Expanded Federal Use of the Non-Federal FSS and MSS Bands, 54402-54403 [2024-14196]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
54402
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709,
requests to establish a tolerance in 40
CFR part 180 for residues of the
herbicide, topramezone, in or on
cottonseed, subgroup 20C at 0.03 ppm
and cotton, gin byproducts at 0.9 ppm.
A HPLC–MS/MS is used to measure and
evaluate the chemical
topramezone.Contact: RD.
7. PP 3F9075. EPA–HQ–OPP–2024–
0187. BASF Corporation, 26 Davis
Drive, P.O. Box 13528, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to
establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180
for residues of the fungicide, boscalid
(3-pyridinecarboxamide, 2-chloro-N-(4′chloro[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)), in or on
cereal grain, field corn subgroup 15–22C
at 0.2 ppm; cereal grain, sweet corn
subgroup 15–22D at 0.2 ppm; corn, field
forage at 20.0 ppm; corn, sweet forage at
20.0 ppm; corn, pop, forage at 20.0 ppm;
corn, field stover at 50.0 ppm; corn,
sweet, stover at 50.0 ppm; corn, pop,
stover at 50.0 ppm.
In addition, the petition includes the
request to modify the expression of the
existing tolerances for indirect or
inadvertent residues of boscalid (3pyridinecarboxamide, 2-chloro-N-(4′chloro[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)) in or on
grain, cereal, group 15 at 0.2 ppm to
grain, cereal, group 15, except corn at
0.2 ppm; grain, cereal, forage, fodder
and straw, group 16, forage at 2.0 ppm
to grain, cereal, forage, fodder and
straw, group 16, forage, except corn
forage at 2.0 ppm; and grain, cereal,
forage, fodder and straw, group 16,
stover at 1.5 ppm to grain, cereal, forage,
fodder and straw, group 16, stover,
except corn stover at 1.5 ppm. Liquid
chromatography tandem mass
spectrometry is used to measure and
evaluate the chemical boscalid. Contact:
RD.
8. PP 3F9085. EPA–HQ–OPP–2024–
0217. The American Spice Trade
Association, 1101 17th Street NW, Suite
700, Washington, DC 20036, requests to
establish tolerances in 40 CFR part 180
for residues of the insecticide,
acetamiprid, in or on pepper, black at
0.1 ppm; and spices from Codex crop
group spices, seed that overlap with
spices in Crop Group 19: Ambrette,
seed; angelica, seed; angelica, daharian,
seed; anise, seed; annatto, seed;
candlebush; caraway, black, seed;
caraway, seed; celery, seed; chervil,
seed; chinese nutmeg tree; coriander,
seed; cubeb, seed; culantro, seed;
cumin, seed; dill, seed; fennel, seed;
fennel flower, seed; fenugreek, seed;
grains of paradise, seed; guarana;
honewort, seed; lovage, seed; mahaleb;
malabar tamarind; milk thistle; mustard,
black, seed; mustard, brown, seed;
mustard, white, seed; nutmeg; poppy
seed; sesame seed; wattle seed at 2.0
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jun 28, 2024
Jkt 262001
ppm. The GC/ECD, HPLC/UV, GC–MS/
MS and HPLC–MS/MS methods are
used to measure and evaluate the
chemical acetamiprid.Contact: RD.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a.
Dated: June 24, 2024.
Kimberly Smith,
Acting Director, Information Technology and
Resources Management Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2024–14408 Filed 6–28–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 2
[ET Docket No. 24–121, DA 24–396; FR ID
227746]
Expanded Federal Use of the NonFederal FSS and MSS Bands
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Office
of Engineering and Technology opens a
new docket and seeks comment on ways
to potentially expand Federal access to
non-Federal, including commercial,
satellite services.
DATES: Interested parties may file
comments on or before July 31, 2024;
and reply comments on or before
August 30, 2024. All filings must refer
to ET Docket No. 24–121.
ADDRESSES: Pursuant to sections 1.415
and 1.419 of the Commission’s rules, 47
CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may
file comments on or before the dates
provided in the DATES section of this
Proposed Rule. Comments may be filed
using the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS). You
may submit comments, identified by ET
Docket No. 24–121 and referencing this
public notice, by any of the following
methods:
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
www.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing.
• Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by First-Class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary are accepted
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. at 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701. All hand deliveries must be held
together with rubber bands or fasteners.
Any envelopes and boxes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
• Commercial overnight deliveries
(other than U.S. Postal Service Express
Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to
9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis
Junction, MD 20701.
• U.S. Postal Service First-Class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, 45 L
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
Commission to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
• Availability of Documents:
Comments and ex parte submissions
will be available via ECFS. Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Oros of the Office of
Engineering and Technology, at
Nicholas.Oros@fcc.gov or 202–418–
0636.
This is a
summary of the Office of Engineering
and Technology’s Public Notice in ET
Docket No. 24–121, DA 24–396, released
April 26, 2024. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection at the following internet
address: https://www.fcc.gov/document/
oet-seeks-comment-expanded-federaluse-non-federal-bands.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis. The 2013 NPRM (FCC 13–65,
78 FR 39200) and 2021 FNPRM (FCC
21–44, 86 FR 30860) included Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analyses (IRFA)
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 603, exploring the
potential impact on small entities of the
Commission’s proposals. The Office of
Engineering and Technology invite
parties to file comments on the IRFAs in
light of this request for supplemental
comments.
Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis.
This document does not contain any
new or modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. Thus, it does not contain any new
or modified information collection
burden for small business concerns with
fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to
the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Ex Parte Presentations. The
Commission has treated this proceeding
as a ‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. Persons making ex parte
presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with rule
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
rule 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
Providing Accountability Through
Transparency Act: The Providing
Accountability Through Transparency
Act, Public Law 118–9, requires each
agency, in providing notice of a
rulemaking, to post online a brief plainlanguage summary of the proposed rule.
The required summary of this Public
Notice is available at https://
www.fcc.gov/proposedrulemakings.
Synopsis
The Office of Engineering and
Technology invites interested parties to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jun 28, 2024
Jkt 262001
supplement the record with additional
comments in this new docket, ET
Docket No. 24–121, on possible
mechanisms to expand Federal use of
the bands used by commercial satellite
networks that are not currently allocated
for the Federal fixed satellite service
(FSS) and mobile satellite service
(MSS). Consistent with the
Commission’s direction to OET in the
2023 Second Report and Order (FCC
23–76, adopted Sept. 21, 2023), the
record compiled in response to this
Public Notice will be considered in
conjunction with the existing record on
this issue compiled in ET Docket No.
13–115 and RM–11341, which the
Office of Engineering and Technology
incorporates herein by reference. In
particular, the Office of Engineering and
Technology invites commenters to
supplement the record on possible
approaches to providing Federal earth
stations with interference protection
when those earth stations are
communicating with commercial
satellites in bands that are not allocated
for Federal FSS and MSS. As noted
above, the 2013 NPRM (FCC 13–65, 78
FR 39200) proposed to add a co-primary
Federal FSS or MSS allocation to
several bands together with an
allocation table footnote that limits
primary Federal use of the bands to
earth stations communicating with nonFederal space stations. The 2013 NPRM
alternatively proposed to add a footnote
to the Allocation Table outlining
circumstances under which Federal
earth stations operating with nonFederal space stations would be entitled
to interference protection. The Office of
Engineering and Technology seeks
renewed comment on these proposals.
The Office of Engineering and
Technology also seeks comment on
whether there should be any additional
modifications to the Allocation Table in
connection with either proposal.
The Satellite Industry Association
(SIA) suggested an alternative to the
2013 NPRM’s two proposals for
providing Federal earth stations with
interference protected access to
spectrum bands that lack a Federal FSS
and MSS allocation. SIA proposed that
FSS and MSS allocations be added to
the Federal portion of the Allocation
Table for these bands along with an
indication that the Federal allocation is
limited to earth stations only. In
addition, SIA proposed adding a
footnote to the Allocation Table for
these bands indicating that the
Commission has exclusive regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
54403
jurisdiction over the co-primary
allocations and that NTIA is responsible
for assignments for Federal earth
stations authorized to operate in the
bands pursuant to the Commission’s
Part 25 rules. The Office of Engineering
and Technology invites commenters to
address SIA’s proposal as well as any
alternative approaches that could be
used to provide Federal earth stations
with interference-protected access to
commercial satellite services. Finally,
the Office of Engineering and
Technology seeks comment on whether
implementing any of these proposals
might inhibit future repurposing of
these bands or expansion of non-Federal
operations and, if so, any approaches
that might avoid such inhibition.
