In the Matter of: USGoBuy, LLC, 6804 NE 79th Ct., Building A, Portland, OR 97218, Respondent; Order Activating Suspended Portion of Civil Penalty and Activating Suspended Denial of Export Privileges Against USGoBuy, LLC, 52022-52024 [2024-13508]
Download as PDF
52022
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices
households and is designed to
supplement the federal statistical
system’s traditional benchmark data
products with a new data source that
provides relevant and timely
information based on a high-quality
sample frame, data integration, and
cooperative expertise.
Affected Public: Households.
Frequency: Households will be
selected once to participate in a 20minute survey.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13, United
States Code, Sections 8(b), 182 and 193.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view the
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection
or the OMB Control Number 0607–1029.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2024–13668 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–34–2024]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 29,
Notification of Proposed Production
Activity; Catalent Pharma Solutions,
LLC (Catalent); (Nonsteroidal
Antiandrogen Tablets); Winchester,
Kentucky
Catalent submitted a notification of
proposed production activity to the FTZ
Board (the Board) for its facility in
Winchester, Kentucky within FTZ 29.
The notification conforming to the
requirements of the Board’s regulations
(15 CFR 400.22) was received on June
11, 2024.
Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ
production activity would be limited to
the specific foreign-status material(s)/
component(s) and specific finished
product(s) described in the submitted
notification (summarized below) and
subsequently authorized by the Board.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Jun 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
The benefits that may stem from
conducting production activity under
FTZ procedures are explained in the
background section of the Board’s
website—accessible via www.trade.gov/
ftz.
The proposed finished products
include: nonsteroidal antiandrogen
tablets (duty-free).
The proposed foreign-status
materials/components include:
apalutamide (active pharmaceutical
ingredient) (duty rate of 6.5%).
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the Board’s Executive
Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The
closing period for their receipt is July
31, 2024.
A copy of the notification will be
available for public inspection in the
‘‘Online FTZ Information System’’
section of the Board’s website.
For further information, contact
Kolade Osho at Kolade.Osho@trade.gov.
Dated: June 14, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–13534 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
In the Matter of: USGoBuy, LLC, 6804
NE 79th Ct., Building A, Portland, OR
97218, Respondent; Order Activating
Suspended Portion of Civil Penalty and
Activating Suspended Denial of Export
Privileges Against USGoBuy, LLC
On June 17, 2021, then-Acting
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement, Kevin J. Kurland
signed an order (the ‘‘June 17, 2021
Order’’) approving the terms of a
settlement agreement (the ‘‘Settlement
Agreement’’) between the Bureau of
Industry and Security, U.S. Department
of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’), and USGoBuy,
LLC (‘‘USGoBuy’’ or ‘‘the Company’’).
USGoBuy is a package forwarding
company based in Portland, Oregon that
offers a service that allows non-U.S.based customers to purchase items
online from U.S. retailers and have
those items shipped to the Company’s
warehouse in Oregon. USGoBuy then
consolidates various items ordered by
its customers and re-packages the items
for export from the United States.
USGoBuy also offers a ‘‘BuyForMe’’
service in which it purchases U.S.origin items on behalf of its customers,
and then exports the items to a foreign
addressee and address provided by the
customer.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Settlement Agreement and the
June 17, 2021 Order relate to an
enforcement action brought by BIS
against USGoBuy for exporting
riflescopes, items classified under
Export Control Classification Number
(‘‘ECCN’’) 0A987.a, controlled for Crime
Control reasons, to China and the
United Arab Emirates, without seeking
or obtaining the licenses required for
these exports, in violation of the Export
Administration Regulations (the
‘‘Regulations’’).1
The Settlement Agreement and June
17, 2021 Order imposed on USGoBuy a
civil penalty of $20,000. USGoBuy was
required to pay $5,000 of this amount to
the Department of Commerce by July 17,
2021. Payment of the remaining $15,000
was suspended for a probationary
period of three years from the date of
the June 17, 2021 Order, after which it
would be waived, provided that during
this three-year probationary period,
USGoBuy paid the $5,000 nonsuspended portion of the civil penalty,
committed no other violation of the
Regulations, and completed an
independent, external audit (the
‘‘Export Compliance Audit’’ or
‘‘Audit’’).
