Amended Record of Decision for the Production of Tritium in Commercial Light Water Reactors, 50664-50665 [2024-13069]
Download as PDF
50664
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 116 / Friday, June 14, 2024 / Notices
By the Board, Mai T. Dinh, Director, Office
of Proceedings.
Brendetta Jones,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024–13166 Filed 6–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Amended Record of Decision for the
Production of Tritium in Commercial
Light Water Reactors
Tennessee Valley Authority.
Amended record of decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) is amending the April
5, 2017 Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) for the
Production of Tritium in a Commercial
Light Water Reactor (CLWR). The SEIS
was issued March 4, 2016, by the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) National
Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA) and adopted by TVA in its 2017
ROD. TVA is amending its previous
decision to increase the number of
tritium-producing burnable absorber
rods (TPBARs) irradiated in its reactors
at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN). In
partnership with NNSA, TVA initially
decided to implement the CLWR SEIS
Preferred Alternative, Alternative 6,
which allows for the irradiation of up to
a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18
months using TVA reactors at both the
WBN and Sequoyah sites. Subsequent to
the CLWR SEIS, WBN Unit 1 increased
production under Unit 1 License
Amendment 107 (July 2016) and Unit 2
tritium production was authorized
under Unit 2 License Amendment 27
(May 2019). In April 2024, WBN Units
1 and 2 were further authorized to
increase their tritium productions to
2,496 TPBARs in each unit under Unit
1 License Amendment 165 and Unit 2
License Amendment 72. Hence, TVA
and NNSA are now opting to choose the
previously analyzed CLWR SEIS
Alternative 4, which allows for the
irradiation of up to a total of 5,000
TPBARs every 18 months at WBN using
Units 1 and 2.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Higdon, Tennessee Valley
Authority, NEPA Specialist, 400 West
Summit Hill Drive (WT11B), Knoxville,
Tennessee 37902; telephone (865) 632–
8051; or email mshigdon@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is provided in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S. Code
[U.S.C.] 4321 et seq.), the Council on
Environmental Quality’s regulations for
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Jun 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
implementing NEPA (40 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) 1500 through
1508, as updated April 20, 2022), and
TVA’s NEPA procedures (18 CFR 1318).
TVA adopted the Final SEIS on March
4, 2016 (81 FR 11557–11558). As a
cooperating agency, TVA provided
subject matter expertise, independent
review and evaluation, and close
coordination with NNSA during the
environmental review process,
including preparation of the Draft SEIS
and the Final SEIS. NNSA issued a ROD
based on the Final SEIS on June 22,
2016 (81 FR 40685) and amended its
ROD on September 14, 2023 (88 FR
63099). By this notice, TVA is providing
notification of its amended decision and
agency reasoning.
Background
The NNSA is responsible for
maintaining and enhancing the safety,
security, reliability, and performance of
the nation’s nuclear weapons stockpile.
Tritium, a radioactive isotope of
hydrogen, is an essential component of
every weapon in the current and
projected U.S. nuclear weapons
stockpile and must be replenished
periodically due to its short half-life. In
March 1999, NNSA published the Final
EIS for Production of Tritium in a
Commercial Light Water Reactor, which
addressed the proposed interagency
agreement with TVA to produce tritium
at TVA reactors using TPBARs. In May
1999, DOE published the ROD for the
1999 EIS, identifying its decision to
implement an agreement for tritium
production at the WBN Unit 1 reactor in
Rhea County, Tennessee, and Sequoyah
Units 1 and 2 reactors in Hamilton
County, Tennessee. Under the proposal,
TVA would irradiate up to 3,400
TPBARs per reactor per fuel cycle,
which lasts about 18 months. The
agreement was needed by NNSA
because at the time the U.S. nuclear
weapons complex did not have the
capability to produce the amounts of
tritium that were needed to support the
nation’s current and future nuclear
weapons stockpile.
Following the environmental review,
the agreement with NNSA was
approved by the TVA Board of Directors
in late 1999 and, in May 2000, TVA
issued a ROD and adopted the NNSA’s
EIS (65 FR 26259). In 2000, TVA entered
into an interagency agreement with
NNSA under The Economy Act to
provide irradiation services for
producing tritium in TVA light water
reactors through November 2035.
