In the Matter of: USGoBuy, LLC, 6804 NE 79th Ct., Building A, Portland, OR 97218, Respondent; Order Activating Suspended Portion of Civil Penalty and Activating Suspended Denial of Export Privileges Against USGoBuy, LLC, 52022-52024 [2024-13508]

Download as PDF 52022 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices households and is designed to supplement the federal statistical system’s traditional benchmark data products with a new data source that provides relevant and timely information based on a high-quality sample frame, data integration, and cooperative expertise. Affected Public: Households. Frequency: Households will be selected once to participate in a 20minute survey. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Legal Authority: Title 13, United States Code, Sections 8(b), 182 and 193. This information collection request may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view the Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function and entering either the title of the collection or the OMB Control Number 0607–1029. Sheleen Dumas, Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Commerce Department. [FR Doc. 2024–13668 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–34–2024] ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 29, Notification of Proposed Production Activity; Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC (Catalent); (Nonsteroidal Antiandrogen Tablets); Winchester, Kentucky Catalent submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facility in Winchester, Kentucky within FTZ 29. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board’s regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on June 11, 2024. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status material(s)/ component(s) and specific finished product(s) described in the submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Jun 20, 2024 Jkt 262001 The benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section of the Board’s website—accessible via www.trade.gov/ ftz. The proposed finished products include: nonsteroidal antiandrogen tablets (duty-free). The proposed foreign-status materials/components include: apalutamide (active pharmaceutical ingredient) (duty rate of 6.5%). Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is July 31, 2024. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Online FTZ Information System’’ section of the Board’s website. For further information, contact Kolade Osho at Kolade.Osho@trade.gov. Dated: June 14, 2024. Elizabeth Whiteman, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024–13534 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security In the Matter of: USGoBuy, LLC, 6804 NE 79th Ct., Building A, Portland, OR 97218, Respondent; Order Activating Suspended Portion of Civil Penalty and Activating Suspended Denial of Export Privileges Against USGoBuy, LLC On June 17, 2021, then-Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement, Kevin J. Kurland signed an order (the ‘‘June 17, 2021 Order’’) approving the terms of a settlement agreement (the ‘‘Settlement Agreement’’) between the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’), and USGoBuy, LLC (‘‘USGoBuy’’ or ‘‘the Company’’). USGoBuy is a package forwarding company based in Portland, Oregon that offers a service that allows non-U.S.based customers to purchase items online from U.S. retailers and have those items shipped to the Company’s warehouse in Oregon. USGoBuy then consolidates various items ordered by its customers and re-packages the items for export from the United States. USGoBuy also offers a ‘‘BuyForMe’’ service in which it purchases U.S.origin items on behalf of its customers, and then exports the items to a foreign addressee and address provided by the customer. PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Settlement Agreement and the June 17, 2021 Order relate to an enforcement action brought by BIS against USGoBuy for exporting riflescopes, items classified under Export Control Classification Number (‘‘ECCN’’) 0A987.a, controlled for Crime Control reasons, to China and the United Arab Emirates, without seeking or obtaining the licenses required for these exports, in violation of the Export Administration Regulations (the ‘‘Regulations’’).1 The Settlement Agreement and June 17, 2021 Order imposed on USGoBuy a civil penalty of $20,000. USGoBuy was required to pay $5,000 of this amount to the Department of Commerce by July 17, 2021. Payment of the remaining $15,000 was suspended for a probationary period of three years from the date of the June 17, 2021 Order, after which it would be waived, provided that during this three-year probationary period, USGoBuy paid the $5,000 nonsuspended portion of the civil penalty, committed no other violation of the Regulations, and completed an independent, external audit (the ‘‘Export Compliance Audit’’ or ‘‘Audit’’). The June 17, 2021 Order required that the Export Compliance Audit cover the 12-month period after the June 17, 2021 Order and be in substantial compliance with the Export Compliance Program sample audit module published by BIS. To the extent USGoBuy identified any violations of the Regulations through the Audit, the June 17, 2021 Order required USGoBuy to promptly provide supporting documentation related to the violations and a detailed plan of corrective actions to be taken. In addition, the June 17, 2021 Order also imposed a three-year denial of USGoBuy’s export privileges under the Regulations. This denial order was suspended pursuant to section 766.18(c) of the Regulations, subject to the same probationary conditions described above. According to the June 17, 2021 Order, if USGoBuy failed to make full and timely payment of the nonsuspended penalty, did not complete the audit and submit the results as required by the Settlement Agreement, or if USGoBuy committed additional violations of the Regulations during the three-year probationary period, BIS could modify or revoke the suspended 1 