30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Stepped and Tiered Rent Demonstration Evaluation OMB Control No.: 2528-0339, 55275-55277 [2024-14624]

Download as PDF khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2024 / Notices Subcommittees Task: To support the Study, the ICCPUD convened a Technical Review Subcommittee (Subcommittee) and an external Scientific Review Panel (SRP). The Subcommittee is composed of ICCPUD member agencies that have subject matter and scientific expertise in alcohol intake and health policy and research, including: • Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health • U.S. Department of Agriculture • Agency for Health Care Research and Quality • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy • Indian Health Service • National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism • National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration The Subcommittee will review all available literature and synthesize the data and conclusions from the Scientific Review Panel. The Subcommittee will assess the scientific evidence provided by the SRP in conjunction with the findings from a complementary National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) Review of Evidence on Alcohol and Health (www.NationalAcademies.org/our-work/ review-of-evidence-on-alcohol-andhealth), provide a synthesis of the data, and summarize the science for the 2025 Report to Congress and provide input to the process for developing the 2025– 2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans related to alcohol and health. The SRP is composed of nationally and internationally renowned subject matter experts. The SRP will conduct a series of studies to assess the available scientific research on alcohol intake and health and will provide the Subcommittee with an assessment of the best available science related to the risks of alcohol use on various health outcomes. Individuals of the SRP have expertise in the following areas: • Public health strategies related to alcohol policies, programs, and practices • Health effects of alcohol • Dietary guidance policy • Cancer epidemiology • Data quality and analysis • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • Biostatistics • Adverse pregnancy outcomes All Subcommittee members and external subject matter experts are VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:36 Jul 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 required to declare sources of funding (direct or indirect) and any connection (direct or indirect) with the tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, or pharmaceutical industries, including any connection (direct or indirect) with any entity that is substantially funded by one of these organizations. Biographies and financial disclosures can be found on the ICCPUD Study on Alcohol Intake and Health website: www.StopAlcoholAbuse.gov/ research-resources/alcohol-intakehealth.aspx. Public Comments: ICCPUD requests written comment from the public on the Alcohol Intake and Health Methodology. Public comment is intended to ensure the broadest evidence base and available data are considered in this study and that the Alcohol Intake and Health methodology is scientifically rigorous. Alcohol Intake and Health methodology materials for public comment can be accessible at www.stopalcoholabuse.gov/researchresources/alcohol-intake-health.aspx. Materials may be requested by email at samhsapra@samhsa.hhs.gov. • Mail: Mail/courier to SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Center for Behaviors Health Quality and Statistics, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E45, Rockville, MD 20857. • When providing public comment, please consider the following questions: Æ Are the topic areas defined in the methodology sufficient for understanding the relationship between alcohol intake and health? Æ Is the methodology clear and transparent? Æ Are the methods proposed scientifically valid? Æ Are the risks of bias identified? Æ Are strategies to minimize bias included? Æ Are there other methodological approaches that should be considered to estimate the risk of alcohol consumption on specific health outcomes? Æ Are the methods proposed subject to major limitations? If so, what strategies could be employed to minimize these limitations? Æ Are there additional data sources that should be considered and/or included for a comprehensive understanding of the burden of alcoholrelated diseases? Æ Are there specific scientific papers or research that should be included in the assessment of risk or concerns regarding the overall methodology outlined in the document? PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55275 Dated: June 28, 2024. Paul Reed, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. [FR Doc. 2024–14650 Filed 7–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4150–32–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–7080–N–29] 30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Stepped and Tiered Rent Demonstration Evaluation OMB Control No.: 2528–0339 Office of Policy Development and Research, Chief Data Officer, HUD. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of public comment. DATES: Comments Due Date: August 2, 2024. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. Interested persons are also invited to submit comments regarding this proposal and comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Anna Guido, Clearance Officer, REE, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 8210, Washington, DC 20410–5000; email PaperworkReductionActOffice@ hud.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management Officer, REE, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 8210, Washington, DC 20410; email: PaperworkReductionActOffice@ hud.gov. telephone (202)–402–5535. This is not a toll-free number, HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1 55276 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2024 / Notices disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone call, please visit: https://www.fcc.gov/ consumers/guides/telecommunicationsrelay-service-trs. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A. The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the information collection for a period of 60 days was published on March 12, 2024 at 89 FR 17862. A. Overview of Information Collection Title of Information Collection: Cohort 2 Stepped and Tiered Rent Demonstration Evaluation. OMB Approval Number: 2528–0339. Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection. Form Number: N/A. Description of the need for the information and proposed use: HUD has selected 10 Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) to participate in the second cohort of the Moving to Work (MTW) Expansion, Stepped and Tiered Rent Demonstration (STRD). These PHAs will implement an alternative rent policy (a stepped rent or tiered rent) that is intended to reduce PHA administrative burden and increase self-sufficiency of assisted households. Five PHAs will implement a stepped rent and five PHAs will implement a tiered rent. HUD’s Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) will evaluate the impacts of those alternative rent policies, using a randomized controlled trial. The evaluation will rely on data from a variety of sources, including new information collection efforts proposed in this Notice. HUD has contracted with MDRC to conduct the first phase of the evaluation, including random assignment, baseline data collection, and monitoring PHA implementation. Within the 10 participating PHAs, eligible households will be randomly assigned to have their rent calculated under the new rules (stepped/tiered rent) or old rules (the Brooke rent, typically 30% of household income). Eligible households will be non-elderly, non-disabled participants in the public housing and housing choice voucher program. Prior to random assignment, each household will be asked to complete a baseline information form (BIF), review the informed consent form, and provide informed consent to authorize HUD’s evaluator to use their data for the evaluation. The BIF will provide important information not otherwise available from HUD’s administrative data, such as whether the household has significant barriers to employment. The BIF will average approximately 7 minutes long and reviewing the consent form is expected to take approximately 11 minutes. MDRC will also conduct interviews with staff from participating PHAs, to better understand their experience implementing the new rent policies. For the first phase of the evaluation, MDRC is expected to conduct two rounds of staff interviews with each PHA. During the first round, MDRC expects to interview up to ten staff per PHA (reflecting a mix of executive management staff, public housing and HCV directors, and public housing and HCV specialists). The second round will focus on staff most directly involved with implementing the new rent policies (public housing and HCV directors and/or managers, and public housing and HCV specialists). The mode in Round 1will be a mix of one-on-one interviews and group interviews, with small groups of 2–3 staff performing similar roles. The mode in Round 2 will be group interviews, with groups of 2– 4 staff performing similar roles. MDRC will collect data extracts that will include a small subset of data elements captured by the PHAs exclusively for the demonstration, called the ‘‘Rent Policy Implementation Data Tracking Tool.’’ MDRC will collect these data fields along with MTW Expansion 50058 data, which is collected under OMB control number 2577–0083, directly from PHAs during the early implementation period to ensure that the new rent rules are being implemented correctly and throughout the demonstration to track hardship requests and collect updated contact information for ongoing communications and reminders about the demonstration and for potential follow-up surveys. EXHIBIT A—TOTAL ESTIMATED BURDEN [Note: Rows 1 through 8 are unchanged from the previously approved ICR. Rows 9 and 10 are being added with this ICR modification] khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Annual burden hours Hourly cost per response Frequency of response Baseline Information Form (household survey) ........................ Stepped Rent Informed Consent Form ..................................... Tiered Rent Informed Consent Form ........................................ PHA Executive Director Interviews (Round 1) .......................... PHA Program Director Interviews (Round 1) ........................... PHA MTW Coordinator Interviews (Round 1) .......................... PHA Housing Specialist Interviews (Round 1) ......................... Rent Policy Implementation Data Tracking Tool ...................... PHA Managers/Supervisors/Policy Informants Interview Guide (Round 2) ............................................................................... Housing Specialist and Property Manager Interview Guide (Round 2) ............................................................................... 24,000 7,000 17,000 10 20 10 60 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 24,000 7,000 17,000 10 20 10 60 10 .12 .18 .18 .75 1.5 .75 1.5 9 2,880 1,260 3,060 7.5 30 7.5 90 90 $9.43 9.43 9.43 59.86 44.24 44.24 25.64 25.64 $27,158.40 11,881.80 28,855.80 448.95 1,327.20 331.80 2,307.60 2,307.60 40 1 40 1.5 60 46.83 2,809.80 80 1 80 1.5 120 27.00 3,240.00 Total ................................................................................... 48,230 .................... .................... .................... 7,605 .................... 