Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, 60317-60319 [2024-16209]
Download as PDF
60317
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
NEW YORK—2015 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS—Continued
[Primary and Secondary]
Designation
Classification
Designated area 1
New York County.
Queens County.
Richmond County.
Rockland County.
Suffolk County.
Westchester County.
Shinnecock Indian Nation ...............................................................
*
*
Date 2
Type
Date 2
........................
Nonattainment .......
August 3, 2018 ......
*
*
*
*
Type
Moderate.
*
1 Includes
any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. EPA is not determining the boundaries of any area of Indian
country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a determination that the State has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
2 This date is August 3, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–16244 Filed 7–24–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[WC Docket No. 17–84; FCC 23–109; FR
ID 232182]
Accelerating Wireline Broadband
Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; announcement of
effective date.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau)
announces that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved, for a period of three years, the
information collection associated with
the Commission’s revised pole
attachment rules. This document is
consistent with Accelerating Wireline
Broadband Deployment by Removing
Barriers to Infrastructure Investment,
Fourth Report and Order, Declaratory
Ruling, FCC 23–109, which stated that
the Bureau would publish a document
in the Federal Register announcing the
effective date of the revised rules.
DATES: Amendatory instruction 2
(adding § 1.1411(c)(4)) and amendatory
instruction 4 (adding § 1.1415),
published at 89 FR 2151, January 12,
2024, are effective on July 25, 2024
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Ray, Attorney Advisor,
Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202)
418–0357, or by email at Michael.Ray@
fcc.gov. For additional information
concerning the Paperwork Reduction
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
Act information collection
requirements, contact Nicole Ongele at
(202) 418–2991 or nicole.ongele@
fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 13, 2023, the Commission
adopted Accelerating Wireline
Broadband Deployment by Removing
Barriers to Infrastructure Investment,
Fourth Report and Order, Declaratory
Ruling, FCC 23–109, published at 89 FR
2151, January 12, 2024. In the Fourth
Report and Order, the Commission
adopted a revision to 47 CFR 1.1411 that
provides communications providers
with information about the status of the
utility poles they plan to use as part of
their broadband buildouts. The
Commission also added new 47 CFR
1.1415 that creates a new expedited
process for the Commission’s review
and assessment of pole attachment
disputes that impede or delay
broadband deployment and established
FCC Form 5653—Request for RBAT
Review and Assessment—to initiate the
expedited process. The Commission
stated that these rule changes may
contain new or modified information
collection requirements and would not
become effective until OMB completes
its review of any information collection
requirements that the Bureau
determined is required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The
Commission also directed the Bureau to
announce the effective date for the
revision to § 1.1411 and new § 1.1415 by
subsequent public release.
On July 2, 2024, OMB approved, for
a period of three years, the information
collection requirements related to the
pole attachment rules contained in the
Fourth Report and Order. The OMB
Control Number is 3060–1151. The
Bureau publishes this document as an
announcement of the effective date of
the pole attachment rules adopted in the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fourth Report and Order, as well as FCC
Form 5653. If you have any comments
on the burden estimates listed below, or
how the Commission can improve the
collections and reduce any burdens
caused thereby, please contact Nicole
Ongele, Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554. Please include
the OMB Control Number 3060–1151 in
your correspondence. The Commission
also will accept your comments via
email at PRA@fcc.gov. To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (Braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507),
the Bureau is notifying the public that
it received final OMB approval on July
2, 2024, for the information collection
requirements contained in the changes
to the Commission’s pole attachment
rules in 47 CFR 1.1411 and 1.1415, as
well as FCC Form 5653.
Under 5 CFR part 1320, an agency
may not conduct or sponsor a collection
of information unless it displays a
current, valid OMB Control Number.
No person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act that does not
display a current, valid OMB Control
Number.
The foregoing notification is required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, Public Law 104–13, October 1,
1995, and 44 U.S.C. 3507.
