Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; Low Emissions Vehicles Program, 57361-57364 [2024-15225]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0498 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T08–0498
Calhoun, KY.
Safety Zone; Green River,
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Green River from Mile Marker 61 to 62.
(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by VHF CH. 16. Those in
the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(c) Enforcement period. This section
will be subject to enforcement each day
from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. on July 16, 2024
through July 19, 2024.
Dated: July 9, 2024.
H.R. Mattern,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2024–15355 Filed 7–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0697; FRL–12048–
01–R1]
Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; Low
Emissions Vehicles Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Connecticut
on December 14, 2015. This SIP revision
includes Connecticut’s revised
regulations for new motor vehicle
emission standards. Connecticut
updated its motor vehicle emission
regulations to adopt California’s
Advanced Clean Car (ACC) I program
that includes California’s low emission
vehicle (LEV) III criteria pollutant
standards and zero-emission vehicle
(ZEV) sales requirements through the
2025 model year, and greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions standards that
commence in the 2017 model year.
Connecticut ensured that its regulations
are identical to the California standards
for which a waiver has been granted, as
required by the Clean Air Act (CAA).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
This rule is effective on August
14, 2024.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR–
2017–0697. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov website. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://
www.regulations.gov or at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
Region 1 Regional Office, Air and
Radiation Division, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA
requests that, if at all possible, you
contact the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays and
facility closures due to COVID–19.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Rackauskas, Air Quality Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
Region 1, 5 Post Office Square—Suite
100 (Mail code 5–MI), Boston, MA
02109–3912, tel. (617) 918–1628, email
rackauskas.eric@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
DATES:
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On January 16, 2018 (83 FR 2097),
EPA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing approval
of Connecticut’s amended Section
22(a)–174–36b (Low Emission Vehicle II
Program) (LEV II) and the newly
adopted Section 22a–174–36c (Low
Emission Vehicle III Program) (LEV III)
of the Connecticut State Regulations
into the Connecticut SIP.1 Connecticut’s
‘‘LEV III regulation’’ adopts all of
California’s ACC I program. California’s
ACC I program is comprised of what it
terms LEV III (which includes criteria
pollutants emission standards and
greenhouse gas emission standards), and
1 See EPA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for
more information on CT’s SIP submittal.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57361
a zero-emissions vehicle sales
requirement. Connecticut’s emission
limits apply to new passenger cars,
light-duty trucks, and medium-duty
passenger vehicles sold, leased,
imported, delivered, purchased, rented,
acquired, or received in the State of
Connecticut. Connecticut has adopted
these rules to reduce emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOC),
particulate matter (PM), and nitrogen
oxides (NOX) in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA), as well as to reduce greenhouse
gases. Connecticut has adopted
standards that are identical to the
California standards that have been
issued a waiver by EPA.2 Other specific
requirements of Connecticut’s December
14, 2015, SIP revision and the rationale
for EPA’s proposed action are explained
in the NPRM and will not be restated
here. EPA received both supportive and
adverse comments on the proposed
Connecticut SIP revision.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received two comments in
support of EPA’s proposed approval of
Connecticut’s SIP revision. The first
comment stated that EPA, ‘‘correctly
determined that the emission standards
in Connecticut’s SIP revision are
identical to the relevant California
Standards’’ and satisfy the requirements
of the CAA. The second comment
supported Connecticut’s action and
encouraged similar action in more states
throughout the country. In addition,
EPA received comments criticizing
some technical aspects of the California
Advanced Clean Car I (ACC I) program
being adopted by Connecticut under the
proposed Connecticut SIP revision.
Under CAA section 209(a), states are
generally preempted from either
adopting or enforcing emissions
standards for new motor vehicles and
engines. CAA section 209(b) allows EPA
to waive this preemption for the State of
California subject to listed criteria.
Additionally, under CAA section 177,
‘‘any state which has plan provisions
approved under this part 3 may adopt
and enforce for any model year
standards relating to control of
2 EPA issued a waiver of preemption under
section 209 of the CAA for California’s Advanced
Clean Car program (that includes its LEV III and
ZEV programs) on January 9, 2013 (78 FR 2211).
EPA issued a section 209 waiver for California’s
LEV II program on April 22, 2003 (68 FR 19811);
see also 70 FR 22034 (April 28, 2005), 75 FR 41948
(July 30, 2010). EPA reinstated the ACC I waiver on
March 14, 2022 (87 FR 14332).
