Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Definition of Material Weakness (DFARS Case 2021-D006), 53561-53572 [2024-13864]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
low power television and television
translator stations will be made up of a
prefix consisting of the initial letter K or
W followed by the channel number
assigned to the station and two
additional letters and a suffix consisting
of the letters –D, consistent with
paragraph (d) of this section. Prior to
filing a license to cover, a new low
power television station must modify its
call sign to be consistent with the
requirements of paragraph (c) of this
section.
(b) Television translator stations. Call
signs for television translator stations
will be made up of a prefix consisting
of the initial letter K or W followed by
the channel number assigned to the
station and two additional letters and a
suffix consisting of the letter –D,
consistent with paragraph (d) of this
section.
(c) Low power television stations and
Class A television stations. Low power
television and Class A television
stations will be made up of a call sign
with a four-letter prefix pursuant to
§ 73.3550 of this chapter along with a
two-letter suffix. Low power stations
will be assigned the suffix –LD and
Class A stations will be assigned the
suffix –CD.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 31. Section 74.793 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) and adding
paragraphs (i) and (j) to read as follows:
interference agreement, that agreement
must be included as an exhibit to the
application.
■ 32. Section 74.794 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 74.794
Emissions.
(a)(1) An applicant for an LPTV or TV
translator station construction permit
shall specify that the station will be
constructed to confine out-of-channel
emissions within one of the following
emission masks: Simple, stringent, or
full service. Stations proposing new or
modified operation on channel 14 shall
specify either the stringent or full
service emission mask.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–13812 Filed 6–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 202, 215, 234, 242, 244,
245, and 252
[Docket DARS–2024–0020]
RIN 0750–AL25
§ 74.793 Low power TV and TV translator
station protection of broadcast stations.
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Definition of
Material Weakness (DFARS Case
2021–D006)
*
AGENCY:
*
*
*
*
(b) Except as provided in this section,
interference prediction analysis is based
on the interference thresholds (D/U
signal strength ratios) and other criteria
and methods specified in § 73.620 of
this chapter. The 2 km cell size
specified in § 73.620(b) is not permitted
for Class A, LPTV, TV translator, DRT,
and DTDRT stations, and if not
specified in the application, the 1 km
cell size will be assumed.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) LPTV, TV translator, DRT, and
DTDRT stations may negotiate
interference consent agreements
consistent with §§ 73.620(e) and
73.6022.
(j) If an existing authorization exceeds
the interference thresholds consistent
with paragraphs (g) or (h) of this section,
when filing a non-displacement minor
modification it may create interference
up to but not exceeding the level
previously authorized. In determining
this level, the proposal shall use the
same cell size and path profile
increment in showing both the existing
and proposed interference. If the
proposal is subject to a formal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2021 that defines the term
‘‘material weakness’’ for Government
evaluation of contractor business
systems. The term ‘‘material weakness’’
replaces the term ‘‘significant
deficiency.’’
SUMMARY:
Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
August 26, 2024, to be considered in the
formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2021–D006,
using either of the following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
DFARS Case 2021–D006. Select
‘‘Comment’’ and follow the instructions
to submit a comment. Please include
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53561
‘‘DFARS Case 2021–D006’’ on any
attached documents.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2021–D006 in the subject
line of the message.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check https://
www.regulations.gov, approximately
two to three days after submission to
verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Jon Snyder, telephone 703–945–5341.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to amend the
DFARS to implement section 806 of the
National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Pub.
L. 116–283), which amends section 893
of the NDAA for FY 2011 (Pub. L. 111–
383). Section 893 of the NDAA for FY
2011 requires a program for the
improvement of contractor business
systems and provides for DoD approval
or disapproval of contractor business
systems. Section 806 of the NDAA for
FY 2021 defines the term ‘‘material
weakness’’, which replaces the term
‘‘significant deficiency.’’
II. Discussion and Analysis
This proposed rule replaces the term
‘‘significant deficiency’’ with ‘‘material
weakness’’ in each of the following
DFARS contract clauses: 252.215–7002,
Cost Estimating System Requirements;
252.234–7002, Earned Value
Management System; 252.242–7004,
Material Management and Accounting
System; 252.242–7005, Contractor
Business Systems; 252.242–7006,
Accounting System Administration;
252.244–7001, Contractor Purchasing
System Administration-Basic and
Alternate I; and 252.245–7003,
Contractor Property Management
System Administration. The term
‘‘material weakness’’ means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is probable or more than
remote but less than likely.
This definition of ‘‘material
weakness’’ aligns with generally
accepted auditing standards. This
proposed rule will therefore assist DoD
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
53562
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
to maintain appropriate oversight over
contractor business systems by enabling
clear classification of deficiencies
according to their severity, consistent
with generally accepted auditing
standards.
To conform with this definitional
change, this proposed rule also replaces
the term ‘‘significant deficiency’’ with
the term ‘‘material weakness’’ each
place it appears in DFARS parts 215,
234, 242, 244, and 245. Further, this
proposed rule adds the word
‘‘underlying’’ to describe ‘‘deficiencies’’
in certain parts of the affected DFARS
text to emphasize that material
weaknesses are comprised of one or
more deficiencies.
Additionally, this proposed rule adds
the full text of definitions in DFARS
parts 215, 234, 242, 244, and 245 in
place of references to definitions located
in DFARS clauses. These definitions are
substantially unchanged. This change is
intended to assist contracting officers by
minimizing cross-references. The
definition of ‘‘material weakness’’ is
added at DFARS 202.101, since the term
applies to multiple DFARS parts in the
proposed rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial
Products (Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items),
and for Commercial Services
This proposed rule amends the
clauses at DFARS 252.215–7002,
252.234–7002, 252.242–7004, 252.242–
7005, 252.242–7006, 252.244–7001—
Basic and Alternate I, and 252.245–
7003. However, this proposed rule does
not impose any new requirements on
contracts at or below the SAT, for
commercial products, including COTS
items, or for commercial services.
Applicability of the clauses to
acquisitions at or below the SAT, to
acquisitions of commercial products,
including COTS items, and to
acquisitions of commercial services
remains unchanged.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
Presently, the DFARS includes a
definition of ‘‘significant deficiency’’ in
the context of DoD evaluation of
contractor business systems.
‘‘Significant deficiency’’ is defined as ‘‘a
shortcoming in the system that
materially affects the ability of officials
of the Department of Defense to rely
upon information produced by the
system that is needed for management
purposes.’’ This proposed rule replaces
the term ‘‘significant deficiency’’ in the
DFARS with the term ‘‘material
weakness,’’ defined as a deficiency or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is probable or more than
remote but less than likely.
This definition of ‘‘material
weakness’’ provides more detail and
clarity both to DoD and to industry in
the context of evaluating contractor
business systems compared to the
definition of ‘‘significant deficiency.’’
This definition of ‘‘material weakness’’
also aligns with generally accepted
auditing standards. Therefore, this
proposed rule will both create
consistency with generally accepted
auditing standards and minimize
confusion about the seriousness of
deficiencies, which will aid both DoD
and industry.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, as amended.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule, when finalized, to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because this proposed rule does not
require contractors to alter their existing
business practices. However, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis has been
performed and is summarized as
follows:
DoD is proposing to amend the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to implement
section 806 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L. 116–283).
Section 806 amends section 893 of the
NDAA for FY 2011 (Pub. L. 111–383),
which requires a program for the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
improvement of contractor business
systems and provides for DoD approval
or disapproval of contractor business
systems. Section 806 of the NDAA for
FY 2021 replaces the term ‘‘significant
deficiency’’ with ‘‘material weakness’’
and defines the term ‘‘material
weakness.’’
The objective of the rule is to
introduce the term ‘‘material weakness’’
for Government evaluation of contractor
business systems, replacing the term
‘‘significant deficiency.’’ The definition
of ‘‘material weakness’’ aligns with
generally accepted auditing standards.
This proposed rule will help DoD
maintain appropriate oversight over
contractor business systems by enabling
clear classification of deficiencies
according to severity. The legal basis for
the rule is section 806 of the NDAA for
FY 2021.
The proposed rule may impact small
entities that are awarded DoD contracts.
Based on data from the Federal
Procurement Data System and the
Electronic Data Access for FY 2021
through FY 2023, DoD estimates that an
average of 5,134 unique small entities
are awarded an average of 22,263
contract actions annually that include
one or more relevant clauses.
This proposed rule does not impose
any new reporting, recordkeeping or
other compliance requirements.
This proposed rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
other Federal rules.
There are no known alternatives that
would accomplish the stated objectives
of the applicable statute.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
proposed rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this proposed rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties
must submit such comments separately
and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS
Case 2021–D006), in correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain
any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 202,
215, 234, 242, 244, 245, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Therefore, the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System proposes to amend
48 CFR parts 202, 215, 234, 242, 244,
245, and 252 as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 202, 215, 234, 242, 244, 245, and
252 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 202—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
AND TERMS
2. Amend section 202.101 by adding
in alphabetical order the definition of
‘‘Material weakness’’ to read as follows:
■
202.101
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 215—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
3. Amend section 215.470–5–70—
a. By revising paragraph (a);
b. In paragraph (c)(2)(ii) by removing
‘‘any deficiencies’’ and adding ‘‘any
weaknesses or deficiencies’’ in its place;
■ c. By revising and republishing
paragraph (d); and
■ d. In paragraph (e) by removing
‘‘significant deficiencies’’ and adding
‘‘material weaknesses’’ in its place.
The revisions and republications read
as follows:
■
■
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
215.407–5–70 Disclosure, maintenance,
and review requirements.
(a) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Acceptable estimating system means
an estimating system that complies with
the system criteria in paragraph (d) of
252.215–7002, Cost Estimating System
Requirements, and provides for a system
that—
(i) Is maintained, reliable, and
consistently applied;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
(ii) Produces verifiable, supportable,
documented, and timely cost estimates
that are an acceptable basis for
negotiation of fair and reasonable prices;
(iii) Is consistent with and integrated
with the contractor’s related
management systems; and
(iv) Is subject to applicable financial
control systems.
Contractor means a business unit as
defined in FAR 2.101.
Estimating system means the
contractor’s policies, procedures, and
practices for budgeting and planning
controls and for generating estimates of
costs and other data included in
proposals submitted to customers in the
expectation of receiving contract
awards. Estimating system includes the
contractor’s—
(i) Organizational structure;
(ii) Established lines of authority,
duties, and responsibilities;
(iii) Internal controls and managerial
reviews;
(iv) Flow of work, coordination, and
communication; and
(v) Budgeting, planning, estimating
methods, techniques, accumulation of
historical costs, and other analyses used
to generate cost estimates.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Disposition of findings—(1)
Reporting of findings. The auditor shall
document findings and
recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer. If the auditor
identifies any material weaknesses, the
report shall describe the underlying
deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow
the contracting officer to understand the
weaknesses and deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall review all
findings and recommendations and, if
there are no material weaknesses, shall
promptly notify the contractor, in
writing, that the contractor’s estimating
system is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more material
weaknesses due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
estimating system criteria in the clause
at 252.215–7002, the contracting officer
shall—
(A) Promptly make an initial written
determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
material weakness in sufficient detail to
allow the contractor to understand the
deficiency (see PGI 215.407–5–70(d)(2));
(B) Request the contractor to respond
in writing to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor’s
responses to the initial determination,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53563
in consultation with the auditor or
functional specialist, and make a final
determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor
in writing that—
(A) The contractor’s estimating system
is acceptable and approved, and no
material weaknesses remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The
notice shall identify any remaining
material weaknesses and indicate the
adequacy of any proposed or completed
corrective action. The contracting officer
shall—
(1) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
determination, either correct the
deficiencies or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
weaknesses;
(2) Disapprove the system in
accordance with the clause at 252.215–
7002; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, if the
clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of material
weaknesses in PGI 215.407–5–70(d)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 234—MAJOR SYSTEM
ACQUISITION
234.001
[Redesignated as 234.001–70]
4. Redesignate section 234.001 as
section 234.001–70.
■ 5. Revise newly redesignated section
234.001–70 to read as follows:
■
234.001–70
Definitions.