The June 17, 2021 Order required that
the Export Compliance Audit cover the
12-month period after the June 17, 2021
Order and be in substantial compliance
with the Export Compliance Program
sample audit module published by BIS.
To the extent USGoBuy identified any
violations of the Regulations through
the Audit, the June 17, 2021 Order
required USGoBuy to promptly provide
supporting documentation related to the
violations and a detailed plan of
corrective actions to be taken.
In addition, the June 17, 2021 Order
also imposed a three-year denial of
USGoBuy’s export privileges under the
Regulations. This denial order was
suspended pursuant to section 766.18(c)
of the Regulations, subject to the same
probationary conditions described
above. According to the June 17, 2021
Order, if USGoBuy failed to make full
and timely payment of the nonsuspended penalty, did not complete
the audit and submit the results as
required by the Settlement Agreement,
or if USGoBuy committed additional
violations of the Regulations during the
three-year probationary period, BIS
could modify or revoke the suspended
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2024). The violations at issue in the Settlement
Agreement occurred in 2015. The Regulations
governing those violations are found in the 2015
version of the Code of Federations (15 CFR parts
730–774). The 2024 Regulations set forth the
procedures that apply to this matter.
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices
denial order and activate against
USGoBuy a denial order including a
denial period of up to three years.
BIS has brought to my attention that
following the imposition of the June 17,
2021 Order, USGoBuy failed to
implement corrective actions in
response to the 2015 violations and
committed additional violations of the
Regulations during the probationary
period in violation of the June 17, 2021
Order.2 Moreover, even after identifying
violations that occurred during the
probationary period, USGoBuy failed to
implement corrective actions to address
those additional violations.
Specifically, through the Export
Compliance Audit, the results of which
USGoBuy submitted over 18 months
after the June 17, 2021 Order, USGoBuy
identified significant continued
deficiencies in its export compliance
program, including with respect to
identifying items for which export
authorization may be required and
related recordkeeping requirements
under the Regulations. The Company
also identified through the Audit 176
instances in which the Company failed
to submit Electronic Export Information
as required by the Regulations and
additional exports for which the
Company failed to maintain adequate
records as required by the Regulations.
Despite identifying these continued
deficiencies through the Audit,
USGoBuy did not implement
corresponding corrective actions to
address the findings of its Audit as
required by the June 17, 2021 Order.
Most notably, the Company did not
implement adequate enhancements
designed to appropriately identify items
in the packages it exports that may
require export authorization from BIS
and a corresponding process to either
refrain from exporting such items or to
seek appropriate authorization.
Separately, in November 2022,
Homeland Security Investigations
(‘‘HSI’’) intercepted a shipment of an
item to USGoBuy on behalf of one of the
Company’s customers. The item
required authorization for export from
the United States to China. After
intercepting the shipment, HSI replaced
the item with one that did not require
authorization, and added conspicuous
markings to the outside of the package
indicating that authorization to export
the package was required. HSI then
allowed the package to continue in
transit to USGoBuy. Despite the
conspicuous export control markings on
2 USGoBuy also only paid the $5,000 nonsuspended portion of its monetary penalty on
October 19, 2021—over 90 days after the date
established in the June 17, 2021 Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Jun 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
the package, USGoBuy exported the
package to China on the same day it
received it without attempting to obtain
authorization. This event illustrates that
despite being subject to a suspended
three-year denial order, USGoBuy did
not have in place appropriate export
clearance procedures to prevent an
unauthorized export even where a
package had explicit export control
markings notifying USGoBuy that
export authorization was required.
As a result of the conduct described
above, USGoBuy has violated the
probationary conditions relating to the
suspension of the denial of their export
privileges. In accordance with sections
766.17(c) and 766.18(c) of the
Regulations, by letter dated May 15,
2024 (the ‘‘Notice Letter’’), I provided
USGoBuy with notice of my preliminary
determination that the Company
violated the probationary conditions of
the June 17, 2021 Order and included a
summary of the facts on which I based
my preliminary determination, which
are also outlined above. The Notice
Letter provided the Company with an
opportunity to respond and to show
why I should not activate the $15,000
suspended penalty amount, issue an
active three-year denial order against
them, or take both actions.