The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 774 (2024). The violations at issue in the Settlement Agreement occurred in 2015. The Regulations governing those violations are found in the 2015 version of the Code of Federations (15 CFR parts 730–774). The 2024 Regulations set forth the procedures that apply to this matter. E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices denial order and activate against USGoBuy a denial order including a denial period of up to three years. BIS has brought to my attention that following the imposition of the June 17, 2021 Order, USGoBuy failed to implement corrective actions in response to the 2015 violations and committed additional violations of the Regulations during the probationary period in violation of the June 17, 2021 Order.2 Moreover, even after identifying violations that occurred during the probationary period, USGoBuy failed to implement corrective actions to address those additional violations. Specifically, through the Export Compliance Audit, the results of which USGoBuy submitted over 18 months after the June 17, 2021 Order, USGoBuy identified significant continued deficiencies in its export compliance program, including with respect to identifying items for which export authorization may be required and related recordkeeping requirements under the Regulations. The Company also identified through the Audit 176 instances in which the Company failed to submit Electronic Export Information as required by the Regulations and additional exports for which the Company failed to maintain adequate records as required by the Regulations. Despite identifying these continued deficiencies through the Audit, USGoBuy did not implement corresponding corrective actions to address the findings of its Audit as required by the June 17, 2021 Order. Most notably, the Company did not implement adequate enhancements designed to appropriately identify items in the packages it exports that may require export authorization from BIS and a corresponding process to either refrain from exporting such items or to seek appropriate authorization. Separately, in November 2022, Homeland Security Investigations (‘‘HSI’’) intercepted a shipment of an item to USGoBuy on behalf of one of the Company’s customers. The item required authorization for export from the United States to China. After intercepting the shipment, HSI replaced the item with one that did not require authorization, and added conspicuous markings to the outside of the package indicating that authorization to export the package was required. HSI then allowed the package to continue in transit to USGoBuy. Despite the conspicuous export control markings on 2 USGoBuy also only paid the $5,000 nonsuspended portion of its monetary penalty on October 19, 2021—over 90 days after the date established in the June 17, 2021 Order. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Jun 20, 2024 Jkt 262001 the package, USGoBuy exported the package to China on the same day it received it without attempting to obtain authorization. This event illustrates that despite being subject to a suspended three-year denial order, USGoBuy did not have in place appropriate export clearance procedures to prevent an unauthorized export even where a package had explicit export control markings notifying USGoBuy that export authorization was required. As a result of the conduct described above, USGoBuy has violated the probationary conditions relating to the suspension of the denial of their export privileges. In accordance with sections 766.17(c) and 766.18(c) of the Regulations, by letter dated May 15, 2024 (the ‘‘Notice Letter’’), I provided USGoBuy with notice of my preliminary determination that the Company violated the probationary conditions of the June 17, 2021 Order and included a summary of the facts on which I based my preliminary determination, which are also outlined above. The Notice Letter provided the Company with an opportunity to respond and to show why I should not activate the $15,000 suspended penalty amount, issue an active three-year denial order against them, or take both actions. In response, USGoBuy submitted a written submission to me on May 30, 2024, which I fully considered. In the response, USGoBuy did not dispute any of the facts outlined above that form the basis of my determination that the Company violated the probationary conditions related to the suspended penalties in this matter. In addition, USGoBuy provided no explanation as to why it failed to implement adequate compliance controls after the June 17, 2021 Order or after the findings from the Audit. USGoBuy did outline in its response certain compliance enhancements that it implemented in May 2024, but these enhancements do not appear reasonably designed to address the Company’s past violations or to identify and prevent future potential misconduct. As a result, the Company’s response did not provide a sufficient showing as to why I should not activate the suspended penalties in this matter. Based on the totality of circumstances here, I have determined within my discretion that it is appropriate to activate a denial order for a period of three years. It is therefore ordered: First, for a period of three years from the date of this Order, USGoBuy, LLC, with a last known address of 6804 NE 79th Ct., Building A, Portland, OR 97218, and when acting for or on its PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52023 behalf, its successors, assigns, representatives, agents, or employees (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘Denied Persons’’), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, license exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or engaging in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations. Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of a Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby a Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from a Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 52024 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to a Denied Person by ownership, control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions of this Order. Fourth, any license issued pursuant to the Act or Regulations in which USGoBuy has an interest of the date of this Order is hereby revoked. Fifth, this Order shall be served on USGoBuy, and shall be published in the Federal Register. This Order is effective immediately. Matthew S. Axelrod, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement. [FR Doc. 2024–13508 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–853] Notice of Extension of the Deadline for Determining the Adequacy of the Antidumping Duty Petition: Large Top Mount Combination RefrigeratorFreezers From Thailand Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: DATES: Applicable June 14, 2024. Lilit Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Extension of Initiation of Investigation ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 The Petition On May 30, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) received an antidumping duty petition on imports of large top mount combination refrigerator-freezers (refrigerators) from Thailand, filed in proper form on behalf of Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. (the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Jun 20, 2024 Jkt 262001 petitioner), a domestic producer of refrigerators.1 Determination of Industry Support for the Petition Section 732(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires that a petition be filed by or on behalf of the domestic industry. To determine that the petition has been filed by or on behalf of the industry, section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act requires that the domestic producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and (ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i) poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or (ii) if there is a large number of producers, determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling method to poll the industry. Extension of Time Section 732(c)(1)(A) of the Act provides that within 20 days of the filing of an antidumping duty petition, Commerce will determine, inter alia, whether the petition has been filed by or on behalf of the U.S. industry producing the domestic like product. Section 732(c)(1)(B) of the Act provides that the deadline for the initiation determination, in exceptional circumstances, may be extended by 20 days in any case in which Commerce must ‘‘poll or otherwise determine support for the petition by the industry.’’ Because the Petition has not established that the domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of total production support the Petition, in accordance with section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act, Commerce has determined that it should poll the industry and extend the time period for determining whether to initiate the investigation in order to further examine the issue of industry support. Commerce will need additional time to gather and analyze additional information regarding industry support. 1 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties,’’ dated May 30, 2024 (Petition). PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Therefore, it is necessary to extend the deadline for determining the adequacy of the Petition for a period not to exceed 40 days from the filing of the Petition. As a result, in accordance with section 732(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce’s initiation determination will now be due no later than July 9, 2024. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will contact the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and will make this extension notice available to the ITC. Dated: June 14, 2024. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2024–13593 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–123] Certain Corrosion Inhibitors From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain producers and exporters of certain corrosion inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China (China) received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. DATES: Applicable June 21, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Pearson, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)-482–2631. AGENCY: Background On April 3, 2024, Commerce published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the 2022 administrative review of the countervailing duty order on corrosion inhibitors from China and invited comments from interested parties.1 For 1 See Certain Corrosion Inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in Part, 2022, 89 FR 23001 (April 3, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52022-52024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


In the Matter of: USGoBuy, LLC, 6804 NE 79th Ct., Building A, 
Portland, OR 97218, Respondent; Order Activating Suspended Portion of 
Civil Penalty and Activating Suspended Denial of Export Privileges 
Against USGoBuy, LLC

    On June 17, 2021, then-Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 
Export Enforcement, Kevin J. Kurland signed an order (the ``June 17, 
2021 Order'') approving the terms of a settlement agreement (the 
``Settlement Agreement'') between the Bureau of Industry and Security, 
U.S. Department of Commerce (``BIS''), and USGoBuy, LLC (``USGoBuy'' or 
``the Company''). USGoBuy is a package forwarding company based in 
Portland, Oregon that offers a service that allows non-U.S.-based 
customers to purchase items online from U.S. retailers and have those 
items shipped to the Company's warehouse in Oregon. USGoBuy then 
consolidates various items ordered by its customers and re-packages the 
items for export from the United States. USGoBuy also offers a 
``BuyForMe'' service in which it purchases U.S.-origin items on behalf 
of its customers, and then exports the items to a foreign addressee and 
address provided by the customer.
