Notice of Availability of the ANCSA 17(d)(1) Withdrawals Final Environmental Impact Statement, Alaska, 55654-55655 [2024-14658]
Download as PDF
55654
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 129 / Friday, July 5, 2024 / Notices
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Abstract: Information is collected
from visitors of public lands and
residents of communities near public
lands. Information gathered from
visitors and local community residents
is used to inform planning decisions in
support of BLM’s Planning for
Recreation and Visitor Services
Handbook H–8320–1. OMB approval for
this information collection is currently
due to expire on April 30, 2025. The
BLM plans to request that OMB renew
these surveys and focus groups for
additional three (3) years.
Title of Collection: Surveys and Focus
Groups to Support Outcomes-Focused
Management (Recreation Survey and
Focus Groups).
OMB Control Number: 1004–0217.
Form Numbers: None.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 5,330.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 7,230.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: Varies from 3 minutes to
complete an on-site survey to 90
minutes to complete a focus group.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 2,046.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: None.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and, notwithstanding any other
provision of law, a person is not
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Darrin A. King,
Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–14745 Filed 7–3–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Bureau of Land Management
[BLM_AK_FRN_MO4500180306]
Notice of Availability of the ANCSA
17(d)(1) Withdrawals Final
Environmental Impact Statement,
Alaska
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jul 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
announces the availability of the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
17(d)(1) Withdrawals Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
The BLM held public meetings on the
Draft EIS and subsistence-related
hearings to receive comments on the
Draft EIS and the project’s potential to
impact subsistence resources and
activities. The Final EIS considers those
comments.
DATES: The BLM will publish the
Record of Decision for the project no
earlier than 30 days following the date
the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its Notice of Availability of
the Final EIS in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: The Final EIS and
documents pertinent to this proposal are
available for review on the BLM
ePlanning project website at https://
eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/
project/2018002/510, and in-person at
the BLM Anchorage Field Office, and at
the BLM Alaska State Office, BLM
Alaska Public Information Center.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Racheal Jones, BLM Project Manager,
telephone (907) 290–0307; address
ANCSA 17(d)(1) EIS, BLM Anchorage
District Office, Attn: Racheal Jones,
4700 BLM Road, Anchorage, Alaska
99507; email rajones@blm.gov.
Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, blind, hard of hearing, or have a
speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services for
contacting Ms. Jones. Individuals
outside the United States should use the
relay services offered within their
country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United
States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Department of the Interior (DOI), BLM
Alaska State Office, prepared this EIS to
evaluate the effects of any Secretarial
decision to revoke withdrawals
established following enactment of
ANCSA Section 17(d)(1) affecting the
lands described in Public Land Order
(PLO) Nos. 7899 through 7903. The
potential revocation of these 17(d)(1)
withdrawals is hereafter referred to as
the 2021 Action. PLO Nos. 7900, 7901,
7902, and 7903, which would revoke
withdrawals on lands in the Ring of
Fire, Bay, Bering Sea-Western Interior,
and East Alaska planning areas,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respectively, were signed on January 15
and 16, 2021; however, they were never
published in the Federal Register. PLO
No. 7899, which would revoke
withdrawals on lands in the KobukSeward Peninsula planning area, was
signed on January 11, 2021, and
published in the Federal Register on
January 19, 2021 (86 FR 5236).
Subsequently, the DOI identified certain
procedural and legal defects in the
decision-making process for these PLOs,
as described in the April 16, 2021,
Federal Register notice (86 FR 20193),
including insufficient analysis under
NEPA. The DOI extended the opening
order for PLO No. 7899 until August 31,
2024, to provide an opportunity to
review the decision and to ensure the
orderly management of the public lands
(88 FR 21207). The BLM used this time
to address identified deficiencies and to
update the NEPA analysis.
The 2021 Action under review is
revocation of the ANCSA 17(d)(1)
withdrawals as described in PLO No.