TVA received license amendments
from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) in 2002 to produce
tritium in WBN Unit 1 reactor and both
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Sequoyah reactors and has been
producing tritium at the WBN Unit 1
reactor since 2003; TVA has not
produced tritium in the Sequoyah
reactors. Since 2003, irradiation
experience at WBN has shown that the
permeation rate per TPBAR per year has
been higher than the estimate that was
included and analyzed in the 1999 EIS
by NNSA. NNSA prepared the 2016
CLWR SEIS to supplement its previous
analysis to address the higher rates of
permeation of tritium from TPBARs at
TVA sites and to evaluate increasing
tritium production quantities to meet
requirements. The 2016 CLWR SEIS
provides analysis of the potential
environmental impacts from TPBAR
irradiation based on a conservative
estimate of the tritium permeation rate
through the TPBAR cladding, NNSA’s
revised estimate of the maximum
number of TPBARs necessary to support
the current and projected future tritium
supply requirements, and a maximum
production scenario of irradiating no
more than a total of 5,000 TPBARs every
18 months.
Six alternatives were analyzed in the
CLWR SEIS, including the No Action
Alternative, which was identified by
TVA in its 2017 ROD as
environmentally preferable. In their
respective RODs, NNSA and TVA
initially decided to implement the
Preferred Alternative, Alternative 6,
which allows for the irradiation of up to
a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18
months using TVA reactors at both the
WBN and Sequoyah sites. At the time,
this decision provided the greatest
flexibility to meet potential future needs
that could arise from various plausible
but unexpected events.
After the 2016 SEIS, TVA increased
irradiation of TPBARs at WBN Unit 1
under License Amendment 107 (July
2016) and at WBN Unit 2 under Unit 2
License Amendment 27 (May 2019). In
April 2024, WBN Units 1 and 2 were
further authorized to increase their
tritium productions to 2,496 TPBARs in
each unit under Unit 1 License
Amendment 165 and Unit 2 License
Amendment 72. Because TVA does not
plan to produce tritium at its Sequoyah
site, TVA and NNSA are now opting to
choose the previously analyzed CLWR
SEIS Alternative 4, which allows for the
irradiation of up to a total of 5,000
TPBARs every 18 months at WBN Units
1 and 2.
In a February 2023 memorandum,
TVA documented its review of the
CLWR SEIS to determine if additional
environmental review under NEPA was
required, consistent with Council on
Environmental Quality’s regulations
implementing NEPA at 40 CFR
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 116 / Friday, June 14, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
1502.9(d). As discussed in the February
2023 memorandum, entitled
‘‘Determination of NEPA Adequacy,
Production of Tritium in a Commercial
Light Water Nuclear Reactor (Watts Bar
Nuclear Plant),’’ TVA concluded that
there were no new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental
concerns that are significant or that
substantially change the analysis of the
2016 CLWR SEIS. Recent information
reviewed by TVA in most cases
confirmed TVA’s previous description
of the affected environment. In
instances where recent information
differed notably, that information does
not substantially change the previous
environmental analysis. TVA found that
the SEIS continues to provide a
conservative bounding analysis for a
variety of key issues, including the
amount of additional fuel assemblies,
the expected tritium permeation rate,
and waste generation. In addition, TVA
confirmed that the CLWR SEIS analysis
indicates that there would not be any
significant increase in radiation
exposure associated with TPBAR
irradiation for facility workers or the
public. For all analyzed alternatives
(including both Alternatives 4 and 6),
estimated radiation exposures would
remain well below regulatory limits.
The calculated estimated exposures for
normal reactor operations with even the
maximum number of TPBARs are
comparable to those for normal reactor
operation without TPBARs.
After determining additional
environmental review was not
necessary, in March 2023 TVA
submitted to the NRC a License
Amendment Request (#165) to Facility
Operating License NPF–90 (#165) and a
License Amendment Request (#72) to
Facility Operating License NPF–96 for
WBN Units 1 and 2. The amendments
would allow TVA to increase the
maximum number of TPBARs to 2,496
in each WBN unit. The NRC approved
the two amendments on April 15, 2024.