The total annual reporting burdens
and costs for the affected respondents
are as follows:
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
60318
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
OMB Control Number: 3060–1151.
OMB Approval Date: July 2, 2024.
OMB Expiration Date: July 31, 2027.
Title: Sections 1.1411, 1.1412, 1.1415,
and 1.1416 Pole Attachment Access and
Dispute Resolution Requirements.
Form Number: FCC Form 5653.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently-approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 1,380 respondents; 165,009
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.25–5
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement and third-party
disclosure requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Mandatory or
required to obtain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in 47 U.S.C. 224.
Total Annual Burden: 120,980 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $1,800.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
received OMB approval for a revision to
an existing information collection, OMB
Collection No. 3060–1151. In
Accelerating Wireline Broadband
Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment, Fourth Report
and Order, Declaratory Ruling, FCC 23–
109, published at 89 FR 2151, January
12, 2024, the Commission adopted rules
that implement the pole attachment
requirements in section 224 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended. The Order substantially
revised 47 CFR 1.1411, redesignated
existing 47 CFR 1.1415 as 47 CFR
1.1416, and added a new 47 CFR 1.1415.
Section 1.1411. In the Order, the
Commission adopted regulations
requiring utilities to share information
about their poles with prospective
telecommunications and cable attachers.
The Commission created this
requirement to help improve the
attachment process and potentially
reduce disputes, thus facilitating
broadband deployment. Specifically, the
Order requires utilities to provide to
potential attachers, upon request, the
information contained in their most
recent cyclical pole inspection reports,
or any intervening, periodic reports
created before the next cyclical
inspection, for the poles covered by a
submitted attachment application,
including whether any of the affected
poles have been ‘‘red tagged’’ by the
utility for replacement and the
scheduled replacement date or
timeframe (if any). For the purposes of
this new transparency requirement, a
cyclical pole inspection report is any
report that a utility creates in the normal
course of its business that sets forth the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
results of the routine inspection of its
poles during the utility’s normal pole
inspection cycle, while a periodic pole
inspection report is any report that a
utility creates in the normal course of its
business that sets forth the results of the
inspection of any of its poles outside the
utility’s normal pole inspection cycle.
When asking for information about the
status of a utility’s poles for a planned
buildout, the attacher must submit its
information request no earlier than
contemporaneously with an attachment
application. The utility will have ten
business days to respond to the request.
Where an attacher amends its
application based on the information it
receives from the utility, the utility will
have the option to restart the 45-day
period for responding to the application
on the merits and conducting the
required make-ready survey. Regardless
of whether the utility elects to restart
the 45-day response period, any
additional survey costs necessitated by
the amended application, such as a
second survey after a survey for the
original application has been
completed, will be borne by the new
attacher consistent with the new
attacher’s obligation to pay for makeready costs associated with its
application. The Commission also
required utilities to retain copies, in
whatever form they were created, of any
such cyclical or periodic pole
inspection reports they conduct in the
normal course of business, until such
time as the utility completes a
superseding cyclical pole inspection
report covering the poles included in
the attachment application. The
Commission reiterated that utilities are
required to provide only the information
they already possess and track in the
normal course of conducting pole
inspections at the time of the attacher’s
request for data. The Commission did
not require utilities to collect or create
new information for the purpose of
responding to such requests or to
provide all information they may
possess on the affected poles outside
their pole inspection reports. The
Commission found that adopting this
limited requirement achieves a balance
between a potential attacher’s need for
more information about the poles that it
plans to use as part of a broadband
buildout and the utility’s interest in
minimizing the burden of mandatory
disclosures.