7899, 7900, 7901, 7902, and 7903,
affecting approximately 28 million acres
in total. This EIS evaluates the resource
conditions on these lands and
incorporates and describes additional
coordination with other Federal
agencies; State and local governments;
Federally recognized Tribes; Alaska
Native Corporations; and other
stakeholders to ensure that the
environmental analyses previously
conducted are updated and expanded
upon as appropriate. This additional
analysis is necessary to ensure display
of the impacts of revocation of the
ANCSA 17(d)(1) withdrawals; to correct
errors in the previous decision-making
process regarding these withdrawals;
and to ensure that opening these lands
is consistent with the purposes of
ANCSA 17(d)(1), which requires that
‘‘the public interest in these lands is
properly protected,’’ including factors
such as subsistence hunting and fishing,
habitat connectivity, protection of
cultural resources, and protection of
threatened and endangered species.
This evaluation is needed to make an
informed public interest determination
to support revocation in full, revocation
in part, or retention in full of the
ANCSA 17(d)(1) withdrawals.
The BLM considered alternatives that
represent retention or revocation of the
17(d)(1) withdrawals and different
configurations of the areas affected in
each of the five planning areas (Bay,
Bering Sea-Western Interior, East
Alaska, Kobuk-Seward, and Ring of
Fire). Each of the alternatives identifies
17(d)(1) withdrawals in the five
planning areas as retained or revoked.
The alternatives range from retaining
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 129 / Friday, July 5, 2024 / Notices
the withdrawals on all lands
(Alternative A) to revoking the
withdrawals on all lands (Alternative
D). Alternatives B and C include partial
revocations based on natural resource
factors. Full or partial revocation of the
ANCSA 17(d)(1) withdrawals would
result in changes to land use that could
affect local residents, wildlife,
vegetation, cultural resources,
subsistence, and recreation. No
development plans have been
submitted, and no stipulations are
attached to selected lands that would
prevent any specific development from
taking place. Therefore, the EIS provides
a reasonably foreseeable development
scenario that identifies and quantifies
potential development activity in the
decision area, including the extraction
of leasable, locatable, and salable
minerals, as well as the establishment of
associated rights-of-way, assuming the
land is not withdrawn from availability
for such activities.
Section 810 of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act
(ANILCA) requires the BLM to evaluate
the effects of the alternatives presented
in the Final EIS on subsistence uses and
needs and to hold public hearings if it
finds that any alternative may
significantly restrict subsistence uses.
The BLM found in the evaluation of
subsistence impacts that Alternatives B,
C, or D, in combination with the
cumulative case as analyzed in the Draft
EIS, may significantly restrict
subsistence uses in many communities.
Therefore, the BLM held public hearings
on subsistence resources and activities
in conjunction with the public meetings
on the Draft EIS in the vicinity of
potentially affected communities. In
consideration of public comments
received on the Draft EIS and at the
public hearings, the BLM revised the
ANILCA Section 810 evaluation,
published as Appendix C of the Final
EIS, but did not change its ‘‘may
significantly restrict subsistence uses’’
findings for the identified communities.
The input of Alaska Native Tribes and
Corporations is of critical importance to
this EIS. Therefore, during the NEPA
process, the BLM consulted with
potentially affected Federally
recognized Tribes on a government-togovernment basis, and with affected
Alaska Native Corporations in
accordance with Executive Order 13175,
as well as Public Law 108–199, Div. H,
sec. 161, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by
Public Law 108–447, Div. H, sec. 518,
118 Stat. 3267, and other Department
and Bureau policies.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jul 03, 2024
Jkt 262001
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6(b))
Steven M. Cohn,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2024–14658 Filed 7–3–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[BLM_CO_FRN_MO4500179560]
Notice of Availability of the Proposed
Resource Management Plan
Amendment and Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the Gunnison
Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus minimus),
Colorado and Utah
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended (FLMPA), the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has
prepared a proposed resource
management plan (RMP) amendment
and final environmental impact
statement (EIS) for the Gunnison SageGrouse (Centrocercus minimus) and by
this notice is announcing the start of a
30-day protest period of the proposed
RMP amendment.
DATES: This notice announces the
beginning of a 30-day protest period to
the BLM on the proposed RMP
amendment. Protests must be
postmarked or electronically submitted
on the BLM’s ePlanning site within 30
days of the date that the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) publishes its
Notice of Availability (NOA) in the
Federal Register. The EPA usually
publishes its NOAs on Fridays.