As used in this part—
Acceptable earned value management
system means an earned value
management system that generally
complies with system criteria in
paragraph (b) of 252.234–7002, Earned
Value Management System.
Earned value management system
means an earned value management
system that complies with the earned
value management system guidelines in
the ANSI/EIA–748.
Production of major defense
acquisition program means the
production and deployment of a major
system that is intended to achieve an
operational capability that satisfies
mission needs, or an activity otherwise
defined as Milestone C under
Department of Defense Instruction
5000.02 or related authorities.
■ 6. Amend section 234.201—
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
53564
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
a. In paragraph (5)(ii) by removing
‘‘any deficiencies’’ and adding ‘‘any
weaknesses or deficiencies’’ in its place;
■ b. By revising and republishing
paragraph (7); and
■ c. In paragraph (8) by removing
‘‘significant deficiencies’’ and adding
‘‘material weaknesses’’ in its place.
The revision and republication reads
as follows:
■
234.201
Policy.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Disposition of findings—(i)
Reporting of findings. The functional
specialist or auditor shall document
findings and recommendations in a
report to the contracting officer. If the
functional specialist or auditor
identifies any material weaknesses in
the contractor’s earned value
management system, the report shall
describe the weaknesses or deficiencies
in sufficient detail to allow the
contracting officer to understand the
weaknesses or deficiencies.
(ii) Initial determination. (A) The
contracting officer shall review all
findings and recommendations and, if
there are no material weaknesses, shall
promptly notify the contractor, in
writing, that the contractor’s earned
value management system is acceptable
and approved; or
(B) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more material
weaknesses due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
earned value management system
criteria in the clause at 252.234–7002,
the contracting officer shall—
(1) Promptly make an initial written
determination of any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
material weakness in sufficient detail to
allow the contractor to understand the
weaknesses (see PGI 234.201(7)(ii));
(2) Request the contractor to respond,
in writing, to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(3) Evaluate the contractor’s response
to the initial determination, in
consultation with the auditor or
functional specialist, and make a final
determination.
(iii) Final determination. (A) The
contracting officer shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor,
in writing, that—
(1) The contractor’s earned value
management system is acceptable and
approved, and no material weaknesses
remain; or
(2) Material weaknesses remain. The
notice shall identify any remaining
material weaknesses and indicate the
adequacy of any proposed or completed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
corrective action. The contracting officer
shall—
(i) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
determination, either correct the
deficiencies or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
weaknesses;
(ii) Disapprove the system in
accordance with the clause at 252.234–
7002 when initial validation is not
successfully completed within the
timeframe approved by the contracting
officer, or the contracting officer
determines that the existing earned
value management system contains one
or more material weaknesses in highrisk guidelines in ANSI/EIA–748
standards (guidelines 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
12, 16, 21, 23, 26, 27, 28, 30, or 32).
When the contracting officer determines
that the existing earned value
management system contains one or
more material weaknesses in one or
more of the remaining 16 guidelines in
ANSI/EIA–748 standards, the
contracting officer shall use discretion
to disapprove the system based on input
received from functional specialists and
the auditor; and
(iii) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, if the
clause is included in the contract.
(B) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of material
weaknesses at PGI 234.201(7)(iii).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 242—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
242.302
[Amended]
7. Amend section 242.302 in
paragraph (a)(7) by removing
‘‘deficiencies’’ and adding ‘‘weaknesses
or deficiencies’’ in its place.
■ 8. Revise and republish section
242.7000 to read as follows:
■
242.7000 Contractor business system
deficiencies.
(a) Definitions. As used in this
subpart—
Acceptable contractor business
systems means contractor business
systems that comply with the terms and
conditions of the applicable business
system clauses listed in the definition of
contractor business systems in this
section.
Contractor business systems means—
(i) Accounting system, if the contract
includes the clause at 252.242–7006,
Accounting System Administration;
(ii) Earned value management system,
if the contract includes the clause at
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
252.234–7002, Earned Value
Management System;
(iii) Estimating system, if the contract
includes the clause at 252.215–7002,
Cost Estimating System Requirements;
(iv) Material management and
accounting system, if the contract
includes the clause at 252.242–7004,
Material Management and Accounting
System;
(v) Property management system, if
the contract includes the clause at
252.245–7003, Contractor Property
Management System Administration;
and
(vi) Purchasing system, if the contract
includes the clause at 252.244–7001,
Contractor Purchasing System
Administration.
Covered contract means a contract
that is subject to the Cost Accounting
Standards under 41 U.S.C. chapter 15,
as implemented in regulations found at
48 CFR 9903.201–1 (10 U.S.C. 3841 note
prec., as amended by section 816 of Pub.
L. 112–81).
(b) Determination to withhold
payments. If the contracting officer
makes a final determination to
disapprove a contractor’s business
system in accordance with the clause at
252.242–7005, Contractor Business
Systems, the contracting officer shall—
(1) In accordance with agency
procedures, identify one or more
covered contracts containing the clause
at 252.242–7005 from which payments
will be withheld. When identifying the
covered contracts from which to
withhold payments, the contracting
officer shall ensure that the total amount
of payment withholding under 252.242–
7005 does not exceed 10 percent of
progress payments, performance-based
payments, and interim payments under
cost-reimbursement, labor-hour, and
time-and-materials contracts billed
under each of the identified covered
contracts. Similarly, the contracting
officer shall ensure that the total amount
of payment withholding under the
clause at 252.242–7005 for each
business system does not exceed 5
percent of progress payments,
performance-based payments, and
interim payments under costreimbursement, labor-hour, and timeand-materials contracts billed under
each of the identified covered contracts.
The contracting officer has the sole
discretion to identify the covered
contracts from which to withhold
payments.
(2) Promptly notify the contractor, in
writing, of the contracting officer’s
determination to implement payment
withholding in accordance with the
clause at 252.242–7005. The notice of
payment withholding shall be included
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
in the contracting officer’s written final
determination for the contractor
business system and shall inform the
contractor that—
(i) Payments shall be withheld from
the contract or contracts identified in
the written determination in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005, until
the contracting officer determines that
there are no remaining material
weaknesses; and
(ii) The contracting officer reserves
the right to take other actions within the
terms and conditions of the contract.
(3) Provide a copy of the
determination to all contracting officers
administering the selected contracts
from which payments will be withheld.
The contracting officer shall also
provide a copy of the determination to
the auditor; payment office; affected
contracting officers at the buying
activities; and cognizant contracting
officers in contract administration
activities.
(c) Monitoring contractor’s corrective
action. The contracting officer, in
consultation with the auditor or
functional specialist, shall monitor the
contractor’s progress in correcting the
weaknesses. The contracting officer
shall notify the contractor of any
decision to decrease or increase the
amount of payment withholding in
accordance with the clause at 252.242–
7005.
(d) Correction of material weaknesses.
(1) If the contractor notifies the
contracting officer that the contractor
has corrected the material weaknesses,
the contracting officer shall request the
auditor or functional specialist to
review the correction to verify that the
weaknesses have been corrected. If, after
receipt of verification, the contracting
officer determines that the contractor
has corrected all material weaknesses as
directed by the contracting officer’s final
determination, the contracting officer
shall discontinue the withholding of
payments, release any payments
previously withheld, and approve the
system, unless other material
weaknesses remain.
(2) Prior to the receipt of verification,
the contracting officer may discontinue
withholding payments pending receipt
of verification, and release any
payments previously withheld, if the
contractor submits evidence that the
material weaknesses have been
corrected, and the contracting officer, in
consultation with the auditor or
functional specialist, determines that
there is a reasonable expectation that
the corrective actions have been
implemented and are expected to
correct the material weaknesses.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
(3) Within 90 days of receipt of the
contractor notification that the
contractor has corrected the material
weaknesses, the contracting officer
shall—
(i) Make a determination that—
(A) The contractor has corrected all
material weaknesses as directed by the
contracting officer’s final determination
in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of
this section;
(B) There is a reasonable expectation
that the corrective actions have been
implemented in accordance with
paragraph (d)(2) of this section; or
(C) The contractor has not corrected
all material weaknesses as directed by
the contracting officer’s final
determination in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, or there
is not a reasonable expectation that the
corrective actions have been
implemented in accordance with
paragraph (d)(2) of this section; or
(ii) Reduce withholding directly
related to the material weaknesses
covered under the corrective action plan
by at least 50 percent of the amount
being withheld from progress payments
and performance-based payments, and
direct the contractor, in writing, to
reduce the percentage withheld on
interim cost vouchers by at least 50
percent, until the contracting officer
makes a determination in accordance
with paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section.
(4) If, at any time, the contracting
officer determines that the contractor
has failed to correct the material
weaknesses identified in the
contractor’s notification, the contracting
officer will continue, reinstate, or
increase withholding from progress
payments and performance-based
payments, and direct the contractor, in
writing, to continue, reinstate, or
increase the percentage withheld on
interim cost vouchers to the percentage
initially withheld, until the contracting
officer determines that the contractor
has corrected all material weaknesses as
directed by the contracting officer’s final
determination.
(e) Sample formats. For sample
formats for written notifications of
contracting officer determinations to
initiate payment withholding, reduce
payment withholding, and discontinue
payment withholding in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005, see
PGI 242.7000.
■ 9. Revise section 242.7201 to read as
follows:
242.7201
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Acceptable material management and
accounting system means a material
management and accounting system that
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53565
generally complies with the system
criteria in paragraph (d) of the clause at
252.242–7004, Material Management
and Accounting System.
Material management and accounting
system (MMAS) means the contractor’s
system or systems for planning,
controlling, and accounting for the
acquisition, use, issuing, and
disposition of material. Material
management and accounting systems
may be manual or automated. They may
be stand-alone systems, or they may be
integrated with planning, engineering,
estimating, purchasing, inventory,
accounting, or other systems.
Valid time-phased requirements
means material that is—
(1) Needed to fulfill the production
plan, including reasonable quantities for
scrap, shrinkage, yield, etc.; and
(2) Charged or billed to contracts or
other cost objectives in a manner
consistent with the need to fulfill the
production plan.
242.7202
[Amended]
10. Amend section 242.7202 in
paragraph (b)(2) by removing ‘‘any
deficiencies’’ and adding ‘‘any
weaknesses or deficiencies’’ in its place.
■ 11. Amend section 242.7203 by—
■ a. Revising and republishing
paragraph (c); and
■ b. Revising paragraph (d).
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
■
242.7203
Review procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Disposition of findings—(1)
Reporting of findings. The auditor or
functional specialist shall document
findings and recommendations in a
report to the contracting officer. If the
auditor or functional specialist
identifies any material weaknesses, the
report shall describe the weaknesses or
deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow
the contracting officer to understand the
weaknesses or deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall review findings
and recommendations and, if there are
no material weaknesses, shall promptly
notify the contractor, in writing, that the
contractor’s MMAS is acceptable and
approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more material
weaknesses due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
MMAS system criteria in the clause at
252.242–7004, the contracting officer
shall—
(A) Promptly make an initial written
determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
53566
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
material weakness in sufficient detail to
allow the contractor to understand the
deficiency;
(B) Request the contractor to respond,
in writing, to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor’s
response to the initial determination in
consultation with the auditor or
functional specialist and make a final
determination (see PGI 242.7203(c)(2)).
(3) Final determination. (i) The ACO
shall make a final determination and
notify the contractor that—
(A) The contractor’s MMAS is
acceptable and approved, and no
deficiencies remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The
notice shall identify any remaining
material weaknesses and indicate the
adequacy of any proposed or completed
corrective action. The contracting officer
shall—
(1) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
determination, either correct the
weaknesses or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
weaknesses;
(2) Disapprove the system in
accordance with the clause at 252.242–
7004; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, if the
clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of material
weaknesses in PGI 242.7203(c)(3).