Section 1.1415. To expedite the
resolution of pole attachment disputes
that impede or delay active broadband
deployment projects, the Commission
established the Rapid Broadband
Assessment Team (RBAT), which will
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
consist of one or more staff from the
Commission’s Enforcement Bureau and
one or more staff from the Commission’s
Wireline Competition Bureau. The
Commission created the RBAT in an
effort to make the Commission’s pole
attachment dispute resolution process
more responsive and adaptable with the
goal of facilitating broadband
deployment. The Order charged the
RBAT with expediting the resolution of
such disputes by swiftly engaging key
stakeholders, gathering relevant
information, distilling issues in dispute,
and recommending to the parties, where
appropriate, an abbreviated mediation
process, placement of a complaint (or
portion of a complaint) on the
Commission’s Accelerated Docket based
on consideration of specified criteria,
and/or any other action that the RBAT
determines will help the parties resolve
their dispute. To request RBAT review
and assessment of a dispute that a party
to the dispute contends is impeding or
delaying deployment of broadband
facilities, the party must first notify the
Chief of the Enforcement Bureau’s
Market Disputes Resolution Division
(MDRD) of the request by phone and in
writing. The MDRD Chief will direct the
party to FCC Form 5653—Request for
RBAT Review and Assessment—on the
MDRD website and to instructions for
completing and electronically
transmitting the form to the RBAT. The
form will elicit information relevant to
the scope and nature of the dispute, and
to whether the dispute is appropriate for
expedited mediation and/or placement
on the Accelerated Docket. The
information submitted by a party on the
FCC Form 5653 will assist the RBAT in
efficiently reviewing and assessing the
party’s dispute and in providing
guidance on the most effective means of
resolving it. The RBAT also may request
that one or both parties provide the
RBAT with documentation or other
information relevant to the dispute.
After reviewing the parties’
submissions, the RBAT will provide
guidance and advice to the parties on
the most effective means of resolving
their dispute, including staff-supervised
mediation, use of the Accelerated
Docket, and/or other action. Should the
RBAT recommend staff-supervised
mediation, it shall be conducted
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.737, the
requirements of which may be modified
or waived as appropriate in this context
or as needed in light of the facts or
circumstances of a particular case. In
the event that the parties are unable to
settle their dispute, and a prospective
complainant seeks placement of its
complaint on the Accelerated Docket,
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
the RBAT will decide whether the
complaint or a portion of the complaint
is suitable for inclusion on the
Accelerated Docket based on a totality
of the factors listed in 47 CFR 1.1415(e).
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 1
Telecommunications, cable, utility,
procedures, filing requirements.
Federal Communications Commission
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Previous Federal Actions
[FR Doc. 2024–16209 Filed 7–24–24; 8:45 am]
Please refer to the proposed listing
rule (88 FR 34800) for the Sira curassow
and southern helmeted curassow
published on May 31, 2023, for a
detailed description of previous Federal
actions concerning these species.
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Peer Review
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0053;
FXES1111090FEDR–245–FF09E22000]
RIN 1018–BG55
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Endangered Species
Status for Sira Curassow and Southern
Helmeted Curassow
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), determine
endangered species status under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act),
as amended, for the Sira curassow
(Pauxi koepckeae) and southern
helmeted curassow (Pauxi unicornis),
two bird species from South America.
This rule extends the protections of the
Act to these species.
DATES: This rule is effective August 26,
2024.
ADDRESSES: This final rule is available
on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments and
materials we received are available for
public inspection at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0053.
Availability of supporting materials:
Supporting materials we used in
preparing this rule, such as the species
status assessment report, are available at
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0053.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel London, Manager, Branch of
Delisting and Foreign Species,
Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, MS: ES, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803; telephone 703–358–2491.
Individuals in the United States who are
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 24, 2024
deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have
a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
Jkt 262001
A species status assessment (SSA)
team prepared an SSA report for the
Sira curassow and southern helmeted
curassow. The SSA team was composed
of Service biologists, in consultation
with other species experts. The SSA
report represents a compilation of the
best scientific and commercial data
available concerning the status of these
species, including the impacts of past,
present, and future factors (both
negative and beneficial) affecting these
species.