ADDRESSES: The proposed RMP
amendment and final EIS is available on
the BLM ePlanning project website at
https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/
project/2019031/510. Documents
pertinent to this proposal may also be
examined at the Grand Junction,
Uncompahgre, Tres Rios, Gunnison, San
Luis Valley, Moab, and Monticello Field
Offices.
Instructions for filing a protest with
the BLM for the Gunnison Sage-Grouse
(Centrocercus minimus) RMP
amendment can be found at: https://
www.blm.gov/programs/planning-andnepa/public-participation/filing-a-planprotest and at 43 CFR 1610.5–2. All
protests must be submitted in writing by
one of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55655
Website: https://eplanning.blm.gov/
eplanning-ui/project/2019031/510.
Regular mail and overnight mail: BLM
Director, Attention: Protest Coordinator
(HQ210), Denver Federal Center,
Building 40 (Door W–4), Lakewood, CO
80215.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina
Phillips, Project Manager, BLM
Colorado, telephone 970–589–9852;
BLM Southwest District Office, 2465 S.
Townsend Ave., Montrose, CO 81401;
email BLM_CO_GUSG_RMPA@blm.gov.
Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have
a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services for
contacting Ms. Phillips. Individuals
outside the United States should use the
relay services offered within their
country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United
States.
The RMP
amendment would change the following
existing plans.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Colorado
• Canyons of the Ancients National
Monument RMP (2010)
• Dominguez-Escalante National
Conservation Area RMP (2017)
• Grand Junction Field Office RMP
(2015)
• Gunnison Gorge National
Conservation Area RMP (2004)
• Gunnison Resource Area RMP (1993)
• McInnis Canyons National
Conservation Area RMP (2004)
• San Luis Resource Area RMP (1991)
• Tres Rios Field Office RMP (2015)
• Uncompahgre Field Office RMP
(2020)
Utah
• Moab Field Office RMP (2008)
• Monticello Field Office RMP (2008)
The Gunnison Sage-Grouse RMP
amendment updates management
decisions and actions to promote
Gunnison sage-grouse recovery and
maintain and enhance habitat, as
identified in the 2020 U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) Recovery
Plan, across the eight currently
recognized populations in southwest
Colorado and southeast Utah. Gunnison
sage-grouse is federally listed as a
threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16
U.S.C. 1531–1544).
Planning Area
The planning area spans portions of
19 Colorado Counties: Alamosa,
Archuleta, Conejos, Costilla, Delta,
Dolores, Garfield, Gunnison, Hinsdale,
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55654-55655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14658]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[BLM_AK_FRN_MO4500180306]
Notice of Availability of the ANCSA 17(d)(1) Withdrawals Final
Environmental Impact Statement, Alaska
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
announces the availability of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
(ANCSA) 17(d)(1) Withdrawals Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS). The BLM held public meetings on the Draft EIS and subsistence-
related hearings to receive comments on the Draft EIS and the project's
potential to impact subsistence resources and activities. The Final EIS
considers those comments.
DATES: The BLM will publish the Record of Decision for the project no
earlier than 30 days following the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its Notice of Availability of the Final EIS in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: The Final EIS and documents pertinent to this proposal are
available for review on the BLM ePlanning project website at https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/2018002/510, and in-person at
the BLM Anchorage Field Office, and at the BLM Alaska State Office, BLM
Alaska Public Information Center.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Racheal Jones, BLM Project Manager,
telephone (907) 290-0307; address ANCSA 17(d)(1) EIS, BLM Anchorage
District Office, Attn: Racheal Jones, 4700 BLM Road, Anchorage, Alaska
99507; email [email protected]. Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, blind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services
for contacting Ms. Jones. Individuals outside the United States should
use the relay services offered within their country to make
international calls to the point-of-contact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI),
BLM Alaska State Office, prepared this EIS to evaluate the effects of
any Secretarial decision to revoke withdrawals established following
enactment of ANCSA Section 17(d)(1) affecting the lands described in
Public Land Order (PLO) Nos. 7899 through 7903. The potential
revocation of these 17(d)(1) withdrawals is hereafter referred to as
the 2021 Action. PLO Nos. 7900, 7901, 7902, and 7903, which would
revoke withdrawals on lands in the Ring of Fire, Bay, Bering Sea-
Western Interior, and East Alaska planning areas, respectively, were
signed on January 15 and 16, 2021; however, they were never published
in the Federal Register. PLO No. 7899, which would revoke withdrawals
on lands in the Kobuk-Seward Peninsula planning area, was signed on
January 11, 2021, and published in the Federal Register on January 19,
2021 (86 FR 5236). Subsequently, the DOI identified certain procedural
and legal defects in the decision-making process for these PLOs, as
described in the April 16, 2021, Federal Register notice (86 FR 20193),
including insufficient analysis under NEPA. The DOI extended the
opening order for PLO No. 7899 until August 31, 2024, to provide an
opportunity to review the decision and to ensure the orderly management
of the public lands (88 FR 21207). The BLM used this time to address
identified deficiencies and to update the NEPA analysis.
