Olives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate, 57061-57064 [2024-15247]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
committee that is made up of growers
and/or handlers that work collectively
to solve industry problems. After
considering the alternative, the
Committee concluded that regulating
the handling of cranberries under the
Order is no longer necessary to ensure
orderly marketing of cranberries. The
costs associated with the administration
of the Order outweigh the benefits, and
that termination of the Order would not
have a negative impact on industry.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 Fruit
Crops. After finalizing termination,
AMS will extract the remaining
cranberry marketing order-related forms
from the forms package during the next
three-year renewal process. OMB’s
three-year expiration date for the
package containing cranberry marketing
order forms is January 31, 2027.
This rule effectuates the removal of
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements on cranberry handlers,
both small and large. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, AMS has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this rulemaking.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The producer referendum was well
publicized in the production area, and
referendum ballots were provided to all
known producers. As such, producers of
U.S. cranberries had an opportunity to
indicate their continued support for the
Order.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Richard Lower at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A proposed rule inviting comments
on the termination of the Order was
published in the Federal Register on
December 7, 2023 (88 FR 85130). A 60day comment period was provided to
allow interested persons an opportunity
to respond to the proposed termination
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jul 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
of the Order. In addition, AMS
published on its website and distributed
to industry stakeholders a notice to
trade announcing the proposed
termination of the Order. Five total
comments were received. One comment
supported the termination, and one
comment was not relevant to the
proposal. Three non-substantive
comments opposed the termination of
the Order, expressing the program is a
value to small businesses. Producers of
both large and small businesses were
provided the opportunity to show
support for the Order during the
continuance referendum. Further,
producers who voted in the referendum
elected to terminate the Order
indicating the costs associated with the
administration of the Order outweigh
the benefits and, therefore, the Order is
no longer meeting the needs of the
industry. Those producers also believe
that terminating the Order will not have
a negative impact on the industry.
Accordingly, after reviewing and
considering all comments received
during the comment period, the
Secretary determined that termination
of the Order was appropriate. All the
comments may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant
to section 608c(16)(A) of the Act and
§ 929.69 of the Order, it is hereby found
that Federal Marketing Order No. 929
regulating the handling of cranberries
grown in the States of Massachusetts,
Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota,
Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in
the State of New York does not tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act
and is therefore terminated.
Following termination, trustees will
be appointed to conclude and liquidate
the Committee affairs and will continue
in that capacity until discharged by the
Secretary. In addition, pursuant to
608c(16)(A) of the Act, USDA is
required to notify Congress 60 days in
advance of termination. Congress was so
notified on April 11, 2024.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 926
Cranberries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 929
Acreage allotments, Cranberries,
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PARTS 926 AND 929—[REMOVED]
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, and under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601–674, the Agricultural
■
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57061
Marketing Service amends title 7,
chapter IX of the Code of Federal
Regulations by removing parts 926 and
929.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–15246 Filed 7–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 932
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–23–0087]
Olives Grown in California; Decreased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action decreases the
assessment rate established for the 2024
fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years
for California olives as recommended by
the California Olive Committee. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective August 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeremy Sasselli, Marketing Specialist, or
Barry Broadbent, Chief, West Region
Branch, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, or Email:
Jeremy.Sasselli@usda.gov or
Barry.Broadbent@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Market Development Division, Specialty
Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–8085, or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations issued to carry out
a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR
900.2(j). This rule is issued under
Marketing Agreement No. 148 and
Order No. 932, both as amended (7 CFR
part 932), regulating the handling of
olives grown in California. Part 932
(referred to as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Committee locally
administers the Order and is comprised
of producers and handlers of olives
operating within the area of production.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
57062
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
The Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
14094 directs agencies to conduct
proactive outreach to engage interested
and affected parties through a variety of
means, such as through field offices,
and alternative platforms and media.
This action falls within a category of
regulatory actions that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
exempted from Executive Order 12866
review.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, which requires agencies
to consider whether their rulemaking
actions will have Tribal implications.