In accordance with our joint policy on
peer review published in the Federal
Register on July 1, 1994 (59 FR 34270),
and our August 22, 2016, memorandum
updating and clarifying the role of peer
review in listing actions under the Act,
we solicited independent scientific
review of the information contained in
the Sira curassow and southern
helmeted curassow SSA report. As
discussed in the proposed rule, we sent
the SSA report to five independent peer
reviewers and received one response.
The peer review can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–HQ–ES–2023–0053. In preparing
the proposed rule, we incorporated the
results of this review, as appropriate,
into the SSA report, which was the
foundation for the proposed rule and
this final rule. A summary of the peer
review comments and our responses can
be found in the proposed rule (88 FR
34800; May 31, 2023).
Summary of Changes From the
Proposed Rule
In this final rule, we make no
substantive changes from the May 31,
2023, proposed rule (88 FR 34800) after
considering the comments we received
during the comment period.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60319
Summary of Comments and
Recommendations
In the proposed rule published on
May 31, 2023 (88 FR 34800), we
requested that all interested parties
submit written comments on the
proposal by July 31, 2023. We also
contacted appropriate Federal agencies,
scientific experts and organizations, and
other interested parties and invited
them to comment on the proposal. All
substantive information received during
comment periods has either been
incorporated directly into this final
determination or is addressed below.
Public Comments
We considered all comments and
information we received from the public
during the comment period for the
proposed listing of the Sira curassow
and southern helmeted curassow. We
received a total of five comments from
the public, all of which support the
proposed listing of these species as
endangered.
One commenter suggested that both
species may be in international trade
because there may be demand for
species in the Pauxi genus, particularly
for ornamental use of the species’
helmet (casque). The commenter
provided some examples of trade in
Pauxi species; however, the species
involved were either not the Sira or
southern helmeted curassow or the
species were not determined. While the
commenter noted some efforts to
regulate and monitor international trade
in southern helmeted curassow by other
countries, international trade has not
been noted for the Sira curassow or
southern helmeted curassow in
assessments of these species (BLI 2023a
and 2023b, unpaginated; IUCN 2023b
and IUCN 2023c, unpaginated). Our
evaluation of the best available data
does not indicate international trade is
a threat to either species. However, as
explained in further detail below, after
evaluating the best scientific and
commercial data available regarding
threats to the species and assessing the
cumulative effect of the threats under
the Act’s section 4(a)(1) factors, we
determined endangered species status
for each species as proposed.
Four of the five public comments
suggested that the length of time
between when we were petitioned to list
the southern helmeted curassow in 1991
and the proposed listing in 2023 is too
long, particularly because we had
determined the species was warranted
for listing in 1994 but precluded by
other priorities. We recognize the length
of time between first making the
southern helmeted curassow a
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60317-60319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-16209]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[WC Docket No. 17-84; FCC 23-109; FR ID 232182]
Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers
to Infrastructure Investment
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau)
announces that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved,
for a period of three years, the information collection associated with
the Commission's revised pole attachment rules. This document is
consistent with Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing
Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, Fourth Report and Order,
Declaratory Ruling, FCC 23-109, which stated that the Bureau would
publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective
date of the revised rules.
DATES: Amendatory instruction 2 (adding Sec. 1.1411(c)(4)) and
amendatory instruction 4 (adding Sec. 1.1415), published at 89 FR
2151, January 12, 2024, are effective on July 25, 2024
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Ray, Attorney Advisor,
Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-0357, or by email at
[email protected]. For additional information concerning the
Paperwork Reduction Act information collection requirements, contact
Nicole Ongele at (202) 418-2991 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 13, 2023, the Commission adopted
Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment, Fourth Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling,
FCC 23-109, published at 89 FR 2151, January 12, 2024. In the Fourth
Report and Order, the Commission adopted a revision to 47 CFR 1.1411
that provides communications providers with information about the
status of the utility poles they plan to use as part of their broadband
buildouts. The Commission also added new 47 CFR 1.1415 that creates a
new expedited process for the Commission's review and assessment of
pole attachment disputes that impede or delay broadband deployment and
established FCC Form 5653--Request for RBAT Review and Assessment--to
initiate the expedited process. The Commission stated that these rule
changes may contain new or modified information collection requirements
and would not become effective until OMB completes its review of any
information collection requirements that the Bureau determined is
required under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Commission also
directed the Bureau to announce the effective date for the revision to
Sec. 1.1411 and new Sec. 1.1415 by subsequent public release.