In response, USGoBuy submitted a
written submission to me on May 30,
2024, which I fully considered. In the
response, USGoBuy did not dispute any
of the facts outlined above that form the
basis of my determination that the
Company violated the probationary
conditions related to the suspended
penalties in this matter. In addition,
USGoBuy provided no explanation as to
why it failed to implement adequate
compliance controls after the June 17,
2021 Order or after the findings from the
Audit. USGoBuy did outline in its
response certain compliance
enhancements that it implemented in
May 2024, but these enhancements do
not appear reasonably designed to
address the Company’s past violations
or to identify and prevent future
potential misconduct. As a result, the
Company’s response did not provide a
sufficient showing as to why I should
not activate the suspended penalties in
this matter.
Based on the totality of circumstances
here, I have determined within my
discretion that it is appropriate to
activate a denial order for a period of
three years.
It is therefore ordered:
First, for a period of three years from
the date of this Order, USGoBuy, LLC,
with a last known address of 6804 NE
79th Ct., Building A, Portland, OR
97218, and when acting for or on its
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52023
behalf, its successors, assigns,
representatives, agents, or employees
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘Denied Persons’’), may not, directly or
indirectly, participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, license exception, or export
control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or engaging
in any other activity subject to the
Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of a Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
a Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby a Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from a Denied Person of any
item subject to the Regulations that has
been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the
United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by a Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
52024
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in section 766.23
of the Regulations, any person, firm,
corporation, or business organization
related to a Denied Person by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order.
Fourth, any license issued pursuant to
the Act or Regulations in which
USGoBuy has an interest of the date of
this Order is hereby revoked.
Fifth, this Order shall be served on
USGoBuy, and shall be published in the
Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately.
Matthew S. Axelrod,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2024–13508 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–853]
Notice of Extension of the Deadline for
Determining the Adequacy of the
Antidumping Duty Petition: Large Top
Mount Combination RefrigeratorFreezers From Thailand
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable June 14, 2024.
Lilit
Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Extension of Initiation of Investigation
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Petition
On May 30, 2024, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
received an antidumping duty petition
on imports of large top mount
combination refrigerator-freezers
(refrigerators) from Thailand, filed in
proper form on behalf of Electrolux
Consumer Products, Inc. (the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Jun 20, 2024
Jkt 262001
petitioner), a domestic producer of
refrigerators.1
Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition
Section 732(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), requires
that a petition be filed by or on behalf
of the domestic industry. To determine
that the petition has been filed by or on
behalf of the industry, section
732(c)(4)(A) of the Act requires that the
domestic producers or workers who
support the petition account for: (i) at
least 25 percent of the total production
of the domestic like product; and (ii)
more than 50 percent of the production
of the domestic like product produced
by that portion of the industry
expressing support for, or opposition to,
the petition. Moreover, section
732(c)(4)(D) of the Act provides that, if
the petition does not establish support
of domestic producers or workers
accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like
product, Commerce shall: (i) poll the
industry or rely on other information in
order to determine if there is support for
the petition, as required by
subparagraph (A); or (ii) if there is a
large number of producers, determine
industry support using a statistically
valid sampling method to poll the
industry.
Extension of Time
Section 732(c)(1)(A) of the Act
provides that within 20 days of the
filing of an antidumping duty petition,
Commerce will determine, inter alia,
whether the petition has been filed by
or on behalf of the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product.
Section 732(c)(1)(B) of the Act provides
that the deadline for the initiation
determination, in exceptional
circumstances, may be extended by 20
days in any case in which Commerce
must ‘‘poll or otherwise determine
support for the petition by the
industry.’’ Because the Petition has not
established that the domestic producers
or workers accounting for more than 50
percent of total production support the
Petition, in accordance with section
732(c)(4)(D) of the Act, Commerce has
determined that it should poll the
industry and extend the time period for
determining whether to initiate the
investigation in order to further examine
the issue of industry support.
Commerce will need additional time
to gather and analyze additional
information regarding industry support.
1 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petition for the
Imposition of Antidumping Duties,’’ dated May 30,
2024 (Petition).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Therefore, it is necessary to extend the
deadline for determining the adequacy
of the Petition for a period not to exceed
40 days from the filing of the Petition.
