Hours of Service of Drivers: Reiman Corp.; Denial of Application for Exemption, 58875-58876 [2024-15879]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2024 / Notices
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as
amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: July 16, 2024.
Jazmyne Lewis,
Information Collection Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–15941 Filed 7–18–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2023–0195]
Hours of Service of Drivers: Reiman
Corp.; Denial of Application for
Exemption
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of final disposition;
denial of application for exemption.
FMCSA announces its denial
of Reiman Corp.’s (Reiman) request for
an exemption from certain hours-ofservice (HOS) regulations. Reiman’s
drivers transport latex embedded
cement for use at highway construction
sites. Reiman requests that it be allowed
to operate under the same HOS
exemption provided for ‘‘specially
trained drivers of commercial motor
vehicles that are specially constructed
to service oil wells.’’ FMCSA analyzed
the application and public comment
and determined that Reiman did not
demonstrate how the commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) operations under such
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater
than, the level that would be achieved
in the absence of the exemption.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Pearlie Robinson, Driver and Carrier
Operations Division; Office of Carrier,
Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards;
FMCSA; 202–366–4225;
pearlie.robinson@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Jul 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, go to
www.regulations.gov, insert the docket
number ‘‘FMCSA–2023–0195’’ in the
keyword box, and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next,
sort the results by ‘‘Posted (NewerOlder),’’ choose the first notice listed,
and click ‘‘View Related Comments.’’
To view documents mentioned in this
notice as being available in the docket,
go to www.regulations.gov, insert the
docket number ‘‘FMCSA–2023–0195’’ in
the keyword box, click ‘‘Search,’’ and
chose the document to review.
If you do not have access to the
internet, you may view the docket by
visiting Dockets Operations at U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 366–9317 or
(202) 366–9826 before visiting Dockets
Operations.
II. Legal Basis
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
material to the docket, contact Dockets
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315(b) to grant
exemptions from Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA
must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including the applicant’s safety
analysis. The Agency must provide an
opportunity for public comment on the
request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses
and public comments submitted and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305(a)).
The Agency must publish its decision in
the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)). If granted, the notice will
identify the regulatory provision from
which the applicant will be exempt, the
effective period, and all terms and
conditions of the exemption (49 CFR
381.315(c)(1)). If the exemption is
denied, the notice will explain the
reason for the denial (49 CFR
381.315(c)(2)). The exemption may be
renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58875
III. Background
Current Regulatory Requirements
The HOS regulations in 49 CFR part
395 limit the time CMV drivers may
drive and require certain off-duty
periods to ensure that individuals stay
awake and alert while driving.
Generally, a driver may not record time
as ‘‘off-duty’’ unless he or she has been
relieved of all duty and responsibility
for the care and custody of the CMV, its
accessories, and its cargo, and is free to
pursue activities of his or her own
choosing. Thus, drivers who are
waiting, whether at a loading dock or at
a natural gas or oil well site, are
generally considered to be ‘‘on duty.’’
Section 395.3(a)(2) provides that ‘‘a
driver may not drive after a period of 14
consecutive hours after coming on-duty
following 10 consecutive hours offduty.’’ However, the FMCSRs provide
an exception to the 14-hour rule for the
waiting time of a specific classification
of driver. Section 395.1(d)(2) provides,
‘‘In case of specially trained drivers of
CMVs that are specially constructed to
service oil wells, on-duty time shall not
include waiting time at a natural gas or
oil well site. Such waiting time shall be
recorded as ‘off-duty’ for purposes of
§§ 395.8 and 395.15.’’ Section
395.1(d)(2) also provides that the
waiting time of these drivers ‘‘shall not
be included in calculating the 14-hour
period in §395.3(a)(2).’’ Furthermore,
specially trained drivers of such CMVs
are not eligible to use the short-haul
operations exemption in §395.1(e)(1).
Applicant’s Request
Reiman indicated that it is involved
in the construction of highway roads
and bridges and not in support of
oilfield operations. Reiman requests an
exemption for nine of its drivers from
certain HOS regulations because it
considers its operations similar to the
oilfield operations exempted in 49 CFR
395.1(d)(2), including that these drivers
are specially trained to operate vehicles
that are specially designed to transport
specific products with vehicle-mounted
equipment. The requested exemption
would allow these drivers who transport
latex embedded cement to record
waiting time at construction sites as
‘‘off-duty’’ for purposes of 49 CFR 395.8
and 395.15. Further, Reiman would not
include waiting time in calculating the
14-hour period in 49 CFR 395.3(a)(2),
and the drivers would not be eligible to
use the short-haul operations provision
in § 395.1(e)(1).