AMS has determined that this rule is
unlikely to have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. Under the Order
now in effect, California olive handlers
are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the Order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate this rule establishes will
be applicable to all assessable olives
beginning on January 1, 2024, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) a petition stating that the order,
any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and requesting a modification of the
order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jul 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
Section 932.38 of the Order authorizes
the Committee, with the approval of
AMS, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members are familiar with the
Committee’s needs and with the costs of
goods and services in their local area
and are thus able to formulate an
appropriate budget and assessment rate.
The assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
This rule decreases the assessment
rate from $35 per ton of assessed olives,
the rate that was established for the
2023 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal
years, to $28 per ton of assessed olives
for the 2024 fiscal year and subsequent
fiscal years. The lower rate is the result
of the significantly higher crop size in
2023 (fruit that is marketed over the
course of the 2024 fiscal year), and the
need to maintain the Committee’s
financial reserve at a responsible level.
The Committee met on December 12,
2023, and unanimously recommended
2024 expenditures of $1,100,151 and an
assessment rate of $28 per ton of
assessed olives. In comparison, last
year’s budgeted expenditures were
$1,154,412. The assessment rate of $28
set for the remainder of the 2024 fiscal
year and subsequent fiscal years is $7
lower than the rate established for the
2023 fiscal year. Producer receipts show
total production of approximately
34,000 tons of olives from the 2023 crop
year that will be assessable during the
2024 fiscal year. This amount is
substantially higher than the quantity of
olives that was harvested in 2022.
Olives harvested in 2023 will be
marketed over the course of the 2024
fiscal year, which begins on January 1,
2024, as the harvested olives are stored
in brining tanks and processed over the
subsequent year. At the $28 per ton
assessment rate, the estimated 34,000
tons of assessable olives from the 2023
crop are expected to generate $952,000
in assessment revenue over the 2024
fiscal year. The balance of funds needed
to cover budgeted expenditures will
come from interest income and the
Committee’s financial reserve. The 2024
fiscal year assessment rate decrease is
appropriate to ensure the Committee has
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sufficient revenue to fund the
recommended 2024 fiscal year budgeted
expenditures while also ensuring that
funds in the reserve do not exceed
approximately one fiscal year’s
expenses, the maximum reserve amount
permitted by § 932.40.
The Order has a fiscal year and a crop
year that are independent of each other.
The crop year is a 12-month period that
begins on August 1 of each year and
ends on July 31 of the following year.
The fiscal year is the 12-month period
that begins on January 1 and ends on
December 31 of each year. Olives are an
alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop
(2022) followed by a large crop (2023).
For this assessment rate rule, the
Committee utilized the estimated 2023
crop year receipts to determine the
recommended assessment rate for the
2024 fiscal year.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2024 fiscal year include $350,250 for
program administration, $164,650 for
export programs, $197,500 for marketing
activities, $302,751 for research, and
$85,000 for inspection. Budgeted
expenses for these items during the
2023 fiscal year were $399,700,
$148,000, $193,000, $325,712, and
$88,000, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee resulted from
consideration of anticipated fiscal year
expenses, estimated olive tonnage
received by handlers during the 2023
crop year, and the amount in the
Committee’s financial reserve. Income
derived from handler assessments and
other revenue sources is expected to be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
The assessment rate established in this
rule will continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by AMS upon
recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
AMS. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
AMS will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s budget for subsequent
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
fiscal years will be reviewed and, as
appropriate, approved by AMS.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this rule on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 800
producers of olives in the production
area and 2 handlers subject to regulation
under the Order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts equal to or less
than $3.5 million (NAICS code 111339,
Other Noncitrus Fruit Farming) and
small agricultural service firms are
defined as those whose annual receipts
are equal to or less than $34.0 million
(NAICS code 115114, Postharvest Crop
Activities) (13 CFR 121.201).
Because of the large year-to-year
variation in California olive production,
it is helpful to use a two-year average of
the seasonal average producer price
when undertaking calculations relating
to average producer revenue. The
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) reported season average
producer prices of olives utilized for
canning for 2021 and 2022 of $851 and
$913 per ton, respectively, with a twoyear average price of $882. NASS had
not reported the 2023 season average
producer price at the time this rule was
published.