80,668.95 B. Solicitation of Public Comment This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:36 Jul 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 Responses per annum Burden hour per response Number of respondents Information collection proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Annual cost (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2024 / Notices information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. (5) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. HUD encourages interested parties to submit comments in response to these questions. C. Authority Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. Anna P. Guido, Department Reports Management Office, Office of Policy Development and Research, Chief Data Officer. [FR Doc. 2024–14624 Filed 7–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–7092–N–31] Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records Office of Policy Development and Research, HUD. ACTION: Notice of a new system of records. AGENCY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the Department of Housing Urban and Development (HUD), Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) is issuing a public notice of its intent to create a new Privacy Act System of Records titled, ‘‘Policy and Research Information System.’’ The Policy and Research Information System (PARIS) contains information related to public housing agencies (PHAs), HUD-assisted families, HUD-assisted properties, and other HUD programs which are used for research, evaluation, monitoring, and budget formulation. DATES: Comments will be accepted on or before August 2, 2024. This proposed action will be effective on the date following the end of the comment period unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number or by one of the following methods: Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically. Fax: 202–619–8365. Email: www.privacy@hud.gov. Mail: Attention: Privacy Office; Mr. Ladonne White, Chief Privacy Officer; khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:36 Jul 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 Office of the Executive Secretariat, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room 10139; Washington, DC 20410–0001. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov. including any personal information provided. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received go to https:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LaDonne White, The Privacy Office; 451 Seventh Street SW, Room 10139; Washington, DC 20410–0001; telephone number (202) 708–3054 (this is not a toll-free number). HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone call, please visit https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/ telecommunications-relay-service-trs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HUD’s Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) maintains the Policy and Research Information System (PARIS) system of records. PARIS serves as a repository of information related to public housing agencies (PHAs), HUDassisted families, HUD-assisted properties, and other HUD programs for the purposes of research, evaluation, monitoring, and budget formulation. PARIS gives PD&R the ability to extract data from multiple data systems, both internal and external to HUD, and to transform the data into a format that can be easily analyzed and reported on. The records in PARIS are not collected directly from individuals. Records are sent to PARIS from other data systems. Data in PARIS are shared through data exchange within HUD with the following offices: PD&R’s Office of Research Evaluation and Monitoring (OREM), Office of Economic Affairs (OEA), the Office of Housing (Single Family and Multifamily), the Office of Public and Indian Housing (PIH), and the Office of Inspector General (OIG). Data in PARIS are exchanged external to HUD with the following agencies: the U.S. Census Bureau (Census), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Department of Treasury (DOT). The compilation and processing PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55277 of data from various HUD program offices as well as external sources into the PARIS system provides researchers and policymakers with easy access to data coming from disparate systems. In addition, the data exchange and data sharing through PARIS provides a secure environment for HUD analysts to make data useful for improving HUD programs. The records that come into PARIS from various sources, internal and external to HUD, are kept separate. The databases are constructed in such manner that sources of the data are identified. SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER: Policy and Research Information System (PARIS), HUD/PD&R–07. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified. SYSTEM LOCATION: Records are maintained at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Headquarters, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20410–0001. Servers are in Stennis Data Center, 9300 Building Complex Stennis Space Center, MS 39529–0001. SYSTEM MANAGER(S): Lydia Taghavi, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of the Chief Data Officer, Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room 8210, Washington, DC 20410–0001; Phone: (202) 402–5741. AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: Sections 501 and 502(g) of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–609); 84 Stat. 1784; 12 U.S.C. 1701z–1 and 1701z–2(g). PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM: HUD PD&R maintains the Policy and Research Information System (PARIS) system of records to serve as a repository of information related to public housing agencies (PHAs), HUDassisted families, HUD-assisted properties, and other HUD programs for research, evaluation, monitoring, and budget formulation. PARIS gives PD&R the ability to extract data from multiple data systems, both internal and external to HUD, and transform the data into a format that can be easily analyzed and reported on. The reporting functions allow HUD to respond to Congressional requests for data on assisted housing programs. The data collected from the multiple systems and surveys is used and stored solely for statistical purposes and will not be used to identify individuals or make decisions that affect E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55275-55277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14624]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-7080-N-29]