Amended Decision
TVA is amending its previous
decision (82 FR 16653) to implement
the 2016 CLWR SEIS’s Alternative 6 that
assumes TVA would irradiate up to a
total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months
using both the WBN and Sequoyah sites.
Because TVA would irradiate a
maximum of 2,500 TPBARs in any one
reactor, this could involve the use of
one or both reactors at each of the sites.
Instead, TVA has decided to implement
the 2016 CLWR SEIS’s Alternative 4 that
assumes TVA would irradiate up to a
total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months
at WBN using both reactors. Since TVA
would irradiate a maximum of 2,500
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Jun 13, 2024
Jkt 262001
TPBARs in any one reactor, both Units
1 and 2 would be used to produce
tritium. Under this amended decision,
TVA will not irradiate TPBARs for
tritium production at the Sequoyah site.
This amended decision is consistent
with the September 2023 decision by
NNSA to amend its previous decision
and implement Alternative 4 of the 2016
CLWR SEIS (88 FR 63099).
Basis for Decision
The basis for TVA’s decision is its
commitment to provide irradiation
services for producing tritium for NNSA
under the interagency agreement
established in 2000 between the two
agencies. The proposal reflects
responsible planning on the part of
NNSA and provides the greatest
flexibility for NNSA to meet future
tritium production requirements and
assist in meeting national security
requirements. The decision reflects
TVA’s continued commitment to
support the nation’s defense efforts and
national security requirements.
The environmental impacts of the
proposed action have been addressed in
the previous environmental impact
statements. TVA’s 2023 Determination
of NEPA Adequacy memorandum
further addresses consideration by TVA
of new information or circumstances
relevant to environmental concerns. In
its 2023 memorandum, TVA addressed
the anticipated effects on the amount of
spent fuel to be generated at WBN, the
fuel cycle there, and the amount of
tritiated wastewater estimated to be
generated from TPBAR irradiation.
Regarding the amount of spent fuel to
be generated at WBN, implementing
Alternative 4 would result in 36
additional fuel assemblies every 18
months. The SEIS, which assumed up to
41 additional fuel assemblies, provides
a conservative bounding analysis of the
approximately 2,500 TPBAR
equilibrium core designs. Although
there would be additional spent fuel
generated under Alternative 4, TVA has
infrastructure in place to manage the
increased volume of spent nuclear fuel
assemblies.
Regarding the new decision’s effects
on the fuel cycle, the cycle length is
only mentioned in the SEIS twice and
only in the context of being a ‘‘potential
uncertainty’’ in determining if it was
necessary to assume in the SEIS a
higher, more conservative tritium
permeation rate. TVA does not consider
the operating cycle length to be
uncertain, and it also does not
anticipate irradiation of up to 2,500
TPBARs at each reactor would affect the
typical fuel cycle. Therefore, the issue
has no bearing on the review of
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50665
adequacy of the SEIS in addressing the
irradiation of up to 5,000 TPBARs at
WBN.
Lastly, the estimated amount of
tritiated wastewater (due to permeation
from the TPBARs into the cooling water)
was not identified in the SEIS, as it is
difficult to separate this out from other
releases from such things as turbine
building sumps, floor drain collector
sumps, groundwater sumps, etc.
However, to keep maximum tritium
concentrations low, TVA will continue
to use a ‘‘feed and bleed’’ technique
when releasing wastewater; the
technique requires additional cooling
water per fuel cycle to ensure discharges
are within regulatory limits. TVA
estimates using this technique will
increase water usage by approximately
25 percent but is not expected to affect
environmental impacts.
The current proposal does not
represent a substantive change to
operations, activities, and associated
impacts addressed and analyzed in the
existing NEPA documentation.