On July 2, 2024, OMB approved, for a period of three years, the
information collection requirements related to the pole attachment
rules contained in the Fourth Report and Order. The OMB Control Number
is 3060-1151. The Bureau publishes this document as an announcement of
the effective date of the pole attachment rules adopted in the Fourth
Report and Order, as well as FCC Form 5653. If you have any comments on
the burden estimates listed below, or how the Commission can improve
the collections and reduce any burdens caused thereby, please contact
Nicole Ongele, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554. Please include the OMB Control Number 3060-1151
in your correspondence. The Commission also will accept your comments
via email at [email protected]. To request materials in accessible formats
for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an email to [email protected] or call the Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432
(TTY).
Synopsis
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507), the Bureau is notifying the public that it received final OMB
approval on July 2, 2024, for the information collection requirements
contained in the changes to the Commission's pole attachment rules in
47 CFR 1.1411 and 1.1415, as well as FCC Form 5653.
Under 5 CFR part 1320, an agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it displays a current, valid OMB
Control Number.
No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply
with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
that does not display a current, valid OMB Control Number.
The foregoing notification is required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, October 1, 1995, and 44 U.S.C. 3507.
The total annual reporting burdens and costs for the affected
respondents are as follows:
[[Page 60318]]
OMB Control Number: 3060-1151.
OMB Approval Date: July 2, 2024.
OMB Expiration Date: July 31, 2027.
Title: Sections 1.1411, 1.1412, 1.1415, and 1.1416 Pole Attachment
Access and Dispute Resolution Requirements.
Form Number: FCC Form 5653.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently-approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 1,380 respondents; 165,009
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.25-5 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement and third-
party disclosure requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Mandatory or required to obtain benefits.
Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47
U.S.C. 224.
Total Annual Burden: 120,980 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $1,800.
Needs and Uses: The Commission received OMB approval for a revision
to an existing information collection, OMB Collection No. 3060-1151. In
Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment, Fourth Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling,
FCC 23-109, published at 89 FR 2151, January 12, 2024, the Commission
adopted rules that implement the pole attachment requirements in
section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. The Order
substantially revised 47 CFR 1.1411, redesignated existing 47 CFR
1.1415 as 47 CFR 1.1416, and added a new 47 CFR 1.1415.
Section 1.1411. In the Order, the Commission adopted regulations
requiring utilities to share information about their poles with
prospective telecommunications and cable attachers. The Commission
created this requirement to help improve the attachment process and
potentially reduce disputes, thus facilitating broadband deployment.