The 2021 Action under review is revocation of the ANCSA 17(d)(1)
withdrawals as described in PLO No. 7899, 7900, 7901, 7902, and 7903,
affecting approximately 28 million acres in total. This EIS evaluates
the resource conditions on these lands and incorporates and describes
additional coordination with other Federal agencies; State and local
governments; Federally recognized Tribes; Alaska Native Corporations;
and other stakeholders to ensure that the environmental analyses
previously conducted are updated and expanded upon as appropriate. This
additional analysis is necessary to ensure display of the impacts of
revocation of the ANCSA 17(d)(1) withdrawals; to correct errors in the
previous decision-making process regarding these withdrawals; and to
ensure that opening these lands is consistent with the purposes of
ANCSA 17(d)(1), which requires that ``the public interest in these
lands is properly protected,'' including factors such as subsistence
hunting and fishing, habitat connectivity, protection of cultural
resources, and protection of threatened and endangered species. This
evaluation is needed to make an informed public interest determination
to support revocation in full, revocation in part, or retention in full
of the ANCSA 17(d)(1) withdrawals.
The BLM considered alternatives that represent retention or
revocation of the 17(d)(1) withdrawals and different configurations of
the areas affected in each of the five planning areas (Bay, Bering Sea-
Western Interior, East Alaska, Kobuk-Seward, and Ring of Fire). Each of
the alternatives identifies 17(d)(1) withdrawals in the five planning
areas as retained or revoked. The alternatives range from retaining
[[Page 55655]]
the withdrawals on all lands (Alternative A) to revoking the
withdrawals on all lands (Alternative D). Alternatives B and C include
partial revocations based on natural resource factors. Full or partial
revocation of the ANCSA 17(d)(1) withdrawals would result in changes to
land use that could affect local residents, wildlife, vegetation,
cultural resources, subsistence, and recreation. No development plans
have been submitted, and no stipulations are attached to selected lands
that would prevent any specific development from taking place.
Therefore, the EIS provides a reasonably foreseeable development
scenario that identifies and quantifies potential development activity
in the decision area, including the extraction of leasable, locatable,
and salable minerals, as well as the establishment of associated
rights-of-way, assuming the land is not withdrawn from availability for
such activities.
Section 810 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
(ANILCA) requires the BLM to evaluate the effects of the alternatives
presented in the Final EIS on subsistence uses and needs and to hold
public hearings if it finds that any alternative may significantly
restrict subsistence uses.
The BLM found in the evaluation of subsistence impacts that
Alternatives B, C, or D, in combination with the cumulative case as
analyzed in the Draft EIS, may significantly restrict subsistence uses
in many communities. Therefore, the BLM held public hearings on
subsistence resources and activities in conjunction with the public
meetings on the Draft EIS in the vicinity of potentially affected
communities. In consideration of public comments received on the Draft
EIS and at the public hearings, the BLM revised the ANILCA Section 810
evaluation, published as Appendix C of the Final EIS, but did not
change its ``may significantly restrict subsistence uses'' findings for
the identified communities.
The input of Alaska Native Tribes and Corporations is of critical
importance to this EIS. Therefore, during the NEPA process, the BLM
consulted with potentially affected Federally recognized Tribes on a
government-to-government basis, and with affected Alaska Native
Corporations in accordance with Executive Order 13175, as well as
Public Law 108-199, Div. H, sec. 161, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by
Public Law 108-447, Div. H, sec. 518, 118 Stat. 3267, and other
Department and Bureau policies.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6(b))
Steven M. Cohn,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-14658 Filed 7-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-10-P