Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 52034-52036 [2024-13464]

Download as PDF ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 52034 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices established by the David L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VII of Public Law 102–183, as amended. Agenda: Monday, June 24, 2024 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. the NSEB will begin an open session with opening remarks by Alternate Designated Federal Officer, Ms. Alison Patz, and the Honorable Shawn Skelly, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness, who will Chair the meeting. The NSEB will receive briefings on the NSEB Statutory Responsibilities and Program Updates, the class of 2024 Boren Scholars and Fellows, and Department of Defense Language Roadmap. The meeting will continue with a mission highlight from Project Global Officer, followed by working group discussion. The meeting’s final session will be an overview of the Boren Awards Alumni Survey. General discussion and closing remarks by the Chair and the DFO will adjourn the meeting. Meeting Accessibility: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b and 41 CFR 102–3.140 through 102–3.165, and the availability of space, this meeting is open to the public, subject to the availability of space. Special Accommodations: Individuals requiring special accommodations to access the public meeting should contact Ms. Alison Patz at alison.m.patz.civ@mail.mil (email) or (571) 329–3894 (voice) no later than Thursday, June 20, 2024, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Written Statements: This meeting is being held under the provisions of the FACA of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102–3.140 and 102–3.150. Pursuant to 41 CFR 102– 3.140 and sections 10(a)(3) of the FACA of 1972, the public or interested organizations may submit written statements to the Department of Defense National Security Education Board about its mission and functions. Written statements may be submitted at any time or in response to the stated agenda of the planned meeting. All written statements shall be submitted to the point of contact at the email address or phone number listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section, and this individual will ensure that the written statements are provided to the membership for their consideration. Statements being submitted in response to the agenda items mentioned in this notice must be received by the point of contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section at least five calendar days prior to the meeting that is the subject of this notice. Written statements received after this date may VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Jun 20, 2024 Jkt 262001 not be provided to or considered by the NSEB until its next meeting. Dated: June 13, 2024. Aaron T. Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2024–13637 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [Docket ID: DoD–2023–OS–0063] Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Office of the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer (CIO), Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice. AGENCY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act. DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by July 22, 2024. ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372–7574, whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dodinformation-collections@mail.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Information Collection; OMB Control Number 0704–0677. Type of Request: New. SUMMARY: Level 2 Certification Assessments Number of Respondents: 10,942. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 10,942. Average Burden per Response: 525.955 hours. Annual Burden Hours: 5,754,999.61. Level 3 Certification Assessments Number of Respondents: 213. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 213. Average Burden per Response: 79.01 hours. PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Annual Burden Hours: 16,829.13. Total Number of Respondents: 11,155. Annual Responses: 11,155. Annual Burden Hours: 5,771,829. Needs and Uses: The CMMC Program provides for the assessment of contractor implementation of cybersecurity requirements to enhance confidence in contractor protection of unclassified information within the DoD supply chain. CMMC contractual requirements are implemented under a Title 48 acquisition rule, with associated rulemaking for the CMMC Program requirements (e.g., CMMC Scoring Methodology, certificate issuance, information accessibility) under a Title 32 program rule (32 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 170). The Title 32 program rule includes two separate information collection requests (ICR), this one for the CMMC Program and one for CMMC eMASS. This information collection is necessary to support the implementation of the CMMC assessment process for Levels 2 and 3 certification assessment, as defined in 32 CFR 170.17 and 170.18 respectively. Level 2 Certification Assessments The Level 2 certification assessment process is conducted by CMMC Certified Assessors, employed by CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs). During the assessment process, Organizations Seeking Certification (OSCs) hire C3PAOs to conduct the third-party assessment required for certification. The Level 2 Certification Assessment information collection reporting and recordkeeping requirements are included in the Title 32 program rule with the exception of the requirement for the OSC to upload the affirmation in SPRS that is included in the Title 48 acquisition rule. Additionally, the information collection requirements for the CMMC instantiation of eMASS are addressed in a separate Title 32 program rule information collection request (ICR). OSCs follow the procedures defined in 32 CFR 170.17 to prepare for Level 2 certification assessment. Certified Assessors assigned by C3PAOs follow the requirements and procedures defined in 32 CFR 170.17 to conduct CMMC assessments on defense contractor information systems to determine conformance with the information safeguarding requirements associated with Level 2 certification assessment to validate implementation of the 110 security requirements from NIST SP 800–171 Rev 2. C3PAOs must generate and collect pre-assessment and E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices planning material (contact information for the OSC, information about the C3PAO and assessors conducting the assessment, the level of assessment planned, the CMMC Model and Assessment Guide versions, and assessment approach), artifact information (list of artifacts, hash of artifacts, and hashing algorithm used), final assessment reports, appropriate CMMC certificates of assessment, and assessment appeal information. C3PAOs submit the data they generate and collect into the CMMC instantiation of eMASS. The information collection required for this submission is addressed in a separate CMMC eMASS ICR for the Title 32 program rule. OSCs may have a POA&M at Level 2 certification assessment as addressed in 32 CFR 170.21. C3PAOs perform a POA&M closeout assessment. The C3PAO process to conduct a POA&M closeout assessment, when applicable, is the same as the initial assessment with the same information collection requirements. OSCs must retain artifacts used as evidence for the assessment for the duration of the validity period of the certificate of assessment, and at minimum, for six years from the date of certification assessment as addressed in 32 CFR 170.17(c)(4). The OSC is responsible for compiling relevant artifacts as evidence and having knowledgeable personnel available during the assessment. The organizational artifacts are proprietary to the OSC and will not be retained by the assessment team unless expressly permitted by the OSC. To preserve the integrity of the artifacts reviewed, the OSC creates a hash of assessment evidence (to include a list of the artifact names, the return values of the hashing algorithm, and the hashing algorithm used) and retains the artifact information for six years. The information obtained from the artifacts is an information collection and is provided to the C3PAO for uploading into the CMMC instantiation of eMASS. If an OSC does not agree with the assessment results, it may formally dispute the assessment and initiate an Assessment Appeal process with the C3PAO who conducted the assessment. C3PAOs submit assessment appeals using eMASS. Appeals are tracked in the CMMC instantiation of eMASS and any resulting changes to the assessment results are uploaded into the CMMC instantiation of eMASS. C3PAOs maintain records for a period of six years of monitoring, education, training, technical knowledge, skills, experience, and authorization of each member of its personnel involved in inspection VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Jun 20, 2024 Jkt 262001 activities; contractual agreements with OSCs; any working papers generated from Level 2 certification assessments; and organizations for whom consulting services were provided as addressed in 32 CFR 170.9(b)(10). Level 3 Certification Assessments The Level 3 certification assessment process is conducted by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC). The Level 3 certification assessment information collection reporting and recordkeeping requirements are included in the Title 32 program rule except for the requirement for the OSC to upload the affirmation in SPRS that is included in the Title 48 acquisition rule. OSCs follow procedures as defined in 32 CFR 170.18 to prepare for Level 3 certification assessment. DCMA DIBCAC assessors follow requirements and procedures as defined in 32 CFR 170.18 to conduct CMMC assessments on defense contractor information systems to determine conformance with the information safeguarding requirements associated with CMMC Level 3. This is an assessment to validate the implementation of the 24 selected security requirements from NIST SP 800–172. Because DCMA DIBCAC is a government entity, there are no public information collection requirements. DCMA DIBCAC must generate and collect pre-assessment and planning material (contact information for the OSC, information about the assessors conducting the assessment, the level of assessment planned, the CMMC Model and Assessment Guide versions, and assessment approach), artifact information (list of artifacts, hash of artifacts, and hashing algorithm used), final assessment reports, appropriate CMMC certificates of assessment, and assessment appeal information. DCMA DIBCAC submits the data it generates and collects into the CMMC instantiation of. OSCs may have a POA&M at CMMC Level 3 as addressed in 32 CFR 170.21. DCMA DIBCAC performs a POA&M closeout assessment. The DCMA DIBCAC process to conduct a POA&M closeout assessment, when applicable, is the same as the initial assessment with the same information collection requirements. OSCs must retain artifacts used as evidence for the assessment for the duration of the validity period of the certificate of assessment, and at minimum, for six years from the date of certification assessment as addressed in 32 CFR 170.18(c)(4). The OSC is responsible for compiling relevant artifacts as evidence and having PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52035 knowledgeable personnel available during the assessment. Assessors will not permanently retain assessment artifacts. To preserve the integrity of the artifacts reviewed during the assessment, the OSC creates a hash of assessment evidence (to include a list of the artifact names, the return values of the hashing algorithm, and the hashing algorithm used) and retains the artifact information for six years. The information obtained from the artifacts is an information collection and DCMA DIBCAC uploads the information into the CMMC instantiation of eMASS (addressed in a separate CMMC eMASS ICR for the Title 32 program rule); the artifacts themselves are not an information collection. If an OSC does not agree with the assessment results, it may formally dispute the assessment and initiate an Assessment Appeal process with DCMA DIBCAC. DCMA DIBCAC submits assessment appeals using eMASS. Appeals are tracked in the CMMC instantiation of eMASS and any resulting changes to the assessment results are uploaded into CMMC eMASS. DCMA DIBCAC maintains records for a period of six years of monitoring, education, training, technical knowledge, skills, experience, and authorization of each member of its personnel involved in inspection activities and working papers generated from Level 3 certification assessments. Accreditation Body and CMMC Assessor and Instructor Certification Organizations (CAICOs) The Accreditation Body provides all plans related to potential sources of revenue, to include but not limited to: fees, licensing, processes, membership, and/or partnerships to the Government CMMC PMO as addressed in 32 CFR 170.8(b)(13). CAICOs maintain records for a period of six years of all procedures, processes, and actions related to fulfillment of the requirements set forth in 32 CFR 170.10(b)(9). Affected Public: Business or other forprofit. Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra. You may also submit comments and recommendations, identified by Docket ID number and title, by the following method: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, Docket ID number, and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1 52036 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2024 / Notices for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas. Requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. Lucas at whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dddod-information-collections@mail.mil. Dated: June 14, 2024. Aaron T. Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2024–13464 Filed 6–20–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 10853–043] ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Otter Tail Power Company; Notice of Application for Non-Capacity Amendment of License Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection: a. Application Type: Non-capacity Amendment of License. b. Project No: 10853–043. c. Date Filed: September 29, 2023, and supplemented November 21, 2023, and June 4, 2024. d. Applicant: Otter Tail Power Company (licensee). e. Name of Project: Otter Tail River Hydroelectric Project. f. Location: The project is located on the Otter Tail River in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, and does not occupy federal land. The project’s five developments, from upstream to downstream, are: (1) Friberg; (2) Hoot; (3) Central; (4) Pisgah; and (5) Dayton Hollow. g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a–825r. h. Applicant Contact: Michael Olson, Otter Tail Power Company, 215 South Cascade Street, Fergus Falls, MN 56537, (218) 739–8411, mjolson@otpco.com and Laura Cowan, Kleinschmidt Associates, P.O. Box 278, 400 Historic Drive, Strasburg, PA 17579, (717) 983– 4065, Laura.Cowan@ KleinschmidtGroup.com. i. FERC Contact: Jeremy Jessup, (202) 502–6779, Jeremy.Jessup@ferc.gov. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Jun 20, 2024 Jkt 262001 j. Cooperating agencies: With this notice, the Commission is inviting federal, state, local, and Tribal agencies with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to environmental issues affected by the proposal, that wish to cooperate in the preparation of any environmental document, if applicable, to follow the instructions for filing such requests described in item k below. Cooperating agencies should note the Commission’s policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation of any environmental document cannot also intervene. See 94 FERC ¶ 61,076 (2001). k. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protests: July 15, 2024. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file comments, motions to intervene, and protests using the Commission’s eFiling system at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at https:// www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, (866) 208–3676 (toll free), or (202) 502–8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to: Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Acting Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Acting Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The first page of any filing should include the docket number P–10853– 043. Comments emailed to Commission staff are not considered part of the Commission record. The Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure require all intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each person whose name appears on the official service list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency. l. Description of Request: The licensee is proposing to amend Article 401 of the license to continue operating in a runof-river mode, with reservoir levels as PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 close to target levels as practicable, but adding an operating band of ±0.5 foot for reservoir elevations except during flood conditions, at all five developments of the project. The licensee states that it has historically managed reservoir levels as close to target levels as practicable, and within ±0.5 foot of the target elevations, except during flood conditions. The licensee explains that continuous management of reservoir levels at the exact target elevation is not possible due to natural variability from wave run-up, precipitation events, etc. The licensee states the proposal would not change run-of-river operation, existing project facilities, the project boundary, or project management and need for project power, nor is there any ground disturbance associated with the amendment. m. Locations of the Application: This filing may be viewed on the Commission’s website at https:// www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also register online at https:// www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, call 1–866–208–3676 or email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, for TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant. n. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission’s mailing list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission. o. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214, respectively. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission’s Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified comment date for the particular application. p. Filing and Service of Documents: Any filing must (1) bear in all capital letters the title ‘‘COMMENTS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, or ‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’ as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM 21JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52034-52036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2023-OS-0063]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer 
(CIO), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by July 22, 
2024.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Cybersecurity Maturity 
Model Certification (CMMC) Program Reporting and Recordkeeping 
Requirements Information Collection; OMB Control Number 0704-0677.
    Type of Request: New.