The appropriate quantities to consider
are the annual assessable olive
quantities, which were 43,336 tons in
2021 and 19,912 tons in 2022, with the
two-year average production being
31,624 tons. Multiplying 31,624 tons by
the two-year average producer price of
$882 yields a two-year average crop
value of $27,892,368. Dividing the crop
value by the number of olive producers
(800) yields calculated annual average
producer revenue of $34,865, much less
than SBA’s size standard of $3.5
million. Thus, the majority of olive
producers may be classified as small
entities.
Dividing the $27,892,368 average crop
value by 2 (the number of handlers)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jul 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
equals $13,946,184, which is the annual
average producer crop value processed
by each of the 2 handlers over the twoyear period. Dividing the $34.0 million
annual sales SBA size threshold for a
large handler by the $13,946,184 crop
value per handler yields an estimate of
a 125 percent manufacturing margin for
the 2 handlers, on average, to be
considered large handlers. A key
question is whether 125 percent is a
reasonable estimate of a manufacturing
margin for the olive canning process.
A review of economic literature on
canned food manufacturing margins
found no recent published estimates. A
series of Economic Research Service
reports on cost components of farm to
retail price spreads, published in the
late 1970s and early 1980s, found that
margins above crop value for a canned
vegetable product were in the range of
76 to 85 percent. Although the studies
are not recent, canning technology has
not changed significantly since that
time. Therefore, with the 125 percent
margin estimate for the 2 olive handlers,
the data indicates that they could be on
the threshold of being large handlers
($34.0 million in annual sales), using
two-year average data, and assuming
that the 2 handlers are about the same
size. In a large crop year, one or both
handlers could be considered large
handlers, depending on the proportion
of the crop that each of the handlers
processed.
This action decreases the assessment
rate collected from handlers for the 2024
fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years
from $35 to $28 per ton of assessable
olives. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2024 expenditures of
$1,100,151 and an assessment rate of
$28 per ton. The recommended
assessment rate of $28 is $7 lower than
the 2023 assessment rate. The quantity
of assessable olives harvested in the
2023 crop year is estimated to be 34,000
tons, compared to 19,912 tons in 2022.
Olives are an alternate-bearing crop,
with a small crop (2022) followed by a
large crop (2023). Income derived from
the $28 per ton assessment rate, along
with interest income and funds from the
authorized reserve, should be adequate
to meet the 2024 fiscal year’s budgeted
expenditures.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2024 fiscal year include $350,250 for
program administration, $164,650 for
export programs, $197,500 for marketing
activities, $302,751 for research, and
$85,000 for inspection. Budgeted
expenses for these items during the
2023 fiscal year were $399,700,
$148,000, $193,000, $325,712, and
$88,000, respectively.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57063
The Committee deliberated on many
of the expenses, weighed the relative
value of various programs or projects,
and decreased their expenses for
inspection and research activities while
increasing marketing activities. Overall,
the 2024 budget of $1,100,151 is
$54,261 less than the $1,154,412
budgeted for the 2023 fiscal year.
Prior to arriving at this budget and
assessment rate, the Committee
considered information from various
sources including the Committee’s
Executive, Marketing, Inspection, and
Research Subcommittees. Alternate
expenditure levels were discussed by
these groups, based upon the relative
value of various projects to the olive
industry and the increased olive
production. The assessment rate of $28
per ton of assessable olives was derived
by considering anticipated expenses, the
high volume of assessable olives, the
current balance in the monetary reserve,
and additional pertinent factors.
A review of information from NASS
indicates that the average producer
price for the 2022 crop year (the most
recent year for which information is
available) was $913 per ton. Therefore,
utilizing the assessment rate established
herein of $28 per ton, assessment
revenue for the 2024 fiscal year as a
percentage of total producer revenue
would be approximately 3.1 percent
($28 divided by $913 times 100).
This action decreases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers. Some of the assessment
costs to handlers may be passed on to
producers. Decreasing the assessment
rate is expected to reduce the burden on
handlers and may also, therefore, reduce
the burden on producers.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 Vegetable
and Specialty Crops. No changes in
those requirements as a result of this
action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
California olive handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
57064
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
AMS has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this action.