(d) System approval. The contracting
officer shall promptly approve a
previously disapproved MMAS and
notify the contractor when the
contracting officer determines that there
are no remaining material weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Revise section 242.7501 to read as
follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
242.7501
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Acceptable accounting system means
a system that complies with the system
criteria in paragraph (c) of the clause at
252.242–7006, Accounting System
Administration, to provide reasonable
assurance that—
(1) Applicable laws and regulations
are complied with;
(2) The accounting system and cost
data are reliable;
(3) Risk of misallocations and
mischarges are minimized; and
(4) Contract allocations and charges
are consistent with billing procedures.
Accounting system means the
contractor’s system or systems for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
accounting methods, procedures, and
controls established to gather, record,
classify, analyze, summarize, interpret,
and present accurate and timely
financial data for reporting in
compliance with applicable laws,
regulations, and management decisions,
and may include subsystems for specific
areas such as indirect and other direct
costs, compensation, billing, labor, and
general information technology.
■ 13. Amend section 242.7502—
■ a. In paragraph (b)(2) by removing
‘‘any deficiencies’’ and adding ‘‘any
weaknesses or deficiencies’’ in its place;
■ b. By revising and republishing
paragraph (d);
■ c. By revising paragraph (e);
■ d. In the paragraph (g) heading and
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2)(i) by
removing ‘‘accounting system’’;
■ e. In paragraph (g)(2)(iii) by removing
‘‘accounting system’s’’; and
■ f. In paragraph (g)(3) introductory text
by removing ‘‘an accounting system
deficiency’’ and adding ‘‘a deficiency’’
in its place.
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
242.7502
Policy.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Disposition of findings—(1)
Reporting of findings. The auditor shall
document findings and
recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer. If the auditor
identifies any material weakness, the
report shall describe the weaknesses or
deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow
the contracting officer to understand the
weaknesses or deficiencies. Follow the
procedures at PGI 242.7502 for reporting
of deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall review findings
and recommendations and, if there are
no material weaknesses, shall promptly
notify the contractor, in writing, that the
contractor’s accounting system is
acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more material
weaknesses due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
accounting system criteria in the clause
at 252.242–7006, the contracting officer
shall—
(A) Promptly make an initial written
determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
material weakness in sufficient detail to
allow the contractor to understand the
weakness (see PGI 242.7502(d)(2));
(B) Request the contractor to respond,
in writing, to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor’s
response to the initial determination, in
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consultation with the auditor or
functional specialist, and make a final
determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor,
in writing, that—
(A) The contractor’s accounting
system is acceptable and approved, and
no material weaknesses remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The
notice shall identify any remaining
material weaknesses and indicate the
adequacy of any proposed or completed
corrective action. The contracting officer
shall—
(1) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
determination, either correct the
weaknesses or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
weaknesses;
(2) Make a determination to
disapprove the system in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7006; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, if the
clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of material
weaknesses in PGI 242.7502(d)(3).
(e) System approval. The contracting
officer shall promptly approve a
previously disapproved accounting
system and notify the contractor when
the contracting officer determines that
there are no remaining material
weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 244—SUBCONTRACTING
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
14. Revise section 244.101 to read as
follows:
■
244.101
Definitions.
As used in this subpart—
Acceptable purchasing system means
a purchasing system that complies with
the system criteria in paragraph (c) of
the clause at 252.244–7001.
Purchasing system means the
contractor’s system or systems for
purchasing and subcontracting,
including make-or-buy decisions, the
selection of vendors, analysis of quoted
prices, negotiation of prices with
vendors, placing and administering of
orders, and expediting delivery of
materials.
■ 15. Amend section 244.305–70—
■ a. In the introductory text be removing
‘‘subsection’’ and adding ‘‘section’’ in
its place;
■ b. By revising and republishing
paragraph (c);
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
c. By revising paragraph (d);
d. In the paragraph (f) heading and
paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2)(i) by
removing ‘‘purchasing system’’;
■ e. In paragraph (f)(2)(iii) by removing
‘‘purchasing system’s’’; and
■ f. In paragraph (f)(3) introductory text
by removing ‘‘purchasing system’’.
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
■
■
244.305–70
Policy.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Disposition of findings—(1)
Reporting of findings. The purchasing
system analyst or auditor shall
document findings and
recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer. If the auditor or
purchasing system analyst identifies any
material weaknesses, the report shall
describe the underlying deficiencies in
sufficient detail to allow the contracting
officer to understand the weaknesses
and deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall review all
findings and recommendations and, if
there are no material weaknesses, shall
promptly notify the contractor that the
contractor’s purchasing system is
acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more material
weaknesses due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
purchasing system criteria in the clause
at 252.244–7001, the contracting officer
shall—
(A) Promptly make an initial written
determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
material weakness in sufficient detail to
allow the contractor to understand the
weakness (see PGI 244.305–70(c)(2));
(B) Request the contractor to respond,
in writing, to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(C) Evaluate the contractor’s response
to the initial determination in
consultation with the auditor or
purchasing system analyst and make a
final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor,
in writing, that—
(A) The contractor’s purchasing
system is acceptable and approved, and
no material weaknesses remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The
notice shall identify any remaining
material weaknesses and indicate the
adequacy of any proposed or completed
corrective action. The contracting officer
shall—
(1) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
determination, either correct the
weaknesses or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
weaknesses;
(2) Disapprove the system in
accordance with the clause at 252.244–
7001; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, if the
clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of material
weaknesses in PGI 244.305–70(c)(3).
(d) System approval. The contracting
officer shall promptly approve a
previously disapproved purchasing
system and notify the contractor when
the contracting officer determines that
there are no remaining material
weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 245—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
16. Amend section 245.105—
a. By revising paragraph (a);
b. In paragraph (b)(2) by removing
‘‘any deficiencies’’ and adding ‘‘any
weaknesses or deficiencies’’ in its place;
■ c. By revising and republishing
paragraph (d); and
■ d. In paragraph (e) by removing
‘‘significant deficiencies’’ and adding
‘‘material weaknesses’’ in its place.
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
■
■
■
245.105 Contractors’ property
management system compliance.
(a) Definitions. As used in this
subpart—
Acceptable property management
system means a property system that
complies with the system criteria in
paragraph (c) of the clause at 252.245–
7003, Contractor Property Management
Administration.
Property management system means
the contractor’s system or systems for
managing and controlling Government
property.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Disposition of findings—(1)
Reporting of findings. The property
administrator shall document findings
and recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer. If the property
administrator identifies any material
weaknesses, the report shall describe
the underlying deficiencies in sufficient
detail to allow the contracting officer to
understand the weaknesses or
deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall review findings
and recommendations and, if there are
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53567
no material weaknesses, shall promptly
notify the contractor, in writing, that the
contractor’s property management
system is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that
there are one or more material
weaknesses due to the contractor’s
failure to meet one or more of the
property management system criteria in
the clause at 252.245–7003, the
contracting officer shall—
(A) Promptly make an initial written
determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in
writing, providing a description of each
material weakness in sufficient detail to
allow the contractor to understand the
weakness (see PGI 245.105(d)(2));
(B) Request the contractor to respond,
in writing, to the initial determination
within 30 days; and
(C) Evaluate the contractor’s response
to the initial determination, in
consultation with the property
administrator, and make a final
determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The
contracting officer shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor,
in writing, that—
(A) The contractor’s property
management system is acceptable and
approved, and no material weaknesses
remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The
notice shall identify any remaining
material weaknesses and indicate the
adequacy of any proposed or completed
corrective action. The contracting officer
shall—
(1) Request that the contractor, within
45 days of receipt of the final
determination, either correct the
weaknesses or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the
weaknesses;
(2) Disapprove the system in
accordance with the clause at 252.245–
7003; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance
with the clause at 252.242–7005,
Contractor Business Systems, if the
clause is included in the contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to
monitoring a contractor’s corrective
action and the correction of material
weaknesses in PGI 245.105(d)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
17. Amend section 252.215–7002—
a. By revising the section heading and
clause date;
■ b. In paragraph (a) by—
■ i. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Material weakness’’; and
■
■
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
53568
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
ii. Removing the definition of
‘‘Significant deficiency’’;
■ c. By revising and republishing
paragraph (e); and
■ d. By revising paragraph (f).
The addition, revisions, and
republication read as follows:
■
252.215–7002 Cost Estimating System
Requirements.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
Cost Estimating System Requirements
(Date)
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Material weaknesses. (1) The
Contracting Officer will provide an
initial determination to the Contractor,
in writing, of any material weaknesses.
The initial determination will describe
the underlying deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weakness or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies material
weaknesses in the Contractor’s
estimating system. If the Contractor
disagrees with the initial determination,
the Contractor shall state, in writing, its
rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(iii) System disapproval, if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more material weaknesses remain.
(f) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of material weaknesses, the Contractor
shall, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
material weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the material weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. Amend section 252.234–7002—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
a. By revising the clause date;
b. In paragraph (a) by—
i. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Material weakness’’; and
■ ii. Removing the definition of
‘‘Significant deficiency’’;
■ c. By revising and republishing
paragraph (i); and
■ d. By adding a heading to paragraph
(k).
The additions, revisions, and
republication read as follows:
■
■
■
252.234–7002
System.
*
*
*
Earned Value Management
*
*
Earned Value Management System
(Date)
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Material weaknesses. (1) The
Contracting Officer will provide an
initial determination to the Contractor,
in writing, of any material weaknesses.
The initial determination will describe
the underlying deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weakness or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies material
weaknesses in the Contractor’s EVMS. If
the Contractor disagrees with the initial
determination, the Contractor shall
state, in writing, its rationale for
disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action;
(iii) System noncompliance, when the
Contractor’s existing EVMS fails to
comply with the earned value
management system guidelines in the
ANSI/EIA–748; and
(iv) System disapproval, if initial
EVMS validation is not successfully
completed within the timeframe
approved by the Contracting Officer, or
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
if the Contracting Officer determines
that the Contractor’s earned value
management system contains one or
more material weaknesses in high-risk
guidelines in ANSI/EIA–748 standards
(guidelines 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16,
21, 23, 26, 27, 28, 30, or 32). When the
Contracting Officer determines that the
existing earned value management
system contains one or more material
weaknesses in one or more of the
remaining 16 guidelines in ANSI/EIA–
748 standards, the Contracting Officer
will use discretion to disapprove the
system based on input received from
functional specialists and the auditor.
(4) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of material weaknesses, the Contractor
shall, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
material weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the material weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Subcontracts. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. Amend section 252.242–7004 by—
■ a. Revising the clause date and
paragraph (a);
■ b. Revising and republishing
paragraph (e); and
■ c. Revising paragraph (f).
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
252.242–7004 Material Management and
Accounting System.
*
*
*
*
*
Material Management and Accounting
System (Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this
clause—
Acceptable material management and
accounting system means a material
management and accounting system that
generally complies with the system
criteria in paragraph (d) of this clause.
Contractor means a business unit as
defined in Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) 2.101.
Material management and accounting
system (MMAS) means the Contractor’s
system or systems for planning,
controlling, and accounting for the
acquisition, use, issuing, and
disposition of material. Material
management and accounting systems
may be manual or automated. They may
be stand-alone systems, or they may be
integrated with planning, engineering,
estimating, purchasing, inventory,
accounting, or other systems.
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
Valid time-phased requirements
means material that is—
(1) Needed to fulfill the production
plan, including reasonable quantities for
scrap, shrinkage, yield, etc.; and
(2) Charged or billed to contracts or
other cost objectives in a manner
consistent with the need to fulfill the
production plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Material weaknesses. (1) The
Contracting Officer will provide an
initial determination to the Contractor,
in writing, of any material weaknesses.
The initial determination will describe
the underlying deficiencies in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weaknesses or
deficiencies.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies material
weaknesses in the Contractor’s MMAS.
If the Contractor disagrees with the
initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for
disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(iii) System disapproval if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more material weaknesses remain.
(f) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of material weaknesses, the Contractor
shall, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
material weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the material weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. Amend section 252.242–7005—
■ a. By revising the section heading and
clause date;
■ b. In paragraph (b) by—
■ i. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Material weakness’’; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
ii. Removing the definition of
‘‘Significant deficiency’’; and
■ c. By revising paragraphs (d), (e)(1)
and (2), (e)(3)(i), and (f).
The addition and revisions read as
follows:
■
252.242–7005
Systems.