3 ‘‘This part’’ refers to Part D of Title I of the CAA.
Part D contains requirements for nonattainment and
maintenance areas and states within the Ozone
Transport Region as defined in CAA section 184(a).
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
57362
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
emissions from new motor vehicles or
new motor vehicle engines.’’
Specifically, section 177 of the CAA
allows a state to adopt the California
emissions standards if:
(1) Such standards are identical to the
California standards for which a waiver
has been granted for such model year,
and
(2) California and such State adopt
such standards at least two years before
commencement of such model year.
EPA did not receive any comments
challenging either of the above criteria.
As such, EPA views the comments
received as beyond the scope of this
action. In this action, EPA is only
approving Connecticut’s adoption of
standards into its SIP under CAA
section 177 for which EPA has already
granted a waiver of preemption to
California (under CAA section 209(b)).
To the extent commenters are
challenging the ACC I program
standards themselves, we note that there
is no discretion to modify those
standards because under CAA section
177, Connecticut cannot adopt
standards that are not identical to the
California standards. Therefore,
challenges to the ACC I standards
themselves are outside the scope of the
present action. For example, comments
pertaining to battery safety, mining of
rare earth elements, and the greenhouse
gas footprint of electric cars are beyond
the scope of this action because they do
not address Connecticut’s authority to
adopt these standards under Section 177
of the CAA. The standards at issue (LEV
III criteria pollutant standards and GHG
emission standards, and ZEV sales
requirements, that all comprise the ACC
I program) are the types of California
standards that can be adopted into a
state’s SIP under the provisions of
section 177 of the CAA and are not
subject to preemption under section 209
of the CAA, so long as the underlying
California standards have been waived
under section 209(b) and the other
criteria of section 177 have been met.
Here, the ACC I standards have been
waived by EPA and the other criteria in
section 177 have been met.4
As explained in the NPRM, EPA
proposed approval of Connecticut’s SIP
revision incorporating California motor
vehicle emissions standards into
Connecticut’s SIP (83 FR 2097).
Specifically, the SIP revision adopts
California’s ACC I program regulations
for which EPA had previously granted
a waiver of preemption to California
under CAA section 209(b) (78 FR 2112;
4 EPA also did not receive any comments that
challenged the approvability of the standards under
section 110 of the CAA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
see also 87 FR 14332). The ACC I
program comprises regulations for ZEV
and LEV, which include standards for
criteria pollutants for new passenger
cars, light-duty trucks, medium-duty
passenger vehicles, and certain heavyduty vehicles for model years 2015
through 2025. The ACC I program also
includes GHG emission standards that
are applicable to 2017 and subsequent
model year vehicles. A complete
description of the ACC I program can be
found at 78 FR 2114, 2122, 2130–31 and
in California Air Resources Board’s
(CARB) 209(b) waiver request, which is
available in the docket for the January
2013 waiver decision, Docket Id. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2012–0562.5
CAA section 110(a)(1) requires that
SIPs provide for the implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of the
NAAQS. As noted in the NPRM,
Connecticut adopted the ACC I
regulations to reduce emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOC),
particulate matter (PM), and nitrogen
oxides (NOX), as well as to reduce GHG
emissions. NOX and VOC are precursors
of both ozone and PM, and reductions
in NOX and VOC emissions can
therefore decrease the concentration of
these criteria pollutants.6 The LEV III,
GHG emissions and ACC I passenger
vehicle ZEV standards that we are
approving into Connecticut’s SIP will
decrease NOX and VOC emissions,
which, along with other emission
control measures in the SIP, will assist
the State in achieving the emissions
reductions needed to comply with the
various nonattainment and maintenance
planning requirements of the CAA.7 As
such, we believe that inclusion of the
also 87 FR 14332.