As the 2021 FNPRM (FCC 21–44, 86
FR 30860) recognized, the spectral
landscape in non-Federal FSS and MSS
allocations has significantly changed
since the 2013 NPRM. As a result, the
Office of Engineering and Technology
seeks to refresh the record on which
FSS and MSS frequency bands that are
not allocated for Federal FSS and MSS
might meet the needs of Federal
agencies for communications with nonFederal satellites. As the Commission
first noted in 2013, providing Federal
earth stations with interference
protection may require that new nonFederal stations, whether satellite earth
stations or terrestrial stations, be
coordinated with existing Federal earth
stations in the FSS and MSS frequency
bands to which any new rules would
apply. This coordination may require
additional effort by non-Federal station
applicants and could restrict the
locations and operating parameters of
new non-Federal stations. Does any
future impact on non-Federal operations
outweigh the benefits of expanding
Federal users’ access to these bands?
The 2013 NPRM proposed to implement
agreed-upon procedures that would be
followed by the Commission and NTIA
to ensure parity between Federal and
non-Federal earth stations that are
similar to the procedures currently used
by the Commission to coordinate new
non-Federal earth stations. Would the
procedures discussed in the 2013 NPRM
be appropriate for coordination between
Federal earth stations and non-Federal
stations?
Federal Communications Commission.
Ronald T. Repasi,
Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology.
[FR Doc. 2024–14196 Filed 6–28–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54402-54403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14196]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 2
[ET Docket No. 24-121, DA 24-396; FR ID 227746]
Expanded Federal Use of the Non-Federal FSS and MSS Bands
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Office of Engineering and Technology
opens a new docket and seeks comment on ways to potentially expand
Federal access to non-Federal, including commercial, satellite
services.
DATES: Interested parties may file comments on or before July 31, 2024;
and reply comments on or before August 30, 2024. All filings must refer
to ET Docket No. 24-121.
ADDRESSES: Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's
rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or
before the dates provided in the DATES section of this Proposed Rule.
Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing
System (ECFS). You may submit comments, identified by ET Docket No. 24-
121 and referencing this public notice, by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier, or by First-Class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
for the Commission's Secretary are accepted between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00
p.m. at 9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701. All hand
deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes and boxes must be disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight deliveries (other than U.S. Postal
Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction
Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
U.S. Postal Service First-Class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: Contact the Commission to
request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign
language interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: [email protected] or phone:
202-418-0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
Availability of Documents: Comments and ex parte
submissions will be available via ECFS. Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Oros of the Office of
Engineering and Technology, at [email protected] or 202-418-0636.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Office of
Engineering and Technology's Public Notice in ET Docket No. 24-121, DA
24-396, released April 26, 2024. The full text of this document is
available for public inspection at the following internet address:
https://www.fcc.gov/document/oet-seeks-comment-expanded-federal-use-non-federal-bands.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis. The 2013 NPRM (FCC 13-
65, 78 FR 39200) and 2021 FNPRM (FCC 21-44, 86 FR 30860) included
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analyses (IRFA) pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
603, exploring the potential impact on small entities of the
Commission's proposals. The Office of Engineering and Technology invite
parties to file comments on the IRFAs in light of this request for
supplemental comments.
Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis. This document does not contain
any new or modified information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Thus, it does not
contain any new or modified information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
[[Page 54403]]
Ex Parte Presentations. The Commission has treated this proceeding
as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the
Commission's ex parte rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must
file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any
oral presentation within two business days after the presentation
(unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex
parte presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted
in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already
reflected in the presenter's written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such
data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other
filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where
such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex
parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must
be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of
electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto,
must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available
for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,
.doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding
should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act: The Providing
Accountability Through Transparency Act, Public Law 118-9, requires
each agency, in providing notice of a rulemaking, to post online a
brief plain-language summary of the proposed rule. The required summary
of this Public Notice is available at https://www.fcc.gov/proposedrulemakings.
