Soybean Promotion and Research: Adjustments to Representation on the United Soybean Board, 51277-51279 [2024-13225]
Download as PDF
51277
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 117
Monday, June 17, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Livestock and Poultry Program, AMS,
USDA; Room 2092–S, STOP 0249; 1400
Independence Avenue SW; Washington,
DC 20250–0249. Comments will be
made available for public inspection at
the above address during regular
business hours or via the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Julian, Research and Promotion
Division, Telephone: (202) 731–2149; or
email at jason.julian@usda.gov.
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1220
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Doc. No. AMS–LP–23–0079]
Soybean Promotion and Research:
Adjustments to Representation on the
United Soybean Board
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) proposes to adjust the
number of members on the United
Soybean Board (Board) to reflect
changes in production levels that have
occurred since the Board was last
reapportioned in 2021. As required by
the Soybean Promotion, Research, and
Consumer Information Act (Act),
membership on the Board is reviewed
every 3 years and adjustments are made
accordingly. The proposed changes
would result in a decrease in Board
membership for the State of North
Dakota from 4 members to 3 members
and an increase in Board membership
for the State of New York from 1
member to 2 members, thus the total
number of Board members would
remain at 77. These changes would be
reflected in the Soybean Promotion and
Research Order (Order) and would be
effective with the Secretary of
Agriculture’s (Secretary) appointments
for terms in the year 2025.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 17, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be posted
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments received will be posted
without change, including any personal
information provided. All comments
should reference the docket number
AMS–LP–23–0079, the date of
submission, and the page number of this
issue of the Federal Register. Comments
may also be sent to Jason Julian,
Agricultural Marketing Specialist;
Research and Promotion Division;
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
AMS is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
(E.O.) 12866, 13563, and 14094. E.O.
12866, 13563, and 14094 direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. E.O. 14094 reaffirms,
supplements, and updates E.O. 12866
and further directs agencies to solicit
and consider input from a wide range of
affected and interested parties through a
variety of means. This proposed action
falls within a category of regulatory
actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) exempted from E.O.
12866 review.
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under E.O. 13175—Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, which requires agencies
to consider whether their rulemaking
actions would have Tribal implications.
AMS has determined that this proposed
rule is unlikely to have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rulemaking has been
reviewed under E.O. 12988—Civil
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Justice Reform. This rulemaking is not
intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act (7 U.S.C. 6309) provides that
nothing in the Act may be construed to
preempt or supersede any other program
relating to soybean promotion organized
and operated under the laws of the U.S.
or any State. There are no
administrative proceedings that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with OMB regulations
(5 CFR part 1320) that implement the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. part 35), the information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements contained in the Order
and accompanying Rules and
Regulations have previously been
approved by OMB and were assigned
OMB control number 0581–0093.
Background and Proposed Action
The Board was initially appointed on
July 11, 1991, pursuant to the provisions
of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6301–6311), and the
Order (7 CFR part 1220) issued
thereunder. The Order established an
initial Board with 60 members,
composed of soybean producers. For
purposes of establishing the Board, the
United States was divided into 31 States
and geographical units. Representation
on the Board from each unit was
determined by the level of production in
each unit.
Reapportionment
Section 1220.201(c) of the Order
provides that at the end of each 3-year
period, the Board shall review soybean
production levels in the geographic
units throughout the United States.
Section 1220.130 of the Order defines a
unit as each State, or group of States,
which is represented on the Board. The
Board may recommend to the Secretary
modification in the levels of production
necessary for Board membership for
each unit.
Section 1220.201(d) of the Order
provides that at the end of each 3-year
period, the Secretary must review the
volume of production of each unit and
adjust the boundaries of any unit and
the number of Board members from
each such unit as necessary to conform
with the criteria set forth in
§ 1220.201(e): To the extent practicable,
(1) States with annual average soybean
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
51278
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 117 / Monday, June 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
production of less than 3 million
bushels shall be grouped into
geographically contiguous units, each of
which has a combined production level
equal to or greater than 3 million
bushels, and each such group shall be
entitled to at least 1 member on the
Board; (2) units with at least 3 million
bushels, but fewer than 15 million
bushels shall be entitled to 1 board
member; (3) units with 15 million
bushels or more but fewer than 70
million bushels shall be entitled to 2
Board members; (4) units with 70
million bushels or more but fewer than
200 million bushels shall be entitled to
3 Board members; and (5) units with
200 million bushels or more shall be
entitled to 4 Board members.