Applicant’s Method To Ensure an
Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety
According to Reiman:
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
58876
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2024 / Notices
The company is aware of the risks inherent
with the extended hours of operations and
will ensure the driver is not operating the
CMV while fatigued. This will be
accomplished by the managers and on-site
project supervisors attending ‘‘Distracted
Driving and Fatigue Awareness’’ training, as
well as through face-to-face interactions with
the driver(s), the intent being increased
awareness of the drivers mental and physical
state.
IV. Public Comments
On November 16, 2023, FMCSA
published Reiman’s application and
requested public comment (88 FR
11504). The Agency received one
response, a joint comment filed by
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety
and the Truck Safety Coalition in
opposition to the requested exemption.
These organizations commented that,
‘‘The basis for seeking the exemption is
no more than the normal daily logistical
issues presented by the Petitioner’s
daily operations.’’ The commenters also
stated that ‘‘Permitting an exemption for
any industry or group of drivers that
face waiting times would render the
HOS limitations meaningless at a time
when driver fatigue remains a serious
safety issue.’’
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
V. FMCSA Safety Analysis and
Decision
FMCSA has evaluated Reiman’s
application and the public comment
and denies the exemption request. The
Agency continues to rely on the
substantial body of HOS research that
supported the adoption of the 14-hour
rule (68 FR 22473, April 28, 2003).
Fatigue during the workday represents a
significant safety risk if this exemption
were granted because drivers would
operate their CMVs after the 14th hour
of coming on duty. The risk of fatigue
increases significantly after the 14th
hour of coming on duty, despite
miscellaneous off-duty periods during
the work shift.
The applicant did not include
alternatives to compliance with the 14hour rule, such as some other fixed
driving window within which all
driving must be completed. The
proposed relief from the 14-hour rule
would enable miscellaneous off-duty
periods at the construction sites to be
excluded when determining whether
the drivers may operate the CMV during
the latter part of the workday. This
would create the potential for fatigued
drivers, subject to long workdays and
without consideration of whether the
driver had accumulated 14 hours of onduty time before completing their
driving tasks for the day. The applicant
has not demonstrated that granting the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Jul 18, 2024
Jkt 262001
exemption would achieve an equivalent
level of safety to the existing regulation.
For the above reasons, FMCSA denies
Reiman’s exemption application.
DTNA filed an original
noncompliance report dated February 9,
2022, and amended the report on April
13, 2022, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Sue Lawless,
Responsibility and Reports. DTNA
Acting Deputy Administrator.
petitioned NHTSA on March 1, 2022,
[FR Doc. 2024–15879 Filed 7–18–24; 8:45 am]
and amended the petition on April 13,
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
2022, for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION this noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
National Highway Traffic Safety
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
Administration
30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or
[Docket No. NHTSA–2022–0025; Notice 2]
Noncompliance.
Notice of receipt of DTNA’s petition
Daimler Trucks North America, LLC,
was published with a 30-day public
Denial of Petition for Decision of
comment period on August 30, 2022, in
Inconsequential Noncompliance
the Federal Register (87 FR 53044). No
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
comments were received. To view the
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
petition and all supporting documents
Department of Transportation (DOT).
log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) website at
ACTION: Denial of petition.
https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
SUMMARY: Daimler Trucks North
follow the online search instructions to
America LLC (DTNA) has determined
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2022–
that certain model year (MY) 2019–2022 0025.’’
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately
Thomas Built Bus school buses do not
28,814 MY 2019–2022 Thomas Built
fully comply with Federal Motor
Saf-T-Liner HDX, EFX, C2, and
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
Minotour school buses, manufactured
217, Bus Emergency Exits and Window
between September 28, 2018, and
Retention and Release. DTNA filed an
February 23, 2021, are potentially
original noncompliance report dated
involved.
