Special Local Regulation; Cayuga Lake, Ithaca, NY, 56677-56679 [2024-14722]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Eastern
Great Lakes
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
(Authority: 15 U.S.C. 46; 15 U.S.C. 57a; 5
U.S.C. 601 note)
April J. Tabor,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–15065 Filed 7–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0544]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Cayuga
Lake, Ithaca, NY
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary special local
regulation for certain waters of the
Cayuga Lake. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters near Ithaca, NY, during
a marine event on August 10, 2024. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from transiting the
area unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Sector Eastern Great Lakes or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 25, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2024–0544 using the Federal DecisionMaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments. This notice of proposed
rulemaking with its plain-language, 100word-or-less proposed rule summary
will be available in this same docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Joseph Stranc,
Marine Safety Unit Thousand Islands,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 315–774–
8524, email SMBMSUThousandIslandsWaterwaysManagement@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
DATES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR
Code of Federal Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jul 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
56677
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
On March 4, 2024, an organization
notified the Coast Guard that it will be
conducting a swim event from 6 a.m. to
11:30 a.m. on August 10, 2024. The
event will take place within the
following boundaries: starting at point
42°30′07.01″ N, 076°30′57.04″ W;
running adjacent shore to point
42°30′30.03″ N, 076°31′09.34″ W; thence
to 42°29′50.20″ N, 076°32′24.99″ W;
running adjacent to the shore to point
42°29′34.71″ N, 076°32′17.11″ W; thence
back to starting position.
Due to the potential hazards
associated with the swim event, the
Captain of the Port Sector Eastern Great
Lakes (COTP) determined that the
potential hazards associated with the
swimming event would be a safety
concern for anyone within the swim
area. The purpose of this rulemaking is
to ensure the safety of participants of
the event on within the navigable waters
within the boundaries described above
before, during, and after the scheduled
event. The Coast Guard is proposing this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70041.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the regulated area.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit through this regulated area
which would impact a small designated
area of Cayuga Lake for less than 6
hours during the morning. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16 about the
regulated area, and the rule would allow
vessels to seek permission to transit
through the area.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
B. Impact on Small Entities
The COTP is proposing to establish a
special local regulation in Cayuga Lake
from 6 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on August 10,
2024. The area regulated by this special
local regulation will cover all navigable
waters, from surface to bottom, within
the area formed by connecting the
following latitude and longitude points
in the following order: starting at point
42°30′07.01″ N, 076°30′57.04″ W;
running adjacent shore to point
42°30′30.03″ N, 076°31′09.34″ W; thence
to 42°29′50.20″ N, 076°32′24.99″ W;
running adjacent to the shore to point
42°29′34.71″ N, 076°32′17.11″ W; thence
back to starting position.
The duration of the proposed special
local regulation is intended to ensure
the safety of event participants on these
navigable waters before, during, and
after the scheduled swim event. No
vessel or person would be permitted to
enter the regulated area without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the area may
be small entities, for the reasons stated
in section IV.A above, this proposed
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
56678
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jul 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
potential effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a special local regulation
lasting 5.5 hours that would prohibit
entry to the swim area of the Cayuga
Lake without authorization from COTP
or their designated representative.
Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L61 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision-Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2024–0544 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click
on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a
‘‘Subscribe’’ option for email alerts. The
option will notify you when comments
are posted, or a final rule is published.
We review all comments received, but
we will only post comments that
address the topic of the proposed rule.
We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments
that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–
1.
2. Add § 160.T09–0544 to read as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
§ 160.T09–0544 Women Swimmin’ for
Hospicare, Cayuga Lake, Ithaca, NY.
(a) Enforcement period. Coast Guard
Sector Eastern Great Lakes Captain of
the Port (COTP) will enforce this section
from 6 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on August 10,
2024, upon the navigable waters of
Cayuga Lake as described in paragraph
(b) of this section.
