Tennessee Valley Authority; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, 53663-53665 [2024-14056]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Cullison, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
2084; email: Infocollects.Resource@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2023–
0201 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2023–0201.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The supporting
statement is available in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML23338A191.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
publicly available documents, is open
by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern
time (ET), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
• NRC’s Clearance Officer: A copy of
the collection of information and related
instructions may be obtained without
charge by contacting the NRC’s
Clearance Officer, David Cullison,
Office of the Chief Information Officer,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–2084; email:
Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC encourages electronic
comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website (https://
www.regulations.gov). Please include
Docket ID NRC–2023–0201, in your
comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:13 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
comment submissions that you do not
want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. All comment
submissions are posted at https://
www.regulations.gov and entered into
ADAMS. Comment submissions are not
routinely edited to remove identifying
or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that comment
submissions are not routinely edited to
remove such information before making
the comment submissions available to
the public or entering the comment into
ADAMS.
II. Background
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the NRC is requesting
public comment on its intention to
request the OMB’s approval for the
information collection summarized as
follows.
1. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR part 54,
Requirements for Renewal of Operating
Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants.
2. OMB approval number: 3150–0155.
3. Type of submission: Extension.
4. The form number, if applicable:
Not applicable.
5. How often the collection is required
or requested: There is a one-time
application for any licensee wishing to
renew the operating license for its
nuclear power plant. There is a one-time
requirement for each licensee with a
renewed operating license to submit a
letter documenting the completion of
inspection and testing activities. All
holders of renewed licenses must
perform yearly record keeping.
6. Who will be required or asked to
respond: Commercial nuclear power
plant licensees who wish to renew their
operating licenses and holders of
renewed licenses.
7. The estimated number of annual
responses: 71 (13 reporting responses +
58 recordkeepers).
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 68 (10 reporting
respondents + 58 recordkeepers).
9. The estimated number of hours
needed annually to comply with the
information collection requirement or
request: 318,318 hours (255,818 hours
reporting plus 62,500 hours
recordkeeping).
10. Abstract: Part 54 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
establishes license renewal
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53663
requirements for commercial nuclear
power plants and describes the
information that licensees must submit
to the NRC when applying for a license
renewal. The application must contain
information on how the licensee will
manage the detrimental effects of agerelated degradation on certain plant
systems, structures, and components to
continue the plant’s safe operation
during the renewal term. The NRC
needs this information to determine
whether the licensee’s actions will be
effective in assuring the plants’
continued safe operation during the
period of extended operation. Holders of
renewed licenses must retain in an
auditable and retrievable form, for the
term of the renewed operating license,
all information and documentation
required to document compliance with
10 CFR part 54. The NRC needs access
to this information for continuing
effective regulatory oversight.
III. Specific Requests for Comments
The NRC is seeking comments that
address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
Please explain your answer.
2. Is the estimate of the burden of the
information collection accurate? Please
explain your answer.
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection on respondents
be minimized, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology?
Dated: June 21, 2024.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David Cullison,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–14060 Filed 6–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–259, 50–260, 50–296, and
72–052; NRC–2024–0114]
Tennessee Valley Authority; Browns
Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3;
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
53664
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Notices
issuance of an exemption for Renewed
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–33,
DPR–52, and DPR–68 held by Tennessee
Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee) for
the operation of Browns Ferry Nuclear
Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Browns Ferry).
The exemption would exempt TVA
from the requirement to install a
monitored alarm at the access control
point of the storage facilities where the
original steam dryers are stored. The
exemption is being requested to address
a regulatory noncompliance which has
resulted in the issuance of minor
violations at the Browns Ferry site. The
NRC staff is issuing an environmental
assessment (EA) and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) associated
with the proposed exemption.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in
this document are available on June 27,
2024.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2024–0114 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2024–0114. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the ‘‘For Further Information
Contact’’ section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS
accession number for each document
referenced (if it is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that it is
mentioned in this document.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
publicly available documents, is open
by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern
time (ET), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Green, Office of Nuclear
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:13 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–415–
1627; email: Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an
exemption from the requirement in
paragraph 37.11(c)(2) of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) to
secure category 1 or category 2
radioactive waste with a locked door or
gate with monitored alarm at the access
control point for Renewed Facility
Operating License Nos. DPR–33, DPR–
52, and DPR–68, issued to Tennessee
Valley Authority (TVA), for operation of
the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1,
2, and 3 (Browns Ferry), respectively,
located in Limestone County, Alabama.