A proposed rulemaking concerning
this action was published in the Federal
Register on March 28, 2024 (89 FR
21441). Copies of the proposed
rulemaking were provided to all olive
handlers. In addition, the proposal was
made available through the internet by
AMS and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 30-day comment period
ending April 29, 2024, was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposal. There were no comments
received during the comment period.
Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rulemaking as proposed.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendations
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, AMS has
determined that this rule is consistent
with, and will effectuate the declared
policy of, the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Marketing agreements, Olives,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service amends 7 CFR part 932 as
follows:
PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for part 932
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read
as follows:
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 932.230
Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2024, an
assessment rate of $28 per ton is
established for California olives.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–15247 Filed 7–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jul 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
[NRC–2024–0096]
RIN 3150–AL17
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: Holtec International HI–STORM
FW System, Certificate of Compliance
No. 1032, Amendment No. 7
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Table of Contents
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is amending its
spent fuel storage regulations by
revising the Holtec International HI–
STORM Flood/Wind Multi-purpose
Canister Storage System listing within
the ‘‘List of approved spent fuel storage
casks’’ to include Amendment No. 7 to
Certificate of Compliance No. 1032.
Amendment No. 7 revises the certificate
of compliance to add a new overpack,
add new multi-purpose canisters MPC–
44 and MPC–37P, and add new fuel
type 10x10J to approved content.
Amendment No. 7 also incorporates
other technical changes and several
editorial changes.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
September 25, 2024, unless significant
adverse comments are received by
August 12, 2024. If this direct final rule
is withdrawn as a result of such
comments, timely notice of the
withdrawal will be published in the
Federal Register. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the NRC is able
to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this
date. Comments received on this direct
final rule will also be considered to be
comments on a companion proposed
rule published in the Proposed Rules
section of this issue of the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID NRC–2024–0096
at https://www.regulations.gov. If your
material cannot be submitted using
https://www.regulations.gov, call or
email the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document for alternate instructions.
You can read a plain language
description of this direct final rule at
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/
NRC-2024-0096. For additional
direction on obtaining information and
submitting comments, see ‘‘Obtaining
Information and Submitting Comments’’
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Caylee Kenny, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards,
telephone: 301–415–7150, email:
Caylee.Kenny@nrc.gov; and Yen-Ju
Chen, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards, telephone: 301–415–
1018, email: Yen-Ju.Chen@nrc.gov. Both
are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting
Comments
II. Rulemaking Procedure
III. Background
IV. Discussion of Changes
V. Voluntary Consensus Standards
VI. Agreement State Compatibility
VII. Plain Writing
VIII. Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
X. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
XI. Regulatory Analysis
XII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
XIII. Congressional Review Act
XIV. Availability of Documents
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2024–
0096 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2024–0096. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Dawn
Forder, telephone: 301–415–3407,
email: Dawn.Forder@nrc.gov. For
technical questions contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. For the
convenience of the reader, instructions
about obtaining materials referenced in
this document are provided in the
‘‘Availability of Documents’’ section.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57061-57064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15247]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 932
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-23-0087]
Olives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action decreases the assessment rate established for the
2024 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years for California olives as
recommended by the California Olive Committee. The assessment rate will
remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
DATES: Effective August 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Sasselli, Marketing Specialist,
or Barry Broadbent, Chief, West Region Branch, Market Development
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-
5901, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-8085, or Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in
7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Agreement No. 148
and Order No. 932, both as amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating the
handling of olives grown in California. Part 932 (referred to as the
``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.'' The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised
of producers and handlers of olives operating within the area of
production.
[[Page 57062]]
The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary,
to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects,
distributive impacts and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094
directs agencies to conduct proactive outreach to engage interested and
affected parties through a variety of means, such as through field
offices, and alternative platforms and media. This action falls within
a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which
requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions will
have Tribal implications. AMS has determined that this rule is unlikely
to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
Under the Order now in effect, California olive handlers are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the Order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate this rule
establishes will be applicable to all assessable olives beginning on
January 1, 2024, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) a petition stating that the order, any provision
of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is
not in accordance with law and requesting a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity
for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on
the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United
States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has
his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review
USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later
than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Section 932.38 of the Order authorizes the Committee, with the
approval of AMS, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members are
familiar with the Committee's needs and with the costs of goods and
services in their local area and are thus able to formulate an
appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly
affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input.