(b) Regulated area. The regulations in
this section apply to the following area:
All navigable waters within Cayuga
Lake starting at point 42°30′07.01″ N
076°30′57.04″ W and running adjacent
to the shore to point 42°30′30.03″ N
076°31′09.34″ W, continuing to point
42°29′50.20″ N 076°32′24.99″ W,
running adjacent to the shore to point
42°29′34.71″ N 076°32′17.11″ W, back to
the starting position.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the COTP in
the enforcement of the regulations in
this section.
(d) Regulations. All vessels will be
required to request permission from the
COTP or their designated representative
to transit the area and will operate at a
no wake speed to reduce the wake to a
minimum, and in a manner which will
not endanger participants in the event
or any other craft. The COTP or their
designated representative may be
contacted on Channel 16 (156.8 MHZ)
by the call sign ‘‘Coast Guard Patrol
Commander’’.
Dated: June 28, 2024.
M.I. Kuperman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Eastern Great Lakes.
[FR Doc. 2024–14722 Filed 7–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3055
[Docket No. RM2024–9; Order No. 7247]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
RIN 3211–AA39
Service Performance Measurement
Systems for Market Dominant
Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking seeks comment
on the Commission’s review of the
accuracy, reliability, and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jul 09, 2024
Jkt 262001
representativeness of the Postal
Service’s Internal Service Performance
Measurement (SPM) System. SPM
produces service performance results
that are an amalgamation of granular
and siloed evaluations of performance
for the individual segments of mail
collection (First Mile), mail processing
(Processing Duration), and mail delivery
(Last Mile). Given recent changes in
operations and mail mix, the
Commission has concerns about the
continued validity of the design and
implementation of each of these three
systems, as well as how the systems
function collectively as a whole. This
document informs the public of the
filing, invites public comment, and
takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Technical Conference: July 24,
2024, at 11 a.m., Eastern Time (ET),
Virtual. Comments are due: September
11, 2024. Reply comments are due:
October 9, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives. The Rule Summary can be
found on the Commission’s Rule
Summary Page at https://www.prc.gov/
rule-summary-page.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to 39 U.S.C. 503, 3652 and 3691, the
Commission finds that it is appropriate
to initiate this proceeding to review the
accuracy, reliability, and
representativeness of the Postal
Service’s Internal Service Performance
Measurement (SPM) System. The
Commission seeks comments regarding
this review.
SPM produces composite service
performance results that are generated
using several different data sources and
data processing methods. The service
performance results produced by SPM
are an amalgamation of granular and
siloed evaluations of performance for
the individual segments of mail
collection (First Mile), mail processing
(Processing Duration), and mail delivery
(Last Mile). Given recent changes in
operations and mail mix, the
Commission has concerns about the
continued validity of the design and
implementation of each of these three
systems, as well as how the systems
function collectively as a whole.
Commission Information Request No.
1 is being issued today in this docket
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
56679
and the Postal Service shall fully
respond by August 14, 2024.
A technical conference will be held
live via Microsoft Teams on July 24,
2024, at 11 a.m. ET. This technical
conference is an informal, off-the-record
opportunity to interactively discuss and
clarify technical issues related to the
nature and extent of the information
sought in Commission Information
Request No. 1, as well as to identify and
discuss information relevant to
evaluating the SPM System. Details on
how to participate appear in Order No.
7247.
Interested persons are invited to
provide written comments to facilitate
the Commission’s review of the
accuracy, reliability, and
representativeness of SPM. Below, the
Commission identifies specific topics on
which it would particularly appreciate
comment. However, commenters are not
limited to addressing these identified
topics—the Commission will consider
all comments that fall within the scope
of this proceeding.
1. Is SPM in its current state
producing accurate, reliable, and/or
representative measurements of the
Postal Service’s service performance? If
not, what specific aspect of SPM’s
design and/or implementation is
causing service performance
measurement to be inaccurate,
unreliable, and/or unrepresentative?
2. Are there modifications that could
be made to SPM in its current state that
would result in it being more accurate,
reliable, and/or representative?
3. Are there alternative measurement
systems (either external or internal) that
would be more accurate, reliable, and/
or representative than SPM?
