Safety Zone; Missouri River, Mile Marker 27-366, 56665-56666 [2024-15184]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0112]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Missouri River, Mile
Marker 27–366
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of the Missouri River from
mile markers 27 to 366. The safety zone
is to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from potential
hazards created by high water levels and
levee conditions. Entry of vessels or
persons into the zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Upper
Mississippi River or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice on July 10, 2024. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from July 5, 2024, until July
10, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
0112 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Commander Richard
Cherkauer, Sector Upper Mississippi
River Waterways Management Division,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314–269–
2560, email Richard.G.Cherkauer@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule under authority in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory
provision authorizes an agency to issue
a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:36 Jul 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Good cause exists for not
publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule, as doing so would be
impracticable. This is because we must
establish this safety zone immediately,
and therefore lack sufficient time to
provide a reasonable comment period
and then consider those comments
before issuing the rule.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public
interest because immediate action is
needed to respond to the potential
hazards created by high water levels and
levee conditions on the Missouri River.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port Sector Upper
Mississippi River (COTP) has
determined a safety zone is necessary to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from potential
hazards created by high water levels and
levee conditions on the Missouri River.
This rule resulted from concerns about
impacts to the levees along the Missouri
River during this period of high-water
levels.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary
safety zone on the waters of the
Missouri River from mile markers 27 to
366. The duration of this safety zone is
intended to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from
potential hazards created by high water
levels and levee conditions on the
Missouri River. No vessel or person will
be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative. A
designated representative is a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) assigned
to units under the operational control of
USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River.
The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public of
the enforcement date and times for these
safety zones, as well as any emergent
safety concerns that may delay the
enforcement of the zone.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56665
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on size, location, and duration
of the temporary safety zones. This
action involves a safety zone to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
created by high water levels and levee
conditions on the Missouri River. This
rule resulted from concerns about
impacts to the levees along the Missouri
River from MM 27 to 366. Moreover, the
Coast Guard will publish a Local Notice
to Mariners and mariners may seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
56666
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone on the Missouri River from MM 27
to 366. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(c)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T08–0112 to read as
follows:
■
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
§ 165.T08–0112 Safety Zone; Missouri
River, Mile Markers 27 to 366.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all navigable waters within
the Missouri River from Mile Marker 27
to 366.
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be subject to enforcement from July
5, 2024, to July 10, 2024.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general safety zone regulations in
§ 165.23, entry of persons or vessels into
the safety zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:36 Jul 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Sector Upper Mississippi River (COTP)
or a designated representative. A
designated representative is a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) assigned
to units under the operational control of
USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or a designated
representative via VHF–FM channel 16,
or through USCG Sector Upper
Mississippi River at 314–269–2332.
Persons and vessels permitted to enter
the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions issued by the
COTP or designated representative.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public of the effective
period for the safety zone as well as any
changes in the dates and times of
enforcement, as well as reductions in
size or scope of the safety zone, through
Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs),
Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs),
and/or Safety Marine Information
Broadcast (SMIB) as appropriate.
Dated: July 5, 2024.
A.R. Bender,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2024–15184 Filed 7–5–24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2024–0302; FRL–12064–
03–R3]
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania;
Interim Final Determination To Stay
and Defer Sanctions Related to
Reasonably Available Control
Technology Requirements for
Keystone, Conemaugh, Homer City
and Montour Generating Facilities for
the 1997 and 2008 Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final determination.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is making an interim final
determination (IFD) that Pennsylvania
has submitted revisions to the SIP that
satisfy the requirements under the Clean
Air Act (CAA) to implement RACT for
these EGUs for the 1997 and 2008 ozone
NAAQS. The effect of this IFD is to stay
emission offset sanctions and defer the
imposition of highway funding
sanctions triggered by an August 2022
EPA partial disapproval of a prior
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 10, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56665-56666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15184]
[[Page 56665]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0112]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Missouri River, Mile Marker 27-366
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of the Missouri River from mile markers 27 to 366. The safety
zone is to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from
potential hazards created by high water levels and levee conditions.
Entry of vessels or persons into the zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Upper
Mississippi River or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice on July 10, 2024.
For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from July
5, 2024, until July 10, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-0112 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Richard Cherkauer, Sector Upper
Mississippi River Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 314-269-2560, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule under authority in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory provision authorizes an agency to
issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Good cause exists
for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect
to this rule, as doing so would be impracticable. This is because we
must establish this safety zone immediately, and therefore lack
sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and then
consider those comments before issuing the rule.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public interest because immediate
action is needed to respond to the potential hazards created by high
water levels and levee conditions on the Missouri River.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sector Upper
Mississippi River (COTP) has determined a safety zone is necessary to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential
hazards created by high water levels and levee conditions on the
Missouri River. This rule resulted from concerns about impacts to the
levees along the Missouri River during this period of high-water
levels.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary safety zone on the waters of the
Missouri River from mile markers 27 to 366. The duration of this safety
zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards created by high water levels and
levee conditions on the Missouri River. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative. A designated representative is
a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard
(USCG) assigned to units under the operational control of USCG Sector
Upper Mississippi River. The COTP or a designated representative will
inform the public of the enforcement date and times for these safety
zones, as well as any emergent safety concerns that may delay the
enforcement of the zone.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on size, location,
and duration of the temporary safety zones. This action involves a
safety zone to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards created by high water levels and levee
conditions on the Missouri River. This rule resulted from concerns
about impacts to the levees along the Missouri River from MM 27 to 366.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will publish a Local Notice to Mariners and
mariners may seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the
[[Page 56666]]
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone on the Missouri River from MM 27 to 366. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(c) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0112 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0112 Safety Zone; Missouri River, Mile Markers 27 to
366.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable
waters within the Missouri River from Mile Marker 27 to 366.
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be subject to enforcement
from July 5, 2024, to July 10, 2024.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general safety zone
regulations in Sec. 165.23, entry of persons or vessels into the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Upper Mississippi
River (COTP) or a designated representative. A designated
representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard (USCG) assigned to units under the operational control of
USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or a designated
representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or through USCG Sector Upper
Mississippi River at 314-269-2332. Persons and vessels permitted to
enter the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions
issued by the COTP or designated representative.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public of the effective period for the
safety zone as well as any changes in the dates and times of
enforcement, as well as reductions in size or scope of the safety zone,
through Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), and/or Safety Marine Information Broadcast (SMIB) as
appropriate.
Dated: July 5, 2024.
A.R. Bender,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Upper
Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2024-15184 Filed 7-5-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P