Hours of Service of Drivers: Reiman Corp.; Denial of Application for Exemption, 58875-58876 [2024-15879]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2024 / Notices Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the FHWA’s performance; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that the burden could be minimized, including the use of electronic technology, without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB’s clearance of this information collection. Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48. Issued on: July 16, 2024. Jazmyne Lewis, Information Collection Officer. [FR Doc. 2024–15941 Filed 7–18–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–22–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA–2023–0195] Hours of Service of Drivers: Reiman Corp.; Denial of Application for Exemption Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of final disposition; denial of application for exemption. FMCSA announces its denial of Reiman Corp.’s (Reiman) request for an exemption from certain hours-ofservice (HOS) regulations. Reiman’s drivers transport latex embedded cement for use at highway construction sites. Reiman requests that it be allowed to operate under the same HOS exemption provided for ‘‘specially trained drivers of commercial motor vehicles that are specially constructed to service oil wells.’’ FMCSA analyzed the application and public comment and determined that Reiman did not demonstrate how the commercial motor vehicle (CMV) operations under such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved in the absence of the exemption. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Pearlie Robinson, Driver and Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards; FMCSA; 202–366–4225; pearlie.robinson@dot.gov. If you have questions on viewing or submitting ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Jul 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Public Participation Viewing Comments and Documents To view comments, go to www.regulations.gov, insert the docket number ‘‘FMCSA–2023–0195’’ in the keyword box, and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, sort the results by ‘‘Posted (NewerOlder),’’ choose the first notice listed, and click ‘‘View Related Comments.’’ To view documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the docket, go to www.regulations.gov, insert the docket number ‘‘FMCSA–2023–0195’’ in the keyword box, click ‘‘Search,’’ and chose the document to review. If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket by visiting Dockets Operations at U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 366–9317 or (202) 366–9826 before visiting Dockets Operations. II. Legal Basis AGENCY: SUMMARY: material to the docket, contact Dockets Services, telephone (202) 366–9826. FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b) to grant exemptions from Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the application, including the applicant’s safety analysis. The Agency must provide an opportunity for public comment on the request. The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305(a)). The Agency must publish its decision in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)). If granted, the notice will identify the regulatory provision from which the applicant will be exempt, the effective period, and all terms and conditions of the exemption (49 CFR 381.315(c)(1)). If the exemption is denied, the notice will explain the reason for the denial (49 CFR 381.315(c)(2)). The exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)). PO 00000 Frm 00173 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58875 III. Background Current Regulatory Requirements The HOS regulations in 49 CFR part 395 limit the time CMV drivers may drive and require certain off-duty periods to ensure that individuals stay awake and alert while driving. Generally, a driver may not record time as ‘‘off-duty’’ unless he or she has been relieved of all duty and responsibility for the care and custody of the CMV, its accessories, and its cargo, and is free to pursue activities of his or her own choosing. Thus, drivers who are waiting, whether at a loading dock or at a natural gas or oil well site, are generally considered to be ‘‘on duty.’’ Section 395.3(a)(2) provides that ‘‘a driver may not drive after a period of 14 consecutive hours after coming on-duty following 10 consecutive hours offduty.’’ However, the FMCSRs provide an exception to the 14-hour rule for the waiting time of a specific classification of driver. Section 395.1(d)(2) provides, ‘‘In case of specially trained drivers of CMVs that are specially constructed to service oil wells, on-duty time shall not include waiting time at a natural gas or oil well site. Such waiting time shall be recorded as ‘off-duty’ for purposes of §§ 395.8 and 395.15.’’ Section 395.1(d)(2) also provides that the waiting time of these drivers ‘‘shall not be included in calculating the 14-hour period in §395.3(a)(2).’’ Furthermore, specially trained drivers of such CMVs are not eligible to use the short-haul operations exemption in §395.1(e)(1). Applicant’s Request Reiman indicated that it is involved in the construction of highway roads and bridges and not in support of oilfield operations. Reiman requests an exemption for nine of its drivers from certain HOS regulations because it considers its operations similar to the oilfield operations exempted in 49 CFR 395.1(d)(2), including that these drivers are specially trained to operate vehicles that are specially designed to transport specific products with vehicle-mounted equipment. The requested exemption would allow these drivers who transport latex embedded cement to record waiting time at construction sites as ‘‘off-duty’’ for purposes of 49 CFR 395.8 and 395.15. Further, Reiman would not include waiting time in calculating the 14-hour period in 49 CFR 395.3(a)(2), and the drivers would not be eligible to use the short-haul operations provision in § 395.1(e)(1). Applicant’s Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety According to Reiman: E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 58876 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2024 / Notices The company is aware of the risks inherent with the extended hours of operations and will ensure the driver is not operating the CMV while fatigued. This will be accomplished by the managers and on-site project supervisors attending ‘‘Distracted Driving and Fatigue Awareness’’ training, as well as through face-to-face interactions with the driver(s), the intent being increased awareness of the drivers mental and physical state. IV. Public Comments On November 16, 2023, FMCSA published Reiman’s application and requested public comment (88 FR 11504). The Agency received one response, a joint comment filed by Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety and the Truck Safety Coalition in opposition to the requested exemption. These organizations commented that, ‘‘The basis for seeking the exemption is no more than the normal daily logistical issues presented by the Petitioner’s daily operations.’’ The commenters also stated that ‘‘Permitting an exemption for any industry or group of drivers that face waiting times would render the HOS limitations meaningless at a time when driver fatigue remains a serious safety issue.’’ ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 V. FMCSA Safety Analysis and Decision FMCSA has evaluated Reiman’s application and the public comment and denies the exemption request. The Agency continues to rely on the substantial body of HOS research that supported the adoption of the 14-hour rule (68 FR 22473, April 28, 2003). Fatigue during the workday represents a significant safety risk if this exemption were granted because drivers would operate their CMVs after the 14th hour of coming on duty. The risk of fatigue increases significantly after the 14th hour of coming on duty, despite miscellaneous off-duty periods during the work shift. The applicant did not include alternatives to compliance with the 14hour rule, such as some other fixed driving window within which all driving must be completed. The proposed relief from the 14-hour rule would enable miscellaneous off-duty periods at the construction sites to be excluded when determining whether the drivers may operate the CMV during the latter part of the workday. This would create the potential for fatigued drivers, subject to long workdays and without consideration of whether the driver had accumulated 14 hours of onduty time before completing their driving tasks for the day. The applicant has not demonstrated that granting the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Jul 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 exemption would achieve an equivalent level of safety to the existing regulation. For the above reasons, FMCSA denies Reiman’s exemption application. DTNA filed an original noncompliance report dated February 9, 2022, and amended the report on April 13, 2022, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Sue Lawless, Responsibility and Reports. DTNA Acting Deputy Administrator. petitioned NHTSA on March 1, 2022, [FR Doc. 2024–15879 Filed 7–18–24; 8:45 am] and amended the petition on April 13, BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P 2022, for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, National Highway Traffic Safety pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and Administration 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or [Docket No. NHTSA–2022–0025; Notice 2] Noncompliance. Notice of receipt of DTNA’s petition Daimler Trucks North America, LLC, was published with a 30-day public Denial of Petition for Decision of comment period on August 30, 2022, in Inconsequential Noncompliance the Federal Register (87 FR 53044). No AGENCY: National Highway Traffic comments were received. To view the Safety Administration (NHTSA), petition and all supporting documents Department of Transportation (DOT). log onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at ACTION: Denial of petition. https://www.regulations.gov/. Then SUMMARY: Daimler Trucks North follow the online search instructions to America LLC (DTNA) has determined locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2022– that certain model year (MY) 2019–2022 0025.’’ II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately Thomas Built Bus school buses do not 28,814 MY 2019–2022 Thomas Built fully comply with Federal Motor Saf-T-Liner HDX, EFX, C2, and Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. Minotour school buses, manufactured 217, Bus Emergency Exits and Window between September 28, 2018, and Retention and Release. DTNA filed an February 23, 2021, are potentially original noncompliance report dated involved. February 9, 2022, and amended the III. Noncompliance: DTNA explains report on April 13, 2022. DTNA that the subject school buses are petitioned NHTSA (the ‘‘Agency’’) on equipped with ‘‘Emergency Exit’’ and March 1, 2022, and later amended the ‘‘Emergency Door’’ labels that do not petition on April 13, 2022, for a decision that the subject noncompliance meet the letter height requirements, as required by paragraph S5.5.3(a) of is inconsequential as it relates to motor FMVSS No. 217. Specifically, some of vehicle safety. This document the letters are 4.9 cm instead of the announces the denial of DTNA’s required minimum 5 cm letter height. petition. IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: S5.5.3(a) of FMVSS No. 217 includes Daniel Lind, Safety Compliance the requirements relevant to this Engineer, NHTSA, Office of Vehicle petition. Each school bus emergency Safety Compliance, (202) 366–7235. exit provided in accordance with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: S5.2.3.1 of FMVSS No. 217 is required I. Overview: On November 20, 2020, to have the designation ‘‘Emergency NHTSA requested information from Door’’ or ‘‘Emergency Exit,’’ as DTNA regarding a test failure with appropriate, in letters that are at least 5 S5.5.3(a) of FMVSS No. 217, Emergency centimeters high and in a color that Exit Identification and Labeling, in a contrasts with the background of the 2019 Thomas Saf-T-Liner school bus. letters. V. Background: In March 2020, NHTSA received DTNA’s response on NHTSA notified DTNA of a potential December 18, 2020, and on January 26, noncompliance regarding the emergency 2022, NHTSA requested that DTNA exit identification labeling in its subject provide additional information or file a school buses. In April 2020, DTNA noncompliance report, if it determines responded to NHTSA and stated its that there is a noncompliance. belief that the label ‘‘should be As a result, DTNA determined that considered compliant’’ because ‘‘with certain MY 2019–2022 Thomas Built standard rounding, the label-letters met Bus school buses do not fully comply the requirements.’’ In its response, with paragraph S5.5.3(a) of FMVSS No. DTNA also contended that NHTSA had 217, Bus Emergency Exits and Window Retention and Release (49 CFR 571.217). previously audited the labels in 2014 PO 00000 Frm 00174 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 139 (Friday, July 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58875-58876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2023-0195]


