Air Plan Approval; New Jersey; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2010 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Standard, 54396-54398 [2024-14268]

Download as PDF 54396 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2024 / Proposed Rules ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R02–OAR–2023–0468; FRL–12057– 01–R2] Air Plan Approval; New Jersey; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2010 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Standard Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the portions of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal from the State of New Jersey demonstrating that the State satisfies the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) addressing interstate transport of pollution with respect to the 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). This action is being taken in accordance with the requirements of the CAA. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 31, 2024. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA– R02–OAR–2023–0468 at https:// www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Jun 28, 2024 Jkt 262001 information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Rutherford, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Programs Branch, Region 2, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007–1866, at (212) 637–3712, or by email at rutherford.robert@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background II. Summary of the SIP Revision and the EPA’s Analysis III. Environmental Justice Considerations IV. The EPA’s Proposed Action V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background On June 2, 2010, the EPA signed a revised primary NAAQS for SO2 at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb), based on a 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of daily maximum 1-hour concentrations (hereafter ‘‘the 2010 1hour SO2 NAAQS’’).1 At the same time, the EPA also revoked the previous 24hour and annual primary SO2 standards. The previous SO2 air quality standards were set in 1971, including a 24-hour average primary standard at 140 ppb and an annual average primary standard at 30 ppb. Current scientific evidence links short-term exposures to SO2, ranging from five minutes to 24 hours, with an array of adverse respiratory effects including bronchoconstriction and increased asthma symptoms. These effects are particularly important for asthmatics at elevated ventilation rates (e.g., while exercising or playing). Studies also show a connection between short-term exposure and increased visits to emergency departments and hospital admissions for respiratory illnesses, particularly in at-risk populations including children, the elderly, and asthmatics. Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, States are required to submit SIPs to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) within three years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS or within such shorter period as EPA may prescribe. The EPA has historically referred to these SIPs as ‘‘infrastructure SIPs.’’ Section 110(a)(2) requires States to address basic SIP elements in their infrastructure SIPs to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS—such as requirements for monitoring, basic program requirements, and legal authority. 1 See 75 FR 35520 (June 22, 2010). See 40 CFR 50.11. PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Section 110(a) imposes the obligation upon States to make a SIP submission to the EPA for a new or revised NAAQS, but the contents of that submission may vary depending upon the facts and circumstances of each NAAQS and what is in each State’s existing SIP. In particular, the data and analytical tools available at the time the State develops and submits the SIP revision for a new or revised NAAQS affect the content of the submission. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA requires a State’s SIP to include adequate provisions prohibiting any emissions activity in the State that contributes significantly to nonattainment, or interferes with maintenance, of the NAAQS in any other State. The EPA sometimes refers to these requirements as prong 1 (significant contribution to nonattainment) and prong 2 (interference with maintenance), or jointly as the ‘‘good neighbor’’ provision of the CAA. II. Summary of the SIP Revision and the EPA’s Analysis On October 17, 2014, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) submitted a revision to its SIP to address requirements under section 110(a)(2) of the CAA (the infrastructure requirements) related to the 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, 2006 PM10, 2011 CO, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA finalized actions on all applicable section 110(a)(2) elements of the October 17, 2014 submittal with the exception of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.2 Further information regarding those actions can be found in the Technical Support Document (TSD) for this action, which is included in the docket for this rulemaking. This proposed rulemaking action is addressing the portions of New Jersey’s infrastructure submittal for the 2010 1hour SO2 NAAQS that pertain to the ‘‘good neighbor’’ provision of the CAA. In their SIP submission to the EPA, NJDEP discussed how they have addressed the interstate transport requirements of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) through their state-adopted rules and enforceable consent decrees, which control sources that impact air quality in neighboring States. NJDEP emphasized that their rules do not hinder other States’ air quality standards, and their emissions regulations are stricter than Federal and nearby State rules. New Jersey 2 See 81 FR 64070 (September 19, 2016), 83 FR 24661 (May 30, 2018), 83 FR 40151 (August 14, 2018), and 85 FR 28883 (May 14, 2020). E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM 01JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2024 / Proposed Rules ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 highlighted its existing SIP-approved regulations and other federally enforceable control measures, including power plant consent decrees and low sulfur fuel requirements for distillate and residual fuels (N.J.A.C. 7:27–9) that have reduced SO2 emissions that may be transported to other States. For the reasons explained in the accompanying TSD in the docket, EPA proposes to determine that New Jersey’s SIP is adequate to prevent sources in New Jersey from significantly contributing to nonattainment or interfering with maintenance in another State with respect to the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. This determination is based on a weight of evidence analysis that takes into account the following considerations: SO2 emissions statewide have declined significantly from 2014 to 2022; the absence of nearby SO2 nonattainment areas in neighboring States or uncharacterized air quality near New Jersey point sources; SO2 ambient air quality data far below the SO2 NAAQS and exhibiting downward trends or remaining stable; EPA’s impact assessment that shows that New Jersey sources within 50 kilometers of New Jersey’s borders are unlikely to significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance in any nearby States based on emission trends, wind patterns, air monitoring, and modeling data; and New Jersey’s existing control measures, which ensure that SO2 emissions will continue to be effectively controlled for existing and new sources or modifications. A detailed summary of EPA’s review and rationale for the proposed approval of this SIP revision as meeting CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010 1hour SO2 may be found in the TSD. III. Environmental