    The Settlement Agreement and the June 17, 2021 Order relate to an 
enforcement action brought by BIS against USGoBuy for exporting 
riflescopes, items classified under Export Control Classification 
Number (``ECCN'') 0A987.a, controlled for Crime Control reasons, to 
China and the United Arab Emirates, without seeking or obtaining the 
licenses required for these exports, in violation of the Export 
Administration Regulations (the ``Regulations'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of 
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2024). The violations 
at issue in the Settlement Agreement occurred in 2015. The 
Regulations governing those violations are found in the 2015 version 
of the Code of Federations (15 CFR parts 730-774). The 2024 
Regulations set forth the procedures that apply to this matter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Settlement Agreement and June 17, 2021 Order imposed on USGoBuy 
a civil penalty of $20,000. USGoBuy was required to pay $5,000 of this 
amount to the Department of Commerce by July 17, 2021. Payment of the 
remaining $15,000 was suspended for a probationary period of three 
years from the date of the June 17, 2021 Order, after which it would be 
waived, provided that during this three-year probationary period, 
USGoBuy paid the $5,000 non-suspended portion of the civil penalty, 
committed no other violation of the Regulations, and completed an 
independent, external audit (the ``Export Compliance Audit'' or 
``Audit'').
    The June 17, 2021 Order required that the Export Compliance Audit 
cover the 12-month period after the June 17, 2021 Order and be in 
substantial compliance with the Export Compliance Program sample audit 
module published by BIS. To the extent USGoBuy identified any 
violations of the Regulations through the Audit, the June 17, 2021 
Order required USGoBuy to promptly provide supporting documentation 
related to the violations and a detailed plan of corrective actions to 
be taken.
    In addition, the June 17, 2021 Order also imposed a three-year 
denial of USGoBuy's export privileges under the Regulations. This 
denial order was suspended pursuant to section 766.18(c) of the 
Regulations, subject to the same probationary conditions described 
above. According to the June 17, 2021 Order, if USGoBuy failed to make 
full and timely payment of the non-suspended penalty, did not complete 
the audit and submit the results as required by the Settlement 
Agreement, or if USGoBuy committed additional violations of the 
Regulations during the three-year probationary period, BIS could modify 
or revoke the suspended

[[Page 52023]]

denial order and activate against USGoBuy a denial order including a 
denial period of up to three years.
    BIS has brought to my attention that following the imposition of 
the June 17, 2021 Order, USGoBuy failed to implement corrective actions 
in response to the 2015 violations and committed additional violations 
of the Regulations during the probationary period in violation of the 
June 17, 2021 Order.\2\ Moreover, even after identifying violations 
that occurred during the probationary period, USGoBuy failed to 
implement corrective actions to address those additional violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ USGoBuy also only paid the $5,000 non-suspended portion of 
its monetary penalty on October 19, 2021--over 90 days after the 
date established in the June 17, 2021 Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, through the Export Compliance Audit, the results of 
which USGoBuy submitted over 18 months after the June 17, 2021 Order, 
USGoBuy identified significant continued deficiencies in its export 
compliance program, including with respect to identifying items for 
which export authorization may be required and related recordkeeping 
requirements under the Regulations. The Company also identified through 
the Audit 176 instances in which the Company failed to submit 
Electronic Export Information as required by the Regulations and 
additional exports for which the Company failed to maintain adequate 
records as required by the Regulations. Despite identifying these 
continued deficiencies through the Audit, USGoBuy did not implement 
corresponding corrective actions to address the findings of its Audit 
as required by the June 17, 2021 Order. Most notably, the Company did 
not implement adequate enhancements designed to appropriately identify 
items in the packages it exports that may require export authorization 
from BIS and a corresponding process to either refrain from exporting 
such items or to seek appropriate authorization.