As a result, in accordance with section
732(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce’s
initiation determination will now be
due no later than July 9, 2024.
International Trade Commission
Notification
Commerce will contact the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC)
and will make this extension notice
available to the ITC.
Dated: June 14, 2024.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2024–13593 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–123]
Certain Corrosion Inhibitors From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain producers and exporters of
certain corrosion inhibitors from the
People’s Republic of China (China)
received countervailable subsidies
during the period of review (POR)
January 1, 2022, through December 31,
2022.
DATES: Applicable June 21, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted
Pearson, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202)-482–2631.
AGENCY:
Background
On April 3, 2024, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the 2022
administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on corrosion
inhibitors from China and invited
comments from interested parties.1 For
1 See Certain Corrosion Inhibitors from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission of Review, in Part, 2022, 89 FR 23001
(April 3, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
(PDM).
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52022-52024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
In the Matter of: USGoBuy, LLC, 6804 NE 79th Ct., Building A,
Portland, OR 97218, Respondent; Order Activating Suspended Portion of
Civil Penalty and Activating Suspended Denial of Export Privileges
Against USGoBuy, LLC
On June 17, 2021, then-Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement, Kevin J. Kurland signed an order (the ``June 17,
2021 Order'') approving the terms of a settlement agreement (the
``Settlement Agreement'') between the Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (``BIS''), and USGoBuy, LLC (``USGoBuy'' or
``the Company''). USGoBuy is a package forwarding company based in
Portland, Oregon that offers a service that allows non-U.S.-based
customers to purchase items online from U.S. retailers and have those
items shipped to the Company's warehouse in Oregon. USGoBuy then
consolidates various items ordered by its customers and re-packages the
items for export from the United States. USGoBuy also offers a
``BuyForMe'' service in which it purchases U.S.-origin items on behalf
of its customers, and then exports the items to a foreign addressee and
address provided by the customer.
The Settlement Agreement and the June 17, 2021 Order relate to an
enforcement action brought by BIS against USGoBuy for exporting
riflescopes, items classified under Export Control Classification
Number (``ECCN'') 0A987.a, controlled for Crime Control reasons, to
China and the United Arab Emirates, without seeking or obtaining the
licenses required for these exports, in violation of the Export
Administration Regulations (the ``Regulations'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2024). The violations
at issue in the Settlement Agreement occurred in 2015. The
Regulations governing those violations are found in the 2015 version
of the Code of Federations (15 CFR parts 730-774). The 2024
Regulations set forth the procedures that apply to this matter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Settlement Agreement and June 17, 2021 Order imposed on USGoBuy
a civil penalty of $20,000. USGoBuy was required to pay $5,000 of this
amount to the Department of Commerce by July 17, 2021. Payment of the
remaining $15,000 was suspended for a probationary period of three
years from the date of the June 17, 2021 Order, after which it would be
waived, provided that during this three-year probationary period,
USGoBuy paid the $5,000 non-suspended portion of the civil penalty,
committed no other violation of the Regulations, and completed an
independent, external audit (the ``Export Compliance Audit'' or
``Audit'').
The June 17, 2021 Order required that the Export Compliance Audit
cover the 12-month period after the June 17, 2021 Order and be in
substantial compliance with the Export Compliance Program sample audit
module published by BIS. To the extent USGoBuy identified any
violations of the Regulations through the Audit, the June 17, 2021
Order required USGoBuy to promptly provide supporting documentation
related to the violations and a detailed plan of corrective actions to
be taken.
In addition, the June 17, 2021 Order also imposed a three-year
denial of USGoBuy's export privileges under the Regulations. This
denial order was suspended pursuant to section 766.18(c) of the
Regulations, subject to the same probationary conditions described
above. According to the June 17, 2021 Order, if USGoBuy failed to make
full and timely payment of the non-suspended penalty, did not complete
the audit and submit the results as required by the Settlement
Agreement, or if USGoBuy committed additional violations of the
Regulations during the three-year probationary period, BIS could modify
or revoke the suspended
[[Page 52023]]
denial order and activate against USGoBuy a denial order including a
denial period of up to three years.