By the Commission.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–14978 Filed 7–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 10, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56677-56679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14722]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0544]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Cayuga Lake, Ithaca, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary special
local regulation for certain waters of the Cayuga Lake. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters
near Ithaca, NY, during a marine event on August 10, 2024. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from transiting
the area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Eastern
Great Lakes or a designated representative. We invite your comments on
this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 25, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2024-0544 using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments. This notice of proposed rulemaking
with its plain-language, 100-word-or-less proposed rule summary will be
available in this same docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Joseph Stranc, Marine Safety Unit
Thousand Islands, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 315-774-8524, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Eastern Great Lakes
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On March 4, 2024, an organization notified the Coast Guard that it
will be conducting a swim event from 6 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on August 10,
2024. The event will take place within the following boundaries:
starting at point 42[deg]30'07.01'' N, 076[deg]30'57.04'' W; running
adjacent shore to point 42[deg]30'30.03'' N, 076[deg]31'09.34'' W;
thence to 42[deg]29'50.20'' N, 076[deg]32'24.99'' W; running adjacent
to the shore to point 42[deg]29'34.71'' N, 076[deg]32'17.11'' W; thence
back to starting position.
Due to the potential hazards associated with the swim event, the
Captain of the Port Sector Eastern Great Lakes (COTP) determined that
the potential hazards associated with the swimming event would be a
safety concern for anyone within the swim area. The purpose of this
rulemaking is to ensure the safety of participants of the event on
within the navigable waters within the boundaries described above
before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70041.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a special local regulation in
Cayuga Lake from 6 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on August 10, 2024. The area
regulated by this special local regulation will cover all navigable
waters, from surface to bottom, within the area formed by connecting
the following latitude and longitude points in the following order:
starting at point 42[deg]30'07.01'' N, 076[deg]30'57.04'' W; running
adjacent shore to point 42[deg]30'30.03'' N, 076[deg]31'09.34'' W;
thence to 42[deg]29'50.20'' N, 076[deg]32'24.99'' W; running adjacent
to the shore to point 42[deg]29'34.71'' N, 076[deg]32'17.11'' W; thence
back to starting position.
The duration of the proposed special local regulation is intended
to ensure the safety of event participants on these navigable waters
before, during, and after the scheduled swim event. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the regulated area without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the regulated area. Vessel
traffic would be able to safely transit through this regulated area
which would impact a small designated area of Cayuga Lake for less than
6 hours during the morning. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
regulated area, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to
transit through the area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A
above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see
[[Page 56678]]
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a special
local regulation lasting 5.5 hours that would prohibit entry to the
swim area of the Cayuga Lake without authorization from COTP or their
designated representative.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2024-0544 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a ``Subscribe'' option for email alerts.
The option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is
published.
We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.
0
2. Add Sec. 160.T09-0544 to read as follows:
[[Page 56679]]
Sec. 160.T09-0544 Women Swimmin' for Hospicare, Cayuga Lake, Ithaca,
NY.
(a) Enforcement period. Coast Guard Sector Eastern Great Lakes
Captain of the Port (COTP) will enforce this section from 6 a.m. to
11:30 a.m. on August 10, 2024, upon the navigable waters of Cayuga Lake
as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Regulated area. The regulations in this section apply to the
following area: All navigable waters within Cayuga Lake starting at
point 42[deg]30'07.01'' N 076[deg]30'57.04'' W and running adjacent to
the shore to point 42[deg]30'30.03'' N 076[deg]31'09.34'' W, continuing
to point 42[deg]29'50.20'' N 076[deg]32'24.99'' W, running adjacent to
the shore to point 42[deg]29'34.71'' N 076[deg]32'17.11'' W, back to
the starting position.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the COTP
in the enforcement of the regulations in this section.
(d) Regulations. All vessels will be required to request permission
from the COTP or their designated representative to transit the area
and will operate at a no wake speed to reduce the wake to a minimum,
and in a manner which will not endanger participants in the event or
any other craft. The COTP or their designated representative may be
contacted on Channel 16 (156.8 MHZ) by the call sign ``Coast Guard
Patrol Commander''.
Dated: June 28, 2024.
M.I. Kuperman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Eastern Great
Lakes.
[FR Doc. 2024-14722 Filed 7-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P