*
*
*
Contractor Business
*
*
Contractor Business Systems (Date)
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The
Contractor shall respond, in writing,
within 30 days to an initial
determination that there are one or more
material weaknesses in one or more of
the Contractor’s business systems.
(2) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
final determination as to whether the
Contractor’s business system contains
material weaknesses. If the Contracting
Officer determines that the Contractor’s
business system contains material
weaknesses, the final determination will
include a notice to withhold payments.
(e) * * *
(1) If the Contracting Officer issues
the final determination with a notice to
withhold payments for material
weaknesses in a contractor business
system required under this contract, the
Contracting Officer will withhold 5
percent of amounts due from progress
payments and performance-based
payments, and direct the Contractor, in
writing, to withhold 5 percent from its
billings on interim cost vouchers on
cost-reimbursement, labor-hour, and
time-and-materials contracts until the
Contracting Officer has determined that
the Contractor has corrected all material
weaknesses as directed by the
Contracting Officer’s final
determination. The Contractor shall,
within 45 days of receipt of the notice,
either correct the weaknesses or submit
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53569
an acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses.
(2) If the Contractor submits an
acceptable corrective action plan within
45 days of receipt of a notice of the
Contracting Officer’s intent to withhold
payments, and the Contracting Officer,
in consultation with the auditor or
functional specialist, determines that
the Contractor is effectively
implementing such plan, the
Contracting Officer will reduce
withholding directly related to the
material weaknesses covered under the
corrective action plan, to 2 percent from
progress payments and performancebased payments, and direct the
Contractor, in writing, to reduce the
percentage withheld on interim cost
vouchers to 2 percent until the
Contracting Officer determines the
Contractor has corrected all material
weaknesses as directed by the
Contracting Officer’s final
determination. However, if at any time,
the Contracting Officer determines that
the Contractor has failed to follow the
accepted corrective action plan, the
Contracting Officer will increase
withholding from progress payments
and performance-based payments, and
direct the Contractor, in writing, to
increase the percentage withheld on
interim cost vouchers to the percentage
initially withheld, until the Contracting
Officer determines that the Contractor
has corrected all material weaknesses as
directed by the Contracting Officer’s
final determination.
(3) * * *
(i) The total percentage of payments
withheld on amounts due under each
progress payment, performance-based
payment, or interim cost voucher on
this contract shall not exceed—
(A) Five percent for one or more
material weaknesses in any single
contractor business system; and
(B) Ten percent for material
weaknesses in multiple contractor
business systems.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Correction of weaknesses. (1) The
Contractor shall notify the Contracting
Officer, in writing, when the Contractor
has corrected the business system’s
weaknesses.
(2) Once the Contractor has notified
the Contracting Officer that all
weaknesses have been corrected, the
Contracting Officer will take one of the
following actions:
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
53570
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(i) If the Contracting Officer
determines that the Contractor has
corrected all material weaknesses as
directed by the Contracting Officer’s
final determination, the Contracting
Officer will, as appropriate, discontinue
the withholding of progress payments
and performance-based payments, and
direct the Contractor, in writing, to
discontinue the payment withholding
from billings on interim cost vouchers
under this contract associated with the
Contracting Officer’s final
determination, and authorize the
Contractor to bill for any monies
previously withheld that are not also
being withheld due to other material
weaknesses. Any payment withholding
under this contract due to other material
weaknesses will remain in effect until
the Contracting Officer determines that
those material weaknesses are corrected.
(ii) If the Contracting Officer
determines that the Contractor still has
material weaknesses, the Contracting
Officer will continue the withholding of
progress payments and performancebased payments, and the Contractor
shall continue withholding amounts
from its billings on interim cost
vouchers in accordance with paragraph
(e) of this clause, and not bill for any
monies previously withheld.
(iii) If the Contracting Officer
determines, based on the evidence
submitted by the Contractor, that there
is a reasonable expectation that the
corrective actions have been
implemented and are expected to
correct the material weaknesses, the
Contracting Officer will discontinue
withholding payments, release any
payments previously withheld directly
related to the material weaknesses
identified in the Contractor notification,
direct the Contractor, in writing, to
discontinue the payment withholding
from billings on interim cost vouchers
associated with the Contracting Officer’s
final determination, and authorize the
Contractor to bill for any monies
previously withheld.
(iv) If, within 90 days of receipt of the
Contractor notification that the
Contractor has corrected the material
weaknesses, the Contracting Officer has
not made a determination in accordance
with paragraph (f)(2)(i), (ii), or (iii) of
this clause, the Contracting Officer will
reduce withholding directly related to
the material weaknesses identified in
the Contractor notification by at least 50
percent of the amount being withheld
from progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct
the Contractor, in writing, to reduce the
payment withholding from billings on
interim cost vouchers directly related to
the material weaknesses identified in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
the Contractor notification by a
specified percentage that is at least 50
percent, but not authorize the
Contractor to bill for any monies
previously withheld until the
Contracting Officer makes a
determination in accordance with
paragraph (f)(2)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this
clause.
(v) At any time after the Contracting
Officer reduces or discontinues the
withholding of progress payments and
performance-based payments, or directs
the Contractor to reduce or discontinue
the payment withholding from billings
on interim cost vouchers under this
contract, if the Contracting Officer
determines that the Contractor has
failed to correct the material weaknesses
identified in the Contractor’s
notification, the Contracting Officer will
reinstate or increase withholding from
progress payments and performancebased payments, and direct the
Contractor, in writing, to reinstate or
increase the percentage withheld on
interim cost vouchers to the percentage
initially withheld, until the Contracting
Officer determines that the Contractor
has corrected all material weaknesses as
directed by the Contracting Officer’s
final determination.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. Amend section 252.242–7006 by—
■ a. Revising the section heading, clause
date, and paragraph (a);
■ b. Revising and republishing
paragraph (d); and
■ c. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions and republication read
as follows:
252.242–7006 Accounting System
Administration.
*
*
*
*
*
Accounting System Administration
(Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this
clause—
Acceptable accounting system means
a system that complies with the system
criteria in paragraph (c) of this clause to
provide reasonable assurance that—
(1) Applicable laws and regulations
are complied with;
(2) The accounting system and cost
data are reliable;
(3) Risk of misallocations and
mischarges are minimized; and
(4) Contract allocations and charges
are consistent with billing procedures.
Accounting system means the
Contractor’s system or systems for
accounting methods, procedures, and
controls established to gather, record,
classify, analyze, summarize, interpret,
and present accurate and timely
financial data for reporting in
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
compliance with applicable laws,
regulations, and management decisions,
and may include subsystems for specific
areas such as indirect and other direct
costs, compensation, billing, labor, and
general information technology.
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The
Contracting Officer will provide an
initial determination to the Contractor,
in writing, of any material weaknesses.
The initial determination will describe
the underlying deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weakness or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies material
weaknesses in the Contractor’s
accounting system. If the Contractor
disagrees with the initial determination,
the Contractor shall state, in writing, its
rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(iii) System disapproval, if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more material weaknesses remain.
(e) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of material weaknesses, the Contractor
shall, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
material weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the material weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 22. Amend section 252.244–7001—
■ a. By revising the section heading and
clause date;
■ b. In paragraph (a) by—
■ i. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Material weakness’’; and
■ ii. Removing the definition of
‘‘Significant deficiency’’;
■ c. By revising and republishing
paragraph (d);
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
53571
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
d. By revising paragraph (e); and
e. In Alternate I—
i. By revising the clause date;
ii. In paragraph (a)—
A. By adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Material weakness’’; and
■ B. By removing the definition of
‘‘Significant deficiency’’;
■ iii. By revising and republishing
paragraph (d); and
■ iv. By revising paragraph (e).
The additions, revisions, and
republications read as follows:
■
■
■
■
■
252.244–7001 Contractor Purchasing
System Administration.
*
*
*
*
*
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Contractor Purchasing System
Administration—Basic (Date)
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The
Contracting Officer will provide
notification of initial determination to
the Contractor, in writing, of any
material weaknesses. The initial
determination will describe the
underlying deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weakness or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies material
weaknesses in the Contractor’s
purchasing system. If the Contractor
disagrees with the initial determination,
the Contractor shall state, in writing, its
rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(iii) System disapproval, if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more material weaknesses remain.
(e) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of material weaknesses, the Contractor
shall, within 45 days of receipt of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
final determination, either correct the
material weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
Alternate I. * * *
Contractor Purchasing System
Administration—Alternate I (Date)
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The
Contracting Officer will provide
notification of initial determination to
the Contractor, in writing, of any
material weaknesses. The initial
determination will describe the
underlying deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weaknesses or
deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies material
weaknesses in the Contractor’s
purchasing system. If the Contractor
disagrees with the initial determination,
the Contractor shall state, in writing, its
rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(iii) System disapproval, if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more material weaknesses remain.
(e) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of material weaknesses, the Contractor
shall, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
material weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 23. Amend section 252.245–7003—
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a. By revising the clause date;
b. In paragraph (a) by—
i. Adding in alphabetical order the
definition of ‘‘Material weakness’’; and
■ ii. Removing the definition of
‘‘Significant deficiency’’;
■ c. By revising and republishing
paragraph (d); and
■ d. By revising paragraph (e).
The addition, revisions, and
republication read as follows:
■
■
■
252.245–7003 Contractor Property
Management System Administration.
*
*
*
*
*
Contractor Property Management
System Administration (Date)
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency
or combination of deficiencies in the
internal control over information in
contractor business systems, such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such
information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely
basis. A reasonable possibility exists
when the likelihood of an event
occurring is—
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than
likely (section 806 of Pub. L. 116–283).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The
Contracting Officer will provide an
initial determination to the Contractor,
in writing, of any material weaknesses.
The initial determination will describe
the underlying deficiency in sufficient
detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weaknesses or
deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond
within 30 days to a written initial
determination from the Contracting
Officer that identifies material
weaknesses in the Contractor’s property
management system. If the Contractor
disagrees with the initial determination,
the Contractor shall state, in writing, its
rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will
evaluate the Contractor’s response and
notify the Contractor, in writing, of the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
concerning—
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or
completed corrective action; and
(iii) System disapproval, if the
Contracting Officer determines that one
or more material weaknesses remain.
(e) If the Contractor receives the
Contracting Officer’s final determination
of material weaknesses, the Contractor
shall, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the
material weaknesses or submit an
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
53572
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2024 / Proposed Rules
acceptable corrective action plan
showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the material weaknesses.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–13864 Filed 6–26–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Office of Federal Procurement Policy
48 CFR Parts 9903 and 9904
Conformance of Cost Accounting
Standards to Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles for Operating
Revenue and Lease Accounting
Cost Accounting Standards
Board, Office of Federal Procurement
Policy, Office of Management and
Budget.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP), Cost
Accounting Standards Board (CAS
Board or the Board), is releasing this
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to elicit public comments on proposed
changes to the Cost Accounting
Standards (CAS) to conform them with
changes in Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) related
to operating revenue and lease
accounting. This proposed rule follows
issuance of an advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) 85 FR
70572 (November, 5, 2020), and a Staff
Discussion Paper (SDP) 84 FR 9143
(March 13, 2019).
DATES: Comments must be in writing
and must be received by August 26,
2024.
ADDRESSES: Respondents are strongly
encouraged to submit comments
electronically to ensure timely receipt.
Electronic comments may be submitted
to OMBCASB@omb.eop.gov. Be sure to
include your name, title, organization,
and reference case 2021–01. If you must
submit by regular mail, please do so at
Office of Federal Procurement Policy,
725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503, ATTN: John L. McClung.
Privacy Act Statement: The CAS
Board proposes the rule to elicit public
views pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1502.
Submission of comments is voluntary.
The information will be used to inform
sound decision-making. Please note that
all comments received in response to
this document may be posted or
released in their entirety, including any
personal and business confidential
information provided. Do not include
any information you would not like to
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Jun 26, 2024
Jkt 262001
be made publicly available.