Because this proposed exemption does
not fall within the NRC’s list of
categorical exclusions in 10 CFR 51.22,
the NRC prepared an EA, as required by
10 CFR 51.21. Based on the results of
the EA that follows, the NRC has
determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
exemption and is issuing a FONSI.
TVA is requesting an exemption from
the requirement to ‘‘[u]se a locked door
or gate with monitored alarm at the
access control point’’ for category 1 and
2 quantities of radioactive material as
set forth in 10 CFR 37.11(c)(2) for the
low-level radioactive waste storage
facility (LLRWSF) at the Browns Ferry
site. The exemption is being requested
to address a regulatory noncompliance
which has resulted in the issuance of
minor violations at the Browns Ferry
site.
The LLRWSF is used to store the
original steam dryers for Browns Ferry,
which were removed during the
extended power uprate outages. The
stored steam dryers exceed the
threshold for a category 2 quantity of
radioactivity, as defined in 10 CFR 37.5,
but do not contain discrete radioactive
sources, ion-exchange resins, or
activated materials that weigh less than
2,000 kilograms (4,409 pounds), as
described in 10 CFR 37.11(c).
TVA describes the LLRWSF as a
robust structure consisting of a group of
rectangular box-type concrete storage
modules that are located outside the
Browns Ferry protected area but inside
the owner-controlled area and exclusion
zone. Each LLRWSF storage module is
closed by five precast concrete caps,
weighing approximately 45,813
kilograms (101,000 pounds) each.
Removal of the caps is the only access
point to the stored steam dryers and
requires heavy lifting and rigging
equipment that cannot be staged or
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
utilized quickly. Removal of the caps is
an evolution that is easily observable
over an extended period of time.
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt
TVA from the requirement to use a
locked door or gate with a monitored
alarm at the access control point to the
LLRWSF storage vaults utilized for the
original steam dryers at Browns Ferry.
The proposed action is in accordance
with the licensee’s exemption request
dated September 28, 2023 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML23271A063), as
supplemented by letter dated March 14,
2024 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML24074A457).
Need for the Proposed Action
The regulation at 10 CFR 37.11(c)(2)
requires, in part, licensees who possess
radioactive waste that contains category
1 or category 2 quantities of radioactive
waste to secure the radioactive waste
with a locked door or gate with
monitored alarm at the access control
point. The Browns Ferry original steam
dryers exceed the threshold for a
category 2 quantity of radioactivity, but
do not contain discrete radioactive
sources, ion-exchange resins, or
activated materials that weigh less than
2,000 kilograms and, therefore, are not
exempt from the requirements in 10
CFR 37.11(c). As such, the licensee is
required to have a monitored alarm at
the access control point to the LLRWSF
where the steam dryers are stored. As
described in the request for exemption
and confirmed in the supplement, the
only access point to the stored steam
dryers is via the removal of the 45,813kilogram concrete caps, and removal of
these caps would require setting up
heavy rigging and lifting equipment.
On March 13, 2014, the NRC issued
Enforcement Guidance Memorandum
(EGM) 2014–001, ‘‘Interim Guidance for
Dispositioning 10 CFR part 37
Violations with Respect to Large
Components or Robust Structures
Containing Category 1 or Category 2
Quantities of Material at Power Reactor
Facilities Licensed Under 10 CFR parts
50 and 52’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14056A151), to provide guidance to
NRC staff for dispositioning violations
associated with 10 CFR part 37 with
respect to large components containing
category 1 and category 2 quantities of
radioactive material stored in robust
structures at power reactor facilities
licensed under 10 CFR parts 50 and 52.