Hours of Service of Drivers: Reiman Corp.; Denial of Application 
for Exemption

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department 
of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of final disposition; denial of application for 
exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its denial of Reiman Corp.'s (Reiman) request 
for an exemption from certain hours-of-service (HOS) regulations. 
Reiman's drivers transport latex embedded cement for use at highway 
construction sites. Reiman requests that it be allowed to operate under 
the same HOS exemption provided for ``specially trained drivers of 
commercial motor vehicles that are specially constructed to service oil 
wells.'' FMCSA analyzed the application and public comment and 
determined that Reiman did not demonstrate how the commercial motor 
vehicle (CMV) operations under such exemption would likely achieve a 
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that 
would be achieved in the absence of the exemption.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Pearlie Robinson, Driver and 
Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle 
Safety Standards; FMCSA; 202-366-4225; [email protected]. If you 
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact 
Dockets Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Public Participation

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, go to www.regulations.gov, insert the docket 
number ``FMCSA-2023-0195'' in the keyword box, and click ``Search.'' 
Next, sort the results by ``Posted (Newer-Older),'' choose the first 
notice listed, and click ``View Related Comments.''
    To view documents mentioned in this notice as being available in 
the docket, go to www.regulations.gov, insert the docket number 
``FMCSA-2023-0195'' in the keyword box, click ``Search,'' and chose the 
document to review.
    If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket 
by visiting Dockets Operations at U.S. Department of Transportation, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure 
someone is there to help you, please call (202) 366-9317 or (202) 366-
9826 before visiting Dockets Operations.

II. Legal Basis

    FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b) to grant 
exemptions from Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). 
FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the Federal 
Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the public an 
opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the application, 
including the applicant's safety analysis. The Agency must provide an 
opportunity for public comment on the request.
    The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted 
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a 
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be 
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305(a)). The Agency must 
publish its decision in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)). If 
granted, the notice will identify the regulatory provision from which 
the applicant will be exempt, the effective period, and all terms and 
conditions of the exemption (49 CFR 381.315(c)(1)). If the exemption is 
denied, the notice will explain the reason for the denial (49 CFR 
381.315(c)(2)). The exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).