Specifically, the Order requires utilities to provide to potential
attachers, upon request, the information contained in their most recent
cyclical pole inspection reports, or any intervening, periodic reports
created before the next cyclical inspection, for the poles covered by a
submitted attachment application, including whether any of the affected
poles have been ``red tagged'' by the utility for replacement and the
scheduled replacement date or timeframe (if any). For the purposes of
this new transparency requirement, a cyclical pole inspection report is
any report that a utility creates in the normal course of its business
that sets forth the results of the routine inspection of its poles
during the utility's normal pole inspection cycle, while a periodic
pole inspection report is any report that a utility creates in the
normal course of its business that sets forth the results of the
inspection of any of its poles outside the utility's normal pole
inspection cycle. When asking for information about the status of a
utility's poles for a planned buildout, the attacher must submit its
information request no earlier than contemporaneously with an
attachment application. The utility will have ten business days to
respond to the request. Where an attacher amends its application based
on the information it receives from the utility, the utility will have
the option to restart the 45-day period for responding to the
application on the merits and conducting the required make-ready
survey. Regardless of whether the utility elects to restart the 45-day
response period, any additional survey costs necessitated by the
amended application, such as a second survey after a survey for the
original application has been completed, will be borne by the new
attacher consistent with the new attacher's obligation to pay for make-
ready costs associated with its application. The Commission also
required utilities to retain copies, in whatever form they were
created, of any such cyclical or periodic pole inspection reports they
conduct in the normal course of business, until such time as the
utility completes a superseding cyclical pole inspection report
covering the poles included in the attachment application. The
Commission reiterated that utilities are required to provide only the
information they already possess and track in the normal course of
conducting pole inspections at the time of the attacher's request for
data. The Commission did not require utilities to collect or create new
information for the purpose of responding to such requests or to
provide all information they may possess on the affected poles outside
their pole inspection reports. The Commission found that adopting this
limited requirement achieves a balance between a potential attacher's
need for more information about the poles that it plans to use as part
of a broadband buildout and the utility's interest in minimizing the
burden of mandatory disclosures.
Section 1.1415. To expedite the resolution of pole attachment
disputes that impede or delay active broadband deployment projects, the
Commission established the Rapid Broadband Assessment Team (RBAT),
which will consist of one or more staff from the Commission's
Enforcement Bureau and one or more staff from the Commission's Wireline
Competition Bureau. The Commission created the RBAT in an effort to
make the Commission's pole attachment dispute resolution process more
responsive and adaptable with the goal of facilitating broadband
deployment. The Order charged the RBAT with expediting the resolution
of such disputes by swiftly engaging key stakeholders, gathering
relevant information, distilling issues in dispute, and recommending to
the parties, where appropriate, an abbreviated mediation process,
placement of a complaint (or portion of a complaint) on the
Commission's Accelerated Docket based on consideration of specified
criteria, and/or any other action that the RBAT determines will help
the parties resolve their dispute. To request RBAT review and
assessment of a dispute that a party to the dispute contends is
impeding or delaying deployment of broadband facilities, the party must
first notify the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau's Market Disputes
Resolution Division (MDRD) of the request by phone and in writing. The
MDRD Chief will direct the party to FCC Form 5653--Request for RBAT
Review and Assessment--on the MDRD website and to instructions for
completing and electronically transmitting the form to the RBAT. The
form will elicit information relevant to the scope and nature of the
dispute, and to whether the dispute is appropriate for expedited
mediation and/or placement on the Accelerated Docket. The information
submitted by a party on the FCC Form 5653 will assist the RBAT in
efficiently reviewing and assessing the party's dispute and in
providing guidance on the most effective means of resolving it. The
RBAT also may request that one or both parties provide the RBAT with
documentation or other information relevant to the dispute. After
reviewing the parties' submissions, the RBAT will provide guidance and
advice to the parties on the most effective means of resolving their
dispute, including staff-supervised mediation, use of the Accelerated
Docket, and/or other action. Should the RBAT recommend staff-supervised
mediation, it shall be conducted pursuant to 47 CFR 1.737, the
requirements of which may be modified or waived as appropriate in this
context or as needed in light of the facts or circumstances of a
particular case. In the event that the parties are unable to settle
their dispute, and a prospective complainant seeks placement of its
complaint on the Accelerated Docket,
[[Page 60319]]
the RBAT will decide whether the complaint or a portion of the
complaint is suitable for inclusion on the Accelerated Docket based on
a totality of the factors listed in 47 CFR 1.1415(e).
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 1
Telecommunications, cable, utility, procedures, filing
requirements.
Federal Communications Commission
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2024-16209 Filed 7-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P