BIS has brought to my attention that following the imposition of
the June 17, 2021 Order, USGoBuy failed to implement corrective actions
in response to the 2015 violations and committed additional violations
of the Regulations during the probationary period in violation of the
June 17, 2021 Order.\2\ Moreover, even after identifying violations
that occurred during the probationary period, USGoBuy failed to
implement corrective actions to address those additional violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ USGoBuy also only paid the $5,000 non-suspended portion of
its monetary penalty on October 19, 2021--over 90 days after the
date established in the June 17, 2021 Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, through the Export Compliance Audit, the results of
which USGoBuy submitted over 18 months after the June 17, 2021 Order,
USGoBuy identified significant continued deficiencies in its export
compliance program, including with respect to identifying items for
which export authorization may be required and related recordkeeping
requirements under the Regulations. The Company also identified through
the Audit 176 instances in which the Company failed to submit
Electronic Export Information as required by the Regulations and
additional exports for which the Company failed to maintain adequate
records as required by the Regulations. Despite identifying these
continued deficiencies through the Audit, USGoBuy did not implement
corresponding corrective actions to address the findings of its Audit
as required by the June 17, 2021 Order. Most notably, the Company did
not implement adequate enhancements designed to appropriately identify
items in the packages it exports that may require export authorization
from BIS and a corresponding process to either refrain from exporting
such items or to seek appropriate authorization.
Separately, in November 2022, Homeland Security Investigations
(``HSI'') intercepted a shipment of an item to USGoBuy on behalf of one
of the Company's customers. The item required authorization for export
from the United States to China. After intercepting the shipment, HSI
replaced the item with one that did not require authorization, and
added conspicuous markings to the outside of the package indicating
that authorization to export the package was required. HSI then allowed
the package to continue in transit to USGoBuy. Despite the conspicuous
export control markings on the package, USGoBuy exported the package to
China on the same day it received it without attempting to obtain
authorization. This event illustrates that despite being subject to a
suspended three-year denial order, USGoBuy did not have in place
appropriate export clearance procedures to prevent an unauthorized
export even where a package had explicit export control markings
notifying USGoBuy that export authorization was required.
As a result of the conduct described above, USGoBuy has violated
the probationary conditions relating to the suspension of the denial of
their export privileges. In accordance with sections 766.17(c) and
766.18(c) of the Regulations, by letter dated May 15, 2024 (the
``Notice Letter''), I provided USGoBuy with notice of my preliminary
determination that the Company violated the probationary conditions of
the June 17, 2021 Order and included a summary of the facts on which I
based my preliminary determination, which are also outlined above. The
Notice Letter provided the Company with an opportunity to respond and
to show why I should not activate the $15,000 suspended penalty amount,
issue an active three-year denial order against them, or take both
actions.
In response, USGoBuy submitted a written submission to me on May
30, 2024, which I fully considered. In the response, USGoBuy did not
dispute any of the facts outlined above that form the basis of my
determination that the Company violated the probationary conditions
related to the suspended penalties in this matter. In addition, USGoBuy
provided no explanation as to why it failed to implement adequate
compliance controls after the June 17, 2021 Order or after the findings
from the Audit. USGoBuy did outline in its response certain compliance
enhancements that it implemented in May 2024, but these enhancements do
not appear reasonably designed to address the Company's past violations
or to identify and prevent future potential misconduct. As a result,
the Company's response did not provide a sufficient showing as to why I
should not activate the suspended penalties in this matter.
Based on the totality of circumstances here, I have determined
within my discretion that it is appropriate to activate a denial order
for a period of three years.
It is therefore ordered:
First, for a period of three years from the date of this Order,
USGoBuy, LLC, with a last known address of 6804 NE 79th Ct., Building
A, Portland, OR 97218, and when acting for or on its behalf, its
successors, assigns, representatives, agents, or employees (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ``Denied Persons''), may not, directly or
indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to
as ``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, license
exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or engaging in any
other activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of a Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control
of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby a Denied Person acquires or
attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from a Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item
[[Page 52024]]
subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the
United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to a Denied Person by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions
of this Order.
Fourth, any license issued pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which USGoBuy has an interest of the date of this Order is hereby
revoked.
Fifth, this Order shall be served on USGoBuy, and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately.
Matthew S. Axelrod,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2024-13508 Filed 6-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P