Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Rules for Patent Maintenance Fees, 58138-58140 [2024-15704]
Download as PDF
58138
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2024 / Notices
repetition and not an abstract idea, Cal.
Inst. of Tech. v. Broadcom Ltd, 25 F.4th
976, 988 (Fed. Cir. 2022).
• Claims to a packet monitor to
identify disjointed connection flows as
belonging to the same conversational
flow were directed to an improvement
in computer technology and not an
abstract idea, Packet Intel. LLC v.
NetScout Sys., Inc., 965 F.3d 1299,
1308–10 (Fed. Cir. 2020).
• Claims to a primary station for use
in a communication system, where an
additional data field is added to enable
the primary station to simultaneously
send inquiry messages and poll parked
secondary stations, were directed to an
improvement in computer functionality,
namely the reduction of latency
experienced by parked secondary
stations in communication systems and
not an abstract idea, Uniloc USA, Inc. v.
LG Elec. USA, Inc., 957 F.3d 1303, 1305,
1307–08 (Fed. Cir. 2020).
• Claims to a cardiac monitoring
device that analyzes the variability in
the beat-to-beat timing for atrial
fibrillation and atrial flutter to more
accurately detect the occurrence of these
cardiac conditions were directed to an
improvement in cardiac monitoring
technology and not an abstract idea,
CardioNet, LLC v. InfoBionic, Inc., 955
F.3d 1358, 1368–69 (Fed. Cir. 2020).
• Claims to varying the way check
data is generated by modifying the
permutation applied to different data
blocks were directed to an improvement
in a technological process for detecting
systemic errors in data transmission and
not an abstract idea, Koninklijke KPN
N.V. v. Gemalto M2M GmbH, 942 F.3d
1143, 1150–51 (Fed. Cir. 2019).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
IV. Applicability of the USPTO
Eligibility Guidance to AI-Assisted
Inventions
For the subject matter eligibility
analysis under 35 U.S.C. 101, whether
an invention was created with the
assistance of AI is not a consideration in
the application of the Alice/Mayo test
and USPTO eligibility guidance and
should not prevent USPTO personnel
from determining that a claim is subject
matter eligible. In other words, how an
invention is developed is not relevant to
the subject matter eligibility inquiry.
Instead, the inquiry focuses on the
claimed invention itself and whether it
is the type of innovation eligible for
patenting.
In contrast, the USPTO recently
issued guidance on inventorship for AIassisted inventions, which are
inventions created by natural persons
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Jul 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
using one or more AI systems.82 The
guidance explains that current statutes
(e.g., 35 U.S.C. 101 and 115) do not
provide for recognizing contributions by
tools such as AI systems (or other
advanced systems) for inventorship
purposes, even if those AI systems were
instrumental in the creation of the
invention. However, AI-assisted
inventions are not categorically
unpatentable. Patent protection may be
sought for AI-assisted inventions where
one or more persons made a significant
contribution to the claimed invention.
V. Examples
The USPTO has developed new
subject matter eligibility examples for
AI inventions. The examples provide
exemplary subject matter eligibility
analyses under 35 U.S.C. 101 of
hypothetical claims.
Example 47 illustrates the application
of the eligibility analysis to claims that
recite limitations specific to AI,
particularly the use of an artificial
neural network to identify or detect
anomalies. Example 48 illustrates the
application of the eligibility analysis to
claims that recite AI-based methods of
analyzing speech signals and separating
desired speech from extraneous or
background speech. Example 49
illustrates the analysis of method claims
reciting an AI model that is designed to
assist in personalizing medical
treatment to the individual
characteristics of a particular patient.
These examples are intended to assist
USPTO personnel and the public in
understanding the proper application of
the USPTO’s subject matter eligibility
guidance in certain fact-specific
situations, such as whether a claim
recites an abstract idea or whether a
claim integrates the abstract idea into a
practical application, because the
claimed invention improves the
functioning of a computer or another
technology or technical field and thus is
not ‘‘directed to’’ the abstract idea. The
USPTO has also produced an updated
index of examples, which includes
examples issued prior to the publication
of this guidance. A copy of the examples
and the index are available on the
USPTO’s website (www.uspto.gov/
PatentEligibility).
Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2024–15377 Filed 7–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
82 Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted
Inventions, 89 FR 10043, 10044 FN1 (February 13,
2024).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Rules for Patent Maintenance
Fees
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, invites comments on the
extension and revision of an existing
information collection: 0651–0016
(Rules for Patent Maintenance Fees).
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60
days for public comment preceding
submission of the information collection
to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration,
comments regarding this information
collection must be received on or before
September 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments by
any of the following methods. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0016
comment’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Justin Isaac, Office of the
Chief Administrative Officer, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Request for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo,
Senior Legal Advisor, Office of Patent
Legal Administration, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–7728; or by email
at raul.tamayo@uspto.gov with ‘‘0651–
0016 comment’’ in the subject line.
Additional information about this
information collection is also available
at https://www.reginfo.gov under
‘‘Information Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
Under 35 U.S.C. 41 and 37 CFR
1.20(e)–(h), 1.362, 1.363, 1.366, 1.377,
and 1.378, the USPTO charges fees for
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
58139
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2024 / Notices
maintaining in force all patents based
on applications filed on or after
December 12, 1980, except for plant and
design patents. Furthermore,
maintenance fees are required for a
reissue patent unless the patent being
reissued did not require maintenance
fees. Payment of these maintenance fees
is due at 31⁄2, 71⁄2, and 111⁄2 years after
the date the patent was granted. See
section 2504 of the Manual of Patent
Examining Procedure (MPEP) (9th
Edition, Rev. 07.2022, February 2023)
for more information.
If the USPTO does not receive
payment of the appropriate maintenance
fee and any applicable surcharge within
a grace period of six months following
each of the above due dates (at 4, 8, or
12 years after the date of grant), the
patent will expire at that time. After a
patent expires, it is no longer
enforceable. Payments of maintenance
fees that are submitted during the 6month grace period before patent
expiration must include the appropriate
surcharge as indicated by 37 CFR
1.20(h). Submissions of maintenance fee
payments and surcharges must include
the relevant patent number and the
corresponding United States application
number in order to identify the correct
patent and ensure proper crediting of
the fee being paid. See MPEP 2506,
2510, and 2515 for more information.
If the USPTO refuses to accept and
record a maintenance fee payment that
was submitted prior to the expiration of
a patent, the patentee may petition the
Director to accept and record the
maintenance fee under 37 CFR 1.377.
This petition must be accompanied by
the fee indicated in 37 CFR 1.17(g),
which may be refunded if it is
determined that the refusal to accept the
maintenance fee was due to an error by
the USPTO.
If a patent has expired due to
nonpayment of a maintenance fee, the
patentee may petition the Director to
accept a delayed payment of the
maintenance fee under 37 CFR 1.378(b).
The Director may accept the payment of
a maintenance fee after the expiration of
the patent if the petitioner shows to the
satisfaction of the Director that the delay
in payment was unintentional. Petitions
to accept unintentionally delayed
payment must also be accompanied by
the required maintenance fee and the
petition fee as set forth in 37 CFR
1.17(m). If the Director accepts the
maintenance fee payment upon petition,
then the patent is reinstated. If the
USPTO denies a petition to accept
delayed payment of a maintenance fee
in an expired patent, the patentee may
petition the Director to reconsider that
decision under 37 CFR 1.378(d).
This information collection covers
maintenance fee petition information,
including the electronic interface and
forms provided by the USPTO to assist
the public with maintenance fee
petitions. To pay a maintenance fee after
patent expiration, the maintenance fee
payment and the petition fee, as set
forth in 37 CFR 1.17(m), must be filed
together with a petition to accept an
unintentionally delayed payment of the
maintenance fee in an expired patent
under 37 CFR 1.378(b). The USPTO
offers two different versions of the form
for petitions to accept unintentionally
delayed payments of maintenance fees:
a web-based ePetition and form PTO/
SB/66 (a fillable PDF). The USPTO
recommends the use of the web-based
ePetition. The USPTO does not offer
forms for the petitions to review the
refusal to accept the payment of a
maintenance fee prior to the expiration
of the patent under 37 CFR 1.377 or the
petitions for the reconsideration of
decisions on petitions refusing to accept
the delayed payment of a maintenance
fee in an expired patent under 37 CFR
1.378(d).