Level 2 Certification Assessments

    Number of Respondents: 10,942.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 10,942.
    Average Burden per Response: 525.955 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,754,999.61.

Level 3 Certification Assessments

    Number of Respondents: 213.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 213.
    Average Burden per Response: 79.01 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 16,829.13.

Total

    Number of Respondents: 11,155.
    Annual Responses: 11,155.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,771,829.
    Needs and Uses: The CMMC Program provides for the assessment of 
contractor implementation of cybersecurity requirements to enhance 
confidence in contractor protection of unclassified information within 
the DoD supply chain. CMMC contractual requirements are implemented 
under a Title 48 acquisition rule, with associated rulemaking for the 
CMMC Program requirements (e.g., CMMC Scoring Methodology, certificate 
issuance, information accessibility) under a Title 32 program rule (32 
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 170). The Title 32 program rule 
includes two separate information collection requests (ICR), this one 
for the CMMC Program and one for CMMC eMASS.
    This information collection is necessary to support the 
implementation of the CMMC assessment process for Levels 2 and 3 
certification assessment, as defined in 32 CFR 170.17 and 170.18 
respectively.

Level 2 Certification Assessments

    The Level 2 certification assessment process is conducted by CMMC 
Certified Assessors, employed by CMMC Third-Party Assessment 
Organizations (C3PAOs). During the assessment process, Organizations 
Seeking Certification (OSCs) hire C3PAOs to conduct the third-party 
assessment required for certification. The Level 2 Certification 
Assessment information collection reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements are included in the Title 32 program rule with the 
exception of the requirement for the OSC to upload the affirmation in 
SPRS that is included in the Title 48 acquisition rule. Additionally, 
the information collection requirements for the CMMC instantiation of 
eMASS are addressed in a separate Title 32 program rule information 
collection request (ICR). OSCs follow the procedures defined in 32 CFR 
170.17 to prepare for Level 2 certification assessment. Certified 
Assessors assigned by C3PAOs follow the requirements and procedures 
defined in 32 CFR 170.17 to conduct CMMC assessments on defense 
contractor information systems to determine conformance with the 
information safeguarding requirements associated with Level 2 
certification assessment to validate implementation of the 110 security 
requirements from NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2. C3PAOs must generate and 
collect pre-assessment and

[[Page 52035]]

planning material (contact information for the OSC, information about 
the C3PAO and assessors conducting the assessment, the level of 
assessment planned, the CMMC Model and Assessment Guide versions, and 
assessment approach), artifact information (list of artifacts, hash of 
artifacts, and hashing algorithm used), final assessment reports, 
appropriate CMMC certificates of assessment, and assessment appeal 
information. C3PAOs submit the data they generate and collect into the 
CMMC instantiation of eMASS. The information collection required for 
this submission is addressed in a separate CMMC eMASS ICR for the Title 
32 program rule. OSCs may have a POA&M at Level 2 certification 
assessment as addressed in 32 CFR 170.21. C3PAOs perform a POA&M 
closeout assessment. The C3PAO process to conduct a POA&M closeout 
assessment, when applicable, is the same as the initial assessment with 
the same information collection requirements. OSCs must retain 
artifacts used as evidence for the assessment for the duration of the 
validity period of the certificate of assessment, and at minimum, for 
six years from the date of certification assessment as addressed in 32 
CFR 170.17(c)(4). The OSC is responsible for compiling relevant 
artifacts as evidence and having knowledgeable personnel available 
during the assessment. The organizational artifacts are proprietary to 
the OSC and will not be retained by the assessment team unless 
expressly permitted by the OSC. To preserve the integrity of the 
artifacts reviewed, the OSC creates a hash of assessment evidence (to 
include a list of the artifact names, the return values of the hashing 
algorithm, and the hashing algorithm used) and retains the artifact 
information for six years. The information obtained from the artifacts 
is an information collection and is provided to the C3PAO for uploading 
into the CMMC instantiation of eMASS. If an OSC does not agree with the 
assessment results, it may formally dispute the assessment and initiate 
an Assessment Appeal process with the C3PAO who conducted the 
assessment. C3PAOs submit assessment appeals using eMASS. Appeals are 
tracked in the CMMC instantiation of eMASS and any resulting changes to 
the assessment results are uploaded into the CMMC instantiation of 
eMASS. C3PAOs maintain records for a period of six years of monitoring, 
education, training, technical knowledge, skills, experience, and 
authorization of each member of its personnel involved in inspection 
activities; contractual agreements with OSCs; any working papers 
generated from Level 2 certification assessments; and organizations for 
whom consulting services were provided as addressed in 32 CFR 
170.9(b)(10).