Additionally, the OMB System of
Records Notice, OMB Public Input
System of Records, OMB/INPUT/01, 88
FR 20913 (available at
www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2023/04/07/2023-07452/privacy-act-of1974-system-of-records), includes a list
of routine uses associated with the
collection of this information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
L. McClung, Manager, Cost Accounting
Standards Board (telephone: 202–881–
9758; email: john.l.mcclung2@
omb.eop.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 820 of Public Law 114–328
directed the Board to conform CAS to
GAAP to the maximum extent
practicable. In accordance with 41
U.S.C. 1502(c), the Board is required to
consult with interested persons
concerning the advantages,
disadvantages, and improvements
anticipated in the pricing and
administration of Government contracts
as a result of the adoption of a proposed
Standard, prior to the promulgation of
any new or revised CAS.
On March 13, 2019, the Board
published a Staff Discussion Paper
(SDP) (84 FR 9143) to solicit views with
respect to the Board’s statutory
requirement to review and conform CAS
requirements, where practicable, to
GAAP. Respondents were invited to
comment, among other things, on
whether and how CAS may need to be
modified to conform to changes to
GAAP that occurred after a related CAS
was promulgated. More specifically, the
SDP asked what recommended actions,
if any, the Board should take regarding
the changes in GAAP for operating
revenue and lease accounting rules. The
Board recognized that since the initial
promulgation of CAS 403 (38 FR 26680,
Dec. 14, 1972), numerous changes have
been made to GAAP. This growth in
GAAP content presents opportunities to
modify or eliminate overlapping CAS
requirements where GAAP standards
may be applied reasonably as a
substitute for CAS. Furthermore, some
changes in GAAP may create
inconsistencies not contemplated
during the initial promulgations of CAS
requiring action by the Board.
Public comments received on the
SDP, amongst other things, urged the
Board to prioritize efforts to address
changes in GAAP related to operating
revenue and lease accounting. In
response to these comments, the Board
issued an advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM) on November 5,
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2020 (85 FR 70572) that described
changes to the CAS that, if adopted,
would (i) align CAS with GAAP on the
handling of operating revenue and (ii)
clarify CAS definitions to make clear
that GAAP changes on lease accounting
are not recognized for CAS purposes.
This NPRM addresses the public
comments received in response to the
ANPRM and also reflects research
accomplished by the Board in response
to the ANPRM. The NPRM is issued by
the Board in accordance with the
requirements of 41 U.S.C. 1502(c).
II. Operating Revenue
A. Overview. The definitions of
operating revenue in CAS and revenue
in GAAP are currently different. The
GAAP definition of ‘‘revenue,’’ found at
Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 606–10–20, reads as
follows:
Inflows or other enhancements of assets of
an entity or settlements of its liabilities (or a
combination of both) from delivering or
producing goods, rendering services, or other
activities that constitute the entity’s ongoing
major or central operations.
The CAS 403–30(a)(3) definition of
‘‘operating revenue’’ reads as follows:
. . . amounts accrued or charge[d] to
customers, clients, and tenants, for the sale
of products manufactured or purchased for
resale, for services, and for rentals of
property held primarily for leasing to others.
It includes both reimbursable costs and fees
under cost-type contracts and percentage-ofcompletion sales accruals except that it
includes only the fee for management
contracts under which the contractor
essentially acts as an agent of the
Government in the erection or operation of
Government-owned facilities. It excludes
incidental interest, dividends, royalty, and
rental income, and proceeds from the sale of
assets used in the business.
In the ANPRM, the Board stated its
belief that the definition in GAAP is
essentially equivalent to the CAS, but
noted that when a contractor essentially
acts as an agent of the Government in
the erection or operation of
Government-owned facilities, CAS
limits the measurement of operating
revenue to only the fee earned for
managing the contract. The Board also
noted that GAAP does not provide such
a limitation. The ANPRM included
language that, if adopted, would remove
the definition of operating revenue from
CAS 403 and rely on the definition of
revenue in GAAP, but retain the CAS
403 criterion regarding only utilizing
the ‘‘fee for management contracts
under which the contractor essentially
acts as an agent of the Government in
the erection or operation of
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53561-53572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13864]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 202, 215, 234, 242, 244, 245, and 252
[Docket DARS-2024-0020]
RIN 0750-AL25
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Definition of
Material Weakness (DFARS Case 2021-D006)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 that defines the term
``material weakness'' for Government evaluation of contractor business
systems. The term ``material weakness'' replaces the term ``significant
deficiency.''
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before August 26, 2024, to be considered
in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2021-D006, using
either of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for DFARS Case 2021-D006. Select ``Comment'' and follow the
instructions to submit a comment. Please include ``DFARS Case 2021-
D006'' on any attached documents.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2021-D006 in
the subject line of the message.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission
to verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jon Snyder, telephone 703-945-
5341.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to amend the DFARS to implement section 806 of the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021
(Pub. L. 116-283), which amends section 893 of the NDAA for FY 2011
(Pub. L. 111-383). Section 893 of the NDAA for FY 2011 requires a
program for the improvement of contractor business systems and provides
for DoD approval or disapproval of contractor business systems. Section
806 of the NDAA for FY 2021 defines the term ``material weakness'',
which replaces the term ``significant deficiency.''
II. Discussion and Analysis
This proposed rule replaces the term ``significant deficiency''
with ``material weakness'' in each of the following DFARS contract
clauses: 252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements; 252.234-
7002, Earned Value Management System; 252.242-7004, Material Management
and Accounting System; 252.242-7005, Contractor Business Systems;
252.242-7006, Accounting System Administration; 252.244-7001,
Contractor Purchasing System Administration-Basic and Alternate I; and
252.245-7003, Contractor Property Management System Administration. The
term ``material weakness'' means a deficiency or combination of
deficiencies in the internal control over information in contractor
business systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility
exists when the likelihood of an event occurring is probable or more
than remote but less than likely.
This definition of ``material weakness'' aligns with generally
accepted auditing standards. This proposed rule will therefore assist
DoD
[[Page 53562]]
to maintain appropriate oversight over contractor business systems by
enabling clear classification of deficiencies according to their
severity, consistent with generally accepted auditing standards.
To conform with this definitional change, this proposed rule also
replaces the term ``significant deficiency'' with the term ``material
weakness'' each place it appears in DFARS parts 215, 234, 242, 244, and
245. Further, this proposed rule adds the word ``underlying'' to
describe ``deficiencies'' in certain parts of the affected DFARS text
to emphasize that material weaknesses are comprised of one or more
deficiencies.
Additionally, this proposed rule adds the full text of definitions
in DFARS parts 215, 234, 242, 244, and 245 in place of references to
definitions located in DFARS clauses. These definitions are
substantially unchanged. This change is intended to assist contracting
officers by minimizing cross-references. The definition of ``material
weakness'' is added at DFARS 202.101, since the term applies to
multiple DFARS parts in the proposed rule.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial Products (Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items), and for Commercial Services
This proposed rule amends the clauses at DFARS 252.215-7002,
252.234-7002, 252.242-7004, 252.242-7005, 252.242-7006, 252.244-7001--
Basic and Alternate I, and 252.245-7003. However, this proposed rule
does not impose any new requirements on contracts at or below the SAT,
for commercial products, including COTS items, or for commercial
services. Applicability of the clauses to acquisitions at or below the
SAT, to acquisitions of commercial products, including COTS items, and
to acquisitions of commercial services remains unchanged.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
Presently, the DFARS includes a definition of ``significant
deficiency'' in the context of DoD evaluation of contractor business
systems. ``Significant deficiency'' is defined as ``a shortcoming in
the system that materially affects the ability of officials of the
Department of Defense to rely upon information produced by the system
that is needed for management purposes.'' This proposed rule replaces
the term ``significant deficiency'' in the DFARS with the term
``material weakness,'' defined as a deficiency or combination of
deficiencies in the internal control over information in contractor
business systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or
detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility
exists when the likelihood of an event occurring is probable or more
than remote but less than likely.
This definition of ``material weakness'' provides more detail and
clarity both to DoD and to industry in the context of evaluating
contractor business systems compared to the definition of ``significant
deficiency.'' This definition of ``material weakness'' also aligns with
generally accepted auditing standards. Therefore, this proposed rule
will both create consistency with generally accepted auditing standards
and minimize confusion about the seriousness of deficiencies, which
will aid both DoD and industry.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, as amended.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed rule, when finalized, to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., because this proposed rule does not require contractors to alter
their existing business practices. However, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis has been performed and is summarized as follows:
DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement section 806 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L.
116-283). Section 806 amends section 893 of the NDAA for FY 2011 (Pub.
L. 111-383), which requires a program for the improvement of contractor
business systems and provides for DoD approval or disapproval of
contractor business systems. Section 806 of the NDAA for FY 2021
replaces the term ``significant deficiency'' with ``material weakness''
and defines the term ``material weakness.''
The objective of the rule is to introduce the term ``material
weakness'' for Government evaluation of contractor business systems,
replacing the term ``significant deficiency.'' The definition of
``material weakness'' aligns with generally accepted auditing
standards. This proposed rule will help DoD maintain appropriate
oversight over contractor business systems by enabling clear
classification of deficiencies according to severity. The legal basis
for the rule is section 806 of the NDAA for FY 2021.
The proposed rule may impact small entities that are awarded DoD
contracts. Based on data from the Federal Procurement Data System and
the Electronic Data Access for FY 2021 through FY 2023, DoD estimates
that an average of 5,134 unique small entities are awarded an average
of 22,263 contract actions annually that include one or more relevant
clauses.
This proposed rule does not impose any new reporting, recordkeeping
or other compliance requirements.
This proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
any other Federal rules.
There are no known alternatives that would accomplish the stated
objectives of the applicable statute.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this proposed rule on
small entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this proposed rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2021-
D006), in correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
[[Page 53563]]
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 202, 215, 234, 242, 244, 245, and
252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, the Defense Acquisition Regulations System proposes to
amend 48 CFR parts 202, 215, 234, 242, 244, 245, and 252 as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 202, 215, 234, 242, 244,
245, and 252 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 202--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
0
2. Amend section 202.101 by adding in alphabetical order the definition
of ``Material weakness'' to read as follows:
202.101 Definitions.
* * * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in contractor business
systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the
likelihood of an event occurring is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
* * * * *
PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
0
3. Amend section 215.470-5-70--
0
a. By revising paragraph (a);
0
b. In paragraph (c)(2)(ii) by removing ``any deficiencies'' and adding
``any weaknesses or deficiencies'' in its place;
0
c. By revising and republishing paragraph (d); and
0
d. In paragraph (e) by removing ``significant deficiencies'' and adding
``material weaknesses'' in its place.
The revisions and republications read as follows:
215.407-5-70 Disclosure, maintenance, and review requirements.
(a) Definitions. As used in this section--
Acceptable estimating system means an estimating system that
complies with the system criteria in paragraph (d) of 252.215-7002,
Cost Estimating System Requirements, and provides for a system that--
(i) Is maintained, reliable, and consistently applied;
(ii) Produces verifiable, supportable, documented, and timely cost
estimates that are an acceptable basis for negotiation of fair and
reasonable prices;
(iii) Is consistent with and integrated with the contractor's
related management systems; and
(iv) Is subject to applicable financial control systems.
Contractor means a business unit as defined in FAR 2.101.
Estimating system means the contractor's policies, procedures, and
practices for budgeting and planning controls and for generating
estimates of costs and other data included in proposals submitted to
customers in the expectation of receiving contract awards. Estimating
system includes the contractor's--
(i) Organizational structure;
(ii) Established lines of authority, duties, and responsibilities;
(iii) Internal controls and managerial reviews;
(iv) Flow of work, coordination, and communication; and
(v) Budgeting, planning, estimating methods, techniques,
accumulation of historical costs, and other analyses used to generate
cost estimates.
