
3B4837 was not uploaded to the docket,
which did not allow respondents the
ability to view the FAP when the notice
was published in the Federal Register.
Therefore, we are reopening the
comment period for 60 days (which
corresponds to the amount of time that
the petition was missing from the
docket) to allow for interested parties to
view the FAP posted to the docket.
Correction
In the Federal Register of Friday,
April 26, 2024 (89 FR 32886), in FR Doc.
2024–09027, on page 32387, in the
second column in the paragraph under
Section II. ‘‘Request To Repeal 21 CFR
part 177.1615,’’ correct the second
sentence to read: ‘‘Specifically, the
petitioners state that the fluorinated
polyethylene manufactured consistent
with § 177.1615 can produce per- and
poly-fluorinated alkyl substances that
can migrate to food and, therefore, are
not safe pursuant to section 409(c)(5) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 348(c)(5)).’’
We are correcting the sentence to
delete the word ‘‘polymeric.’’
Dated: July 22, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024–16337 Filed 7–24–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 1
RIN 2900–AS11
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
60338
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2024 / Proposed Rules
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations governing the
confidentiality and release of VA
records subject to the Privacy Act of
1974. VA proposes to exempt portions
of the new ‘‘Law Enforcement Officer
Evaluations (LEO Evals)—VA’’
(216VA10) system of records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act of
1974 to prevent compromising the
objectivity and fairness of the testing
and evaluation process.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 23, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments
received before the close of the
comment period will be available at
www.regulations.gov for public viewing,
inspection, or copying, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. Comments received before
the close of the comment period on
www.regulations.gov will be posted as
soon as possible after they have been
received. VA will not post
Regulations.gov public comments that
make threats to individuals or
institutions or suggest that the
individual will take actions to harm the
individual. VA encourages individuals
not to submit duplicative comments;
however, we will post comments from
multiple unique commenters even if the
content is identical or nearly identical
to other comments. Any public
comment received after the comment
period’s closing date is considered late
and will not be considered in the final
rulemaking. In accordance with the
Providing Accountability Through
Transparency Act of 2023, a 100 word
Plain-Language Summary of this
proposed rule is available at
Regulations.gov, under RIN 2900–AS11.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephania Griffin, Chief Privacy Officer,
Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20420, stephania.griffin@va.gov, 704–
245–2492 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Privacy Act of 1974, codified at section
552a of title 5, United States Code
(U.S.C.), governs the means by which
the U.S. Government collects,
maintains, uses, and disseminates
personally identifiable information. The
Privacy Act applies to such information
that is maintained in a ‘‘system of
records.’’ A system of records is a group
of any records under the control of an
agency from which information about
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Jul 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
an individual is retrieved by the name
of the individual or by some identifying
number, symbol, or other identifying
particular assigned to the individual.
See section 552a(a)(4) and (5).
VA maintains numerous systems of
records and, in accordance with section
552a(e)(4), provides notice in the
Federal Register each time a system of
records is established or revised. In
order to safeguard personal information
contained in VA’s systems of records
and carry out the requirements of the
Privacy Act, VA has established
regulations in 38 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 1.575 through 1.582.
These regulations govern VA’s policy on
maintenance, use, and disclosure of
information contained in its systems of
records, including the ability of
individuals to access information about
themselves under the Privacy Act.
While individuals may request access
to records containing information about
themselves under the Privacy Act,
sections 552a(j) and (k) allow the head
of a Federal agency to promulgate rules
to exempt a system of records from the
general accounting, access, and
administrative provisions of the Privacy
Act contained in section 552a(c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f). In
particular, section 552a(j) provides for
general exemptions and section 552a(k)
provides for specific exemptions.
Concurrent with this proposed
rulemaking, notice is being provided in
the Federal Register that VA is
establishing a new system of records
entitled ‘‘Law Enforcement Officer
Evaluations (LEO Evals)—VA
(216VA10).’’ Information in this new
system of records will be used to
document the records of VA police
officer candidates and VA police
officers undergoing psychological
evaluations for hire or annually after
hire. The function of the VA Police
Service is to provide for the
maintenance of law and order and the
protection of persons and property on
Department property. Having qualified
individuals is critical to this function.