The Board was last reapportioned in
2021. The total Board membership
decreased from 78 to 77 members, with
Alabama decreasing one member. The
final rule was published in the Federal
Register (86 FR 61668) on November 8,
2021. This change was effective with the
2022 appointments.
This proposed rulemaking would
keep total membership of the Board at
77 members. Production data was used
for years 2018–2022 (excluding the
crops in years in which production was
the highest and in which production
was the lowest in each State) was
reported by U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA) National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS).
This change would not affect the
number of geographical units.
This proposed rulemaking would
adjust representation on the Board as
follows:
Current
representation
State
New York .........................................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ....................................................................................................................................................
Board adjustments as proposed by
this rulemaking would become effective,
if adopted, with the 2025 appointment
process.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS considered the
economic effect of this action on small
entities and determined that this
proposed rulemaking would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly burdened.
Effective August 19, 2019, the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
part 121.201) published an interim final
rule (84 FR 34261) that adjusts the
monetary-based size standards for
inflation. As a result of this rule, the
size classification for soybean producers
changed from sales of $750,000 or less
to sales of $1,000,000 or less. There are
an estimated 413,358 soybean producers
and an estimated 10,000 first purchasers
who collect the assessment, most of
whom would be considered small
businesses under the criteria established
by SBA.
According to USDA’s NASS 2022
Census of Agriculture, the number of
operations in the United States with
soybean production totaled 270,851.1
The most recent (2022) Census of
Agriculture data show that roughly 19
percent of producers with soybean
production, or 52,756 operations, have
annual receipts of $1,000,000 or more.2
Therefore, most soybean producers, 81
percent, would be considered small
businesses with the new SBA guidance.
It should be noted that producers are
only indirectly impacted by the
proposed rulemaking.
The proposed rulemaking imposes no
new burden on the industry, as it only
adjusts representation on the Board to
reflect changes in soybean production.
The adjustments are required by the
Order and would not result in a change
to Board membership, which will
remain at 77 members.
AMS is committed to complying with
E-Government Act of 2002 to promote
the use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to government information and
services, and for other purposes. USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
Proposed
representation
1
4
2
3
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1220
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Soybeans.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part
1220 as follows:
PART 1220—SOYBEAN PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER
INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1220 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6301–6311 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
2. Amend § 1220.201 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 1220.201
Membership of Board.
(a) For the purposes of nominating
and appointing producers to the Board,
the United States shall be divided into
31 geographic units and the number of
Board members from each unit, subject
to paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section
shall be as follows:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
State/unit
Number of members
South Dakota .......................................................................................................................................................................
Ohio .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Missouri ................................................................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ............................................................................................................................................................................
Iowa .....................................................................................................................................................................................
1 https://www.nass.usda.gov/AgCensus/
index.php.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
2 https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/
F0860BE3-0E1F-33B4-8571-74E2B061CBED.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
4
4
4
4
4
4
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 117 / Monday, June 17, 2024 / Proposed Rules
51279
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)—Continued
State/unit
Number of members
Indiana .................................................................................................................................................................................
Illinois ...................................................................................................................................................................................
North Dakota ........................................................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .............................................................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ............................................................................................................................................................................
Michigan ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Kentucky ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Kansas .................................................................................................................................................................................
Arkansas ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Virginia .................................................................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ........................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina ......................................................................................................................................................................
Maryland ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Louisiana ..............................................................................................................................................................................
New York .............................................................................................................................................................................
Alabama ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Texas ...................................................................................................................................................................................
South Carolina .....................................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .............................................................................................................................................................................
New Jersey ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Georgia ................................................................................................................................................................................
Delaware ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Unit:
Eastern Region (Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico) ...........................................................................................................
Western Region (Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon,
Utah, Washington, and Wyoming) ............................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–13225 Filed 6–14–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2024–1614; Airspace
Docket No. 24–AEA–9]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of Class D Airspace;
Martinsburg, WV
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend Class D airspace extending
upward from the surface to and
including 3,100 feet MSL within a 4.2mile radius of Eastern West Virginia
Regional/Shepherd Field Airport by
updating the airport coordinates and
description formatting to comply with
FAA Orders and databases. This action
would not change the airspace
boundaries or operating requirements.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 14, 2024
Comments must be received on
or before August 1, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by FAA Docket No. FAA–2024–1614
and Airspace Docket No. 24–AEA–9
using any of the following methods:
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
* Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
* Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except for Federal holidays.
* Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at (202) 493–2251.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except for Federal
holidays.
DATES:
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
FAA Order JO 7400.11H Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. You may also contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Office of
Policy, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Joseph Kann, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA
30337; Telephone: (404) 305–5576.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority, as it would
amend Class D airspace in Martinsburg,
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51277-51279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13225]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 117 / Monday, June 17, 2024 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 51277]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1220
[Doc. No. AMS-LP-23-0079]
Soybean Promotion and Research: Adjustments to Representation on
the United Soybean Board
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to adjust
the number of members on the United Soybean Board (Board) to reflect
changes in production levels that have occurred since the Board was
last reapportioned in 2021. As required by the Soybean Promotion,
Research, and Consumer Information Act (Act), membership on the Board
is reviewed every 3 years and adjustments are made accordingly. The
proposed changes would result in a decrease in Board membership for the
State of North Dakota from 4 members to 3 members and an increase in
Board membership for the State of New York from 1 member to 2 members,
thus the total number of Board members would remain at 77. These
changes would be reflected in the Soybean Promotion and Research Order
(Order) and would be effective with the Secretary of Agriculture's
(Secretary) appointments for terms in the year 2025.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 17, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be posted online at https://www.regulations.gov. Comments received will be posted without change,
including any personal information provided. All comments should
reference the docket number AMS-LP-23-0079, the date of submission, and
the page number of this issue of the Federal Register. Comments may
also be sent to Jason Julian, Agricultural Marketing Specialist;
Research and Promotion Division; Livestock and Poultry Program, AMS,
USDA; Room 2092-S, STOP 0249; 1400 Independence Avenue SW; Washington,
DC 20250-0249. Comments will be made available for public inspection at
the above address during regular business hours or via the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Julian, Research and Promotion
Division, Telephone: (202) 731-2149; or email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
AMS is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive
Orders (E.O.) 12866, 13563, and 14094. E.O. 12866, 13563, and 14094
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive
impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. E.O. 14094 reaffirms, supplements, and
updates E.O. 12866 and further directs agencies to solicit and consider
input from a wide range of affected and interested parties through a
variety of means. This proposed action falls within a category of
regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
exempted from E.O. 12866 review.
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed under E.O. 13175--Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires
agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have Tribal
implications. AMS has determined that this proposed rule is unlikely to
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rulemaking has been reviewed under E.O. 12988--Civil
Justice Reform. This rulemaking is not intended to have retroactive
effect.
The Act (7 U.S.C. 6309) provides that nothing in the Act may be
construed to preempt or supersede any other program relating to soybean
promotion organized and operated under the laws of the U.S. or any
State. There are no administrative proceedings that must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320) that implement
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. part 35), the
information collection and recordkeeping requirements contained in the
Order and accompanying Rules and Regulations have previously been
approved by OMB and were assigned OMB control number 0581-0093.
Background and Proposed Action
The Board was initially appointed on July 11, 1991, pursuant to the
provisions of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6301-6311), and the Order (7 CFR part
1220) issued thereunder. The Order established an initial Board with 60
members, composed of soybean producers. For purposes of establishing
the Board, the United States was divided into 31 States and
geographical units. Representation on the Board from each unit was
determined by the level of production in each unit.
Reapportionment
Section 1220.201(c) of the Order provides that at the end of each
3-year period, the Board shall review soybean production levels in the
geographic units throughout the United States. Section 1220.130 of the
Order defines a unit as each State, or group of States, which is
represented on the Board. The Board may recommend to the Secretary
modification in the levels of production necessary for Board membership
for each unit.