* * * * *
(d) Disposition of findings--(1) Reporting of findings. The auditor
shall document findings and recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer. If the auditor identifies any material weaknesses,
the report shall describe the underlying deficiencies in sufficient
detail to allow the contracting officer to understand the weaknesses
and deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The contracting officer shall review
all findings and recommendations and, if there are no material
weaknesses, shall promptly notify the contractor, in writing, that the
contractor's estimating system is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
material weaknesses due to the contractor's failure to meet one or more
of the estimating system criteria in the clause at 252.215-7002, the
contracting officer shall--
(A) Promptly make an initial written determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in writing, providing a
description of each material weakness in sufficient detail to allow the
contractor to understand the deficiency (see PGI 215.407-5-70(d)(2));
(B) Request the contractor to respond in writing to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor's responses to the initial
determination, in consultation with the auditor or functional
specialist, and make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The contracting officer shall make a
final determination and notify the contractor in writing that--
(A) The contractor's estimating system is acceptable and approved,
and no material weaknesses remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The notice shall identify any
remaining material weaknesses and indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The contracting officer shall--
(1) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses;
(2) Disapprove the system in accordance with the clause at 252.215-
7002; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7005, Contractor Business Systems, if the clause is included in the
contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of material weaknesses in PGI
215.407-5-70(d)(3).
* * * * *
PART 234--MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
234.001 [Redesignated as 234.001-70]
0
4. Redesignate section 234.001 as section 234.001-70.
0
5. Revise newly redesignated section 234.001-70 to read as follows:
234.001-70 Definitions.
As used in this part--
Acceptable earned value management system means an earned value
management system that generally complies with system criteria in
paragraph (b) of 252.234-7002, Earned Value Management System.
Earned value management system means an earned value management
system that complies with the earned value management system guidelines
in the ANSI/EIA-748.
Production of major defense acquisition program means the
production and deployment of a major system that is intended to achieve
an operational capability that satisfies mission needs, or an activity
otherwise defined as Milestone C under Department of Defense
Instruction 5000.02 or related authorities.
0
6. Amend section 234.201--
[[Page 53564]]
0
a. In paragraph (5)(ii) by removing ``any deficiencies'' and adding
``any weaknesses or deficiencies'' in its place;
0
b. By revising and republishing paragraph (7); and
0
c. In paragraph (8) by removing ``significant deficiencies'' and adding
``material weaknesses'' in its place.
The revision and republication reads as follows:
234.201 Policy.
* * * * *
(7) Disposition of findings--(i) Reporting of findings. The
functional specialist or auditor shall document findings and
recommendations in a report to the contracting officer. If the
functional specialist or auditor identifies any material weaknesses in
the contractor's earned value management system, the report shall
describe the weaknesses or deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow
the contracting officer to understand the weaknesses or deficiencies.
(ii) Initial determination. (A) The contracting officer shall
review all findings and recommendations and, if there are no material
weaknesses, shall promptly notify the contractor, in writing, that the
contractor's earned value management system is acceptable and approved;
or
(B) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
material weaknesses due to the contractor's failure to meet one or more
of the earned value management system criteria in the clause at
252.234-7002, the contracting officer shall--
(1) Promptly make an initial written determination of any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in writing, providing a
description of each material weakness in sufficient detail to allow the
contractor to understand the weaknesses (see PGI 234.201(7)(ii));
(2) Request the contractor to respond, in writing, to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(3) Evaluate the contractor's response to the initial
determination, in consultation with the auditor or functional
specialist, and make a final determination.
(iii) Final determination. (A) The contracting officer shall make a
final determination and notify the contractor, in writing, that--
(1) The contractor's earned value management system is acceptable
and approved, and no material weaknesses remain; or
(2) Material weaknesses remain. The notice shall identify any
remaining material weaknesses and indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The contracting officer shall--
(i) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the deficiencies or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses;
(ii) Disapprove the system in accordance with the clause at
252.234-7002 when initial validation is not successfully completed
within the timeframe approved by the contracting officer, or the
contracting officer determines that the existing earned value
management system contains one or more material weaknesses in high-risk
guidelines in ANSI/EIA-748 standards (guidelines 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
12, 16, 21, 23, 26, 27, 28, 30, or 32). When the contracting officer
determines that the existing earned value management system contains
one or more material weaknesses in one or more of the remaining 16
guidelines in ANSI/EIA-748 standards, the contracting officer shall use
discretion to disapprove the system based on input received from
functional specialists and the auditor; and
(iii) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7005, Contractor Business Systems, if the clause is included in the
contract.
(B) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of material weaknesses at PGI
234.201(7)(iii).
* * * * *
PART 242--CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
242.302 [Amended]
0
7. Amend section 242.302 in paragraph (a)(7) by removing
``deficiencies'' and adding ``weaknesses or deficiencies'' in its
place.
0
8. Revise and republish section 242.7000 to read as follows:
242.7000 Contractor business system deficiencies.
(a) Definitions. As used in this subpart--
Acceptable contractor business systems means contractor business
systems that comply with the terms and conditions of the applicable
business system clauses listed in the definition of contractor business
systems in this section.
Contractor business systems means--
(i) Accounting system, if the contract includes the clause at
252.242-7006, Accounting System Administration;
(ii) Earned value management system, if the contract includes the
clause at 252.234-7002, Earned Value Management System;
(iii) Estimating system, if the contract includes the clause at
252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements;
(iv) Material management and accounting system, if the contract
includes the clause at 252.242-7004, Material Management and Accounting
System;
(v) Property management system, if the contract includes the clause
at 252.245-7003, Contractor Property Management System Administration;
and
(vi) Purchasing system, if the contract includes the clause at
252.244-7001, Contractor Purchasing System Administration.
Covered contract means a contract that is subject to the Cost
Accounting Standards under 41 U.S.C. chapter 15, as implemented in
regulations found at 48 CFR 9903.201-1 (10 U.S.C. 3841 note prec., as
amended by section 816 of Pub. L. 112-81).
(b) Determination to withhold payments. If the contracting officer
makes a final determination to disapprove a contractor's business
system in accordance with the clause at 252.242-7005, Contractor
Business Systems, the contracting officer shall--
(1) In accordance with agency procedures, identify one or more
covered contracts containing the clause at 252.242-7005 from which
payments will be withheld. When identifying the covered contracts from
which to withhold payments, the contracting officer shall ensure that
the total amount of payment withholding under 252.242-7005 does not
exceed 10 percent of progress payments, performance-based payments, and
interim payments under cost-reimbursement, labor-hour, and time-and-
materials contracts billed under each of the identified covered
contracts. Similarly, the contracting officer shall ensure that the
total amount of payment withholding under the clause at 252.242-7005
for each business system does not exceed 5 percent of progress
payments, performance-based payments, and interim payments under cost-
reimbursement, labor-hour, and time-and-materials contracts billed
under each of the identified covered contracts. The contracting officer
has the sole discretion to identify the covered contracts from which to
withhold payments.
(2) Promptly notify the contractor, in writing, of the contracting
officer's determination to implement payment withholding in accordance
with the clause at 252.242-7005. The notice of payment withholding
shall be included
[[Page 53565]]
in the contracting officer's written final determination for the
contractor business system and shall inform the contractor that--
(i) Payments shall be withheld from the contract or contracts
identified in the written determination in accordance with the clause
at 252.242-7005, until the contracting officer determines that there
are no remaining material weaknesses; and
(ii) The contracting officer reserves the right to take other
actions within the terms and conditions of the contract.
(3) Provide a copy of the determination to all contracting officers
administering the selected contracts from which payments will be
withheld. The contracting officer shall also provide a copy of the
determination to the auditor; payment office; affected contracting
officers at the buying activities; and cognizant contracting officers
in contract administration activities.
(c) Monitoring contractor's corrective action. The contracting
officer, in consultation with the auditor or functional specialist,
shall monitor the contractor's progress in correcting the weaknesses.
The contracting officer shall notify the contractor of any decision to
decrease or increase the amount of payment withholding in accordance
with the clause at 252.242-7005.
(d) Correction of material weaknesses. (1) If the contractor
notifies the contracting officer that the contractor has corrected the
material weaknesses, the contracting officer shall request the auditor
or functional specialist to review the correction to verify that the
weaknesses have been corrected. If, after receipt of verification, the
contracting officer determines that the contractor has corrected all
material weaknesses as directed by the contracting officer's final
determination, the contracting officer shall discontinue the
withholding of payments, release any payments previously withheld, and
approve the system, unless other material weaknesses remain.
(2) Prior to the receipt of verification, the contracting officer
may discontinue withholding payments pending receipt of verification,
and release any payments previously withheld, if the contractor submits
evidence that the material weaknesses have been corrected, and the
contracting officer, in consultation with the auditor or functional
specialist, determines that there is a reasonable expectation that the
corrective actions have been implemented and are expected to correct
the material weaknesses.
(3) Within 90 days of receipt of the contractor notification that
the contractor has corrected the material weaknesses, the contracting
officer shall--
(i) Make a determination that--
(A) The contractor has corrected all material weaknesses as
directed by the contracting officer's final determination in accordance
with paragraph (d)(1) of this section;
(B) There is a reasonable expectation that the corrective actions
have been implemented in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this
section; or
(C) The contractor has not corrected all material weaknesses as
directed by the contracting officer's final determination in accordance
with paragraph (d)(1) of this section, or there is not a reasonable
expectation that the corrective actions have been implemented in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this section; or
(ii) Reduce withholding directly related to the material weaknesses
covered under the corrective action plan by at least 50 percent of the
amount being withheld from progress payments and performance-based
payments, and direct the contractor, in writing, to reduce the
percentage withheld on interim cost vouchers by at least 50 percent,
until the contracting officer makes a determination in accordance with
paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section.
(4) If, at any time, the contracting officer determines that the
contractor has failed to correct the material weaknesses identified in
the contractor's notification, the contracting officer will continue,
reinstate, or increase withholding from progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct the contractor, in writing, to
continue, reinstate, or increase the percentage withheld on interim
cost vouchers to the percentage initially withheld, until the
contracting officer determines that the contractor has corrected all
material weaknesses as directed by the contracting officer's final
determination.
(e) Sample formats. For sample formats for written notifications of
contracting officer determinations to initiate payment withholding,
reduce payment withholding, and discontinue payment withholding in
accordance with the clause at 252.242-7005, see PGI 242.7000.
0
9. Revise section 242.7201 to read as follows:
242.7201 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Acceptable material management and accounting system means a
material management and accounting system that generally complies with
the system criteria in paragraph (d) of the clause at 252.242-7004,
Material Management and Accounting System.
Material management and accounting system (MMAS) means the
contractor's system or systems for planning, controlling, and
accounting for the acquisition, use, issuing, and disposition of
material. Material management and accounting systems may be manual or
automated. They may be stand-alone systems, or they may be integrated
with planning, engineering, estimating, purchasing, inventory,
accounting, or other systems.
Valid time-phased requirements means material that is--
(1) Needed to fulfill the production plan, including reasonable
quantities for scrap, shrinkage, yield, etc.; and
(2) Charged or billed to contracts or other cost objectives in a
manner consistent with the need to fulfill the production plan.
242.7202 [Amended]
0
10. Amend section 242.7202 in paragraph (b)(2) by removing ``any
deficiencies'' and adding ``any weaknesses or deficiencies'' in its
place.
0
11. Amend section 242.7203 by--
0
a. Revising and republishing paragraph (c); and
0
b. Revising paragraph (d).
The revisions and republication read as follows:
242.7203 Review procedures.
* * * * *
(c) Disposition of findings--(1) Reporting of findings. The auditor
or functional specialist shall document findings and recommendations in
a report to the contracting officer. If the auditor or functional
specialist identifies any material weaknesses, the report shall
describe the weaknesses or deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow
the contracting officer to understand the weaknesses or deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The contracting officer shall review
findings and recommendations and, if there are no material weaknesses,
shall promptly notify the contractor, in writing, that the contractor's
MMAS is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
material weaknesses due to the contractor's failure to meet one or more
of the MMAS system criteria in the clause at 252.242-7004, the
contracting officer shall--
(A) Promptly make an initial written determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in writing, providing a
description of each
[[Page 53566]]
material weakness in sufficient detail to allow the contractor to
understand the deficiency;
(B) Request the contractor to respond, in writing, to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor's response to the initial
determination in consultation with the auditor or functional specialist
and make a final determination (see PGI 242.7203(c)(2)).