III. Background

Current Regulatory Requirements

    The HOS regulations in 49 CFR part 395 limit the time CMV drivers 
may drive and require certain off-duty periods to ensure that 
individuals stay awake and alert while driving. Generally, a driver may 
not record time as ``off-duty'' unless he or she has been relieved of 
all duty and responsibility for the care and custody of the CMV, its 
accessories, and its cargo, and is free to pursue activities of his or 
her own choosing. Thus, drivers who are waiting, whether at a loading 
dock or at a natural gas or oil well site, are generally considered to 
be ``on duty.'' Section 395.3(a)(2) provides that ``a driver may not 
drive after a period of 14 consecutive hours after coming on-duty 
following 10 consecutive hours off-duty.'' However, the FMCSRs provide 
an exception to the 14-hour rule for the waiting time of a specific 
classification of driver. Section 395.1(d)(2) provides, ``In case of 
specially trained drivers of CMVs that are specially constructed to 
service oil wells, on-duty time shall not include waiting time at a 
natural gas or oil well site. Such waiting time shall be recorded as 
`off-duty' for purposes of Sec. Sec.  395.8 and 395.15.'' Section 
395.1(d)(2) also provides that the waiting time of these drivers 
``shall not be included in calculating the 14-hour period in 
Sec. 395.3(a)(2).'' Furthermore, specially trained drivers of such CMVs 
are not eligible to use the short-haul operations exemption in 
Sec. 395.1(e)(1).

Applicant's Request

    Reiman indicated that it is involved in the construction of highway 
roads and bridges and not in support of oilfield operations. Reiman 
requests an exemption for nine of its drivers from certain HOS 
regulations because it considers its operations similar to the oilfield 
operations exempted in 49 CFR 395.1(d)(2), including that these drivers 
are specially trained to operate vehicles that are specially designed 
to transport specific products with vehicle-mounted equipment. The 
requested exemption would allow these drivers who transport latex 
embedded cement to record waiting time at construction sites as ``off-
duty'' for purposes of 49 CFR 395.8 and 395.15. Further, Reiman would 
not include waiting time in calculating the 14-hour period in 49 CFR 
395.3(a)(2), and the drivers would not be eligible to use the short-
haul operations provision in Sec.  395.1(e)(1).

Applicant's Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety

    According to Reiman:


[[Page 58876]]


    The company is aware of the risks inherent with the extended 
hours of operations and will ensure the driver is not operating the 
CMV while fatigued. This will be accomplished by the managers and 
on-site project supervisors attending ``Distracted Driving and 
Fatigue Awareness'' training, as well as through face-to-face 
interactions with the driver(s), the intent being increased 
awareness of the drivers mental and physical state.

IV. Public Comments

    On November 16, 2023, FMCSA published Reiman's application and 
requested public comment (88 FR 11504). The Agency received one 
response, a joint comment filed by Advocates for Highway and Auto 
Safety and the Truck Safety Coalition in opposition to the requested 
exemption. These organizations commented that, ``The basis for seeking 
the exemption is no more than the normal daily logistical issues 
presented by the Petitioner's daily operations.'' The commenters also 
stated that ``Permitting an exemption for any industry or group of 
drivers that face waiting times would render the HOS limitations 
meaningless at a time when driver fatigue remains a serious safety 
issue.''

V. FMCSA Safety Analysis and Decision

    FMCSA has evaluated Reiman's application and the public comment and 
denies the exemption request. The Agency continues to rely on the 
substantial body of HOS research that supported the adoption of the 14-
hour rule (68 FR 22473, April 28, 2003). Fatigue during the workday 
represents a significant safety risk if this exemption were granted 
because drivers would operate their CMVs after the 14th hour of coming 
on duty. The risk of fatigue increases significantly after the 14th 
hour of coming on duty, despite miscellaneous off-duty periods during 
the work shift.
    The applicant did not include alternatives to compliance with the 
14-hour rule, such as some other fixed driving window within which all 
driving must be completed. The proposed relief from the 14-hour rule 
would enable miscellaneous off-duty periods at the construction sites 
to be excluded when determining whether the drivers may operate the CMV 
during the latter part of the workday. This would create the potential 
for fatigued drivers, subject to long workdays and without 
consideration of whether the driver had accumulated 14 hours of on-duty 
time before completing their driving tasks for the day. The applicant 
has not demonstrated that granting the exemption would achieve an 
equivalent level of safety to the existing regulation.
    For the above reasons, FMCSA denies Reiman's exemption application.

Sue Lawless,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-15879 Filed 7-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.