A fee address indication form (PTO/
SB/47) was previously associated with
this information collection. This item
permits applicants, patentees, assignees,
or their representatives of record to
specify a ‘‘fee address’’ for
correspondence related to maintenance
fees that is separate from the
correspondence address associated with
a patent or application. This item is
considered by OMB to be exempt from
the PRA and therefore this item is no
longer included in this information
collection.
II. Method of Collection
The USPTO prefers for the items in
this information collection to be
submitted via online electronic
submissions. Submission by mail, fax,
or hand delivery is available. See MPEP
2510 for more information.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0651–0016.
Forms: (AIA = America Invents Act;
SB = Specimen Book)
• PTO/SB/66 (Petition to Accept
Unintentionally Delayed Payment of
Maintenance Fee in an Expired Patent
(37 CFR 1.378(b))
Type of Review: Extension and
revision of a currently approved
information collection.
Affected Public: Private sector.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 2,616 respondents.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 2,616 responses.
Frequency: On occasion.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that the responses in
this information collection will take the
public approximately between 5
minutes (0.08 hours) and 8 hours to
complete. This includes the time to
gather the necessary information, create
the document, and submit the
completed request to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 3,424 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Hourly Cost Burden: $1,530,528.
TABLE 1—TOTAL BURDEN HOURS AND HOURLY COSTS TO PRIVATE SECTOR RESPONDENTS
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Item
No.
1 ............
2 ............
Item
Petition to Accept Unintentionally Delayed Payment of
Maintenance Fee in an Expired Patent (37 CFR
1.378(b)) (Web-based
ePetition and PTO/SB/66).
Petition to Review Refusal to
Accept Payment of Maintenance Fee Prior to Expiration
of Patent (37 CFR 1.377).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Jul 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Estimated
annual
respondents
Responses per
respondent
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
time for
response
(hours)
Estimated
hourly burden
(hour/year)
Rate 1
($/hour)
Estimated
annual
respondent
cost burden
(a)
(b)
(a) × (b) = (c)
(d)
(c) × (d) = (e)
(f)
(e) × (f) = (g)
2,500
1
2,500
1
2,500
$447
$1,117,500
1
1
1
4
4
447
1,788
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
58140
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2024 / Notices
TABLE 1—TOTAL BURDEN HOURS AND HOURLY COSTS TO PRIVATE SECTOR RESPONDENTS—Continued
Item
No.
3 ............
Item
Estimated
annual
respondents
Responses per
respondent
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
time for
response
(hours)
Estimated
hourly burden
(hour/year)
Rate 1
($/hour)
Estimated
annual
respondent
cost burden
(a)
(b)
(a) × (b) = (c)
(d)
(c) × (d) = (e)
(f)
(e) × (f) = (g)
Petition for Reconsideration of
Decision on Petition Refusing
to Accept Delayed Payment
of Maintenance Fee in an Expired Patent (37 CFR
1.378(d)).
115
1
115
8
920
447
411,240
Totals .................................
2,616
..........................
2,616
....................
3,424
....................
1,530,528
1 2023
Report of the Economic Survey, published by the Committee on Economics of Legal Practice of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA);
pg. F–41. The USPTO uses the average billing rate for intellectual property work in all firms which is $447 per hour (https://www.aipla.org/home/news-publications/
economic-survey).
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Non-hourly Cost Burden: $2,577,316.
There are no capital start-up,
maintenance costs, or recordkeeping
costs associated with this information
collection. However, the USPTO
estimates that the total annual (nonhour) cost burden for this information
collection, in the form of filing fees and
postage, is $2,577,316.
Filing Fees
Two petitions (IC lines 1 and 2) in
this information collection have
associated filing fees resulting in
$2,577,052 in filing fees.