(3) Final determination. (i) The ACO shall make a final
determination and notify the contractor that--
(A) The contractor's MMAS is acceptable and approved, and no
deficiencies remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The notice shall identify any
remaining material weaknesses and indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The contracting officer shall--
(1) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses;
(2) Disapprove the system in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7004; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7005, Contractor Business Systems, if the clause is included in the
contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of material weaknesses in PGI
242.7203(c)(3).
(d) System approval. The contracting officer shall promptly approve
a previously disapproved MMAS and notify the contractor when the
contracting officer determines that there are no remaining material
weaknesses.
* * * * *
0
12. Revise section 242.7501 to read as follows:
242.7501 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Acceptable accounting system means a system that complies with the
system criteria in paragraph (c) of the clause at 252.242-7006,
Accounting System Administration, to provide reasonable assurance
that--
(1) Applicable laws and regulations are complied with;
(2) The accounting system and cost data are reliable;
(3) Risk of misallocations and mischarges are minimized; and
(4) Contract allocations and charges are consistent with billing
procedures.
Accounting system means the contractor's system or systems for
accounting methods, procedures, and controls established to gather,
record, classify, analyze, summarize, interpret, and present accurate
and timely financial data for reporting in compliance with applicable
laws, regulations, and management decisions, and may include subsystems
for specific areas such as indirect and other direct costs,
compensation, billing, labor, and general information technology.
0
13. Amend section 242.7502--
0
a. In paragraph (b)(2) by removing ``any deficiencies'' and adding
``any weaknesses or deficiencies'' in its place;
0
b. By revising and republishing paragraph (d);
0
c. By revising paragraph (e);
0
d. In the paragraph (g) heading and paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2)(i) by
removing ``accounting system'';
0
e. In paragraph (g)(2)(iii) by removing ``accounting system's''; and
0
f. In paragraph (g)(3) introductory text by removing ``an accounting
system deficiency'' and adding ``a deficiency'' in its place.
The revisions and republication read as follows:
242.7502 Policy.
* * * * *
(d) Disposition of findings--(1) Reporting of findings. The auditor
shall document findings and recommendations in a report to the
contracting officer. If the auditor identifies any material weakness,
the report shall describe the weaknesses or deficiencies in sufficient
detail to allow the contracting officer to understand the weaknesses or
deficiencies. Follow the procedures at PGI 242.7502 for reporting of
deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The contracting officer shall review
findings and recommendations and, if there are no material weaknesses,
shall promptly notify the contractor, in writing, that the contractor's
accounting system is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
material weaknesses due to the contractor's failure to meet one or more
of the accounting system criteria in the clause at 252.242-7006, the
contracting officer shall--
(A) Promptly make an initial written determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in writing, providing a
description of each material weakness in sufficient detail to allow the
contractor to understand the weakness (see PGI 242.7502(d)(2));
(B) Request the contractor to respond, in writing, to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(C) Promptly evaluate the contractor's response to the initial
determination, in consultation with the auditor or functional
specialist, and make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The contracting officer shall make a
final determination and notify the contractor, in writing, that--
(A) The contractor's accounting system is acceptable and approved,
and no material weaknesses remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The notice shall identify any
remaining material weaknesses and indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The contracting officer shall--
(1) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses;
(2) Make a determination to disapprove the system in accordance
with the clause at 252.242-7006; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7005, Contractor Business Systems, if the clause is included in the
contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of material weaknesses in PGI
242.7502(d)(3).
(e) System approval. The contracting officer shall promptly approve
a previously disapproved accounting system and notify the contractor
when the contracting officer determines that there are no remaining
material weaknesses.
* * * * *
PART 244--SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
0
14. Revise section 244.101 to read as follows:
244.101 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Acceptable purchasing system means a purchasing system that
complies with the system criteria in paragraph (c) of the clause at
252.244-7001.
Purchasing system means the contractor's system or systems for
purchasing and subcontracting, including make-or-buy decisions, the
selection of vendors, analysis of quoted prices, negotiation of prices
with vendors, placing and administering of orders, and expediting
delivery of materials.
0
15. Amend section 244.305-70--
0
a. In the introductory text be removing ``subsection'' and adding
``section'' in its place;
0
b. By revising and republishing paragraph (c);
[[Page 53567]]
0
c. By revising paragraph (d);
0
d. In the paragraph (f) heading and paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2)(i) by
removing ``purchasing system'';
0
e. In paragraph (f)(2)(iii) by removing ``purchasing system's''; and
0
f. In paragraph (f)(3) introductory text by removing ``purchasing
system''.
The revisions and republication read as follows:
244.305-70 Policy.
* * * * *
(c) Disposition of findings--(1) Reporting of findings. The
purchasing system analyst or auditor shall document findings and
recommendations in a report to the contracting officer. If the auditor
or purchasing system analyst identifies any material weaknesses, the
report shall describe the underlying deficiencies in sufficient detail
to allow the contracting officer to understand the weaknesses and
deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The contracting officer shall review
all findings and recommendations and, if there are no material
weaknesses, shall promptly notify the contractor that the contractor's
purchasing system is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
material weaknesses due to the contractor's failure to meet one or more
of the purchasing system criteria in the clause at 252.244-7001, the
contracting officer shall--
(A) Promptly make an initial written determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in writing, providing a
description of each material weakness in sufficient detail to allow the
contractor to understand the weakness (see PGI 244.305-70(c)(2));
(B) Request the contractor to respond, in writing, to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(C) Evaluate the contractor's response to the initial determination
in consultation with the auditor or purchasing system analyst and make
a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The contracting officer shall make a
final determination and notify the contractor, in writing, that--
(A) The contractor's purchasing system is acceptable and approved,
and no material weaknesses remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The notice shall identify any
remaining material weaknesses and indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The contracting officer shall--
(1) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses;
(2) Disapprove the system in accordance with the clause at 252.244-
7001; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7005, Contractor Business Systems, if the clause is included in the
contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of material weaknesses in PGI
244.305-70(c)(3).
(d) System approval. The contracting officer shall promptly approve
a previously disapproved purchasing system and notify the contractor
when the contracting officer determines that there are no remaining
material weaknesses.
* * * * *
PART 245--GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
0
16. Amend section 245.105--
0
a. By revising paragraph (a);
0
b. In paragraph (b)(2) by removing ``any deficiencies'' and adding
``any weaknesses or deficiencies'' in its place;
0
c. By revising and republishing paragraph (d); and
0
d. In paragraph (e) by removing ``significant deficiencies'' and adding
``material weaknesses'' in its place.
The revisions and republication read as follows:
245.105 Contractors' property management system compliance.
(a) Definitions. As used in this subpart--
Acceptable property management system means a property system that
complies with the system criteria in paragraph (c) of the clause at
252.245-7003, Contractor Property Management Administration.
Property management system means the contractor's system or systems
for managing and controlling Government property.
* * * * *
(d) Disposition of findings--(1) Reporting of findings. The
property administrator shall document findings and recommendations in a
report to the contracting officer. If the property administrator
identifies any material weaknesses, the report shall describe the
underlying deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow the contracting
officer to understand the weaknesses or deficiencies.
(2) Initial determination. (i) The contracting officer shall review
findings and recommendations and, if there are no material weaknesses,
shall promptly notify the contractor, in writing, that the contractor's
property management system is acceptable and approved; or
(ii) If the contracting officer finds that there are one or more
material weaknesses due to the contractor's failure to meet one or more
of the property management system criteria in the clause at 252.245-
7003, the contracting officer shall--
(A) Promptly make an initial written determination on any material
weaknesses and notify the contractor, in writing, providing a
description of each material weakness in sufficient detail to allow the
contractor to understand the weakness (see PGI 245.105(d)(2));
(B) Request the contractor to respond, in writing, to the initial
determination within 30 days; and
(C) Evaluate the contractor's response to the initial
determination, in consultation with the property administrator, and
make a final determination.
(3) Final determination. (i) The contracting officer shall make a
final determination and notify the contractor, in writing, that--
(A) The contractor's property management system is acceptable and
approved, and no material weaknesses remain; or
(B) Material weaknesses remain. The notice shall identify any
remaining material weaknesses and indicate the adequacy of any proposed
or completed corrective action. The contracting officer shall--
(1) Request that the contractor, within 45 days of receipt of the
final determination, either correct the weaknesses or submit an
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the weaknesses;
(2) Disapprove the system in accordance with the clause at 252.245-
7003; and
(3) Withhold payments in accordance with the clause at 252.242-
7005, Contractor Business Systems, if the clause is included in the
contract.
(ii) Follow the procedures relating to monitoring a contractor's
corrective action and the correction of material weaknesses in PGI
245.105(d)(3).
* * * * *
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
17. Amend section 252.215-7002--
0
a. By revising the section heading and clause date;
0
b. In paragraph (a) by--
0
i. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Material
weakness''; and
[[Page 53568]]
0
ii. Removing the definition of ``Significant deficiency'';
0
c. By revising and republishing paragraph (e); and
0
d. By revising paragraph (f).
The addition, revisions, and republication read as follows:
252.215-7002 Cost Estimating System Requirements.
* * * * *
Cost Estimating System Requirements (Date)
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in contractor business
systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the
likelihood of an event occurring is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
* * * * *
(e) Material weaknesses. (1) The Contracting Officer will provide
an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any material
weaknesses. The initial determination will describe the underlying
deficiency in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand
the weakness or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
material weaknesses in the Contractor's estimating system. If the
Contractor disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(iii) System disapproval, if the Contracting Officer determines
that one or more material weaknesses remain.
(f) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of material weaknesses, the Contractor shall, within 45
days of receipt of the final determination, either correct the material
weaknesses or submit an acceptable corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the material weaknesses.
* * * * *
0
18. Amend section 252.234-7002--
0
a. By revising the clause date;
0
b. In paragraph (a) by--
0
i. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Material
weakness''; and
0
ii. Removing the definition of ``Significant deficiency'';
0
c. By revising and republishing paragraph (i); and
0
d. By adding a heading to paragraph (k).
The additions, revisions, and republication read as follows:
252.234-7002 Earned Value Management System.
* * * * *
Earned Value Management System (Date)
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in contractor business
systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the
likelihood of an event occurring is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
* * * * *
(i) Material weaknesses. (1) The Contracting Officer will provide
an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any material
weaknesses. The initial determination will describe the underlying
deficiency in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand
the weakness or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
material weaknesses in the Contractor's EVMS. If the Contractor
disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor shall state,
in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
(iii) System noncompliance, when the Contractor's existing EVMS
fails to comply with the earned value management system guidelines in
the ANSI/EIA-748; and
(iv) System disapproval, if initial EVMS validation is not
successfully completed within the timeframe approved by the Contracting
Officer, or if the Contracting Officer determines that the Contractor's
earned value management system contains one or more material weaknesses
in high-risk guidelines in ANSI/EIA-748 standards (guidelines 1, 3, 6,
7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 21, 23, 26, 27, 28, 30, or 32). When the
Contracting Officer determines that the existing earned value
management system contains one or more material weaknesses in one or
more of the remaining 16 guidelines in ANSI/EIA-748 standards, the
Contracting Officer will use discretion to disapprove the system based
on input received from functional specialists and the auditor.
(4) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of material weaknesses, the Contractor shall, within 45
days of receipt of the final determination, either correct the material
weaknesses or submit an acceptable corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the material weaknesses.
* * * * *
(k) Subcontracts. * * *
* * * * *
0
19. Amend section 252.242-7004 by--
0
a. Revising the clause date and paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising and republishing paragraph (e); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (f).
The revisions and republication read as follows:
252.242-7004 Material Management and Accounting System.
* * * * *
Material Management and Accounting System (Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Acceptable material management and accounting system means a
material management and accounting system that generally complies with
the system criteria in paragraph (d) of this clause.
Contractor means a business unit as defined in Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) 2.101.
Material management and accounting system (MMAS) means the
Contractor's system or systems for planning, controlling, and
accounting for the acquisition, use, issuing, and disposition of
material. Material management and accounting systems may be manual or
automated. They may be stand-alone systems, or they may be integrated
with planning, engineering, estimating, purchasing, inventory,
accounting, or other systems.