its notice of decision granting a waiver of
CAA preemption for the ACC I regulations, EPA
discussed the types of air pollution and emission
benefits identified by CARB in its ACC I rulemaking
associated with its passenger vehicle LEV III, GHG,
and ZEV standards (78 FR 2112, 2122). In
subsequent documentation, CARB further identified
air pollution and emission benefits of its GHG
emission and passenger vehicle ZEV standards
(both within the ACC I program) that have a
connection to a number of NAAQS, including the
PM and ozone NAAQS. See CARB, Staff Report,
Attachment B to Executive Order S–21–010
(‘‘Emissions Benefits of California’s Passenger
Vehicle GHG Standards’’), dated July 2, 2021; see
also CARB, Staff Report, Appendix A—Criteria
Pollutant Emission reductions from California’s
Zero Emission Vehicle Standards for Model Years
2017–2025, dated July 6, 2021. While CARB’s
estimates of the criteria pollutant precursor
reductions resulting from adoption of these
standards are specific to California, CARB’s analysis
supports the connection between adoption of the
GHG standards and resulting criteria pollutant
precursor reductions.
7 Connecticut remains in nonattainment status for
the 2008 and 2015 ozone standards, and in
maintenance for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 standards.
See EPA’s Green Book: https://www.epa.gov/greenbook.
PO 00000
5 See
6 In
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
LEV III, GHG, and ZEV portions of the
ACC I program in the Connecticut SIP
is appropriate under CAA section
110(a)(1).
III. Final Action
EPA is finalizing its proposed
approval of Connecticut’s December 14,
2015, SIP revision. Specifically, EPA is
approving Connecticut’s SIP revision
adopting California’s Advanced Clean
Car I program into its SIP, which
includes California’s low emission
vehicle (LEV) III criteria pollutant
standards GHG emission standards that
commence in the 2017 model year, and
zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) sales
requirements through the 2025 model
year.
EPA is approving this SIP revision
because it meets all applicable
requirements of the Clean Air Act,
including CAA section 110(l), because it
will not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress, or any other
applicable requirement of the Act.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
Connecticut Department of Energy and
Environmental Protection’s adoption of
the California Advanced Clean Car I
program, in Sections 22(a)–174–36b and
22a–174–36c of the Regulations of
Connecticut State Agencies, as
discussed in sections I. and III. of this
preamble and set forth below in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52. The
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents generally
available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 1 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a
Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
Tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection did not
evaluate environmental justice
considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and
did not consider EJ in this action. Due
to the nature of the action being taken
here, this action is expected to have a
neutral to positive impact on the air
quality of the affected area.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 13,
2024. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57363
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 28, 2024.
David Cash,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart H—Connecticut
2. Section 52.370 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(132) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.370
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(132) Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan submitted by the
Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection on December
14, 2015.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Regulations of Connecticut State
Agencies, Regulation 22a–174–36b,
‘‘Low emission vehicles II program,’’
amended August 1, 2013.
(B) Regulations of Connecticut State
Agencies, Regulation 22a–174–36c,
‘‘Low Emission Vehicle III Program,’’
effective August 1, 2013.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Connecticut
Department of Energy and
Environmental Protection, dated
December 14, 2015, submitting a
revision to the Connecticut State
Implementation Plan.
■ 3. Section 52.385, is amended in
Table 52.385 by:
■ a. adding a third entry for state
citation ‘‘22a–174–36b’’ before the entry
for ‘‘22a–174–36(g)’’; and
■ b. adding an entry for state citation
‘‘22a–174–36c’’ before the entry for
‘‘22a–174–36(g)’’.
The additions read as follows:
§ 52.385 EPA-approved Connecticut
regulations.
*
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
*
*
15JYR1
*
*
57364
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 52.385—EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS
Dates
Connecticut
State citation
Title/subject
Date
adopted
by State
*
*
22a–174–36b ......... Low Emission Vehicle II
Program.
22a–174–36c ......... Low Emission Vehicle III
Program.
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R04–RCRA–2024–0116; FRL–11972–
02–R4]
North Carolina: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final action.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action on the authorization of changes
to North Carolina’s hazardous waste
program under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
as amended. These changes were
outlined in a June 26, 2023, application
to the EPA. We have determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements
needed for final authorization.
DATES: This authorization is effective on
September 13, 2024 without further
notice unless the EPA receives adverse
comment by August 14, 2024. If the EPA
receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final action in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
RCRA–2024–0116, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
*
8/1/13
7/15/2024
*
8/1/13
7/15/2024
*
[FR Doc. 2024–15225 Filed 7–12–24; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
Date
approved
by EPA
Federal Register citation
Section
52.370
*
[Insert Federal Register
citation].
[Insert Federal Register
citation].
