Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act, 57943-57944 [2024-15615]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2024 / Notices
the United States after importation of
certain eye cosmetics and packaging
therefor by reason of the infringement of
U.S. Trademark Registration No.
4,328,655 (‘‘the ’655 mark’’). The second
amended complaint also alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute. The second amended complaint
further alleges violations of section 337
based upon the importation into the
United States, or in the sale of certain
eye cosmetics and packaging therefor by
reason of unfair competition and false
advertising, the threat or effect of which
is to destroy or substantially injure an
industry in the United States. The
complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order, or in the
alternative a limited exclusion order,
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
July 10, 2024, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine:
(a) whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Jul 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
certain products identified in paragraph
(2) by reason of infringement of the ’655
mark, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337; and
(b) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, or in
the sale of certain products identified in
paragraph (2) by reason of unfair
competition or false advertising, the
threat or effect of which is to destroy or
substantially injure an industry in the
United States;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘eye cosmetics, i.e., eye
creams, eye palettes, eye kits, eye
patches, eye serums and eye lashes’’;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Amarte USA
Holdings, Inc., 1731 California St.,
Redding, California 96001.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Unilever PLC, Port Sunlight, Wirral,
Merseyside CH62 4ZD, United
Kingdom
Unilever United States, Inc., 800 Sylvan
Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
07632
Carver Korea Co., Ltd., 81 Tojeong-ro
31-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul (Daeheungdong), South Korea
Bourne & Morgan Ltd., 71–75 Shelton
Street, Covent Garden, London,
United Kingdom, WC2H 9JQ
MZ Skin Ltd., 5 Elstree Gate, Elstree
Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire,
United Kingdom, WD61JD
Kaibeauty, 104 Nanjing W Rd.,
Zhongshan District, Taipei City,
Taiwan 10491
I’ll Global Co., Ltd., 3F, Samdeok Bldg.,
315, Sinbanporro, Seocho-gu, Seoul,
South Korea 06546
Hikari Laboratories Ltd., 207 Rishonim
Street, Bnei Atarot 60991, Israel
Iman Cosmetics, P.O. Box 6867,
London, Greater London, E14 5AN,
United Kingdom; and, 363 7th Ave
Suite 8, New York, NY 10001
Strip Lashed, 38 Main Street,
Rawmarsh, Rotherham, South
Yorkshire, S62 50W, United Kingdom
Kelz Beauty, Almassy Ter 11, 1077,
Budapest, Hungary
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57943
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
2020), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the complainant of the
complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 11, 2024.
Sharon Bellamy,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–15630 Filed 7–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On July 11, 2024, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed consent
decree with the United States District
Court for the District of North Dakota in
the lawsuit entitled United States v.
Marathon Oil Company, Civil Action
No. 1:24–cv–00136–DMT–CRH.
The United States filed this lawsuit
under the Clean Air Act against
Defendant Marathon Oil Company,
alleging two types of violations at oil
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
57944
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2024 / Notices
and gas production facilities on the Fort
Berthold Indian Reservation in North
Dakota: (1) violation of requirements to
obtain preconstruction permits under
the prevention of significant
deterioration program and operating
permits under the Title V permitting
program; and (2) violation of design,
operation and maintenance
requirements applicable to oil and gas
production facilities. The complaint
seeks injunctive relief and civil
penalties for the defendants’ alleged
violations. The consent decree requires
the defendants to perform injunctive
relief to address the alleged violations,
perform additional projects to mitigate
excess emissions, and pay a $64.5
million civil penalty.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
consent decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. Marathon Oil
Company, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–
10388/4. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days
after the publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Any comments submitted in writing
may be filed in whole or in part on the
public court docket without notice to
the commenter.
During the public comment period,
the consent decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
If you require assistance accessing the
consent decree, you may request
assistance by email or mail to the
addresses provided above for submitting
comments.
Laura Thoms,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2024–15615 Filed 7–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2011–0858]
Permit-Required Confined Spaces
Standard; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits public
comments concerning the proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
specified in the Permit-Required
Confined Spaces Standard.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
September 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Documents in the
docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the websites.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
through the OSHA Docket Office.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office at (202)
693–2350 (TTY (877) 889–5627) for
assistance in locating docket
submissions.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2011–0858) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). OSHA will place all comments,
including any personal information, in
the public docket, which may be made
available online. Therefore, OSHA
cautions interested parties about
submitting personal information such as
social security numbers and birthdates.
For further information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Seleda Perryman, Directorate of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Jul 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of
the continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e.,
employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to
provide the public with an opportunity
to comment on proposed and
continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, the collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.)
authorizes information collection by
employers as necessary or appropriate
for enforcement of the OSH Act or for
developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29
U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires
that OSHA obtain such information
with minimum burden upon employers,
especially those operating small
businesses, and to reduce to the
maximum extent feasible unnecessary
duplication of effort in obtaining
information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The following sections describe who
uses the information collected under
each requirement, as well as how they
use it. The purpose of these
requirements is to ensure that
employers systematically evaluate the
dangers in permit spaces before entry is
attempted, and to ensure that adequate
measures are taken to make the spaces
safe for entry.
Section 1910.146(c)(2) requires the
employer to post danger signs to inform
exposed employees of the existence and
location of, and the dangers posed by,
permit spaces.
Section 1920.146(c)(4) requires the
employer to develop and implement a
written ‘‘permit-space program’’ when
the employer decides that its employees
will enter permit spaces. The written
program is to be made available for
inspection by employees and their
authorized representatives. Section
1910.146(d) provides the employer with
the requirements of a permit-required
confined space program.
Section 1910.146(c)(5)(i)(E) requires
that the determinations and supporting
data specified by paragraphs (c)(5)(i)(A),
(c)(5)(i)(C) of this section are
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57943-57944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15615]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On July 11, 2024, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed
consent decree with the United States District Court for the District
of North Dakota in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Marathon Oil
Company, Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-00136-DMT-CRH.
The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air Act
against Defendant Marathon Oil Company, alleging two types of
violations at oil
[[Page 57944]]
and gas production facilities on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation
in North Dakota: (1) violation of requirements to obtain
preconstruction permits under the prevention of significant
deterioration program and operating permits under the Title V
permitting program; and (2) violation of design, operation and
maintenance requirements applicable to oil and gas production
facilities. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties
for the defendants' alleged violations. The consent decree requires the
defendants to perform injunctive relief to address the alleged
violations, perform additional projects to mitigate excess emissions,
and pay a $64.5 million civil penalty.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and
should refer to United States v. Marathon Oil Company, D.J. Ref. No.
90-5-2-1-10388/4. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty
(30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................ [email protected].
By mail............................. Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any comments submitted in writing may be filed in whole or in part
on the public court docket without notice to the commenter.
During the public comment period, the consent decree may be
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. If you require assistance
accessing the consent decree, you may request assistance by email or
mail to the addresses provided above for submitting comments.
Laura Thoms,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-15615 Filed 7-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P