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in
[[Page 53569]]
contractor business systems, such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of such information will not
be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A
reasonable possibility exists when the likelihood of an event occurring
is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
Valid time-phased requirements means material that is--
(1) Needed to fulfill the production plan, including reasonable
quantities for scrap, shrinkage, yield, etc.; and
(2) Charged or billed to contracts or other cost objectives in a
manner consistent with the need to fulfill the production plan.
* * * * *
(e) Material weaknesses. (1) The Contracting Officer will provide
an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any material
weaknesses. The initial determination will describe the underlying
deficiencies in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand
the weaknesses or deficiencies.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
material weaknesses in the Contractor's MMAS. If the Contractor
disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor shall state,
in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(iii) System disapproval if the Contracting Officer determines that
one or more material weaknesses remain.
(f) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of material weaknesses, the Contractor shall, within 45
days of receipt of the final determination, either correct the material
weaknesses or submit an acceptable corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the material weaknesses.
* * * * *
0
20. Amend section 252.242-7005--
0
a. By revising the section heading and clause date;
0
b. In paragraph (b) by--
0
i. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Material
weakness''; and
0
ii. Removing the definition of ``Significant deficiency''; and
0
c. By revising paragraphs (d), (e)(1) and (2), (e)(3)(i), and (f).
The addition and revisions read as follows:
252.242-7005 Contractor Business Systems.
* * * * *
Contractor Business Systems (Date)
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in contractor business
systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the
likelihood of an event occurring is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
* * * * *
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The Contractor shall respond, in
writing, within 30 days to an initial determination that there are one
or more material weaknesses in one or more of the Contractor's business
systems.
(2) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the final determination as to
whether the Contractor's business system contains material weaknesses.
If the Contracting Officer determines that the Contractor's business
system contains material weaknesses, the final determination will
include a notice to withhold payments.
(e) * * *
(1) If the Contracting Officer issues the final determination with
a notice to withhold payments for material weaknesses in a contractor
business system required under this contract, the Contracting Officer
will withhold 5 percent of amounts due from progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct the Contractor, in writing, to
withhold 5 percent from its billings on interim cost vouchers on cost-
reimbursement, labor-hour, and time-and-materials contracts until the
Contracting Officer has determined that the Contractor has corrected
all material weaknesses as directed by the Contracting Officer's final
determination. The Contractor shall, within 45 days of receipt of the
notice, either correct the weaknesses or submit an acceptable
corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to eliminate the
weaknesses.
(2) If the Contractor submits an acceptable corrective action plan
within 45 days of receipt of a notice of the Contracting Officer's
intent to withhold payments, and the Contracting Officer, in
consultation with the auditor or functional specialist, determines that
the Contractor is effectively implementing such plan, the Contracting
Officer will reduce withholding directly related to the material
weaknesses covered under the corrective action plan, to 2 percent from
progress payments and performance-based payments, and direct the
Contractor, in writing, to reduce the percentage withheld on interim
cost vouchers to 2 percent until the Contracting Officer determines the
Contractor has corrected all material weaknesses as directed by the
Contracting Officer's final determination. However, if at any time, the
Contracting Officer determines that the Contractor has failed to follow
the accepted corrective action plan, the Contracting Officer will
increase withholding from progress payments and performance-based
payments, and direct the Contractor, in writing, to increase the
percentage withheld on interim cost vouchers to the percentage
initially withheld, until the Contracting Officer determines that the
Contractor has corrected all material weaknesses as directed by the
Contracting Officer's final determination.
(3) * * *
(i) The total percentage of payments withheld on amounts due under
each progress payment, performance-based payment, or interim cost
voucher on this contract shall not exceed--
(A) Five percent for one or more material weaknesses in any single
contractor business system; and
(B) Ten percent for material weaknesses in multiple contractor
business systems.
* * * * *
(f) Correction of weaknesses. (1) The Contractor shall notify the
Contracting Officer, in writing, when the Contractor has corrected the
business system's weaknesses.
(2) Once the Contractor has notified the Contracting Officer that
all weaknesses have been corrected, the Contracting Officer will take
one of the following actions:
[[Page 53570]]
(i) If the Contracting Officer determines that the Contractor has
corrected all material weaknesses as directed by the Contracting
Officer's final determination, the Contracting Officer will, as
appropriate, discontinue the withholding of progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct the Contractor, in writing, to
discontinue the payment withholding from billings on interim cost
vouchers under this contract associated with the Contracting Officer's
final determination, and authorize the Contractor to bill for any
monies previously withheld that are not also being withheld due to
other material weaknesses. Any payment withholding under this contract
due to other material weaknesses will remain in effect until the
Contracting Officer determines that those material weaknesses are
corrected.
(ii) If the Contracting Officer determines that the Contractor
still has material weaknesses, the Contracting Officer will continue
the withholding of progress payments and performance-based payments,
and the Contractor shall continue withholding amounts from its billings
on interim cost vouchers in accordance with paragraph (e) of this
clause, and not bill for any monies previously withheld.
(iii) If the Contracting Officer determines, based on the evidence
submitted by the Contractor, that there is a reasonable expectation
that the corrective actions have been implemented and are expected to
correct the material weaknesses, the Contracting Officer will
discontinue withholding payments, release any payments previously
withheld directly related to the material weaknesses identified in the
Contractor notification, direct the Contractor, in writing, to
discontinue the payment withholding from billings on interim cost
vouchers associated with the Contracting Officer's final determination,
and authorize the Contractor to bill for any monies previously
withheld.
(iv) If, within 90 days of receipt of the Contractor notification
that the Contractor has corrected the material weaknesses, the
Contracting Officer has not made a determination in accordance with
paragraph (f)(2)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this clause, the Contracting
Officer will reduce withholding directly related to the material
weaknesses identified in the Contractor notification by at least 50
percent of the amount being withheld from progress payments and
performance-based payments, and direct the Contractor, in writing, to
reduce the payment withholding from billings on interim cost vouchers
directly related to the material weaknesses identified in the
Contractor notification by a specified percentage that is at least 50
percent, but not authorize the Contractor to bill for any monies
previously withheld until the Contracting Officer makes a determination
in accordance with paragraph (f)(2)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this clause.
(v) At any time after the Contracting Officer reduces or
discontinues the withholding of progress payments and performance-based
payments, or directs the Contractor to reduce or discontinue the
payment withholding from billings on interim cost vouchers under this
contract, if the Contracting Officer determines that the Contractor has
failed to correct the material weaknesses identified in the
Contractor's notification, the Contracting Officer will reinstate or
increase withholding from progress payments and performance-based
payments, and direct the Contractor, in writing, to reinstate or
increase the percentage withheld on interim cost vouchers to the
percentage initially withheld, until the Contracting Officer determines
that the Contractor has corrected all material weaknesses as directed
by the Contracting Officer's final determination.
* * * * *
0
21. Amend section 252.242-7006 by--
0
a. Revising the section heading, clause date, and paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising and republishing paragraph (d); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions and republication read as follows:
252.242-7006 Accounting System Administration.
* * * * *
Accounting System Administration (Date)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Acceptable accounting system means a system that complies with the
system criteria in paragraph (c) of this clause to provide reasonable
assurance that--
(1) Applicable laws and regulations are complied with;
(2) The accounting system and cost data are reliable;
(3) Risk of misallocations and mischarges are minimized; and
(4) Contract allocations and charges are consistent with billing
procedures.
Accounting system means the Contractor's system or systems for
accounting methods, procedures, and controls established to gather,
record, classify, analyze, summarize, interpret, and present accurate
and timely financial data for reporting in compliance with applicable
laws, regulations, and management decisions, and may include subsystems
for specific areas such as indirect and other direct costs,
compensation, billing, labor, and general information technology.
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in contractor business
systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the
likelihood of an event occurring is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
* * * * *
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The Contracting Officer will provide
an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any material
weaknesses. The initial determination will describe the underlying
deficiency in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand
the weakness or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
material weaknesses in the Contractor's accounting system. If the
Contractor disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(iii) System disapproval, if the Contracting Officer determines
that one or more material weaknesses remain.
(e) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of material weaknesses, the Contractor shall, within 45
days of receipt of the final determination, either correct the material
weaknesses or submit an acceptable corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the material weaknesses.
* * * * *
0
22. Amend section 252.244-7001--
0
a. By revising the section heading and clause date;
0
b. In paragraph (a) by--
0
i. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Material
weakness''; and
0
ii. Removing the definition of ``Significant deficiency'';
0
c. By revising and republishing paragraph (d);
[[Page 53571]]
0
d. By revising paragraph (e); and
0
e. In Alternate I--
0
i. By revising the clause date;
0
ii. In paragraph (a)--
0
A. By adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Material
weakness''; and
0
B. By removing the definition of ``Significant deficiency'';
0
iii. By revising and republishing paragraph (d); and
0
iv. By revising paragraph (e).
The additions, revisions, and republications read as follows:
252.244-7001 Contractor Purchasing System Administration.
* * * * *
Contractor Purchasing System Administration--Basic (Date)
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in contractor business
systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the
likelihood of an event occurring is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
* * * * *
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The Contracting Officer will provide
notification of initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of
any material weaknesses. The initial determination will describe the
underlying deficiency in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weakness or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
material weaknesses in the Contractor's purchasing system. If the
Contractor disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(iii) System disapproval, if the Contracting Officer determines
that one or more material weaknesses remain.
(e) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of material weaknesses, the Contractor shall, within 45
days of receipt of the final determination, either correct the material
weaknesses or submit an acceptable corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the weaknesses.
* * * * *
Alternate I. * * *
Contractor Purchasing System Administration--Alternate I (Date)
* * * * *
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in contractor business
systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the
likelihood of an event occurring is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
* * * * *
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The Contracting Officer will provide
notification of initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of
any material weaknesses. The initial determination will describe the
underlying deficiency in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to
understand the weaknesses or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
material weaknesses in the Contractor's purchasing system. If the
Contractor disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(iii) System disapproval, if the Contracting Officer determines
that one or more material weaknesses remain.
(e) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of material weaknesses, the Contractor shall, within 45
days of receipt of the final determination, either correct the material
weaknesses or submit an acceptable corrective action plan showing
milestones and actions to eliminate the weaknesses.
* * * * *
0
23. Amend section 252.245-7003--
0
a. By revising the clause date;
0
b. In paragraph (a) by--
0
i. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Material
weakness''; and
0
ii. Removing the definition of ``Significant deficiency'';
0
c. By revising and republishing paragraph (d); and
0
d. By revising paragraph (e).
The addition, revisions, and republication read as follows:
252.245-7003 Contractor Property Management System Administration.
* * * * *
Contractor Property Management System Administration (Date)
(a) * * *
Material weakness means a deficiency or combination of deficiencies
in the internal control over information in contractor business
systems, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of such information will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the
likelihood of an event occurring is--
(1) Probable; or
(2) More than remote but less than likely (section 806 of Pub. L.
116-283).
* * * * *
(d) Material weaknesses. (1) The Contracting Officer will provide
an initial determination to the Contractor, in writing, of any material
weaknesses. The initial determination will describe the underlying
deficiency in sufficient detail to allow the Contractor to understand
the weaknesses or deficiency.
(2) The Contractor shall respond within 30 days to a written
initial determination from the Contracting Officer that identifies
material weaknesses in the Contractor's property management system. If
the Contractor disagrees with the initial determination, the Contractor
shall state, in writing, its rationale for disagreeing.
(3) The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's response
and notify the Contractor, in writing, of the Contracting Officer's
final determination concerning--
(i) Remaining material weaknesses;
(ii) The adequacy of any proposed or completed corrective action;
and
(iii) System disapproval, if the Contracting Officer determines
that one or more material weaknesses remain.
(e) If the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer's final
determination of material weaknesses, the Contractor shall, within 45
days of receipt of the final determination, either correct the material
weaknesses or submit an
[[Page 53572]]
acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to
eliminate the material weaknesses.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-13864 Filed 6-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P