Psychological evaluations, testing, and
notes will contain data to assess the
applicant’s or employee’s psychological
fitness to meet the functional
requirements of a VA police officer
position. Such information will be
provided by VA Police Officers and VA
Police Officer candidates; VA
psychologists and psychiatrists
conducting psychological evaluations;
VA police chiefs and supervisors; and
VA human resources and occupational
health staff.
Consistent with section 552a(k)(6),
which allows an agency to exempt
testing or examination materials used
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
solely to determine individual
qualifications for appointment or
promotion in the Federal service the
disclosure of which would compromise
the objectivity or fairness of the testing
or examination process, VA proposes to
exempt portions of the ‘‘LEO Evals’’
system of records from the accounting,
access, and administrative provisions of
the Privacy Act established in section
552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f).
VA proposes this exemption because
portions of a record may relate to testing
and examination material used solely to
determine individual qualifications for
appointment or promotion in the
Federal service. Access to or
amendment of this information by VA
police officers and VA police officer
candidates would compromise the
objectivity and fairness of the testing or
examination process. Amendment of
such records could also impose a highly
impracticable administrative burden by
requiring testing and examinations to be
continuously re-administered.
Without this proposed exemption, the
accounting, access, and administrative
provisions of the Privacy Act contained
in 38 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through
(4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f)
would allow VA police officers and VA
police officer candidates to obtain their
personal information contained in the
‘‘LEO Evals’’ system of records, to
obtain an accounting of certain
disclosures of such personal
information, and to amend certain
personal information contained therein.
Therefore, VA proposes to add this
exemption to its current list of Privacy
Act exemptions in new paragraph (f) of
38 CFR 1.582. This would ensure the
integrity of the testing and examination
process to certify only those VA police
officers that possess the emotional and
mental stability to serve in this critical
role.
As proposed, 38 CFR 1.582(f) would
thus state that VA provides limited
access to Law Enforcement Officer
Evaluations (LEO Evals)—VA
(216VA10). Subparagraph (1) would
state that records contained in this
system of records are exempted
pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(6) from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3),
(d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G)
through (I), and (f). Subparagraph (2)
would further explain that these
exemptions apply to the extent that
information in this system of records is
subject to exemption pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(6) because they relate to
testing or examination material used
solely to determine individual
qualifications for appointment or
promotion in the Federal service, the
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2024 / Proposed Rules
disclosure of which could compromise
the objectivity or fairness of the testing
or examination process.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) directs agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
14094 (Executive Order on Modernizing
Regulatory Review) supplements and
reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing contemporary
regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
and Executive Order 13563 of January
18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review). The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rulemaking is not
a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, as amended by
Executive Order 14094. The Regulatory
Impact Analysis associated with this
rulemaking can be found as a
supporting document at
www.regulations.gov.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612). This
proposed rule would exempt certain
personnel evaluations from disclosure
under certain provisions of the Privacy
Act of 1974. The Privacy Act primarily
affects individuals and not entities and
the proposed rule would impose no
duties or obligations on small entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604 do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Jul 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
Tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
60339
disclosure of which could compromise
the objectivity or fairness of the testing
or examination process.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–16275 Filed 7–24–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and
procedure, Archives and records,
Government employees, Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved and signed
this document on July 18, 2024, and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2021–0264; FRL–8980–01–
R4]
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina;
Mecklenburg Emission Control
Standards and Nitrogen Oxides
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision to the Mecklenburg County
portion of the North Carolina SIP,
hereinafter referred to as the
Mecklenburg Local Implementation
Plan (LIP). The revision was submitted
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy by the State of North Carolina, through
the North Carolina Division of Air
& Management, Office of General Counsel,
Quality (NCDAQ), on behalf of
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Mecklenburg County Air Quality
For the reasons stated in the
(MCAQ) via a letter dated April 24,
preamble, the Department of Veterans
2020. The revision includes updates to
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part
various emission control standards
1 as set forth below:
contained in the Mecklenburg County
Air Pollution Control Ordinance
PART 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS
(MCAPCO) incorporated into the LIP.