TABLE 2—FILING FEES
Item
No.
Fee
code(s)
1 ............
1558
1 ............
2558
1 ............
3558
2 ............
1463
2 ............
2463
2 ............
3463
Item
Estimated
annual
responses
Filing
fee
($)
Non-hourly
cost
burden
(a)
(b)
(a) × (b) = (c)
Petition to Accept Unintentionally Delayed Payment of Maintenance Fee in an Expired Patent
(37 CFR 1.378(b)) (undiscounted entity).
Petition to Accept Unintentionally Delayed Payment of Maintenance Fee in an Expired Patent
(37 CFR 1.378(b)) (small entity).
Petition to Accept Unintentionally Delayed Payment of Maintenance Fee in an Expired Patent
(37 CFR 1.378(b)) (micro entity).
Petition to Review Refusal to Accept Payment of Maintenance Fee Prior to Expiration of Patent (37 CFR 1.377) (undiscounted entity).
Petition to Review Refusal to Accept Payment of Maintenance Fee Prior to Expiration of Patent (37 CFR 1.377) (small entity).
Petition to Review Refusal to Accept Payment of Maintenance Fee Prior to Expiration of Patent (37 CFR 1.377) (micro entity).
Totals ......................................................................................................................................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Postage Costs
Although the USPTO prefers that the
items in this information collection be
submitted electronically, responses may
be submitted by mail through the
United States Postal Service (USPS).
The USPTO estimates that 1% of the
2,616 items will be submitted in the
mail resulting in 26 mailed items. The
USPTO estimates that the average
postage cost for a mailed submission,
using a Priority Mail legal flat rate
envelope, will be $10.15. Therefore, the
USPTO estimates the total mailing costs
for this information collection at $264.
IV. Request for Comments
The USPTO is soliciting public
comments to:
(a) Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Jul 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
All comments submitted in response
to this notice are a matter of public
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
530
$2,100
$1,113,000
1,515
840
1,272,600
455
420
191,100
1
220
220
1
88
88
1
44
44
2,503
....................
$2,577,052
record. The USPTO will include or
summarize each comment in the request
to OMB to approve this information
collection. Before including an address,
phone number, email address, or other
personally identifiable information (PII)
in a comment, be aware that the entire
comment—including PII—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you may ask in your comment to
withhold PII from public view, the
USPTO cannot guarantee that it will be
able to do so.
Lisa Lawn,
Director, Records and Information
Compliance Program Office, Office of the
Chief Administrative Officer, United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2024–15704 Filed 7–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58138-58140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15704]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Rules for Patent Maintenance Fees
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of information collection; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, invites comments on
the extension and revision of an existing information collection: 0651-
0016 (Rules for Patent Maintenance Fees). The purpose of this notice is
to allow 60 days for public comment preceding submission of the
information collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration, comments regarding this information
collection must be received on or before September 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments by
any of the following methods. Do not submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
Email: [email protected]. Include ``0651-
0016 comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Justin Isaac, Office of the Chief Administrative
Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Request for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of
Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7728;
or by email at [email protected] with ``0651-0016 comment'' in the
subject line. Additional information about this information collection
is also available at https://www.reginfo.gov under ``Information
Collection Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
Under 35 U.S.C. 41 and 37 CFR 1.20(e)-(h), 1.362, 1.363, 1.366,
1.377, and 1.378, the USPTO charges fees for
[[Page 58139]]
maintaining in force all patents based on applications filed on or
after December 12, 1980, except for plant and design patents.
Furthermore, maintenance fees are required for a reissue patent unless
the patent being reissued did not require maintenance fees. Payment of
these maintenance fees is due at 3\1/2\, 7\1/2\, and 11\1/2\ years
after the date the patent was granted. See section 2504 of the Manual
of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) (9th Edition, Rev. 07.2022,
February 2023) for more information.