The EGM defines a large component as
an item weighing 2,000 kilograms or
more, but not containing either discrete
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Notices
sources or ion exchange resins, and
limits the components to steam
generators, steam dryers, turbine rotors,
reactor vessels, reactor vessel heads,
reactor coolant pumps, and shielding
blocks. It also defines a robust structure
as a closed concrete bunker or modular
vault for which access to the radioactive
materials contained within the structure
is gained only through the use of heavy
equipment to remove structural
components or large access blocks that
weigh 2,000 kilograms or more. The
EGM allows the NRC Regional Offices to
evaluate potential violations and
consider if the use of enforcement
discretion is warranted under certain
circumstances. The EGM will remain
effective until the underlying technical
issue is dispositioned through
rulemaking or other regulatory action.
Therefore, to address a regulatory
noncompliance and avoid future
violations, TVA has requested an
exemption.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC staff has assessed the
potential environmental impacts from
granting the requested exemption. The
proposed action involves no new
construction or modification of the
facilities at Browns Ferry, and no
changes to the contents of the LLRWSF
vaults where the original steam dryers
are stored. Therefore, the proposed
action would have no direct impact on
land and water use or water quality,
including terrestrial and aquatic biota,
and there would be no change in the
quality or quantity of radiological and
non-radiological effluents. Additionally,
there would be no change in dose to
members of the public and occupational
workers. The proposed action would
have no effect on air pollutant emissions
or ambient air quality. In addition, the
proposed action would have no
noticeable effect on socioeconomic and
environmental justice conditions in the
region, and no adverse effect on historic
and cultural resources. Therefore, the
proposed action would have no
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the staff considered denial of the
exemption request (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative). Denial of the exemption
request would result in the need to
install a locked door or gate with
monitored alarm, and there would be no
change in the current environmental
impacts. Accordingly, the
environmental impacts from the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:13 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
proposed action and the no-action
alternative are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
There are no unresolved conflicts
concerning alternative uses of available
resources under the proposed action.
53665
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Kimberly Green,
Senior Project Manager, Licensing Projects
Branch II–2, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2024–14056 Filed 6–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Agencies and Persons Consulted
No agencies or persons were
consulted. Because the proposed action
is not a type of activity that has the
potential to cause effects on historic
properties, the NRC has no further
obligations under section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
Similarly, the proposed action would
not affect threatened or endangered
species; therefore, consultation under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
is not required.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
TVA requested an exemption from the
requirement in 10 CFR 37.11(c)(2) to
have a locked gate or door with a
monitored alarm at the access control
point for the Browns Ferry LLRWSF
vaults where the original steam dryers
are stored. Based on the review of
available information, including the
information provided in the licensee’s
request for exemption and its response
to a request for additional information,
the NRC determined that the proposed
action would not have any significant
environmental impacts. Also, the
impacts of the ‘‘no-action’’ alternative
would be similar to the impacts of the
proposed action.
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the
NRC conducted an environmental
review of the proposed action and, in
accordance with 10 CFR 51.32(a)(4), this
FONSI incorporates the EA in Section II
of this document by reference.
Therefore, the NRC concludes that the
proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined an environmental
impact statement for the proposed
action is not needed.
This FONSI and related
environmental documents are available
for public inspection online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS should contact the
NRC’s PDR reference staff by telephone
at 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or
by email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov.
Dated: June 21, 2024.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–390, 50–391, and 72–1048;
NRC–2024–0118]
Tennessee Valley Authority; Watts Bar
Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2;
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption for Facility
Operating License Nos. NPF–90 and
NPF–96 held by Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA, the licensee) for the
operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant,
Units 1 and 2 (Watts Bar). The
exemption would exempt TVA from the
requirement to install a monitored alarm
at the access control point of the storage
facilities where the old steam generators
are stored. The exemption is being
requested to address a regulatory
noncompliance which has resulted in
the issuance of minor violations at the
Watts Bar site. The NRC staff is issuing
an environmental assessment (EA) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI)
associated with the proposed
exemption.