EPA is proposing to approve these
■ 1. The authority citation for part 1
changes pursuant to the Clean Air Act
continues to read as follows:
(CAA or Act).
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5101, and as noted
DATES
: Comments must be received on
in specific sections.
or before August 26, 2024.
■ 2. Amend § 1.582 by adding paragraph
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
(f) to read as follows:
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
§ 1.582 Exemptions.
OAR–2021–0264 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
*
*
*
*
*
instructions for submitting comments.
(f) Exemption of Law Enforcement
Officer Evaluation Records. VA provides Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
limited access to Law Enforcement
EPA may publish any comment received
Officer Evaluations (LEO Evals)—VA
to its public docket. Do not submit
(216VA10).
electronically any information you
(1) Records contained in this system
of records are exempted pursuant to the consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(6) from 5
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4),
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f).
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
(2) These exemptions apply to the
extent that information in this system of comment. The written comment is
records is subject to exemption pursuant considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(6) because they
relate to testing or examination material you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
used solely to determine individual
contents located outside of the primary
qualifications for appointment or
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
promotion in the Federal service, the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60337-60339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-16275]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 1
RIN 2900-AS11
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60338]]
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations governing the confidentiality and release of VA records
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974. VA proposes to exempt portions of
the new ``Law Enforcement Officer Evaluations (LEO Evals)--VA''
(216VA10) system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act
of 1974 to prevent compromising the objectivity and fairness of the
testing and evaluation process.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 23, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments received before the close of the
comment period will be available at www.regulations.gov for public
viewing, inspection, or copying, including any personally identifiable
or confidential business information that is included in a comment.
Comments received before the close of the comment period on
www.regulations.gov will be posted as soon as possible after they have
been received. VA will not post Regulations.gov public comments that
make threats to individuals or institutions or suggest that the
individual will take actions to harm the individual. VA encourages
individuals not to submit duplicative comments; however, we will post
comments from multiple unique commenters even if the content is
identical or nearly identical to other comments. Any public comment
received after the comment period's closing date is considered late and
will not be considered in the final rulemaking. In accordance with the
Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2023, a 100 word
Plain-Language Summary of this proposed rule is available at
Regulations.gov, under RIN 2900-AS11.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephania Griffin, Chief Privacy
Officer, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420,
[email protected], 704-245-2492 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Privacy Act of 1974, codified at section
552a of title 5, United States Code (U.S.C.), governs the means by
which the U.S. Government collects, maintains, uses, and disseminates
personally identifiable information. The Privacy Act applies to such
information that is maintained in a ``system of records.'' A system of
records is a group of any records under the control of an agency from
which information about an individual is retrieved by the name of the
individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying
particular assigned to the individual. See section 552a(a)(4) and (5).
VA maintains numerous systems of records and, in accordance with
section 552a(e)(4), provides notice in the Federal Register each time a
system of records is established or revised. In order to safeguard
personal information contained in VA's systems of records and carry out
the requirements of the Privacy Act, VA has established regulations in
38 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1.575 through 1.582. These
regulations govern VA's policy on maintenance, use, and disclosure of
information contained in its systems of records, including the ability
of individuals to access information about themselves under the Privacy
Act.
While individuals may request access to records containing
information about themselves under the Privacy Act, sections 552a(j)
and (k) allow the head of a Federal agency to promulgate rules to
exempt a system of records from the general accounting, access, and
administrative provisions of the Privacy Act contained in section
552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f). In particular,
section 552a(j) provides for general exemptions and section 552a(k)
provides for specific exemptions.