*
(c)(132) ......
*
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. Please also contact Leah Davis
if you need assistance in a language
other than English or if you are a person
with disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leah Davis; RCRA Programs and
Cleanup Branch; Land, Chemicals and
Redevelopment Division; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency;
Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960;
telephone number: (404) 562–8562; fax
number: (404) 562–9964; email address:
davis.leah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is the EPA using a direct final
action?
The EPA is publishing this action
without a prior proposed rule because
we view this as a noncontroversial
action and anticipate no adverse
comment. This action is a routine
program change. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this issue
of the Federal Register, we are
publishing a separate document that
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
(c)(132) ......
*
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
The EPA encourages electronic
submittals and lists all publicly
available docket materials electronically
at www.regulations.gov. If you are
unable to make electronic submittals or
require alternative access to docket
materials, please notify Leah Davis
through the provided contacts in the
Sfmt 4700
Comments/description
*
*
Revises LEV II program, places end
date on model year vehicles.
Adopts the LEV III regulation.
*
will serve as the proposed rule allowing
the public an opportunity to comment.
We will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. For further information about
commenting on this action, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
If the EPA receives comments that
oppose this authorization, we will
withdraw this action by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before
the action becomes effective. The EPA
will base any further decision on the
authorization of the State’s program
changes on the proposal mentioned in
the previous paragraph. We will then
address all public comments in a later
final action.
II. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States that have received final
authorization from the EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask the EPA to authorize
the changes. Changes to State programs
may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to the EPA’s regulations in title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), parts 124, 260 through 268, 270,
273, and 279.
New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that the EPA promulgates
pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA)
take effect in authorized states at the
same time they take effect in
unauthorized States. Thus, the EPA will
implement those requirements and
prohibitions in North Carolina,
including the issuance of new permits
implementing those requirements, until
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 135 (Monday, July 15, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57361-57364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15225]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0697; FRL-12048-01-R1]
Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; Low Emissions Vehicles Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Connecticut on December 14, 2015. This SIP revision includes
Connecticut's revised regulations for new motor vehicle emission
standards. Connecticut updated its motor vehicle emission regulations
to adopt California's Advanced Clean Car (ACC) I program that includes
California's low emission vehicle (LEV) III criteria pollutant
standards and zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) sales requirements through
the 2025 model year, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards that
commence in the 2017 model year. Connecticut ensured that its
regulations are identical to the California standards for which a
waiver has been granted, as required by the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on August 14, 2024.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0697. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed
in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
Region 1 Regional Office, Air and Radiation Division, 5 Post Office
Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that, if at all possible,
you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding legal holidays and facility closures due to COVID-19.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Rackauskas, Air Quality Branch,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office
Square--Suite 100 (Mail code 5-MI), Boston, MA 02109-3912, tel. (617)
918-1628, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On January 16, 2018 (83 FR 2097), EPA published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing approval of Connecticut's amended
Section 22(a)-174-36b (Low Emission Vehicle II Program) (LEV II) and
the newly adopted Section 22a-174-36c (Low Emission Vehicle III
Program) (LEV III) of the Connecticut State Regulations into the
Connecticut SIP.\1\ Connecticut's ``LEV III regulation'' adopts all of
California's ACC I program. California's ACC I program is comprised of
what it terms LEV III (which includes criteria pollutants emission
standards and greenhouse gas emission standards), and a zero-emissions
vehicle sales requirement. Connecticut's emission limits apply to new
passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles
sold, leased, imported, delivered, purchased, rented, acquired, or
received in the State of Connecticut. Connecticut has adopted these
rules to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC),
particulate matter (PM), and nitrogen oxides (NOX) in
accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as well as
to reduce greenhouse gases. Connecticut has adopted standards that are
identical to the California standards that have been issued a waiver by
EPA.\2\ Other specific requirements of Connecticut's December 14, 2015,
SIP revision and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained
in the NPRM and will not be restated here. EPA received both supportive
and adverse comments on the proposed Connecticut SIP revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See EPA's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for more information
on CT's SIP submittal.