February 9, 2022, and amended the
III. Noncompliance: DTNA explains
report on April 13, 2022. DTNA
that the subject school buses are
petitioned NHTSA (the ‘‘Agency’’) on
equipped with ‘‘Emergency Exit’’ and
March 1, 2022, and later amended the
‘‘Emergency Door’’ labels that do not
petition on April 13, 2022, for a
decision that the subject noncompliance meet the letter height requirements, as
required by paragraph S5.5.3(a) of
is inconsequential as it relates to motor
FMVSS No. 217. Specifically, some of
vehicle safety. This document
the letters are 4.9 cm instead of the
announces the denial of DTNA’s
required minimum 5 cm letter height.
petition.
IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
S5.5.3(a) of FMVSS No. 217 includes
Daniel Lind, Safety Compliance
the requirements relevant to this
Engineer, NHTSA, Office of Vehicle
petition. Each school bus emergency
Safety Compliance, (202) 366–7235.
exit provided in accordance with
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
S5.2.3.1 of FMVSS No. 217 is required
I. Overview: On November 20, 2020,
to have the designation ‘‘Emergency
NHTSA requested information from
Door’’ or ‘‘Emergency Exit,’’ as
DTNA regarding a test failure with
appropriate, in letters that are at least 5
S5.5.3(a) of FMVSS No. 217, Emergency centimeters high and in a color that
Exit Identification and Labeling, in a
contrasts with the background of the
2019 Thomas Saf-T-Liner school bus.
letters.
V. Background: In March 2020,
NHTSA received DTNA’s response on
NHTSA notified DTNA of a potential
December 18, 2020, and on January 26,
noncompliance regarding the emergency
2022, NHTSA requested that DTNA
exit identification labeling in its subject
provide additional information or file a
school buses. In April 2020, DTNA
noncompliance report, if it determines
responded to NHTSA and stated its
that there is a noncompliance.
belief that the label ‘‘should be
As a result, DTNA determined that
considered compliant’’ because ‘‘with
certain MY 2019–2022 Thomas Built
standard rounding, the label-letters met
Bus school buses do not fully comply
the requirements.’’ In its response,
with paragraph S5.5.3(a) of FMVSS No.
DTNA also contended that NHTSA had
217, Bus Emergency Exits and Window
Retention and Release (49 CFR 571.217). previously audited the labels in 2014
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 139 (Friday, July 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58875-58876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15879]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2023-0195]
Hours of Service of Drivers: Reiman Corp.; Denial of Application
for Exemption
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of final disposition; denial of application for
exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its denial of Reiman Corp.'s (Reiman) request
for an exemption from certain hours-of-service (HOS) regulations.
Reiman's drivers transport latex embedded cement for use at highway
construction sites. Reiman requests that it be allowed to operate under
the same HOS exemption provided for ``specially trained drivers of
commercial motor vehicles that are specially constructed to service oil
wells.'' FMCSA analyzed the application and public comment and
determined that Reiman did not demonstrate how the commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) operations under such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that
would be achieved in the absence of the exemption.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Pearlie Robinson, Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle
Safety Standards; FMCSA; 202-366-4225; [email protected]. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact
Dockets Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, go to www.regulations.gov, insert the docket
number ``FMCSA-2023-0195'' in the keyword box, and click ``Search.''
Next, sort the results by ``Posted (Newer-Older),'' choose the first
notice listed, and click ``View Related Comments.''
To view documents mentioned in this notice as being available in
the docket, go to www.regulations.gov, insert the docket number
``FMCSA-2023-0195'' in the keyword box, click ``Search,'' and chose the
document to review.
If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket
by visiting Dockets Operations at U.S. Department of Transportation,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure
someone is there to help you, please call (202) 366-9317 or (202) 366-
9826 before visiting Dockets Operations.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b) to grant
exemptions from Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs).
FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the Federal
Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the public an
opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the application,
including the applicant's safety analysis. The Agency must provide an
opportunity for public comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305(a)). The Agency must
publish its decision in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)). If
granted, the notice will identify the regulatory provision from which
the applicant will be exempt, the effective period, and all terms and
conditions of the exemption (49 CFR 381.315(c)(1)). If the exemption is
denied, the notice will explain the reason for the denial (49 CFR
381.315(c)(2)). The exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Background
Current Regulatory Requirements
The HOS regulations in 49 CFR part 395 limit the time CMV drivers
may drive and require certain off-duty periods to ensure that
individuals stay awake and alert while driving. Generally, a driver may
not record time as ``off-duty'' unless he or she has been relieved of
all duty and responsibility for the care and custody of the CMV, its
accessories, and its cargo, and is free to pursue activities of his or
her own choosing. Thus, drivers who are waiting, whether at a loading
dock or at a natural gas or oil well site, are generally considered to
be ``on duty.'' Section 395.3(a)(2) provides that ``a driver may not
drive after a period of 14 consecutive hours after coming on-duty
following 10 consecutive hours off-duty.'' However, the FMCSRs provide
an exception to the 14-hour rule for the waiting time of a specific
classification of driver. Section 395.1(d)(2) provides, ``In case of
specially trained drivers of CMVs that are specially constructed to
service oil wells, on-duty time shall not include waiting time at a
natural gas or oil well site. Such waiting time shall be recorded as
`off-duty' for purposes of Sec. Sec. 395.8 and 395.15.'' Section
395.1(d)(2) also provides that the waiting time of these drivers
``shall not be included in calculating the 14-hour period in
Sec. 395.3(a)(2).'' Furthermore, specially trained drivers of such CMVs
are not eligible to use the short-haul operations exemption in
Sec. 395.1(e)(1).
Applicant's Request
Reiman indicated that it is involved in the construction of highway
roads and bridges and not in support of oilfield operations. Reiman
requests an exemption for nine of its drivers from certain HOS
regulations because it considers its operations similar to the oilfield
operations exempted in 49 CFR 395.1(d)(2), including that these drivers
are specially trained to operate vehicles that are specially designed
to transport specific products with vehicle-mounted equipment. The
requested exemption would allow these drivers who transport latex
embedded cement to record waiting time at construction sites as ``off-
duty'' for purposes of 49 CFR 395.8 and 395.15. Further, Reiman would
not include waiting time in calculating the 14-hour period in 49 CFR
395.3(a)(2), and the drivers would not be eligible to use the short-
haul operations provision in Sec. 395.1(e)(1).
Applicant's Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety
According to Reiman:
[[Page 58876]]
The company is aware of the risks inherent with the extended
hours of operations and will ensure the driver is not operating the
CMV while fatigued. This will be accomplished by the managers and
on-site project supervisors attending ``Distracted Driving and
Fatigue Awareness'' training, as well as through face-to-face
interactions with the driver(s), the intent being increased
awareness of the drivers mental and physical state.
IV. Public Comments
On November 16, 2023, FMCSA published Reiman's application and
requested public comment (88 FR 11504). The Agency received one
response, a joint comment filed by Advocates for Highway and Auto
Safety and the Truck Safety Coalition in opposition to the requested
exemption. These organizations commented that, ``The basis for seeking
the exemption is no more than the normal daily logistical issues
presented by the Petitioner's daily operations.'' The commenters also
stated that ``Permitting an exemption for any industry or group of
drivers that face waiting times would render the HOS limitations
meaningless at a time when driver fatigue remains a serious safety
issue.''
V. FMCSA Safety Analysis and Decision
FMCSA has evaluated Reiman's application and the public comment and
denies the exemption request. The Agency continues to rely on the
substantial body of HOS research that supported the adoption of the 14-
hour rule (68 FR 22473, April 28, 2003). Fatigue during the workday
represents a significant safety risk if this exemption were granted
because drivers would operate their CMVs after the 14th hour of coming
on duty. The risk of fatigue increases significantly after the 14th
hour of coming on duty, despite miscellaneous off-duty periods during
the work shift.
The applicant did not include alternatives to compliance with the
14-hour rule, such as some other fixed driving window within which all
driving must be completed. The proposed relief from the 14-hour rule
would enable miscellaneous off-duty periods at the construction sites
to be excluded when determining whether the drivers may operate the CMV
during the latter part of the workday. This would create the potential
for fatigued drivers, subject to long workdays and without
consideration of whether the driver had accumulated 14 hours of on-duty
time before completing their driving tasks for the day. The applicant
has not demonstrated that granting the exemption would achieve an
equivalent level of safety to the existing regulation.
For the above reasons, FMCSA denies Reiman's exemption application.
Sue Lawless,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-15879 Filed 7-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P