SUMMARY:
The EA and FONSI referenced in
this document are available on June 27,
2024.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2024–0118 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2024–0118. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53663-53665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14056]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260, 50-296, and 72-052; NRC-2024-0114]
Tennessee Valley Authority; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1,
2, and 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
[[Page 53664]]
issuance of an exemption for Renewed Facility Operating License Nos.
DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 held by Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the
licensee) for the operation of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2,
and 3 (Browns Ferry). The exemption would exempt TVA from the
requirement to install a monitored alarm at the access control point of
the storage facilities where the original steam dryers are stored. The
exemption is being requested to address a regulatory noncompliance
which has resulted in the issuance of minor violations at the Browns
Ferry site. The NRC staff is issuing an environmental assessment (EA)
and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) associated with the
proposed exemption.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in this document are available on
June 27, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2024-0114 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2024-0114. Address
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301-415-0624; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the ``For Further
Information Contact'' section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at 301-415-4737,
or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for
each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this document.
NRC's PDR: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies
of publicly available documents, is open by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to
[email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Green, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-1627; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an exemption from the
requirement in paragraph 37.11(c)(2) of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) to secure category 1 or category 2 radioactive
waste with a locked door or gate with monitored alarm at the access
control point for Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-33, DPR-
52, and DPR-68, issued to Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), for
operation of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Browns
Ferry), respectively, located in Limestone County, Alabama. Because
this proposed exemption does not fall within the NRC's list of
categorical exclusions in 10 CFR 51.22, the NRC prepared an EA, as
required by 10 CFR 51.21. Based on the results of the EA that follows,
the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement
for the exemption and is issuing a FONSI.
TVA is requesting an exemption from the requirement to ``[u]se a
locked door or gate with monitored alarm at the access control point''
for category 1 and 2 quantities of radioactive material as set forth in
10 CFR 37.11(c)(2) for the low-level radioactive waste storage facility
(LLRWSF) at the Browns Ferry site. The exemption is being requested to
address a regulatory noncompliance which has resulted in the issuance
of minor violations at the Browns Ferry site.
The LLRWSF is used to store the original steam dryers for Browns
Ferry, which were removed during the extended power uprate outages. The
stored steam dryers exceed the threshold for a category 2 quantity of
radioactivity, as defined in 10 CFR 37.5, but do not contain discrete
radioactive sources, ion-exchange resins, or activated materials that
weigh less than 2,000 kilograms (4,409 pounds), as described in 10 CFR
37.11(c).
TVA describes the LLRWSF as a robust structure consisting of a
group of rectangular box-type concrete storage modules that are located
outside the Browns Ferry protected area but inside the owner-controlled
area and exclusion zone. Each LLRWSF storage module is closed by five
precast concrete caps, weighing approximately 45,813 kilograms (101,000
pounds) each. Removal of the caps is the only access point to the
stored steam dryers and requires heavy lifting and rigging equipment
that cannot be staged or utilized quickly. Removal of the caps is an
evolution that is easily observable over an extended period of time.
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt TVA from the requirement to use a
locked door or gate with a monitored alarm at the access control point
to the LLRWSF storage vaults utilized for the original steam dryers at
Browns Ferry.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's exemption
request dated September 28, 2023 (ADAMS Accession No. ML23271A063), as
supplemented by letter dated March 14, 2024 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML24074A457).
Need for the Proposed Action
The regulation at 10 CFR 37.11(c)(2) requires, in part, licensees
who possess radioactive waste that contains category 1 or category 2
quantities of radioactive waste to secure the radioactive waste with a
locked door or gate with monitored alarm at the access control point.
The Browns Ferry original steam dryers exceed the threshold for a
category 2 quantity of radioactivity, but do not contain discrete
radioactive sources, ion-exchange resins, or activated materials that
weigh less than 2,000 kilograms and, therefore, are not exempt from the
requirements in 10 CFR 37.11(c). As such, the licensee is required to
have a monitored alarm at the access control point to the LLRWSF where
the steam dryers are stored. As described in the request for exemption
and confirmed in the supplement, the only access point to the stored
steam dryers is via the removal of the 45,813-kilogram concrete caps,
and removal of these caps would require setting up heavy rigging and
lifting equipment.