If the USPTO does not receive payment of the appropriate
maintenance fee and any applicable surcharge within a grace period of
six months following each of the above due dates (at 4, 8, or 12 years
after the date of grant), the patent will expire at that time. After a
patent expires, it is no longer enforceable. Payments of maintenance
fees that are submitted during the 6-month grace period before patent
expiration must include the appropriate surcharge as indicated by 37
CFR 1.20(h). Submissions of maintenance fee payments and surcharges
must include the relevant patent number and the corresponding United
States application number in order to identify the correct patent and
ensure proper crediting of the fee being paid. See MPEP 2506, 2510, and
2515 for more information.
If the USPTO refuses to accept and record a maintenance fee payment
that was submitted prior to the expiration of a patent, the patentee
may petition the Director to accept and record the maintenance fee
under 37 CFR 1.377. This petition must be accompanied by the fee
indicated in 37 CFR 1.17(g), which may be refunded if it is determined
that the refusal to accept the maintenance fee was due to an error by
the USPTO.
If a patent has expired due to nonpayment of a maintenance fee, the
patentee may petition the Director to accept a delayed payment of the
maintenance fee under 37 CFR 1.378(b). The Director may accept the
payment of a maintenance fee after the expiration of the patent if the
petitioner shows to the satisfaction of the Director that the delay in
payment was unintentional. Petitions to accept unintentionally delayed
payment must also be accompanied by the required maintenance fee and
the petition fee as set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(m). If the Director
accepts the maintenance fee payment upon petition, then the patent is
reinstated. If the USPTO denies a petition to accept delayed payment of
a maintenance fee in an expired patent, the patentee may petition the
Director to reconsider that decision under 37 CFR 1.378(d).
This information collection covers maintenance fee petition
information, including the electronic interface and forms provided by
the USPTO to assist the public with maintenance fee petitions. To pay a
maintenance fee after patent expiration, the maintenance fee payment
and the petition fee, as set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(m), must be filed
together with a petition to accept an unintentionally delayed payment
of the maintenance fee in an expired patent under 37 CFR 1.378(b). The
USPTO offers two different versions of the form for petitions to accept
unintentionally delayed payments of maintenance fees: a web-based
ePetition and form PTO/SB/66 (a fillable PDF). The USPTO recommends the
use of the web-based ePetition. The USPTO does not offer forms for the
petitions to review the refusal to accept the payment of a maintenance
fee prior to the expiration of the patent under 37 CFR 1.377 or the
petitions for the reconsideration of decisions on petitions refusing to
accept the delayed payment of a maintenance fee in an expired patent
under 37 CFR 1.378(d).
A fee address indication form (PTO/SB/47) was previously associated
with this information collection. This item permits applicants,
patentees, assignees, or their representatives of record to specify a
``fee address'' for correspondence related to maintenance fees that is
separate from the correspondence address associated with a patent or
application. This item is considered by OMB to be exempt from the PRA
and therefore this item is no longer included in this information
collection.
II. Method of Collection
The USPTO prefers for the items in this information collection to
be submitted via online electronic submissions. Submission by mail,
fax, or hand delivery is available. See MPEP 2510 for more information.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0651-0016.
Forms: (AIA = America Invents Act; SB = Specimen Book)
PTO/SB/66 (Petition to Accept Unintentionally Delayed Payment
of Maintenance Fee in an Expired Patent (37 CFR 1.378(b))
Type of Review: Extension and revision of a currently approved
information collection.
Affected Public: Private sector.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 2,616 respondents.
Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 2,616 responses.
Frequency: On occasion.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that the responses
in this information collection will take the public approximately
between 5 minutes (0.08 hours) and 8 hours to complete. This includes
the time to gather the necessary information, create the document, and
submit the completed request to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 3,424 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Hourly Cost Burden: $1,530,528.
Table 1--Total Burden Hours and Hourly Costs to Private Sector Respondents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Estimated Responses per Estimated time for Estimated Rate \1\ ($/ annual
Item No. Item annual respondent annual response hourly burden hour) respondent cost
respondents responses (hours) (hour/year) burden
(a) (b) (a) x (b) = (c) (d) (c) x (d) = (e) (f) (e) x (f) = (g)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................. Petition to Accept 2,500 1 2,500 1 2,500 $447 $1,117,500
Unintentionally
Delayed Payment of
Maintenance Fee in an
Expired Patent (37
CFR 1.378(b)) (Web-
based ePetition and
PTO/SB/66).