Therefore, based on its review of
Alternative 4 in the 2016 CLWR SEIS
and TVA’s updated analysis and review
for significant new circumstances or
information or substantial changes to
the proposal, TVA’s decision is
reasonable and no further NEPA
analysis is required. Similar to the
identification in the 2017 ROD, TVA
identifies the No Action Alternative as
the environmentally preferred
alternative in this amended ROD. The
amended decision does not affect TVA’s
commitment to implement relevant
mitigation measures identified in TVA’s
2017 ROD, and TVA will continue to
monitor its operations for emissions to
air and water in accordance with NRC
licensing requirements. TVA has
adopted all practicable means to avoid
or minimize environmental harm from
the selected alternative.
Authority: 40 CFR 1505.2.
Matthew M. Rasmussen,
Senior Vice President, Nuclear Engineering
and Operations Support.
[FR Doc. 2024–13069 Filed 6–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 116 (Friday, June 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50664-50665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13069]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Amended Record of Decision for the Production of Tritium in
Commercial Light Water Reactors
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
ACTION: Amended record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is amending the April 5,
2017 Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial
Light Water Reactor (CLWR). The SEIS was issued March 4, 2016, by the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA) and adopted by TVA in its 2017 ROD. TVA is
amending its previous decision to increase the number of tritium-
producing burnable absorber rods (TPBARs) irradiated in its reactors at
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN). In partnership with NNSA, TVA initially
decided to implement the CLWR SEIS Preferred Alternative, Alternative
6, which allows for the irradiation of up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs
every 18 months using TVA reactors at both the WBN and Sequoyah sites.
Subsequent to the CLWR SEIS, WBN Unit 1 increased production under Unit
1 License Amendment 107 (July 2016) and Unit 2 tritium production was
authorized under Unit 2 License Amendment 27 (May 2019). In April 2024,
WBN Units 1 and 2 were further authorized to increase their tritium
productions to 2,496 TPBARs in each unit under Unit 1 License Amendment
165 and Unit 2 License Amendment 72. Hence, TVA and NNSA are now opting
to choose the previously analyzed CLWR SEIS Alternative 4, which allows
for the irradiation of up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months at
WBN using Units 1 and 2.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Higdon, Tennessee Valley
Authority, NEPA Specialist, 400 West Summit Hill Drive (WT11B),
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902; telephone (865) 632-8051; or email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S. Code
[U.S.C.] 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality's
regulations for implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
1500 through 1508, as updated April 20, 2022), and TVA's NEPA
procedures (18 CFR 1318). TVA adopted the Final SEIS on March 4, 2016
(81 FR 11557-11558). As a cooperating agency, TVA provided subject
matter expertise, independent review and evaluation, and close
coordination with NNSA during the environmental review process,
including preparation of the Draft SEIS and the Final SEIS. NNSA issued
a ROD based on the Final SEIS on June 22, 2016 (81 FR 40685) and
amended its ROD on September 14, 2023 (88 FR 63099). By this notice,
TVA is providing notification of its amended decision and agency
reasoning.
Background
The NNSA is responsible for maintaining and enhancing the safety,
security, reliability, and performance of the nation's nuclear weapons
stockpile. Tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, is an essential
component of every weapon in the current and projected U.S. nuclear
weapons stockpile and must be replenished periodically due to its short
half-life. In March 1999, NNSA published the Final EIS for Production
of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor, which addressed the
proposed interagency agreement with TVA to produce tritium at TVA
reactors using TPBARs. In May 1999, DOE published the ROD for the 1999
EIS, identifying its decision to implement an agreement for tritium
production at the WBN Unit 1 reactor in Rhea County, Tennessee, and
Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 reactors in Hamilton County, Tennessee. Under
the proposal, TVA would irradiate up to 3,400 TPBARs per reactor per
fuel cycle, which lasts about 18 months. The agreement was needed by
NNSA because at the time the U.S. nuclear weapons complex did not have
the capability to produce the amounts of tritium that were needed to
support the nation's current and future nuclear weapons stockpile.
Following the environmental review, the agreement with NNSA was
approved by the TVA Board of Directors in late 1999 and, in May 2000,
TVA issued a ROD and adopted the NNSA's EIS (65 FR 26259). In 2000, TVA
entered into an interagency agreement with NNSA under The Economy Act
to provide irradiation services for producing tritium in TVA light
water reactors through November 2035.