On March 13, 2014, the NRC issued Enforcement Guidance Memorandum
(EGM) 2014-001, ``Interim Guidance for Dispositioning 10 CFR part 37
Violations with Respect to Large Components or Robust Structures
Containing Category 1 or Category 2 Quantities of Material at Power
Reactor Facilities Licensed Under 10 CFR parts 50 and 52'' (ADAMS
Accession No. ML14056A151), to provide guidance to NRC staff for
dispositioning violations associated with 10 CFR part 37 with respect
to large components containing category 1 and category 2 quantities of
radioactive material stored in robust structures at power reactor
facilities licensed under 10 CFR parts 50 and 52. The EGM defines a
large component as an item weighing 2,000 kilograms or more, but not
containing either discrete
[[Page 53665]]
sources or ion exchange resins, and limits the components to steam
generators, steam dryers, turbine rotors, reactor vessels, reactor
vessel heads, reactor coolant pumps, and shielding blocks. It also
defines a robust structure as a closed concrete bunker or modular vault
for which access to the radioactive materials contained within the
structure is gained only through the use of heavy equipment to remove
structural components or large access blocks that weigh 2,000 kilograms
or more. The EGM allows the NRC Regional Offices to evaluate potential
violations and consider if the use of enforcement discretion is
warranted under certain circumstances. The EGM will remain effective
until the underlying technical issue is dispositioned through
rulemaking or other regulatory action. Therefore, to address a
regulatory noncompliance and avoid future violations, TVA has requested
an exemption.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC staff has assessed the potential environmental impacts from
granting the requested exemption. The proposed action involves no new
construction or modification of the facilities at Browns Ferry, and no
changes to the contents of the LLRWSF vaults where the original steam
dryers are stored. Therefore, the proposed action would have no direct
impact on land and water use or water quality, including terrestrial
and aquatic biota, and there would be no change in the quality or
quantity of radiological and non-radiological effluents. Additionally,
there would be no change in dose to members of the public and
occupational workers. The proposed action would have no effect on air
pollutant emissions or ambient air quality. In addition, the proposed
action would have no noticeable effect on socioeconomic and
environmental justice conditions in the region, and no adverse effect
on historic and cultural resources. Therefore, the proposed action
would have no significant effect on the quality of the human
environment.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the exemption request (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the exemption request would result in the need to install a
locked door or gate with monitored alarm, and there would be no change
in the current environmental impacts. Accordingly, the environmental
impacts from the proposed action and the no-action alternative are
similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
There are no unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of
available resources under the proposed action.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
No agencies or persons were consulted. Because the proposed action
is not a type of activity that has the potential to cause effects on
historic properties, the NRC has no further obligations under section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Similarly, the proposed
action would not affect threatened or endangered species; therefore,
consultation under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not
required.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
TVA requested an exemption from the requirement in 10 CFR
37.11(c)(2) to have a locked gate or door with a monitored alarm at the
access control point for the Browns Ferry LLRWSF vaults where the
original steam dryers are stored. Based on the review of available
information, including the information provided in the licensee's
request for exemption and its response to a request for additional
information, the NRC determined that the proposed action would not have
any significant environmental impacts. Also, the impacts of the ``no-
action'' alternative would be similar to the impacts of the proposed
action.
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC conducted an environmental
review of the proposed action and, in accordance with 10 CFR
51.32(a)(4), this FONSI incorporates the EA in Section II of this
document by reference. Therefore, the NRC concludes that the proposed
action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human
environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined an environmental
impact statement for the proposed action is not needed.
This FONSI and related environmental documents are available for
public inspection online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's PDR reference staff by
telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by email to
[email protected].
Dated: June 21, 2024.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Kimberly Green,
Senior Project Manager, Licensing Projects Branch II-2, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2024-14056 Filed 6-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P