Level 3 Certification Assessments

    The Level 3 certification assessment process is conducted by the 
Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Defense Industrial Base 
Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC). The Level 3 certification 
assessment information collection reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements are included in the Title 32 program rule except for the 
requirement for the OSC to upload the affirmation in SPRS that is 
included in the Title 48 acquisition rule. OSCs follow procedures as 
defined in 32 CFR 170.18 to prepare for Level 3 certification 
assessment. DCMA DIBCAC assessors follow requirements and procedures as 
defined in 32 CFR 170.18 to conduct CMMC assessments on defense 
contractor information systems to determine conformance with the 
information safeguarding requirements associated with CMMC Level 3. 
This is an assessment to validate the implementation of the 24 selected 
security requirements from NIST SP 800-172. Because DCMA DIBCAC is a 
government entity, there are no public information collection 
requirements. DCMA DIBCAC must generate and collect pre-assessment and 
planning material (contact information for the OSC, information about 
the assessors conducting the assessment, the level of assessment 
planned, the CMMC Model and Assessment Guide versions, and assessment 
approach), artifact information (list of artifacts, hash of artifacts, 
and hashing algorithm used), final assessment reports, appropriate CMMC 
certificates of assessment, and assessment appeal information. DCMA 
DIBCAC submits the data it generates and collects into the CMMC 
instantiation of. OSCs may have a POA&M at CMMC Level 3 as addressed in 
32 CFR 170.21. DCMA DIBCAC performs a POA&M closeout assessment. The 
DCMA DIBCAC process to conduct a POA&M closeout assessment, when 
applicable, is the same as the initial assessment with the same 
information collection requirements. OSCs must retain artifacts used as 
evidence for the assessment for the duration of the validity period of 
the certificate of assessment, and at minimum, for six years from the 
date of certification assessment as addressed in 32 CFR 170.18(c)(4). 
The OSC is responsible for compiling relevant artifacts as evidence and 
having knowledgeable personnel available during the assessment. 
Assessors will not permanently retain assessment artifacts. To preserve 
the integrity of the artifacts reviewed during the assessment, the OSC 
creates a hash of assessment evidence (to include a list of the 
artifact names, the return values of the hashing algorithm, and the 
hashing algorithm used) and retains the artifact information for six 
years. The information obtained from the artifacts is an information 
collection and DCMA DIBCAC uploads the information into the CMMC 
instantiation of eMASS (addressed in a separate CMMC eMASS ICR for the 
Title 32 program rule); the artifacts themselves are not an information 
collection. If an OSC does not agree with the assessment results, it 
may formally dispute the assessment and initiate an Assessment Appeal 
process with DCMA DIBCAC. DCMA DIBCAC submits assessment appeals using 
eMASS. Appeals are tracked in the CMMC instantiation of eMASS and any 
resulting changes to the assessment results are uploaded into CMMC 
eMASS. DCMA DIBCAC maintains records for a period of six years of 
monitoring, education, training, technical knowledge, skills, 
experience, and authorization of each member of its personnel involved 
in inspection activities and working papers generated from Level 3 
certification assessments.

Accreditation Body and CMMC Assessor and Instructor Certification 
Organizations (CAICOs)

    The Accreditation Body provides all plans related to potential 
sources of revenue, to include but not limited to: fees, licensing, 
processes, membership, and/or partnerships to the Government CMMC PMO 
as addressed in 32 CFR 170.8(b)(13).
    CAICOs maintain records for a period of six years of all 
procedures, processes, and actions related to fulfillment of the 
requirements set forth in 32 CFR 170.10(b)(9).
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    You may also submit comments and recommendations, identified by 
Docket ID number and title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, Docket ID number, and title for this Federal Register document. 
The general policy

[[Page 52036]]

for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to 
make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.
    Requests for copies of the information collection proposal should 
be sent to Mr. Lucas at [email protected].

    Dated: June 14, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-13464 Filed 6-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.