Concurrent with this proposed rulemaking, notice is being provided
in the Federal Register that VA is establishing a new system of records
entitled ``Law Enforcement Officer Evaluations (LEO Evals)--VA
(216VA10).'' Information in this new system of records will be used to
document the records of VA police officer candidates and VA police
officers undergoing psychological evaluations for hire or annually
after hire. The function of the VA Police Service is to provide for the
maintenance of law and order and the protection of persons and property
on Department property. Having qualified individuals is critical to
this function. Psychological evaluations, testing, and notes will
contain data to assess the applicant's or employee's psychological
fitness to meet the functional requirements of a VA police officer
position. Such information will be provided by VA Police Officers and
VA Police Officer candidates; VA psychologists and psychiatrists
conducting psychological evaluations; VA police chiefs and supervisors;
and VA human resources and occupational health staff.
Consistent with section 552a(k)(6), which allows an agency to
exempt testing or examination materials used solely to determine
individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal
service the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity or
fairness of the testing or examination process, VA proposes to exempt
portions of the ``LEO Evals'' system of records from the accounting,
access, and administrative provisions of the Privacy Act established in
section 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I),
and (f).
VA proposes this exemption because portions of a record may relate
to testing and examination material used solely to determine individual
qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service.
Access to or amendment of this information by VA police officers and VA
police officer candidates would compromise the objectivity and fairness
of the testing or examination process. Amendment of such records could
also impose a highly impracticable administrative burden by requiring
testing and examinations to be continuously re-administered.
Without this proposed exemption, the accounting, access, and
administrative provisions of the Privacy Act contained in 38 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f)
would allow VA police officers and VA police officer candidates to
obtain their personal information contained in the ``LEO Evals'' system
of records, to obtain an accounting of certain disclosures of such
personal information, and to amend certain personal information
contained therein.
Therefore, VA proposes to add this exemption to its current list of
Privacy Act exemptions in new paragraph (f) of 38 CFR 1.582. This would
ensure the integrity of the testing and examination process to certify
only those VA police officers that possess the emotional and mental
stability to serve in this critical role.
As proposed, 38 CFR 1.582(f) would thus state that VA provides
limited access to Law Enforcement Officer Evaluations (LEO Evals)--VA
(216VA10). Subparagraph (1) would state that records contained in this
system of records are exempted pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(6) from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f). Subparagraph (2) would further explain
that these exemptions apply to the extent that information in this
system of records is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(6) because they relate to testing or examination material used
solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or
promotion in the Federal service, the
[[Page 60339]]
disclosure of which could compromise the objectivity or fairness of the
testing or examination process.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) directs
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 (Executive Order on
Modernizing Regulatory Review) supplements and reaffirms the
principles, structures, and definitions governing contemporary
regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), and Executive Order 13563 of
January 18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review). The
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this
rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094. The Regulatory Impact
Analysis associated with this rulemaking can be found as a supporting
document at www.regulations.gov.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612). This proposed rule would exempt certain personnel
evaluations from disclosure under certain provisions of the Privacy Act
of 1974. The Privacy Act primarily affects individuals and not entities
and the proposed rule would impose no duties or obligations on small
entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and Tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and procedure, Archives and records,
Government employees, Privacy, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved and signed
this document on July 18, 2024, and authorized the undersigned to sign
and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of
General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part 1 as set forth below:
PART 1--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5101, and as noted in specific sections.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1.582 by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.582 Exemptions.
* * * * *
(f) Exemption of Law Enforcement Officer Evaluation Records. VA
provides limited access to Law Enforcement Officer Evaluations (LEO
Evals)--VA (216VA10).
(1) Records contained in this system of records are exempted
pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(6) from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f).
(2) These exemptions apply to the extent that information in this
system of records is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(6) because they relate to testing or examination material used
solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or
promotion in the Federal service, the disclosure of which could
compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination
process.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-16275 Filed 7-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P