Justice Considerations New Jersey provided a supplement to the SIP submission being proposed for approval with this rulemaking on May 16, 2023. The supplemental submission briefed the EPA on Environmental Justice (EJ) considerations within New Jersey by detailing the State’s programs and initiatives addressing the needs of communities with EJ concerns that have been ongoing since 1998. Although New Jersey included environmental justice considerations as part of its SIP submittal, the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. In its supplement, New Jersey discussed how the State has been addressing the needs of communities with EJ concerns since 1998, including assisting in the creation of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Jun 28, 2024 Jkt 262001 Environmental Equity Task Force, which later evolved into the Environmental Justice Advisory Council (EJAC). EJAC and its predecessor have held regular meetings that include EJ advocates and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to discuss and address issues of concern. New Jersey has also noted that the State has implemented numerous initiatives, collaborations, Administrative Orders and Executive Orders to address the needs and concerns of overburdened communities. New Jersey provided a timeline of the EJ actions implemented by the State, both prior to the SIP submittal on October 17, 2014, and subsequent to it, to note its continued attention to environmental justice in the state. New Jersey’s Administrative Orders (AO) and Executive Orders (E.O.) include the State’s first EJ E.O. issued by Governor James E. McGreevey in 2004 (E.O. No. 96), an EJ E.O. issued by Governor Jon Corzine in 2009 (E.O. No. 131), an EJ AO issued by NJDEP Commissioner Bob Martin in 2016 (AO 2016–08) and an EJ E.O. issued by Governor Phil Murphy in 2018 (E.O. No. 23). Notably, U.S. Senator for New Jersey, Cory Booker, introduced the first Federal EJ bill in 2017 (S.1996— Environmental Justice Act of 2017). Additionally, New Jersey also created the ‘‘What’s In My Community?’’ 3 tool, a GIS-mapping web application that allows a user to see the air permits issued in their community. The tool also identifies overburdened communities, schools, hospitals, and emergency services. The public users can also see measurements from air monitors and generate a report when using the tool. The EPA has reviewed this material but has determined that conducting a comprehensive EJ analysis is not necessary in the context of this SIP submission for interstate transport for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, as the CAA and its applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation of EJ in relation to the relevant requirements. Additionally, there is no evidence suggesting that this action contradicts the goals of E.O. 12898 or that it will disproportionately harm any specific group or have severe health or environmental impacts. However, the EPA expects that this action, which assesses whether New Jersey’s SIP adequately addresses the 3 Access the mapping application for locating facilities with an air permit registered with NJDEP’s Division of Air Quality from their website at https:// njdep.maps.arcgis.com/app4s/webappviewer/ index.html?id=76194937cbbe46b1ab9a9 ec37c7d709b. PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 54397 interstate transport of air pollution that affects downwind States’ ability to attain and maintain the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, will generally have a neutral impact on all populations, including communities of color and low-income groups. At the very least, it will not worsen existing air quality standards. In summary, the EPA concludes, for informational purposes only, that this proposed rule will not disproportionately harm communities with environmental justice concerns. New Jersey did evaluate EJ considerations voluntarily in its SIP submission, but the EPA’s assessment of these considerations is provided for context, not as the basis for the action. The EPA is taking action under the CAA independently of the State’s EJ assessment. IV. The EPA’s Proposed Action The EPA is proposing to approve the portions of New Jersey’s SIP submittal addressing interstate transport for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS as meeting the requirements in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA. The EPA is soliciting public comment on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM 01JYP1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 54398 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2024 / Proposed Rules • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program; • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act. In addition, the SIP is not proposing to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rulemaking does not have Tribal implications and it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, February16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address ‘‘disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects’’ of their actions on minority populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further defines the term ‘‘fair treatment’’ to mean that ‘‘no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and policies.’’ The NJDEP evaluated environmental justice as part of its SIP submittal even though the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require an evaluation. The EPA’s evaluation of the NJDEP’s environmental justice considerations is described above in the section titled, ‘‘Environmental Justice Considerations.’’ The analysis was done for the purpose of providing additional context and information about this rulemaking to the public, not as a basis of the action. The EPA is taking action VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Jun 28, 2024 Jkt 262001 under the CAA on bases independent of New Jersey’s evaluation of environmental justice. In addition, there is no information in the record upon which this decision is based that is inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples. of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. As part of the mailing address, include the contact person’s name, division, and mail code. The division to contact is listed at the end of each application summary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur dioxide, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. I. General Information Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Lisa Garcia, Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. 2024–14268 Filed 6–28–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2024–0059; FRL–11682–05– OCSPP] Receipt of a Pesticide Petition Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities (May 2024) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of filing of petition and request for comment. AGENCY: This document announces the Agency’s receipt of an initial filing of a pesticide petition requesting the establishment or modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various commodities. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 31, 2024. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2024–0059, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rosenblatt, Registration Division (RD) (7505T), main telephone number: (202) 566–2875, email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov. The mailing address for each contact person is Office SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ comments.html. 3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks information on E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM 01JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54396-54398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14268]