This rule decreases the assessment rate from $35 per ton of
assessed olives, the rate that was established for the 2023 fiscal year
and subsequent fiscal years, to $28 per ton of assessed olives for the
2024 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years. The lower rate is the
result of the significantly higher crop size in 2023 (fruit that is
marketed over the course of the 2024 fiscal year), and the need to
maintain the Committee's financial reserve at a responsible level.
The Committee met on December 12, 2023, and unanimously recommended
2024 expenditures of $1,100,151 and an assessment rate of $28 per ton
of assessed olives. In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures
were $1,154,412. The assessment rate of $28 set for the remainder of
the 2024 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years is $7 lower than the
rate established for the 2023 fiscal year. Producer receipts show total
production of approximately 34,000 tons of olives from the 2023 crop
year that will be assessable during the 2024 fiscal year. This amount
is substantially higher than the quantity of olives that was harvested
in 2022.
Olives harvested in 2023 will be marketed over the course of the
2024 fiscal year, which begins on January 1, 2024, as the harvested
olives are stored in brining tanks and processed over the subsequent
year. At the $28 per ton assessment rate, the estimated 34,000 tons of
assessable olives from the 2023 crop are expected to generate $952,000
in assessment revenue over the 2024 fiscal year. The balance of funds
needed to cover budgeted expenditures will come from interest income
and the Committee's financial reserve. The 2024 fiscal year assessment
rate decrease is appropriate to ensure the Committee has sufficient
revenue to fund the recommended 2024 fiscal year budgeted expenditures
while also ensuring that funds in the reserve do not exceed
approximately one fiscal year's expenses, the maximum reserve amount
permitted by Sec. 932.40.
The Order has a fiscal year and a crop year that are independent of
each other. The crop year is a 12-month period that begins on August 1
of each year and ends on July 31 of the following year. The fiscal year
is the 12-month period that begins on January 1 and ends on December 31
of each year. Olives are an alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop
(2022) followed by a large crop (2023). For this assessment rate rule,
the Committee utilized the estimated 2023 crop year receipts to
determine the recommended assessment rate for the 2024 fiscal year.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2024
fiscal year include $350,250 for program administration, $164,650 for
export programs, $197,500 for marketing activities, $302,751 for
research, and $85,000 for inspection. Budgeted expenses for these items
during the 2023 fiscal year were $399,700, $148,000, $193,000,
$325,712, and $88,000, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee resulted from
consideration of anticipated fiscal year expenses, estimated olive
tonnage received by handlers during the 2023 crop year, and the amount
in the Committee's financial reserve. Income derived from handler
assessments and other revenue sources is expected to be adequate to
cover budgeted expenses. The assessment rate established in this rule
will continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by AMS upon recommendation and information submitted by the
Committee or other available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or AMS.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. AMS will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's budget for subsequent
[[Page 57063]]
fiscal years will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by AMS.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final
regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 800 producers of olives in the production
area and 2 handlers subject to regulation under the Order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts equal to or less than $3.5
million (NAICS code 111339, Other Noncitrus Fruit Farming) and small
agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts
are equal to or less than $34.0 million (NAICS code 115114, Postharvest
Crop Activities) (13 CFR 121.201).
Because of the large year-to-year variation in California olive
production, it is helpful to use a two-year average of the seasonal
average producer price when undertaking calculations relating to
average producer revenue. The National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) reported season average producer prices of olives utilized for
canning for 2021 and 2022 of $851 and $913 per ton, respectively, with
a two-year average price of $882. NASS had not reported the 2023 season
average producer price at the time this rule was published.
The appropriate quantities to consider are the annual assessable
olive quantities, which were 43,336 tons in 2021 and 19,912 tons in
2022, with the two-year average production being 31,624 tons.
Multiplying 31,624 tons by the two-year average producer price of $882
yields a two-year average crop value of $27,892,368. Dividing the crop
value by the number of olive producers (800) yields calculated annual
average producer revenue of $34,865, much less than SBA's size standard
of $3.5 million. Thus, the majority of olive producers may be
classified as small entities.