Section 1220.201(d) of the Order provides that at the end of each
3-year period, the Secretary must review the volume of production of
each unit and adjust the boundaries of any unit and the number of Board
members from each such unit as necessary to conform with the criteria
set forth in Sec. 1220.201(e): To the extent practicable, (1) States
with annual average soybean
[[Page 51278]]
production of less than 3 million bushels shall be grouped into
geographically contiguous units, each of which has a combined
production level equal to or greater than 3 million bushels, and each
such group shall be entitled to at least 1 member on the Board; (2)
units with at least 3 million bushels, but fewer than 15 million
bushels shall be entitled to 1 board member; (3) units with 15 million
bushels or more but fewer than 70 million bushels shall be entitled to
2 Board members; (4) units with 70 million bushels or more but fewer
than 200 million bushels shall be entitled to 3 Board members; and (5)
units with 200 million bushels or more shall be entitled to 4 Board
members.
The Board was last reapportioned in 2021. The total Board
membership decreased from 78 to 77 members, with Alabama decreasing one
member. The final rule was published in the Federal Register (86 FR
61668) on November 8, 2021. This change was effective with the 2022
appointments.
This proposed rulemaking would keep total membership of the Board
at 77 members. Production data was used for years 2018-2022 (excluding
the crops in years in which production was the highest and in which
production was the lowest in each State) was reported by U.S.
Department of Agriculture's (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS). This change would not affect the number of geographical
units.
This proposed rulemaking would adjust representation on the Board
as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Proposed
State representation representation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York............................ 1 2
North Dakota........................ 4 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Board adjustments as proposed by this rulemaking would become
effective, if adopted, with the 2025 appointment process.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS considered the economic
effect of this action on small entities and determined that this
proposed rulemaking would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions
in order that small businesses will not be unduly burdened.
Effective August 19, 2019, the Small Business Administration (SBA)
(13 CFR part 121.201) published an interim final rule (84 FR 34261)
that adjusts the monetary-based size standards for inflation. As a
result of this rule, the size classification for soybean producers
changed from sales of $750,000 or less to sales of $1,000,000 or less.
There are an estimated 413,358 soybean producers and an estimated
10,000 first purchasers who collect the assessment, most of whom would
be considered small businesses under the criteria established by SBA.
According to USDA's NASS 2022 Census of Agriculture, the number of
operations in the United States with soybean production totaled
270,851.\1\ The most recent (2022) Census of Agriculture data show that
roughly 19 percent of producers with soybean production, or 52,756
operations, have annual receipts of $1,000,000 or more.\2\ Therefore,
most soybean producers, 81 percent, would be considered small
businesses with the new SBA guidance. It should be noted that producers
are only indirectly impacted by the proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.nass.usda.gov/AgCensus/index.php.
\2\ https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/F0860BE3-0E1F-33B4-8571-74E2B061CBED.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rulemaking imposes no new burden on the industry, as
it only adjusts representation on the Board to reflect changes in
soybean production. The adjustments are required by the Order and would
not result in a change to Board membership, which will remain at 77
members.
AMS is committed to complying with E-Government Act of 2002 to
promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to government
information and services, and for other purposes. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1220
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Soybeans.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural
Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 1220 as follows:
PART 1220--SOYBEAN PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1220 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6301-6311 and 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1220.201 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1220.201 Membership of Board.
(a) For the purposes of nominating and appointing producers to the
Board, the United States shall be divided into 31 geographic units and
the number of Board members from each unit, subject to paragraphs (d)
and (e) of this section shall be as follows:
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/unit Number of members
------------------------------------------------------------------------
South Dakota................................... 4
Ohio........................................... 4
Nebraska....................................... 4
Missouri....................................... 4
Minnesota...................................... 4
Iowa........................................... 4
[[Page 51279]]
Indiana........................................ 4
Illinois....................................... 4
North Dakota................................... 3
Wisconsin...................................... 3
Tennessee...................................... 3
Mississippi.................................... 3
Michigan....................................... 3
Kentucky....................................... 3
Kansas......................................... 3
Arkansas....................................... 3
Virginia....................................... 2
Pennsylvania................................... 2
North Carolina................................. 2
Maryland....................................... 2
Louisiana...................................... 2
New York....................................... 2
Alabama........................................ 1
Texas.......................................... 1
South Carolina................................. 1
Oklahoma....................................... 1
New Jersey..................................... 1
Georgia........................................ 1
Delaware....................................... 1
Unit:
Eastern Region (Connecticut, Florida, 1
Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode
Island, Vermont, West Virginia, District
of Columbia, and Puerto Rico).............
Western Region (Alaska, Arizona, 1
California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho,
Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah,
Washington, and Wyoming)..................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-13225 Filed 6-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P