[[Page 54396]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2023-0468; FRL-12057-01-R2]


Air Plan Approval; New Jersey; Interstate Transport Requirements 
for the 2010 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve the portions of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal 
from the State of New Jersey demonstrating that the State satisfies the 
infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) addressing 
interstate transport of pollution with respect to the 2010 1-hour 
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) primary National Ambient Air Quality 
Standard (NAAQS). This action is being taken in accordance with the 
requirements of the CAA.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 31, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R02-OAR-2023-0468 at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written 
comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, 
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance 
on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Rutherford, Environmental 
Protection Agency, Air Programs Branch, Region 2, 290 Broadway, New 
York, New York 10007-1866, at (212) 637-3712, or by email at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
I. Background
II. Summary of the SIP Revision and the EPA's Analysis
III. Environmental Justice Considerations
IV. The EPA's Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On June 2, 2010, the EPA signed a revised primary NAAQS for 
SO2 at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb), based on a 3-
year average of the annual 99th percentile of daily maximum 1-hour 
concentrations (hereafter ``the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS'').\1\ 
At the same time, the EPA also revoked the previous 24-hour and annual 
primary SO2 standards. The previous SO2 air 
quality standards were set in 1971, including a 24-hour average primary 
standard at 140 ppb and an annual average primary standard at 30 ppb.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 75 FR 35520 (June 22, 2010). See 40 CFR 50.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Current scientific evidence links short-term exposures to 
SO2, ranging from five minutes to 24 hours, with an array of 
adverse respiratory effects including bronchoconstriction and increased 
asthma symptoms. These effects are particularly important for 
asthmatics at elevated ventilation rates (e.g., while exercising or 
playing). Studies also show a connection between short-term exposure 
and increased visits to emergency departments and hospital admissions 
for respiratory illnesses, particularly in at-risk populations 
including children, the elderly, and asthmatics.
    Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, States are required to 
submit SIPs to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) 
within three years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS or 
within such shorter period as EPA may prescribe. The EPA has 
historically referred to these SIPs as ``infrastructure SIPs.'' Section 
110(a)(2) requires States to address basic SIP elements in their 
infrastructure SIPs to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS--
such as requirements for monitoring, basic program requirements, and 
legal authority. Section 110(a) imposes the obligation upon States to 
make a SIP submission to the EPA for a new or revised NAAQS, but the 
contents of that submission may vary depending upon the facts and 
circumstances of each NAAQS and what is in each State's existing SIP. 
In particular, the data and analytical tools available at the time the 
State develops and submits the SIP revision for a new or revised NAAQS 
affect the content of the submission.
    Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA requires a State's SIP to 
include adequate provisions prohibiting any emissions activity in the 
State that contributes significantly to nonattainment, or interferes 
with maintenance, of the NAAQS in any other State. The EPA sometimes 
refers to these requirements as prong 1 (significant contribution to 
nonattainment) and prong 2 (interference with maintenance), or jointly 
as the ``good neighbor'' provision of the CAA.