\2\ EPA issued a waiver of preemption under section 209 of the
CAA for California's Advanced Clean Car program (that includes its
LEV III and ZEV programs) on January 9, 2013 (78 FR 2211). EPA
issued a section 209 waiver for California's LEV II program on April
22, 2003 (68 FR 19811); see also 70 FR 22034 (April 28, 2005), 75 FR
41948 (July 30, 2010). EPA reinstated the ACC I waiver on March 14,
2022 (87 FR 14332).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Response to Comments
EPA received two comments in support of EPA's proposed approval of
Connecticut's SIP revision. The first comment stated that EPA,
``correctly determined that the emission standards in Connecticut's SIP
revision are identical to the relevant California Standards'' and
satisfy the requirements of the CAA. The second comment supported
Connecticut's action and encouraged similar action in more states
throughout the country. In addition, EPA received comments criticizing
some technical aspects of the California Advanced Clean Car I (ACC I)
program being adopted by Connecticut under the proposed Connecticut SIP
revision.
Under CAA section 209(a), states are generally preempted from
either adopting or enforcing emissions standards for new motor vehicles
and engines. CAA section 209(b) allows EPA to waive this preemption for
the State of California subject to listed criteria. Additionally, under
CAA section 177, ``any state which has plan provisions approved under
this part \3\ may adopt and enforce for any model year standards
relating to control of
[[Page 57362]]
emissions from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``This part'' refers to Part D of Title I of the CAA. Part D
contains requirements for nonattainment and maintenance areas and
states within the Ozone Transport Region as defined in CAA section
184(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, section 177 of the CAA allows a state to adopt the
California emissions standards if:
(1) Such standards are identical to the California standards for
which a waiver has been granted for such model year, and
(2) California and such State adopt such standards at least two
years before commencement of such model year.
EPA did not receive any comments challenging either of the above
criteria. As such, EPA views the comments received as beyond the scope
of this action. In this action, EPA is only approving Connecticut's
adoption of standards into its SIP under CAA section 177 for which EPA
has already granted a waiver of preemption to California (under CAA
section 209(b)). To the extent commenters are challenging the ACC I
program standards themselves, we note that there is no discretion to
modify those standards because under CAA section 177, Connecticut
cannot adopt standards that are not identical to the California
standards. Therefore, challenges to the ACC I standards themselves are
outside the scope of the present action. For example, comments
pertaining to battery safety, mining of rare earth elements, and the
greenhouse gas footprint of electric cars are beyond the scope of this
action because they do not address Connecticut's authority to adopt
these standards under Section 177 of the CAA. The standards at issue
(LEV III criteria pollutant standards and GHG emission standards, and
ZEV sales requirements, that all comprise the ACC I program) are the
types of California standards that can be adopted into a state's SIP
under the provisions of section 177 of the CAA and are not subject to
preemption under section 209 of the CAA, so long as the underlying
California standards have been waived under section 209(b) and the
other criteria of section 177 have been met. Here, the ACC I standards
have been waived by EPA and the other criteria in section 177 have been
met.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ EPA also did not receive any comments that challenged the
approvability of the standards under section 110 of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained in the NPRM, EPA proposed approval of Connecticut's
SIP revision incorporating California motor vehicle emissions standards
into Connecticut's SIP (83 FR 2097). Specifically, the SIP revision
adopts California's ACC I program regulations for which EPA had
previously granted a waiver of preemption to California under CAA
section 209(b) (78 FR 2112; see also 87 FR 14332). The ACC I program
comprises regulations for ZEV and LEV, which include standards for
criteria pollutants for new passenger cars, light-duty trucks, medium-
duty passenger vehicles, and certain heavy-duty vehicles for model
years 2015 through 2025. The ACC I program also includes GHG emission
standards that are applicable to 2017 and subsequent model year
vehicles. A complete description of the ACC I program can be found at
78 FR 2114, 2122, 2130-31 and in California Air Resources Board's
(CARB) 209(b) waiver request, which is available in the docket for the
January 2013 waiver decision, Docket Id. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0562.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See also 87 FR 14332.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAA section 110(a)(1) requires that SIPs provide for the
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS. As noted in
the NPRM, Connecticut adopted the ACC I regulations to reduce emissions
of volatile organic compounds (VOC), particulate matter (PM), and
nitrogen oxides (NOX), as well as to reduce GHG emissions.