Synopsis
The Office of Engineering and Technology invites interested parties
to supplement the record with additional comments in this new docket,
ET Docket No. 24-121, on possible mechanisms to expand Federal use of
the bands used by commercial satellite networks that are not currently
allocated for the Federal fixed satellite service (FSS) and mobile
satellite service (MSS). Consistent with the Commission's direction to
OET in the 2023 Second Report and Order (FCC 23-76, adopted Sept. 21,
2023), the record compiled in response to this Public Notice will be
considered in conjunction with the existing record on this issue
compiled in ET Docket No. 13-115 and RM-11341, which the Office of
Engineering and Technology incorporates herein by reference. In
particular, the Office of Engineering and Technology invites commenters
to supplement the record on possible approaches to providing Federal
earth stations with interference protection when those earth stations
are communicating with commercial satellites in bands that are not
allocated for Federal FSS and MSS. As noted above, the 2013 NPRM (FCC
13-65, 78 FR 39200) proposed to add a co-primary Federal FSS or MSS
allocation to several bands together with an allocation table footnote
that limits primary Federal use of the bands to earth stations
communicating with non-Federal space stations. The 2013 NPRM
alternatively proposed to add a footnote to the Allocation Table
outlining circumstances under which Federal earth stations operating
with non-Federal space stations would be entitled to interference
protection. The Office of Engineering and Technology seeks renewed
comment on these proposals. The Office of Engineering and Technology
also seeks comment on whether there should be any additional
modifications to the Allocation Table in connection with either
proposal.
The Satellite Industry Association (SIA) suggested an alternative
to the 2013 NPRM's two proposals for providing Federal earth stations
with interference protected access to spectrum bands that lack a
Federal FSS and MSS allocation. SIA proposed that FSS and MSS
allocations be added to the Federal portion of the Allocation Table for
these bands along with an indication that the Federal allocation is
limited to earth stations only. In addition, SIA proposed adding a
footnote to the Allocation Table for these bands indicating that the
Commission has exclusive regulatory jurisdiction over the co-primary
allocations and that NTIA is responsible for assignments for Federal
earth stations authorized to operate in the bands pursuant to the
Commission's Part 25 rules. The Office of Engineering and Technology
invites commenters to address SIA's proposal as well as any alternative
approaches that could be used to provide Federal earth stations with
interference-protected access to commercial satellite services.
Finally, the Office of Engineering and Technology seeks comment on
whether implementing any of these proposals might inhibit future
repurposing of these bands or expansion of non-Federal operations and,
if so, any approaches that might avoid such inhibition.
As the 2021 FNPRM (FCC 21-44, 86 FR 30860) recognized, the spectral
landscape in non-Federal FSS and MSS allocations has significantly
changed since the 2013 NPRM. As a result, the Office of Engineering and
Technology seeks to refresh the record on which FSS and MSS frequency
bands that are not allocated for Federal FSS and MSS might meet the
needs of Federal agencies for communications with non-Federal
satellites. As the Commission first noted in 2013, providing Federal
earth stations with interference protection may require that new non-
Federal stations, whether satellite earth stations or terrestrial
stations, be coordinated with existing Federal earth stations in the
FSS and MSS frequency bands to which any new rules would apply. This
coordination may require additional effort by non-Federal station
applicants and could restrict the locations and operating parameters of
new non-Federal stations. Does any future impact on non-Federal
operations outweigh the benefits of expanding Federal users' access to
these bands? The 2013 NPRM proposed to implement agreed-upon procedures
that would be followed by the Commission and NTIA to ensure parity
between Federal and non-Federal earth stations that are similar to the
procedures currently used by the Commission to coordinate new non-
Federal earth stations. Would the procedures discussed in the 2013 NPRM
be appropriate for coordination between Federal earth stations and non-
Federal stations?
Federal Communications Commission.
Ronald T. Repasi,
Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology.
[FR Doc. 2024-14196 Filed 6-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P