II. Summary of the SIP Revision and the EPA's Analysis

    On October 17, 2014, the New Jersey Department of Environmental 
Protection (NJDEP) submitted a revision to its SIP to address 
requirements under section 110(a)(2) of the CAA (the infrastructure 
requirements) related to the 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone, 2010 
NO2, 2010 SO2, 2006 PM10, 2011 CO, and 
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
    The EPA finalized actions on all applicable section 110(a)(2) 
elements of the October 17, 2014 submittal with the exception of 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.\2\ Further 
information regarding those actions can be found in the Technical 
Support Document (TSD) for this action, which is included in the docket 
for this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 81 FR 64070 (September 19, 2016), 83 FR 24661 (May 30, 
2018), 83 FR 40151 (August 14, 2018), and 85 FR 28883 (May 14, 
2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This proposed rulemaking action is addressing the portions of New 
Jersey's infrastructure submittal for the 2010 1-hour SO2 
NAAQS that pertain to the ``good neighbor'' provision of the CAA.
    In their SIP submission to the EPA, NJDEP discussed how they have 
addressed the interstate transport requirements of CAA 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) through their state-adopted rules and enforceable 
consent decrees, which control sources that impact air quality in 
neighboring States. NJDEP emphasized that their rules do not hinder 
other States' air quality standards, and their emissions regulations 
are stricter than Federal and nearby State rules. New Jersey

[[Page 54397]]

highlighted its existing SIP-approved regulations and other federally 
enforceable control measures, including power plant consent decrees and 
low sulfur fuel requirements for distillate and residual fuels 
(N.J.A.C. 7:27-9) that have reduced SO2 emissions that may 
be transported to other States.
    For the reasons explained in the accompanying TSD in the docket, 
EPA proposes to determine that New Jersey's SIP is adequate to prevent 
sources in New Jersey from significantly contributing to nonattainment 
or interfering with maintenance in another State with respect to the 
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. This determination is based on a 
weight of evidence analysis that takes into account the following 
considerations: SO2 emissions statewide have declined 
significantly from 2014 to 2022; the absence of nearby SO2 
nonattainment areas in neighboring States or uncharacterized air 
quality near New Jersey point sources; SO2 ambient air 
quality data far below the SO2 NAAQS and exhibiting downward 
trends or remaining stable; EPA's impact assessment that shows that New 
Jersey sources within 50 kilometers of New Jersey's borders are 
unlikely to significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with 
maintenance in any nearby States based on emission trends, wind 
patterns, air monitoring, and modeling data; and New Jersey's existing 
control measures, which ensure that SO2 emissions will 
continue to be effectively controlled for existing and new sources or 
modifications.
    A detailed summary of EPA's review and rationale for the proposed 
approval of this SIP revision as meeting CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) 
for the 2010 1-hour SO2 may be found in the TSD.