NOX and VOC are precursors of both ozone and PM, and
reductions in NOX and VOC emissions can therefore decrease
the concentration of these criteria pollutants.\6\ The LEV III, GHG
emissions and ACC I passenger vehicle ZEV standards that we are
approving into Connecticut's SIP will decrease NOX and VOC
emissions, which, along with other emission control measures in the
SIP, will assist the State in achieving the emissions reductions needed
to comply with the various nonattainment and maintenance planning
requirements of the CAA.\7\ As such, we believe that inclusion of the
LEV III, GHG, and ZEV portions of the ACC I program in the Connecticut
SIP is appropriate under CAA section 110(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In its notice of decision granting a waiver of CAA
preemption for the ACC I regulations, EPA discussed the types of air
pollution and emission benefits identified by CARB in its ACC I
rulemaking associated with its passenger vehicle LEV III, GHG, and
ZEV standards (78 FR 2112, 2122). In subsequent documentation, CARB
further identified air pollution and emission benefits of its GHG
emission and passenger vehicle ZEV standards (both within the ACC I
program) that have a connection to a number of NAAQS, including the
PM and ozone NAAQS. See CARB, Staff Report, Attachment B to
Executive Order S-21-010 (``Emissions Benefits of California's
Passenger Vehicle GHG Standards''), dated July 2, 2021; see also
CARB, Staff Report, Appendix A--Criteria Pollutant Emission
reductions from California's Zero Emission Vehicle Standards for
Model Years 2017-2025, dated July 6, 2021. While CARB's estimates of
the criteria pollutant precursor reductions resulting from adoption
of these standards are specific to California, CARB's analysis
supports the connection between adoption of the GHG standards and
resulting criteria pollutant precursor reductions.
\7\ Connecticut remains in nonattainment status for the 2008 and
2015 ozone standards, and in maintenance for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 standards. See EPA's Green Book: https://www.epa.gov/green-book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Final Action
EPA is finalizing its proposed approval of Connecticut's December
14, 2015, SIP revision. Specifically, EPA is approving Connecticut's
SIP revision adopting California's Advanced Clean Car I program into
its SIP, which includes California's low emission vehicle (LEV) III
criteria pollutant standards GHG emission standards that commence in
the 2017 model year, and zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) sales requirements
through the 2025 model year.
EPA is approving this SIP revision because it meets all applicable
requirements of the Clean Air Act, including CAA section 110(l),
because it will not interfere with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other
applicable requirement of the Act.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection's
adoption of the California Advanced Clean Car I program, in Sections
22(a)-174-36b and 22a-174-36c of the Regulations of Connecticut State
Agencies, as discussed in sections I. and III. of this preamble and set
forth below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents generally available through
https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 1 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
[[Page 57363]]
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that
``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection did not
evaluate environmental justice considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Due to the nature of
the action being taken here, this action is expected to have a neutral
to positive impact on the air quality of the affected area.
Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there
is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of
E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-
income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 13, 2024. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 28, 2024.
David Cash,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart H--Connecticut
0
2. Section 52.370 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(132) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.370 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(132) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection on December 14,
2015.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, Regulation 22a-174-
36b, ``Low emission vehicles II program,'' amended August 1, 2013.
(B) Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, Regulation 22a-174-
36c, ``Low Emission Vehicle III Program,'' effective August 1, 2013.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Connecticut Department of Energy and
Environmental Protection, dated December 14, 2015, submitting a
revision to the Connecticut State Implementation Plan.
0
3. Section 52.385, is amended in Table 52.385 by:
0
a. adding a third entry for state citation ``22a-174-36b'' before the
entry for ``22a-174-36(g)''; and
0
b. adding an entry for state citation ``22a-174-36c'' before the entry
for ``22a-174-36(g)''.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.385 EPA-approved Connecticut regulations.
* * * * *
[[Page 57364]]
Table 52.385--EPA-Approved Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dates
-------------------------------- Federal Register
Connecticut State citation Title/subject Date adopted Date approved citation Section 52.370 Comments/description
by State by EPA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
22a-174-36b................ Low Emission Vehicle 8/1/13 7/15/2024 [Insert Federal (c)(132)............ Revises LEV II
II Program. Register citation]. program, places end
date on model year
vehicles.
22a-174-36c................ Low Emission Vehicle 8/1/13 7/15/2024 [Insert Federal (c)(132)............ Adopts the LEV III
III Program. Register citation]. regulation.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2024-15225 Filed 7-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