Dividing the $27,892,368 average crop value by 2 (the number of
handlers) equals $13,946,184, which is the annual average producer crop
value processed by each of the 2 handlers over the two-year period.
Dividing the $34.0 million annual sales SBA size threshold for a large
handler by the $13,946,184 crop value per handler yields an estimate of
a 125 percent manufacturing margin for the 2 handlers, on average, to
be considered large handlers. A key question is whether 125 percent is
a reasonable estimate of a manufacturing margin for the olive canning
process.
A review of economic literature on canned food manufacturing
margins found no recent published estimates. A series of Economic
Research Service reports on cost components of farm to retail price
spreads, published in the late 1970s and early 1980s, found that
margins above crop value for a canned vegetable product were in the
range of 76 to 85 percent. Although the studies are not recent, canning
technology has not changed significantly since that time. Therefore,
with the 125 percent margin estimate for the 2 olive handlers, the data
indicates that they could be on the threshold of being large handlers
($34.0 million in annual sales), using two-year average data, and
assuming that the 2 handlers are about the same size. In a large crop
year, one or both handlers could be considered large handlers,
depending on the proportion of the crop that each of the handlers
processed.
This action decreases the assessment rate collected from handlers
for the 2024 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years from $35 to $28
per ton of assessable olives. The Committee unanimously recommended
2024 expenditures of $1,100,151 and an assessment rate of $28 per ton.
The recommended assessment rate of $28 is $7 lower than the 2023
assessment rate. The quantity of assessable olives harvested in the
2023 crop year is estimated to be 34,000 tons, compared to 19,912 tons
in 2022. Olives are an alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop (2022)
followed by a large crop (2023). Income derived from the $28 per ton
assessment rate, along with interest income and funds from the
authorized reserve, should be adequate to meet the 2024 fiscal year's
budgeted expenditures.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2024
fiscal year include $350,250 for program administration, $164,650 for
export programs, $197,500 for marketing activities, $302,751 for
research, and $85,000 for inspection. Budgeted expenses for these items
during the 2023 fiscal year were $399,700, $148,000, $193,000,
$325,712, and $88,000, respectively.
The Committee deliberated on many of the expenses, weighed the
relative value of various programs or projects, and decreased their
expenses for inspection and research activities while increasing
marketing activities. Overall, the 2024 budget of $1,100,151 is $54,261
less than the $1,154,412 budgeted for the 2023 fiscal year.
Prior to arriving at this budget and assessment rate, the Committee
considered information from various sources including the Committee's
Executive, Marketing, Inspection, and Research Subcommittees. Alternate
expenditure levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the
relative value of various projects to the olive industry and the
increased olive production. The assessment rate of $28 per ton of
assessable olives was derived by considering anticipated expenses, the
high volume of assessable olives, the current balance in the monetary
reserve, and additional pertinent factors.
A review of information from NASS indicates that the average
producer price for the 2022 crop year (the most recent year for which
information is available) was $913 per ton. Therefore, utilizing the
assessment rate established herein of $28 per ton, assessment revenue
for the 2024 fiscal year as a percentage of total producer revenue
would be approximately 3.1 percent ($28 divided by $913 times 100).
This action decreases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers. Some of
the assessment costs to handlers may be passed on to producers.
Decreasing the assessment rate is expected to reduce the burden on
handlers and may also, therefore, reduce the burden on producers.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 Vegetable and
Specialty Crops. No changes in those requirements as a result of this
action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California olive handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
[[Page 57064]]
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this action.
A proposed rulemaking concerning this action was published in the
Federal Register on March 28, 2024 (89 FR 21441). Copies of the
proposed rulemaking were provided to all olive handlers. In addition,
the proposal was made available through the internet by AMS and the
Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day comment period ending April
29, 2024, was provided for interested persons to respond to the
proposal. There were no comments received during the comment period.
Accordingly, no changes will be made to the rulemaking as proposed.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and
other available information, AMS has determined that this rule is
consistent with, and will effectuate the declared policy of, the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Marketing agreements, Olives, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural
Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 932 as follows:
PART 932--OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for part 932 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 932.230 Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2024, an assessment rate of $28 per ton is
established for California olives.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-15247 Filed 7-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P