30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Stepped and 
Tiered Rent Demonstration Evaluation OMB Control No.: 2528-0339

AGENCY: Office of Policy Development and Research, Chief Data Officer, 
HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In 
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment 
from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of 
public comment.

DATES: Comments Due Date: August 2, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding 
this proposal. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. Interested 
persons are also invited to submit comments regarding this proposal and 
comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number 
and should be sent to: Anna Guido, Clearance Officer, REE, Department 
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 8210, 
Washington, DC 20410-5000; email [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management 
Officer, REE, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th 
Street SW, Room 8210, Washington, DC 20410; email: 
[email protected]. telephone (202)-402-5535. This is 
not a toll-free number, HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls 
from individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as 
individuals with speech or communication

[[Page 55276]]

disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone 
call, please visit: https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs. Copies of available documents 
submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is 
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in 
Section A.
    The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the 
information collection for a period of 60 days was published on March 
12, 2024 at 89 FR 17862.

A. Overview of Information Collection

    Title of Information Collection: Cohort 2 Stepped and Tiered Rent 
Demonstration Evaluation.
    OMB Approval Number: 2528-0339.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Description of the need for the information and proposed use: HUD 
has selected 10 Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) to participate in the 
second cohort of the Moving to Work (MTW) Expansion, Stepped and Tiered 
Rent Demonstration (STRD). These PHAs will implement an alternative 
rent policy (a stepped rent or tiered rent) that is intended to reduce 
PHA administrative burden and increase self-sufficiency of assisted 
households. Five PHAs will implement a stepped rent and five PHAs will 
implement a tiered rent. HUD's Office of Policy Development and 
Research (PD&R) will evaluate the impacts of those alternative rent 
policies, using a randomized controlled trial. The evaluation will rely 
on data from a variety of sources, including new information collection 
efforts proposed in this Notice. HUD has contracted with MDRC to 
conduct the first phase of the evaluation, including random assignment, 
baseline data collection, and monitoring PHA implementation.
    Within the 10 participating PHAs, eligible households will be 
randomly assigned to have their rent calculated under the new rules 
(stepped/tiered rent) or old rules (the Brooke rent, typically 30% of 
household income). Eligible households will be non-elderly, non-
disabled participants in the public housing and housing choice voucher 
program. Prior to random assignment, each household will be asked to 
complete a baseline information form (BIF), review the informed consent 
form, and provide informed consent to authorize HUD's evaluator to use 
their data for the evaluation. The BIF will provide important 
information not otherwise available from HUD's administrative data, 
such as whether the household has significant barriers to employment. 
The BIF will average approximately 7 minutes long and reviewing the 
consent form is expected to take approximately 11 minutes.
    MDRC will also conduct interviews with staff from participating 
PHAs, to better understand their experience implementing the new rent 
policies. For the first phase of the evaluation, MDRC is expected to 
conduct two rounds of staff interviews with each PHA. During the first 
round, MDRC expects to interview up to ten staff per PHA (reflecting a 
mix of executive management staff, public housing and HCV directors, 
and public housing and HCV specialists). The second round will focus on 
staff most directly involved with implementing the new rent policies 
(public housing and HCV directors and/or managers, and public housing 
and HCV specialists). The mode in Round 1will be a mix of one-on-one 
interviews and group interviews, with small groups of 2-3 staff 
performing similar roles. The mode in Round 2 will be group interviews, 
with groups of 2-4 staff performing similar roles.
    MDRC will collect data extracts that will include a small subset of 
data elements captured by the PHAs exclusively for the demonstration, 
called the ``Rent Policy Implementation Data Tracking Tool.'' MDRC will 
collect these data fields along with MTW Expansion 50058 data, which is 
collected under OMB control number 2577-0083, directly from PHAs during 
the early implementation period to ensure that the new rent rules are 
being implemented correctly and throughout the demonstration to track 
hardship requests and collect updated contact information for ongoing 
communications and reminders about the demonstration and for potential 
follow-up surveys.

                                                            Exhibit A--Total Estimated Burden
            [Note: Rows 1 through 8 are unchanged from the previously approved ICR. Rows 9 and 10 are being added with this ICR modification]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Burden hour     Annual    Hourly cost
                    Information collection                      Number of    Frequency    Responses       per         burden        per      Annual cost
                                                               respondents  of response   per annum     response      hours       response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline Information Form (household survey).................       24,000            1       24,000          .12        2,880        $9.43   $27,158.40
Stepped Rent Informed Consent Form...........................        7,000            1        7,000          .18        1,260         9.43    11,881.80
Tiered Rent Informed Consent Form............................       17,000            1       17,000          .18        3,060         9.43    28,855.80
PHA Executive Director Interviews (Round 1)..................           10            1           10          .75          7.5        59.86       448.95
PHA Program Director Interviews (Round 1)....................           20            1           20          1.5           30        44.24     1,327.20
PHA MTW Coordinator Interviews (Round 1).....................           10            1           10          .75          7.5        44.24       331.80
PHA Housing Specialist Interviews (Round 1)..................           60            1           60          1.5           90        25.64     2,307.60
Rent Policy Implementation Data Tracking Tool................           10            1           10            9           90        25.64     2,307.60
PHA Managers/Supervisors/Policy Informants Interview Guide              40            1           40          1.5           60        46.83     2,809.80
 (Round 2)...................................................
Housing Specialist and Property Manager Interview Guide                 80            1           80          1.5          120        27.00     3,240.00
 (Round 2)...................................................
                                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total....................................................       48,230  ...........  ...........  ...........        7,605  ...........    80,668.95
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Solicitation of Public Comment

    This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and 
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in 
Section A on the following:
    (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information;
    (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate 
automated collection techniques or other forms of

[[Page 55277]]

information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of 
responses.
    (5) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    HUD encourages interested parties to submit comments in response to 
these questions.

C. Authority

    Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35.

Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Office, Office of Policy Development and 
Research, Chief Data Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-14624 Filed 7-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.