III. Environmental Justice Considerations

    New Jersey provided a supplement to the SIP submission being 
proposed for approval with this rulemaking on May 16, 2023. The 
supplemental submission briefed the EPA on Environmental Justice (EJ) 
considerations within New Jersey by detailing the State's programs and 
initiatives addressing the needs of communities with EJ concerns that 
have been ongoing since 1998. Although New Jersey included 
environmental justice considerations as part of its SIP submittal, the 
CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor 
require such an evaluation.
    In its supplement, New Jersey discussed how the State has been 
addressing the needs of communities with EJ concerns since 1998, 
including assisting in the creation of the Environmental Equity Task 
Force, which later evolved into the Environmental Justice Advisory 
Council (EJAC). EJAC and its predecessor have held regular meetings 
that include EJ advocates and the New Jersey Department of 
Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to discuss and address issues of 
concern.
    New Jersey has also noted that the State has implemented numerous 
initiatives, collaborations, Administrative Orders and Executive Orders 
to address the needs and concerns of overburdened communities. New 
Jersey provided a timeline of the EJ actions implemented by the State, 
both prior to the SIP submittal on October 17, 2014, and subsequent to 
it, to note its continued attention to environmental justice in the 
state.
    New Jersey's Administrative Orders (AO) and Executive Orders (E.O.) 
include the State's first EJ E.O. issued by Governor James E. McGreevey 
in 2004 (E.O. No. 96), an EJ E.O. issued by Governor Jon Corzine in 
2009 (E.O. No. 131), an EJ AO issued by NJDEP Commissioner Bob Martin 
in 2016 (AO 2016-08) and an EJ E.O. issued by Governor Phil Murphy in 
2018 (E.O. No. 23). Notably, U.S. Senator for New Jersey, Cory Booker, 
introduced the first Federal EJ bill in 2017 (S.1996--Environmental 
Justice Act of 2017).
    Additionally, New Jersey also created the ``What's In My 
Community?'' \3\ tool, a GIS-mapping web application that allows a user 
to see the air permits issued in their community. The tool also 
identifies overburdened communities, schools, hospitals, and emergency 
services. The public users can also see measurements from air monitors 
and generate a report when using the tool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Access the mapping application for locating facilities with 
an air permit registered with NJDEP's Division of Air Quality from 
their website at https://njdep.maps.arcgis.com/app4s/webappviewer/?id=76194937cbbe46b1ab9a9ec37c7d709b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA has reviewed this material but has determined that 
conducting a comprehensive EJ analysis is not necessary in the context 
of this SIP submission for interstate transport for the 2010 1-hour 
SO2 NAAQS, as the CAA and its applicable implementing 
regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation of EJ in 
relation to the relevant requirements. Additionally, there is no 
evidence suggesting that this action contradicts the goals of E.O. 
12898 or that it will disproportionately harm any specific group or 
have severe health or environmental impacts.
    However, the EPA expects that this action, which assesses whether 
New Jersey's SIP adequately addresses the interstate transport of air 
pollution that affects downwind States' ability to attain and maintain 
the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, will generally have a neutral 
impact on all populations, including communities of color and low-
income groups. At the very least, it will not worsen existing air 
quality standards.
    In summary, the EPA concludes, for informational purposes only, 
that this proposed rule will not disproportionately harm communities 
with environmental justice concerns. New Jersey did evaluate EJ 
considerations voluntarily in its SIP submission, but the EPA's 
assessment of these considerations is provided for context, not as the 
basis for the action. The EPA is taking action under the CAA 
independently of the State's EJ assessment.

IV. The EPA's Proposed Action

    The EPA is proposing to approve the portions of New Jersey's SIP 
submittal addressing interstate transport for the 2010 1-hour 
SO2 NAAQS as meeting the requirements in section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA. The EPA is soliciting public comment on 
the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be 
considered before taking final action.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State 
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 
2023);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);

[[Page 54398]]

     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act.
    In addition, the SIP is not proposing to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe 
has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rulemaking does not have Tribal implications and it 
will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or 
preempt Tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 
November 9, 2000).
    Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, 
February16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address 
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental 
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income 
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. 
EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and 
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, 
national origin, or income with respect to the development, 
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and 
policies.'' EPA further defines the term ``fair treatment'' to mean 
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of 
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the 
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and 
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
    The NJDEP evaluated environmental justice as part of its SIP 
submittal even though the CAA and applicable implementing regulations 
neither prohibit nor require an evaluation. The EPA's evaluation of the 
NJDEP's environmental justice considerations is described above in the 
section titled, ``Environmental Justice Considerations.'' The analysis 
was done for the purpose of providing additional context and 
information about this rulemaking to the public, not as a basis of the 
action. The EPA is taking action under the CAA on bases independent of 
New Jersey's evaluation of environmental justice. In addition, there is 
no information in the record upon which this decision is based that is 
inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving 
environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and 
Indigenous peoples.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur dioxide, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Lisa Garcia,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2024-14268 Filed 6-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.