2................. Petition to Review 1 1 1 4 4 447 1,788
Refusal to Accept
Payment of
Maintenance Fee Prior
to Expiration of
Patent (37 CFR 1.377).
[[Page 58140]]
3................. Petition for 115 1 115 8 920 447 411,240
Reconsideration of
Decision on Petition
Refusing to Accept
Delayed Payment of
Maintenance Fee in an
Expired Patent (37
CFR 1.378(d)).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals............. 2,616 ............... 2,616 ........... 3,424 ........... 1,530,528
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 2023 Report of the Economic Survey, published by the Committee on Economics of Legal Practice of the American Intellectual Property Law Association
(AIPLA); pg. F-41. The USPTO uses the average billing rate for intellectual property work in all firms which is $447 per hour (https://www.aipla.org/home/news-publications/economic-survey).
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Non-hourly Cost Burden:
$2,577,316. There are no capital start-up, maintenance costs, or
recordkeeping costs associated with this information collection.
However, the USPTO estimates that the total annual (non-hour) cost
burden for this information collection, in the form of filing fees and
postage, is $2,577,316.
Filing Fees
Two petitions (IC lines 1 and 2) in this information collection
have associated filing fees resulting in $2,577,052 in filing fees.
Table 2--Filing Fees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Item No. Fee Item annual Filing fee Non-hourly cost
code(s) responses ($) burden
(a) (b) (a) x (b) = (c)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................... 1558 Petition to Accept 530 $2,100 $1,113,000
Unintentionally Delayed Payment
of Maintenance Fee in an Expired
Patent (37 CFR 1.378(b))
(undiscounted entity).
1....................... 2558 Petition to Accept 1,515 840 1,272,600
Unintentionally Delayed Payment
of Maintenance Fee in an Expired
Patent (37 CFR 1.378(b)) (small
entity).
1....................... 3558 Petition to Accept 455 420 191,100
Unintentionally Delayed Payment
of Maintenance Fee in an Expired
Patent (37 CFR 1.378(b)) (micro
entity).
2....................... 1463 Petition to Review Refusal to 1 220 220
Accept Payment of Maintenance
Fee Prior to Expiration of
Patent (37 CFR 1.377)
(undiscounted entity).
2....................... 2463 Petition to Review Refusal to 1 88 88
Accept Payment of Maintenance
Fee Prior to Expiration of
Patent (37 CFR 1.377) (small
entity).
2....................... 3463 Petition to Review Refusal to 1 44 44
Accept Payment of Maintenance
Fee Prior to Expiration of
Patent (37 CFR 1.377) (micro
entity).
------------------------------------------
Totals........................ 2,503 ........... $2,577,052
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postage Costs
Although the USPTO prefers that the items in this information
collection be submitted electronically, responses may be submitted by
mail through the United States Postal Service (USPS). The USPTO
estimates that 1% of the 2,616 items will be submitted in the mail
resulting in 26 mailed items. The USPTO estimates that the average
postage cost for a mailed submission, using a Priority Mail legal flat
rate envelope, will be $10.15. Therefore, the USPTO estimates the total
mailing costs for this information collection at $264.
IV. Request for Comments
The USPTO is soliciting public comments to:
(a) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of
the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
All comments submitted in response to this notice are a matter of
public record. The USPTO will include or summarize each comment in the
request to OMB to approve this information collection. Before including
an address, phone number, email address, or other personally
identifiable information (PII) in a comment, be aware that the entire
comment--including PII--may be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask in your comment to withhold PII from public view, the
USPTO cannot guarantee that it will be able to do so.
Lisa Lawn,
Director, Records and Information Compliance Program Office, Office of
the Chief Administrative Officer, United States Patent and Trademark
Office.
[FR Doc. 2024-15704 Filed 7-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P