TVA received license amendments from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) in 2002 to produce tritium in WBN Unit 1 reactor and
both Sequoyah reactors and has been producing tritium at the WBN Unit 1
reactor since 2003; TVA has not produced tritium in the Sequoyah
reactors. Since 2003, irradiation experience at WBN has shown that the
permeation rate per TPBAR per year has been higher than the estimate
that was included and analyzed in the 1999 EIS by NNSA. NNSA prepared
the 2016 CLWR SEIS to supplement its previous analysis to address the
higher rates of permeation of tritium from TPBARs at TVA sites and to
evaluate increasing tritium production quantities to meet requirements.
The 2016 CLWR SEIS provides analysis of the potential environmental
impacts from TPBAR irradiation based on a conservative estimate of the
tritium permeation rate through the TPBAR cladding, NNSA's revised
estimate of the maximum number of TPBARs necessary to support the
current and projected future tritium supply requirements, and a maximum
production scenario of irradiating no more than a total of 5,000 TPBARs
every 18 months.
Six alternatives were analyzed in the CLWR SEIS, including the No
Action Alternative, which was identified by TVA in its 2017 ROD as
environmentally preferable. In their respective RODs, NNSA and TVA
initially decided to implement the Preferred Alternative, Alternative
6, which allows for the irradiation of up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs
every 18 months using TVA reactors at both the WBN and Sequoyah sites.
At the time, this decision provided the greatest flexibility to meet
potential future needs that could arise from various plausible but
unexpected events.
After the 2016 SEIS, TVA increased irradiation of TPBARs at WBN
Unit 1 under License Amendment 107 (July 2016) and at WBN Unit 2 under
Unit 2 License Amendment 27 (May 2019). In April 2024, WBN Units 1 and
2 were further authorized to increase their tritium productions to
2,496 TPBARs in each unit under Unit 1 License Amendment 165 and Unit 2
License Amendment 72. Because TVA does not plan to produce tritium at
its Sequoyah site, TVA and NNSA are now opting to choose the previously
analyzed CLWR SEIS Alternative 4, which allows for the irradiation of
up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months at WBN Units 1 and 2.
In a February 2023 memorandum, TVA documented its review of the
CLWR SEIS to determine if additional environmental review under NEPA
was required, consistent with Council on Environmental Quality's
regulations implementing NEPA at 40 CFR
[[Page 50665]]
1502.9(d). As discussed in the February 2023 memorandum, entitled
``Determination of NEPA Adequacy, Production of Tritium in a Commercial
Light Water Nuclear Reactor (Watts Bar Nuclear Plant),'' TVA concluded
that there were no new circumstances or information relevant to
environmental concerns that are significant or that substantially
change the analysis of the 2016 CLWR SEIS. Recent information reviewed
by TVA in most cases confirmed TVA's previous description of the
affected environment. In instances where recent information differed
notably, that information does not substantially change the previous
environmental analysis. TVA found that the SEIS continues to provide a
conservative bounding analysis for a variety of key issues, including
the amount of additional fuel assemblies, the expected tritium
permeation rate, and waste generation. In addition, TVA confirmed that
the CLWR SEIS analysis indicates that there would not be any
significant increase in radiation exposure associated with TPBAR
irradiation for facility workers or the public. For all analyzed
alternatives (including both Alternatives 4 and 6), estimated radiation
exposures would remain well below regulatory limits. The calculated
estimated exposures for normal reactor operations with even the maximum
number of TPBARs are comparable to those for normal reactor operation
without TPBARs.
After determining additional environmental review was not
necessary, in March 2023 TVA submitted to the NRC a License Amendment
Request (#165) to Facility Operating License NPF-90 (#165) and a
License Amendment Request (#72) to Facility Operating License NPF-96
for WBN Units 1 and 2. The amendments would allow TVA to increase the
maximum number of TPBARs to 2,496 in each WBN unit. The NRC approved
the two amendments on April 15, 2024.