    Separately, in November 2022, Homeland Security Investigations 
(``HSI'') intercepted a shipment of an item to USGoBuy on behalf of one 
of the Company's customers. The item required authorization for export 
from the United States to China. After intercepting the shipment, HSI 
replaced the item with one that did not require authorization, and 
added conspicuous markings to the outside of the package indicating 
that authorization to export the package was required. HSI then allowed 
the package to continue in transit to USGoBuy. Despite the conspicuous 
export control markings on the package, USGoBuy exported the package to 
China on the same day it received it without attempting to obtain 
authorization. This event illustrates that despite being subject to a 
suspended three-year denial order, USGoBuy did not have in place 
appropriate export clearance procedures to prevent an unauthorized 
export even where a package had explicit export control markings 
notifying USGoBuy that export authorization was required.
    As a result of the conduct described above, USGoBuy has violated 
the probationary conditions relating to the suspension of the denial of 
their export privileges. In accordance with sections 766.17(c) and 
766.18(c) of the Regulations, by letter dated May 15, 2024 (the 
``Notice Letter''), I provided USGoBuy with notice of my preliminary 
determination that the Company violated the probationary conditions of 
the June 17, 2021 Order and included a summary of the facts on which I 
based my preliminary determination, which are also outlined above. The 
Notice Letter provided the Company with an opportunity to respond and 
to show why I should not activate the $15,000 suspended penalty amount, 
issue an active three-year denial order against them, or take both 
actions.
    In response, USGoBuy submitted a written submission to me on May 
30, 2024, which I fully considered. In the response, USGoBuy did not 
dispute any of the facts outlined above that form the basis of my 
determination that the Company violated the probationary conditions 
related to the suspended penalties in this matter. In addition, USGoBuy 
provided no explanation as to why it failed to implement adequate 
compliance controls after the June 17, 2021 Order or after the findings 
from the Audit. USGoBuy did outline in its response certain compliance 
enhancements that it implemented in May 2024, but these enhancements do 
not appear reasonably designed to address the Company's past violations 
or to identify and prevent future potential misconduct. As a result, 
the Company's response did not provide a sufficient showing as to why I 
should not activate the suspended penalties in this matter.
    Based on the totality of circumstances here, I have determined 
within my discretion that it is appropriate to activate a denial order 
for a period of three years.
    It is therefore ordered:
    First, for a period of three years from the date of this Order, 
USGoBuy, LLC, with a last known address of 6804 NE 79th Ct., Building 
A, Portland, OR 97218, and when acting for or on its behalf, its 
successors, assigns, representatives, agents, or employees (hereinafter 
collectively referred to as ``Denied Persons''), may not, directly or 
indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any 
commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to 
as ``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is 
subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the 
Regulations, including, but not limited to:
    A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, license 
exception, or export control document;
    B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, 
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, 
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, 
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the 
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or engaging in any 
other activity subject to the Regulations; or
    C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item 
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to 
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
    Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the 
following:
    A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of a Denied Person any item 
subject to the Regulations;
    B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted 
acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control 
of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be 
exported from the United States, including financing or other support 
activities related to a transaction whereby a Denied Person acquires or 
attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
    C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition 
or attempted acquisition from a Denied Person of any item subject to 
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
    D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item 
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the 
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
    E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the 
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States 
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person, or 
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or 
controlled by a Denied Person if such service involves the use of any 
item

[[Page 52024]]

subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the 
United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means 
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
    Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in 
section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or 
business organization related to a Denied Person by ownership, control, 
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the 
conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions 
of this Order.
    Fourth, any license issued pursuant to the Act or Regulations in 
which USGoBuy has an interest of the date of this Order is hereby 
revoked.
    Fifth, this Order shall be served on USGoBuy, and shall be 
published in the Federal Register.
    This Order is effective immediately.

Matthew S. Axelrod,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2024-13508 Filed 6-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.