Amended Decision
TVA is amending its previous decision (82 FR 16653) to implement
the 2016 CLWR SEIS's Alternative 6 that assumes TVA would irradiate up
to a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months using both the WBN and
Sequoyah sites. Because TVA would irradiate a maximum of 2,500 TPBARs
in any one reactor, this could involve the use of one or both reactors
at each of the sites. Instead, TVA has decided to implement the 2016
CLWR SEIS's Alternative 4 that assumes TVA would irradiate up to a
total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months at WBN using both reactors. Since
TVA would irradiate a maximum of 2,500 TPBARs in any one reactor, both
Units 1 and 2 would be used to produce tritium. Under this amended
decision, TVA will not irradiate TPBARs for tritium production at the
Sequoyah site. This amended decision is consistent with the September
2023 decision by NNSA to amend its previous decision and implement
Alternative 4 of the 2016 CLWR SEIS (88 FR 63099).
Basis for Decision
The basis for TVA's decision is its commitment to provide
irradiation services for producing tritium for NNSA under the
interagency agreement established in 2000 between the two agencies. The
proposal reflects responsible planning on the part of NNSA and provides
the greatest flexibility for NNSA to meet future tritium production
requirements and assist in meeting national security requirements. The
decision reflects TVA's continued commitment to support the nation's
defense efforts and national security requirements.
The environmental impacts of the proposed action have been
addressed in the previous environmental impact statements. TVA's 2023
Determination of NEPA Adequacy memorandum further addresses
consideration by TVA of new information or circumstances relevant to
environmental concerns. In its 2023 memorandum, TVA addressed the
anticipated effects on the amount of spent fuel to be generated at WBN,
the fuel cycle there, and the amount of tritiated wastewater estimated
to be generated from TPBAR irradiation.
Regarding the amount of spent fuel to be generated at WBN,
implementing Alternative 4 would result in 36 additional fuel
assemblies every 18 months. The SEIS, which assumed up to 41 additional
fuel assemblies, provides a conservative bounding analysis of the
approximately 2,500 TPBAR equilibrium core designs. Although there
would be additional spent fuel generated under Alternative 4, TVA has
infrastructure in place to manage the increased volume of spent nuclear
fuel assemblies.
Regarding the new decision's effects on the fuel cycle, the cycle
length is only mentioned in the SEIS twice and only in the context of
being a ``potential uncertainty'' in determining if it was necessary to
assume in the SEIS a higher, more conservative tritium permeation rate.
TVA does not consider the operating cycle length to be uncertain, and
it also does not anticipate irradiation of up to 2,500 TPBARs at each
reactor would affect the typical fuel cycle. Therefore, the issue has
no bearing on the review of adequacy of the SEIS in addressing the
irradiation of up to 5,000 TPBARs at WBN.
Lastly, the estimated amount of tritiated wastewater (due to
permeation from the TPBARs into the cooling water) was not identified
in the SEIS, as it is difficult to separate this out from other
releases from such things as turbine building sumps, floor drain
collector sumps, groundwater sumps, etc. However, to keep maximum
tritium concentrations low, TVA will continue to use a ``feed and
bleed'' technique when releasing wastewater; the technique requires
additional cooling water per fuel cycle to ensure discharges are within
regulatory limits. TVA estimates using this technique will increase
water usage by approximately 25 percent but is not expected to affect
environmental impacts.
The current proposal does not represent a substantive change to
operations, activities, and associated impacts addressed and analyzed
in the existing NEPA documentation. Therefore, based on its review of
Alternative 4 in the 2016 CLWR SEIS and TVA's updated analysis and
review for significant new circumstances or information or substantial
changes to the proposal, TVA's decision is reasonable and no further
NEPA analysis is required. Similar to the identification in the 2017
ROD, TVA identifies the No Action Alternative as the environmentally
preferred alternative in this amended ROD. The amended decision does
not affect TVA's commitment to implement relevant mitigation measures
identified in TVA's 2017 ROD, and TVA will continue to monitor its
operations for emissions to air and water in accordance with NRC
licensing requirements. TVA has adopted all practicable means to avoid
or minimize environmental harm from the selected alternative.
Authority: 40 CFR 1505.2.
Matthew M. Rasmussen,
Senior Vice President, Nuclear Engineering and Operations Support.
[FR Doc. 2024-13069 Filed 6-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P